New Jersey Wants Your Baby's Genes
Collecting and analyzing newborns' blood could allow the state to surveil people for life.
Collecting and analyzing newborns' blood could allow the state to surveil people for life.
The Hamas-embraced idea that Jews have no place in Israel fosters extremism on both sides.
No, it's not ethical to keep them from potentially lifesaving information about their babies—and themselves.
Mendel had a history of run-ins with the state.
Remembering the world’s first geneticist, and a tax protester to boot
Plus: Airbnb will host 20,000 Afghan refugees, court rejects Nunes lawsuit against Liz Mair, and more..
That horse has left the barn.
New technologies mean new crimesolving techniques—and new threats to privacy and liberty.
We already give our kids music lessons, braces, and tutoring. Why not also give them better genes?
"If my kids lived in Africa, I'd say, 'Go for it as quickly as possible,'" says researcher.
It would be deeply immoral to require parents to select for particular traits, but it is also wrong to deny them the chance to make life easier for their children.
If Times editors don't want to learn about their genetics, then they simply shouldn't take the tests.
Companies should be applauded, not criticized, for working to identify the genetic roots of diseases that afflict humanity.
On sale now by Veritas Genetics, but likely to be the list price in a year or two.
The good news is that anti-technology activists are unlikely to succeed in imposing a global moratorium.
When genetic testing results become a tool for law enforcement
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
Is it genes, or have we "started building a stupidity-inducing environment"?
A bioethicist argues that the genetic testing company is fostering pseudoscientific bigotry by urging customers to pick a soccer team based on their ancestry.
Do you have a reasonable expectation of genetic privacy under the Fourth Amendment?
The Silicon Valley entrepreneur says cryptocurrencies, virtual reality, and mobile devices are helping individuals escape failed institutions.
Worried about your genetic privacy? Then don't take the tests.
FDA head Scott Gottlieb overturns Obama's ban on direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
Should your life insurance company be prohibited from requiring you to take the test?
Destroying the idea of racial purity one tiki torcher at a time
A work-around for the FDA's ban on direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Even if genetic testing is just brightly colored signage, it still has the potential to improve health outcomes.
Still forbidden to tell customers nearly 90 percent of what the company used to be able to share
I don't want to have a "conversation" with regulators; I want them to get the hell out of the way
It's way too early to start putting people like me in jail based on our genomes
Go slow and let more people suffer and die
While we wait for a vaccine, GMO mosquitoes are here now to help control the outbreak.
A scitech research and policy roundup for January 6, 2016
I'm a bioethicist, and I am here to help slow down scientific and medical progress
George Mason University economist Tyler Cowen suggests that it might be.
"If scientists can dream of a genetic manipulation, CRISPR can now make it happen"
A "relatively common" genetic mutation may trigger poor impulse control, especially when drinking.
Agency still treats consumers like idiots
Even worse, CEO Holmes evidently wants the FDA to regulate competing products
Let us decide for ourselves if genetic ignorance is bliss.
Since such bans are largely unenforceable, the measure is more mechanism for pro-life political signaling than anything else.
Is it immoral to slow progress toward curing diseases and creating more environmentally benign products?
Is life better than death; health better disease; wealth better than poverty? Opinions vary.
Is progress itself an ethical obligation? Opinions vary.
A pretty good way to discourage people from using gene testing services
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today