[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US7778755B2 - Method for reaching a deployment decision - Google Patents

Method for reaching a deployment decision Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US7778755B2
US7778755B2 US10/571,232 US57123204A US7778755B2 US 7778755 B2 US7778755 B2 US 7778755B2 US 57123204 A US57123204 A US 57123204A US 7778755 B2 US7778755 B2 US 7778755B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
integrated
yaw rate
transverse acceleration
vehicle transverse
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related, expires
Application number
US10/571,232
Other versions
US20070168098A1 (en
Inventor
Thomas Lich
Robert Lahmann
Michael Schmid
Mario Kroeninger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Assigned to ROBERT BOSCH GMBH reassignment ROBERT BOSCH GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LAHMANN, ROBERT, KROENINGER, MARIO, SCHMID, MICHAEL, LICH, THOMAS
Publication of US20070168098A1 publication Critical patent/US20070168098A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7778755B2 publication Critical patent/US7778755B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • B60R21/0133Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value by integrating the amplitude of the input signal
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • B60R2021/01322Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value comprising variable thresholds, e.g. depending from other collision parameters
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60RVEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B60R21/00Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
    • B60R21/01Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
    • B60R21/013Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
    • B60R21/0132Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
    • B60R2021/01327Angular velocity or angular acceleration

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to a method for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system in a vehicle.
  • a method for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system is described in published German patent document DE 101 49 112.
  • Soil trips are understood to mean situations in which the vehicle slides sideways after a skid and then runs into a ground surface having a high coefficient of friction, for example, an unpaved surface next to a roadway. If the vehicle then slides to the right, for example, the tires on the right side of the vehicle experience a severe deceleration which then induces a torque on the vehicle on the unpaved surface.
  • the deployment decision is determined as a function of vehicle dynamics data, i.e., a float angle in conjunction with a vehicle transverse velocity and a vehicle tipping motion being used as the vehicle dynamics data. The deployment decision is then reached through appropriate threshold value comparisons.
  • the method according to the present invention for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system has the advantage that earlier deployment is made possible in the event of soil trips. This is due to the fact that the vehicle transverse acceleration is not only linked to the yaw rate, but is also compared to a threshold value which is set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration. The establishment of the threshold value results in a better adaptation to accident conditions.
  • the threshold may be set continuously or at set time intervals. This threshold value decision may be made by comparing a value pair, composed of the vehicle transverse acceleration and the vehicle transverse velocity, to a characteristic curve.
  • the threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration is generated as a function of the quotient of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle acceleration.
  • This quotient is referred to as the rollover susceptibility of the vehicle.
  • the present invention makes use of the following findings: When a body in motion due to its inertia is decelerated by an externally acting force, the inert mass of the vehicle experiences an inertial force. In the simplified assumption of a rigid body, this inertial force may be represented by a force vector acting on the center of gravity of the vehicle. This is illustrated in FIG. 3 . A vehicle 30 is subjected to inertial force F inert , the vector of which points to the right. To the right of the vehicle an obstruction 31 is also seen, there being a height H 1 between the center of gravity at which inertial force F inert acts and obstruction 31 .
  • the vehicle When the height of the center of rotation is equal to or greater than the height of the center of gravity, the vehicle cannot be overturned at all.
  • the acceleration sensors in the vehicle measure an acceleration which allows conclusions to be drawn concerning the magnitude and the direction of the acting force, but not concerning the point of application of the force.
  • the rollover susceptibility of the vehicle S roll is computed as follows:
  • start and end points are generated by a suitable calibration.
  • One possible implementation is to define starting time T 0 as the time at which the acceleration has exceeded a predefined threshold, and then to set end time T n as the time when the integral over a y reaches a predefined value.
  • a side impact is understood to mean an impact on the side, for example on a curb, or also an impact on the side as the result of the wheels digging into an unpaved ground surface.
  • S roll may be refined in such a way that the integral is formed only when an additional condition is met, such as when the acceleration exceeds a minimum value.
  • the formation of S roll is then modified as follows:
  • variable g (S roll ) is then derived, which appropriately varies the threshold for a y , which is generated according to a procedure.
  • One possibility for deriving variable g (S roll ) is provided by an analytical formula or an additional characteristic curve (look-up table) through which a variable g (S roll ) is associated with every value of S roll .
  • FIG. 4 One example for the modification of a threshold by g (S roll ) is provided in FIG. 4 .
  • the yaw rate is compared to a threshold value which is likewise set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
  • the rollover susceptibility it is possible for the rollover susceptibility to be used for establishing the threshold value for the yaw rate, as described above.
  • a base characteristic curve for the threshold value is then also used for the yaw rate, the threshold value being modified as a function of the rollover susceptibility.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an example embodiment of the system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram illustrating an example method according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates the effects of various heights of laterally positioned obstructions.
  • FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the rollover susceptibility and the modified value for the thresholds.
  • Modern systems for sensing rollover events use micromechanical yaw rate sensors which allow the rotational angle to be computed by numerical integration.
  • the combination of information on the yaw rate and the rotational angle allows a prediction of the rollover, and thus a deployment decision, which is more robust and flexible than deploying via a fixed angle threshold of an inclination sensor.
  • Rollover sensing systems based on yaw rate sensors thus allow deployment of irreversible restraining means, such as pyrotechnic seat belt tensioners and windowbags, in addition to the original applications of rollover sensing, the deployment of a reversible roll bar in convertibles.
  • a classic rollover is induced when during straight-ahead driving the vehicle is forced by conditions of the surroundings into a z-directional motion, i.e., in the vertical direction, resulting in a rotation of the vehicle.
  • Typical examples of such situations include sloping embankments next to the roadway, and ramps typically provided with lateral guard rails.
  • the lateral accelerations which arise in such maneuvers are relatively low, and the occupants are put into an “out of position” situation late, if at all, so that the deployment of occupant protection systems is not necessary until a relatively late point in time.
  • “out of position” situation means that a passenger is not in the seated position in which the restraining means provides the optimum protection.
  • the present invention uses, in addition to the variables of yaw rate and acceleration in the y and z directions, an appropriately determined vehicle velocity in the y direction, i.e., the vehicle transverse velocity.
  • the deployment decision is reached in such a way that, in addition to linking the yaw rate and the vehicle transverse acceleration, the vehicle transverse acceleration is subjected to a threshold value decision, the threshold value being set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
  • the vehicle transverse velocity may be used for this purpose.
  • the appropriately filtered acceleration in vehicle transverse direction a y is particularly suited for the threshold value decision, since a lateral acceleration on the tire initiates the rollover.
  • transverse acceleration a y must increase with decreasing vehicle transverse velocity v y .
  • the relationship is not linear, and is taken into account by the threshold decision.
  • the critical transverse acceleration i.e., the transverse acceleration resulting in a rollover, shows a gradient which becomes larger as the vehicle transverse velocity more closely approaches the “critical sliding velocity” (CSV) from higher speeds.
  • CSV critical sliding velocity
  • the CSV is defined as the transverse velocity of the vehicle below which a rollover of the vehicle due to physically based principles, i.e., the energy balance, is impossible.
  • the exact shape of the characteristic curve depends on the type of vehicle and the requirements for the system. However, in the following example it may be assumed that the characteristic curve, i.e., the absolute value of the critical transverse acceleration, monotonically increases as a function of the vehicle transverse velocity for decreasing values of v y .
  • the appropriately filtered yaw rates ⁇ x about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle are also suitable for the threshold value decision, which in this instance is used as a link.
  • the use of ⁇ x may be less intuitive, since a lateral deceleration initiates the soil trip process.
  • analyses of corresponding vehicle tests have shown that both ⁇ x and a y , with appropriate filtering, are suitable as variables for a deployment decision.
  • ⁇ x may also be compared to a threshold value set as a function of v y , or the v y -dependent threshold value may be modified as a function of ⁇ x .
  • a y is negative, i.e., is a deceleration, and that both v y and yaw rate ⁇ x are positive. If it is assumed that a y is determined by a sensor in the airbag control unit, the algebraic sign depends on whether the soil trip occurs as the result of lateral sliding to the left or right. Likewise, the algebraic sign of v y depends on the convention used in the determination of v y . The following method is provided for the implementation in the microcontroller, i.e., in the processor in the airbag control unit:
  • the lateral acceleration which results in tipping of the vehicle is essentially determined by the position of the center of gravity and the track width of a vehicle, and is determined by computer using the static stability factor (SSF).
  • SSF static stability factor
  • Typical values for automobiles and sport utility vehicles (SUVS) are in the approximate range of SSF 1.0 to 1.7.
  • the SSF corresponds to the lateral acceleration, in units of g, necessary to tip over the vehicle.
  • at v y will therefore always have a value as the lowest deployment threshold which is greater than the SSF value, in g, for the corresponding vehicle.
  • a threshold for the appropriately filtered yaw rate must be exceeded.
  • a threshold for the integrated yaw rate i.e., the resulting angle, must be exceeded, it being advantageous to link the start of integration to a threshold value for the yaw rate being exceeded.
  • the start of an integration of a yaw rate may be linked to a threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration being exceeded.
  • the yaw rate is not integrated unless the appropriately filtered vehicle transverse acceleration is greater than a defined value.
  • a threshold for the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration i.e., the drop in velocity
  • a threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration i.e., the drop in velocity
  • an integration of the yaw rate may be linked to a threshold value for the yaw rate being exceeded: in this case, the vehicle transverse acceleration is not integrated unless the appropriately filtered yaw rate is greater than a defined value.
  • a deployment decision to link the signals from a yaw rate sensor and an acceleration sensor.
  • Methods have been described heretofore in which a primary deployment decision was made based on a characteristic curve for a y and ⁇ x and then an additional, less stringent deployment condition was based on a plausibility check of the response of ⁇ x and a y .
  • an equivalent deployment decision for a y and ⁇ x is also possible, i.e., characteristic curves may be defined for both a y and ⁇ x , the deployment decisions for which are appropriately linked, such as by a simple logical AND.
  • a y and ⁇ x may be suitably processed (filtering and integration, for example) and linked.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates in a block diagram the system according to the present invention.
  • a yaw rate sensor 10 for detecting yaw rate ⁇ x about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle is connected to a first input of a processor 11 .
  • An acceleration sensor 12 which detects accelerations in the transverse direction of the vehicle is connected to a second input of a processor 11 .
  • Restraining means 13 such as airbags, seat belt tensioners, and roll bars are connected to an output of processor 11 .
  • Components 10 , 11 , and 12 may be located in a common control unit.
  • sensors 10 and 12 may be situated outside the control unit in which processor 11 —which may be a microcontroller, for example—is located, the sensors being situated, for example, in a kinematic sensor platform. Sensors 10 and 12 may be connected to analog inputs of microcontroller 11 . The analog-digital conversion then occurs in microcontroller 11 . However, sensors 10 and 12 may each be digital sensors, which already emit digital signals. Therefore, digital inputs are then used for controller 11 to detect the sensor signals from yaw rate sensor 10 and acceleration sensor 12 .
  • Microcontroller 11 uses variables ⁇ x and a y to make a deployment decision with respect to a rollover. Most rollovers occur about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle.
  • the deployment decision is made as a function of threshold value decisions concerning vehicle transverse acceleration a y and, optionally, yaw rate ⁇ x . In this instance, this threshold value is varied to account for various circumstances, the various obstructions, which result in different heights of the centers of rotation.
  • the threshold value for a y is generated from the quotient of integrated yaw rate ⁇ x and integrated vehicle transverse acceleration a y , and a y is then compared to this threshold value. If a y is greater than the threshold value, the deployment decision is reached; if a y is lower than the threshold value, the deployment decision is suppressed.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates in a block diagram the sequence of the method according to the present invention.
  • Vehicle transverse acceleration a y is detected by acceleration sensor 12 in block 20 .
  • Vehicle transverse acceleration a y is integrated in block 21 and compared to a threshold value in block 24 , which threshold value is determined as a function of the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and the integrated yaw rate from block 23 .
  • the result of the threshold value comparison is recorded in block 26 in order to then reach the deployment decision.
  • Yaw rate ⁇ x is detected by sensor 10 in block 22 .
  • the yaw rate is likewise integrated in block 23 and subjected to a threshold value comparison in block 25 , this threshold value also being generated as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
  • the threshold value generation is performed by forming a quotient, so that the rollover susceptibility sets the threshold value in each case.
  • the result of the threshold value comparison of yaw rate ⁇ x with its threshold value in block 25 is recorded in block 27 , and is available for further processing.
  • FIG. 3 shows two typical situations involving vehicle torques.
  • vehicle 30 On the left, vehicle 30 is subjected to an inertial force F inert to the right.
  • the inertial force acts on the center of gravity of the vehicle. Therefore, the arrow representing the inertial force is drawn in at that point. Vehicle 30 therefore moves to the right against obstruction 31 .
  • a torque is thus induced by obstruction 31 which results from the product F inert *H.
  • H is the vertical distance between the upper edge of the obstruction (center of rotation) and the center of gravity of the vehicle. Comparing the left-hand and right-hand illustrations in FIG. 3 , Hi>H 2 , so that in the right-hand illustration a greater force, i.e., deceleration, must act on the vehicle to generate the same torque when the vehicle begins to tip.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Driving Devices And Active Controlling Of Vehicle (AREA)
  • Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)

Abstract

A deployment decision for a vehicle restraint system is reached as a function of vehicle dynamics data, at least one vehicle transverse acceleration and one yaw rate about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle being linked to one another as the vehicle dynamics data to reach the deployment decision. The vehicle transverse acceleration is then additionally subjected to a threshold value decision for reaching the deployment decision, the threshold value being set as a function of the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and the integrated yaw rate.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system in a vehicle.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A method for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system, e.g., for soil trips, is described in published German patent document DE 101 49 112. Soil trips are understood to mean situations in which the vehicle slides sideways after a skid and then runs into a ground surface having a high coefficient of friction, for example, an unpaved surface next to a roadway. If the vehicle then slides to the right, for example, the tires on the right side of the vehicle experience a severe deceleration which then induces a torque on the vehicle on the unpaved surface. In published German patent document DE 101 49 112, the deployment decision is determined as a function of vehicle dynamics data, i.e., a float angle in conjunction with a vehicle transverse velocity and a vehicle tipping motion being used as the vehicle dynamics data. The deployment decision is then reached through appropriate threshold value comparisons.
Published international patent document WO 99/47384 describes reaching a deployment decision for a soil trip rollover as a function of the yaw rate about the vehicle longitudinal axis, a vehicle speed, and a vehicle transverse acceleration. The vehicle transverse acceleration is compared to a fixed threshold value. It is not possible to reach a deployment decision until this fixed threshold value is exceeded.
SUMMARY
The method according to the present invention for reaching a deployment decision for a restraint system has the advantage that earlier deployment is made possible in the event of soil trips. This is due to the fact that the vehicle transverse acceleration is not only linked to the yaw rate, but is also compared to a threshold value which is set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration. The establishment of the threshold value results in a better adaptation to accident conditions. The threshold may be set continuously or at set time intervals. This threshold value decision may be made by comparing a value pair, composed of the vehicle transverse acceleration and the vehicle transverse velocity, to a characteristic curve.
Analyses of soil trip vehicle tests have shown that the vehicle transverse velocity has a crucial influence on the maximum roll angle achieved, and thus on the rollover behavior of a vehicle. In any case, for reaching a deployment decision, it is advantageous for the signals to be detected from a yaw rate sensor for rotations about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, and to link these signals with the signals from an acceleration sensor for detecting acceleration in the transverse direction of the vehicle. This results in a higher reliability and an earlier deployment possibility for the restraint system. The vehicle transverse acceleration is suitable, since, as described above, during a soil trip a lateral deceleration occurs at the tires and initiates the rollover.
It is also possible to use not only the vehicle transverse velocity, but also the vehicle transverse acceleration, as well as the yaw rate about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, to enable a high degree of reliability for the deployment decision and, at the same time, a very early deployment decision.
It is particularly advantageous that the threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration is generated as a function of the quotient of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle acceleration. This quotient is referred to as the rollover susceptibility of the vehicle. The present invention makes use of the following findings: When a body in motion due to its inertia is decelerated by an externally acting force, the inert mass of the vehicle experiences an inertial force. In the simplified assumption of a rigid body, this inertial force may be represented by a force vector acting on the center of gravity of the vehicle. This is illustrated in FIG. 3. A vehicle 30 is subjected to inertial force Finert, the vector of which points to the right. To the right of the vehicle an obstruction 31 is also seen, there being a height H1 between the center of gravity at which inertial force Finert acts and obstruction 31.
The higher the center of rotation, thus for example the upper edge of a roadway curb, which in this case is obstruction 31, the lower the torque induced, under constant force, as a result of the inertial force. In the second example in FIG. 3, vehicle 33 once again is subjected to an inertial force Finert which points to the right, but now, height H2 is less since obstruction 32 is higher. Consequently, the torque is also lower. As a result, the higher the center of rotation the greater the inertial force, and thus also the deceleration measured in the vehicle—since the vehicle mass may be assumed to be constant—must be in order to cause the vehicle to overturn. When the height of the center of rotation is equal to or greater than the height of the center of gravity, the vehicle cannot be overturned at all. The acceleration sensors in the vehicle measure an acceleration which allows conclusions to be drawn concerning the magnitude and the direction of the acting force, but not concerning the point of application of the force. To obtain a measure of the effect of the laterally acting force on the rollover behavior of the vehicle, the rollover susceptibility of the vehicle Sroll is computed as follows:
s roll = Δφ x / Δ v y = T 0 t_end ω x t / T 0 t_end a y t ( 1 )
In this regard, the start and end points are generated by a suitable calibration. One possible implementation is to define starting time T0 as the time at which the acceleration has exceeded a predefined threshold, and then to set end time Tn as the time when the integral over ay reaches a predefined value.
It is possible that in the denominator of equation (1) the integral over ay may be subtracted from the transverse velocity present at the beginning of the soil trip on account of sliding. An expression is then provided in the denominator for the magnitude of speed which is instantaneously present in the transverse direction, the reduction in speed resulting from the impact being taken into account by the integral over ay. The kinetic energy in the transverse direction of the vehicle may then be easily computed. In this instance, a side impact is understood to mean an impact on the side, for example on a curb, or also an impact on the side as the result of the wheels digging into an unpaved ground surface.
The computation of Sroll may be refined in such a way that the integral is formed only when an additional condition is met, such as when the acceleration exceeds a minimum value. The formation of Sroll is then modified as follows:
s roll = Δ φ x / Δ v y = T 0 t_end ( f weight × ω x ) t / T 0 t_end ( f weight × a y ) t ( 2 )
where the weighting function fweight=0 when the additional condition, for example, the absolute value of ay> a threshold, is not met, and fweight=1 in all other cases. Thus, at any time during a rollover the rollover susceptibility is determined, and the applicable threshold of a base characteristic curve at this time modifies the applicable formulas.
From the rollover susceptibility a variable g (Sroll) is then derived, which appropriately varies the threshold for ay, which is generated according to a procedure. One possibility for deriving variable g (Sroll) is provided by an analytical formula or an additional characteristic curve (look-up table) through which a variable g (Sroll) is associated with every value of Sroll. The effect of g (Sroll) may be, for example, that an existing threshold of ay is increased by g (Sroll), as follows:
threshold (new)=threshold (old)+g(S roll),
or is multiplied by g (Sroll), as follows:
threshold (new)=threshold (old)*g(S roll).
One example for the modification of a threshold by g (Sroll) is provided in FIG. 4.
Furthermore, it is advantageous for the yaw rate to be compared to a threshold value which is likewise set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration. Here as well, it is possible for the rollover susceptibility to be used for establishing the threshold value for the yaw rate, as described above. A base characteristic curve for the threshold value is then also used for the yaw rate, the threshold value being modified as a function of the rollover susceptibility.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an example embodiment of the system according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a block diagram illustrating an example method according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 illustrates the effects of various heights of laterally positioned obstructions.
FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the rollover susceptibility and the modified value for the thresholds.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Modern systems for sensing rollover events use micromechanical yaw rate sensors which allow the rotational angle to be computed by numerical integration. The combination of information on the yaw rate and the rotational angle allows a prediction of the rollover, and thus a deployment decision, which is more robust and flexible than deploying via a fixed angle threshold of an inclination sensor. Rollover sensing systems based on yaw rate sensors thus allow deployment of irreversible restraining means, such as pyrotechnic seat belt tensioners and windowbags, in addition to the original applications of rollover sensing, the deployment of a reversible roll bar in convertibles. A classic rollover is induced when during straight-ahead driving the vehicle is forced by conditions of the surroundings into a z-directional motion, i.e., in the vertical direction, resulting in a rotation of the vehicle. Typical examples of such situations include sloping embankments next to the roadway, and ramps typically provided with lateral guard rails. The lateral accelerations which arise in such maneuvers are relatively low, and the occupants are put into an “out of position” situation late, if at all, so that the deployment of occupant protection systems is not necessary until a relatively late point in time. In this regard, “out of position” situation means that a passenger is not in the seated position in which the restraining means provides the optimum protection.
However, the matter is different for soil trip rollovers. These are situations in which the vehicle slides sideways after a skid and then runs into a ground surface having a high coefficient of friction, such as an unpaved surface next to a roadway. If the vehicle then slides to the right, the tires on the right side experience a strong deceleration which then creates a torque on the vehicle. The critical difference from the previously described rollover is that, because of great lateral deceleration of the vehicle, the passengers are put “out of position” very early. It is therefore necessary to protect the passengers at a very early point in time by activating the appropriate protective devices, such as windowbags, for example, before injuries occur by impact with the B-pillar or window. Such an early deployment is not possible with current systems, at least not without incurring the risk of unintentional deployment of the restraining means in many non-deployment situations. The present invention provides a method which allows an earlier deployment time in the case of soil trips.
To allow such an early deployment time in the case of soil trips, the present invention uses, in addition to the variables of yaw rate and acceleration in the y and z directions, an appropriately determined vehicle velocity in the y direction, i.e., the vehicle transverse velocity.
According to the present invention, the deployment decision is reached in such a way that, in addition to linking the yaw rate and the vehicle transverse acceleration, the vehicle transverse acceleration is subjected to a threshold value decision, the threshold value being set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration. The vehicle transverse velocity may be used for this purpose.
The appropriately filtered acceleration in vehicle transverse direction ay is particularly suited for the threshold value decision, since a lateral acceleration on the tire initiates the rollover. As confirmed by vehicle tests, in order to roll over a vehicle, transverse acceleration ay must increase with decreasing vehicle transverse velocity vy. Normally the relationship is not linear, and is taken into account by the threshold decision. Rather, as a function of the vehicle transverse velocity, the critical transverse acceleration, i.e., the transverse acceleration resulting in a rollover, shows a gradient which becomes larger as the vehicle transverse velocity more closely approaches the “critical sliding velocity” (CSV) from higher speeds. The CSV is defined as the transverse velocity of the vehicle below which a rollover of the vehicle due to physically based principles, i.e., the energy balance, is impossible. The exact shape of the characteristic curve depends on the type of vehicle and the requirements for the system. However, in the following example it may be assumed that the characteristic curve, i.e., the absolute value of the critical transverse acceleration, monotonically increases as a function of the vehicle transverse velocity for decreasing values of vy.
Besides ay, the appropriately filtered yaw rates ωx about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle are also suitable for the threshold value decision, which in this instance is used as a link. The use of ωx may be less intuitive, since a lateral deceleration initiates the soil trip process. However, analyses of corresponding vehicle tests have shown that both ωx and ay, with appropriate filtering, are suitable as variables for a deployment decision.
By assuming a continuous, essentially exact determination of the vehicle transverse velocity vy, after a starting condition for the algorithm is met, the sensed values for ay, ωx, and vy are continuously, i.e., in each loop of the algorithm, compared to the critical values stored in the form of a characteristic curve. If the value pair (ay, vy) at a time t is greater than the critical value of the characteristic curve, the primary deployment condition is met. It must also be ensured that the lateral acceleration also in fact induces a rotation. This subject will be discussed further below. In addition to ay, ωx may also be compared to a threshold value set as a function of vy, or the vy-dependent threshold value may be modified as a function of ωx.
In the following discussion it may be assumed that ay is negative, i.e., is a deceleration, and that both vy and yaw rate ωx are positive. If it is assumed that ay is determined by a sensor in the airbag control unit, the algebraic sign depends on whether the soil trip occurs as the result of lateral sliding to the left or right. Likewise, the algebraic sign of vy depends on the convention used in the determination of vy. The following method is provided for the implementation in the microcontroller, i.e., in the processor in the airbag control unit:
The absolute values for all variables vy, ay, and ωx are determined. In addition, an algebraic sign ensures that vy, ay, and ωx point in the same direction as a condition for a rollover.
The lateral acceleration which results in tipping of the vehicle is essentially determined by the position of the center of gravity and the track width of a vehicle, and is determined by computer using the static stability factor (SSF). Typical values for automobiles and sport utility vehicles (SUVS) are in the approximate range of SSF=1.0 to 1.7. The SSF corresponds to the lateral acceleration, in units of g, necessary to tip over the vehicle. A characteristic curve for |ay | at vy, will therefore always have a value as the lowest deployment threshold which is greater than the SSF value, in g, for the corresponding vehicle. Depending on the ground surface, however, it is also possible for a high acceleration to develop on all tires, i.e., not only on the right or left tires, during lateral skids to the right or left, respectively, so that, although the vehicle skids sideways, no sufficiently large torque is induced to cause the vehicle to tip. If one relies solely on a threshold value for |ay | as a function of vy to be exceeded for the deployment decision, in the worst case scenario this may result in deployment under high vehicle transverse acceleration without significant development of a tipping angle. To suppress deployment in such cases, it is advantageous to link an additional deployment condition to the yaw rate signal. The following methods provide a possible implementation of the yaw rate signal being additionally taken into account:
a) As an additional deployment condition, a threshold for the appropriately filtered yaw rate must be exceeded.
b) As an additional deployment condition, a threshold for the integrated yaw rate, i.e., the resulting angle, must be exceeded, it being advantageous to link the start of integration to a threshold value for the yaw rate being exceeded.
c) Furthermore, the start of an integration of a yaw rate may be linked to a threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration being exceeded. In this case, the yaw rate is not integrated unless the appropriately filtered vehicle transverse acceleration is greater than a defined value. As an additional deployment condition, it is then required that the resulting integral, having the dimension of an angle, must exceed a threshold value.
The above-described tasks do not result when a threshold value for ωx is considered as a function of vy. However, even for driving maneuvers that are not relevant to soil trips, such as for fast driving on narrow curves, very high yaw rates may develop which then possibly may result in spurious deployment. In this case, it is therefore advantageous to introduce a threshold based on the sensor signal for the vehicle transverse acceleration. Similarly to the above-described additional deployment conditions based on the yaw rate signals, the following implementation examples are described:
a) As an additional deployment condition the threshold for the appropriately filtered vehicle transverse acceleration must be exceeded.
b) As an additional deployment condition a threshold for the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration, i.e., the drop in velocity, must be exceeded, it being advantageous to link the start of integration to a threshold value for the vehicle transverse acceleration being exceeded.
c) Furthermore, an integration of the yaw rate may be linked to a threshold value for the yaw rate being exceeded: in this case, the vehicle transverse acceleration is not integrated unless the appropriately filtered yaw rate is greater than a defined value. As an additional deployment condition, it is then required that the resulting integral, having the dimension of a speed, must exceed a threshold value.
Thus, in any case it is advantageous for a deployment decision to link the signals from a yaw rate sensor and an acceleration sensor. Methods have been described heretofore in which a primary deployment decision was made based on a characteristic curve for ay and ωx and then an additional, less stringent deployment condition was based on a plausibility check of the response of ωx and ay. Of course, an equivalent deployment decision for ay and ωx is also possible, i.e., characteristic curves may be defined for both ay and ωx, the deployment decisions for which are appropriately linked, such as by a simple logical AND. In addition, ay and ωx may be suitably processed (filtering and integration, for example) and linked.
FIG. 1 illustrates in a block diagram the system according to the present invention. For the sake of simplicity, only the components which are involved in the decision method according to the present invention are shown, although it is possible for many more components to be included in the system. A yaw rate sensor 10 for detecting yaw rate ωx about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle is connected to a first input of a processor 11. An acceleration sensor 12 which detects accelerations in the transverse direction of the vehicle is connected to a second input of a processor 11. Restraining means 13, such as airbags, seat belt tensioners, and roll bars are connected to an output of processor 11. Components 10, 11, and 12 may be located in a common control unit. However, it is possible for sensors 10 and 12 to be situated outside the control unit in which processor 11—which may be a microcontroller, for example—is located, the sensors being situated, for example, in a kinematic sensor platform. Sensors 10 and 12 may be connected to analog inputs of microcontroller 11. The analog-digital conversion then occurs in microcontroller 11. However, sensors 10 and 12 may each be digital sensors, which already emit digital signals. Therefore, digital inputs are then used for controller 11 to detect the sensor signals from yaw rate sensor 10 and acceleration sensor 12.
Microcontroller 11 uses variables ωx and ay to make a deployment decision with respect to a rollover. Most rollovers occur about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. The deployment decision is made as a function of threshold value decisions concerning vehicle transverse acceleration ay and, optionally, yaw rate ωx. In this instance, this threshold value is varied to account for various circumstances, the various obstructions, which result in different heights of the centers of rotation. The threshold value for ay is generated from the quotient of integrated yaw rate ωx and integrated vehicle transverse acceleration ay, and ay is then compared to this threshold value. If ay is greater than the threshold value, the deployment decision is reached; if ay is lower than the threshold value, the deployment decision is suppressed.
FIG. 2 illustrates in a block diagram the sequence of the method according to the present invention. Vehicle transverse acceleration ay is detected by acceleration sensor 12 in block 20. Vehicle transverse acceleration ay is integrated in block 21 and compared to a threshold value in block 24, which threshold value is determined as a function of the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and the integrated yaw rate from block 23. The result of the threshold value comparison is recorded in block 26 in order to then reach the deployment decision. Yaw rate ωx is detected by sensor 10 in block 22. The yaw rate is likewise integrated in block 23 and subjected to a threshold value comparison in block 25, this threshold value also being generated as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration. As illustrated, the threshold value generation is performed by forming a quotient, so that the rollover susceptibility sets the threshold value in each case. The result of the threshold value comparison of yaw rate ωx with its threshold value in block 25 is recorded in block 27, and is available for further processing.
FIG. 3 shows two typical situations involving vehicle torques. On the left, vehicle 30 is subjected to an inertial force Finert to the right. The inertial force acts on the center of gravity of the vehicle. Therefore, the arrow representing the inertial force is drawn in at that point. Vehicle 30 therefore moves to the right against obstruction 31. A torque is thus induced by obstruction 31 which results from the product Finert*H. H is the vertical distance between the upper edge of the obstruction (center of rotation) and the center of gravity of the vehicle. Comparing the left-hand and right-hand illustrations in FIG. 3, Hi>H2, so that in the right-hand illustration a greater force, i.e., deceleration, must act on the vehicle to generate the same torque when the vehicle begins to tip.
In FIG. 4, rollover susceptibility Sroll is plotted in arbitrary units on the x-axis. Modification factor g (Sroll) is likewise plotted in arbitrary units, on the y-axis. A curve 40 describes the relationship therebetween. In this instance the relationship is empirical. Curve 40 may alternatively be linear or exponential.

Claims (10)

1. A method for making a deployment decision for a restraint system in a vehicle, comprising:
detecting a vehicle transverse acceleration and a yaw rate about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle;
linking the vehicle transverse acceleration and the yaw rate about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle as vehicle dynamics data;
comparing the vehicle transverse acceleration to a first threshold value, wherein the first threshold value is set as a function of an integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and an integrated yaw rate about the longitudinal axis of the vehicle; and
making the deployment decision based at least on the vehicle dynamics data and the comparison of the vehicle transverse acceleration to the first threshold value.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the first threshold value is set as a function of a ratio of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein integrations for deriving the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and the integrated yaw rate start as a function of the vehicle transverse acceleration and end as a function of an integral value for the vehicle transverse acceleration.
4. The method as recited in claim 2, further comprising:
comparing the yaw rate to a second threshold value, wherein the second threshold value is set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the second threshold value is formed as a function of a quotient of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein in the determination of the quotient of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration, the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration is subtracted from a vehicle transverse velocity at the beginning of a lateral impact event.
7. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein in the determination of the ratio of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration, the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration is subtracted from a vehicle transverse velocity at the beginning of a lateral impact event.
8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein integrations for deriving the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration and the integrated yaw rate start as a function of the vehicle transverse acceleration and end as a function of an integral value for the vehicle transverse acceleration.
9. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising:
comparing the yaw rate to a second threshold value, wherein the second threshold value is set as a function of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the second threshold value is formed as a function of a quotient of the integrated yaw rate and the integrated vehicle transverse acceleration.
US10/571,232 2003-09-25 2004-09-16 Method for reaching a deployment decision Expired - Fee Related US7778755B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10344613 2003-09-25
DE10344613A DE10344613A1 (en) 2003-09-25 2003-09-25 Method for forming a triggering decision
DE10344613.3 2003-09-25
PCT/DE2004/002068 WO2005030536A1 (en) 2003-09-25 2004-09-16 Method for reaching a trigger decision

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070168098A1 US20070168098A1 (en) 2007-07-19
US7778755B2 true US7778755B2 (en) 2010-08-17

Family

ID=34384289

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/571,232 Expired - Fee Related US7778755B2 (en) 2003-09-25 2004-09-16 Method for reaching a deployment decision

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7778755B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1667878B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4448846B2 (en)
CN (1) CN100448720C (en)
DE (2) DE10344613A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2005030536A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10493937B2 (en) 2017-02-01 2019-12-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Restraint device deployment calibration

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102004029374A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for determining a triggering decision for restraining means of a motor vehicle
US7477974B2 (en) 2004-07-27 2009-01-13 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vehicle restraint device control method and apparatus using dynamically determined threshold
DE102004040140A1 (en) * 2004-08-19 2006-02-23 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for eliminating a risk of tipping over of a motor vehicle
US7522982B2 (en) * 2004-09-15 2009-04-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Methods and systems for detecting automobile rollover
US7239952B2 (en) * 2004-12-08 2007-07-03 Continental Teves, Inc. Reduced order parameter identification for vehicle rollover control system
US7734394B2 (en) * 2005-04-25 2010-06-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh System and method for sensing soil-and curb-tripped rollover events
ITRM20060571A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-04-24 Dainese Spa METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE PREDICTION OF A FALL FROM A MOTORCYCLE
DE102007024821B3 (en) * 2007-05-29 2008-11-27 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method and device for detecting a vehicle rollover
DE102007032591B3 (en) * 2007-07-12 2008-09-04 Vdo Automotive Ag Automotive process and assembly to detect the condition of roll over and activate on-board safety systems
US7996132B2 (en) 2007-11-29 2011-08-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Fast sensing system and method for soil- and curb-tripped vehicle rollovers
DE102007059414A1 (en) * 2007-12-10 2009-06-18 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and arrangement for controlling safety devices for a vehicle
DE102009046067A1 (en) * 2009-10-28 2011-05-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and control unit for detecting a safety-critical impact of an object on a vehicle
DE102009033760A1 (en) * 2009-07-17 2011-01-27 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method for roll detection
DE102010027969B4 (en) * 2010-04-20 2020-07-02 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for determining a type of impact of an object on a vehicle
KR20120060509A (en) * 2010-12-02 2012-06-12 현대자동차주식회사 Inertial Measurement Intergrated Airbag Control Unit
DE102011115374A1 (en) 2011-10-10 2013-04-11 Continental Automotive Gmbh Method for rollover detection of vehicle e.g. motor vehicle, involves determining transverse velocity of vehicle, and predicting staggering rate and staggering angle from transverse velocity discharge time and lateral acceleration
US9114772B2 (en) * 2013-11-27 2015-08-25 Bruce L Kepley Centripetal phase shift isolation control system, in deflection, dampen, dissipation, transposition and isolation of a stochastic vector
US11648900B2 (en) * 2020-07-27 2023-05-16 Robert Bosch Gmbh Off-zone crash detection using lateral accelerations at different positions in a vehicle

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999047384A1 (en) 1998-03-17 1999-09-23 Autoliv Development Ab A safety arrangement in a vehicle
US6100797A (en) * 1997-10-06 2000-08-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh System for producing a release signal for a vehicle safety device
US20020075140A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-06-20 Trw Inc. System and method for sensing vehicle rollover
EP1219500A2 (en) 2000-12-28 2002-07-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Rollover determining apparatus and methods
DE10149112A1 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-04-30 Bosch Gmbh Robert Method for determining a triggering decision for restraint devices in a vehicle

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100202941B1 (en) * 1994-10-31 1999-06-15 배길훈 Car collision type judging device taking advantage of three-direction speed reduction signal

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6100797A (en) * 1997-10-06 2000-08-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh System for producing a release signal for a vehicle safety device
WO1999047384A1 (en) 1998-03-17 1999-09-23 Autoliv Development Ab A safety arrangement in a vehicle
US20020075140A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-06-20 Trw Inc. System and method for sensing vehicle rollover
EP1219500A2 (en) 2000-12-28 2002-07-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Rollover determining apparatus and methods
DE10149112A1 (en) 2001-10-05 2003-04-30 Bosch Gmbh Robert Method for determining a triggering decision for restraint devices in a vehicle

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10493937B2 (en) 2017-02-01 2019-12-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Restraint device deployment calibration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1667878A1 (en) 2006-06-14
CN100448720C (en) 2009-01-07
CN1856419A (en) 2006-11-01
US20070168098A1 (en) 2007-07-19
JP2006524601A (en) 2006-11-02
EP1667878B1 (en) 2007-05-23
JP4448846B2 (en) 2010-04-14
DE502004003903D1 (en) 2007-07-05
DE10344613A1 (en) 2005-05-04
WO2005030536A1 (en) 2005-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7778755B2 (en) Method for reaching a deployment decision
US7460937B2 (en) Method for generating a firing decision for a restraining system
US7206680B2 (en) Method for determining a decision for the triggering of restraint means in a vehicle
EP2065263B1 (en) Fast sensing system and method for soil- and curb-tripped vehicle rollovers
EP1236620B1 (en) Vehicle rollover detection system
US7162343B2 (en) Intelligent vehicle rollover detection methods and systems
US6560519B2 (en) Rollover-sensing system for a vehicle and method of operating the same
US7698036B2 (en) Vehicle rollover detection system
US7522982B2 (en) Methods and systems for detecting automobile rollover
EP2289753B1 (en) Method and control device for detecting and/or plausibilizing an airborne situation of a vehicle
US7664587B2 (en) Device for recognizing a vehicle overturn
EP1642780B1 (en) A method and system for detecting a vehicle rollover
EP3390163B1 (en) Acceleration sensing of fast roll and slow roll for vehicle
CN113386697A (en) Method and system for controlling an actuatable restraining device with enhanced rollover discrimination
KR20220152277A (en) Method and Apparatus for Controlling an Operable Protection Device with Offload and Rollover Detection
JP6019694B2 (en) Vehicle control device
JP4699969B2 (en) Vehicle occupant protection device
JP4334964B2 (en) Crew protection device
JP2007153284A (en) Rollover determining device and method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LICH, THOMAS;LAHMANN, ROBERT;SCHMID, MICHAEL;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060412 TO 20060522;REEL/FRAME:018527/0001

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LICH, THOMAS;LAHMANN, ROBERT;SCHMID, MICHAEL;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018527/0001;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060412 TO 20060522

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552)

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20220817