BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Title
Micronized pharmaceuticals
2.Field of the invention
The present invention relates to the production of micronized pharmaceuticals, particularly sulfonamides and sulfones (eg. Nimesulide, N-(4-nitro-2-phenoxy- phenyl)methanesulfonamide, CAS 51803-78-2, Rofecoxib, 4-[4- (methylsulfonyl)phenyl]-3-phenylfuran-2(5H)-one, CAS 162011-90-7, Celecoxib, 4- [3-(1 ,1 ,1-trifluoromethyl)-5-(4-methylphenyl)-pyrazol-1-yl]-benzensulfonamide, CAS 169590-42-5) characterized by amorphous or semicristalline particles of micrometric and submicrometric dimensions.
3. Description of Related Art
Numerous sulfonamides, sulfones and their derivatives posess pharmacological actions which classify them in as diverse therapeutic categories as analgesics, bacteriostatics, antibiotics, antihypertensives, antiinflammatories, antirheumatics, antipyretics and diuretics. Among these there is Nimesulide which is a non steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID) with analgesic and antiinflammatory properties. It is the active ingredient in numerous pharmaceuticals such as Nisulid, Aulin, Flogovital, Mesulid, Nimed, Sulidene. It is slightly soluble in water and posesses a moderate bioavailibility. One can partially correct this problem by producing it in form of its micronized sodium salt, by means of spray-drying or milling, in dimensions comprised between 5μm and 20μm ( European Patent EP 937709 A1 , 25.08.1999, (Helsinn Healthcare SA)). Nimesulide is a cyclooxigenase inhibitor, as are Rofecoxib (a sulfone) and Celecoxib (a sulfonamide). Cyclooxigenase is an enzyme involved in the synthesis of prostaglandins. Pharmacologic properties are in fact often attributable to a particular SAR (Structure Activity Relationship), and sulfonamide and sulfone functional groups are in effect bioisosteric. Structural similarity is also at the origin of similar
chemical and physical properties, and therefore of their behaviour in micronization processes carried out by means of the SAS technique, object of the present invention. The pharmacokinetics of these active principles depends not only from their chemical and physical properties but also from the dimensions of the particles which constitute the solid.
The usual industrial synthesis methods produce crystalline solids, which are then subsequently micronizable by physical means ( eg. jet milling). This method allows a reduction of the crystal diameter to 4-5μm, but with a very wide range in size, in the order of 20-30μm. Other techniques utilized to produce micronized powders with diameters of a couple of μm are: precipitation from liquids, plasma spray, freeze drying and spray drying. These techniques have numerous disadvantages because they are limited as far as smallest obtainable particle size, they generate rather wide granulometric distributions and create problems associated with thermal stability and solvent residues. The particle size limit affects in turn the solubility and especially the speed of dissolution. This limitation has important consequences regarding the preparation of injectable solutions, the development of new applications for the active ingredient ( eg. as an inhalable ) and the pharmacokinetics.
With respect to the crystalline state, the amorphous state poses less of a hinderance to interactions between the solvent and the still to be dissolved solid. The production of an amorphous state entails the solubilization of the substance in a solvent and its subsequent solidification in conditions which prevent crystal formation.
During the course of the last decade micronization techniques based on supercritical fluids have been developed, and these have allowed one to obtain micrometric and submicrometric particles with a controlled granulometric distribution. One of these techniques called Supercritical AntiSoivent (SAS) precipitation is based on the fact that the supercritical fluid insoluble substance one wants to micronize is dissolved in an organic solvent, which is soluble in the supercritical fluid. The organic solution is then brought in contact with the supercritical fluid, into which it swells. The solvent
then passes into the supercritical fluid. During this process the solute initially in the organic solution is released in form of particles. The speed of the process and the extreme dispersion of the precipitating solute preclude the formation of crystals, so that the solid precipitates in form of amorphous particles, which according to the conditions range from several hundred nanometers to several micrometers. The semi-continuous variant of this technique is described by Gallagher et al. (Supercritical fluids Science and Technology, ACS Symp. Series 406,1989, p. 334), the continuous one by Yeo et al. (Biotech. Bioeng., 41 , 341 (1993)), and by Reverchon et al. ((Ind.Eng. Chem. Res., 34, 4087, (1995), Pat. It. ITSA970010 A 19970701 (0.-07.97) and finally the batch one by Debenedetti et al. (EP 0542314A1 (1992)).
The SAS technique has been successfully applied to proteins, explosives, solid propellants, polymers, superconducting ceramic precursors and pharmaceuticals such as antibiotics (eg. amoxycillin ) and anti-asthmatics ( eg. salbutamol ).
The SAS technique has not yet been applied to the sulfonamides and sulfones. This invention utilizes the SAS technique to produce sulfonamides, sulfones and their derivatives in form of amorphous or semicrystalline particles posessing dimensions between 100 nm and 3μm, for use in the production of pharmaceuticals.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig 1. Description of the apparatus utilized for the precipitation process:
1. Precipitation chamber for the micronized solid
2. Injector utilized for feeding the solution of substance to be micronized, with nozzle to atomize the solution
3. Injector for the supercritical fluid used as antisolvent
4. Porous frit to retain micronized powder and allow outflow of solvent and supercritical fluid utilized as antisolvent
5. Outlet for solvent and supercritical fluid utilized as antisolvent 6. Probe to measure temperature and pressure in the chamber listed under 1
ig 2. SEM image of the micronized product
The product obtained by means of the SAS technique may be analysed by means of a scanning electron microscope to verify its dimensions, its degree of aggregation and its granulometric distribution. In this image one can see the particles obtained by means of the production method 1.
Enlargement: 50O00 x. Scale: 1 mm = 40 nm
Fig 3. Granulometric distribution curve
By means of specific software (Sigma Scan 5.0 ) one obtains the granulometric distribution curve in form of a histogram ( % total particles in function of particle diameter ) from the SEM image.
Minimum diameter ( smallest particle diameter ): 121 nm Maximum diameter ( largest particle diameter ): 385 nm Mean diameter: 244 nm Standard deviation from mean value: 5,3% 70% of the particles posesses a diameter between 190 nm and 300 nm
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
According to this invention sulfonamides or sulfones are produced in form of amorphous or semicrystalline micronized powders. One starts from a solution of the given sulfonamide or sulfone dissolved in an organic solvent (eg. dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO), 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), ethanol, acetone , ethyl acetate, dimethylformamide (DMF), etc.).
The apparatus to precipitate the micronized powder is decribed in Fig. 1. It allows one to perform the SAS technique as described in the literature (Reverchon, Delia Porta, Taddeo, Pallado, Stassi, Ind. Eng. Chem Res., 34, 4087, (1995); Reverchon,
Celano, Delia Porta, Pace, Istituto Nazionale per la FISI (IT): Pat. It. ITSA970010 A
19970701 (0.-07.97); Reverchon, Celano, Delia Porta, J. Mat. Res., Vol. 13, No.2, Feb 1998).
It consists of a precipitation chamber 1 , posessing two independent inlets: -the injector 2 to feed the solution of the substance to be micronized (solute) in a liquid solvent.
-the injector 3 to feed the supercritical fluid to be used as antisolvent. The injector 2 has a nozzle at its extremity in order to atomize the solution on its entry into chamber 1. Chamber 1 also has a probe fixed into it in order to measure temperature and pressure in the particle forming region. The flow exiting from injectors 2 and 3 should preferably be parallel and flowing in the same direction as is shown in Fig. 1.
On the bottom of the chamber there is a porous frit , preferably made of sinterized material and having an apparent porosity lying preferably between 50 and 100 μm. It must be able to retain the particles and allow the outflow of the solvent and antisolvent through the outlet 5. The solution (solvent +solute) is fed by a first pump to the precipitation chamber 1 , and subsequently atomized (formation of microscopic droplets with diameter 20 to 120 μm ) by passage through injector 2 and its nozzle. The very high surface area so obtained enables the interaction between solvent and supercritical fluid, which flows continually into chamber 1 by means of injector 3 which in turn is fed by a second pump. During its solubilization in the supercritical fluid the solvent augments its volume by a factor of between 10 and 100. At the same time the supercritical fluid aids the precipitation of the solute because they are mutually insoluble. The solid deposits itself on the porous frit 4 while the solvent and antisolvent are vented from outlet 5. The solvent is subsequently recuperated by allowing the spontaneous evaporation of the supercritical fluid. The feed of solvent and antisolvent by means of independent pumps, the pressurization of the supercritical fluid used as antisolvent, the solvent recovery and the eventual recycling of the supercritical fluid used as antisolvent are all carried out as is customary in supercritical fluid plant technology and as described in the literature (Reverchon, Celano, Dalla Porta, J. Mater. Res., Vol 13, No. 2, Feb 1998).
.
6
The micronizing effect depends on the speed of the expansion process and on the affinity the solvent has for the supercritical fluid. The nature of the chosen solvent and antisolvent, the antisolvent pressure and temperature as determined by means of probe 6, the solute concentration in the solution and the ratio between flow rate of solution and antisolvent are the factors that determine the dimensions and granulometric distribution of the particles produced. In the present invention DMSO, NMP, ethanol, ethyl acetate or DMF were utilized as solvents, while carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, propane, ethylene, water or trifluoromethane in their respective supercritical phase were utilized as antisolvent. Flow rates comprised between 0,1 and 100 ml/min were utilized for the solution. The antisolvent flow rate was comprised between 1000 and 10000 ml/min expressed as gas at STP. The concetration of the solution was comprised between 1 and 20 mg/ml. The physical state of the obtained product can be analyzed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM image allows one to verify:
-the amorphous ( typically in form of spheres ) or crystalline ( needles, cubes, or other geometric forms according to the nature of the substance ) state -the degree of aggregation -the granulometric distribution of the micronized powder by means of a specific software (eg. Sigma Scan ).
The information one is able to obtain from the SEM analysis allows one to optimize the process parameters (eg. pressure of supercritical fluid used as antisolvent, precipitation chamber temperature, solution concentration, flow ratio of solution and supercritical fluid used as antisolvent ), in order to obtain the desired product characteristics (eg. mean particle diameter, granulometric distribution and degree of particle aggregation ).
EXAMPLES
Production example 1.
By means of the SAS technique amorphous or semicrystalline Nimesulide particles were produced. The substance was dissolved preferably in 1 -methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The resulting solution should posess a concentration comprised between 0,1 and 100 mg/ml, preferably 10 mg/ml.
The solution is fed into the chamber at a flow rate between 0,1 and 10 ml/min, preferably at 1 ml/min, at a density of 1100 kg/m3, in quantities ranging from 20 to 50 ml, preferably 30 ml.
The antisolvent, preferably carbon dioxide, is fed into the chamber at a flow rate comprised between 1000 and 10000 ml(gas STP)/min, preferably at 8000 ml (gas STP)/min and at a pressure between 78 and 400 bar, preferably 85 bar and at a temperature between 30 and 60 °C, preferably 40 °C. The resulting ratio between flow rate of solvent and flow rate of antisolvent is 1 ,25 E-04. The product is finally washed by passing only antisolvent through the chamber for a period of time ranging from 60 to 100 min, preferably 80 min.
Results: • Yield:
The yield of recovered Nimesulide (300 mg) was higher than 95%. • Identification based on physical data:
The product collected from the bottom of chamber 1 was analyzed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with an magnification of 50000 X, resulting in Fig. 2.
One is able to observe the remarkable homogeneity of the particle dimensions and their partial aggregation.
The particle diameter and the granulometric distribution were obtained from the
SEM image by means of specific software (Sigma Scan 5.0). The spherical shape of the particles is typical of their amorphous state, as this subtance has needle shaped crystals in the crystalline state.
The granulometric distribution curve is shown in Fig. 3 in form of a histogram. It depicts the number of particles ( % particles ) in function of particle diameter. The granulometric distribution curve has the following characteristics: mean diameter (mean) of 244 nm minimum diameter (min) of 121 nm maximum diameter (max) of 385 nm
The standard deviation (S.D.) is 5,3% and 70% of the particles posesses a diameter comprised between 180 and 300 nm.
Production example 2.
By means of the SAS technique amorphous or semicrystalline Nimesulide particles were produced. The substance was dissolved preferably in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP). The resulting solution should posess a concentration comprised between 0,1 and 100 mg/ml, preferably 10 mg/ml.
The solution is fed into the chamber at a flow rate between 0,1 and 10 ml/min, preferably at 1 ml/min, at a density of 1100 kg/m3, in quantities ranging from 20 to 50 ml, preferably 30 ml. The antisolvent, preferably carbon dioxide, is fed into the chamber at a flow rate comprised between 1000 and 10000 ml(gas STP)/min, preferably at 8000 ml (gas STP)/min and at a pressure between 80 and 200 bar, preferably 100 bar and at a temperature between 30 and 60 °C, preferably 40 °C. The resulting ratio between flow rate of solvent and flow rate of antisolvent is 1 ,25 E-04. The product is finally washed by passing only antisolvent through the chamber for a period of time ranging from 60 to 100 min, preferably 60 min. Results: • Yield:
The yield of recovered Nimesulide (300 mg) was 93%. • Identification based on physical data:
The product collected from the bottom of chamber 1 was analyzed by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), with an magnification of 50000 X.
One is able to observe the remarkable homogeneity of the particle dimensions and their partial aggregation.
The particle diameter and the granulometric distribution were obtained from the SEM image by means of specific software (Sigma Scan 5.0). The spherical shape of the particles is typical of their amorphous state, as this subtance has needle shaped crystals in the crystalline state.
The granulometric distribution curve has the following characteristics: mean diameter (mean) of 235 nm minimum diameter (min) of 120 nm maximum diameter (max) of 375 nm
The standard deviation (S.D.) is 5,8% and 70% of the particles posesses a diameter comprised between 180 and 300 nm.