[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2019179584A1 - Éolienne haubanée - Google Patents

Éolienne haubanée Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019179584A1
WO2019179584A1 PCT/DK2019/050082 DK2019050082W WO2019179584A1 WO 2019179584 A1 WO2019179584 A1 WO 2019179584A1 DK 2019050082 W DK2019050082 W DK 2019050082W WO 2019179584 A1 WO2019179584 A1 WO 2019179584A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
stay
cable
cables
stay cable
wind turbine
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/DK2019/050082
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Edgar LEIJTEN
Original Assignee
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vestas Wind Systems A/S filed Critical Vestas Wind Systems A/S
Publication of WO2019179584A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019179584A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D13/00—Assembly, mounting or commissioning of wind motors; Arrangements specially adapted for transporting wind motor components
    • F03D13/20—Arrangements for mounting or supporting wind motors; Masts or towers for wind motors
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2240/00—Components
    • F05B2240/90—Mounting on supporting structures or systems
    • F05B2240/91—Mounting on supporting structures or systems on a stationary structure
    • F05B2240/917—Mounting on supporting structures or systems on a stationary structure attached to cables
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70—Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70—Wind energy
    • Y02E10/728—Onshore wind turbines

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a wind turbine comprising at least three stay cables, sometimes referred to as a cable stayed wind turbine.
  • the wind turbine of the invention is positioned at a site with uneven terrain.
  • the invention further relates to a method of constructing such a wind turbine.
  • Wind turbines are sometimes provided with stay cables connected between a mounting position at the tower of the wind turbine and a stay cable foundation arranged at a distance from the tower of the wind turbine.
  • the stay cables support the tower, in particular with respect to bending moments in the tower. Thereby it is possible to provide slender towers, possible with thinner walls, while ensuring that the strength of the wind turbine is sufficient to withstand expected loads during operation. Smaller foundations may also be used when the wind turbine is provided with stay cables.
  • stay cables extending from the wind turbine tower in different directions may have lengths which differ from each other. This gives rise to variations in stiffness of the cables, from one cable to another. This is highly undesirable, since it may result in uneven natural frequencies and uneven loads on the wind turbine, in particular on the tower.
  • EP 2 711 485 B1 discloses a hybrid tower structure comprising a plurality of stay cables connected to the tower structure and equipped with means for adjusting the tension of the cables for adjusting the stiffness of the tower structure and thereby obtaining specific frequencies for the tower structure.
  • the invention provides a wind turbine comprising a tower mounted on a foundation, a nacelle mounted on the tower and a rotor mounted on the nacelle, wherein at least three stay cables are connected, at a first end, to the tower, each stay cable further being connected, at a second end, to a stay cable foundation, wherein the stay cable foundations are positioned on a slope defined by a slope plane intersecting at least three of the stay cable foundations, wherein each stay cable has a length defined by a distance between its connecting point at the tower and its stay cable foundation, wherein the lengths of the stay cables differ from each other due to the slope of the slope plane, wherein each stay cable is configured in such a manner that the stiffness of the stay cables are substantially equal and with a tension in the stay cables that are substantially equal
  • the invention provides a wind turbine comprising a tower mounted on a foundation.
  • a nacelle is mounted on the tower and a rotor is mounted on the nacelle.
  • the wind turbine is further provided with at least three stay cables, i.e. the wind turbine is a cable stayed wind turbine.
  • Each stay cable is connected, at a first end, to the tower and, at a second end, to a stay cable foundation.
  • the wind turbine is positioned at a site with an uneven terrain, and therefore the stay cable foundations are not all positioned at the same level, and the foundation of the tower is not necessarily arranged at the same level as any of the stay cable foundations.
  • the stay cable foundations are positioned on a slope defined by a slope plane intersecting at least three of the stay cable foundations.
  • the term 'slope plane' should be interpreted to mean an imaginary or mathematical plane which is defined by the positions of at least three of the stay cable foundations. Due to the uneven terrain, the slope plane may not be arranged horizontally, and thereby it will define a slope relative to horizontal, i.e. it will be inclined relative to horizontal. It is, however, not ruled out that the slope plane may be arranged horizontally, but in this case the foundation of the tower may be arranged above or below the slope plane.
  • Each stay cable has a length defined by a distance between its connecting point at the tower and its stay cable foundation. Due to the slope of the slope plane, caused by the uneven terrain, the lengths of the stay cables differ from each other.
  • Each stay cable is configured in such a manner that the stiffness of the stay cables are substantially equal and with a tension in the stay cables that are substantially equal. If cables of the same kind are used for the stay cables, the differing lengths of the stay cables would result in differing stiffness of the stay cables, and this would in turn result in variations in tower eigenfrequencies.
  • Equal cable frequencies of the stay cables can be obtained by adjusting the tension in the cables, e.g. as described in EP 2 711 485 Bl. However, this may result in uneven loads on the wind turbine, in particular on the tower.
  • the tower frequencies are typically not allowed to overlap with the wind turbine rotor frequencies. Therefore, variations in the frequencies may lead to a need for design changes, and possibly non-optimal material use, and it may even be impossible to make a single design which suits different sites.
  • each stay cable is configured in such a manner that the stiffness of the stay cables as well as the tension in the stay cables are substantially equal, because thereby the differing lengths of the stay cables can be handled in a manner which does not affect the eigenfrequencies and without introducing uneven loads in the wind turbine.
  • each stay cable is configured with due consideration to the length which is dictated by the uneven terrain, and in such a manner that the same stiffness, or at least approximately the same stiffness, is obtained for all of the stay cables.
  • the wind turbine may comprise exactly three stay cables.
  • the stay cables may advantageously be arranged with an angle of 120° there between.
  • the wind turbine may comprise more than three stay cables, for instance an uneven number of stay cables and/or a multiple of three stay cables.
  • Each stay cable may have a cross-sectional area, and the cross-sectional areas of the stay cables may be configured to achieve a substantially equal stiffness of the stay cables.
  • the equal stiffness of the stay cables are obtained by carefully selecting appropriate cross-sectional areas for each of the stay cables.
  • the cross-sectional area of at least one stay cable may be different from the cross sectional area of the other stay cables.
  • the length, L, of each of the stay cables is given by the positions of the stay cable foundations, i.e. by the distance between each of the connecting points on the tower and the corresponding stay cable foundation.
  • a desired stiffness, k which is to apply to all of the stay cables can be selected, and then the cross-sectional area, A, can easily be calculated for each of the stay cables, using the formula above.
  • Each stay cable may be formed from a plurality of strands, and the cross- sectional area of each stay cable may be selected by selecting the number of strands in each stay cable. This is a very easy way of adjusting the cross- sectional areas of the stay cables.
  • the cross- sectional area of each stay cable may be selected from a plurality of discrete area steps, where the distance between the area steps corresponds to the cross- sectional area of a single strand.
  • the cross-sectional area of a stay cable can be increased or decreased by one area step by adding or removing one strand to/from the cable.
  • each stay cable may be formed from a single strand.
  • the cross-sectional areas of the stay cables may be varied continuously, and thereby exactly identical stiffness of all of the stay cables may be obtained.
  • the cross-sectional area of each of the stay cables may be larger than a predefined minimum cross-sectional area.
  • the minimum cross-sectional area may be selected in such a manner that it is ensured that each of the stay cables is capable of withstanding expected loads during operation of the wind turbine.
  • the cross-sectional area of each of the stay cables should be sufficient to provide a required breaking force of the cable.
  • the cross-sectional areas of the shorter stay cables should not be reduced below the minimum cross-sectional area in order to obtain equal stiffness of the stay cables. Instead the cross-sectional areas of the longer stay cables must be increased.
  • stay cables As an alternative to adjusting the cross-sectional areas of the stay cables, other parameters of the stay cables, such as choice of material, cable angle, use of reinforcement element, etc., could be varied from one stay cable to another. Alternatively or additionally, an additional element with a selected spring stiffness could be arranged in series with the cables, in order to keep the overall stiffness constant.
  • An angle defined between a stay cable and the tower may be substantially identical for each of the stay cables.
  • the cable defines an angle with the tower, which is larger than 0° and smaller than 90°. The angle decreases if the stay cable foundation is moved closer to the tower, and it increases if the stay cable foundation is moved longer away from the tower.
  • the angle defined between a given stay cable and the tower may
  • One of the stay cables may be arranged along a direction which is directly downhill along the slope plane.
  • the stay cable which is arranged directly downhill along the slope plane will typically be the one having its stay cable foundation arranged at the lowest level among the stay cable foundations.
  • the wind turbine comprises exactly three stay cables, and in the case that the wind turbine is positioned on a sloping hill, the other two stay cables will be arranged along directions which are uphill along the slope plane. These two stay cable may be of substantially equal length. This orientation of the stay cables is the one which minimises the added material use when handling the uneven terrain.
  • the material for the stay cables may be selected such that Young's module of at least one stay cable is different from the Young's module of the other stay cables.
  • the stiffness of the stay cables is adjusted by adjusting material properties of the stay cables, instead of or in addition to adjusting the cross-sectional area.
  • the invention provides a method of constructing a wind turbine comprising a tower mounted on a foundation, a nacelle mounted on the tower, a rotor mounted on the nacelle, and at least three stay cables, each connected, at a first end, to the tower and, at a second end, to a stay cable foundation, the stay cable foundations being positioned on a slope, the method comprising the steps of: - identifying a position for the foundation,
  • the method according to the second aspect is a method of constructing a wind turbine.
  • the wind turbine could, e.g., be a wind turbine according to the first aspect of the invention, and the remarks set forth above are therefore equally applicable here.
  • the wind turbine being constructed comprises at least three stay cables, each being connected between a connecting point on the tower of the wind turbine and a stay cable foundation, and thereby the wind turbine is a cable stayed wind turbine.
  • the wind turbine is arranged in an uneven terrain, as described above, and the stay cable foundations are thereby positioned on a slope. Accordingly, once the positions for the foundation and the stay cable foundations have been identified, a slope plane intersecting at least three of the stay cable foundations is defined. In the case that the wind turbine comprises exactly three stay cables, the positions of the three stay cable foundations uniquely defines a plane
  • the wind turbine comprises more than three stay cables
  • all of the stay cable foundation may still be intersected by the slope plane, but it is not ruled out than one or more of them will not be intersected by the slope plane.
  • the slope plane may be defined based on the three stay cable foundations which are regarded as the ones which most accurately reflect actual sloping conditions on the site of the wind turbine.
  • a length of each of the stay cables is derived from the distance between its connecting point at the tower and its stay cable foundation.
  • each of the stay cables is selected in such a manner that a stiffness of the stay cables are substantially equal and with a tension in the stay cables that are substantially equal. This has already been described in detail above.
  • the wind turbine may be erected, arranging the foundation and the stay cable foundations at the identified positions, and using the selected stay cables.
  • the step of selecting each of the stay cables may comprise tailoring a cross- sectional area of each stay cable in order to achieve a substantially equal stiffness of the stay cables. This has already been described above.
  • One of the stay cable foundations may be arranged directly downhill along the slope plane relative to the foundation, and the step of selecting each of the stay cables may comprise selecting a cable with a baseline cross-sectional area for the stay cable foundation arranged directly downhill relative to the foundation, and calculating cross-sectional areas for each of the other stay cables based on the baseline cross-sectional area.
  • the stay cable being connected to the stay cable foundation which is arranged directly downhill relative to the foundation of the wind turbine is the one which is expected to be the longest of the stay cables.
  • the longest of the stay cables should also be the one with the largest cross-sectional area when an equal stiffness of the stay cables is desired.
  • the baseline cross- sectional area is selected.
  • the length of the stay cable is defined by the position of the stay cable foundation, and the Young's module of the stay cable is defined by the material of the stay cable.
  • the stiffness, k calculated in this manner is then selected as the stiffness which all of the other stay cables must have.
