US9270349B2 - Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback - Google Patents
Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9270349B2 US9270349B2 US14/741,197 US201514741197A US9270349B2 US 9270349 B2 US9270349 B2 US 9270349B2 US 201514741197 A US201514741197 A US 201514741197A US 9270349 B2 US9270349 B2 US 9270349B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- pmi
- sampling
- sub
- coding
- report
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0023—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
- H04L1/0028—Formatting
- H04L1/0031—Multiple signaling transmission
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
- H04B7/0417—Feedback systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
- H04B7/0456—Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
- H04B7/0456—Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
- H04B7/0478—Special codebook structures directed to feedback optimisation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
- H04B7/0456—Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting
- H04B7/0486—Selection of precoding matrices or codebooks, e.g. using matrices antenna weighting taking channel rank into account
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
- H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
- H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
- H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
- H04B7/0621—Feedback content
- H04B7/0626—Channel coefficients, e.g. channel state information [CSI]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
- H04L5/0053—Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
- H04L5/0057—Physical resource allocation for CQI
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/0091—Signaling for the administration of the divided path
-
- H04W72/0413—
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/20—Control channels or signalling for resource management
- H04W72/21—Control channels or signalling for resource management in the uplink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards the network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0023—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
- H04L1/0026—Transmission of channel quality indication
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03891—Spatial equalizers
- H04L25/03898—Spatial equalizers codebook-based design
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/0001—Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
- H04L5/0014—Three-dimensional division
- H04L5/0023—Time-frequency-space
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/14—Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex
- H04L5/1469—Two-way operation using the same type of signal, i.e. duplex using time-sharing
Definitions
- the technical field of this invention is wireless communication such as wireless telephony.
- This invention deals with the problem of signaling channel state information (CSI) between a user equipment (UE) and a base station (eNB).
- CSI channel state information
- This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of Rank Indicator (RI), Channel Quality Indicator (CQI), first precoding matrix (W 1 ) and second precoding matrix (W 2 ). If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W 1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W 1 and W 1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary prior art wireless communication system to which this application is applicable
- FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) Time Division Duplex (TDD) frame structure of the prior art
- FIG. 3 illustrates the process of RI, CQI W 1 and W 2 reporting according to this invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of a base station and a mobile user equipment in the network system of FIG. 1 suitable for implementing this invention.
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary wireless telecommunications network 100 .
- the illustrative telecommunications network includes base stations 101 , 102 and 103 , though in operation, a telecommunications network necessarily includes many more base stations.
- Each of base stations 101 , 102 and 103 (eNB) are operable over corresponding coverage areas 104 , 105 and 106 .
- Each base station's coverage area is further divided into cells. In the illustrated network, each base station's coverage area is divided into three cells.
- Handset or other user equipment (UE) 109 is shown in Cell A 108 .
- Cell A 108 is within coverage area 104 of base station 101 .
- Base station 101 transmits to and receives transmissions from UE 109 .
- UE 109 may be handed over to base station 102 . Because UE 109 is synchronized with base station 101 , UE 109 can employ non-synchronized random access to initiate handover to base station 102 .
- Non-synchronized UE 109 also employs non-synchronous random access to request allocation of up-link 111 time or frequency or code resources. If UE 109 has data ready for transmission, which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update, UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111 . The random access signal notifies base station 101 that UE 109 requires up-link resources to transmit the UEs data. Base station 101 responds by transmitting to UE 109 via down-link 110 , a message containing the parameters of the resources allocated for UE 109 up-link transmission along with a possible timing error correction. After receiving the resource allocation and a possible timing advance message transmitted on down-link 110 by base station 101 , UE 109 optionally adjusts its transmit timing and transmits the data on up-link 111 employing the allotted resources during the prescribed time interval.
- data ready for transmission which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update
- UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111 .
- Base station 101 configures UE 109 for periodic uplink sounding reference signal (SRS) transmission.
- Base station 101 estimates uplink channel quality information (CSI) from the SRS transmission.
- SRS uplink sounding reference signal
- FIG. 2 shows the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) time division duplex (TDD) Frame Structure. Different sub-frames are allocated for downlink (DL) or uplink (UL) transmissions. Table 1 shows applicable DL/UL subframe allocations. D refers to a downlink sub-frame, U refers to an uplink sub-frame, S refers to a special sub-frame for switching between downlink to uplink.
- E-UTRA Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access
- TDD time division duplex
- CSI (channel state information) feedback from UE to eNB consists of rank indicator (RI), precoding matrix indicator (PMI) and channel quality indicator (CQI).
- RI denotes the number of layers in data transmission recommended by the UE.
- PMI is the index to the recommended precoding matrix for data transmission, derived from a codebook.
- CQI is the channel quality when the reported RI/PMI are used for data transmission.
- the 8 TX codebook for Rel. 10 downlink (DL) MIMO was adopted in the applicable standard for 8 antenna ports system.
- the component codebook for W 1 and W 2 are denoted respectively C 1 and C 2 .
- For CSI feedback both W 1 and W 2 need to be reported.
- PUCCH Physical Uplink Shared CHannel
- not all precoding matrices in the C 1 and C 2 codebook can be used in PUCCH feedback. Following the agreement on CSI reporting modes for PUCCH, the possibility of applying codebook sub-sampling needs to be investigated.
- This document outlines some possible codebook sub-sampling mechanisms in relation to PUCCH mode 1-1 for both CSI mode 1 and 2. This facilitates further comparison between CSI mode 1 and 2.
- the adopted reporting structure is given in Table 2.
- Table 2 shows the reporting structure for PUCCH mode 1-1.
- the notation x+y (as in RI+W 1 , W 1 +W 2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
- the notation x/y (as in RI/WI, W 1 /W 2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
- FIG. 3 illustrates this process.
- FIG. 3 begins with start block 301 .
- Test block 302 determines if CSI mode 1 or CSI mode 2 is selected. If CSI mode 1 is selected, then block 303 generates report 1.
- RI and W 1 are jointly encoded. They are also codebook sub-sampled according to one of Tables 3 to 15 below.
- Block 304 generates report 2 with CQI and W 2 separately encoded.
- Block 305 If CSI mode 2 is selected, then block 305 generates report 1. This includes the separately encoded RI.
- Block 306 generates report 2 with CQI, W 1 and W 2 .
- W 1 and W 2 are jointly encoded with codebook sub-sampling according to one of Tables 16 to 19.
- FIG. 3 ends with continue block 306 .
- codebook sub-sampling may be performed on W 2 as shown in Tables 21 to 25.
- Codebook sub-sampling is selected for the two scenarios mentioned above.
- the total payload RI+W 1 is kept within 5 bits to ensure that the effect of error propagation is not significant for any practical range of RI reporting interval.
- the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C 1 for W 1 .
- Second, overlapping beams between two different W 1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
- precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding using only one W 1 matrix may be appropriate.
- Table 3 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
- Table 4 shows a second example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
- Table 5 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
- Table 6 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
- Table 7 shows a fifth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 .
- the RI/W 1 payload can be UE-specific.
- RI/W 1 may be reduced to 4 bits or sub-sampling may not be performed for 2 Rx and 4 Rx UE with 5-bits RI/W 1 .
- Tables 8 to 14 show a number of exemplary sub-sampling cases.
- Table 8 shows a sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 4-bit RI+W 1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
- Table 9 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX) with no sub-sampling.
- Table 10 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
- Table 11 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
- Table 12 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
- Table 13 shows sub-sampling of codebook C 1 with 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
- Table 14 shows sub-sampling of codebook C for 5-bit RI+W 1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
- the maximum payload associated with RI depends on the UE capability of the maximum number of layers.
- the codebook sub-sampling scheme for a given rank or across the ranks can be designed so that it is not dependent on the UE capability in terms of the maximum number of layers.
- Table 15 shows an example. For ranks 5 to 7, it is possible to utilize only one 1 of 4 available W 1 matrices if fixed preceding is desired. This nets to a total of 24 hypotheses. This can be done if reducing the total number of hypotheses from 27 to 24 is beneficial despite the same payload of 5 bits. Such a scenario is possible if the reserved (unused) hypotheses can be used for other purposes.
- some additional channel coding is applied on top of the (20,N) Reed-Muller code to improve error protection.
- Table 15 shows an example codebook sub-sampling scheme for CSI mode 1 report 1.
- the total payload of CQI together with W 1 +W 2 should not exceed 11 bits to ensure the same worst-case coverage as the Rel. 8 format 2/2a/2b.
- the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C 1 +C 2 for W 1 +W 2 :
- Overlapping beams between two different W 1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
- precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4)
- fixed precoding using only one W 1 matrix
- Sub-sampling of C 1 and C 2 can also be performed jointly rather than separately.
- Table 16 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
- Table 17 shows a second example sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
- Table 18 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
- Table 19 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C 1 +C 2 .
- the payload associated with each CSI mode can be compared below.
- Table 20 shows a payload comparison for PUCCH mode 1-1 (bits).
- PUSCH feedback mode for 8 TX supports natural extension of Rel.
- 8 PUSCH reporting mode (1-2, 2-2, 3-1) under the double-codebook structure and considers Mode 3-2 with sub-band PMI+CQI for CQI accuracy enhancement in Rel. 10.
- the feedback overhead is reduced via codebook sub-sampling even further especially for the modes with sub-band PMI such as mode 1-2 and 3-2. Since W 1 is wideband, there is no need to apply codebook sub-sampling in this case as the overhead is small relative to the rests. Codebook sub-sampling is applied only to W 2 in the context of PUSCH reporting modes 1-2 and 3-2.
- Mode 3-2 Codebook sub-sampling may be more compelling for mode 3-2. This is because the sub-band W 2 payload size is ⁇ 4,4,4,3 ⁇ bits for rank ⁇ 1,2,3,4 ⁇ , which is also comparable to the payload in Rel. 8 mode 1-2.
- mode 3-2 consists of both sub-band CQI and sub-band PMI.
- W 2 codebook sub-sampling can be performed in different manners.
- the W 1 codebook is not sub-sampled and all the possible W 1 matrices are used.
- Some exemplary W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for different sub-sampling size are given in Table 21. While this is not exhaustive, the schemes given in Table 21 are expected to perform well. Note the design in Table 21 satisfies a nested property, so that the 1-bit W 2 codebook is a subset of 2-bit W 2 codebook. Thus a 2-bit W 2 codebook is a subset of the 3-bit W 2 codebook.
- Table 21 shows different W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH.
- W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 2 ], and [e 1 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing;
- W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 2 ], and [e 2 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing;
- W 2 ⁇ [e 1 ,e 1 ], [e 3 , e 3 ], [e 1 ,e 4 ], and [e 2 ,e 4 ] ⁇ , with 2-co-phasing.
- rank-3 sub-sampling can be designed slightly differently. A few examples are listed in Table 22.
- this invention chooses 8 out of 16 possible codebook entries. The nested property can be ensured where the 1-bit W 2 is a subset of the 2-bit W 2 , while 1 ⁇ 2 bit W 2 are subsets of 3-bits W 2 codebook. This is satisfied in examples 1, 2 and 3.
- Table 22 shows different W 2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH for Rank-3.
- Example 1 Example 2
- Example 3 Example 4 size Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3 Rank 3 1-bit Choose only choose only choose only choose only 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 2 out of 16 possible possible possible possible possible (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), (Y1, Y2), e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g. (e1, [e1 e.g.)
- the payload size for subband W 2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
- rank 3 it is also possible to sub-sample the W 2 codebook such that every 4th of the 16 possible (Y 1 , Y 2 ) are chosen. This results in the following W 2 codebook.
- the payload size of subband W 2 is then reduced to 2-bits.
- W 2 ⁇ C 2 ⁇ 1 2 ⁇ [ Y 1 Y 2 Y 1 - Y 2 ] ⁇ , ( Y 1 , Y 2 ) ⁇ ⁇ ( e 1 , [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] ) ( e 5 , [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] ) ( [ e 1 ⁇ e 5 ] , e 5 ) ( [ e 5 ⁇ e 1 ] , e 1 ) ⁇
- W 2 codebook it is possible to further sub-sample the W 2 codebook such that only [e 1 e 5 ] and [e 3 e 7 ] are chosen for [Y 1 , Y 2 ].
- the payload size of subband W 2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
- Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks
- Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks.
- Table 25 is an example of this combination with different sizes across different ranks.
- the agreed standard 8 TX codebook can be written as shown below.
- the following notation is used:
- ⁇ n denotes a 4 ⁇ 1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1;
- e n denotes an 8 ⁇ 1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1.
- ⁇ X ( 0 ) [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 j - 1 - j 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 - j - 1 j ]
- W 1 [ X ( 0 ) 0 0 X ( 0 ) ]
- Rank ⁇ ⁇ 8 ⁇ : ⁇ ⁇ W 2 1 2 ⁇ [ e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 4 e ⁇ 4 e ⁇ 1 - e ⁇ 1 e ⁇ 2 - e ⁇ 2 e ⁇ 3 - e ⁇ 3 e ⁇ 4 - e ⁇ 4 ]
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating internal details of an eNB 1002 and a mobile UE 1001 in the network system of FIG. 1 .
- Mobile UE 1001 may represent any of a variety of devices such as a server, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a cellular phone, a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a smart phone or other electronic devices.
- PDA Personal Digital Assistant
- the electronic mobile UE 1001 communicates with eNB 1002 based on a LTE or Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) protocol.
- E-UTRAN Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network
- another communication protocol now known or later developed can be used.
- Mobile UE 1001 comprises a processor 1010 coupled to a memory 1012 and a transceiver 1020 .
- the memory 1012 stores (software) applications 1014 for execution by the processor 1010 .
- the applications could comprise any known or future application useful for individuals or organizations. These applications could be categorized as operating systems (OS), device drivers, databases, multimedia tools, presentation tools, Internet browsers, emailers, Voice-Over-Internet Protocol (VOIP) tools, file browsers, firewalls, instant messaging, finance tools, games, word processors or other categories. Regardless of the exact nature of the applications, at least some of the applications may direct the mobile UE 1001 to transmit UL signals to eNB (base-station) 1002 periodically or continuously via the transceiver 1020 .
- eNB base-station
- the mobile UE 1001 identifies a Quality of Service (QoS) requirement when requesting an uplink resource from eNB 1002 .
- QoS Quality of Service
- the QoS requirement may be implicitly derived by eNB 1002 from the type of traffic supported by the mobile UE 1001 .
- VOIP and gaming applications often involve low-latency uplink (UL) transmissions while High Throughput (HTP)/Hypertext Transmission Protocol (HTTP) traffic can involve high-latency uplink transmissions.
- HTTP High Throughput
- HTTP Hypertext Transmission Protocol
- Transceiver 1020 includes uplink logic which may be implemented by execution of instructions that control the operation of the transceiver. Some of these instructions may be stored in memory 1012 and executed when needed by processor 1010 . As would be understood by one of skill in the art, the components of the uplink logic may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1020 . Transceiver 1020 includes one or more receivers 1022 and one or more transmitters 1024 .
- PHY physical
- MAC Media Access Control
- transmitter 1024 may be or become non-synchronized with its serving eNB. In this case, it sends a random access signal. As part of this procedure, it determines a preferred size for the next data transmission, referred to as a message, by using a power threshold value provided by the serving eNB, as described in more detail above.
- the message preferred size determination is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1012 by processor 1010 . In other embodiments, the message size determination may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
- eNB 1002 comprises a Processor 1030 coupled to a memory 1032 , symbol processing circuitry 1038 , and a transceiver 1040 via backplane bus 1036 .
- the memory stores applications 1034 for execution by processor 1030 .
- the applications could comprise any known or future application useful for managing wireless communications. At least some of the applications 1034 may direct eNB 1002 to manage transmissions to or from mobile UE 1001 .
- Transceiver 1040 comprises an uplink Resource Manager, which enables eNB 1002 to selectively allocate uplink Physical Uplink Shared CHannel (PUSCH) resources to mobile UE 1001 .
- the components of the uplink resource manager may involve the physical (PHY) layer and/or the Media Access Control (MAC) layer of the transceiver 1040 .
- Transceiver 1040 includes at least one receiver 1042 for receiving transmissions from various UEs within range of eNB 1002 and at least one transmitter 1044 for transmitting data and control information to the various UEs within range of eNB 1002 .
- the uplink resource manager executes instructions that control the operation of transceiver 1040 . Some of these instructions may be located in memory 1032 and executed when needed on processor 1030 .
- the resource manager controls the transmission resources allocated to each UE 1001 served by eNB 1002 and broadcasts control information via the PDCCH.
- Symbol processing circuitry 1038 performs demodulation using known techniques. Random access signals are demodulated in symbol processing circuitry 1038 .
- receiver 1042 may receive a random access signal from a UE 1001 .
- the random access signal is encoded to request a message size that is preferred by UE 1001 .
- UE 1001 determines the preferred message size by using a message threshold provided by eNB 1002 .
- the message threshold calculation is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1032 by processor 1030 .
- the threshold calculation may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
- the message threshold is a fixed value that may be stored in memory 1032 , for example.
- eNB 1002 schedules an appropriate set of resources and notifies UE 1001 with a resource grant.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Compression, Expansion, Code Conversion, And Decoders (AREA)
Abstract
This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of RI, CQI, W1 and W2. If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W1 and W2 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.
Description
This application is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 14/248,199 filed Apr. 8, 2014, which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 13/224,764 flied Sep. 2, 2011, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e)(1) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/379,525 filed Sep. 2, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/384,925 filed Sep. 21, 2010 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/385,671 filed Sep. 23, 2010.
The technical field of this invention is wireless communication such as wireless telephony.
This invention deals with the problem of signaling channel state information (CSI) between a user equipment (UE) and a base station (eNB).
This invention is codebook sub-sampling of the reporting of Rank Indicator (RI), Channel Quality Indicator (CQI), first precoding matrix (W1) and second precoding matrix (W2). If CSI mode 1 is selected RI and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 1. If CSI mode 2 is selected W1 and W1 are jointly encoded using codebook sub-sampling in report 2.
These and other aspects of this invention are illustrated in the drawings, in which:
Non-synchronized UE 109 also employs non-synchronous random access to request allocation of up-link 111 time or frequency or code resources. If UE 109 has data ready for transmission, which may be traffic data, measurements report, tracking area update, UE 109 can transmit a random access signal on up-link 111. The random access signal notifies base station 101 that UE 109 requires up-link resources to transmit the UEs data. Base station 101 responds by transmitting to UE 109 via down-link 110, a message containing the parameters of the resources allocated for UE 109 up-link transmission along with a possible timing error correction. After receiving the resource allocation and a possible timing advance message transmitted on down-link 110 by base station 101, UE 109 optionally adjusts its transmit timing and transmits the data on up-link 111 employing the allotted resources during the prescribed time interval.
TABLE 1 | ||
Config- | Switch-point | Sub-frame |
uration | periodicity |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |||
0 | 5 ms | D | S | U | U | U | D | S | | U | U | |
1 | 5 ms | D | S | U | U | D | D | S | | U | D | |
2 | 5 ms | D | S | U | D | D | D | S | | D | D | |
3 | 10 ms | D | S | U | U | U | D | D | | D | D | |
4 | 10 ms | D | S | U | U | D | D | D | | D | D | |
5 | 10 ms | D | S | U | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | |
6 | 10 ms | D | S | U | U | U | D | S | U | U | D | |
CSI (channel state information) feedback from UE to eNB consists of rank indicator (RI), precoding matrix indicator (PMI) and channel quality indicator (CQI). RI denotes the number of layers in data transmission recommended by the UE. PMI is the index to the recommended precoding matrix for data transmission, derived from a codebook. CQI is the channel quality when the reported RI/PMI are used for data transmission.
The 8 TX codebook for Rel. 10 downlink (DL) MIMO was adopted in the applicable standard for 8 antenna ports system. For 8 TX each precoding matrix is a multiplication of two component matrices denoted by W=W1*W2. The component codebook for W1 and W2 are denoted respectively C1 and C2. For CSI feedback, both W1 and W2 need to be reported. Because Physical Uplink Shared CHannel (PUCCH) payload is limited (maximum 11-bits), not all precoding matrices in the C1 and C2 codebook can be used in PUCCH feedback. Following the agreement on CSI reporting modes for PUCCH, the possibility of applying codebook sub-sampling needs to be investigated. This document outlines some possible codebook sub-sampling mechanisms in relation to PUCCH mode 1-1 for both CSI mode 1 and 2. This facilitates further comparison between CSI mode 1 and 2. The adopted reporting structure is given in Table 2. Table 2 shows the reporting structure for PUCCH mode 1-1. The notation x+y (as in RI+W1, W1+W2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding. Similarly the notation x/y (as in RI/WI, W1/W2 indicates the possibility for joint encoding.
TABLE 2 | |||
|
|
||
|
RI + | RI | ||
Report | ||||
2 | CQI, W2 | CQI, W1 + W2 | ||
From Table 2 it is apparent that in CSI mode 1 report 2 simply follows the Rel. 8 Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI) principle where W2 is analogous to the Rel. 8 PMI. In CSI mode 2 report 1 carries only the Rel. 8 RI making codebook sub-sampling irrelevant. Codebook sub-sampling is needed for CSI mode 1 report 1 and CSI mode 2 report 2. This will be discussed below.
If CSI mode 2 is selected, then block 305 generates report 1. This includes the separately encoded RI. Block 306 generates report 2 with CQI, W1 and W2. W1 and W2 are jointly encoded with codebook sub-sampling according to one of Tables 16 to 19. FIG. 3 ends with continue block 306.
For CSI report on PUSCH, codebook sub-sampling may be performed on W2 as shown in Tables 21 to 25.
Codebook Sub-Sampling
Codebook sub-sampling is selected for the two scenarios mentioned above.
In this case, the total payload RI+W1 is kept within 5 bits to ensure that the effect of error propagation is not significant for any practical range of RI reporting interval. The following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C1 for W1. First, joint encoding of RI and W1 follow the standard. This ensures efficient signaling of W1 with minimum overhead. Second, overlapping beams between two different W1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature. Third, since precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding using only one W1 matrix may be appropriate.
Tables 3 to 15 show three exemplary W1 codebook sub-sampling schemes. These examples are ordered in increasing total number of hypotheses. It is possible to combine a part of one example with other parts from other examples. For example, for RI=1 to 4 example 1 may be used while for RI=5 to 8 example 3 may be used. While the total number of hypotheses differs, all these exemplary designs occupy a maximum of 5 bits for jointly coded RI and W1. Thus some additional encoding may be performed to reap the advantage of the design with the smallest number of hypotheses. For instance, example 1 can use an encoding technique to map 24 hypotheses onto 25=32 available code points. Otherwise, it seems more attractive to choose example 3 as the 5-bit payload carries more precoding hypotheses.
Table 3 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 3 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
3 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
4 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
5 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
6 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
7 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 24, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 4 shows a second example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 4 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
3 | 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) | 4 |
4 | 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) | 4 |
5 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
6 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
7 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 28, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 5 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 5 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
3 | 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) | 4 |
4 | 0, 1, 2, 3 (all) | 4 |
5 | 0, 1 ( |
2 |
6 | 0, 1 ( |
2 |
7 | 0, 1 ( |
2 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, required | 31, 5 bits |
coding bits | |
Table 6 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 6 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0-15 | 16 |
3 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
4 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
5 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
6 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
7 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, required | 32, 5 bits |
coding bits | |
Table 7 shows a fifth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1.
TABLE 7 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0-15 | 16 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 |
overlap) | ||
3 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
4 | 0, 2 (no overlap) | 2 |
5 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
6 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
7 | 0 (fixed precoding) | 1 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 32, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
As an alternative, it is possible for the RI/W1 payload to be UE-specific. Thus the RI/W1 payload varies as a function of the UE category, such as a maximum number of layers supported in downlink data transmission in PDSCH or number of UE receive antennas. For example, if a UE has only two receive antennas or can receive up to 2 layers in downlink data transmission, RI+W1 reporting is limited to RI=1 or RI=2. Hence in Tables 3-7 the payload of RI/W1 is determined by the total entries in RI=1 and RI=2. This is already supported in Rel. 8 where the RI bit width can be 1 or 2 bits based on UE category. Thus the payload of RI/W1 may be reduced to 4 bits or sub-sampling may not be performed for 2 Rx and 4 Rx UE with 5-bits RI/W1. Tables 8 to 14 show a number of exemplary sub-sampling cases.
Table 8 shows a sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 4-bit RI+W1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 8 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 16, 4 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 9 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for a 2-layer capable UE (2 RX) with no sub-sampling.
TABLE 9 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0-15 | 16 |
2 | 0-15 | 16 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 32, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 10 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 10 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0-15 | 16 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 24, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 11 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 for 5-bit RI+W1 for 2-layer capable UE (2 RX).
TABLE 11 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0-15 | 16 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 24, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 12 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 12 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0-15 | 16 |
3 | 0-3 | 4 |
4 | 0-3 | 4 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 32, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 13 shows sub-sampling of codebook C1 with 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 13 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0-15 | 16 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 |
overlap) | ||
3 | 0-3 | 4 |
4 | 0-3 | 4 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 32, 5 bits |
required coding bits | |
Table 14 shows sub-sampling of codebook C for 5-bit RI+W1 for 4-layer capable UE (4 RX).
TABLE 14 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 |
3 | 0-3 | 4 |
4 | 0-3 | 4 |
Total no. hypotheses across ranks, | 24, 5 bits | |
required coding bits | ||
The maximum payload associated with RI depends on the UE capability of the maximum number of layers. The codebook sub-sampling scheme for a given rank or across the ranks can be designed so that it is not dependent on the UE capability in terms of the maximum number of layers. Table 15 shows an example. For ranks 5 to 7, it is possible to utilize only one 1 of 4 available W1 matrices if fixed preceding is desired. This nets to a total of 24 hypotheses. This can be done if reducing the total number of hypotheses from 27 to 24 is beneficial despite the same payload of 5 bits. Such a scenario is possible if the reserved (unused) hypotheses can be used for other purposes. In addition the use of some additional channel coding is applied on top of the (20,N) Reed-Muller code to improve error protection.
Table 15 shows an example codebook sub-sampling scheme for CSI mode 1 report 1.
TABLE 15 | ||
No. W1 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 index for sub-sampling (i1) | |
1 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 |
overlapping beams) | ||
2 | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 |
overlapping beams) | ||
3 | 0, 2 (no overlapping beams) | 2 |
4 | 0, 2 (no overlapping beams) | 2 |
5 | 0, 1 ( | 2 |
6 | 0, 1 ( | 2 |
7 | 0, 1 ( | 2 |
8 | 0 | 1 |
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across | 16, 4 bits | |
ranks 1-2 (max. layers = 2), | ||
required coding bits | ||
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across | 20, 4 bits | |
ranks 1-4 (max. layers = 4), | ||
required coding bits | ||
Total no. W1 + RI hypotheses across | 27, 5 bits | |
ranks 1-8 (max. layers = 8), | ||
required coding bits | ||
In this case, the total payload of CQI together with W1+W2 should not exceed 11 bits to ensure the same worst-case coverage as the Rel. 8 format 2/2a/2b. Hence, the following actions are performed to attain such goal when sub-sampling is performed on the codebook C1+C2 for W1+W2:
To maintain the maximum overhead of 11 bits:
RI=1: Since CQI occupies 4 bits, the payload for W1+W2 should not exceed 7 bits
RI>1: Since CQI occupies 7 bits, the payload for W1+W2 should not exceed 4 bits
Joint encoding of W1 and W2 should be performed whenever possible: This ensures efficient signaling of W1+W2 with minimum overhead.
Overlapping beams between two different W1 matrices can be skipped whenever appropriate as overlapping beam can be seen as an optimization feature.
Since precoding gain is expected to be small for higher-rank transmission (rank>4), fixed precoding (using only one W1 matrix) should also be considered whenever appropriate.
Sub-sampling of C1 and C2 can also be performed jointly rather than separately.
Keeping the above principles in mind, three exemplary W1+W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes are given below in Tables 16 to 19.
Table 16 shows a first example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
FIG. 16 |
No. W1 + W2 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling | hypotheses |
1 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 × 8 = 64, |
(i1) | 6 bits | |
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 and e3 | ||
with all 4 possible co-phasing [note: | ||
this resembles (N, Nb) = (16, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-3, 8-11) | ||
2 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 × 2 = 18, |
(i1) | 4 bits | |
W2: for each W1, choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) | ||
with all 2 possible co-phasing [note: | ||
this resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-1) | ||
3 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 16 | 4 bits | |
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the even indexed | ||
or the last 8 | ||
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15) | ||
4 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16 |
W2: all | 4 bits | |
5 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
6 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
7 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
8 | W1: 0 (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
Table 17 shows a second example sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 17 | ||
No. W1 + W2 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling | hypotheses |
1 | W1: all (i1) | 16 × 4 = 64, |
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 with all 4 | 6 bits | |
possible co-phasing [note: this | ||
resembles (N, Nb) = (16, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-3) | ||
2 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no overlap) | 8 × 2 = 18, |
(i1) | 4 bits | |
W2: for each W1, choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) | ||
with all 2 possible co-phasing [note: | ||
this resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-1) | ||
3 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of 16 | 4 bits | |
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the even indexed | ||
or the last 8 | ||
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15) | ||
4 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: all | 4 bits | |
5 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
6 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
7 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
8 | W1: 0 (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
Table 18 shows a third example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 18 | ||
No. W1 + W2 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling | hypotheses |
1 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 × 16 = 128, |
overlap) (i1) | 7 bits | |
W2: all [note: maximum refinement gain | ||
for frequency selective | ||
precoding] | ||
2 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 × 2 = 16, |
overlap) (i1) | 4 bits | |
W2: for each W1, choose only | ||
(Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with all 2 | ||
possible co-phasing [note: this | ||
resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-1) | ||
3 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of | 4 bits | |
16 possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the | ||
even indexed or the last 8 | ||
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15) | ||
4 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: all | 4 bits | |
5 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
6 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
7 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
8 | W1: 0 (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
Table 19 shows a fourth example of sub-sampling of codebook C1+C2.
TABLE 19 | ||
No. W1 + W2 | ||
RI | Chosen W1 + W2 index for sub-sampling | hypotheses |
1 | W1: all (i1) | 16 × 8 = 128, |
W2: for each W1, choose only Y = e1 and | 7 bits | |
e2 with all 4 possible co-phasing | ||
[note: this resembles | ||
(N, Nb) = (32, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-7) | ||
2 | W1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 (no | 8 × 2 = 18, |
overlap) (i1) | 4 bits | |
W2: for each W1, choose only | ||
(Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with all 2 | ||
possible co-phasing [note: this | ||
resembles (N, Nb) = (8, 1) design] | ||
(i2 = 0-1) | ||
3 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: for each W1, choose only 8 out of | 4 bits | |
16 possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. the | ||
even indexed or the last 8 | ||
(i2 = 0, 2, . . . 14 or 8-15) | ||
4 | W1: 0, 2 (no overlap) (i1) | 2 × 8 = 16, |
W2: all | 4 bits | |
5 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
6 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
7 | W1: 0 (fixed precoding) (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
8 | W1: 0 (i1) | 1, 0 bit |
For any of the above exemplary designs, it is possible to combine a part of one example with other part(s) from other examples. Furthermore, it is possible to use more than one (e.g. 2 or all 4) W1 matrices for ranks 5, 6 and 7 for any of the above examples in Tables 16 to 19.
Feedback Payload Analysis
Based on the above codebook sub-sampling designs, the payload associated with each CSI mode can be compared below.
Table 20 shows a payload comparison for PUCCH mode 1-1 (bits).
TABLE 20 | ||||
| |
| Report | 1 | | | |
1 | 5 (**) | 8 | 3 | 10/11 |
2 | 5 (**) | 11 | 3 | 11 |
3 | 5 (**) | 11 | 3 | 11 |
4 | 5 (**) | 10 | 3 | 11 |
5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 to 9 (*) |
6 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 to 9 (*) |
7 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 to 9 (*) |
8 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
For entries marked with (*) the result depends on how many W1 precoding matrices are used for |
Codebook Sub-Sampling for PUSCH
PUSCH feedback mode for 8 TX supports natural extension of Rel. 8 PUSCH reporting mode (1-2, 2-2, 3-1) under the double-codebook structure and considers Mode 3-2 with sub-band PMI+CQI for CQI accuracy enhancement in Rel. 10. Considering the potentially larger payload and the use of carrier aggregation, the feedback overhead is reduced via codebook sub-sampling even further especially for the modes with sub-band PMI such as mode 1-2 and 3-2. Since W1 is wideband, there is no need to apply codebook sub-sampling in this case as the overhead is small relative to the rests. Codebook sub-sampling is applied only to W2 in the context of PUSCH reporting modes 1-2 and 3-2.
Codebook sub-sampling may be more compelling for mode 3-2. This is because the sub-band W2 payload size is {4,4,4,3} bits for rank {1,2,3,4}, which is also comparable to the payload in Rel. 8 mode 1-2. On the other hand, mode 3-2 consists of both sub-band CQI and sub-band PMI.
For the standard 8 TX codebook, W2 codebook sub-sampling can be performed in different manners. The W1 codebook is not sub-sampled and all the possible W1 matrices are used. Some exemplary W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for different sub-sampling size are given in Table 21. While this is not exhaustive, the schemes given in Table 21 are expected to perform well. Note the design in Table 21 satisfies a nested property, so that the 1-bit W2 codebook is a subset of 2-bit W2 codebook. Thus a 2-bit W2 codebook is a subset of the 3-bit W2 codebook.
Table 21 shows different W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH.
TABLE 21 | |
W2 sub- | |
sampling | W2 sub-sampled codebook |
size | Rank 1 | Rank 2 | Rank 3 | Rank 4 |
1-bit | Y = e1 with | (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] | Choose only | Y = [e1 e5] |
only 2 out | with all 2 | 2 out of 16 | with all 2 | |
of 4 | co-phasing | possible | co-phasing | |
possible | (Note this | (Y1, Y2), | (Note this | |
co-phasing | corresponds to | e.g. (e1, [e1 | corresponds | |
(e.g. BPSK | i2 = 0, 1) | e5]) or([e1 | to i2 = 0, 1) | |
only +/−1) | e5], e5) | |||
(Note this | (Note this | |||
corresponds | corresponds | |||
to i2 = 0, 2) | to i2 = 0, 2) | |||
2-bit | Y = e1 with | (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] | Choose only | Y = [e1 e5] or |
all 4 | or [e3, e3] with | 4 out of 16 | [e3 e7] with | |
co-phasing | all 2 | possible | all 2 | |
(Note this | co-phasing | (Y1, Y2), | co-phasing | |
corresponds | (Note this | e.g. (e1, [e1 | (Note this | |
to i2 = 0, 1, | corresponds to | e5]), | corresponds | |
2, 3) | i2 = 0, 1, 4, 5) | (e3, [e3 | to i2 = 0, 1, | |
e7]), ([e1 | 4, 5) | |||
e5], e5), or | ||||
([e3 e7], e7) | ||||
(Note this | ||||
corresponds | ||||
to i2 = 0, 2, | ||||
8, 10) | ||||
3-bit | Y = e1 or e3 | (Y1, Y2) = [e1, e1] | Choose only | No |
with all 4 | or [e2, | 8 out of 16 | sub-sampling | |
co-phasing | e2], [e3, e3], or | possible | (full set) | |
(Note this | [e4, e4] with | (Y1, Y2), | ||
corresponds | all 2 | e.g. the | ||
to i2 = 0-3 | co-phasing | even indexed | ||
and 8-11) | (Note this | or the last 8 | ||
corresponds to | (Note this | |||
i2 = 0-7) | corresponds | |||
to i2 = 0, 2, . . . | ||||
14, or | ||||
i2 = 8-15) | ||||
4-bit | No | No sub-sampling | No | n/a |
sub-sampling | (full set) | sub-sampling | ||
(full set) | (full set) | |||
For rank-2 with 3-bit sub-sampling, instead of choosing (Y1,Y2)=[e1,e1] or [e2,e2], [e3,e3], or [e4,e4], this invention chooses a N1 precoders from {[e1,e1], [e2, e2], [e3,e3], [e4,e4]} with 2-co-phasing and chooses a N2 precoders from {[e1 e2], [e2 e3], [e1 e4], [e2 e4]} with 2 co-phasing, where N1+N2=8. Achieves a good performance tradeoff between ULA and XPD antenna configurations. Example:
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e2], and [e1,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing;
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e2], and [e2,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing; and
W2={[e1,e1], [e3, e3], [e1,e4], and [e2,e4]}, with 2-co-phasing.
In these examples, it is possible to replace {[e1,e1], [e3,e3]} with {[e2,e2, [e4,e4]}. It is also possible to replace [e1,e2] with [e2,e3]. Similarly, for rank-2 with 2-bit sub-sampling, it is possible to replace [e3,e3] with [e1,e2], or [e2,e3], or [e1,e4] or [e2,e4].
For rank-3, sub-sampling can be designed slightly differently. A few examples are listed in Table 22. For a 3-bit rank-3 codebook, this invention chooses 8 out of 16 possible codebook entries. The nested property can be ensured where the 1-bit W2 is a subset of the 2-bit W2, while ½ bit W2 are subsets of 3-bits W2 codebook. This is satisfied in examples 1, 2 and 3.
Table 22 shows different W2 codebook sub-sampling schemes for PUSCH for Rank-3.
TABLE 22 | ||||
W2 sub- | ||||
sampling | Example 1 | Example 2 | Example 3 | Example 4 |
size | Rank 3 | Rank 3 | Rank 3 | Rank 3 |
1-bit | Choose only | Choose only | Choose only | Choose only |
2 out of 16 | 2 out of 16 | 2 out of 16 | 2 out of 16 | |
possible | possible | possible | possible | |
(Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | |
e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | |
e5]) or([e1 | e5]) or([e5 | e5]) or([e1 | e5]) or([e5 | |
e5], e5) | e1], e1) | e5], e5) | e1], e1) | |
(Note this | (Note this | (Note this | (Note this | |
corresponds | corresponds | corresponds | corresponds | |
to i2 = 0, 2) | to i2 = 0, 3) | to i2 = 0, 2) | to i2 = 0, 3) | |
2-bit | Choose only | Choose only | Choose only | Choose only |
4 out of 16 | 4 out of 16 | 4 out of 16 | 4 out of 16 | |
possible | possible | possible | possible | |
(Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | |
e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | e.g. (e1, [e1 | |
e5]), | e5]), | e5]), | e5]), | |
(e3, [e3 | (e3, [e3 | (e3, [e3 | (e3, [e3 | |
e7]), ([e1 | e7]), ([e5 | e7]), ([e1 | e7]), ([e5 | |
e5], e5), or | e1], e1), or | e5], e5), or | e1], e1), or | |
([e3 e7], e7) | ([e7 e3], e3) | ([e3 e7], e7) | ([e7 e3], e3) | |
(Note this | (Note this | (Note this | (Note this | |
corresponds | corresponds | corresponds | corresponds | |
to i2 = 0, 2, | to i2 = 0, 3, | to i2 = 0, 2, | to i2 = 0, 3, | |
8, 10) | 8, 11) | 8, 10) | 8, 11) | |
3-bit | Choose 8 out | Choose 8 out | Choose only | Choose only |
of 16 | of 16 | 8 out of 16 | 8 out of 16 | |
possible | possible | possible | possible | |
(Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | (Y1, Y2), | |
e.g. even | e.g. even | e.g. the | e.g. the | |
indexed | indexed | even indexed | even indexed | |
entries from | entries from | (Note this | (Note this | |
the codebook | the codebook | corresponds | corresponds | |
(Note this | (Note this | to i2 = 0, | to i2 = 0, | |
corresponds | corresponds | 2, . . . 14 | 2, . . . 14 | |
to i2 = 0, 1, | to i2 = 0, 1, | |||
2, 3, 8, 9, | 2, 3, 8, 9, | |||
10, 11) | 10, 11) | |||
4-bit | No | No | No | No |
sub-sampling | sub-sampling | sub-sampling | sub-sampling | |
(full set) | (full set) | (full set) | (full set) | |
We further note the following. For rank 1 it is possible to sub-sample the W2 such that Y=[e1] with all 4 co-phasing are chosen. In this case the effective rank-1 codebook becomes [N, Nb]=[16,1] design with no sub-sampling for W1. The payload size for subband W2 is then reduced to 2 bits. For rank 3 it is also possible to sub-sample the W2 codebook such that every 4th of the 16 possible (Y1, Y2) are chosen. This results in the following W2 codebook. The payload size of subband W2 is then reduced to 2-bits.
For rank-4, it is possible to further sub-sample the W2 codebook such that only [e1 e5] and [e3 e7] are chosen for [Y1, Y2]. The payload size of subband W2 is then reduced to 2 bits.
Thus one may generate any sub-sampling scheme with a combination of the schemes given in Table 22, where the sub-sampling size for rank-n (n=1, . . . 8) are different possibly. Some examples are given in Tables 23 to 25.
Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks
TABLE 23 | ||
No. W2 | ||
hypotheses | ||
RI | Chosen W2 index for sub-sampling | (bits) |
1 | Y = e1 with all 4 possible | W2 payload: |
co-phasing | log2(4) = 2 |
|
2 | Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with | W2 payload: |
all 2 possible co-phasing | log2(2) = 1 |
|
3 | Choose only 4 out of 16 possible | W2 payload: |
(Y1, Y2), e.g. every 4th entry | log2(4) = 2 bits | |
4 | [Y1 Y2] = [e1, e5] and [e3 e7] | W2 payload: |
log2(4) = 2 |
||
5 | All | 1, 0 bit |
6 | All | 1, 0 |
7 | All | 1, 0 |
8 | All | 1, 0 bit |
Table 23 is an example of combination with different sizes across different ranks.
TABLE 24 | ||
No. W2 | ||
hypotheses | ||
RI | Chosen W2 index for sub-sampling | (bits) |
1 | Y = e1 and e3 with all 4 possible | W2 payload: |
co-phasing | log2(8) = 3 |
|
2 | Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) with | W2 payload: |
all 2 possible co-phasing | log2(2) = 1 |
|
3 | Choose only 8 out of 16 possible | W2 payload: |
(Y1, Y2), e.g. the even | log2(8) = 3 bits | |
indexed or the last 8 | ||
4 | All | 1, 0 |
5 | All | 1, 0 bit |
6 | All | 1, 0 |
7 | All | 1, 0 |
8 | All | 1, 0 bit |
Table 25 is an example of this combination with different sizes across different ranks.
TABLE 25 | ||
No. W2 | ||
Chosen W2 index for | hypotheses | |
RI | sub-sampling | (bits) |
1 | Y = e1 and e3 with all 4 | W2 payload: |
possible co-phasing | log2(8) = 3 |
|
2 | Choose only (Y1, Y2) = (e1, e1) or | W2 payload: |
(e3, e3) with all 2 | log2(4) = 2 bits | |
co-phasing | ||
3 | Choose only 4 out of 16 | W2 payload: |
possible (Y1, Y2), e.g. | log2(4) = 2 bits | |
every 4th entry | ||
4 | [Y1 Y2] = [e1, e5] and [e3 e7] | W2 payload: |
log2(4) = 2 |
||
5 | All | 1, 0 bit |
6 | All | 1, 0 |
7 | All | 1, 0 |
8 | All | 1, 0 bit |
The agreed standard 8 TX codebook can be written as shown below. The composite precoder W is derived from W=W1*W2. The following notation is used:
ēn denotes a 4×1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1; and
en denotes an 8×1 selection vector with all zeros except for the n-th element with value 1.
Rank 8:
During transmission and reception of voice data or other application data, transmitter 1024 may be or become non-synchronized with its serving eNB. In this case, it sends a random access signal. As part of this procedure, it determines a preferred size for the next data transmission, referred to as a message, by using a power threshold value provided by the serving eNB, as described in more detail above. In this embodiment, the message preferred size determination is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1012 by processor 1010. In other embodiments, the message size determination may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example.
The uplink resource manager executes instructions that control the operation of transceiver 1040. Some of these instructions may be located in memory 1032 and executed when needed on processor 1030. The resource manager controls the transmission resources allocated to each UE 1001 served by eNB 1002 and broadcasts control information via the PDCCH.
During transmission and reception of voice data or other application data, receiver 1042 may receive a random access signal from a UE 1001. The random access signal is encoded to request a message size that is preferred by UE 1001. UE 1001 determines the preferred message size by using a message threshold provided by eNB 1002. In this embodiment, the message threshold calculation is embodied by executing instructions stored in memory 1032 by processor 1030. In other embodiments, the threshold calculation may be embodied by a separate processor/memory unit, by a hardwired state machine, or by other types of control logic, for example. Alternatively, in some networks the message threshold is a fixed value that may be stored in memory 1032, for example. In response to receiving the message size request, eNB 1002 schedules an appropriate set of resources and notifies UE 1001 with a resource grant.
Claims (4)
1. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling into a maximum of 5 bits as follows:
and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling.
2. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein for a 2-layer capable user equipment said jointly coding RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling into 4 bits as follows:
and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling.
3. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling; and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling as follows for the first PMI:
4. A transceiver, comprising:
a receiver for receiving; and
a transmitter for transmitting via a Physical Uplink Control CHannel (PUCCH) a Channel State Information feedback signal having:
a first mode with a first report jointly coding Rank Indicator (RI) and a first Precoding Matrix Indicator (PMI), and with a second report coding Channel Quality Indicator (CQI) and a second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the RI and the first PMI employs codebook sub-sampling; and
a second mode with a first report coding RI, and with a second report coding CQI and jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI, wherein said jointly coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs codebook sub-sampling:
for RI equal one joint coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs 7 bits or less, and
for RI greater than one joint coding the first PMI and the second PMI employs 4 bits or less.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/741,197 US9270349B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2015-06-16 | Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US37952510P | 2010-09-02 | 2010-09-02 | |
US38492510P | 2010-09-21 | 2010-09-21 | |
US38567110P | 2010-09-23 | 2010-09-23 | |
US13/224,764 US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/248,199 US9088324B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/741,197 US9270349B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2015-06-16 | Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/248,199 Continuation US9088324B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150288433A1 US20150288433A1 (en) | 2015-10-08 |
US9270349B2 true US9270349B2 (en) | 2016-02-23 |
Family
ID=46718949
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/224,764 Active US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/248,177 Active US9048910B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/248,199 Active US9088324B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/741,197 Active US9270349B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2015-06-16 | Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/224,764 Active US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2011-09-02 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/248,177 Active US9048910B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US14/248,199 Active US9088324B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US8693421B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (52)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8914539B2 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2014-12-16 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Service cloud console |
KR101871707B1 (en) | 2010-04-02 | 2018-06-27 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | User equipment apparatus and method for feedback channel state information in wireless communication system |
KR101817724B1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2018-02-21 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Multiple input multiple output communication system using codebook corresopding to each reporting mode |
US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
KR101835326B1 (en) | 2010-09-26 | 2018-03-07 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in a wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna |
US9602177B2 (en) * | 2010-09-26 | 2017-03-21 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in a wireless communication system supporting multiple antennas |
CN102448114B (en) * | 2010-10-07 | 2015-07-15 | 上海贝尔股份有限公司 | Method and equipment for improving transmission accuracy of CSI (Channel State Information) through PUCCH (Physical Uplink Control Channel) |
CN102447501B (en) * | 2010-10-07 | 2015-04-29 | 上海贝尔股份有限公司 | Codebook sub-sampling method applied to LTE-A system and device thereof |
EP2637319B1 (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2017-09-06 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antennas |
CN103023621B (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2016-03-09 | 华为技术有限公司 | The method of transmission information, subscriber equipment and base station |
US20130088978A1 (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2013-04-11 | Nokia Siemens Networks Oy | Joint Encoding of Rank and CQI Feedback For Comp |
CN102368698B (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2014-04-16 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Precoding matrix indicator (PMI) information transmission method and apparatus thereof |
EP3651375A1 (en) | 2012-06-14 | 2020-05-13 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method for determining precoding matrix indicator, user equipment, and base station evolved node b |
CN104885376B (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2019-03-29 | Hmd全球公司 | Method and apparatus used in carrier wave polymerization |
CN103580825B (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2017-05-24 | 电信科学技术研究院 | UCI transmission method and device |
CN103780289B (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2018-07-27 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | A kind of method and apparatus that code book processing is carried out to channel information |
US9088323B2 (en) * | 2013-01-09 | 2015-07-21 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for reporting downlink channel state |
US9281881B2 (en) | 2013-02-12 | 2016-03-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 4TX codebook enhancement in LTE |
US9143212B2 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2015-09-22 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback on PUCCH for 4Tx MIMO |
GB2511550B (en) * | 2013-03-07 | 2015-08-12 | Broadcom Corp | Method, apparatus and computer program for controlling a wireless device |
US9729216B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2017-08-08 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Multiple transmitter codebook methods and devices |
US9698887B2 (en) * | 2013-03-08 | 2017-07-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for enhanced MIMO operation |
RU2621010C2 (en) * | 2013-03-21 | 2017-05-30 | ЭлДжи ЭЛЕКТРОНИКС ИНК. | Method and apparatus for communication channel state information in wireless communication |
EP2979389B1 (en) | 2013-03-25 | 2020-02-12 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Optical link establishment |
SG11201506671VA (en) * | 2013-04-29 | 2015-11-27 | Lg Electronics Inc | Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system |
EP4135210A1 (en) | 2013-05-10 | 2023-02-15 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method for determining precoding matrix indicator, user equipment, and base station |
CN114257341B (en) * | 2013-05-24 | 2023-08-29 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Channel state information feedback method and terminal |
CN105144600B (en) * | 2013-05-31 | 2018-11-02 | 英特尔Ip公司 | Hybrid digital and analog beam for large-scale antenna array shape |
KR102169960B1 (en) | 2013-06-05 | 2020-10-26 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system |
US10171153B2 (en) | 2013-06-05 | 2019-01-01 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for transmitting channel state information in wireless communication system |
US9847818B2 (en) * | 2013-06-07 | 2017-12-19 | Nec Corporation | Channel state information (CSI) feedback and subsampling |
US9432101B2 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2016-08-30 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Methods for codebook sub-sampling |
AU2015202414B2 (en) * | 2013-06-07 | 2016-08-11 | Nec Corporation | Channel state information (CSI) feedback and codebook subsampling |
KR102160008B1 (en) | 2013-06-17 | 2020-09-25 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving channerl state information |
CN108494450B (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2020-06-16 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for determining precoding matrix indication, receiving equipment and transmitting equipment |
WO2015032038A1 (en) * | 2013-09-04 | 2015-03-12 | 华为技术有限公司 | Channel measurement method, terminal device and base station |
CN106685496A (en) * | 2015-11-06 | 2017-05-17 | 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 | Method of feeding back channel state information in multiple input output system |
CN106685502A (en) * | 2015-11-06 | 2017-05-17 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Quantitative CSI (Channel State Information) feedback method and terminal |
US10200102B2 (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2019-02-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel station information reporting and transmission mode for enhanced machine type communication |
CN108352925A (en) * | 2015-11-20 | 2018-07-31 | 华为技术有限公司 | It is a kind of transmission or receiving channel state information CSI method, terminal and base station |
CN107707285B (en) * | 2016-08-05 | 2021-04-09 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and device for transmitting and receiving channel state information |
CN107888323B (en) | 2016-09-29 | 2020-01-17 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Method and device for transmitting channel state information |
US10924162B2 (en) | 2017-05-05 | 2021-02-16 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Facilitation of incremental feedback for 5G or other next generation network |
JP2020526063A (en) * | 2017-06-08 | 2020-08-27 | クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッドQualcomm Incorporated | PMI Feedback for Type II CSI Feedback in NR-MIMO |
CN109150458B (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2022-11-08 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Control information transmission method and device |
US11368864B2 (en) * | 2017-08-18 | 2022-06-21 | Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. | Channel state information reporting method and related equipment |
CN109474315B (en) | 2017-09-07 | 2021-06-01 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and equipment for indicating and determining precoding matrix |
CN112514275B (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2023-11-28 | Lg 电子株式会社 | Method and apparatus for reporting channel state information in a wireless communication system |
CN110830092B (en) * | 2018-08-10 | 2021-10-26 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for indicating precoding matrix and determining precoding matrix and communication device |
TWI687063B (en) | 2019-01-04 | 2020-03-01 | 財團法人工業技術研究院 | A communication system and codec method based on deep learning and channel state information |
CN117204084A (en) * | 2021-07-12 | 2023-12-08 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Wireless communication method and terminal equipment |
WO2023070497A1 (en) * | 2021-10-29 | 2023-05-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Neural network structure for feedback of orthogonal precoding information |
Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090286482A1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Spatial interference mitigation schemes for wireless communication |
US20110194638A1 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-11 | Adoram Erell | Codebook adaptation in mimo communication systems using multilevel codebooks |
US20110249637A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2011-10-13 | David Hammarwall | Parameterized Codebook Subsets for use with Precoding MIMO Transmissions |
US20110249578A1 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2011-10-13 | Shahrokh Nayeb Nazar | Channel state information transmission for multiple carriers |
US20110268100A1 (en) | 2009-11-02 | 2011-11-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication |
US20110268204A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Multiple input multiple output communication system of supporting several reporting modes |
US20120003945A1 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2012-01-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for 8-tx codebook and feedback signaling in 3gpp wireless networks |
US20120020288A1 (en) | 2010-05-14 | 2012-01-26 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for pucch feedback in 3gpp wireless networks |
US20120069917A1 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2012-03-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for pucch subband feedback signaling in a wireless network |
US20120076023A1 (en) | 2010-09-26 | 2012-03-29 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparats for performing efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna |
US20120087254A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2012-04-12 | Sharp Laboratories Of Ameria, Inc. | Uplink control information transmission on backward compatible pucch formats with carrier aggregation |
US20130094368A1 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2013-04-18 | Toshizo Nogami | Terminal device, base station device, communication system, and communication method |
US20130195035A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-08-01 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Mobile terminal device and radio base station apparatus |
US8625450B2 (en) | 2010-04-05 | 2014-01-07 | Nokia Corporation | Channel state information feedback for enhanced downlink multiple input—multiple output operation |
US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US8811520B2 (en) | 2010-04-02 | 2014-08-19 | Lg Electronics Inc. | User equipment apparatus and method for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system |
-
2011
- 2011-09-02 US US13/224,764 patent/US8693421B2/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-04-08 US US14/248,177 patent/US9048910B2/en active Active
- 2014-04-08 US US14/248,199 patent/US9088324B2/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-06-16 US US14/741,197 patent/US9270349B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090286482A1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Spatial interference mitigation schemes for wireless communication |
US20110268100A1 (en) | 2009-11-02 | 2011-11-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for hierarchical codebook design in wireless communication |
US20110249578A1 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2011-10-13 | Shahrokh Nayeb Nazar | Channel state information transmission for multiple carriers |
US20110194638A1 (en) | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-11 | Adoram Erell | Codebook adaptation in mimo communication systems using multilevel codebooks |
US8811520B2 (en) | 2010-04-02 | 2014-08-19 | Lg Electronics Inc. | User equipment apparatus and method for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system |
US8625450B2 (en) | 2010-04-05 | 2014-01-07 | Nokia Corporation | Channel state information feedback for enhanced downlink multiple input—multiple output operation |
US20110249637A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2011-10-13 | David Hammarwall | Parameterized Codebook Subsets for use with Precoding MIMO Transmissions |
US20130195035A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2013-08-01 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Mobile terminal device and radio base station apparatus |
US20110268204A1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2011-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Multiple input multiple output communication system of supporting several reporting modes |
US20120020288A1 (en) | 2010-05-14 | 2012-01-26 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for pucch feedback in 3gpp wireless networks |
US20130094368A1 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2013-04-18 | Toshizo Nogami | Terminal device, base station device, communication system, and communication method |
US20120003945A1 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2012-01-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for 8-tx codebook and feedback signaling in 3gpp wireless networks |
US8693421B2 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-04-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US20140219219A1 (en) | 2010-09-02 | 2014-08-07 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 tx codebook sub-sampling for csi feedback |
US9048910B2 (en) * | 2010-09-02 | 2015-06-02 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US9088324B2 (en) * | 2010-09-02 | 2015-07-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Downlink 8 TX codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback |
US20120069917A1 (en) | 2010-09-17 | 2012-03-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for pucch subband feedback signaling in a wireless network |
US20120076023A1 (en) | 2010-09-26 | 2012-03-29 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparats for performing efficient feedback in wireless communication system supporting multiple antenna |
US20120087254A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2012-04-12 | Sharp Laboratories Of Ameria, Inc. | Uplink control information transmission on backward compatible pucch formats with carrier aggregation |
Non-Patent Citations (14)
Title |
---|
3GPP TS 36.213, V10.0.0, "3rd Generation Partnership Proiect; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer Procedures (Release 10)", Dec. 2010. |
3GPP TS 36.213, V9.2.0, "3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Physical Layer Procedures (Release 9)", Jun. 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 62, R1-104475, Texas Instruments, "Progressing on CSI Feedback for Rel. 10 Downlink MIMO", Madrid, Spain, Aug. 23-27, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-103596, ZTE, "Considerations on Signaling for Two-Component Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #60bis, R1-104196, ZTE "Considerations on Signaling for Two-Component Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105438, NTT Docomo, CSI Feedback Signaling on PUCCH for LTE-Advanced, Xi'an China, Oct. 11-15, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105533, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks, "Detailed PUCCH CSI Feedback Signaling Design", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105657, LG Electronics, "Remaining Details on PUCCH Reporting Modes", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN1 #62b, R1-105609, Motorola, "Remaining Details of CSI Feedback on PUCCH and PUSCH", Xi'an, China, Oct. 11-15, 2010. |
3GPP TSG RAN1, #63, R1-106504, Motorola, "CSI Reporting Modes and Codebook Sub-Sampling on PUCCH", Jacksonville, FL, Nov. 15-19, 2010. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 #61bis, R1-103840, Ericsson, ST-Ericsson, "CSI Feedback Signaling Feedback", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 61bis, R1-104120, Texas Instruments, "Extending Rel. 8/9 CSI Feedback Schemes for Rel. 10", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #61bis, R1-103806, Nokia Siemens Networks, Nokia, "UL CSI Feedback Channel Design and Performance", Dresden, Germany, Jun. 28-Jul. 2, 2010. |
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #62bis, R1-105413, NEC Group, "Discussions on Rel-10 PUCCH Modes", Xi'an China, Oct. 11-15, 2010. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9088324B2 (en) | 2015-07-21 |
US20140219219A1 (en) | 2014-08-07 |
US20140219218A1 (en) | 2014-08-07 |
US20120218948A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 |
US9048910B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 |
US8693421B2 (en) | 2014-04-08 |
US20150288433A1 (en) | 2015-10-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9270349B2 (en) | Downlink 8 Tx codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback | |
US11082099B2 (en) | Codebook sub-sampling for CSI feedback on PUCCH for 4TX MIMO | |
US20230127074A1 (en) | Transmission modes and signaling for uplink mimo support or single tb dual-layer transmission in lte uplink | |
US11777565B2 (en) | Downlink multiple input multiple output enhancements for single-cell with remote radio heads | |
US20120270535A1 (en) | Implicit CSI Feedback for DL Multiuser MIMO Transmission | |
US8781018B2 (en) | Six transmit antenna codebook design | |
US20120220286A1 (en) | Periodic Channel Quality Indicator on Physical Uplink Control Channel for Carrier Aggregation | |
US20110243079A1 (en) | Transmission Modes and Signaling for Uplink MIMO Support or Single TB Dual-Layer Transmission in LTE Uplink | |
US20120147838A1 (en) | Method and device for transmitting semi-persistent scheduling data | |
WO2024007245A1 (en) | Method and apparatus of dynamic adaption of spatial elements |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |