WO2022037414A1 - 安全控制方法、装置、工业机器人及计算机存储介质 - Google Patents
安全控制方法、装置、工业机器人及计算机存储介质 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2022037414A1 WO2022037414A1 PCT/CN2021/110732 CN2021110732W WO2022037414A1 WO 2022037414 A1 WO2022037414 A1 WO 2022037414A1 CN 2021110732 W CN2021110732 W CN 2021110732W WO 2022037414 A1 WO2022037414 A1 WO 2022037414A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- safety
- input signal
- robot
- test pulse
- perform
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 98
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012954 risk control Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010027339 Menstruation irregular Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000000306 component Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008358 core component Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of industrial robots, in particular to a safety control method, device, industrial robot and computer storage medium including an OSSD signal verification mechanism.
- Industrial robots are multi-joint manipulators or multi-degree-of-freedom robots mainly facing the industrial field.
- Industrial robots include traditional industrial robots and collaborative robots.
- collaborative robots can cooperate with people to complete work efficiently, and can complete work in dangerous environments with high precision and high efficiency, so they are favored by more and more users.
- Collaborative robots need to interact and cooperate closely with people in their work. Therefore, for collaborative robots, work safety is a core performance indicator.
- Conventional collaborative robots already have a number of safety detection mechanisms, such as speed monitoring and torque monitoring. Safety for users of collaborative robots working together.
- the industrial robot When the industrial robot is working, it can receive the input signal of the external safety equipment to judge the safety of the robot's working environment.
- the traditional industrial robot usually works in the area enclosed by the fence. When the fence is opened, the robot receives the signal. to stop performing work to avoid injury to the intruder. If the signal cannot be accurately detected, it will bring a great security risk to the user.
- the purpose of the present invention is to provide a safety control method, device, industrial robot and computer storage medium with good safety.
- a safety control method applied to an industrial robot, the safety control method is used to detect the safety risk of the robot and control it to perform safety actions, and the method includes: receiving an input signal from a safety device , the input signal includes a test pulse for verifying whether the input signal is normal; judges the level state of the input signal; when the input signal is at a low level, the robot is controlled to perform a safety action; when the input signal is at a high level, Determine whether the period and duration of the test pulse of the input signal are in the preset first parameter interval and the second parameter interval, respectively. If the period and duration meet the requirements, control the robot to run normally. If the period and duration are at least One does not meet the requirements, and controls the robot to perform safe actions.
- the method includes: when receiving at least two input signals, judging the level states of the at least two input signals respectively, and when there is a low level input signal, controlling the robot to perform a safety action; when the at least two input signals are present When both input signals are at high level, it is judged whether the period and duration of the test pulses meet the requirements, and when at least one of the at least two input signals does not meet the requirements, the robot is controlled to perform safe actions.
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 1000ms]
- the second parameter interval is [10us, 1000us].
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 500ms]
- the second parameter interval is [50us, 500us].
- the input signal comes from at least one of a safety light curtain, a safety laser scanner, and a safety door lock.
- the method includes: when the input signal is at a high level, detecting whether there is setting information for the user to enable the verification function, and judging whether the period and duration of the test pulse meet the requirements only when the setting information exists.
- a safety control device applied to an industrial robot, the safety control device is used to control the robot to perform safety actions when there is a safety risk
- the safety control device comprises: an input module, for receiving an input signal from a safety device, the input signal including a test pulse for verifying the normal operation of the input signal; a logic processing module for processing the input signal and generating an output signal indicating a safety risk to the robot ; an output module, used to control the robot to perform safe actions when indicating that the robot has a safety risk according to the output signal;
- the output module controls the robot to perform safe actions; when the input signal is at a high level, the logic processing module determines whether the period of the test pulse is within the preset first parameter range, and judging whether the duration of the test pulse is within a preset second parameter range, and when either of the period and the duration does not meet the requirements, the output module controls the robot to perform a safety action.
- the safety control device includes a first control module and a second control module, and the first control module and the second control module are respectively used to control the robot to perform safety actions when there is a safety risk.
- the robot when any one of the first control module and the second control module detects that the input signal is at a low level, the robot is controlled to perform a safety action; when both the first control module and the second control module detect the input signal When the level is high, when any one of the first control module and the second control module detects that the period and duration of the test pulse do not meet the requirements, the robot is controlled to perform a safety action.
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 1000ms]
- the second parameter interval is [10us, 1000us].
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 500ms]
- the second parameter interval is [50us, 500us].
- the input signal comes from at least one of a safety light curtain, a safety laser scanner, and a safety door lock.
- the logic processing module is configured to detect whether there is setting information for the user to enable the verification function, and only when the setting information exists, judge whether the period and duration of the test pulse meet the requirements.
- an industrial robot comprising a base and a mechanical arm
- the mechanical arm can be used to connect a tool to perform work
- the industrial robot includes the safety control device described in any one of the foregoing.
- the present invention is also used to protect the following technical solution: a computer storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, any one of the aforementioned methods is implemented.
- the beneficial effects of the specific embodiments of the present invention are: providing an OSSD verification mechanism for the input signal of the safety device, that is, reconfirming the reliability of the input signal from the safety device, and in the presence of an effective The reliability of the test pulse is confirmed.
- the robot is controlled to perform safe actions, thereby improving the safety of the industrial robot.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a safety control device according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a module of a safety control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a working schematic diagram of a safety control device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a module of a safety control device according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- Fig. 5 is a working flow chart of the safety control device described in Fig. 4
- FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an industrial robot according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a security control method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of a safety control device 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the safety control device provided by the present invention is suitable for ensuring industrial robots. and control the industrial robot to perform safety actions when there is a safety risk.
- the safety actions include controlling the robot to alarm, decelerate or stop, etc. to attract the user's attention or reduce the operation risk of the robot.
- the safety control device 100 can receive input signals from the safety equipment 200, process the input signals to generate output signals, and the output signals are used to control the robot to perform safety actions.
- 3 shows a schematic block diagram of the safety control device 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the safety control device 100 provided by the present invention can be used to ensure the working safety of the robot, that is, when the safety control device 100 determines that the robot meets the safety conditions, Control the robot to run normally. When it is judged that the robot does not meet the safety conditions, that is, when the robot has a safety risk, the robot is controlled to perform safe actions to ensure the safe operation of the robot.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a safety control apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the safety control apparatus includes an input module 110 for receiving an input signal from a safety device 200, and the input signal includes an input signal for checking A test pulse for whether the input signal is operating normally, that is, an OSSD verification signal; the logic processing module 111 is used to process the input signal to generate an output signal indicating the safety risk of the robot; the output module 120, the output module 120 is used for Control the robot to perform safe actions when the robot is instructed to be at risk according to the above output signal.
- the industrial robot can receive an input signal of an external safety device 200 in a working environment, and evaluate and process the input signal to determine an output signal, wherein the input signal usually includes a test pulse for verifying the input Whether the signal is running normally, that is, including the verification of the OSSD (Output signal switch device) signal, and only when the input signal can run normally, it is possible to obtain the correct output signal.
- the input signal usually includes a test pulse for verifying the input Whether the signal is running normally, that is, including the verification of the OSSD (Output signal switch device) signal, and only when the input signal can run normally, it is possible to obtain the correct output signal.
- OSSD Output signal switch device
- the safety control device 100 is used for, when the input signal is at a low level, the output module 120 controls the robot to reduce damage or stop; when the input signal is at a high level, the logic processing module 111 judges the input Whether the period of the test pulse of the signal is in the preset first parameter interval, and whether the duration of the test pulse is in the preset second parameter interval, when either of the period and the duration does not meet the requirements, The output module controls the robot to perform safety actions.
- the above-mentioned safety device 200 is usually a safety device set in the working environment of the industrial robot, the safety device can notify the industrial robot when there is an unsafe factor in the working environment, and the safety control device 100 of the industrial robot can receive the indication. Perform corresponding actions when notified of unsafe factors, such as performing safety actions, to ensure the safe operation of the robot.