  • the lengths of the other stay cables are defined by the positions of the their respective stay cable foundations, and the Young's modules are defined by the selected material. Accordingly, the cross- sectional areas of each of the other stay cables can be calculated, using the formula above.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a wind turbine tower for a wind turbine according to an embodiment of the invention
  • Fig. 2 shows side views of wind turbine towers for wind turbines according to three different embodiments of the invention
  • Figs. 3-5 are graphs illustrating cable stiffness, tower bending frequencies, cable forces and strand forces for a prior art wind turbine, and
  • Figs. 6-8 are graphs illustrating cable stiffness, tower bending frequencies, cable forces and strand forces for a wind turbine according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 1 is a perspective view of a tower 10 for a wind turbine according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Three stay cables 11 are each connected, at a first end, to the tower 10, and, at a second end, to respective stay cable foundations 12.
  • the tower 10 is a cable stayed tower.
  • the stay cables 11 are labelled ⁇ ', '2' and '3' in order to distinguish them from each other in the following.
  • the tower 10 is positioned in an uneven terrain, and therefore the stay cable foundations 12 are arranged at various levels. Thereby a slope plane 13 is defined, the slope plane 13 intersecting each of the three stay cable foundations 12. Due to the uneven terrain, the slope plane 13 is inclined, i.e. it defines an angle with respect to horizontal.
  • the stay cables 11 have been positioned in such a manner that the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is arranged along a direction downhill from the position of the tower 10. Accordingly, the stay cable foundation 12 of the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is arranged at a lower level than stay cable foundations 12 of the stay cables 11 labelled '2' and '3', and the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is arranged essentially along a slope defined by the slope plane 13. This is illustrated by insert 14, in that the slope plane 13 is tilted around the y axis shown in the insert 14.
  • the lengths of the stay cables 11 are not identical. Instead, the length of the stay cable labelled ⁇ ' is the longest, since the stay cable foundation 12 of this stay cable 11 is the one which is arranged at the lowest level.
  • the stay cables 11 labelled '2' and '3' may have substantially identical lengths, but this needs not be the case.
  • each of the stay cables 11 is configured in such a manner that the stiffness of each of the stay cables 11 are substantially equal and with a tension in the stay cables 11 that are substantially equal.
  • the individual stay cable 11 is designed with due consideration to the length of the stay cable 11, and in such a manner that the stiffness and tension do not vary from one stay cable 11 to another.
  • a cross-sectional area of each stay cable 11 may be selected in such a manner that equal stiffness is obtained among the stay cables 11, without having to increase the tension in some of the stay cables 11.
  • a longer stay cable 11 should be designed with a larger cross-sectional area than a shorter stay cable 11.
  • Various cross-sectional areas may, e.g., be obtained by varying the number of strands used for forming the stay cable 11.
  • Fig. 2 shows side views of wind turbine towers 10a, 10b, 10c for wind turbines according to three different embodiments of the invention.
  • the towers 10a, 10b, 10c are similar to the tower 10 illustrated in Fig. 1, and they will therefore not be described in detail here.
  • the slope plane is indicated by a dotted line. This is the situation illustrated in Fig. 1 and described above. Accordingly, for the tower 10a the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is longer than the stay cables 11 labelled '2' and '3', and should therefore be designed differently, e.g. with a larger cross-sectional area, in order to obtain substantially equal stiffness of the stay cables 11.
  • the tower 10c is arranged at a position where the slope plane is inclined with respect to horizontal, in such a manner that the stay cable foundation of the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is arranged at a higher level than the stay cable foundations of the stay cables 11 labelled '2' and '3'. This is indicated by
  • ⁇ + 10°', and can also be seen from the varying levels of the end points of the stay cables 11.
  • the slope plane is indicated by a dotted line. Accordingly, for the tower 10c the stay cable 11 labelled ⁇ ' is shorter than the stay cables 11 labelled '2' and '3', and should therefore be designed differently, e.g. with a smaller cross-sectional area, in order to obtain substantially equal stiffness of the stay cables 11.
  • Figs. 3-5 show graphs illustrating various parameters of a prior art wind turbine.
  • the wind turbine is a cable stayed wind turbine comprising three stay cables, and it is positioned in an uneven terrain, resulting in different lengths of the stay cables, essentially as described above with reference to Figs. 1 and 2.
  • the stay cables are arranged in such a manner that a slope plane intersecting each of the stay cable foundations is tilted around a y axis as defined in the insert of Fig. 1.
  • the stay cables are designed in an identical manner, i.e. from the same cable material, without taking the various lengths of the stay cables into account.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph illustrating cable stiffness of the three stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane. It is clear from the graph, that the inclination angle has a significant impact on the stiffness of the cables. This is due to the fact that a change in inclination angle changes the levels at which the stay cable foundations are arranged, and thereby the lengths of the stay cables.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph illustrating tower bending frequencies originating from the three stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane. It is clear from the graph, that the inclination angle has a significant impact on the tower bending frequencies.
  • Fig. 5 shows three graphs illustrating minimum cable forces, maximum cable forces, minimum strand forces and maximum strand forces, respectively, introduced in the stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane. It can be seen from the graphs of Fig. 5 that these forces also vary as a function of the inclination angle of the slope plane. As a result, a cable design which is optimised to the limit level will lead to upper and/or lower limits being exceeded. The limit levels are indicated by dashed lines.
  • Figs. 6-8 are graphs illustrating various parameters for a wind turbine according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the wind turbine is a cable stayed wind turbine comprising three stay cables, and it is positioned in an uneven terrain, resulting in different lengths of the stay cables, essentially as described above with reference to Figs. 1 and 2.
  • the stay cables are arranged in such a manner that a slope plane intersecting each of the stay cable foundations is tilted around a y axis as defined in the insert of Fig. 1.
  • the stay cables are designed in accordance with the invention, i.e. in such a manner that the various lengths of the stay cables are taken into account, and in such a manner that the stiffness of the stay cables is substantially equal.
  • Fig. 6 is a graph illustrating cable stiffness of the three stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane, and is similar to Fig. 3.
  • the stiffness of each of the stay cables is substantially independent of the inclination angle of the slope plane. This is due to the design of the stay cables described above. Accordingly, regardless of the inclination angle of the slope plane, the stiffness of the stay cables remains substantially identical, i .e. no difference in stiffness occurs, as was the case in the prior art wind turbine illustrated in Fig. 3.
  • Fig. 7 is a graph illustrating tower bending frequencies originating from the three stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane, and is similar to Fig. 4.
  • the inclination angle has almost no impact on the tower bending frequencies, and thereby almost no difference in tower bending frequencies from one stay cable to another occurs, even for large inclination angles of the slope plane. This is due to the close relationship between the stiffness of the stay cables and the tower bending frequencies described above, and due to the design of the stay cables ensuring equal stiffness of the stay cables.
  • Fig. 8 shows three graphs illustrating minimum cable forces, maximum cable forces, minimum strand forces and maximum strand forces, respectively, introduced in the stay cables as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane, and is similar to Fig. 5. It can be seen from the graphs of Fig. 8 that these forces still vary as a function of inclination angle of the slope plane, and that the maximum and minimum limits are still exceeded. However, if a baseline cable thickness is selected which takes the load limits into account, the graphs of Fig.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une éolienne comprenant une tour (10) et au moins trois câbles de haubanage (11) reliés chacun, au niveau d'une première extrémité, à la tour (10), et, au niveau d'une seconde extrémité, à une fondation de câble de haubanage (12). Les fondations de câble de haubanage (12) sont positionnées sur une pente définie par un plan de pente (13) croisant au moins trois des fondations de câble de haubanage (12). Chaque câble de haubanage (11) a une longueur définie par une distance entre son point de raccordement au niveau de la tour (10) et sa fondation de câble de haubanage (12), les longueurs des câbles de haubanage (11) différant l'une de l'autre en raison de la pente du plan de pente (13). Chaque câble de haubanage (11) est configuré de telle sorte que leur rigidité soit sensiblement égale et avec une tension sensiblement égale pour chacun d'eux.
PCT/DK2019/050082 2018-03-21 2019-03-07 Éolienne haubanée WO2019179584A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA201870177 2018-03-21
DKPA201870177 2018-03-21

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019179584A1 true WO2019179584A1 (fr) 2019-09-26

Family

ID=65818139

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/DK2019/050082 WO2019179584A1 (fr) 2018-03-21 2019-03-07 Éolienne haubanée

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2019179584A1 (fr)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3672105A (en) * 1970-06-16 1972-06-27 Wikstrand & Berg Ab Arrangement in staying a telescopic tower by means of stay wires
US4309854A (en) * 1978-09-18 1982-01-12 Vendramini D Telescopic mast
US20120139253A1 (en) * 2011-07-13 2012-06-07 Lambert Walter L Stay Cable for Structures
EP2711485A1 (fr) 2012-09-21 2014-03-26 Eurostal OY Structure de tour hybride et procédé pour sa construction
WO2016206689A1 (fr) * 2015-06-23 2016-12-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Procédé d'érection d'une tour d'éolienne attachée
WO2017041806A1 (fr) * 2015-09-11 2017-03-16 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Section de mât destinée à un mât d'éolienne haubané

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3672105A (en) * 1970-06-16 1972-06-27 Wikstrand & Berg Ab Arrangement in staying a telescopic tower by means of stay wires
US4309854A (en) * 1978-09-18 1982-01-12 Vendramini D Telescopic mast
US20120139253A1 (en) * 2011-07-13 2012-06-07 Lambert Walter L Stay Cable for Structures
EP2711485A1 (fr) 2012-09-21 2014-03-26 Eurostal OY Structure de tour hybride et procédé pour sa construction
WO2016206689A1 (fr) * 2015-06-23 2016-12-29 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Procédé d'érection d'une tour d'éolienne attachée
WO2017041806A1 (fr) * 2015-09-11 2017-03-16 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Section de mât destinée à un mât d'éolienne haubané

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3750790B1 (fr) Ensemble flotteur
EP3443220B1 (fr) Éolienne à rotors multiples
AU2006339899B2 (en) A method and control system for reducing the fatigue loads in the components of a wind turbine subjected to asymmetrical loading of the rotor plane
EP3527751B1 (fr) Tour en treillis
EP2317125B1 (fr) Eolienne et pale d'éolienne
US10731632B2 (en) Power boost of a wind turbine using model predictive control
RU2673364C2 (ru) Башенная сборная конструкция для ветротурбинной установки
US20110006525A1 (en) Method for Operating a Wind Farm Comprising a Plurality of Wind Turbines
US9523211B2 (en) Towers
KR102360544B1 (ko) 풍력 터빈용 타워 세그먼트를 사전 조립 및/또는 운송 및/또는 조립하기 위한 플랜지 프레임 및 조립 세트, 및 방법
EP2522853B1 (fr) Contrôle de la vitesse et du couple du rotor d'une turbine éolienne
CN101469665A (zh) 向前倾斜的塔架顶部部分
US11401914B2 (en) Method for operating a wind turbine
US20180100486A1 (en) Wind Farm and Wind Power Generation Apparatus
KR20130050272A (ko) 풍력 발전소의 제어 장치 및 풍력 발전소의 제어 방법
WO2019179584A1 (fr) Éolienne haubanée
EP3724493B1 (fr) Parc éolien comprenant des éoliennes à haubans
WO2023143686A1 (fr) Parc éolien en mer à lignes d'amarrage de différentes longueurs
CN108026899B (zh) 用于风力发电机的塔
US11851902B2 (en) Tower arrangement for a wind turbine, wind turbine comprising the tower arrangement and method for erecting a wind turbine
US20210355912A1 (en) Method for designing and operating a wind power installation, wind power installation and wind farm
EP2545231B1 (fr) Assemblage d'angle, en particulier pour une tour de turbine éolienne
AU2010283977A1 (en) A blade assembly for a wind turbine
US9599092B2 (en) Wind generator system with multiple turbines
US20130272890A1 (en) Wind turbine blade, wind turbine generator including wind turbine blade, and method for designing wind turbine blade

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 19712138

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 19712138

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1