[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2011019811A1 - High strength paper - Google Patents

High strength paper Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2011019811A1
WO2011019811A1 PCT/US2010/045162 US2010045162W WO2011019811A1 WO 2011019811 A1 WO2011019811 A1 WO 2011019811A1 US 2010045162 W US2010045162 W US 2010045162W WO 2011019811 A1 WO2011019811 A1 WO 2011019811A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tether
starch
activator
polymer
cellulose fibers
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2010/045162
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Gangadhar Jogikalmath
Patrick D. Kincaid
Lynn Reis
David Soane
Original Assignee
Nanopaper, Llc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanopaper, Llc filed Critical Nanopaper, Llc
Priority to EP10808690.1A priority Critical patent/EP2464786A4/en
Priority to CA2768219A priority patent/CA2768219C/en
Publication of WO2011019811A1 publication Critical patent/WO2011019811A1/en
Priority to US13/331,861 priority patent/US8980059B2/en
Priority to US14/614,999 priority patent/US9605383B2/en

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28Starch
    • D21H17/29Starch cationic
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/63Inorganic compounds
    • D21H17/70Inorganic compounds forming new compounds in situ, e.g. within the pulp or paper, by chemical reaction with other substances added separately
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/33Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • D21H17/34Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D21H17/41Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups
    • D21H17/44Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups cationic
    • D21H17/45Nitrogen-containing groups
    • D21H17/455Nitrogen-containing groups comprising tertiary amine or being at least partially quaternised
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/14Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by function or properties in or on the paper
    • D21H21/18Reinforcing agents

Definitions

  • This application relates generally to making paper products.
  • High strength is desirable in many paper and paperboard applications.
  • One way to achieve this is by manufacturing dense, high-caliper sheets or boards. This requires the use of large amounts of expensive pulp, and produces a heavy product.
  • Another method of creating high strength in paper products is to add starch as sizing.
  • the sizing process uses cooked starch solutions to impart stiffness or strength to the paper.
  • the wet web is first dried to a pre-set moisture content and/or is re-wet to achieve uniform moisture content throughout; then the material is fed into a size press where a high loading of gelatinized starch is applied to the paper surface; then the material is dried again.
  • This process yields a strong paper, but involves a number of downstream processes that can be inefficient. Inefficiencies result from the number of steps involved in preparing the substrate, cooking the starch and applying it to form the finished product.
  • gelatinized starch can be added to the wet end of the papermaking process, but its retention on the pulp fibers is often poor. Moreover, the contamination of the Whitewater with gelatinized starch leads to increased biological oxygen demand of the effluent, so that the process is environmentally unfavorable.
  • Ungelatinized starch granules can also be added to the wet end of papermaking, but they are also poorly retained. Such starch granules can gelatinize during the drying process, imparting strength to the paper web once it is dry. Adding starch granules in this manner requires lower amounts of energy to dry the paper web, while also eliminating or reducing the use of a size press. As an alternative, ungelatinized starch granules can be incorporated as fillers. In their native state, ungelatinized starch granules do not absorb water like the gelatinized starches, so they can be applied to paper webs that have not been pre-dried.
  • these granules can be sprayed on the moving moist web, and gelatinization can be effected in the dryer. This yields an improvement in dry strength and stiffness of the paper.
  • the spraying process does not disperse starch uniformly throughout the thickness of the paper, leading to anisotropic properties.
  • FIG. 1 shows a graph comparing strength with starch loading.
  • FIG. 2 shows a graph comparing strength with starch retention.
  • FIG. 3 shows tensile strength of paper samples.
  • FIG. 4 shows results from hydrophobicity tests on paper samples.
  • the particulate additive can be an organic additive.
  • the organic additive can comprise starch, and the starch can be a cationic starch or a hydrophobic starch.
  • the particulate additive can be an inorganic additive.
  • a paper product comprising activating a population of cellulose fibers in a liquid medium with an activator, preparing a tether-bearing particulate additive, wherein the tether-bearing particulate additive comprises a tether capable of interacting with the activator; and adding the tether-bearing particulate additive to the activated population of cellulose fibers, thereby attaching the additive to the fibers by the interaction of the activator and the tether.
  • methods for increasing the strength of a paper product formed from a pulp slurry comprising cellulose fibers, comprising adding an activator polymer to the pulp slurry, forming complexes between the activator polymer and cellulose fibers in the pulp slurry, preparing tether-bearing starch granules, wherein the tether-bearing starch granules comprise a tether polymer capable of interacting with the activator polymer, and adding the tether-bearing starch granules to the pulp slurry, whereby the starch granules are attached to the cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator polymer and the tether polymer, thereby increasing the strength of the paper product formed from the pulp slurry.
  • the invention is a paper product comprising starch granules, wherein said starch granules are attached to cellulose fibers of said paper product by an interaction between an activator polymer and a tether polymer, wherein the activator polymer is attached to the cellulose fibers and the tether polymer is attached to the starch granules.
  • Disclosed herein are systems and methods for enhancing the attachment of a particulate additive to a fibrous matrix, so that the particles are efficiently and durably attached to the coarser fibrous matrix. Also disclosed herein are processes for manufacturing a paper product by forming a complex between a particulate additive (such as starch) and the fibers. The invention also encompasses paper made by the processes or method described herein.
  • a particulate additive such as starch
  • the systems and methods disclosed herein involve three components: activating the fibers as they are dispersed in a solution, attaching a tethering agent to the particulate additive, and adding the tether-bearing particulate additive to the dispersion containing the activated fibers, so that the additive is attached to the fibers by the interaction of the activating agent and the tethering agent.
  • these systems and methods can be used to treat fibers used in papermaking with a cationic polymer of a specific molecular weight and composition as an activator, to treat starch granules with an anionic polymer as a tethering agent, and to combine these separately-treated populations so that the starch granules are attached to the pulp fibers.
  • activation refers to the interaction of an activating material, such as a polymer, with suspended particles or fibers in a liquid medium, such as an aqueous solution.
  • An “Activator polymer” can carry out this activation.
  • high molecular weight polymers can be introduced into the particulate or fibrous dispersion as Activator polymers, so that these polymers interact, or complex, with the dispersed particles or fibers.
  • the polymer-fiber complexes interact with other similar complexes, or with other fibers, and form agglomerates.
  • This "activation" step can function as a pretreatment to prepare the surface of the suspended material (e.g., fibers) for further interactions in the subsequent phases of the disclosed system and methods.
  • the activation step can prepare the surface of the suspended materials to interact with other polymers that have been rationally designed to interact therewith in a subsequent "tethering" step, as described below.
  • an activating material such as a polymer
  • these coated materials can adopt some of the surface properties of the polymer or other coating. This altered surface character in itself can be advantageous for retention, attachment and/or dewatering.
  • activation can be accomplished by chemical modification of the suspended material.
  • oxidants or bases/alkalis can increase the negative surface energy of fibers or particles, and acids can decrease the negative surface energy or even induce a positive surface energy on suspended material.
  • electrochemical oxidation or reduction processes can be used to affect the surface charge on the suspended materials. These chemical modifications can produce activated particulates that have a higher affinity for tethered anchor particles as described below.
  • Suspended materials suitable for modification, or activation can include organic or inorganic particles, or mixtures thereof.
  • Inorganic particles can include one or more materials such as calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, other metal oxides and the like.
  • Organic particles can include one or more materials such as starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like. Particle sizes can range from a few nanometers to few hundred microns. In certain embodiments, macroscopic particles in the millimeter range may be suitable.
  • suspended materials may comprise materials such as lignocellulosic material, cellulosic material, minerals, vitreous material, cementitious material, carbonaceous material, plastics, elastomeric materials, and the like.
  • cellulosic and lignocellulosic materials may include wood materials such as wood flakes, wood fibers, wood waste material, wood powder, lignins, wood pulp, or fibers from woody plants.
  • the "activation" step may be performed using flocculants or other polymeric substances.
  • the polymers or flocculants can be charged, including anionic or cationic polymers.
  • anionic polymers can be used, including, for example, olefmic polymers, such as polymers made from polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, and salts, esters and copolymers thereof (such as (sodium acrylate/acrylamide) copolymers), sulfonated polymers, such as sulfonated polystyrene, and salts, esters and copolymers thereof.
  • Suitable polycations include: polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallyldimethylammoniums (e.g., the chloride salt), branched or linear polyethyleneimine, crosslinked amines (including
  • Nonionic polymers suitable for hydrogen bonding interactions can include polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, polyhydroxyethylacrylate, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, and the like.
  • an activator such as polyethylene oxide can be used as an activator with a cationic tethering material in accordance with the description of tethering materials below.
  • activator polymers with hydrophobic modifications can be used.
  • Flocculants such as those sold under the trademark MAGNAFLOC® by Ciba Specialty Chemicals can be used.
  • activators such as polymers or copolymers containing carboxylate, sulfonate, phosphonate, or hydroxamate groups can be used. These groups can be incorporated in the polymer as manufactured, alternatively they can be produced by neutralization of the corresponding acid groups, or generated by hydrolysis of a precursor such as an ester, amide, anhydride, or nitrile group. The neutralization or hydrolysis step could be done on site prior to the point of use, or it could occur in situ in the process stream.
  • the activated suspended material e.g., fiber
  • the activated suspended material can also be an amine
  • modified material can include any material that has been modified by the attachment of one or more amine functional groups as described herein.
  • the functional group on the surface of the suspended material can be from modification using a multifunctional coupling agent or a polymer.
  • the multifunctional coupling agent can be an amino silane coupling agent as an example. These molecules can bond to a material's surface and then present their amine group for interaction with the particulate matter.
  • the polymer on the surface of a suspended fiber or particle can be covalently bound to the surface or interact with the surface of the particle and/or fiber using any number of other forces such as electrostatic, hydrophobic, or hydrogen bonding interactions.
  • a multifunctional coupling agent can be used such as a silane coupling agent.
  • Suitable coupling agents include isocyano silanes and epoxy silanes as examples.
  • a polyamine can then react with an isocyano silane or epoxy silane for example.
  • Polyamines include polyallyl amine, polyvinyl amine, chitosan, and polyethylenimine.
  • polyamines can also self-assemble onto the surface of the suspended particles or fibers to functionalize them without the need of a coupling agent.
  • polyamines can self-assemble onto the surface of the particles or fibers through electrostatic interactions. They can also be precipitated onto the surface in the case of chitosan for example. Since chitosan is soluble in acidic aqueous conditions, it can be precipitated onto the surface of suspended material by adding a chitosan solution to the suspended material at a low pH and then raising the solution pH.
  • the amines or a majority of amines are charged.
  • polyamines such as quarternary amines are fully charged regardless of the pH. Other amines can be charged or uncharged depending on the environment.
  • the polyamines can be charged after addition onto the suspended particles or fibers by treating them with an acid solution to protonate the amines.
  • the acid solution can be non-aqueous to prevent the polyamine from going back into solution in the case where it is not covalently attached to the particle or fiber.
  • the polymers or particles can complex via forming one or more ionic bonds, covalent bonds, hydrogen bonding and combinations thereof, for example. Ionic complexing is preferred.
  • the activator could be introduced into a liquid medium through several different means.
  • a large mixing tank could be used to mix an activating material with fine particulate materials.
  • Activated particles or fibers are produced that can be treated with one or more subsequent steps of attachment to tether-bearing anchor particles.
  • tethering refers to an interaction between an activated suspended particle or fiber and an anchor particle (as described below).
  • the anchor particle for example, a particulate additive, can be treated or coated with a tethering material.
  • the tethering material such as a polymer, forms a complex or coating on the surface of the anchor particles such that the tethered anchor particles have an affinity for the activated suspended material.
  • the selection of tether and activator materials is intended to make the two solids streams complementary so that the activated particles or fibers in the suspension become tethered, linked or otherwise attached to the anchor particle.
  • the tethering material acts as a complexing agent to affix the activated particles or fibers to an anchor material.
  • a tethering material can be any type of material that interacts strongly with the activating material and that is connectable to an anchor particle.
  • an anchor particle may comprise materials such as
  • cellulosic and lignocellulosic materials may include wood materials such as wood flakes, wood fibers, wood waste material, wood powder, lignins, or fibers from woody plants.
  • inorganic particles useful as anchor particles include clays such as attapulgite and bentonite.
  • the inorganic compounds can be vitreous materials, such as ceramic particles, glass, fly ash, PCC, GCC, chalk, TiO2, silica, bentonite, kaolin, talc, and the like.
  • the anchor particles may be solid or may be partially or completely hollow.
  • glass or ceramic microspheres may be used as particles.
  • Vitreous materials such as glass or ceramic may also be formed as fibers to be used as particles.
  • Cementitious materials may include gypsum, Portland cement, blast furnace cement, alumina cement, silica cement, and the like.
  • Carbonaceous materials may include carbon black, graphite, carbon fibers, carbon microparticles, and carbon nanoparticles, for example carbon nanotubes.
  • plastic materials may be used as anchor particles. Both thermoset and thermoplastic resins may be used to form plastic particles.
  • Plastic particles may be shaped as solid bodies, hollow bodies or fibers, or any other suitable shape.
  • Plastic particles can be formed from a variety of polymers.
  • a polymer useful as a plastic particle may be a homopolymer or a copolymer. Copolymers can include block copolymers, graft copolymers, and interpolymers.
  • suitable plastics may include, for example, addition polymers (e.g., polymers of ethylenically
  • Addition polymers can include, for example, polyolefins, polystyrene, and vinyl polymers.
  • Polyolefins can include, in embodiments, polymers prepared from C 2 -Ci 0 olefin monomers, e.g., ethylene, propylene, butylene, dicyclopentadiene, and the like.
  • poly( vinyl chloride) polymers, acrylonitrile polymers, and the like can be used.
  • useful polymers for the formation of particles may be formed by condensation reaction of a polyhydric compound (e.g., an alkylene glycol, a polyether alcohol, or the like) with one or more polycarboxylic acids.
  • a polyhydric compound e.g., an alkylene glycol, a polyether alcohol, or the like
  • Polyethylene terephthalate is an example of a suitable polyester resin.
  • Polyurethane resins can include, e.g., polyether polyurethanes and polyester polyurethanes.
  • Plastics may also be obtained for these uses from waste plastic, such as post-consumer waste including plastic bags, containers, bottles made of high density polyethylene, polyethylene grocery store bags, and the like.
  • plastic particles for anchor particles can be formed as expandable polymeric pellets.
  • Such pellets may have any geometry useful for the specific application, whether spherical, cylindrical, ovoid, or irregular.
  • Expandable pellets may be pre-expanded before using them. Pre-expansion can take place by heating the pellets to a temperature above their softening point until they deform and foam to produce a loose composition having a specific density and bulk. After pre- expansion, the particles may be molded into a particular shape and size. For example, they may be heated with steam to cause them to fuse together into a lightweight cellular material with a size and shape conforming to the mold cavity. Expanded pellets may be 2-4 times larger than unexpanded pellets.
  • expandable polymeric pellets may be formed from polystyrenes and polyolefms. Expandable pellets are available in a variety of unexpanded particle sizes. Pellet sizes, measured along the pellet's longest axis, on a weight average basis, can range from about 0.1 to 6 mm.
  • the expandable pellets may be formed by polymerizing the pellet material in an aqueous suspension in the presence of one or more expanding agents, or by adding the expanding agent to an aqueous suspension of finely subdivided particles of the material.
  • An expanding agent also called a "blowing agent” is a gas or liquid that does not dissolve the expandable polymer and which boils below the softening point of the polymer. Blowing agents can include lower alkanes and halogenated lower alkanes, e.g., propane, butane, pentane, cyclopentane, hexane, cyclohexane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and trifluorochloromethane, and the like.
  • elastomeric materials can be used as particles. Particles of natural or synthetic rubber can be used, for example.
  • various interactions such as electrostatic, hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic behavior can be used to affix an activated complex to a tethering material complexed with an anchor particle.
  • an anchor particle can be selected from any particulate matter that is desirably attached to cellulose fibers in the final paper product.
  • the tether-bearing anchor particle comprising the desirable additive can then interact with the activated cellulose fibers in the wet paper stream.
  • starch granules can be used as an anchor particle to be attached to the cellulose fibers, as is described in more detail below.
  • organic and inorganic particulate matter can be attached to celluose fibers to achieve desired properties.
  • inorganic materials like calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, various other metal oxides, and the like, can be used as anchor particles in accordance with these systems and methods.
  • organic particles such as starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like, can be used as anchor particles in accordance with these systems and methods.
  • polymers such as linear or branched polyethyleneimine can be used as tethering materials. It would be understood that other anionic or cationic polymers could be used as tethering agents, for example polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (poly(D ADMAC). In other embodiments, cationic tethering agents such as epichlorohydrin dimethylamine (epi/DMA), styrene maleic anhydride imide (SMAI), polyethylene imide (PEI), polyvinylamine, polyallylamine, amine-aldehyde
  • epi/DMA epichlorohydrin dimethylamine
  • SMAI styrene maleic anhydride imide
  • PEI polyethylene imide
  • polyvinylamine polyallylamine
  • poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl chloride quaternary) polymers and the like can be used.
  • cationic polymers useful as tethering agents can include quaternary ammonium or phosphonium groups.
  • polymers with quaternary ammonium groups such as poly(D ADMAC) or epi/DMA can be used as tethering agents.
  • polyvalent metal salts e.g., calcium, magnesium, aluminum, iron salts, and the like
  • cationic surfactants such as dimethyldialkyl(C8-C22)ammonium halides, alkyl(C8-C22)trimethylammonium halides, alkyl(C8-C22)dimethylbenzylammonium halides, cetyl pyridinium chloride, fatty amines, protonated or quaternized fatty amines, fatty amides and alkyl phosphonium compounds can be used as tethering agents.
  • polymers having hydrophobic modifications can be used as tethering agents.
  • tethering material can depend on the activating material.
  • a high affinity between the tethering material and the activating material can lead to a strong and/or rapid interaction there between.
  • a suitable choice for tether material is one that can remain bound to the anchor surface, but can impart surface properties that are beneficial to a strong complex formation with the activator polymer.
  • a polyanionic activator can be matched with a polycationic tether material or a polycationic activator can be matched with a polyanionic tether material.
  • a poly(sodium acrylate-co-acrylamide) activator is matched with a chitosan tether material.
  • a hydrogen bond donor should be used in conjunction with a hydrogen bond acceptor.
  • the tether material can be complementary to the chosen activator, and both materials can possess a strong affinity to their respective deposition surfaces while retaining this surface property.
  • cationic-anionic interactions can be arranged between activated suspended materials and tether-bearing anchor particles.
  • the activator may be a cationic or an anionic material, as long as it has an affinity for the suspended material to which it attaches.
  • the complementary tethering material can be selected to have affinity for the specific anchor particles being used in the system.
  • hydrophobic interactions can be employed in the activation-tethering system.
  • tether-bearing anchor particles could be designed to complex with a specific type of activated particulate matter.
  • the systems and methods disclosed herein could be used for complexing with organic waste particles, for example.
  • Other activation-tethering- anchoring systems may be envisioned for removal of suspended particulate matter in fluid streams, including gaseous streams.
  • the complexes formed from the anchor particles and the activated fibrous matter can form a homogeneous part of a fibrous product like paper and/or other paper products.
  • Paper products include, for example, products and materials made from cellulose pulp, including, but not limited to, papers,
  • the interactions between the activated suspended fibers and the tether-bearing anchor particles can enhance the mechanical properties of the complex that they form.
  • an activated suspended material can be durably bound to one or more tether-bearing anchor particles, so that the tether-bearing anchor particles do not segregate or move from their position on the fibers.
  • Increased compatibility of the activated fine materials with a denser (anchor) matrix modified with the appropriate tether polymer can lead to further mechanical stability of the resulting composite material.
  • cationic and anionic polymers for activators and tethering agents can be selected from a wide variety of available polymers, as described above.
  • Starch granules or other desirable particles can be selected as anchor particles, where their attachment to pulp fibers would be advantageous.
  • desirable particles include, but are not limited to inorganic and organic anchor particles such as have been described above (e.g., for inorganic materials, calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, various other metal oxides and the like, and for organic materials, starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like).
  • inorganic and organic anchor particles such as have been described above (e.g., for inorganic materials, calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, various other metal oxides and the like, and for organic materials, starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like).
  • starch granules When starch granules are used as anchor particles for attachment to cellulose fibers, they can be used in their native state, or they can be modified with short amine side-groups, with amine polymers, or with hydrophobic side groups (each such starch encompassed by the term "modified starch"). The presence of amines on the surface of the starch granules can help in attaching an anionic tethering polymer.
  • cationic polymers can be used for activating the cellulose fibers.
  • the polycation can be linked to the fiber surface using a coupling agent, for example a bifunctional crosslinking agent such as a carbonyldiimidazole or a silane, or the polyamine can self-assemble onto the surface of the cellulose fiber through electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, or hydrophobic interactions.
  • the polyamine can spontaneously self-assemble onto the fiber surface or it can be precipitated onto the surface.
  • chitosan can be precipitated on the surface of the cellulose fibers to activate them.
  • chitosan is soluble only in an acidic solution, it can be added to a cellulose fiber dispersion at an acidic pH, and then can be precipitated onto the surface of the cellulose fibers by slowly adding base to the dispersion until chitosan is no longer soluble.
  • a difunctional crosslinking agent can be used to attach the polycation to the fiber, by reacting with both the polycation and the fiber.
  • a polycation such as a polyamine can be added directly to the fiber dispersion or slurry.
  • the addition level of the polycation can be between about 0.01% to 5.0% (based on the weight of the fiber), e.g., between 0.1% to 2%.
  • a polyamine like polyD ADMAC a separately treated population of tether-bearing starch granules can be mixed in thereafter, resulting in the attachment of the starch granules to the cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator polymer and the tether polymer.
  • Starch granules can be treated with a variety of anionic polymers, such as anionic
  • polyacrylamide which then act as tethers.
  • individual retention aids such as polyacrylamide are known in the art to help with the retention of starch granules within a cellulose matrix, the drainage of the paper web is severely affected by the use of these agents individually.
  • a complimentary polycation e.g., polyD ADMAC
  • polyanion as a tether attached to the starch granules in accordance with these systems and methods avoids this problem, reducing the water retention in the paper web and leading to efficient drainage.
  • the use of these systems and methods eliminates the requirement for cooking the starch before using it, thereby eliminating the gelatinizing ("cooking") step, and decreasing energy utilization.
  • the systems and methods described herein result in a percent starch retention within the cellulose matrix of a paper product of at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90% or at least about 90%. In certain aspects, the systems and methods result in a starch retention of at least about 85%. Percent starch retention is the amount of starch retained within the cellulose matrix as a percentage of the total amount of starch added to the pulp slurry. An exemplary method of determining starch retention is described in more detail in the Examples.
  • Starch that is to be treated in accordance with these systems and methods can be further derivatized or coated with moieties that impart desirable properties, e.g., hydrophobicity, oleophobicity or both. Starches thus modified may be also termed
  • Preferred oil resistant coating formulations are aqueous solutions of cellulose derivatives such as methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, ethylhydroxypropyl cellulose, and ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, which may further comprise polyvinyl alcohol and/or its derivatives.
  • cellulose derivatives such as methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, ethylhydroxypropyl cellulose, and ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, which may further comprise polyvinyl alcohol and/or its derivatives.
  • Another group of preferred oil resistant coating compositions are latex emulsions such as the emulsions of polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer, carboxylated styrene-butadiene copolymer, ethylene - vinyl chloride copolymer, styrene-acrylic copolymer, polyvinyl acetate, ethylene -vinyl acetate copolymer, and vinyl acetate-acrylic copolymer.
  • the starch granule thus coated with grease resistant formulations could be attached to the activated pulp fibers via tethering, such that the surface segregation of the starch granule will modify the surface of the paper product.
  • the presence of hydrophobic starch also improves the hydrophobicity of the resulting paper without needing an internal sizing such as alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA), alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) or Rosin.
  • ASA alkyl succinic anhydride
  • ALD alkyl ketene dimer
  • Rosin Rosin.
  • the gelatinized hydrophobic starch sizes the entire thickness of the paper. This property is useful in reducing the coating requirements in making coated sheets. The coating applied using a roller or a metering bar or any such methods, would remain on the surface of the paper and not impregnate the bulk of the paper thus needing less coating to achieve the same amount of gloss and surface finish.
  • the addition of a coating agent to the starch can improve its mechanical properties such as bending stiffness or tensile strength, or could improve its optical properties (e.g., TiO2 nanoparticles bound to starch).
  • the slurry can be subjected to additional steps in order to make a paper product.
  • the slurry can be mixed, drained of water, added to a handsheet maker, dried and/or pressed, or any combination thereof.
  • An exemplary method of making a handsheet is described in the Examples below.
  • a 0.5% slurry was prepared by blending 3.5% by weight softwood and hardwood pulp mixture (in the ratio of 20:80) in water.
  • Example 2 Control recycled pulp
  • a 0.5% slurry was prepared by blending 3.1% recycled deinked pulp in water.
  • Handsheets were prepared using a Mark V Dynamic Paper Chemistry Jar and Hand-Sheet Mold from Paper Chemistry Laboratory, Inc. (Larchmont, NY).
  • Handsheets were prepared without addition of polymers as controls, using the control pulps as described in Example 1 and 2. Handsheets were prepared with the addition of polymers as experimental samples, as described below. For preparing each
  • Instron 3343 Samples of handsheets for tensile testing were initially cut into 1 in wide strips with a paper cutter, then attached within the Instron 3343. The gauge length region was set at 4 in and the crosshead speed was 1 in/minute. Thickness was measured to provide stress data as was the weight to be able to normalize the data by weight of samples. The strips were tested to failure with an appropriate load cell. At least three strips from each control or experimental handsheet sample were tested and the values were averaged together.
  • Sta Lok 356 or Filmkote starches were dispersed in water such that the solids content was about 20 to 25% to get a slurry of cationic and hydrophobic starches respectively.
  • 1% by weight of anionic polyacrylamide magnafloc LT30 was used as the tethering agent.
  • Example 6 Process for preparing handsheets from activated pulp and tethered starch
  • Starch retention was determined by first analyzing the effluent created after making the handsheets in Example 6. A piece of VWR Grade 413 filter paper with 5 ⁇ m particle retention was initially dried in an oven at 110°C to remove any moisture and then weighed. The effluent from the handsheet preparation carried out in Example 5 was then filtered through the paper using vacuum filtration. The filter paper was dried again at HO 0 C to remove any moisture, and was weighed to determine the lost solids from the handsheet. These solids included the fines from the papermaking process and starch granules. To normalize for only the starch contribution to the effluent, a control experiment was run using the effluent from the preparation of a control pulp using the activator polymer but no starch addition. The filtered solid content in the control effluent was subtracted from the filtered solid content in the starch-bearing effluent, to yield the amount of starch therein. This amount was used to determine the starch retention of the pulp in Example 6.
  • Example 8 Effect on starch retention of polymeric retention aids added to cellulose pulp -(no starch tethering) [0069] Experiments were carried out to evaluate the starch retention effects of various polymers that can be used to functionalize cellulose fibers. A pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Example 1 was treated with the various polymers listed in Table 1 , at the loading levels listed in the Table. The Table lists the effects of the various cellulose fiber polymeric treatments on starch retention, where starch retention was measured in accordance with Example 7. The anionic polyacrylamide (LT 30) resulted in good starch retention, but was observed during the experiment to adversely affect the drainage of water.
  • LT 30 anionic polyacrylamide
  • Example 9 The Effect of Starch Loading on Strength
  • Samples were prepared as in Example 6, where the amount of tether-bearing starch (Sta Lok 356) ranged from 0.18g to 2.Og, i.e., initial loadings of 4% to 33% of the solids weight.
  • the tether-bearing starch was prepared in accordance with Example 5. Samples were made both with activator and tether and without either activator or tether. For samples made with activator, tether and the anchor (ATA), the tether used on the starch was 1% MagnaFloc LT30 by solids and the activator on the pulp was 1% polyD ADMAC by solids. Starch retention was measured as set forth in Example 7, and the max load for each sample was measured using an Instron as in Example 4.
  • Example 10 The Effect of Starch Loading on Strength and Hydrophobicity
  • Samples were prepared as in Example 6 with tether-bearing Sta Lok 356 starch. Starch retention was measured as set forth in Example 7, and the tensile strength for each sample was measured using an Instron as in Example 4. As set forth in Table 3, certain of the samples were treated with polyD ADMAC as activator in concentrations of 1% by solids, and with MagnaFloc LT30 as the tethering agent attached to the starch in concentrations of 1% by solids all in accordance with Example 6. These samples are designated as ATA Process samples in the table below (Table 3).
  • Graph 2 (FIG. 2) illustrates the effect of starch retention on the strength of the paper.
  • Graph 2 compares the difference between strength of the handsheets made with the ATA Process compared to handsheets that have not been treated with any polymer addition.
  • Example 11 Effect of hydrophobic starch loading on strength of paper made with recycled fibers
  • Recycled fibers are relatively weak due to fiber length reduction during fiber recovery and processing.
  • the ATA process is applied to improve the strength of handsheets made from recycled fibers by incorporating starch within the fibrous web.
  • a recycled pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Example 3 was treated in accordance with Example 6, using Filmkote hydrophobic starches as tether-bearing starches.
  • Filmkote starches of varying degrees of hydrophobicity were used, as set forth in Graph 3 (FIG. 3).
  • the starch Filmkote 550 is more hydrophobic than Filmkote 54.
  • the tensile strength of the paper samples was measured as set forth in Example 4.
  • the ATA process as applied to recycled paper improved the strength of the paper samples by amounts from about 25-40%.
  • Example 12 Effect of hydrophobic starch loading on hydrophobicity of paper made with recycled fibers

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for attaching particulate additives to a population of cellulose fibers dispersed in an aqueous solution. The cellulose fibers are treated with an activator that forms complexes with them. The particulate additive is attached to a tether that is capable of interacting with the activator, thereby forming a tether-bearing particulate additive. The tether-bearing particulate additive can be added to the activated suspension of cellulose fibers. The resulting interaction between the tether and the activator forms durable complexes that attach the particulate additive to the cellulose fibers. Using these systems and methods, useful additives like starches can be attached to cellulose fibers, imparting advantageous properties such as increased strength to paper products formed thereby. These systems and methods are particularly useful for papermaking involving virgin pulp fibers, recycled fibers, or any combination thereof.

Description

HIGH STRENGTH PAPER
RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
61/233,448, filed August 12, 2009. The entire teachings of the above-referenced application are incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE APPLICATION
[0002] This application relates generally to making paper products.
BACKGROUND
[0003] High strength is desirable in many paper and paperboard applications. One way to achieve this is by manufacturing dense, high-caliper sheets or boards. This requires the use of large amounts of expensive pulp, and produces a heavy product. Another method of creating high strength in paper products is to add starch as sizing.
[0004] In one approach, the sizing process uses cooked starch solutions to impart stiffness or strength to the paper. In the sizing process, the wet web is first dried to a pre-set moisture content and/or is re-wet to achieve uniform moisture content throughout; then the material is fed into a size press where a high loading of gelatinized starch is applied to the paper surface; then the material is dried again. This process yields a strong paper, but involves a number of downstream processes that can be inefficient. Inefficiencies result from the number of steps involved in preparing the substrate, cooking the starch and applying it to form the finished product. A
considerable amount of energy is required for these steps, which adds to the costs of the process.
[0005] In some instances, gelatinized starch can be added to the wet end of the papermaking process, but its retention on the pulp fibers is often poor. Moreover, the contamination of the Whitewater with gelatinized starch leads to increased biological oxygen demand of the effluent, so that the process is environmentally unfavorable.
[0006] Ungelatinized starch granules can also be added to the wet end of papermaking, but they are also poorly retained. Such starch granules can gelatinize during the drying process, imparting strength to the paper web once it is dry. Adding starch granules in this manner requires lower amounts of energy to dry the paper web, while also eliminating or reducing the use of a size press. As an alternative, ungelatinized starch granules can be incorporated as fillers. In their native state, ungelatinized starch granules do not absorb water like the gelatinized starches, so they can be applied to paper webs that have not been pre-dried. To apply ungelatinized starch, these granules can be sprayed on the moving moist web, and gelatinization can be effected in the dryer. This yields an improvement in dry strength and stiffness of the paper. However, the spraying process does not disperse starch uniformly throughout the thickness of the paper, leading to anisotropic properties.
[0007] There remains a need in the art, therefore, for systems and methods for incorporating and retaining ungelatinized starch fillers in the wet end so that high amounts of these fillers are dispersed uniformly in the paper. These fillers should, desirably, be incorporated so that they are stably anchored to the pulp fibers, allowing them to expand or gelatinize during paper manufacturing without being dislodged. In this manner, the fillers can occupy the interstitial spaces between cellulose fibers more completely, improving the rigidity of the paper product. Furthermore, it is known that high filler content has a detrimental effect on the strength of the wet web before it is dried because the fillers act as spacers and interfere with fiber-fiber bonding. An efficient retention system that attaches the fillers to fibers durably in the wet web can advantageously enhance wet web strength during processing by allowing fiber-fiber bonding to proceed unimpeded.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0008] FIG. 1 shows a graph comparing strength with starch loading.
[0009] FIG. 2 shows a graph comparing strength with starch retention.
[0010] FIG. 3 shows tensile strength of paper samples.
[0011] FIG. 4 shows results from hydrophobicity tests on paper samples.
SUMMARY
[0012] Disclosed herein, in embodiments, are systems for papermaking, comprising a population of cellulose fibers dispersed in an aqueous solution and complexed with an activator, and a tether-bearing particulate additive, wherein the addition of the tether- bearing particulate additive attaches the additive to the population of cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator and the tether. In embodiments, the particulate additive can be an organic additive. In embodiments, the organic additive can comprise starch, and the starch can be a cationic starch or a hydrophobic starch. In other embodiments, the particulate additive can be an inorganic additive.
[0013] Further disclosed herein are methods for manufacturing a paper product, comprising activating a population of cellulose fibers in a liquid medium with an activator, preparing a tether-bearing particulate additive, wherein the tether-bearing particulate additive comprises a tether capable of interacting with the activator; and adding the tether-bearing particulate additive to the activated population of cellulose fibers, thereby attaching the additive to the fibers by the interaction of the activator and the tether. In embodiments, methods are disclosed herein for increasing the strength of a paper product formed from a pulp slurry comprising cellulose fibers, comprising adding an activator polymer to the pulp slurry, forming complexes between the activator polymer and cellulose fibers in the pulp slurry, preparing tether-bearing starch granules, wherein the tether-bearing starch granules comprise a tether polymer capable of interacting with the activator polymer, and adding the tether-bearing starch granules to the pulp slurry, whereby the starch granules are attached to the cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator polymer and the tether polymer, thereby increasing the strength of the paper product formed from the pulp slurry. Further disclosed herein are paper products manufactured in accordance with these methods. In some embodiments, the invention is a paper product comprising starch granules, wherein said starch granules are attached to cellulose fibers of said paper product by an interaction between an activator polymer and a tether polymer, wherein the activator polymer is attached to the cellulose fibers and the tether polymer is attached to the starch granules. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0014] Disclosed herein are systems and methods for enhancing the attachment of a particulate additive to a fibrous matrix, so that the particles are efficiently and durably attached to the coarser fibrous matrix. Also disclosed herein are processes for manufacturing a paper product by forming a complex between a particulate additive (such as starch) and the fibers. The invention also encompasses paper made by the processes or method described herein. The systems and methods disclosed herein involve three components: activating the fibers as they are dispersed in a solution, attaching a tethering agent to the particulate additive, and adding the tether-bearing particulate additive to the dispersion containing the activated fibers, so that the additive is attached to the fibers by the interaction of the activating agent and the tethering agent. In embodiments, these systems and methods can be used to treat fibers used in papermaking with a cationic polymer of a specific molecular weight and composition as an activator, to treat starch granules with an anionic polymer as a tethering agent, and to combine these separately-treated populations so that the starch granules are attached to the pulp fibers.
1. Activation
[0015] As used herein, the term "activation" refers to the interaction of an activating material, such as a polymer, with suspended particles or fibers in a liquid medium, such as an aqueous solution. An "Activator polymer" can carry out this activation. In embodiments, high molecular weight polymers can be introduced into the particulate or fibrous dispersion as Activator polymers, so that these polymers interact, or complex, with the dispersed particles or fibers. The polymer-fiber complexes interact with other similar complexes, or with other fibers, and form agglomerates.
[0016] This "activation" step can function as a pretreatment to prepare the surface of the suspended material (e.g., fibers) for further interactions in the subsequent phases of the disclosed system and methods. For example, the activation step can prepare the surface of the suspended materials to interact with other polymers that have been rationally designed to interact therewith in a subsequent "tethering" step, as described below. Not to be bound by theory, it is believed that when the suspended materials (e.g., fibers) are coated by an activating material such as a polymer, these coated materials can adopt some of the surface properties of the polymer or other coating. This altered surface character in itself can be advantageous for retention, attachment and/or dewatering.
[0017] In another embodiment, activation can be accomplished by chemical modification of the suspended material. For example, oxidants or bases/alkalis can increase the negative surface energy of fibers or particles, and acids can decrease the negative surface energy or even induce a positive surface energy on suspended material. In another embodiment, electrochemical oxidation or reduction processes can be used to affect the surface charge on the suspended materials. These chemical modifications can produce activated particulates that have a higher affinity for tethered anchor particles as described below. [0018] Suspended materials suitable for modification, or activation, can include organic or inorganic particles, or mixtures thereof. Inorganic particles can include one or more materials such as calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, other metal oxides and the like. Organic particles can include one or more materials such as starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like. Particle sizes can range from a few nanometers to few hundred microns. In certain embodiments, macroscopic particles in the millimeter range may be suitable.
[0019] In embodiments, suspended materials may comprise materials such as lignocellulosic material, cellulosic material, minerals, vitreous material, cementitious material, carbonaceous material, plastics, elastomeric materials, and the like. In embodiments, cellulosic and lignocellulosic materials may include wood materials such as wood flakes, wood fibers, wood waste material, wood powder, lignins, wood pulp, or fibers from woody plants.
[0020] The "activation" step may be performed using flocculants or other polymeric substances. Preferably, the polymers or flocculants can be charged, including anionic or cationic polymers.
[0021] In embodiments, anionic polymers can be used, including, for example, olefmic polymers, such as polymers made from polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, and salts, esters and copolymers thereof (such as (sodium acrylate/acrylamide) copolymers), sulfonated polymers, such as sulfonated polystyrene, and salts, esters and copolymers thereof. Suitable polycations include: polyvinylamines, polyallylamines, polydiallyldimethylammoniums (e.g., the chloride salt), branched or linear polyethyleneimine, crosslinked amines (including
epichlorohydrin/dimethylamine, and epichlorohydrin/alkylenediamines), quaternary ammonium substituted polymers, such as (acrylamide/dimethylaminoethylacrylate methyl chloride quat) copolymers and trimethylammoniummethylene- substituted polystyrene, and the like. Nonionic polymers suitable for hydrogen bonding interactions can include polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, polyhydroxyethylacrylate, polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, and the like. In embodiments, an activator such as polyethylene oxide can be used as an activator with a cationic tethering material in accordance with the description of tethering materials below. In embodiments, activator polymers with hydrophobic modifications can be used. Flocculants such as those sold under the trademark MAGNAFLOC® by Ciba Specialty Chemicals can be used.
[0022] In embodiments, activators such as polymers or copolymers containing carboxylate, sulfonate, phosphonate, or hydroxamate groups can be used. These groups can be incorporated in the polymer as manufactured, alternatively they can be produced by neutralization of the corresponding acid groups, or generated by hydrolysis of a precursor such as an ester, amide, anhydride, or nitrile group. The neutralization or hydrolysis step could be done on site prior to the point of use, or it could occur in situ in the process stream.
[0023] The activated suspended material (e.g., fiber) can also be an amine
functionalized or modified. As used herein, the term "modified material" can include any material that has been modified by the attachment of one or more amine functional groups as described herein. The functional group on the surface of the suspended material can be from modification using a multifunctional coupling agent or a polymer. The multifunctional coupling agent can be an amino silane coupling agent as an example. These molecules can bond to a material's surface and then present their amine group for interaction with the particulate matter. In the case of a polymer, the polymer on the surface of a suspended fiber or particle can be covalently bound to the surface or interact with the surface of the particle and/or fiber using any number of other forces such as electrostatic, hydrophobic, or hydrogen bonding interactions. In the case that the polymer is covalently bound to the surface, a multifunctional coupling agent can be used such as a silane coupling agent. Suitable coupling agents include isocyano silanes and epoxy silanes as examples. A polyamine can then react with an isocyano silane or epoxy silane for example. Polyamines include polyallyl amine, polyvinyl amine, chitosan, and polyethylenimine.
[0024] In embodiments, polyamines (polymers containing primary, secondary, tertiary, and/or quaternary amines) can also self-assemble onto the surface of the suspended particles or fibers to functionalize them without the need of a coupling agent. For example, polyamines can self-assemble onto the surface of the particles or fibers through electrostatic interactions. They can also be precipitated onto the surface in the case of chitosan for example. Since chitosan is soluble in acidic aqueous conditions, it can be precipitated onto the surface of suspended material by adding a chitosan solution to the suspended material at a low pH and then raising the solution pH. [0025] In embodiments, the amines or a majority of amines are charged. Some polyamines, such as quarternary amines are fully charged regardless of the pH. Other amines can be charged or uncharged depending on the environment. The polyamines can be charged after addition onto the suspended particles or fibers by treating them with an acid solution to protonate the amines. In embodiments, the acid solution can be non-aqueous to prevent the polyamine from going back into solution in the case where it is not covalently attached to the particle or fiber.
[0026] The polymers or particles can complex via forming one or more ionic bonds, covalent bonds, hydrogen bonding and combinations thereof, for example. Ionic complexing is preferred.
[0027] To obtain activated suspended materials, the activator could be introduced into a liquid medium through several different means. For example, a large mixing tank could be used to mix an activating material with fine particulate materials. Activated particles or fibers are produced that can be treated with one or more subsequent steps of attachment to tether-bearing anchor particles.
2. Tethering
[0028] As used herein, the term "tethering" refers to an interaction between an activated suspended particle or fiber and an anchor particle (as described below). The anchor particle, for example, a particulate additive, can be treated or coated with a tethering material. The tethering material, such as a polymer, forms a complex or coating on the surface of the anchor particles such that the tethered anchor particles have an affinity for the activated suspended material. In embodiments, the selection of tether and activator materials is intended to make the two solids streams complementary so that the activated particles or fibers in the suspension become tethered, linked or otherwise attached to the anchor particle.
[0029] In accordance with these systems and methods, the tethering material acts as a complexing agent to affix the activated particles or fibers to an anchor material. In embodiments, a tethering material can be any type of material that interacts strongly with the activating material and that is connectable to an anchor particle.
[0030] In embodiments, an anchor particle may comprise materials such as
lignocellulosic material, cellulosic material, minerals, vitreous material, cementitious material, carbonaceous material, plastics, elastomeric materials, and the like. In embodiments, cellulosic and lignocellulosic materials may include wood materials such as wood flakes, wood fibers, wood waste material, wood powder, lignins, or fibers from woody plants.
[0031] Examples of inorganic particles useful as anchor particles include clays such as attapulgite and bentonite. In embodiments, the inorganic compounds can be vitreous materials, such as ceramic particles, glass, fly ash, PCC, GCC, chalk, TiO2, silica, bentonite, kaolin, talc, and the like. The anchor particles may be solid or may be partially or completely hollow. For example, glass or ceramic microspheres may be used as particles. Vitreous materials such as glass or ceramic may also be formed as fibers to be used as particles. Cementitious materials may include gypsum, Portland cement, blast furnace cement, alumina cement, silica cement, and the like.
Carbonaceous materials may include carbon black, graphite, carbon fibers, carbon microparticles, and carbon nanoparticles, for example carbon nanotubes.
[0032] In embodiments, plastic materials may be used as anchor particles. Both thermoset and thermoplastic resins may be used to form plastic particles. Plastic particles may be shaped as solid bodies, hollow bodies or fibers, or any other suitable shape. Plastic particles can be formed from a variety of polymers. A polymer useful as a plastic particle may be a homopolymer or a copolymer. Copolymers can include block copolymers, graft copolymers, and interpolymers. In embodiments, suitable plastics may include, for example, addition polymers (e.g., polymers of ethylenically
unsaturated monomers), polyesters, polyurethanes, aramid resins, acetal resins, formaldehyde resins, and the like. Addition polymers can include, for example, polyolefins, polystyrene, and vinyl polymers. Polyolefins can include, in embodiments, polymers prepared from C2-Ci0 olefin monomers, e.g., ethylene, propylene, butylene, dicyclopentadiene, and the like. In embodiments, poly( vinyl chloride) polymers, acrylonitrile polymers, and the like can be used. In embodiments, useful polymers for the formation of particles may be formed by condensation reaction of a polyhydric compound (e.g., an alkylene glycol, a polyether alcohol, or the like) with one or more polycarboxylic acids. Polyethylene terephthalate is an example of a suitable polyester resin. Polyurethane resins can include, e.g., polyether polyurethanes and polyester polyurethanes. Plastics may also be obtained for these uses from waste plastic, such as post-consumer waste including plastic bags, containers, bottles made of high density polyethylene, polyethylene grocery store bags, and the like.
[0033] In embodiments, plastic particles for anchor particles can be formed as expandable polymeric pellets. Such pellets may have any geometry useful for the specific application, whether spherical, cylindrical, ovoid, or irregular. Expandable pellets may be pre-expanded before using them. Pre-expansion can take place by heating the pellets to a temperature above their softening point until they deform and foam to produce a loose composition having a specific density and bulk. After pre- expansion, the particles may be molded into a particular shape and size. For example, they may be heated with steam to cause them to fuse together into a lightweight cellular material with a size and shape conforming to the mold cavity. Expanded pellets may be 2-4 times larger than unexpanded pellets. As examples, expandable polymeric pellets may be formed from polystyrenes and polyolefms. Expandable pellets are available in a variety of unexpanded particle sizes. Pellet sizes, measured along the pellet's longest axis, on a weight average basis, can range from about 0.1 to 6 mm.
[0034] In embodiments, the expandable pellets may be formed by polymerizing the pellet material in an aqueous suspension in the presence of one or more expanding agents, or by adding the expanding agent to an aqueous suspension of finely subdivided particles of the material. An expanding agent, also called a "blowing agent," is a gas or liquid that does not dissolve the expandable polymer and which boils below the softening point of the polymer. Blowing agents can include lower alkanes and halogenated lower alkanes, e.g., propane, butane, pentane, cyclopentane, hexane, cyclohexane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and trifluorochloromethane, and the like.
Depending on the amount of blowing agent used and the technique for expansion, a range of expansion capabilities exist for any specific unexpanded pellet system. The expansion capability relates to how much a pellet can expand when heated to its expansion temperature. In embodiments, elastomeric materials can be used as particles. Particles of natural or synthetic rubber can be used, for example.
[0035] In embodiments, various interactions such as electrostatic, hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic behavior can be used to affix an activated complex to a tethering material complexed with an anchor particle.
[0036] For use in papermaking, an anchor particle can be selected from any particulate matter that is desirably attached to cellulose fibers in the final paper product. The tether-bearing anchor particle comprising the desirable additive can then interact with the activated cellulose fibers in the wet paper stream. As an example, starch granules can be used as an anchor particle to be attached to the cellulose fibers, as is described in more detail below. In other examples, organic and inorganic particulate matter can be attached to celluose fibers to achieve desired properties. For example, inorganic materials like calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, various other metal oxides, and the like, can be used as anchor particles in accordance with these systems and methods. In other embodiments, organic particles such as starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like, can be used as anchor particles in accordance with these systems and methods.
[0037] In embodiments, polymers such as linear or branched polyethyleneimine can be used as tethering materials. It would be understood that other anionic or cationic polymers could be used as tethering agents, for example polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (poly(D ADMAC). In other embodiments, cationic tethering agents such as epichlorohydrin dimethylamine (epi/DMA), styrene maleic anhydride imide (SMAI), polyethylene imide (PEI), polyvinylamine, polyallylamine, amine-aldehyde
condensates, poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate methyl chloride quaternary) polymers and the like can be used. Advantageously, cationic polymers useful as tethering agents can include quaternary ammonium or phosphonium groups. Advantageously, polymers with quaternary ammonium groups such as poly(D ADMAC) or epi/DMA can be used as tethering agents. In other embodiments, polyvalent metal salts (e.g., calcium, magnesium, aluminum, iron salts, and the like) can be used as tethering agents. In other embodiments cationic surfactants such as dimethyldialkyl(C8-C22)ammonium halides, alkyl(C8-C22)trimethylammonium halides, alkyl(C8-C22)dimethylbenzylammonium halides, cetyl pyridinium chloride, fatty amines, protonated or quaternized fatty amines, fatty amides and alkyl phosphonium compounds can be used as tethering agents. In embodiments, polymers having hydrophobic modifications can be used as tethering agents.
[0038] The efficacy of a tethering material, however, can depend on the activating material. A high affinity between the tethering material and the activating material can lead to a strong and/or rapid interaction there between. A suitable choice for tether material is one that can remain bound to the anchor surface, but can impart surface properties that are beneficial to a strong complex formation with the activator polymer. For example, a polyanionic activator can be matched with a polycationic tether material or a polycationic activator can be matched with a polyanionic tether material. In one embodiment, a poly(sodium acrylate-co-acrylamide) activator is matched with a chitosan tether material. [0039] In hydrogen bonding terms, a hydrogen bond donor should be used in conjunction with a hydrogen bond acceptor. In embodiments, the tether material can be complementary to the chosen activator, and both materials can possess a strong affinity to their respective deposition surfaces while retaining this surface property.
[0040] In other embodiments, cationic-anionic interactions can be arranged between activated suspended materials and tether-bearing anchor particles. The activator may be a cationic or an anionic material, as long as it has an affinity for the suspended material to which it attaches. The complementary tethering material can be selected to have affinity for the specific anchor particles being used in the system. In other
embodiments, hydrophobic interactions can be employed in the activation-tethering system.
[0041] As would be further appreciated by those of ordinary skill, tether-bearing anchor particles could be designed to complex with a specific type of activated particulate matter. The systems and methods disclosed herein could be used for complexing with organic waste particles, for example. Other activation-tethering- anchoring systems may be envisioned for removal of suspended particulate matter in fluid streams, including gaseous streams.
3. Retention and incorporation in papermaking
[0042] It is envisioned that the complexes formed from the anchor particles and the activated fibrous matter can form a homogeneous part of a fibrous product like paper and/or other paper products. Paper products include, for example, products and materials made from cellulose pulp, including, but not limited to, papers,
containerboard, paperboard, corrugated containers, recycled paper products, and the like. In embodiments, the interactions between the activated suspended fibers and the tether-bearing anchor particles can enhance the mechanical properties of the complex that they form. For example, an activated suspended material can be durably bound to one or more tether-bearing anchor particles, so that the tether-bearing anchor particles do not segregate or move from their position on the fibers. Increased compatibility of the activated fine materials with a denser (anchor) matrix modified with the appropriate tether polymer can lead to further mechanical stability of the resulting composite material.
[0043] For papermaking, cationic and anionic polymers for activators and tethering agents (respectively) can be selected from a wide variety of available polymers, as described above. Starch granules or other desirable particles can be selected as anchor particles, where their attachment to pulp fibers would be advantageous. Examples of such desirable particles include, but are not limited to inorganic and organic anchor particles such as have been described above (e.g., for inorganic materials, calcium carbonate, dolomite, calcium sulfate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, sand, diatomaceous earth, aluminum hydroxide, silica, various other metal oxides and the like, and for organic materials, starch, modified starch, polymeric spheres (both solid and hollow), carbon based nanoparticles such as carbon nanotubes and the like). When starch granules are used as anchor particles for attachment to cellulose fibers, they can be used in their native state, or they can be modified with short amine side-groups, with amine polymers, or with hydrophobic side groups (each such starch encompassed by the term "modified starch"). The presence of amines on the surface of the starch granules can help in attaching an anionic tethering polymer.
[0044] For activating the cellulose fibers, cationic polymers can be used. The polycation can be linked to the fiber surface using a coupling agent, for example a bifunctional crosslinking agent such as a carbonyldiimidazole or a silane, or the polyamine can self-assemble onto the surface of the cellulose fiber through electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, or hydrophobic interactions. In embodiments, the polyamine can spontaneously self-assemble onto the fiber surface or it can be precipitated onto the surface. For example, in embodiments, chitosan can be precipitated on the surface of the cellulose fibers to activate them. Because chitosan is soluble only in an acidic solution, it can be added to a cellulose fiber dispersion at an acidic pH, and then can be precipitated onto the surface of the cellulose fibers by slowly adding base to the dispersion until chitosan is no longer soluble. In embodiments, a difunctional crosslinking agent can be used to attach the polycation to the fiber, by reacting with both the polycation and the fiber.
[0045] In other embodiments, a polycation such as a polyamine can be added directly to the fiber dispersion or slurry. For example, the addition level of the polycation can be between about 0.01% to 5.0% (based on the weight of the fiber), e.g., between 0.1% to 2%. For example, if the cellulose fiber population is treated with a polyamine like polyD ADMAC, a separately treated population of tether-bearing starch granules can be mixed in thereafter, resulting in the attachment of the starch granules to the cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator polymer and the tether polymer. Starch granules can be treated with a variety of anionic polymers, such as anionic
polyacrylamide, which then act as tethers. [0046] While individual retention aids such as polyacrylamide are known in the art to help with the retention of starch granules within a cellulose matrix, the drainage of the paper web is severely affected by the use of these agents individually. The use of a complimentary polycation (e.g., polyD ADMAC) as an activator, combined with the use of the polyanion as a tether attached to the starch granules in accordance with these systems and methods avoids this problem, reducing the water retention in the paper web and leading to efficient drainage. Furthermore, the use of these systems and methods eliminates the requirement for cooking the starch before using it, thereby eliminating the gelatinizing ("cooking") step, and decreasing energy utilization.
[0047] In certain aspects, the systems and methods described herein result in a percent starch retention within the cellulose matrix of a paper product of at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90% or at least about 90%. In certain aspects, the systems and methods result in a starch retention of at least about 85%. Percent starch retention is the amount of starch retained within the cellulose matrix as a percentage of the total amount of starch added to the pulp slurry. An exemplary method of determining starch retention is described in more detail in the Examples.
[0048] Starch that is to be treated in accordance with these systems and methods can be further derivatized or coated with moieties that impart desirable properties, e.g., hydrophobicity, oleophobicity or both. Starches thus modified may be also termed
"modified starches." Preferred oil resistant coating formulations are aqueous solutions of cellulose derivatives such as methylcellulose, ethyl cellulose, propyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, ethylhydroxypropyl cellulose, and ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, which may further comprise polyvinyl alcohol and/or its derivatives. Another group of preferred oil resistant coating compositions are latex emulsions such as the emulsions of polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer, carboxylated styrene-butadiene copolymer, ethylene - vinyl chloride copolymer, styrene-acrylic copolymer, polyvinyl acetate, ethylene -vinyl acetate copolymer, and vinyl acetate-acrylic copolymer. The starch granule thus coated with grease resistant formulations could be attached to the activated pulp fibers via tethering, such that the surface segregation of the starch granule will modify the surface of the paper product.
[0049] In embodiments, the presence of hydrophobic starch also improves the hydrophobicity of the resulting paper without needing an internal sizing such as alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA), alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) or Rosin. The gelatinized hydrophobic starch sizes the entire thickness of the paper. This property is useful in reducing the coating requirements in making coated sheets. The coating applied using a roller or a metering bar or any such methods, would remain on the surface of the paper and not impregnate the bulk of the paper thus needing less coating to achieve the same amount of gloss and surface finish.
[0050] In other embodiments, the addition of a coating agent to the starch can improve its mechanical properties such as bending stiffness or tensile strength, or could improve its optical properties (e.g., TiO2 nanoparticles bound to starch).
[0051] As will be understood by the skilled artisan, after adding the tether bearing particulate additive to the population of cellulose fibers, the slurry can be subjected to additional steps in order to make a paper product. For example, the slurry can be mixed, drained of water, added to a handsheet maker, dried and/or pressed, or any combination thereof. An exemplary method of making a handsheet is described in the Examples below.
EQUIVALENTS
[0052] While specific embodiments of the subject invention have been discussed, the above specification is illustrative and not restrictive. Many variations of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of this specification.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term "about." Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in this specification and attached claims are approximations that can vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
EXAMPLES
[0053] Materials
• Market softwood and hardwood pulp
• Recycled and deinked pulp from magazine and newsprint • Poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), Hi Molecular Weight, 20 wt% in water (polyD ADMAC), Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO
• MagnaFloc LT30 (PAM) Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation, Suffolk, VA
• STA-LOK 356 Starch, Tate & LyIe, Decatur, IL (cationic starch granules) • ChitoClear Chitosan CG800, Primex, Siglufjordur, Iceland
• Lupamin 9095, BASF Corporation, Florham Park, NJ
• R465 Cationic Starch, Grain Processing Corporation, Muscarine, IA
• FilmKote hydrophobic starches, National Starch LLC, Bridgewater NJ [0054] Example 1 : Control virgin Pulp
[0055] A 0.5% slurry was prepared by blending 3.5% by weight softwood and hardwood pulp mixture (in the ratio of 20:80) in water.
[0056] Example 2: Control recycled pulp
[0057] A 0.5% slurry was prepared by blending 3.1% recycled deinked pulp in water.
[0058] Example 3 : Handsheet Preparation
[0059] Handsheets were prepared using a Mark V Dynamic Paper Chemistry Jar and Hand-Sheet Mold from Paper Chemistry Laboratory, Inc. (Larchmont, NY).
Handsheets were prepared without addition of polymers as controls, using the control pulps as described in Example 1 and 2. Handsheets were prepared with the addition of polymers as experimental samples, as described below. For preparing each
experimental handsheet, the appropriate volume of 0.5% pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Examples 1 or2 (as applicable) was activated with up to 2% of the selected polymer(s) (based on dry weight), as described below in more detail. Polymer additions were performed at 5 minute intervals. This polymer-containing slurry was diluted with up to 2 L of water and added to the handsheet maker, where it was mixed at a rate of 1100 RPM for 5 seconds, 700 RPM for 5 seconds, and 400 RPM for 5 seconds. The water was then drained off. The subsequent sheet was then transferred off of the wire, pressed and dried.
[0060] Example 4: Tensile Test
[0061] Tensile tests were conducted on control and experimental samples using an
Instron 3343. Samples of handsheets for tensile testing were initially cut into 1 in wide strips with a paper cutter, then attached within the Instron 3343. The gauge length region was set at 4 in and the crosshead speed was 1 in/minute. Thickness was measured to provide stress data as was the weight to be able to normalize the data by weight of samples. The strips were tested to failure with an appropriate load cell. At least three strips from each control or experimental handsheet sample were tested and the values were averaged together.
[0062] Example 5: Preparation of tethered starches
[0063] Sta Lok 356 or Filmkote starches were dispersed in water such that the solids content was about 20 to 25% to get a slurry of cationic and hydrophobic starches respectively. 1% by weight of anionic polyacrylamide magnafloc LT30 was used as the tethering agent.
[0064] Example 6: Process for preparing handsheets from activated pulp and tethered starch
[0065] 800 ml of a 0.5% pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Example 1 or 2 (as applicable) was initially provided. The pulp slurry was activated with 1% by fiber weight polyDADMAC. Separately, tethered cationic (or hydrophobic) starch granules were prepared as a slurry in accordance with Example 5. Each slurry was mixed for 5 minutes and then combined and mixed for another 5 minutes using an overhead stirrer. Handsheets were then produced by the method in Example 3. The final paper weight was approximately 4g for these handsheets.
[0066] Example 7: Starch Retention Measurement
[0067] Starch retention was determined by first analyzing the effluent created after making the handsheets in Example 6. A piece of VWR Grade 413 filter paper with 5μm particle retention was initially dried in an oven at 110°C to remove any moisture and then weighed. The effluent from the handsheet preparation carried out in Example 5 was then filtered through the paper using vacuum filtration. The filter paper was dried again at HO0C to remove any moisture, and was weighed to determine the lost solids from the handsheet. These solids included the fines from the papermaking process and starch granules. To normalize for only the starch contribution to the effluent, a control experiment was run using the effluent from the preparation of a control pulp using the activator polymer but no starch addition. The filtered solid content in the control effluent was subtracted from the filtered solid content in the starch-bearing effluent, to yield the amount of starch therein. This amount was used to determine the starch retention of the pulp in Example 6.
[0068] Example 8: Effect on starch retention of polymeric retention aids added to cellulose pulp -(no starch tethering) [0069] Experiments were carried out to evaluate the starch retention effects of various polymers that can be used to functionalize cellulose fibers. A pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Example 1 was treated with the various polymers listed in Table 1 , at the loading levels listed in the Table. The Table lists the effects of the various cellulose fiber polymeric treatments on starch retention, where starch retention was measured in accordance with Example 7. The anionic polyacrylamide (LT 30) resulted in good starch retention, but was observed during the experiment to adversely affect the drainage of water.
Table 1
Figure imgf000018_0001
[0070] Example 9: The Effect of Starch Loading on Strength
[0071] Samples were prepared as in Example 6, where the amount of tether-bearing starch (Sta Lok 356) ranged from 0.18g to 2.Og, i.e., initial loadings of 4% to 33% of the solids weight. The tether-bearing starch was prepared in accordance with Example 5. Samples were made both with activator and tether and without either activator or tether. For samples made with activator, tether and the anchor (ATA), the tether used on the starch was 1% MagnaFloc LT30 by solids and the activator on the pulp was 1% polyD ADMAC by solids. Starch retention was measured as set forth in Example 7, and the max load for each sample was measured using an Instron as in Example 4. Data were normalized by the mass to show load contribution per overall solids weight. Graph 1 (FIG.l) shows the strength improvement with starch loading with and without the ATA process chemistry. For all samples functionalized with the ATA chemistry described in Example 6, the starch granule retention was >98%. Without being bound by theory, it is understood that the inclusion of untethered starch in the unactivated paper matrix is limited by the amount physical entanglements between starch and cellulose, reflected in the plateau in strength measurement with higher loads of starch added without ATA processing. With ATA, a greater amount of starch can be attached effectively to the cellulose, progressively increasing strength as shown in FIG. 1. As the amount of ATA-bound starch increases, it yields a maximum benefit in strength, which then decreases at higher loadings. It is hypothesized that the higher loadings beyond the maximum exceed the capacity of the hydrogen bonding network of the cellulose fibers.
[0072] Example 10: The Effect of Starch Loading on Strength and Hydrophobicity
[0073] Samples were prepared as in Example 6 with tether-bearing Sta Lok 356 starch. Starch retention was measured as set forth in Example 7, and the tensile strength for each sample was measured using an Instron as in Example 4. As set forth in Table 3, certain of the samples were treated with polyD ADMAC as activator in concentrations of 1% by solids, and with MagnaFloc LT30 as the tethering agent attached to the starch in concentrations of 1% by solids all in accordance with Example 6. These samples are designated as ATA Process samples in the table below (Table 3).
Table 3
Figure imgf000019_0001
[0074] Graph 2 (FIG. 2) illustrates the effect of starch retention on the strength of the paper. Graph 2 compares the difference between strength of the handsheets made with the ATA Process compared to handsheets that have not been treated with any polymer addition. [0075] Example 11 : Effect of hydrophobic starch loading on strength of paper made with recycled fibers
[0076] Recycled fibers are relatively weak due to fiber length reduction during fiber recovery and processing. In this example, the ATA process is applied to improve the strength of handsheets made from recycled fibers by incorporating starch within the fibrous web. To produce handsheets of recycled paper using the ATA process, a recycled pulp slurry prepared in accordance with Example 3 was treated in accordance with Example 6, using Filmkote hydrophobic starches as tether-bearing starches.
Filmkote starches of varying degrees of hydrophobicity were used, as set forth in Graph 3 (FIG. 3). For example, the starch Filmkote 550 is more hydrophobic than Filmkote 54. The tensile strength of the paper samples was measured as set forth in Example 4. As shown in Graph 3 (FIG. 3), the ATA process as applied to recycled paper improved the strength of the paper samples by amounts from about 25-40%.
[0077] Example 12: Effect of hydrophobic starch loading on hydrophobicity of paper made with recycled fibers
[0078] Using recycled fiber handsheet samples prepared as in Example 11 , hydrophobicity was tested by depositing a 15 microliter water droplet on the surface of the paper and recording the time for the droplet to completely absorbed by the paper. The results of the hydrophobicity tests are shown in Graph 4 (FIG. 4). These results demonstrate that the use of the ATA process to attach hydrophobic starches to recycled pulp fibers improves the water resistance of the paper by nearly 500% compared to control samples having no added no starch.

Claims

CLAIMS: What is claimed:
1. A system for papermaking, comprising:
a population of cellulose fibers dispersed in an aqueous solution and complexed with an activator, and
a tether-bearing particulate additive,
wherein the addition of the tether-bearing particulate additive attaches the additive to the population of cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator and the tether.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the additive is an organic additive.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the organic additive comprises a starch.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the starch comprises a cationic starch.
5. The system of claim 3, wherein the starch comprises a hydrophobic starch.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the additive is an inorganic additive.
7. A method for manufacturing a paper product, comprising:
activating a population of cellulose fibers in a liquid medium with an activator; preparing a tether-bearing particulate additive, wherein the tether-bearing particulate additive comprises a tether capable of interacting with the activator; and
adding the tether-bearing particulate additive to the activated population of cellulose fibers, thereby attaching the additive to the fibers by the interaction of the activator and the tether.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the additive comprises a starch.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the starch comprises a hydrophobic starch.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the starch comprises a cationic starch.
11. The method of any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise
recycled fibers.
12. The method of any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the activator is a cationic polymer.
13. The method of any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the tether is an anionic polymer.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the tether is an anionic polymer and the additive comprises a starch.
15. A method of increasing the strength of a paper product formed from a pulp slurry comprising cellulose fibers, comprising:
adding an activator polymer to the pulp slurry, forming complexes between the activator polymer and the cellulose fibers,
preparing tether-bearing starch granules, wherein the tether-bearing starch granules comprise a tether polymer capable of interacting with the activator polymer, and
adding the tether-bearing starch granules to the pulp slurry, whereby the starch granules are attached to the cellulose fibers by the interaction of the activator polymer and the tether polymer, thereby increasing the strength of the paper product formed from the pulp slurry.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the cellulose fibers comprise recycled fibers.
17. A paper product formed according to the method of any one of claims 7 to 16.
18. A paper product comprising starch granules, wherein said starch granules are
attached to cellulose fibers of said paper product by an interaction between an activator polymer and a tether polymer, wherein the activator polymer is attached to the cellulose fibers and the tether polymer is attached to the starch granules.
19. The paper product of claim 18, wherein activator polymer is a cationic polymer and the tether polymer is an anionic polymer.
20. The paper product of any one of claims 17 or 18, wherein the starch granules are ungelatinized.
PCT/US2010/045162 2009-08-12 2010-08-11 High strength paper WO2011019811A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10808690.1A EP2464786A4 (en) 2009-08-12 2010-08-11 High strength paper
CA2768219A CA2768219C (en) 2009-08-12 2010-08-11 High strength paper
US13/331,861 US8980059B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2011-12-20 High strength paper
US14/614,999 US9605383B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2015-02-05 High strength paper

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US23344809P 2009-08-12 2009-08-12
US61/233,448 2009-08-12

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/331,861 Continuation US8980059B2 (en) 2009-08-12 2011-12-20 High strength paper

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2011019811A1 true WO2011019811A1 (en) 2011-02-17

Family

ID=43586453

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/045162 WO2011019811A1 (en) 2009-08-12 2010-08-11 High strength paper

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2464786A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2768219C (en)
WO (1) WO2011019811A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120152476A1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2012-06-21 Nanopaper, Llc High strength paper
WO2012122257A3 (en) * 2011-03-08 2012-11-08 Nanopaper, Llc High-performance fibrous products
WO2013033368A1 (en) * 2011-09-01 2013-03-07 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
RU2483151C1 (en) * 2011-11-10 2013-05-27 Российская Федерация, От Имени Которой Выступает Министерство Промышленности И Торговли Российской Федерации Method of manufacturing paper for printing
WO2013082007A1 (en) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-06 Soane Labs, Llc Functional pulp-containing composites for drywall applications
WO2013188630A2 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
EP3018175B1 (en) 2014-11-07 2019-02-06 Omya International AG A process for the preparation of flocculated filler particles
US11155965B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2021-10-26 Omya International Ag Process for the preparation of flocculated filler particles
PL442314A1 (en) * 2022-09-19 2024-03-25 Epicom Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Strengthening-functionalizing composition and its application method and method of preparing the strengthening composition

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6303000B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2001-10-16 Omnova Solutions Inc. Paper making process utilizing a reactive cationic starch composition
US6849156B2 (en) * 2001-07-11 2005-02-01 Arie Cornelis Besemer Cationic fibers
US20060257678A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Benson Olester Jr Fiber reinforced optical films

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6303000B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2001-10-16 Omnova Solutions Inc. Paper making process utilizing a reactive cationic starch composition
US6849156B2 (en) * 2001-07-11 2005-02-01 Arie Cornelis Besemer Cationic fibers
US20060257678A1 (en) * 2005-05-10 2006-11-16 Benson Olester Jr Fiber reinforced optical films

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2464786A4 *

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8980059B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2015-03-17 Nanopaper, Llc High strength paper
US20120152476A1 (en) * 2009-08-12 2012-06-21 Nanopaper, Llc High strength paper
WO2012122257A3 (en) * 2011-03-08 2012-11-08 Nanopaper, Llc High-performance fibrous products
US20140224443A1 (en) * 2011-09-01 2014-08-14 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
WO2013033368A1 (en) * 2011-09-01 2013-03-07 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
RU2483151C1 (en) * 2011-11-10 2013-05-27 Российская Федерация, От Имени Которой Выступает Министерство Промышленности И Торговли Российской Федерации Method of manufacturing paper for printing
WO2013082007A1 (en) * 2011-11-29 2013-06-06 Soane Labs, Llc Functional pulp-containing composites for drywall applications
WO2013188630A3 (en) * 2012-06-15 2014-02-20 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
WO2013188630A2 (en) * 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
US9587353B2 (en) 2012-06-15 2017-03-07 Nanopaper, Llc Additives for papermaking
EP3018175B1 (en) 2014-11-07 2019-02-06 Omya International AG A process for the preparation of flocculated filler particles
US11155965B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2021-10-26 Omya International Ag Process for the preparation of flocculated filler particles
US11326307B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2022-05-10 Omya International Ag Process for the preparation of flocculated filler particles
PL442314A1 (en) * 2022-09-19 2024-03-25 Epicom Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Strengthening-functionalizing composition and its application method and method of preparing the strengthening composition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2464786A4 (en) 2014-03-26
EP2464786A1 (en) 2012-06-20
CA2768219C (en) 2016-01-26
CA2768219A1 (en) 2011-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2768219C (en) High strength paper
US9605383B2 (en) High strength paper
US20160369457A1 (en) Paper Products and Methods for Manufacture Thereof
EP2519692B1 (en) Process to enhancing dry strength of paper by treatment with vinylamine-containing polymers and acrylamide containing polymers
CN102648254B (en) Surface application of polymers and polymer mixtures to improve paper strength
CA2671041A1 (en) Cellulosic product
US20170233947A1 (en) Additives for papermaking
MX2007009615A (en) An additive system for use in paper making and process of using the same.
AU2006223142A1 (en) Compositions containing expandable microspheres and an ionic compound, as well as methods of making and using the same
JP2015533954A (en) Filler suspension and its use in the manufacture of paper
EP2328947A1 (en) Expandable microspheres and methods of making and using the same
RU2384661C2 (en) Paper making method
US20160010283A1 (en) Enhanced bulk and high strength paper
KR102123132B1 (en) Improved Method for Manufacturing Paper Using a Cationic Polymer Obtained by Hofmann Degradation
CA2591874C (en) Microsphere and thickener containing composition and its use in the production of paper
NZ529997A (en) Aqueous composition having anionic organic polymeric particles and colloidal anionic silica-based particles
EP1838739B1 (en) Chemical composition and process
US20090165976A1 (en) Expansion agents for paper-based materials
KR20150064193A (en) Filler suspension and its use in the manufacture of paper
WO2007131874A1 (en) Process for making paper and paperboard

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10808690

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2768219

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010808690

Country of ref document: EP