US9137331B2 - Adaptive replication - Google Patents
Adaptive replication Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9137331B2 US9137331B2 US13/184,055 US201113184055A US9137331B2 US 9137331 B2 US9137331 B2 US 9137331B2 US 201113184055 A US201113184055 A US 201113184055A US 9137331 B2 US9137331 B2 US 9137331B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- data
- node
- delay
- retrieve
- selected node
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/60—Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
- H04L67/63—Routing a service request depending on the request content or context
-
- H04L67/327—
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1095—Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
Definitions
- the present disclosure is generally related to synchronization of data at nodes of a network. Since some networks may be challenged because of bandwidth, latency, packet loss or just general network availability, a network may not be able to support synchronization of data over the network. Further, synchronization of a node from one node to another can sometimes be inefficient and time consuming. There may also be problems when a node is required to synchronize to another node and has lost communication. The present disclosure presents solutions to these and other problems.
- Adaptive replication can allow a node in a network to optimally determine where, when, and how to retrieve data from other nodes in the network.
- adaptive replication may include receiving a notification corresponding to data at a first node in the network and selecting a node of multiple nodes in the network to retrieve the data from.
- the first node may retrieve the data from any node within the network that has the data.
- a node may add delays or select which node to retrieve data from based on a priority, such as a priority associated with the data, the network, or a node.
- the node may also use a network bandwidth, latency, or any other system metric to determine where the optimal location is to retrieve the data.
- the node can also be configured to use different metrics depending on time of day or any other conditions that might change.
- a device for adaptive replication may include an interface for receiving and sending data; a memory; and a controller configured to implement adaptive replication.
- the controller may be configured to receive a notification at a first node, the notification indicating that data is available for the first node to retrieve, the notification received from a second node.
- the controller may also be configured to select a node of multiple nodes in the network to retrieve the data from, where the first node may retrieve the data from any node within the network that has the data, including the second node and retrieve the data from the selected node when the first node requests the data.
- Another device for adaptive replication may include computer readable instructions stored in a memory that, when the instructions are executed by a processor, cause the processor to receive a notification, the notification indicating that data is available for the device to retrieve, the notification received from a second device.
- the instructions may further cause the processor to select a node of multiple nodes in a network to retrieve the data from, where the device may retrieve the data from any node within the network that has the data; and retrieve the data from the selected node when the first node requests the data.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of an illustrative embodiment of a system for adaptive replication
- FIG. 2 is a diagram of another illustrative embodiment of a system for adaptive replication
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an illustrative embodiment of a method for adaptive replication
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of another illustrative embodiment of a method for adaptive replication.
- the system 100 can include a node, such as nodes 102 , 104 , or 106 , that includes an adaptive replication module 108 .
- the nodes 102 , 104 , and 106 may be computers, servers, or other devices that communicate with each other via one or more networks, such as networks 110 , 112 , and 114 .
- One or more of the nodes 102 , 104 , and 106 may be a network operations center (NOC), though a NOC is not necessary.
- NOC network operations center
- node 102 may be a NOC that supports a fleet of ships, where node 104 represents a first ship and node 106 represents a second ship.
- the networks 110 , 112 , and 114 may be wireless networks or wired networks and each network may have different characteristics.
- the networks 110 , 112 , and 114 may have different data transfer rates, physical distances, data bandwidth, support capabilities, hardware components, processing speeds, methods used to convey data, or other characteristics.
- at least one of the networks 110 , 112 , and 114 may have a low bandwidth that makes synchronization of data relatively slow or impractical.
- the adaptive replication module(s) 108 allows the nodes 102 , 104 , and 106 to synchronize data between the nodes and perform the operations described herein.
- the adaptive replication module(s) allow for flexible synchronization of data, where in some instances, a node is not pre-determined to synchronize with a specific other node.
- the adaptive replication module may dynamically determine an optimal method and node to synchronize to.
- the adaptive replication module(s) may include hardware circuitry, software, or any combination thereof.
- a package may be any object that could be synchronized between nodes of a network and may consist of one or more objects.
- a package may be a manifest, local or remote differential compression information, a replication package, another object, or any combination thereof.
- a package or manifest which may consist of data representing events that have occurred at a node (such as file updates, etc.)
- the node 102 can log information (such as events) that correspond to a package, such as time, object identification (such as an identifier of a file an event happened to), event identification (such as a pointer to a type of event), a locator (such as a uniform resource locator (URL) or an unique key), or any other metadata about an object, i.e. a check-out or published status.
- a manifest may include a list of events corresponding to an object.
- the manifest may be metadata containing information about a corresponding package or object, or a command that should be executed.
- a manifest identification may be similar to a corresponding package identification, such as the same identification value or number with a different extension. For example, a task modified on a specific date can have an event identification that is included in a manifest.
- the adaptive replication module 108 may tell other connected modules that the specific package is needed at their location.
- the notification of the existence of the specific package can be a short and efficient transmission to other nodes and may contain the package identification and a list of locations that are known (at that time) to store the particular package.
- the list of locations can include, at minimum, the originating node plus any other nodes that the originating node is aware of having the package.
- the originating node may log which other nodes have been notified about the specific package.
- Nodes that have received the notification of the existence of a specific package can log the existence of the specific package locally. However, each receiving node may first check to see if it has already been notified of that particular package by another node. If the receiving node is already aware of the existence of the package, there is no need to add a log for the existence of the package, and it can add this node to its list of locations that has the package or manifest. However, the receiving nodes can store a list of known locations that the package or manifest could be found at, which at minimum should include the node that just notified the receiving node about the package.
- the node may fetch the metadata about the package by doing a sequence of bits requests for the corresponding manifest. For example, the node may fetch blocks of the manifest from the notifying node directly, fetch blocks of the manifest from different known sources, such as in a distributed file sharing system, or fetch blocks using another file transfer technology, such as the Binary Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS). Fetching the manifest over a system such as BITS can help when transmitting over a low bandwidth network.
- BITS Binary Intelligent Transfer Service
- the adaptive replication module 108 of the receiving node can examine the contents of the manifest to determine what further action may be required.
- the manifest could contain a command to be executed, or a reference to a package to be fetched.
- the node can also double check to see if the events or command indicated in the manifest have already been processed or are needed at the receiving node.
- the receiving node may also notify all the other nodes of a replication group that have not received this package or manifest that it is required. In some instances, the receiving node can notify other nodes of the replication group when the package or manifest has been downloaded, the manifest has been received, or both, even if the other nodes might be able to fetch the package or the manifest from somewhere else.
- the adaptive replication module 108 of the receiving node determines the package corresponding to the received manifest needs to be fetched, the adaptive replication module 108 can fetch the corresponding package, but the adaptive replication module 108 may decide where to retrieve it from based on known locations, which may have been received with the notification of the existence of the package. The adaptive replication module 108 may also determine where to fetch the package from based on preferred network connections or a round-robin attempt to locate the package at other nodes.
- the package being retrieved should be on the source node, but if it is not there or not available, the retrieving node can look for the package at other nodes by requesting from another node in the replication group and eventually one of them should have the package even if the requesting node is not aware of it.
- the package When the package arrives at the requesting node that fetched it, the package can be processed and the events of the package may be applied to the associated data stored at the receiving node as needed. Once the package or manifest arrives, the node can then notify other nodes that it has the package available for anybody that needs it. In some instances, the node may notify all other nodes that it has the package available.
- System 200 is another example of a network topology that may be used in an adaptive replication system.
- the system 200 can include multiples nodes, such as nodes 202 , 204 , 206 , 208 , and 210 , having an adaptive replication module 212 .
- a node may be a general purpose computing device, a special purpose computing device, or any other appropriate device that can connect to a network.
- a node may be a personal computer, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a server, a phone, a tablet computer, a media player, or any other device that is capable of connecting to a network and implementing the systems or methods described herein.
- the network 214 may correspond to any connectivity topology including, but not limited to: a direct wired connection (e.g. parallel port, serial port, USB, IEEE 1394, etc.), a wireless connection (e.g. IR port, Bluetooth port, etc.), a wired network, a wireless network (e.g. 802.11x, cellular, etc.) a local area network, a wide area network, an ultra-wide area network, an internet, an intranet, and an extranet.
- a direct wired connection e.g. parallel port, serial port, USB, IEEE 1394, etc.
- a wireless connection e.g. IR port, Bluetooth port, etc.
- a wired network e.g. 802.11x, cellular, etc.
- 802.11x e.g. 802.11x, cellular, etc.
- a node such as node 202 , etc., may include an adaptive replication module 212 that can be implemented as software or firmware to be executed by a processor.
- the adaptive replication module 212 can perform the same functions as the adaptive replication module 108 shown in FIG. 1 .
- the adaptive replication module 212 could also be implemented as a hardware circuit or a combination of hardware circuit and software.
- a node may include a memory having a cache (not shown), a processing device (not shown), and an interface (not shown) to transmit or receive over the network 214 .
- the memory may be volatile or non-volatile memory, or any combination of the thereof.
- a node may also have additional features or functionality and may include input or output devices.
- a node may include an operating system that may execute one or more application programs, or modules, that reside in a memory, such as the adaptive replication module 212 .
- a flowchart of an illustrative embodiment of a method for adaptive replication is shown and generally designated 300 .
- the method 300 is generally applicable to synchronize data objects (such as files) between one node in a network to another node in the network, such as nodes 102 - 106 shown in FIG. 1 or nodes 202 - 212 shown in FIG. 2 .
- the method 300 and adaptive replication, can be particularly useful for networks with low-available bandwidth, such as a network with an overall low-bandwidth or a network with restrictions on bandwidth such as a network with a bandwidth allotment per user or per data transfer or per connection.
- the method 300 may be executed by a node and can determine an existence of a package, at 302 , such as a package that indicates a file was updated at another node.
- a package may include an indicator for the existence of the package, a manifest detailing a list of events or actions that relate to the package, and details (e.g. data) corresponding to the events.
- the node may find or retrieve the package from the node that sent the notification that the package existed or may find or retrieve the package from a different node. Where a node retrieves a package from may be determined based on one or more factors, such as a preferred connection, a preferred node, a bandwidth of a connection, a speed of a connection, other factors, or any combination thereof.
- the node may get the data from the selected node, at 308 .
- the node may also notify other nodes that it now has the package, at 310 ; for example, if any of the other nodes also need that package. Notifying the other nodes may be done at another time in the method 300 , as long as the node sending the notice actually has the package.
- a node may send a location or pointer for a package that may be located at another node.
- the method 300 may attempt to build the package, at 312 . This may include applying updates to a file or folder or other changes at the node. If the package is not complete, at 314 ; for example, as described in a manifest of the package, the method 300 may repeat the process, at 316 , to determine what is still needed to complete the package, at 304 .
- the method 300 and the node may apply the package, at 318 .
- the details and data of the package may be applied to make changes to files or folders at the node or make other changes.
- a node once it has received notification of the existence of a package may choose to retrieve the package immediately or at a later time. Further, each node in a network may choose for itself what is the best way and location to retrieve a package.
- a flowchart of an illustrative embodiment of a method for adaptive replication is shown and generally designated 400 .
- a node may notify other nodes of the existence of the data or package, at 404 .
- a node may implement a process 405 to find and determine where and when to retrieve the data or the package associated with a notification, such as discussed with respect to step 306 shown in FIG. 3 .
- the node may find a location of the data or packet that needs retrieving, at 406 , based on a list of nodes that the retrieving node is aware has the needed data or packet. Another way a retrieving node could find a location of a needed packet would be to poll other nodes to determine if another node has the packet or knows of a location of the packet. For example, a retrieving node may perform a round-round polling of other nodes until it locates the needed data or packet.
- the node may select where to retrieve the needed data or packet from based on one or more factors including, but not limited to: an assigned priority of a node, an assigned priority of the data or package, a bandwidth of a network connection between nodes, a determined speed of a connection, an expected transfer speed, a determined transfer speed, a number of connections, other network metrics, any other factor, or any combination thereof.
- the node may determine when to retrieve the data, at 408 .
- When to retrieve the data may be pre-determined or may be calculated in real-time or at another time.
- a node may determine when to retrieve the data based on one or more factors including, but not limited to: an assigned priority of a node, an assigned priority of the data or package, a bandwidth of a network connection between nodes, a determined speed of a connection, an expected transfer speed, a determined transfer speed, a number of connections, other network metrics, any other factor, or any combination thereof.
- a custom retrieval scheme may be implemented in a node to allow a user or other computer to specify which node or nodes should be used to retrieve or disseminate packages, manifests, data, or other objects.
- a custom retrieval scheme could also specify when specific packages, or types of packages, may be retrieved and could associate a specified delay with packages, such as a pre-determined delay based on the type of package to be retrieved or disseminated.
- the custom retrieval scheme may also specify one or more lengths of delay.
- a node assigns almost no delay for when to retrieve the data (such as a highest priority or a fast connection), such as by a delay indicator like the number one (1)
- the node may proceed to retrieve the data almost immediately, at 410 .
- the process 405 may proceed, at 412 , to implement a delay or wait time, at 414 .
- the node may assign a delay indicator (such as greater than 1) to implement a delay in retrieving the data or to prioritize multiple pending retrievals; for example, a larger delay indicator may correspond to a longer the delay.
- a node may have a maximum delay that may override the delay indicator once the maximum delay has been reached.
- An amount of time of a delay may be pre-determined, set by a user, or may be determined by the node based on one or more factors, such as an assigned priority of a node, an assigned priority of the data or package, a bandwidth of a network connection between nodes, a determined speed of a connection, an expected transfer speed, a determined transfer speed, a number of connections, other network metrics, any other factor, or any combination thereof.
- the process 405 may determine a next delay indicator of data to be retrieved, at 416 . For example, the process 405 may adjust a value indicating an associated delay and then retrieve the data that is associated with adjusted value indicating the new delay. When data is associated with a selected delay, the process 405 may proceed to retrieve the data, at 417 . When the data is not associated with the currently selected delay, the process 405 may determine if a maximum delay (i.e. time out) has been reached, at 418 . When the maximum delay has been reached, the maximum delay may allow the node to retrieve the data regardless of the delay indicator and proceed to retrieving the data, at 419 .
- a maximum delay i.e. time out
- the process 405 may implement another delay, at 414 , and proceed through the process 405 until the data is retrieved.
- Delays may be represented within a node or system by multiple levels that the process 405 may advance through to allow implementation of different lengths of delays ranging from almost no delay to a maximum delay time; though, multiple levels of delay and a maximum delay time are not required to be implemented.
- the methods described herein may be implemented as one or more software programs running on a computer processor, controller, or other control circuit.
- Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits, programmable gate arrays, and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the systems and methods described herein.
- the systems and methods described herein can be applied to any type of system or computer that transfers data over a network.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (17)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/184,055 US9137331B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2011-07-15 | Adaptive replication |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/184,055 US9137331B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2011-07-15 | Adaptive replication |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130018987A1 US20130018987A1 (en) | 2013-01-17 |
US9137331B2 true US9137331B2 (en) | 2015-09-15 |
Family
ID=47519592
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/184,055 Expired - Fee Related US9137331B2 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2011-07-15 | Adaptive replication |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9137331B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8983076B2 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2015-03-17 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for key delivery in HTTP live streaming |
US10496676B2 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2019-12-03 | Netapp Inc. | Synchronization cache seeding |
US10031794B1 (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2018-07-24 | EMC IP Holding Company, LLC | Message generation system and method |
US11050675B2 (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2021-06-29 | Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. | Scheduler for coordination and synchronization of data across low-bandwidth links and method thereof |
JP2021099555A (en) * | 2019-12-19 | 2021-07-01 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Storage system and controller arrangement method |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5649196A (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1997-07-15 | Legent Corporation | System and method for distributed storage management on networked computer systems using binary object identifiers |
US5832514A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1998-11-03 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for discovery based data recovery in a store and forward replication process |
US6101194A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2000-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conflict resolution in multi-node communication network |
US20070177587A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-02 | Gardner Paul A | Systems and methods for distributing data |
US20080285496A1 (en) * | 2007-05-14 | 2008-11-20 | Bamboo Mediacasting Ltd. | Data download in wireless network |
US20090203451A1 (en) * | 2001-11-23 | 2009-08-13 | Jean-Marie Gatto | Gaming Systems Configured for Large Scale Controlled and Secure Data Downloading |
US7653668B1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2010-01-26 | Symantec Operating Corporation | Fault tolerant multi-stage data replication with relaxed coherency guarantees |
US20100049720A1 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2010-02-25 | Apple Inc. | Synching data |
US20100076925A1 (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2010-03-25 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System for managing data collection processes |
US7752630B2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2010-07-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System sending behavior modification hint to client to suggest alternative servers based on operating conditions of current server |
US7788223B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2010-08-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Resource freshness and replication |
US20100257403A1 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Restoration of a system from a set of full and partial delta system snapshots across a distributed system |
US20110196900A1 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2011-08-11 | Alexandre Drobychev | Storage of Data In A Distributed Storage System |
US8117173B2 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient chunking algorithm |
US20120084383A1 (en) * | 2010-04-23 | 2012-04-05 | Ilt Innovations Ab | Distributed Data Storage |
US20120246276A1 (en) * | 2011-03-22 | 2012-09-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Data synchronization server, system, and data transfer bandwidth control method |
US8412676B2 (en) | 2008-10-21 | 2013-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Forgetting items with knowledge based synchronization |
-
2011
- 2011-07-15 US US13/184,055 patent/US9137331B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5649196A (en) | 1993-07-01 | 1997-07-15 | Legent Corporation | System and method for distributed storage management on networked computer systems using binary object identifiers |
US5832514A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1998-11-03 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for discovery based data recovery in a store and forward replication process |
US6101194A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2000-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conflict resolution in multi-node communication network |
US20090203451A1 (en) * | 2001-11-23 | 2009-08-13 | Jean-Marie Gatto | Gaming Systems Configured for Large Scale Controlled and Secure Data Downloading |
US7752630B2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2010-07-06 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System sending behavior modification hint to client to suggest alternative servers based on operating conditions of current server |
US8117173B2 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2012-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficient chunking algorithm |
US7653668B1 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2010-01-26 | Symantec Operating Corporation | Fault tolerant multi-stage data replication with relaxed coherency guarantees |
US7788223B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2010-08-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Resource freshness and replication |
US20070177587A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-02 | Gardner Paul A | Systems and methods for distributing data |
US20100076925A1 (en) * | 2007-02-21 | 2010-03-25 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System for managing data collection processes |
US20080285496A1 (en) * | 2007-05-14 | 2008-11-20 | Bamboo Mediacasting Ltd. | Data download in wireless network |
US20100049720A1 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2010-02-25 | Apple Inc. | Synching data |
US8412676B2 (en) | 2008-10-21 | 2013-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Forgetting items with knowledge based synchronization |
US20100257403A1 (en) * | 2009-04-03 | 2010-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Restoration of a system from a set of full and partial delta system snapshots across a distributed system |
US20110196900A1 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2011-08-11 | Alexandre Drobychev | Storage of Data In A Distributed Storage System |
US20120084383A1 (en) * | 2010-04-23 | 2012-04-05 | Ilt Innovations Ab | Distributed Data Storage |
US20120246276A1 (en) * | 2011-03-22 | 2012-09-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Data synchronization server, system, and data transfer bandwidth control method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20130018987A1 (en) | 2013-01-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10204114B2 (en) | Replicating data across data centers | |
CN107590001B (en) | Load balancing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
AU2008268539B2 (en) | Server-assisted and peer-to-peer synchronization | |
US10244023B2 (en) | Active offline storage management for streaming media application used by multiple client devices | |
US8819080B2 (en) | System and method for collection, retrieval, and distribution of data | |
US8606996B2 (en) | Cache optimization | |
TWI549080B (en) | The method, system and device for sending information of category information | |
US20170364572A1 (en) | Method and system for providing a synchronization service | |
US10951395B2 (en) | Data fetching in data exchange networks | |
CN101674257B (en) | Method and device for storing message and message processing system | |
CN108173774B (en) | Client upgrading method and system | |
US9853906B2 (en) | Network prioritization based on node-level attributes | |
US9229740B1 (en) | Cache-assisted upload proxy | |
JP2013522736A (en) | Method and system for providing a message including a universal resource locator | |
US9137331B2 (en) | Adaptive replication | |
US11425209B2 (en) | Communication system | |
US11394800B2 (en) | Systems and methods for remote network topology discovery | |
US9948580B2 (en) | Techniques to replicate data using uploads from messaging clients | |
US10474644B2 (en) | Systems and methods for optimizing selection of a replication data node in a distributed file system | |
US9491067B2 (en) | Timeout for identifying network device presence | |
EP3555767A1 (en) | Partial storage of large files in distinct storage systems | |
CN110798495B (en) | Method and server for end-to-end message push in cluster architecture mode | |
CN111083204A (en) | File transmission method, device and storage medium | |
CN114731297B (en) | Ad hoc network group for message restriction for computing device peer matching | |
US10728291B1 (en) | Persistent duplex connections and communication protocol for content distribution |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SYNTERGY, INC., CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SEAMAN, DAVID ROBERT;WALL, BLAIR JAMES;CAPSON, CHRISTOPHER CARL;REEL/FRAME:026600/0953 Effective date: 20110712 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GOLD HILL CAPITAL 2008, L.P., MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: FIRST AMENDMENT TO IPSA;ASSIGNOR:METALOGIX INTERNATIONAL GMBH;REEL/FRAME:030592/0038 Effective date: 20130605 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FIFTH STREET MANAGEMENT LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGE Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:METALOGIX INTERNATIONAL GMBH;REEL/FRAME:034290/0262 Effective date: 20141201 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: METALOGIX INTERNATIONAL GMBH, SWITZERLAND Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:GOLD HILL CAPITAL 2008, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:034604/0378 Effective date: 20141230 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: METALOGIX INTERNATIONAL GMBH, WASHINGTON Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:OAKTREE FUND ADMINISTRATION, LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT FOR THE LENDERS AND SUCCESSOR AGENT TO FIFTH STREET MANAGEMENT LLC;REEL/FRAME:047048/0008 Effective date: 20180629 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20190915 |