[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2015130752A1 - Sensor network gateway - Google Patents

Sensor network gateway Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015130752A1
WO2015130752A1 PCT/US2015/017470 US2015017470W WO2015130752A1 WO 2015130752 A1 WO2015130752 A1 WO 2015130752A1 US 2015017470 W US2015017470 W US 2015017470W WO 2015130752 A1 WO2015130752 A1 WO 2015130752A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
network
packet
address
protocol
generating
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2015/017470
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
John Boudreaux
Original Assignee
John Boudreaux
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US14/463,970 external-priority patent/US20150288604A1/en
Application filed by John Boudreaux filed Critical John Boudreaux
Priority to CN201580013943.0A priority Critical patent/CN106465416A/en
Priority to EP15755293.6A priority patent/EP3111712A4/en
Priority to JP2016554654A priority patent/JP2017512022A/en
Priority to KR1020167026932A priority patent/KR20170020309A/en
Publication of WO2015130752A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015130752A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
    • H04L12/46Interconnection of networks
    • H04L12/4604LAN interconnection over a backbone network, e.g. Internet, Frame Relay
    • H04L12/462LAN interconnection over a bridge based backbone
    • H04L12/4625Single bridge functionality, e.g. connection of two networks over a single bridge
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L61/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
    • H04L61/09Mapping addresses
    • H04L61/10Mapping addresses of different types
    • H04L61/106Mapping addresses of different types across networks, e.g. mapping telephone numbers to data network addresses
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W8/00Network data management
    • H04W8/26Network addressing or numbering for mobility support
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L2101/00Indexing scheme associated with group H04L61/00
    • H04L2101/60Types of network addresses
    • H04L2101/672Short addresses
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L61/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming
    • H04L61/59Network arrangements, protocols or services for addressing or naming using proxies for addressing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W92/00Interfaces specially adapted for wireless communication networks
    • H04W92/02Inter-networking arrangements

Definitions

  • This specification relates generally to gateways for sensor networks that may be used in the operation of systems, such as security or alarm systems.
  • Wireless sensor network / wireless device based data collection systems having remote server-based monitoring and report generation are used in applications such as home safety monitoring, electrical and water utility meter monitoring, and human and asset tracking. For example, it is common for businesses and homeowners to have a security system for detecting alarm conditions at their premises and for signaling conditions to a monitoring station or to authorized users of the security system.
  • an apparatus for interfacing between first and second networks includes memory storing instructions that are executable and one or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform operations including extracting a short address of a node on a first network, the short address being extracted from a first data packet operating under a first protocol for the first network, the first network being a wireless mesh network, generating a second packet operating under a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a network address of the apparatus and a destination address corresponding to a device on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address, and outputting the second packet to the second network.
  • aspects also include methods and computer program products.
  • Ail or part of the foregoing may be implemented as a computer program product comprised of instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media or devices, and which are executable on one or more processing devices. All or part of the foregoing may be implemented as an apparatus, method, or network system that may include one or more processing devices and memory to store executable instructions to implement functionality.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example networked security system.
  • FIG.2 is a block diagram of an example gateway between two different networks.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an example process that may be performed by the gateway.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of components of an example networked security system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Example security systems may include an intrusion detection panel that is electrically or wirelessly connected to a variety of sensors.
  • Those sensors types may include motion detectors, cameras, and proximity sensors (used, e.g., to determine whether a door or window has been opened).
  • proximity sensors used, e.g., to determine whether a door or window has been opened.
  • such systems receive a very simple signal (electrically open or closed) from one or more of these sensors to indicate that a particular condition being monitored has changed or become unsecure.
  • typical intrusion systems can be set-up to monitor entry doors in a building.
  • a proximity sensor senses a magnetic contact and produces an electrically closed circuit.
  • the proximity sensor opens the circuit, and sends a signal to the panel indicating that an alarm condition has occurred (e.g., an opened entry door).
  • Data collection systems are becoming more common in some applications, such as home safety monitoring, electrical and water utility meter monitoring, and human and asset tracking.
  • Data collection systems employ wireless sensor networks and wireless devices, and may include remote server-based monitoring and report generation.
  • wireless sensor networks generally use a combination of wired and wireless links between computing devices, with wireless links usually used for the lowest level connections (e.g., end-node device to
  • the edge (wirelessly-connected) tier of the network is comprised of resource-constrained devices with specific functions. These devices may have a small-to-moderate amount of processing power and memory, and may be battery powered, thus requiring that they conserve energy by spending much of their time in sleep mode.
  • a typical model is one where the edge devices generally form a single wireless network in which each end-node communicates directly with its parent node in a hub-and-spoke-style architecture.
  • the parent node may be, e.g., an access point on a gateway or a sub-coordinator which is, in turn, connected to the access point or another sub-coordinator.
  • FIG. 1 shows an example (global) distributed network topology 100 for an example Wireless Sensor Network (WSN).
  • upper tier 101 of the network may include traditional servers 103 and/or virtual servers running in a "cloud computing" environment and networked using appropriate networking technologies such as Internet connections or which can be private networks that use none or part of the Internet. Applications running on those servers may communicate using XML/SOAP, ESTful web sendee, and/or other appropriate application layer technologies such as HTTP and ATOM.
  • middle tier 104 may include gateways 105 located at central, convenient places inside individual buildings and structures. Such gateways may communicate with the upper tier servers and cloud applications using web programming techniques or other appropriate technologies.
  • gateways 105 communicate with servers 103 in the upper tier whether the servers are stand-alone dedicated servers and/or cloud based servers running cloud applications using web programming techniques.
  • the middle tier gateways 105 are also shown with both local area network (e.g., Ethernet or 802.11) and cellular network interfaces .
  • lower tier (edge layer) 108 may include fully-functional sensor nodes 110 (wireless devices, marked in FIG. 1 with "F") and constrained wireless sensor nodes or sensor end nodes. These end nodes include constrained devices 111 (marked in the FIG. 1 with "C").
  • Constrained computing devices 11 ! as used herein are devices with
  • constrained devices are those with less than about a megabyte of flash'persistent memory, and less than 10-20 kilobytes (KB) of RAM/volatile memory). These constrained devices 111 are configured in this manner; generally due to cost/physical configuration considerations.
  • each gateway may be equipped with an access point
  • the communication links (illustrated by lines 113) shown in FIG. 1 are direct (single-hop network layer) connections between devices.
  • a formal networking layer (that may function in each of the three tiers shown in FIG. 1) can use a series of these links, together with appropriate routing technology, to send messages (fragmented or unfragmented) from one device to another, over a physical distance.
  • each link may represent two or more hops and/or the configuration may be different than shown in Fig 1.
  • the WSN state function-based application layer uses an edge device operating system (not shown, but such as disclosed in the above mentioned provisional applications) that allows for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) without rebooting the device (so-called "dynamic programming").
  • edge devices could use other operating systems provided such systems allow for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) preferable without rebooting of the edge devices.
  • Example distributed network topology 100 may include or be part of a wireless mesh network. In some implementations, all of distributed network topology 100 is implemented wireless mesh technology. In some implementations, only part of distributed network topology 100 is implemented using wireless mesh technology.
  • upper tier 101 may be implemented using standard network technology
  • middle tier 104 and lower tier 108 may be implemented as one or more wireless mesh networks.
  • upper tier 101 and middle tier 104 may be implemented using standard network technology
  • lower tier 108 may be implemented using one or more wireless mesh networks.
  • a different wireless mesh network may be associated with each gateway, or a single wireless mesh network may include all of the gateways shown in FIG. 1 (and others), as well as all or some functional and sensor nodes.
  • wireless mesh network includes a self-organizing wireless network, in which the network devices themselves establish communication links with one another.
  • a wireless mesh network may be established between sensor, functional and/or gateway devices that are part of a larger building, or enterprise- wide system.
  • such devices may be used for monitor and/or control in a security/intrusion, fire alarm, or other appropriate system.
  • the devices report status information from their systems to a central monitoring service, which may include one or more host computing devices.
  • the central monitoring service may include one or more servers 103, in addition to other computing equipment.
  • the central monitoring service may also send control commands, which the devices use for configuration and/or control.
  • multiple mesh networks in the topology of FIG. 1.
  • Multiple mesh networks may occupy the same physical space, and devices therefor may overlap in that space.
  • Data packets for different mesh networks may be differentiated, e.g., by different network group identifiers (ID).
  • ID network group identifiers
  • Wireless mesh networks may be established by one or more prospective network devices initiating communication to one or more other prospective network devices.
  • a first prospective network device such as node 115
  • a second prospective network device (such as device 116 ) in that vicinity may respond and identify itself as a device that is available for connection to the first device. The two devices may then establish a connection through appropriate back-and-forth communications. This process, or other(s) like it, may be repeated either by both devices or by other devices until the mesh network is formed.
  • At least one of the devices is initially in communication with an access point, gateway or other wired connection to the central monitoring service, enabling connection between the wireless mesh network and the central monitoring service.
  • routing tables throughout the wireless network may be updated.
  • Devices may enter, e.g., become part of, a wireless mesh network in the manner described above, or using other appropriate protocol(s). Likewise, devices may also leave the wireless mesh network. For example, devices may be deactivated or lose power, causing the devices to leave the network. In some cases, loss of a single device may affect communication to one or more other devices on the network. For example, a single device may be the primary pathway over which communications to numerous other devices pass. As a result, loss of that device also interrupts that primary path, necessitating re-routing of communications through the wireless mesh network. This re-routing can affect the contents of routing tables in various network nodes, and may ⁇ be performed using the protocol described above.
  • a gateway 120 of FIG. 1 is configured to operate as an interface between a sensor network containing, e.g., functional (F) and sensor end nodes (C), and an external network containing, e.g., servers and other devices.
  • FIG. 2 shows an example implementation of gateway 120 operating as an interface.
  • a gateway 200 (which may be gateway 120 or any other gateway in network 100) provides an interface between two networks (e.g., upper tier 101 and lower tier 108 of FIG. 1).
  • gateway 200 enables devices on one network 202 (e.g., lower tier 108) to communicate with devices on a second, external (e.g., IP-based) network 204 (e.g., upper tier 101) by converting data packets formatted for one network into data packets formatted for the other network.
  • Gateway 200 may be implemented using any appropriate hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software.
  • network 202 is a wireless mesh network, as described above, and the external network 204 is an IPv4-based network, such as the Internet.
  • IPv4 is a protocol/address suite currently in use for both internal intranets and the Internet.
  • the example gateway and processes described herein may be used with other types of networks or combinations of networ ks.
  • gateway 200 is configured to perform the operations of process 300 to route data packets between network 202 and external network 204.
  • gateway 200 obtains (e.g., acquires or is assigned) short address(s) of devices on network 202 (referred to herein as a "sensor network" because the network includes networked sensor devices (e.g., C of FIG. 1) in this example implementation).
  • a short address is a 2 -byte/16-bit address that is randomly assigned in a single wired/wireless network to allow nodes to communicate with each other.
  • Short, addresses are typically logically linked to long network addresses (e.g., a 64-bit address or a 128-bit address used for full addressing), and are used for data compression.
  • gateway 200 acquires the short address by receiving (301) a packet from a node 206 on the sensor network.
  • This received packet may be in the UDPv6 (User Datagram Protocol version 6) protocol; however, different protocol(s) may be used.
  • UDPv6 User Datagram Protocol version 6
  • UDPv6 is a packet protocol used for
  • IPv6 is a protocol/address suite that is proposed to replace IPv4 to address issues arising from large numbers of nodes on a network.
  • IPv6 replaces 32-bit IPv4 addresses with 128-bit addresses.
  • the packet that gateway 200 receives contains node 206's short address in the packet's mesh header.
  • Gateway 200 extracts (302) this short address from the packet's mesh header and stores (303) the short address in memory in association with an identifier, such as a random unique (e.g., 16-bit) number. Any appropriate identifier may be used.
  • gateway 200 if information about the source (node 206) is not already contained in memory, gateway 200 generates the identifier for the node and saves the identifier along with the source information from sensor network. If information about the source is already contained in memory, gateway 200 obtains the identifier from that information, and uses the identifier for storage.
  • gateway 200 Using the received packet from the sensor network, gateway 200 generates
  • this second packet has an IPv4 protocol header; however, different types of headers may be used in other implementations.
  • the type of header used depends on the protocol used on the external network.
  • This second packet includes a source address that corresponds to (e.g., is) the gateway's network address and a destination address on the external network (e.g., the address of device 208).
  • Gateway 200 obtains the destination address using a function that may be implemented by, or accessed by, the gateway.
  • the function may be a computer program running on the gateway (e.g., as part of routing table 210), on a host computer at the central service, or on any other appropriate processing device.
  • the function is referenced by (e.g., associated with) the incoming short address/port number contained in the received packet (e.g., the packet received from node 206 on the sensor network).
  • the port number is a 2-byte number used in UDPv4 and UDPv6 to divide packets by function/application.
  • the source port number of the second packet is set to a previously generated looked-up number.
  • Gateway 200 sends (305) the second packet out over the external network (e.g., the Internet) on the path to its destination.
  • the external network e.g., the Internet
  • gateway 200 listens (306) for a reply on a port corresponding to (e.g., equal to) the source port number.
  • gateway 200 receives (307) a packet (in this example implementation, a UDPv4 packet) on that port from external network 204 (e.g., the Internet), gateway 200 removes (308) the UDP/IP headers from the received packet.
  • Gateway 200 also obtains (309) original source data for the packet from local memory using a port number in the received packet as a key.
  • Gateway 200 generates (310) a compressed packet (in this example implementation, a UDPv6 compressed packet) using the original short address/port of nod e 206 as a destination and the address of gateway 200 as the source. That packet is then sent (311) out on the sensor network.
  • Gateway 200 listens (312) on that same port for a reply. The foregoing operations can be repeated.
  • IPv4 protocol the IPv6 protocol
  • UDPv4 protocol the UDPv6 protocol
  • UDPv6 the UDPv6 protocol
  • Devices in the sensor network may include, but are not limited to, sensors comprising, associated with, or that contain computing devices, such as those described herein, central processing units (CPUs), microeiectromechanicai (MEMs) devices, or the like.
  • CPUs central processing units
  • MEMs microeiectromechanicai
  • the processes presented herein are described in the context of communications between a wireless mesh network (e.g., FIGS. 1 and 2) and an IP- based network, the processes may be used for communication between any two appropriate networks.
  • the processes may be used for communication between a wired controller network, e.g., (a Control Area Network (C AN), a Local Interconnect Network (LIN), or the like), and an IP-based or non-IP-based network.
  • a wired controller network e.g., (a Control Area Network (C AN), a Local Interconnect Network (LIN), or the like
  • IP-based or non-IP-based network e.g., IP-based or non-IP-based network.
  • Gateway 200 may include one or more computing devices that include, or have access to, non-transitory machine-readable storage, such as volatile and non-volatile computer memory, e.g., RAM, (not shown), storing executable instructions. Gateway 200 may also include one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors, programmable logic, application-specific integrated circuits, and so forth) to execute the instructions to implement the gateway functionality described herein. In some examples, gateway 200 may be implemented on a dedicated device, whereas in other implementations, gateway 200 may be implemented on a network device having additional or other functionality.
  • non-transitory machine-readable storage such as volatile and non-volatile computer memory, e.g., RAM, (not shown), storing executable instructions.
  • Gateway 200 may also include one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors, programmable logic, application-specific integrated circuits, and so forth) to execute the instructions to implement the gateway functionality described herein.
  • processing devices e.g., microprocessors,
  • An example, non-limiting application of the WSN of FIGS. 1 to 3 is in a security system for intrusion detection, fire, toxic gas, monitor, etc. installed at one or more premises such as one or more residential houses or building(s) and especially in, e.g., commercial, industrial, buildings, complexes, etc.
  • an intrusion detection panel is included, whereas in others more sophisticated management systems are included. Sensors/detectors may be disbursed throughout the premises.
  • the intrusion detection system may be in communication with a central monitoring station (also referred to as central monitoring centerjvia one or more data or communication networks(only one shown), such as the Internet; the phone system, or cel lular communication system.
  • the intrusion detection panel may be configured to receive signals from plural detectors/sensors that send, to the intrusion detection panel, information about the status of the monitored premises.
  • sensor/detectors unless otherwise noted are used interchangeably herein
  • One type of detector is a detector that sends a binary signal that indicates presence or absence of an event. Examples of these types of detectors include glass break detectors and contact switches.
  • Another type of detector is a detector sends metadata that includes data resulting from processing applied by the detector to inputs received by the sensor. Examples of these types of detectors may include microphones, motion detectors, smart switches and cameras, recognition devices and so forth.
  • the detectors 'sensors may be hard wired but in general the detectors communicate with systems wirelessly over the WSN, In general, detectors sense glass breakage, motion, gas leaks, fire, and/or breach of an entry point, and send the sensed information over the WSN, as needed and appropriate. Based on the information received from the detectors, the intrusion detection panel determines whether to trigger alarms, e.g., by triggering one or more sirens (not shown) at the premise and/or sending alarm messages to the monitoring station.
  • sirens not shown
  • the WSN may include any combination of wired and wireless links that are capable of carrying packet and/or switched traffic, may span multiple carriers and a wide geography, and hay have the features discussed above.
  • portions of WSN may include the Internet.
  • the WSN may include one or more wireless links, and may include a wireless data network, e.g., with tower such as a 2G, 3G, 4G or LTE cellular data network.
  • the panel may be in communication with the network by way of Ethernet switch or router (not illustrated).
  • the panel may include an Ethernet or similar interface, which may be wired or wireless. Further network components, such as access points, routers, switches, DSL modems, and the like possibly interconnecting the panel with the data network are not illustrated.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exampl e of a security sy stem having features of the WSN described with respect to FIGS. 1 to 3 and having the various functionalities described herein.
  • correlation processing receives inputs from certain constrained nodes (although these can also be fully functional nodes). These inputs may include credential information and video information, and the correlation processing may produce correlated results that are sent over the network.
  • Context management processing receives inputs from certain constrained nodes (although these can also be fully functional nodes) e.g., credential information and video and grouping information, and performs context processing with results sent over the network.
  • the network supports operation of emergency exit indicators; emergency cameras as well as distributed rule processing and rule engine/messaging processing.
  • Range extenders are used with e.g., gateways, and a real time location system receives inputs from various sensors (e.g., constrained type)as shown.
  • Servers interface to the WSN via a cloud computing configuration and parts of some networks can be run as sub-nets.
  • the sensors provide in addition to an indication that something is detected in an area within the range of the sensors, detailed additional information that can be used to evaluate what that indication may be without the intrusion detection panel being required to perform extensive analysis of inputs to the particular sensor.
  • a motion detector could be configured to analyze the heat signature of a warm body moving in a room to determine if the body is that of a human or a pet. Results of that analysis would be a message or data that conveys information about the body detected.
  • Various sensors thus are used to sense sound, motion, vibration, pressure, heat, images, and so forth, in an appropriate combination to detect a true or verified alarm condition at the intrusion detection panel.
  • Recognition software can be used to discriminate between objects that are a human and objects that are an animal; further facial recognition software can be built into video cameras and used to verify that the perimeter intrusion was the result of a recognized, authorized individual.
  • video cameras would comprise a processor and memory and the recognition software to process inputs (captured images) by the camera and produce the metadata to convey information regarding recognition or lack of recognition of an individual captured by the video camera.
  • the processing could also alternatively or in addition include information regarding characteristic of the individual in the area captured/monitored by the video camera.
  • the information would be either metadata received from enhanced motion detectors and video cameras that performed enhanced analysis on inputs to the sensor that gives characteristics of the perimeter intrusion or a metadata resulting from very complex processing that seeks to establish recognition of the object.
  • Sensor devices can integrate multiple sensors to generate more complex outputs so that the intrusion detection panel can utilize its processing capabilities to execute algorithms that analyze the environment by building virtual images or signatures of the environment to make an intelligent decision about the validity of a breach.
  • Memory stores program instructions and data used by the processor of the intrusion detection panel.
  • the memory may be a suitable combination of random access memory and read-only memory, and may host suitable program instructions (e.g. firmware or operating software), and configuration and operating data and may be organized as a file system or otherwise.
  • the stored program instruction may include one or more authentication processes for authenticating one or more users.
  • the program instructions stored in the memory of the panel may further store software components allowing network communications and establishment of connections to the data network.
  • the software components may, for example, include an internet protocol (IP) stack, as well as driver components for the various interfaces, including the interfaces and the keypad .Other software components suitable for establishing a connection and communicating across network will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
  • IP internet protocol
  • Program instructions stored in the memory, along with configuration data may control overall operation of the panel.
  • the monitoring server includes one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors), a network interface and a memory (all not il lustrated).
  • the monitoring server may physically take the form of a rack mounted card and may be in communication with one or more operator terminals (not shown).
  • An example monitoring server is a SURGARDTM SG-System III Virtual, or similar system.
  • each monitoring server acts as a controller for each monitoring server, and is in communication with, and controls overall operation, of each server.
  • the processor may include, or be in communication with, the memory that stores processor executable instructions controlling the overall operation of the monitoring server.
  • Suitable software enable each monitoring server to receive alarms and cause appropriate actions to occur.
  • Software may include a suitable Internet protocol (IP) stack and applications/clients.
  • IP Internet protocol
  • Each monitoring server of the central monitoring station may be associated with an IP address and port( s) by which it communicates with the control panels and/or the user devices to handle alarm events, etc.
  • the monitoring server address may be static, and thus alway s identify a particular one of monitoring server to the intnision detection panels.
  • dynamic addresses could be used, and associated with static domain names, resolved through a domain name service.
  • the network interface card interfaces with the network to receive incoming signals, and may for example take the form of an Ethernet network interface card (NIC).
  • NIC Ethernet network interface card
  • the servers may be computers, thin-clients, or the like, to which received data representative of an alarm event is passed for handling by human operators.
  • the monitoring station may further include, or have access to, a subscriber database that includes a database under control of a database engine.
  • the database may contain entries corresponding to the various subscriber devices/processes to panels like the panel that are serviced by the monitoring station.
  • a computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment.
  • a computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multi le computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
  • Actions associated with implementing the processes can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions of the calibration process. All or part of the processes can be
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer.
  • a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both.
  • Elements of a computer include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data.
  • a computer will also include, or be operativelv coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine -readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
  • Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, mcluding by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks;
  • magneto-optical disks and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)

Abstract

Disclosed are techniques for interfacing between first and second networks includes memory storing instructions that are executable and one or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform operations including extracting a short address of a node on a first network, the short address being extracted from a first data packet operating under a first protocol for the first network, the first network being a wireless mesh network, generating a second packet operating under a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a network address of the apparatus and a destination address corresponding to a device on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address, and outputting the second packet to the second network.

Description

CLAIM OF PRIORITY
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/973,962, filed on April 2, 2014, entitled: "Wireless Sensor Network", and provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/946,054, filed on February 28, 2014, entitled: "Wireless Sensor Network", and utility U.S. Patent Application 14/463,970, filed August 20, 2014, entitled: "Sensor Network Gateway", the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
SENSOR NETW RK GATEWAY BACKGROUND
This specification relates generally to gateways for sensor networks that may be used in the operation of systems, such as security or alarm systems.
Wireless sensor network / wireless device based data collection systems having remote server-based monitoring and report generation are used in applications such as home safety monitoring, electrical and water utility meter monitoring, and human and asset tracking. For example, it is common for businesses and homeowners to have a security system for detecting alarm conditions at their premises and for signaling conditions to a monitoring station or to authorized users of the security system. SUMMARY
According to an aspect, an apparatus for interfacing between first and second networks includes memory storing instructions that are executable and one or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform operations including extracting a short address of a node on a first network, the short address being extracted from a first data packet operating under a first protocol for the first network, the first network being a wireless mesh network, generating a second packet operating under a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a network address of the apparatus and a destination address corresponding to a device on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address, and outputting the second packet to the second network.
Aspects also include methods and computer program products.
Any two or more of the features described in this specification, including this summary section, may be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.
Ail or part of the foregoing may be implemented as a computer program product comprised of instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media or devices, and which are executable on one or more processing devices. All or part of the foregoing may be implemented as an apparatus, method, or network system that may include one or more processing devices and memory to store executable instructions to implement functionality.
The details of one or more examples are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Further features, aspects, and advantages will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example networked security system.
FIG.2 is a block diagram of an example gateway between two different networks.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an example process that may be performed by the gateway.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of components of an example networked security system. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Described herein are examples of network features that may be used in various contexts including, but not limited to, security/intrusion and alarm systems. Example security systems may include an intrusion detection panel that is electrically or wirelessly connected to a variety of sensors. Those sensors types may include motion detectors, cameras, and proximity sensors (used, e.g., to determine whether a door or window has been opened). Typically, such systems receive a very simple signal (electrically open or closed) from one or more of these sensors to indicate that a particular condition being monitored has changed or become unsecure.
For example, typical intrusion systems can be set-up to monitor entry doors in a building. When a door is secured, a proximity sensor senses a magnetic contact and produces an electrically closed circuit. When the door is opened, the proximity sensor opens the circuit, and sends a signal to the panel indicating that an alarm condition has occurred (e.g., an opened entry door).
Data collection systems are becoming more common in some applications, such as home safety monitoring, electrical and water utility meter monitoring, and human and asset tracking. Data collection systems employ wireless sensor networks and wireless devices, and may include remote server-based monitoring and report generation. As described in more detail below, wireless sensor networks generally use a combination of wired and wireless links between computing devices, with wireless links usually used for the lowest level connections (e.g., end-node device to
hub/gateway). In an example network, the edge (wirelessly-connected) tier of the network is comprised of resource-constrained devices with specific functions. These devices may have a small-to-moderate amount of processing power and memory, and may be battery powered, thus requiring that they conserve energy by spending much of their time in sleep mode. A typical model is one where the edge devices generally form a single wireless network in which each end-node communicates directly with its parent node in a hub-and-spoke-style architecture. The parent node may be, e.g., an access point on a gateway or a sub-coordinator which is, in turn, connected to the access point or another sub-coordinator.
FIG. 1 shows an example (global) distributed network topology 100 for an example Wireless Sensor Network (WSN). In this example network topology 100, upper tier 101 of the network may include traditional servers 103 and/or virtual servers running in a "cloud computing" environment and networked using appropriate networking technologies such as Internet connections or which can be private networks that use none or part of the Internet. Applications running on those servers may communicate using XML/SOAP, ESTful web sendee, and/or other appropriate application layer technologies such as HTTP and ATOM. In example network topology 100, middle tier 104 may include gateways 105 located at central, convenient places inside individual buildings and structures. Such gateways may communicate with the upper tier servers and cloud applications using web programming techniques or other appropriate technologies. These gateways 105 communicate with servers 103 in the upper tier whether the servers are stand-alone dedicated servers and/or cloud based servers running cloud applications using web programming techniques. The middle tier gateways 105 are also shown with both local area network (e.g., Ethernet or 802.11) and cellular network interfaces .
In example network topology 100, lower tier (edge layer) 108 may include fully-functional sensor nodes 110 (wireless devices, marked in FIG. 1 with "F") and constrained wireless sensor nodes or sensor end nodes. These end nodes include constrained devices 111 (marked in the FIG. 1 with "C").
Constrained computing devices 11 ! as used herein are devices with
substantially less persistent and volatile memory than other computing devices, examples of which include sensors in a detection system. Currently, examples of constrained devices would be those with less than about a megabyte of flash'persistent memory, and less than 10-20 kilobytes (KB) of RAM/volatile memory). These constrained devices 111 are configured in this manner; generally due to cost/physical configuration considerations.
In some implementations, each gateway may be equipped with an access point
(fully functional node or "F" node) physically attached thereto, which provides a wireless connection point to the other nodes in the wireless network. In example network topology 100, the communication links (illustrated by lines 113) shown in FIG. 1 are direct (single-hop network layer) connections between devices. A formal networking layer (that may function in each of the three tiers shown in FIG. 1) can use a series of these links, together with appropriate routing technology, to send messages (fragmented or unfragmented) from one device to another, over a physical distance. In other network topologies, each link may represent two or more hops and/or the configuration may be different than shown in Fig 1.
In this example implementation, the WSN state function-based application layer uses an edge device operating system (not shown, but such as disclosed in the above mentioned provisional applications) that allows for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) without rebooting the device (so-called "dynamic programming"). In other implementations, edge devices could use other operating systems provided such systems allow for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) preferable without rebooting of the edge devices.
Example distributed network topology 100 may include or be part of a wireless mesh network. In some implementations, all of distributed network topology 100 is implemented wireless mesh technology. In some implementations, only part of distributed network topology 100 is implemented using wireless mesh technology. For example, in FIG. 1 , in some implementations, upper tier 101 may be implemented using standard network technology, and middle tier 104 and lower tier 108 may be implemented as one or more wireless mesh networks. In some implementations, upper tier 101 and middle tier 104 may be implemented using standard network technology, and lower tier 108 may be implemented using one or more wireless mesh networks. For example, a different wireless mesh network may be associated with each gateway, or a single wireless mesh network may include all of the gateways shown in FIG. 1 (and others), as well as all or some functional and sensor nodes.
In some implementations, wireless mesh network includes a self-organizing wireless network, in which the network devices themselves establish communication links with one another. In the example implementations described herein, a wireless mesh network may be established between sensor, functional and/or gateway devices that are part of a larger building, or enterprise- wide system. In examples, such devices may be used for monitor and/or control in a security/intrusion, fire alarm, or other appropriate system. The devices report status information from their systems to a central monitoring service, which may include one or more host computing devices. For example, the central monitoring service may include one or more servers 103, in addition to other computing equipment. The central monitoring service may also send control commands, which the devices use for configuration and/or control.
As noted above, there may be multiple mesh networks in the topology of FIG. 1. Multiple mesh networks may occupy the same physical space, and devices therefor may overlap in that space. Data packets for different mesh networks may be differentiated, e.g., by different network group identifiers (ID). Thus, the networks remain logically separate even though they occupy the same physical space.
Wireless mesh networks may be established by one or more prospective network devices initiating communication to one or more other prospective network devices. For example, a first prospective network device (such as node 115) may output a packet identifying the first device (node 115) and in an attempt to locate other devices within the F vicinity of the first device (node 115), with which the first prospective network device may connect. A second prospective network device (such as device 116 ) in that vicinity may respond and identify itself as a device that is available for connection to the first device. The two devices may then establish a connection through appropriate back-and-forth communications. This process, or other(s) like it, may be repeated either by both devices or by other devices until the mesh network is formed. In some implementations, at least one of the devices is initially in communication with an access point, gateway or other wired connection to the central monitoring service, enabling connection between the wireless mesh network and the central monitoring service. Upon connection to the wireless network, routing tables throughout the wireless network may be updated.
Devices may enter, e.g., become part of, a wireless mesh network in the manner described above, or using other appropriate protocol(s). Likewise, devices may also leave the wireless mesh network. For example, devices may be deactivated or lose power, causing the devices to leave the network. In some cases, loss of a single device may affect communication to one or more other devices on the network. For example, a single device may be the primary pathway over which communications to numerous other devices pass. As a result, loss of that device also interrupts that primary path, necessitating re-routing of communications through the wireless mesh network. This re-routing can affect the contents of routing tables in various network nodes, and may¬ be performed using the protocol described above.
In an example implementation, a gateway 120 of FIG. 1 is configured to operate as an interface between a sensor network containing, e.g., functional (F) and sensor end nodes (C), and an external network containing, e.g., servers and other devices. FIG. 2 shows an example implementation of gateway 120 operating as an interface. Referring to FIG. 2, a gateway 200 (which may be gateway 120 or any other gateway in network 100) provides an interface between two networks (e.g., upper tier 101 and lower tier 108 of FIG. 1). In the example implementations described herein, gateway 200 enables devices on one network 202 (e.g., lower tier 108) to communicate with devices on a second, external (e.g., IP-based) network 204 (e.g., upper tier 101) by converting data packets formatted for one network into data packets formatted for the other network. Gateway 200 may be implemented using any appropriate hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software.
In an example implementation, network 202 is a wireless mesh network, as described above, and the external network 204 is an IPv4-based network, such as the Internet. Generally, IPv4 is a protocol/address suite currently in use for both internal intranets and the Internet. However, the example gateway and processes described herein may be used with other types of networks or combinations of networ ks.
Referring also to FIG. 3, gateway 200 is configured to perform the operations of process 300 to route data packets between network 202 and external network 204. As described below, gateway 200 obtains (e.g., acquires or is assigned) short address(s) of devices on network 202 (referred to herein as a "sensor network" because the network includes networked sensor devices (e.g., C of FIG. 1) in this example implementation). As noted above, in some implementations, a short address is a 2 -byte/16-bit address that is randomly assigned in a single wired/wireless network to allow nodes to communicate with each other. Short, addresses are typically logically linked to long network addresses (e.g., a 64-bit address or a 128-bit address used for full addressing), and are used for data compression.
In some example implementations, gateway 200 acquires the short address by receiving (301) a packet from a node 206 on the sensor network. This received packet may be in the UDPv6 (User Datagram Protocol version 6) protocol; however, different protocol(s) may be used. Generally, UDPv6 is a packet protocol used for
communication between IPv6 devices on the Internet (a similar UDPv4 protocol is in place for IPv4 devices on the Internet). Generally, IPv6 is a protocol/address suite that is proposed to replace IPv4 to address issues arising from large numbers of nodes on a network. Among other things, IPv6 replaces 32-bit IPv4 addresses with 128-bit addresses. The packet that gateway 200 receives contains node 206's short address in the packet's mesh header. Gateway 200 extracts (302) this short address from the packet's mesh header and stores (303) the short address in memory in association with an identifier, such as a random unique (e.g., 16-bit) number. Any appropriate identifier may be used. In this regard, if information about the source (node 206) is not already contained in memory, gateway 200 generates the identifier for the node and saves the identifier along with the source information from sensor network. If information about the source is already contained in memory, gateway 200 obtains the identifier from that information, and uses the identifier for storage.
Using the received packet from the sensor network, gateway 200 generates
(304) a second, different packet for transmission over the external network. In some implementations, this second packet has an IPv4 protocol header; however, different types of headers may be used in other implementations. The type of header used depends on the protocol used on the external network.
This second packet includes a source address that corresponds to (e.g., is) the gateway's network address and a destination address on the external network (e.g., the address of device 208). Gateway 200 obtains the destination address using a function that may be implemented by, or accessed by, the gateway. For example, the function may be a computer program running on the gateway (e.g., as part of routing table 210), on a host computer at the central service, or on any other appropriate processing device. The function is referenced by (e.g., associated with) the incoming short address/port number contained in the received packet (e.g., the packet received from node 206 on the sensor network). In some implementations, the port number is a 2-byte number used in UDPv4 and UDPv6 to divide packets by function/application. The source port number of the second packet is set to a previously generated looked-up number.
Gateway 200 sends (305) the second packet out over the external network (e.g., the Internet) on the path to its destination.
After the second packet is sent, gateway 200 listens (306) for a reply on a port corresponding to (e.g., equal to) the source port number. When the gateway 200 receives (307) a packet (in this example implementation, a UDPv4 packet) on that port from external network 204 (e.g., the Internet), gateway 200 removes (308) the UDP/IP headers from the received packet. Gateway 200 also obtains (309) original source data for the packet from local memory using a port number in the received packet as a key. Gateway 200 generates (310) a compressed packet (in this example implementation, a UDPv6 compressed packet) using the original short address/port of nod e 206 as a destination and the address of gateway 200 as the source. That packet is then sent (311) out on the sensor network. Gateway 200 then listens (312) on that same port for a reply. The foregoing operations can be repeated.
The example implementations described herein use the IPv4 protocol, the IPv6 protocol, the UDPv4 protocol, and the UDPv6. In other implementations, different protocols or different combinations of these protocols with other protocols may be used.
Devices (e.g., nodes) in the sensor network may include, but are not limited to, sensors comprising, associated with, or that contain computing devices, such as those described herein, central processing units (CPUs), microeiectromechanicai (MEMs) devices, or the like.
Although the processes presented herein are described in the context of communications between a wireless mesh network (e.g., FIGS. 1 and 2) and an IP- based network, the processes may be used for communication between any two appropriate networks. For example, the processes may be used for communication between a wired controller network, e.g., (a Control Area Network (C AN), a Local Interconnect Network (LIN), or the like), and an IP-based or non-IP-based network.
Gateway 200 may include one or more computing devices that include, or have access to, non-transitory machine-readable storage, such as volatile and non-volatile computer memory, e.g., RAM, (not shown), storing executable instructions. Gateway 200 may also include one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors, programmable logic, application-specific integrated circuits, and so forth) to execute the instructions to implement the gateway functionality described herein. In some examples, gateway 200 may be implemented on a dedicated device, whereas in other implementations, gateway 200 may be implemented on a network device having additional or other functionality.
An example, non- limiting application of the WSN of FIGS. 1 to 3 is in a security system for intrusion detection, fire, toxic gas, monitor, etc. installed at one or more premises such as one or more residential houses or building(s) and especially in, e.g., commercial, industrial, buildings, complexes, etc.
In some typical intrusion detection system implementations, an intrusion detection panel is included, whereas in others more sophisticated management systems are included. Sensors/detectors may be disbursed throughout the premises. The intrusion detection system may be in communication with a central monitoring station (also referred to as central monitoring centerjvia one or more data or communication networks(only one shown), such as the Internet; the phone system, or cel lular communication system.
The intrusion detection panel may be configured to receive signals from plural detectors/sensors that send, to the intrusion detection panel, information about the status of the monitored premises. Several types of sensor/detectors (unless otherwise noted are used interchangeably herein)may be used. One type of detector is a detector that sends a binary signal that indicates presence or absence of an event. Examples of these types of detectors include glass break detectors and contact switches. Another type of detector is a detector sends metadata that includes data resulting from processing applied by the detector to inputs received by the sensor. Examples of these types of detectors may include microphones, motion detectors, smart switches and cameras, recognition devices and so forth.
Some of the detectors 'sensors may be hard wired but in general the detectors communicate with systems wirelessly over the WSN, In general, detectors sense glass breakage, motion, gas leaks, fire, and/or breach of an entry point, and send the sensed information over the WSN, as needed and appropriate. Based on the information received from the detectors, the intrusion detection panel determines whether to trigger alarms, e.g., by triggering one or more sirens (not shown) at the premise and/or sending alarm messages to the monitoring station.
As described above with respect to Figs. 1 to 3, the WSN may include any combination of wired and wireless links that are capable of carrying packet and/or switched traffic, may span multiple carriers and a wide geography, and hay have the features discussed above. In an example implementation, portions of WSN may include the Internet. In another implementation, the WSN may include one or more wireless links, and may include a wireless data network, e.g., with tower such as a 2G, 3G, 4G or LTE cellular data network. The panel may be in communication with the network by way of Ethernet switch or router (not illustrated). The panel may include an Ethernet or similar interface, which may be wired or wireless. Further network components, such as access points, routers, switches, DSL modems, and the like possibly interconnecting the panel with the data network are not illustrated.
FIG. 4 shows an exampl e of a security sy stem having features of the WSN described with respect to FIGS. 1 to 3 and having the various functionalities described herein. As shown in FIG. 4, correlation processing receives inputs from certain constrained nodes (although these can also be fully functional nodes). These inputs may include credential information and video information, and the correlation processing may produce correlated results that are sent over the network. Context management processing receives inputs from certain constrained nodes (although these can also be fully functional nodes) e.g., credential information and video and grouping information, and performs context processing with results sent over the network. The network supports operation of emergency exit indicators; emergency cameras as well as distributed rule processing and rule engine/messaging processing. Range extenders are used with e.g., gateways, and a real time location system receives inputs from various sensors (e.g., constrained type)as shown. Servers interface to the WSN via a cloud computing configuration and parts of some networks can be run as sub-nets.
The sensors provide in addition to an indication that something is detected in an area within the range of the sensors, detailed additional information that can be used to evaluate what that indication may be without the intrusion detection panel being required to perform extensive analysis of inputs to the particular sensor.
For example, a motion detector could be configured to analyze the heat signature of a warm body moving in a room to determine if the body is that of a human or a pet. Results of that analysis would be a message or data that conveys information about the body detected. Various sensors thus are used to sense sound, motion, vibration, pressure, heat, images, and so forth, in an appropriate combination to detect a true or verified alarm condition at the intrusion detection panel.
Recognition software can be used to discriminate between objects that are a human and objects that are an animal; further facial recognition software can be built into video cameras and used to verify that the perimeter intrusion was the result of a recognized, authorized individual. Such video cameras would comprise a processor and memory and the recognition software to process inputs (captured images) by the camera and produce the metadata to convey information regarding recognition or lack of recognition of an individual captured by the video camera. The processing could also alternatively or in addition include information regarding characteristic of the individual in the area captured/monitored by the video camera. Thus, depending on the circumstances, the information would be either metadata received from enhanced motion detectors and video cameras that performed enhanced analysis on inputs to the sensor that gives characteristics of the perimeter intrusion or a metadata resulting from very complex processing that seeks to establish recognition of the object.
Sensor devices can integrate multiple sensors to generate more complex outputs so that the intrusion detection panel can utilize its processing capabilities to execute algorithms that analyze the environment by building virtual images or signatures of the environment to make an intelligent decision about the validity of a breach.
Memory stores program instructions and data used by the processor of the intrusion detection panel. The memory may be a suitable combination of random access memory and read-only memory, and may host suitable program instructions (e.g. firmware or operating software), and configuration and operating data and may be organized as a file system or otherwise. The stored program instruction may include one or more authentication processes for authenticating one or more users. The program instructions stored in the memory of the panel may further store software components allowing network communications and establishment of connections to the data network. The software components may, for example, include an internet protocol (IP) stack, as well as driver components for the various interfaces, including the interfaces and the keypad .Other software components suitable for establishing a connection and communicating across network will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
Program instructions stored in the memory, along with configuration data may control overall operation of the panel.
The monitoring server includes one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors), a network interface and a memory (all not il lustrated). The monitoring server may physically take the form of a rack mounted card and may be in communication with one or more operator terminals (not shown). An example monitoring server is a SURGARD™ SG-System III Virtual, or similar system.
The processor of each monitoring server acts as a controller for each monitoring server, and is in communication with, and controls overall operation, of each server. The processor may include, or be in communication with, the memory that stores processor executable instructions controlling the overall operation of the monitoring server. Suitable software enable each monitoring server to receive alarms and cause appropriate actions to occur. Software may include a suitable Internet protocol (IP) stack and applications/clients.
Each monitoring server of the central monitoring station may be associated with an IP address and port( s) by which it communicates with the control panels and/or the user devices to handle alarm events, etc. The monitoring server address may be static, and thus alway s identify a particular one of monitoring server to the intnision detection panels. Alternatively, dynamic addresses could be used, and associated with static domain names, resolved through a domain name service.
The network interface card interfaces with the network to receive incoming signals, and may for example take the form of an Ethernet network interface card (NIC). The servers may be computers, thin-clients, or the like, to which received data representative of an alarm event is passed for handling by human operators. The monitoring station may further include, or have access to, a subscriber database that includes a database under control of a database engine. The database may contain entries corresponding to the various subscriber devices/processes to panels like the panel that are serviced by the monitoring station.
All or part of the processes described h erein and their various modifications (hereinafter referred to as "the processes") can be implemented, at least in part, via a computer program product, i.e., a computer program tangibly embodied in one or more tangible, non-transitor}' machine-readable storage media for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers
A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multi le computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing the processes can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions of the calibration process. All or part of the processes can be
implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operativelv coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine -readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. Machine-readable storage media suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage area, mcluding by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks;
magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks.
In addition, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In addition, other actions may be provided, or actions may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Likewise, actions depicted in the figures may be performed by different entities or consolidated.
Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the processes, computer programs, etc. described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein. Other implementations not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for interfacing between first and second networks, comprising: memory storing instructions that are executable; and
one or more processing devices to execute the instructions to perform operations comprising:
extracting a short address of a node on a first network, the short address being extracted from a first data packet operating under a first protocol for the first network, the first network being a wireless mesh network;
generating a second packet operating under a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a networ k address of the apparatus and a destination address corresponding to a device on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address; and
outputting the second packet to the second network.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second packet is output over a port of the apparatus and the operations further comprise:
storing, in memory, information about the node;
receiving, on the port, a data packet from the second network;
retrieving the information about the node from memory;
generating a third packet having the first protocol based on the information retrieved; and
outputting the third packet over the first network.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the operations comprise:
listening on the port for a reply to the second packet, the data packet received on the port corresponding to the reply.
4. The apparatus of clai 2, wherein generating the third packet comprises addressing the third packet using original source data for the first data packet.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein generating the third packet comprises addressing the third packet using the short address,
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first network is a sensor network and the second network is an Internet Protocol (IP)-based network.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein generating the second packet comprises: identifying a function based on the short address; and
using the function to obtain the destination address.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second network is an Internet Protocol (IP) network.
9. One or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media storing instructions that are executable to perform operations comprising:
obtaining a short address of a node on a first network, the short ad dress being obtained from a first data packet having a first protocol for the first network, the first network being a wireless mesh network;
generating a second packet having a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a network address of the one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media and a destination address corresponding to a device on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address; and
outputting the second packet to the second network.
10. The one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media of claim 9, wherein the second packet is output over a port of the one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media; and
wherein the operations further comprise:
storing, in memory, information about the node;
receiving, on the port, a data packet from the second network; retrieving the information about the node from memory;
generating a third packet having the first protocol based on the information retrieved; and
outputting the third packet over the first network.
1 1 . The one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the operations comprise:
listening on the port for a reply to the second packet, the data packet received on the port corresponding to the reply.
12. The one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein generating the third packet comprises addressing the third packet using original source data for the first data packet .
13. The one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media of claim 12, wherein generating the third packet comprises addressing the third packet using the short address.
14. The one or more non-transitory machine-readable storage media of claim 9, wherein the second network is an Internet Protocol (IP)-based network.
15. A etwork comprisi g :
sensor devices arranged in a wireless mesh network that supports a first protocol;
one or more servers on a second network that supports a second protocol; and a gateway device to interface between the sensor devices and the one or more servers, the gateway device comprising one or more processing devices and non- transitory machine -readable storage storing instructions that are executable to perform operations comprising:
obtaining a short address of a sensor on the wireless mesh network, the short address being obtained from a first data packet having a first protocol for the wireless mesh network, the first network being a wireless mesh network; generating a second packet having a second protocol for the second network, the second packet having a source address corresponding to a network address of the sensor and a destination address corresponding to a server on the second network, the destination address being obtained using the short address; and
outputting the second packet to the second network.
PCT/US2015/017470 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway WO2015130752A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201580013943.0A CN106465416A (en) 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway
EP15755293.6A EP3111712A4 (en) 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway
JP2016554654A JP2017512022A (en) 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway
KR1020167026932A KR20170020309A (en) 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201461946054P 2014-02-28 2014-02-28
US61/946,054 2014-02-28
US201461973962P 2014-04-02 2014-04-02
US61/973,962 2014-04-02
US14/463,970 US20150288604A1 (en) 2014-04-02 2014-08-20 Sensor Network Gateway
US14/463,970 2014-08-20

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015130752A1 true WO2015130752A1 (en) 2015-09-03

Family

ID=54009566

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2015/017470 WO2015130752A1 (en) 2014-02-28 2015-02-25 Sensor network gateway

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015130752A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018125989A3 (en) * 2016-12-30 2018-08-23 Intel Corporation Naming and blockchain recording for the internet of things
CN110463146A (en) * 2017-03-14 2019-11-15 弗劳恩霍夫应用研究促进协会 Transmitter for transmitting signals and receiver for receiving signal
US11861343B2 (en) 2016-09-28 2024-01-02 Mcafee, Llc Systems, apparatus, and methods for updating a programmable device using a distributed ledger

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080056261A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Zigbee/IP Gateway
US20100061272A1 (en) * 2008-09-04 2010-03-11 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing mesh network communications using a mesh network protocol
US20120082062A1 (en) * 2009-06-10 2012-04-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Advanced commissioning of wireless network systems
US20120124367A1 (en) * 2010-11-15 2012-05-17 Trilliant Holdings Inc. System and Method for Securely Communicating Across Multiple Networks Using a Single Radio
US20130086195A1 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-04-04 Siemens Industry, Inc. DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ENABLING BACnet COMMUNICATION FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS DEVICES OPERABLE WITHIN A BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM
CN203057531U (en) * 2012-09-05 2013-07-10 江南大学 A Multi-Gateway Transmission System Based on ZigBee Network

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080056261A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Zigbee/IP Gateway
US20100061272A1 (en) * 2008-09-04 2010-03-11 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing mesh network communications using a mesh network protocol
US20120082062A1 (en) * 2009-06-10 2012-04-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Advanced commissioning of wireless network systems
US20120124367A1 (en) * 2010-11-15 2012-05-17 Trilliant Holdings Inc. System and Method for Securely Communicating Across Multiple Networks Using a Single Radio
US20130086195A1 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-04-04 Siemens Industry, Inc. DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ENABLING BACnet COMMUNICATION FOR WIRED AND WIRELESS DEVICES OPERABLE WITHIN A BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEM
CN203057531U (en) * 2012-09-05 2013-07-10 江南大学 A Multi-Gateway Transmission System Based on ZigBee Network

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3111712A4 *

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11861343B2 (en) 2016-09-28 2024-01-02 Mcafee, Llc Systems, apparatus, and methods for updating a programmable device using a distributed ledger
US11296935B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2022-04-05 Intel Corporation Service provision to IoT devices
US11902090B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2024-02-13 Intel Corporation Data packaging protocols for communications between IoT devices
US11108627B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2021-08-31 Intel Corporation Object identification for groups of IoT devices
US11128528B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2021-09-21 Intel Corporation Decentralized data storage and processing for IoT devices
US11196623B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2021-12-07 Intel Corporation Data packaging protocols for communications between IoT devices
US12218795B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2025-02-04 Intel Corporation Internet of things
US11290324B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2022-03-29 Intel Corporation Blockchains for securing IoT devices
WO2018125989A3 (en) * 2016-12-30 2018-08-23 Intel Corporation Naming and blockchain recording for the internet of things
US12132609B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2024-10-29 Intel Corporation Blockchains for securing IoT devices
US11431561B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2022-08-30 Intel Corporation Internet of things
US11296937B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2022-04-05 Intel Corporation Decentralized data storage and processing for IoT devices
US11770296B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2023-09-26 Intel Corporation Decentralized data storage and processing for IoT devices
US11916730B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2024-02-27 Intel Corporation Service provision to IoT devices
US11637746B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2023-04-25 Intel Corporation Object identification for groups of IoT devices
CN110463146A (en) * 2017-03-14 2019-11-15 弗劳恩霍夫应用研究促进协会 Transmitter for transmitting signals and receiver for receiving signal
US11089472B2 (en) 2017-03-14 2021-08-10 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Transmitter for emitting signals and receiver for receiving signals
CN110463146B (en) * 2017-03-14 2022-03-15 弗劳恩霍夫应用研究促进协会 Transmitter for transmitting signals and receiver for receiving signals

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20150288604A1 (en) Sensor Network Gateway
EP3111712A1 (en) Sensor network gateway
US10050865B2 (en) Maintaining routing information
US10878323B2 (en) Rules engine combined with message routing
CN105721457A (en) Network security defense system and network security defense method based on dynamic transformation
WO2015130752A1 (en) Sensor network gateway
EP3910906A1 (en) Communication security apparatus, control method, and storage medium storing a program
CN107547546B (en) Lightweight high-interaction honeynet data transmission method and system based on card computer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 15755293

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016554654

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2015755293

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2015755293

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20167026932

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A