- the safety control device 100 can receive an input signal from at least one of a safety light curtain, a safety laser scanner, a safety door lock, and an emergency stop switch, that is, the safety device 200 is correspondingly a safety light curtain, a safety door lock, and an emergency stop switch. Laser scanners, safety door locks, emergency switches, exemplarily via which the industrial robot can be switched off in a dangerous situation.
- the safety light curtain is taken as an example for description.
- a safety light curtain is an OSSD device, which is designed to automatically generate a signal indicating each state of the light curtain. If the light curtain is working properly, the light used to determine the safety state is not interrupted by foreign intruding objects.
- the safety control device 100 sends the input signal, the safety light curtain continuously detects whether there is an intruding object in the working environment, for example, continuously detects whether someone breaks in, the safety control device 100 can receive the detection signal of the safety light curtain , that is, the input signal of the input module 110 of the safety control device 100 is the detection signal of the safety light curtain.
- FIG. 3 is a working schematic diagram of the safety control device 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the safety control device 100 can receive the input signal 10 from the safety device 200.
- the safety device 200 is taken as an example of a safety light curtain.
- the safety light curtain can detect the intrusion of foreign objects in the working environment and generate a detection signal.
- the input module 110 of the safety control device 100 can receive the input signal 10 from the safety light curtain, and the logic processing module 111 evaluates the input signal 10 or, if necessary, the logic processing module 111 evaluates the input signal 10 and its test pulses 12 to An output signal is generated.
- the input signal 10 includes the test pulse 12 .
- the test pulse 12 can verify whether the input signal 10 is normal. Based on the normal input signal 10 , the safety control device 100 can accurately judge the working environment.
- the detection signal is at a low level, that is, the input signal 10 is at a low level, and the output module controls the robot to perform safety actions; when the input signal 10 is at a high level
- the preliminary judgment according to the input signal 10 is that the safety light curtain has not detected an intruding object. In this case, it is not simply judged that there is no intruding object in the working environment, but it is further judged that the high level signal is accurate.
- the input signal 10 includes the test pulse 12, that is, the OSSD function, that is, the output signal switch device, and the OSSD can judge whether the input signal is normal as the characteristic of the input signal, that is, under the premise that there is an effective OSSD check, the safety light
- the detection signal of the screen can be accurately reflected.
- the safety control device 100 provided by the present invention can detect whether the test pulse 12 is running normally, that is, when there is a test pulse running normally, it can be considered that the current input signal 10 is correct, and if the normal running test pulse cannot be detected
- the test pulse 12 that is, there is a problem with the verification of the input signal 10 , and the reliability of the input signal 10 itself is low.
- the output module 120 controls the robot to perform safe actions. Specifically, when the input signal 10 is at a high level, the logic processing module 111 judges whether the period T of the test pulse 12 of the input signal 10 is within the preset first parameter range, and judges whether the duration d of the test pulse 12 is not In the preset second parameter interval, when any one of the period T and the duration d does not meet the requirements, the output module controls the robot to perform a safe action.
- the duration d and period T of the test pulse 12 are determined to determine whether there is a valid test pulse. pulse. That is, when both the duration d and the period T of the test pulse 12 meet the requirements, it is judged that there is a valid test pulse, and when either the duration d and the period T of the test pulse 12 do not meet the requirements, it is judged that there is no valid test pulse. test pulse.
- the test pulse 12 includes a preset first parameter interval and a second parameter interval, when the period T of the test pulse 12 is in the preset first parameter interval, and the duration d of the test pulse 12 is in the preset first parameter interval.
- the test pulse 12 is an effective test pulse.
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 1000ms]
- the second parameter interval is [10us, 1000us]. Selecting this range can cover almost all scenarios of security equipment. Further, the first parameter interval is [10ms, 500ms], and the second parameter interval is [50us, 500us].
- the first parameter interval is [10ms, 500ms]
- the second parameter interval is [50us, 500us]
- the period T of the test pulse 12 needs to be greater than or equal to 10ms and less than or equal to 500ms
- the test pulse The duration d of 12 needs to be greater than or equal to 50us and less than or equal to 500us, and the period and duration of the test pulses of different safety devices are also different, so that the first parameter interval and the second parameter interval selected by the present invention can be used. It covers more products on the market, and at the same time, it will not introduce too much interference and cause misjudgment because the parameter range is too large, or the adaptability to the safety equipment is poor because the parameter range is too small.
- the logic processing module is configured to judge whether the period and time of the test pulse meet the requirements only when receiving the setting information from the user to enable the verification function. That is, the logic processing module can choose to perform the determination of the test pulse, and not to perform the determination of the test pulse, whether to perform the determination of the test pulse based on whether the setting information from the user is received.
- safety equipment There are many types of safety equipment.
- the input signal of some safety equipment includes test pulse, but there are also safety equipment whose input signal does not include test pulse. When the input signal of safety equipment does not include test pulse, if the test pulse is detected, it will be Misjudgment occurred.
- the industrial robot usually includes a robot teach pendant. The user can set whether to activate the function of judging the test pulse through the teach pendant. When the user's setting enables the function of judging the test pulse, the judgment of the test pulse is performed to avoid misjudgment.
- the safety control device 100 can receive the input signal 10 from the safety device 200, process the input signal to generate the output signal.
- FIG. 4 shows a schematic block diagram of the safety control apparatus 100 of this embodiment.
- the safety control apparatus 100 includes a first control module 1 and a second control module 2.
- the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 are respectively used to control the robot to perform safety actions when there is a safety risk.
- the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 have two sets of The same constituent components, when the safety control device 100 performs work, the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 each perform work respectively, and the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 have the same structure
- the safety control device 100 includes an input module 110, a logic processing module 111, and an output module 120, that is, the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 respectively include an input module, a logic processing module and an output module module, the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 can be used to perform safety judgment respectively, that is, the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 can respectively perform the aforementioned
- the input module receives
- the logic processing module processes the input signal, and when the input signal is at a low level, controls the industrial robot to perform a safety action; when the input signal is at a high level, judges the test signal of the input signal Whether the period and duration meet the requirements.
- FIG. 5 is a working flow chart of the safety control device of the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 , that is, the working flow when the safety control device 100 includes the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 .
- the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 perform work respectively, and the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 respectively judge whether the input signal is at a low level. If the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 If any one of them judges that the input signal is at a low level, the robot will be controlled to perform a safe action; if both the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 judge that the input signal is at a high level, they will detect the test of the input signal respectively.
- the first control module 1 judges that the period T of the test pulse is in the first parameter range, the duration d is in the second parameter range, and the second control module 2 judges The period T of the test pulse is in the first parameter range, and the duration d is in the second parameter range, then it is determined that the test pulses of the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 both meet the requirements, which means that the test pulse from the safety device 200 is at this time.
- the input signal does not indicate that there is an unsafe factor in the environment, that is, the industrial robot is controlled to perform a safe action, otherwise, the robot operates normally.
- the safety control device 100 that is, the first control module 1 and the second control module 2 respectively perform judgment and control, which further improves the safety performance of the safety control device.
- the beneficial effect of the above preferred embodiment is to provide a detection mechanism for the OSSD signal of the safety equipment, further improve the reliability of the detection signal of the safety equipment, weaken the possibility of misjudgment, and improve the safety of the safety control device, and at the same time,
- the dual-channel safety control device is adopted, which further improves the reliability of the safety control device.
- the present invention is also used to provide an industrial robot.
- the industrial robot 300 includes any of the safety control devices described above.
- the safety control device is one of the core components of the industrial robot 300.
- the industrial robot 300 especially a new type of collaborative robot, the reliability of the safety control device will greatly affect the working performance of the robot, and the industrial robot 300 provided by the present invention is preferably a collaborative robot.
- the industrial robot 300 generally includes a base 310 and a robotic arm 320.
- the robotic arm can be connected to a tool 330 to perform work tasks.
- the industrial robot 300 also includes necessary software configurations.
- the industrial robot 300 of this embodiment includes the aforementioned Any of the safety control devices can ensure the safe operation of the industrial robot 300, and control the industrial robot 300 to perform safe actions when there are unsafe factors in the operating environment of the industrial robot 300.
- the present invention is also suitable for providing a safety control method, which is applied to an industrial robot.
- the safety control method is used to control the robot to perform safety actions when there is a safety risk.
- the method includes: S1. S2, determine the level state of the input signal; S3, when the input signal is low, control the robot to perform safety actions S4, when the described input signal is high level, judge whether the cycle T and duration d of the test pulse of the input signal are respectively in the preset first parameter interval and the second parameter interval, if the cycle T and duration d meets the requirements, the robot is controlled to run normally, and if at least one of the period T and the duration d does not meet the requirements, the robot is controlled to perform safe actions.
- the robot needs to be controlled to perform a safety action; when the input signal 10 is at a high level Usually, it means that the current security device 200 may not detect unsafe factors in the environment. In this case, the reliability of the input signal 10 needs to be reconfirmed to determine whether the high-level signal at this time is indeed reliable enough. Indicates that there is no unsafe factor in the working environment.
- the period T and duration d of the test pulse it can be confirmed whether there is an effective test pulse. An effective test pulse can make the input signal 10 more reliable. Therefore, it is judged that there is an effective test pulse. When testing the pulse, it can be confirmed that when the input signal 10 is at a high level, the input signal is trustworthy.
- the safety device 200 can generate at least two input signals 10 to the safety device 200. There are two input signals from the safety device, correspondingly including two test signals.
- the safety control method can evaluate the above two inputs respectively. When the two input signals are at high level, the test pulses are verified respectively, and when any test pulse does not meet the requirements of the preset first parameter interval and the second parameter interval, the robot is controlled to perform safe actions.
- the safety device 200 can respectively execute the safety control method based on the above at least two input signals, that is, respectively receive the at least two input signals and evaluate the two input signals respectively, that is, the safety control method includes receiving the safety device 200
- the at least two input signals are evaluated respectively, and each of the at least two input signals has an OSSD safety verification function, that is, the safety control method is used for each input signal respectively.
- the period of the test pulse is in the first parameter interval, ie [10ms, 1000ms]
- the duration d of the test pulse is in the second parameter interval, [50us, 500us]
- the control robot runs normally.
- the input signal from the safety device usually has the OSSD function, that is, it is necessary to confirm whether there is a valid test pulse by limiting the first parameter interval and the second parameter interval, and the period and duration of the test pulse of different safety devices are also different.
- the first parameter interval and the second parameter interval are selected, so that the first parameter interval and the second parameter interval selected by the present invention can cover more products on the market, and at the same time It will not introduce too much interference and cause misjudgment because the parameter interval selection is too large, or the adaptability to the safety equipment is poor because the parameter interval selection is too small.
- the realization of each process of the security control method is consistent with the security control device described above, and details are not repeated here.
- the period and duration of the test pulse it is detected whether the period and duration of the test pulse meet the conditions to determine whether there is an effective test pulse.
- the period of the test pulse may be an irregular period.
- the period of the pulse is a pulse.
- the duration and interval of the test pulse are determined by judging the period and duration of the test pulse to confirm the validity of the test pulse. For others skilled in the art, simple deformations can be made based on this, such as detecting the interval and duration of the test pulse.
- the duration determines whether the test pulse is a valid test pulse, which of course also belongs to the protection scope of the present invention.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
- Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (13)
- 一种安全控制方法,应用于工业机器人,所述安全控制方法用于检测机器人存在安全风险时控制其执行安全动作,其特征在于,所述方法包括:接收来自安全设备的输入信号,所述输入信号包括用于校验所述输入信号是否正常的测试脉冲;判断输入信号的电平状态;当输入信号为低电平时,控制机器人执行安全动作;当输入信号为高电平时,判断输入信号的测试脉冲的周期和持续时间是否分别处于预设的第一参数区间和第二参数区间,若所述周期和持续时间满足要求,控制机器人正常运行,若所述周期和持续时间至少其一不满足要求,控制机器人执行安全动作。
- 根据权利要求1所述的安全控制方法,其特征在于,所述方法包括:当接收到至少两个输入信号时,分别判断至少两个输入信号的电平状态,当存在低电平的输入信号时,控制机器人执行安全动作;当所述至少两个输入信号均为高电平时,分别判断其测试脉冲的周期和持续时间是否满足要求,且在至少两个输入信号的至少其一不满足要求时,控制机器人执行安全动作。
- 根据权利要求1所述的安全控制方法,其特征在于,所述第一参数区间为[10ms,1000ms],所述第二参数区间为[10us,1000us]。
- 根据权利要求1所述的安全控制方法,其特征在于,所述输入信号来自安全光幕、安全激光扫描仪、安全门锁中至少其一。
- 根据权利要求1所述的安全控制方法,其特征在于,所述方法包括:当输入信号为高电平时,检测是否存在用户开启校验功能的设置信息,仅当存在所述设置信息时判断所述测试脉冲的周期和持续时间是否满足要求。
- 一种安全控制装置,应用于工业机器人,所述安全控制装置用于在机器人存在安全风险时控制其执行安全动作,其特征在于,所述安全控制装置包括:输入模块,用于接收来自安全设备的输入信号,所述输入信号包括用于校验所述输入信号是否正常运行的测试脉冲;逻辑处理模块,用于处理所述输入信号并生成指示机器人安全风险的输出信号;输出模块,用于根据所述输出信号指示机器人存在安全风险时,控制机器人 执行安全动作;当所述输入信号为低电平时,所述输出模块控制机器人执行安全动作;当所述输入信号为高电平时,逻辑处理模块判断所述测试脉冲的周期是否处于预设的第一参数区间,以及判断所述测试脉冲的持续时间是否处于预设的第二参数区间,当所述周期和持续时间其中任一不满足要求时,输出模块控制所述机器人执行安全动作。
- 根据权利要求6所述的安全控制装置,其特征在于,所述安全控制装置包括第一控制模块和第二控制模块,所述第一控制模块和第二控制模块分别用于当机器人存在安全风险时控制其执行安全动作。
- 根据权利要求7所述的安全控制装置,其特征在于,当所述第一控制模块和第二控制模块其中任一检测到输入信号为低电平时,控制机器人执行安全动作;当所述第一控制模块和第二控制模块均检测到输入信号为高电平时,当所述第一控制模块和第二控制模块其中任一检测到测试脉冲的周期和持续时间不满足要求时,控制机器人执行安全动作。
- 根据权利要求6所述的安全控制装置,其特征在于,所述第一参数区间为[10ms,1000ms],所述第二参数区间为[10us,1000us]。
- 根据权利要求6所述的安全控制装置,其特征在于,所述输入信号来自安全光幕、安全激光扫描仪、安全门锁中至少其一。
- 根据权利要求6所述的安全控制装置,其特征在于,所述逻辑处理模块被配置为检测是否存在用户开启校验功能的设置信息,仅当存在所述设置信息时判断所述测试脉冲的周期和持续时间是否满足要求。
- 一种工业机器人,包括底座和机械臂,所述机械臂可用于连接工具以执行工作,其特征在于,所述工业机器人包括权利要求6-11中任一项所述的安全控制装置。
- 一种计算机存储介质,其上存储有计算机程序,其特征在于,所述计算机程序被处理器执行时实现权利要求1-5中任一项所述的方法。
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010847428.5A CN114076852B (zh) | 2020-08-21 | 2020-08-21 | 一种用于工业机器人的安全控制系统及安全控制方法 |
CN202010847428.5 | 2020-08-21 | ||
CN202021759740.0 | 2020-08-21 | ||
CN202021759740 | 2020-08-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2022037414A1 true WO2022037414A1 (zh) | 2022-02-24 |
Family
ID=80323372
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2021/110732 WO2022037414A1 (zh) | 2020-08-21 | 2021-08-05 | 安全控制方法、装置、工业机器人及计算机存储介质 |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
WO (1) | WO2022037414A1 (zh) |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102008005837A1 (de) * | 2008-01-24 | 2009-07-30 | Sick Ag | Sicherheitsgerät und System |
CN103885374A (zh) * | 2014-03-19 | 2014-06-25 | 上海成途自动化工程有限公司 | 基于安全可编程逻辑控制器的焊装线控制系统 |
CN105765470A (zh) * | 2013-11-13 | 2016-07-13 | 皮尔茨公司 | 具有可配置输入的安全控制系统 |
CN109129578A (zh) * | 2017-06-28 | 2019-01-04 | 得利捷Ip 科技有限公司 | 安全系统 |
CN208673079U (zh) * | 2018-06-14 | 2019-03-29 | 西门子股份公司 | 工业机器人的安全控制系统以及工业机器人 |
CN111331619A (zh) * | 2020-04-26 | 2020-06-26 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | 机器人的安全控制设备及机器人的控制方法、机器人 |
-
2021
- 2021-08-05 WO PCT/CN2021/110732 patent/WO2022037414A1/zh active Application Filing
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102008005837A1 (de) * | 2008-01-24 | 2009-07-30 | Sick Ag | Sicherheitsgerät und System |
CN105765470A (zh) * | 2013-11-13 | 2016-07-13 | 皮尔茨公司 | 具有可配置输入的安全控制系统 |
CN103885374A (zh) * | 2014-03-19 | 2014-06-25 | 上海成途自动化工程有限公司 | 基于安全可编程逻辑控制器的焊装线控制系统 |
CN109129578A (zh) * | 2017-06-28 | 2019-01-04 | 得利捷Ip 科技有限公司 | 安全系统 |
CN208673079U (zh) * | 2018-06-14 | 2019-03-29 | 西门子股份公司 | 工业机器人的安全控制系统以及工业机器人 |
CN111331619A (zh) * | 2020-04-26 | 2020-06-26 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | 机器人的安全控制设备及机器人的控制方法、机器人 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4749985A (en) | Functional relationship-based alarm processing | |
Su | Automatic fire detection system using adaptive fusion algorithm for fire fighting robot | |
KR101785998B1 (ko) | 안전사고예방을 위한 출입감지시스템 | |
CN110704874B (zh) | 一种基于数据溯源的隐私泄露防护方法 | |
WO2007101132A2 (en) | System and method to combine and weight multiple sensors with overlapping sensing range to create a measurement system utilized in a high integrity or safety environment | |
CN104464158B (zh) | 一种火灾报警的联动控制方法及系统 | |
CN104991528A (zh) | Dcs信息安全控制方法及控制站 | |
JP2009515265A (ja) | 機能安全装置の設定及び監視方法とオペレータ・コントロール・ユニット | |
US9311800B2 (en) | Safety device for a technical installation or a technical process | |
WO2022037414A1 (zh) | 安全控制方法、装置、工业机器人及计算机存储介质 | |
JP2007140587A (ja) | 侵入監視方法、プログラム及びシステム | |
CN114076852B (zh) | 一种用于工业机器人的安全控制系统及安全控制方法 | |
CN113075438B (zh) | 一种窃电检测方法及其装置、防窃电装置和可读存储介质 | |
JP2018120296A (ja) | 通信環境への侵入を検出するシステム、および侵入検出方法 | |
CN118081800B (zh) | 增强安全性摘复钩机器人系统及控制方法 | |
JP2669905B2 (ja) | リレーの溶着検出方法 | |
CN117938567A (zh) | 基于智能门锁的安全监控方法、系统、终端及存储介质 | |
KR102497155B1 (ko) | 방범 시스템에서 감지 루프에 대한 강제 루핑을 검출하기 위한 장치 및 이를 위한 방법 | |
JP3012297B2 (ja) | 異常事象同定方法及び装置 | |
CN117478363B (zh) | 基于工业互联网态势感知的光伏电力网络安全监控系统及其方法 | |
JP3933902B2 (ja) | 監視装置、監視方法および状態変化検知装置 | |
Debnath et al. | IoT Based Smart Home and Office Fire Notification Alert System | |
KR20100135063A (ko) | 지능형 로봇의 자가 치유 방법, 지능형 로봇의 자가 치유 방법이 기록된 기록 매체 및 지능형 로봇의 자가 치유 시스템 | |
CN110609303B (zh) | 位置传感器、基于位置传感器的安全芯片 | |
CN113542931B (zh) | 一种防火门监控器按键功能自动化测试系统及方法 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 21857509 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 21857509 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205 DATED 14.08.2023) |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 21857509 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |