[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US9270349B2 - Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback - Google Patents

Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9270349B2
US9270349B2 US14/741,197 US201514741197A US9270349B2 US 9270349 B2 US9270349 B2 US 9270349B2 US 201514741197 A US201514741197 A US 201514741197A US 9270349 B2 US9270349 B2 US 9270349B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
pmi
sampling
sub
coding
report
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US14/741,197
Other versions
US20150288433A1 (en
Inventor
Eko N. Onggosanusi
Runhua Chen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Texas Instruments Inc
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Texas Instruments Inc filed Critical Texas Instruments Inc
Priority to US14/741,197 priority Critical patent/US9270349B2/en
Publication of US20150288433A1 publication Critical patent/US20150288433A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9270349B2 publication Critical patent/US9270349B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0028Formatting
    • H04L1/0031Multiple signaling transmission
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/0413MIMO systems
    • H04B7/0417Feedback systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/0413MIMO systems
    • H04B7/0456Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/0413MIMO systems
    • H04B7/0456Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
    • H04B7/0478Special codebook structures directed to feedback optimisation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/0413MIMO systems
    • H04B7/0456Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
    • H04B7/0486Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting taking channel rank into account
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0621Feedback content
    • H04B7/0626Channel coefficients, e.g. channel state information [CSI]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • H04L5/0057Physical resource allocation for CQI
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0091Signaling for the administration of the divided path
    • H04W72/0413
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/20Control channels or signalling for resource management
    • H04W72/21Control channels or signalling for resource management in the uplink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards the network
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0026Transmission of channel quality indication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03891Spatial equalizers
    • H04L25/03898Spatial equalizers codebook-based design
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0001Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
    • H04L5/0014Three-dimensional division
    • H04L5/0023Time-frequency-space
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/14Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex
    • H04L5/1469Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex using time-sharing

Definitions

  • the technical field of this invention is wireless communication such as wireless telephony.
  • This invention deals with the problem of signaling channel state information (CSI) between a user equipment (UE) and a base station (eNB).
  • CSI channel state information
  • This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of Rank Indicator (RI), Channel Quality Indicator (CQI), first precoding matrix (W 1 ) and second precoding matrix (W 2 ). If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W 1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W 1 and W 1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary prior art wireless communication system to which this application is applicable
  • FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) Time Division Duplex (TDD) frame structure of the prior art
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the process of RI, CQI W 1 and W 2 reporting according to this invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of a base station and a mobile user equipment in the network system of FIG. 1 suitable for implementing this invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary wireless telecommunications network 100 .
  • the illustrative telecommunications network includes base stations 101 , 102 and 103 , though in operation, a telecommunications network necessarily includes many more base stations.
  • Each of base stations 101 , 102 and 103 (eNB) are operable over corresponding coverage areas 104 , 105 and 106 .
  • Each base station's coverage area is further divided into cells. In the illustrated network, each base station's coverage area is divided into three cells.
  • Handset or other user equipment (UE) 109 is shown in Cell A 108 .
  • Cell A 108 is within coverage area 104 of base station 101 .
  • Base station 101 transmits to and receives transmissions from UE 109 .
  • UE 109 may be handed over to base station 102 . Because UE 109 is synchronized with base station 101 , UE 109 can employ non-synchronized random access to initiate handover to base station 102 .
  • Non-synchronized UE 109 also employs non-synchronous random access to request allocation of up-link 111 time or frequency or code resources. If UE 109 has data ready for transmission, which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update, UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111 . The random access signal notifies base station 101 that UE 109 requires up-link resources to transmit the UEs data. Base station 101 responds by transmitting to UE 109 via down-link 110 , a message containing the parameters of the resources allocated for UE 109 up-link transmission along with a possible timing error correction. After receiving the resource allocation and a possible timing advance message transmitted on down-link 110 by base station 101 , UE 109 optionally adjusts its transmit timing and transmits the data on up-link 111 employing the allotted resources during the prescribed time interval.
  • data ready for transmission which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update
  • UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111 .
  • Base station 101 configures UE 109 for periodic uplink sounding reference signal (SRS) transmission.
  • Base station 101 estimates uplink channel quality information (CSI) from the SRS transmission.
  • SRS uplink sounding reference signal
  • FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) time division duplex (TDD) Frame Structure. Different sub-frames are allocated for downlink (DL) or uplink (UL) transmissions. Table 1 shows applicable DL/UL subframe allocations. D refers to a downlink sub-frame, U refers to an uplink sub-frame, S refers to a special sub-frame for switching between downlink to uplink.
  • E-UTRA Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access
  • TDD time division duplex
  • CSI (channel state information) feedback from UE to eNB consists of rank indicator (RI), precoding matrix indicator (PMI) and channel quality indicator (CQI).
  • RI denotes the number of layers in data transmission recommended by the UE.
  • PMI is the index to the recommended precoding matrix for data transmission, derived from a codebook.
  • CQI is the channel quality when the reported RI/PMI are used for data transmission.
  • the 8 TX codebook for Rel. 10 downlink (DL) MIMO was adopted in the applicable standard for 8 antenna ports system.
  • the component codebook for W 1 and W 2 are denoted respectively C 1 and C 2 .
  • For CSI feedback both W 1 and W 2 need to be reported.
  • PUCCH Physical Uplink Shared CHannel
  • not all precoding matrices in the C 1 and C 2 codebook can be used in PUCCH feedback. Following the agreement on CSI reporting modes for PUCCH, the possibility of applying codebook sub-sampling needs to be investigated.
  • This document outlines some possible codebook sub-sampling mechanisms in relation to PUCCH mode 1-1 for both CSI mode 1 and 2. This facilitates further comparison between CSI mode 1 and 2.
  • the adopted reporting structure is given in Table 2.
  • Table 2 shows the reporting structure for PUCCH mode 1-1.
  • the notation x+y (as in RI+W 1 , W 1 +W 2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
  • the notation x/y (as in RI/WI, W 1 /W 2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates this process.
  • FIG. 3 begins with start block 301 .
  • Test block 302 determines if CSI mode 1 or CSI mode 2 is selected. If CSI mode 1 is selected, then block 303 generates report 1.
  • RI and W 1 are jointly encoded. They are also codebook sub-sampled according to one of Tables 3 to 15 below.
  • Block 304 generates report 2 with CQI and W 2 separately encoded.
  • Block 305 If CSI mode 2 is selected, then block 305 generates report 1. This includes the separately encoded RI.
  • Block 306 generates report 2 with CQI, W 1 and W 2 .
  • W 1 and W 2 are jointly encoded with codebook sub-sampling according to one of Tables 16 to 19.
  • FIG. 3 ends with continue block 306 .
  • codebook sub-sampling may be performed on W 2 as shown in Tables 21 to 25.
  • Codebook sub-sampling is selected for the two scenarios mentioned above.
  • the total payload RI+W 1 is kept within 5 bits to ensure that the effect of error propagation is not significant for any practical range of RI reporting interval.
  • the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C 1 for W 1 .
  • Second, overlapping beams between two different W 1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
  • precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding using only one W 1 matrix may be appropriate.
  • Table 3 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
  • Table 4 shows a second example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
  • Table 5 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
  • Table 6 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
  • Table 7 shows a fifth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
  • the RI/W 1 payload can be UE-specific.
  • RI/W 1 may be reduced to 4 bits or sub-sampling may not be performed for 2 Rx and 4 Rx UE with 5-bits RI/W 1 .
  • Tables 8 to 14 show a number of exemplary sub-sampling cases.
  • Table 8 shows a sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 4-bit RI+W 1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
  • Table 9 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX) with no sub-sampling.
  • Table 10 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
  • Table 11 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
  • Table 12 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
  • Table 13 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
  • Table 14 shows sub-sampling of codebook C for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
  • the maximum payload associated with RI depends on the UE capability of the maximum number of layers.
  • the codebook sub-sampling scheme for a given rank or across the ranks can be designed so that it is not dependent on the UE capability in terms of the maximum number of layers.
  • Table 15 shows an example. For ranks 5 to 7, it is possible to utilize only one 1 of 4 available W 1 matrices if fixed preceding is desired. This nets to a total of 24 hypotheses. This can be done if reducing the total number of hypotheses from 27 to 24 is beneficial despite the same payload of 5 bits. Such a scenario is possible if the reserved (unused) hypotheses can be used for other purposes.
  • some additional channel coding is applied on top of the (20,N) Reed-Muller code to improve error protection.
  • Table 15 shows an example codebook sub-sampling scheme for CSI mode 1 report 1.
  • the total payload of CQI together with W 1 +W 2 should not exceed 11 bits to ensure the same worst-case coverage as the Rel. 8 format 2/2a/2b.
  • the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C 1 +C 2 for W 1 +W 2 :
  • Overlapping beams between two different W 1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
  • precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4)
  • fixed precoding using only one W 1 matrix
  • Sub-sampling of C 1 and C 2 can also be performed jointly rather than separately.
  • Table 16 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
  • Table 17 shows a second example sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
  • Table 18 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
  • Table 19 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
  • the payload associated with each CSI mode can be compared below.
  • Table 20 shows a payload comparison for PUCCH mode 1-1 (bits).
  • PUSCH feedback mode for 8 TX supports natural extension of Rel.
  • 8 PUSCH reporting mode (1-2, 2-2, 3-1) under the double-codebook structure and considers Mode 3-2 with sub-band PMI+CQI for CQI accuracy enhancement in Rel. 10.
  • the feedback overhead is reduced via codebook sub-sampling even further especially for the modes with sub-band PMI such as mode 1-2 and 3-2. Since W 1 is wideband, there is no need to apply codebook sub-sampling in this case as the overhead is small relative to the rests. Codebook sub-sampling is applied only to W 2 in the context of PUSCH reporting modes 1-2 and 3-2.
  • Mode 3-2 Codebook sub-sampling may be more compelling for mode 3-2. This is because the sub-band W 2 payload size is ⁇ 4,4,4,3 ⁇ bits for rank ⁇ 1,2,3,4 ⁇ , which is also comparable to the payload in Rel. 8 mode 1-2.
  • mode 3-2 consists of both sub-band CQI and sub-band PMI.
  • W 2 codebook sub-sampling can be performed in different manners.
  • the W 1 codebook is not sub-sampled and all the possible W 1 matrices are used.
  • Some exemplary W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for different sub-sampling size are given in Table 21. While this is not exhaustive, the schemes given in Table 21 are expected to perform well. Note the design in Table 21 satisfies a nested property, so that the 1-bit W 2 codebook is a subset of 2-bit W 2 codebook. Thus a 2-bit W 2 codebook is a subset of the 3-bit W 2 codebook.
  • Table 21 shows different W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH.
  • W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 2 ], and [e 1 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing;
  • W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 2 ], and [e 2 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing;
  • W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 4 ], and [e 2 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing.
  • rank-3 sub-sampling can be designed slightly differently. A few examples are listed in Table 22.
  • this invention chooses 8 out of 16 possible codebook entries. The nested property can be ensured where the 1-bit W 2 is a subset of the 2-bit W 2 , while 1 ⁇ 2 bit W 2 are subsets of 3-bits W 2 codebook. This is satisfied in examples 1, 2 and 3.
  • Table 22 shows different W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH for Rank-3.
  • Example 1 Example 2
  • Example 3 Example 4 size Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3 1-bit Choose only choose only choose only choose only 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 possible possible possible possible possible (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g.)
  • the payload size for subband W 2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
  • rank 3 it is also possible to sub-sample the W 2 codebook such that every 4th of the 16 possible (Y 1 , Y 2 ) are chosen. This results in the following W 2 codebook.
  • the payload size of subband W 2 is then reduced to 2-bits.
  • W 2 ⁇ C 2 ⁇ 1 2 ⁇ [ Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 - Y 2 ] ⁇ , ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) ⁇ ⁇ ( e 1 , [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] ) ( e 5 , [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] ) ( [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] , e 5 ) ( [ e 5 ⁇ e 1 ] , e 1 ) ⁇
  • W 2 codebook it is possible to further sub-sample the W 2 codebook such that only [e 1 e 5 ] and [e 3 e 7 ] are chosen for [Y 1 , Y 2 ].
  • the payload size of subband W 2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
  • Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks
  • Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks.
  • Table 25 is an example of this combination with different sizes across different ranks.
  • the agreed standard 8 TX codebook can be written as shown below.
  • the following notation is used:
  • ⁇ n denotes a 4 ⁇ 1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1;
  • e n denotes an 8 ⁇ 1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1.
  • ⁇ X ( 0 ) [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 j - 1 - j 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 - j - 1 j ]
  • W 1 [ X ( 0 ) 0 0 X ( 0 ) ]
  • Rank ⁇ ⁇ 8 ⁇ : ⁇ ⁇ W 2 1 2 ⁇ [ e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 4 e ⁇ 4 e ⁇ 1 - e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 2 - e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 3 - e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 4 - e ⁇ 4 ]
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of an eNB 1002 and a mobile UE 1001 in the network system of FIG. 1 .
  • Mobile UE 1001 may represent any of a variety of devices such as a server, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a cellular phone, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or other electronic devices.
  • PDA Personal Digital Assistant
  • the electronic mobile UE 1001 communicates with eNB 1002 based on a LTE or Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) protocol.
  • E-UTRAN Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network
  • another communication protocol now known or later developed can be used.
  • Mobile UE 1001 comprises a processor 1010 coupled to a memory 1012 and a transceiver 1020 .
  • the memory 1012 stores (software) applications 1014 for execution by the processor 1010 .
  • the applications could comprise any known or future application useful for individuals or organizations. These applications could be categorized as operating systems (OS), device drivers, databases, multimedia tools, presentation tools, Internet browsers, emailers, Voice-Over-Internet Protocol (VOIP) tools, file browsers, firewalls, instant messaging, finance tools, games, word processors or other categories. Regardless of the exact nature of the applications, at least some of the applications may direct the mobile UE 1001 to transmit UL signals to eNB (base-station) 1002 periodically or continuously via the transceiver 1020 .
  • eNB base-station
  • the mobile UE 1001 identifies a Quality of Service (QoS) requirement when requesting an uplink resource from eNB 1002 .
  • QoS Quality of Service
  • the QoS requirement may be implicitly derived by eNB 1002 from the type of traffic supported by the mobile UE 1001 .
  • VOIP and gaming applications often involve low-latency uplink (UL) transmissions while High Throughput (HTP)/Hypertext Transmission Protocol (HTTP) traffic can involve high-latency uplink transmissions.
  • HTTP High Throughput
  • HTTP Hypertext Transmission Protocol
  • Transceiver 1020 includes uplink logic which may be implemented by execution of instructions that control the operation of the transceiver. Some of these instructions may be stored in memory 1012 and executed when needed by processor 1010 . As would be understood by one of skill in the art, the components of the uplink logic may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1020 . Transceiver 1020 includes one or more receivers 1022 and one or more transmitters 1024 .
  • PHY physical
  • MAC Media Access Control
  • transmitter 1024 may be or become non-synchronized with its serving eNB. In this case, it sends a random access signal. As part of this procedure, it determines a preferred size for the next data transmission, referred to as a message, by using a power threshold value provided by the serving eNB, as described in more detail above.
  • the message preferred size determination is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1012 by processor 1010 . In other embodiments, the message size determination may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
  • eNB 1002 comprises a Processor 1030 coupled to a memory 1032 , symbol processing circuitry 1038 , and a transceiver 1040 via backplane bus 1036 .
  • the memory stores applications 1034 for execution by processor 1030 .
  • the applications could comprise any known or future application useful for managing wireless communications. At least some of the applications 1034 may direct eNB 1002 to manage transmissions to or from mobile UE 1001 .
  • Transceiver 1040 comprises an uplink Resource Manager, which enables eNB 1002 to selectively allocate uplink Physical Uplink Shared CHannel (PUSCH) resources to mobile UE 1001 .
  • the components of the uplink resource manager may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1040 .
  • Transceiver 1040 includes at least one receiver 1042 for receiving transmissions from various UEs within range of eNB 1002 and at least one transmitter 1044 for transmitting data and control information to the various UEs within range of eNB 1002 .
  • the uplink resource manager executes instructions that control the operation of transceiver 1040 . Some of these instructions may be located in memory 1032 and executed when needed on processor 1030 .
  • the resource manager controls the transmission resources allocated to each UE 1001 served by eNB 1002 and broadcasts control information via the PDCCH.
  • Symbol processing circuitry 1038 performs demodulation using known techniques. Random access signals are demodulated in symbol processing circuitry 1038 .
  • receiver 1042 may receive a random access signal from a UE 1001 .
  • the random access signal is encoded to request a message size that is preferred by UE 1001 .
  • UE 1001 determines the preferred message size by using a message threshold provided by eNB 1002 .
  • the message threshold calculation is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1032 by processor 1030 .
  • the threshold calculation may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
  • the message threshold is a fixed value that may be stored in memory 1032 , for example.
  • eNB 1002 schedules an appropriate set of resources and notifies UE 1001 with a resource grant.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Compression, Expansion, Code Conversion, And Decoders (AREA)

Abstract

This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of RI, CQI, W1 and W2. If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W1 and W2 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.

Description

CLAIM OF PRIORITY
This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 14/248,199 filed Apr. 8, 2014, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 13/224,764 flied Sep. 2, 2011, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)(1) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/379,525 filed Sep. 2, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/384,925 filed Sep. 21, 2010 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/385,671 filed Sep. 23, 2010.
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The technical field of this invention is wireless communication such as wireless telephony.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention deals with the problem of signaling channel state information (CSI) between a user equipment (UE) and a base station (eNB).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of Rank Indicator (RI), Channel Quality Indicator (CQI), first precoding matrix (W1) and second precoding matrix (W2). If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W1 and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other aspects of this invention are illustrated in the drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary prior art wireless communication system to which this application is applicable;
FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) Time Division Duplex (TDD) frame structure of the prior art;
FIG. 3 illustrates the process of RI, CQI W1 and W2 reporting according to this invention; and
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of a base station and a mobile user equipment in the network system of FIG. 1 suitable for implementing this invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 shows an exemplary wireless telecommunications network 100. The illustrative telecommunications network includes base stations 101, 102 and 103, though in operation, a telecommunications network necessarily includes many more base stations. Each of base stations 101, 102 and 103 (eNB) are operable over corresponding coverage areas 104, 105 and 106. Each base station's coverage area is further divided into cells. In the illustrated network, each base station's coverage area is divided into three cells. Handset or other user equipment (UE) 109 is shown in Cell A 108. Cell A 108 is within coverage area 104 of base station 101. Base station 101 transmits to and receives transmissions from UE 109. As UE 109 moves out of Cell A 108 and into Cell B 107, UE 109 may be handed over to base station 102. Because UE 109 is synchronized with base station 101, UE 109 can employ non-synchronized random access to initiate handover to base station 102.
Non-synchronized UE 109 also employs non-synchronous random access to request allocation of up-link 111 time or frequency or code resources. If UE 109 has data ready for transmission, which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update, UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111. The random access signal notifies base station 101 that UE 109 requires up-link resources to transmit the UEs data. Base station 101 responds by transmitting to UE 109 via down-link 110, a message containing the parameters of the resources allocated for UE 109 up-link transmission along with a possible timing error correction. After receiving the resource allocation and a possible timing advance message transmitted on down-link 110 by base station 101, UE 109 optionally adjusts its transmit timing and transmits the data on up-link 111 employing the allotted resources during the prescribed time interval.
Base station 101 configures UE 109 for periodic uplink sounding reference signal (SRS) transmission. Base station 101 estimates uplink channel quality information (CSI) from the SRS transmission.
FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) time division duplex (TDD) Frame Structure. Different sub-frames are allocated for downlink (DL) or uplink (UL) transmissions. Table 1 shows applicable DL/UL subframe allocations. D refers to a downlink sub-frame, U refers to an uplink sub-frame, S refers to a special sub-frame for switching between downlink to uplink.
TABLE 1
Config- Switch-point Sub-frame number
uration periodicity
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0  5 ms D S U U U D S U U U
1  5 ms D S U U D D S U U D
2  5 ms D S U D D D S U D D
3 10 ms D S U U U D D D D D
4 10 ms D S U U D D D D D D
5 10 ms D S U D D D D D D D
6 10 ms D S U U U D S U U D
CSI (channel state information) feedback from UE to eNB consists of rank indicator (RI), precoding matrix indicator (PMI) and channel quality indicator (CQI). RI denotes the number of layers in data transmission recommended by the UE. PMI is the index to the recommended precoding matrix for data transmission, derived from a codebook. CQI is the channel quality when the reported RI/PMI are used for data transmission.
The 8 TX codebook for Rel. 10 downlink (DL) MIMO was adopted in the applicable standard for 8 antenna ports system. For 8 TX each precoding matrix is a multiplication of two component matrices denoted by W=W1*W2. The component codebook for W1 and W2 are denoted respectively C1 and C2. For CSI feedback, both W1 and W2 need to be reported. Because Physical Uplink Shared CHannel (PUCCH) payload is limited (maximum 11-bits), not all precoding matrices in the C1 and C2 codebook can be used in PUCCH feedback. Following the agreement on CSI reporting modes for PUCCH, the possibility of applying codebook sub-sampling needs to be investigated. This document outlines some possible codebook sub-sampling mechanisms in relation to PUCCH mode 1-1 for both CSI mode 1 and 2. This facilitates further comparison between CSI mode 1 and 2. The adopted reporting structure is given in Table 2. Table 2 shows the reporting structure for PUCCH mode 1-1. The notation x+y (as in RI+W1, W1+W2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding. Similarly the notation x/y (as in RI/WI, W1/W2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
TABLE 2
CSI mode 1 CSI mode 2
Report 1 RI + W1 RI
Report
2 CQI, W2 CQI, W1 + W2
From Table 2 it is apparent that in CSI mode 1 report 2 simply follows the Rel. 8 Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI) principle where W2 is analogous to the Rel. 8 PMI. In CSI mode 2 report 1 carries only the Rel. 8 RI making codebook sub-sampling irrelevant. Codebook sub-sampling is needed for CSI mode 1 report 1 and CSI mode 2 report 2. This will be discussed below.
FIG. 3 illustrates this process. FIG. 3 begins with start block 301. Test block 302 determines if CSI mode 1 or CSI mode 2 is selected. If CSI mode 1 is selected, then block 303 generates report 1. RI and W1 are jointly encoded. They are also codebook sub-sampled according to one of Tables 3 to 15 below. Block 304 generates report 2 with CQI and W2 separately encoded.
If CSI mode 2 is selected, then block 305 generates report 1. This includes the separately encoded RI. Block 306 generates report 2 with CQI, W1 and W2. W1 and W2 are jointly encoded with codebook sub-sampling according to one of Tables 16 to 19. FIG. 3 ends with continue block 306.
For CSI report on PUSCH, codebook sub-sampling may be performed on W2 as shown in Tables 21 to 25.
Codebook Sub-Sampling
Codebook sub-sampling is selected for the two scenarios mentioned above.
CSI Mode 1 Report 1 (RI+W1)
In this case, the total payload RI+W1 is kept within 5 bits to ensure that the effect of error propagation is not significant for any practical range of RI reporting interval. The following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C1 for W1. First, joint encoding of RI and W1 follow the standard. This ensures efficient signaling of W1 with minimum overhead. Second, overlapping beams between two different W1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature. Third, since precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding using only one W1 matrix may be appropriate.
Tables 3 to 15 show three exemplary W1 codebook sub-sampling schemes. These examples are ordered in increasing total number of hypotheses. It is possible to combine a part of one example with other parts from other examples. For example, for RI=1 to 4 example 1 may be used while for RI=5 to 8 example 3 may be used. While the total number of hypotheses differs, all these exemplary designs occupy a maximum of 5 bits for jointly coded RI and W1. Thus some additional encoding may be performed to reap the advantage of the design with the smallest number of hypotheses. For instance, example 1 can use an encoding technique to map 24 hypotheses onto 25=32 available code points. Otherwise, it seems more attractive to choose example 3 as the 5-bit payload carries more precoding hypotheses.
Table 3 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 3
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
3 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
4 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
5 0 (fixed precoding) 1
6 0 (fixed precoding) 1
7 0 (fixed precoding) 1
8 0 1
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 24, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 4 shows a second example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 4
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
3 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) 4
4 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) 4
5 0 (fixed precoding) 1
6 0 (fixed precoding) 1
7 0 (fixed precoding) 1
8 0 1
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 28, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 5 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 5
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
3 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) 4
4 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) 4
5 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
6 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
7 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
8 0 1
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, required 31, 5 bits
coding bits
Table 6 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 6
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0-15 16 
3 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
4 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
5 0 (fixed precoding) 1
6 0 (fixed precoding) 1
7 0 (fixed precoding) 1
8 0 1
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, required 32, 5 bits
coding bits
Table 7 shows a fifth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 7
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0-15 16 
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8
overlap)
3 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
4 0, 2 (no overlap) 2
5 0 (fixed precoding) 1
6 0 (fixed precoding) 1
7 0 (fixed precoding) 1
8 0 1
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 32, 5 bits
required coding bits
As an alternative, it is possible for the RI/W1 payload to be UE-specific. Thus the RI/W1 payload varies as a function of the UE category, such as a maximum number of layers supported in downlink data transmission in PDSCH or number of UE receive antennas. For example, if a UE has only two receive antennas or can receive up to 2 layers in downlink data transmission, RI+W1 reporting is limited to RI=1 or RI=2. Hence in Tables 3-7 the payload of RI/W1 is determined by the total entries in RI=1 and RI=2. This is already supported in Rel. 8 where the RI bit width can be 1 or 2 bits based on UE category. Thus the payload of RI/W1 may be reduced to 4 bits or sub-sampling may not be performed for 2 Rx and 4 Rx UE with 5-bits RI/W1. Tables 8 to 14 show a number of exemplary sub-sampling cases.
Table 8 shows a sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 4-bit RI+W1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 8
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 16, 4 bits
required coding bits
Table 9 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX) with no sub-sampling.
TABLE 9
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0-15 16
2 0-15 16
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 32, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 10 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 10
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap)  8
2 0-15 16
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 24, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 11 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 11
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0-15 16
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap)  8
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 24, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 12 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 12
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0-15 16 
3 0-3 4
4 0-3 4
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 32, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 13 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 13
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0-15 16 
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8
overlap)
3 0-3 4
4 0-3 4
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 32, 5 bits
required coding bits
Table 14 shows sub-sampling of codebook C for 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 14
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8
3 0-3 4
4 0-3 4
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, 24, 5 bits
required coding bits
The maximum payload associated with RI depends on the UE capability of the maximum number of layers. The codebook sub-sampling scheme for a given rank or across the ranks can be designed so that it is not dependent on the UE capability in terms of the maximum number of layers. Table 15 shows an example. For ranks 5 to 7, it is possible to utilize only one 1 of 4 available W1 matrices if fixed preceding is desired. This nets to a total of 24 hypotheses. This can be done if reducing the total number of hypotheses from 27 to 24 is beneficial despite the same payload of 5 bits. Such a scenario is possible if the reserved (unused) hypotheses can be used for other purposes. In addition the use of some additional channel coding is applied on top of the (20,N) Reed-Muller code to improve error protection.
Table 15 shows an example codebook sub-sampling scheme for CSI mode 1 report 1.
TABLE 15
No. W1
RI Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) hypotheses
1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8
overlapping beams)
2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8
overlapping beams)
3 0, 2 (no overlapping beams) 2
4 0, 2 (no overlapping beams) 2
5 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
6 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
7 0, 1 (use 2 out of 4) 2
8 0 1
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across 16, 4 bits
ranks 1-2 (max. layers = 2),
required coding bits
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across 20, 4 bits
ranks 1-4 (max. layers = 4),
required coding bits
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across 27, 5 bits
ranks 1-8 (max. layers = 8),
required coding bits

CSI Mode 2 Report 2 (CQI, W1+W2)
In this case, the total payload of CQI together with W1+W2 should not exceed 11 bits to ensure the same worst-case coverage as the Rel. 8 format 2/2a/2b. Hence, the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C1+C2 for W1+W2:
To maintain the maximum overhead of 11 bits:
RI=1: Since CQI occupies 4 bits, the payload for W1+W2 should not exceed 7 bits
RI>1: Since CQI occupies 7 bits, the payload for W1+W2 should not exceed 4 bits
Joint encoding of W1 and W2 should be performed whenever possible: This ensures efficient signaling of W1+W2 with minimum overhead.
Overlapping beams between two different W1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
Since precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding (using only one W1 matrix) should also be considered whenever appropriate.
Sub-sampling of C1 and C2 can also be performed jointly rather than separately.
Keeping the above principles in mind, three exemplary W1+W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes are given below in Tables 16 to 19.
Table 16 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
FIG. 16
No. W1 + W2
RI Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling hypotheses
1 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8 × 8 = 64,
(i1) 6 bits
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 and e3
with all 4 possible co-phasing [note:
this resembles (N, Nb) = (16, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-3, 8-11)
2 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8 × 2 = 18,
(i1) 4 bits
W2: for each W1, choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1)
with all 2 possible co-phasing [note:
this resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-1)
3 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 16 4 bits
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the even indexed
or the last 8
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15)
4 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16
W2: all 4 bits
5 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
6 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
7 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
8 W1: 0 (i1) 1, 0 bit
Table 17 shows a second example sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 17
No. W1 + W2
RI Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling hypotheses
1 W1: all (i1) 16 × 4 = 64,
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 with all 4 6 bits
possible co-phasing [note: this
resembles (N, Nb) = (16, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-3)
2 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) 8 × 2 = 18,
(i1) 4 bits
W2: for each W1, choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1)
with all 2 possible co-phasing [note:
this resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-1)
3 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 16 4 bits
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the even indexed
or the last 8
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15)
4 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: all 4 bits
5 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
6 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
7 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
8 W1: 0 (i1) 1, 0 bit
Table 18 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 18
No. W1 + W2
RI Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling hypotheses
1 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8 × 16 = 128,
overlap) (i1) 7 bits
W2: all [note: maximum refinement gain
for frequency selective
precoding]
2 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8 × 2 = 16,
overlap) (i1) 4 bits
W2: for each W1, choose only
(Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with all 2
possible co-phasing [note: this
resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-1)
3 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 4 bits
16 possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the
even indexed or the last 8
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15)
4 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: all 4 bits
5 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
6 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
7 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
8 W1: 0 (i1) 1, 0 bit
Table 19 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 19
No. W1 + W2
RI Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling hypotheses
1 W1: all (i1) 16 × 8 = 128,
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 and 7 bits
e2 with all 4 possible co-phasing
[note: this resembles
(N, Nb) = (32, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-7)
2 W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no 8 × 2 = 18,
overlap) (i1) 4 bits
W2: for each W1, choose only
(Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with all 2
possible co-phasing [note: this
resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design]
(i2 = 0-1)
3 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 4 bits
16 possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the
even indexed or the last 8
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15)
4 W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) 2 × 8 = 16,
W2: all 4 bits
5 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
6 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
7 W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) 1, 0 bit
8 W1: 0 (i1) 1, 0 bit
For any of the above exemplary designs, it is possible to combine a part of one example with other part(s) from other examples. Furthermore, it is possible to use more than one (e.g. 2 or all 4) W1 matrices for ranks 5, 6 and 7 for any of the above examples in Tables 16 to 19.
Feedback Payload Analysis
Based on the above codebook sub-sampling designs, the payload associated with each CSI mode can be compared below.
Table 20 shows a payload comparison for PUCCH mode 1-1 (bits).
TABLE 20
CSI mode 1 CSI mode 2
RI Report 1 Report 2 Report 1 Report 2
1 5 (**) 8 3 10/11
2 5 (**) 11 3 11
3 5 (**) 11 3 11
4 5 (**) 10 3 11
5 5 7 3 7 to 9 (*)
6 5 7 3 7 to 9 (*)
7 5 7 3 7 to 9 (*)
8 5 7 3  7
For entries marked with (*) the result depends on how many W1 precoding matrices are used for ranks 5, 6, and 7. Entries marked (**) may be reduced to 4 bits if RI/W1 payload is to be variable and UE-specific depending on the UE category, for example the number of UE receive antennas or the maximum number of layers.

Codebook Sub-Sampling for PUSCH
PUSCH feedback mode for 8 TX supports natural extension of Rel. 8 PUSCH reporting mode (1-2, 2-2, 3-1) under the double-codebook structure and considers Mode 3-2 with sub-band PMI+CQI for CQI accuracy enhancement in Rel. 10. Considering the potentially larger payload and the use of carrier aggregation, the feedback overhead is reduced via codebook sub-sampling even further especially for the modes with sub-band PMI such as mode 1-2 and 3-2. Since W1 is wideband, there is no need to apply codebook sub-sampling in this case as the overhead is small relative to the rests. Codebook sub-sampling is applied only to W2 in the context of PUSCH reporting modes 1-2 and 3-2.
Codebook sub-sampling may be more compelling for mode 3-2. This is because the sub-band W2 payload size is {4,4,4,3} bits for rank {1,2,3,4}, which is also comparable to the payload in Rel. 8 mode 1-2. On the other hand, mode 3-2 consists of both sub-band CQI and sub-band PMI.
For the standard 8 TX codebook, W2 codebook sub-sampling can be performed in different manners. The W1 codebook is not sub-sampled and all the possible W1 matrices are used. Some exemplary W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for different sub-sampling size are given in Table 21. While this is not exhaustive, the schemes given in Table 21 are expected to perform well. Note the design in Table 21 satisfies a nested property, so that the 1-bit W2 codebook is a subset of 2-bit W2 codebook. Thus a 2-bit W2 codebook is a subset of the 3-bit W2 codebook.
Table 21 shows different W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH.
TABLE 21
W2 sub-
sampling W2 sub-sampled codebook
size Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4
1-bit Y = e1 with (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] Choose only Y = [e1 e5]
only 2 out with all 2 2 out of 16 with all 2
of 4 co-phasing possible co-phasing
possible (Note this (Y1, Y2), (Note this
co-phasing corresponds to e.g. (e1, [e1 corresponds
(e.g. BPSK i2 = 0, 1) e5]) or([e1 to i2 = 0, 1)
only +/−1) e5], e5)
(Note this (Note this
corresponds corresponds
to i2 = 0, 2) to i2 = 0, 2)
2-bit Y = e1 with (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] Choose only Y = [e1 e5] or
all 4 or [e3, e3] with 4 out of 16 [e3 e7] with
co-phasing all 2 possible all 2
(Note this co-phasing (Y1, Y2), co-phasing
corresponds (Note this e.g. (e1, [e1 (Note this
to i2 = 0, 1, corresponds to e5]), corresponds
2, 3) i2 = 0, 1, 4, 5) (e3, [e3 to i2 = 0, 1,
e7]), ([e1 4, 5)
e5], e5), or
([e3 e7], e7)
(Note this
corresponds
to i2 = 0, 2,
8, 10)
3-bit Y = e1 or e3 (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] Choose only No
with all 4 or [e2, 8 out of 16 sub-sampling
co-phasing e2], [e3, e3], or possible (full set)
(Note this [e4, e4] with (Y1, Y2),
corresponds all 2 e.g. the
to i2 = 0-3 co-phasing even indexed
and 8-11) (Note this or the last 8
corresponds to (Note this
i2 = 0-7) corresponds
to i2 = 0, 2, . . .
14, or
i2 = 8-15)
4-bit No No sub-sampling No n/a
sub-sampling (full set) sub-sampling
(full set) (full set)
For rank-2 with 3-bit sub-sampling, instead of choosing (Y1,Y2)=[e1,e1] or [e2,e2], [e3,e3], or [e4,e4], this invention chooses a N1 precoders from {[e1,e1], [e2, e2], [e3,e3], [e4,e4]} with 2-co-phasing and chooses a N2 precoders from {[e1 e2], [e2 e3], [e1 e4], [e2 e4]} with 2 co-phasing, where N1+N2=8. Achieves a good performance tradeoff between ULA and XPD antenna configurations. Example:
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e2], and [e1,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing;
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e2], and [e2,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing; and
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e4], and [e2,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing.
In these examples, it is possible to replace {[e1,e1], [e3,e3]} with {[e2,e2, [e4,e4]}. It is also possible to replace [e1,e2] with [e2,e3]. Similarly, for rank-2 with 2-bit sub-sampling, it is possible to replace [e3,e3] with [e1,e2], or [e2,e3], or [e1,e4] or [e2,e4].
For rank-3, sub-sampling can be designed slightly differently. A few examples are listed in Table 22. For a 3-bit rank-3 codebook, this invention chooses 8 out of 16 possible codebook entries. The nested property can be ensured where the 1-bit W2 is a subset of the 2-bit W2, while ½ bit W2 are subsets of 3-bits W2 codebook. This is satisfied in examples 1, 2 and 3.
Table 22 shows different W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH for Rank-3.
TABLE 22
W2 sub-
sampling Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4
size Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3
1-bit Choose only Choose only Choose only Choose only
2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16
possible possible possible possible
(Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2),
e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1
e5]) or([e1 e5]) or([e5 e5]) or([e1 e5]) or([e5
e5], e5) e1], e1) e5], e5) e1], e1)
(Note this (Note this (Note this (Note this
corresponds corresponds corresponds corresponds
to i2 = 0, 2) to i2 = 0, 3) to i2 = 0, 2) to i2 = 0, 3)
2-bit Choose only Choose only Choose only Choose only
4 out of 16 4 out of 16 4 out of 16 4 out of 16
possible possible possible possible
(Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2),
e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1
e5]), e5]), e5]), e5]),
(e3, [e3 (e3, [e3 (e3, [e3 (e3, [e3
e7]), ([e1 e7]), ([e5 e7]), ([e1 e7]), ([e5
e5], e5), or e1], e1), or e5], e5), or e1], e1), or
([e3 e7], e7) ([e7 e3], e3) ([e3 e7], e7) ([e7 e3], e3)
(Note this (Note this (Note this (Note this
corresponds corresponds corresponds corresponds
to i2 = 0, 2, to i2 = 0, 3, to i2 = 0, 2, to i2 = 0, 3,
8, 10) 8, 11) 8, 10) 8, 11)
3-bit Choose 8 out Choose 8 out Choose only Choose only
of 16 of 16 8 out of 16 8 out of 16
possible possible possible possible
(Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2),
e.g. even e.g. even e.g. the e.g. the
indexed indexed even indexed even indexed
entries from entries from (Note this (Note this
the codebook the codebook corresponds corresponds
(Note this (Note this to i2 = 0, to i2 = 0,
corresponds corresponds 2, . . . 14 2, . . . 14
to i2 = 0, 1, to i2 = 0, 1,
2, 3, 8, 9, 2, 3, 8, 9,
10, 11) 10, 11)
4-bit No No No No
sub-sampling sub-sampling sub-sampling sub-sampling
(full set) (full set) (full set) (full set)
We further note the following. For rank 1 it is possible to sub-sample the W2 such that Y=[e1] with all 4 co-phasing are chosen. In this case the effective rank-1 codebook becomes [N, Nb]=[16,1] design with no sub-sampling for W1. The payload size for subband W2 is then reduced to 2 bits. For rank 3 it is also possible to sub-sample the W2 codebook such that every 4th of the 16 possible (Y1, Y2) are chosen. This results in the following W2 codebook. The payload size of subband W2 is then reduced to 2-bits.
W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 - Y 2 ] } , ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) { ( e 1 , [ e 1 e 5 ] ) ( e 5 , [ e 1 e 5 ] ) ( [ e 1 e 5 ] , e 5 ) ( [ e 5 e 1 ] , e 1 ) }
For rank-4, it is possible to further sub-sample the W2 codebook such that only [e1 e5] and [e3 e7] are chosen for [Y1, Y2]. The payload size of subband W2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y Y Y - Y ] , 1 2 [ Y Y jY - jY ] } , Y { [ e 1 e 5 ] , [ e 3 e 7 ] }
Thus one may generate any sub-sampling scheme with a combination of the schemes given in Table 22, where the sub-sampling size for rank-n (n=1, . . . 8) are different possibly. Some examples are given in Tables 23 to 25.
Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks
TABLE 23
No. W2
hypotheses
RI Chosen W2 index for sub-sampling (bits)
1 Y = e1 with all 4 possible W2 payload:
co-phasing log2(4) = 2 bits
2 Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with W2 payload:
all 2 possible co-phasing log2(2) = 1 bit
3 Choose only 4 out of 16 possible W2 payload:
(Y1, Y2), e.g. every 4th entry log2(4) = 2 bits
4 [Y1 Y2] = [e1, e5] and [e3 e7] W2 payload:
log2(4) = 2 bits
5 All 1, 0 bit
6 All 1, 0 bit
7 All 1, 0 bit
8 All 1, 0 bit
Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks.
TABLE 24
No. W2
hypotheses
RI Chosen W2 index for sub-sampling (bits)
1 Y = e1 and e3 with all 4 possible W2 payload:
co-phasing log2(8) = 3 bits
2 Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with W2 payload:
all 2 possible co-phasing log2(2) = 1 bits
3 Choose only 8 out of 16 possible W2 payload:
(Y1, Y2), e.g. the even log2(8) = 3 bits
indexed or the last 8
4 All 1, 0 bit
5 All 1, 0 bit
6 All 1, 0 bit
7 All 1, 0 bit
8 All 1, 0 bit
Table 25 is an example of this combination with different sizes across different ranks.
TABLE 25
No. W2
Chosen W2 index for hypotheses
RI sub-sampling (bits)
1 Y = e1 and e3 with all 4 W2 payload:
possible co-phasing log2(8) = 3 bits
2 Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) or W2 payload:
(e3, e3) with all 2 log2(4) = 2 bits
co-phasing
3 Choose only 4 out of 16 W2 payload:
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. log2(4) = 2 bits
every 4th entry
4 [Y1 Y2] = [e1, e5] and [e3 e7] W2 payload:
log2(4) = 2 bits
5 All 1, 0 bit
6 All 1, 0 bit
7 All 1, 0 bit
8 All 1, 0 bit
The agreed standard 8 TX codebook can be written as shown below. The composite precoder W is derived from W=W1*W2. The following notation is used:
ēn denotes a 4×1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1; and
en denotes an 8×1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1.
Rank 1 and 2:
B = [ b 0 , b 1 b 31 ] , [ B ] 1 + m , 1 + n = j 2 π mn 32 , m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , n = 0 , 1 , , 31 X ( k ) { [ b 2 k mod 32 b ( 2 k + 1 ) mod 32 b ( 2 k + 2 ) mod 32 b ( 2 k + 3 ) mod 32 ] : k = 0 , 1 , , 15 } W 1 ( k ) = [ X ( k ) 0 0 X ( k ) ] , C 1 = { W 1 ( 0 ) , W 1 ( 1 ) , W 1 ( 2 ) , , W 1 ( 15 ) } Rank 1 : W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y Y ] , 1 2 [ Y jY ] , 1 2 [ Y - Y ] , 1 2 [ Y - jY ] } , Y { e ~ 1 , e ~ 2 , e ~ 3 , e ~ 4 } Rank 2 : W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y Y ] , 1 2 [ Y jY ] , 1 2 [ Y - Y ] , 1 2 [ Y - jY ] } ( Y 1 , Y 1 ) { ( e ~ 1 , e ~ 1 ) , ( e ~ 2 , e ~ 2 ) , ( e ~ 3 , e ~ 3 ) , ( e ~ 4 , e ~ 4 ) , ( e ~ 1 , e ~ 2 ) , ( e ~ 2 , e ~ 3 ) , ( e ~ 1 , e ~ 4 ) , ( e ~ 2 , e ~ 4 ) }
Rank 3 and 4:
B = [ b 0 , b 1 b 15 ] , [ B ] 1 + m , 1 + n = j 2 π mn 16 , m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , n = 0 , 1 , , 15 X ( k ) { [ b 4 k mod 16 b ( 4 k + 1 ) mod 16 b ( 4 k + 7 ) mod 16 ] : k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 } W 1 ( k ) = [ X ( k ) 0 0 X ( k ) ] , C 1 = { W 1 ( 0 ) , W 1 ( 1 ) , W 1 ( 2 ) , , W 1 ( 3 ) } Rank 3 : W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 - Y 2 ] } , ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) { ( e 1 , [ e 1 e 5 ] ) , ( e 2 , [ e 2 e 6 ] ) , ( e 3 , [ e 3 e 7 ] ) , ( e 4 , [ e 4 e 8 ] ) ( e 5 , [ e 1 e 5 ] ) , ( e 6 , [ e 2 e 6 ] ) , ( e 7 , [ e 3 e 7 ] ) , ( e 8 , [ e 4 e 8 ] ) ( [ e 1 e 5 ] , e 5 ) , ( [ e 2 e 6 ] , e 6 ) , ( [ e 3 e 7 ] , e 7 ) , ( [ e 4 e 8 ] , e 8 ) ( [ e 5 e 1 ] , e 1 ) , ( [ e 6 e 2 ] , e 2 ) , ( [ e 7 e 3 ] , e 3 ) , ( [ e 8 e 4 ] , e 4 ) } Rank 4 : W 2 C 2 = { 1 2 [ Y Y Y - Y ] , 1 2 [ Y Y jY - jY ] } , Y { [ e 1 e 5 ] , [ e 2 e 6 ] , [ e 3 e 7 ] , [ e 4 e 8 ] }
Rank 5 to 7:
X ( k ) = diag { 1 , j π 8 k , j π 4 k , j 3 π 8 k } × [ 1 1 1 1 1 j - 1 - j 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 - j - 1 j ] W 1 C 1 = { [ X ( 0 ) 0 0 X ( 0 ) ] , [ X ( 1 ) 0 0 X ( 1 ) ] , [ X ( 2 ) 0 0 X ( 2 ) ] , [ X ( 3 ) 0 0 X ( 3 ) ] } Rank 5 : W 2 = 1 2 [ e ~ 1 e ~ 1 e ~ 2 e ~ 2 e ~ 3 e ~ 1 - e ~ 1 e ~ 2 - e ~ 2 e ~ 3 ] Rank 6 : W 2 = 1 2 [ e ~ 1 e ~ 1 e ~ 2 e ~ 2 e ~ 3 e ~ 3 e ~ 1 - e ~ 1 e ~ 2 - e ~ 2 e ~ 3 - e ~ 3 ] Rank 7 : W 2 = 1 2 [ e ~ 1 e ~ 1 e ~ 2 e ~ 2 e ~ 3 e ~ 3 e ~ 4 e ~ 1 - e ~ 1 e ~ 2 - e ~ 2 e ~ 3 - e ~ 3 e ~ 4 ]
Rank 8:
X ( 0 ) = [ 1 1 1 1 1 j - 1 - j 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 - j - 1 j ] , W 1 = [ X ( 0 ) 0 0 X ( 0 ) ] Rank 8 : W 2 = 1 2 [ e ~ 1 e ~ 1 e ~ 2 e ~ 2 e ~ 3 e ~ 3 e ~ 4 e ~ 4 e ~ 1 - e ~ 1 e ~ 2 - e ~ 2 e ~ 3 - e ~ 3 e ~ 4 - e ~ 4 ]
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of an eNB 1002 and a mobile UE 1001 in the network system of FIG. 1. Mobile UE 1001 may represent any of a variety of devices such as a server, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a cellular phone, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or other electronic devices. In some embodiments, the electronic mobile UE 1001 communicates with eNB 1002 based on a LTE or Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) protocol. Alternatively, another communication protocol now known or later developed can be used.
Mobile UE 1001 comprises a processor 1010 coupled to a memory 1012 and a transceiver 1020. The memory 1012 stores (software) applications 1014 for execution by the processor 1010. The applications could comprise any known or future application useful for individuals or organizations. These applications could be categorized as operating systems (OS), device drivers, databases, multimedia tools, presentation tools, Internet browsers, emailers, Voice-Over-Internet Protocol (VOIP) tools, file browsers, firewalls, instant messaging, finance tools, games, word processors or other categories. Regardless of the exact nature of the applications, at least some of the applications may direct the mobile UE 1001 to transmit UL signals to eNB (base-station) 1002 periodically or continuously via the transceiver 1020. In at least some embodiments, the mobile UE 1001 identifies a Quality of Service (QoS) requirement when requesting an uplink resource from eNB 1002. In some cases, the QoS requirement may be implicitly derived by eNB 1002 from the type of traffic supported by the mobile UE 1001. As an example, VOIP and gaming applications often involve low-latency uplink (UL) transmissions while High Throughput (HTP)/Hypertext Transmission Protocol (HTTP) traffic can involve high-latency uplink transmissions.
Transceiver 1020 includes uplink logic which may be implemented by execution of instructions that control the operation of the transceiver. Some of these instructions may be stored in memory 1012 and executed when needed by processor 1010. As would be understood by one of skill in the art, the components of the uplink logic may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1020. Transceiver 1020 includes one or more receivers 1022 and one or more transmitters 1024.
Processor 1010 may send or receive data to various input/output devices 1026. A subscriber identity module (SIM) card stores and retrieves information used for making calls via the cellular system. A Bluetooth baseband unit may be provided for wireless connection to a microphone and headset for sending and receiving voice data. Processor 1010 may send information to a display unit for interaction with a user of mobile UE 1001 during a call process. The display may also display pictures received from the network, from a local camera, or from other sources such as a Universal Serial Bus (USB) connector. Processor 1010 may also send a video stream to the display that is received from various sources such as the cellular network via RF transceiver 1020 or the camera.
During transmission and reception of voice data or other application data, transmitter 1024 may be or become non-synchronized with its serving eNB. In this case, it sends a random access signal. As part of this procedure, it determines a preferred size for the next data transmission, referred to as a message, by using a power threshold value provided by the serving eNB, as described in more detail above. In this embodiment, the message preferred size determination is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1012 by processor 1010. In other embodiments, the message size determination may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
eNB 1002 comprises a Processor 1030 coupled to a memory 1032, symbol processing circuitry 1038, and a transceiver 1040 via backplane bus 1036. The memory stores applications 1034 for execution by processor 1030. The applications could comprise any known or future application useful for managing wireless communications. At least some of the applications 1034 may direct eNB 1002 to manage transmissions to or from mobile UE 1001.
Transceiver 1040 comprises an uplink Resource Manager, which enables eNB 1002 to selectively allocate uplink Physical Uplink Shared CHannel (PUSCH) resources to mobile UE 1001. As would be understood by one of skill in the art, the components of the uplink resource manager may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1040. Transceiver 1040 includes at least one receiver 1042 for receiving transmissions from various UEs within range of eNB 1002 and at least one transmitter 1044 for transmitting data and control information to the various UEs within range of eNB 1002.
The uplink resource manager executes instructions that control the operation of transceiver 1040. Some of these instructions may be located in memory 1032 and executed when needed on processor 1030. The resource manager controls the transmission resources allocated to each UE 1001 served by eNB 1002 and broadcasts control information via the PDCCH.
Symbol processing circuitry 1038 performs demodulation using known techniques. Random access signals are demodulated in symbol processing circuitry 1038.
During transmission and reception of voice data or other application data, receiver 1042 may receive a random access signal from a UE 1001. The random access signal is encoded to request a message size that is preferred by UE 1001. UE 1001 determines the preferred message size by using a message threshold provided by eNB 1002. In this embodiment, the message threshold calculation is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1032 by processor 1030. In other embodiments, the threshold calculation may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example. Alternatively, in some networks the message threshold is a fixed value that may be stored in memory 1032, for example. In response to receiving the message size request, eNB 1002 schedules an appropriate set of resources and notifies UE 1001 with a resource grant.

Claims (4)

What is claimed is:
1. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling into a maximum of 5 bits as follows:
RI Codebook index (i1) 1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 3 0, 2 4 0, 2
and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling.
2. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein for a 2-layer capable user equipment said jointly coding RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling into 4 bits as follows:
RI Codebook index (i1) 1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14
and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling.
3. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling; and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling as follows for the first PMI:
RI Codebook index (i1) 1 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 2 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 3 0, 2 4 0, 2.
4. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling; and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling:
for RI equal one joint coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs 7 bits or less, and
for RI greater than one joint coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs 4 bits or less.
US14/741,197 2010-09-02 2015-06-16 Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback Active US9270349B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/741,197 US9270349B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2015-06-16 Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US37952510P 2010-09-02 2010-09-02
US38492510P 2010-09-21 2010-09-21
US38567110P 2010-09-23 2010-09-23
US13/224,764 US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2011-09-02 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/248,199 US9088324B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/741,197 US9270349B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2015-06-16 Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/248,199 Continuation US9088324B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150288433A1 US20150288433A1 (en) 2015-10-08
US9270349B2 true US9270349B2 (en) 2016-02-23

Family

ID=46718949

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/224,764 Active US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2011-09-02 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/248,177 Active US9048910B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/248,199 Active US9088324B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/741,197 Active US9270349B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2015-06-16 Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/224,764 Active US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2011-09-02 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/248,177 Active US9048910B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US14/248,199 Active US9088324B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US8693421B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8914539B2 (en) * 2010-03-12 2014-12-16 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Service cloud console
KR101871707B1 (en) 2010-04-02 2018-06-27 엘지전자 주식회사 User equipment apparatus and method for feedback channel state information in wireless communication system
KR101817724B1 (en) * 2010-04-30 2018-02-21 삼성전자주식회사 Multiple input multiple output communication system using codebook corresopding to each reporting mode
US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
KR101835326B1 (en) 2010-09-26 2018-03-07 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in a wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna
US9602177B2 (en) * 2010-09-26 2017-03-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in a wireless communication system supporting multiple antennas
CN102448114B (en) * 2010-10-07 2015-07-15 上海贝尔股份有限公司 Method and equipment for improving transmission accuracy of CSI (Channel State Information) through PUCCH (Physical Uplink Control Channel)
CN102447501B (en) * 2010-10-07 2015-04-29 上海贝尔股份有限公司 Codebook sub-sampling method applied to LTE-A system and device thereof
EP2637319B1 (en) * 2010-11-02 2017-09-06 LG Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antennas
CN103023621B (en) 2011-09-23 2016-03-09 华为技术有限公司 The method of transmission information, subscriber equipment and base station
US20130088978A1 (en) * 2011-10-07 2013-04-11 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Joint Encoding of Rank and CQI Feedback For Comp
CN102368698B (en) * 2011-11-10 2014-04-16 电信科学技术研究院 Precoding matrix indicator (PMI) information transmission method and apparatus thereof
EP3651375A1 (en) 2012-06-14 2020-05-13 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for determining precoding matrix indicator, user equipment, and base station evolved node b
CN104885376B (en) * 2012-08-03 2019-03-29 Hmd全球公司 Method and apparatus used in carrier wave polymerization
CN103580825B (en) * 2012-08-03 2017-05-24 电信科学技术研究院 UCI transmission method and device
CN103780289B (en) * 2012-10-22 2018-07-27 中兴通讯股份有限公司 A kind of method and apparatus that code book processing is carried out to channel information
US9088323B2 (en) * 2013-01-09 2015-07-21 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for reporting downlink channel state
US9281881B2 (en) 2013-02-12 2016-03-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated 4TX codebook enhancement in LTE
US9143212B2 (en) * 2013-02-25 2015-09-22 Texas Instruments Incorporated Codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback on PUCCH for 4Tx MIMO
GB2511550B (en) * 2013-03-07 2015-08-12 Broadcom Corp Method, apparatus and computer program for controlling a wireless device
US9729216B2 (en) 2013-03-08 2017-08-08 Nokia Technologies Oy Multiple transmitter codebook methods and devices
US9698887B2 (en) * 2013-03-08 2017-07-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for enhanced MIMO operation
RU2621010C2 (en) * 2013-03-21 2017-05-30 ЭлДжи ЭЛЕКТРОНИКС ИНК. Method and apparatus for communication channel state information in wireless communication
EP2979389B1 (en) 2013-03-25 2020-02-12 Nokia Technologies Oy Optical link establishment
SG11201506671VA (en) * 2013-04-29 2015-11-27 Lg Electronics Inc Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system
EP4135210A1 (en) 2013-05-10 2023-02-15 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method for determining precoding matrix indicator, user equipment, and base station
CN114257341B (en) * 2013-05-24 2023-08-29 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Channel state information feedback method and terminal
CN105144600B (en) * 2013-05-31 2018-11-02 英特尔Ip公司 Hybrid digital and analog beam for large-scale antenna array shape
KR102169960B1 (en) 2013-06-05 2020-10-26 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system
US10171153B2 (en) 2013-06-05 2019-01-01 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system
US9847818B2 (en) * 2013-06-07 2017-12-19 Nec Corporation Channel state information (CSI) feedback and subsampling
US9432101B2 (en) 2013-06-07 2016-08-30 Google Technology Holdings LLC Methods for codebook sub-sampling
AU2015202414B2 (en) * 2013-06-07 2016-08-11 Nec Corporation Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling
KR102160008B1 (en) 2013-06-17 2020-09-25 삼성전자 주식회사 Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving channerl state information
CN108494450B (en) 2013-08-08 2020-06-16 华为技术有限公司 Method for determining precoding matrix indication, receiving equipment and transmitting equipment
WO2015032038A1 (en) * 2013-09-04 2015-03-12 华为技术有限公司 Channel measurement method, terminal device and base station
CN106685496A (en) * 2015-11-06 2017-05-17 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 Method of feeding back channel state information in multiple input output system
CN106685502A (en) * 2015-11-06 2017-05-17 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Quantitative CSI (Channel State Information) feedback method and terminal
US10200102B2 (en) * 2015-11-13 2019-02-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Channel station information reporting and transmission mode for enhanced machine type communication
CN108352925A (en) * 2015-11-20 2018-07-31 华为技术有限公司 It is a kind of transmission or receiving channel state information CSI method, terminal and base station
CN107707285B (en) * 2016-08-05 2021-04-09 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for transmitting and receiving channel state information
CN107888323B (en) 2016-09-29 2020-01-17 电信科学技术研究院 Method and device for transmitting channel state information
US10924162B2 (en) 2017-05-05 2021-02-16 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitation of incremental feedback for 5G or other next generation network
JP2020526063A (en) * 2017-06-08 2020-08-27 クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッドQualcomm Incorporated PMI Feedback for Type II CSI Feedback in NR-MIMO
CN109150458B (en) * 2017-06-16 2022-11-08 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Control information transmission method and device
US11368864B2 (en) * 2017-08-18 2022-06-21 Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. Channel state information reporting method and related equipment
CN109474315B (en) 2017-09-07 2021-06-01 华为技术有限公司 Method and equipment for indicating and determining precoding matrix
CN112514275B (en) * 2018-07-27 2023-11-28 Lg 电子株式会社 Method and apparatus for reporting channel state information in a wireless communication system
CN110830092B (en) * 2018-08-10 2021-10-26 华为技术有限公司 Method for indicating precoding matrix and determining precoding matrix and communication device
TWI687063B (en) 2019-01-04 2020-03-01 財團法人工業技術研究院 A communication system and codec method based on deep learning and channel state information
CN117204084A (en) * 2021-07-12 2023-12-08 Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 Wireless communication method and terminal equipment
WO2023070497A1 (en) * 2021-10-29 2023-05-04 Qualcomm Incorporated Neural network structure for feedback of orthogonal precoding information

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090286482A1 (en) 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Spatial interference mitigation schemes for wireless communication
US20110194638A1 (en) 2010-02-10 2011-08-11 Adoram Erell Codebook adaptation in mimo communication systems using multilevel codebooks
US20110249637A1 (en) 2010-04-07 2011-10-13 David Hammarwall Parameterized Codebook Subsets for use with Precoding MIMO Transmissions
US20110249578A1 (en) 2010-01-08 2011-10-13 Shahrokh Nayeb Nazar Channel state information transmission for multiple carriers
US20110268100A1 (en) 2009-11-02 2011-11-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication
US20110268204A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Multiple input multiple output communication system of supporting several reporting modes
US20120003945A1 (en) 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for 8-tx codebook and feedback signaling in 3gpp wireless networks
US20120020288A1 (en) 2010-05-14 2012-01-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for pucch feedback in 3gpp wireless networks
US20120069917A1 (en) 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and method for pucch subband feedback signaling in a wireless network
US20120076023A1 (en) 2010-09-26 2012-03-29 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparats for performing efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna
US20120087254A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 Sharp Laboratories Of Ameria, Inc. Uplink control information transmission on backward compatible pucch formats with carrier aggregation
US20130094368A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2013-04-18 Toshizo Nogami Terminal device, base station device, communication system, and communication method
US20130195035A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2013-08-01 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile terminal device and radio base station apparatus
US8625450B2 (en) 2010-04-05 2014-01-07 Nokia Corporation Channel state information feedback for enhanced downlink multiple input—multiple output operation
US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US8811520B2 (en) 2010-04-02 2014-08-19 Lg Electronics Inc. User equipment apparatus and method for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system

Patent Citations (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090286482A1 (en) 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Qualcomm Incorporated Spatial interference mitigation schemes for wireless communication
US20110268100A1 (en) 2009-11-02 2011-11-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication
US20110249578A1 (en) 2010-01-08 2011-10-13 Shahrokh Nayeb Nazar Channel state information transmission for multiple carriers
US20110194638A1 (en) 2010-02-10 2011-08-11 Adoram Erell Codebook adaptation in mimo communication systems using multilevel codebooks
US8811520B2 (en) 2010-04-02 2014-08-19 Lg Electronics Inc. User equipment apparatus and method for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system
US8625450B2 (en) 2010-04-05 2014-01-07 Nokia Corporation Channel state information feedback for enhanced downlink multiple input—multiple output operation
US20110249637A1 (en) 2010-04-07 2011-10-13 David Hammarwall Parameterized Codebook Subsets for use with Precoding MIMO Transmissions
US20130195035A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2013-08-01 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Mobile terminal device and radio base station apparatus
US20110268204A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Multiple input multiple output communication system of supporting several reporting modes
US20120020288A1 (en) 2010-05-14 2012-01-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for pucch feedback in 3gpp wireless networks
US20130094368A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2013-04-18 Toshizo Nogami Terminal device, base station device, communication system, and communication method
US20120003945A1 (en) 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Systems and methods for 8-tx codebook and feedback signaling in 3gpp wireless networks
US8693421B2 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-04-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US20140219219A1 (en) 2010-09-02 2014-08-07 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 tx codebook sub-sampling for csi feedback
US9048910B2 (en) * 2010-09-02 2015-06-02 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US9088324B2 (en) * 2010-09-02 2015-07-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US20120069917A1 (en) 2010-09-17 2012-03-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and method for pucch subband feedback signaling in a wireless network
US20120076023A1 (en) 2010-09-26 2012-03-29 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparats for performing efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna
US20120087254A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 Sharp Laboratories Of Ameria, Inc. Uplink control information transmission on backward compatible pucch formats with carrier aggregation

Non-Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
3GPP TS 36.213, V10.0.0, "3rd Generation Partnership Proiect; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer Procedures (Release 10)", Dec. 2010.
3GPP TS 36.213, V9.2.0, "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer Procedures (Release 9)", Jun. 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, R1-104475, Texas Instruments, "Progressing on CSI Feedback for Rel. 10 Downlink MIMO", Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-103596, ZTE, "Considerations on Signaling for Two-Component Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-104196, ZTE "Considerations on Signaling for Two-Component Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105438, NTT Docomo, CSI Feedback Signaling on PUCCH for LTE-Advanced, Xi'an China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105533, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks, "Detailed PUCCH CSI Feedback Signaling Design", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105657, LG Electronics, "Remaining Details on PUCCH Reporting Modes", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN1 #62b, R1-105609, Motorola, "Remaining Details of CSI Feedback on PUCCH and PUSCH", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.
3GPP TSG RAN1, #63, R1-106504, Motorola, "CSI Reporting Modes and Codebook Sub-Sampling on PUCCH", Jacksonville, FL, Nov. 15-19, 2010.
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #61bis, R1-103840, Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, "CSI Feedback Signaling Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 61bis, R1-104120, Texas Instruments, "Extending Rel. 8/9 CSI Feedback Schemes for Rel. 10", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #61bis, R1-103806, Nokia Siemens Networks, Nokia, "UL CSI Feedback Channel Design and Performance", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010.
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105413, NEC Group, "Discussions on Rel-10 PUCCH Modes", Xi'an China, Oct. 11-15, 2010.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9088324B2 (en) 2015-07-21
US20140219219A1 (en) 2014-08-07
US20140219218A1 (en) 2014-08-07
US20120218948A1 (en) 2012-08-30
US9048910B2 (en) 2015-06-02
US8693421B2 (en) 2014-04-08
US20150288433A1 (en) 2015-10-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9270349B2 (en) Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback
US11082099B2 (en) Codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback on PUCCH for 4TX MIMO
US20230127074A1 (en) Transmission modes and signaling for uplink mimo support or single tb dual-layer transmission in lte uplink
US11777565B2 (en) Downlink multiple input multiple output enhancements for single-cell with remote radio heads
US20120270535A1 (en) Implicit CSI Feedback for DL Multiuser MIMO Transmission
US8781018B2 (en) Six transmit antenna codebook design
US20120220286A1 (en) Periodic Channel Quality Indicator on Physical Uplink Control Channel for Carrier Aggregation
US20110243079A1 (en) Transmission Modes and Signaling for Uplink MIMO Support or Single TB Dual-Layer Transmission in LTE Uplink
US20120147838A1 (en) Method and device for transmitting semi-persistent scheduling data
WO2024007245A1 (en) Method and apparatus of dynamic adaption of spatial elements

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8