US6141648A - Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property - Google Patents
Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US6141648A US6141648A US09/118,188 US11818898A US6141648A US 6141648 A US6141648 A US 6141648A US 11818898 A US11818898 A US 11818898A US 6141648 A US6141648 A US 6141648A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- per square
- square foot
- subject property
- value
- comparable
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0206—Price or cost determination based on market factors
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to real estate appraisals and more particularly to a method for estimating the dollar per square foot value of real property.
- Real estate appraisals are used to estimate the defined value of a real property interest in real estate.
- the appraisals have use in many types of real estate transactions. For example, a buyer may use an appraisal to find out a property's market value before accepting a selling price, a seller may use an appraisal to determine a selling price, an insurer may use an appraisal before underwriting a mortgage loan, or a lender may use an appraisal to acquire certain information about a property before issuing a loan for that property.
- a problem with appraisals is that they can take a lot of time (i.e. about four days) to complete, which may be too long in many of today's real estate transactions.
- the appraisal takes about four days because the appraiser needs to inspect the subject property, find recent sales that are comparable to the subject property, determine the comparables which are the most relevant to the subject property, adjust the sales prices of the most relevant comparables to reflect their differences from the subject property, reconcile the adjusted sales prices to derive a single value estimate of the subject property.
- a full appraisal is not needed.
- an easier way to appraise real property is to determine the dollars per square foot that would be typical for the real property.
- a dollar value estimate for the real property is determined by taking the dollars per square foot value for the real property and multiplying it by the living area of the property.
- a computer-implemented method for estimating a dollar per square foot value of a subject property according to a set of comparable properties is retrieved from a case base.
- the comparable properties are characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value.
- the plurality of common attributes comprise distance from the subject property and living area measured in dollars per square foot.
- the distance attribute values from the set of comparable properties are evaluated to the subject property on a fuzzy preference scale indicating desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match with the subject property. Each evaluation generates a weighted preference having a value between 0 and 1.
- the living area attribute from each of the comparable properties are then aggregated with the weighted preference into a dollar per square foot estimate of the subject property.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing the steps of determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention
- FIG. 2 is a system for determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart describing the steps set forth in FIG. 1 in more detail.
- FIG. 4 is a graphical display illustrating the preference criteria used in this invention.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing the steps of determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention.
- an initial set of real estate properties that are comparable to the subject property are retrieved at 10.
- the initial set of comparable properties and the subject property are both characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value.
- the attributes include transaction characteristics such as distance of the property to the subject property, the date of sale, the living area, the number of bedrooms, and the number of bathrooms, and the lot size.
- the attributes of the comparable properties are then compared to the subject property in order to obtain the most closely related comparable properties. Typically, this invention will find anywhere from four to 100 comparable properties at 12. After retrieving comparable properties, an estimate of the dollar per square foot of the subject property based on the comparable properties is generated at 14.
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic of a system 16 used to determine a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention.
- the system 16 includes a comparable property database 18, and a personal computer or work station 20 having a hard drive 22, an input device such as a keyboard 24 and a mouse 26, and an output device such as a display 28 and a printer 30, connected to the database 18.
- the comparable property database 18 is preferably a case base having a plurality of properties that are retrieved by the computer 20 using SQL queries.
- the case base 18 contains about 600,000 properties, with each property being characterized by about 166 attributes.
- the retrieval returns anywhere from four to one hundred comparable properties.
- the selection is performed by comparing specific attributes (i.e., distance from the subject property, date of sale, living area, the number of bedrooms, the number of bathrooms, and lot size) of the subject property with the same attributes of each comparable properties. All of the retrieved potential comparable properties have values that are within allowable deviations for the subject property. If the size of the comparable set of properties is too small (e.g., less than 10), then the allowable deviations can be adjusted so that more comparables of lesser quality can be obtained.
- specific attributes i.e., distance from the subject property, date of sale, living area, the number of bedrooms, the number of bathrooms, and lot size
- the dollar per square foot estimate is generated.
- the determination of the dollar per square foot estimate is shown in further detail in the flow chart of FIG. 3.
- the dollar per square foot estimate is generated by examining the values generated for the distance of the comparable property from the subject property.
- the distance from the comparable property to the subject property is rated on a fuzzy preference scale that indicates desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match.
- An understanding of the preference criteria for the distance from subject property is graphically described in FIG. 4.
- the trapezoidal shape of the graph in FIG. 4 represents the criteria evaluation used in the present invention.
- the broader base of the trapezoidal shape represents the range of tolerable values and corresponds to the interval-value used in the preliminary retrieval query.
- the smaller base of the trapezoidal shape or the core represents the most desirable range of values and establishes the top preference for the attribute.
- An attribute value falling inside the most desirable region will receive a preference value of 1.
- the values in the [0,1] interval represent the partial degree of membership of the attribute values in the fuzzy sets and fuzzy relations representing the preference criteria provided in the fuzzy preference scales.
- the preference distribution for a comparable property that is located within one quarter of a mile is 1. If the comparable property is located between one quarter of a mile and a half of a mile away from the subject property, its preference value will be between zero and one. If the comparable property is located more than a half a mile away from the subject property, its preference value will be zero.
- the comparables are evaluated to determine the distance related weight preferences at 32.
- the distance related weight preferences for each comparable are obtained from the graph of FIG. 4.
- the typical dollar per square foot value for each comparable property is determined and then outputted at 36.
- the typical dollar per square foot value for a subject property is determined by multiplying the weighted distance preferences for all of the comparables by each comparable's dollar per square foot value to generate a weighted dollar per square foot value.
- the weighted dollar per square foot value for all of the comparables are summed to generate a total weighted dollar per square foot value.
- the total weighted dollar per square foot value is then divided by the sum of the weighted distance values to generate an estimate dollar per square foot value of the subject property.
- Table 1 An example of determining the dollar per square foot value for a subject property from a set of comparable properties is shown in Table 1.
- Table 1 An example of determining the dollar per square foot value for a subject property from a set of comparable properties is shown in Table 1.
- ten comparable properties were retrieved. Listed in each row are the distance that the comparable property is from the subject property, the dollar per square foot value, the distance weight, and the weighted dollar per square foot value.
- the dollar per square foot value for the subject property is determined by summing the distance weights and the weighted dollar per square foot values for all of the comparable properties and dividing the total weighted dollar per square foot values by the total distance weights.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
A computer-implemented method for estimating a dollar per square foot value of a subject property. A set of properties comparable to the subject property are retrieved. The comparable properties are characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value. The plurality of common attributes include distance from the subject property, sale price, and living area. The distance of the comparable properties to the subject property are rated on a fuzzy preference scale indicating desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match with the subject property. Each evaluation generates a weighted preference. The sale price and the living area from each of the comparable properties are then aggregated with the weighted preference for that comparable into a dollar per square foot estimate of the subject property.
Description
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/519,479 filed Aug. 25, 1995, now abandoned.
This application is related in subject matter to application Ser. No. 09/118,103 filed Jul. 17, 1998, and application Ser. No. 09/118,112 filed Jul. 17, 1998.
This invention relates generally to real estate appraisals and more particularly to a method for estimating the dollar per square foot value of real property.
Real estate appraisals are used to estimate the defined value of a real property interest in real estate. The appraisals have use in many types of real estate transactions. For example, a buyer may use an appraisal to find out a property's market value before accepting a selling price, a seller may use an appraisal to determine a selling price, an insurer may use an appraisal before underwriting a mortgage loan, or a lender may use an appraisal to acquire certain information about a property before issuing a loan for that property. A problem with appraisals is that they can take a lot of time (i.e. about four days) to complete, which may be too long in many of today's real estate transactions. The appraisal takes about four days because the appraiser needs to inspect the subject property, find recent sales that are comparable to the subject property, determine the comparables which are the most relevant to the subject property, adjust the sales prices of the most relevant comparables to reflect their differences from the subject property, reconcile the adjusted sales prices to derive a single value estimate of the subject property. In many cases a full appraisal is not needed. For example, an easier way to appraise real property is to determine the dollars per square foot that would be typical for the real property. In this approach, a dollar value estimate for the real property is determined by taking the dollars per square foot value for the real property and multiplying it by the living area of the property. However, there are presently no easy approaches that determine the dollars per square foot value of real property based on a set of comparable properties.
Thus, in accordance with this invention, there is provided a computer-implemented method for estimating a dollar per square foot value of a subject property according to a set of comparable properties. In this invention, the set of properties comparable to the subject property are retrieved from a case base. The comparable properties are characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value. The plurality of common attributes comprise distance from the subject property and living area measured in dollars per square foot. The distance attribute values from the set of comparable properties are evaluated to the subject property on a fuzzy preference scale indicating desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match with the subject property. Each evaluation generates a weighted preference having a value between 0 and 1. Next, the living area attribute from each of the comparable properties are then aggregated with the weighted preference into a dollar per square foot estimate of the subject property.
While the present invention will hereinafter be described in connection with an illustrative embodiment and method of use, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to this embodiment. Instead, it is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing the steps of determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention;
FIG. 2 is a system for determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart describing the steps set forth in FIG. 1 in more detail; and
FIG. 4 is a graphical display illustrating the preference criteria used in this invention.
This invention estimates the dollar per square foot value of a subject property by using case-based reasoning principles. In particular, case-based reasoning is used to automate the steps of finding recent sales comparable to the subject property, determining the most relevant units of comparison, comparing the subject property with the comparables, and estimating the dollar per square foot value of the subject property. FIG. 1 is a flow chart describing the steps of determining a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention. In FIG. 1, an initial set of real estate properties that are comparable to the subject property are retrieved at 10. The initial set of comparable properties and the subject property are both characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value. The attributes include transaction characteristics such as distance of the property to the subject property, the date of sale, the living area, the number of bedrooms, and the number of bathrooms, and the lot size. The attributes of the comparable properties are then compared to the subject property in order to obtain the most closely related comparable properties. Typically, this invention will find anywhere from four to 100 comparable properties at 12. After retrieving comparable properties, an estimate of the dollar per square foot of the subject property based on the comparable properties is generated at 14.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic of a system 16 used to determine a dollar per square foot value estimate of a subject property according to this invention. The system 16 includes a comparable property database 18, and a personal computer or work station 20 having a hard drive 22, an input device such as a keyboard 24 and a mouse 26, and an output device such as a display 28 and a printer 30, connected to the database 18. The comparable property database 18 is preferably a case base having a plurality of properties that are retrieved by the computer 20 using SQL queries. In the illustrative embodiment, the case base 18 contains about 600,000 properties, with each property being characterized by about 166 attributes. Typically, the retrieval returns anywhere from four to one hundred comparable properties. The selection is performed by comparing specific attributes (i.e., distance from the subject property, date of sale, living area, the number of bedrooms, the number of bathrooms, and lot size) of the subject property with the same attributes of each comparable properties. All of the retrieved potential comparable properties have values that are within allowable deviations for the subject property. If the size of the comparable set of properties is too small (e.g., less than 10), then the allowable deviations can be adjusted so that more comparables of lesser quality can be obtained.
After the initial set of comparable properties has been retrieved, the dollar per square foot estimate is generated. The determination of the dollar per square foot estimate is shown in further detail in the flow chart of FIG. 3. In the illustrative embodiment, the dollar per square foot estimate is generated by examining the values generated for the distance of the comparable property from the subject property. In particular, the distance from the comparable property to the subject property is rated on a fuzzy preference scale that indicates desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match. An understanding of the preference criteria for the distance from subject property is graphically described in FIG. 4. The trapezoidal shape of the graph in FIG. 4 represents the criteria evaluation used in the present invention. In particular, the broader base of the trapezoidal shape represents the range of tolerable values and corresponds to the interval-value used in the preliminary retrieval query. The smaller base of the trapezoidal shape or the core represents the most desirable range of values and establishes the top preference for the attribute. An attribute value falling inside the most desirable region will receive a preference value of 1. As the feature value moves away from the most desirable range, its associated preference value will decrease from 1 to 0. The values in the [0,1] interval represent the partial degree of membership of the attribute values in the fuzzy sets and fuzzy relations representing the preference criteria provided in the fuzzy preference scales.
Typically, comparable properties selected in the preliminary retrieval that have attribute values falling outside the tolerable value range will not be evaluated. In the illustrative embodiment, the preference distribution for a comparable property that is located within one quarter of a mile is 1. If the comparable property is located between one quarter of a mile and a half of a mile away from the subject property, its preference value will be between zero and one. If the comparable property is located more than a half a mile away from the subject property, its preference value will be zero.
Referring again to FIG. 3, after the initial set of comparable properties has been retrieved, the comparables are evaluated to determine the distance related weight preferences at 32. The distance related weight preferences for each comparable are obtained from the graph of FIG. 4. At 34, the typical dollar per square foot value for each comparable property is determined and then outputted at 36. In particular, the typical dollar per square foot value for a subject property is determined by multiplying the weighted distance preferences for all of the comparables by each comparable's dollar per square foot value to generate a weighted dollar per square foot value. The weighted dollar per square foot value for all of the comparables are summed to generate a total weighted dollar per square foot value. The total weighted dollar per square foot value is then divided by the sum of the weighted distance values to generate an estimate dollar per square foot value of the subject property.
An example of determining the dollar per square foot value for a subject property from a set of comparable properties is shown in Table 1. In the example, ten comparable properties were retrieved. Listed in each row are the distance that the comparable property is from the subject property, the dollar per square foot value, the distance weight, and the weighted dollar per square foot value. As mentioned above, the dollar per square foot value for the subject property is determined by summing the distance weights and the weighted dollar per square foot values for all of the comparable properties and dividing the total weighted dollar per square foot values by the total distance weights.
TABLE 1 ______________________________________ Dollar Per Square Foot Value Determination distance weighted Property Distance(miles) $/sq ft weight $/sq ft ______________________________________ 342-837 0.1 100 1 100 113-012 0.15 98 1 98 306-018 0.2 102 1 102 093-018 0.25 103 1 103 305-006 0.3 99 0.8 79.2 685-046 0.4 110 0.4 44 847-984 0.45 98 0.2 19.6 873-005 0.5 112 0 0 431-023 0.7 90 0 0 331-018 0.9 124 0 0 Total 5.4 545.8 $/sq ft 101.0741 ______________________________________
In Table 1, the total distance weight is 5.4 and the total weighted dollar per square foot value is 545.8. Dividing 545.8 by 5.4 gives a dollar per square foot value for the subject property of 101.0741.
It is therefore apparent that there has been provided in accordance with the present invention, a method for estimating the dollar per square foot value of real property that fully satisfy the aims and advantages and objectives hereinbefore set forth. The invention has been described with reference to several embodiments, however, it will be appreciated that variations and modifications can be effected by a person of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims (2)
1. A computer-implemented method for estimating a dollar per square foot value of a subject property according to a set of comparable properties, comprising:
retrieving the set of properties comparable to the subject property from a case base, the comparable properties characterized by a plurality of common attributes each having a respective value, the plurality of common attributes comprising distance from the subject property and living area measured in dollars per square foot;
evaluating the distance attribute values from the set of comparable properties to the subject property on a fuzzy preference scale indicating desirable and tolerable deviations from an ideal match with the subject property, each evaluation generating a weighted preference having a value between 0 and 1; and
aggregating the living area attribute from each of the comparable properties with the weighted preference into a dollar per square foot estimate of the subject property.
2. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1, wherein aggregating comprises multiplying the weighted preference with the dollar per square foot value for each of the comparable properties to generate a weighted dollar per square foot value, summing the weighted dollar per square foot values to generate a total weighted dollar per square foot value, dividing the total weighted dollar per square foot value by the total weighted preferences to estimate the dollar per square foot value of the subject property.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/118,188 US6141648A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1998-07-17 | Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51947995A | 1995-08-25 | 1995-08-25 | |
US09/118,188 US6141648A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1998-07-17 | Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US51947995A Continuation-In-Part | 1995-08-25 | 1995-08-25 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US6141648A true US6141648A (en) | 2000-10-31 |
Family
ID=24068477
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/118,188 Expired - Fee Related US6141648A (en) | 1995-08-25 | 1998-07-17 | Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6141648A (en) |
Cited By (44)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2002011038A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2002-02-07 | Case Shiller Weiss, Inc. | Property rating and ranking system and method |
US20020099650A1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2002-07-25 | Cole James A. | Method for automatically processing a financial loan application and the system thereof |
US20030046129A1 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2003-03-06 | Simon Brecher | Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate |
US20030115163A1 (en) * | 2001-12-10 | 2003-06-19 | Moore George C. | Methods and systems for estimating building reconstruction costs |
US20030149658A1 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2003-08-07 | Radian Group, Inc. | System for providing a warranty for the automated valuation of property |
US20030187701A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-10-02 | Bonissone Piero Patrone | Process for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US20030187699A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-10-02 | Bonissone Piero Patrone | System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US6658460B1 (en) * | 1999-11-09 | 2003-12-02 | Gas Products, Inc. | Computer based system for evaluating a particular natural resource property |
US20040059653A1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2004-03-25 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | System and method for rendering automated real property title decisions |
US6748369B2 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2004-06-08 | General Electric Company | Method and system for automated property valuation |
US20040153330A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-08-05 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | System and method for evaluating future collateral risk quality of real estate |
US6815362B1 (en) | 2001-05-04 | 2004-11-09 | Lam Research Corporation | End point determination of process residues in wafer-less auto clean process using optical emission spectroscopy |
US6842738B1 (en) * | 1996-10-11 | 2005-01-11 | Freddie Mac | System and method for providing property value estimates |
US20050108025A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US20050171822A1 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Responsive confidence scoring method for a proposed valuation of aproperty |
US20060015357A1 (en) * | 2004-07-16 | 2006-01-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for spatiotemporal valuation of real estate |
US7003487B1 (en) * | 2000-08-10 | 2006-02-21 | Skirpa Alexander R | Automated management system |
US20060080132A1 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Hall Greg S | Method for generating, accessing, and managing property inspection reports |
US20060085234A1 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2006-04-20 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for constructing a forecast standard deviation for automated valuation modeling |
US20060271472A1 (en) * | 2005-05-24 | 2006-11-30 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for advanced mortgage diagnostic analytics |
US20070033122A1 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2007-02-08 | First American Real Estate Solutions, Lp | Method and apparatus for computing selection criteria for an automated valuation model |
US7219078B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2007-05-15 | Causeway Data Communications Limited | Spatially-based valuation of property |
US7249146B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2007-07-24 | Shimon Brecher | Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate |
US20080004893A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | First American Corelogic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score |
US20080120363A1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | Damien Gerard Loveland | System and method for facilitating property comparisons |
US7383239B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2008-06-03 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for a fusion classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US20090088967A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Lerner Matthew R | Systems, techniques, and methods for providing location assessments |
AU2009100367B4 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2009-07-16 | Residex Pty Limited | Real estate value estimation |
US7567914B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2009-07-28 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for dominance classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7593890B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2009-09-22 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US7630910B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2009-12-08 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US20100023379A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-28 | HMVP Partners, LLC | Method and system for determining real estate market value changes |
US7693765B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2010-04-06 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for creating electronic real estate registration |
US7698159B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2010-04-13 | Genworth Financial Inc. | Systems and methods for performing data collection |
US7801748B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2010-09-21 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for detecting outliers for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7809635B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2010-10-05 | Corelogic Information Solutions, Inc. | Method and system for updating a loan portfolio with information on secondary liens |
US7813945B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2010-10-12 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for multivariate adaptive regression splines classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7818186B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-10-19 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7844476B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-11-30 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7844477B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-11-30 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7895062B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-02-22 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US8005693B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-08-23 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US9076185B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2015-07-07 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for managing electronic real estate registry information |
US20180025452A1 (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-25 | Realtex Value LLC | Computerized systems and methods for optimizing building construction |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5361201A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1994-11-01 | Hnc, Inc. | Real estate appraisal using predictive modeling |
US5414621A (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1995-05-09 | Hough; John R. | System and method for computing a comparative value of real estate |
US5680305A (en) * | 1995-02-16 | 1997-10-21 | Apgar, Iv; Mahlon | System and method for evaluating real estate |
US5960407A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1999-09-28 | Vivona; Robert G. | Automated market price analysis system |
-
1998
- 1998-07-17 US US09/118,188 patent/US6141648A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5414621A (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1995-05-09 | Hough; John R. | System and method for computing a comparative value of real estate |
US5361201A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1994-11-01 | Hnc, Inc. | Real estate appraisal using predictive modeling |
US5680305A (en) * | 1995-02-16 | 1997-10-21 | Apgar, Iv; Mahlon | System and method for evaluating real estate |
US5960407A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1999-09-28 | Vivona; Robert G. | Automated market price analysis system |
Non-Patent Citations (16)
Title |
---|
"A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal" by A Gonzalez, et al., pp. 229-246. |
"The Sales Comparison Approach" Apraising Residential Properties (2nd Edition, 1994) pp. 371-436. |
A Case Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal by A Gonzalez, et al., pp. 229 246. * |
Americal Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraising Residential Property, pp. 371 436 2ed., Jul. 1994. * |
Americal Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraising Residential Property, pp. 371-436 2ed., Jul. 1994. |
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraising Residential Properties, 371 436 (2d ed.) Jul. 1994. * |
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, Appraising Residential Properties, 371-436 (2d ed.) Jul. 1994. |
Avelino J. Gonsales, "A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal", Expert Systems with Applications, v4 pp. 229-246, Year 1992. |
Avelino J. Gonsales, A Case Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal , Expert Systems with Applications, v4 pp. 229 246, Year 1992. * |
Avelino J. Gonzales, "A Case-Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal", Expert Systems with Applications, v 4, pp. 229-246, 1992. |
Avelino J. Gonzales, A Case Based Reasoning Approach to Real Estate Property Appraisal , Expert Systems with Applications, v 4, pp. 229 246, 1992. * |
The Sales Comparison Approach Apraising Residential Properties (2nd Edition, 1994) pp. 371 436. * |
US Patent Application, RD 24,351 A Method for Estimating the Value of Real Property by William E. Cheetam. & Piero P. Bonissone. * |
US Patent Application, RD 24,354 A Method for Validating Specified Prices on Real Property by William E. Cheetam and Piero P. Bonissone. * |
US Patent Application, RD-24,351 "A Method for Estimating the Value of Real Property" by William E. Cheetam. & Piero P. Bonissone. |
US Patent Application, RD-24,354 "A Method for Validating Specified Prices on Real Property" by William E. Cheetam and Piero P. Bonissone. |
Cited By (68)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6842738B1 (en) * | 1996-10-11 | 2005-01-11 | Freddie Mac | System and method for providing property value estimates |
US6748369B2 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2004-06-08 | General Electric Company | Method and system for automated property valuation |
US6658460B1 (en) * | 1999-11-09 | 2003-12-02 | Gas Products, Inc. | Computer based system for evaluating a particular natural resource property |
US20020035520A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2002-03-21 | Weiss Allan N. | Property rating and ranking system and method |
WO2002011038A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2002-02-07 | Case Shiller Weiss, Inc. | Property rating and ranking system and method |
US7003487B1 (en) * | 2000-08-10 | 2006-02-21 | Skirpa Alexander R | Automated management system |
US20020099650A1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2002-07-25 | Cole James A. | Method for automatically processing a financial loan application and the system thereof |
US7499882B2 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2009-03-03 | Teranet Enterprises Inc. | Method for automatically processing a financial loan application and the system thereof |
US6815362B1 (en) | 2001-05-04 | 2004-11-09 | Lam Research Corporation | End point determination of process residues in wafer-less auto clean process using optical emission spectroscopy |
US20030046129A1 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2003-03-06 | Simon Brecher | Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate |
US7236985B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2007-06-26 | Simon Brecher | Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate |
US7219078B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2007-05-15 | Causeway Data Communications Limited | Spatially-based valuation of property |
US7249146B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2007-07-24 | Shimon Brecher | Computerized system and method for acquiring and analyzing data pertaining to real estate |
US7373303B2 (en) | 2001-12-10 | 2008-05-13 | E2Value, Inc. | Methods and systems for estimating building reconstruction costs |
US20030115163A1 (en) * | 2001-12-10 | 2003-06-19 | Moore George C. | Methods and systems for estimating building reconstruction costs |
US20030187701A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-10-02 | Bonissone Piero Patrone | Process for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7844477B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-11-30 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7844476B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-11-30 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US8793146B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2014-07-29 | Genworth Holdings, Inc. | System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7895062B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-02-22 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7630910B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2009-12-08 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for case-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7899688B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-03-01 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7818186B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2010-10-19 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US20030187699A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-10-02 | Bonissone Piero Patrone | System for rule-based insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US8005693B2 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-08-23 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | Process for determining a confidence factor for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US20030149658A1 (en) * | 2002-02-06 | 2003-08-07 | Radian Group, Inc. | System for providing a warranty for the automated valuation of property |
US20040059653A1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2004-03-25 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | System and method for rendering automated real property title decisions |
US20040153330A1 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2004-08-05 | Fidelity National Financial, Inc. | System and method for evaluating future collateral risk quality of real estate |
US7801748B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2010-09-21 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for detecting outliers for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US8214314B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2012-07-03 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for a fusion classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7567914B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2009-07-28 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for dominance classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7383239B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2008-06-03 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for a fusion classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
US7813945B2 (en) | 2003-04-30 | 2010-10-12 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and process for multivariate adaptive regression splines classification for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system |
AU2009100367B4 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2009-07-16 | Residex Pty Limited | Real estate value estimation |
AU2004203433B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2009-09-17 | Rp Data Pty Ltd | Real estate value estimation |
US8108302B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2012-01-31 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) | Systems and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US8239318B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2012-08-07 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US7593890B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2009-09-22 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US8280806B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2012-10-02 | Freddie Mac | Systems and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US8548905B1 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2013-10-01 | Freddie Mac | System and methods for determining the likelihood that a loan closes |
US7599882B2 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2009-10-06 | First American Corelogic, Inc. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US20050108025A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US20100088242A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2010-04-08 | First American Corelogic, Inc. | Method for mortgage fraud detection |
US20050171822A1 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Responsive confidence scoring method for a proposed valuation of aproperty |
US7698159B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2010-04-13 | Genworth Financial Inc. | Systems and methods for performing data collection |
US20060015357A1 (en) * | 2004-07-16 | 2006-01-19 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for spatiotemporal valuation of real estate |
US20060085234A1 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2006-04-20 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for constructing a forecast standard deviation for automated valuation modeling |
US20060080132A1 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Hall Greg S | Method for generating, accessing, and managing property inspection reports |
US8160944B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2012-04-17 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for creating electronic real estate registration |
US9076185B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2015-07-07 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for managing electronic real estate registry information |
US20100198714A1 (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2010-08-05 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for creating electronic real estate registration |
US7693765B2 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2010-04-06 | Michael Dell Orfano | System and method for creating electronic real estate registration |
US7853518B2 (en) | 2005-05-24 | 2010-12-14 | Corelogic Information Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for advanced mortgage diagnostic analytics |
US20060271472A1 (en) * | 2005-05-24 | 2006-11-30 | First American Real Estate Solutions, L.P. | Method and apparatus for advanced mortgage diagnostic analytics |
US20070033122A1 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2007-02-08 | First American Real Estate Solutions, Lp | Method and apparatus for computing selection criteria for an automated valuation model |
US7873570B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2011-01-18 | Corelogic Information Solutions, Inc. | Method and system for updating a loan portfolio with information on secondary liens |
US7809635B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2010-10-05 | Corelogic Information Solutions, Inc. | Method and system for updating a loan portfolio with information on secondary liens |
US20080004893A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | First American Corelogic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score |
US9031881B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2015-05-12 | Corelogic Solutions, Llc | Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score |
US20190050953A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2019-02-14 | Corelogic Solutions, Llc. | Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score |
US20080120363A1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | Damien Gerard Loveland | System and method for facilitating property comparisons |
US7818265B2 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2010-10-19 | Damien Gerard Loveland | System and method for facilitating property comparisons |
US20090088967A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Lerner Matthew R | Systems, techniques, and methods for providing location assessments |
US20090089149A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Lerner Matthew R | Systems, techniques, and methods for providing location assessments |
US8738422B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2014-05-27 | Walk Score Management, LLC | Systems, techniques, and methods for providing location assessments |
US8892455B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2014-11-18 | Walk Score Management, LLC | Systems, techniques, and methods for providing location assessments |
US20100023379A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2010-01-28 | HMVP Partners, LLC | Method and system for determining real estate market value changes |
US20180025452A1 (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2018-01-25 | Realtex Value LLC | Computerized systems and methods for optimizing building construction |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6141648A (en) | Method for estimating the price per square foot value of real property | |
US6115694A (en) | Method for validating specified prices on real property | |
US8301459B1 (en) | Method for forecasting housing prices using a dynamic error correction model | |
Harrison et al. | Environmental determinants of housing prices: The impact of flood zone status | |
US7219078B2 (en) | Spatially-based valuation of property | |
Petrick | Development of a multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service | |
US20020087389A1 (en) | Value your home | |
Meese et al. | Nonparametric estimation of dynamic hedonic price models and the construction of residential housing price indices | |
US20190005553A1 (en) | Automatically determining a current value for a home | |
US20010039506A1 (en) | Process for automated real estate valuation | |
US20050171822A1 (en) | Responsive confidence scoring method for a proposed valuation of aproperty | |
US20080015972A1 (en) | Process and product for determining an amount of posting payment | |
US20080243569A1 (en) | Automated loan system and method | |
WO2007149941A2 (en) | System and method for acquiring mortgage customers | |
KR20030004313A (en) | Total advertisement managing system using advertisement portfolio model | |
WO2007149943A2 (en) | System and method for retaining mortgage customers | |
Crompton et al. | Sources of variation in economic impact multipliers | |
US20080201247A1 (en) | Method, system and computer-readable media for evaluation or selection of real estate appraisers | |
KR101975448B1 (en) | Evaluation System and Method for Big Data Based Commodity Investment Recommendation Algorithms Using Artificial Intelligence | |
US20090327167A1 (en) | Method for the valuation of intellectual property rights | |
Gross et al. | An empirical evaluation of the probabilistic bid-rent model: The case of homogenous households | |
Stover et al. | Agricultural lending decision: a multiattribute analysis | |
Finlay et al. | The performance measurement of property investments | |
AU784943B2 (en) | Loan processing system and method | |
Wolverton | Empirical investigation into the limitations of the normative paired sales adjustment method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHEETHAM, WILLIAM ESTEL;BONISSONE, PIERO PATRONE;REEL/FRAME:009325/0664;SIGNING DATES FROM 19980706 TO 19980708 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20081031 |