USRE41706E1 - Moving objects in a distributed computing environment - Google Patents
Moving objects in a distributed computing environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USRE41706E1 USRE41706E1 US11/331,418 US33141806A USRE41706E US RE41706 E1 USRE41706 E1 US RE41706E1 US 33141806 A US33141806 A US 33141806A US RE41706 E USRE41706 E US RE41706E
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- new
- host location
- primary object
- aggregate
- primary
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/48—Program initiating; Program switching, e.g. by interrupt
- G06F9/4806—Task transfer initiation or dispatching
- G06F9/4843—Task transfer initiation or dispatching by program, e.g. task dispatcher, supervisor, operating system
- G06F9/485—Task life-cycle, e.g. stopping, restarting, resuming execution
- G06F9/4856—Task life-cycle, e.g. stopping, restarting, resuming execution resumption being on a different machine, e.g. task migration, virtual machine migration
- G06F9/4862—Task life-cycle, e.g. stopping, restarting, resuming execution resumption being on a different machine, e.g. task migration, virtual machine migration the task being a mobile agent, i.e. specifically designed to migrate
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/448—Execution paradigms, e.g. implementations of programming paradigms
- G06F9/4488—Object-oriented
- G06F9/449—Object-oriented method invocation or resolution
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/448—Execution paradigms, e.g. implementations of programming paradigms
- G06F9/4488—Object-oriented
- G06F9/4492—Inheritance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/448—Execution paradigms, e.g. implementations of programming paradigms
- G06F9/4488—Object-oriented
- G06F9/4493—Object persistence
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to object-oriented technologies and more particularly to a method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment.
- object-oriented programming real world objects are modeled by software objects that have encapsulated therein special procedures and data elements.
- procedures are referred to as methods.
- object-oriented programming provides the concept of classes.
- An inherent structure of one or more levels of increasingly more specialized classes is created to provide templates that define the methods and variables to be included in the objects of each class.
- the classes at the lower levels of the inheritance structure inherit the behavior, methods, and variables of the classes above.
- Classes above a certain class in an inheritance structure are referred to as parent classes setting up a parent-child relationship. Therefore, an object belonging to a class is a member of that class, and contains the special behavior defined by the class. In this manner, each object is an instance of a defined class or template and the need to redefine the methods and data members for each occurrence of the object is eliminated.
- Java developed by Sun Microsystems.
- the programmer creates a .java file containing the source code to define the class.
- the .java file is compiled to create a .class file containing the executable code to define the class.
- Instances of the class file are instantiated to create an object containing data and methods defined by the .class file.
- Object-oriented programming is a method of programming that abstracts a computer program into manageable sections.
- the key to object-oriented programming is the concept of encapsulation.
- Encapsulation is a method by which the subroutines, or methods, that manipulate data are combined with the declaration and storage of that data. This encapsulation prevents the data from arbitrarily being accessed by other programs' subroutines, or objects.
- an object is invoked, the associated data is available and can be manipulated by any of the methods that are defined within an object to act upon the data.
- a class is an abstraction for a set of objects that share the same structure and behavior.
- An object is a single instance of a class that retains the structure and behavior of the class.
- Objects also contain methods that are the processes by which an object is instructed to perform some procedure or manipulation of data that it controls. Classes may also be characterized by their interface which defines the elements necessary for proper communication between objects.
- a programmer needs to add functionality to an existing class of objects but either does not want to change the existing .class file or does not have access to the source code and, therefore, does not have the ability to alter the source code.
- the programmer may not want to alter the functionality of the existing .class file since a .class file may be used in more than one application program. Therefore, it is desirable to add functionality to an existing class of objects during the execution of an application program without altering the associated source code.
- Distributed computing allows an object on one computer system to seamlessly communicate with and manipulate an object contained in a second computer system when the two computer systems are connected by a computer network.
- the second computer system may also be referred to as another address space.
- Client/server systems are an example of this type of distributed computing system. Sophisticated distributed computing systems have removed the communications burden from the computer programs, or objects in an object oriented programming environment, and placed it in a mid-level operating system that manages communications across a computer network to facilitate a client's access to and manipulation of data contained on a server system.
- the server system could be a computer in a different address space and remote to a user on a client system.
- an improved method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment is provided that substantially eliminate or reduce disadvantages and problems associated with conventional methods for moving objects in a distributed computing environment.
- a method for moving objects in a distributed computing system that includes receiving a move indication at a mobility object.
- the mobility object is aggregated with the primary object through an aggregate object located at a current host address and port number.
- the move indication instructs the mobility object to move the primary object to a new host address and port number.
- the aggregate object has the primary object as a primary facet object and the mobility object has as a facet object.
- the method then creates a serialized version of the mobility object in response to the move indication.
- the method then sends the serialized version of the mobility object to the new host address and port number and creates a new version of the mobility object at the new host address and port number from the serialized version of the mobility object.
- the method then creates a serialized version of the primary object in response to a serialize and move message received from the new version of the mobility object.
- the method then sends the serialized version of the primary object to the new host address and port number and creates a new version of the primary object at the new host address and port number from the serialized version of the primary object.
- the method then creates a new aggregate object with the new version of the primary object as a new primary facet object and the new version of the mobility object as a new facet object at the new host address and port number.
- the present invention provides various technical advantages over conventional methods for moving objects in a distributed computing environment. For example, one technical advantage is providing a method for objects that exchange a large number of messages to move to a common computer to reduce the amount of time needed for communications and to conserve system resources. Other technical advantages may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, description, and claims.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of an application program utilizing aggregate objects
- FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of the application program utilizing aggregate objects where facet objects are distributed in different processing environments
- FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram of a facet control module used within the application program
- FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram illustrating creation of aggregate objects
- FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram illustrating a method of locating an object that extends a requested class or implements a requested interface
- FIG. 6 illustrates a flow diagram illustrating a method for adding a class to an aggregate object
- FIGS. 7A-7F illustrate an exemplary process for moving an object from one host address and port number to another host address and port number within a computer network
- FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate an exemplary process for forwarding messages by a reference holder
- FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate various move notifications that may occur while moving the object from one host address and port number to another host address and port number within the computer network.
- an application program using dynamically aggregated objects is generally indicated at 10 .
- An application program 12 may access one or more aggregate objects 14 through a facet control module 30 .
- Aggregate object 14 includes a set of facets 32 that may contain one or more facets such as a primary facet 34 , a first facet 36 , and a second facet 38 .
- One or more facet objects 28 are linked to the set of facets 32 in a one to one correspondence.
- a primary facet object 16 having a primary interface 18 is linked to primary facet 34
- a first facet object 20 having a first interface 22 is linked to first facet 36
- a second facet object 24 having a second interface 26 is linked to second facet 38 .
- Aggregate object 14 is an aggregation of one or more facet objects 28 within an object-oriented environment.
- Aggregate object 14 and the associated facet objects 28 function as a single logical object within the object-oriented environment.
- a change to one of the facet objects 28 creates a logical change in the other facet objects 28 and aggregate object 14 .
- Primary facet objects 16 , first facet object 20 , and second facet object 24 represent a group of one or more facet objects 28 .
- Each aggregate object 14 communicates directly with its associated set of facets 32 .
- Each facet within a set of facets 32 is linked to a particular facet object 28 .
- Each facet in the set of facets 32 contains basic information related to its associated facet object 28 to facilitate use of the aggregate object 14 within application program 12 .
- the information contained in each facet in the set of facets 32 for its associated facet object 28 includes the class of the facet object 28 and any interfaces implemented by the facet object 28 .
- each facet in set of facets 32 is a proxy object created from the associated facet object 28 .
- the proxy object is created by using Java Reflection to determine a particular facet object's 28 name, class, and interfaces.
- the particular facet in set of facets 32 is an object that includes the name, class, and interfaces for the associated facet object 28 .
- An interface in an object oriented environment defines the format and information needed to communicate with a particular object.
- An interface may be referred to as the public view of the object.
- the software developer may utilize aggregate objects 14 to extend the functionality of existing objects without modifying source code.
- the software developer extends functionality of an existing object by placing it in an aggregate object 14 as the primary facet object 16 and aggregating additional objects within aggregate object 14 as facet objects 28 .
- a particular object may be the primary facet object 16 of only one aggregate object 14 .
- Each aggregate object 14 in application program 12 will have a unique primary facet object 16 .
- a software developer desires to extend the functionality of a specified object to add additional functions such as mobility within a distributed processing environment or the ability to function as an agent within a distributed processing environment. Another example of adding functionality to an existing object would be adding repair history to a car object or adding a bonus plan to an employee object.
- the software developer dynamically creates an aggregate object 14 with the specified object as the associated primary facet object 16 .
- the term “dynamically” is used here to refer to using program statements during execution of application program 12 to create aggregate object 14 .
- the software developer then dynamically adds first facet object 20 and second facet object 24 to aggregate object 14 .
- First facet object 20 and second aggregate object 24 provide additional functionality for primary facet object 16 . Any method of any facet object 28 may affect all facet objects 28 within aggregate object 14 . Therefore, invoking a method on first facet object 20 will effect a change in primary facet object 16 .
- Application program 12 may create and utilize one or more aggregate objects 14 . Each aggregate object 14 has one or more associated facet objects 28 . Facet objects 28 may be added and deleted as application program 12 progresses depending upon processing requirements. To access a particular facet object 28 , application program 12 may request access to the particular facet object 28 that extends the functionality of a primary facet object 16 by requesting a class or interface using commands that invoke facet control module 30 . Facet control module 30 then scans the set of facets 32 associated with the aggregate object 14 identified in the facet control system command until locating the particular facet object 28 that has a class that equals or extends the requested class or implements the requested interface.
- Facet control module 30 returns a reference to the first facet in the set of facets 32 that has a class that equals or extends the requested class or implements the requested interface. Application program 12 can then invoke the particular facet object 28 by using the returned reference to the facet in the set of facets 32 . In another embodiment, facet control system 30 may return a list of all facets within the set of facets 32 with associated facet objects 28 that have a class that equal or extend the requested class or implement the requested interface. Application program 12 can then determine which facet object 28 in the returned reference list to invoke.
- a not-found condition is returned to application program 12 as a null reference.
- Application program 12 can then determine whether a new aggregate object 14 should be created, whether an object should be added to an existing aggregate object 14 as an additional facet object 28 , or whether appropriate error handling procedures should be performed.
- system 40 a system with an application program 12 using dynamically aggregated objects in a distributed processing environment is generally indicated at 40 .
- the structure and operation of system 40 is the same as system 10 except that facet objects 28 may exist within different address spaces in a distributed processing environment and be accessed by aggregate object 14 using proxies.
- first facet object proxy 46 resides in first environment 42 and is logically coupled to first facet object 20 in second environment 44 .
- First facet object proxy 46 may be a conventional proxy object created from first facet object 20 .
- First facet object proxy 46 has an interface 47 modeled on first interface 22 .
- Interface 47 has a format and needed information similar to first interface 22 .
- Second facet object 24 resides in a third environment 48 .
- a second facet object proxy 50 resides in first environment 42 and provides communications between aggregate object 14 and second facet object 24 .
- Second facet object proxy 50 may be a conventional proxy object created from second facet object 24 .
- Second facet object proxy 50 has an interface modeled on second interface 26 .
- Interface 51 has a format and needed information similar to second interface 26 .
- Facet control module 30 provides dynamic aggregation of existing objects for application program 12 .
- Facet control module 30 consists of several modules including a facet creator 70 , an object adder 72 , an object deleter 74 , and a class/interface finder 76 .
- the functionality of facet control module 30 will be discussed with reference to the flow diagrams of FIGS. 4 , 5 and 6 .
- a flow diagram illustrating a method for dynamically aggregating objects is generally indicated at 100 .
- the method commences at step 102 where application program 12 requests that an aggregate object 14 be created with a specified primary object.
- the method proceeds to step 104 where facet control module 30 receives the request and forwards it to facet creator 70 to create an aggregate object 14 with a primary facet object 16 of the specified object named in the create aggregate object request.
- a particular object may be the primary facet object 16 of only one aggregate object 14 .
- the method proceeds to step 106 where a new facet 32 for the specified primary facet object 16 is created as primary facet 34 .
- the method proceeds to step 108 where the specified primary facet object 16 is identified and linked to primary facet 34 .
- the method proceeds to step 110 where primary facet 34 is linked to the new aggregate object 14 .
- the following syntax may be used to create an aggregate object 14 :
- Facet control module 30 creates an aggregate object 14 identified as myFacets.
- facet control module 30 creates a primary facet 34 identified as primaryFacet.
- Primary facet 34 is linked to aggregate object 14 .
- facet control module 30 creates a primary facet object 16 identified as myPrimary.
- Primary facet object 16 is linked to primary facet 34 .
- Facet control module 30 creates primary facet 34 such that primary facet 34 contains the class of primary facet object 16 and the interfaces implemented by primary facet object 16 .
- a flow diagram illustrating a method for locating an object that extends a requested class or implements a requested interface within an aggregate object 14 is generally indicated at 120 .
- the method proceeds to step 122 where application program 12 requests that facet control module 30 locate a facet object 28 that has a class that equals or extends a requested class or implements a requested interface.
- facet control module 30 Upon receiving this type of request, facet control module 30 forwards the request to class/interface finder 76 .
- the following syntax may be used to request access to a facet object 28 that has a class that equals or extends the requested class or implements the requested interface:
- myfacets.get identifies the aggregate object 14 (myfacets) and the operation (get) for class/interface finder 76 .
- the class name in the above example may also identify a requested interface name.
- the method proceeds to step 124 where a facet reference is set to aggregate object's 14 primary facet, primary facet 34 .
- Primary facet 34 should be the first facet in the set of facets 32 .
- step 125 class/interface finder 76 determines if the facet referenced by facet-reference has a class that equals the requested class, has a class that extends the requested class, or implements the requested interface. If the facet in the set of facets 32 identified by the facet-reference meets one of the above tests, the Yes branch of decisional step 125 proceeds to step 126 where class/interface finder 76 returns a reference to the facet in the set of facets 32 identified by the facet-reference. The method proceeds to step 128 where application program 12 uses the returned reference to identify the facet object 28 through the reference to a facet in the set of facets 32 . Application program 12 then invokes the facet object 28 . After step 128 , the method terminates.
- decisional step 125 if the facet in the set of facets 32 identified by the facet-reference does not meet one of the aforementioned tests, the No branch of decisional step 125 proceeds to decisional step 130 where class/interface finder 76 determines whether aggregate object 14 has more facets within its associated set of facets 32 . If the set of facets 32 includes more facets, the Yes branch of decisional step 130 proceeds to step 132 where the facet-reference is set to the next facet, first facet 36 in this example, in the set of facets 32 associated with aggregate object 14 . The method returns to decisional step 125 to process the next facet identified by the facet-reference.
- step 130 if the set of facets 32 associated with aggregate object 14 does not include more facets, the No branch of decisional step 130 proceeds to step 134 where a null reference is returned. Application program 12 would then perform appropriate error processing upon receipt of the null reference. After step 134 , the method terminates.
- a flow diagram illustrating a method for adding objects to an aggregate object 14 is generally indicated at 150 .
- the method commences at step 152 where application program 12 requests a facet object 28 that has a class that equals or extends a requested class.
- the following syntax may be used to add objects to a aggregate object 14 as facet objects 28 :
- class name refers to an existing .class file.
- step 154 the method of FIG. 5 identified in steps 122 - 126 and 130 - 134 is performed until a facet within the set of facets 32 associated with aggregate object 14 is found that has a class that equals or extends the requested class or a null reference is returned.
- step 156 a determination is made regarding whether a null reference was returned. If a null reference was not returned, the No branch of decisional step 156 proceeds to step 158 where the reference received from step 126 in the method of FIG. 5 is returned. If a null reference is not received, the requested class has already been added to the set of facets 32 in aggregate object 14 and processing may continue. After step 158 the method terminates.
- step 160 object adder 72 creates an instance of the requested class.
- the method proceeds to step 162 where object adder 72 creates a new facet for the instance of the requested class.
- Object adder 72 creates the new facet by adding the requested class and the interfaces implemented by that class to the new facet.
- the new facet is an object that summarizes available information regarding the associated facet object that in this example is the created instance of the requested class.
- the new facet becomes a member of the set of facets 32 associated with the aggregate object 14 .
- step 164 object adder 72 links the instance of the requested class created in step 160 to the new facet created in step 162 .
- step 166 object adder 72 links the new facet created in step 162 to the aggregate object 14 .
- step 168 a reference to the new facet created in step 162 is returned. After step 168 , the method terminates.
- the facets.of command that is used to add objects to an existing aggregate object 14 may be used by software developers when they have determined that a requested class should be part of aggregate object 14 but they are not sure that the requested class has been added to facet objects 28 that are associated with aggregate object 14 .
- the software developer requests a facet object 28 that has a class that equals or extends a requested class and is guaranteed that a reference to a facet object 28 will be returned.
- one embodiment of the present invention includes the following command to determine the primary facet object 16 of aggregate object 14 :
- the sample command returns a reference to primary facet object 16 .
- Another sample command from one embodiment of the present invention includes the following command to determine the members of set of facets 32 associated with aggregate object 14 ;
- the sample command returns a list of each facet object 28 associated with aggregate object 14 .
- Object deleter 74 of facet control module 30 provides a software developer with the ability to delete a specified object from facet objects 28 .
- the software developer identifies the particular facet object 28 to be removed from aggregate object 14 and instructs facet control module 30 to remove the specified facet object from aggregate object 14 .
- Object deleter 74 physically deletes the associated facet in set of facets 32 and removes the link between the specified facet object and aggregate object 14 . If the specified facet object has no remaining references, an operating system of the object oriented environment may remove the specified facet object from the object oriented environment during a garbage collection procedure.
- An object may be made mobile within a distributed processing environment by defining the object as a primary facet object 16 linked to an aggregate object 14 and aggregating a mobility object as a second facet object 24 as previously described.
- a mobility method is invoked within aggregate object 14 .
- aggregate object 14 locates the facet without one or more facet objects 28 that provides the requested method.
- the mobility method may be invoked directly on the mobility facet object. In that case, the mobility facet object informs the aggregate object that the mobility method has been invoked.
- the functionality of mobility is built into the object. To cause that object to move from one address space to another address space, a mobility method is invoked on the object.
- the location of an object may be generally defined as “host:portnumber/alias”.
- the location of an object may be “dallas:8000/store1”, where “dallas” defines the host address, “8000” defines the port number, and “store1” defines an alias for the object.
- the host may be referred to by host name or an IP address.
- An object may be an agent which is defined as a specialized object that possesses the characteristic of autonomy. Autonomy is the ability to program an agent with one or more goals that it will attempt to satisfy, even when it has moved into a network on other platforms and has lost all contact with its creator. Agents also have the additional abilities of movement, persistence and event generation.
- FIGS. 7A-7F utilize a modified illustration of the structure of the aggregate object depicted in FIG. 1 .
- Aggregate object 202 , primary facet object 204 , and mobility facet object 206 each have a local reference and a reference holder. The reference holder and local reference are together equivalent to a member of set of facets 32 .
- Aggregate object 202 has a local reference 208 and a reference holder 210 .
- Reference holder 210 is linked to local reference 208 and receives and routes messages to aggregate object 202 through local reference 208 .
- Local reference 208 contains an address identifying the physical location of aggregate object 202 .
- primary facet object 204 has a local reference 212 and a reference holder 214 .
- Mobility facet object 206 has a local reference 216 and a reference holder 218 .
- Aggregate object 202 is linked to both reference holder 214 for primary facet object 204 and to reference holder 218 for mobility facet object 206 .
- a primary object proxy 220 is linked to primary facet object 204 through reference holder 214 . Any message received by primary object proxy 220 is forwarded to reference holder 214 that further forwards the message to primary object 204 .
- Aggregate object 202 , primary facet object 204 , mobility facet object 206 , and their associated local references and reference holders may be generally referred to as an aggregate group 200 .
- the movement process begins in FIG. 7A where mobility facet object 206 located at a current host address and port number 222 receives a move indication 224 .
- Move indication 224 may be received from a requesting object 226 located at an originating host address and port number 228 .
- Requesting object 226 may be any object or application in the distributed computing system and may exist in any address space including an address space on the current host for aggregate group 200 .
- Aggregate group 200 may also be an agent that carries its own move indication 224 .
- mobility facet object 206 accesses a lock object 230 in order to block all incoming messages to aggregate group 200 while aggregate group 200 is moving to a new host address and port number.
- Mobility facet object 206 creates a serialized version 232 of itself at current host address and port number 222 .
- the serialized version 232 is then sent to a desired new host address and port number 234 .
- the serialized version may be created by mobility facet object 206 sending a message containing itself as a parameter.
- a new version 236 of mobility facet object 206 is created at new host address and port number 234 from the serialized version 232 .
- the move operation continues in FIG. 7C where the new version 236 of mobility facet object 206 creates a serialize and move message 238 and sends it to aggregate group 200 at current host address and port number 222 .
- the serialize and move message 238 informs aggregate group 200 that the initial phase of moving was successful and that the other serializable parts of aggregate group 200 should be serialized and sent to new host address and port number 234 .
- the move operation continues at FIG. 7D where the aggregate group 200 receives the serialize and move message 238 .
- Aggregate group 200 forwards the serialize and move message 238 to primary facet object 204 .
- Primary facet object 204 creates a serialized version 240 of itself at current host address and port number 222 .
- the serialized version 240 is then sent to the new host address and port number 234 .
- a new version 242 of primary facet object 204 is created at new host address and port number 234 from the serialized version 240 .
- a new aggregate group 244 is generated as previously described with a new aggregate object 246 , new version 242 of primary facet object 204 as a new primary facet object 248 and new version 236 of mobility facet object 206 as a new mobility facet object 250 .
- New aggregate group 244 and new aggregate object 246 register at new host address and port number 234 along with new version 236 of mobility facet object 206 and new version 242 of primary facet object 204 .
- new aggregate group 244 sends a successful message 252 to aggregate group 200 at current host address and port number 222 .
- Aggregate group 200 , aggregate object 202 , primary facet object 204 , and mobility facet object 206 deregister from current host address and port number 222 .
- aggregate object 202 severs its links to mobility facet object 206 and primary facet object 204 .
- Aggregate object 202 and mobility facet object 206 are garbage collected by the system.
- all references to primary facet object 204 are removed such that it is garbage collected by the system.
- Local reference 212 of primary facet object 204 is updated with new host address and port number 234 and becomes remote reference 254 .
- Reference holder 214 remains a reference holder at current host address and port number 222 for new version 242 of primary facet object 204 at new host address and port number 234 .
- Reference holder 214 is coupled to remote reference 254 that contains the address of the physical location of new version 242 of primary facet object 204 .
- Reference holder 214 is used to forward messages destined for primary facet object 204 to new host address and port number 234 .
- FIGS. 8A-8B the process of forwarding messages for a moved object is illustrated.
- the forwarding operation begins at FIG. 8A where message MSG 1 from an object 306 at a first host address and port number 308 and message MSG 2 from an object 310 at a second host address and port number 312 require processing by an object 314 .
- Object 314 has moved to a new host address and port number 316 .
- Object 314 may be an aggregate group such as new aggregate group 244 .
- Messages MSG 1 and MSG 2 may be messages that were previously sent but were blocked as a result of move indication 224 or may be messages sent from out of date objects at host address and port numbers not knowing that object 314 has moved to new host address and port number 316 .
- a reference holder 302 and a remote address 304 occupy an old host address and port number 318 previously occupied by object 314 .
- old host address and port number 318 and first host address and port number 308 exist in the same address space identified by the host address. Thus communications between object 306 and reference holder 302 are local.
- FIG. 8B The forwarding operation continues at FIG. 8B where reference holder 302 , having the new host address and port number 316 for object 314 stored in remote reference 304 , reroutes message MSG 1 to object 314 at new host address and port number 316 .
- Messages, such as message MSG 1 that are local with respect to reference holder 302 may be directly forwarded to the new location for an object referenced in the message since the message travels through only one host address on its way to a destination host address.
- Reference holder 302 receives message MSG and determines that it is a remote message.
- a remote message is determined by comparing the host address of the object originating the message with the host address of the reference holder 302 .
- reference holder 302 throws an “object moved” exception to object 310 .
- Object 310 catches the “object moved” exception and resends message MSG 2 to new host address and port number 316 identified in the “object moved” exception. All future messages from object 310 are sent directly to object 314 at new host address and port number 316 .
- By using the “object moved” exception messages destined for a target object do not pass through an intermediate host address thereby making communications between objects more efficient.
- callback notifications that may occur during the movement of an object from current host address and port number 222 to new address and port number 234 are illustrated.
- Callback notifications may be sent provided that primary facet object 204 requests callback notification.
- primary facet object 204 implements a specified Java interface to request callback notifications.
- any suitable method of requesting callback notifications may be used such as setting a callback notification flag.
- FIG. 9A illustrates a pre-departure notification for primary facet object 204 at current host address and port number 222 .
- a pre-departure notification may be generated for primary facet object 204 to determine if primary facet object 204 is available to be moved. If primary facet object 204 determines that it is not available to be moved, primary facet object 204 may throw a mobility exception causing the move to abort. The mobility exception may be thrown for any reason as determined by primary facet object 204 such as processing required to be completed at current host address and port number 222 has not been completed.
- FIG. 9B illustrates a pre-arrival notification for new version 242 of primary facet object 204 at new host address and port number 234 .
- the pre-arrival notification occurs immediately after new version 242 of primary facet object 204 is created from serialized version 240 at new host address and port number 234 .
- the pre-arrival notification may be used by new version 242 of primary facet object 204 to determine if new version 242 was successfully created. If the new version 242 was not successfully created or any other suitable error condition exists within new version 242 of primary facet object 204 , new version 242 may throw a mobility exception causing the move to abort.
- FIG. 9C illustrates post-movement callback notifications.
- a post-arrival callback notification may be sent to new version 242 of primary facet object 204 at new host address and port number 234 .
- new aggregate group 244 is the active object and the move cannot be aborted. Thus, the move is deemed successful.
- This callback notification allows new aggregate group 244 to perform specific post-move processing that is not provided by the system.
- a post-departure callback notification may be sent to primary facet object 204 .
- the component parts of aggregate group 200 are considered stale since a new active aggregate group 244 exists at new host address and port number 234 .
- the post-departure callback notification allows aggregate group 200 to perform internal final processing before its component parts are delinked and garbage collected and prior to unblocking any messages at current host address and port number 222 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (100)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/331,418 USRE41706E1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2006-01-13 | Moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/451,495 US6678743B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 1999-11-30 | Method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
US11/331,418 USRE41706E1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2006-01-13 | Moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/451,495 Reissue US6678743B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 1999-11-30 | Method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USRE41706E1 true USRE41706E1 (en) | 2010-09-14 |
Family
ID=29780590
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/451,495 Ceased US6678743B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 1999-11-30 | Method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
US11/331,418 Expired - Lifetime USRE41706E1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2006-01-13 | Moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/451,495 Ceased US6678743B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 1999-11-30 | Method for moving objects in a distributed computing environment |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6678743B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3690720B2 (en) | 1999-09-14 | 2005-08-31 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Client server system, object pooling method, and storage medium |
GB0004090D0 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2000-04-12 | Innovation Venture Ltd | Application programming system and method of operation thereof |
AU2002234777A1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2002-09-19 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and system for distributed processing management |
US6928478B1 (en) * | 2001-06-25 | 2005-08-09 | Network Appliance, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implementing a MAC address pool for assignment to a virtual interface aggregate |
US7472400B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2008-12-30 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method for dynamically generating a wrapper class |
US7472401B2 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2008-12-30 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Computer product for a dynamically generated wrapper class |
US8881099B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2014-11-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Dynamic generation of wrapper classes to implement call-by-value semantics |
US7865583B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2011-01-04 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Aggregating network activity using software provenance data |
US8020177B2 (en) * | 2007-07-27 | 2011-09-13 | Composite Ideas, Llc | Contained command invocation middleware framework |
CA2667845C (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2015-02-03 | Seg-Ins Inc. | Foldable truck bed extender |
ITMI20111210A1 (en) * | 2011-06-30 | 2012-12-31 | Ibm | DYNAMIC REACTIVATION OF SOFTWARE IMAGES |
Citations (95)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5325524A (en) | 1989-04-06 | 1994-06-28 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Locating mobile objects in a distributed computer system |
US5341478A (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1994-08-23 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Methods and apparatus for providing dynamic invocation of applications in a distributed heterogeneous environment |
US5396630A (en) | 1992-10-06 | 1995-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for object management across process boundries in a data processing system |
US5432924A (en) | 1993-12-15 | 1995-07-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for selectively applying an appropriate object ownership model |
US5481721A (en) | 1991-07-17 | 1996-01-02 | Next Computer, Inc. | Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation of object oriented programming language-based message passing into operation system message passing using proxy objects |
US5511197A (en) | 1992-11-13 | 1996-04-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for network marshalling of interface pointers for remote procedure calls |
EP0727739A1 (en) | 1995-02-17 | 1996-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object-oriented programming interface for developing and running network management applications on a network communication infrastructure |
US5577251A (en) | 1992-12-21 | 1996-11-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Object oriented system for executing application call by using plurality of client-side subcontract mechanism associated with corresponding plurality of server-side subcontract mechanism |
US5603031A (en) | 1993-07-08 | 1997-02-11 | General Magic, Inc. | System and method for distributed computation based upon the movement, execution, and interaction of processes in a network |
US5619710A (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1997-04-08 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for object-oriented invocation of a server application by a client application |
US5634010A (en) | 1994-10-21 | 1997-05-27 | Modulus Technologies, Inc. | Managing and distributing data objects of different types between computers connected to a network |
US5655101A (en) | 1993-06-01 | 1997-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Accessing remote data objects in a distributed memory environment using parallel address locations at each local memory to reference a same data object |
US5724503A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-03 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interpreting exceptions in a distributed object system |
US5737607A (en) | 1995-09-28 | 1998-04-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for allowing generic stubs to marshal and unmarshal data in object reference specific data formats |
US5745703A (en) | 1995-07-18 | 1998-04-28 | Nec Research Institute, Inc. | Transmission of higher-order objects across a network of heterogeneous machines |
US5778227A (en) | 1995-08-01 | 1998-07-07 | Intergraph Corporation | System for adding attributes to an object at run time in an object oriented computer environment |
US5781633A (en) | 1996-07-01 | 1998-07-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Capability security for transparent distributed object systems |
US5787175A (en) | 1995-10-23 | 1998-07-28 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for collaborative document control |
US5793965A (en) | 1995-03-22 | 1998-08-11 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the type of an object in a distributed object system |
US5812781A (en) | 1994-09-05 | 1998-09-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | System for routing incoming connection-less messages to processes which are already handling messages from same source node |
US5812793A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 1998-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for asynchronous store and forward data replication |
US5822585A (en) | 1995-02-21 | 1998-10-13 | Compuware Corporation | System and method for cooperative processing using object-oriented framework |
US5848419A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1998-12-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for providing transparent persistence in a distributed object operating environment |
GB2326255A (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1998-12-16 | Ibm | Automatic object distribution enables remote running of objects using local method calls |
US5862325A (en) | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5867665A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 1999-02-02 | Pfn, Inc | Domain communications server |
US5881230A (en) | 1996-06-24 | 1999-03-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for remote automation of object oriented applications |
US5897634A (en) | 1997-05-09 | 1999-04-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimized caching of SQL data in an object server system |
US5903725A (en) | 1995-09-15 | 1999-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Recoverable proxy object in an object oriented environment |
US5928335A (en) | 1996-10-30 | 1999-07-27 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Client/server system having middleware-based interface between client and server image processing objects |
US5956737A (en) | 1996-09-09 | 1999-09-21 | Design Intelligence, Inc. | Design engine for fitting content to a medium |
US5983233A (en) | 1996-08-20 | 1999-11-09 | Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite | Process for managing the naming of objects, process for mapping an object name to a CORBA object reference, program module, computer unit, and computer system |
US5987506A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 1999-11-16 | Mangosoft Corporation | Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment |
US5999988A (en) | 1997-03-31 | 1999-12-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating and employing a run-time generated stub to reference an object in object oriented systems |
US6006018A (en) | 1995-10-03 | 1999-12-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed file system translator with extended attribute support |
US6012067A (en) | 1998-03-02 | 2000-01-04 | Sarkar; Shyam Sundar | Method and apparatus for storing and manipulating objects in a plurality of relational data managers on the web |
US6012081A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2000-01-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Service and event synchronous/asynchronous manager |
US6026415A (en) | 1995-01-31 | 2000-02-15 | Next Software, Inc. | Transparent local and distributed memory management system |
US6032190A (en) | 1997-10-03 | 2000-02-29 | Ascend Communications, Inc. | System and method for processing data packets |
US6041166A (en) | 1995-07-14 | 2000-03-21 | 3Com Corp. | Virtual network architecture for connectionless LAN backbone |
US6044409A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 2000-03-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Framework for marshaling and unmarshaling argument object references |
US6061740A (en) | 1996-12-09 | 2000-05-09 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for heterogeneous network management |
US6085086A (en) | 1995-08-22 | 2000-07-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Network-based migrating user agent for personal communication services |
US6085030A (en) | 1997-05-02 | 2000-07-04 | Novell, Inc. | Network component server |
US6092196A (en) | 1997-11-25 | 2000-07-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | HTTP distributed remote user authentication system |
US6134591A (en) | 1997-06-18 | 2000-10-17 | Client/Server Technologies, Inc. | Network security and integration method and system |
US6138235A (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2000-10-24 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Controlling access to services between modular applications |
US6138251A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2000-10-24 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for reliable remote object reference management |
US6141759A (en) | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-31 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System and architecture for distributing, monitoring, and managing information requests on a computer network |
US6151639A (en) | 1997-06-19 | 2000-11-21 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for remote object invocation |
US6178505B1 (en) | 1997-03-10 | 2001-01-23 | Internet Dynamics, Inc. | Secure delivery of information in a network |
US6182154B1 (en) | 1994-11-21 | 2001-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Universal object request broker encapsulater |
US6182155B1 (en) | 1997-05-09 | 2001-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Uniform access to and interchange between objects employing a plurality of access methods |
US6195794B1 (en) | 1997-08-12 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for distributing templates in a component system |
US6205491B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2001-03-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for deferred throwing of exceptions in C++ |
US6212574B1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2001-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | User mode proxy of kernel mode operations in a computer operating system |
US6230160B1 (en) | 1997-07-17 | 2001-05-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating proxies for distributed beans and event objects |
US6237135B1 (en) | 1998-06-18 | 2001-05-22 | Borland Software Corporation | Development system with visual design tools for creating and maintaining Java Beans components |
US20010003824A1 (en) | 1997-03-14 | 2001-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Bootstrapping technique for distributed object client systems |
US6253253B1 (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2001-06-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for optimizing references to objects in a data processing system |
US6253256B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2001-06-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Deferred reconstruction of objects and remote loading in a distributed system |
US6260078B1 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2001-07-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Using a distributed object system to find and download java-based applications |
US6269373B1 (en) | 1999-02-26 | 2001-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for persisting beans as container-managed fields |
US6282580B1 (en) | 1996-07-02 | 2001-08-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Bridge providing communication between different implementations of object request brokers |
US6304918B1 (en) | 1997-03-11 | 2001-10-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Object interface control system |
US6321275B1 (en) | 1995-04-24 | 2001-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Interpreted remote procedure calls |
US6324543B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic object migration method using proxy object links to support automatic object distribution in an object-oriented environment |
US6338089B1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 2002-01-08 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and system for providing session pools for high performance web browser and server communications |
US6343332B1 (en) | 1997-10-20 | 2002-01-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Communication link information generating device, a three-tier client/server system, and a medium storing a communication link information generator program |
US6345382B1 (en) | 1998-02-12 | 2002-02-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Run-time customization in object-oriented design |
US6347342B1 (en) | 1996-07-15 | 2002-02-12 | Next Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically brokering object messages among object models |
US6347341B1 (en) | 1999-02-22 | 2002-02-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer program product used for exchange and transfer of data having a siga vector and utilizing a queued direct input-output device |
US6356930B2 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2002-03-12 | Silverstream Software, Inc. | Connection concentrator for distributed object systems |
US6374308B1 (en) | 1996-04-23 | 2002-04-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interactively connecting distributed objects to a graphic user interface |
US6385661B1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 2002-05-07 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for dynamic generation of remote proxies |
US6405246B1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2002-06-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic and dynamic software code management |
US6415315B1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-07-02 | Recursion Software, Inc. | Method of moving objects in a computer network |
US6434595B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2002-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of executing mobile objects and recording medium storing mobile objects |
US6438616B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2002-08-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for fast, local corba object references |
US6442620B1 (en) | 1998-08-17 | 2002-08-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Environment extensibility and automatic services for component applications using contexts, policies and activators |
US6446084B1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2002-09-03 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Optimizing symbol table lookups in platform-independent virtual machines |
US6453333B1 (en) | 1997-06-11 | 2002-09-17 | Lion Bioscience Ag | Research system using multi-platform object oriented program language for providing objects at runtime for creating and manipulating biological or chemical data to facilitate research |
US6496871B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2002-12-17 | Nec Research Institute, Inc. | Distributed agent software system and method having enhanced process mobility and communication in a computer network |
US6513157B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-01-28 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for dynamically aggregating objects |
US6567861B1 (en) | 1997-09-17 | 2003-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for remotely running objects using data streams and/or complex parameters |
US6601018B1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2003-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic test framework system and method in software component testing |
US6629128B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-09-30 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for distributed processing in a computer network |
US6701382B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2004-03-02 | Nortel Networks Limited | Name service for transparent container objects |
US6714976B1 (en) | 1997-03-20 | 2004-03-30 | Concord Communications, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring distributed applications using diagnostic information |
US6851118B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2005-02-01 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Remote object access |
US6931455B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-08-16 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for communications between a CORBA object request broker and a non-CORBA object request broker |
US6947965B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-09-20 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for communications in a distributed computing environment |
US6951021B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-09-27 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for server-side communication support in a distributed computing environment |
US6993774B1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 2006-01-31 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for remote enabling classes without interfaces |
US7347342B2 (en) | 2003-10-30 | 2008-03-25 | Elmar Grandy | Container for holding sterile goods and sterile goods dispenser |
-
1999
- 1999-11-30 US US09/451,495 patent/US6678743B1/en not_active Ceased
-
2006
- 2006-01-13 US US11/331,418 patent/USRE41706E1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5325524A (en) | 1989-04-06 | 1994-06-28 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Locating mobile objects in a distributed computer system |
US5619710A (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1997-04-08 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for object-oriented invocation of a server application by a client application |
US5341478A (en) | 1990-08-14 | 1994-08-23 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Methods and apparatus for providing dynamic invocation of applications in a distributed heterogeneous environment |
US5481721A (en) | 1991-07-17 | 1996-01-02 | Next Computer, Inc. | Method for providing automatic and dynamic translation of object oriented programming language-based message passing into operation system message passing using proxy objects |
US5396630A (en) | 1992-10-06 | 1995-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for object management across process boundries in a data processing system |
US5511197A (en) | 1992-11-13 | 1996-04-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for network marshalling of interface pointers for remote procedure calls |
US5577251A (en) | 1992-12-21 | 1996-11-19 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Object oriented system for executing application call by using plurality of client-side subcontract mechanism associated with corresponding plurality of server-side subcontract mechanism |
US5655101A (en) | 1993-06-01 | 1997-08-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Accessing remote data objects in a distributed memory environment using parallel address locations at each local memory to reference a same data object |
US5603031A (en) | 1993-07-08 | 1997-02-11 | General Magic, Inc. | System and method for distributed computation based upon the movement, execution, and interaction of processes in a network |
US6016393A (en) | 1993-07-08 | 2000-01-18 | General Magic, Inc. | System and method for distributed computation based upon the movement, execution, and interaction of processes in a network |
US5432924A (en) | 1993-12-15 | 1995-07-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for selectively applying an appropriate object ownership model |
US5812781A (en) | 1994-09-05 | 1998-09-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | System for routing incoming connection-less messages to processes which are already handling messages from same source node |
US5634010A (en) | 1994-10-21 | 1997-05-27 | Modulus Technologies, Inc. | Managing and distributing data objects of different types between computers connected to a network |
US6182154B1 (en) | 1994-11-21 | 2001-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Universal object request broker encapsulater |
US6026415A (en) | 1995-01-31 | 2000-02-15 | Next Software, Inc. | Transparent local and distributed memory management system |
EP0727739A1 (en) | 1995-02-17 | 1996-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object-oriented programming interface for developing and running network management applications on a network communication infrastructure |
US6182153B1 (en) | 1995-02-17 | 2001-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Object-oriented programming interface for developing and running network management applications on a network communication infrastructure |
US5822585A (en) | 1995-02-21 | 1998-10-13 | Compuware Corporation | System and method for cooperative processing using object-oriented framework |
US5793965A (en) | 1995-03-22 | 1998-08-11 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the type of an object in a distributed object system |
US5724503A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-03 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interpreting exceptions in a distributed object system |
US5848419A (en) | 1995-03-31 | 1998-12-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for providing transparent persistence in a distributed object operating environment |
US6321275B1 (en) | 1995-04-24 | 2001-11-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Interpreted remote procedure calls |
US6041166A (en) | 1995-07-14 | 2000-03-21 | 3Com Corp. | Virtual network architecture for connectionless LAN backbone |
US5745703A (en) | 1995-07-18 | 1998-04-28 | Nec Research Institute, Inc. | Transmission of higher-order objects across a network of heterogeneous machines |
US5778227A (en) | 1995-08-01 | 1998-07-07 | Intergraph Corporation | System for adding attributes to an object at run time in an object oriented computer environment |
US6085086A (en) | 1995-08-22 | 2000-07-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Network-based migrating user agent for personal communication services |
US5903725A (en) | 1995-09-15 | 1999-05-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Recoverable proxy object in an object oriented environment |
US5737607A (en) | 1995-09-28 | 1998-04-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for allowing generic stubs to marshal and unmarshal data in object reference specific data formats |
US6006018A (en) | 1995-10-03 | 1999-12-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed file system translator with extended attribute support |
US5787175A (en) | 1995-10-23 | 1998-07-28 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for collaborative document control |
US5862325A (en) | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US6374308B1 (en) | 1996-04-23 | 2002-04-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interactively connecting distributed objects to a graphic user interface |
US5881230A (en) | 1996-06-24 | 1999-03-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for remote automation of object oriented applications |
US6044409A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 2000-03-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Framework for marshaling and unmarshaling argument object references |
US5812793A (en) | 1996-06-26 | 1998-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for asynchronous store and forward data replication |
US5781633A (en) | 1996-07-01 | 1998-07-14 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Capability security for transparent distributed object systems |
US6282580B1 (en) | 1996-07-02 | 2001-08-28 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Bridge providing communication between different implementations of object request brokers |
US6012081A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2000-01-04 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Service and event synchronous/asynchronous manager |
US6260078B1 (en) | 1996-07-03 | 2001-07-10 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Using a distributed object system to find and download java-based applications |
US6347342B1 (en) | 1996-07-15 | 2002-02-12 | Next Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically brokering object messages among object models |
US5983233A (en) | 1996-08-20 | 1999-11-09 | Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite | Process for managing the naming of objects, process for mapping an object name to a CORBA object reference, program module, computer unit, and computer system |
US5956737A (en) | 1996-09-09 | 1999-09-21 | Design Intelligence, Inc. | Design engine for fitting content to a medium |
US5928335A (en) | 1996-10-30 | 1999-07-27 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Client/server system having middleware-based interface between client and server image processing objects |
US5987506A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 1999-11-16 | Mangosoft Corporation | Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment |
US6061740A (en) | 1996-12-09 | 2000-05-09 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for heterogeneous network management |
US6178505B1 (en) | 1997-03-10 | 2001-01-23 | Internet Dynamics, Inc. | Secure delivery of information in a network |
US6304918B1 (en) | 1997-03-11 | 2001-10-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Object interface control system |
US20010003824A1 (en) | 1997-03-14 | 2001-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Bootstrapping technique for distributed object client systems |
US6714976B1 (en) | 1997-03-20 | 2004-03-30 | Concord Communications, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring distributed applications using diagnostic information |
US5867665A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 1999-02-02 | Pfn, Inc | Domain communications server |
US5999988A (en) | 1997-03-31 | 1999-12-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating and employing a run-time generated stub to reference an object in object oriented systems |
US6212574B1 (en) | 1997-04-04 | 2001-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | User mode proxy of kernel mode operations in a computer operating system |
US6085030A (en) | 1997-05-02 | 2000-07-04 | Novell, Inc. | Network component server |
GB2326255A (en) | 1997-05-07 | 1998-12-16 | Ibm | Automatic object distribution enables remote running of objects using local method calls |
US6157960A (en) | 1997-05-07 | 2000-12-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Technique for programmatically creating distributed object programs |
US6182155B1 (en) | 1997-05-09 | 2001-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Uniform access to and interchange between objects employing a plurality of access methods |
US5897634A (en) | 1997-05-09 | 1999-04-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimized caching of SQL data in an object server system |
US6453333B1 (en) | 1997-06-11 | 2002-09-17 | Lion Bioscience Ag | Research system using multi-platform object oriented program language for providing objects at runtime for creating and manipulating biological or chemical data to facilitate research |
US6134591A (en) | 1997-06-18 | 2000-10-17 | Client/Server Technologies, Inc. | Network security and integration method and system |
US6151639A (en) | 1997-06-19 | 2000-11-21 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for remote object invocation |
US6138251A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2000-10-24 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for reliable remote object reference management |
US6230160B1 (en) | 1997-07-17 | 2001-05-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating proxies for distributed beans and event objects |
US6195794B1 (en) | 1997-08-12 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for distributing templates in a component system |
US6253253B1 (en) | 1997-08-25 | 2001-06-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for optimizing references to objects in a data processing system |
US6567861B1 (en) | 1997-09-17 | 2003-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for remotely running objects using data streams and/or complex parameters |
US6032190A (en) | 1997-10-03 | 2000-02-29 | Ascend Communications, Inc. | System and method for processing data packets |
US6851118B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2005-02-01 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Remote object access |
US6253256B1 (en) | 1997-10-15 | 2001-06-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Deferred reconstruction of objects and remote loading in a distributed system |
US6343332B1 (en) | 1997-10-20 | 2002-01-29 | Fujitsu Limited | Communication link information generating device, a three-tier client/server system, and a medium storing a communication link information generator program |
US6092196A (en) | 1997-11-25 | 2000-07-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | HTTP distributed remote user authentication system |
US6434595B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2002-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of executing mobile objects and recording medium storing mobile objects |
US6415315B1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-07-02 | Recursion Software, Inc. | Method of moving objects in a computer network |
US6141759A (en) | 1997-12-10 | 2000-10-31 | Bmc Software, Inc. | System and architecture for distributing, monitoring, and managing information requests on a computer network |
US6438616B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2002-08-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for fast, local corba object references |
US6205491B1 (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2001-03-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for deferred throwing of exceptions in C++ |
US6345382B1 (en) | 1998-02-12 | 2002-02-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Run-time customization in object-oriented design |
US6012067A (en) | 1998-03-02 | 2000-01-04 | Sarkar; Shyam Sundar | Method and apparatus for storing and manipulating objects in a plurality of relational data managers on the web |
US6324543B1 (en) * | 1998-03-06 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic object migration method using proxy object links to support automatic object distribution in an object-oriented environment |
US6237135B1 (en) | 1998-06-18 | 2001-05-22 | Borland Software Corporation | Development system with visual design tools for creating and maintaining Java Beans components |
US6138235A (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2000-10-24 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Controlling access to services between modular applications |
US6496871B1 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2002-12-17 | Nec Research Institute, Inc. | Distributed agent software system and method having enhanced process mobility and communication in a computer network |
US6442620B1 (en) | 1998-08-17 | 2002-08-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Environment extensibility and automatic services for component applications using contexts, policies and activators |
US6446084B1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2002-09-03 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Optimizing symbol table lookups in platform-independent virtual machines |
US6405246B1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2002-06-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic and dynamic software code management |
US6338089B1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 2002-01-08 | Bull Hn Information Systems Inc. | Method and system for providing session pools for high performance web browser and server communications |
US6356930B2 (en) | 1998-10-16 | 2002-03-12 | Silverstream Software, Inc. | Connection concentrator for distributed object systems |
US6385661B1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 2002-05-07 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for dynamic generation of remote proxies |
US6993774B1 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 2006-01-31 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for remote enabling classes without interfaces |
US6549955B2 (en) | 1998-10-19 | 2003-04-15 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for dynamic generation of remote proxies |
US6701382B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2004-03-02 | Nortel Networks Limited | Name service for transparent container objects |
US6601018B1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2003-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic test framework system and method in software component testing |
US6347341B1 (en) | 1999-02-22 | 2002-02-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer program product used for exchange and transfer of data having a siga vector and utilizing a queued direct input-output device |
US6269373B1 (en) | 1999-02-26 | 2001-07-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for persisting beans as container-managed fields |
US6629128B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-09-30 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for distributed processing in a computer network |
US6931455B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-08-16 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for communications between a CORBA object request broker and a non-CORBA object request broker |
US6947965B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-09-20 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for communications in a distributed computing environment |
US6951021B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-09-27 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for server-side communication support in a distributed computing environment |
US6513157B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-01-28 | Recursion Software, Inc. | System and method for dynamically aggregating objects |
US7347342B2 (en) | 2003-10-30 | 2008-03-25 | Elmar Grandy | Container for holding sterile goods and sterile goods dispenser |
Non-Patent Citations (41)
Title |
---|
"Distribution Object Activation and Communication Protocols", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, US, IBM Corp. New York, vol. 37(7), (Jul. 1, 1994),539-542. |
"Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,734, (Aug. 20, 2009), 18 pages. |
"Improved Process for Visual Development of Client/Server Programs", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 41(1), XP-000772108,(Jan. 1998),281-283. |
"Java Core Reflection, API and Specification", JavaSoft, (Jan. 1997),40-47. |
"Java RMI Tutorial", Revision 1.3, JDK 1.1 FCS, Sun Microsystems, (Feb. 10, 1997),1-14. |
"Life Cycle Service Specification", CORBA Object Services Specification, Chp. 6, OMG, c9i.omg.org/docs/formal/97-02-11.pdf,, (Feb. 11, 1997),pp. 6-1 through 6-62. |
"Non Final Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/858,878, (Mar. 29, 2010), 30 pages. |
"Non Final Offce Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,734, (Feb. 19, 2010), 21 pages. |
"Passing Proxies as Parameters to Methods and Return Values from Methods", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 41(1), XP-000772037,(Jan. 1998),89-92. |
"PCT/US99/24510", International Search Report for Appl. No. PCT/US99/24510,(Apr. 19, 2000),4. |
"SOMobjects Developer's Toolkit Programmer's Guide", vol. I: SOM and DSOM, (Dec. 1996),275-276. |
"The Component Object Model (DRAFT) Specification", Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 6, 1995),1-4, 39-46. |
"The Component Object Model Specification", Microsoft Corporation and Digital Equipment Corporation, Chapters 1 and 2 (printed on Oct. 26, 2005 from daimi.au.dk*-datpete/COT/COM SPEC/html/com_spec.html),(Oct. 24, 1995),54. |
Bent, Thomsen et al., "Mobile Agents", External Report ECRC-92-21, European Computer-Industry Research Center, (1995). |
Bieszczad, A. "Towards Plug-and-Play Networks wilh Mobile Code", SCE Technical Report, (Mar. 1997),17. |
Bowers, "Some Principles for the Encapsulation of The Behavior of Aggregate Objects", IEEE, (1993),6/1-6/4. |
Brando, Thom "Comparing COBRA and DCE", (Mar. 1996). |
Cappelo, Robert "Overview of RMI Architecture (Computer Science Online Course Notes)", University of California Santa Barbara Department of Computer Science, cs.ucsb.edu/-cappello/290i/lectures/rmi/architecture/sld001.htm,(Sep. 7, 1998). |
Glen McCluskey, "Using Java Reflection," Jan. 1998, 6 pages. * |
Glen, McCluskey "Using Java Reflection", article retrieved from java.sun.com website., (Jan. 1998). |
Hayton, Richard et al., "FlexiNet Architecture", (Feb. 1999),171-178. |
Hayton, Richard et al., "Mobile Java Objects", (1998). |
Henderson, Sellers et al., "What is This Thing Called Aggregation?", IEEE, (Jun. 1999),236-250. |
Henry, E. et al., "Fine-Grained Mobility in the Emerald System", ACM, (Feb. 1998),22. |
Hof, Markus "Just-in-Time Stub Generation", Proceedings of the Joint Modular Languages Conference (JMLC) 97, Linz, Austria,(Mar. 19-21, 1997),197-206. |
HOP;OMG's Internet Inter-ORG Protocol, A Brief discription, printed from omg.org,(1994). |
Johansen, Dag et al., "An Introduction to the TACOMA Distributed System Version 1.0", Technical Report 95-23, Department of Computer Science, University of Troms, Norway, (Jun. 1995). |
Matthew Izatt and Patrick Chan, "Ajents: Toward an Environment for Parallel, Distributed and Mobile Java Applications", Jun. 1999, pp. 1-10. * |
McKie, S. "Software Agents: Application Intelligence Goes Undercover", DBMS, (Apr. 1995),8. |
McManis, Chuck "Take an in-depthlook at the java reflection API", retrieved from JavaWorld.com, (Sep. 1997),1-10. |
Moons, H. et al., "Object Migration In a Heterogeneous World-A Multi-Dimensional Affair", IEEE, (1993),62-72. |
Orfali, et al., "The Essentiai Distributed Objects Survival Guide", Chapter 4, Published by John Wiley & Suns, Inc., (1996),67-90. |
Petrie, C. J., "Agent-based Engineering, the Web, and Intelligence", IEEE Expert, (Dec. 1996),12. |
Richard Hayton and ANSA Team, "FlexiNet Architecture," Feb. 1999, p. 171-178. |
Richard Hayton, Mike Bursell, Douglas Donaldson, Andrew Herbert, "Mobile Java Objects," 1998. |
Robert, Gray et al., "Mobile agents for mobile computing", Technical Report PCS-TR96-285, Dept. of Computer Science, Dartmouth College,(May 1996). |
Roy, Mark et al., "IChoosing between COBRA and DCOM", (Oct. 1996). |
Roy, Mark et al., "Interworking COM with COBRA", (May 1996). |
Spruit, Sandor "Reflections on Java, Beans, and Relational databases", retrieved from JavaWorld.com, (Sep. 1997),1-8. |
Wayner, P. "Free Agents", BYTE, (Mar. 1995),7. |
Wescom, et al., "The object/agent approach: A computing model for the future", Object Magazine, (Mar.-Apr. 1995),31-33. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6678743B1 (en) | 2004-01-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
USRE41706E1 (en) | Moving objects in a distributed computing environment | |
US6389452B1 (en) | Method of communicating between objects and agents across a computer network | |
US6233601B1 (en) | Itinerary based agent mobility including mobility of executable code | |
US6282568B1 (en) | Platform independent distributed management system for manipulating managed objects in a network | |
US6408342B1 (en) | Communications framework for supporting multiple simultaneous communications protocols in a distributed object environment | |
EP0660234B1 (en) | Method and system for executing code remotely | |
Milojicic et al. | Mobile objects and agents (MOA) | |
US6477564B1 (en) | Process for transforming and routing data between agent servers present in some machines and a central agent server present in another machine | |
US6415315B1 (en) | Method of moving objects in a computer network | |
US5819281A (en) | Notification of aspect value change in object-oriented programming | |
US6490255B1 (en) | Network management system | |
McCullough | Transparent forwarding: First steps | |
US20020059472A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for transporting behavior in an event-based distributed system | |
US6535928B1 (en) | Method of determining the timing for reclaiming a remote object | |
US6442586B1 (en) | Method of moving objects across multiple locations in a computer network | |
US5454109A (en) | Data processing system with interface between application programs and external tools residing in separate environments | |
US6834389B1 (en) | Method of forwarding messages to mobile objects in a computer network | |
US6513157B1 (en) | System and method for dynamically aggregating objects | |
JPH11259301A (en) | Method and device for delay input of exception in c++ | |
EP1088422B1 (en) | A telecommunication controller messaging system | |
US6321261B1 (en) | Method of constructing an object remotely across a computer network | |
US6519653B1 (en) | Method of communicating between agent objects in a computer network | |
US20070094675A1 (en) | Object mobility | |
JP2001502093A (en) | Path information based agent movement including movement of executable code | |
Clark et al. | Multi-threading and message communication in Qu-Prolog |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OBJECTSPACE, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GUTHRIE, RHETT DAVIS;GLASS, GRAHAM W.;REEL/FRAME:020111/0822 Effective date: 19981011 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RECURSION SOFTWARE, INC., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OBJECTSPACE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020121/0928 Effective date: 20020214 Owner name: MAINLINE DATA LLC, NEVADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RECURSION SOFTWARE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020121/0966 Effective date: 20050621 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: XYLON LLC, DELAWARE Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:MAINLINE DATA LLC;REEL/FRAME:037053/0611 Effective date: 20150813 |