[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US4489432A - Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4489432A
US4489432A US06/383,151 US38315182A US4489432A US 4489432 A US4489432 A US 4489432A US 38315182 A US38315182 A US 38315182A US 4489432 A US4489432 A US 4489432A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
speaker
location
sub
main
ear
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US06/383,151
Inventor
Matthew S. Polk
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Polk Investment Corp
Original Assignee
Polk Audio LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Polk Audio LLC filed Critical Polk Audio LLC
Priority to US06/383,151 priority Critical patent/US4489432A/en
Assigned to POLK AUDIO, INC. reassignment POLK AUDIO, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: POLK, MATTHEW S.
Priority to GB08314479A priority patent/GB2122459B/en
Priority to JP58092567A priority patent/JP2529933B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4489432A publication Critical patent/US4489432A/en
Assigned to POLK INVESTMENT CORPORATION reassignment POLK INVESTMENT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Assignors: POLK AUDIO, INC., A MD. CORP.
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04SSTEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS 
    • H04S3/00Systems employing more than two channels, e.g. quadraphonic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04SSTEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS 
    • H04S1/00Two-channel systems
    • H04S1/002Non-adaptive circuits, e.g. manually adjustable or static, for enhancing the sound image or the spatial distribution

Definitions

  • This invention pertains to a method and apparatus for reproducing sound from stereophonic source signals in which the reproduced sound has a realistic ambient field and acoustic image.
  • the present invention can best be understood and appreciated by setting forth a generalized discussion of the manner in which stereophonic signals originate, as well as a generalized discussion of the manner in which sound is conventionally reproduced from a stereophonic signal source.
  • the human auditory system localizes position through two mechanisms.
  • Direction is perceived due to an interaural time delay or phase shift.
  • Distance is perceived due to the time delay between an initial sound and a similar reflected sound.
  • a third, poorly understood mechanism causes the ear to perceive only the first of two similar sounds when separated by a very short delay. This is called the precedence effect.
  • the listener perceives the direct sound reflected from the walls of the hall. Due to the direction and distance information contained in the reflected signals the listener forms a subliminal impression of the size and shape of the hall in which the performance is taking place. Referring to FIG. 1, for example there is illustrated a source S spaced from a listener P in an environment which includes a plurality of walls, W1, W2, and W3.
  • the listener will of course perceive sounds from the source S along a direct path DP1. Also, the listener will perceive sounds reflected from the walls of the environment, illustrated in FIG. 1 by the path RP1 to a point P1 on the wall W1 and thence along path RP2 to the listener P.
  • microphones ML and MR are situated in front of the source S as shown in FIG. 1. If the source S is equidistant from the microphones, then both microphones will pick up sounds from the source S along direct paths DP2 and DP3.
  • the hall ambience information will be recorded by the left and right microphones ML and MR in addition to the direct sound from the source. This is illustrated by the reflected paths RP3 and RP4 from the point P1 on wall W1.
  • FIG. 2 there is illustrated what happens when the sounds recorded by the microphones as in FIG. 1 are reproduced by loudspeakers LS and RS positioned in the same position relative to the listener P as the recording microphones.
  • the listener P is shown as having a left ear Le and a right ear Re. If the sound recorded as in FIG. 1 was initially equidistant from the two microphones, the sound will reach each microphone at the same time. Accordingly, in reproducing the sound, a listener equidistant from the two speakers LS and RS will hear the reproduced direct sound from the left speaker in the left ear (path A) at the same time as the same sound from the right speaker is heard in the right ear (path B). The precedence effect will tend to reduce perception of interaural crosstalk paths a and b. The listener P, hearing the same sound in both ears at once will localize the sound as being directly in front of and between the speakers, as shown in FIG. 3.
  • the listener When reproduced by the loudspeakers LS and RS the listener will first hear the direct sound from the source at the same time in both ears, corresponding to the apparent source shown in FIG. 4. The listener will then hear the delayed sound corresponding to the reflection from P1 being recorded by the left microphone and reproduced by the left speaker first in the left ear Le and then in the right ear Re. The initial delay caused by the longer path taken by the reflection in reaching the left microphone ML gives the listener an impression of the distance between the original source, P1, and himself.
  • the interaural delay ⁇ t (corresponding to the time it takes sound to travel between a listener's ears) gives the impression that the reflected sound has come from a point behind and in the same direction as the left speaker, illustrated as the first apparent point P1 in FIG. 4.
  • the location of the actual point P1 is also shown in FIG. 4.
  • the listener will hear the reflected sound reproduced by the right speaker RS. Since the additional delay (correspondinq to the distance MD in FIG. 1) is much greater than any possible interaural delay (except for the case of a verv small microphone spacing) this sound will create a second apparent point P1 behind and in the same direction as the riqht speaker, as illustrated in FIG. 4.
  • the path lengths to the two microphones ML and MR will be such that the differences in arrival times of the reflected sound at the two microphones will be comparable to a possible value of interaural time delay.
  • the reflected sound from point P2 to the left microphone ML along path d' would be approximately equal to the path length c' to the right microphone MR plus the interaural time delay ⁇ t.
  • d' equals c'+ ⁇ t.
  • each possible value of interaural time delay corresponds to an angle of incidence for the perceived sound within a 180° arc.
  • the apparent direction of the sound would swing rapidly to the right or left. In practice this is limited by the listening angle of the loudspeakers.
  • the interaural crosstalk signal of the opposite speaker gradually takes precedence effectively limiting the apparent sound sources to within the listening angle of the speaker.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,058,675 to Kobayashi et al discloses a means for cancelling interaural crosstalk using inverted and delayed versions of the left and right stereo signals fed to a second pair of speakers arranged to produce the correct geometry.
  • the Kobayashi et al device is only partially effective.
  • Carver discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,585 an electronic device for cancelling interaural crosstalk. This device inverts one stereo signal, splits it into several components, delays each component separately by a different amount and recombines these with a modified version of the other stereo signal. Performing this operation on both stereo signals, Carver claims to effect a cancellation of interaural crosstalk and to create a "dimensionalized effect.”
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,658 to Iwahara also discloses a technique for performing the interaural crosstalk cancellation.
  • Iwahara uses a second pair of speakers to reproduce the cancellation signal, which is composed of a frequency and phase compensated version of the inverted main signal.
  • This cancellation signal is fed to a speaker just outside the main speaker on the opposite side from which the cancellation signal was derived.
  • the necessary delay is accomplished acoustically by the placement of the sub-speakers and detailed consideration is given to the phase and frequency compensation required to accomplish the cancellation.
  • a binaural signal input is specified. It will be seen later why a binaural input is essential to the correct function of an interaural crosstalk cancellation system.
  • FIG. 7 shows an off axis source whose signal arrives at the right microphone ⁇ t later than at the left microphone.
  • ⁇ t is equal to the maximum possible interaural time delay.
  • FIG. 8 shows the apparent source displaced far to the left of the listener, which it would appear to the listener in such a circumstance.
  • a right main speaker and a left main speaker are provided respectively at right and left main speaker locations which are equidistantly spaced from a listening location.
  • the listening location is defined as a spatial position for accommodating a listener's head facing the main speakers and having a right ear location and a left ear location along an ear axis, with the right and left ear locations separated along the ear axis by a maximum interaural sound distance of ⁇ t max , and the listening location being defined as the point on the ear axis equidistant to the right and left ears.
  • a right sub-speaker and a left sub-speaker are provided at right and left sub-speaker locations which are equidistantly spaced from the listening location.
  • the right and left channel outputs are coupled respectively to the right and left main speakers.
  • a left channel minus right channel signal is developed and coupled to the left sub-speaker and a right channel minus left channel signal is developed and coupled to the right sub-speaker.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of the typical environment in which stereophonic recordings are made.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating conventional stereophonic sound reproduction, and showing interaural crosstalk paths.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the apparent source as perceived by a listener for a sound source equidistant from the recording microphones when the sound is reproduced over a pair of speakers.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the location of apparent sources to a listener when a stereophonic recording is reproduced, taking into account reflection of sound from the walls of the hall in which the recording was made.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a situation where path lengths to two recording microphones for reflected sounds is such that the difference in arrival times of the reflected sound of the two microphones is comparable to a possible value of interaural time delay.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing how each possible value of interaural time delay corresponds to an angle of incidence for perceived sounds within a 180° arc.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an off-axis source whose signal arrives at the right microphone ⁇ t later than at the left microphone, where ⁇ t is equal to the maximum possible interaural time delay.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates the apparent source that would appear to a listener for the situation shown in FIG. 7 when the recording were reproduced on a pair of speakers.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing use of main speakers and sub-speakers in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an apparent source location as produced by the arrangement of FIG. 9.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which the sub-speakers and main speakers are commonly mounted in respective enclosures.
  • a left main speaker LMS and a right main speaker RMS are disposed at left and right main speaker locations along a speaker axis and the left and right main speakers are equidistantly spaced from a listening location.
  • the listening location is defined as the point common to a listening axis perpendicular to the speaker axis and equidistantly spaced from the main speakers, and to the ear axis at a point midway between the left ear Le and right ear Re of a person P.
  • a left sub-speaker LSS and a right sub-speaker RSS are also provided at left and right sub-speaker locations which, in accordance with this one embodiment, are situated on the speaker axis.
  • the left and right sub-speakers are also equidistantly spaced with respect to the listening location.
  • the right and left main speakers are fed the right and left channel stereo signals, respectively.
  • the sub-speakers, positioned outside the left main speaker and outside the right main speaker are fed the difference signals left channel minus right channel and right channel minus left channel, respectively.
  • stereo difference signals left channel minus right channel and/or right channel minus left channel
  • U.S. Pat. No. 3,697,692 to Hafler describes a method of synthesizing 4-channel sound using rear speakers fed by a difference signal. This system was later made commercially available as the Dynaco QD-1 "Quadaptor".
  • U.S. Pat. No. 4,308,423 to Cohen describes an electronic device for cancelling interaural crosstalk and amplifying off-axis stereo images. This is accomplished by creating a difference signal, left minus right, which is electronically delayed and mixed with the main left signal.
  • the inverted difference signal right minus left is delayed electronically and mixed with the main right signal.
  • Cohen describes this technique as a method of cancelling interaural crosstalk without "muddying" the central region and without reducing bass output. Cohen does not, however, present any detailed analysis of the effects of this system on the reproduction of recorded sound.
  • the present invention as shown in FIG. 9 accomplishes many of the same ends as the Cohen U.S. Pat. No. 4,308,423 through purely acoustic means, and with some advantages over Cohen. That the present invention also produces a realistic treatment of recorded material will be seen from the following analysis.
  • the left and right signals as functions of time. Specifically, distances will be expressed as sound distances, which correspond to the time it takes sound to travel the distance in question.
  • the time required for sound from the main right speaker RMS to reach the right ear Re is t.
  • the signal at the right ear from this speaker will be designated R(t).
  • the quantity ⁇ t is the interaural time delay corresponding to the listening angle of the speakers relative to the listener as shown in FIG. 9, and ⁇ t' is the delay of the difference signal, e.g. R-L, relative to the main signal, e.g. R, as determined by the relative placement and orientation of the speakers and listener as shown in FIG. 9.
  • the signals arriving at the left and right ears would be:
  • FIG. 10 illustrates the apparent source that a listener would perceive in such a situation. Referring to FIG.
  • the right ear would hear the same signal at the same time as the left ear, but at half the strength.
  • the listener will perceive the apparent sound source as slightly shifted to the left of center between the speakers.
  • the left ear will perceive only the main signal, L(t), since the other signals are weaker and later.
  • the right ear however, has a half strength signal which arrives first followed by a full strength signal delayed by ⁇ t.
  • the precedence effect does not fully mask the late arrival of the stronger signal so that the listener perceives, at least slightly, a direction cue placing the apparent sound source at a listening angle corresponding to an approximate interaural delay slightly less than ⁇ t. This will place the apparent sound source nearly out to the left speaker.
  • the difference signal is reduced gradually to zero as the channels become equal.
  • the inter-speaker delay ⁇ t' between the respective main and sub-speakers along the listening angle between the speakers and the listening location must be greater than the interaural delay ⁇ t as shown in FIG. 9 along the listening angle of the listening location with respect to the speaker locations by enough to insure the desired function of the precedence effect as outlined above.
  • ⁇ t equals ⁇ t' the effect is not unpleasant, it is just that the optimum ambience information is not present in the reproduced sound field.
  • ⁇ t' is greater than ⁇ t, in order to obtain the best image quality outside the listening angle of the speakers, ⁇ t' should be close enough to ⁇ t such that a substantial cancellation of interaural crosstalk occurs.
  • values of ⁇ t' about 1.2 times greater than ⁇ t provide a suitable compromise and provide a realistic ambient field and acoustic image.
  • the left and right main and sub-speakers are located at respective main and sub-speaker locations arranged on a speaker axis which is parallel to an ear axis of a listener in a normal listening position along a listening axis equidistant from the two sets of speakers.
  • a speaker axis which is parallel to an ear axis of a listener in a normal listening position along a listening axis equidistant from the two sets of speakers.
  • the main and sub-speakers may be very similar, if not identical, in construction. This will assure that differences in acoustic position of dissimilar drive units or differences in phase shift of dissimilar cross-over networks will not occur and hence not degrade the performance of the system. Additionally, it should be understood that in order to obtain the best performance from the system that there are some limitations on the placement of the speakers relative to the listener.
  • the sum of ⁇ t+ ⁇ t' (FIG. 9) should never exceed the maximum possible interaural time delay ⁇ t max corresponding to a distance along the ear axis.
  • ⁇ t max corresponds to the time it takes sound to travel such a distance.
  • the condition that the sum of ⁇ t and ⁇ t' should not exceed the maximum possible interaural time delay ⁇ t max can be met in practice if the distance between the left and right main speakers D along the speaker axis is always less than the perpendicular distance from the listening location along the listening axis D' with respect to the speaker axis.
  • the spacing D between the main speakers is on the order of 0.7 to 0.9 times as large as the distance D'.
  • D gets very close to D', the realistic ambient field and enhanced acoustic image that is otherwise obtained begins to disappear.
  • the left main speaker and the left sub-speaker may be commonly mounted in a single enclosure LE, and the right main speaker and right sub-speaker are commonly mounted in a common enclosure RE.
  • This has the advantages of fixing the inter-speaker delay ⁇ t', and offers the advantage that only two speaker enclosures are required.
  • a spacing between the main and sub-speakers of eight inches, with the main and sub-speakers being identical two-way loudspeakers each having a six inch woofer and a one inch tweeter was found to work well.
  • a main to sub-speaker spacing of eight inches, and assuming an ear spacing between the left and right ears of approximately 6.5 inches this yields a value of ⁇ t' approximately 1.2 times greater than ⁇ t, as discussed herein before as a suitable compromise.
  • the difference signals left channel minus right channel and right channel minus left channel which have been referred to throughout this description are easily obtained in practice by connecting the sub-speakers across the left plus and right plus terminals of a stereophonic amplifier's outputs. Connecting left plus to the plus speaker terminal of the left sub-speaker and right plus to the sub-speaker common or normal ground terminal will give a signal corresponding to the left channel minus right channel. Reversing this connection will give a signal to the right sub-speaker corresponding to the right channel minus the left channel.
  • the known techniques for cancelling interaural crosstalk if successful in their stated aim, create an unnatural impression when reproducing sounds, particularly ambient sounds, far off the equidistant axis of two microphones placed farther apart than ear spacing.
  • the present invention creates a realistic acoustic image regardless of the position of the recorded source.
  • this realistic ambient field and acoustic image is created in accordance with the present invention with commonly available recorded material and does not require a specially recorded input signal.
  • the present invention is a purely acoustic implementation requiring no special electronic components and utilizing the unmodified output from a standard stereophonic high fidelity system.
  • the present invention recognizes the advantages of certain specific values of delay and sets forth a technique for fixing this value relative to the listener, i.e. incorporating the main and sub-speaker for each channel in a common enclosure, thereby offering increased simplification of set-up and operation to the user.
  • the performance of the present invention is not subject to the inevitable degradation caused by extra stages of electronic signal processing.
  • the invention described herein is a novel apparatus and method for creating a realistic impression of sounds reproduced from commonly available recorded material. It offers performance advantages over those techniques and apparatus described in the prior art, and is utterly straightforward and simple in its preferred embodiments.
  • the invention has been described herein with respect to certain preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the invention to any specific details of those preferred embodiments. That is, it should be clear that various modifications and changes can be made to those preferred embodiments without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, which is intended to be set forth in the accompanying claims.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Stereophonic System (AREA)

Abstract

Apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image is used in a stereophonic sound reproduction system having a left channel output and a right channel output. A right main speaker and a left main speaker are disposed at right and left main speaker locations, respectively, which are equidistantly spaced from a listening location along a listening axis perpendicular to a line joining the left and right main speakers. A right sub-speaker and a left sub-speaker are respectively disposed at right and left sub-speaker locations equidistantly spaced from the listening location, and further from the listening location than the main speaker. The left and right channel outputs are respectively coupled to the left and right main speakers. A left channel minus right channel difference signal is coupled to the left sub-speaker and a right channel minus left channel difference signal is coupled to the right sub-speaker. In one embodiment, the main and sub-speakers for each channel are respectively incorporated in a common enclosure to fix the spacing therebetween. A technique for determining optimal spacing between the main and sub-speakers and between the various speakers and the listening location is set forth.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to a method and apparatus for reproducing sound from stereophonic source signals in which the reproduced sound has a realistic ambient field and acoustic image.
The present invention can best be understood and appreciated by setting forth a generalized discussion of the manner in which stereophonic signals originate, as well as a generalized discussion of the manner in which sound is conventionally reproduced from a stereophonic signal source.
When live music is, for example, performed the listener perceives both the sonic qualities of the instruments and the performers and also the sonic qualities of the acoustic environment in which the music is performed. Normal stereophonic recording and reproducing techniques retain much of the former, but most of the latter is lost.
The human auditory system localizes position through two mechanisms. Direction is perceived due to an interaural time delay or phase shift. Distance is perceived due to the time delay between an initial sound and a similar reflected sound. A third, poorly understood mechanism, causes the ear to perceive only the first of two similar sounds when separated by a very short delay. This is called the precedence effect. Through these mechanisms the listener perceives the direct sound reflected from the walls of the hall. Due to the direction and distance information contained in the reflected signals the listener forms a subliminal impression of the size and shape of the hall in which the performance is taking place. Referring to FIG. 1, for example there is illustrated a source S spaced from a listener P in an environment which includes a plurality of walls, W1, W2, and W3. In such an environment the listener will of course perceive sounds from the source S along a direct path DP1. Also, the listener will perceive sounds reflected from the walls of the environment, illustrated in FIG. 1 by the path RP1 to a point P1 on the wall W1 and thence along path RP2 to the listener P. In stereophonic recording, microphones ML and MR are situated in front of the source S as shown in FIG. 1. If the source S is equidistant from the microphones, then both microphones will pick up sounds from the source S along direct paths DP2 and DP3. In addition, the hall ambience information will be recorded by the left and right microphones ML and MR in addition to the direct sound from the source. This is illustrated by the reflected paths RP3 and RP4 from the point P1 on wall W1.
Turning now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated what happens when the sounds recorded by the microphones as in FIG. 1 are reproduced by loudspeakers LS and RS positioned in the same position relative to the listener P as the recording microphones. In FIG. 2 the listener P is shown as having a left ear Le and a right ear Re. If the sound recorded as in FIG. 1 was initially equidistant from the two microphones, the sound will reach each microphone at the same time. Accordingly, in reproducing the sound, a listener equidistant from the two speakers LS and RS will hear the reproduced direct sound from the left speaker in the left ear (path A) at the same time as the same sound from the right speaker is heard in the right ear (path B). The precedence effect will tend to reduce perception of interaural crosstalk paths a and b. The listener P, hearing the same sound in both ears at once will localize the sound as being directly in front of and between the speakers, as shown in FIG. 3.
Referring again for a moment to FIG. 1, consider a sound reflected from the point P1 on the wall W1 of the hall. The reflected sound from the secondary source reaches the left microphone ML first via the path RP3. This sound is delayed relative to the direct sound along path DP2, partially preserving the distance information about the reflection from P1. The sound from P1 at some time thereafter reaches the right microphone MR along path RP4 after a further delay and further reduction in loudness. In this case, the delay corresponds approximately to the distance MD between the microphones. Turning now to FIG. 4, there is illustrated what the listener P will hear with respect to both the direct and reflected sound illustrated in FIG. 1. When reproduced by the loudspeakers LS and RS the listener will first hear the direct sound from the source at the same time in both ears, corresponding to the apparent source shown in FIG. 4. The listener will then hear the delayed sound corresponding to the reflection from P1 being recorded by the left microphone and reproduced by the left speaker first in the left ear Le and then in the right ear Re. The initial delay caused by the longer path taken by the reflection in reaching the left microphone ML gives the listener an impression of the distance between the original source, P1, and himself. However, the interaural delay Δt, (corresponding to the time it takes sound to travel between a listener's ears) gives the impression that the reflected sound has come from a point behind and in the same direction as the left speaker, illustrated as the first apparent point P1 in FIG. 4. For reference, the location of the actual point P1 is also shown in FIG. 4. After a further delay, the listener will hear the reflected sound reproduced by the right speaker RS. Since the additional delay (correspondinq to the distance MD in FIG. 1) is much greater than any possible interaural delay (except for the case of a verv small microphone spacing) this sound will create a second apparent point P1 behind and in the same direction as the riqht speaker, as illustrated in FIG. 4. However, it has been observed in experiments that the listener mainly perceives the direction information of the first apparent point source P1, largely ignoring the second. Thus the listener perceives the sound as coming primarily from the direction of the left speaker or slightly inside the left speaker if the loudness of the second apparent point source P1 is significant compared to the first. This analysis describes the effect on any other sound sources recorded by the two microphones such that the difference in arrival times at the two microphones is greater than the maximum possible interaural time delay.
Referring to FIG. 5, for some reflected sounds the path lengths to the two microphones ML and MR will be such that the differences in arrival times of the reflected sound at the two microphones will be comparable to a possible value of interaural time delay. Thus, the reflected sound from point P2 to the left microphone ML along path d' would be approximately equal to the path length c' to the right microphone MR plus the interaural time delay Δt. Thus, assume that d' equals c'+Δt. When this occurs, the arrival of the reproduced sound from the two speakers at the corresponding ears at slightly different times will have the same effect as an interaural time delay giving the listener a definite impression of the direction and distance of the reflected sound. Referring to FIG. 6, as there illustrated each possible value of interaural time delay corresponds to an angle of incidence for the perceived sound within a 180° arc. As the difference in arrival times at the microphones approaches the maximum possible value of the interaural delay, the apparent direction of the sound would swing rapidly to the right or left. In practice this is limited by the listening angle of the loudspeakers. When the time difference of the sounds arriving at the respective ears approaches the interaural delay corresponding to the listening angle of the speakers, the interaural crosstalk signal of the opposite speaker gradually takes precedence effectively limiting the apparent sound sources to within the listening angle of the speaker.
It should be apparent at this point that all sound sources, ambient or otherwise, whose signals arrive at the respective microphones with a time difference greater than the interaural time delay corresponding to the listening angle of the reproducing speakers will appear to the listener as apparent sources behind and in the same general direction as one of the speakers as shown in FIG. 4. The delayed signal appearing in the other channel, being lower in loudness, will have only slight effect in drawing the apparent source inside the speakers. This has been confirmed by experiments which show that, in fact, the apparent sound source remains substantially within the listening angle defined by the speakers.
The existence of interaural crosstalk has long been known and discussed at some length in the literature. Additionally, there are several recent patents which have disclosed methods and techniques for eliminating interaural crosstalk, without however making a complete analysis of the consequences of so doing.
One such prior art patent is U.S. Pat. No. 4,058,675 to Kobayashi et al. This patent discloses a means for cancelling interaural crosstalk using inverted and delayed versions of the left and right stereo signals fed to a second pair of speakers arranged to produce the correct geometry. As explained in U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,585 to Carver, the Kobayashi et al device is only partially effective. Carver discloses in U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,585 an electronic device for cancelling interaural crosstalk. This device inverts one stereo signal, splits it into several components, delays each component separately by a different amount and recombines these with a modified version of the other stereo signal. Performing this operation on both stereo signals, Carver claims to effect a cancellation of interaural crosstalk and to create a "dimensionalized effect."
U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,658 to Iwahara also discloses a technique for performing the interaural crosstalk cancellation. Iwahara uses a second pair of speakers to reproduce the cancellation signal, which is composed of a frequency and phase compensated version of the inverted main signal. This cancellation signal is fed to a speaker just outside the main speaker on the opposite side from which the cancellation signal was derived. The necessary delay is accomplished acoustically by the placement of the sub-speakers and detailed consideration is given to the phase and frequency compensation required to accomplish the cancellation. Additionally, a binaural signal input is specified. It will be seen later why a binaural input is essential to the correct function of an interaural crosstalk cancellation system.
Assuming that a method or technique is successful in cancelling the interaural crosstalk, it should be examined what effect this would have on the listener's perception of the reproduced sound. Referring to FIG. 2, if the interaural crosstalk cancellation were successful, paths a and b to the opposite ears would be eliminated. This would help the localization of sources equidistant from the recording microphones (FIGS. 1 and 3). As the sources moved off-center, however, the difference in arrival times at the two microphones increases corresponding to larger values of interaural time delay and hence greater angles of incidence as illustrated in FIG. 6. Since the crosstalk paths from the speakers have been cancelled out, the speakers give no directional information about themselves. The perceived direction of the apparent sound source will depend only on the difference in arrival times of the signal at the two recording microphones and to a much lesser degree the relative loudness. FIG. 7, for example, shows an off axis source whose signal arrives at the right microphone Δt later than at the left microphone. In this example Δt is equal to the maximum possible interaural time delay. When reproduced, with crosstalk cancelled, the right channel signal will arrive at the right ear Δt later than the left signal at the left ear. FIG. 8 shows the apparent source displaced far to the left of the listener, which it would appear to the listener in such a circumstance.
It should be clear that for microphones spaced far apart only a small displacement off the equidistant axis will be required to create an arrival time difference at the microphone equal to the maximum possible interaural time delay. This will result in a rather dramatic expansion of a small portion of the center of the stereo stage. For sound sources further displaced and corresponding to time delays greater than the maximum possible interaural time delay, which will include most of the ambience information, the listener will have difficulty localizing any apparent source. In effect, the listener will be forced to perceive sounds as if he had ears placed at the recording microphone spacing and may perceive apparent sound sources within his own head when the microphone spacing is large. An accurate prediction of the effects of this situation is beyond the current state of the art of psychoacoustics and beyond the scope of this discussion. It is precisely because of this potential difficulty that the U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,658 to Iwahara specifies a binaural signal input. That is to say, that the recording has been made with a microphone spacing equal to the ear spacing. However, recordings made in this manner are extremely rare. It is also possible that the problem outlined above accounts for the unspecified "dimensionalized effect" referred to by Carver in U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,585. Use of any of the above-mentioned crosstalk cancellation systems with commonly available recordings might well result in the effect described by Carver:
"The overall effect of this is a rather startling creation of the impression that the sound is `totally dimensionalized`, in that the hearer somehow appears to be `within the sound` or in some manner surrounded by the various sources of the sound." (U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,585, column 9, lines 35-39)."
Although this effect that Carver describes may be an interesting aural effect, it is not believed to give a realistic impression of the original performance, particularly in the reproduction of ambient information which constitutes the majority of far-off axis signals.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an apparatus and method for realistic reproduction of recorded ambience information regardless of the recording microphone placement.
It is a more specific object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method which is practical and inexpensive for realistic reproduction of recorded ambience information as well as other signals off the central axis, regardless of the recording microphone placement.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, in a stereophonic sound reproduction system having a left channel output and a right channel output, a right main speaker and a left main speaker are provided respectively at right and left main speaker locations which are equidistantly spaced from a listening location. The listening location is defined as a spatial position for accommodating a listener's head facing the main speakers and having a right ear location and a left ear location along an ear axis, with the right and left ear locations separated along the ear axis by a maximum interaural sound distance of Δtmax, and the listening location being defined as the point on the ear axis equidistant to the right and left ears. A right sub-speaker and a left sub-speaker are provided at right and left sub-speaker locations which are equidistantly spaced from the listening location. The right and left channel outputs are coupled respectively to the right and left main speakers. A left channel minus right channel signal is developed and coupled to the left sub-speaker and a right channel minus left channel signal is developed and coupled to the right sub-speaker. By careful selection of the distance between the main speakers and sub-speakers, sound reproduced by the system as perceived by a listener whose head is located generally at the listening location has a realistic acoustic field and enhanced acoustic image.
Other objects and specific features of the method and apparatus of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a diagram of the typical environment in which stereophonic recordings are made.
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating conventional stereophonic sound reproduction, and showing interaural crosstalk paths.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the apparent source as perceived by a listener for a sound source equidistant from the recording microphones when the sound is reproduced over a pair of speakers.
FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating the location of apparent sources to a listener when a stereophonic recording is reproduced, taking into account reflection of sound from the walls of the hall in which the recording was made.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a situation where path lengths to two recording microphones for reflected sounds is such that the difference in arrival times of the reflected sound of the two microphones is comparable to a possible value of interaural time delay.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing how each possible value of interaural time delay corresponds to an angle of incidence for perceived sounds within a 180° arc.
FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an off-axis source whose signal arrives at the right microphone Δt later than at the left microphone, where Δt is equal to the maximum possible interaural time delay.
FIG. 8 illustrates the apparent source that would appear to a listener for the situation shown in FIG. 7 when the recording were reproduced on a pair of speakers.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing use of main speakers and sub-speakers in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an apparent source location as produced by the arrangement of FIG. 9.
FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which the sub-speakers and main speakers are commonly mounted in respective enclosures.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Referring now to FIG. 9, there is shown a diagram of one embodiment of a sound reproduction system in accordance with the present invention. A left main speaker LMS and a right main speaker RMS are disposed at left and right main speaker locations along a speaker axis and the left and right main speakers are equidistantly spaced from a listening location. The listening location is defined as the point common to a listening axis perpendicular to the speaker axis and equidistantly spaced from the main speakers, and to the ear axis at a point midway between the left ear Le and right ear Re of a person P.
A left sub-speaker LSS and a right sub-speaker RSS are also provided at left and right sub-speaker locations which, in accordance with this one embodiment, are situated on the speaker axis. The left and right sub-speakers are also equidistantly spaced with respect to the listening location.
As shown in FIG. 9, the right and left main speakers are fed the right and left channel stereo signals, respectively. The sub-speakers, positioned outside the left main speaker and outside the right main speaker are fed the difference signals left channel minus right channel and right channel minus left channel, respectively.
Applications of the stereo difference signals (left channel minus right channel and/or right channel minus left channel) have long been known and are discussed both in the literature and in various prior art patents. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,697,692 to Hafler describes a method of synthesizing 4-channel sound using rear speakers fed by a difference signal. This system was later made commercially available as the Dynaco QD-1 "Quadaptor". As a further example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,308,423 to Cohen describes an electronic device for cancelling interaural crosstalk and amplifying off-axis stereo images. This is accomplished by creating a difference signal, left minus right, which is electronically delayed and mixed with the main left signal. The inverted difference signal right minus left is delayed electronically and mixed with the main right signal. Cohen describes this technique as a method of cancelling interaural crosstalk without "muddying" the central region and without reducing bass output. Cohen does not, however, present any detailed analysis of the effects of this system on the reproduction of recorded sound.
The present invention as shown in FIG. 9 accomplishes many of the same ends as the Cohen U.S. Pat. No. 4,308,423 through purely acoustic means, and with some advantages over Cohen. That the present invention also produces a realistic treatment of recorded material will be seen from the following analysis.
In order to facilitate the analysis, consider the left and right signals as functions of time. Specifically, distances will be expressed as sound distances, which correspond to the time it takes sound to travel the distance in question. As shown in FIG. 9, the time required for sound from the main right speaker RMS to reach the right ear Re is t. The signal at the right ear from this speaker will be designated R(t). The quantity Δt is the interaural time delay corresponding to the listening angle of the speakers relative to the listener as shown in FIG. 9, and Δt' is the delay of the difference signal, e.g. R-L, relative to the main signal, e.g. R, as determined by the relative placement and orientation of the speakers and listener as shown in FIG. 9. Using this notation, the signals arriving at the left and right ears would be:
Left Ear:
L(t)+L(t+Δt')-R(t+Δt')+R(t+Δt)+R(t+Δt+Δt')-L(t+Δt+Δt')                                      (1)
Right Ear:
R(t)+R(t+Δt')-L(t+Δt')+L(t+Δt)+L(t+Δt+Δt')-R(t+Δt+Δt')                                      (2)
First, consider a source whose sound arrives at both microphones at the same time during recording. Since the left and right channel signals are the same, there will be no difference signal. This is analogous to the situation shown and described with reference to FIG. 3 where the listener, hearing the same signal in both ears at the same time, localizes an apparent sound source directly between the speakers.
As a second case consider a signal appearing only in the left channel. The signals at each ear will reduce to the following:
Left Ear:
L(t)+L(t+Δt')-L(t+Δt+Δt')                (3)
Right Ear:
-L(t+Δt')+L(t+Δt)+L(t+Δt+Δt')      (4)
If Δt is comparable to Δt' the right ear terms will largely cancel leaving only L(t+Δt+Δt') corresponding to the left channel main signal portion of the difference signal emanating from the left sub-speaker and delayed by both the interspeaker time delay Δt' and the interaural time delay Δt. Due to the procedure effect, the left ear will mainly perceive only the first signal to arrive, L(t). FIG. 10 illustrates the apparent source that a listener would perceive in such a situation. Referring to FIG. 10, hearing the main left signal in the left ear and the same signal delayed by Δt+Δt' in the right ear, the listener will perceive an apparent sound source with a listening angle outside the speakers corresponding to an interaural delay of Δt+Δt' as illustrated in FIG. 10. Referring to FIG. 4, ambience information reflected from point P1 on wall W1 would appear first only in the left channel and sometime later (roughly corresponding to the microphones spacing for this specific case) would appear in the right channel. Referring to FIG. 10, the listener would perceive an apparent source as shown in FIG. 10 showing a good correspondence with the correct ambience information. A second apparent source on the right would seem to be indicated at the time that the signal arrives at the right microphone, further away and at a lesser loudness. However, it has been observed in experiments that the listener perceives only the first apparent source. This is probably due to the ability of the auditory system to assign direction to the first and loudest of similar sounds, as discussed previously.
As the recorded source moves more towards the center of the recording microphones, the difference in arrival times at the microphones will become less. This means that the time that a signal will exist only in one or the other channel will become shorter, and the question of the relative loudness of the signal in each channel becomes important in assigning a direction to the apparent source. Consider a case where the same signal appears in both left and right channels but with the left channel twice as loud as the right channel. The respective ears would receive the following signals, after combining like terms:
Left Ear:
L(t)+L/2(t+Δt')+L/2(t+Δt)-L/2(t+Δt+Δt') (5)
Right Ear:
L/2(t)+L(t+Δt)-L/2(t+Δt')+L/2(t+Δt+Δt') (6)
If Δt equals Δt' these expressions will further reduce to:
Left Ear:
L(t)+L(t+Δt)-L/2(t+Δt+Δt')               (7)
Right Ear:
L/2(t)+L/2(t+Δt)-L/2(t+Δt+Δt')           (8)
In this case the right ear would hear the same signal at the same time as the left ear, but at half the strength. The listener will perceive the apparent sound source as slightly shifted to the left of center between the speakers.
However, if Δt' is made slightly greater than Δt an important result is obtained. Referring back to the original terms with the terms being rearranged in order of arrival time at the ears, the following is obtained:
Left Ear:
L(t)+L/2(t+Δt)+L/2(t+Δt')-L/2(t+Δt+Δt') (9)
Right Ear:
L/2(t)+L(t+Δt)-L/2(t+Δt')+L/2(t+Δt+Δt') (10)
The left ear will perceive only the main signal, L(t), since the other signals are weaker and later. The right ear however, has a half strength signal which arrives first followed by a full strength signal delayed by Δt. The precedence effect does not fully mask the late arrival of the stronger signal so that the listener perceives, at least slightly, a direction cue placing the apparent sound source at a listening angle corresponding to an approximate interaural delay slightly less than Δt. This will place the apparent sound source nearly out to the left speaker. As the right channel signal is increased further, relative to the left channel signal, the difference signal is reduced gradually to zero as the channels become equal. The precedence effect gives increasing importance to the now louder first signal arrival at the right ear and the listener perceives a smooth shift of acoustic image towards the center between the speakers. Conversely, if the right signal is reduced further from the L/2 relative loudness, the exact opposite will occur. The difference signals will become louder and the listener will perceive a smooth shift of acoustic image outward to the perimeter of the 180° stereo field.
In order for a smooth image transition to occur, the inter-speaker delay Δt' between the respective main and sub-speakers along the listening angle between the speakers and the listening location must be greater than the interaural delay Δt as shown in FIG. 9 along the listening angle of the listening location with respect to the speaker locations by enough to insure the desired function of the precedence effect as outlined above. In experiments, it has been found that if Δt equals Δt' the effect is not unpleasant, it is just that the optimum ambience information is not present in the reproduced sound field. Although in accordance with a preferred embodiment Δt' is greater than Δt, in order to obtain the best image quality outside the listening angle of the speakers, Δt' should be close enough to Δt such that a substantial cancellation of interaural crosstalk occurs. In practice, but with no intention to limit the invention to such a particular spacing, it has been found that values of Δt' about 1.2 times greater than Δt provide a suitable compromise and provide a realistic ambient field and acoustic image.
As shown in FIG. 9, in accordance with one specific embodiment of the invention the left and right main and sub-speakers are located at respective main and sub-speaker locations arranged on a speaker axis which is parallel to an ear axis of a listener in a normal listening position along a listening axis equidistant from the two sets of speakers. It should be understood, however, that any arrangement of main and sub-speakers giving the proper inter-speaker delay Δt' will suffice. The arrangement of FIG. 9 where both the main and sub-speakers are located on an axis parallel to the ear axis of a listener does, however, have advantages in allowing greater flexibility in listener position. That is, exact listener positioning is more critical when the sub-speakers are not on the same axis as the main speakers, or if the sub-speakers are not parallel to the main speakers.
It is possible that some modifications of the frequency or phase response of the main or sub-speakers may be desirable. One example might be the attenuation of bass response in the sub-speakers. This would be desirable since very little difference information exists between the channels at low frequencies other than turntable rumble or other spurious signals. In addition, it is desirable that the main and sub-speakers be very similar, if not identical, in construction. This will assure that differences in acoustic position of dissimilar drive units or differences in phase shift of dissimilar cross-over networks will not occur and hence not degrade the performance of the system. Additionally, it should be understood that in order to obtain the best performance from the system that there are some limitations on the placement of the speakers relative to the listener. If it is desired to obtain the best performance, the sum of Δt+Δt' (FIG. 9) should never exceed the maximum possible interaural time delay Δtmax corresponding to a distance along the ear axis. For an average person, the spacing between the ears is on the order of 6.5 inches, so that the Δtmax corresponds to the time it takes sound to travel such a distance.
Referring to FIG. 11, the condition that the sum of Δt and Δt' should not exceed the maximum possible interaural time delay Δtmax can be met in practice if the distance between the left and right main speakers D along the speaker axis is always less than the perpendicular distance from the listening location along the listening axis D' with respect to the speaker axis. In practice, it has been found that good results are obtained if the spacing D between the main speakers is on the order of 0.7 to 0.9 times as large as the distance D'. In experiments, it has been observed that as D gets very close to D', the realistic ambient field and enhanced acoustic image that is otherwise obtained begins to disappear.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of the invention, and as illustrated in FIG. 11, the left main speaker and the left sub-speaker may be commonly mounted in a single enclosure LE, and the right main speaker and right sub-speaker are commonly mounted in a common enclosure RE. This has the advantages of fixing the inter-speaker delay Δt', and offers the advantage that only two speaker enclosures are required.
In accordance with a specific embodiment, a spacing between the main and sub-speakers of eight inches, with the main and sub-speakers being identical two-way loudspeakers each having a six inch woofer and a one inch tweeter, was found to work well. With a main to sub-speaker spacing of eight inches, and assuming an ear spacing between the left and right ears of approximately 6.5 inches, this yields a value of Δt' approximately 1.2 times greater than Δt, as discussed herein before as a suitable compromise.
The difference signals left channel minus right channel and right channel minus left channel which have been referred to throughout this description are easily obtained in practice by connecting the sub-speakers across the left plus and right plus terminals of a stereophonic amplifier's outputs. Connecting left plus to the plus speaker terminal of the left sub-speaker and right plus to the sub-speaker common or normal ground terminal will give a signal corresponding to the left channel minus right channel. Reversing this connection will give a signal to the right sub-speaker corresponding to the right channel minus the left channel.
As discussed before, the known techniques for cancelling interaural crosstalk, if successful in their stated aim, create an unnatural impression when reproducing sounds, particularly ambient sounds, far off the equidistant axis of two microphones placed farther apart than ear spacing. Only the Iwahara Patent discussed previously addresses this problem, and requires that the input signal be recorded binaurally, by two microphones at the ear spacing. In contrast, the present invention creates a realistic acoustic image regardless of the position of the recorded source. In addition, this realistic ambient field and acoustic image is created in accordance with the present invention with commonly available recorded material and does not require a specially recorded input signal.
As compared to the device described in the prior Cohen Patent referred to previously, the present invention is a purely acoustic implementation requiring no special electronic components and utilizing the unmodified output from a standard stereophonic high fidelity system. In addition, the present invention recognizes the advantages of certain specific values of delay and sets forth a technique for fixing this value relative to the listener, i.e. incorporating the main and sub-speaker for each channel in a common enclosure, thereby offering increased simplification of set-up and operation to the user. Further, the performance of the present invention is not subject to the inevitable degradation caused by extra stages of electronic signal processing.
The invention described herein is a novel apparatus and method for creating a realistic impression of sounds reproduced from commonly available recorded material. It offers performance advantages over those techniques and apparatus described in the prior art, and is utterly straightforward and simple in its preferred embodiments. Although the invention has been described herein with respect to certain preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the invention to any specific details of those preferred embodiments. That is, it should be clear that various modifications and changes can be made to those preferred embodiments without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, which is intended to be set forth in the accompanying claims.

Claims (14)

I claim:
1. In a stereophonic sound reproduction system having a left channel output and a right channel output, apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image comprising:
a right main speaker and a left main speaker disposed respectively at right and left main speaker locations equidistantly spaced from a listening location, the listening location being a place in space for accommodating a listener's head facing the main speakers and having a right ear location and a left ear location along an ear axis, with the right and left ear locations separated along the ear axis by a maximum interaural sound distance of Δtmax, and the listening location being defined as the point on the ear axis equidistant to the right and left ears;
a right sub-speaker and a left sub-speaker disposed respectively at right and left sub-speaker locations equidistantly spaced from the listening location;
the right main speaker being separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t and being separated from the left ear by a sound distance t+Δt where Δt is the interaural sound distance of the right and left ear locations with respect to the right main speaker;
the right sub-speaker being separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t+Δt' where Δt' is the sound distance spacing with respect to the right ear location between the right main speaker location and right sub-speaker location;
the left main speaker being separated from the left ear location by a sound distance t and being separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t+Δt where Δt is the interaural sound distance between the left and right ear locations with respect to the left main speaker;
the left sub-speaker being separated from the left ear location by a sound distance t+Δt' where Δt' is the sound distance spacing with respect to the left ear location between the left main speaker location and left sub-speaker location;
the main speaker locations and sub-speaker locations being spaced from the listening location in a manner such that Δt+Δt' is ≦Δtmax ;
means coupling the right and left channel outputs, respectively, to said right and left main speakers;
means connected to the right and left channel outputs for developing a left channel minus right channel signal and a right channel minus left channel signal;
means coupling said left channel minus right channel signal to said left sub-speaker and said right channel minus left channel signal to said right sub-speaker;
whereby sound reproduced by said apparatus as perceived by a listener whose head is located generally at the listening location has a realistic acoustic field and enhanced acoustic image.
2. Apparatus in accordance with claim 1 wherein the spacing of the main speakers and sub-speakers with respect to the listening location is such that the sound distance Δt' is approximately 1.2 times the sound distance Δt.
3. Apparatus in accordance with claim 1 including a left speaker enclosure wherein the left main speaker and left sub-speaker are incorporated to fix the spacing therebetween, and a right speaker enclosure wherein the right main speaker and right sub-speaker are incorporated to fix the spacing therebetween.
4. Apparatus in accordance with claim 1 wherein the spacing of the main speakers with respect to each other and with respect to the listening location is such that the distance along a main speaker axis between right and left main speakers is less than the perpendicular distance from the listening location to the main speaker axis.
5. In a stereophonic sound reproduction system having a left channel output and a right channel output, apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image comprising:
a right main speaker and a left main speaker disposed respectively at right and left main speaker locations spaced apart along a speaker axis, with a listening location located generally along a listening axis perpendicular to the speaker axis and intersecting the speaker axis at a point midway between the right and left main speaker locations;
means coupling the right and left channel outputs, respectively, to said right and left main speakers;
a right sub-speaker positioned on the speaker axis at a right sub-speaker location spaced a predetermined distance from the right main speaker location and further from the listening axis than said right main speaker location;
a left sub-speaker positioned on the speaker axis at a left sub-speaker location spaced a predetermined distance from the right main speaker location and further from the listening axis than said left main speaker location;
means connected to the right and left channel outputs for developing a left channel minus right channel signal and a right channel minus left channel signal;
means coupling said left channel minus right channel signal to said left sub-speaker and said right channel minus left channel signal to said right sub-speaker;
whereby sound reproduced by said apparatus as perceived by a listener located generally along the listening axis has a realistic acoustic field and enhanced acoustic image.
6. Apparatus in accordance with claim 5 wherein the listening location has a right and left ear location on an ear axis parallel to the speaker axis, with the right and left ear locations spaced along the ear axis by a sound distance Δtmax, wherein the right and left ear locations are differentially spaced from each of the main speakers by an interaural sound distance Δt, wherein the respective main and sub-speakers are differentially spaced from a corresponding ear location by a sound distance Δt', and wherein Δt+Δt' is ≦ to Δtmax.
7. Apparatus in accordance with claim 6 wherein the left and right main speakers are separated from each other by a distance D, and wherein the listening location is spaced along the listening axis at a distance D' from the speaker axis and wherein D is <D'.
8. Apparatus in accordance with claim 7 including a right channel speaker enclosure wherein the right main speaker and right sub-speaker are commonly mounted to fix the spacing therebetween, and including a left channel enclosure wherein the left main speaker and left sub-speaker are commonly mounted to fix the spacing therebetween.
9. A method for reproducing sound from a stereophonic source having a left channel output and a right channel output in which the reproduced sound has a realistic ambient field and acoustic image comprising the steps of:
disposing a right main speaker and a left main speaker at right and left main speaker locations equidistantly spaced from a listening location, the listening location being a place in space for accommodating a listener's head facing the main speakers and having a right ear location and a left ear location along an ear axis, with the right and left ear locations separated along the ear axis by a maximum interaural sound distance of Δtmax, and the listening location being defined as the point on the ear axis equidistant to the right and left ears;
disposing a right sub-speaker and a left sub-speaker respectively at right and left sub-speaker locations equidistantly spaced from the listening location;
selecting the right main speaker location as separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t and separated from the left ear by a sound distance t plus Δt, where Δt is the interaural sound distance of the right and left ear locations with respect to the right main speaker location;
selecting the right sub-speaker location as separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t plus Δt', where Δt' is the sound distance spacing with respect to the right ear location between the right main speaker location and right sub-speaker location;
selecting the left main speaker location as separated from the left ear location by a sound distance t and separated from the right ear location by a sound distance t plus Δt, where Δt is the interaural sound distance between the left and right ear locations with respect to the left main speaker;
selecting the left sub-speaker location as separated from the left ear location by a sound distance t plus Δt' where Δt' is the sound distance spacing with respect to the left ear location between the left main speaker location and left sub-speaker location;
selecting the main speaker locations and sub-speaker locations with respect to the listening location in a manner such that Δt plus Δt' is ≦Δtmax ;
coupling the right and left channel outputs, respectively, to the right and left main speakers;
developing from the right and left channel outputs a left channel minus right channel signal and a right channel minus left channel signal; and
coupling the left channel minus right channel signal to the left sub-speaker and the right channel minus left channel signal to the right sub-speaker;
whereby sound reproduced by the method as described above as perceived by a listener whose head is located generally at the listening location has a realistic acoustic field and enhanced acoustic image.
10. A method in accordance with claim 9 wherein the right and left main speakers and the right and left sub-speakers are disposed along a common axis.
11. A method in accordance with claim 10 including the steps of incorporating the left main speaker and left sub-speaker in a common enclosure to fix the spacing therebetween, and incorporating the right main speaker and right sub-speaker in a common enclosure to fix the distance therebetween.
12. A method in accordance with claim 11 wherein the spacing between the left and right main speakers is selected to be a distance D, and wherein the listening location is selected to be a distance D' in a perpendicular direction from the common axis on which the main speakers are disposed, with D selected to be <D'.
13. In a stereophonic sound reproduction system having a left channel output and a right channel output, apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image comprising:
a right and left channel speaker enclosure, each having a main speaker and a sub-speaker mounted therein which are spaced from each other by a predetermined distance, with the right and left speaker enclosures intended for situating such that the right and left main speakers are closer than the sub-speakers with respect to a listening location on a listening axis midway between the speaker enclosures;
means coupling the right and left channel outputs, respectively, to said right and left main speakers;
means connected to the right and left channel outputs for developing a left channel minus right channel signal and a right channel minus left channel signal;
means coupling said left channel minus right channel signal to said left sub-speaker and said right channel minus left channel signal to said right sub-speaker;
whereby sound reproduced by said apparatus as perceived by a listener whose head is located generally at the listening location has a realistic acoustic field and enhanced acoustic image.
14. Apparatus in accordance with claim 13 wherein the left and right speaker enclosures are separated from each other by a distance D along a speaker axis, and wherein the listening location is spaced along the listening axis at a distance D' from the speaker axis, and wherein D is less than D'.
US06/383,151 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image Expired - Lifetime US4489432A (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/383,151 US4489432A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
GB08314479A GB2122459B (en) 1982-05-28 1983-05-25 Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
JP58092567A JP2529933B2 (en) 1982-05-28 1983-05-27 Sound reproduction method with realism and sound image

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/383,151 US4489432A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4489432A true US4489432A (en) 1984-12-18

Family

ID=23511944

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US06/383,151 Expired - Lifetime US4489432A (en) 1982-05-28 1982-05-28 Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US4489432A (en)
JP (1) JP2529933B2 (en)
GB (1) GB2122459B (en)

Cited By (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4612663A (en) * 1984-03-26 1986-09-16 Holbrook Kyle A Multichannel audio reproduction system
US4630298A (en) * 1985-05-30 1986-12-16 Polk Matthew S Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
US4638505A (en) * 1985-08-26 1987-01-20 Polk Audio Inc. Optimized low frequency response of loudspeaker systems having main and sub-speakers
US4748669A (en) * 1986-03-27 1988-05-31 Hughes Aircraft Company Stereo enhancement system
US4841572A (en) * 1988-03-14 1989-06-20 Hughes Aircraft Company Stereo synthesizer
US4888804A (en) * 1988-05-12 1989-12-19 Gefvert Herbert I Sound reproduction system
US4910779A (en) * 1987-10-15 1990-03-20 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system with optimal equalization
US4975954A (en) * 1987-10-15 1990-12-04 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system with optimal equalization
US5034983A (en) * 1987-10-15 1991-07-23 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system
US5117459A (en) * 1990-05-03 1992-05-26 Chicago Steel Rule Die & Fabricators Co. Ambient imaging loudspeaker system
US5136651A (en) * 1987-10-15 1992-08-04 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system
US5274708A (en) * 1992-06-01 1993-12-28 Fusan Labs, Inc. Digital stereo sound enhancement unit and method
US5594801A (en) * 1994-05-26 1997-01-14 Mcshane; Charles L. Ambient expansion loudspeaker system
US5661808A (en) * 1995-04-27 1997-08-26 Srs Labs, Inc. Stereo enhancement system
US5850453A (en) * 1995-07-28 1998-12-15 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US5912976A (en) * 1996-11-07 1999-06-15 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording and playback and methods for providing same
US5970152A (en) * 1996-04-30 1999-10-19 Srs Labs, Inc. Audio enhancement system for use in a surround sound environment
US6281749B1 (en) 1997-06-17 2001-08-28 Srs Labs, Inc. Sound enhancement system
US20020161882A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Masayuki Chatani Altering network transmitted content data based upon user specified characteristics
US20020181718A1 (en) * 2001-05-29 2002-12-05 Pioneer Corporation Audio apparatus
US6590983B1 (en) 1998-10-13 2003-07-08 Srs Labs, Inc. Apparatus and method for synthesizing pseudo-stereophonic outputs from a monophonic input
US20050129248A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2005-06-16 Alan Kraemer Systems and methods of spatial image enhancement of a sound source
US6937737B2 (en) 2003-10-27 2005-08-30 Britannia Investment Corporation Multi-channel audio surround sound from front located loudspeakers
US7031474B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2006-04-18 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US20060269069A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Polk Matthew S Jr Compact audio reproduction system with large perceived acoustic size and image
US20090175472A1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2009-07-09 Embracing Sound Experience Ab Loudspeaker Device
US20100298136A1 (en) * 2006-03-29 2010-11-25 Bayer Cropscience Ag Active ingredient combinations with insecticidal properties
US7987281B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2011-07-26 Srs Labs, Inc. System and method for enhanced streaming audio
US8050434B1 (en) 2006-12-21 2011-11-01 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system
US9071897B1 (en) 2013-10-17 2015-06-30 Robert G. Johnston Magnetic coupling for stereo loudspeaker systems
US9084047B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-07-14 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US9088858B2 (en) 2011-01-04 2015-07-21 Dts Llc Immersive audio rendering system
USD740784S1 (en) 2014-03-14 2015-10-13 Richard O'Polka Portable sound device
US9258664B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2016-02-09 Comhear, Inc. Headphone audio enhancement system
US10149058B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-12-04 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US10327064B2 (en) 2016-10-27 2019-06-18 Polk Audio, Llc Method and system for implementing stereo dimensional array signal processing in a compact single enclosure active loudspeaker product
US10327086B2 (en) * 2017-04-27 2019-06-18 Polk Audio, Llc Head related transfer function equalization and transducer aiming of stereo dimensional array (SDA) loudspeakers
WO2020102183A1 (en) 2018-11-15 2020-05-22 Polk Audio, Llc Loudspeaker system with overhead sound image generating elevation module
US11937066B2 (en) 2019-03-07 2024-03-19 Polk Audio, Llc Active cancellation of a height-channel soundbar array's forward sound radiation

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4569074A (en) * 1984-06-01 1986-02-04 Polk Audio, Inc. Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
AT394650B (en) * 1988-10-24 1992-05-25 Akg Akustische Kino Geraete ELECTROACOUSTIC ARRANGEMENT FOR PLAYING STEREOPHONER BINAURAL AUDIO SIGNALS VIA HEADPHONES
JP2001340522A (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-11 Heiwa Corp Game machine frame body
US8306243B2 (en) * 2007-08-13 2012-11-06 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Audio device

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3697692A (en) * 1971-06-10 1972-10-10 Dynaco Inc Two-channel,four-component stereophonic system
GB1425519A (en) * 1972-10-13 1976-02-18 Sony Corp Stereophonic signal reproducing apparatus
GB1459188A (en) * 1973-01-13 1976-12-22 Emi Ltd Apparatus for producing pseudo quadraphonic signals from stereo signals
US4058675A (en) * 1975-06-19 1977-11-15 Sansui Electric Co., Ltd. Loudspeaker system for use in a stereophonic sound reproduction system
US4199658A (en) * 1977-09-10 1980-04-22 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Binaural sound reproduction system
US4219696A (en) * 1977-02-18 1980-08-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Sound image localization control system
GB2074823A (en) * 1980-03-12 1981-11-04 Cohen J M Stereophonic audio reproduction system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS476801U (en) * 1971-02-15 1972-09-25

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3697692A (en) * 1971-06-10 1972-10-10 Dynaco Inc Two-channel,four-component stereophonic system
GB1367705A (en) * 1971-06-10 1974-09-18 Dynaco Inc Audio reproduction systems
GB1425519A (en) * 1972-10-13 1976-02-18 Sony Corp Stereophonic signal reproducing apparatus
GB1459188A (en) * 1973-01-13 1976-12-22 Emi Ltd Apparatus for producing pseudo quadraphonic signals from stereo signals
US4058675A (en) * 1975-06-19 1977-11-15 Sansui Electric Co., Ltd. Loudspeaker system for use in a stereophonic sound reproduction system
US4219696A (en) * 1977-02-18 1980-08-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Sound image localization control system
US4199658A (en) * 1977-09-10 1980-04-22 Victor Company Of Japan, Limited Binaural sound reproduction system
GB2074823A (en) * 1980-03-12 1981-11-04 Cohen J M Stereophonic audio reproduction system
US4308423A (en) * 1980-03-12 1981-12-29 Cohen Joel M Stereo image separation and perimeter enhancement

Cited By (73)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4612663A (en) * 1984-03-26 1986-09-16 Holbrook Kyle A Multichannel audio reproduction system
US4630298A (en) * 1985-05-30 1986-12-16 Polk Matthew S Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
US4638505A (en) * 1985-08-26 1987-01-20 Polk Audio Inc. Optimized low frequency response of loudspeaker systems having main and sub-speakers
US4748669A (en) * 1986-03-27 1988-05-31 Hughes Aircraft Company Stereo enhancement system
US5034983A (en) * 1987-10-15 1991-07-23 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system
US5136651A (en) * 1987-10-15 1992-08-04 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system
US4910779A (en) * 1987-10-15 1990-03-20 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system with optimal equalization
US4975954A (en) * 1987-10-15 1990-12-04 Cooper Duane H Head diffraction compensated stereo system with optimal equalization
US4841572A (en) * 1988-03-14 1989-06-20 Hughes Aircraft Company Stereo synthesizer
US4888804A (en) * 1988-05-12 1989-12-19 Gefvert Herbert I Sound reproduction system
US5117459A (en) * 1990-05-03 1992-05-26 Chicago Steel Rule Die & Fabricators Co. Ambient imaging loudspeaker system
US5274708A (en) * 1992-06-01 1993-12-28 Fusan Labs, Inc. Digital stereo sound enhancement unit and method
US5594801A (en) * 1994-05-26 1997-01-14 Mcshane; Charles L. Ambient expansion loudspeaker system
US5661808A (en) * 1995-04-27 1997-08-26 Srs Labs, Inc. Stereo enhancement system
US7636443B2 (en) 1995-04-27 2009-12-22 Srs Labs, Inc. Audio enhancement system
US5892830A (en) * 1995-04-27 1999-04-06 Srs Labs, Inc. Stereo enhancement system
US6597791B1 (en) 1995-04-27 2003-07-22 Srs Labs, Inc. Audio enhancement system
US20040005063A1 (en) * 1995-04-27 2004-01-08 Klayman Arnold I. Audio enhancement system
US20060062395A1 (en) * 1995-07-28 2006-03-23 Klayman Arnold I Acoustic correction apparatus
US6718039B1 (en) 1995-07-28 2004-04-06 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US7555130B2 (en) 1995-07-28 2009-06-30 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US5850453A (en) * 1995-07-28 1998-12-15 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US7043031B2 (en) 1995-07-28 2006-05-09 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US20040247132A1 (en) * 1995-07-28 2004-12-09 Klayman Arnold I. Acoustic correction apparatus
US5970152A (en) * 1996-04-30 1999-10-19 Srs Labs, Inc. Audio enhancement system for use in a surround sound environment
US7200236B1 (en) 1996-11-07 2007-04-03 Srslabs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording playback and methods for providing same
US20090190766A1 (en) * 1996-11-07 2009-07-30 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording playback and methods for providing same
US7492907B2 (en) 1996-11-07 2009-02-17 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording and playback and methods for providing same
US8472631B2 (en) 1996-11-07 2013-06-25 Dts Llc Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording playback and methods for providing same
US5912976A (en) * 1996-11-07 1999-06-15 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system for use in recording and playback and methods for providing same
US6281749B1 (en) 1997-06-17 2001-08-28 Srs Labs, Inc. Sound enhancement system
US20040005066A1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2004-01-08 Kraemer Alan D. Apparatus and method for synthesizing pseudo-stereophonic outputs from a monophonic input
US6590983B1 (en) 1998-10-13 2003-07-08 Srs Labs, Inc. Apparatus and method for synthesizing pseudo-stereophonic outputs from a monophonic input
US7031474B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2006-04-18 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US7907736B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2011-03-15 Srs Labs, Inc. Acoustic correction apparatus
US7987281B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2011-07-26 Srs Labs, Inc. System and method for enhanced streaming audio
US8751028B2 (en) 1999-12-10 2014-06-10 Dts Llc System and method for enhanced streaming audio
US20020161882A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Masayuki Chatani Altering network transmitted content data based upon user specified characteristics
US8108509B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2012-01-31 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Altering network transmitted content data based upon user specified characteristics
US20070168359A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2007-07-19 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Method and system for proximity based voice chat
US20020181718A1 (en) * 2001-05-29 2002-12-05 Pioneer Corporation Audio apparatus
JP2007510334A (en) * 2003-10-27 2007-04-19 ブリタニア インベストメント コーポレーション Multi-channel audio surround sound system from front loudspeakers
US20050226425A1 (en) * 2003-10-27 2005-10-13 Polk Matthew S Jr Multi-channel audio surround sound from front located loudspeakers
US6937737B2 (en) 2003-10-27 2005-08-30 Britannia Investment Corporation Multi-channel audio surround sound from front located loudspeakers
JP4743790B2 (en) * 2003-10-27 2011-08-10 ブリタニア インベストメント コーポレーション Multi-channel audio surround sound system from front loudspeakers
US7231053B2 (en) 2003-10-27 2007-06-12 Britannia Investment Corp. Enhanced multi-channel audio surround sound from front located loudspeakers
US20050129248A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2005-06-16 Alan Kraemer Systems and methods of spatial image enhancement of a sound source
US7522733B2 (en) 2003-12-12 2009-04-21 Srs Labs, Inc. Systems and methods of spatial image enhancement of a sound source
US20060269069A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2006-11-30 Polk Matthew S Jr Compact audio reproduction system with large perceived acoustic size and image
US7817812B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2010-10-19 Polk Audio, Inc. Compact audio reproduction system with large perceived acoustic size and image
US20100298136A1 (en) * 2006-03-29 2010-11-25 Bayer Cropscience Ag Active ingredient combinations with insecticidal properties
US8620010B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2013-12-31 Embracing Sound Experience Ab Loudspeaker device
US20090175472A1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2009-07-09 Embracing Sound Experience Ab Loudspeaker Device
US8509464B1 (en) 2006-12-21 2013-08-13 Dts Llc Multi-channel audio enhancement system
US9232312B2 (en) 2006-12-21 2016-01-05 Dts Llc Multi-channel audio enhancement system
US8050434B1 (en) 2006-12-21 2011-11-01 Srs Labs, Inc. Multi-channel audio enhancement system
US10034113B2 (en) 2011-01-04 2018-07-24 Dts Llc Immersive audio rendering system
US9088858B2 (en) 2011-01-04 2015-07-21 Dts Llc Immersive audio rendering system
US9154897B2 (en) 2011-01-04 2015-10-06 Dts Llc Immersive audio rendering system
US9084047B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-07-14 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US10149058B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-12-04 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US10771897B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-09-08 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US9560442B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-01-31 Richard O'Polka Portable sound system
US10284955B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2019-05-07 Comhear, Inc. Headphone audio enhancement system
US9866963B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2018-01-09 Comhear, Inc. Headphone audio enhancement system
US9258664B2 (en) 2013-05-23 2016-02-09 Comhear, Inc. Headphone audio enhancement system
US9071897B1 (en) 2013-10-17 2015-06-30 Robert G. Johnston Magnetic coupling for stereo loudspeaker systems
USD740784S1 (en) 2014-03-14 2015-10-13 Richard O'Polka Portable sound device
US10327064B2 (en) 2016-10-27 2019-06-18 Polk Audio, Llc Method and system for implementing stereo dimensional array signal processing in a compact single enclosure active loudspeaker product
US10327086B2 (en) * 2017-04-27 2019-06-18 Polk Audio, Llc Head related transfer function equalization and transducer aiming of stereo dimensional array (SDA) loudspeakers
WO2020102183A1 (en) 2018-11-15 2020-05-22 Polk Audio, Llc Loudspeaker system with overhead sound image generating elevation module
US12120494B2 (en) 2018-11-15 2024-10-15 Polk Audio, Llc Loudspeaker system with overhead sound image generating (e.g., ATMOS™) elevation module and method and apparatus for direct signal cancellation
US11937066B2 (en) 2019-03-07 2024-03-19 Polk Audio, Llc Active cancellation of a height-channel soundbar array's forward sound radiation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS5932300A (en) 1984-02-21
GB2122459B (en) 1986-04-23
GB8314479D0 (en) 1983-06-29
JP2529933B2 (en) 1996-09-04
GB2122459A (en) 1984-01-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4489432A (en) Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
US4569074A (en) Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
US4497064A (en) Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having an expanded acoustic image
US4630298A (en) Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
US4819269A (en) Extended imaging split mode loudspeaker system
US4199658A (en) Binaural sound reproduction system
US4058675A (en) Loudspeaker system for use in a stereophonic sound reproduction system
US6236730B1 (en) Full sound enhancement using multi-input sound signals
US5117459A (en) Ambient imaging loudspeaker system
US4567607A (en) Stereo image recovery
US4069394A (en) Stereophonic sound reproduction system
US5181247A (en) Sound image enhancing
US4359605A (en) Monaural signal to artificial stereo signals convertings and processing circuit for headphones
JPH09505702A (en) Binaural signal processor
US4847904A (en) Ambient imaging loudspeaker system
US6222930B1 (en) Method of reproducing sound
US4087631A (en) Projected sound localization headphone apparatus
CA1198683A (en) Method and apparatus for reproducing sound having a realistic ambient field and acoustic image
JPH07503112A (en) speaker system
US7796766B2 (en) Audio center channel phantomizer
JPH0662486A (en) Acoustic reproducing device
US3162727A (en) Stereophonic reverberation system
JPS61237600A (en) Acoustic device
JPS6322800Y2 (en)
JPH05191898A (en) Sound image expansion device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: POLK AUDIO, INC. 1915 ANNAPOLIS ROAD, BALTIMORE, M

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:POLK, MATTHEW S.;REEL/FRAME:004011/0078

Effective date: 19820527

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: POLK INVESTMENT CORPORATION, SUITE 1704, BANK OF D

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:POLK AUDIO, INC., A MD. CORP.;REEL/FRAME:004772/0384

Effective date: 19870928

Owner name: POLK INVESTMENT CORPORATION,DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POLK AUDIO, INC., A MD. CORP.;REEL/FRAME:004772/0384

Effective date: 19870928

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HLDR NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENT STAT AS SMALL BUSINESS (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LSM2); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS - SMALL BUSINESS (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SM02); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12