US2851311A - Portable scaffold - Google Patents
Portable scaffold Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2851311A US2851311A US503168A US50316855A US2851311A US 2851311 A US2851311 A US 2851311A US 503168 A US503168 A US 503168A US 50316855 A US50316855 A US 50316855A US 2851311 A US2851311 A US 2851311A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- runway
- section
- sections
- concrete
- deck
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04G—SCAFFOLDING; FORMS; SHUTTERING; BUILDING IMPLEMENTS OR AIDS, OR THEIR USE; HANDLING BUILDING MATERIALS ON THE SITE; REPAIRING, BREAKING-UP OR OTHER WORK ON EXISTING BUILDINGS
- E04G1/00—Scaffolds primarily resting on the ground
- E04G1/28—Scaffolds primarily resting on the ground designed to provide support only at a low height
Definitions
- This invention relates to a light weight portable scaffold defining a runway made up of plural interconnected sectrons for erection and use in construction work as, for example, when a largereinforced slab deck is poured utilizing concrete buggies which are moved upon the runway to carry the wet concrete to the pour.
- One object of my invention is to provide a portable scaifold defining a runway in which the individual interconnected sections are sufiiciently strong to support loaded concrete buggies yet which are sufficiently light in weight that a single workman can lift and carry a section when it must be moved about on the job.
- Therun- Ways themselves are of many and diverse forms, one of the most popular and inexpensive being a flat wood platform made up of rough timbers set upon sawhorses. It is one object of the instant invention to improve these conventional runways in strength, practicality, cost, Weight, and other factors as now will be described.
- One of the primary disadvantages of the conventional runway is that the sections of decking are massive, bulky, cumbersome and rough wood planks joined together and or" such weight that two men are required to lift and carry them about. Portability, however, is an essential feature. Initially, of course, the runway must be assembled in place. Later, as a portion of the slab is poured, the runway must be pickedup and removed section by section to make room for the" pouring of the next section. With the conventional massive runway, this has required that two men step-down among the steel reinforcingelements and, sometimes, into the wet concrete to lift the decking and remove the supporting sawhorses.
- each section of runway is made up with a skeletal framework of light weight hollow pieces of pipe andwith two legs supporting a plywooddeck.
- the legs for each sec tion also are hollow pipe and these are" welded to-the framework.
- a hollow frustoconic skirt encircles the legs and is screw threaded to the bottom thereof.
- This skirt defines a support foot for the leg. Further, this skirt readily is detached so that additional lengths of pipe may be coupled or screw threaded onto the leg.
- Another object of my invention is to provide a section of portable runway with a smooth rather than a rough deck in order that concrete will not adhere thereto and Still another object of my invention is to provide deck of a portable runway with small cutaway portions adjacent each corner and adjacent the midpoint on each side so as to allow two-legged sections of runway tojbe joined, one to another, either end to end or at right angles.
- Fig. l is a perspective view of my portable scaffold defining a runway with certain of the sections connected end to end and with other sections connected at right angles, two workmen being shown upon the runway, one
- Fig. 2 is a perspective view, partially broken away, showing a single typical section of the scaffold
- Fig. 3 is a detail view, also partially broken away, showing one of the legs which support a section, this particular leg having an extension thereon to increase the height of the runway;
- Fig. 4 is a side view showing a large number of the scaffold sections with the support feet removed and the sections nested to illustrate the ease of handling and storage which results;
- Fig. 5 is a detail view, taken substantially on the line 55 of Fig. 1, showing the joinder of a hook or to an aperture when the sections are arranged end to end;
- Fig. 6 is another detail view, taken substantially on the line 6-6 of Fig. 1, showing the joinder of a hook to one of the hollow pieces of pipe which defines a side member, this joinder being utilized when a section is added at right angles to another section.
- each of the many sections of scaffolding defining a runway which is illustrated in the drawings is identical in order to provide a modular length and in order to allow a standard fabrication procedure.
- each includes a pair of parallel end members 7 and a pair of parallel side members 8. These are welded or otherwise joined end to end to form a rigid structural framework of rectangular outline.
- both the side and end members are hollow pieces of pipe.
- the framework is reinforced with additional parallel longitudinal stringers 9 which also are hollow pieces of pipe.
- I weld or otherwise fix a triangular fillet plate 10 so as to provide additional reinforcement and so as to provide a means for attaching a deck as hereinafter will be described.
- this provides a structural framework which is both light in Weight and of superior structural strength so as safely to support the heavy load imposed by a loaded buggy of concrete and so as to withstand the abuse incident to transportation and use in construction work.
- each section of scaffolding is a two legged truss.
- I prefer to weld a pendent hollow tubular leg 11 to the corners at but one end of the framework.
- Each of these legs carries a pipe coupling structure which I prefer to form as a threaded section 12 adjacent the lower end thereof for a purpose now to be described.
- I provide a hollow frusto-conic skirt 13 having a wide annular base as best shown in Fig. 3. This skirt defines a wide. sturdy support for each of the legs. Further.
- each skirt detachably is secured to the corresponding leg in order to allow quick removal of the foot when the length of the leg is to be varied or when a plurality of the sections are to be nested or moved about as shown in 4.
- each skirt bounds a circular axial opening having an upper diameter which slidingly fits about the leg and a threaded lower diameter 14 which is mated to the aforementioned threaded section 12 of the leg.
- that portion of the leg 11 which is welded directly to the framework has been extended by adding a lower section of pipe 21. and by joining the parts 11 and 21 with a threaded collar 15.
- the conic foot 13 is threaded and slidingly is fitted over the bottom of the lower pipe section 21. In this manner, I provide for each runway section a sturdy yet a light weight support which quickly can be varied in height.
- a hook member 16 is welded or otherwise secured across the top end of two of the pipes so as to protrude longitudinally from the end of the framework opposite to the end which carries the legs 11.
- Each of these hooks carries a downturned end portion 17 and, in cooperation therewith, vertical apertures 18 pierce the side members 8 which each overlies a leg 11.
- each hook 16 is provided with a longitudinal clearance indicated by the letter C and the arrow.
- This clearance is intermediate the downturned end portion 17 and the body of the structural framework.
- the clearance C is at least as great as the diameter of one of the members 7, 8.
- This clearance allows an arrangement of the runway sections at right angles to one another as hereinafter Will be described.
- it also allows a different type of end to end joinder of the sections where the ends of the hook are moved inboard slightly so as to overlie the periphery of the next adjacent end member 7 rather than to fit Within the apertures 18. This may be preferred, for example, where it is feared that the apertures 18 inadvertently may fill with concrete.
- the deck member itself includes a fiat rectangular sheet of plywood 19 which fits upon the upper face of the rectangular framework.
- This plywood deck is secured at each corner to a corresponding one of the triangular fillet plates 10 by a bolt 20.
- This bolt traverses an appropriate aperture 22 in the fillet plate, which arrangement is best shown in Fig. 2.
- a nut can be employed beneath the fillet plate to secure the bolt and deck in place. This holds the deck firmly in place yet allows the deck to be removed should replacement become necessary over the years.
- each deck member 19 is provided with a small cutaway portion 23 adjacent the corner so as to accommodate the previously described hook and aperture structure 16, 18.
- the mid-point at each side of the deck is cut away, as at 24, so as to accommodate the hook of an adjoining section when two of these sections are fitted together at right angles as shown in Fig. 6.
- the deck thus is arranged to accommodate either an end to end or a right angle disposition of the sections.
- a plurality of sections of scaffolding defining a runway are laid up end to end and with branch runways at right angles as shown in Fig. 1, the particular pattern being dependent upon the requirements of the particular job. Since each of the sections carries but two legs, the first section must be supported at one end upon the forms, a sawhorse, or other appropriate structure. Thereinafter, sections are added end to end by fitting the hooks 16, 17 to the apertures 18. Branch runways are added at right angles by allowing the hooks to overlie the side members 8 so as to rest within the cutaway portions 24 of adjoining sections.
- one hook will rest within a middle cutaway portion 24 on a first section whereas the other hook will rest in a corresponding cutaway portion of a second abutting section as shown in Figs. 1 and 6.
- This particular joinder is accommodated by virtue of the clearance C which is shown in Fig. 6 whereby the hook can overlie a pipe periphery with the downturned portion in abutment.
- the runway is assembled on the job with the legs 11 intermediate the steel reinforcing bars and fixtures and with the feet 13 resting upon the ground or underlying forms.
- the workmen wheel their loaded buggies along the runway and dump the wet concrete from the ends of both the main and the branch runways.
- the end sections is removed to make room for the next succeeding pour. In this way, the job progresses back toward the first section of runway which was laid up.
- the removal is illustrated in Fig. 1 where a workman is shown carrying a section away so as to allow the pouring to proceed from the end of the next inboard section.
- each section is sufficiently light in weight that a single workman can lift and carry it about.
- the workman often can remove the hooks from the apertures and lift the section by himself.
- the legs and skirts may be more or less interwoven through the maize of reinforcing steel.
- one of the workers distributing, finishing or vibrating the concrete will help lift the feet 13 clear of the steel.
- the worker on the runway then can lift the section up on to his back and carry it away either to a point of storage or to a point of further use.
- a single workman can add a section where additional branches must be built out.
- theassembly will be effected by fitting the hooks to the eyes and allowing the far end of the section to drop into place.
- This provides a flexibility allowing the contractor to complete a big job with a minimum number of sections and thus is saving of capital expenditure money.
- additional height is required or where the of each section can be varied and the runway can be built up either end to end or at right angles as required. In total, this allows the runway to be fabricated in modular lengths at a minimal cost having practical appeal to contractors engaged in concrete construction.
- a portable scaffold comprising plural sections, each section having a mass capable of being lifted and carried by a single workman, said sections being detachably joined together to define an elongated runway, each section comprising a flat rectangular frame element composed of pairs of opposed side and end members, leg members fixed to one face of said frame element, at one end only of each section, decking secured to the other face of said frame element, and horizontal latch-fingers secured to and extending laterally over and beyond the frame end not carrying leg members and having a depending end portion.
- Claim 1 modified in that the frame element at at least one side and at the end unsupported by legs is provided with a latch-finger engaging portion and the latch-fingers have a reach and clearance to overlie and grip a latch-finger engaging portion on an adjacent section.
- Claim 1 modified in that said latch fingers lie generally in the plane of the decking, which latter is cut away to accommodate said latch fingers.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
Description
Sept. 9, 1958 Filed April 22, 1955 R. J. GIBBS PORTABLE SCAFFOLD 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 INVENTOR.
' .geaz cmibb Aim Sept. 9, 1958 R.IJ. GIBBS 2,851,311
PORTABLE SCAFFOLD Filed April 22, 1955 2 She etS-Sheet 2 N o R m x INVENTOR.
.501 hcZGi b 2,5 l ,3] i atontecl Sept. 9, 1958 PORTABLE SCAFFOLD Ralph J. Gihhs, .Eu enaoreg. Application April 22, 1955,Serial No. 503,168 SClaims. .(Cl. i304--1) This invention relates to a light weight portable scaffold defining a runway made up of plural interconnected sectrons for erection and use in construction work as, for example, when a largereinforced slab deck is poured utilizing concrete buggies which are moved upon the runway to carry the wet concrete to the pour.
One object of my invention is to provide a portable scaifold defining a runway in which the individual interconnected sections are sufiiciently strong to support loaded concrete buggies yet which are sufficiently light in weight that a single workman can lift and carry a section when it must be moved about on the job.
The advantages of the instant invention are best explained with reference to a construction job which includes the pouring of a reinforced concrete slab or deck. To this end, it will be appreciated that initially, the ground is prepared, the peripheral or outer forms are set,- the steel reinforcing is placed and tied, the conduits or pipe which must traverse the finished slab are placed, and the inner forms are erected. After this preparation, long flat buggy runways are erected the length and width of the job so as to provide access across the job site for the workman and the concrete buggies. These runways stand on legs above the level of the steel and the finished slab. The loaded buggies are pushed by hand and dumped from the edges or ends of the runway to spill the concrete into the forms and over the steel. Therun- Ways themselves are of many and diverse forms, one of the most popular and inexpensive being a flat wood platform made up of rough timbers set upon sawhorses. It is one object of the instant invention to improve these conventional runways in strength, practicality, cost, Weight, and other factors as now will be described.
One of the primary disadvantages of the conventional runway is that the sections of decking are massive, bulky, cumbersome and rough wood planks joined together and or" such weight that two men are required to lift and carry them about. Portability, however, is an essential feature. Initially, of course, the runway must be assembled in place. Later, as a portion of the slab is poured, the runway must be pickedup and removed section by section to make room for the" pouring of the next section. With the conventional massive runway, this has required that two men step-down among the steel reinforcingelements and, sometimes, into the wet concrete to lift the decking and remove the supporting sawhorses. With the instant invention, on the other hand, each section of runway is made up with a skeletal framework of light weight hollow pieces of pipe andwith two legs supporting a plywooddeck. The legs for each sec tion also are hollow pipe and these are" welded to-the framework. in end result, this provides: a runway in which each section is sulficiently light" in'wei-ght that-a ingle workman can lift and carry. it about and in which;
the'legs are integral with rather than separate fronr'the deck. infect, each sect-ion-oan-be liftedandsrernoved; by a workman standing on an adjacent;sectiorsof'runway thereby eliminating the necessity to step down all the runway into the wet concrete. The provision of this structure is one object of my invention.
Another disadvantage of the conventional runwayis that the height at which the runway stands aboveithe steel and the ground or forms is diflicult,=if not impossible, to adjust. Thus, amajority of contractors utilize a standard'sawhorse height which is sufiicient to clear the thickest slab they expect to encounter. This not only increases the weight of the runway structure needlessly when a thin slab is poured, but italso spaces the buggies an excessive distance above the forms when such athin slab is poured. To eliminate this disadvantage, the legs of my portable runwaysection purposely are of a minimum length and are formed with a threaded section adjacent the lower end. In cooperation with this threaded section, a hollow frustoconic skirt encircles the legs and is screw threaded to the bottom thereof. This skirt defines a support foot for the leg. Further, this skirt readily is detached so that additional lengths of pipe may be coupled or screw threaded onto the leg. This provision allows the contractor to increase or decrease the height of the runway from job tojob and the provision .of structure allowing this result is another object of my invention. 7 I
With the conventional concrete runway, it is accepted practice to bridge the joint between sections of runway which are at right angles to one another by laying a board or other ramp over that joint. This has been considered essential since the width of the joint may vary and the buggies need a more or less continuous supporting surface when loaded. However, experience has shown that this is not an efficient or a safe method of joining runway sections at right angles or of bridging the joint. Firstly, the sections themselves are substantially independent and rest upon separate sawhorses. This allows one section to move relative to its neighbor after erection. With the instant invention, on the other hand, the abutting sections are provided with mated keepers which hook together such that adjoining sections can be joined and fixed together either end to end or at right angles one to another. In either arrangement, the adjoining sections are held in a close, face to face abutment and thus a ramp or board is not required over the joint. The provision of a keeper construction in combination with a runway of the above type is a further object of my invention.
Another object of my invention is to provide a section of portable runway with a smooth rather than a rough deck in order that concrete will not adhere thereto and Still another object of my invention is to provide deck of a portable runway with small cutaway portions adjacent each corner and adjacent the midpoint on each side so as to allow two-legged sections of runway tojbe joined, one to another, either end to end or at right angles.
These and other objects and advantages of invert: tion will become apparent during a cons1derat1on of following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Fig. l is a perspective view of my portable scaffold defining a runway with certain of the sections connected end to end and with other sections connected at right angles, two workmen being shown upon the runway, one
dumping a buggy of concrete and one removing one of the sections of runway;
Fig. 2 is a perspective view, partially broken away, showing a single typical section of the scaffold;
Fig. 3 is a detail view, also partially broken away, showing one of the legs which support a section, this particular leg having an extension thereon to increase the height of the runway;
Fig. 4 is a side view showing a large number of the scaffold sections with the support feet removed and the sections nested to illustrate the ease of handling and storage which results;
Fig. 5 is a detail view, taken substantially on the line 55 of Fig. 1, showing the joinder of a hook or to an aperture when the sections are arranged end to end; and
Fig. 6 is another detail view, taken substantially on the line 6-6 of Fig. 1, showing the joinder of a hook to one of the hollow pieces of pipe which defines a side member, this joinder being utilized when a section is added at right angles to another section.
Each of the many sections of scaffolding defining a runway which is illustrated in the drawings is identical in order to provide a modular length and in order to allow a standard fabrication procedure. To this end, each includes a pair of parallel end members 7 and a pair of parallel side members 8. These are welded or otherwise joined end to end to form a rigid structural framework of rectangular outline. As can be seen in Fig. 2. both the side and end members are hollow pieces of pipe. In addition, the framework is reinforced with additional parallel longitudinal stringers 9 which also are hollow pieces of pipe. Across each of the four inner corners of the rectangular framework, I weld or otherwise fix a triangular fillet plate 10 so as to provide additional reinforcement and so as to provide a means for attaching a deck as hereinafter will be described. In sum total. this provides a structural framework which is both light in Weight and of superior structural strength so as safely to support the heavy load imposed by a loaded buggy of concrete and so as to withstand the abuse incident to transportation and use in construction work.
In form, each section of scaffolding is a two legged truss. To this end. I prefer to weld a pendent hollow tubular leg 11 to the corners at but one end of the framework. Each of these legs carries a pipe coupling structure which I prefer to form as a threaded section 12 adjacent the lower end thereof for a purpose now to be described. Thus, in coniunction with each leg. I provide a hollow frusto-conic skirt 13 having a wide annular base as best shown in Fig. 3. This skirt defines a wide. sturdy support for each of the legs. Further. the skirt detachably is secured to the corresponding leg in order to allow quick removal of the foot when the length of the leg is to be varied or when a plurality of the sections are to be nested or moved about as shown in 4. To this end. each skirt bounds a circular axial opening having an upper diameter which slidingly fits about the leg and a threaded lower diameter 14 which is mated to the aforementioned threaded section 12 of the leg. In Fig. 3, that portion of the leg 11 which is welded directly to the framework has been extended by adding a lower section of pipe 21. and by joining the parts 11 and 21 with a threaded collar 15. In this case, of course, the conic foot 13 is threaded and slidingly is fitted over the bottom of the lower pipe section 21. In this manner, I provide for each runway section a sturdy yet a light weight support which quickly can be varied in height.
. Referring more particularly to Figs. 2, 5, and 6, I have illustrated a mated keeper structure which joins the sec-- tions of scaffolding defining a runway either end to end or at right angles. To this end, a hook member 16 is welded or otherwise secured across the top end of two of the pipes so as to protrude longitudinally from the end of the framework opposite to the end which carries the legs 11. Each of these hooks carries a downturned end portion 17 and, in cooperation therewith, vertical apertures 18 pierce the side members 8 which each overlies a leg 11. When two of the sections of runway are to be joined end to end, the hooks on one section merely are inserted through the apertures 18 in an adjoining section. Through an appropriate spacing of the structural elements, this causes the sections to come into close, face to face abut ment so a buggy can traverse the runway smoothly Without employing ramps or the like over the joints between the sections.
Referring to Fig. 6, it is another impotrant feature that each hook 16 is provided with a longitudinal clearance indicated by the letter C and the arrow. This clearance is intermediate the downturned end portion 17 and the body of the structural framework. In accordance with one object of my invention, the clearance C is at least as great as the diameter of one of the members 7, 8. This clearance allows an arrangement of the runway sections at right angles to one another as hereinafter Will be described. Optionally, it also allows a different type of end to end joinder of the sections where the ends of the hook are moved inboard slightly so as to overlie the periphery of the next adjacent end member 7 rather than to fit Within the apertures 18. This may be preferred, for example, where it is feared that the apertures 18 inadvertently may fill with concrete.
In decking over each scaffolding section defining a runway, I have provided a smooth fiat surface to which concrete will not adhere with the tenacity exhibited in the rough timbers of the conventional runway. To this end, the deck member itself includes a fiat rectangular sheet of plywood 19 which fits upon the upper face of the rectangular framework. This plywood deck is secured at each corner to a corresponding one of the triangular fillet plates 10 by a bolt 20. This bolt traverses an appropriate aperture 22 in the fillet plate, which arrangement is best shown in Fig. 2. As is conventional, a nut can be employed beneath the fillet plate to secure the bolt and deck in place. This holds the deck firmly in place yet allows the deck to be removed should replacement become necessary over the years.
In detail, each deck member 19 is provided with a small cutaway portion 23 adjacent the corner so as to accommodate the previously described hook and aperture structure 16, 18. In addition, the mid-point at each side of the deck is cut away, as at 24, so as to accommodate the hook of an adjoining section when two of these sections are fitted together at right angles as shown in Fig. 6. The deck thus is arranged to accommodate either an end to end or a right angle disposition of the sections.
In use, a plurality of sections of scaffolding defining a runway are laid up end to end and with branch runways at right angles as shown in Fig. 1, the particular pattern being dependent upon the requirements of the particular job. Since each of the sections carries but two legs, the first section must be supported at one end upon the forms, a sawhorse, or other appropriate structure. Thereinafter, sections are added end to end by fitting the hooks 16, 17 to the apertures 18. Branch runways are added at right angles by allowing the hooks to overlie the side members 8 so as to rest within the cutaway portions 24 of adjoining sections. That is to say, one hook will rest within a middle cutaway portion 24 on a first section whereas the other hook will rest in a corresponding cutaway portion of a second abutting section as shown in Figs. 1 and 6. This particular joinder is accommodated by virtue of the clearance C which is shown in Fig. 6 whereby the hook can overlie a pipe periphery with the downturned portion in abutment.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the construction trades, the runway is assembled on the job with the legs 11 intermediate the steel reinforcing bars and fixtures and with the feet 13 resting upon the ground or underlying forms. After assembly, the workmen wheel their loaded buggies along the runway and dump the wet concrete from the ends of both the main and the branch runways. As each section of the slab is poured, one of the end sections is removed to make room for the next succeeding pour. In this way, the job progresses back toward the first section of runway which was laid up. The removal is illustrated in Fig. 1 where a workman is shown carrying a section away so as to allow the pouring to proceed from the end of the next inboard section. This removal is accommodated, with the instant invention, by the light weight tubular construction and plywood decking. Thus, each section is sufficiently light in weight that a single workman can lift and carry it about. As is apparent, the workman often can remove the hooks from the apertures and lift the section by himself. In certain instances, however, the legs and skirts may be more or less interwoven through the maize of reinforcing steel. In this instance, one of the workers distributing, finishing or vibrating the concrete will help lift the feet 13 clear of the steel. The worker on the runway then can lift the section up on to his back and carry it away either to a point of storage or to a point of further use. Similarly, it will be evident that a single workman can add a section where additional branches must be built out. To this end, theassembly will be effected by fitting the hooks to the eyes and allowing the far end of the section to drop into place. This provides a flexibility allowing the contractor to complete a big job with a minimum number of sections and thus is saving of capital expenditure money. Yet further, where additional height is required or where the of each section can be varied and the runway can be built up either end to end or at right angles as required. In total, this allows the runway to be fabricated in modular lengths at a minimal cost having practical appeal to contractors engaged in concrete construction.
I claim:
1. In a portable scaffold comprising plural sections, each section having a mass capable of being lifted and carried by a single workman, said sections being detachably joined together to define an elongated runway, each section comprising a flat rectangular frame element composed of pairs of opposed side and end members, leg members fixed to one face of said frame element, at one end only of each section, decking secured to the other face of said frame element, and horizontal latch-fingers secured to and extending laterally over and beyond the frame end not carrying leg members and having a depending end portion.
2. Claim 1 modified in that the frame element at at least one side and at the end unsupported by legs is provided with a latch-finger engaging portion and the latch-fingers have a reach and clearance to overlie and grip a latch-finger engaging portion on an adjacent section.
3. Claim 1 modified in that said latch fingers lie generally in the plane of the decking, which latter is cut away to accommodate said latch fingers.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 911,195 Baker Feb. 2, 1909 1,900,867 Olds Mar. 7, 1933 2,294,550 Greulich Sept. 1, 1942 2,306,311 Holland Dec. 22, 1942 2,446,372 Jones et a1. Aug. 3, 1948 2,596,663 Duifey May 13, 1952 2,618,124 Holsten Nov. 14, 1952 2.681. 1 N w u 5
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US503168A US2851311A (en) | 1955-04-22 | 1955-04-22 | Portable scaffold |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US503168A US2851311A (en) | 1955-04-22 | 1955-04-22 | Portable scaffold |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US2851311A true US2851311A (en) | 1958-09-09 |
Family
ID=24000987
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US503168A Expired - Lifetime US2851311A (en) | 1955-04-22 | 1955-04-22 | Portable scaffold |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US2851311A (en) |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2969720A (en) * | 1957-07-09 | 1961-01-31 | Troy T Burnahm | Pouring bridge for concrete work |
US2990876A (en) * | 1960-03-16 | 1961-07-04 | Brook John Burbige | Chair |
US3025934A (en) * | 1958-01-30 | 1962-03-20 | Joseph W Spiselman | Sectional flooring |
US3096623A (en) * | 1960-11-09 | 1963-07-09 | Ray H Laird | Small boat dock |
US3199470A (en) * | 1963-08-16 | 1965-08-10 | Harter Corp | Drop-in table for modular furniture |
US3250345A (en) * | 1963-07-04 | 1966-05-10 | Beteiligungs & Patentverw Gmbh | Scaffold |
US3289614A (en) * | 1965-06-21 | 1966-12-06 | Frazier Donald | Multi-deck table |
US3703870A (en) * | 1971-03-10 | 1972-11-28 | Us Air Force | Coupler-cargo pallet/container |
US4008506A (en) * | 1975-07-30 | 1977-02-22 | Smith Stuart D | Portable docks and bridges |
US4175889A (en) * | 1978-06-12 | 1979-11-27 | JBC Enterprises, Inc. | Subfloor for offshore production platform |
US4330151A (en) * | 1980-05-09 | 1982-05-18 | Healey Robert W | Multi-purpose adjustable table and bench device |
US4635913A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1987-01-13 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
US4718653A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1988-01-12 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
WO1988008908A1 (en) * | 1987-05-07 | 1988-11-17 | Garox Corporation | Modular scaffolding platform and truss frame components therefor |
US4802553A (en) * | 1987-06-16 | 1989-02-07 | Alumax, Inc. | Aluminum scaffold plank |
US4807317A (en) * | 1987-06-24 | 1989-02-28 | Easter Seal Society Of Michigan, Inc. | Modular ramp |
US4811937A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1989-03-14 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
US4922835A (en) * | 1989-02-17 | 1990-05-08 | Trychest Pty., Limited | Multi-part table |
US5203428A (en) * | 1987-05-07 | 1993-04-20 | Garox Corporation | Modular scaffolding platform and truss frame components therefor |
US5249397A (en) * | 1992-01-16 | 1993-10-05 | Monaco Gary J | Knockdown roof platform for use on an inclined roof |
US5343978A (en) * | 1993-04-23 | 1994-09-06 | New York State Electric & Gas Corporation | Telescoping scaffolding for maintenance and repair of multi-story, power-generating boiler systems |
US5746288A (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 1998-05-05 | O'neal; Diana | Walk board |
US5911288A (en) * | 1996-11-04 | 1999-06-15 | Z.A.F. Contractors, Inc. | Bridge painting platform |
US6017005A (en) * | 1994-07-05 | 2000-01-25 | Portable Pipe Hangers, Inc. | Pipe hanging and rooftop load supporting system |
US6568419B1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2003-05-27 | Promethean Medical Technologies, Inc. | Disposable fluid control island |
US20040189065A1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | Wenger Corporation | Audience seating system |
US20050051061A1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-10 | Paul Smith | Modular terrain assembly |
US20050133092A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2005-06-23 | Robinson Allan R. | Fluid control island |
US20080251323A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2008-10-16 | Peri Gmbh | Industrial Scaffolding |
US20100224447A1 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2010-09-09 | Athos Construction Products, Inc. | Integrated plank and toeboard system |
US20140318895A1 (en) * | 2013-04-29 | 2014-10-30 | John Birk | Adjustable length scaffolding and method therefor |
US20150096837A1 (en) * | 2013-10-07 | 2015-04-09 | Peter Aguilar | Method and apparatus for preservation of a crime scene |
USD735435S1 (en) | 2013-12-01 | 2015-07-28 | Nicholas A. Guido, III | Wet area bridge |
US9442245B2 (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2016-09-13 | Norman Napaul Pepin | Light scaffold electric arc sound effect |
US10145128B2 (en) * | 2016-12-16 | 2018-12-04 | Werner Co. | Interlocking work platform system and method |
US20190040993A1 (en) * | 2017-08-07 | 2019-02-07 | Bozikis Vaios | Modular trussed suspended platform |
US10506870B2 (en) * | 2016-02-26 | 2019-12-17 | Bcg Design Group Limited | Table and table connector system |
US10550585B1 (en) * | 2018-10-23 | 2020-02-04 | Gold Water International Inc. | Assemblable platform made of fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) |
US11375805B2 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2022-07-05 | Peter Hurley | Multi-purpose portable platform stage |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US911195A (en) * | 1908-06-03 | 1909-02-02 | George N Baker | Metal frame. |
US1900867A (en) * | 1927-10-26 | 1933-03-07 | Olds Marshall | Container and method and means for handling cargo by such containers |
US2294550A (en) * | 1940-09-24 | 1942-09-01 | Carnegie Illionis Steel Corp | Portable deck |
US2306311A (en) * | 1941-04-12 | 1942-12-22 | John G Holland | Bridge construction |
US2446372A (en) * | 1944-10-10 | 1948-08-03 | Scaffolding Great Britain Ltd | Metal tubular scaffolding |
US2596663A (en) * | 1949-11-10 | 1952-05-13 | Duffy Alice | Collapsible interlocking extensible table |
US2618124A (en) * | 1948-02-18 | 1952-11-18 | Clarence T Holsten | Portable landing dock |
US2687617A (en) * | 1952-04-14 | 1954-08-31 | Foster S Newell | Demountable pier structure |
-
1955
- 1955-04-22 US US503168A patent/US2851311A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US911195A (en) * | 1908-06-03 | 1909-02-02 | George N Baker | Metal frame. |
US1900867A (en) * | 1927-10-26 | 1933-03-07 | Olds Marshall | Container and method and means for handling cargo by such containers |
US2294550A (en) * | 1940-09-24 | 1942-09-01 | Carnegie Illionis Steel Corp | Portable deck |
US2306311A (en) * | 1941-04-12 | 1942-12-22 | John G Holland | Bridge construction |
US2446372A (en) * | 1944-10-10 | 1948-08-03 | Scaffolding Great Britain Ltd | Metal tubular scaffolding |
US2618124A (en) * | 1948-02-18 | 1952-11-18 | Clarence T Holsten | Portable landing dock |
US2596663A (en) * | 1949-11-10 | 1952-05-13 | Duffy Alice | Collapsible interlocking extensible table |
US2687617A (en) * | 1952-04-14 | 1954-08-31 | Foster S Newell | Demountable pier structure |
Cited By (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2969720A (en) * | 1957-07-09 | 1961-01-31 | Troy T Burnahm | Pouring bridge for concrete work |
US3025934A (en) * | 1958-01-30 | 1962-03-20 | Joseph W Spiselman | Sectional flooring |
US2990876A (en) * | 1960-03-16 | 1961-07-04 | Brook John Burbige | Chair |
US3096623A (en) * | 1960-11-09 | 1963-07-09 | Ray H Laird | Small boat dock |
US3250345A (en) * | 1963-07-04 | 1966-05-10 | Beteiligungs & Patentverw Gmbh | Scaffold |
US3199470A (en) * | 1963-08-16 | 1965-08-10 | Harter Corp | Drop-in table for modular furniture |
US3289614A (en) * | 1965-06-21 | 1966-12-06 | Frazier Donald | Multi-deck table |
US3703870A (en) * | 1971-03-10 | 1972-11-28 | Us Air Force | Coupler-cargo pallet/container |
US4008506A (en) * | 1975-07-30 | 1977-02-22 | Smith Stuart D | Portable docks and bridges |
US4175889A (en) * | 1978-06-12 | 1979-11-27 | JBC Enterprises, Inc. | Subfloor for offshore production platform |
US4330151A (en) * | 1980-05-09 | 1982-05-18 | Healey Robert W | Multi-purpose adjustable table and bench device |
US4718653A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1988-01-12 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
US4811937A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1989-03-14 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
US4635913A (en) * | 1985-10-29 | 1987-01-13 | Rothman Michael L | Portable surgical drainage platform |
WO1988008908A1 (en) * | 1987-05-07 | 1988-11-17 | Garox Corporation | Modular scaffolding platform and truss frame components therefor |
AU620332B2 (en) * | 1987-05-07 | 1992-02-20 | Beeche Systems Corp. | Modular scaffolding platform and truss frame components therefor |
US5203428A (en) * | 1987-05-07 | 1993-04-20 | Garox Corporation | Modular scaffolding platform and truss frame components therefor |
US4802553A (en) * | 1987-06-16 | 1989-02-07 | Alumax, Inc. | Aluminum scaffold plank |
US4807317A (en) * | 1987-06-24 | 1989-02-28 | Easter Seal Society Of Michigan, Inc. | Modular ramp |
US4922835A (en) * | 1989-02-17 | 1990-05-08 | Trychest Pty., Limited | Multi-part table |
US5249397A (en) * | 1992-01-16 | 1993-10-05 | Monaco Gary J | Knockdown roof platform for use on an inclined roof |
US5343978A (en) * | 1993-04-23 | 1994-09-06 | New York State Electric & Gas Corporation | Telescoping scaffolding for maintenance and repair of multi-story, power-generating boiler systems |
US6017005A (en) * | 1994-07-05 | 2000-01-25 | Portable Pipe Hangers, Inc. | Pipe hanging and rooftop load supporting system |
US5746288A (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 1998-05-05 | O'neal; Diana | Walk board |
US5911288A (en) * | 1996-11-04 | 1999-06-15 | Z.A.F. Contractors, Inc. | Bridge painting platform |
US7086409B2 (en) | 1998-02-09 | 2006-08-08 | Promethean Medical Technologies, Inc. | Fluid control island |
US6568419B1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2003-05-27 | Promethean Medical Technologies, Inc. | Disposable fluid control island |
US20050133092A1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2005-06-23 | Robinson Allan R. | Fluid control island |
US7107734B2 (en) | 2000-10-19 | 2006-09-19 | Wenger Corporation | Audience seating system |
US6922947B2 (en) | 2000-10-19 | 2005-08-02 | Wenger Corporation | Audience seating system |
US20050252095A1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2005-11-17 | Wenger Corporation | Audience seating system |
US20040189065A1 (en) * | 2000-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | Wenger Corporation | Audience seating system |
US7107913B2 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2006-09-19 | Paul Smith | Modular terrain assembly |
US20050051061A1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-10 | Paul Smith | Modular terrain assembly |
US20080251323A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2008-10-16 | Peri Gmbh | Industrial Scaffolding |
US9316007B2 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2016-04-19 | Peri Gmbh | Industrial scaffolding |
US20100224447A1 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2010-09-09 | Athos Construction Products, Inc. | Integrated plank and toeboard system |
US9051746B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2015-06-09 | Athos Construction Products Inc. | Integrated plank and toeboard system |
US20140318895A1 (en) * | 2013-04-29 | 2014-10-30 | John Birk | Adjustable length scaffolding and method therefor |
US20150096837A1 (en) * | 2013-10-07 | 2015-04-09 | Peter Aguilar | Method and apparatus for preservation of a crime scene |
USD735435S1 (en) | 2013-12-01 | 2015-07-28 | Nicholas A. Guido, III | Wet area bridge |
US9442245B2 (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2016-09-13 | Norman Napaul Pepin | Light scaffold electric arc sound effect |
US10506870B2 (en) * | 2016-02-26 | 2019-12-17 | Bcg Design Group Limited | Table and table connector system |
US10145128B2 (en) * | 2016-12-16 | 2018-12-04 | Werner Co. | Interlocking work platform system and method |
US11473318B2 (en) * | 2016-12-16 | 2022-10-18 | Werner Co. | Interlocking work platform system and method |
US20190040993A1 (en) * | 2017-08-07 | 2019-02-07 | Bozikis Vaios | Modular trussed suspended platform |
US11506331B2 (en) * | 2017-08-07 | 2022-11-22 | Bozikis Vaios | Modular trussed suspended platform |
US11375805B2 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2022-07-05 | Peter Hurley | Multi-purpose portable platform stage |
US20220287451A1 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2022-09-15 | Peter Hurley | Multi-purpose portable platform stage |
US10550585B1 (en) * | 2018-10-23 | 2020-02-04 | Gold Water International Inc. | Assemblable platform made of fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US2851311A (en) | Portable scaffold | |
US2571337A (en) | Boat dock and the like | |
US3082843A (en) | Demountable scaffolding for side mounting on columns | |
US2671697A (en) | Portable shoring | |
US3684058A (en) | Scaffold | |
US4382488A (en) | Pump jack poles | |
US4227672A (en) | Beam form and shoring structure | |
US4585204A (en) | Concrete forming system | |
MX2008014431A (en) | Stackable concrete forming apparatus components. | |
US20030183453A1 (en) | Interlocking scaffold plank | |
US4450120A (en) | Concrete form and method of assembling and dismantling the same | |
US7014011B1 (en) | Scaffolding lift system | |
US4693449A (en) | Beam form and slab form adjustment structure | |
US3234620A (en) | Hyperbolic paraboloid roof construction | |
US4098045A (en) | Wall forming construction unit | |
EP0117643A2 (en) | Dismountable framework | |
US5110083A (en) | Ross staging bracket | |
JPS6026761A (en) | Freely extensible walking passage | |
US3306397A (en) | Sectional platform or support for use with scaffolding | |
US4089389A (en) | Scaffold | |
JP3841499B2 (en) | Slope working scaffold and method of constructing slope working scaffold | |
US3471117A (en) | Concrete forming apparatus | |
US20060060422A1 (en) | Scaffolding | |
US4175889A (en) | Subfloor for offshore production platform | |
US3614049A (en) | Combined building walls panels and associated form structure |