[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US3034982A - Well drilling fluid - Google Patents

Well drilling fluid Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3034982A
US3034982A US658378A US65837857A US3034982A US 3034982 A US3034982 A US 3034982A US 658378 A US658378 A US 658378A US 65837857 A US65837857 A US 65837857A US 3034982 A US3034982 A US 3034982A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
lignite
parts
reaction
mud
sulfo
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US658378A
Inventor
Kenneth P Monroe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Magnet Cove Barium Corp
Original Assignee
Magnet Cove Barium Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Magnet Cove Barium Corp filed Critical Magnet Cove Barium Corp
Priority to US658378A priority Critical patent/US3034982A/en
Priority to US151590A priority patent/US3135727A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3034982A publication Critical patent/US3034982A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/02Well-drilling compositions
    • C09K8/04Aqueous well-drilling compositions
    • C09K8/14Clay-containing compositions
    • C09K8/18Clay-containing compositions characterised by the organic compounds
    • C09K8/22Synthetic organic compounds

Definitions

  • This invention relates to water-soluble or water dispersible lignite derivatives and also to awell fluid in which such lignite derivatives are employed to control the properties, particularly the yield point and viscosity characteristics of the fluid. In another respect, it relates to methods for producing such lignite derivatives. In still another aspect, the invention relates to a method for controlling the yield point of a well fluid such as a mud.
  • Lignite an abundant and cheap domestic raw material, previously has been used to control the viscosity of oil well drilling muds. Its usefulness as a thinner for muds has been limited because it is rendered much less effective by commonly encountered mud contaminants such as common salt (sodium chloride) and calcium compounds (anhydrite, gypsum, cement and the like). In other words, these mud contaminants will progressively coagulate the lignite so that it can no longer exert its desired protective colloidal action.
  • common salt sodium chloride
  • calcium compounds anhydrite, gypsum, cement and the like
  • lignite is significantly effective as a viscosity control agent only when used in conjunction with caustic or in a highly alkaline mud.
  • One practice has been to mix raw lignite and caustic together at the well site in order not only to solubilize the lignite but also to give the mud the required causticity for the lignite to exert its maximum thinning effect. This requires not only handling of two separate materials but also the handling of large amounts of caustic, which is fraught with danger.
  • control in the field of the caustic-lignite reaction and of the amount of caustic present in the mud to get optimum results are both diflicult so that treating results tend to be erratic.
  • the driller To decrease the degree of coagulation, the driller must add not only the pre-reacted lignite but also a large amount of additional caustic (usually a weight about equal to that of the pre-reacted lignite). Thus the driller must still handle two ingredients including relatively large amounts of the troublesome caustic, so that in such cases there is very little advantage in using prereacted lignite in place of raw lignite other than the fact that the pro-reacted lignite can be dispersed more easily than the raw lignite.
  • a new and novel process in which raw lignite is reacted, in an alkaline medium, with a water-soluble sulfite or bisulfite and an aldehyde or ketone to produce a new and novel product, sulfo-alkylated lignite which in turn, can be oxidized or nitritated to produce still another new and novel product, oxidized or nitritated sulfoalkylated lignite.
  • the efiicieney ofthe sulfo-alkylated lignite is less than that of the oxidized or nitritated sulfo-alkylated lignite.
  • the' sulfo-alkylated lignite and the oxidized form thereof are usually at least equal in dispersing power to conventional quebracho-eaustic and lignite-caustic dispersants and, in many mud systems, particularly those containing a hydratable clay such as bentonite, they are superior to these two conventional dispersant's and this is particularly true in those systems contaminated with salt and calcium.
  • the new products above referred to can be provided as dry products for commercial use by conventional drying methods, such by drum drying, spray drying, or the like. They are stable, non-caking and free-flowing products when packaged, stored and transported in conventional multi-wall paper bags. They are readily useable by the oil well driller without additional processing, affording the driller for the first time a lignitic additive which in many systems can be used without the addition of caustic therewith and in other systems with only small amounts of added caustic, to yield the desired maximum yield point control of muds in the presence of commonly encountered mud contaminants.
  • the products are non-corrosive to the skin and are not prone toward spontaneous combustion under customary conditions of manufacture, storage and transport.
  • Another object is to provide a process of treating lignite to convert it into an eflicient dispersing agent finding particular use in drilling muds, the treatment involving the reaction of lignite with certain reactants in such a manner that its dispersing power is greatly increased without the use of large quantities of caustic so that the resulting lignitic product can be packaged, sold and used as a single product which will not cake during storage and which is not noticeably corrosive to the skin.
  • Another object is to provide a process wherein sulfoalkylated lignite is oxidized to further enhance its dispers- 1ng powers.
  • Another object is to provide a drilling mud in which a lignitic derivative of the foregoing types is employed as a dispersant to control the yield point of the mud, particularly when the mud is contaminated with salt or calcium or when it contains highly hydratable clays such as bentonite.
  • Another object is to provide a method for controllingthe yield point characteristics of a mud through the use 3 of a lignitic reaction product of the types above mentioned.
  • Another object is to provide a process for increasing the hydrophilic properties of lignite to produce new products having various uses in addition to those mentioned above.
  • FIG. 1 represents a comparison of the thinning characteristics of a preferred species of this invention and conventional dispersants
  • FIG. 2 represents a comparison in a lime-contaminated mud of the thinning characteristics of sulfo-alkylated lignite and conventional alkali-lignite;
  • FIG. 3 is another comparison in a salt-contaminated mud
  • FIG. 4 illustrates the viscosity control characteristics of various alkali metal sulfo-methylated lignites
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the variation of effectiveness of one dispersant of this invention in a lime mud with varying amounts of sulfo-alkylation
  • FIG. 6 represents the diiference in results which are obtained in a lime mud when varying amounts of sodium hydroxide are used in preparing the sulfo-alkylated lignite of this invention.
  • the sulfo-alkylated lignite of this invention can be prepared by admixing lignite, a water-soluble alkali metal hydroxide, a water-soluble sulfite or bisulfite of an alkali metal, and an aldehyde or ketone in a reaction medium and then causing inter-action between these ingredients under conditions of time and temperature which cause chemical conversion of a substantial portion of the original lignite to a more hydrophilic product.
  • this product is a sulfo-alkylated lignite, the term alkylated being use in its broadest sense to include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, heterocyclic and aryl groups. If such i true, then the lignite is solubilized by adding thereto a sulfo-alkyl radical --R--SO3M (I) wherein R is a methylene radical or a substituted methylene radical derived from a ketone or an aldehyde and M is an alkali metal.
  • a dior a poly-ketone or -aldehyde that is one containing a plurality of keto or aldo, or both, groups per molecule, the two methylene groups wil lbe linked together by the remainder of the ketone or aldehyde molecule, there being present two SO M groups and the methylene groups being connected to one or more lignite molecules.
  • this type of product due to the chemical complexity of the lignite molecule and its reactions, it is preferred to describe this type of product as the reaction product of lignite, a sulfite and an aldehyde or ketone in a basic reaction medium.
  • the term sulfo-alkylated lignite will be used herein to describe such a product, the alkylated part of the term being as above defined.
  • Lignite is found in many parts of the United States. It is defined as a variety of coal intermediate between peat and bituminous coal, especially one in which the texture of the original wood is distinct. It is also called brown coal or wood coal. Its chemical characteristics and composition have been widely described in the literature, such as in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 69 (1947), and in the US. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 7691, part 1 and 2, published July, 1954. Lignite is to be sharply distinguished from lignin and quebracho, neither of which Will yield a dispersant of improved properties when substituted for lignite in the process of this invention. This is understandable when it is understood that these three substances are of quite different chemical nature. Thus,
  • lignin consist only of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen while amount of caustic is present.
  • lignite contains also nitrogen and sulfur. Lignin contains no fatty components whereas lignite does.
  • Recent research has yielded conclusive evidence that lignite is derived primarily from seeds (cones) of the original gymnosperms rather than from the holes or branches or needles, whereas lignin is derived primarily from the holes or branches or needles and not from seeds. Further, as will be shown hereafter, the sulfo-alkylation of lignin and quebracho, whether or not followed by oxidation, does not materially improve the dispersing properties of these materials; in fact, it will sometimes cause these properties to deteriorate.
  • lignite will be used herein to mean not only lignite per se but also all naturally occurring carboniferous minerals containing 10 percent or more, preferably 30 to 50 percent, of humic acid.
  • the alkali metal hydroxide employed in the. sulfoalkylation reaction can be sodium, lithium or potassium hydroxide.
  • the amounts to be used can be varied over a considerable range. Its principal function is thought to be to impart sufficient initial solubility to the raw lignite that it can react with the sulfite and'aldehyde or ketone reactants.
  • the pH of the reaction medium should be at least 10. In any event, enough hydroxide should be used so that the initial pH of the reaction medium is at least 7 and preferably 10 to 13.
  • the reaction can be described as being conducted in a basic reaction medium and it is immaterial whether the hydroxide is separately added to the medium, in admixture with other materials or is already present therein.
  • a bisulfite e.g., sodium hydrogen sulfite
  • suificient hydroxide should be present to convert this to the sulfite form.
  • the amount of alkali metal hydroxide used be within the range of 10 to parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the raw lignite.
  • the alkali metal hydroxide can be pre-reacted with the lignite before the sulfite and aldehyde or ketone are brought into the reaction, or it can be added with the latter.
  • the caustic to be used can be selected from the aforesaid range of 10 to 100 parts per 100 parts of raw lignite to give the desired degree of causticity to the final dry product so that when the dry product is mixed with the mud or other well fluid, the latter has the desired causticity.
  • an amount of caustic in the lower part of the range, and less than that desired in the final dry product can be used during the sulfo-alkylation reaction. Then the additional caustic required to yield the final desired caustic concentration can be added to the sulfo-alkylated product, the only requirement being that the caustic be intimately mixed with the lignite reaction product.
  • the final product can be dried by conventional methods.
  • the dry product is still free flowing, non-hygroscopic and substantially non-corrosive to the skin.
  • the lignite product masks the caustic, rendering it incapable of doing damage when the dispersant caustic mixture is used in its intended manner.
  • the alkali metal sulfite can be sodium, potassium or lithium sulfite or bisulfite.
  • sulfurous acid and its water-soluble salts also can be used.
  • the addition of a bisulfite or sulfurous acid to the basic reaction medium will convert the bisulfite or acid to a sulfite.
  • sulfite will be used herein to include the bisulfite as well as other compounds which, when added to the basic reaction medium, will in effect react as an alkali metal sulfite.
  • the amount of sulfite to be used will be dependent upon the percentage of lignite desired to be converted to the sulfo-alkylated form. About 25 parts of sodium sulfite are required to secure approximately total conversion of 100 parts of raw lignite and is therefore the stoichiometric equivalent for the sulfo-alklation reaction. As will be demonstrated in the examples, use of excess sulfite over that stoichiometrically required to convert the lignite is not harmful to the reaction but is wasteful of sulfite. Generally, it is desired that at least 6 parts of sulfite be used per 100 parts of lignite.
  • the numerical range can be stated to be from 6 to 50 parts of sulfite p r 100 parts of lignite, it being understood that at the lower limit, the lignite will not be completely converted and at the upper end of the range, unreacted sulfite will remain in the reaction product. For optimum results, the stoichiometric equivalent of sulfite should be used.
  • the aldehyde or ketone employed in the reaction can be any type of aldehyde or ketone having at least one aldo (I-ICO) or methyl keto (CH CO) group per molecule so that the aldehyde or ketone has a carbon atom capable of becoming a methylene or a substituted methylene group in the sulfo-alkylation reaction. Both water-soluble and Water-insoluble ones can be used.
  • the aldehyde or ketone reactant can be represented by the formula (RCO) R where R is chosen to be hydrogen for the aldehydes and a methyl group for the ketones, n is a whole number of 1 to 3 inclusive and R being non-functional in the reaction, can be any aliphatic, alicyclic, aryl or heterocyclic group.
  • R is chosen to be hydrogen for the aldehydes and a methyl group for the ketones
  • n is a whole number of 1 to 3 inclusive and R being non-functional in the reaction, can be any aliphatic, alicyclic, aryl or heterocyclic group.
  • alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl and alkenynl monoand poly-aldehydes and monoand poly-methyl ketones can be used and exemplary of these are methanal (including the para form which is preferred), ethanal, propanal, butanal, hexanal, decanal, dodecanal, tetradecanal, hexadecanal, eicosanal, dotricontanal, acrolein, propenal, butenal, heptenal, decenal, hexadecenal, eicosenal, doctriconteual, propargylal-dehyde, butynal, ecynal; the corresponding ketones with the carbonyl group in the alpha position (except of course that there is no ketone corresponding to methanal, etc.) such as 2-p1opanone (acetone), 2-butanone, .2-eicosanone, etc.; the
  • alicyclic aldehydes and ketones iS cyclohexanal, cyclobutanal, cyclooctanal, cyclo-nonal, methyl cyclobutyl ketone, methyl cyclohexyl ketone, methyl cycloheptyl ketone, methyl cyclononyl ketone, etc
  • aryl aldehydes can be mentioned benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde, vanillin, cumic aldehyde, cinnamic aldehyde, etc.
  • Furfural can be named as representative of the heterocyclic aldehydes.
  • aryl ketones may be mentioned acetophenone, benzalacetone, etc.
  • the amount of aldehyde or ketone, like the sulfite, is preferably the stoichiometric equivalent required to completely react the lignite. It has been found that approximately twelve to twelve and one-half parts of formaldehyde are required to substantially convert the lignite to the sulfo-methylated form. Stated as a numerical range, the formaldehyde can be used in the amount of 3 to 25 parts per 100 parts of lignite.
  • the ketones and the aldehydes other than formaldehyde can be used in amounts within the above-specified range to obtain operable results. However, it is preferred to use amounts which are stoichiometric equivalents for substantially complete reaction of the lignite. Accordingly, the weight of the other aldehyde or ketone used should preferably be that which is stoichiO- metrically equivalent to the lignite or to the formaldehyde as above disclosed.
  • the amount of aldehyde or ketone of any type to be used in this reaction will be specified herein as an amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range of 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite.
  • the reaction medium can be any fluid which is substantially inert insofar as the reaction is concerned and preferably is water.
  • the sulfo-alkylation reaction proceeds best at elevated temperatures. It can be carried out in simple refluxing equipment at temperatures within the range of to 212 F. However, the degree of conversion of the lignite within this temperature range is not complete within commercially feasible time limits such as 3 to 7 hours. It is accordingly preferred that the sulfo-alkylation reaction be carried out in pressure vessels at temperatures within the range of 275 to 375 F. At these temperatures, the time of reaction for substantially complete conversion of the lignite will usually fall within the range of 1 to 6 hours. Stated in another manner, the lower limit of the temperature range is rather flexible but should be high enough to give the desired degree of conversion within the desired time. Of course, lengthening the reaction time permits lowering of the reaction temperature to give the same conversion.
  • the upper limit of the temperature range is dictated by the maximum temperature which the lignite will tolerate without serious disruption of its large molecules and consequent deterioration of the protective colloidal action of the sulfo-alkylate products. Approximately 360 to 375 F. represents a workable maximum which will not cause substantial degradation of the lignite in aqueous solution.
  • the lignite, base, sulfite and aldehyde or ketone are refluxed together in an aqueous suspending medium at a temperature of to 212 F. This refluxing is continued for a period of 3 to 6 hours. Then the mixture is autoclaved or otherwise subjected to temperatures in the higher range mentioned above.
  • the initial reactants can be placed directly in the autoclave and subjected to the elevated temperature from the beginning. However, in such case, closed control is required and the reaction may not proceed so smoothly as when the mixture is refluxed before being autoclaved.
  • the reaction product can be used in liquid form as it comes from the reaction, but preferably it is dried first. Such drying can be accomplished by conventional procedures such as by drum drying or spray drying at a temperature in the range of 215 to 375 F.
  • the dried solids can then be bagged and shipped to the field for use as described above.
  • the dried product when bagged in conventional multi-wall bags, remains dry and free-flowing over long periods of storage and will not cake. It is not noticeably corrosive to the skin and can thus be handled with safety.
  • It can be added to the mud as a single thinning or dispersing additive by simply pouring it into a mud stream or otherwise admixing it therewith. Since it exhibits a marked solubility in water, little or no difficulty will be encountered in getting it into solution where it can be active to exert its protective colloidal properties.
  • oxidation shall be used in its broadest sense to include reaction with oxygen, chlorine, nitrites, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, etc.
  • the increased dispersing efiiciency of the oxidized product is particularly notable in drilling muds containing hydratalble clays, such as bentonite, and other types of muds, such as lime base muds, which exhibit very high yield points prior to adding a dispersant thereto.
  • the starting material for the oxidation reaction can be any of the sulfo-alkylated lignites disclosed above, but it should be noted that the increase in efficiency brought about by the oxidation reaction will vary in degree with the different sulfo-alkylated lignites. For example, a maximum increase in efiiciency seems to be secured with sulfo-alkylated lignite prepared from formaldehyde or furfural.
  • Oxygen preferably ordinary air (for economic reasons)
  • Others include chlorine gas, alkali metal nitrites, the alkali metal hypochlorites, hydrogen peroxide and others.
  • Ozone can also be used and it is particularly efiicient because of its high oxidation potential and oxidative catalytic power.
  • a suitable catalyst to speed up the reaction.
  • Various ones of well-known catalysts can be used. It should be an oxygen-containing compound of a polyvalent metallic element known to have more than one valence toward oxygen. For example, manganese may have valences of 2, 4, 6 or 7, while vanadium may have vala'nces of 2, 3, 4 or 5. It is desirable, but not absolutely essential, that the oxygen-containing compound of the polyvalent metallic element be capable of becoming the negative component of an alkali metal salt having at least a moderate solubility in water over the alkaline pH range.
  • manganese dioxide is almost insolulble in neutral watery suspension but forms manganites, manganates and permanganates which are reasonably soluble in water.
  • vanadium may enter into the negative component as ammonium or alkali metal vanadates or as the alkali metal salts of vandous acid and of the other acids with vanadium in still other valence states.
  • oxygen-containing compounds of vanadium and manganese there may be mentioned the oxygen-containing compounds of copper, chromium, molybdenum, selenium, tellurium, tungsten, cerium, arsenic, antimony, iron, cobalt and nickel.
  • Catalysts which are preferred primarily for economic reasons, are cobalt acetate and also manganese dioxide promoted with ammonium meta-vanadate.
  • the amount of catalyst to be used will be determined primri'ly by economic considerations, that is, the cost of the catalyst per se, the amount required to be used to obtain the desired reaction in a minimum of time, etc.
  • the amount used is not critical as long as enough is present to speed up the reaction so that it will be completed in the desired time.
  • the amount of manganese dioxide can be within the range of between to 5% of the weight of the sulfo-alkylated lignite being oxidized and the amount of ammonium met-a-vanadate equal to approximately to A the weight of the manganese dioxide.
  • An amount of cobalt within the range of that given above for the manganese dioxide can be used. The same range applies to other catalysts.
  • the oxidation reaction can proceed without a catalyst
  • the amount of catalyst used is not important except excessive amounts are expensive and insufiicient amounts may not cause the reaction to be completed in a desired time
  • the type of oxidation catalyst may be chosen from those known to the prior art.
  • the oxidation reaction can be carried out in various manners.
  • the sulfo-alkylated lignite or starting material should be in admixture with a suitable reaction medium, such as water, the mixture having a pH on the alkaline side. Catalyst, if used, can then be added to this mixture followed by the addition of the oxidizing agent.
  • a suitable reaction medium such as water
  • Catalyst if used, can then be added to this mixture followed by the addition of the oxidizing agent.
  • air it is preferably bubbled through the reaction mixture so as to assure that reactive oxygen is dissolved in the reaction medium.
  • Chlorine can be used in the same way, but it should be noted that chlorine is very much more reactive than air so that it should be added to the reaction mixture at a lesser rate.
  • Other oxidizing agents such as the nitrites, hydrogen peroxide and the like can be added in the same manner or the total required amount added at the initiation of the reaction.
  • the pressure at which the oxidation reaction is conducted can vary over wide limits although usually atmospheric pressure will be preferred.
  • the temperature at which the oxidation reaction is conducted can also vary considerably, but should be below the temperature Which the sulfo-alkyl ated lignite will tolerate without serious disruption of its molecule with a consequent deterioration of its protective colloidal properties. Approximately 360 to 375 F. represents a workable maximum. However from a practical standpoint, a temperature within the range of 40 to 212 F., preferably to F. can be used. Where the reaction is carried out at superatmospheric pressure, the range can extend as high as 350 F. Thus the broad range can be stated as 40 to 350 F.
  • reaction time and temperature are adjusted to each other in manners well-known to those skilled in the art so that the oxidation reaction will proceed to a point such that the oxidized product has a desired increase in its beneficial properties.
  • the sulfo-alkylated product is oxidized to an extent such as will increase its hydrophilic properties.
  • One way of easily determining the optimum time and temperature conditions is to merely sample the reaction mixture after various time and temperature reaction cycles and then determine the efiiciency of the samples by routine tests, such as by using mud samples.
  • the pH of the reaction mixture will decrease and for air oxidation, a drop of about 1 pH unit will indicate the oxidation reaction has proceeded far enough.
  • the pH will usually drop from about 10.5 or 11 to about 9.5 during air oxidation and to even lower values (e.g. 8) during chlorination.
  • the oxidation should proceed until the pH of the sulfo-alkylated lignite solution has dropped at least 0.5 unit.
  • Another way of defining the extent of operable oxidation is to state that the sulfoalkylated lignite is oxidized until it increases at least 3, preferably from 3 to 25, percent in weight.
  • an oxidation time of from 0.5 to 10 hours will suffice and the exact value chosen from this range will depend on the oxidation temperature, catalyst, oxidizing agent and its concentration, extent of agitation and other factors.
  • a sulfomethylated lignite sample was prepared by mixing together 30 parts of water, 8 parts of lignite, 2 parts each of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite, and 1 part of para-formaldehyde. The mixture was refluxed at 203 to 212 F. for approximately 3 hours and then autoclaved for about 5 hours at 296 to 314 F. The resulting product was drum dried and denoted as MP- 32. To evaluate MP-32 as a simple dispersing agent for drilling muds, a 7 weight percent dispersion of bentonite in fresh water was made up. Increasing portions of MP 32 were added to the mud and its yield point determined. The results are shown in FIG. 1.
  • MP-32 is superior to the alkali lignite and is at least comparable to causticquebracho in its eifectiveness.
  • MP-l3 200 parts of lignite were refluxed with 27.5 parts of sodium hydroxide for about 5 hours. 50 parts of sodium sulfite followed by 25 parts of paraformaldehyde were then added. The mixture was refluxed at 203- 212 F. for 5 hours.
  • MP-23 The same procedure was followed as for MP-l3 except that 50 parts of sodium hydroxide were used.
  • MP-l7 200 parts of lignite were refluxed with 27.5 parts of sodium hydroxide for 5 hours at 203-2l2 F.
  • the sulfomethylated lignite is markedly superior to conventional alkali lignite. Also, increasing the amount of sodium hydroxide in the sulfo-methylating reaction resulted in a somewhat superior product.
  • the sulfo-methylated lignite not only is superior to alkali lignite in lime base or calciumcontaminated muds but also in salt-contaminated muds.
  • lithium, sodium and potassium compounds are interchangeable in preparing the dispersant of this invention but the sodium compounds will usually be preferred because of their relative cheapness.
  • EXAMPLE V The eflect of varying the amount of sulfite and aldehydre used in the sulfo-methylating reaction is shown in FIG. 5.
  • the MP-23 is the same as that used in Example II.
  • the MP23 /z and MI -23% were prepared in the same manner as the MP-23 except that approximately /2 and A as much sodium sulfite and paraformaldehyde were used, respectively. Again, a 7 /2 Weight percent bentonite suspension was used. After 3 lb./bbl. of
  • FIG. 6 shows the eflect of varying the amount of sodium hydroxide used in the sulfo-methylating reaction.
  • the MP-23 and MP-l3 were the same as in Example II while the MP-37 was prepared in the same manner except parts of sodium hydroxide were used.
  • the mud samples were 7 /2 weight percent bentonite suspensions. No additional caustic was added with the lime.
  • the testing procedure was the same as in Example V.
  • quebracho which has been treated in the same manner as lignite with sulfite and aldehyde is not rendered equivalent thereto. In fact, it is inferior to both sulfomethylated lignite and to conventional caustic-quebracho as a dispersant.
  • the MP-69 was then tested in' base stock and in a lime base mud. The results are reported in Table III.
  • MP-69 is at least as good as Quebracho and caustic for thinning simple mud systems and is actually superior in lime base muds because of the much lower 10 minute gel.
  • EXAMPLE XI A series of difierent sulfa-alkylated lignites were prepared by mixing 25 parts of each of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite with parts of lignite in approximately 330 parts of water. The mixture was then stirred at a temperature slightly below the boiling point thereof and then various amounts of the aldehydes and ketones indicated in Table IV were added. The reaction was allowed to continue for approximately 5 hours at approximately 200-212 F. and atmospheric pressure. Thereafter, the mixture was autoclaved for 5 hours at a temperature in the range of 275-315 F. Where the reaction product was not to be oxidized, the mixture was then removed from the autoclave and dried. Where the mixture was oxidized, this was accomplished by bubbling air therethrough for approximately 7 hours at about F. A catalyst comprising one part of manganese dioxide and .2 part of ammonium meta-vanadate was used.
  • the various reaction products were tested in drilling muds.
  • WBM water base mud
  • the mud comprised about 15 lb./bbl. of Yellowstone bentonite, 31 lb./bbl. of a low yielding adsorptive clay (X-act) and 73 lb./bbl. of barite, thus giving a mud having 25.4% solids by weight and a weight of 10.3 p.p.g.
  • the lime base muds (LBM) were made by adding 6 lb./bbl. of lime to the water base muds.
  • 2 lb./bbl. of the reaction product (thinner) were added.
  • For the tests for the lime base mud 5 lb./bbl. of the thinner plus 1 lb./bbl. of caustic were added.
  • the reactants labelled C C C and C are long chain aliphatic monoaldehydes having 7 carbon atoms per molecule, 10 carbon atoms per molecule, etc.
  • EXAMPLE XII sulfo-methylated lignite (MP-32) was oxidized by nitration. To accomplish this, 850 parts by weight of MP-32 solids were placed in water along with 25 parts by weight of sodium nitrite. The mixture was refluxed for hours at 200-2l2 F. and then dried to constant weight at 23 F. During the oxidation, the MP32 solids increased approximately 3% in weight. Comparative tests of the oxidized (nitritated) produce (thinner) (3 lb./ bbl.
  • the original sulfo-methylated lignite and quebracho-caustic (-5) in a lime mud showed that the yield point of the muds containing the nitritated product was only /4 of the yield point of the muds containing sulfo-methylated lignite or the quebracho-caustic product.
  • Tests of the oxidized products in water base muds as above defined reduced the yield point (at 2 lb./bbl. of the oxidized product) to about 30% of that of the untreated mud.
  • the sulfo-alkylated lignites of this invention can have their efiiciency increased by using chlorine (or equivalent) as the oxidizing agent.
  • chlorine or equivalent
  • a solution of sulfo-methylated lignite (MP-32) was vigorously agitated while a moderate stream of chlorine gas was passed thereinto.
  • the temperature of th charge rose about 20 F. within one hour, while the pH dropped from an original 10.6 to 7.0.
  • the chlorination was interrupted after one hour.
  • the rapid drop in pH and rise in temperature indicated a viborous oxidation of the sulfO-methylated l-ignite by the chlorine.
  • the dispersing agents of this invention are useful not only in simple water-base muds, but more particularly in muds contaminated with calcium and sodium compounds which tend to increase the viscosity of the mud.
  • the amounts of these compounds required to cause an increase in viscosity in the absence of the viscosity reducing agents of this invention will vary with the mud composition and type and the conditions of its use. Accordingly, no hard and fast rule can be laid down as to the amounts of these contaminants which will cause a substantial increase in yield and, as is usual in the mud treatment, such mud will have to have its individual tolerance to these compounds determined before any reliable conclusion can be drawn as the yield point increasing amounts of these contaminants. Ordinarily, at least 0.5 lb./bbl.
  • the thinning agents of this invention are especially useful in lime base muds where lime is deliberately added along with caustic in a manner well-known to those skilled in the art.
  • the pH of the mud to be treated will be above 7.
  • a well drilling fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating 100 parts of lignite in an alkaline liquid reaction medium with 6 to 50 parts of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and water soluble salts thereof, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being present in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, to a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F.
  • R-SO M R-SO M, wherein -R-- is selected from the group consisting of methylene and substituted methylene radicals and M is an alkali metal.
  • a well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing 100 parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of an alkali metal sulfite, 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde, and 10 to 100 parts of alkali metal hydroxide at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time suflicient for a substantial portion of the sulfite and formaldehyde to react with the lignite to form side chains on the lignite having the formula R-SO M, wherein R- is a methylene radical and M is an alkali metal.
  • a well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating an alkaline liquid reaction medium containing lignite, 6 to 50 parts per 100 parts of lignite of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and its water soluble salts, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being employed in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time sufficient for a substantial proportion of the methylenic compound, sulfur compound and lignite to react; and oxidizing the resulting lignite derivative sufficiently to increase the yield point reducing power of the lignite derivative.
  • a well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a normally yield point increasing amount of sodium chloride and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of alkali metal sulfite, 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde and 10 to 100 parts of alkali metal hydroxide at a temperature in the range from to 375 F. for a time sufiicient for a substantial portion of the sulfite and formaldehyde to react with each other and with the lignite to form side chains on the lignite having the formula --RSO M, wherein R is a methylene radical and M is an alkali metal.
  • a well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a normally yield point increasing amount of a material selected from the group consisting of water soluble calcium and sodium salts, a yield point lowering amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing 100 parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and its water soluble salts, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being present in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde in the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, and an alkali hydroxide at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time sufficient for a substantial portion of the sulfur compound and the methylenic compound to react with each other and with the lignite.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Description

YIELD POINT May 15, 1962 Filed May 10, 1957 K. P. MONROE WELL DRILLING FLUID 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 YIELD POINT MP-23 l/4 l I l l 2 lbs/bbl Dispersunt lbs/bbl Lime FIG. 6 M
KENNETH R MONROE INVENTOR.
ATTORNEYS M34582 Patented May 15, 1962 3,034,?82 WELL DRILLDIG FLUHD Kenneth P. Monroe, Houston, Tex., assignor to Magnet Cove Barium Corporation, Houston, Tex., a corporation of Arkansas Filed May 10, 1957, Ser. No. 658,378 11 Claims. (Cl. 252-85) This invention relates to water-soluble or water dispersible lignite derivatives and also to awell fluid in which such lignite derivatives are employed to control the properties, particularly the yield point and viscosity characteristics of the fluid. In another respect, it relates to methods for producing such lignite derivatives. In still another aspect, the invention relates to a method for controlling the yield point of a well fluid such as a mud.
Lignite, an abundant and cheap domestic raw material, previously has been used to control the viscosity of oil well drilling muds. Its usefulness as a thinner for muds has been limited because it is rendered much less effective by commonly encountered mud contaminants such as common salt (sodium chloride) and calcium compounds (anhydrite, gypsum, cement and the like). In other words, these mud contaminants will progressively coagulate the lignite so that it can no longer exert its desired protective colloidal action.
Further, lignite is significantly effective as a viscosity control agent only when used in conjunction with caustic or in a highly alkaline mud. One practice has been to mix raw lignite and caustic together at the well site in order not only to solubilize the lignite but also to give the mud the required causticity for the lignite to exert its maximum thinning effect. This requires not only handling of two separate materials but also the handling of large amounts of caustic, which is fraught with danger. Furthermore, control in the field of the caustic-lignite reaction and of the amount of caustic present in the mud to get optimum results are both diflicult so that treating results tend to be erratic.
Attempts have been made to pre-react lignite with caustic or soda ash so as not only to improve its unlfulness as a mud thinner but also to provide a single material which can be manufactured under controlled conditions at a central site and then shippped to the field for use as a single additive. Such pro-reaction of raw lignite with moderate amounts of water-soluble alkali (up to and including about 25% of the weight of the raw lignite so pro-reacted) has been a common practice, since the resulting product can be readily manufactured as a non-caking, free-flowing powder by conventional drying methods. However, the pre-reacted product does not have the desired effectiveness as a thinning agent in the presence of salt and calcium contamination because it will still be coagulated. To decrease the degree of coagulation, the driller must add not only the pre-reacted lignite but also a large amount of additional caustic (usually a weight about equal to that of the pre-reacted lignite). Thus the driller must still handle two ingredients including relatively large amounts of the troublesome caustic, so that in such cases there is very little advantage in using prereacted lignite in place of raw lignite other than the fact that the pro-reacted lignite can be dispersed more easily than the raw lignite. Efforts have been made to pre-react the necessary large amount of caustic with the lignite, but the large amount of caustic makes the complete removal of water from the final product very difficult, and the final product, even when forcibly dried under extreme conditions, is extremely hygroscopic, cakes severely under ordinary conditions of handling and storage, is almost as corrosive to the skin as is pure sodium hydroxide, and is often easily spontaneously combustible. Therefore, since pre-reaction of all the required caustic with the lignite is not commercially feasible, the oil well driller necessarily has to handle caustic at the wellhead even though he uses the pre-reacted lignite.
In accordance with one aspect of this invention, there is provided a new and novel process in which raw lignite is reacted, in an alkaline medium, with a water-soluble sulfite or bisulfite and an aldehyde or ketone to produce a new and novel product, sulfo-alkylated lignite which in turn, can be oxidized or nitritated to produce still another new and novel product, oxidized or nitritated sulfoalkylated lignite.
It has been found these products can be used as a dispersing agent, particularly as a thinning and yield point controlling agent for drilling muds. The efiicieney ofthe sulfo-alkylated lignite is less than that of the oxidized or nitritated sulfo-alkylated lignite. As will beshown, the' sulfo-alkylated lignite and the oxidized form thereof are usually at least equal in dispersing power to conventional quebracho-eaustic and lignite-caustic dispersants and, in many mud systems, particularly those containing a hydratable clay such as bentonite, they are superior to these two conventional dispersant's and this is particularly true in those systems contaminated with salt and calcium. Through this discovery, there is provided new and novel well fluids and methods of treating the same to control their yield point without substantially adversely affecting their other characteristics such as gel strength and fluid loss. I
The new products above referred to can be provided as dry products for commercial use by conventional drying methods, such by drum drying, spray drying, or the like. They are stable, non-caking and free-flowing products when packaged, stored and transported in conventional multi-wall paper bags. They are readily useable by the oil well driller without additional processing, affording the driller for the first time a lignitic additive which in many systems can be used without the addition of caustic therewith and in other systems with only small amounts of added caustic, to yield the desired maximum yield point control of muds in the presence of commonly encountered mud contaminants. The products are non-corrosive to the skin and are not prone toward spontaneous combustion under customary conditions of manufacture, storage and transport.
It is accordingly an object of this invention to provide new lignitic derivative products of the types above-mentioned and to provide a process for making such lignitic products, the process being directed to the upgrading of lignite into a water-soluble form such that it will be an eflicient dispersant not requiring large quantities of canstic for its use.
Another object is to provide a process of treating lignite to convert it into an eflicient dispersing agent finding particular use in drilling muds, the treatment involving the reaction of lignite with certain reactants in such a manner that its dispersing power is greatly increased without the use of large quantities of caustic so that the resulting lignitic product can be packaged, sold and used as a single product which will not cake during storage and which is not noticeably corrosive to the skin.
Another object is to provide a process wherein sulfoalkylated lignite is oxidized to further enhance its dispers- 1ng powers.
Another object is to provide a drilling mud in which a lignitic derivative of the foregoing types is employed as a dispersant to control the yield point of the mud, particularly when the mud is contaminated with salt or calcium or when it contains highly hydratable clays such as bentonite.
Another object is to provide a method for controllingthe yield point characteristics of a mud through the use 3 of a lignitic reaction product of the types above mentioned.
Another object is to provide a process for increasing the hydrophilic properties of lignite to produce new products having various uses in addition to those mentioned above.
Other objects, advantages and features of this invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon consideration of the written specification and claims.
The annexed drawings represent plots of the results of certain tests set out in the examples below. In these drawrugs:
FIG. 1 represents a comparison of the thinning characteristics of a preferred species of this invention and conventional dispersants;
FIG. 2 represents a comparison in a lime-contaminated mud of the thinning characteristics of sulfo-alkylated lignite and conventional alkali-lignite;
FIG. 3 is another comparison in a salt-contaminated mud;
FIG. 4 illustrates the viscosity control characteristics of various alkali metal sulfo-methylated lignites;
FIG. 5 illustrates the variation of effectiveness of one dispersant of this invention in a lime mud with varying amounts of sulfo-alkylation; and
FIG. 6 represents the diiference in results which are obtained in a lime mud when varying amounts of sodium hydroxide are used in preparing the sulfo-alkylated lignite of this invention.
The sulfo-alkylated lignite of this invention can be prepared by admixing lignite, a water-soluble alkali metal hydroxide, a water-soluble sulfite or bisulfite of an alkali metal, and an aldehyde or ketone in a reaction medium and then causing inter-action between these ingredients under conditions of time and temperature which cause chemical conversion of a substantial portion of the original lignite to a more hydrophilic product.
It is thought that this product is a sulfo-alkylated lignite, the term alkylated being use in its broadest sense to include aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, heterocyclic and aryl groups. If such i true, then the lignite is solubilized by adding thereto a sulfo-alkyl radical --R--SO3M (I) wherein R is a methylene radical or a substituted methylene radical derived from a ketone or an aldehyde and M is an alkali metal. Further where a dior a poly-ketone or -aldehyde is used, that is one containing a plurality of keto or aldo, or both, groups per molecule, the two methylene groups wil lbe linked together by the remainder of the ketone or aldehyde molecule, there being present two SO M groups and the methylene groups being connected to one or more lignite molecules. However, due to the chemical complexity of the lignite molecule and its reactions, it is preferred to describe this type of product as the reaction product of lignite, a sulfite and an aldehyde or ketone in a basic reaction medium. The term sulfo-alkylated lignite will be used herein to describe such a product, the alkylated part of the term being as above defined.
Lignite is found in many parts of the United States. It is defined as a variety of coal intermediate between peat and bituminous coal, especially one in which the texture of the original wood is distinct. It is also called brown coal or wood coal. Its chemical characteristics and composition have been widely described in the literature, such as in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 69 (1947), and in the US. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 7691, part 1 and 2, published July, 1954. Lignite is to be sharply distinguished from lignin and quebracho, neither of which Will yield a dispersant of improved properties when substituted for lignite in the process of this invention. This is understandable when it is understood that these three substances are of quite different chemical nature. Thus,
lignin consist only of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen while amount of caustic is present.
lignite contains also nitrogen and sulfur. Lignin contains no fatty components whereas lignite does. Recent research has yielded conclusive evidence that lignite is derived primarily from seeds (cones) of the original gymnosperms rather than from the holes or branches or needles, whereas lignin is derived primarily from the holes or branches or needles and not from seeds. Further, as will be shown hereafter, the sulfo-alkylation of lignin and quebracho, whether or not followed by oxidation, does not materially improve the dispersing properties of these materials; in fact, it will sometimes cause these properties to deteriorate.
In general, the term lignite will be used herein to mean not only lignite per se but also all naturally occurring carboniferous minerals containing 10 percent or more, preferably 30 to 50 percent, of humic acid.
The alkali metal hydroxide employed in the. sulfoalkylation reaction can be sodium, lithium or potassium hydroxide. The amounts to be used can be varied over a considerable range. Its principal function is thought to be to impart sufficient initial solubility to the raw lignite that it can react with the sulfite and'aldehyde or ketone reactants. Thus it has been found that in order to achieve a practical reaction rate for the sulfo-alkylation reaction, the pH of the reaction medium should be at least 10. In any event, enough hydroxide should be used so that the initial pH of the reaction medium is at least 7 and preferably 10 to 13. Hence, the reaction can be described as being conducted in a basic reaction medium and it is immaterial whether the hydroxide is separately added to the medium, in admixture with other materials or is already present therein. When a bisulfite (e.g., sodium hydrogen sulfite) is used, suificient hydroxide should be present to convert this to the sulfite form. It is preferred that the amount of alkali metal hydroxide used be within the range of 10 to parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of the raw lignite. The alkali metal hydroxide can be pre-reacted with the lignite before the sulfite and aldehyde or ketone are brought into the reaction, or it can be added with the latter. In this connection, commercial alkali lignite can be used as a starting material insted of raw lignite. In some cases, it is desired that the final lignite product have a certain causticity. Thus, in using the instant lignitic derivatives as mud thinners, it has been found that optimum results are frequently obtained when a certain For example, in treating simple aqueous dispersions of clays, optimum results are achieved when about 10 percent by weight of additional caustic, based on the weight of the sulfo-alkylated lignite product, is added. In lime base muds, this figure is about 20 percent of additional caustic. The caustic to be used can be selected from the aforesaid range of 10 to 100 parts per 100 parts of raw lignite to give the desired degree of causticity to the final dry product so that when the dry product is mixed with the mud or other well fluid, the latter has the desired causticity. Alternatively, an amount of caustic in the lower part of the range, and less than that desired in the final dry product, can be used during the sulfo-alkylation reaction. Then the additional caustic required to yield the final desired caustic concentration can be added to the sulfo-alkylated product, the only requirement being that the caustic be intimately mixed with the lignite reaction product. The final product can be dried by conventional methods. The dry product is still free flowing, non-hygroscopic and substantially non-corrosive to the skin. In effect then, the lignite product masks the caustic, rendering it incapable of doing damage when the dispersant caustic mixture is used in its intended manner.
The above applies not only to the use of the sulfw alkylated product of this invention but also to the use of the oxidized derivatives thereof as disclosed herein.
The alkali metal sulfite can be sodium, potassium or lithium sulfite or bisulfite. In general, sulfurous acid and its water-soluble salts also can be used. In this connection, the addition of a bisulfite or sulfurous acid to the basic reaction medium will convert the bisulfite or acid to a sulfite. Hence, the term sulfite will be used herein to include the bisulfite as well as other compounds which, when added to the basic reaction medium, will in effect react as an alkali metal sulfite.
The amount of sulfite to be used will be dependent upon the percentage of lignite desired to be converted to the sulfo-alkylated form. About 25 parts of sodium sulfite are required to secure approximately total conversion of 100 parts of raw lignite and is therefore the stoichiometric equivalent for the sulfo-alklation reaction. As will be demonstrated in the examples, use of excess sulfite over that stoichiometrically required to convert the lignite is not harmful to the reaction but is wasteful of sulfite. Generally, it is desired that at least 6 parts of sulfite be used per 100 parts of lignite. The numerical range can be stated to be from 6 to 50 parts of sulfite p r 100 parts of lignite, it being understood that at the lower limit, the lignite will not be completely converted and at the upper end of the range, unreacted sulfite will remain in the reaction product. For optimum results, the stoichiometric equivalent of sulfite should be used.
The aldehyde or ketone employed in the reaction can be any type of aldehyde or ketone having at least one aldo (I-ICO) or methyl keto (CH CO) group per molecule so that the aldehyde or ketone has a carbon atom capable of becoming a methylene or a substituted methylene group in the sulfo-alkylation reaction. Both water-soluble and Water-insoluble ones can be used. In general, then, the aldehyde or ketone reactant can be represented by the formula (RCO) R where R is chosen to be hydrogen for the aldehydes and a methyl group for the ketones, n is a whole number of 1 to 3 inclusive and R being non-functional in the reaction, can be any aliphatic, alicyclic, aryl or heterocyclic group. Thus, within this definition, aliphatic, alicyclic, aryl and heterocyclic aldehydes and ketones, and mixtures thereof, all may be used. For example, alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl and alkenynl monoand poly-aldehydes and monoand poly-methyl ketones can be used and exemplary of these are methanal (including the para form which is preferred), ethanal, propanal, butanal, hexanal, decanal, dodecanal, tetradecanal, hexadecanal, eicosanal, dotricontanal, acrolein, propenal, butenal, heptenal, decenal, hexadecenal, eicosenal, doctriconteual, propargylal-dehyde, butynal, ecynal; the corresponding ketones with the carbonyl group in the alpha position (except of course that there is no ketone corresponding to methanal, etc.) such as 2-p1opanone (acetone), 2-butanone, .2-eicosanone, etc.; the corresponding diand tri-aldehydes and the diand triketones (with at least one carbonyl group in the alpha position-4t is not necessary that all carbonyl groups be so positioned), such as glyoxal, glutaraldehyde, adipialdehyde, arachicaldehyde, 2,4-pentanedione, 2,4- and 2,5- hexanedione, 2,15-hexadecanone, 2,5-hexenedione, etc. Representative of the alicyclic aldehydes and ketones iS cyclohexanal, cyclobutanal, cyclooctanal, cyclo-nonal, methyl cyclobutyl ketone, methyl cyclohexyl ketone, methyl cycloheptyl ketone, methyl cyclononyl ketone, etc Among the aryl aldehydes can be mentioned benzaldehyde, salicylaldehyde, vanillin, cumic aldehyde, cinnamic aldehyde, etc. Furfural can be named as representative of the heterocyclic aldehydes. Among the aryl ketones may be mentioned acetophenone, benzalacetone, etc.
It is not believed necessary to further burden the application by listing specific ones of operable aldehydes and ketones because such can be readily discerned once it is realized that the reaction of this invention is operable with any aldehyde or ketone having one or more aldo or methyl keto, or both, groups per molecule. Nevertheless, it is to be realized that the sulfo-alkylated products will vary one from the other in their properties depending somewhat upon the nature of the aldehyde or ketone used in the reaction. For example, it has been found most desirable to use formaldehyde or acetaldehyde for producing addiives to be used in well fluids because the other aliphatic aldehydes seem to produce products which cause foaming of the Well fluid. However, even with such foaming products, well-known defoamiug agents could be added to the mud to control the foaming. The tendency to foam has not been noted with furfural or with the ketones or with the aryl aldehydes. For preparing a dispersant for use in wells, it is greatly preferred to use formaldehyde not only because of its cheapness and availability but because it yields a product having somewhat superior properties as a yield control or thinning agent for muds.
The amount of aldehyde or ketone, like the sulfite, is preferably the stoichiometric equivalent required to completely react the lignite. It has been found that approximately twelve to twelve and one-half parts of formaldehyde are required to substantially convert the lignite to the sulfo-methylated form. Stated as a numerical range, the formaldehyde can be used in the amount of 3 to 25 parts per 100 parts of lignite.
As for the ketones and the aldehydes other than formaldehyde, many of them can be used in amounts within the above-specified range to obtain operable results. However, it is preferred to use amounts which are stoichiometric equivalents for substantially complete reaction of the lignite. Accordingly, the weight of the other aldehyde or ketone used should preferably be that which is stoichiO- metrically equivalent to the lignite or to the formaldehyde as above disclosed. For convenience in defining a range, the amount of aldehyde or ketone of any type to be used in this reaction will be specified herein as an amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range of 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite.
It has been found that excess of aldehyde or ketone over the stoichiometric equivalent does not harm the reaction, but results in waste of material. Use of less than stoichiometric amounts results in less than 100% conversion of lignite.
It will of course be seen from the above that mixtures of the various aldehydes and ketones can be used to obtain various results.
The reaction medium can be any fluid which is substantially inert insofar as the reaction is concerned and preferably is water.
The sulfo-alkylation reaction proceeds best at elevated temperatures. It can be carried out in simple refluxing equipment at temperatures within the range of to 212 F. However, the degree of conversion of the lignite within this temperature range is not complete within commercially feasible time limits such as 3 to 7 hours. It is accordingly preferred that the sulfo-alkylation reaction be carried out in pressure vessels at temperatures within the range of 275 to 375 F. At these temperatures, the time of reaction for substantially complete conversion of the lignite will usually fall within the range of 1 to 6 hours. Stated in another manner, the lower limit of the temperature range is rather flexible but should be high enough to give the desired degree of conversion within the desired time. Of course, lengthening the reaction time permits lowering of the reaction temperature to give the same conversion. On the other hand, the upper limit of the temperature range is dictated by the maximum temperature which the lignite will tolerate without serious disruption of its large molecules and consequent deterioration of the protective colloidal action of the sulfo-alkylate products. Approximately 360 to 375 F. represents a workable maximum which will not cause substantial degradation of the lignite in aqueous solution.
In a preferred mode of procedure, the lignite, base, sulfite and aldehyde or ketone are refluxed together in an aqueous suspending medium at a temperature of to 212 F. This refluxing is continued for a period of 3 to 6 hours. Then the mixture is autoclaved or otherwise subjected to temperatures in the higher range mentioned above. Of course, if desired, the initial reactants can be placed directly in the autoclave and subjected to the elevated temperature from the beginning. However, in such case, closed control is required and the reaction may not proceed so smoothly as when the mixture is refluxed before being autoclaved.
The reaction product can be used in liquid form as it comes from the reaction, but preferably it is dried first. Such drying can be accomplished by conventional procedures such as by drum drying or spray drying at a temperature in the range of 215 to 375 F. The dried solids can then be bagged and shipped to the field for use as described above. The dried product, when bagged in conventional multi-wall bags, remains dry and free-flowing over long periods of storage and will not cake. It is not noticeably corrosive to the skin and can thus be handled with safety. It can be added to the mud as a single thinning or dispersing additive by simply pouring it into a mud stream or otherwise admixing it therewith. Since it exhibits a marked solubility in water, little or no difficulty will be encountered in getting it into solution where it can be active to exert its protective colloidal properties.
As indicated above, it has been found possible to increase the hydrophilic properties of the sulfo-alkylated product and to increase its resistance to calcium and salt, as well as to improve its dispersing powers in a mud, by oxidizing or nitritating the same. As used herein, the term oxidation shall be used in its broadest sense to include reaction with oxygen, chlorine, nitrites, hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorites, etc. The increased dispersing efiiciency of the oxidized product is particularly notable in drilling muds containing hydratalble clays, such as bentonite, and other types of muds, such as lime base muds, which exhibit very high yield points prior to adding a dispersant thereto.
The starting material for the oxidation reaction can be any of the sulfo-alkylated lignites disclosed above, but it should be noted that the increase in efficiency brought about by the oxidation reaction will vary in degree with the different sulfo-alkylated lignites. For example, a maximum increase in efiiciency seems to be secured with sulfo-alkylated lignite prepared from formaldehyde or furfural.
There is a wide variety of oxidizing agents which can be used. Thus, any oxidizing agent which has an effective oxidation potential in a reaction medium, such as water, over the alkaline range of pH7 or above is operable. Oxygen, preferably ordinary air (for economic reasons), is the preferred oxidizing agent. Others include chlorine gas, alkali metal nitrites, the alkali metal hypochlorites, hydrogen peroxide and others. Ozone can also be used and it is particularly efiicient because of its high oxidation potential and oxidative catalytic power.
While the oxidation reaction proceeds in the absence of a catalyst, it is preferred to use a suitable catalyst to speed up the reaction. Various ones of well-known catalysts can be used. It should be an oxygen-containing compound of a polyvalent metallic element known to have more than one valence toward oxygen. For example, manganese may have valences of 2, 4, 6 or 7, while vanadium may have vala'nces of 2, 3, 4 or 5. It is desirable, but not absolutely essential, that the oxygen-containing compound of the polyvalent metallic element be capable of becoming the negative component of an alkali metal salt having at least a moderate solubility in water over the alkaline pH range. For example, manganese dioxide is almost insolulble in neutral watery suspension but forms manganites, manganates and permanganates which are reasonably soluble in water. Likewise, vanadium may enter into the negative component as ammonium or alkali metal vanadates or as the alkali metal salts of vandous acid and of the other acids with vanadium in still other valence states. In addition to the oxygen-containing compounds of vanadium and manganese, there may be mentioned the oxygen-containing compounds of copper, chromium, molybdenum, selenium, tellurium, tungsten, cerium, arsenic, antimony, iron, cobalt and nickel. Catalysts which are preferred primarily for economic reasons, are cobalt acetate and also manganese dioxide promoted with ammonium meta-vanadate. The amount of catalyst to be used will be determined primri'ly by economic considerations, that is, the cost of the catalyst per se, the amount required to be used to obtain the desired reaction in a minimum of time, etc. The amount used is not critical as long as enough is present to speed up the reaction so that it will be completed in the desired time. In the case of the manganese dioxide-ammonium meta-vanadate combination, the amount of manganese dioxide can be within the range of between to 5% of the weight of the sulfo-alkylated lignite being oxidized and the amount of ammonium met-a-vanadate equal to approximately to A the weight of the manganese dioxide. An amount of cobalt within the range of that given above for the manganese dioxide can be used. The same range applies to other catalysts. However, it must be emphasized (1) that the oxidation reaction can proceed without a catalyst, (2) that the amount of catalyst used is not important except excessive amounts are expensive and insufiicient amounts may not cause the reaction to be completed in a desired time, and (3) the type of oxidation catalyst may be chosen from those known to the prior art.
The oxidation reaction can be carried out in various manners. The sulfo-alkylated lignite or starting material should be in admixture with a suitable reaction medium, such as water, the mixture having a pH on the alkaline side. Catalyst, if used, can then be added to this mixture followed by the addition of the oxidizing agent. When air is used, it is preferably bubbled through the reaction mixture so as to assure that reactive oxygen is dissolved in the reaction medium. Chlorine can be used in the same way, but it should be noted that chlorine is very much more reactive than air so that it should be added to the reaction mixture at a lesser rate. Other oxidizing agents, such as the nitrites, hydrogen peroxide and the like can be added in the same manner or the total required amount added at the initiation of the reaction.
The pressure at which the oxidation reaction is conducted can vary over wide limits although usually atmospheric pressure will be preferred.
The temperature at which the oxidation reaction is conducted can also vary considerably, but should be below the temperature Which the sulfo-alkyl ated lignite will tolerate without serious disruption of its molecule with a consequent deterioration of its protective colloidal properties. Approximately 360 to 375 F. represents a workable maximum. However from a practical standpoint, a temperature within the range of 40 to 212 F., preferably to F. can be used. Where the reaction is carried out at superatmospheric pressure, the range can extend as high as 350 F. Thus the broad range can be stated as 40 to 350 F.
The reaction time and temperature are adjusted to each other in manners well-known to those skilled in the art so that the oxidation reaction will proceed to a point such that the oxidized product has a desired increase in its beneficial properties. In other words, the sulfo-alkylated product is oxidized to an extent such as will increase its hydrophilic properties. One way of easily determining the optimum time and temperature conditions is to merely sample the reaction mixture after various time and temperature reaction cycles and then determine the efiiciency of the samples by routine tests, such as by using mud samples.
It has been noted that during the oxidation reaction, the pH of the reaction mixture will decrease and for air oxidation, a drop of about 1 pH unit will indicate the oxidation reaction has proceeded far enough. Thus, the pH will usually drop from about 10.5 or 11 to about 9.5 during air oxidation and to even lower values (e.g. 8) during chlorination. Hence, the oxidation should proceed until the pH of the sulfo-alkylated lignite solution has dropped at least 0.5 unit. Another way of defining the extent of operable oxidation is to state that the sulfoalkylated lignite is oxidized until it increases at least 3, preferably from 3 to 25, percent in weight. Generally an oxidation time of from 0.5 to 10 hours will suffice and the exact value chosen from this range will depend on the oxidation temperature, catalyst, oxidizing agent and its concentration, extent of agitation and other factors.
To further demonstrate the invention, the following examples are set forth:
EXAMPLE I A sulfomethylated lignite sample was prepared by mixing together 30 parts of water, 8 parts of lignite, 2 parts each of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite, and 1 part of para-formaldehyde. The mixture was refluxed at 203 to 212 F. for approximately 3 hours and then autoclaved for about 5 hours at 296 to 314 F. The resulting product was drum dried and denoted as MP- 32. To evaluate MP-32 as a simple dispersing agent for drilling muds, a 7 weight percent dispersion of bentonite in fresh water was made up. Increasing portions of MP 32 were added to the mud and its yield point determined. The results are shown in FIG. 1.
In order to compare the elfectiveness of MP-32 with other dispersants, other samples of the bentonite dispersion were treated with various amounts of causticdispersant solutions as indicated in FIG. 1. In this figure, the weight ratio of caustic to dispersant for each curve is followed by the identification of the caustic-dispersant mixture used.
From FIG. 1, it will be seen that MP-32 is superior to the alkali lignite and is at least comparable to causticquebracho in its eifectiveness.
EXAMPLE II To compare the effectiveness of sulfo-methylated lignite with alkali lignite in lime base muds, the following dispersants were prepared:
MP-l3: 200 parts of lignite were refluxed with 27.5 parts of sodium hydroxide for about 5 hours. 50 parts of sodium sulfite followed by 25 parts of paraformaldehyde were then added. The mixture was refluxed at 203- 212 F. for 5 hours.
MP-23: The same procedure was followed as for MP-l3 except that 50 parts of sodium hydroxide were used.
MP-l7: 200 parts of lignite were refluxed with 27.5 parts of sodium hydroxide for 5 hours at 203-2l2 F.
Three pounds per barrel of the various dispersants (calculated on a water-free basis) and three pounds per barrel of caustic were added to samples of a 7 /2 weight percent suspension of bentonite in fresh water. Increasing increments of lime were then added to the samples and their yield points determined. The results are shown in FIG. 2.
As will be seen from this figure, the sulfomethylated lignite is markedly superior to conventional alkali lignite. Also, increasing the amount of sodium hydroxide in the sulfo-methylating reaction resulted in a somewhat superior product.
EXAMPLE III The MP-17 and MP23 dispersants of Example II, as well as NIP-24 (prepared the same as MP23 except the autoclaving temperature was 360-370" F.), were each added in increments to samples of a 7 /2 weight percent bentonite suspension. The yield points were determined after each addition. When 2 lb./bbl. of each dispersant had been added to its sample, salt (sodium chloride) was then added in increments and the yield point determined after each addition. The results are shown in FIG. 3.
It will thus be seen that the sulfo-methylated lignite not only is superior to alkali lignite in lime base or calciumcontaminated muds but also in salt-contaminated muds.
EXAMPLE IV To show that each of the alkali metal salts of sulfomethylated lignite are operable to give the advantages of this invention, MP40 and MP41 were prepared. The procedure of preparation was the same as for MP23 recited above except that equivalent amounts of lithium hydroxide and lithium sulfite were substituted for the corresponding sodium compounds of MP-23 in preparing MP-40. Similarly, potassium compounds were substituted in preparing MP41.
Various amounts of MP-23, MP-40 and MP-4'1 were added to samples of a 7 /2 weight percent bentonite suspension and the yield points determined. Sodium chloride was added in increments to the bentonite suspension samples which contained 3 lb./bbl. of the respective dispersants. The results are plotted in FIG. 4.
It will be seen that lithium, sodium and potassium compounds are interchangeable in preparing the dispersant of this invention but the sodium compounds will usually be preferred because of their relative cheapness.
EXAMPLE V The eflect of varying the amount of sulfite and aldehydre used in the sulfo-methylating reaction is shown in FIG. 5. The MP-23 is the same as that used in Example II. The MP23 /z and MI -23% were prepared in the same manner as the MP-23 except that approximately /2 and A as much sodium sulfite and paraformaldehyde were used, respectively. Again, a 7 /2 Weight percent bentonite suspension was used. After 3 lb./bbl. of
dispersant had been added to the respective mud samples,
lime was added in increments without the addition of additional caustic; hence, the hump at low lime concentrations. Yield points were determined after each addition to the mud.
While MP23 gave the best results in the lime muds at higher concentrations of lime, it will be seen that all three dispersants are about equally efiective in the absence of lime.
EXAMPLE VI FIG. 6 shows the eflect of varying the amount of sodium hydroxide used in the sulfo-methylating reaction. The MP-23 and MP-l3 were the same as in Example II while the MP-37 was prepared in the same manner except parts of sodium hydroxide were used. The mud samples were 7 /2 weight percent bentonite suspensions. No additional caustic was added with the lime. The testing procedure was the same as in Example V.
From FIG. 6, it can be seen that generally the effectiveness of the dispersant in lime muds increases with the increasing amount of sodium hydroxide used in its synthesis. However, all of the dispersants are usable, with perhaps slightly more of the MP-l3 and MP-23 being required to give the same results as MP-37 at the higher lime concentrations. The cost of the increased amounts of MP-13 and MP-23 may be partially or wholly offset by the extra cost of the additional amount of sodium hydroxide used in preparing the MP37.
EXAMPLE VII To determine the effect of sulfo-methylating quebracho, 200 parts of quebracho extract (dry, 70% tannin), 50 parts of sodium hydroxide, 50 grams sodium sulfite and 25 grams of paraformaldehyde and 1675 parts of Water were stirred together and refluxed for 5 hours at 203-212 F. This was followed by autoclaving for 5 hours at 296 to 314 F. The resulting product (MP-50) was tested in various muds as shown in Table I. NIP-32, prepared as in Example I, and caustic-quebracho were also tested for comparative purposes.
1 1b./bbl. caustic 12 7% Weight Percent Bentonite Suspension:
2 lb./bbl. MP-50 2 lbJbbl. MP-32 21b./'obl. Quebracho 1 lbJbbl. caustic.
From the foregoing it can be seen that quebracho which has been treated in the same manner as lignite with sulfite and aldehyde is not rendered equivalent thereto. In fact, it is inferior to both sulfomethylated lignite and to conventional caustic-quebracho as a dispersant.
EXAMPLE VIII To demonstrate the range of concentrations of sodium hydroxide, sodium sulfite and paraformaldehyde which can be reacted with lignite to achieve the benefits of this invention, the tests reported in Table II were run. In each test, the amounts of the indicated reactants were stirred into water and the mixture refluxed for five hours at 203-212 F. In some cases, the mixture was autoclaved for five additional hours at the temperature indicated. The final product was then analyzed and the percentage of sulfite and aldehyde reacted was calculated.
Table II Reactants-Parts Percent Percent Product Autosodium para- Dispersslaving, sulfite formaldeant Desig- Lig- Sodium Para- F. rehyde nation nite NaOIl sulfite formalacted 1 reacted 1 dehyde 50 100 50 None 17 8. 5 50 100 50 296-314 24. 5 12. 3 27. 5 50 25 None 14. 8 7. 4 27. 5 50 25 296-314 23. 3 11. 7 27. 5 50 25 360-370 24. 3 12. 2 50 5O 25 296-314 24. 12. 0 MP-23V--- 200 50 25 13 296-314 12.2 6. 1 MP-23V 200 50 13 7 296-314 6. 1 3. 1
1 Based upon weight of raw lignite (containing 4 to percent of water.
From Table II, it can be seen that autoclaving (reaction at temperatures substantially above 212 F. but below the decomposition temperature of lignite) increases the degree of sulfo-methylation, compared with refluxing only, about 50% irrespective of whether the sulfite-aldehyde is present in excess or in stoichiometric equivalents to the lignite. Also, regardless of whether or not the sulfite-aldehyde concentrations are doubled (MP-1 and 1a), the maximum amount of sulfite reacted is 15 to 17 weight percent of the weight of the lignite with refluxing only and is about 24% by refluxing and autoclaving. Further, the maximum amount of sodium sulfite and paraformaldehyde which can be reacted with the North Dakota lignite used at temperatures below the decomposition temperature of such lignite is about 2425% and 12,12.5% respectively.
EXAMPLE IX 400 parts of lignite, 100 parts each of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite and 50 parts of paraformaldehyde were combined with 1510 ml. of water and refluxed for 5 hours at 203-212 F. Thereafter, the mixture was autoclaved for 5 hours at 296-314 F. Then the reaction mixture was dried and weighed. Each 100 ml. of mixture yielded 26.2 grams of dry solids. This is equivalent to a yield of dry solids of 87.3 weight percent of the dry reactant starting materials. Calculations based on the theoretical reaction and taking into account the water formed by the reaction indicated a theoretical yield of dry solids of 88.5 weight percent of the original dry solid EXAMPLE X A 10% aqueous solution of MP-32 (prepared as per Example I) was mixed with 1% (based upon the dry solid MP-32) of ground manganese dioxide and 0.10% ammonium meta-vanadate (based upon weight of manganese dioxide). The resulting mixture was placed in a Cavitator and air bubbled therethrough at atmospheric pressure. The oxidation caused a mild temperature peak (87 F. with an eventual drop nearly back to room temperature). The total oxidation time was 12 hours. The air-oxidized solution was oven-dried at 230 F., ground, bottled and labelled MP-69. The dry product weighed approximately 12% more than the weight of the original dry MP-32. The pH of the solution dropped approximatel 1 pH unit during the oxidation.
The MP-69 was then tested in' base stock and in a lime base mud. The results are reported in Table III.
From Table III, it would seen that MP-69 is at least as good as Quebracho and caustic for thinning simple mud systems and is actually superior in lime base muds because of the much lower 10 minute gel.
EXAMPLE XI A series of difierent sulfa-alkylated lignites were prepared by mixing 25 parts of each of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite with parts of lignite in approximately 330 parts of water. The mixture was then stirred at a temperature slightly below the boiling point thereof and then various amounts of the aldehydes and ketones indicated in Table IV were added. The reaction was allowed to continue for approximately 5 hours at approximately 200-212 F. and atmospheric pressure. Thereafter, the mixture was autoclaved for 5 hours at a temperature in the range of 275-315 F. Where the reaction product was not to be oxidized, the mixture was then removed from the autoclave and dried. Where the mixture was oxidized, this was accomplished by bubbling air therethrough for approximately 7 hours at about F. A catalyst comprising one part of manganese dioxide and .2 part of ammonium meta-vanadate was used.
In each reaction, there was a significant decrease in pH of the mixture during both the sulfo-alkylation reaction and the subsequent oxidation. In most cases the pH dropped from the order of 12 for the initial mixture to 9 or 10 for the final oxidized mixture. Each reaction yielded at least 90% of theoretical and there was increase in weight of from 5 to about 15% (based upon the sulfoalkylated product per se) during the oxidation reaction.
13 Each product upon drying remained dry and free-flowing and was not corrosive to the skin.
The various reaction products were tested in drilling muds. For the column labelled WBM (water base mud) the mud comprised about 15 lb./bbl. of Yellowstone bentonite, 31 lb./bbl. of a low yielding adsorptive clay (X-act) and 73 lb./bbl. of barite, thus giving a mud having 25.4% solids by weight and a weight of 10.3 p.p.g. The lime base muds (LBM) were made by adding 6 lb./bbl. of lime to the water base muds. For the tests to determine the yield point of the water base mud, 2 lb./bbl. of the reaction product (thinner) were added. For the tests for the lime base mud, 5 lb./bbl. of the thinner plus 1 lb./bbl. of caustic were added.
Table IV Yield Point Reactatnt-Pts/Wgt. Oxidized WBM LBM Glutaraldehyde-26 24 Acrylic aldehyde-2L Acetone-25 21 Methyl ethyl ketone-3l 14 Hexane dione-24 5 Methyl isobutyl ketone-27 41 Acetophenone-4l C *26 C14 35 C s 45 Propionaldehyde-24 16 Acetaldehyde 10 18 Butyraldehyde 15 Butyraldehyde 30 23 Butyraldehyde30 14 Furiural 40 19 Bcnzaldehyde-21 15 Benzaldehydc-21 36 Salicylaldehyde-26 12 Salicylaldehyde-26 14 The above tests clearly demonstrate the thinning action of the various reaction products, particularly when it is considered that the water base mud, in the absence of a. thinner, had a yield point of approximately 70 or more. The yield point of the lime base mud, without thinner, was even higher because the mud was too thick to measure.
In the foregoing table, the reactants labelled C C C and C are long chain aliphatic monoaldehydes having 7 carbon atoms per molecule, 10 carbon atoms per molecule, etc.
EXAMPLE XII sulfo-methylated lignite (MP-32) was oxidized by nitration. To accomplish this, 850 parts by weight of MP-32 solids were placed in water along with 25 parts by weight of sodium nitrite. The mixture was refluxed for hours at 200-2l2 F. and then dried to constant weight at 23 F. During the oxidation, the MP32 solids increased approximately 3% in weight. Comparative tests of the oxidized (nitritated) produce (thinner) (3 lb./ bbl. of thinner), the original sulfo-methylated lignite and quebracho-caustic (-5) in a lime mud showed that the yield point of the muds containing the nitritated product was only /4 of the yield point of the muds containing sulfo-methylated lignite or the quebracho-caustic product. A comparison of the nitritated product and MP-69 (air-oxidized sulfo-methylated lignite) at a level of 5 ub./ bbl. in the lime base mud indicated the yields of the mud were approximately the same and in each case were 6 or less.
EXAMPLE XIII To demonstrate that hydrogen peroxide could be used as the oxidizing agent, 1000 parts of sulfo-(methylated lignite (MP32) solution (30% MP32 solids) were oxidized with 120 parts of 30% hydrogen peroxide added over a period of 1.5 hours. In one test, 23 parts of ammonium meta-vanadate (plus 8 parts of additional NaOI-I) was used as a catalyst and in the other 50 parts of cobalt acetate tetra-hydrate (plus 16 grams additional NaOI-I) was used as a catalyst. In each case, the reaction was conducted at about 175 F. and at atmospheric pressure. During the oxidation, the pH of the mixture dropped approximately 1 unit and there was a noticeable decrease in viscosity and a typical gain in weight of the MP-32.
Tests of the oxidized products in water base muds as above defined reduced the yield point (at 2 lb./bbl. of the oxidized product) to about 30% of that of the untreated mud.
EXAMPLE XIV As pointed out above, the sulfo-alkylated lignites of this invention can have their efiiciency increased by using chlorine (or equivalent) as the oxidizing agent. To demonstrate this, a solution of sulfo-methylated lignite (MP-32) was vigorously agitated while a moderate stream of chlorine gas was passed thereinto. As the chlorination proceeded, the temperature of th charge rose about 20 F. within one hour, while the pH dropped from an original 10.6 to 7.0. The chlorination was interrupted after one hour. The rapid drop in pH and rise in temperature indicated a viborous oxidation of the sulfO-methylated l-ignite by the chlorine. At this point it should be pointed out that since the oxidation was conducted in an alkaline medium, the chlorine probably was converted to sodium hypochlorite and this was actually the oxidizing agent. However, whether sodium hypochlorite, chlorine gas or other halide yielding materials are used, the over all process can be called oxidation.
Tests of the chlorinated product in a lime base mud (6 lb./bbl. lime), using 4 lb./bbl. of the product with 2.5 lb./bbl. of caustic, reduced the yield point of the mud to 7 from a value which would have been too thick to measure without the thinner. It should be noted that since final pH of the chlorinated product is somewhat lower than that for the air-oxidized product (MP69), it may be advisable to use additional amounts of caustic in the mud to compensate for this.
All parts referred to herein are parts by weight unless otherwise specifically noted. All test procedures used in conjunction with evaluating the various dispersants in drilling muds were conducted according to A.P.I. Code 29 and yields are reported in pounds per square feet.
As indicated above, the dispersing agents of this invention are useful not only in simple water-base muds, but more particularly in muds contaminated with calcium and sodium compounds which tend to increase the viscosity of the mud. The amounts of these compounds required to cause an increase in viscosity in the absence of the viscosity reducing agents of this invention will vary with the mud composition and type and the conditions of its use. Accordingly, no hard and fast rule can be laid down as to the amounts of these contaminants which will cause a substantial increase in yield and, as is usual in the mud treatment, such mud will have to have its individual tolerance to these compounds determined before any reliable conclusion can be drawn as the yield point increasing amounts of these contaminants. Ordinarily, at least 0.5 lb./bbl. of these contaminants will be required to tend to cause a substantial increase in yield. It should further be pointed out that the thinning agents of this invention are especially useful in lime base muds where lime is deliberately added along with caustic in a manner well-known to those skilled in the art.
The exact amounts of the thinners which are to be added to a particular mud to reduce its yield to a desired value can only be determined in the field by routine tests. As is known, these tests are conducted on mud before it is thinned even when well-known thinners such as causticquebracho are being used. However, for the sake of completeness, it is stated that the dispersing agents of this invention can be used in amounts within the range of 0.5
15 to 15, preferably 1 to 10, lb./bbl. to achieve various degrees of thinning in different muds.
Usually the pH of the mud to be treated will be above 7.
From the foregoing it will be seen that this invention is one well adapted to attain all of the ends and objects hereinabove set forth, together with other advantages which are obvious and which are inherent to the composition and method.
The invention having been described, what is claimed is:
1. A well drilling fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating 100 parts of lignite in an alkaline liquid reaction medium with 6 to 50 parts of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and water soluble salts thereof, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being present in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, to a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time sufficient for a substantial portion of the methylenic and sulfur compounds to react with the lignite to form side chains on the lignite having the formula R-SO M, wherein -R-- is selected from the group consisting of methylene and substituted methylene radicals and M is an alkali metal.
2. The well fluid of claim 1 wherein the methylenic compound is formaldehyde.
3. The well fluid of claim 1 wherein the methylenic compound is furfural.
4. The well fluid of claim 1 wherein the methylenic compound is acetone.
5. A well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing 100 parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of an alkali metal sulfite, 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde, and 10 to 100 parts of alkali metal hydroxide at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time suflicient for a substantial portion of the sulfite and formaldehyde to react with the lignite to form side chains on the lignite having the formula R-SO M, wherein R- is a methylene radical and M is an alkali metal.
6. A well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating an alkaline liquid reaction medium containing lignite, 6 to 50 parts per 100 parts of lignite of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and its water soluble salts, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being employed in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde within the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time sufficient for a substantial proportion of the methylenic compound, sulfur compound and lignite to react; and oxidizing the resulting lignite derivative sufficiently to increase the yield point reducing power of the lignite derivative.
7. The well fluid of claim 6 wherein the methylenic compound is formaldehyde.
8. The well fluid of claim 6 wherein the methylenic compound is furfural.
9. The well fluid of claim 6 wherein the methylenic compound is acetone.
10. A well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a normally yield point increasing amount of sodium chloride and a yield point reducing amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of alkali metal sulfite, 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde and 10 to 100 parts of alkali metal hydroxide at a temperature in the range from to 375 F. for a time sufiicient for a substantial portion of the sulfite and formaldehyde to react with each other and with the lignite to form side chains on the lignite having the formula --RSO M, wherein R is a methylene radical and M is an alkali metal.
11. A well fluid comprising an aqueous dispersion of clay containing a normally yield point increasing amount of a material selected from the group consisting of water soluble calcium and sodium salts, a yield point lowering amount of a water soluble lignite derivative made by heating a liquid reaction mixture containing 100 parts of lignite, 6 to 50 parts of a sulfur compound selected from the group consisting of sulfurous acid and its water soluble salts, a methylenic compound selected from the group consisting of aldehydes and methyl ketones, said methylenic compound being present in amount stoichiometrically equivalent to an amount of formaldehyde in the range from 3 to 25 parts of formaldehyde per 100 parts of lignite, and an alkali hydroxide at a temperature in the range from 175 to 375 F. for a time sufficient for a substantial portion of the sulfur compound and the methylenic compound to react with each other and with the lignite.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,736,014 Plauson Nov. 19, 1929 1,736,015 Plauson Nov. 19, 1929 2,172,301 Sutterlin et a1. Sept. 5, 1939 2,312,449 Shoemaker Mar. 2, 1943 2,331,281 Wayne Oct. 12, 1943 2,491,437 Perkins Dec. 13, 1949 2,560,380 Wrightsman July 10, 1951 2,579,453 Post et a1 Dec. 25, 1951 2,650,197 Rahn Aug. 25, 1953 2,783,201 Rahn Feb. 26, 1957 2,813,826 Crowley et al Nov. 19, 1957

Claims (1)

1. A WELL DRILLING FLUID COMPRISING AN AQUEOUS DISPERSION OF CLAY CONTAINING A YIELD POINT REDUCING AMOUNT OF A WATER SOLUBLE LIGNITE DERIVATIVE MADE BY HEATING 100 PARTS OF LIGNITE IN AN ALKALINE LIQUID REACTION MEDIUM WITH 6 TO 50 PARTS OF A SULFUR COMPOUND SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF SULFUROUS ACID AND WATER SOLUBLE SALTS THEREOF, A METHYLENIC COMPOUND SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF ALDEHYDES AND METHYL KETONES, SAID METHYLENIC COMPOUND BEING PRESENT IN AMOUNT STOICHIOMETRICALLY EQUIVALENT TO AN AMOUNT OF FORMALDEHYDE WITHIN THE RANGE FROM 3 TO 25 PARTS OF FORMALDEHYDE PER 100 PARTS OF LIGNITE, TO A TEMPERATURE IN THE RANGE FROM 175* TO 375*F. FOR A TIME SUFFICIENT FOR A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE METHYLENIC AND SULFUR COMPOUNDSTO REACT WITH THE LIGNITE TO FORM SIDE CHAINS ON THE LIGNITE HAVING THE DORMULA-R-SO3M, WHEREIN-R-IS SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF METHYLENE AND SUBSTITUTED METHYLENE RADICALS AND M IS AN ALKALI METAL.
US658378A 1957-05-10 1957-05-10 Well drilling fluid Expired - Lifetime US3034982A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US658378A US3034982A (en) 1957-05-10 1957-05-10 Well drilling fluid
US151590A US3135727A (en) 1957-05-10 1961-10-31 Lignite derivative and process for preparing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US658378A US3034982A (en) 1957-05-10 1957-05-10 Well drilling fluid

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3034982A true US3034982A (en) 1962-05-15

Family

ID=24641010

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US658378A Expired - Lifetime US3034982A (en) 1957-05-10 1957-05-10 Well drilling fluid

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3034982A (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3344063A (en) * 1965-09-30 1967-09-26 Phillips Petroleum Co Drilling fluids and additives therefor
US3352902A (en) * 1964-01-13 1967-11-14 Canadian Patents Dev Sulfomethylation of humic acids, lignites, and coals and products thereof
US3391173A (en) * 1965-09-30 1968-07-02 Phillips Petroleum Co Metal complexes of sulfoalkalated tannies
US3441504A (en) * 1968-03-14 1969-04-29 Milchem Inc Drilling mud additive for filtration control
DE2702858A1 (en) * 1976-02-02 1977-08-04 Halliburton Co SET Retarder for hydraulic cement
US4072192A (en) * 1976-02-04 1978-02-07 Texaco Inc. Sulfomethylated lignite salt as a sacrifical agent in oil recovery processes
US4645609A (en) * 1985-05-23 1987-02-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Sulfonated asphalt/causticized lignite blend
US4704214A (en) * 1984-10-11 1987-11-03 Phillips Petroleum Company Drilling fluid
EP0786490A2 (en) * 1996-01-26 1997-07-30 Lignotech USA, Inc. Production of acid soluble humates
US20110124847A1 (en) * 2007-08-22 2011-05-26 Jiangsu Tms Group Method for preparing concrete water reducer by grafting of lignosulfonate with carbonyl aliphatics

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1736014A (en) * 1923-07-02 1929-11-19 Disperoid Syndicate Ltd Manufacture of sulfur dyestuffs
US1736015A (en) * 1924-06-28 1929-11-19 Plauson Hermann Manufacture of sulfur dyestuffs
US2172301A (en) * 1936-07-14 1939-09-05 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process of producing a product having cation-exchanging properties from lignite or peat
US2312449A (en) * 1938-10-13 1943-03-02 Res Prod Corp Cationic exchange material
US2331281A (en) * 1939-03-31 1943-10-12 Truman B Wayne Treatment of mud-laden drilling fluids
US2491437A (en) * 1948-08-03 1949-12-13 Sun Oil Co Drilling mud
US2560380A (en) * 1948-08-25 1951-07-10 Standard Oil Dev Co Improved drilling mud composition
US2579453A (en) * 1947-01-31 1951-12-25 American Cyanamid Co Composition for drilling muds
US2650197A (en) * 1953-04-21 1953-08-25 Henry W Rahn Well drilling composition and method of manufacture thereof
US2783201A (en) * 1953-07-27 1957-02-26 Columbia Southern Chem Corp Process of preparing a dry composition containing an alkali metal hydroxide and a tannin containing material
US2813826A (en) * 1953-12-29 1957-11-19 Gulf Research Development Co Preparation and use of drilling fluid treating agents

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1736014A (en) * 1923-07-02 1929-11-19 Disperoid Syndicate Ltd Manufacture of sulfur dyestuffs
US1736015A (en) * 1924-06-28 1929-11-19 Plauson Hermann Manufacture of sulfur dyestuffs
US2172301A (en) * 1936-07-14 1939-09-05 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Process of producing a product having cation-exchanging properties from lignite or peat
US2312449A (en) * 1938-10-13 1943-03-02 Res Prod Corp Cationic exchange material
US2331281A (en) * 1939-03-31 1943-10-12 Truman B Wayne Treatment of mud-laden drilling fluids
US2579453A (en) * 1947-01-31 1951-12-25 American Cyanamid Co Composition for drilling muds
US2491437A (en) * 1948-08-03 1949-12-13 Sun Oil Co Drilling mud
US2560380A (en) * 1948-08-25 1951-07-10 Standard Oil Dev Co Improved drilling mud composition
US2650197A (en) * 1953-04-21 1953-08-25 Henry W Rahn Well drilling composition and method of manufacture thereof
US2783201A (en) * 1953-07-27 1957-02-26 Columbia Southern Chem Corp Process of preparing a dry composition containing an alkali metal hydroxide and a tannin containing material
US2813826A (en) * 1953-12-29 1957-11-19 Gulf Research Development Co Preparation and use of drilling fluid treating agents

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3352902A (en) * 1964-01-13 1967-11-14 Canadian Patents Dev Sulfomethylation of humic acids, lignites, and coals and products thereof
US3344063A (en) * 1965-09-30 1967-09-26 Phillips Petroleum Co Drilling fluids and additives therefor
US3391173A (en) * 1965-09-30 1968-07-02 Phillips Petroleum Co Metal complexes of sulfoalkalated tannies
DE1296105B (en) * 1965-09-30 1969-05-29 Phillips Petroleum Co Process for the production of an additive for a drilling fluid
US3441504A (en) * 1968-03-14 1969-04-29 Milchem Inc Drilling mud additive for filtration control
DE2702858A1 (en) * 1976-02-02 1977-08-04 Halliburton Co SET Retarder for hydraulic cement
US4072192A (en) * 1976-02-04 1978-02-07 Texaco Inc. Sulfomethylated lignite salt as a sacrifical agent in oil recovery processes
US4704214A (en) * 1984-10-11 1987-11-03 Phillips Petroleum Company Drilling fluid
US4645609A (en) * 1985-05-23 1987-02-24 Phillips Petroleum Company Sulfonated asphalt/causticized lignite blend
EP0786490A2 (en) * 1996-01-26 1997-07-30 Lignotech USA, Inc. Production of acid soluble humates
EP0786490A3 (en) * 1996-01-26 1998-04-08 Lignotech USA, Inc. Production of acid soluble humates
US20110124847A1 (en) * 2007-08-22 2011-05-26 Jiangsu Tms Group Method for preparing concrete water reducer by grafting of lignosulfonate with carbonyl aliphatics

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3034982A (en) Well drilling fluid
US3956140A (en) Drilling fluids
US4678591A (en) Terpolymer composition for aqueous drilling fluids
US4411800A (en) High temperature stable fluid loss control system
US3391173A (en) Metal complexes of sulfoalkalated tannies
US4473480A (en) High temperature stable fluid loss control system
JPS59112891A (en) Method of removing hydrogen sulfide and iron sulfide from aqueous system
US4457853A (en) Oil well drilling clay conditioners and method of their preparation
US3344063A (en) Drilling fluids and additives therefor
US4389319A (en) High temperature stable viscosifier and fluid loss control system
US3135727A (en) Lignite derivative and process for preparing the same
US4447339A (en) Oil well drilling clay conditioners and method of their preparation
US4220585A (en) Drilling fluid additives
US2911365A (en) Drilling mud containing a telomer
US4666979A (en) Metal compounds of acid group-containing condensation products and co-condensation products of ketones and aldehydes
US3634387A (en) Sulfomethylated lignin-ferrochrome complex and process for producing same
US2858271A (en) Well drilling fluids and method of making the same
US3039958A (en) Well drilling fluids containing lignite derivatives
US3555006A (en) Polysaccharide polymer cyclic ketals
US3135728A (en) Lignite products and methods of making same
NO130024B (en)
US3741894A (en) Chemically modified organic polymers
US4826611A (en) Well drilling and completion composition
US6420602B1 (en) Method for the production of tetramethylthiuram disulfide
US3766229A (en) Drilling fluids