[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2009 Jul 20;106(31):12897–12902. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905195106

Long-term survival following a single treatment of kidney tumors with multiwalled carbon nanotubes and near-infrared radiation

Andrew Burke a, Xuanfeng Ding b, Ravi Singh a, Robert A Kraft b, Nicole Levi-Polyachenko c, Marissa Nichole Rylander d, Chris Szot d, Cara Buchanan d, Jon Whitney d, Jessica Fisher d, Heather C Hatcher a, Ralph D'Agostino Jr e,f, Nancy D Kock g, P M Ajayan h, David L Carroll f,i, Steven Akman a,f, Frank M Torti a,f, Suzy V Torti f,j,1
PMCID: PMC2722274  PMID: 19620717

Abstract

Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) exhibit physical properties that render them ideal candidates for application as noninvasive mediators of photothermal cancer ablation. Here, we demonstrate that use of MWCNTs to generate heat in response to near-infrared radiation (NIR) results in thermal destruction of kidney cancer in vitro and in vivo. We document the thermal effects of the therapy through magnetic resonance temperature-mapping and heat shock protein-reactive immunohistochemistry. Our results demonstrate that use of MWCNTs enables ablation of tumors with low laser powers (3 W/cm2) and very short treatment times (a single 30-sec treatment) with minimal local toxicity and no evident systemic toxicity. These treatment parameters resulted in complete ablation of tumors and a >3.5-month durable remission in 80% of mice treated with 100 μg of MWCNT. Use of MWCNTs with NIR may be effective in anticancer therapy.

Keywords: nanomedicine, thermal ablation, tumor therapy, photothermal therapy, heat shock proteins


Most modern cancer treatments require participation by the cancer cell to affect its own death (1, 2). Unfortunately, this requirement provides the selective pressure necessary to drive the evolution of treatment-resistant cancer cell clones. In contrast, therapies that function by exceeding physical cell tolerances offer the advantage of eliciting a cytotoxic response in cancer cells regardless of their phenotypic diversity.

Thermal ablation represents one such therapy. Thermal ablation is achieved when cells are heated above a temperature threshold, typically 55 °C (3). This treatment induces coagulative necrosis, a form of cell death that involves protein denaturation and membrane lysis (3, 4). For example, radiofrequency (RF) ablation (RFA), a method used to treat kidney, lung, and liver tumors (among others), employs percutaneous probes inserted into tumors to elevate tumor temperature. Limitations of this procedure include a single point source of thermal energy that results in uneven tumor heating, as well as reports of tumor “seeding” along the needle track of RF probes that can result in tumor recurrences (5). Thus, despite its efficacy, widespread adoption of RFA and similar treatment modalities has been limited by an inability to generate tumor-specific heating in a minimally invasive manner.

Here, we explore whether multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) can overcome these limitations and generate effective thermal tumor ablation. MWCNTs are nested, cylindrical graphene structures with diameters ranging from a few to hundreds of nanometers and lengths up to a few micrometers. Since their discovery, carbon nanotubes have generated interest due to their many novel properties, including their potential for anticancer therapy (6, 7). MWCNTs release substantial vibrational energy after exposure to near-infrared radiation (NIR) (8, 9). The release of this energy within a tissue produces localized heating, which can potentially be exploited as a tumor therapy. Furthermore, because biological systems largely lack chromophores that absorb in the NIR region, lesions can be treated without the need for direct access to the tumor site. Although other nanomaterials share some of these properties (10), MWCNTs offer an excellent combination of attributes for the development of a noninvasive photothermal therapy. They behave as highly efficient dipole antennae with broad absorption spectra compared with the specific resonance absorptions of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) and nanoshells, rendering them amenable to stimulation by a range of NIR energy sources (10, 11). Additionally, MWCNTs can be expected to absorb significantly more NIR radiation compared with materials such as SWCNTs, both because MWCNTs have more available electrons for absorption per particle and because, per weight, MWCNTs contain more metallic tubes than SWCNTs given that two-thirds of SWCNTs are semiconducting (12). This will reduce the amount of NIR radiation (and consequent potential for damage to dermal layers) needed to treat embedded cancers. Among carbon-based nanomaterials, others (11, 13) have demonstrated that SWCNTs effectively transduce heat in vitro, and our group (9) has demonstrated the same property for nitrogen-doped MWCNTs. However, whether carbon nanotubes can actually produce durable antitumor responses in vivo is unknown.

In this report, we demonstrate that MWCNTs are effective thermal ablation agents that result in long-term survival of tumor-bearing mice.

Results

MWCNT Suspensions Are More Efficient at Producing an NIR-Dependent Increase in Temperature than SWCNTs.

Stable suspensions of MWCNTs or SWCNTs were prepared in physiologic saline with 1%(wt/wt) Pluronic F127, a biocompatible surfactant (see Materials and Methods), and compared for their ability to increase temperature after exposure to a 1,064-nm Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser at 3 W/cm2 for 30 sec. MWCNTs were more efficient than SWCNTs in inducing a temperature increase (Fig. 1). At low concentrations, where bundling and scattering effects are minimized, MWCNTs performed markedly better than SWCNTs: For example, after a 30-sec exposure to a Nd:YAG laser (3 W/cm2, λ = 1,064 nm), the temperature of a 0.1 mg/ml solution of MWCNTs increased from 23 °C to 51 ± 0.7 °C, whereas that of a 0.1 mg/ml solution of SWCNTs increased from 23 °C to 27 ± 0.3 °C. Although SWCNTs were comparable with MWCNTs in inducing a temperature increase at the upper limit of concentrations tested, it required a 20-fold greater concentration of SWCNTs to generate a temperature increase equivalent to that of a 0.1 mg/ml MWCNT suspension (Fig. 1). Varying NIR laser exposure time (range: 15–60 sec) revealed that the thermal ablation temperature threshold (50–55 °C) of a 0.1 mg/ml suspension of MWCNT could be reached within 30 sec of laser irradiation (T30 = 53.1 ± 0.1 °C) (Fig. 2). The ability of MWCNTs to induce temperature increases compatible with thermal ablation at low concentrations and short laser exposure times suggests that MWCNTs may be useful as photothermal mediators.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

MWCNTs produce a greater temperature increase than SWCNTs in response to NIR illumination. MWCNT and SWCNT were suspended at a range of final concentrations in saline containing 1% (wt/wt) Pluronic F127 and illuminated at 3 W/cm2 for 30 sec with a 1,064-nm continuous-wave NIR laser. Temperature was measured by thermocouple. Shown are mean and standard deviations of triplicate measurements. (Inset) Detail on the dilution range from 1 to 100 μg/ml.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

NIR stimulation of MWCNTs induces thermoablative temperatures that inhibit clonogenic survival of cultured kidney cancer cells. RENCA cells in a final volume of 300 μl of medium were either treated with 100 μg/ml MWCNT or left untreated. Approximately 15 min after the addition of MWCNT, cells were exposed to 30 sec or 45 sec of NIR laser illumination (3 W/cm2). Temperature (two curves, right-hand scale) and clonogenic survival (bars, left-hand scale) were measured. Shown are means and standard deviations of triplicate measurements. (No colonies formed from cells treated with MWCNTs and 45 sec of laser exposure.) The combination of MWCNTs and 30 sec of laser exposure reduced viability 62-fold, and 0 colonies formed from cells treated with both MWCNTs and 45 sec of NIR laser illumination (P ≤ 0.02).

MWCNTs Efficiently Kill Cancer Cells in Vitro.

We next tested whether we could identify treatment parameters that would enable MWCNTs to be used as thermoablative agents. Cultured RENCA kidney cancer cells were overlaid with growth media containing 0.1 mg/ml MWCNTs and illuminated with the NIR laser at 3 W/cm2 for 0, 30, or 45 sec, and then the temperature was measured. As shown in Fig. 2, these parameters generated mean final temperatures of 53 °C and 62.7 °C, respectively, which were in excess of the thermal ablative temperature threshold and significantly higher than control (P < 0.0001). We also assessed the effects on clonogenic survival, a rigorous assay that measures the ability of individual tumor cells to survive, proliferate, and form colonies. MWCNTs themselves had no statistically significant effect on colony-forming ability, and no effect was seen for laser alone (Fig. 2). However, a 62-fold reduction in viability was seen with the combination of MWCNTs and 30 sec of laser exposure (P < 0.0001), and no colonies formed from cells treated with both MWCNTs and 45 sec of NIR laser illumination. Cell-killing depended on reaching thermoablative temperatures and was not a temperature-independent consequence of NIR on MWCNTs, since modifications of the treatment conditions (an increase in media fluid volume) that reduced the temperature increase to below this threshold eliminated the cytotoxic effect even at 10-fold higher concentrations of MWCNTs [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. The thermal sensitivity of RENCA cells was similar to that of a number of other cancer cell lines (Fig. S2), indicating that the rapid thermal death observed in this experiment was not due to the inadvertent selection of particularly heat-sensitive cells.

MWCNT Photothermal Therapy Is Compatible with Magnetic Resonance Temperature Mapping and Produces Therapeutically Relevant Temperature Increases in Vivo.

To determine whether MWCNTs could be used to attain thermoablative temperatures in vivo, RENCA tumors were implanted in the flanks of 4 nude mice. Five to 7 days after implantation, 2 mice were injected intratumorally with 50 μl of a MWCNT suspension (100 μg of total MWCNTs), and 2 control mice were injected with 50 μl of diluent. Twenty-four hours later, all tumors were laser-treated (3 W/cm2, 30 sec) in the bore of 7T magnetic resonance (MR) magnet to monitor temperature change over the tumor volume in real time. (A diagram of the experimental set-up is shown as Fig. S3.) Proton resonance frequency MR temperature-mapping protocols were used to generate spatially resolved temperature profiles (14, 15). Fig. 3A presents MR images (Fig. 3A Left) and superimposed MR thermometry images (Fig. 3A Right) of a control and MWCNT-containing tumor. MWCNTs induce an increase in temperature measurable by MR thermometry: After 30 seconds of laser illumination, the average temperature of the MWCNT-loaded tumor increased to 74 °C compared with 46 °C in control tumors exposed to laser alone (Fig. 3B). Thus, MWCNTs increased intratumoral temperatures to a level sufficient to induce tumor ablation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Intratumoral temperature distribution during MWCNT-mediated photothermal therapy resolved by MR temperature imaging. (A) High-resolution sagittal MR images across s.c. RENCA tumors in mice after injection with either 100 μg of MWCNT (i) or vehicle (iii). Bright dots in each image (indicated by white arrows in i) correspond to tubes of Magnevist (a gadolinium-based contrast agent) used in alignment of the laser aperture. Tumors were exposed to 30 sec of NIR laser, and temperature maps were obtained by MR temperature imaging. False-colored images depicting maximal temperatures are overlaid on the MR images (ii and iv). Temperature increase after 30 sec of NIR laser exposure in a saline-injected tumor is lower in magnitude and more superficial than that seen in the MWCNT-containing tumor. (B) Quantification of temperature changes in the center of the tumors.

Laser-Stimulated MWCNTs Produce a Temperature Gradient That Extends More Deeply into Tissue than Laser Treatment Alone.

MR temperature maps suggested that the combination of MWCNTs and laser produced a deeper distribution of heat when compared to laser alone (Fig. 3). To confirm this result, we used an independent measure of heat generation: induction of heat shock proteins (HSPs). HSPs are induced by elevated temperatures (typically in excess of 43 °C) and serve as endogenous cellular markers of thermal stress. As seen in Fig. 4, minimal expression exists for all HSPs in untreated tumors. In the tumor treated with laser alone, maximal HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 expression was induced proximal to the incident laser and then gradually diminished. In contrast, in the tumor treated with laser plus MWCNTs, temperature elevation at the surface was sufficient to induce coagulative necrosis, thus preventing HSP induction. HSP induction was seen at deeper tissue levels, at the interface between tumor and normal tissue (Fig. 4). These results suggest that MWCNTs can be used to extend the depth of thermal therapy.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Characterization of the HSP response to MWCNT-mediated photothermal therapy. Tumors that had been either untreated, treated with 30 sec of NIR laser alone, or treated with the combination of MWCNT plus laser were serially sectioned, and HSP expression was detected by immunofluorescent staining as described in Materials and Methods. (A) The top row of images depicts basal level of expression of HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 in an untreated tumor. The middle two rows of images depict HSP expression in tumor sections taken at increasing tissue depths in a tumor treated with laser alone. Induction of HSPs proximate to the skin surface after 30 sec of NIR laser exposure is consistent with the superficial heating detected by MR thermometry (see Fig. 3). The lower two rows of images depict HSP expression in tumor sections taken at increasing tissue depths in a tumor treated with the combination of MWCNT plus laser. Thermoablative temperatures reached with the combination of MWCNTS and 30 sec of NIR laser exposure prevent HSP induction at the tumor surface. (B) HSP levels were quantified as described in Materials and Methods and expressed relative to untreated tumors (HSP expression in untreated tumors was the same throughout the tumor). Due to changes in tissue size imposed by processing, distances from the surface are presented as relative units: 1 is closest to the tumor surface (indicated as “surface” in A) and 4 is furthest from the surface (labeled “tumor base” in A). Means and standard deviations of 3 replicate 5-μm sections from 5 independently treated tumors in each group are shown.

MWCNT-Mediated Thermal Ablation Reduces Tumor Volume and Enhances Survival.

We next investigated the effectiveness of MWCNT-based therapy in reducing tumor growth and enhancing survival in vivo. For this study, 2-mm3 RENCA tumor fragments were s.c. implanted into the flanks of 60 nude mice. Once tumors measured ≈5.5 mm (5.5 ± 0.5 mm) in greatest dimension (<1 week), mice were randomized into one of 6 treatment groups (n = 10 per group) as illustrated in Fig. 5. There was no statistical difference among group mean tumor volumes at the onset of treatment (P = 0.44). Mice were then injected intratumorally with 50 μl of treatment solution containing 100, 50, or 10 μg of MWCNTs. As assessed by polarized light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), MWCNTs introduced into tumors by this method appeared well-distributed (Fig. S4). Control mice were either injected with 50 μl of vehicle (saline with 1% Pluronic) or left untreated. Twenty-four hours after injection, tumors were illuminated with a 1,064-nm NIR laser for 30 sec (3 W/cm2; spot size, 5 mm). The untreated control group received neither MWCNTs nor laser treatment. Tumor growth was monitored, and mice were removed from the study when their tumor burden reached 1,000 mm3 or they were deemed moribund by veterinary consult.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

MWCNT-based photothermal therapy reduces tumor volume. Nu/nu mice were implanted s.c. with RENCA tumors and divided into groups of 10. Mice were either left untreated, treated with MWCNT alone, treated with laser alone, or treated with the combination of MWCNT and laser. (A) Photographs at day 21 of representative mice from groups treated with laser only, untreated controls, or mice treated with 100 μg of MWCNT plus laser. (B) Mice treated with the combination of MWCNTs and laser were injected with a range of MWCNT doses. Tumor sizes were measured every 2 days. Means and standard errors are shown. Control groups (untreated, treated with MWCNTs alone, or treated with laser alone) were statistically identical. There is a dose-dependent attenuation in tumor growth after 30 sec of NIR laser treatment of MWCNT-loaded tumors (P < 0.0001).

Control tumors (untreated control, laser-only control, and 100 μg of MWCNT with no laser) grew rapidly and uniformly, and all mice were removed from the study within the first 30 days. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor growth rate (P = 0.77) or final tumor size (P = 0.979) in any of the control groups, indicating that tumor growth was not affected by MWCNTs alone or by laser alone. In contrast, a statistically significant dose-dependent attenuation of tumor growth was observed in mice treated with MWCNT plus laser (Fig. 5). Effects were most pronounced at the highest dose of MWCNT (100 μg), where mean tumor volume at 30 days was reduced from 1,472 ± 118 mm3 in controls to 11 ± 11 mm3 (P < 0.0001). A significant reduction in mean tumor volume was also evident at the 50-μg dose (354 ± 176, P < 0.0001). The lowest dose of MWCNTs produced the most modest response, with a mean tumor volume of 590 ± 178 mm3 (P < 0.0001).

The inhibition of tumor growth in mice treated with the combination of MWCNTs and NIR translated into a significant survival advantage (Fig. 6). Relative to control, overall survival was significantly prolonged in each treatment group, with 80% of mice alive and tumor-free >3 months after treatment in the 100-μg treatment group (P < 0.0001) (tumor recurrence accounted for the mice that died in this group). Effect on survival was dose-dependent: 60% remained alive in the 50-μg treatment group (P = 0.0004), and 20%survived in the 10-μg MWCNT treatment group (P = 0.0395). There was no statistical difference between control groups (P = 0.775), which exhibited median survivals of 25 days (95% C.I. 23–27) in untreated controls, 23 days (95% C.I. 21–25) in mice treated with laser alone, and 23 days (95% C.I. 21–25) in mice treated with 100 μg of MWCNTs alone. Median survival in the group treated with 10 μg of MWCNT plus laser was 29.5 days (95% C.I. 25–53). Median survivals could not be calculated for the 2 highest dose treatment groups, because too few mice died after treatment to make the determination; however, it was extended to at least 300 days in these treatment groups.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

MWCNT-based photothermal therapy increases long-term survival of tumor-bearing mice. Survival of mice treated as described in Fig. 5 was assessed for ≈10 months after treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrate a significant increase in survival in mice treated with all doses of MWCNTs plus laser (P < 0.0001). Mice were removed from the study (considered dead) when their tumor burden exceeded 1,000 mm3 or they were deemed moribund by veterinary consult. Survival curves for all control groups were statistically identical (P = 0.775).

We performed a limited survey of the long-term effects of MWCNT plus laser treatment on mouse organs. All animals developed a nonpermanent cutaneous surface injury that healed over time. MWCNTs remained evident at the site of injection after tumor regression: In all mice that were treated with MWCNTs and laser, there was visible black material directly under the skin, and this persisted to the conclusion of the study. TEM analysis (performed in a subset of mice) confirmed that this was due to the persistence of MWCNTs at the injection site (Fig. S5). To assess effects on internal organs, 5 mice that had remained in disease remission for 3.5 months after treatment with 100 μg of MWCNT plus laser were randomly selected, and sections of the lungs, liver, spleen, skin (from MWCNT injection site), kidneys, and brain were examined. All were essentially normal, without evidence of nanotube-induced injury or inflammation as assessed by a veterinary pathologist (Fig. S6). Furthermore, the remaining 11 MWCNT-injected mice that were not selected for this analysis continued to survive without evidence of recurrence or notable physical or behavioral abnormalities for >6 months. Thus, the treatment involving MWCNTs produces a durable remission without evident toxicological consequences.

Discussion

In this article we describe a therapeutic system using MWCNTs stimulated by low-power NIR that results in the complete and durable eradication of a high proportion of s.c. mouse kidney tumors. Effects on tumor regression were dependent on the dose of MWCNTs delivered to the tumor: At a dose of 100 μg of MWCNTs, complete tumor regression without recurrence for >3 months was observed in 80% of the mice. Remarkably, this response was attained after a single 30-sec treatment with 3 W/cm2 NIR. In contrast, tumor regression was not seen in untreated mice, mice treated with MWCNTs alone, or mice treated with laser-generated NIR alone.

We monitored temperature changes both through MR thermometry and induction of HSPs (Figs. 3 and 4). MR thermometry enables monitoring of heat induction in near real-time and can thus be used to minimize incomplete treatment of tumor margins, a major limitation of current thermal therapies. Measurement of HSPs can also be used to demarcate thermally treated regions. Induction of HSP can increase the likelihood of tumor recurrence by enhancing cell viability through suppression of apoptosis and enhanced resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Conversely, HSPs can also be used as tumor targets: For example, anti-HSP vaccines (16) or targeting of HSP90 pathways (17) have been proposed as antitumor strategies. Thus, measurement of HSPs may be useful in optimization of MWCNT therapies in the future. In our experiments, tumors treated with laser alone demonstrated significant elevation of HSP expression due to sublethal temperature elevation. However, inclusion of MWCNTs dramatically reduced expression of HSPs within the tumor region due to attainment of tumor ablative temperatures (Fig. 3). In tumors containing MWCNTs, HSP induction was only observed at the interface between normal and tumor tissue (Fig. 4) and did not prevent a durable response to therapy (Fig. 6). In aggregate, the combined results of MR thermometry and HSP distribution patterns indicate that MWCNTs effectively increase the depth of thermal tumor ablation.

The toxicity induced by carbon nanotubes is a source of debate and may depend on nanotube type, size, shape, and surface characteristics (18). We observed no major toxicities and only transient local skin injury in >6 months of follow-up after treatment with MWCNTs plus NIR. Specifically, examination of multiple organs did not show organ damage or inflammatory sites. However, more definitive studies will be required to rule out nonspecific toxicities of these materials.

A number of biomedical investigations of carbon nanotubes have focused on their application for the treatment of cancer. These studies include the use of carbon nanotubes as molecular shuttles for chemotherapeutic agents (19, 20), radionuclides (21), and nucleic acids (22), and as antitumor vaccine delivery systems (23) and cancer diagnostic agents (24) in animal models. In terms of tumor treatment, metallic and carbon-based nanomaterials, such as SWCNTs (11), carbon nanohorns (7), gold nanoshells (25), and nanorods (26), have been explored. Compared to these materials, MWCNTs enabled more rapid treatments with reduced laser power. These properties may lessen off-target effects and nonspecific thermal injury, which others have reported in some applications of SWCNTs (27). In our experiments, MWCNTs produced greater temperature increases than SWCNTs (Fig. 1). Importantly, we observed that MWCNTs substantially prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 6). The ability of other carbon-based nanomaterials to produce durable remissions in tumor-bearing animals has not thus far been assessed.

Although we were able to increase the temperature in MWCNT-treated tumor tissue to 76 °C after laser irradiation, the peak temperature measured in laser-irradiated tumors was 46 °C in the absence of MWCNTs (Fig. 3). This finding indicates that the irradiation must be carefully monitored and controlled to avoid injury to healthy tissue surrounding the MWCNT-treated area. Such control might readily be achieved by reducing laser exposure time or possibly through use of a pulsed laser (28). Alternatively, strategies involving conjugation to cancer targeting moieties may be explored.

In this study, we used NIR to activate MWCNTs. An advantage of NIR is that biological systems largely lack chromophores that absorb in this region (29). However, penetration of NIR is limited to several centimeters. Nevertheless, many tumors lie within this distance from the surface, suggesting that the combination of NIR and MWCNTs may ultimately be of benefit in treating such tumors. An alternative approach would be the use of tuned radiofrequency energy to enable activation of nanotubes with deeper tissue penetration, although this approach has been reported to engender off-target toxicity (27).

We used direct intratumoral injection to infuse MWCNT into tumors. MWCNTs delivered by this route appeared well-distributed in the tumor tissue (Fig. S4). It is important to note that this simple method of delivery is more than a convenient experimental tool; it represents a potentially useful clinical modality in itself. Not only are many tumors in reach of NIR, but many that represent difficult clinical problems are accessible to direct injection with MWCNTs, including cutaneous, s.c., and muscle tumors, as well as prostate cancer, superficial bladder cancers, lung cancers accessible by bronchoscopy, and some breast, oral, and kidney tumors, among others.

MWCNTs also have some important advantages relative to RF ablation, the most common modality in current clinical use for thermal ablation. Unlike RF treatment, which is largely incompatible with simultaneous MR imaging, the compatibility of nanotubes and fiberoptic laser materials with MR thermometry can enable precise delivery of heat to the tumor volume, a critical tool in limiting injury of adjacent normal tissues while ensuring complete ablation of the target lesion. In addition, the laser beam delivering the NIR is not a point source, as it is in RF treatment, but can be expanded and shaped to provide relatively even distribution of heat to the tumor volume. Finally, once the nanotubes are delivered, the possibility of multiple, fractionated laser treatments of the tumor volume exists, which provides substantial advantage over RF, which requires direct insertion of the RF probe with each treatment.

Our results suggest that the combination of MWCNTs and NIR for photothermal treatment of cancer may be a viable approach for cancer therapy. We also note that thermal effects generated by MWCNTs may have benefits in addition to direct thermal ablation of cancer cells. For example, hyperthermia can increase the permeability of tumor vasculature, which can enhance the delivery of drugs into tumors, as well as synergistically enhance tumor cytotoxicity when combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy (30). When this advantage is considered within the context of other previously elucidated MWCNT capabilities, such as the ability to function as carriers for chemotherapeutic compounds and MRI contrast agents, MWCNTs have the potential to become multifunctional platforms for the treatment of cancer.

Materials and Methods

Materials.

MWCNTs were produced by chemical vapor deposition at the Wake Forest University Center for Nanotechnology and Molecular Materials and characterized by TEM (Phillips 400, Phillips) (see Fig. S7). MWCNTs were massed and suspended in saline with 1% (wt/wt) Pluronic F127 (BASF) through sonication. HiPCo-generated SWCNTs were purchased from Carbon Nanotechnologies Inc. (Unidym). Details of this and other methods are presented in SI Materials and Methods.

Cell Culture.

RENCA murine kidney cancer cells were a gift from Robert Wiltrout (National Cancer Institute). MCF-7 breast cancer, PC-3 prostate cancer, Caki-1 kidney cancer, and HeLa cervical cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured as described in SI Materials and Methods.

TEM Imaging.

Stock solutions of 2 mg/ml MWCNT and SWCNT were deposited on formvar-coated grids and imaged with a TEM 400 at either 55 or 80 KeV.

Comparison of Heating by SWCNT and MWCNT.

MWCNT and SWCNT were suspended at a range of final concentrations (wt/vol) in saline containing 1% (wt/wt) Pluronic F127. Three hundred microliters of each suspension was illuminated at 3 W/cm2 for 30 sec by using a 1,064-nm continuous-wave NIR laser. Temperature was measured by thermocouple.

NIR-Heating and Cell Killing of MWCNTs in Solution.

MWCNT were diluted in growth medium, illuminated with a 1,064-nm continuous-wave NIR laser (power density, 3 W/cm2; spot size, 5 mm; exposure duration, 15–60 sec). Temperatures were measured by thermocouple (Fluke). Effects on clonogenicity were assessed by diluting and replating cells immediately after treatment and measuring colony formation after 13 days.

Thermal Sensitivity of Cultured Cancer Cells.

Cells were trypsinized, suspended in growth medium, and incubated for 30 min in a heat block equilibrated to the desired temperature. Aliquots measuring 100 μl were transferred in triplicate to 96-well plates and incubated overnight at 37 °C in a humidified incubator in a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere, and viability was assessed with an MTT assay (Sigma).

Animal Handling.

All animal studies were performed in compliance with the institutional guidelines on animal use and welfare (Animal Care and Use Committee of Wake Forest University Health Sciences) under an approved protocol. Female nu/nu athymic mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (5–8 wk old). Mice were housed 5 per cage in standard plastic cages, provided food and water ad libitum, and maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle.

Tumor Regression and Survival Studies.

RENCA tumor fragments measuring 2 mm3 were transplanted into the flanks of 60 female athymic mice. Once tumors reached a mean diameter of ≈5.5 mm, mice were randomized into one of 6 treatment groups. For groups receiving MWCNTs, 2 mg/ml MWCNT stock solution was diluted with vehicle (1% Pluronic in saline) to provide the appropriate dosages of nanotubes (MWCNT control: 100 μg; MWCNT plus laser groups: 100, 50, and 10 μg, respectively). In all cases, solutions were injected directly into the center of the tumor mass. Twenty-four hours after injection, the following groups were laser treated: vehicle control and all 3 MWCNT plus laser cohorts. Laser treatment consisted of illuminating the tumor with a 1,064-nm continuous-wave NIR laser beam (IPG Photonics) at 3 W/cm2 (spot size, 5 mm) for 30 sec. After treatment, tumor volumes were tracked every 2 days by digital caliper, and tumor volumes were calculated according to the formula (4/3)·π·(x/2)·(y/2)·(z/2). For the survival study, mice were removed once their tumor volume reached >1,000 mm3 or when deemed moribund by veterinary consult.

MR Temperature Mapping.

Temperature-mapping experiments were performed in a 7T Bruker Biospin MR system. A high-resolution MR sagittal image was acquired by using a gradient-echo sequence across the mouse tumor followed by a low-resolution sagittal scan to detect the temperature-induced phase difference across the treated mouse tumor. During the first scan the tumor was illuminated with the1,064-nm NIR fiber laser (beam diameter, 1 cm; power density, 3 W/cm2) for 30 sec. All image reconstruction and analysis was performed in Matlab (Mathworks).

HSP Expression Measurement.

Tumors from mice that were untreated (basal control), treated with laser alone, or treated with the combination of laser plus MWCNT were harvested 16 h after laser treatment and embedded in OCT cryomatrix (Sakura Finetek). Sections were prepared at various tumor depths and analyzed by fluorescent immunostaining for expression of HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90. Fluorescence was quantified by using Leica Microsystems AF6000 software.

Statistical Analysis.

All analyses were performed by a statistician (R.D.) in the statistical core facility of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University with SPSS software (SPSS).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments.

We thank the Ben Mynatt family for support and Ken Grant and the Microscopy Core of the Comprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest University for assistance with TEM and light microscopy. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1CA12842 (to S.V.T.). A.B., H.C.H. and R.S. were supported in part by National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32CA079448.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0905195106/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Pommier Y, et al. Apoptosis defects and chemotherapy resistance: Molecular interaction maps and networks. Oncogene. 2004;23:2934–2949. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gottesman MM. Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance. Annu Rev Med. 2002;53:615–627. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.103929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nikfarjam M, Muralidharan V, Christophi C. Mechanisms of focal heat destruction of liver tumors. J Surg Res. 2005;127:208–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hildebrandt B, et al. The cellular and molecular basis of hyperthermia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002;43:33–56. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(01)00179-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Imamura J, et al. Neoplastic seeding after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:3057–3062. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02153.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M. Opportunities and challenges of carbon-based nanomaterials for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008;5:331–342. doi: 10.1517/17425247.5.3.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang M, et al. Fabrication of ZnPC/protein nanohorns for double photodynamic and hyperthermic cancer phototherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14773–14778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801349105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sun X, et al. Broadband optical limiting with multiwalled carbon Nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;73:3632–3634. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Torti SV, et al. Thermal ablation therapeutics based on Cn(X) multi-walled nanotubes. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2:707–714. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirsch LR, et al. Metal nanoshells. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:15–22. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kam NW, O'Connell M, Wisdom JA, Dai H. Carbon nanotubes as multifunctional biological transporters and near-infrared agents for selective cancer cell destruction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:11600–11605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502680102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Endo M, Iijima S, Dresselhaus MS, editors. Carbon Nanotubes. Oxford: Pergamon; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chakravarty P, et al. Thermal ablation of tumor cells with antibody-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:8697–8702. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803557105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peters RD, Hinks RS, Henkelman RM. Ex vivo tissue-type independence in proton-resonance frequency shift MR thermometry. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:454–459. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bernstein MA, Fain SB, Riederer SJ. Effect of windowing and zero-filled reconstruction of MRI data on spatial resolution and acquisition strategy. J Magn Reson Imag. 2001;14:270–280. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murshid A, Gong J, Calderwood SK. Heat-shock proteins in cancer vaccines: Agents of antigen cross-presentation. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7:1019–1030. doi: 10.1586/14760584.7.7.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barginear MF, et al. The heat shock protein 90 chaperone complex: An evolving therapeutic target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2008;8:522–532. doi: 10.2174/156800908785699379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poland CA, et al. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3:423–428. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Z, et al. Drug delivery with carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2008;68:6652–6660. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feazell RP, Nakayama-Ratchford N, Dai H, Lippard SJ. Soluble single-walled carbon nanotubes as longboat delivery systems for platinum(IV) anticancer drug design. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:8438–8439. doi: 10.1021/ja073231f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McDevitt MR, et al. Tumor targeting with antibody-functionalized, radiolabeled carbon nanotubes. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1180–1189. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.039131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Singh R, et al. Binding and condensation of plasmid DNA onto functionalized carbon nanotubes: Toward the construction of nanotube-based gene delivery vectors. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:4388–4396. doi: 10.1021/ja0441561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Meng J, et al. Carbon nanotubes conjugated to tumor lysate protein enhance the efficacy of an antitumor immunotherapy. Small. 2008;4:1364–1370. doi: 10.1002/smll.200701059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yu X, et al. Carbon nanotube amplification strategies for highly sensitive immunodetection of cancer biomarkers. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:11199–11205. doi: 10.1021/ja062117e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O'Neal DP, et al. Photo-thermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 2004;209:171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) using gold nanoparticles. Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23:217–228. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0470-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gannon CJ, et al. Carbon nanotube-enhanced thermal destruction of cancer cells in a noninvasive radiofrequency field. Cancer. 2007;110:2654–2665. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kang B, et al. Cancer-cell targeting and photoacoustic therapy using carbon nanotubes as “bomb” agents. Small. 2009;5:1292–1301. doi: 10.1002/smll.200801820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weissleder R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:316–317. doi: 10.1038/86684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Falk MH, Issels RD. Hyperthermia in oncology. Int J Hyperthermia. 2001;17:1–18. doi: 10.1080/02656730150201552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES