[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2015095766A2 - Nouveaux anticorps anti-lingo1 et méthodes d'utilisation - Google Patents

Nouveaux anticorps anti-lingo1 et méthodes d'utilisation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015095766A2
WO2015095766A2 PCT/US2014/071614 US2014071614W WO2015095766A2 WO 2015095766 A2 WO2015095766 A2 WO 2015095766A2 US 2014071614 W US2014071614 W US 2014071614W WO 2015095766 A2 WO2015095766 A2 WO 2015095766A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
seq
antibody
antibodies
ling01
cancer
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2014/071614
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2015095766A3 (fr
Inventor
Deepti ROKKAM
Marianne Santaguida
Original Assignee
Stem Centrx, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stem Centrx, Inc. filed Critical Stem Centrx, Inc.
Publication of WO2015095766A2 publication Critical patent/WO2015095766A2/fr
Publication of WO2015095766A3 publication Critical patent/WO2015095766A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/574—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for cancer
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/68—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment
    • A61K47/6835—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment the modifying agent being an antibody or an immunoglobulin bearing at least one antigen-binding site
    • A61K47/6851—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being an antibody, an immunoglobulin or a fragment thereof, e.g. an Fc-fragment the modifying agent being an antibody or an immunoglobulin bearing at least one antigen-binding site the antibody targeting a determinant of a tumour cell
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/2803—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants against the immunoglobulin superfamily
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/30—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants from tumour cells
    • C07K16/3015—Breast
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K16/00—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies
    • C07K16/18—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans
    • C07K16/28—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants
    • C07K16/30—Immunoglobulins [IGs], e.g. monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against material from animals or humans against receptors, cell surface antigens or cell surface determinants from tumour cells
    • C07K16/3069—Reproductive system, e.g. ovaria, uterus, testes, prostate
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/20—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin
    • C07K2317/24—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by taxonomic origin containing regions, domains or residues from different species, e.g. chimeric, humanized or veneered
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/50—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/52—Constant or Fc region; Isotype
    • C07K2317/53—Hinge
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/50—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by immunoglobulin fragments
    • C07K2317/55—Fab or Fab'
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/70—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by effect upon binding to a cell or to an antigen
    • C07K2317/77—Internalization into the cell
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K2317/00—Immunoglobulins specific features
    • C07K2317/90—Immunoglobulins specific features characterized by (pharmaco)kinetic aspects or by stability of the immunoglobulin
    • C07K2317/92—Affinity (KD), association rate (Ka), dissociation rate (Kd) or EC50 value

Definitions

  • This application generally relates to novel anti-LING01 antibodies or immunoreactive fragments thereof and compositions, including antibody drug conjugates, comprising the same for the treatment, diagnosis or prophylaxis of cancer and any recurrence or metastasis thereof.
  • Selected embodiments of the invention provide for the use of such anti-LING01 antibodies or antibody drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer comprising a reduction in tumorigenic cell frequency.
  • Differentiation and proliferation of stem cells and progenitor cells are normal ongoing processes that act in concert to support tissue growth during organogenesis, cell repair and cell replacement.
  • the system is tightly regulated to ensure that only appropriate signals are generated based on the needs of the organism.
  • Cell proliferation and differentiation normally occur only as necessary for the replacement of damaged or dying cells or for growth.
  • disruption of these processes can be triggered by many factors including the under- or overabundance of various signaling chemicals, the presence of altered microenvironments, genetic mutations or a combination thereof.
  • Disruption of normal cellular proliferation and/or differentiation can lead to various disorders including proliferative diseases such as cancer.
  • the invention is broadly directed to antibodies and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) that bind to LING01 proteins.
  • the invention comprises an isolated antibody that binds to tumor initiating cells expressing LING01.
  • the isolated antibody of the invention binds specifically to LING01 and competes for binding with an antibody that binds to the LRRNT, LRR1 and/or LRR2 domain(s) of LING01.
  • such isolated antibodies bind to the LRRNT, LRR1 and/or LRR2 domain(s) of LING01 , where LING01 is expressed on a cancer stem cell.
  • Any of the anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention may be internalizing antibodies and may be chimeric, CDR grafted, humanized or recombinant antibody, or a fragment thereof.
  • the isolated antibody of the invention binds to LING01 and competes for binding with an antibody comprising: a light chain variable region (VL) of SEQ ID NO: 21 and a heavy chain variable region (VH) of SEQ ID NO: 23; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 25 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 27; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 29 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 31 ; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 33 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 35; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 37 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 39; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 41 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 43; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 45 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 47; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 49 and a VH of SEQ ID NO: 51 ; or a VL of SEQ ID NO: 53 and a
  • the antibodies of the invention are humanized antibodies that bind to LING01 and compete for binding with an antibody comprising three variable light chain CDRs (CDRL) as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 149; and three variable heavy chain CDRs (CDRH) as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 151 ; or three CDRL as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 153 and three CDRH as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 155; or three CDRL as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 149 and three CDRH as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 159; or three CDRL as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 157 and three CDRH as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 151 ; or three CDRL as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 161 and three CDRH as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 155.
  • CDRL variable light chain CDRs
  • CDRH variable heavy chain CDRs
  • the antibodies of the invention are humanized antibodies that bind to LING01 and compete for binding with an antibody comprising a VH and VL, wherein the VL has three CDRL comprising a CDRL1 of SEQ ID NO: 170, a CDRL2 of SEQ ID NO: 171 and a CDRL3 of SEQ ID NO: 172; or a VL having three CDRLs comprising a CDRL1 of SEQ ID NO: 176, a CDRL2 of SEQ ID NO: 177 and a CDRL3 of SEQ ID NO: 178; or a VL having three CDRLs comprising a CDRL1 of SEQ ID NO: 176, a CDRL2 of SEQ ID NO: 177 and a CDRL3 of SEQ ID NO: 182.
  • the antibodies of the invention are humanized antibodies that bind to LING01 and compete for binding with an antibody comprising a CDRH1 of SEQ ID NO: 173, a CDRH2 of SEQ ID NO: 174 and a CDRH3 of SEQ ID NO: 175; or the VH has three CDRHs comprising a CDRH1 of SEQ ID NO: 179, a CDRH2 of SEQ ID NO: 180 and a CDRH3 of SEQ ID NO: 181 .
  • the antibodies of the invention are humanized antibodies that bind to LING01 and compete for binding with an antibody comprising a VL and VH wherein the VL has three CDRLs comprising a CDRL1 of SEQ ID NO: 170, a CDRL2 of SEQ ID NO: 171 and a CDRL3 of SEQ ID NO: 172 and the VH has three CDRHs comprising a CDRH1 of SEQ ID NO: 173, a CDRH2 of SEQ ID NO: 174 and a CDRH3 of SEQ ID NO: 175; or an antibody comprising a VL and VH wherein the VL has three CDRLs comprising a CDRL1 of SEQ ID NO: 176, a CDRL2 of SEQ ID NO: 177 and a CDRL3 of SEQ ID NO: 178 and the VH has three CDRHs comprising a CDRH1 of SEQ ID NO: 179, a CDRH2 of SEQ ID NO: 180 and a CDRH
  • the antibodies of the invention are humanized antibodies that bind to LING01 comprising a full length light chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 162 and a full length heavy chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 163; or a full length light chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 164 and a full length heavy chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 165; or a full length light chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 162 and a full length heavy chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 167; or a full length light chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 166 and a full length heavy chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 163; or a full length light chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 169 and a full length heavy chain set forth as SEQ ID NO: 165.
  • the invention comprises a nucleic acid encoding the antibody of any of the anti-LING01 antibodies disclosed herein.
  • the invention comprises a vector comprising one or more of the nucleic acids encoding an anti-LING01 antibody disclosed herein or a host cell comprising said vector.
  • the invention comprises an ADC of the formula Ab-[L-D]n, wherein
  • Ab is an anti-LING01 antibody; L is an optional linker; D is a drug; and n is an integer from about 1 to about 20.
  • Ab is a chimeric, CDR grafted, humanized or recombinant human antibody, or a fragment thereof, which binds to tumor initiating cells expressing LING01.
  • Ab can be any of the anti-LING01 antibodies disclosed herein.
  • the invention comprises a method of treating cancer comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising an ADC, wherein the ADC comprises an anti-LING01 antibody of the invention conjugated to a payload.
  • the invention comprises a method of treating cancer comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising an anti- LING01 ADC, wherein the cancer is selected from ovarian cancer, skin cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer.
  • the cancer is ovarian cancer and may comprise ovarian serous cancer or malignant mixed mesodermal ovarian cancer.
  • the invention comprises a method of treating cancer comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a pharmaceutical composition comprising an anti- LING01 ADC and at least one additional therapeutic moiety.
  • the invention comprises a method of reducing tumor initiating cells in a tumor cell population, wherein the method comprises contacting a tumor cell population comprising tumor initiating cells and tumor cells other than tumor initiating cells with an anti-LING01 ADC; whereby the frequency of tumor initiating cells is reduced.
  • Such contacting can be performed in vivo or in vitro.
  • the invention comprises a method of delivering a cytotoxin to a cell comprising contacting the cell with an ADC comprising any anti-LING01 antibody disclosed herein.
  • the invention discloses a method of detecting, diagnosing, or monitoring cancer in a subject, the method comprising the steps of (a) contacting tumor cells with an anti-LING01 antibody disclosed herein; and (b) detecting the antibody on the tumor cells.
  • Such contacting can be performed in vitro or in vivo and can be used to diagnose, for example, ovarian cancer, skin cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer.
  • FIGS. 1A and 1 B show LING01 mRNA expression determined by whole transcriptome sequencing in selected patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors and normal human tissues analyzed using SOLiD (FIG. 1A) or lllumina (FIG. 1 B) platforms;
  • PDX patient-derived xenograft
  • FIGS. 1A and 1 B show LING01 mRNA expression determined by whole transcriptome sequencing in selected patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors and normal human tissues analyzed using SOLiD (FIG. 1A) or lllumina (FIG. 1 B) platforms;
  • FIGS. 2A and 2B show LING01 mRNA expression determined by qRT-PCR in normal human tissues or selected PDX tumor subtypes (FIG. 2A) and in tumors that were sorted into tumor initiating cells (TIC) and non-tumorigenic (NTG) subpopulations (FIG. 2B);
  • FIG. 2C shows LING01 mRNA expression in whole tumor specimens (black dots) or matched normal tissue (white dots) from patients with various tumor types as determined by qRT- PCR Origene array;
  • FIG. 3 shows normalized intensity values from microarray analysis of LING01 mRNA expression in normal tissue (NormTox; Norm) and various PDX tumor cell lines;
  • FIG. 4 depicts mRNA expression of LING01 across a large number of tumor and normal tissues derived from a public database (The Cancer Genome Atlas);
  • FIGS. 5A and 5B are tabular representation of various characteristics of anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention obtained from first (FIG. 5A) and second (FIG. 5B) immunization including binning, affinity for human LING01 and cross reactivity to a mouse ortholog of human LING01 ;
  • FIGS. 6A-60 provide amino acid and nucleic acid sequences of mouse and humanized anti- LING01 antibodies.
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B show light chain (FIG. 6A) and heavy chain (FIG. 6B) variable region amino acid sequences of exemplary mouse and humanized anti-LING01 antibodies and variants of hSC28.6 and hSC28.10 (SEQ ID NOS: 21-161 , odd numbers).
  • FIG. 6C shows the nucleic acid sequences of the same light and heavy chain variable regions of such exemplary mouse and humanized anti-LING01 antibodies and variants of hSC28.6 and hSC28.10 (SEQ ID NOS: 20-160, even numbers).
  • FIGS. 6E to 60 show annotated amino acid sequences (numbered as per Kabat ef a/.) of the light and heavy chain variable regions of mouse anti-LING01 antibodies, SC28.6 (FIG. 6E), SC28.10 (FIG. 6F), SC28.103 (FIG. 6G), SC28.1 10 (FIG. 6H), SC28.142 (FIG. 6I), SC28.145 (FIG. 6J), SC28.146 (FIG.
  • FIG. 7 shows LING01 protein expression in various PDX tumor subpopulations using a chemiluminescent assay
  • FIG. 8A shows the ability of numerous anti-LING01 antibodies to bind Jurkat cells overexpressing LING01 using flow cytometry where results are shown as a histogram, with the solid black line indicating the binding of the indicated antibody to cells overexpressing LING01 compared to the binding of an isotype-control (gray-fill);
  • FIG. 8B shows expression of LING01 protein on the surface of tumor cell populations using flow cytometry, where the solid black line indicates binding of an anti-LING01 antibody and the gray fill indicates binding of an isotype control antibody;
  • FIG. 8C shows expression of LING01 protein on the surface of tumor cell populations using flow cytometry with the solid black line indicating binding of an anti-LING01 antibody to
  • the dashed line indicating binding of an anti-LING01 antibody to non-tumorigenic cells, and the gray fill indicates binding of an isotype control antibody to bulk tumor cells;
  • FIG. 9 shows LING01 expression on primary ovarian tumors using in situ hybridization
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B depict the ability of murine (FIG. 10A) and humanized (FIG. 10B) anti- LING01 antibodies to internalize and mediate the delivery of saporin cytotoxin into Jurkat cells overexpressing LING01 ;
  • FIG. 10C demonstrates an association of antibody binning with killing activity
  • FIG. 1 1A shows the distribution of LINGOI -expressing versus LING01 non-expressing ovarian PDX cells following cell sorting by flow cytometry with an anti-LING01 antibody;
  • FIG. 1 1 B demonstrates LING01 as a biomarker of tumorigenicity in ovarian tumor cells.
  • LING01 has surprisingly been found to be a biological marker of a number of tumor types and this association may be exploited for the treatment of such tumors. It has also unexpectedly been found that LING01 is associated with tumorigenic cells and may be effectively exploited to inhibit or eliminate them. Tumorigenic cells, which will be described in more detail below, are known to exhibit resistance to many conventional treatments. In contrast to the teachings of the prior art, the disclosed compounds and methods effectively overcome this inherent resistance.
  • the invention provides anti-LING01 antibodies (including antibody drug conjugates) and their use in the prognosis, diagnosis, theragnosis, treatment and/or prevention of a variety of LINGOI-associated cancers regardless of any particular mechanism of action or specifically targeted cellular or molecular component.
  • I LINGQ1 Physiology I LINGQ1 Physiology
  • LING01 Leucine rich repeat and Ig domain containing
  • LERN1 and LRRN6A Leucine rich repeat and Ig domain containing
  • Representative LING01 protein orthologs include, but are not limited to, human (Q96FE5 (Uniprot Numbering)), chimpanzee (XP_003314848), rhesus monkey (XP_002804934), rat (NP_001094192), and mouse (NP_851419).
  • the LING01 gene consists of 2 exons spanning approximately 19.7 kBp on chromosome 15.
  • LING01 locus Transcription of the human LING01 locus yields a spliced 2.9 kBp mature RNA transcript (NM_032808), encoding a 620 amino acid preprotein (NP_1 16197). Processing of the LING01 preprotein is predicted to involve the removal of the first 41 amino acids comprising the secretion signal peptide.
  • the mature LING01 protein is predicted to contain 520 amino acids in the extracellular domain (amino acids 42 - 561 ), a 21 amino acid helical transmembrane domain (amino acids 562-582), and a 38 amino acid cytoplasmic domain (amino acids 583 - 620).
  • the LING01 protein is predicted to be comprised of a total thirteen tandem leucine rich repeat (LRR) motifs followed by an Ig-like C2-type domain.
  • LRRs are horseshoe shaped protein structures that are thought to be optimal for mediating protein-protein interactions (Enkhbayar et al. (2004), PMID 14747988; Kobe and Kajava (2001 ), PMID 1 1751054), which would be consistent with the ability of the LING01 to interact with itself and modulate the Nogo receptor signaling complex (Jepson ef al., (2012), PMID 22514275; Mosyak ef a/. (2006), PMID: 17005555).
  • the Ig-like C2-type domain is another protein domain thought to mediate protein-protein interactions and cell adhesion functions (Smith and Xue, 1997; PMID: 9417933).
  • LING01 Most of the biological functions reported for LING01 pertain to its role in CNS function: for example, its negative regulation of myelination during development (e.g., Mi ef a/., 2005; PMID: 15895088), or its role as an essential coreceptor of the Nogo receptor complex (e.g., Mi ef a/. , 2004; PMID: 14966521 ).
  • LING01 function and dysfunction as well as SNPs in the LING01 gene have been explored for links to neurodegenerative disorders such as multiple sclerosis (e.g., see Oh and Calabresi, 2013, PMID: 24090587), essential tremor (e.g., see Jimenez-Jimenez ef a/., 2013, PMID 23682623), or Parkinson's disease (e.g., Wu ef a/. , 2012, PMID:22710005).
  • Monoclonal antibodies to LING01 have been explored for their potential as therapeutics in the treatment of these disorders, for example, see McDonald ef a/. 201 1 (PMID: 21 1 10803).
  • a tumor comprises non-tumorigenic cells and tumorigenic cells.
  • Non-tumorigenic cells do not have the capacity to self-renew and are incapable of reproducibly forming tumors, even when transplanted into immunocompromised mice in excess cell numbers.
  • Tumorigenic cells also referred to herein as "tumor initiating cells” (TICs), which make up 0.1-40% of a tumor's cell population, have the ability to form tumors.
  • Tumorigenic cells encompass both tumor perpetuating cells (TPCs), referred to interchangeably as cancer stem cells (CSCs) and tumor progenitor cells (TProgs).
  • TPCs tumor perpetuating cells
  • CSCs cancer stem cells
  • TProgs tumor progenitor cells
  • CSCs like normal stem cells that support cellular hierarchies in normal tissue, are able to self-replicate indefinitely while maintaining the capacity for multilineage differentiation. CSCs are able to generate both tumorigenic progeny and non-tumorigenic progeny and are able to completely recapitulate the heterogeneous cellular composition of the parental tumor as demonstrated by serial isolation and transplantation of low numbers of isolated CSCs into immunocompromised mice. TProgs, like CSCs have the ability to fuel tumor growth in a primary transplant.
  • TProgs are typically only capable of a finite number of cell divisions as demonstrated by serial transplantation of low numbers of highly purified TProg into immunocompromised mice.
  • TProgs may further be divided into early TProgs and late TProgs, which may be distinguished by phenotype (e.g., cell surface markers) and their different capacities to recapitulate tumor cell architecture. While neither can recapitulate a tumor to the same extent as CSCs, early TProgs have a greater capacity to recapitulate the parental tumor's characteristics than late TProgs. Notwithstanding the foregoing distinctions, it has been shown that some TProg populations can, on rare occasion, gain self- renewal capabilities normally attributed to CSCs and can themselves become CSCs.
  • CSCs exhibit higher tumorigenicity and are relatively more quiescent than: (i) TProgs (both early and late TProgs); and (ii) non-tumorigenic cells such as tumor-infiltrating cells, for example, fibroblasts/stroma, endothelial and hematopoietic cells that may be derived from CSCs and typically comprise the bulk of a tumor.
  • TProgs both early and late TProgs
  • non-tumorigenic cells such as tumor-infiltrating cells, for example, fibroblasts/stroma, endothelial and hematopoietic cells that may be derived from CSCs and typically comprise the bulk of a tumor.
  • CSCs are relatively chemoresistant to conventional therapies.
  • Other characteristics that may make CSCs relatively chemoresistant to conventional therapies are increased expression of multi-drug resistance transporters, enhanced DNA repair mechanisms and anti-apoptotic gene expression. These properties in CSCs constitute a key reason for the failure of standard oncology treatment regimens to ensure long-term benefit for most patients with advanced stage neoplasia because standard chemotherapy does not target the CSCs that actually fuel continued tumor growth and recurrence.
  • LING01 expression is associated with various tumorigenic cell subpopulations.
  • the invention provides anti-LING01 antibodies that may be particularly useful for targeting tumorigenic cells and may be used to silence, sensitize, neutralize, reduce the frequency, block, abrogate, interfere with, decrease, hinder, restrain, control, deplete, moderate, mediate, diminish, reprogram, eliminate, or otherwise inhibit (collectively, "inhibit") tumorigenic cells, thereby facilitating the treatment, management and/or prevention of proliferative disorders (e.g. cancer).
  • proliferative disorders e.g. cancer
  • the novel anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention may be selected so they preferably reduce the frequency or tumorigenicity of tumorigenic cells upon administration to a subject regardless of the form of the LING01 determinant (e.g., phenotypic or genotypic).
  • the reduction in tumorigenic cell frequency may occur as a result of (i) inhibition or eradication of tumorigenic cells; (ii) controlling the growth, expansion or recurrence of tumorigenic cells; (iii) interrupting the initiation, propagation, maintenance, or proliferation of tumorigenic cells; or (iv) by otherwise hindering the survival, regeneration and/or metastasis of the tumorigenic cells.
  • the inhibition of tumorigenic cells may occur as a result of a change in one or more physiological pathways.
  • the change in the pathway whether by inhibition of the tumorigenic cells, modification of their potential (for example, by induced differentiation or niche disruption) or otherwise interfering with the ability of tumorigenic cells to influence the tumor environment or other cells, allows for the more effective treatment of LING01 associated disorders by inhibiting tumorigenesis, tumor maintenance and/or metastasis and recurrence.
  • Methods that can be used to assess the reduction in the frequency of tumorigenic cells include but are not limited to, cytometric or immunohistochemical analysis, preferably by in vitro or in vivo limiting dilution analysis (Dylla ef a/. 2008, PMID: PMC2413402 and Hoey ef a/. 2009, PMID: 19664991 ).
  • In vitro limiting dilution analysis may be performed by culturing fractionated or unfractionated tumor cells (e.g. from treated and untreated tumors, respectively) on solid medium that fosters colony formation and counting and characterizing the colonies that grow.
  • the tumor cells can be serially diluted onto plates with wells containing liquid medium and each well can be scored as either positive or negative for colony formation at any time after inoculation but preferably more than 10 days after inoculation.
  • In vivo limiting dilution is performed by transplanting tumor cells, from either untreated controls or from tumors exposed to selected therapeutic agents, into immunocompromised mice in serial dilutions and subsequently scoring each mouse as either positive or negative for tumor formation.
  • the scoring may occur at any time after the implanted tumors are detectable but is preferably done 60 or more days after the transplant.
  • the analysis of the results of limiting dilution experiments to determine the frequency of tumorigenic cells is preferably done using Poisson distribution statistics or assessing the frequency of predefined definitive events such as the ability to generate tumors in vivo or not (Fazekas ef a/., 1982, PMID: 7040548).
  • Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry may also be used to determine tumorigenic cell frequency. Both techniques employ one or more antibodies or reagents that bind art recognized cell surface proteins or markers known to enrich for tumorigenic cells (see WO 2012/031280). As known in the art, flow cytometry (e.g. florescence activated cell sorting (FACS)) can also be used to characterize, isolate, purify, enrich or sort for various cell populations including tumorigenic cells. Flow cytometry measures tumorigenic cell levels by passing a stream of fluid, in which a mixed population of cells is suspended, through an electronic detection apparatus which is able to measure the physical and/or chemical characteristics of up to thousands of particles per second. Immunohistochemistry provides additional information in that it enables visualization of tumorigenic cells in situ (e.g., in a tissue section) by staining the tissue sample with labeled antibodies or reagents which bind to tumorigenic cell markers.
  • FACS florescence activated cell sorting
  • the antibodies of the invention may be useful for identifying, characterizing, monitoring, isolating, sectioning or enriching populations or subpopulations of tumorigenic cells through methods such as, for example, flow cytometry, magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS), laser mediated sectioning or FACS.
  • FACS is a reliable method used to isolate cell subpopulations at more than 99.5% purity based on specific cell surface markers.
  • Other compatible techniques for the characterization and manipulation of tumorigenic cells including CSCs can be seen, for example, in U.S.P.N.s 12/686,359, 12/669,136 and 12/757,649.
  • markers that have been associated with CSC populations and have been used to isolate or characterize CSCs are markers that have been associated with CSC populations and have been used to isolate or characterize CSCs: ABCA1 , ABCA3, ABCG2, ADAM9, ADCY9, ADORA2A, AFP, AXIN1 , B7H3, BCL9, Bmi-1 , BMP-4, C20orf52, C4.4A, carboxypeptidase M, CAV1 , CAV2, CD105, CD133, CD14, CD16, CD166, CD16a, CD16b, CD2, CD20, CD24, CD29, CD3, CD31 , CD324, CD325, CD34, CD38, CD44, CD45, CD46, CD49b, CD49f, CD56, CD64, CD74, CD9, CD90, CEACAM6, CELSR1 , CPD, CRIM1 , CX3CL1 , CXCR4, DAF, decorin, easyhl , easyh2, EDG3,
  • cell surface phenotypes associated with CSCs of certain tumor types include CD44 hi CD24 l0W , ALDhT, CD133 + , CD123 + , CD34 + CD38 " , CD44 + CD24 “ , CD46 hi CD324 + CD66c " , CD133 + CD34 + CD10 " CD19 “ , CD138 " CD34 " CD19 + , CD133 + RC2 + , CD44 + a 2 3i hi CD133 + , CD44 + CD24 + ESA + , CD271 + , ABCB5 + as well as other CSC surface phenotypes that are known in the art.
  • CSC preparations comprising CD46 hl CD324 + phenotypes.
  • “Positive,” “low” and “negative” expression levels as they apply to markers or marker phenotypes are defined as follows.
  • Cells with negative expression are herein defined as those cells expressing less than, or equal to, the 95th percentile of expression observed with an isotype control antibody in the channel of fluorescence in the presence of the complete antibody staining cocktail labeling for other proteins of interest in additional channels of fluorescence emission.
  • FMO fluorescence minus one
  • Cells with expression greater than the 95th percentile of expression observed with an isotype control antibody using the FMO staining procedure described above are herein defined as "positive” (i.e.”+").
  • a cell is defined as positive if the mean observed expression of the antigen is above the 95th percentile determined using FMO staining with an isotype control antibody as described above.
  • the positive cells may be termed cells with low expression (i.e. "lo") if the mean observed expression is above the 95 th percentile determined by FMO staining and is within one standard deviation of the 95 th percentile.
  • the positive cells may be termed cells with high expression (i.e. "hi") if the mean observed expression is above the 95 th percentile determined by FMO staining and greater than one standard deviation above the 95 th percentile.
  • the 99th percentile may preferably be used as a demarcation point between negative and positive FMO staining and in particularly preferred embodiments the percentile may be greater than 99%.
  • the CD46 hl CD324 + marker phenotype and those exemplified immediately above may be used in conjunction with standard flow cytometric analysis and cell sorting techniques to characterize, isolate, purify or enrich TIC and/or TPC cells or cell populations for further analysis.
  • the ability of the antibodies of the current invention to reduce the frequency of tumorigenic cells can therefore be determined using the techniques and markers described above.
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies may reduce the frequency of tumorigenic cells by 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% or even by 35%.
  • the reduction in frequency of tumorigenic cells may be in the order of 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60% or 65%.
  • the disclosed compounds my reduce the frequency of tumorigenic cells by 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90% or even 95%. It will be appreciated that any reduction of the frequency of tumorigenic cells is likely to result in a corresponding reduction in the tumorigenicity, persistence, recurrence and aggressiveness of the neoplasia.
  • Antibodies and variants and derivatives thereof including accepted nomenclature and numbering systems, have been extensively described, for example, in Abbas ef a/. (2010), Cellular and Molecular Immunology (6 th Ed.), W.B. Saunders Company; or Murphey ef a/. (201 1 ), Janeway's Immunobiology (8 th Ed.), Garland Science.
  • an “antibody” or “intact antibody” typically refers to a Y-shaped tetrameric protein comprising two heavy (H) and two light (L) polypeptide chains held together by covalent disulfide bonds and non-covalent interactions.
  • Human light chains are classified as kappa or lambda light chains. Each light chain is composed of one variable domain (VL) and one constant domain (CL).
  • Each heavy chain comprises one variable domain (VH) and a constant region, which in the case of IgG, IgA, and IgD, comprises three domains termed CH1 , CH2, and CH3 (IgM and IgE have a fourth domain, CH4).
  • the CH1 and CH2 domains are separated by a flexible hinge region, which is a proline and cysteine rich segment of variable length (generally from about 10 to about 60 amino acids in IgG).
  • the variable domains in both the light and heavy chains are joined to the constant domains by a "J" region of about 12 or more amino acids and the heavy chain also has a "D" region of about 10 additional amino acids.
  • Each class of antibody further comprises inter-chain and intra-chain disulfide bonds formed by paired cysteine residues.
  • antibody includes polyclonal antibodies, multiclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antibodies, humanized and primatized antibodies, CDR grafted antibodies, human antibodies, recombinantly produced antibodies, intrabodies, multispecific antibodies, bispecific antibodies, monovalent antibodies, multivalent antibodies, anti-idiotypic antibodies, synthetic antibodies, including muteins and variants thereof, immunospecific antibody fragments such as Fd, Fab, F(ab') 2 , F(ab') fragments, single-chain fragments (e.g. ScFv and ScFvFc); and derivatives thereof including Fc fusions and other modifications, and any other immunoreactive molecule so long as it exhibits preferential association or binding with a determinant.
  • immunospecific antibody fragments such as Fd, Fab, F(ab') 2 , F(ab') fragments, single-chain fragments (e.g. ScFv and ScFvFc); and derivatives thereof including Fc fusions and other modifications, and any other immuno
  • the term further comprises all classes of antibodies (i.e. IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM) and all subclasses (i.e., lgG1 , lgG2, lgG3, lgG4, lgA1 , and lgA2).
  • Heavy-chain constant domains that correspond to the different classes of antibodies are typically denoted by the corresponding lower case Greek letter ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ , ⁇ , and ⁇ , respectively.
  • Light chains of the antibodies from any vertebrate species can be assigned to one of two clearly distinct types, called kappa ( ⁇ ) and lambda ( ⁇ ), based on the amino acid sequences of their constant domains.
  • variable domains of antibodies show considerable variation in amino acid composition from one antibody to another and are primarily responsible for antigen recognition and binding. Variable regions of each light/heavy chain pair form the antibody binding site such that an intact IgG antibody has two binding sites (i.e. it is bivalent).
  • V H and V L domains comprise three regions of extreme variability, which are termed hypervariable regions, or more commonly, complementarity- determining regions (CDRs), framed and separated by four less variable regions known as framework regions (FRs).
  • CDRs complementarity- determining regions
  • FRs framework regions
  • the non-covalent association between the V H and the V L region forms the Fv fragment (for "fragment variable") which contains one of the two antigen-binding sites of the antibody.
  • ScFv fragments for single chain fragment variable
  • which can be obtained by genetic engineering associates in a single polypeptide chain, the V H and the V L region of an antibody, separated by a peptide linker.
  • the assignment of amino acids to each domain, framework region and CDR may be in accordance with one of the numbering schemes provided by Kabat ef a/. (1991 ) Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest (5 th Ed.), US Dept. of Health and Human Services, PHS, NIH, NIH Publication no. 91-3242; Chothia ef a/., 1987, PMID: 3681981 ; Chothia ef a/. , 1989, PMID: 2687698; MacCallum ef a/., 1996, PMID: 8876650; or Dubel, Ed.
  • Variable regions and CDRs in an antibody sequence can be identified according to general rules that have been developed in the art (as set out above, such as, for example, the Kabat ef a/, numbering system) or by aligning the sequences against a database of known variable regions. Methods for identifying these regions are described in Kontermann and Dubel, eds., Antibody Engineering, Springer, New York, NY, 2001 and Dinarello ef a/. , Current Protocols in Immunology, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2000. Exemplary databases of antibody sequences are described in, and can be accessed through, the "Abysis" website at www.bioinf.org.uk/abs (maintained by A.C.
  • sequences are analyzed using the Abysis database, which integrates sequence data from Kabat ef a/., IMGT and the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with structural data from the PDB. See Dr. Andrew C. R. Martin's book chapter Protein Sequence and Structure Analysis of Antibody Variable Domains. In: Antibody Engineering Lab Manual (Ed.: Duebel, S.
  • the Abysis database website further includes general rules that have been developed for identifying CDRs which can be used in accordance with the teachings herein.
  • FIGS. 6E to 60 appended hereto show the results of such analysis in the annotation of several exemplary antibody heavy and light chain variable regions. Unless otherwise indicated, all CDRs set forth herein are derived according to the Abysis database website as per Kabat ef a/.
  • EU index as set forth in Kabat or "EU index of Kabat” or “EU index” in the context of the heavy chain refers to the residue numbering system based on the human lgG1 Eu antibody of Edelman ef a/, as set forth in Kabat ef a/., 1991 (supra.)
  • the numbering system used for the light chain constant region amino acid sequence is similarly set forth in Kabat ef a/., (supra.)
  • An exemplary kappa light chain constant region amino acid sequence compatible with the present invention is set forth immediately below:
  • RTVAAPSVFIFPPSDEQLKSGTASWCLLNNFYPREAKVQWKVDNALQSGNSQESVTEQDSKDST YSLSSTLTLSKADYEKHKVYACEVTHQGLSSPVTKSFNRGEC SEQ ID NO: 1 .
  • the disclosed constant region sequences, or variations or derivatives thereof, may be operably associated with the disclosed heavy and light chain variable regions using standard molecular biology techniques to provide full-length antibodies that may be used as such or incorporated in the anti-LING01 ADCs of the invention.
  • the antibodies or immunoglobulins of the invention may be generated from any antibody that specifically recognizes or associates with the relevant determinant.
  • determinant or “target” means any detectable trait, property, marker or factor that is identifiably associated with, or specifically found in or on a particular cell, cell population or tissue. Determinants or targets may be morphological, functional or biochemical in nature and are preferably phenotypic. In certain preferred embodiments a determinant is a protein that is differentially expressed (over- or under-expressed) by specific cell types or by cells under certain conditions (e.g., during specific points of the cell cycle or cells in a particular niche).
  • a determinant preferably is differentially expressed on aberrant cancer cells and may comprise a LING01 protein, or any of its splice variants, isoforms or family members, or specific domains, regions or epitopes thereof.
  • An "antigen”, “immunogenic determinant”, “antigenic determinant” or “immunogen” means any protein or any fragment, region or domain thereof that can stimulate an immune response when introduced into an immunocompetent animal and is recognized by the antibodies produced from the immune response.
  • the presence or absence of the determinants contemplated herein may be used to identify a cell, cell subpopulation or tissue (e.g., tumors, tumorigenic cells or CSCs).
  • interchain and intrachain disulfide bonds There are two types of disulfide bridges or bonds in immunoglobulin molecules: interchain and intrachain disulfide bonds. As is well known in the art the location and number of interchain disulfide bonds vary according to the immunoglobulin class and species. While the invention is not limited to any particular class or subclass of antibody, the lgG1 immunoglobulin shall be used throughout the instant disclosure for illustrative purposes. In wild-type lgG1 molecules there are twelve intrachain disulfide bonds (four on each heavy chain and two on each light chain) and four interchain disulfide bonds. Intrachain disulfide bonds are generally somewhat protected and relatively less susceptible to reduction than interchain bonds.
  • interchain disulfide bonds are located on the surface of the immunoglobulin, are accessible to solvent and are usually relatively easy to reduce.
  • Two interchain disulfide bonds exist between the heavy chains and one from each heavy chain to its respective light chain. It has been demonstrated that interchain disulfide bonds are not essential for chain association.
  • the lgG1 hinge region contain the cysteines in the heavy chain that form the interchain disulfide bonds, which provide structural support along with the flexibility that facilitates Fab movement.
  • the heavy/heavy lgG1 interchain disulfide bonds are located at residues C226 and C229 (Eu numbering) while the lgG1 interchain disulfide bond between the light and heavy chain of lgG1 (heavy/light) are formed between C214 of the kappa or lambda light chain and C220 in the upper hinge region of the heavy chain.
  • Antibodies of the invention can be produced using a variety of methods known in the art.
  • polyclonal antibodies in various host animals is well known in the art (see for example, Harlow and Lane (Eds.) (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, CSH Press; and Harlow ef a/. (1989) Antibodies, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Press).
  • an immunocompetent animal e.g., mouse, rat, rabbit, goat, non-human primate, etc.
  • an antigenic protein or cells or preparations comprising an antigenic protein.
  • polyclonal antibody-containing serum is obtained by bleeding or sacrificing the animal.
  • the serum may be used in the form obtained from the animal or the antibodies may be partially or fully purified to provide immunoglobulin fractions or isolated antibody preparations.
  • antigen any form of antigen, or cells or preparations containing the antigen, can be used to generate an antibody that is specific for a determinant.
  • the term "antigen" is used in a broad sense and may comprise any immunogenic fragment or determinant of the selected target including a single epitope, multiple epitopes, single or multiple domains or the entire extracellular domain (ECD).
  • the antigen may be an isolated full-length protein, a cell surface protein (e.g., immunizing with cells expressing at least a portion of the antigen on their surface), or a soluble protein (e.g., immunizing with only the ECD portion of the protein).
  • the antigen may be produced in a genetically modified cell.
  • any of the aforementioned antigens may be used alone or in combination with one or more immunogenicity enhancing adjuvants known in the art.
  • the DNA encoding the antigen may be genomic or non-genomic (e.g., cDNA) and may encode at least a portion of the ECD, sufficient to elicit an immunogenic response.
  • Any vectors may be employed to transform the cells in which the antigen is expressed, including but not limited to adenoviral vectors, lentiviral vectors, plasmids, and non-viral vectors, such as cationic lipids.
  • the invention contemplates use of monoclonal antibodies.
  • monoclonal antibody or “mAb” refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible mutations (e.g., naturally occurring mutations), that may be present in minor amounts.
  • Monoclonal antibodies can be prepared using a wide variety of techniques including hybridoma techniques, recombinant techniques, phage display technologies, transgenic animals (e.g., a XenoMouse ® ) or some combination thereof.
  • monoclonal antibodies can be produced using hybridoma and biochemical and genetic engineering techniques such as described in more detail in An, Zhigiang (ed.) Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies: From Bench to Clinic, John Wiley and Sons, 1 st ed. 2009; Shire et. al. (eds.) Current Trends in Monoclonal Antibody Development and Manufacturing, Springer Science + Business Media LLC, 1 st ed. 2010; Harlow ef al.
  • monoclonal antibodies A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2nd ed. 1988; Hammerling, ef al., in: Monoclonal Antibodies and T-Cell Hybridomas 563-681 (Elsevier, N.Y., 1981 ).
  • suitable antibodies may be selected through various screening processes, based on, for example, affinity for the determinant or rate of internalization.
  • monoclonal antibodies produced as described herein may be used as "source” antibodies and further modified to, for example, to improve affinity for the target, improve its production in cell culture, reduce immunogenicity in vivo, create multispecific constructs, etc. A more detailed description of monoclonal antibody production and screening is set out below and in the appended Examples. 3. Human antibodies
  • the antibodies may comprise fully human antibodies.
  • human antibody refers to an antibody (preferably a monoclonal antibody) which possesses an amino acid sequence that corresponds to that of an antibody produced by a human and/or has been made using any of the techniques for making human antibodies described below.
  • recombinant human antibodies may be isolated by screening a recombinant combinatorial antibody library prepared using phage display.
  • the library is a scFv phage or yeast display library, generated using human VL and VH cDNAs prepared from mRNA isolated from B-cells.
  • Human antibodies can also be made by introducing human immunoglobulin loci into transgenic animals, e.g., mice in which the endogenous immunoglobulin genes have been partially or completely inactivated and human immunoglobulin genes have been introduced. Upon challenge antibody generation is observed which closely resembles that seen in humans in all respects, including gene rearrangement, assembly and fully human antibody repertoire. This approach is described, for example, in U.S.P.Ns. 5,545,807; 5,545,806; 5,569,825; 5,625,126; 5,633,425; 5,661 ,016, and U.S.P.Ns.
  • a human antibody may be prepared via immortalization of human B lymphocytes producing an antibody directed against a target antigen (such B lymphocytes may be recovered from an individual suffering from a neoplastic disorder or may have been immunized in vitro). See, e.g., Cole ef a/., Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R. Liss, p. 77 (1985); Boerner ef a/. , 1991 , PMID: 2051030; and U.S. P.N. 5,750,373.
  • the source antibodies may be further altered to provide anti-LING01 antibodies having improved pharmaceutical characteristics.
  • the source antibodies are modified or altered using known molecular engineering techniques to provide derived antibodies having the desired therapeutic properties.
  • Selected embodiments of the invention comprise murine antibodies that immunospecifically bind to LING01 and, for the purposes of the instant disclosure, may be considered “source” antibodies.
  • antibodies compatible with the invention can be derived from such "source” antibodies through optional modification of the constant region and/or the antigen binding amino acid sequences of the source antibody.
  • an antibody is "derived” from a source antibody if selected amino acids in the source antibody are altered through deletion, mutation, substitution, integration or combination.
  • a "derived” antibody is one in which fragments of the source antibody (e.g., one or more CDRs or the entire heavy and light chain variable regions) are combined with or incorporated into an acceptor antibody sequence to provide the derivative antibody (e.g. chimeric or humanized antibodies).
  • derived antibodies can be generated using standard molecular biological techniques as described below, such as, for example, to improve affinity for the determinant; to improve antibody stability; to improve production and yield in cell culture; to reduce immunogenicity in vivo; to reduce toxicity; to facilitate conjugation of an active moiety; or to create a multispecific antibody.
  • Such antibodies may also be derived from source antibodies through modification of the mature molecule (e.g., glycosylation patterns or pegylation) by chemical means or post-translational modification.
  • the chimeric antibodies of the invention comprise chimeric antibodies that are derived from protein segments from at least two different species or class of antibodies that have been covalently joined.
  • the term "chimeric" antibody is directed to constructs in which a portion of the heavy and/or light chain is identical or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or subclass, while the remainder of the chain(s) is identical or homologous to corresponding sequences in antibodies from another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass, as well as fragments of such antibodies (U.S. P.N. 4,816,567; Morrison ef a/., 1984, PMID: 6436822).
  • chimeric antibodies of the instant invention may comprise all or most of the selected murine heavy and light chain variable regions operably linked to human light and heavy chain constant regions.
  • anti-LING01 antibodies may be "derived" from the mouse antibodies disclosed herein.
  • the chimeric antibodies of the invention are "CDR grafted" antibodies, where the CDRs (as defined using Kabat, Chothia, McCallum, etc.) are derived from a particular species or belonging to a particular antibody class or subclass, while the remainder of the antibody is derived from an antibody from another species or belonging to another antibody class or subclass.
  • CDRs as defined using Kabat, Chothia, McCallum, etc.
  • one or more selected rodent CDRs e.g., mouse CDRs
  • the CDR grafted antibodies will comprise one or more CDRs obtained from a mouse incorporated in a human framework sequence.
  • a “humanized” antibody is a human antibody (acceptor antibody) comprising one or more amino acid sequences (e.g. CDR sequences) derived from one or more non-human antibodies (donor or source antibody).
  • CDR sequences amino acid sequences
  • donor or source antibody donor or source antibody
  • back mutations can be introduced into the humanized antibody, in which residues in one or more FRs of the variable region of the recipient human antibody are replaced by corresponding residues from the non-human species donor antibody. Such back mutations may to help maintain the appropriate three-dimensional configuration of the grafted CDR(s) and thereby improve affinity and antibody stability.
  • Antibodies from various donor species may be used including, without limitation, mouse, rat, rabbit, or non-human primate.
  • humanized antibodies may comprise new residues that are not found in the recipient antibody or in the donor antibody to, for example, further refine antibody performance.
  • CDR grafted and humanized antibodies compatible with the instant invention are provided as set forth in Example 10 below.
  • V-BASE directory (VBASE2 - Retter ef a/. , Nucleic Acid Res. 33; 671-674, 2005) which provides a comprehensive directory of human immunoglobulin variable region sequences (compiled by Tomlinson, I. A. ef a/. MRC Centre for Protein Engineering, Cambridge, UK) may also be used to identify compatible acceptor sequences. Additionally, consensus human framework sequences described, for example, in U.S. P.N. 6,300,064 may also prove to be compatible acceptor sequences are can be used in accordance with the instant teachings.
  • human framework acceptor sequences are selected based on homology with the murine source framework sequences along with an analysis of the CDR canonical structures of the source and acceptor antibodies.
  • the derived sequences of the heavy and light chain variable regions of the derived antibody may then be synthesized using art recognized techniques.
  • sequence identity or homology of the CDR grafted or humanized antibody variable region to the human acceptor variable region may be determined as discussed herein and, when measured as such, will preferably share at least 60% or 65% sequence identity, more preferably at least 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, or 90% sequence identity, even more preferably at least 93%, 95%, 98% or 99% sequence identity.
  • residue positions which are not identical differ by conservative amino acid substitutions.
  • a "conservative amino acid substitution” is one in which an amino acid residue is substituted by another amino acid residue having a side chain (R group) with similar chemical properties (e.g., charge or hydrophobicity).
  • R group side chain
  • a conservative amino acid substitution will not substantially change the functional properties of a protein.
  • the percent sequence identity or degree of similarity may be adjusted upwards to correct for the conservative nature of the substitution.
  • the antibodies of the instant invention may be engineered to facilitate conjugation to a cytotoxin or other anti-cancer agent (as discussed in more detail below). It is advantageous for the antibody drug conjugate (ADC) preparation to comprise a homogenous population of ADC molecules in terms of the position of the cytotoxin on the antibody and the drug to antibody ratio (DAR). Based on the instant disclosure one skilled in the art could readily fabricate site-specific engineered constructs as described herein.
  • a "site-specific antibody” or “site- specific construct” means an antibody, or immunoreactive fragment thereof, wherein at least one amino acid in either the heavy or light chain is deleted, altered or substituted (preferably with another amino acid) to provide at least one free cysteine.
  • a "site-specific conjugate” shall be held to mean an ADC comprising a site-specific antibody and at least one cytotoxin or other compound conjugated to the unpaired cysteine(s).
  • the unpaired cysteine residue will comprise an unpaired intrachain residue.
  • the free cysteine residue will comprise an unpaired interchain cysteine residue.
  • the engineered antibody can be of various isotypes, for example, IgG, IgE, IgA or IgD; and within those classes the antibody can be of various subclasses, for example, lgG1 , lgG2, lgG3 or lgG4.
  • the light chain of the antibody can comprise either a kappa or lambda isotype each incorporating a C214 that, in preferred embodiments, may be unpaired due to a lack of a C220 residue in the lgG1 heavy chain.
  • the engineered antibody comprises at least one amino acid deletion or substitution of an intrachain or interchain cysteine residue.
  • intrachain cysteine residue means a cysteine residue that is involved in a native disulfide bond either between the light and heavy chain of an antibody or between the two heavy chains of an antibody while an "intrachain cysteine residue” is one naturally paired with another cysteine in the same heavy or light chain.
  • the deleted or substituted interchain cysteine residue is involved in the formation of a disulfide bond between the light and heavy chain.
  • the deleted or substituted cysteine residue is involved in a disulfide bond between the two heavy chains.
  • an interchain cysteine residue is deleted.
  • an interchain cysteine is substituted for another amino acid (e.g., a naturally occurring amino acid).
  • the amino acid substitution can result in the replacement of an interchain cysteine with a neutral (e.g. serine, threonine or glycine) or hydrophilic (e.g. methionine, alanine, valine, leucine or isoleucine) residue.
  • a neutral e.g. serine, threonine or glycine
  • hydrophilic e.g. methionine, alanine, valine, leucine or isoleucine
  • the deleted or substituted cysteine residue is on the light chain (either kappa or lambda) thereby leaving a free cysteine on the heavy chain. In other embodiments the deleted or substituted cysteine residue is on the heavy chain leaving the free cysteine on the light chain constant region.
  • cysteine at position 214 (C214) of the IgG light chain is deleted or substituted.
  • cysteine at position 220 (C220) on the IgG heavy chain is deleted or substituted.
  • cysteine at position 226 or position 229 on the heavy chain is deleted or substituted.
  • C220 on the heavy chain is substituted with serine (C220S) to provide the desired free cysteine in the light chain.
  • C214 in the light chain is substituted with serine (C214S) to provide the desired free cysteine in the heavy chain.
  • the strategy for generating antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug loading is broadly applicable to all anti-LING01 antibodies as it primarily involves engineering of the conserved constant domains of the antibody.
  • amino acid sequences and native disulfide bridges of each class and subclass of antibody are well documented, one skilled in the art could readily fabricate engineered constructs of various antibodies without undue experimentation and, accordingly, such constructs are expressly contemplated as being within the scope of the instant invention.
  • Selected embodiments of the present invention may also comprise substitutions or modifications of the constant region (i.e. the Fc region), including without limitation, amino acid residue substitutions, mutations and/or modifications, which result in a compound with preferred characteristics including, but not limited to: altered pharmacokinetics, increased serum half-life, increase binding affinity, reduced immunogenicity, increased production, altered Fc ligand binding to an Fc receptor (FcR), enhanced or reduced ADCC or CDC, altered glycosylation and/or disulfide bonds and modified binding specificity.
  • the constant region i.e. the Fc region
  • amino acid residue substitutions amino acid residue substitutions, mutations and/or modifications
  • Selected embodiments of the present invention may also comprise substitutions or modifications of the constant region (i.e. the Fc region), including without limitation, amino acid residue substitutions, mutations and/or modifications, which result in a compound with preferred characteristics including, but not limited to: altered pharmacokinetics, increased serum half-life, increase binding affinity, reduced immunogenicity, increased production,
  • FcyRI, FcyRIIA and B, FcyRIII and FcRn an Fc receptor
  • FcyRI, FcyRIIA and B, FcyRIII and FcRn an Fc receptor
  • cytotoxicity and/or altered pharmacokinetics such as increased serum half-life
  • antibodies with increased in vivo half-lives can be generated by modifying (e.g., substituting, deleting or adding) amino acid residues identified as involved in the interaction between the Fc domain and the FcRn receptor (see, e.g., International Publication Nos. WO 97/34631 ; WO 04/029207; U.S.P.N. 6,737,056 and U.S.P.N. 2003/019031 1 ).
  • Fc variants may provide half-lives in a mammal, preferably a human, of greater than 5 days, greater than 10 days, greater than 15 days, preferably greater than 20 days, greater than 25 days, greater than 30 days, greater than 35 days, greater than 40 days, greater than 45 days, greater than 2 months, greater than 3 months, greater than 4 months, or greater than 5 months.
  • the increased half-life results in a higher serum titer which thus reduces the frequency of the administration of the antibodies and/or reduces the concentration of the antibodies to be administered.
  • Binding to human FcRn in vivo and serum half-life of human FcRn high affinity binding polypeptides can be assayed, e.g., in transgenic mice or transfected human cell lines expressing human FcRn, or in primates to which the polypeptides with a variant Fc region are administered.
  • WO 2000/42072 describes antibody variants with improved or diminished binding to FcRns. See also, e.g., Shields ef al. J. Biol. Chem. 9(2):6591-6604 (2001 ).
  • Fc alterations may lead to enhanced or reduced ADCC or CDC activity.
  • CDC refers to the lysing of a target cell in the presence of complement
  • ADCC refers to a form of cytotoxicity in which secreted Ig bound onto FcRs present on certain cytotoxic cells (e.g., Natural Killer cells, neutrophils, and macrophages) enables these cytotoxic effector cells to bind specifically to an antigen-bearing target cell and subsequently kill the target cell with cytotoxins.
  • antibody variants are provided with "altered" FcR binding affinity, which is either enhanced or diminished binding as compared to a parent or unmodified antibody or to an antibody comprising a native sequence FcR.
  • Such variants which display decreased binding may possess little or no appreciable binding, e.g., 0-20% binding to the FcR compared to a native sequence, e.g. as determined by techniques well known in the art.
  • the variant will exhibit enhanced binding as compared to the native immunoglobulin Fc domain. It will be appreciated that these types of Fc variants may advantageously be used to enhance the effective anti-neoplastic properties of the disclosed antibodies.
  • such alterations lead to increased binding affinity, reduced immunogenicity, increased production, altered glycosylation and/or disulfide bonds (e.g., for conjugation sites), modified binding specificity, increased phagocytosis; and/or down regulation of cell surface receptors (e.g. B cell receptor; BCR), etc.
  • Still other embodiments comprise one or more engineered glycoforms, e.g., a site-specific antibody comprising an altered glycosylation pattern or altered carbohydrate composition that is covalently attached to the protein (e.g., in the Fc domain). See, for example, Shields, R. L. ef a/. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277:26733-26740.
  • Engineered glycoforms may be useful for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to enhancing or reducing effector function, increasing the affinity of the antibody for a target or facilitating production of the antibody.
  • the molecule may be engineered to express an aglycosylated form. Substitutions that may result in elimination of one or more variable region framework glycosylation sites to thereby eliminate glycosylation at that site are well known (see e.g. U.S.P.Ns. 5,714,350 and 6,350,861 ). Conversely, enhanced effector functions or improved binding may be imparted to the Fc containing molecule by engineering in one or more additional glycosylation sites.
  • Fc variants include an Fc variant that has an altered glycosylation composition, such as a hypofucosylated antibody having reduced amounts of fucosyl residues or an antibody having increased bisecting GlcNAc structures. Such altered glycosylation patterns have been demonstrated to increase the ADCC ability of antibodies.
  • Engineered glycoforms may be generated by any method known to one skilled in the art, for example by using engineered or variant expression strains, by co-expression with one or more enzymes (for example N- acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnTIII)), by expressing a molecule comprising an Fc region in various organisms or cell lines from various organisms or by modifying carbohydrate(s) after the molecule comprising Fc region has been expressed (see, for example, WO 2012/1 17002).
  • one or more enzymes for example N- acetylglucosaminyltransferase III (GnTIII)
  • GnTIII N- acetylglucosaminyltransferase III
  • an antibody fragment comprises at least a portion of an intact antibody.
  • fragment of an antibody molecule includes antigen-binding fragments of antibodies, and the term “antigen-binding fragment” refers to a polypeptide fragment of an immunoglobulin or antibody that immunospecifically binds or reacts with a selected antigen or immunogenic determinant thereof or competes with the intact antibody from which the fragments were derived for specific antigen binding.
  • Exemplary site-specific fragments include: variable light chain fragments (VL), an variable heavy chain fragments (VH), scFv, F(ab')2 fragment, Fab fragment, Fd fragment, Fv fragment, single domain antibody fragments, diabodies, linear antibodies, single-chain antibody molecules and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments.
  • an active site-specific fragment comprises a portion of the antibody that retains its ability to interact with the antigen/substrates or receptors and modify them in a manner similar to that of an intact antibody (though maybe with somewhat less efficiency).
  • Such antibody fragments may further be engineered to comprise one or more free cysteines.
  • an antibody fragment is one that comprises the Fc region and that retains at least one of the biological functions normally associated with the Fc region when present in an intact antibody, such as FcRn binding, antibody half-life modulation, ADCC function and complement binding.
  • an antibody fragment is a monovalent antibody that has an in vivo half-life substantially similar to an intact antibody.
  • such an antibody fragment may comprise an antigen binding arm linked to an Fc sequence comprising at least one free cysteine capable of conferring in vivo stability to the fragment.
  • fragments can be obtained by molecular engineering or via chemical or enzymatic treatment (such as papain or pepsin) of an intact or complete antibody or antibody chain or by recombinant means. See, e.g., Fundamental Immunology, W. E. Paul, ed., Raven Press, N.Y. (1999), for a more detailed description of antibody fragments.
  • the antibodies and conjugates of the invention may be monovalent or multivalent (e.g., bivalent, trivalent, etc.).
  • valency refers to the number of potential target binding sites associated with an antibody. Each target binding site specifically binds one target molecule or specific position or locus on a target molecule. When an antibody is monovalent, each binding site of the molecule will specifically bind to a single antigen position or epitope. When an antibody comprises more than one target binding site (multivalent), each target binding site may specifically bind the same or different molecules (e.g., may bind to different ligands or different antigens, or different epitopes or positions on the same antigen). See, for example, U.S.P.N. 2009/0130105.
  • the antibodies are bispecific antibodies in which the two chains have different specificities, as described in Millstein ef a/., 1983, Nature, 305:537-539.
  • Other embodiments include antibodies with additional specificities such as trispecific antibodies.
  • Other more sophisticated compatible multispecific constructs and methods of their fabrication are set forth in U.S. P.N. 2009/0155255, as well as WO 94/04690; Suresh ef a/., 1986, Methods in Enzymology, 121 :210; and WO96/2701 1.
  • Multivalent antibodies may immunospecifically bind to different epitopes of the desired target molecule or may immunospecifically bind to both the target molecule as well as a heterologous epitope, such as a heterologous polypeptide or solid support material. While preferred embodiments only bind two antigens (i.e. bispecific antibodies), antibodies with additional specificities such as trispecific antibodies are also encompassed by the instant invention. Bispecific antibodies also include cross-linked or "heteroconjugate" antibodies. For example, one of the antibodies in the heteroconjugate can be coupled to avidin, the other to biotin. Such antibodies have, for example, been proposed to target immune system cells to unwanted cells (U.S. P.N.
  • Heteroconjugate antibodies may be made using any convenient cross-linking methods. Suitable cross-linking agents are well known in the art, and are disclosed in U.S. P.N. 4,676,980, along with a number of cross-linking techniques.
  • the antibodies of the invention may be utilized in adoptive immunity gene therapy to treat tumors.
  • the antibodies of the invention e.g. ScFv fragments
  • a "CAR” is a fused protein made up of an ECD comprising the anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention or immunoreactive fragments thereof (e.g. ScFv fragments), a transmembrane domain, and at least one intracellular domain.
  • T-cells, natural killer cells or dendritic cells that have been genetically engineered to express CARs can be introduced into a subject suffering from cancer in order to stimulate the immune system of the subject to specifically target tumor cells expressing LING01.
  • the CARs of the invention will comprise an intracellular domain that initiates a primary cytoplasmic signaling sequence, that is, a sequence for initiating antigen-dependent primary activation via a T-cell receptor complex, for example, intracellular domains derived from ⁇ 3 ⁇ , FcRy, FcR3, CD3y, CD35, CD3e, CD5, CD22, CD79a, CD79b, and CD66d.
  • a primary cytoplasmic signaling sequence that is, a sequence for initiating antigen-dependent primary activation via a T-cell receptor complex
  • intracellular domains derived from ⁇ 3 ⁇ , FcRy, FcR3, CD3y, CD35, CD3e, CD5, CD22, CD79a, CD79b, and CD66d for example, intracellular domains derived from ⁇ 3 ⁇ , FcRy, FcR3, CD3y, CD35, CD3e, CD5, CD22, CD79a, CD79b, and CD66d.
  • the CARs of the invention will comprise an intracellular domain that initiates a secondary or co-stimulating signal, for example, intracellular domains derived from CD2, CD4, CD5, CD8a, CD83, CD28, CD134, CD137, ICOS, CD154, 4-1 BB and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (see U.S. P.N. US/2014/0242701 ).
  • antibody variable domains with the desired binding specificities are fused to immunoglobulin constant domain sequences, such as an immunoglobulin heavy chain constant domain comprising at least part of the hinge, CH2, and/or CH3 regions, using methods well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. 5. Recombinant production of antibodies
  • Antibodies and fragments thereof may be produced or modified using genetic material obtained from antibody producing cells and recombinant technology (see, for example, Berger and Kimmel, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques, Methods in Enzymology vol. 152 Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA; Sambrook and Russell (Eds.) (2000) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (3 rd Ed.), NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Ausubel ef al. (2002) Short Protocols in Molecular Biology: A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Wiley, John & Sons, Inc.; and U.S.P.N. 7,709,61 1 ).
  • nucleic acid molecules that encode the antibodies of the invention.
  • the nucleic acids may be present in whole cells, in a cell lysate, or in a partially purified or substantially pure form.
  • a nucleic acid is "isolated” or rendered substantially pure when separated from other cellular components or other contaminants, e.g., other cellular nucleic acids or proteins, by standard techniques, including alkaline/SDS treatment, CsCI banding, column chromatography, agarose gel electrophoresis and others well known in the art.
  • a nucleic acid of the invention can be, for example, DNA (e.g.
  • genomic DNA e.g., genomic DNA, cDNA), RNA and artificial variants thereof (e.g., peptide nucleic acids), whether single-stranded or double-stranded or RNA, RNA and may or may not contain introns.
  • the nucleic acid is a cDNA molecule.
  • Nucleic acids of the invention can be obtained using standard molecular biology techniques.
  • hybridomas e.g., hybridomas prepared as set forth in the
  • cDNAs encoding the light and heavy chains of the antibody can be obtained by standard PCR amplification or cDNA cloning techniques.
  • nucleic acid encoding the antibody can be recovered from the library.
  • DNA fragments encoding VH and VL segments can be further manipulated by standard recombinant DNA techniques, for example to convert the variable region genes to full-length antibody chain genes, to Fab fragment genes or to a scFv gene. In these manipulations, a VL- or
  • VH-encoding DNA fragment is operatively linked to another DNA fragment encoding another protein, such as an antibody constant region or a flexible linker.
  • operatively linked means that the two DNA fragments are joined such that the amino acid sequences encoded by the two DNA fragments remain in-frame.
  • the isolated DNA encoding the VH region can be converted to a full-length heavy chain gene by operatively linking the VH-encoding DNA to another DNA molecule encoding heavy chain constant regions (CH1 , CH2 and CH3).
  • the sequences of human heavy chain constant region genes are known in the art (see e.g., Kabat, ef al. (1991 ) ⁇ supra)) and DNA fragments encompassing these regions can be obtained by standard PCR amplification.
  • the heavy chain constant region can be an lgG1 , lgG2, lgG3, lgG4, IgA, IgE, IgM or IgD constant region, but most preferably is an lgG1 or lgG4 constant region.
  • An exemplary lgG1 constant region is set forth in SEQ ID NO: 2.
  • the VH-encoding DNA can be operatively linked to another DNA molecule encoding only the heavy chain CH1 constant region.
  • the isolated DNA encoding the VL region can be converted to a full-length light chain gene (as well as a Fab light chain gene) by operatively linking the VL-encoding DNA to another DNA molecule encoding the light chain constant region, CL.
  • the sequences of human light chain constant region genes are known in the art (see e.g., Kabat, ef al. (1991 ) (supra)) and DNA fragments encompassing these regions can be obtained by standard PCR amplification.
  • the light chain constant region can be a kappa or lambda constant region, but most preferably is a kappa constant region. In this respect an exemplary compatible kappa light chain constant region is set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 .
  • polypeptides e.g. antigens or antibodies
  • sequence identity sequence similarity
  • sequence homology sequence homology to the polypeptides of the invention.
  • a “homologous” polypeptide may exhibit 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, or 90% sequence identity. In other embodiments a “homologous” polypeptides may exhibit 93%, 95% or 98% sequence identity.
  • percent homology between two amino acid sequences is equivalent to the percent identity between the two sequences.
  • the comparison of sequences and determination of percent identity between two sequences can be accomplished using a mathematical algorithm, as described in the non-limiting examples below.
  • the percent identity between two amino acid sequences can be determined using the algorithm of E. Meyers and W. Miller (Comput. Appl. fi/ ' osc/ ' .,4:1 1-17 (1988)) which has been incorporated into the ALIGN program (version 2.0), using a PAM120 weight residue table, a gap length penalty of 12 and a gap penalty of 4.
  • the percent identity between two amino acid sequences can be determined using the Needleman and Wunsch (J. Mol. Biol.
  • the protein sequences of the present invention can further be used as a "query sequence" to perform a search against public databases to, for example, identify related sequences. Such searches can be performed using the XBLAST program (version 2.0) of Altschul, et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10.
  • Gapped BLAST can be utilized as described in Altschul ef al., (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25(17):3389-3402.
  • the default parameters of the respective programs e.g., XBLAST and NBLAST
  • Residue positions which are not identical may differ by conservative amino acid substitutions or by non-conservative amino acid substitutions.
  • a "conservative amino acid substitution” is one in which an amino acid residue is substituted by another amino acid residue having a side chain with similar chemical properties (e.g., charge or hydrophobicity).
  • a conservative amino acid substitution will not substantially change the functional properties of a protein.
  • the percent sequence identity or degree of similarity may be adjusted upwards to correct for the conservative nature of the substitution.
  • the polypeptide exhibiting sequence identity will retain the desired function or activity of the polypeptide of the invention (e.g., antibody.)
  • nucleic acids that that exhibit "sequence identity", sequence similarity” or “sequence homology” to the nucleic acids of the invention.
  • a “homologous sequence” means a sequence of nucleic acid molecules exhibiting at least about 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, or 90% sequence identity. In other embodiments, a “homologous sequence" of nucleic acids may exhibit 93%, 95% or 98% sequence identity to the reference nucleic acid.
  • the instant invention also provides vectors comprising such nucleic acids described above, which may be operably linked to a promoter (see, e.g., WO 86/05807; WO 89/01036; and U.S. P.N. 5,122,464); and other transcriptional regulatory and processing control elements of the eukaryotic secretory pathway.
  • the invention also provides host cells harboring those vectors and host- expression systems.
  • host-expression system includes any kind of cellular system that can be engineered to generate either the nucleic acids or the polypeptides and antibodies of the invention.
  • host-expression systems include, but are not limited to microorganisms (e.g., £. coli or B.
  • subtilis transformed or transfected with recombinant bacteriophage DNA or plasmid DNA; yeast (e.g., Saccharomyces) transfected with recombinant yeast expression vectors; or mammalian cells (e.g., COS, CHO-S, HEK-293T, 3T3 cells) harboring recombinant expression constructs containing promoters derived from the genome of mammalian cells or viruses (e.g., the adenovirus late promoter).
  • the host cell may be co-transfected with two expression vectors, for example, the first vector encoding a heavy chain derived polypeptide and the second vector encoding a light chain derived polypeptide.
  • the host cell may also be engineered to allow the production of an antigen binding molecule with various characteristics (e.g. modified glycoforms or proteins having GnTIII activity).
  • cell lines that stably express the selected antibody may be engineered using standard art recognized techniques and form part of the invention.
  • host cells can be transformed with DNA controlled by appropriate expression control elements (e.g., promoter or enhancer sequences, transcription terminators, polyadenylation sites, etc.), and a selectable marker.
  • appropriate expression control elements e.g., promoter or enhancer sequences, transcription terminators, polyadenylation sites, etc.
  • selectable marker e.g., promoter or enhancer sequences, transcription terminators, polyadenylation sites, etc.
  • Any of the selection systems well known in the art may be used, including the glutamine synthetase gene expression system (the GS system) which provides an efficient approach for enhancing expression under certain conditions.
  • the GS system is discussed in whole or part in connection with EP 0 216 846, EP 0 256 055, EP 0 323 997 and EP 0 338 841 and U.S.P.N.s 5,591 ,639 and 5,879,936.
  • Another preferred expression system for the development of stable cell lines is the Freedom TM CHO-S Kit (Life Technologies).
  • an antibody of the invention may be purified or isolated by methods known in the art, meaning that it is identified and separated and/or recovered from its natural environment and separated from contaminants that would interfere with diagnostic or therapeutic uses for the antibody.
  • Isolated antibodies include antibodies in situ within recombinant cells.
  • isolated preparations may be purified using various art recognized techniques, such as, for example, ion exchange and size exclusion chromatography, dialysis, diafiltration, and affinity chromatography, particularly Protein A or Protein G affinity chromatography.
  • antibody-producing cells e.g., hybridomas, yeast colonies, etc.
  • Hybridomas can be expanded in vitro in cell culture or in vivo in syngeneic immunocompromised animals. Methods of selecting, cloning and expanding hybridomas and/or colonies are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Once the desired antibodies are identified the relevant genetic material may be isolated, manipulated and expressed using common, art-recognized molecular biology and biochemical techniques.
  • the antibodies produced by naive libraries may be of moderate affinity (K a of about 10 6 to 10 7 M "1 ).
  • affinity maturation may be mimicked in vitro by constructing antibody libraries (e.g., by introducing random mutations in vitro by using error- prone polymerase) and reselecting antibodies with high affinity for the antigen from those secondary libraries (e.g. by using phage or yeast display).
  • WO 9607754 describes a method for inducing mutagenesis in a CDR of an immunoglobulin light chain to create a library of light chain genes.
  • phage or yeast display in which a library of human combinatorial antibodies or scFv fragments is synthesized on phages or yeast, the library is screened with the antigen of interest or an antibody-binding portion thereof, and the phage or yeast that binds the antigen is isolated, from which one may obtain the antibodies or immunoreactive fragments (Vaughan ef a/., 1996, PMID: 9630891 ; Sheets ef a/., 1998, PMID: 9600934; Boder ef a/. , 1997, PMID: 9181578; Pepper ef a/. , 2008, PMID: 18336206).
  • Kits for generating phage or yeast display libraries are commercially available. There also are other methods and reagents that can be used in generating and screening antibody display libraries (see U.S.P.N. 5,223,409; WO 92/18619, WO 91/17271 , WO 92/20791 , WO 92/15679, WO 93/01288, WO 92/01047, WO 92/09690; and Barbas ef a/., 1991 , PMID: 1896445). Such techniques advantageously allow for the screening of large numbers of candidate antibodies and provide for relatively easy manipulation of sequences (e.g., by recombinant shuffling).
  • antibody-producing cells e.g., hybridomas or yeast colonies
  • antibody-producing cells may be selected, cloned and further screened for favorable properties including, for example, robust growth, high antibody production and, as discussed in more detail below, desirable site-specific antibody characteristics.
  • characteristics of the antibody may be imparted by selecting a particular antigen (e.g., a specific LING01 isoform) or immunoreactive fragment of the target antigen for inoculation of the animal.
  • the selected antibodies may be engineered as described above to enhance or refine immunochemical characteristics such as affinity or pharmacokinetics.
  • the antibodies of the invention may be "antagonists" or “neutralizing” antibodies, meaning that the antibody may associate with a determinant and block or inhibit the activities of said determinant either directly or by preventing association of the determinant with a binding partner such as a ligand or a receptor, thereby interrupting the biological response that otherwise would result from the interaction of the molecules.
  • a neutralizing or antagonist antibody will substantially inhibit binding of the determinant to its ligand or substrate when an excess of antibody reduces the quantity of binding partner bound to the determinant by at least about 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, 99% or more as measured, for example, by target molecule activity or in an in vitro competitive binding assay.
  • the modified activity may be measured directly using art recognized techniques or may be measured by the impact the altered activity has downstream (e.g., oncogenesis or cell survival).
  • the disclosed antibodies or ADCs will be associated with, or conjugated to, one or more drugs that kill the cell upon internalization.
  • the ADCs of the instant invention will comprise an internalizing site-specific ADC.
  • an antibody that "internalizes" is one that is taken up (along with any cytotoxin) by the cell upon binding to an associated antigen or receptor.
  • internalization will preferably occur in vivo in a subject in need thereof.
  • the number of ADCs internalized may be sufficient to kill an antigen-expressing cell, especially an antigen-expressing cancer stem cell.
  • the uptake of a single antibody molecule into the cell is sufficient to kill the target cell to which the antibody binds.
  • certain drugs are so highly potent that the internalization of a few molecules of the toxin conjugated to the antibody is sufficient to kill the tumor cell.
  • Whether an antibody internalizes upon binding to a mammalian cell can be determined by various art- recognized assays including those described in the Examples below. Methods of detecting whether an antibody internalizes into a cell are also described in U.S. P.N. 7,619,068. C. Depleting antibodies
  • the antibodies of the invention are depleting antibodies.
  • the term "depleting" antibody refers to an antibody that preferably binds to an antigen on or near the cell surface and induces, promotes or causes the death of the cell (e.g., by CDC, ADCC or introduction of a cytotoxic agent).
  • the selected depleting antibodies will be conjugated to a cytotoxin.
  • a depleting antibody will be able to kill at least 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 97%, or 99% of LINGOI-expressing cells in a defined cell population.
  • the cell population may comprise enriched, sectioned, purified or isolated tumorigenic cells, including cancer stem cells.
  • the cell population may comprise whole tumor samples or heterogeneous tumor extracts that comprise cancer stem cells. Standard biochemical techniques may be used to monitor and quantify the depletion of tumorigenic cells in accordance with the teachings herein.
  • K D refers to the dissociation constant or apparent affinity of a particular antibody-antigen interaction.
  • An antibody of the invention can immunospecifically bind its target antigen when the dissociation constant K D (k off /k on ) is ⁇ 10 "7 M.
  • the antibody specifically binds antigen with high affinity when the K D is ⁇ 5x10 "9 M, and with very high affinity when the K D is ⁇ 5x10 "10 M.
  • the antibody has a K D of ⁇ 10 "9 M and an off-rate of about 1x10 "4 /sec.
  • the off-rate is ⁇ 1 x10 "5 /sec.
  • the antibodies will bind to a determinant with a K D of between about 10 "7 M and 10 "10 M, and in yet another embodiment it will bind with a K D ⁇ 2x10 "10 M.
  • Still other selected embodiments of the invention comprise antibodies that have a K D (k off /k on ) of less than 10 "6 M, less than 5x10 "6 M, less than 10 "7 M, less than 5x10 "7 M, less than 10 "8 M, less than 5x10 "8 M, less than 10 "9 M, less than 5x10 "9 M, less than 10 "10 M, less than 5x10 "10 M, less than 10 "11 M, less than 5x10 "11 M, less than 10 "12 M, less than 5x10 "12 M, less than 10 "13 M, less than 5x10 "13 M, less than 10 "14 M, less than 5x10 "14 M, less than 10 "15 M or less than 5x10 "15 M.
  • an antibody of the invention that immunospecifically binds to a determinant e.g. LING01 may have an association rate constant or k on (or k a) rate (antibody + antigen (Ag) k on ⁇ antibody-Ag) of at least 10 5 IvlV, at least 2x10 5 IvlV, at least 5x10 5 IvlV, at least 10 6 MV, at least 5x10 6 MV, at least 10 7 MV, at least 5x10 7 MV, or at least 10 8 MV.
  • an antibody of the invention that immunospecifically binds to a determinant e.g.
  • LING01 may have a disassociation rate constant or k off (or k d) rate (antibody + antigen (Ag) k off ⁇ — antibody-Ag) of less than I0 " ' s “ ', less than 5xl0 " ' s “ ', less than I0 "2 s “ ', less than 5xl0 " 2 s “ ', less than I0 "3 s “ ', less than 5xl0 "3 s “ ', less than I0 "4 s " ', less than 5xl0 4 s “ ', less than I0 "5 s " ', less than 5xl0 "5 s " ', less than I0 "6 s “ ', less than 5xl0 “6 s “ ' less than I0 "7 s " ', less than 5xl0 "7 s “ ', less than I0 "8 s " ', less than 5xl0 "8 s “ ', less
  • Binding affinity may be determined using various techniques known in the art, for example, surface plasmon resonance, bio-layer interferometry, dual polarization interferometry, static light scattering, dynamic light scattering, isothermal titration calorimetry, ELISA, analytical ultracentrifugation, and flow cytometry.
  • bins refers to methods used to group antibodies into “bins” based on their antigen binding characteristics and whether they compete with each other. The initial determination of bins may be further refined and confirmed by epitope mapping and other techniques as described herein. However it will be appreciated that empirical assignment of antibodies to individual bins provides information that may be indicative of the therapeutic potential of the disclosed antibodies.
  • a selected reference antibody or fragment thereof competes for binding with a second test antibody (i.e., is in the same bin) by using methods known in the art and set forth in the Examples herein.
  • a reference antibody is associated with LING01 antigen under saturating conditions and then the ability of a secondary or test antibody to bind to LING01 is determined using standard immunochemical techniques. If the test antibody is able to substantially bind to LING01 at the same time as the reference anti-LING01 antibody, then the secondary or test antibody binds to a different epitope than the primary or reference antibody.
  • test antibody if the test antibody is not able to substantially bind to LING01 at the same time, then the test antibody binds to the same epitope, an overlapping epitope, or an epitope that is in close proximity (at least sterically) to the epitope bound by the primary antibody. That is, the test antibody competes for antigen binding and is in the same bin as the reference antibody.
  • Competing antibody when used in the context of the disclosed antibodies means competition between antibodies as determined by an assay in which a test antibody or immunologically functional fragment being tested inhibits specific binding of a reference antibody to a common antigen.
  • an assay involves the use of purified antigen (e.g., LING01 or a domain or fragment thereof) bound to a solid surface or cells, an unlabeled test antibody and a labeled reference antibody.
  • Competitive inhibition is measured by determining the amount of label bound to the solid surface or cells in the presence of the test antibody.
  • the test antibody is present in excess and/or allowed to bind first. Additional details regarding methods for determining competitive binding are provided in the Examples herein.
  • a competing antibody when present in excess, it will inhibit specific binding of a reference antibody to a common antigen by at least 30%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70% or 75%. In some instance, binding is inhibited by at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 97% or more.
  • the reference antibody when bound it will preferably inhibit binding of a subsequently added test antibody (i.e., an anti-LING01 antibody) by at least 30%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70% or 75%. In some instance, binding of the test antibody is inhibited by at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 97% or more.
  • a subsequently added test antibody i.e., an anti-LING01 antibody
  • binning or competitive binding may be determined using various art-recognized techniques, such as, for example, immunoassays such as western blots, radioimmunoassays, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), "sandwich” immunoassays, immunoprecipitation assays, precipitin reactions, gel diffusion precipitin reactions, immunodiffusion assays, agglutination assays, complement-fixation assays, immunoradiometric assays, fluorescent immunoassays and protein A immunoassays.
  • immunoassays such as western blots, radioimmunoassays, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), "sandwich” immunoassays, immunoprecipitation assays, precipitin reactions, gel diffusion precipitin reactions, immunodiffusion assays, agglutination assays, complement-fixation assays, immunoradiometric assays, fluorescent immunoassays and protein A immunoassay
  • cross-blocking assays may be used (see, for example, WO 2003/48731 ; and Harlow ef al. (1988) Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Ed Harlow and David Lane).
  • BIAcoreTM 2000 system GE Healthcare
  • bio- layer interferometry using, for example, a ForteBio ® Octet RED (ForteBio)
  • flow cytometry bead arrays using, for example, a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) or a multiplex LUMINEXTM detection assay (Luminex).
  • Luminex is a bead-based immunoassay platform that enables large scale multiplexed antibody pairing.
  • the assay compares the simultaneous binding patterns of antibody pairs to the target antigen.
  • One antibody of the pair (capture mAb) is bound to Luminex beads, wherein each capture mAb is bound to a bead of a different color.
  • the other antibody (detector mAb) is bound to a fluorescent signal (e.g. phycoerythrin (PE)).
  • PE phycoerythrin
  • the assay analyzes the simultaneous binding (pairing) of antibodies to an antigen and groups together antibodies with similar pairing profiles. Similar profiles of a detector mAb and a capture mAb indicates that the two antibodies bind to the same or closely related epitopes.
  • pairing profiles can be determined using Pearson correlation coefficients to identify the antibodies which most closely correlate to any particular antibody on the panel of antibodies that are tested.
  • a test/detector mAb will be determined to be in the same bin as a reference/capture mAb if the Pearson's correlation coefficient of the antibody pair is at least 0.9.
  • the Pearson's correlation coefficient is at least 0.8, 0.85, 0.87 or 0.89.
  • the Pearson's correlation coefficient is at least 0.91 , 0.92, 0.93, 0.94, 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, 0.99 or 1 .
  • Other methods of analyzing the data obtained from the Luminex assay are described in U.S. P.N. 8,568,992.
  • Luminex to analyze 100 different types of beads (or more) simultaneously provides almost unlimited antigen and/or antibody surfaces, resulting in improved throughput and resolution in antibody epitope profiling over a biosensor assay (Miller, ef a/., 201 1 , PMID: 21223970).
  • “Surface plasmon resonance,” refers to an optical phenomenon that allows for the analysis of real-time specific interactions by detection of alterations in protein concentrations within a biosensor matrix.
  • a technique that can be used to determine whether a test antibody "competes" for binding with a reference antibody is “bio-layer interferometry", an optical analytical technique that analyzes the interference pattern of white light reflected from two surfaces: a layer of immobilized protein on a biosensor tip, and an internal reference layer. Any change in the number of molecules bound to the biosensor tip causes a shift in the interference pattern that can be measured in real-time.
  • biolayer interferometry assays may be conducted using a ForteBio ® Octet RED machine as follows. A reference antibody (Ab1 ) is captured onto an anti- mouse capture chip, a high concentration of non-binding antibody is then used to block the chip and a baseline is collected.
  • Monomeric, recombinant target protein is then captured by the specific antibody (Ab1 ) and the tip is dipped into a well with either the same antibody (Ab1 ) as a control or into a well with a different test antibody (Ab2). If no further binding occurs, as determined by comparing binding levels with the control Ab1 , then Ab1 and Ab2 are determined to be "competing" antibodies. If additional binding is observed with Ab2, then Ab1 and Ab2 are determined not to compete with each other. This process can be expanded to screen large libraries of unique antibodies using a full row of antibodies in a 96-well plate representing unique bins.
  • a test antibody will compete with a reference antibody if the reference antibody inhibits specific binding of the test antibody to a common antigen by at least 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70% or 75%. In other embodiments, binding is inhibited by at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, or 97% or more.
  • a bin encompassing a group of competing antibodies, has been defined further characterization can be carried out to determine the specific domain or epitope on the antigen to which the antibodies in a bin bind. Domain-level epitope mapping may be performed using a modification of the protocol described by Cochran ef a/., 2004, PMID: 15099763 and as detailed below in Example 8 appended hereto.
  • Fine epitope mapping is the process of determining the specific amino acids on the antigen that comprise the epitope of a determinant to which the antibody binds.
  • epitope is used in its common biochemical sense and refers to that portion of the target antigen capable of being recognized and specifically bound by a particular antibody.
  • epitopes or immunogenic determinants include chemically active surface groupings of molecules such as amino acids, sugar side chains, phosphoryl groups, or sulfonyl groups, and, in certain embodiments, may have specific three-dimensional structural characteristics, and/or specific charge characteristics.
  • an antibody is said to specifically bind an antigen when it preferentially recognizes its target antigen in a complex mixture of proteins and/or macromolecules.
  • epitopes may generally be formed from both contiguous amino acids and noncontiguous amino acids juxtaposed by tertiary folding of a protein ("conformational epitopes"). In such conformational epitopes the points of interaction occur across amino acid residues on the protein that are linearly separated from one another. Epitopes formed from contiguous amino acids (sometimes referred to as “linear” or “continuous” epitopes) are typically retained upon protein denaturing, whereas epitopes formed by tertiary folding are typically lost upon protein denaturing.
  • An antibody epitope typically includes at least 3, and more usually, at least 5 or 8-10 amino acids in a unique spatial conformation. Methods of epitope determination or "epitope mapping" are well known in the art and may be used in conjunction with the instant disclosure to identify epitopes on LING01 bound by the disclosed antibodies.
  • Compatible epitope mapping techniques include alanine scanning mutants, peptide blots
  • MAP Modification-Assisted Profiling
  • SAP Antigen Structure-based Antibody Profiling
  • This technology allows rapid filtering of genetically identical antibodies, such that characterization can be focused on genetically distinct antibodies. It will be appreciated that MAP may be used to sort the anti- LING01 antibodies of the invention into groups of antibodies binding different epitopes
  • a desired epitope on an antigen it is possible to generate antibodies to that epitope, e.g., by immunizing with a peptide comprising the epitope using techniques described in the present invention.
  • the generation and characterization of antibodies may elucidate information about desirable epitopes located in specific domains or motifs. From this information, it is then possible to competitively screen antibodies for binding to the same epitope. An approach to achieve this is to conduct competition studies to find antibodies that compete for binding to the antigen.
  • a high throughput process for binning antibodies based upon their cross-competition is described in WO 03/48731.
  • Other methods of binning or domain level or epitope mapping comprising antibody competition or antigen fragment expression on yeast are well known in the art.
  • the antibodies of the invention may be conjugated with pharmaceutically active or diagnostic moieties to form an "antibody drug conjugate” (ADC) or "antibody conjugate".
  • ADC antibody drug conjugate
  • conjugate is used broadly and means the covalent or non- covalent association of any pharmaceutically active or diagnostic moiety with an antibody of the instant invention regardless of the method of association. In certain embodiments the association is effected through a lysine or cysteine residue of the antibody. In particularly preferred embodiments the pharmaceutically active or diagnostic moieties may be conjugated to the antibody via one or more site-specific free cysteine(s).
  • the disclosed ADCs may be used for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.
  • the ADCs of the instant invention may be used to deliver cytotoxins or other payloads to the target location (e.g., tumorigenic cells and/or cells expressing LING01 ).
  • the terms “drug” or “warhead” may be used interchangeably and will mean a biologically active or detectable molecule or compound, including anti-cancer agents as described below.
  • a "payload” may comprise a drug or warhead in combination with an optional linker compound.
  • the warhead on the conjugate may comprise peptides, proteins, or prodrugs which are metabolized to an active agent in vivo, polymers, nucleic acid molecules, small molecules, binding agents, mimetic agents, synthetic drugs, inorganic molecules, organic molecules and radioisotopes.
  • the disclosed ADCs will direct the bound payload to the target site in a relatively unreactive, non-toxic state before releasing and activating the payload.
  • This targeted release of the payload is preferably achieved through stable conjugation of the payloads (e.g., via one or more cysteines on the antibody) and the relatively homogeneous composition of the ADC preparations which minimize over-conjugated toxic species.
  • the conjugates of the instant invention can substantially reduce undesirable non-specific toxicity. This advantageously provides for relatively high levels of the active cytotoxin at the tumor site while minimizing exposure of non-targeted cells and tissue thereby providing an enhanced therapeutic index.
  • any disclosure directed to exemplary therapeutic payloads is also applicable to payloads comprising diagnostic agents or biocompatible modifiers as discussed herein unless otherwise dictated by context.
  • the selected payload may be covalently or non- covalently linked to, the antibody and exhibit various stoichiometric molar ratios depending, at least in part, on the method used to effect the conjugation.
  • the conjugates of the instant invention may be represented by the formula:
  • Ab comprises an anti-LING01 antibody
  • L comprises an optional linker
  • c) D comprises a drug
  • n is an integer from about 1 to about 20.
  • conjugates according to the aforementioned formula may be fabricated using a number of different linkers and drugs and that conjugation methodology will vary depending on the selection of components.
  • any drug or drug linker compound that associates with a reactive residue (e.g., cysteine or lysine) of the disclosed antibodies are compatible with the teachings herein.
  • any reaction conditions that allow for site-specific conjugation of the selected drug to an antibody are within the scope of the present invention.
  • particularly preferred embodiments of the instant invention comprise selective conjugation of the drug or drug linker to free cysteines using stabilization agents in combination with mild reducing agents as described herein. Such reaction conditions tend to provide more homogeneous preparations with less non-specific conjugation and contaminants and correspondingly less toxicity.
  • Exemplary payloads compatible with the teachings herein are set forth below.
  • the antibodies of the invention may be conjugated, linked or fused to or otherwise associated with a pharmaceutically active moiety which is a therapeutic moiety or a drug such as an anti-cancer agent including, but not limited to, cytotoxic agents, cytostatic agents, anti- angiogenic agents, debulking agents, chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapeutic agents, targeted anti-cancer agents, biological response modifiers, cancer vaccines, cytokines, hormone therapies, anti-metastatic agents and immunotherapeutic agents.
  • Preferred exemplary anti-cancer agents comprise 1-dehydrotestosterone, anthramycins, actinomycin D, bleomycin, calicheamicin, colchicin, cyclophosphamide, cytochalasin B, dactinomycin (formerly actinomycin), dihydroxy anthracin, dione, emetine, epirubicin, ethidium bromide, etoposide, glucocorticoids, gramicidin D, lidocaine, maytansinoids such as DM-1 and DM-4 (Immunogen), mithramycin, mitomycin, mitoxantrone, paclitaxel, procaine, propranolol, puromycin, tenoposide, tetracaine and pharmaceutically acceptable salts or solvates, acids or derivatives of any of the above.
  • Additional compatible cytotoxins comprise dolastatins and auristatins, including monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) (Seattle Genetics), amanitins such as alpha-amanitin, beta-amanitin, gamma-amanitin or epsilon-amanitin (Heidelberg Pharma), DNA minor groove binding agents such as duocarmycin derivatives (Syntarga), alkylating agents such as modified or dimeric pyrrolobenzodiazepines (PBD), mechlorethamine, thioepa, chlorambucil, melphalan, carmustine (BCNU), lomustine (CCNU), cyclothosphamide, busulfan, dibromomannitol, streptozotocin, mitomycin C and cisdichlorodiamine platinum (II) (DDP) cisplatin, splicing inhibitors such as me
  • tubular binding agents such as epothilone analogs and paclitaxel and DNA damaging agents such as calicheamicins and esperamicins
  • antimetabolites such as methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, 6- thioguanine, cytarabine, and 5-fluorouracil decarbazine
  • anti-mitotic agents such as vinblastine and vincristine and anthracyclines
  • daunorubicin (formerly daunomycin) and doxorubicin
  • pharmaceutically acceptable salts or solvates acids or derivatives of any of the above.
  • the antibodies of the instant invention may be associated with anti-CD3 binding molecules to recruit cytotoxic T-cells and have them target tumorigenic cells (BiTE technology; see e.g., Fuhrmann et. al. (2010) Annual Meeting of AACR Abstract No. 5625).
  • ADCs of the invention may comprise therapeutic radioisotopes conjugated using appropriate linkers.
  • exemplary radioisotopes that may be compatible with such embodiments include, but are not limited to, iodine ( 131 l, 125 l, 123 l, 121 l,), carbon ( 14 C), copper ( 62 Cu,
  • the ADCs of the invention may comprise PBDs and pharmaceutically acceptable salts or solvates, acids or derivatives thereof, as warheads.
  • PBDs are alkylating agents that exert antitumor activity by covalently binding to DNA in the minor groove and inhibiting nucleic acid synthesis.
  • PBDs have been shown to have potent antitumor properties while exhibiting minimal bone marrow depression.
  • PBDs compatible with the invention may be linked to an antibody using several types of linkers (e.g., a peptidyl linker comprising a maleimido moiety with a free sulfhydryl), and in certain embodiments are dimeric in form (i.e., PBD dimers).
  • Antibodies of the present invention may also be conjugated to biological response modifiers.
  • the drug moiety can be a polypeptide possessing a desired biological activity.
  • proteins may include, for example, a toxin such as abrin, ricin A, Onconase (or another cytotoxic RNase), pseudomonas exotoxin, cholera toxin, diphtheria toxin; an apoptotic agent such as tumor necrosis factor e.g.
  • TNF- a or TNF- ⁇ a- interferon, ⁇ -interferon, nerve growth factor, platelet derived growth factor, tissue plasminogen activator, AIM I (WO 97/33899), AIM II (WO 97/3491 1 ), Fas Ligand (Takahashi ef a/., 1994, PMID: 7826947), and VEGI (WO 99/23105), a thrombotic agent, an anti-angiogenic agent, e.g., angiostatin or endostatin, a lymphokine, for example, interleukin-1 (IL-1 ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), or a growth factor e.g., growth hormone (GH).
  • IL-1 interleukin-1
  • IL-2 interleukin-2
  • IL-6 interleukin-6
  • the antibodies of the invention, or fragments or derivatives thereof are conjugated to a diagnostic or detectable agent, marker or reporter which may be, for example, a biological molecule (e.g., a peptide or nucleotide), a small molecule, fluorophore, or radioisotope.
  • a diagnostic or detectable agent e.g., a biological molecule (e.g., a peptide or nucleotide), a small molecule, fluorophore, or radioisotope.
  • Labeled antibodies can be useful for monitoring the development or progression of a hyperproliferative disorder or as part of a clinical testing procedure to determine the efficacy of a particular therapy including the disclosed antibodies (i.e. theragnostics) or to determine a future course of treatment.
  • markers or reporters may also be useful in purifying the selected antibody, for use in antibody analytics (e.g., epitope binding or antibody binning), separating or isolating tumorigenic cells or in preclin
  • Such diagnosis, analysis and/or detection can be accomplished by coupling the antibody to detectable substances including, but not limited to, various enzymes comprising for example horseradish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, beta-galactosidase, or acetylcholinesterase; prosthetic groups, such as but not limited to streptavidinlbiotin and avidin/biotin; fluorescent materials, such as but not limited to, umbelliferone, fluorescein, fluorescein isothiocynate, rhodamine, dichlorotriazinylamine fluorescein, dansyl chloride or phycoerythrin; luminescent materials, such as but not limited to, luminol; bioluminescent materials, such as but not limited to, luciferase, luciferin, and aequorin; radioactive materials, such as but not limited to iodine ( 131 l, 125 l, 123 l, 121 l,
  • the antibodies or fragments thereof can be fused or conjugated to marker sequences or compounds, such as a peptide or fluorophore to facilitate purification or diagnostic or analytic procedures such as immunohistochemistry, bio-layer interferometry, surface plasmon resonance, flow cytometry, competitive ELISA, FACs, etc.
  • the marker comprises a histidine tag such as that provided by the pQE vector (Qiagen), among others, many of which are commercially available.
  • peptide tags useful for purification include, but are not limited to, the hemagglutinin "HA” tag, which corresponds to an epitope derived from the influenza hemagglutinin protein (Wilson ef a/., 1984, Cell 37:767) and the "flag" tag (U.S. P.N. 4,703,004).
  • HA hemagglutinin
  • Flag flag
  • the antibodies of the invention may be conjugated with biocompatible modifiers that may be used to adjust, alter, improve or moderate antibody characteristics as desired.
  • biocompatible modifiers that may be used to adjust, alter, improve or moderate antibody characteristics as desired.
  • antibodies or fusion constructs with increased in vivo half- lives can be generated by attaching relatively high molecular weight polymer molecules such as commercially available polyethylene glycol (PEG) or similar biocompatible polymers.
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • PEG polyethylene glycol
  • PEG can be attached to antibodies or antibody fragments or derivatives with or without a multifunctional linker either through conjugation of the PEG to the N- or C- terminus of said antibodies or antibody fragments or via epsilon-amino groups present on lysine residues.
  • Linear or branched polymer derivatization that results in minimal loss of biological activity may be used.
  • the degree of conjugation can be closely monitored by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry to ensure optimal conjugation of PEG molecules to antibody molecules.
  • Unreacted PEG can be separated from antibody-PEG conjugates by, e.g., size exclusion or ion-exchange chromatography.
  • the disclosed antibodies can be conjugated to albumin in order to make the antibody or antibody fragment more stable in vivo or have a longer half-life in vivo.
  • the techniques are well known in the art, see e.g., WO 93/15199, WO 93/15200, and WO 01/77137; and EP 0 413, 622.
  • Other biocompatible conjugates are evident to those of ordinary skill and may readily be identified in accordance with the teachings herein.
  • linker compounds can be used to conjugate the antibodies of the invention to the relevant warhead.
  • the linkers merely need to covalently bind with the reactive residue on the antibody (preferably a cysteine or lysine) and the selected drug compound. Accordingly, any linker that reacts with the selected antibody residue and may be used to provide the relatively stable conjugates (site-specific or otherwise) of the instant invention is compatible with the teachings herein.
  • Conjugation reactions involving reduced cysteines and lysines include, but are not limited to, thiol-maleimide, thiol-halogeno (acyl halide), thiol-ene, thiol-yne, thiol- vinylsulfone, thiol-bisulfone, thiol-thiosulfonate, thiol-pyridyl disulfide and thiol-parafluoro reactions.
  • thiol-maleimide bioconjugation is one of the most widely used approaches due to its fast reaction rates and mild conjugation conditions.
  • Thiol-pyridyl disulfide reaction is another popular bioconjugation route.
  • the pyridyl disulfide undergoes fast exchange with free thiol resulting in the mixed disulfide and release of pyridine-2-thione.
  • Mixed disulfides can be cleaved in the reductive cell environment releasing the payload.
  • Other approaches gaining more attention in bioconjugation are thiol-vinylsulfone and thiol-bisulfone reactions, each of which are compatible with the teachings herein and expressly included within the scope of the invention.
  • compatible linkers will confer stability on the ADCs in the extracellular environment, prevent aggregation of the ADC molecules and keep the ADC freely soluble in aqueous media and in a monomeric state.
  • the ADC Before transport or delivery into a cell, the ADC is preferably stable and remains intact, i.e. the antibody remains linked to the drug moiety. While the linkers are stable outside the target cell they are designed to be cleaved or degraded at some efficacious rate inside the cell. Accordingly an effective linker will: (i) maintain the specific binding properties of the antibody; (ii) allow intracellular delivery of the conjugate or drug moiety; (iii) remain stable and intact, i.e.
  • the stability of the ADC may be measured by standard analytical techniques such as HPLC/UPLC, mass spectroscopy, HPLC, and the separation/analysis techniques LC/MS and LC/MS/MS.
  • covalent attachment of the antibody and the drug moiety requires the linker to have two reactive functional groups, i.e. bivalency in a reactive sense.
  • Bivalent linker reagents which are useful to attach two or more functional or biologically active moieties, such as MMAE and site-specific antibodies are known, and methods have been described to provide their resulting conjugates.
  • Linkers compatible with the present invention may broadly be classified as cleavable and non-cleavable linkers.
  • Cleavable linkers which may include acid-labile linkers, protease cleavable linkers and disulfide linkers, are internalized into the target cell and are cleaved in the
  • cytotoxins endosomal-lysosomal pathway inside the cell. Release and activation of the cytotoxin relies on endosome/lysosome acidic compartments that facilitate cleavage of acid-labile chemical linkages such as hydrazone or oxime. If a lysosomal-specific protease cleavage site is engineered into the linker the cytotoxins will be released in proximity to their intracellular targets. Alternatively, linkers containing mixed disulfides provide an approach by which cytotoxic payloads are released intracellular ⁇ as they are selectively cleaved in the reducing environment of the cell, but not in the oxygen-rich environment in the bloodstream.
  • linker containing amide linked polyethyleneglycol or alkyl spacers liberate toxic payloads during lysosomal degradation of the ADC within the target cell.
  • linker will depend on the particular drug used in the conjugate, the particular indication and the antibody target.
  • certain embodiments of the invention comprise a linker that is cleavable by a cleaving agent that is present in the intracellular environment (e.g., within a lysosome or endosome or caveolae).
  • the linker can be, for example, a peptidyl linker that is cleaved by an intracellular peptidase or protease enzyme, including, but not limited to, a lysosomal or endosomal protease.
  • the peptidyl linker is at least two amino acids long or at least three amino acids long.
  • Cleaving agents can include cathepsins B and D and plasmin, each of which is known to hydrolyze dipeptide drug derivatives resulting in the release of active drug inside target cells.
  • Exemplary peptidyl linkers that are cleavable by the thiol-dependent protease Cathepsin-B are peptides comprising Phe-Leu since cathepsin-B has been found to be highly expressed in cancerous tissue. Other examples of such linkers are described, for example, in U.S. P.N. 6,214,345.
  • the peptidyl linker cleavable by an intracellular protease is a Val-Cit linker, a Val-Ala linker or a Phe-Lys linker such as is described in U.S. P.N. 6,214,345.
  • One advantage of using intracellular proteolytic release of the therapeutic agent is that the agent is typically attenuated when conjugated and the serum stabilities of the conjugates are typically high.
  • the cleavable linker is pH-sensitive.
  • the pH-sensitive linker will be hydrolyzable under acidic conditions.
  • an acid-labile linker that is hydrolyzable in the lysosome e.g., a hydrazone, oxime, semicarbazone, thiosemicarbazone, cis-aconitic amide, orthoester, acetal, ketal, or the like
  • Such linkers are relatively stable under neutral pH conditions, such as those in the blood, but are unstable at below pH 5.5 or 5.0, the approximate pH of the lysosome.
  • the linker is cleavable under reducing conditions (e.g., a disulfide linker).
  • a disulfide linker e.g., a disulfide linker.
  • disulfide linkers are known in the art, including, for example, those that can be formed using SATA (N-succinimidyl-S-acetylthioacetate), SPDP (N-succinimidyl-3-(2- pyridyldithio)propionate), SPDB (N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio) butyrate) and SMPT (N- succinimidyl-oxycarbonyl-alpha-methyl-alpha-(2-pyridyl-dithio)toluene).
  • SATA N-succinimidyl-S-acetylthioacetate
  • SPDP N-succinimidyl-3-(2- pyridy
  • the linker is a malonate linker (Johnson ef a/., 1995, Anticancer Res. 15:1387-93), a maleimidobenzoyl linker (Lau ef a/., 1995, Bioorg-Med-Chem. 3(10): 1299-1304), or a 3'-N-amide analog (Lau ef a/., 1995, Bioorg-Med-Chem. 3(10):1305-12).
  • compatible peptidyl linkers will comprise:
  • CBA is the anti-LING01 antibody
  • L 1 is a linker
  • A is a connecting group (optionally comprising a spacer) connecting L 1 to a reactive residue on the antibody
  • L 1 or L 2 is a cleavable linker.
  • L 1 is preferably the cleavable linker, and may be referred to as a trigger for activation of the linker for cleavage.
  • L 1 and L 2 can vary widely. These groups are chosen on the basis of their cleavage characteristics, which may be dictated by the conditions at the site to which the conjugate is delivered. Those linkers that are cleaved by the action of enzymes are preferred, although linkers that are cleavable by changes in pH (e.g. acid or base labile), temperature or upon irradiation (e.g. photolabile) may also be used. Linkers that are cleavable under reducing or oxidizing conditions may also find use in the present invention.
  • pH e.g. acid or base labile
  • temperature or upon irradiation e.g. photolabile
  • L 1 may comprise a contiguous sequence of amino acids.
  • the amino acid sequence may be the target substrate for enzymatic cleavage, thereby allowing release of the drug.
  • L 1 is cleavable by the action of an enzyme.
  • the enzyme is an esterase or a peptidase.
  • L 1 comprises a dipeptide.
  • the dipeptide may be represented as -NH-XrX 2 -CO-, where -NH- and -CO- represent the N- and C-terminals of the amino acid groups Xi and X 2 respectively.
  • the amino acids in the dipeptide may be any combination of natural amino acids.
  • the linker is a cathepsin labile linker
  • the dipeptide may be the site of action for cathepsin-mediated cleavage.
  • CO and NH may represent that side chain functionality.
  • the group -X X 2 - in dipeptide, -NH-XrX 2 -CO- is selected from: -Phe- Lys-, -Val-Ala-, -Val-Lys-, -Ala-Lys-, -Val-Cit-, -Phe-Cit-, -Leu-Cit-, -lle-Cit-, -Phe-Arg- and -Trp-Cit- where Cit is citrulline.
  • the group -X X 2 - in dipeptide, -NH-XrX 2 -CO- is selected from:-Phe-Lys-, -Val- Ala-, -Val-Lys-, -Ala-Lys-, and -Val-Cit-.
  • the group -X X 2 - in dipeptide, -NH-XrX 2 -CO-, is -Phe-Lys- or -Val-Ala-.
  • the enzyme cleaves the bond between L 1 and L 2 .
  • An amino group of L 1 that connects to L 2 may be the N-terminus of an amino acid or may be derived from an amino group of an amino acid side chain, for example a lysine amino acid side chain.
  • a carboxyl group of L 1 that connects to L 2 may be the C-terminus of an amino acid or may be derived from a carboxyl group of an amino acid side chain, for example a glutamic acid amino acid side chain.
  • a hydroxyl group of L 1 that connects to L 2 may be derived from a hydroxyl group of an amino acid side chain, for example a serine amino acid side chain.
  • amino acid side chain includes those groups found in: (i) naturally occurring amino acids such as alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine; (ii) minor amino acids such as ornithine and citrulline; (iii) unnatural amino acids, beta-amino acids, synthetic analogs and derivatives of naturally occurring amino acids; and (iv) all enantiomers, diastereomers, isomerically enriched, isotopically labelled (e.g. 2 H, 3 H, 14 C, 15 N), protected forms, and racemic mixtures thereof.
  • naturally occurring amino acids such as alanine, arginine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine
  • n is 0 to 3.
  • the phenylene ring is optionally substituted with one, two or three substituents as described herein. In one embodiment, the phenylene group is optionally substituted with halo, N0 2 , R or OR.
  • Y is NH
  • n is 0 or 1 .
  • n is 0.
  • the self-immolative linker may be referred to as a p-aminobenzylcarbonyl linker (PABC).
  • PABC p-aminobenzylcarbonyl linker
  • the linker may include a self-immolative linker and the dipeptide together form the group -NH-Val-Ala-CO-NH-PABC-, which is illustrated below:
  • the asterisk indicates the point of attachment to the selected cytotoxic moiety
  • the wavy line indicates the point of attachment to the remaining portion of the linker (e.g., the spacer- antibody binding segments) which may be conjugated to the antibody.
  • L * is the activated form of the remaining portion of the linker comprising the now cleaved peptidyl unit.
  • A is a covalent bond.
  • L 1 and the antibody are directly connected.
  • L 1 comprises a contiguous amino acid sequence
  • the N-terminus of the sequence may connect directly to the antibody residue.
  • A is a spacer group.
  • L 1 and the antibody are indirectly connected.
  • the drug linkers of the instant invention will preferably be linked to reactive thiol nucleophiles on cysteines, including free cysteines.
  • the cysteines of the antibodies may be made reactive for conjugation with linker reagents by treatment with various reducing agent such as DTT or TCEP or mild reducing agents as set forth herein.
  • the drug linkers of the instant invention will preferably be linked to a lysine.
  • the linker contains an electrophilic functional group for reaction with a nucleophilic functional group on the antibody.
  • Nucleophilic groups on antibodies include, but are not limited to: (i) N-terminal amine groups, (ii) side chain amine groups, e.g. lysine, (iii) side chain thiol groups, e.g. cysteine, and (iv) sugar hydroxyl or amino groups where the antibody is glycosylated.
  • Amine, thiol, and hydroxyl groups are nucleophilic and capable of reacting to form covalent bonds with electrophilic groups on linker moieties and linker reagents including: (i) maleimide groups (ii) activated disulfides, (iii) active esters such as NHS (N-hydroxysuccinimide) esters, HOBt (N- hydroxybenzotriazole) esters, haloformates, and acid halides; (iv) alkyl and benzyl halides such as haloacetamides; and (v) aldehydes, ketones, carboxyl, and, some of which are exemplified as follows:
  • connection between a site-specific antibody and the drug-linker moiety is through a thiol residue of a free cysteine of the site specific antibody and a terminal maleimide group of present on the linker.
  • the connection between the antibody and the drug-linker is: where the asterisk indicates the point of attachment to the remaining portion of drug-linker and the wavy line indicates the point of attachment to the remaining portion of the antibody.
  • the S atom is preferably derived from a site-specific free cysteine.
  • the binding moiety comprises a terminal iodoacetamide that may be reacted with activated residues to provide the desired conjugate. In any event one skilled in the art could readily conjugate each of the disclosed drug-linker compounds with a compatible anti- LING01 site-specific antibody in view of the instant disclosure.
  • ADCs of the instant invention may be generated through conjugation of drugs to solvent-exposed amino groups of lysine residues present in the selected antibody.
  • Still other embodiments comprise activation of the N- terminal threonine and serine residues which may then be used to attach the disclosed payloads to the antibody.
  • the selected conjugation methodology will preferably be tailored to optimize the number of drugs attached to the antibody and provide a relatively high therapeutic index.
  • cysteine residues will be deprotonated to generate a thiolate nucleophile which may be reacted with soft electrophiles, such as maleimides and iodoacetamides.
  • soft electrophiles such as maleimides and iodoacetamides.
  • reagents for such conjugations may react directly with a cysteine thiol of a cysteine to form the conjugated protein or with a linker-drug to form a linker-drug intermediate.
  • linker In the case of a linker, several routes, employing organic chemistry reactions, conditions, and reagents are known to those skilled in the art, including: (1 ) reaction of a cysteine group of the protein of the invention with a linker reagent, to form a protein-linker intermediate, via a covalent bond, followed by reaction with an activated compound; and (2) reaction of a nucleophilic group of a compound with a linker reagent, to form a drug-linker intermediate, via a covalent bond, followed by reaction with a cysteine group of a protein of the invention.
  • bifunctional linkers are useful in the present invention.
  • the bifunctional linker may comprise a thiol modification group for covalent linkage to the cysteine residue(s) and at least one attachment moiety (e.g., a second thiol modification moiety) for covalent or non-covalent linkage to the compound.
  • antibodies Prior to conjugation, antibodies may be made reactive for conjugation with linker reagents by treatment with a reducing agent such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or (f/7s(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP).
  • a reducing agent such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or (f/7s(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP).
  • additional nucleophilic groups can be introduced into antibodies through the reaction of lysines with reagents, including but not limited to, 2-iminothiolane (Traut's reagent), SATA, SATP or SAT(PEG)4, resulting in conversion of an amine into a thiol.
  • cysteine thiol or lysine amino groups are nucleophilic and capable of reacting to form covalent bonds with electrophilic groups on linker reagents or compound-linker intermediates or drugs including: (i) active esters such as NHS esters, HOBt esters, haloformates, and acid halides; (ii) alkyl and benzyl halides, such as haloacetamides; (iii) aldehydes, ketones, carboxyl, and maleimide groups; and (iv) disulfides, including pyridyl disulfides, via sulfide exchange.
  • active esters such as NHS esters, HOBt esters, haloformates, and acid halides
  • alkyl and benzyl halides such as haloacetamides
  • aldehydes ketones, carboxyl, and maleimide groups
  • disulfides including pyridyl disulfides, via s
  • Nucleophilic groups on a compound or linker include, but are not limited to amine, thiol, hydroxyl, hydrazide, oxime, hydrazine, thiosemicarbazone, hydrazine carboxylate, and arylhydrazide groups capable of reacting to form covalent bonds with electrophilic groups on linker moieties and linker reagents.
  • Preferred labeling reagents include maleimide, haloacetyl, iodoacetamide succinimidyl ester, isothiocyanate, sulfonyl chloride, 2,6-dichlorotriazinyl, pentafluorophenyl ester, and phosphoramidite, although other functional groups can also be used.
  • methods include, for example, the use of maleimides, iodoacetimides or haloacetyl/alkyl halides, aziridne, acryloyl derivatives to react with the thiol of a cysteine to produce a thioether that is reactive with a compound.
  • Disulphide exchange of a free thiol with an activated piridyldisulphide is also useful for producing a conjugate (e.g., use of 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic (TNB) acid).
  • a maleimide is used.
  • lysine may also be used as a reactive residue to effect conjugation as set forth herein.
  • the nucleophilic lysine residue is commonly targeted through amine- reactive succinimidylesters.
  • the pH of the aqueous solution must be below the pKa of the lysine ammonium group, which is around 10.5, so the typical pH of the reaction is about 8 and 9.
  • the common reagent for the coupling reaction is NHS-ester which reacts with nucleophilic lysine through a lysine acylation mechanism.
  • isocyanates and isothiocyanates which also may be used in conjunction with the teachings herein to provide ADCs.
  • Methods are also known in the art for conjugating a compound to a threonine or serine residue (preferably a N-terminal residue).
  • a threonine or serine residue preferably a N-terminal residue.
  • carbonyl precursors are derived from the 1 ,2-aminoalcohols of serine or threonine, which can be selectively and rapidly converted to aldehyde form by periodate oxidation.
  • Reaction of the aldehyde with a 1 ,2-aminothiol of cysteine in a compound to be attached to a protein of the invention forms a stable thiazolidine product. This method is particularly useful for labeling proteins at N-terminal serine or threonine residues.
  • reactive thiol groups may be introduced into the selected antibody (or fragment thereof) by introducing one, two, three, four, or more free cysteine residues (e.g., preparing antibodies comprising one or more free non-native cysteine amino acid residues).
  • free cysteine residues e.g., preparing antibodies comprising one or more free non-native cysteine amino acid residues.
  • the present invention additionally provides for the selective reduction of certain prepared free cysteine sites and direction of the drug-linker to the same.
  • the conjugation specificity promoted by the engineered sites and the selective reduction allows for a high percentage of site directed conjugation at the desired positions.
  • Significantly some of these conjugation sites, such as those present in the terminal region of the light chain constant region, are typically difficult to conjugate effectively as they tend to cross-react with other free cysteines.
  • efficient conjugation rates may be obtained which considerably reduces unwanted high-DAR contaminants and non-specific toxicity.
  • the engineered constructs and disclosed novel conjugation methods comprising selective reduction provide ADC preparations having improved pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics and, potentially, an improved therapeutic index.
  • the site-specific constructs present free cysteine(s), which when reduced comprise thiol groups that are nucleophilic and capable of reacting to form covalent bonds with electrophilic groups on linker moieties such as those disclosed above.
  • Preferred antibodies of the instant invention will have reducible unpaired interchain or intrachain cysteines, i.e. cysteines providing such nucleophilic groups.
  • the reaction of free sulfhydryl groups of the reduced unpaired cysteines and the terminal maleimido or haloacetamide groups of the disclosed drug-linkers will provide the desired conjugation.
  • the free cysteines of the antibodies may be made reactive for conjugation with linker reagents by treatment with a reducing agent such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or (tris (2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP).
  • DTT dithiothreitol
  • TCEP tris (2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
  • Each free cysteine will thus present, theoretically, a reactive thiol nucleophile. While such reagents are compatible it will be appreciated that conjugation of the site-specific antibodies may be effected using various reactions, conditions and reagents known to those skilled in the art.
  • the free cysteines of engineered antibodies may be selectively reduced to provide enhanced site-directed conjugation and a reduction in unwanted, potentially toxic contaminants.
  • stabilizing agents such as arginine have been found to modulate intra- and inter-molecular interactions in proteins and may be used, in conjunction with selected reducing agents (preferably relatively mild), to selectively reduce the free cysteines and to facilitate site-specific conjugation as set forth herein.
  • selected reducing agents preferably relatively mild
  • selected reducing agents preferably relatively mild
  • selective reduction or “selectively reducing” may be used interchangeably and shall mean the reduction of free cysteine(s) without substantially disrupting native disulfide bonds present in the engineered antibody. In selected embodiments this may be affected by certain reducing agents.
  • selective reduction of an engineered construct will comprise the use of stabilization agents in combination with reducing agents (including mild reducing agents).
  • reducing agents including mild reducing agents.
  • selective conjugation shall mean the conjugation of an engineered antibody that has been selectively reduced with a cytotoxin as described herein.
  • use of such stabilizing agents in combination with selected reducing agents can markedly improve the efficiency of site-specific conjugation as determined by extent of conjugation on the heavy and light antibody chains and DAR distribution of the preparation.
  • such stabilizing agents may act to modulate the electrostatic microenvironment and/or modulate conformational changes at the desired conjugation site, thereby allowing relatively mild reducing agents (which do not materially reduce intact native disulfide bonds) to facilitate conjugation at the desired free cysteine site.
  • Such agents e.g., certain amino acids
  • Such agents are known to form salt bridges (via hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions) and may modulate protein-protein interactions in such a way as to impart a stabilizing effect that may cause favorable conformation changes and/or may reduce unfavorable protein-protein interactions.
  • such agents may act to inhibit the formation of undesired intramolecular (and intermolecular) cysteine-cysteine bonds after reduction thus facilitating the desired conjugation reaction wherein the engineered site-specific cysteine is bound to the drug (preferably via a linker). Since selective reduction conditions do not provide for the significant reduction of intact native disulfide bonds, the subsequent conjugation reaction is naturally driven to the relatively few reactive thiols on the free cysteines (e.g., preferably 2 free thiols per antibody). As previously alluded to this considerably reduces the levels of non-specific conjugation and corresponding impurities in conjugate preparations fabricated as set forth herein.
  • stabilizing agents compatible with the present invention will generally comprise compounds with at least one moiety having a basic pKa.
  • the moiety will comprise a primary amine while in other preferred embodiments the amine moiety will comprise a secondary amine.
  • the amine moiety will comprise a tertiary amine or a guanidinium group.
  • the amine moiety will comprise an amino acid while in other compatible embodiments the amine moiety will comprise an amino acid side chain.
  • the amine moiety will comprise a proteinogenic amino acid.
  • the amine moiety comprises a non-proteinogenic amino acid.
  • compatible stabilizing agents may comprise arginine, lysine, proline and cysteine.
  • compatible stabilizing agents may include guanidine and nitrogen containing heterocycles with basic pKa.
  • compatible stabilizing agents comprise compounds with at least one amine moiety having a pKa of greater than about 7.5, in other embodiments the subject amine moiety will have a pKa of greater than about 8.0, in yet other embodiments the amine moiety will have a pKa greater than about 8.5 and in still other embodiments the stabilizing agent will comprise an amine moiety having a pKa of greater than about 9.0.
  • Other preferred embodiments will comprise stabilizing agents where the amine moiety will have a pKa of greater than about 9.5 while certain other embodiments will comprise stabilizing agents exhibiting at least one amine moiety having a pKa of greater than about 10.0.
  • the stabilizing agent will comprise a compound having the amine moiety with a pKa of greater than about 10.5, in other embodiments the stabilizing agent will comprise a compound having a amine moiety with a pKa greater than about 1 1 .0, while in still other embodiments the stabilizing agent will comprise a amine moiety with a pKa greater than about 1 1.5. In yet other embodiments the stabilizing agent will comprise a compound having an amine moiety with a pKa greater than about 12.0, while in still other embodiments the stabilizing agent will comprise an amine moiety with a pKa greater than about 12.5. Those of skill in the art will understand that relevant pKa's may readily be calculated or determined using standard techniques and used to determine the applicability of using a selected compound as a stabilizing agent.
  • the disclosed stabilizing agents are shown to be particularly effective at targeting conjugation to free site-specific cysteines when combined with certain reducing agents.
  • compatible reducing agents may include any compound that produces a reduced free site-specific cysteine for conjugation without significantly disrupting the engineered antibody native disulfide bonds.
  • the activated drug linker is largely limited to binding to the desired free site-specific cysteine site.
  • Relatively mild reducing agents or reducing agents used at relatively low concentrations to provide mild conditions are particularly preferred.
  • the terms "mild reducing agent” or “mild reducing conditions” shall be held to mean any agent or state brought about by a reducing agent (optionally in the presence of stabilizing agents) that provides thiols at the free cysteine site(s) without substantially disrupting native disulfide bonds present in the engineered antibody. That is, mild reducing agents or conditions are able to effectively reduce free cysteine(s) (provide a thiol) without significantly disrupting the protein's native disulfide bonds.
  • the desired reducing conditions may be provided by a number of sulfhydryl- based compounds that establish the appropriate environment for selective conjugation.
  • mild reducing agents may comprise compounds having one or more free thiols while in particularly preferred embodiments mild reducing agents will comprise compounds having a single free thiol.
  • Non-limiting examples of reducing agents compatible with the instant invention comprise glutathione, n-acetyl cysteine, cysteine, 2-aminoethane-1 -thiol and 2- hydroxyethane-1 -thiol.
  • conjugation efficiency in site-specific antibodies may be determined by various art-accepted techniques.
  • the efficiency of the site-specific conjugation of a drug to an antibody may be determined by assessing the percentage of conjugation on the target conjugation site (in this invention the free cysteine on the c-terminus of the light chain) relative to all other conjugated sites.
  • the method herein provides for efficiently conjugating a drug to an antibody comprising free cysteines.
  • the conjugation efficiency is at least 5%, at least 10%, at least 15%, at least 20%, at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 35%, at least 40%, at least 45%, at least 50%, at least 55%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95%, at least 98% or more as measured by the percentage of target conjugation relative to all other conjugation sites.
  • engineered antibodies capable of conjugation may contain free cysteine residues that comprise sulfhydryl groups that are blocked or capped as the antibody is produced or stored.
  • Such caps include small molecules, proteins, peptides, ions and other materials that interact with the sulfhydryl group and prevent or inhibit conjugate formation.
  • the unconjugated engineered antibody may comprise free cysteines that bind other free cysteines on the same or different antibodies. As discussed herein such cross-reactivity may lead to various contaminants during the fabrication procedure.
  • the engineered antibodies may require uncapping prior to a conjugation reaction.
  • antibodies herein are uncapped and display a free sulfhydryl group capable of conjugation.
  • antibodies herein are subjected to an uncapping reaction that does not disturb or rearrange the naturally occurring disulfide bonds. It will be appreciated that in most cases the uncapping reactions will occur during the normal reduction reactions (reduction or selective reduction).
  • One of the advantages of conjugation with site specific antibodies of the present invention is the ability to generate relatively homogeneous ADC preparations comprising a narrow DAR distribution.
  • the disclosed constructs and/or selective conjugation provides for homogeneity of the ADC species within a sample in terms of the stoichiometric ratio between the drug and the engineered antibody.
  • drug to antibody ratio or “DAR” refers to the molar ratio of drug to antibody.
  • a conjugate preparation may be substantially homogeneous with respect to its DAR distribution, meaning that within the preparation is a predominant species of site-specific ADC with a particular DAR (e.g., a DAR of 2 or 4) that is also uniform with respect to the site of loading (i.e., on the free cysteines).
  • a particular DAR e.g., a DAR of 2 or 4
  • the desired homogeneity may be achieved through the use of site-specific constructs in combination with selective reduction.
  • the preparations may be further purified using analytical or preparative chromatography techniques.
  • the homogeneity of the ADC sample can be analyzed using various techniques known in the art including but not limited to mass spectrometry, HPLC (e.g. size exclusion HPLC, RP-HPLC, HIC-HPLC etc.) or capillary electrophoresis.
  • HPLC e.g. size exclusion HPLC, RP-HPLC, HIC-HPLC etc.
  • capillary electrophoresis e.g. size exclusion HPLC, RP-HPLC, HIC-HPLC etc.
  • liquid chromatography methods such as reverse phase (RP) and hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) may separate compounds in the mixture by drug loading value.
  • RP reverse phase
  • HIC hydrophobic interaction chromatography
  • IEC ion-exchange
  • MMC mixed-mode chromatography
  • the disclosed ADCs and preparations thereof may comprise drug and antibody moieties in various stoichiometric molar ratios depending on the configuration of the antibody and, at least in part, on the method used to effect conjugation.
  • the drug loading per ADC may comprise from 1-20 warheads (i.e., n is 1 -20).
  • Other selected embodiments may comprise ADCs with a drug loading of from 1 to 15 warheads.
  • the ADCs may comprise from 1-12 warheads or, more preferably, from 1-10 warheads.
  • the ADCs will comprise from 1 to 8 warheads.
  • practical drug loading provided by the instant invention preferably ranges from 1 to 8 drugs per conjugate, i.e. where 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 drugs are covalently attached to each antibody (e.g., for lgG1 , other antibodies may have different loading capacity depending the number of disulfide bonds).
  • the DAR of compositions of the instant invention will be approximately 2, 4 or 6 and in particularly preferred embodiments the DAR will comprise approximately 2.
  • the disclosed compositions actually comprise a mixture of conjugates with a range of drugs compounds, from 1 to 8 (in the case of a lgG1 ).
  • the disclosed ADC compositions include mixtures of conjugates where most of the constituent antibodies are covalently linked to one or more drug moieties and (despite the conjugate specificity of selective reduction) where the drug moieties may be attached to the antibody by various thiol groups. That is, following conjugation ADC compositions of the invention will comprise a mixture of conjugates with different drug loads (e.g., from 1 to 8 drugs per lgG1 antibody) at various concentrations (along with certain reaction contaminants primarily caused by free cysteine cross reactivity).
  • the conjugate compositions may be driven to the point where they largely contain a single predominant desired ADC species (e.g., with a drug loading of 2) with relatively low levels of other ADC species (e.g., with a drug loading of 1 , 4, 6, etc.).
  • the average DAR value represents the weighted average of drug loading for the composition as a whole (i.e., all the ADC species taken together). Due to inherent uncertainty in the quantification methodology employed and the difficulty in completely removing the non-predominant ADC species in a commercial setting, acceptable DAR values or specifications are often presented as an average, a range or distribution (i.e., an average DAR of 2 +/- 0.5). Preferably compositions comprising a measured average DAR within the range (i.e., 1 .5 to 2.5) would be used in a pharmaceutical setting.
  • the present invention will comprise compositions having an average DAR of 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 each +/- 0.5. In other preferred embodiments the present invention will comprise an average DAR of 2, 4, 6 or 8 +/- 0.5. Finally, in selected preferred embodiments the present invention will comprise an average DAR of 2 +/- 0.5. It will be appreciated that the range or deviation may be less than 0.4 in certain preferred embodiments. Thus, in other embodiments the compositions will comprise an average DAR of 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 each +/- 0.3, an average DAR of 2, 4, 6 or 8 +/- 0.3, even more preferably an average DAR of 2 or 4 +/- 0.3 or even an average DAR of 2 +/- 0.3.
  • lgG1 conjugate compositions will preferably comprise a composition with an average DAR of 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 each +/- 0.4 and relatively low levels (i.e., less than 30%) of non-predominant ADC species.
  • the ADC composition will comprise an average DAR of 2, 4, 6 or 8 each +/- 0.4 with relatively low levels ( ⁇ 30%) of non-predominant ADC species.
  • the ADC composition will comprise an average DAR of 2 +/- 0.4 with relatively low levels ( ⁇ 30%) of non-predominant ADC species.
  • the predominant ADC species (e.g., DAR of 2) will be present at a concentration of greater than 65%, at a concentration of greater than 70%, at a concentration of greater than 75%, at a concentration of greater that 80%, at a concentration of greater than 85%, at a concentration of greater than 90%, at a concentration of greater than 93%, at a concentration of greater than 95% or even at a concentration of greater than 97% when measured against other DAR species.
  • the distribution of drugs per antibody in preparations of ADC from conjugation reactions may be characterized by conventional means such as UV-Vis spectrophotometry, reverse phase HPLC, HIC, mass spectroscopy, ELISA, and electrophoresis.
  • the quantitative distribution of ADC in terms of drugs per antibody may also be determined.
  • ELISA the averaged value of the drugs per antibody in a particular preparation of ADC may be determined.
  • the distribution of drug per antibody values is not discernible by the antibody-antigen binding and detection limitation of ELISA.
  • ELISA assay for detection of antibody-drug conjugates does not determine where the drug moieties are attached to the antibody, such as the heavy chain or light chain fragments, or the particular amino acid residues.
  • the invention provides in vitro and in vivo methods for detecting, diagnosing or monitoring proliferative disorders and methods of screening cells from a patient to identify tumor cells including tumorigenic cells.
  • Such methods include identifying an individual having cancer for treatment or monitoring progression of a cancer, comprising contacting the patient or a sample obtained from a patient (either in vivo or in vitro) with an antibody as described herein and detecting presence or absence, or level of association, of the antibody to bound or free target molecules in the sample.
  • the antibody will comprise a detectable label or reporter molecule as described herein.
  • the association of the antibody with particular cells in the sample can denote that the sample may contain tumorigenic cells, thereby indicating that the individual having cancer may be effectively treated with an antibody as described herein.
  • Samples can be analyzed by numerous assays, for example, radioimmunoassays, enzyme immunoassays (e.g. ELISA), competitive-binding assays, fluorescent immunoassays, immunoblot assays, Western Blot analysis and flow cytometry assays.
  • Compatible in vivo theragnostic or diagnostic assays can comprise art recognized imaging or monitoring techniques, for example, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography (e.g. CAT scan), positron tomography (e.g., PET scan), radiography, ultrasound, etc.
  • the antibodies of the instant invention may be used to detect and quantify levels of a particular determinant (e.g., LING01 ) in a patient sample (e.g., plasma or blood) which may, in turn, be used to detect, diagnose or monitor proliferative disorders that are associated with the relevant determinant.
  • a patient sample e.g., plasma or blood
  • the antibodies of the instant invention may be used to detect, monitor and/or quantify circulating tumor cells either in vivo or in vitro (WO 2012/0128801 ).
  • the circulating tumor cells may comprise tumorigenic cells.
  • the tumorigenic cells in a subject or a sample from a subject may be assessed or characterized using the disclosed antibodies prior to therapy or regimen to establish a baseline.
  • the tumorigenic cells can be assessed from a sample that is derived from a subject that was treated.
  • the antibodies can be used to screen samples in order to identify compounds or agents (e.g., antibodies or ADCs) that alter a function or activity of tumor cells by interacting with a determinant.
  • tumor cells are put in contact with an antibody or ADC and the antibody or ADC can be used to screen the tumor for cells expressing a certain target (e.g. LING01 ) in order to identify such cells for purposes, including but not limited to, diagnostic purposes, to monitor such cells to determine treatment efficacy or to enrich a cell population for such target-expressing cells.
  • a certain target e.g. LING01
  • a method includes contacting, directly or indirectly, tumor cells with a test agent or compound and determining if the test agent or compound modulates an activity or function of the determinant-associated tumor cells for example, changes in cell morphology or viability, expression of a marker, differentiation or de-differentiation, cell respiration, mitochondrial activity, membrane integrity, maturation, proliferation, viability, apoptosis or cell death.
  • a direct interaction is physical interaction
  • an indirect interaction includes, for example, the action of a composition upon an intermediary molecule that, in turn, acts upon the referenced entity (e.g., cell or cell culture).
  • Screening methods include high throughput screening, which can include arrays of cells
  • the antibodies or ADCs of the invention can be formulated in various ways using art recognized techniques.
  • the therapeutic compositions of the invention can be administered neat or with a minimum of additional components while others may optionally be formulated to contain suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • pharmaceutically acceptable carriers comprise excipients, vehicles, adjuvants and diluents that are well known in the art and can be available from commercial sources for use in pharmaceutical preparation (see, e.g., Gennaro (2003) Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy with Facts and Comparisons: Drugfacts Plus, 20th ed., Mack Publishing; Ansel ef al.
  • Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers comprise substances that are relatively inert and can facilitate administration of the antibody or can aid processing of the active compounds into preparations that are pharmaceutically optimized for delivery to the site of action.
  • Such pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include agents that can alter the form, consistency, viscosity, pH, tonicity, stability, osmolarity, pharmacokinetics, protein aggregation or solubility of the formulation and include buffering agents, wetting agents, emulsifying agents, diluents, encapsulating agents and skin penetration enhancers.
  • Certain non-limiting examples of carriers include saline, buffered saline, dextrose, arginine, sucrose, water, glycerol, ethanol, sorbitol, dextran, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and combinations thereof.
  • Antibodies for systemic administration may be formulated for enteral, parenteral or topical administration. Indeed, all three types of formulation may be used simultaneously to achieve systemic administration of the active ingredient. Excipients as well as formulations for parenteral and nonparenteral drug delivery are set forth in Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy (2000) 20th Ed. Mack Publishing.
  • Suitable formulations for enteral administration include hard or soft gelatin capsules, pills, tablets, including coated tablets, elixirs, suspensions, syrups or inhalations and controlled release forms thereof.
  • Formulations suitable for parenteral administration include aqueous or non-aqueous, isotonic, pyrogen-free, sterile liquids (e.g., solutions, suspensions), in which the active ingredient is dissolved, suspended, or otherwise provided (e.g., in a liposome or other microparticulate).
  • Such liquids may additionally contain other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, such as anti-oxidants, buffers, preservatives, stabilizers, bacteriostats, suspending agents, thickening agents, and solutes that render the formulation isotonic with the blood (or other relevant bodily fluid) of the intended recipient.
  • excipients include, for example, water, alcohols, polyols, glycerol, vegetable oils, and the like.
  • suitable isotonic pharmaceutically acceptable carriers for use in such formulations include Sodium Chloride Injection, Ringer's Solution, or Lactated Ringer's Injection.
  • Compatible formulations for parenteral administration may comprise ADC or antibody concentrations of from about 10 ⁇ g mL to about 100 mg/ mL.
  • antibody or ADC concentrations will comprise 20 ⁇ g mL, 40 ⁇ g mL, 60 ⁇ g mL, 80 g/mL, 100 g/mL, 200 g/mL, 300, g/mL, 400 g/mL, 500 g/mL, 600 g/mL, 700 g/mL, 800 ⁇ g mL, 900 ⁇ g mL or 1 mg/mL.
  • ADC concentrations will comprise 2 mg/mL, 3 mg/mL, 4 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL, 6 mg/mL, 8 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, 12 mg/mL, 14 mg/mL, 16 mg/mL, 18 mg/mL, 20 mg/mL, 25 mg/mL, 30 mg/mL, 35 mg/mL, 40 mg/mL, 45 mg/mL, 50 mg/mL, 60 mg/mL, 70 mg/mL, 80 mg/mL, 90 mg/mL or 100 mg/mL.
  • the compounds and compositions of the invention may be administered in vivo, to a subject in need thereof, by various routes, including, but not limited to, oral, intravenous, intra-arterial, subcutaneous, parenteral, intranasal, intramuscular, intracardiac, intraventricular, intratracheal, buccal, rectal, intraperitoneal, intradermal, topical, transdermal, and intrathecal, or otherwise by implantation or inhalation.
  • compositions may be formulated into preparations in solid, semi-solid, liquid, or gaseous forms; including, but not limited to, tablets, capsules, powders, granules, ointments, solutions, suppositories, enemas, injections, inhalants, and aerosols.
  • the appropriate formulation and route of administration may be selected according to the intended application and therapeutic regimen.
  • the particular dosage regimen i.e., dose, timing and repetition, will depend on the particular individual, as well as empirical considerations such as pharmacokinetics (e.g., half-life, clearance rate, etc.). Determination of the frequency of administration may be made by persons skilled in the art, such as an attending physician based on considerations of the condition and severity of the condition being treated, age and general state of health of the subject being treated and the like. Frequency of administration may be adjusted over the course of therapy based on assessment of the efficacy of the selected composition and the dosing regimen. Such assessment can be made on the basis of markers of the specific disease, disorder or condition.
  • these include direct measurements of tumor size via palpation or visual observation; indirect measurement of tumor size by x-ray or other imaging techniques; an improvement as assessed by direct tumor biopsy and microscopic examination of a tumor sample; the measurement of an indirect tumor marker (e.g., PSA for prostate cancer) or an antigen identified according to the methods described herein; reduction in the number of proliferative or tumorigenic cells, maintenance of the reduction of such neoplastic cells; reduction of the proliferation of neoplastic cells; or delay in the development of metastasis.
  • an indirect tumor marker e.g., PSA for prostate cancer
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs of the invention may be administered in various ranges. These include about 5 ⁇ g/kg body weight to about 100 mg/kg body weight per dose; about 50 ⁇ g/kg body weight to about 5 mg/kg body weight per dose; about 100 ⁇ g/kg body weight to about 10 mg/kg body weight per dose. Other ranges include about 100 ⁇ g kg body weight to about 20 mg/kg body weight per dose and about 0.5 mg/kg body weight to about 20 mg/kg body weight per dose.
  • the dosage is at least about 100 ⁇ g/kg body weight, at least about 250 ⁇ g/kg body weight, at least about 750 ⁇ g/kg body weight, at least about 3 mg/kg body weight, at least about 5 mg/kg body weight, at least about 10 mg/kg body weight.
  • the LING01 antibodies or ADCs will be administered (preferably intravenously) at approximately 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 ⁇ g/kg body weight per dose.
  • Other embodiments may comprise the administration of ADCs at about 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1 100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900 or 2000 ⁇ g/kg body weight per dose.
  • the disclosed conjugates will be administered at 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.58, 9 or 10 mg/kg.
  • the conjugates may be administered at 12, 14, 16, 18 or 20 mg/kg body weight per dose.
  • the conjugates may be administered at 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 90 or 100 mg/kg body weight per dose.
  • the conjugates may be administered in dosages from 1 mg/m 2 to 800 mg/m 2 , from 50 mg/m 2 to 500 mg/m 2 and at dosages of 100 mg/m 2 , 150 mg/m 2 , 200 mg/m 2 , 250 mg/m 2 , 300 mg/m 2 , 350 mg/m 2 , 400 mg/m 2 or 450 mg/m 2 . It will also be appreciated that art recognized and empirical techniques may be used to determine appropriate dosage.
  • Anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs may be administered on a specific schedule. Generally, an effective dose of the LING01 conjugate is administered to a subject one or more times. More particularly, an effective dose of the ADC is administered to the subject once a month, more than once a month, or less than once a month. In certain embodiments, the effective dose of the LING01 antibody or ADC may be administered multiple times, including for periods of at least a month, at least six months, at least a year, at least two years or a period of several years.
  • the course of treatment involving conjugated antibodies will comprise multiple doses of the selected drug product over a period of weeks or months. More specifically, antibodies or ADCs of the instant invention may administered once every day, every two days, every four days, every week, every ten days, every two weeks, every three weeks, every month, every six weeks, every two months, every ten weeks or every three months. In this regard it will be appreciated that the dosages may be altered or the interval may be adjusted based on patient response and clinical practices.
  • Dosages and regimens may also be determined empirically for the disclosed therapeutic compositions in individuals who have been given one or more administration(s). For example, individuals may be given incremental dosages of a therapeutic composition produced as described herein. In selected embodiments the dosage may be gradually increased or reduced or attenuated based respectively on empirically determined or observed side effects or toxicity. To assess efficacy of the selected composition, a marker of the specific disease, disorder or condition can be followed as described previously.
  • these include direct measurements of tumor size via palpation or visual observation, indirect measurement of tumor size by x-ray or other imaging techniques; an improvement as assessed by direct tumor biopsy and microscopic examination of the tumor sample; the measurement of an indirect tumor marker (e.g., PSA for prostate cancer) or a tumorigenic antigen identified according to the methods described herein, a decrease in pain or paralysis; improved speech, vision, breathing or other disability associated with the tumor; increased appetite; or an increase in quality of life as measured by accepted tests or prolongation of survival.
  • an indirect tumor marker e.g., PSA for prostate cancer
  • the LING01 proteins are expressed in the tight junctions of epithelial cells where they are thought to establish the paracellular barrier that controls the flow of molecules in the intercellular space between epithelial cells.
  • the use of an anti-LING01 antibodies may result in the disruption of the tight junctions of epithelial cells and thus improve access of therapeutics that otherwise would not be able to penetrate cancer cells.
  • various therapies in combination with the anti-LING01 antibodies and ADCs of the invention may be useful in preventing or treating cancer and in preventing metastasis or recurrence of cancer.
  • Combination therapy means the administration of a combination comprising at least one anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and at least one therapeutic moiety (e.g., anti-cancer agent) wherein the combination preferably has therapeutic synergy or improves the measurable therapeutic effects in the treatment of cancer over (i) the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC used alone, or (ii) the therapeutic moiety used alone, or (iii) the use of the therapeutic moiety in combination with another therapeutic moiety without the addition of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC.
  • therapeutic moiety e.g., anti-cancer agent
  • therapeutic synergy means the combination of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and one or more therapeutic moiety(ies) having a therapeutic effect greater than the additive effect of the combination of the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and the one or more therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • Desired outcomes of the disclosed combinations are quantified by comparison to a control or baseline measurement.
  • relative terms such as “improve,” “increase,” or “reduce” indicate values relative to a control, such as a measurement in the same individual prior to initiation of treatment described herein, or a measurement in a control individual (or multiple control individuals) in the absence of the anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs described herein but in the presence of other therapeutic moiety(ies) such as standard of care treatment.
  • a representative control individual is an individual afflicted with the same form of cancer as the individual being treated, who is about the same age as the individual being treated (to ensure that the stages of the disease in the treated individual and the control individual are comparable.)
  • Changes or improvements in response to therapy are generally statistically significant.
  • the term "significance” or “significant” relates to a statistical analysis of the probability that there is a non-random association between two or more entities. To determine whether or not a relationship is “significant” or has “significance,” a "p-value” can be calculated. P-values that fall below a user-defined cut-off point are regarded as significant. A p-value less than or equal to 0.1 , less than 0.05, less than 0.01 , less than 0.005, or less than 0.001 may be regarded as significant.
  • a synergistic therapeutic effect may be an effect of at least about two-fold greater than the therapeutic effect elicited by a single therapeutic moiety or anti-LING01 antibody or ADC, or the sum of the therapeutic effects elicited by the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC or the single therapeutic moiety(ies) of a given combination, or at least about five-fold greater, or at least about ten-fold greater, or at least about twenty-fold greater, or at least about fifty-fold greater, or at least about one hundred-fold greater.
  • a synergistic therapeutic effect may also be observed as an increase in therapeutic effect of at least 10% compared to the therapeutic effect elicited by a single therapeutic moiety or anti-LING01 antibody or ADC, or the sum of the therapeutic effects elicited by the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC or the single therapeutic moiety(ies) of a given combination, or at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 40%, or at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80%, or at least 90%, or at least 100%, or more.
  • a synergistic effect is also an effect that permits reduced dosing of therapeutic agents when they are used in combination.
  • the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and therapeutic moiety(ies) may be administered to the subject simultaneously, either in a single composition, or as two or more distinct compositions using the same or different administration routes.
  • treatment with the anti-LING01 antibody or ADC may precede or follow the therapeutic moiety treatment by, e.g., intervals ranging from mins. to weeks.
  • both the therapeutic moiety and the antibody or ADC are administered within about 5 mins. to about two weeks of each other.
  • several days (2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7), several weeks (1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8) or several months (1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8) may lapse between administration of the antibody and the therapeutic moiety.
  • the combination therapy can be administered until the condition is treated, palliated or cured on various schedules such as once, twice or three times daily, once every two days, once every three days, once weekly, once every two weeks, once every month, once every two months, once every three months, once every six months, or may be administered continuously.
  • the antibody and therapeutic moiety(ies) may be administered on alternate days or weeks; or a sequence of anti-LING01 antibody or ADC treatments may be given, followed by one or more treatments with the additional therapeutic moiety.
  • an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC is administered in combination with one or more therapeutic moiety(ies) for short treatment cycles.
  • the combination treatment is administered for long treatment cycles.
  • the combination therapy can be administered via any route.
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs may be used in combination with various first line cancer treatments.
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and a traditional antiproliferative chemotherapeutic (e.g. ifosfamide, mytomycin C, vindesine, vinblastine, etoposide, ironitecan, gemcitabine, taxanes, vinorelbine, methotrexate, and pemetrexed) and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • a traditional antiproliferative chemotherapeutic e.g. ifosfamide, mytomycin C, vindesine, vinblastine, etoposide, ironitecan, gemcitabine, taxanes, vinorelbine, methotrexate, and pemetrexed
  • a traditional antiproliferative chemotherapeutic e.g. ifosfamide, mytomycin C, vindesine, vinblastine, etoposide
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti- LING01 antibody or ADC and a platinum-based drug (e.g. carboplatin or cisplatin) and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies) (e.g. vinorelbine; gemcitabine; a taxane such as, for example, docetaxel or paclitaxel; irinotican; or pemetrexed).
  • a platinum-based drug e.g. carboplatin or cisplatin
  • other therapeutic moiety(ies) e.g. vinorelbine; gemcitabine; a taxane such as, for example, docetaxel or paclitaxel; irinotican; or pemetrexed.
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and one or more therapeutic moieties described as "hormone therapy”.
  • hormone therapy refers to, e.g., tamoxifen; gonadotropin or luteinizing releasing hormone (GnRH or LHRH); everolimus and exemestane; toremifene; or aromatase inhibitors (e.g. anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane or fulvestrant).
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and trastuzumab or ado-trastuzumab emtansine and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies) (e.g. pertuzumab and/or docetaxel).
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and a taxane (e.g. docetaxel or paclitaxel) and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies), for example, an anthracycline (e.g. doxorubicin or epirubicin) and/or eribulin.
  • a taxane e.g. docetaxel or paclitaxel
  • an additional therapeutic moiety(ies) for example, an anthracycline (e.g. doxorubicin or epirubicin) and/or eribulin.
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti- LING01 antibody or ADC and megestrol and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and a poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (e.g. BMN-673, olaparib, rucaparib and veliparib) and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • PARP poly ADP ribose polymerase
  • the combination therapy comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and cyclophosphamide and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies) (e.g. doxorubicin, a taxane, epirubicin, 5-FU and/or methotrexate.
  • an additional therapeutic moiety(ies) e.g. doxorubicin, a taxane, epirubicin, 5-FU and/or methotrexate.
  • combination therapy for the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and afatinib and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies) (e.g. erlotinib and/or bevacizumab).
  • combination therapy for the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and erlotinib and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies) (e.g. bevacizumab).
  • combination therapy for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and ceritinib and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • combination therapy for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC comprises the use of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and crizotinib and optionally one or more other therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies and ADCs can be used to treat kidney cancer in combination with targeted therapies (e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus pazopanib), and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • targeted therapies e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus pazopanib
  • additional therapeutic moiety(ies) e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, temsirolimus, everolimus pazopanib
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies and ADCs can be used to treat kidney cancer or NSCLC in combination with anti-angiogenesis drugs (e.g., bevacizumab), and optionally an additional therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • anti-angiogenesis drugs e.g., bevacizumab
  • additional therapeutic moiety(ies) e.g., bevacizumab
  • the anti-LING01 antibodies and ADCs can be used to treat skin cancer in combination with various treatments for melanoma.
  • the combination therapy may comprise an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC and a vaccine to a cancer associated antigen (e.g. melanocyte-lineage specific antigen tyrosinase, gp100, Melan-A MART-1 or gp75.)
  • a cancer associated antigen e.g. melanocyte-lineage specific antigen tyrosinase, gp100, Melan-A MART-1 or gp75.
  • the combination therapy may comprise administration of an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC together with in vitro expansion, activation, and adoptive reintroduction of autologous CTLs or natural killer cells. CTL activation may also be promoted by strategies that enhance tumor antigen presentation by antigen presenting cells.
  • Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor promotes the recruitment of dendritic cells and activation of dendritic cell cross-priming.
  • the combination therapy may comprise the isolation of antigen presenting cells, activation of such cells with stimulatory cytokines (e.g. GM-CSF), priming with tumor-associated antigens, and then adoptive reintroduction of the antigen presenting cells into patients in combination with the use of anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs and optionally one or more different therapeutic moiety(ies).
  • the invention also provides for the combination of anti-LING01 antibodies or ADCs with radiotherapy.
  • radiotherapy means, any mechanism for inducing DNA damage locally within tumor cells such as gamma-irradiation, X-rays, UV-irradiation, microwaves, electronic emissions and the like.
  • Combination therapy using the directed delivery of radioisotopes to tumor cells is also contemplated, and may be used in combination or as a conjugate of the anti- LING01 antibodies disclosed herein.
  • radiation therapy is administered in pulses over a period of time from about 1 to about 2 weeks.
  • the radiation therapy may be administered as a single dose or as multiple, sequential doses.
  • an anti-LING01 antibody or ADC may be used in combination with one or more of the anti-cancer agents described below.
  • anti-cancer agent or "chemotherapeutic agent” as used herein is one subset of “therapeutic moieties", which in turn is a subset of the agents described as “pharmaceutically active moieties”. More particularly "anti-cancer agent” means any agent that can be used to treat a cell proliferative disorder such as cancer, and includes, but is not limited to, cytotoxic agents, cytostatic agents, anti-angiogenic agents, debulking agents, chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapy and radiotherapeutic agents, targeted anti-cancer agents, biological response modifiers, therapeutic antibodies, cancer vaccines, cytokines, hormone therapy, anti-metastatic agents and immunotherapeutic agents. It will be appreciated that in selected embodiments as discussed above, such anti-cancer agents may comprise conjugates and may be associated with antibodies prior to administration. In certain embodiments the disclosed anti-cancer agent will be linked to an antibody to provide an ADC as disclosed herein.
  • cytotoxic agent which can also be an anti-cancer agent means a substance that is toxic to the cells and decreases or inhibits the function of cells and/or causes destruction of cells.
  • the substance is a naturally occurring molecule derived from a living organism (or a synthetically prepared natural product).
  • cytotoxic agents include, but are not limited to, small molecule toxins or enzymatically active toxins of bacteria (e.g., Diptheria toxin, Pseudomonas endotoxin and exotoxin, Staphylococcal enterotoxin A), fungal (e.g., osarcin, restrictocin), plants (e.g., abrin, ricin, modeccin, viscumin, pokeweed anti-viral protein, saporin, gelonin, momoridin, trichosanthin, barley toxin, Aleurites fordii proteins, dianthin proteins, Phytolacca mericana proteins (PAPI, PAPII, and PAP-S), Momordica charantia inhibitor, curcin, crotin, saponaria officinalis inhibitor, mitegellin, restrictocin, phenomycin, neomycin, and the tricothecenes) or animals, (e.g.,
  • An anti-cancer agent can include any chemical agent that inhibits, or is designed to inhibit, a cancerous cell or a cell likely to become cancerous or generate tumorigenic progeny (e.g., tumorigenic cells).
  • Such chemical agents are often directed to intracellular processes necessary for cell growth or division, and are thus particularly effective against cancerous cells, which generally grow and divide rapidly.
  • vincristine depolymerizes microtubules, and thus inhibits cells from entering mitosis.
  • Such agents are often administered, and are often most effective, in combination, e.g., in the formulation CHOP.
  • such anti-cancer agents may be conjugated to the disclosed antibodies.
  • anti-cancer agents examples include, but are not limited to, alkylating agents, alkyl sulfonates, anastrozole, amanitins, aziridines, ethylenimines and methylamelamines, acetogenins, a camptothecin, BEZ-235, bortezomib, bryostatin, callystatin, CC-1065, ceritinib, crizotinib, cryptophycins, dolastatin, duocarmycin, eleutherobin, erlotinib, pancratistatin, a sarcodictyin, spongistatin, nitrogen mustards, antibiotics, enediyne dynemicin, bisphosphonates, esperamicin, chromoprotein enediyne antiobiotic chromophores, aclacinomysins, actino
  • anti-hormonal agents that act to regulate or inhibit hormone action on tumors
  • anti-estrogens and selective estrogen receptor antibodies aromatase inhibitors that inhibit the enzyme aromatase, which regulates estrogen production in the adrenal glands, and anti-androgens
  • troxacitabine a 1 ,3- dioxolane nucleoside cytosine analog
  • antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes such as a VEGF expression inhibitor and a HER2 expression inhibitor
  • vaccines PROLEUKIN ® rlL-2; LURTOTECAN ® topoisomerase 1 inhibitor; ABARELIX ® rmRH; Vinorelbine and Esperamicins and pharmaceutically acceptable salts or solvates, acids or derivatives of any of the above.
  • anti-cancer agents comprise commercially or clinically available compounds such as erlotinib (TARCEVA®, Genentech/OSI Pharm.), docetaxel (TAXOTERE®, Sanofi-Aventis), 5-FU (fluorouracil, 5-fluorouracil, CAS No. 51-21 -8), gemcitabine (GEMZAR®, Lilly), PD-0325901 (CAS No. 391210-10-9, Pfizer), cisplatin (cis-diamine, dichloroplatinum(ll), CAS No. 15663-27-1 ), carboplatin (CAS No.
  • paclitaxel TAXOL®, Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, N.J.
  • trastuzumab HERCEPTIN®, Genentech
  • temozolomide 4-methyl-5- oxo- 2,3,4,6,8-pentazabicyclo [4.3.0] nona-2,7,9-triene- 9-carboxamide, CAS No.
  • tamoxifen (Z)-2-[4-(1 ,2-diphenylbut-1- enyl)phenoxy]-/V,/V-dimethylethanamine, NOLVADEX®, ISTUBAL®, VALODEX®), and doxorubicin (ADRIAMYCIN®).
  • anti-cancer agents comprise oxaliplatin (ELOXATIN®, Sanofi), bortezomib (VELCADE®, Millennium Pharm.), sutent (SUNITINIB®, SU1 1248, Pfizer), letrozole (FEMARA®, Novartis), imatinib mesylate (GLEEVEC®, Novartis), XL-518 (Mek inhibitor, Exelixis, WO 2007/044515), ARRY-886 (Mek inhibitor, AZD6244, Array BioPharma, Astra Zeneca), SF-1 126 (PI3K inhibitor, Semafore Pharmaceuticals), BEZ-235 (PI3K inhibitor, Novartis), XL-147 (PI3K inhibitor, Exelixis), PTK787/ZK 222584 (Novartis), fulvestrant (FASLODEX®, AstraZeneca), leucovorin (folinic acid), rapamycin (ELOXATIN®
  • salts means organic or inorganic salts of a molecule or macromolecule. Acid addition salts can be formed with amino groups. Exemplary salts include, but are not limited, to sulfate, citrate, acetate, oxalate, chloride, bromide, iodide, nitrate, bisulfate, phosphate, acid phosphate, isonicotinate, lactate, salicylate, acid citrate, tartrate, oleate, tannate, pantothenate, bitartrate, ascorbate, succinate, maleate, gentisinate, fumarate, gluconate, glucuronate, saccharate, formate, benzoate, glutamate, methanesulfonate, ethanesulfonate, benzenesulfonate, p-toluenesulfonate, and pamoate (i.e., 1 ,1 ' m
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable salt may involve the inclusion of another molecule such as an acetate ion, a succinate ion or other counterion.
  • the counterion may be any organic or inorganic moiety that stabilizes the charge on the parent compound.
  • a pharmaceutically acceptable salt may have more than one charged atom in its structure. Where multiple charged atoms are part of the pharmaceutically acceptable salt, the salt can have multiple counter ions. Hence, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt can have one or more charged atoms and/or one or more counterion.
  • “Pharmaceutically acceptable solvate” or “solvate” refers to an association of one or more solvent molecules and a molecule or macromolecule.
  • solvents that form pharmaceutically acceptable solvates include, but are not limited to, water, isopropanol, ethanol, methanol, DMSO, ethyl acetate, acetic acid, and ethanolamine.
  • the antibodies or ADCs of the instant invention may be used in combination with any one of a number of antibodies (or immunotherapeutic agents) presently in clinical trials or commercially available.
  • the disclosed antibodies may be used in combination with an antibody selected from the group consisting of abagovomab, adecatumumab, afutuzumab, alemtuzumab, altumomab, amatuximab, anatumomab, arcitumomab, bavituximab, bectumomab, bevacizumab, bivatuzumab, blinatumomab, brentuximab, cantuzumab, catumaxomab, cetuximab, citatuzumab, cixutumumab, clivatuzumab, conatumumab, daratumumab, drozitumab, duligotumab, dusigit
  • antibodies approved for cancer therapy including, but not limited to, rituximab, gemtuzumab ozogamcin, alemtuzumab, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab, bevacizumab, cetuximab, patitumumab, ofatumumab, ipilimumab and brentuximab vedotin.
  • rituximab gemtuzumab ozogamcin
  • alemtuzumab ibritumomab tiuxetan
  • tositumomab bevacizumab
  • cetuximab cetuximab
  • patitumumab ofatumumab
  • ipilimumab and brentuximab vedotin Those skilled in the art will be able to readily identify additional anti-cancer agents that are compatible with the teachings here
  • the present invention also provides for the combination of antibodies or ADCs with radiotherapy (i.e., any mechanism for inducing DNA damage locally within tumor cells such as gamma-irradiation, X-rays, UV-irradiation, microwaves, electronic emissions and the like).
  • radiotherapy i.e., any mechanism for inducing DNA damage locally within tumor cells such as gamma-irradiation, X-rays, UV-irradiation, microwaves, electronic emissions and the like.
  • Combination therapy using the directed delivery of radioisotopes to tumor cells is also contemplated, and the disclosed antibodies or ADCs may be used in connection with a targeted anti-cancer agent or other targeting means.
  • radiation therapy is administered in pulses over a period of time from about 1 to about 2 weeks.
  • the radiation therapy may be administered to subjects having head and neck cancer for about 6 to 7 weeks.
  • the radiation therapy may be administered as a single dose or as multiple, sequential doses.
  • the invention provides for the use of antibodies and ADCs of the invention for the diagnosis, theragnosis, treatment and/or prophylaxis of various disorders including neoplastic, inflammatory, angiogenic and immunologic disorders and disorders caused by pathogens.
  • key targets for treatment are neoplastic conditions comprising solid tumors, although hematologic malignancies are within the scope of the invention.
  • the antibodies of the invention will be used to treat tumors or tumorigenic cells expressing a particular determinant (e.g. LING01 ).
  • a particular determinant e.g. LING01
  • the "subject" or "patient” to be treated will be human although, as used herein, the terms are expressly held to comprise any mammalian species.
  • Neoplastic conditions subject to treatment in accordance with the instant invention may be benign or malignant; solid tumors or other blood neoplasia; and may be selected from the group including, but not limited to: adrenal gland tumors, AIDS-associated cancers, alveolar soft part sarcoma, astrocytic tumors, autonomic ganglia tumors, bladder cancer (squamous cell carcinoma and transitional cell carcinoma), blastocoelic disorders, bone cancer (adamantinoma, aneurismal bone cysts, osteochondroma, osteosarcoma), brain and spinal cord cancers, metastatic brain tumors, breast cancer, carotid body tumors, cervical cancer, chondrosarcoma, chordoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, colon cancer, colorectal cancer, cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytomas, desmoplastic small round cell tumors, ependymomas, epithelial disorders, Ewing's tumors, extraskeletal myxoi
  • the disclosed antibodies and ADCs are especially effective at treating lung cancer, including the following subtypes: small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (e.g. squamous cell non-small cell lung cancer or squamous cell small cell lung cancer).
  • the antibodies and ADCs can be administered to patients exhibiting limited stage disease or extensive stage disease.
  • the disclosed conjugated antibodies will be administered to refractory patients (i.e., those whose disease recurs during or shortly after completing a course of initial therapy); sensitive patients (i.e., those whose relapse is longer than 2-3 months after primary therapy); or patients exhibiting resistance to a platinum based agent (e.g. carboplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin) and/or a taxane (e.g. docetaxel, paclitaxel, larotaxel or cabazitaxel).
  • a platinum based agent e.g. carboplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin
  • the disclosed antibodies and ADCs are effective at treating ovarian cancer, including ovarian-serous carcinoma and ovarian-papillary serous carcinoma.
  • the disclosed antibodies and ADCs are effective at treating melanoma, including the following subtypes: acral, lentigous, uveal, spindle, nodular and superficial spreading.
  • the disclosed antibodies or ADCs may be administered to refractory patients (i.e., those whose disease recurs during or shortly after completing a course of initial therapy); sensitive patients (i.e., those whose relapse is longer than 2-3 months after primary therapy); or patients exhibiting resistance to BRAF-targeted or immunomodulatory therapies.
  • the invention also provides for a preventative or prophylactic treatment of subjects who present with benign or precancerous tumors. No particular type of tumor or proliferative disorder is excluded from treatment using the antibodies of the invention.
  • the invention includes pharmaceutical packs and kits comprising one or more containers, wherein a container can comprise one or more doses of an antibody or ADC of the invention.
  • the pack or kit contains a unit dosage, meaning a predetermined amount of a composition comprising, for example, an antibody or ADC of the invention, with or without one or more additional agents and optionally, one or more anti-cancer agents.
  • the kit of the invention will generally contain in a suitable container a pharmaceutically acceptable formulation of the antibody or ADC of the invention and, optionally, one or more anticancer agents in the same or different containers.
  • the kits may also contain other pharmaceutically acceptable formulations or devices, either for diagnosis or combination therapy.
  • diagnostic devices or instruments include those that can be used to detect, monitor, quantify or profile cells or markers associated with proliferative disorders (for a full list of such markers, see above).
  • the devices may be used to detect, monitor and/or quantify circulating tumor cells either in vivo or in vitro (see, for example, WO 2012/0128801 ).
  • the circulating tumor cells may comprise tumorigenic cells.
  • the kits contemplated by the invention can also contain appropriate reagents to combine the antibody or ADC of the invention with an anti-cancer agent or diagnostic agent (e.g., see U.S.P.N. 7,422,739).
  • the liquid solution can be non-aqueous, however, an aqueous solution is preferred, with a sterile aqueous solution being particularly preferred.
  • the formulation in the kit can also be provided as dried powder(s) or in lyophilized form that can be reconstituted upon addition of an appropriate liquid.
  • the liquid used for reconstitution can be contained in a separate container.
  • Such liquids can comprise sterile, pharmaceutically acceptable buffer(s) or other diluent(s) such as bacteriostatic water for injection, phosphate-buffered saline, Ringer's solution or dextrose solution.
  • the solution may be pre-mixed, either in a molar equivalent combination, or with one component in excess of the other.
  • the antibody or ADC of the invention and any optional anti-cancer agent or other agent can be maintained separately within distinct containers prior to administration to a patient.
  • the kit can comprise one or multiple containers and a label or package insert in, on or associated with the container(s), indicating that the enclosed composition is used for diagnosing or treating the disease condition of choice.
  • Suitable containers include, for example, bottles, vials, syringes, etc.
  • the containers can be formed from a variety of materials such as glass or plastic.
  • the container(s) can comprise a sterile access port, for example, the container may be an intravenous solution bag or a vial having a stopper that can be pierced by a hypodermic injection needle.
  • the kit can contain a means by which to administer the antibody and any optional components to a patient, e.g., one or more needles or syringes (pre-filled or empty), an eye dropper, pipette, or other such like apparatus, from which the formulation may be injected or introduced into the subject or applied to a diseased area of the body.
  • the kits of the invention will also typically include a means for containing the vials, or such like, and other components in close confinement for commercial sale, such as, e.g., blow-molded plastic containers into which the desired vials and other apparatus are placed and retained.
  • CDRL1 170-175 hSC28.6 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • CDRL1 176-181 hSC28.10 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • CDRL1 193-198 hSC28.142 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • CDRL1 205-210 hSC28.146 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • CDRL1 21 1 -216 hSC28.216 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • CDRL1 220-222 hSC28.278 CDRL1 ; CDRL3, CDRH2
  • CDRL1 223-228 hSC28.286 CDRL1 ; CDRL2; CDRL3, CDRH1 ; CDRH2; CDRH3
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B denote the three Kabat CDRs of each heavy (CDRH) and light (CDRL) chain variable region sequence and Table 3 above provides, for selected humanized antibodies, a SEQ ID designation that may be applied to each CDRL1 , CDRL2 and CDRL3 of the light chain and each CDRH1 , CDRH2 and CDRH3 of the heavy chain.
  • the hSC28.6 light chain (SEQ ID NO: 149) comprises CDRL1 (SEQ ID NO: 170) as set forth in FIG. 6A (i.e., RASESVDNYGISFMN).
  • CDRL2 SEQ ID NO: 171
  • CDRL2 SEQ ID NO: 171
  • AASNQGS The same CDR sequences are also provided in the appended sequence listing.
  • PDX tumor cell types are denoted by an abbreviation followed by a number, which indicates the particular tumor cell line.
  • the passage number of the tested sample is indicated by p0-p# appended to the sample designation where pO is indicative of an unpassaged sample obtained directly from a patient tumor and p# is indicative of the number of times the tumor has been passaged through a mouse prior to testing.
  • the abbreviations of the tumor types and subtypes are shown in Table 4 as follows:
  • a large PDX tumor bank was developed and maintained using art recognized techniques.
  • the PDX tumor bank comprising a large number of discrete tumor cell lines, was propagated in immunocompromised mice through multiple passages of tumor cells originally obtained from cancer patients afflicted by a variety of solid tumor malignancies.
  • Early passage PDX tumors are representative of tumors in their native environments and respond to therapeutic agents such as irinotecan (i.e. Camptosar ® ), providing clinically relevant insight into underlying mechanisms driving tumor growth and resistance to current therapies.
  • PDX tumors from the tumor bank were resected from mice after they reached 800 - 2,000 mm 3 and were dissociated into single cell suspensions using art-recognized enzymatic digestion techniques (see, for example, U.S. P.N. 2007/0292414).
  • the dissociated tumors were either analyzed as bulk samples or were sorted into TIC and NTG populations prior to analysis.
  • a comparative analysis of expression of LING01 in TICs compared to NTG cells dissociated bulk tumor cells were incubated with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to detect dead cells, anti-mouse CD45 and H-2Kd antibodies to identify mouse cells and anti-human EPCAM antibody to identify human cells.
  • DAPI 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
  • anti-mouse CD45 and H-2Kd antibodies to identify mouse cells
  • anti-human EPCAM antibody to identify human cells.
  • tumor cells were incubated with anti-human CD46 and/or CD324 to identify TICs and were then sorted using a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences) (see U.S.P.N.s 2013/0260385, 2013/0061340 and 2013/0061342).
  • RNA sequencing of high quality RNA was performed using two different systems. Some samples were analyzed using Applied Biosystems (ABI) Sequencing by Oligo Ligation/Detection (SOLiD) 4.5 or SOLiD 5500x1 next generation sequencing system (Life Technologies). Other samples were analyzed using lllumina HiSeq 2000 or 2500 next generation sequencing system (lllumina).
  • SOLiD whole transcriptome analysis was performed with cDNA that was generated from 1 ng total RNA from bulk tumor samples using either a modified whole transcriptome protocol from ABI designed for low input total RNA or the Ovation RNA-Seq System V2 TM (NuGEN Technologies).
  • the resulting cDNA library was fragmented, and barcode adapters were added to allow pooling of fragment libraries from different samples during sequencing runs.
  • Data generated by the SOLiD platform mapped to 34,609 genes as annotated by RefSeq version 47 using NCBI version hg19.2 of the published human genome and provided verifiable measurements of RNA levels in most samples.
  • Sequencing data from the SOLiD platform is nominally represented as a transcript expression value using the metrics RPM (reads per million) or RPKM (read per kilobase per million) mapped to exon regions of genes, enabling basic gene expression analysis to be normalized and enumerated as RPM_Transcript or RPKM_Transcript.
  • LING01 mRNA was elevated in skin and UVM PDX lines compared to normal melanocytes (FIG.1A).
  • lllumina whole transcriptome analysis was performed with cDNA that was generated using 5 ng total RNA extracted from a TIC tumor population that was isolated as described above. The analysis was done using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation Kit v2 (lllumina). The resulting cDNA library was fragmented and barcoded. Sequencing data from the lllumina platform is nominally represented as a fragment expression value using the metrics FPM (fragment per million) or FPKM (fragment per kilobase per million) mapped to exon regions of genes, enabling basic gene expression analysis to be normalized and enumerated as FPM_Transcript or FPKM_Transcript.
  • FPM fragment per million
  • FPKM fragment per kilobase per million
  • LING01 mRNA was elevated in TICs of BR and OV PDX lines compared to the following normal tissues: pancreas, skin, stomach, colon, kidney, spleen, trachea, heart, liver and lung (FIG. 1 B).
  • normal tissue were separated into a subset of normal tissues having a presumed low risk for toxicity in relation to ADC-type drugs ("Norm") compared to a second set of normal tissues designated (“NormTox").
  • Normal tissues (NormTox or Norm) was compared to expression in PDX cell lines (FIG. 2A; each dot represents the average relative expression of each individual tissue or PDX cell line, with the horizontal line indicating the geometric mean).
  • High expression of LING01 was observed in most SK-MEL, a single PR, and many OV-S/PS PDX models.
  • Some BR, CR, EM, KDY, LIV, LU, and other subtypes of OV PDX tumors also exhibited high expression of LING01.
  • Normal represents samples of various normal tissues as follows: adrenal gland, artery, colon, dorsal root ganglion, kidney, liver, lung, pancreas, skeletal muscle, heart, skin, small intestine, stomach, spleen, vein, vascular smooth muscle, esophagus and trachea.
  • Normal represents the following samples of normal tissue: prostate, uterus, placenta, bladder, thyroid, thymus, ovary, testes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), B cells, monocytes, NK cells, T cells, salivary gland, cervix, melanocytes, fetal liver, breast and adipose.
  • PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cells
  • B cells monocytes
  • NK cells NK cells
  • T cells salivary gland
  • cervix melanocytes
  • fetal liver fetal liver
  • adipose normal brain tissue, separated from exposure to antibody-based therapeutics by the blood brain barrier, was noted to express significant levels of LING01 but was omitted from this analysis due to the immunoprivileged nature of this tissue and to better reveal the substantial differential expression of LING01 relative to more relevant toxicologic comparators.
  • FIG. 2B shows that the expression of LING01 mRNA in ovarian TICs (black-filled bars) is elevated compared to NTG PDX tumor cells (empty bars), including in the following tumor subtypes: OV-S (e.g. OV27MET, OV44), and OV-MMMT (e.g. OV45, OV55).
  • OV-S e.g. OV27MET, OV44
  • OV-MMMT e.g. OV45, OV55
  • RNA samples were derived, substantially as described in Example 2, from PDX tumor cell lines comprising a variety of cancer types.
  • the samples were analyzed using the Agilent Human GE 8x60 v2 microarray platform which contains -35,607 probes designed against 21 ,440 genes in the human genome.
  • RNA samples were labeled and hybridized using standard industry practices. Data was normalized and transformed to quantify gene expression for each sample, represented as an intensity value.
  • Norm tissues include kidney, breast, stomach, spleen, skin, pancreas, ovary, lung, liver, heart, colon and PBMCs. Highest expression is seen in heart.
  • LING01 mRNA in various tumors was confirmed using a large, publically available dataset of tumors and normal samples known as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, National Cancer Institute).
  • Exon level 3 expression data from the IHuminaHiSeq_RNASeqV2 platform was downloaded from the TCGA Data Portal (https://tcga- data.nci.nih.gov/tcga/tcgaDownload.jsp] and parsed to aggregate the reads from the individual exons of each gene to generate a single value read per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (RPKM).
  • FIG. 4 shows that LING01 expression is generally elevated, and often substantially elevated, in a large number of BR samples relative to normal BR tissue.
  • a chimeric fusion gene was generated in which the extracellular domain (ECD) of the hLINGOl protein, comprising residues C42-T556 of accession NP_1 16197, was fused in-frame with either a histidine tag or human lgG2 Fc tag.
  • ECD extracellular domain
  • the CMV-driven hLINGOl expression vector permits high level transient expression in HEK-293T and/or CHO-S cells.
  • Suspension or adherent cultures of HEK-293T cells, or suspension CHO-S cells were transfected with expression constructs encoding either the hLING01 -ECD-His or hLING01-ECD-Fc proteins, using polyethylenimine polymer as the transfecting reagent.
  • hLING01-ECD-His or hLING01-ECD-Fc proteins were purified from clarified cell-supernatants using an AKTA explorer and either Nickel-EDTA (Qiagen) or MabSelect SuRe TM Protein A (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) columns, respectively.
  • a cDNA clone encoding the human LING02 (hLING02) protein was purchased from
  • hLING02 Origene (Rockville, MD). This cDNA clone was used for all subsequent engineering of constructs expressing the mature hLING02 protein or fragments thereof.
  • a chimeric fusion gene was generated in which the ECD of the hLING02 protein, comprising residues C28-T545 from accession NP_689783, was fused in-frame with a human lgG2 Fc tag, in the same manner as described for the chimeric gene constructs with hLINGOl above.
  • human lgG2-tagged recombinant hLING02 was produced in HEK-293T and/or CHO-S cells using the methods described above for hLINGOl .
  • mLINGOI a cDNA clone (GenBank accession BC065696) encoding a protein identical to the mouse RefSeq LING01 protein (GenBank accession NP_851419) was purchased from ThermoFisher.
  • cynomolgus monkey LING01 sequence was first deduced by BLASTing the DNA sequence encoding the human LING01 protein versus the cynomolgus whole genome shotgun contigs sequence database at the NCBI.
  • Engineered cell lines overexpressing the various LING01 proteins listed above were constructed using lentiviral vectors to transduce HEK-293T or Jurkat cell lines using art recognized techniques.
  • PCR was used to amplify the DNA fragments encoding the protein of interest (e.g., hLINGOI , mLINGOI , cLINGOI ) using the specific DNA fragments described above as templates.
  • the individual PCR products were subcloned into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of the lentiviral expression vector pCDH-EF1 -MCS-T2A-GFP (System Biosciences), which had been previously modified to introduce nucleotide sequences encoding an IgK signal peptide followed by a DDDK epitope tag upstream of the multiple cloning site.
  • MCS multiple cloning site
  • the T2A sequence in pCEMT promotes ribosomal skipping of a peptide bond condensation, resulting in expression of two independent proteins: high level expression of DDDK-tagged cell surface proteins encoded upstream of the T2A peptide, with co-expression of the GFP marker protein encoded downstream of the T2A peptide.
  • LING01- positive cells were selected using fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) of high-expressing HEK-293T or Jurkat subclones (e.g., cells that were strongly positive for GFP and high DDK epitope tag expressers).
  • FACS fluorescent activated cell sorting
  • Anti-LING01 mouse antibodies were produced by inoculating six mice (two each of the following strains: BALB/c, CD-1 , FVB) with 10 ⁇ g hLING01-His protein emulsified with an equal volume of TiterMax ® adjuvant. Following the initial inoculation the mice were injected at weekly intervals, 4 times with 5 ⁇ g hLING01-His protein emulsified with an equal volume of alum adjuvant plus CpG, and then 3 times with 5 ⁇ g hLING01-Fc protein emulsified with an equal volume of alum adjuvant plus CpG. The final injection prior to the fusion was with 5 ⁇ g hLING01-Fc in PBS. A second immunization was performed substantially using the same protocol as above with 10 ⁇ g hl_ING01 -His protein emulsified with an equal volume of alum adjuvant plus CpG.
  • mice were sacrificed and draining lymph nodes (popliteal, inguinal, and medial iliac) were dissected and used as a source for antibody producing cells.
  • a single cell suspension of B cells was produced and (430x10 6 cells) were fused with non-secreting P3x63Ag8.653 myeloma cells (ATCC # CRL-1580) at a ratio of 1 :1 by electro cell fusion using a model BTX Hybrimmune System (BTX Harvard Apparatus).
  • Cells were re-suspended in hybridoma selection medium consisting of DMEM medium supplemented with azaserine, 15% fetal clone I serum, 10% BM condimed, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM HEPES, 100 IU penicillin-streptomycin, and 50 ⁇ 2- mercaptoethanol, and were cultured in four T225 flasks in 100 ml. selection medium per flask. The flasks were placed in a humidified 37 °C incubator containing 5% C0 2 and 95% air for 6 days.
  • hybridoma library cells were collected from the flask and plated at one cell per well (using a FACSAria I cell sorter) in 90 ⁇ _ of supplemented hybridoma selection medium (as described above) into 12 Falcon 384-well plates. The remainder of the library was frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen.
  • Sorted clonal hybridomas were cultured for 10 days and the supernatants were collected, re- arrayed onto 384-well plates, and screened for antibodies specific to hLINGOI using flow cytometry performed as follows. 1 x10 5 per well of Jurkat cells stably transduced with hLINGOI were incubated for 30 mins. with 25 ⁇ _ hybridoma supernatant and then washed with PBS/2% FCS. Cells were incubated for 15 mins.
  • DAPI 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
  • Hybridomas were counterscreened with an ELISA assay to eliminate hybridomas that produced antibodies which bound to LING02, which is the closest family member of LING01 by amino acid identity. Plates were coated with purified hl_ING02-Fc at 1 ⁇ g/mL in PBS. After 1 hour at room temperature the protein solution was removed and the wells were washed with PBST (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20). 20 ⁇ _ of PBST and 25 ⁇ _ of hybridoma supernatants were added to the wells for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with PBST, 25 [ ⁇ Uwe ⁇ HRP-labeled goat anti- mouse IgG diluted 1 :10,000 in PBST was added for 30 mins. at room temperature.
  • the plates were washed and developed by the addition of 25 [ ⁇ Uwe ⁇ of TMB substrate solution (Thermo Scientific) for 1-5 mins. at room temperature. An equal volume of 0.2 M H 2 S0 4 was added to stop substrate development. The samples were then analyzed by a spectrophotometer at OD 450. Samples that had an OD 450 greater than 3 times the background were considered to bind LING02. Hybridomas that bound LING02 were excluded from further analysis.
  • the isotype of a representative number of antibodies was determined using the Milliplex mouse immunoglobulin isotyping kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Results for exemplary unique LI NG01 -specific antibodies can be seen in FIGS. 5A and 5B.
  • the affinity of the anti-LING01 antibodies for hLINGOl protein was determined by surface plasmon resonance using a BIAcore 2000 (GE Healthcare).
  • An anti-mouse antibody capture kit was used to immobilize mouse anti-LING01 antibodies on a CM5 biosensor chip.
  • mouse antibodies at a concentration of 2 ⁇ g mL were captured on the surface with a contact time of 2 mins. and a flow rate of 5 ⁇ / ⁇ .
  • the captured antibody loading from baseline was constant at 80-120 response units.
  • monomeric hLING01-His antigen generated as described in Example 5 was flowed over the surface at concentrations of 50 nM, 25 nM and 12.5 nM for a 2 min.
  • association phase followed by a 4 min. dissociation phase at a flow rate of 10 ⁇ / ⁇ .
  • the anti-mouse antibody capture kit was regenerated with 2 min. contact time of 10 mM Glycine, pH 1 .7 at 10 ⁇ / ⁇ . following each cycle.
  • the data was processed by subtracting a control Mouse IgG surface response from the specific antibody surface response and data was truncated to the association and dissociation phase.
  • the resulting response curves were used to fit a 1 :1 Langmuir binding model and to generate an apparent affinity using the calculated k on and k off kinetics constants using BiaEvaluation Software 3.1 (GE Healthcare).
  • the selected antibodies exhibited affinities for hLINGOl in the nanomolar range (FIGS. 5A and 5B).
  • Antibody binning was determined for various anti-LING01 antibodies.
  • a ForteBio RED (ForteBio) was used per manufacturer's instructions to identify competing antibodies that bound to the same or different epitope bins. Briefly, a reference antibody (Ab1 ) was captured onto an anti- mouse capture chip, a high concentration of non-binding antibody was then used to block the chip and a baseline was collected. Monomeric recombinant hLING01-His (from Example 5) was then captured by the specific antibody (Ab1 ) and the tip was dipped into a well with either the same antibody (Ab1 ) as a control or into a well with a different test antibody (Ab2).
  • Bin A simply refers to a group of antibodies that bind to overlapping epitopes
  • the same reference clones were used to designate antibodies as "Bin A” in both assays. In this way, the bin designations were standardized between assays.
  • each unique anti-LING01 antibody (capture mAb) at a concentration of 10 ⁇ g mL was incubated for 1 hour with magnetic beads (Luminex) that had been conjugated to an anti-mouse kappa antibody (Miller ef a/., 201 1 , PMID: 21223970.)
  • the capture mAb/conjugated bead complexes were washed with PBST buffer (1 % BSA in PBS with 0.05% Tween20) and then pooled. Following removal of residual wash buffer the beads were incubated for 1 hour with 2 ⁇ g mL hLING01 -His protein, washed and then resuspended in PBST.
  • the pooled bead mixture was distributed into a 96 well plate, each well containing a unique anti-LING01 antibody (detector mAb) and incubated for 1 hour with shaking. Following a wash step, anti-mouse kappa antibody (the same as that used above), conjugated to PE, was added at a concentration of 5 ⁇ g ml to the wells and incubated for 1 hour. Beads were washed again and resuspended in PBST. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values were measured with a Luminex MAGPIX instrument. Antibody pairing was visualized as a dendrogram of a distance matrix computed from the Pearson correlation coefficients of the antibody pairs.
  • MFI mean fluorescence intensity
  • domain-level epitope mapping was performed using an ELISA-based method with CHO-S-cells expressing various domains of the LING01 protein.
  • the mature LING01 protein is predicted to contain 520 amino acids (aa) in the extracellular domain (aa 42 - 561 ), a 21 amino acid helical transmembrane domain (aa 562-582), and a 38 amino acid cytoplasmic domain (aa 583 - 620).
  • the LING01 protein comprises thirteen tandem leucine rich repeat (LRR) motifs followed by an Ig-like C2-type domain.
  • LRRNT (aa 42-71 ), LRR1 (aa 72-93), LRR2 (aa 96-1 17), LRR3 (aa 120-141 ), LRR4 (aa 144-165), LRR5 (aa 168-189), LRR6 (aa 192-213), LRR7 (aa 216-237), LRR8 (aa 264-285), LRR9 (aa 288-309), LRR10 (aa 312-333), LRR1 1 (aa 336-357), LRRCT (369-423) and Ig-like C2-type domain (aa 41 1-513).
  • Domain 1 (D1 , aa 42-1 17) comprising LRRNT, LRR1 and LRR2; Domain 2 (D2, aa 1 18- 189) comprising LRR3, LRR4 and LRR5; Domain 3 (D3, aa 190-285) comprising LRR6, LRR7 and LRR8; Domain 4 (D4, aa 286-410) comprising LRR9, LRR10, LRR1 1 and LRRCT; and Domain 5 (D5, aa 41 1-556) comprising the Ig-like C2-type domain. All residue numbering includes the leader sequence of the preprotein.
  • Fragments of DNA encoding fragments D1 through D5 or combinations of domains were produced by PCR amplification using as a template a cDNA clone containing the hLINGOI (see Example 5). These various PCR products were subsequently subcloned into a CMV driven expression vector in frame and downstream of an IgK signal peptide sequence and upstream of a human lgG2 Fc cDNA, using standard molecular techniques, to yield the various desired mammalian expression constructs. Using art-recognized techniques, these constructs were expressed in CHO-S cells, using polyethylenimine as a transfection reagent. Three days after transfection, protein was used as unpurified supernatant.
  • anti-LING01 antibodies were coated overnight onto an ELISA plate at 0.2 ⁇ g mL in sodium bicarbonate buffer.
  • the plate was washed, blocked with PBST + 3% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature, washed again, and then incubated with 50 ⁇ _ clarified supernatant from cell culture for 1 hour at room temperature.
  • the plate was washed, and then incubated with goat anti-human or anti-mouse Fc or His-tagged polyclonal antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch) at 1 ⁇ g mL for 1 hour at room temperature.
  • the plate was washed, and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse His-tagged antibody or anti-human Fc antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch) for 30 min. at room temperature.
  • the plates were then washed and developed using 1-Step Turbo-TMB reagent (Pierce), and quenched with 2 M sulfuric acid.
  • Table 5 summarizes the results of domain mapping experiments. In some cases, antibodies did not bind to individual domains, but did bind to combinations of domains. A domain range is listed in these cases. For example D3-D5 indicates binding to a construct containing D3, D4 and D5.
  • Anti-LING01 antibodies were generated as described above and then the encoding nucleic acids were sequenced. Selected hybridoma cells were lysed in Trizol ® reagent (Trizol ® Plus RNA Purification System, Life Technologies) to prepare the RNA. Between 10 4 and 10 5 cells were re- suspended in 1 mL Trizol and shaken vigorously after addition of 200 ⁇ chloroform. Samples were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 mins. the aqueous phase was transferred to a fresh microfuge tube and an equal volume of 70% ethanol was added. The sample was loaded on an RNeasy Mini spin column, placed in a 2 mL collection tube and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • Trizol ® reagent Trizol ® Plus RNA Purification System, Life Technologies
  • variable region of the Ig heavy chain of each hybridoma was amplified using a 5' primer mix comprising 32 mouse specific leader sequence primers designed to target the complete mouse VH repertoire in combination with a 3' mouse Cy primer specific for all mouse Ig isotypes.
  • a primer mix containing thirty two 5' VK leader sequences designed to amplify each of the VK mouse families was used in combination with a single reverse primer specific to the mouse kappa constant region in order to amplify and sequence the kappa light chain.
  • the VH and VL transcripts were amplified from 100 ng total RNA using the Qiagen One Step RT-PCR kit as follows.
  • PCR reaction mixtures included 3 ⁇ _ of RNA, 0.5 ⁇ _ of 100 ⁇ of either heavy chain or kappa light chain primers (custom synthesized by IDT), 5 ⁇ _ of 5x RT-PCR buffer, 1 ⁇ _ dNTPs, 1 ⁇ _ of enzyme mix containing reverse transcriptase and DNA polymerase, and 0.4 ⁇ _ of ribonuclease inhibitor RNasin (1 unit).
  • the thermal cycler program was RT step 50 °C for 30 mins., 95 °C for 15 mins. followed by 30 cycles of (95 °C for 30 sees., 48 °C for 30 sees., 72 °C for 1 min.) There was then a final incubation at 72 °C for 10 mins.
  • the extracted PCR products were sequenced using the same specific variable region primers as described above for the amplification of the variable regions.
  • To prepare the PCR products for direct DNA sequencing they were purified using the QIAquick TM PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
  • the DNA was eluted from the spin column using 50 ⁇ _ of sterile water and then sequenced directly from both strands.
  • Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the IMGT sequence analysis tool to identify germline V, D and J gene members with the highest sequence homology.
  • the derived sequences were compared to known germline DNA sequences of the Ig V- and J-regions using V-BASE2 and by alignment of VH and VL genes to the mouse germline database.
  • FIGS. 6A and 6B depict the contiguous amino acid sequences of 32 novel mouse VL and VH from anti-LING01 antibodies (SEQ ID NOS: 21-147, odd numbers). Taken together, FIGS. 6A and 6B provide the annotated variable region sequences of 32 mouse anti-LING01 antibodies termed: SC28.1 , SC28.3, SC28.4, SC28.5, SC28.6, SC28.7, SC28.9, SC28.10, SC28.1 1 , SC28.12, SC28.13, SC28.14, SC28.15, SC28.16, SC28.103 (identical to SC28.268), SC28.108, SC28.1 10, SC28.1 13, SC28.1 15, SC28.123, SC28.135, SC28.142, SC28.145, SC28.146, SC28.157, SC28.162, SC28.216, SC28.226, SC28.245, SC28.269, SC28.278 and SC28.286.
  • FIG. 6C shows corresponding nucleic acid sequences for each antibody amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NOS: 20- 146, even numbers).
  • Selected antibodies, SC28.6 and SC28.10 were humanized as described below.
  • FIGS. 6E to 60 show annotated amino acid sequences (numbered as per Kabat ef a/.) of the light and heavy chain variable regions of the mouse anti-LING01 antibodies, SC28.6 (FIG. 6E), SC28.10 (FIG. 6F), SC28.103 (FIG. 6G), SC28.1 10 (FIG. 6H), SC28.142 (FIG. 6I), SC28.145 (FIG. 6J), SC28.146 (FIG. 6K), SC28.216 (FIG. 6L), SC28.269 (FIG. 6M), SC28.278 (FIG. 6N) and SC28.286 (FIG. 60), wherein CDRs are derived using Kabat, Chothia, ABM and Contact methodologies.
  • a chimeric anti-LING01 antibody comprising mouse heavy and light chain variable regions, a human lgG1 heavy chain constant region and a light chain kappa constant region was generated using art-recognized techniques as follows.
  • Total RNA was extracted from the hybridomas and amplified as set forth in Example 2.
  • Data regarding V, D and J gene segments of the VH and VL chains of the mouse antibodies were obtained from the nucleic acid sequences in FIG. 6C.
  • Primer sets specific to the leader sequence of the VH and VL chain of the antibodies were designed using the following restriction sites: Agel and Xhol for the VH fragments, and Xmal and Dralll for the VL fragments.
  • PCR products were purified with a Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen), followed by digestion with restriction enzymes Agel and Xhol for the VH fragments and Xmal and Dralll for the VL fragments.
  • the VH and VL digested PCR products were purified and ligated into lgG1 or IgK human constant region expression vectors, respectively.
  • Ligation reactions were performed in a total volume of 10 ⁇ with 200U T4-DNA Ligase (New England Biolabs), 7.5 ⁇ of digested and purified gene-specific PCR product and 25 ng linearized vector DNA. Competent E. coli DH10B bacteria (Life Technologies) were transformed via heat shock at 42 °C with 3 ⁇ ligation product and plated onto ampicillin plates at a concentration of 100 ⁇ g mL.
  • the VH fragment was cloned into the Agel-Xhol restriction sites of the pEE6.4HulgG1 expression vector (Lonza) and the VL fragment was cloned into the Xmal-Dralll restriction sites of the pEE12.4Hu-Kappa expression vector (Lonza).
  • Chimeric antibodies were expressed by co-transfection of HEK-293T cells with pEE6.4HulgG1 and pEE12.4Hu-Kappa expression vectors.
  • DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium
  • FCS 10% heat inactivated FCS
  • 100 ⁇ g mL streptomycin 100 U/mL penicillin G.
  • DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium
  • the same mouse anti-LING01 antibodies were humanized using a proprietary computer- aided CDR-grafting method (Abysis Database, UCL Business) and standard molecular engineering techniques as follows.
  • Human framework regions of the variable regions were designed based on the highest homology between the framework sequences and CDR canonical structures of human germline antibody sequences, and the framework sequences and CDRs of the relevant mouse antibodies.
  • the assignment of amino acids to each of the CDR domains was done in accordance with Kabat ef a/, numbering. Once the variable regions were selected, they were generated from synthetic gene segments (Integrated DNA Technologies). Humanized antibodies were cloned and expressed using the molecular methods described above for chimeric antibodies.
  • VL and VH amino acid sequences of the humanized antibodies hSC28.6 (SEQ ID NOS: 149 and 151 ) and hSC28.10 (SEQ ID NOS: 153 and 155) and their variants, hSC28.6v1 (SEQ ID NOS: 149 and 159), hSC28.6v2 (SEQ ID NOS: 157 and 159) and hSC28.10v1 (SEQ ID NOS: 161 and 155) were derived from the VL and VH sequences of the corresponding mouse antibodies, SC28.6 and SC28.10.
  • the corresponding nucleic acid sequences encoding the VL and VH are set forth in FIG. 6C (SEQ ID NOS: 148 - 160, even numbers).
  • the binding affinity of hSC28.6 (2.1 nM) and hSC28.10 as determined using Biacore was found to comparable to that of the mouse source antibody.
  • the hSC28.6v1 variant comprises the same VL as hSC28.6 (SEQ ID NO: 149) but has a different VH (SEQ ID NO: 159).
  • the hSC28.6v2 variant comprises a humanized light chain variable region as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 157 paired with the same heavy chain variable region as used in the hSC28.6v1 antibody (SEQ ID NO: 159). Both hSC28.6 variants showed good stability.
  • hSC28.10 In order to address stability concerns in the CDRs of the hSC28.10 antibody, the cysteine at Kabat position 91 in CDRL3 was modified to serine to generate hSC28.10v1 having a VL set forth in SEQ ID NO: 161. hSC28.10 and hSC28.10v1 share the same heavy chain (SEQ ID NO: 155), and both constructs were confirmed to have identical affinity. TABLE 6
  • VL and VH chain amino acid sequences were analyzed to determine their homology to the mouse donor and human acceptor light and heavy chain variable regions.
  • Table 7 show that the humanized constructs consistently exhibited a higher homology to the human acceptor sequences than to the mouse donor sequences.
  • the mouse VL and VH chains show a similar overall percentage homology to a closest match of human germline genes compared to the homology of the humanized antibodies and the donor hybridoma protein sequences.
  • PDX tumors were excised from mice and flash frozen on dry ice/ethanol. Normal tissues were purchased from a commercial source. Protein Extraction Buffer (Biochain Institute) was added to the thawed tumor or normal pieces and tissues were pulverized using a TissueLyser system (Qiagen). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation (20,000 g, 20 mins., 4 °C) and the total protein concentration in each lysate was quantified using bicinchoninic acid. The protein lysates were then normalized to 5 mg/mL and stored at -80 °C until assayed.
  • Protein Extraction Buffer Biochain Institute
  • LING01 protein concentrations from the lysate samples were determined by interpolating the values from a standard protein concentration curve that was generated using purified recombinant LING01 protein with a His-tag (from Example 5).
  • the LING01 protein standard curve and protein quantification assay were conducted as follows:
  • MSD standard plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with 15 ⁇ _ of SC28.7 antibody at 1 ⁇ g mL in PBS. Plates were washed in PBST and blocked in 35 ⁇ _ MSD 3% Blocker A solution for one hour while shaking. Plates were again washed in PBST. 10 ⁇ _ of 10x diluted lysate (or serially diluted recombinant LING01 standard) in MSD 1 % Blocker A containing 10% Protein Extraction Buffer was also added to the wells and incubated for two hours while shaking. Plates were again washed in PBST. The SC28.3 antibody was SULFO-tagged using an MSD® SULF0- TAG NHS Ester according to the manufacturer's protocol.
  • MSD SULFO-TAG NHS-Ester is an amine reactive, N-hydroxysuccinimide ester which readily couples to primary amine groups of proteins under mildly basic conditions to form a stable amide bond.
  • 10 ⁇ _ of the tagged SC28.3 was added to the washed plates at 0.5 ⁇ g mL in MSD 1 % Blocker A for 1 hour at room temperature while shaking. Plates were washed in PBST.
  • MSD Read Buffer T with surfactant was diluted to 1 X in water and 35 ⁇ _ was added to each well. Plates were read on an MSD Sector Imager 2400 using an integrated software analysis program to derive LING01 concentrations in PDX samples via interpolation from the standard curve.
  • each data point represents LING01 protein concentrations derived from a single PDX tumor line (empty circles) or normal organ sample (filled circles).
  • Each data point represents the average relative expression of each individual tissue or PDX cell line, with box and whiskers plotting showing the median, upper and lower quartiles.
  • FIG. 7 shows that representative samples of breast, kidney, lung, ovarian, and skin tumors exhibited high LING01 protein expression.
  • the normal tissue lysates were separated into a subset of normal tissues having a presumed low risk for toxicity in relation to ADC-type drugs ("Norm") compared to a second set of normal tissues designated (“NormTox”) organ tissues.
  • NormTox tissues included adrenal gland, artery, esophagus, gall bladder, heart, liver, lung, peripheral or sciatic nerve, pancreas, skeletal muscle, skin, small intestine, spleen, stomach, trachea, red and white blood cells and platelets.
  • Norm tissues include bladder, brain, breast, eye, lymph node, ovary, pituitary gland, prostate and spinal cord.
  • Flow cytometry was used to assess the ability of the anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention to specifically detect the presence of human LING01 protein on the surface of Jurkat cell lines overexpressing LING01 and on the surface of melanoma or ovarian PDX tumor cells.
  • anti-LING01 antibodies of the invention e.g. SC28.3, SC28.4, SC28.6, SC28.10, SC28.13, SC28.14, SC28.16; black line
  • SC28.3, SC28.4, SC28.6, SC28.10, SC28.13, SC28.14, SC28.16 black line
  • IgG isotype control antibodies gray-filled histogram
  • PDX tumor cells were harvested and dissociated using art-recognized enzymatic tissue digestion techniques to obtain single cell suspensions of PDX tumor cells (see, for example, U.S. P.N. 2007/0292414).
  • the tumor cells were co-stained with commercially available anti-mouse CD45 and H-2Kd antibodies and anti-human EpCAM. Mouse cells that stained positive for CD45 and H-2Kd were excluded from the analysis.
  • the PDX tumor cells were also sorted into TIC and NTG cell population in order to determine whether there was differential binding of the anti-LING01 antibodies on tumorigenic (e.g.
  • TICs compared to NTG cells.
  • PDX tumor cells were incubated with anti-human CD46 and/or CD324 and ESA and were then sorted using a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences) to isolate TICs (CD46 hi /CD324 + cells) from bulk NTG cells (see U.S.P.N.s 2013/0260385, 2013/0061340 and 2013/0061342).
  • LING01 protein expression was detected on melanoma cells using the anti-LING01 antibody SC28.10 but was not detected on the same melanoma cells using an lgG2a isotype antibody (FIG. 8B).
  • LING01 expression was higher on ovarian tumor TICs (FIG.
  • RNAscope® 2.0 Reagent Kit Advanced Cell Diagnostics; Wang ef a/, 2012, PMID: 22166544.
  • the RNAscope probe used was specific to nucleotides 222-1556 of the LING01 gene.
  • Each sample was quality controlled for RNA integrity with an RNAscope probe specific to Peptidylprolyl Isomerase B (PPIB), a cyclosporine-binding protein located within the endoplasmic reticulum of all cells. Background staining was determined using a probe specific to DiAminoPimelate (dapB) RNA.
  • PPIB Peptidylprolyl Isomerase B
  • FFPE formalin fixed, paraffin embedded
  • an in vitro cell killing assay was performed using selected anti-LING01 antibodies and saporin linked to a secondary anti-mouse antibody FAB fragment.
  • Saporin is a plant toxin that deactivates ribosomes, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis and resulting in the death of the cell. Saporin is only cytotoxic inside the cell where it has access to ribosomes, but is unable to internalize on its own. Therefore, saporin-mediated cellular cytotoxicity in these assays is indicative of the ability of the anti-mouse FAB-Saporin conjugate to internalize into the target cell only upon binding and internalization of mouse anti-LING01 antibodies.
  • Single cell suspensions of HEK-293T parental cells or HEK-293T cells overexpressing hLINGOI were plated at 500 cells per well into BD Tissue Culture plates (BD Biosciences). One day later, various concentrations of purified anti-LING01 antibodies were added to the culture together with a fixed concentration of 2 nM anti-Mouse IgG FAB-saporin conjugates (Advanced Targeting Systems) and then the plates were incubated for 72 hours. After the incubation viable cells were enumerated using CellTiter-Glo ® (Promega) as per the manufacturer's instructions.
  • the humanized antibodies hSC28.6v1 and hSC28.6v2 showed comparable efficacy to the mouse antibody (SC28.6) from which they were derived as can be seen in FIG. 10B.
  • FIG. 10A In addition treatment of HEK-293T parental cells with anti-LING01 antibodies did not result in any cell death (FIG. 10A), indicating that the anti-LING01 antibodies specifically bind to the LING01 protein.
  • the variation in efficacy between different antibodies illustrates the fact that it cannot easily be predicted which antibodies will be more effective than others in eliminating tumor cells despite the fact that the antibodies target the same protein.
  • the above results demonstrate the ability of anti-LING01 mouse and humanized antibodies to mediate internalization and their ability to deliver cytotoxic payloads to tumor cells, supporting the hypothesis that anti-LING01 antibodies may have therapeutic utility as the targeting moiety of an ADC.
  • a plot of in vitro killing of anti-LING01 antibodies versus the antibodies' epitope bins as determined in Example 7 shows that those antibodies that were found to be in Bins A and E demonstrated enhanced efficacy (FIG. 10C). Furthermore, as shown in Table 8, antibodies in Bins A and E were found to bind domains D1 (aa 42-1 17) and D5 (aa 41 1 -556), respectively (as designated in Example 8 above).
  • antibodies that bind to domain D1 comprising the LRRNT, LRR1 and LRR2 domains of LING01 ; and antibodies that bind to domain D5, comprising the Ig- like C2-type domain of LING01 , are particularly efficacious in binding to LINGOI-expressing cells expressing LING01 and delivering cytotoxic agents. These antibodies will therefore likely be particularly useful in the treatment of cancer.
  • OV PDX tumor samples (OV106) were resected from mice after the tumor reached 800 - 2,000 mm 3 and were dissociated into single cell suspensions using art-recognized enzymatic digestion techniques (see, for example, U.S. P.N. 2007/0292414).
  • Human OV PDX tumor cells were stained with mouse CD45 or H2kD antibodies and anti-LING01 antibody (SC28.10) and then sorted using a FACSAria TM Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences).
  • FIG. 1 1A is a histogram that shows the distribution of LINGOI-expressing versus LING01 non-expressing OV PDX tumor cells following enrichment with anti-LING01 antibody.
  • OV LINGOI-positive tumor cells or LINGOI-negative tumor cells were subsequently transplanted into 5 female NOD/SCID immunocompromised mice by subcutaneous injection into the mammary fat pad at doses typically ranging from 50 to 1 ,000 cells per mouse.
  • FIG. 1 1 B shows the measured tumor volume from sorted cell subpopulations that were implanted into immunocompromised mice. None of the LINGOI-negative tumor cells grew whereas 4 of the 5 LINGOI -positive tumor cells grew (see table in FIG. 1 1 B). Thus, tumor cells expressing LING01 were much more tumorigenic than those tumor cells that did not express LING01 , suggesting that LING01 is a biomarker of tumorigenicity.
  • Anti-LING01 antibody drug conjugates are prepared having the Ab-[L-D] structure, where Ab refers to the anti-LING01 antibody, L refers to a linker (e.g. a terminal maleimido moiety with a free sulfhydryl group) and D refers to a drug or cytotoxin (e.g. auristatins, calicheamicin etc.).
  • Each ADC comprises an anti-LING01 antibody covalently linked to a linker-drug.
  • ADCs are synthesized and purified using techniques known in the art, for example, essentially as follows.
  • the cysteine bonds of anti-LING01 antibodies are partially reduced with a pre-determined molar addition of mol tris(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine (TCEP) per mol antibody for 90 min. at 20 °C in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 5 mM EDTA.
  • the linker-drug dissolved in dimethyl acetamide (DMA), is added at a ratio of 3 mol/mol anti-LING01 antibody.
  • DMA dimethyl acetamide
  • the reaction is allowed to proceed for 30 min. Using a 10 mM stock solution of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) prepared in water, the reaction is quenched with the addition of excess NAC to linker-drug.
  • the pH is adjusted to 6.0 with the addition of 0.5 M acetic acid and buffer exchanged into diafiltration buffer by diafiltration using a 30 kDa membrane.
  • the dialfiltered anti- LING01 ADC is then formulated with sucrose and polysorbate-20 to the target final concentration.
  • the resulting anti-LING01 ADCs are analyzed for protein concentration (by measuring UV), aggregation (SEC), drug to antibody ratio (DAR) by reverse-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) and in vitro cytotoxicity.
  • An engineered human lgG1/kappa anti-LING01 site-specific antibody was constructed comprising a native light chain (LC) constant region and heavy chain (HC) constant region, wherein cysteine 220 (C220) in the upper hinge region of the HC, which forms an interchain disulfide bond with cysteine 214 (C214) in the LC, was substituted with serine (C220S).
  • LC native light chain
  • HC heavy chain
  • cysteine 220 C220
  • C214 cysteine 214
  • serine C220S
  • the HCs and LCs form an antibody comprising two free cysteines that are suitable for conjugation to a therapeutic agent.
  • all numbering of constant region residues is in accordance with the EU numbering scheme as set forth in Kabat ef a/.
  • the engineered antibody was generated as follows.
  • An expression vector encoding the humanized anti-LING01 antibody hSC28.6 HC (SEQ ID NO: 163), was used as a template for PCR amplification and site directed mutagenesis. Site directed mutagenesis was performed using the Quick-change ® system (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • the vector encoding the mutant C220S HC of hSC28.6 was co-transfected with the native lgG1 kappa LC of hSC28.6 (SEQ ID NO:162) in CHO-S cells and expressed using a mammalian transient expression system.
  • the engineered anti-LING01 site-specific antibody containing the C220S mutant was termed hSC28.6ss1.
  • Amino acid sequences of the full length LC and HC of the hSC28.6ss1 site specific antibody are shown in FIG. 6D (SEQ ID NOS: 162 and 168).
  • the reactive cysteine is in bold and underlined, as is the mutated residue (serine) at position 220 in the HC.
  • the engineered anti-LING01 antibodies were characterized by SDS-PAGE to confirm that the correct mutants had been generated.
  • SDS-PAGE was conducted on a pre-cast 10% Tris-Glycine mini gel from life technologies in the presence and absence of a reducing agent such as DTT (dithiothreitol). Following electrophoresis, the gels were stained with a colloidal coomassie solution (data not shown). Under reducing conditions, two bands corresponding to the free LCs and free HCs, were observed. This pattern is typical of IgG molecules in reducing conditions. Under non- reducing conditions, the band patterns were different from native IgG molecules, indicative of the absence of a disulfide bond between the HC and LC.
  • Anti-LING01 antibody drug conjugates are prepared having the Ab-[L-D] structure as described in Example 16 above, wherein the Ab moiety is a site specific antibody, for example, hSC28.6ss1 , generated as set forth in Example 6 above.
  • DAR drug to antibody ratio
  • the site specific antibody e.g. "hSC28.6ss1 ”
  • hSC28.6ss1 the site specific antibody
  • a stabilizing agent e.g. L-arginine
  • a mild reducing agent e.g. glutathione
  • HIC preparative hydrophobic interaction chromatography
  • a preparation of the site specific antibody is partially reduced in a buffer containing 1 M L- arginine/5 mM glutathione, reduced (GSH)/5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 for a minimum of one hour at room temperature. All preparations are then buffer exchanged into a 20 mM Tris/3.2 mM EDTA, pH 8.2 buffer using a 30 kDa membrane (Millipore Amicon Ultra) to remove the reducing buffer. The resulting partially reduced preparations are then conjugated to a cytotoxin (e.g. auristatin, calicheamicin etc.) via a linker (e.g. maleimide linker) for a minimum of 30 mins. at room temperature.
  • a cytotoxin e.g. auristatin, calicheamicin etc.
  • linker e.g. maleimide linker
  • the reaction is then quenched with the addition of excess NAC to linker-drug using a 10 mM stock solution of NAC prepared in water. After a minimum quench time of 20 mins., the pH is adjusted to 6.0 with the addition of 0.5 M acetic acid.
  • the site specific ADC is buffer exchanged into diafiltration buffer using a 30 kDa membrane.
  • the site specific ADC preparation is then diluted with a high salt buffer to increase the conductivity to promote binding onto the resin, and then loaded on a Butyl HP resin chromatography column (GE Life Sciences).
  • the anti-LING01 ADCs generated, for example, as described in Example 13 above, are tested using art-recognized techniques, essentially as described below, to demonstrate their ability to suppress ovarian tumor growth in immunodeficient mice.
  • PDX tumor lines expressing LING01 e.g. OV PDX tumor lines
  • control tumor lines which do not express LING01 are grown subcutaneously in the flanks of female NOD/SCID mice using art-recognized techniques. Tumor volumes and mouse weights are monitored once or twice per week. When tumor volumes reach 150-250 mm 3 , mice are randomly assigned to treatment groups and injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of 1 or 2 mg/kg humanized anti-LING01 ADC, a single dose of 2 mg/kg anti-hapten control human IgG ADC or vehicle control, for example, 0.9% saline or 5% glucose. Following treatment, tumor volumes and mouse weights are monitored until tumors exceed 800 mm 3 or the mice become sick.
  • mice treated with humanized anti-LING01 ADC that do not exhibit any adverse health effects beyond those typically seen in immunodeficient, tumor-bearing NOD/SCID mice are selected for further analysis.
  • Anti-LING01 ADCs that effectively reduce tumor volume compared to control IgG ADC and vehicle are selected for further toxicity studies.
  • LING01 expression is associated with tumorigenicity. Accordingly, to demonstrate that treatment with anti-LING01 ADCs reduces the frequency of tumor initiating cells (TIC) that are known to be drug resistant and to fuel tumor recurrence and metastasis, in vivo limiting dilution assays (LDA) are performed, for example, essentially as described below.
  • TIC tumor initiating cells
  • LDA in vivo limiting dilution assays
  • PDX tumors e.g. melanoma or ovarian
  • PDX tumors are grown subcutaneously in immunodeficient mice.
  • tumor volumes average 150 mm 3 - 250 mm 3 in size
  • the mice are randomly segregated into two groups.
  • One group is injected intraperitoneally with a human lgG1 conjugated to a drug as a negative control; and the other group is injected intraperitoneally with an anti- LING01 ADC (e.g., as prepared in Examples 16 and 18).
  • an anti- LING01 ADC e.g., as prepared in Examples 16 and 18.
  • One week following dosing two representative mice from each group are euthanized and their tumors are harvested and dispersed to single-cell suspensions. The tumor cells from each treatment group are then harvested, pooled and disaggregated as previously described in Example 1.
  • the cells are labeled with FITC conjugated anti-mouse H2kD and anti-mouse CD45 antibodies to detect mouse cells; EpCAM to detect human cells; and DAPI to detect dead cells.
  • the resulting suspension is then sorted by FACS using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer and live human tumor cells are isolated and collected.
  • mice Four cohorts of mice are injected with either 1250, 375, 1 15 or 35 sorted live, human cells from tumors treated with anti-LING01 ADC. As a negative control four cohorts of mice are transplanted with either 1000, 300, 100 or 30 sorted live, human cells from tumors treated with the control lgG1 ADC. Tumors in recipient mice are measured weekly, and individual mice are euthanized before tumors reach 1500 mm 3 . Recipient mice are scored as having positive or negative tumor growth. Positive tumor growth is defined as growth of a tumor exceeding 100 mm 3 .
  • Poisson distribution statistics (L-Calc software, Stemcell Technologies) is used to calculate the frequency of TICs in each population.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Gynecology & Obstetrics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Pregnancy & Childbirth (AREA)
  • Reproductive Health (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne de nouveaux anticorps anti-LINGO1, et des conjugués anticorps-médicaments (ADC), y compris leurs dérivés, ainsi que des méthodes d'utilisation de ceux-ci pour traiter des affections prolifératives.
PCT/US2014/071614 2013-12-20 2014-12-19 Nouveaux anticorps anti-lingo1 et méthodes d'utilisation WO2015095766A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361919150P 2013-12-20 2013-12-20
US61/919,150 2013-12-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015095766A2 true WO2015095766A2 (fr) 2015-06-25
WO2015095766A3 WO2015095766A3 (fr) 2015-08-13

Family

ID=53403897

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2014/071614 WO2015095766A2 (fr) 2013-12-20 2014-12-19 Nouveaux anticorps anti-lingo1 et méthodes d'utilisation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2015095766A2 (fr)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3107936A1 (fr) * 2014-02-17 2016-12-28 Oxford University Innovation Limited Biomarqueurs et cibles thérapeutiques pour le sarcome
CN108430516A (zh) * 2015-11-19 2018-08-21 艾伯维施特姆森特克斯有限责任公司 新颖抗emr2抗体和使用方法
WO2019133799A1 (fr) * 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 University Of Florida Research Foundation Anticorps monoclonaux ciblant le domaine de liaison aux microtubules de la protéine tau
US10415080B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2019-09-17 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
EP3458482A4 (fr) * 2016-05-20 2020-01-15 Agency for Science, Technology and Research Anticorps anti-récepteur tyrosine kinase axl et utilisations correspondantes
US20220298244A1 (en) * 2021-03-16 2022-09-22 Beijing Mabworks Biotech Co. Ltd. Antibodies binding pd-l1 and uses thereof
US11549139B2 (en) 2018-05-14 2023-01-10 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007092370A2 (fr) * 2006-02-03 2007-08-16 Wyeth Structure lingo-1
AU2009269099B2 (en) * 2008-07-09 2016-03-10 Biogen Ma Inc. Compositions comprising antibodies to LINGO or fragments thereof

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3107936A1 (fr) * 2014-02-17 2016-12-28 Oxford University Innovation Limited Biomarqueurs et cibles thérapeutiques pour le sarcome
CN108430516A (zh) * 2015-11-19 2018-08-21 艾伯维施特姆森特克斯有限责任公司 新颖抗emr2抗体和使用方法
EP3458482A4 (fr) * 2016-05-20 2020-01-15 Agency for Science, Technology and Research Anticorps anti-récepteur tyrosine kinase axl et utilisations correspondantes
US11306153B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2022-04-19 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Anti-AXL tyrosine kinase receptor antibodies and uses thereof
US10415080B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2019-09-17 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
US11279969B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2022-03-22 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
US11821026B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2023-11-21 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
US12049666B2 (en) 2016-11-21 2024-07-30 Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
WO2019133799A1 (fr) * 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 University Of Florida Research Foundation Anticorps monoclonaux ciblant le domaine de liaison aux microtubules de la protéine tau
US11629183B2 (en) 2017-12-29 2023-04-18 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Monoclonal antibodies targeting microtubule-binding domain of tau protein and methods of detecting tau protein in vivo
US11549139B2 (en) 2018-05-14 2023-01-10 Nanostring Technologies, Inc. Chemical compositions and methods of using same
US20220298244A1 (en) * 2021-03-16 2022-09-22 Beijing Mabworks Biotech Co. Ltd. Antibodies binding pd-l1 and uses thereof
US11718674B2 (en) * 2021-03-16 2023-08-08 Beijing Mabworks Biotech Co., Ltd. Antibodies binding PD-L1 and uses thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015095766A3 (fr) 2015-08-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9777071B2 (en) Anti-DPEP3 antibodies and methods of use
US10053511B2 (en) Anti-claudin antibodies and methods of use
US10428156B2 (en) Anti-MFI2 antibodies and methods of use
US20170073430A1 (en) Novel anti-rnf43 antibodies and methods of use
EP3383917A1 (fr) Nouveaux anticorps anti-claudine et méthodes d'utilisation
US20180327506A1 (en) Novel anti-emr2 antibodies and methods of use
WO2015095766A2 (fr) Nouveaux anticorps anti-lingo1 et méthodes d'utilisation
WO2018107109A1 (fr) Nouveaux anticorps anti-kremen2 et méthodes d'utilisation
EP3394107A1 (fr) Nouveaux anticorps anti-tnfsf9 et méthodes d'utilisation
US20210261670A1 (en) Novel anti-bmpr1b antibodies and methods of use
AU2016378744A1 (en) Novel anti-UPK1B antibodies and methods of use
US20190127476A1 (en) Novel anti-tnfrsf21 antibodies and methods of use

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14871077

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14871077

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2