US4733963A - Method of measuring a sound pressure distribution in a solid body due to a ultrasonic probe by using photoelasticity - Google Patents
Method of measuring a sound pressure distribution in a solid body due to a ultrasonic probe by using photoelasticity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US4733963A US4733963A US06/928,818 US92881886A US4733963A US 4733963 A US4733963 A US 4733963A US 92881886 A US92881886 A US 92881886A US 4733963 A US4733963 A US 4733963A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- brightness
- image
- solid body
- sound pressure
- probe
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/22—Details, e.g. general constructional or apparatus details
- G01N29/24—Probes
- G01N29/2418—Probes using optoacoustic interaction with the material, e.g. laser radiation, photoacoustics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01H—MEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OR ULTRASONIC, SONIC OR INFRASONIC WAVES
- G01H9/00—Measuring mechanical vibrations or ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves by using radiation-sensitive means, e.g. optical means
- G01H9/002—Measuring mechanical vibrations or ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves by using radiation-sensitive means, e.g. optical means for representing acoustic field distribution
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02872—Pressure
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/04—Wave modes and trajectories
- G01N2291/042—Wave modes
- G01N2291/0421—Longitudinal waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/04—Wave modes and trajectories
- G01N2291/042—Wave modes
- G01N2291/0422—Shear waves, transverse waves, horizontally polarised waves
Definitions
- Ultrasonic flaw detection provides a non-destructive test for detecting defects in materials.
- An ultrasonic pulse (hereinafter referred to simply as pulse) is emitted from an ultrasonic probe (hereinafter referred to simply as probe) into the object.
- the pulse is reflected from a defect, if any, and such reflection is detected by the probe thereby to detect the fault in the material.
- the ultrasonic flaw detection is most generally used for objects of the type mentioned above.
- the probe is generally of the ceramic type and it is configured as a piezoelectric transducer. Its characteristics deviate from probe to probe by reason of manufacturing tolerances, and further is frequently exchanged as consumption goods. It is necessary, however, to obtain consistent and reliable quantitative analysis characteristics and a uniformity in test results for similar defects regardless of the probe used. Also needed is an ability to determine a tolerance of the sound pressure distribution of the pulse emitted from each probe. Furthermore, to avoid detection of a fault in actual flaw detection, one must be able to select a suitable probe, an arrangement and a scanning pitch of the probe for the particular application. The most important factors for carrying out the ultrasound fault detection procedure require measurement and assessment of the. pulse waveform emitted from the probe, the sound pressure distribution relative to the waveform, and the changes in their propagation through the object.
- the present invention provides a quantitative measuring method for measuring the pulse waveform and the sound pressure distribution on the waveform by emitting from the probe a pulse into a transparent solid model of the object which will be tested.
- the method enables evaluation of the characteristics concerning the sound pressure distribution of the particular probe, by carrying out tests on a transparent solid model of the material to be tested.
- the transparent model material is selected to have characteristics which are similar to those of the actually to be tested material.
- the present invention allows various probes to be characterized and is effective to enable selection of probes suitable for most detecting particular defects, arrangement of probes, determination of a scanning pitch thereof, and a development of new probes.
- the method serves to improve the reliability and the precision available with ultrasonic flaw detection.
- the method of the present invention relates to a technique for measuring weak stresses with sensitivities which are much higher than those available with conventional photoelastic stress measuring techniques. Therefore, the present method can be utilized for static weak stress measurements and for dynamic weak stress measurements of repeat phenomenon.
- the sound pressure distribution is consequently evaluated taking account of the characteristics of the probe for receiving the pulse and the electro-dynamic sensor. Therefore, only the relative sound pressure distribution can be measured and information concerning the absolute value of the pulse waveform and the sound pressure can not be obtained. Furthermore, there are disadvantages that the frequency characteristic of the reflection due to the minute reflection body in the standard test piece is very unique, and the reflection waveform is undesirably dependent on the input waveform.
- the method of visually evaluating the pulse has a possibility of measuring the pulse waveform and the sound pressure on the waveform.
- the Schilieren method does not provide a visual image which is proportional to the sound pressure, obtaining a quantitative measurement is difficult.
- the photoelastic method a principal stress difference can be measured. Therefore, the sound pressure of the ultrasonic pulse can be measured directly.
- the conventional photoelastic method for visually measuring the pulse uses two kinds of approaches.
- One relies on a linear polariscope and the other on a circular polariscope, in which a stroboscopic light source having a short flash time is used for obtaining a still picture of the pulse travelling with high speed.
- a linear polariscope In the method using the linear polariscope, a high sensitivity sufficient for obtaining a visual image of the pulse can be obtained, but the visual image is undesirably changed in accordance with the direction of the incident polarized light used, because of the linear polarization, therefore a quantitative measurement can not be obtained.
- the method using the circular polariscope a visual image proportional to a principal stress difference can be obtained in principle.
- It is an object of the present invention is to provide a photoelastic method which attains a sensitivity which is high enough to provide sound-pressure-distribution resolution which is comparable to that obtained from the photoelastic method using the circular polariscope.
- the method produces a visual image of the pulse generated by the combination of the conventional ultrasonic flaw detector and the probe, and enables measurement of the pulse waveform and the sound pressure distribution on the waveform from the visual image. It is then possible to evaluate and characterize the sound pressure characteristics of the probe.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus for visualizing an ultrasonic pulse generated by the combination of the photoelastic apparatus of the linear polarization type and the stroboscopic light source.
- FIG. 2 is provided for explaining the brightness at predetermined points when the same stress field is observed at the linearly polarized lights which are separated from each other on the principal axis by 45°.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the method of the present invention, from the step of synthesizing a picture to the step of sound pressure distribution measurement.
- FIG. 4 is a front view of a calibrating apparatus for a sound pressure apparatus.
- FIG. 5 is a graph of a calibration curve showing the relationship between the brightness of the negative film obtained from the synthesized picture and the stress.
- FIGS. 6 to 9 are graphs of the sound pressure distribution of the probe obtained by the method of the present invention.
- FIGS. 10-13 are reference photographs.
- FIGS. 10 and 11 are each two visual images obtained by the present invention.
- FIGS. 12 and 13 are visual images obtained by the conventional method.
- the pulse generated by the conventional ultrasonic flaw detector is emitted from the conventional probe into a transparent test piece of glass, as is known from conventional flaw detection methods.
- a trigger pulse is fetched from the ultrasonic flaw detector in synchronism with the pulse emitted into the glass test piece to apply it to a delay circuit for providing a delay time and further to actuate a stroboscope.
- the reason for using glass is that the ultrasonic wave velocity of glass is similar to that of the steel material tested most frequently. If the photoelastic apparatus of the linearly polarized light type is combined with the test piece of glass, the pulse can be visually observed since the pulse in the glass test piece is a stress wave. Th visual image obtained by the apparatus shown in FIG. 1 is the conventional visual image of the linear polarization. A quantitative analysis can not therefore be obtained because of the linear polarization.
- FIG. 2 there are shown two pictures of linear polarization in which the principal axis of the polarizer is always perpendicular to the principal axis of the analyzer and each principal axis in the first picture is 45° different from each principal axis in the second picture.
- I 1 is brightness at predetermined points on the first picture
- a is a constant
- ⁇ is the angle between the principal axis and the principal stress direction of the stress field
- ⁇ represents the following equation
- C is a photoelastic constant
- d is the thickness of the test piece
- ⁇ 1 and ⁇ 2 represent principal stress.
- the brightness at the predetermined points on the synthesized picture corresponds to only the principal stress difference, and the relationship between the brightness and the stress value is the same as the case of the circular polarization.
- the brightness corresponds to the principal stress difference as mentioned above, but since the relation between the principal stress components of longitudinal wave and shear wave are known in the case of ultrasonic pulse, the sound pressure can be measured and evaluated at the predetermined points by measuring the brightness of the synthesized picture by using the equation (4).
- FIGS. 10-13 There are shown examples for measuring the sound pressure distribution of an ultrasonic pulse generated from a normal longitudinal wave probe and a angle shear wave probe.
- the visual image obtained by the circular polariscope is also shown in FIGS. 10-13.
- the ultrasonic flaw detecting apparatus and the probe are commercially available.
- the frequency of the probe is 2 MHz.
- the probe has a diameter of 20 mm for the longitudinal wave and 22 ⁇ 22 mm for the shear wave.
- Pyrex glass having the dimension 100 ⁇ 100 mm of square and thickness of 20 mm was used for a glass test piece.
- the pyrex glass has a wave speed of 5490 m/sec for longitudinal waves and 3420 m/sec for shear waves which values are similar to those of steel. Having further a high sensitivity of photoelasticity, the pyrex glass sufficiently simulates actual test material for the ultrasonic flaw detection test.
- a stroboscope was used having a flash time of 150 ns.
- FIGS. 12 and 13 show photographs recorded with the same image by the circular polarization. As is apparent from FIGS. 12 and 13 in comparison with FIGS. 10 and 11 according to the visual image by the circular polarization, they are at most recognized as the pulse and it is not possible to achieve the quantitative evaluation.
- a calibration curve between the brightness of image and the stress value as shown in FIG. 5 was obtained by providing the synthesized picture by applying a concentrated load to the glass test piece by using the apparatus that is shown in FIG. 4.
- the brightness corresponds to the output voltage of the brightness distribution measuring apparatus.
- FIGS. 6 to 9 show sound pressure distributions.
- the sound distribution of FIGS. 6 to 9 are obtained in such a manner that the brightness distribution of the longitudinal and shear waves shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 respectively are measured on the basis of the calibration curve in FIG. 5, and the brightness distributions are converted to the sound pressure distributions.
- FIG. 6 shows a sound pressure distribution on the center line of the normal longitudinal wave probe;
- FIG. 7 shows a sound pressure distribution in the transversal direction;
- FIG. 8 shows a sound pressure distribution in the transmission direction of the angle shear wave probe;
- FIG. 9 shows a sound pressure distribution in the transversal direction.
- the sound pressure distribution of the pulse generated from the probe can be measured and the characteristics of the probe can be evaluated and defined.
- the object of the present invention is to develop a method having a sensitivity which is higher than that of the conventional method using the circular polarization of photoelasticity. It has been known that the object of the present invention can be achieved by synthesizing two pictures, in which the direction of the principal axis is different by 45°, and using a linear polariscope, as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11. It is apparent that the visual images shown by the FIGS. 10 and 11 are much clearer than the conventional images shown by FIGS. 12 and 13. According to the present invention, it has been possible to measure the sound pressure quantitatively.
- the visual images shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 show the pulse waveform emitted from the probe, the travelling direction, and existence of extraneous pulse data. From the sound pressure distribution on the waveform as shown in FIGS. 6 to 9, it is possible to evaluate and define the characteristics of the probe, such as the maximum value and its position of the sound pressure, the width of the pulse concerning a resolution (for example the width at the level at 6 db), and directivity characteristics.
- the measurement of the brightness distribution is effected by enlarging the negative film and moving a phototransistor by using an X-Y stage, and then the sound pressure value is obtained.
- the sequential process from the image synthesization to the evaluation is performed by using a computer thereby to obtain speedy processing.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
TABLE 1 __________________________________________________________________________ Comparison between the present method and the conventional method Method using a Method using an Method using visual images standard test piece electro-dynamic sensor Conventional method Present __________________________________________________________________________ method Evaluation of the characteristics of probe Pulse waveform Difficult Difficult Partially possible Possible Sound pressure distribution Relative distribution Relative distribution Difficult Possible Sensitivity of transmitting Difficult Difficult Difficult All is possible since the and receiving the pulse evaluation is effected on Resolution Possible Partially possible Partially possible the basis of the pulse Distance-amplitude characteristics Possible Possible Difficult waveform and the sound pressure distribution. Development of new type probe May be of reference May be of reference May be of reference It is possible to evaluate quantitatively. Application to flaw detection Selection of most suitable probe Partially possible Partially possible Partially may be All is possible, if the of reference model having the same Determination of scanning pitch Possible Possible Partially may be formation as the of reference object is provided. Arrangement of probes to the Difficult Difficult Possible object having complex formation. Evaluation of flaw detection results Difficult Difficult Partially possible __________________________________________________________________________
Claims (9)
I.sub.1 =a.sup.2 ·sin.sup.2 2θ·sin.sup.2 δ/2 . . .
I.sub.2 =a.sup.2 ·cos.sup.2 2θ·sin.sup.2 δ/2 . . .
I=I.sub.1 +I.sub.2 =a.sup.2 ·sin.sup.2 δ/2 . . . .
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP60251804A JPS62112056A (en) | 1985-11-09 | 1985-11-09 | Measuring method for sound pressure in solid body of ultrasonic probe by photoelastic method |
JP60-251804 | 1985-11-09 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US4733963A true US4733963A (en) | 1988-03-29 |
Family
ID=17228170
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US06/928,818 Expired - Lifetime US4733963A (en) | 1985-11-09 | 1986-11-07 | Method of measuring a sound pressure distribution in a solid body due to a ultrasonic probe by using photoelasticity |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4733963A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0222346B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS62112056A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3681252D1 (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5606410A (en) * | 1993-11-04 | 1997-02-25 | Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires | Method for controlling the surface state of one face of a solid and the associated device |
US5942690A (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 1999-08-24 | Shvetsky; Arkady | Apparatus and method for ultrasonic inspection of rotating machinery while the machinery is in operation |
US20030067593A1 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-10 | Szaroletta William K. | Method and apparatus for enhancing visualization of mechanical stress |
US20100193349A1 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-05 | Erik Braam | Ultrasonic Horn |
CN103575381A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-12 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | Ultrasonic transducer sound field measuring method based on dynamic photoelastic method |
CN107270234A (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2017-10-20 | 中国农业大学 | A kind of stroboscope |
CN107884061A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2018-04-06 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | A kind of dynamic photoelasticity ultrasonic imaging method and system |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3763698A (en) * | 1972-05-24 | 1973-10-09 | Toyoda Kobi K K | Rotating object breakage test apparatus |
-
1985
- 1985-11-09 JP JP60251804A patent/JPS62112056A/en active Pending
-
1986
- 1986-11-07 US US06/928,818 patent/US4733963A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1986-11-07 DE DE8686115467T patent/DE3681252D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1986-11-07 EP EP86115467A patent/EP0222346B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3763698A (en) * | 1972-05-24 | 1973-10-09 | Toyoda Kobi K K | Rotating object breakage test apparatus |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5606410A (en) * | 1993-11-04 | 1997-02-25 | Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires | Method for controlling the surface state of one face of a solid and the associated device |
US5942690A (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 1999-08-24 | Shvetsky; Arkady | Apparatus and method for ultrasonic inspection of rotating machinery while the machinery is in operation |
US20030067593A1 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-10 | Szaroletta William K. | Method and apparatus for enhancing visualization of mechanical stress |
US20060110717A1 (en) * | 2001-10-09 | 2006-05-25 | Szaroletta William K | Apparatus for enhancing visualization of mechanical stress |
US7430038B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2008-09-30 | Purdue Research Foundation | Apparatus for enhancing visualization of mechanical stress |
US20100193349A1 (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-05 | Erik Braam | Ultrasonic Horn |
CN103575381A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2014-02-12 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | Ultrasonic transducer sound field measuring method based on dynamic photoelastic method |
CN103575381B (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-09-09 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | Measurement method of sound field of ultrasonic transducer based on dynamic photoelasticity method |
CN107270234A (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2017-10-20 | 中国农业大学 | A kind of stroboscope |
CN110056826A (en) * | 2017-06-12 | 2019-07-26 | 中国农业大学 | A kind of information transmission system |
CN107884061A (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2018-04-06 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | A kind of dynamic photoelasticity ultrasonic imaging method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0222346B1 (en) | 1991-09-04 |
JPS62112056A (en) | 1987-05-23 |
EP0222346A2 (en) | 1987-05-20 |
EP0222346A3 (en) | 1988-01-20 |
DE3681252D1 (en) | 1991-10-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4378701A (en) | Apparatus and method for indicating stress in an object | |
US9182354B2 (en) | Electromagnetic wave measurement device, measurement method, and recording medium | |
Bruttomesso et al. | Development of interferometer for acoustic emission testing | |
US4788866A (en) | Method and apparatus for visualizing ultrasonic waves in liquid-solid systems | |
US4733963A (en) | Method of measuring a sound pressure distribution in a solid body due to a ultrasonic probe by using photoelasticity | |
GB2105465A (en) | Ultrasonic pulse-echo detection of defects | |
US4121467A (en) | Non-destructive technique for surface wave velocity measurement | |
Nam et al. | A quantitative evaluation of elastic wave in solid by stroboscopic photoelasticity | |
JP2003149214A (en) | Nondestructive inspecting method and its apparatus using ultrasonic sensor | |
JP2740871B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring shear wave velocity in ultrasonic test | |
JPH06242086A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection system | |
Date et al. | Visualization of ultrasonic waves in a solid by stroboscopic photoelasticity and image processing techniques | |
Schmitte et al. | Visualization of phased-array sound fields and flaw interaction using the photoelastic effect | |
CN101443650A (en) | Determining capability of an on-line sensor | |
JPS5735704A (en) | Surface state measuring method of metallic plate and its device | |
JPH0729447Y2 (en) | Ultrasonic measuring device | |
Imano | Measurement of Stress in Glass Sample Using Sensitive Tint and Sénarmont Method under the Ultrasonic Standing Field | |
JPS585629A (en) | Method for measuring ductile fracture resistance | |
Chick | 6 Research instruments and systems | |
JP2739972B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detector | |
CN117168667A (en) | Method, device and medium for calibrating ultrasonic detection of stress under protective paint layer | |
DATE et al. | a Quantitative Evaluation of Ultrasonic Waves in Solids by Photoelastic Visualization Method | |
JPS61256255A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus | |
JPH0136064B2 (en) | ||
RU2034236C1 (en) | Ultrasound echo thickness gage |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KRAUTKRAMER FOERSTER JAPAN CO., LTD., 2-10-12, DOG Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 Owner name: DATE, KAZUHIRO, SENDAI-SHI, MIYAGI-KEN, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 Owner name: SHIMADA, HEIHACHI, SENDAI-SHI, MIYAGI-KEN, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 Owner name: KRAUTKRAMER FOERSTER JAPAN CO., LTD.,JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 Owner name: DATE, KAZUHIRO,JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 Owner name: SHIMADA, HEIHACHI,JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DATE, KAZUHIRO;SHIMADA, HEIHACHI;REEL/FRAME:004632/0603 Effective date: 19861027 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HLDR NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENT STAT AS INDIV INVENTOR (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LSM1); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS - SMALL BUSINESS (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SM02); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |