[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

WO2010092670A1 - Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method - Google Patents

Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010092670A1
WO2010092670A1 PCT/JP2009/052239 JP2009052239W WO2010092670A1 WO 2010092670 A1 WO2010092670 A1 WO 2010092670A1 JP 2009052239 W JP2009052239 W JP 2009052239W WO 2010092670 A1 WO2010092670 A1 WO 2010092670A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tag
identification information
quality
reference value
measurement
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2009/052239
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
誠一 瓜田
栄治 古川
敦 黒崎
Original Assignee
富士通株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 富士通株式会社 filed Critical 富士通株式会社
Priority to PCT/JP2009/052239 priority Critical patent/WO2010092670A1/en
Publication of WO2010092670A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010092670A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/0008General problems related to the reading of electronic memory record carriers, independent of its reading method, e.g. power transfer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/0095Testing the sensing arrangement, e.g. testing if a magnetic card reader, bar code reader, RFID interrogator or smart card reader functions properly
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06KGRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/10009Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves
    • G06K7/10366Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves the interrogation device being adapted for miscellaneous applications
    • G06K7/10465Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves the interrogation device being adapted for miscellaneous applications the interrogation device being capable of self-diagnosis, e.g. in addition to or as part of the actual interrogation process
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/40Business processes related to the transportation industry

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an inspection program, an inspection apparatus, and an inspection method for inspecting whether or not an RFID tag distributed in a package can be used.
  • RFID Radio Frequency IDentification
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for inspecting whether or not an ID card can be used. Specifically, the quality of data read such as the number of retransmissions of the ID card (the number of retries) and the electric field strength is measured, and whether or not the measured value satisfies a quality standard value set in advance to determine whether or not it can be used. Whether or not an ID card can be used is determined.
  • Patent Document 1 has a problem that it is not possible to correctly determine whether or not a tag attached to a package can be used. That is, the deterioration speed of the tag data reading quality is affected by environmental factors such as the presence or absence of wind and rain, the presence or absence of impact, and the magnitude of temperature change. For this reason, even if the tag is determined to be usable by inspection, the tag may deteriorate during transportation depending on the destination of the tag, and information may not be read in the intermediate warehouse.
  • An object is to provide an inspection program, an inspection apparatus, and an inspection method.
  • the disclosed inspection program includes a measurement value acquisition procedure for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring a current data read quality of a tag attached to a package and distributed,
  • the identification information acquisition procedure for acquiring the identification information for identifying the destination, and the storage unit storing the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination, the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed
  • the tag in which the data read quality is measured is used. It is a requirement that the computer execute a determination procedure for determining that it is possible.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the outline of the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the inspection apparatus.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing by the inspection apparatus.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of the inspection apparatus according to the second embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit according to the second embodiment.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the transport route storage unit according to the second embodiment.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of information stored in the external environment factor table.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the inspection apparatus according to the third embodiment.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of information stored in the destination management table.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a computer that executes an inspection program.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the outline of the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment.
  • the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment is summarized to inspect whether or not the tag can be used.
  • the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment correctly determines whether or not a tag used for physical distribution can be used.
  • the inspection apparatus has a DB that stores a quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination.
  • the quality reference value is, for example, a reference value for the number of retransmissions indicating the number of trials of read processing required until the reader reads data from the tag.
  • the inspection device acquires a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and circulates, and acquires identification information for identifying the destination of the tag. Then, the inspection apparatus reads the quality standard value corresponding to the destination of the tag for which the data read quality is measured from the DB, and the acquired measurement value satisfies the quality standard value read from the DB. Determines that a tag for which a data read quality measurement has been made is available.
  • the inspection apparatus repeatedly executes a read process for reading identification information for identifying a destination from a tag, and measures the number of retransmissions.
  • the inspection apparatus reads the reference value of the number of retransmissions corresponding to the identification information read from the tag from the DB and compares it with the measured number of retransmissions.
  • the inspection apparatus determines that the tag to be inspected can be used.
  • the inspection apparatus determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used.
  • the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment can correctly determine whether or not a tag used for physical distribution can be used. And the inspection apparatus which concerns on Example 1 can prevent the fall of the business efficiency in physical distribution business as a result of preventing the tag from which information cannot be read in an intermediate warehouse being used for physical distribution.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the inspection apparatus. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the inspection apparatus 1 includes an input unit 10, an output unit 20, a storage unit 30, and a processing unit 40.
  • the input unit 10 accepts input of various types of information.
  • the input unit 10 includes a reader for reading information from the tag, and reads and inputs identification information from the tag.
  • the output unit 20 outputs various information.
  • the output unit 20 includes a monitor (or a display, a touch panel) and a speaker, and outputs, for example, a message indicating that the tag to be inspected cannot be used.
  • the storage unit 30 stores data and programs necessary for various processes by the processing unit 40. Specifically, the storage unit 30 includes a reference value storage unit 31.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing information stored in the reference value storage unit.
  • the reference value storage unit 31 stores, for each tag destination, a quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination.
  • the reference value storage unit 31 is a quality reference value for determining whether or not a tag can be used for physical distribution in the environment at the time of tag inspection. Is stored in the reference value table.
  • the reference value storage unit 31 determines, for each identification information, whether or not the tag can be used for physical distribution in the environment of the tag destination.
  • a reference value table in which quality reference values are stored is stored.
  • Each reference value table stores a reference value for reading distance, a reference value for the number of retransmissions, and a reference value for electric field strength, as shown in FIG.
  • the reading distance is the longest distance between the reader and the tag from which the reader can read information from the tag.
  • the electric field strength is the strength of the radio wave returned from the tag to the reader.
  • the processing unit 40 includes a tag installation unit 41 for installing a tag, an identification information acquisition unit 42, and an availability determination unit 43.
  • the identification information acquisition unit 42 acquires identification information for identifying the destination of the tag from the tag installed in the tag installation unit 41. Further, the identification information acquisition unit 42 acquires a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and distributed. Specifically, when the inspection target tag is installed in the tag installation unit 41, the identification information acquisition unit 42 repeatedly transmits a radio wave to the inspection target tag. And the identification information acquisition part 42 acquires the identification information which identifies the destination of a package from the radio wave returned from the tag to be examined. Here, the identification information acquisition unit 42 measures the number of transmissions of radio waves transmitted from the start of transmission of radio waves to the tag to be inspected until the identification information can be acquired as the number of retransmissions.
  • the identification information acquisition unit 42 starts the position away from the inspection target tag by a predetermined distance, gradually moves the reader away from the inspection target tag to a position where the identification information cannot be read, and reads the reading distance. Measure. Further, the identification information acquisition unit 42 measures the strength of the radio wave returned from the inspection target tag as the electric field strength.
  • the identification information acquisition unit 42 is also referred to as a measurement value acquisition unit.
  • the identification information for identifying the destination of the tag has been described by using an example of acquiring the identification information from the tag installed in the tag setting unit 41.
  • the identification information for identifying the destination can be obtained from the barcode of the slip attached to the package. You may make it acquire by other methods, such as reading by using a barcode reader, or manual input.
  • the availability determination unit 43 reads the quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag whose data read quality is measured from the reference value storage unit 31, and the measurement value acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 is read. If the quality reference value is satisfied, it is determined that the tag for which the data read quality measurement has been performed is usable.
  • the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table in the environment at the time of tag inspection stored in the reference value storage unit 31. Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively.
  • the availability determination unit 43 determines that the inspection target tag cannot be used when any one of the measurement values does not satisfy the reference value, and the inspection target tag is used. A message indicating that it cannot be output to the output unit 20. In other words, when the reading distance measurement value is less than or equal to the reading distance reference value, the retransmission count measurement value is greater than or equal to the retransmission count reference value, or the electric field strength measurement value is less than or equal to the electric field strength reference value. The availability determination unit 43 outputs a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used in all environments.
  • the availability determination unit 43 is acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 when all the measurement values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table under the environment at the time of tag inspection. It is determined whether the destination environment identified by the identification information matches the environment at the time of tag inspection.
  • the availability determination unit 43 when it is determined that they match, the availability determination unit 43 outputs a message to the output unit 20 indicating that the inspection target tag can be used. On the other hand, if the availability determination unit 43 determines that they do not match, the read distance corresponding to the identification information acquired from the reference value table stored in the reference value storage unit 31 by the identification information acquisition unit 42, the retransmission Read the reference number of times and field strength.
  • the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively.
  • the availability determination unit 43 determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used, and The message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used is output to the output unit 20.
  • the availability determination unit 43 indicates that the inspection target tag can be used when all measured values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information. Is output to the output unit 20.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing by the inspection apparatus.
  • the identification information acquiring unit 42 acquires identification information from the tag to be inspected, as well as reading distance and retransmission. The number of times and the electric field strength are measured (step S102).
  • the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table under the environment at the time of tag inspection (step S103), and the reading distance measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 The number of retransmissions and the measured electric field strength are compared (step S104).
  • the availability determination unit 43 displays a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used. Output (step S105).
  • the availability determination unit 43 uses the identification information. It is determined whether the identified destination environment matches the environment at the time of tag inspection (step S106).
  • the availability determination unit 43 outputs a message indicating that the inspection target tag can be used (Step S107).
  • the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information (Step S108). .
  • the availability determination unit 43 compares the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the measured electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 (step S109).
  • the availability determination unit 43 displays a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used. Output (step S105).
  • Step S107 if all measured values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information (No at Step S109), a message indicating that the tag to be inspected can be used is output. (Step S107).
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of the inspection apparatus according to the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 5, the inspection apparatus 1 according to the second embodiment further includes a transport route storage unit 32 and a transport route specifying unit 44, and differs from the first embodiment in the points described below.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit according to the second embodiment.
  • the reference value storage unit 31 stores the quality reference value in association with the identification information for identifying the tag destination (see FIG. 3), and identifies the transportation route identification information for identifying the transportation route and the warehouse where the tag can be distributed.
  • the quality standard value is stored in association with the warehouse identification information (see FIG. 6).
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the transport route storage unit according to the second embodiment.
  • the transport route storage unit 32 associates the transport route identification information for identifying the transport route through which the tag passes, and the warehouse intermediate warehouse through which the tag passes, in association with the identification information for identifying the destination of the tag. Identification information for identification is stored.
  • the information stored in the transport route storage unit 32 is obtained after a tag shipped to the country A assembly plant is transported from the supplier to the intermediate warehouse D via the transport route D and sorted in the intermediate warehouse D. , It means reaching the country A assembly plant via the transport route F.
  • the transport route specifying unit 44 reads the quality standard value corresponding to the distribution route through which the tag can be distributed and the quality standard value corresponding to the warehouse through which the tag can be distributed from the standard value storage unit 31. Specifically, the transport route specifying unit 44 reads transport route identification information corresponding to the identification information acquired by the identification information acquiring unit 42 from the transport route storage unit 32 and warehouse identification information.
  • the availability determination unit 43 determines that the tag whose data read quality is measured can be used only when the measurement value acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 satisfies all the read quality reference values. To do. Specifically, the availability determination unit 43 correlates with the transport route identification information and the warehouse identification information acquired by the transport route specifying unit 44, and stores the read distance, the number of retransmissions, and the number of retransmissions stored in the transport route storage unit 32. Read out all reference values for field strength.
  • the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively. Then, the availability determining unit 43 determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used when there is a measured value that does not satisfy the reference value among the measured values.
  • whether or not the tag can be used is determined for each transport route and warehouse in which the tag can circulate, so it is possible to determine whether or not the tag can be used more accurately.
  • the quality standard values are the destination of the tag, the transport route through which the tag passes, the intermediate warehouse, the temperature of the place where the tag is inspected, the humidity, the strength of static electricity, the presence of radio wave interference, the presence of dust. Can be changed as appropriate.
  • the inspection apparatus 1 further includes an external environment influence factor table that stores temperature and the like for each transport route and intermediate warehouse through which the tag passes, and a weighting factor arbitrarily set by the user. Each quality standard value is set based on this.
  • FIG. 8 External environmental influence factor table
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of information stored in the external environment factor table.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the inspection apparatus according to the third embodiment.
  • the inspection apparatus 1 further includes a destination management table in which a destination code indicating the destination of the tag is stored in association with the management code, and corresponds to the management code read from the tag.
  • a destination code (identification information) may be acquired.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of information stored in the destination management table.
  • tags may be inspected during the transportation of packages, or inspected again at the intermediate warehouse through which the tags pass. It may be.
  • each component of the inspection device 1 shown in FIG. 2 is functionally conceptual and does not necessarily need to be physically configured as illustrated.
  • the specific form of distribution / integration of the inspection apparatus 1 is not limited to the illustrated one, and for example, the identification information acquisition unit 42 and the availability determination unit 43 are integrated.
  • all or a part of the inspection apparatus 1 can be configured to be functionally or physically distributed and integrated in arbitrary units according to various loads and usage conditions.
  • the processing function (see FIG. 4) performed in the inspection apparatus 1 is realized in whole or in part by a CPU and a program that is analyzed and executed by the CPU, or hardware by wired logic. Can be realized as
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a computer that executes an inspection program.
  • the communication control unit 110 controls communication related to various types of information exchanged with other devices.
  • the HDD 120 stores information necessary for the CPU 140 to execute various processes.
  • the RAM 130 temporarily stores various information.
  • the CPU 140 executes various arithmetic processes.
  • the HDD 120 has an identification information acquisition program 121, an availability determination program 122, and reference value data 123 that exhibit the same functions as the processing units of the inspection apparatus 1 shown in the above embodiment. Is stored in advance. Note that the identification information acquisition program 121 and the availability determination program 122 may be appropriately distributed and stored in a storage unit of another computer that is communicably connected via a network.
  • the CPU 140 reads out the identification information acquisition program 121 and the availability determination program 122 from the HDD 120 and expands them in the RAM 130, so that the identification information acquisition program 121 becomes an identification information acquisition process 131 as shown in FIG.
  • the availability determination program 122 functions as the availability determination process 132.
  • the availability determination process 132 reads the reference value data 123 and the like from the HDD 120, expands them in an area allocated to itself in the RAM 130, and executes various processes based on the expanded data and the like.
  • the identification information acquisition process 131 and the availability determination process 132 correspond to the processes executed in the processing unit 40 of the inspection apparatus 1 shown in FIG.
  • each program is stored in a computer-readable storage medium such as a flexible disk (FD), a CD-ROM, a DVD disk, a magneto-optical disk, and an IC card inserted into the computer 100.
  • the program may be read and executed.
  • each program is stored in “another computer (or server)” connected to the computer 100 via a communication line such as a public line, the Internet, a LAN, or a WAN, and the computer 100 uses these communication lines.
  • Each program may be read out from “another computer (or server)” and executed.
  • a measurement value acquisition step for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and the identification information for identifying the destination of the tag is acquired.
  • the identification information acquisition step (see step S102 in FIG. 4) and the destination of the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed from the storage unit storing the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination If the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition step satisfies the read quality reference value, the tag that has been measured for the data read quality can be used.
  • An inspection method including a determination step (see step S109 in FIG. 4) for determining that is is realized.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Whether or not a tag which is attached to a pack and is circulated can be utilized is correctly judged. An inspection device acquires the measurement value by measuring the data reading quality of a tag at present and acquires identification information for identifying the destination of the tag. The inspection device reads the quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag whose the data reading quality has been measured from a storage section for storing quality reference value for determining the utilization lives of the tags in a plurality of environments where the tags can be circulated. If the acquired measurement value satisfies the quality reference value, the inspection device determines that the tag whose data reading quality has been measured can be utilized.

Description

検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法Inspection program, inspection apparatus, and inspection method
 荷物に付されて流通するRFIDタグの利用の可否を検査するための検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法に関する。 The present invention relates to an inspection program, an inspection apparatus, and an inspection method for inspecting whether or not an RFID tag distributed in a package can be used.
 従来より、物流では、荷物にRFID(Radio Frequency IDentification)タグを貼り付け、RFIDタグに書き込まれた情報により荷物の管理が行なわれる。例えば、荷物を中継する中間倉庫では、RFIDタグから読み出した荷物の行き先に応じて、荷物の仕分けが行われる。 Conventionally, in logistics, RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) tags are pasted on packages, and packages are managed based on information written on the RFID tags. For example, in an intermediate warehouse that relays a package, the package is sorted according to the package destination read from the RFID tag.
 このような物流では、荷物の輸送中にタグが劣化し、中間倉庫においてタグに書き込まれた情報を読み出すことができなくなると、物流業務における業務効率の低下が起こる。そのため、荷物がサプライヤから輸送ルートに流通する前に、荷物に付されて流通するタグの利用寿命、言い換えると、タグの利用の可否を予め検査しておくことは重要である。 In such logistics, if the tag deteriorates during the transportation of luggage and the information written in the tag cannot be read in the intermediate warehouse, the business efficiency in the logistics business is lowered. For this reason, it is important to inspect in advance the service life of a tag that is attached to the package and distributed, in other words, whether the tag can be used before the package is distributed from the supplier to the transportation route.
 タグを検査するための技術に関連する技術として、例えば、特許文献1では、IDカードの利用の可否を検査する技術が開示されている。具体的には、IDカードの再送回数(リトライ回数)や電界強度などのデータ読取り品質を測定し、測定値が利用の可否を判定するために予め設定された品質基準値を満足しているか否かによって、IDカードが利用できるかどうか判定する。 As a technique related to a technique for inspecting a tag, for example, Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for inspecting whether or not an ID card can be used. Specifically, the quality of data read such as the number of retransmissions of the ID card (the number of retries) and the electric field strength is measured, and whether or not the measured value satisfies a quality standard value set in advance to determine whether or not it can be used. Whether or not an ID card can be used is determined.
特開2007-199938号公報JP 2007-199938 A
 しかしながら、特許文献1に開示の検査技術では、荷物に付されて流通するタグの利用の可否を正しく判定することができないという課題があった。すなわち、タグのデータ読取り品質の劣化スピードは、風雨の有無、衝撃の有無、温度変化の大きさなどの環境要因に影響を受ける。そのため、検査によって利用できると判定されたタグであっても、そのタグの行き先によっては、輸送中にタグが劣化し、中間倉庫において情報の読み出しができなくなることがあった。 However, the inspection technique disclosed in Patent Document 1 has a problem that it is not possible to correctly determine whether or not a tag attached to a package can be used. That is, the deterioration speed of the tag data reading quality is affected by environmental factors such as the presence or absence of wind and rain, the presence or absence of impact, and the magnitude of temperature change. For this reason, even if the tag is determined to be usable by inspection, the tag may deteriorate during transportation depending on the destination of the tag, and information may not be read in the intermediate warehouse.
 そこで、この検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法は、上述した従来技術の課題を解決するためになされたものであり、荷物に付されて流通するタグの利用の可否を正しく判定することが可能な検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the inspection program, the inspection apparatus, and the inspection method are made to solve the above-described problems of the conventional technology, and can correctly determine whether or not the tag attached to the package can be used. An object is to provide an inspection program, an inspection apparatus, and an inspection method.
 上述した課題を解決し、目的を達成するため、開示の検査プログラムは、荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する測定値取得手順と、前記タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する識別情報取得手順と、各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する記憶部から、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得手順により取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する判定手順とをコンピュータに実行させることを要件とする。 In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, the disclosed inspection program includes a measurement value acquisition procedure for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring a current data read quality of a tag attached to a package and distributed, The identification information acquisition procedure for acquiring the identification information for identifying the destination, and the storage unit storing the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination, the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed When the quality reference value corresponding to the destination is read and the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition procedure satisfies the read quality reference value, the tag in which the data read quality is measured is used. It is a requirement that the computer execute a determination procedure for determining that it is possible.
 開示の検査プログラムによれば、荷物に付されて流通するタグの利用の可否を正しく判定することが可能である。 According to the disclosed inspection program, it is possible to correctly determine whether or not a tag attached to a package can be used.
図1は、実施例1に係る検査装置の概要を説明するための図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the outline of the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment. 図2は、検査装置の構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the inspection apparatus. 図3は、基準値記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit. 図4は、検査装置による処理の流れを示すフローチャート図である。FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing by the inspection apparatus. 図5は、実施例2に係る検査装置の構成を示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of the inspection apparatus according to the second embodiment. 図6は、実施例2に係る基準値記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit according to the second embodiment. 図7は、実施例2に係る輸送ルート記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the transport route storage unit according to the second embodiment. 図8は、外部環境要因テーブルに記憶される情報の一例を示した図である。FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of information stored in the external environment factor table. 図9は、実施例3に係る検査装置を説明するための図である。FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the inspection apparatus according to the third embodiment. 図10は、仕向け先管理テーブルに格納される情報の一例を示した図である。FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of information stored in the destination management table. 図11は、検査プログラムを実行するコンピュータを示す図である。FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a computer that executes an inspection program.
符号の説明Explanation of symbols
 1 検査装置
 10 入力部
 20 出力部
 30 記憶部
 31 基準値記憶部
 32 輸送ルート記憶部
 40 処理部
 41 タグ設置部
 42 識別情報取得部
 43 利用可否判定部
 44 輸送ルート特定部
 100 コンピュータ
 110 通信制御部
 120 HDD(Hard diskdrive)
 121 識別情報取得プログラム
 122 利用可否判定プログラム
 123 基準値データ
 130 RAM(Random Access Memory)
 131 識別情報取得プロセス
 132 利用可否判定プロセス
 140 CPU(Central Processing Unit)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Inspection apparatus 10 Input part 20 Output part 30 Storage part 31 Reference value storage part 32 Transportation route storage part 40 Processing part 41 Tag installation part 42 Identification information acquisition part 43 Use availability determination part 44 Transportation route specification part 100 Computer 110 Communication control part 120 HDD (Hard diskdrive)
121 Identification information acquisition program 122 Usability determination program 123 Reference value data 130 RAM (Random Access Memory)
131 Identification information acquisition process 132 Availability determination process 140 CPU (Central Processing Unit)
 以下に添付図面を参照して、検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法の一実施の形態を詳細に説明する。 Hereinafter, an embodiment of an inspection program, an inspection apparatus, and an inspection method will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[実施例1に係る検査装置の概要]
 図1は、実施例1に係る検査装置の概要を説明するための図である。実施例1に係る検査装置は、タグの利用の可否を検査することを概要とする。そして、実施例1に係る検査装置は、特に、物流に用いられるタグの利用の可否を正しく判定する。
[Outline of Inspection Apparatus According to Embodiment 1]
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the outline of the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment. The inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment is summarized to inspect whether or not the tag can be used. In particular, the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment correctly determines whether or not a tag used for physical distribution can be used.
 すなわち、実施例1に係る検査装置は、各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶するDBを有する。ここで、品質基準値とは、例えば、リーダがタグからデータを読み出すまでに要した読み出し処理の試行回数を示す再送回数の基準値などである。また、検査装置は、荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得し、タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する。そして、検査装置は、DBから、データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、取得された測定値がDBから読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する。 That is, the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment has a DB that stores a quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination. Here, the quality reference value is, for example, a reference value for the number of retransmissions indicating the number of trials of read processing required until the reader reads data from the tag. Further, the inspection device acquires a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and circulates, and acquires identification information for identifying the destination of the tag. Then, the inspection apparatus reads the quality standard value corresponding to the destination of the tag for which the data read quality is measured from the DB, and the acquired measurement value satisfies the quality standard value read from the DB. Determines that a tag for which a data read quality measurement has been made is available.
 例えば、図1に示すように、検査装置は、タグから行き先を識別する識別情報を読み出すための読み出し処理を繰り返し実行し、再送回数を測定する。次に、検査装置は、タグから読み出した識別情報に対応する再送回数の基準値をDBから読み出し、測定した再送回数と比較する。ここで、検査装置は、再送回数の測定値が再送回数の基準値以下である場合には、検査対象のタグが利用可能であると判定する。一方では、検査装置は、再送回数の測定値が再送回数の基準値を上回っている場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できないと判定する。 For example, as shown in FIG. 1, the inspection apparatus repeatedly executes a read process for reading identification information for identifying a destination from a tag, and measures the number of retransmissions. Next, the inspection apparatus reads the reference value of the number of retransmissions corresponding to the identification information read from the tag from the DB and compares it with the measured number of retransmissions. Here, when the measured value of the number of retransmissions is equal to or smaller than the reference value of the number of retransmissions, the inspection apparatus determines that the tag to be inspected can be used. On the other hand, when the measured value of the number of retransmissions exceeds the reference value for the number of retransmissions, the inspection apparatus determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used.
 このようなことから、実施例1に係る検査装置は、物流に用いられるタグの利用の可否を正しく判定することが可能である。そして、実施例1に係る検査装置は、中間倉庫において情報の読み出しができなくなるタグが物流に用いられることを防止する結果、物流業務における業務効率の低下を防止することができる。 For this reason, the inspection apparatus according to the first embodiment can correctly determine whether or not a tag used for physical distribution can be used. And the inspection apparatus which concerns on Example 1 can prevent the fall of the business efficiency in physical distribution business as a result of preventing the tag from which information cannot be read in an intermediate warehouse being used for physical distribution.
[検査装置の構成]
 図2は、検査装置の構成を示すブロック図である。図2に示すように、この検査装置1は、入力部10と、出力部20と、記憶部30と、処理部40とを有する。
[Configuration of inspection equipment]
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of the inspection apparatus. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the inspection apparatus 1 includes an input unit 10, an output unit 20, a storage unit 30, and a processing unit 40.
 このうち、入力部10は、各種の情報の入力を受付ける。具体的には、入力部10は、タグから情報を読み出すためのリーダを備え、タグから識別情報を読み出して入力する。出力部20は、各種の情報を出力する。具体的には、出力部20は、モニタ(若しくはディスプレイ、タッチパネル)やスピーカを備え、例えば、検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージなどを出力する。 Of these, the input unit 10 accepts input of various types of information. Specifically, the input unit 10 includes a reader for reading information from the tag, and reads and inputs identification information from the tag. The output unit 20 outputs various information. Specifically, the output unit 20 includes a monitor (or a display, a touch panel) and a speaker, and outputs, for example, a message indicating that the tag to be inspected cannot be used.
 記憶部30は、処理部40による各種処理に必要なデータおよびプログラムを記憶する。具体的には、記憶部30は、基準値記憶部31を有する。 The storage unit 30 stores data and programs necessary for various processes by the processing unit 40. Specifically, the storage unit 30 includes a reference value storage unit 31.
 図3は、基準値記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。基準値記憶部31は、タグの行き先ごとに、各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する。具体的には、基準値記憶部31は、図3の(A)に示すように、タグ検査時の環境下の物流にタグを利用することができるか否かを判定するための品質基準値が格納された基準値テーブルを記憶する。また、基準値記憶部31は、図3の(B~D)に示すように、識別情報ごとに、タグの行き先の環境下の物流にタグを利用することができるか否かを判定するための品質基準値が格納された基準値テーブルを記憶する。 FIG. 3 is a diagram showing information stored in the reference value storage unit. The reference value storage unit 31 stores, for each tag destination, a quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3A, the reference value storage unit 31 is a quality reference value for determining whether or not a tag can be used for physical distribution in the environment at the time of tag inspection. Is stored in the reference value table. Further, as shown in FIGS. 3B to 3D, the reference value storage unit 31 determines, for each identification information, whether or not the tag can be used for physical distribution in the environment of the tag destination. A reference value table in which quality reference values are stored is stored.
 各基準値テーブルは、図3に示すように、読み取り距離の基準値、再送回数の基準値および電界強度の基準値を記憶する。ここで、読み取り距離とは、リーダがタグから情報を読み出すことが可能なリーダとタグとの間の最長距離である。また、電界強度とは、タグからリーダに返信された無線電波の強度である。 Each reference value table stores a reference value for reading distance, a reference value for the number of retransmissions, and a reference value for electric field strength, as shown in FIG. Here, the reading distance is the longest distance between the reader and the tag from which the reader can read information from the tag. The electric field strength is the strength of the radio wave returned from the tag to the reader.
 処理部40は、タグを設置するためのタグ設置部41と、識別情報取得部42と、利用可否判定部43とを有する。 The processing unit 40 includes a tag installation unit 41 for installing a tag, an identification information acquisition unit 42, and an availability determination unit 43.
 識別情報取得部42は、タグ設置部41に設置されたタグからタグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する。また、識別情報取得部42は、荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する。具体的には、識別情報取得部42は、タグ設置部41に検査対象のタグが設置されると、検査対象のタグに対して無線電波を繰り返し送信する。そして、識別情報取得部42は、検査対象のタグから返信される無線電波から荷物の行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する。ここで、識別情報取得部42は、検査対象のタグに対する無線電波の送信を開始してから識別情報を取得できるまでに送信した無線電波の送信回数を再送回数として測定する。 The identification information acquisition unit 42 acquires identification information for identifying the destination of the tag from the tag installed in the tag installation unit 41. Further, the identification information acquisition unit 42 acquires a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and distributed. Specifically, when the inspection target tag is installed in the tag installation unit 41, the identification information acquisition unit 42 repeatedly transmits a radio wave to the inspection target tag. And the identification information acquisition part 42 acquires the identification information which identifies the destination of a package from the radio wave returned from the tag to be examined. Here, the identification information acquisition unit 42 measures the number of transmissions of radio waves transmitted from the start of transmission of radio waves to the tag to be inspected until the identification information can be acquired as the number of retransmissions.
 また、識別情報取得部42は、検査対象のタグから所定の距離が離れた位置を開始位置として、識別情報を読み出すことができなくなる位置までリーダを徐々に検査対象のタグから遠ざけて、読み取り距離を測定する。また、識別情報取得部42は、検査対象のタグから返信される無線電波の強さを電界強度として測定する。なお、識別情報取得部42は、測定値取得部とも言う。 Further, the identification information acquisition unit 42 starts the position away from the inspection target tag by a predetermined distance, gradually moves the reader away from the inspection target tag to a position where the identification information cannot be read, and reads the reading distance. Measure. Further, the identification information acquisition unit 42 measures the strength of the radio wave returned from the inspection target tag as the electric field strength. The identification information acquisition unit 42 is also referred to as a measurement value acquisition unit.
 なお、タグの行き先を識別する識別情報をタグ設置部41に設置されたタグから取得する一例を用いて説明をしたが、行き先を識別する識別情報を、荷物に張られた伝票のバーコードからバーコードリーダを用いて読み取ることで、あるいは、手入力など他の方法で取得するようにしても良い。 The identification information for identifying the destination of the tag has been described by using an example of acquiring the identification information from the tag installed in the tag setting unit 41. However, the identification information for identifying the destination can be obtained from the barcode of the slip attached to the package. You may make it acquire by other methods, such as reading by using a barcode reader, or manual input.
 利用可否判定部43は、基準値記憶部31からデータ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、識別情報取得部42により取得された測定値が読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する。 The availability determination unit 43 reads the quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag whose data read quality is measured from the reference value storage unit 31, and the measurement value acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 is read. If the quality reference value is satisfied, it is determined that the tag for which the data read quality measurement has been performed is usable.
 具体的には、利用可否判定部43は、基準値記憶部31に記憶されたタグ検査時の環境下の基準値テーブルから読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値を読み出す。続いて、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報取得部42によって測定された読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の測定値と、読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値とをそれぞれ比較する。 Specifically, the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table in the environment at the time of tag inspection stored in the reference value storage unit 31. Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively.
 ここで、利用可否判定部43は、各測定値の内で、1つでも基準値を満足しない測定値がある場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できないと判定し、検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージを出力部20に出力する。つまり、読み取り距離の測定値が読み取り距離の基準値以下である場合、再送回数の測定値が再送回数の基準値以上である場合または電界強度の測定値が電界強度の基準値以下である場合には、利用可否判定部43は、全ての環境下において検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージを出力する。 Here, the availability determination unit 43 determines that the inspection target tag cannot be used when any one of the measurement values does not satisfy the reference value, and the inspection target tag is used. A message indicating that it cannot be output to the output unit 20. In other words, when the reading distance measurement value is less than or equal to the reading distance reference value, the retransmission count measurement value is greater than or equal to the retransmission count reference value, or the electric field strength measurement value is less than or equal to the electric field strength reference value. The availability determination unit 43 outputs a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used in all environments.
 一方では、利用可否判定部43は、タグ検査時の環境下の基準値テーブルから読み出された各基準値を全ての測定値が満足している場合には、識別情報取得部42によって取得された識別情報により識別される行き先の環境と、タグ検査時の環境とが一致するか否かを判定する。 On the other hand, the availability determination unit 43 is acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 when all the measurement values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table under the environment at the time of tag inspection. It is determined whether the destination environment identified by the identification information matches the environment at the time of tag inspection.
 ここで、利用可否判定部43は、一致すると判定した場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できることを示すメッセージを出力部20に出力する。一方では、利用可否判定部43は、一致しないと判定した場合には、基準値記憶部31に記憶された基準値テーブルから識別情報取得部42によって取得された識別情報に対応する読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値を読み出す。 Here, when it is determined that they match, the availability determination unit 43 outputs a message to the output unit 20 indicating that the inspection target tag can be used. On the other hand, if the availability determination unit 43 determines that they do not match, the read distance corresponding to the identification information acquired from the reference value table stored in the reference value storage unit 31 by the identification information acquisition unit 42, the retransmission Read the reference number of times and field strength.
 続いて、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報取得部42によって測定された読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の測定値と、読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値とをそれぞれ比較する。 Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively.
 ここで、利用可否判定部43は、各測定値の内で、1つでも基準値を満足しない測定値がある場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できないと判定し、タグの行き先の環境下において検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージを出力部20に出力する。一方では、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報に対応する基準値テーブルから読み出された各基準値を全ての測定値が満足している場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できることを示すメッセージを出力部20に出力する。 Here, when there is a measurement value that does not satisfy the reference value among the measurement values, the availability determination unit 43 determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used, and The message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used is output to the output unit 20. On the other hand, the availability determination unit 43 indicates that the inspection target tag can be used when all measured values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information. Is output to the output unit 20.
[検査装置による処理]
 図4は、検査装置による処理の流れを示すフローチャート図である。図4に示すように、識別情報取得部42は、タグ設置部41に検査対象のタグが設置されると(ステップS101肯定)、検査対象のタグから識別情報を取得するとともに、読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度を測定する(ステップS102)。
[Processing by inspection equipment]
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of processing by the inspection apparatus. As shown in FIG. 4, when a tag to be inspected is installed in the tag installing unit 41 (Yes in step S101), the identification information acquiring unit 42 acquires identification information from the tag to be inspected, as well as reading distance and retransmission. The number of times and the electric field strength are measured (step S102).
 続いて、利用可否判定部43は、タグ検査時の環境下の基準値テーブルから読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値を読み出し(ステップS103)、識別情報取得部42によって測定された読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の測定値と比較する(ステップS104)。 Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table under the environment at the time of tag inspection (step S103), and the reading distance measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 The number of retransmissions and the measured electric field strength are compared (step S104).
 ここで、各測定値の内で、1つでも基準値を満足しない測定値がある場合には(ステップS104肯定)、利用可否判定部43は、検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージを出力する(ステップS105)。 Here, when there is a measured value that does not satisfy the reference value among the measured values (Yes at Step S104), the availability determination unit 43 displays a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used. Output (step S105).
 一方では、タグ検査時の環境下の基準値テーブルから読み出された各基準値を全ての測定値が満足している場合には(ステップS104否定)、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報により識別される行き先の環境と、タグ検査時の環境とが一致するか否かを判定する(ステップS106)。 On the other hand, when all the measured values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table under the environment at the time of tag inspection (No at Step S104), the availability determination unit 43 uses the identification information. It is determined whether the identified destination environment matches the environment at the time of tag inspection (step S106).
 ここで、一致すると判定した場合には(ステップS106肯定)、利用可否判定部43は、検査対象のタグが利用できることを示すメッセージを出力する(ステップS107)。 Here, when it is determined that they match (Yes at Step S106), the availability determination unit 43 outputs a message indicating that the inspection target tag can be used (Step S107).
 一方では、一致しないと判定した場合には(ステップS106否定)、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報に対応する基準値テーブルから読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値を読み出す(ステップS108)。 On the other hand, when it is determined that they do not match (No at Step S106), the availability determination unit 43 reads the reference value of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information (Step S108). .
 続いて、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報取得部42によって測定された読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の測定値と比較する(ステップS109)。 Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 compares the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the measured electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 (step S109).
 ここで、各測定値の内で、1つでも基準値を満足しない測定値がある場合には(ステップS109肯定)、利用可否判定部43は、検査対象のタグが利用できないことを示すメッセージを出力する(ステップS105)。 Here, when there is a measured value that does not satisfy the reference value among the measured values (Yes in step S109), the availability determination unit 43 displays a message indicating that the inspection target tag cannot be used. Output (step S105).
 一方では、識別情報に対応する基準値テーブルから読み出された各基準値を全ての測定値が満足している場合には(ステップS109否定)、検査対象のタグが利用できることを示すメッセージを出力する(ステップS107)。 On the other hand, if all measured values satisfy each reference value read from the reference value table corresponding to the identification information (No at Step S109), a message indicating that the tag to be inspected can be used is output. (Step S107).
[実施例1の効果]
 上記したように、実施例1によれば、物流に用いられるタグの利用の可否を正しくすることが可能である。例えば、実施例1によれば、タグの行き先に応じた読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値によって、タグが利用できるか否か判定するので、タグの利用の可否を正しく判定することができる。また、実施例1によれば、輸送中に情報の読み出しができなくなるタグが物流に用いられることが防止できるため、物流業務における業務効率の低下を防止することもできる。
[Effect of Example 1]
As described above, according to the first embodiment, it is possible to correctly determine whether or not a tag used for physical distribution can be used. For example, according to the first embodiment, whether or not the tag can be used is determined based on the reading distance according to the tag destination, the number of retransmissions, and the reference value of the electric field strength. it can. In addition, according to the first embodiment, it is possible to prevent a tag that cannot read information during transportation from being used in logistics, and thus it is possible to prevent a reduction in business efficiency in logistics business.
 図5は、実施例2に係る検査装置の構成を示す図である。図5に示すように、実施例2に係る検査装置1は、輸送ルート記憶部32と、輸送ルート特定部44とをさらに有し、以下に説明する点が実施例1とは異なる。 FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the configuration of the inspection apparatus according to the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 5, the inspection apparatus 1 according to the second embodiment further includes a transport route storage unit 32 and a transport route specifying unit 44, and differs from the first embodiment in the points described below.
 図6は、実施例2に係る基準値記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。基準値記憶部31は、タグの行き先を識別する識別情報に対応付けて品質基準値を記憶する(図3参照)とともに、輸送ルートを識別する輸送ルート識別情報およびタグが流通し得る倉庫を識別する倉庫識別情報に対応付けて、品質基準値を記憶する(図6参照)。 FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the reference value storage unit according to the second embodiment. The reference value storage unit 31 stores the quality reference value in association with the identification information for identifying the tag destination (see FIG. 3), and identifies the transportation route identification information for identifying the transportation route and the warehouse where the tag can be distributed. The quality standard value is stored in association with the warehouse identification information (see FIG. 6).
 図7は、実施例2に係る輸送ルート記憶部に記憶される情報を示した図である。輸送ルート記憶部32は、図7に示すように、タグの行き先を識別する識別情報に対応付けて、タグが経由する輸送ルートを識別する輸送ルート識別情報と、タグが経由する倉庫中間倉庫を識別する識別情報を記憶する。例えば、輸送ルート記憶部32が記憶する情報は、A国組立工場に出荷されるタグが、サプライヤから輸送ルートDを経由して中間倉庫Dに輸送され、中間倉庫Dにおいて仕分けが行なわれた後に、輸送ルートFを経由してA国組立工場に到達することを意味する。 FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating information stored in the transport route storage unit according to the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 7, the transport route storage unit 32 associates the transport route identification information for identifying the transport route through which the tag passes, and the warehouse intermediate warehouse through which the tag passes, in association with the identification information for identifying the destination of the tag. Identification information for identification is stored. For example, the information stored in the transport route storage unit 32 is obtained after a tag shipped to the country A assembly plant is transported from the supplier to the intermediate warehouse D via the transport route D and sorted in the intermediate warehouse D. , It means reaching the country A assembly plant via the transport route F.
 輸送ルート特定部44は、タグが流通し得る流通ルートに対応する品質基準値、および、タグが流通し得る倉庫に対応する品質基準値を基準値記憶部31から読み出す。具体的には、輸送ルート特定部44は、輸送ルート記憶部32から識別情報取得部42によって取得された識別情報に対応する輸送ルート識別情報と、倉庫識別情報とを読み出す。 The transport route specifying unit 44 reads the quality standard value corresponding to the distribution route through which the tag can be distributed and the quality standard value corresponding to the warehouse through which the tag can be distributed from the standard value storage unit 31. Specifically, the transport route specifying unit 44 reads transport route identification information corresponding to the identification information acquired by the identification information acquiring unit 42 from the transport route storage unit 32 and warehouse identification information.
 利用可否判定部43は、識別情報取得部42により取得された測定値が読み込まれた品質基準値を全て満足する場合に限り、データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する。具体的には、利用可否判定部43は、輸送ルート特定部44によって取得された輸送ルート識別情報および倉庫識別情報に対応付けて、輸送ルート記憶部32に記憶されている読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値を全て読み出す。 The availability determination unit 43 determines that the tag whose data read quality is measured can be used only when the measurement value acquired by the identification information acquisition unit 42 satisfies all the read quality reference values. To do. Specifically, the availability determination unit 43 correlates with the transport route identification information and the warehouse identification information acquired by the transport route specifying unit 44, and stores the read distance, the number of retransmissions, and the number of retransmissions stored in the transport route storage unit 32. Read out all reference values for field strength.
 続いて、利用可否判定部43は、識別情報取得部42によって測定された読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の測定値と、読み取り距離、再送回数および電界強度の基準値とをそれぞれ比較する。そして、利用可否判定部43は、各測定値の内で、1つでも基準値を満足しない測定値がある場合には、検査対象のタグが利用できないと判定する。 Subsequently, the availability determination unit 43 compares the measured values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength measured by the identification information acquisition unit 42 with the reference values of the reading distance, the number of retransmissions, and the electric field strength, respectively. Then, the availability determining unit 43 determines that the tag to be inspected cannot be used when there is a measured value that does not satisfy the reference value among the measured values.
 このようなことから、実施例2によれば、タグが流通し得る輸送ルートおよび倉庫ごとにタグの利用の可否を判定するので、より正確にタグの利用の可否を判定することが可能である。 For this reason, according to the second embodiment, whether or not the tag can be used is determined for each transport route and warehouse in which the tag can circulate, so it is possible to determine whether or not the tag can be used more accurately. .
 以下に、検査プログラム、検査装置および検査方法の他の実施形態について説明する。 Hereinafter, other embodiments of the inspection program, the inspection apparatus, and the inspection method will be described.
(1)外部環境影響要因テーブル
 品質基準値は、タグの行き先、タグが経由する輸送ルート、中間倉庫、タグを検査する場所の温度、湿度、静電気の強さ、電波干渉の有無、塵埃の有無によって適宜変更することができる。例えば、検査装置1は、図8に示すように、タグが経由する輸送ルートや中間倉庫ごとに、温度などを記憶する外部環境影響要因テーブルをさらに備え、ユーザによって任意に設定された重み係数に基づいて、各品質基準値を設定する。また、図9に示すように、荷物の材料である貼付材料、リーダがタグから情報を読み出すときの角度である読取有効角度、無線電波を反射する反射板の材料、タグの耐用年数などをさらに考慮して品質基準値を設定するようにしてもよい。なお、図8は、外部環境要因テーブルに記憶される情報の一例を示した図である。図9は、実施例3に係る検査装置を説明するための図である。
(1) External environmental influence factor table The quality standard values are the destination of the tag, the transport route through which the tag passes, the intermediate warehouse, the temperature of the place where the tag is inspected, the humidity, the strength of static electricity, the presence of radio wave interference, the presence of dust. Can be changed as appropriate. For example, as shown in FIG. 8, the inspection apparatus 1 further includes an external environment influence factor table that stores temperature and the like for each transport route and intermediate warehouse through which the tag passes, and a weighting factor arbitrarily set by the user. Each quality standard value is set based on this. In addition, as shown in FIG. 9, the adhesive material that is the material of the baggage, the reading effective angle that is the angle when the reader reads information from the tag, the material of the reflector that reflects radio waves, the useful life of the tag, etc. The quality reference value may be set in consideration. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of information stored in the external environment factor table. FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the inspection apparatus according to the third embodiment.
(2)識別情報
 タグの行き先を識別する識別情報は、ユーザが検査装置1に入力することで、例えば、同一の行き先に流通する多数のタグを検査するときに、タグから識別情報を毎回読み出す必要がなくなり、効率よく物流に用いられるタグの利用の可否を判定することができる。また、検査装置1は、図10に示すように、管理コードに対応付けてタグの行き先を示した仕向け先コードが格納された仕向け先管理テーブルをさらに備え、タグから読み出した管理コードに対応する仕向け先コード(識別情報)を取得するようにしてもよい。図10は、仕向け先管理テーブルに格納される情報の一例を示した図である。
(2) Identification information Identification information for identifying a destination of a tag is input by the user into the inspection apparatus 1 so that, for example, when a large number of tags distributed to the same destination are inspected, the identification information is read from the tag every time. This eliminates the need for it, and it is possible to efficiently determine whether or not a tag used for logistics can be used. Further, as shown in FIG. 10, the inspection apparatus 1 further includes a destination management table in which a destination code indicating the destination of the tag is stored in association with the management code, and corresponds to the management code read from the tag. A destination code (identification information) may be acquired. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of information stored in the destination management table.
(3)タグを検査する場所
 タグの検査は、サプライヤから輸送ルートに流通する前だけでなく、荷物の輸送中にタグを検査してもよいし、タグが経由する中間倉庫で再度検査するようにしてもよい。
(3) Where to inspect tags In addition to pre-distribution from the supplier to the transportation route, tags may be inspected during the transportation of packages, or inspected again at the intermediate warehouse through which the tags pass. It may be.
(4)装置構成
 例えば、図2に示した検査装置1の各構成要素は機能概念的なものであり、必ずしも物理的に図示の如く構成されていることを要しない。すなわち、検査装置1の分散・統合の具体的形態は図示のものに限られず、例えば、識別情報取得部42と利用可否判定部43とを統合する。このようにして、検査装置1の全部または一部を、各種の負荷や使用状況などに応じて、任意の単位で機能的または物理的に分散・統合して構成することができる。さらに、検査装置1にて行なわれる処理機能(図4参照)は、その全部または任意の一部が、CPUおよび当該CPUにて解析実行されるプログラムにて実現され、あるいは、ワイヤードロジックによるハードウェアとして実現され得る。
(4) Device Configuration For example, each component of the inspection device 1 shown in FIG. 2 is functionally conceptual and does not necessarily need to be physically configured as illustrated. In other words, the specific form of distribution / integration of the inspection apparatus 1 is not limited to the illustrated one, and for example, the identification information acquisition unit 42 and the availability determination unit 43 are integrated. In this way, all or a part of the inspection apparatus 1 can be configured to be functionally or physically distributed and integrated in arbitrary units according to various loads and usage conditions. Furthermore, the processing function (see FIG. 4) performed in the inspection apparatus 1 is realized in whole or in part by a CPU and a program that is analyzed and executed by the CPU, or hardware by wired logic. Can be realized as
(5)検査プログラム
 また、上記の実施例で説明した検査装置1の各種の処理(図4参照)は、あらかじめ用意されたプログラムをパーソナルコンピュータやワークステーションなどのコンピュータシステムで実行することによって実現することができる。そこで、以下では、図11を用いて、上記の実施例と同様の機能を有する検査プログラムを実行するコンピュータの一例を説明する。図11は、検査プログラムを実行するコンピュータを示す図である。
(5) Inspection program Various processes (see FIG. 4) of the inspection apparatus 1 described in the above embodiment are realized by executing a program prepared in advance on a computer system such as a personal computer or a workstation. be able to. In the following, an example of a computer that executes an inspection program having the same function as that of the above embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a computer that executes an inspection program.
 通信制御部110は、他の装置との間でやり取りされる各種情報の関する通信を制御する。HDD120は、CPU140による各種処理の実行に必要な情報を記憶する。RAM130は、各種情報を一時的に記憶する。CPU140は、各種演算処理を実行する。 The communication control unit 110 controls communication related to various types of information exchanged with other devices. The HDD 120 stores information necessary for the CPU 140 to execute various processes. The RAM 130 temporarily stores various information. The CPU 140 executes various arithmetic processes.
 そして、HDD120には、図11に示すように、上記の実施例に示した検査装置1の各処理部と同様の機能を発揮する識別情報取得プログラム121、利用可否判定プログラム122および基準値データ123があらかじめ記憶されている。なお、識別情報取得プログラム121と、利用可否判定プログラム122を適宜分散させて、ネットワークを介して通信可能に接続された他のコンピュータの記憶部に記憶させておくこともできる。 As shown in FIG. 11, the HDD 120 has an identification information acquisition program 121, an availability determination program 122, and reference value data 123 that exhibit the same functions as the processing units of the inspection apparatus 1 shown in the above embodiment. Is stored in advance. Note that the identification information acquisition program 121 and the availability determination program 122 may be appropriately distributed and stored in a storage unit of another computer that is communicably connected via a network.
 そして、CPU140が、識別情報取得プログラム121および利用可否判定プログラム122をHDD120から読み出してRAM130に展開することにより、図11に示すように、識別情報取得プログラム121は、識別情報取得プロセス131として、また、利用可否判定プログラム122は、利用可否判定プロセス132として機能するようになる。 Then, the CPU 140 reads out the identification information acquisition program 121 and the availability determination program 122 from the HDD 120 and expands them in the RAM 130, so that the identification information acquisition program 121 becomes an identification information acquisition process 131 as shown in FIG. The availability determination program 122 functions as the availability determination process 132.
 すなわち、利用可否判定プロセス132は、基準値データ123等をHDD120から読み出して、RAM130において自身に割り当てられた領域に展開し、この展開したデータ等に基づいて各種処理を実行する。なお、識別情報取得プロセス131および利用可否判定プロセス132は、図2に示した検査装置1の処理部40において実行される処理に対応する。 That is, the availability determination process 132 reads the reference value data 123 and the like from the HDD 120, expands them in an area allocated to itself in the RAM 130, and executes various processes based on the expanded data and the like. The identification information acquisition process 131 and the availability determination process 132 correspond to the processes executed in the processing unit 40 of the inspection apparatus 1 shown in FIG.
 なお、上記した識別情報取得プログラム121および利用可否判定プログラム122については、必ずしも最初からHDD120に記憶させておく必要はない。例えば、コンピュータ100に挿入されるフレキシブルディスク(FD)、CD-ROM、DVDディスク、光磁気ディスク、ICカードなどのコンピュータ読み取り可能な記憶媒体に各プログラムを記憶させておき、コンピュータ100がこれらから各プログラムを読み出して実行するようにしてもよい。あるいは、公衆回線、インターネット、LAN、WANなどの通信回線を介してコンピュータ100に接続される「他のコンピュータ(またはサーバ)」などに各プログラムを記憶させておき、コンピュータ100がこれらの通信回線を介して「他のコンピュータ(またはサーバ)」などから各プログラムを読み出して実行するようにしてもよい。 Note that the identification information acquisition program 121 and the availability determination program 122 described above are not necessarily stored in the HDD 120 from the beginning. For example, each program is stored in a computer-readable storage medium such as a flexible disk (FD), a CD-ROM, a DVD disk, a magneto-optical disk, and an IC card inserted into the computer 100. The program may be read and executed. Alternatively, each program is stored in “another computer (or server)” connected to the computer 100 via a communication line such as a public line, the Internet, a LAN, or a WAN, and the computer 100 uses these communication lines. Each program may be read out from “another computer (or server)” and executed.
(6)検査方法
 上記の実施例で説明した検査装置1により、以下のような検査方法が実現される。すなわち、荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する測定値取得ステップ(図4のステップS102参照)と、前記タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する識別情報取得ステップ(図4のステップS102参照)と、各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する記憶部から、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得ステップにより取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する判定ステップ(図4のステップS109参照)とを含む検査方法が実現される。
(6) Inspection Method The following inspection method is realized by the inspection apparatus 1 described in the above embodiment. That is, a measurement value acquisition step (see step S102 in FIG. 4) for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and the identification information for identifying the destination of the tag is acquired. The identification information acquisition step (see step S102 in FIG. 4) and the destination of the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed from the storage unit storing the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination If the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition step satisfies the read quality reference value, the tag that has been measured for the data read quality can be used. An inspection method including a determination step (see step S109 in FIG. 4) for determining that is is realized.

Claims (6)

  1.  荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する測定値取得手順と、
     前記タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する識別情報取得手順と、
     各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する記憶部から、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得手順により取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する判定手順と
     をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする検査プログラム。
    A measurement value acquisition procedure for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and distributed;
    An identification information acquisition procedure for acquiring identification information for identifying the destination of the tag;
    Acquire the measured value by reading the quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed from the storage unit that stores the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination If the measurement value obtained by the procedure satisfies the read quality standard value, the computer executes a determination procedure for determining that the tag for which the data read quality measurement has been performed is usable. Inspection program characterized by
  2.  前記測定値取得手順は、リーダがタグからデータを読み出すまでに要した読み出し処理の試行回数の測定値、リーダがタグから情報を読み出すことが可能なリーダとタグとの間の最長距離の測定値、およびタグからリーダに返信された無線電波の強度を前記データ読取り品質を測定した測定値として取得し、
     前記判定手順は、前記測定値取得手順により取得された全ての測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値をそれぞれ満足する場合に限り、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の検査プログラム。
    The measurement value acquisition procedure includes a measurement value of the number of trials of read processing required until the reader reads data from the tag, and a measurement value of the longest distance between the reader and the tag from which the reader can read information from the tag. , And the intensity of the radio wave returned from the tag to the reader is acquired as a measurement value obtained by measuring the data read quality,
    The determination procedure can use the tag on which the measurement of the data read quality is performed only when all the measurement values acquired by the measurement value acquisition procedure satisfy the read quality reference value. The inspection program according to claim 1, wherein the inspection program is determined.
  3.  前記識別情報に対応付けて、タグが経由する輸送ルートを識別する輸送ルート識別情報を記憶する記憶部から、前記識別情報取得手順によって取得された識別情報に対応する輸送ルート識別情報を取得する輸送ルート識別情報取得手順をさらにコンピュータに実行させ、
     前記判定手順は、各輸送ルートでのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する第二の記憶部から、前記輸送ルート識別情報取得手順によって取得された輸送ルート識別情報に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得手順により取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定することを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の検査プログラム。
    Transportation that acquires transportation route identification information corresponding to the identification information acquired by the identification information acquisition procedure from a storage unit that stores transportation route identification information that identifies a transportation route through which the tag passes in association with the identification information. Let the computer further execute the route identification information acquisition procedure,
    The determination procedure corresponds to the transport route identification information acquired by the transport route identification information acquisition procedure from the second storage unit that stores the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag in each transport route. When the quality reference value is read and the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition procedure satisfies the read quality reference value, the tag on which the data read quality is measured can be used. The inspection program according to claim 1, wherein the inspection program is determined.
  4.  前記判定手順は、前記測定値取得手順により取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足し、かつ、前記輸送ルート識別情報取得手順によって取得された輸送ルート識別情報に対応する品質基準値を満足する場合に限り、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の検査プログラム。 In the determination procedure, the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition procedure satisfies the read quality reference value, and the quality standard corresponding to the transport route identification information acquired by the transport route identification information acquisition procedure 4. The inspection program according to claim 3, wherein it is determined that the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed is usable only when the value is satisfied.
  5.  各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する記憶部と、
     荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する測定値取得部と、
     前記タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する識別情報取得部と、
     前記記憶部から、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得手順により取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する判定部と
     を有することを特徴とする検査装置。
    A storage unit for storing a quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination;
    A measurement value acquisition unit for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and distributed;
    An identification information acquisition unit for acquiring identification information for identifying the destination of the tag;
    The quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed is read from the storage unit, and the measurement value acquired by the measurement value acquisition procedure satisfies the read quality reference value In this case, the inspection apparatus includes: a determination unit that determines that the tag for which the data reading quality is measured is usable.
  6.  荷物に付されて流通するタグの現時点のデータ読取り品質を測定した測定値を取得する測定値取得ステップと、
     前記タグの行き先を識別する識別情報を取得する識別情報取得ステップと、
     各行き先でのタグの利用寿命を判定するための品質基準値を記憶する記憶部から、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行われたタグの行き先に対応する品質基準値を読み込んで、前記測定値取得ステップにより取得された測定値が前記読み込まれた品質基準値を満足する場合には、前記データ読取り品質の測定が行なわれたタグが利用可能であると判定する判定ステップと
     を含むことを特徴とする検査方法。
    A measurement value acquisition step for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring the current data read quality of the tag attached to the package and distributed;
    An identification information acquisition step of acquiring identification information for identifying the destination of the tag;
    Acquire the measured value by reading the quality reference value corresponding to the destination of the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality is performed from the storage unit that stores the quality reference value for determining the service life of the tag at each destination A determination step of determining that the tag for which the measurement of the data read quality has been performed is usable when the measurement value acquired by the step satisfies the read quality reference value, Inspection method to do.
PCT/JP2009/052239 2009-02-10 2009-02-10 Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method WO2010092670A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2009/052239 WO2010092670A1 (en) 2009-02-10 2009-02-10 Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2009/052239 WO2010092670A1 (en) 2009-02-10 2009-02-10 Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010092670A1 true WO2010092670A1 (en) 2010-08-19

Family

ID=42561523

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2009/052239 WO2010092670A1 (en) 2009-02-10 2009-02-10 Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2010092670A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL2009489C2 (en) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-20 Nedap Nv IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR RFID LABELS.

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004217426A (en) * 2002-12-25 2004-08-05 Fujitsu Ltd Distribution control system
JP2007179429A (en) * 2005-12-28 2007-07-12 Honda Motor Co Ltd Rfid tag testing method and rfid tag testing system
JP2007199938A (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-08-09 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Article management system and article management method
JP2008532877A (en) * 2005-03-01 2008-08-21 キンバリー クラーク ワールドワイド インコーポレイテッド System and method for tracking ID tags using tag read data structures

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004217426A (en) * 2002-12-25 2004-08-05 Fujitsu Ltd Distribution control system
JP2008532877A (en) * 2005-03-01 2008-08-21 キンバリー クラーク ワールドワイド インコーポレイテッド System and method for tracking ID tags using tag read data structures
JP2007179429A (en) * 2005-12-28 2007-07-12 Honda Motor Co Ltd Rfid tag testing method and rfid tag testing system
JP2007199938A (en) * 2006-01-25 2007-08-09 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Article management system and article management method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL2009489C2 (en) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-20 Nedap Nv IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR RFID LABELS.

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090328223A1 (en) Evaluating the effectiveness of a threat model
US8957970B1 (en) Receiving items into inventory
TW202223780A (en) Electronic apparatus and information providing method thereof
CN110518990A (en) Calibration method, system and the computer readable storage medium of multiple antennas WiFi product
CN110267215B (en) Data detection method, equipment and storage medium
CN111813382A (en) Intangible asset management system and method
CN105738720B (en) A kind of electronic product test method, equipment and system
CN108958890A (en) Container microscope testing method, apparatus and electronic equipment
US20110154292A1 (en) Structure based testing
WO2010092670A1 (en) Inspection program, inspection device, and inspection method
US20140277667A1 (en) Method and system for filtering lot schedules using a previous schedule
CN109614257A (en) Processing method, device, computer storage medium and the electronic equipment of program exception
US11170670B2 (en) Live configurable device and package labeling
US6990387B1 (en) Test system for identification and sorting of integrated circuit devices
CN116911737A (en) Inspection reagent management method, system, equipment and medium
JP2017044480A (en) Inspection device and inspection method
US10395078B1 (en) Digital fingerprint generation using sensor embedded packaging elements
US9625524B2 (en) Efficient method of retesting integrated circuits
CN116433213A (en) Factory equipment inspection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
US10761137B1 (en) Flexible manufacturing flow enabled by adaptive binning system
JP5046109B2 (en) Source code verification management apparatus, method, and program
WO2017159781A1 (en) Tag management device, tag management method, and program
JP6917431B2 (en) Systems, management devices, management methods, mobile communication terminals, programs, and information management methods
JP5422071B1 (en) Goods management system
JP5458660B2 (en) Data management system, data management method, program, and data server

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09839992

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09839992

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP