US20150208750A1

US20150208750A1 - Body impact bracing apparatus

Info

Publication number: US20150208750A1
Application number: US14/679,001
Authority: US
Inventors: Chester Lewis White
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2013-04-30
Filing date: 2015-04-05
Publication date: 2015-07-30
Also published as: CA2910699A1; WO2014179507A1

Abstract

A body impact bracing apparatus is introduced for hockey, American football, rugby, hazardous motor-cycle/vehicle racecourse, big-truck arena sports, and even rodeo bull riding, whereby protective helmets are expected to provide adequate safeguards against high-impact injuries. The default vulnerability in such impacts is the lack of securitization of one's neck, regarding tandem movements between head and torso. New technology now protects against these injuries to both by rendering the helmet effectively immobile with respect to head and torso at split-second instance of impact either to protective helmet, shoulder harness, or to the torso. It presumes optimal protections based upon safeguarding the segmented integrity of the CNS: head, neck, and torso/spinal cord. Using electronics and laws of motion: inertia and counterpoise body weight, this technology absorbs impacting forces against the body, “distributing” them, and so attenuating and softening their overall effect. It's a three-segment protective apparatus for a three-segment central nervous system.

Description

This is a Continuation of International Application PCT/US2014/036261 with international Filing Date: 30 Apr. 2014, [Published WO 2014/179507 Date: 6 Nov. 2014] now abandoned, further claiming priority benefit to Provisional Application 61/817,484, Filed 30 Apr. 2013

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention
The invention presented herein relates generally to requirements for a vest/torso bracing framework component as protective gear against bodily injury which would be needed in the fields of often hazardous competitive events. More specifically, it is relevant to a component which affords a wearer relative optimal protections against injurious impacts to the head, relevant to neck vulnerabilities, and the torso thus inhibiting and delimiting these often traumatic impacts in the fields of both athletic tackle sports such as hockey, rugby, lacrosse, American football, etc., in addition to motor vehicle racing competitions, bicycle riding, and even rodeo bull riding.
2. Description of Related Prior Art
Due to its unique design, this invention has no known competing prior art that could be found during preliminary national search, and international search by IPEA since no prior art for protective helmets specifies a neck securitization device for means of unitary system bracing. As inferior and obsolete protective equipment is now being acknowledged, this novel idea presents a radical change from the traditional practice of “protection by padding.” It is a unique apparatus which would effectively offset the numerous incidences of field injuries and subsequent reports of failure of existing equipment to protect players against injury.

SUMMARY

A unique design as body protective gear is herein provided. American football's current association with media reports of repeated impact trauma, leading to concussions and long-term health issues, now calls the sport into question. This new apparatus, in part, addresses this dilemma with a safe solution for the players as well as a welcome amenity for the sport itself. The essential benefit of such apparatus may be thought of as an “exo-skeletal firewall” structure designed to interrupt and immobilize any movement of the torso and neck, (head) from forward & backward, twisting, side-to-side, and bending motions upon onset of an exterior impact to the protective helmet, collar or to the vest/torso bracing framework component of the structure. The concern is not with the flexible movement of the torso, per se, but with the split-second capability of the frame to prevent a twisting or bending movement between the waist and shoulders, and the neck, (by a locking motion of helmet) with respect to an “anchoring capacity” of the shoulders and waist, and further, protection of the head within the helmet.
The impact bracing of the present invention overcomes the problems associated with prior art proposing to accomplish bodily impact protection while in hazardous environments of tackle and impact sports and, as well, (with design modifications) in those of competitive vehicular motor racing competitions and, still further, in such environments as industrial new product testing. The protective capability of this component product is for mechanical and electronic coordinated bracing, in addition to the dynamic physical laws of inertia, as detailed further below in the Description and Operation of Alternative Embodiments section.

OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES

Other than the benefits of the apparatus described above, additional objects and advantages are to provide a body impact bracing apparatus:

- a. which, upon impact, immediately braces itself, (and so the wearer) by use of an electronic response mechanism utilizing at least electronic, mechanical, magnetic, and electromagnetic facilities;
- b. whose efficiency in protecting the head, neck, and torso of its wearer, in the sport of football and hockey, (in addition to rugby and lacrosse) for instance, will safeguard health and vitality; but moreover in the long run, it will actually save lives;
- c. which can protect a wearer's head from the devastating injuries that can incapacitate the wearer with neurological maladies due to impact trauma to the head, in particular, but also to the neck and torso as relevant to the spinal cord and the protective central nervous system (CNS) whose disruption has been overlooked as a factor in the ongoing neurological problems of those who sustain head impact injuries in the design of impact protective equipment in sports activities such as hockey, rugby, American football, rodeo bull riding, motor vehicle riding, and other activities such as even in military usage;
- d. which features an extraordinary helmet protective mechanism, protecting a wearer's head against opposing-player impact from whatever angle of approach and of whatever intensity of force; moreover, upon a wearer's hitting the ground, the same electronic reaction occurs: As a unique electronic process, the locking mechanism would immediately brace the neck area, (i.e. the tandem anchoring of helmet to collar/shoulder bracing component and vest/torso bracing framework component) thus the head and torso of the wearer, delimiting usual neck injuries and those connected with TBI since, in fact, the spinal cord, a protective encasement of a vital segment (the cervix) of the central nervous system (CNS) with regard to concussions, is still involved in such instances as it extends from the brain;
- e. whose utilization will offset fatigue since repetitive impacts to the head and body would be circumvented with the result of maintaining a higher level of stamina and energy;
- f. whose helmet component design provides a head-to-helmet securing component, harnessing and position sensing device. This facility allows for the helmet to be “harnessed” to the head but without the presently excessive helmet padding; there will be distance between the interior cushioning surface of the helmet and the head of the wearer. This provides “leeway-of-movement” sufficient enough for an onset of an “e-brace” event arising from an exterior impact. Design of the harnessing and position sensing device is such that detected movement, not made by wearer, would cause a position sensing device mechanism to prompt a locking signal of the entire bracing system;
- g. that is designed for heavy duty twists, turns, stretching, bending, and forceful impacts. It is sufficiently durable so as to be capable of being subjected to the most rigorous demands on any of the fields of sports such as hockey, American football, rugby (modified gear) and other sports and vehicular cycle racing competitions. The many hits and tackles expected in such sports, with their forceful impact effects, are expected as normal and, so, not capable of damaging this protective gear;
- h. which has a three-tier corresponding circuit mechanism for bracing: 1. The helmet, once struck externally, will cause the system to brace itself, neck/head and torso, with both the collar/shoulder and waist serving as substantial anchoring structures against any movement consequent to an impact apparatus 2. The torso, (vest framework area) upon sustaining an impact, will immediately brace itself as well as relay an impact signal to the helmet-neck area for bracing; 3. The neck, not subject to “direct” hits, is designed to “brace by default” of impact to either the helmet segment or to the vest/torso bracing framework component since they are both functionally contiguous with the collar/shoulder bracing component bracing component as a corresponding three-component operation;
- i. whose protection of head, neck, and torso/spinal cord from exterior impact is initiated by the speed of electronic circuits and mechanical processes;
- j. whose electrical circuiting operations are powered by an employment of at least dry cell batteries;
- k. whose operation for immobilization of the protection helmet entails mechanical, coordinated, and corresponding mechanisms which include a means for, at least, electronic, electromagnetic, and line-cord mechanisms to effectuate cessations of movements of the protective helmet and/or the vest/torso bracing framework component at the onset-of-impact bracing signals as initiated from protective helmet and/or vest/torso bracing framework component impacts. The component's tubular bracing members are predisposed for a catchment sequence for means of coordinated and unified clenching at their connecting end-points, their clench-switch devices, rather than bending inward at such points; the tubular bracing members, in this manner, may physically provide a barrier against injury to the torso from the exterior impacts to the vest/torso bracing framework component;
- l. whose efficiency involves delimiting of torsion, turning, stretching, and bending movements of the body and neck, (and movement of head) of the wearer at onset of a discrete-point impact event; such event causes the depression of, at least, a simple, momentary button switch, such as a leaf switch, to activate electronic circuits to impede torsion, turning, and bending motions of neck, torso, and head movement of the wearer;
- m. which may include extension sleeves for the legs, (thighs). These may provide additional anchoring support for both waist, (top-down thrust) and shoulders, (medial torque) against possible turning of the apparatus thus a more effective deterrent against both twisting movement & downward/head-on impact. Also, there may be structured into this novel art a “mini-HVAC” device for those times, when the environmental temperature requires, conductive arm-to-glove sleeves;
- n. whose collar/shoulder bracing component bracing component and vest/torso bracing framework component structures are sufficiently predisposed to momentarily impede movements of torso and neck (thus the head) upon impact from any direction: right angle, lateral, diagonal, head on, frontal, dorsal, head-on shoulder, head-on crown of helmet, side, rear of helmet, etc. for about 0.5 sec., or as soon as electronic, hydraulic, pneumatic, or mechanical bracing onset-of-impact bracing signal, (closed switch(es)) is released;
- o. whose applications can be effectively beneficial, (as modified/head, neck, shoulder) in the arenas, (in addition to that of American football and hockey) race car competitions, motorcycle and speedboat racing, demolition derby competitions, bicycle riding and various other hazardous occupations and competitive events requiring body protection, particularly to for the head;
- p. which can lessen the brutality of professional boxing; that is, this new product, (as modified accordingly) allows for a possible revolutionizing of the sports of boxing, hockey, military pugilist training, etc., by making such sport a high-tech non-brutal, bloodless, and non-injurious, event. Points can be scored by a digital monitoring system whereby hits, or punches, (impacts) to head and torso, would register on a monitor screen to be graphically assessed by computer and weighed by judges;
- q. which can be adaptable sufficiently enough to utilize a monitoring system for digital representations of impacts to head and/or torso which would register on a monitoring screen or other data storage/retrieval mechanism which would be assessed by specialists for determining the effectiveness of the and the overall adverse or beneficial physiological reactive experiences of the wearer of the apparatus;
- r. whose overall protections cover not only the head but also the neck and torso/spinal cord. Such extended protection from injurious impacts signifies the superior value of this new technology in that its design presumes that vital cerebrospinal fluid, (CSF) flows among the three segments, head, neck and torso, each of which harbors some segment of the CNS, central nervous system. This vital resource has been overlooked in the design of the present conventional sports protective gear;
- s. whose “force of impact deflection” is such that it does not matter whether the impact is head-on or to the torso; the “mass weight” of the body, as secured to the device, would take the “distributed force” of the jolt, not the wearer's body itself thus circumventing any injury; that is, tandem anchoring of protective helmet, spanning the neck, to the shoulder to the vest/torso bracing framework component equals lateral inertial resistance/deflection against shock of an exterior impact as divided by the “weight” of the wearer;
- t. whose use protects not only hockey and American football players from impact injuries, but also those who are non-professional, high school, college football, junior league football, etc. who are preparing for careers in these sports thus allowing new cycles of players who have not been earlier introduced to the hazards to debilitating injuries at younger ages to be ready, willing, and prepared for these sports yet impervious to the now typical injuries;
- u. which is light in weight, ergonomic, contoured to the movement dynamics of the human body, and easy to use;
- v. whose helmet will have an interior helmet-to-head supportive feature, a harnessing and position sensing device, which allows free movement of helmet precisely coordinating with wearer's head movement, further providing that any exterior movements, or impacts, (a contrasting movement to the harnessing and position sensing device would cause a bracing, locking, event for the entire device, vest/torso bracing framework component and collar/shoulder bracing component bracing component;
- w. that is designed for heavy duty twists, turns, stretching, bending, and forceful impacts, being sufficiently durable so as to be capable of being subjected to the most rigorous demands on any of the fields of sports such as football, hockey, and la crosse; the many hits and tackles expected in such sports, with their forceful impact effects, are expected as normal and thus not capable of damaging this protective gear;
- x. whose “helmet-to-vest” tandem anchoring dynamics for deflection of external adverse field impacts is due to split-second locking of movements of both the protective helmet [ie. collar/shoulder bracing component] and the vest/torso bracing framework component;
- y. whose head-to-waist, (head, neck, and torso) protection provides non-conventional but superior safety for a wearer such as a football player as opposed to conventional helmets whose cushioning materials may actually contribute to head injury due to its hardened compression at moment of high intensity exterior impact. With this new product, cushioning and padding, alone, will cease to be considered as adequate protection for the head though it has its place (as modified) in conjunction with this novel apparatus being herein introduced;
- z. whose introduction is designed to replace the conventional tackle protective equipment used primarily in sports activities such as hockey and American football;
- aa. whose vest/torso bracing framework component is donned from its side; whose collar/shoulder bracing component bracing component is donned by attaching to the vest/torso bracing framework component from above it; and helmet segment is donned by attaching its lower edge to neck stabilizing and spanning device for a helmet at upper attachment of the collar/shoulder bracing component;
- bb. whose materials used in the manufacture of the various segments of the, as well as its overall resiliency, will prove to be efficient as a safety for hockey, American football, motor-cycle/vehicle racecourse-arena events; additionally, a modified design is appropriate for rugby, riders of the conventional bicycle, sky diving, and even rodeo bull riders;
- cc. whose “helmet-to-vest/torso” anchoring dynamics for deflection of external adverse field impacts is due to split-second locking of movement of the helmet; such novel dynamics address and resolve the ongoing tackle-sports impacts dilemma involving neurological health liabilities for the players as well as liabilities for the various sports themselves;
- dd. whose framework structure is sufficiently predisposed to momentarily impede all movements of torso, neck, (thus the head) upon impact from any direction: right angle, lateral, diagonal, head on, frontal, dorsal, head-on shoulder, head-on crown of helmet, side, rear of helmet, etc. for about 0.5 sec., or as soon as electronic, hydraulic, or mechanical bracing onset signal, (closed switch(es)) is released consequent to relief from the impacting impingement;
- ee. whose bracing initiation switches are strategically located in the helmet, about the shoulders, the torso vest framework front, the torso vest framework back, and the torso vest framework sides. Essentially they are designed into the framework and corresponding with deferent said clench-switch devices;
- ff. whose design for bodily protection for each player is uniquely contoured to the body of the wearer. Both the materials used in the manufacture of the various segments of the apparatus, as well as its overall resiliency, will prove to be a constant reminder that, at least, American football, hockey, rugby, and lacrosse, for instance, can be played safely.

DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 and 2 (Page 1) show two frontal perspective views of representational models of the relationships between a sports protective helmet and a wearer's head, further that one example utilizes the novel invention herein; the other does not;

FIG. 3 (Page 2) illustrates a frontal representational model of sports protective helmet utilizing the novel invention herein and the benefit it would afford a wearer;

FIG. 4A (Page 2) is an anterior perspective of the collar/shoulder bracing component;

FIG. 4B (Page 2) is a posterior perspective view of the collar/shoulder bracing component;

FIG. 5A (Page 3) illustrates a frontal/exterior view of the neck stabilizing and spanning device; it is an alternative depiction of No. 39 FIG. 4A in its natural setting;

FIG. 5B (Page 3) illustrates a rear/interior view of the neck stabilizing and spanning device; it is an alternative depiction of No. 39′ FIG. 4B in its natural setting;

FIG. 6A-1,2,3, & 4 (Page 3) show frontal exterior views of structural and process sequences for the mechanical operations of the neck stabilizing and spanning device;

FIG. 6B-1,2,3, & 4 (Page 7) are side views of various composed and de-coupled structural parts and elements of one of the units of the neck stabilizing and spanning device, FIGS. 17 and 18;

FIG. 7 (Page 3) is a side view of the switching device unit as how it would appear in the Harnessing and position sensing device, (and again on page 8 in its environment);

FIG. 8 (Page 4) comprises depictions of tubular bracing members that constitute, in part, the vest/torso bracing framework component;

FIG. 9A (Pages 5 & 9) is a top view of the Wire Cord Retraction Module, WCRModule-1;

FIG. 9B (Pages 5 & 10) a top view of Wire Cord Retraction Module, WCRModule-2;

FIG. 10 (Page 5) is a depiction of the posterior vest framework component of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus;

FIG. 11 (Page 5) is a side perspective view of a clench-switch device;

FIG. 12 (Page 6) is a top view of a model representation of both anterior and posterior vest framework components of the apparatus showing only the geometric arrangement of the wires and the centered retraction modules;

FIGS. 13A and 13B (Page 6) are top views of the anterior and posterior model representations, respectively, of the front and rear torso framework segments;

FIG. 14 (Page 6) shows a top view of a model representation of the structural method for the wire/cord retraction scheme of bracing the two segments of the vest/torso bracing framework component of the apparatus;

FIG. 15 (Page 6) is a top linear perspective view of a model representation of two of the triangular quadrants the two segments FIG. 13A and FIG. 13B;

FIG. 17 (Page 7) show top views 114, 118 of an attractive metal and an electromagnet with their respective friction and anchoring/controlling rods 58, and side views of these two attractive metal and electromagnet, in mutually facing aspect;

FIG. 18 (Page 7) illustrates elements of major structures of one of the bracing units of the neck stabilizing and spanning device FIG. 6B-1;

FIGS. 19A, B, C, & D (Page 8) are model representative underside views of a protective helmet indicating various positions of the Lateral Movement/Flex Mechanism 139;

FIG. 20A (Page 9) is a frontal illustration of the apparatus as it would appear on a wearer less the relevant torso bracing jacket which envelopes it;

FIG. 20B (Page 10) is a posterior view of the apparatus as it would appear on a wearer without the torso bracing jacket; a battery control module is also shown;

FIG. 21A and FIG. 21B (Page 9) are frontal views of the undersides of a protective helmet;

FIG. 22 (Page 10) is a frontal view of a battery pack module of the apparatus;

FIG. 23 (Page 11) is a model representational frontal view graphic of the interior rear side of the jacket-like bracing segment that would be worn enclosing the posterior frame segment of the apparatus;

FIG. 24 (Page 11) represents side views of various layers of the torso bracing jacket segment of the apparatus.

FIG. 25 (Page 8) is a frontal view of an illustration of the Harnessing and position sensing device as it would be disposed within a protective helmet and as specified for hazardous events.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Page 1

FIG. 1 reference 10 is the space taken by the padding and cushioning of typical football helmets. For reference 12, see FIG. 2. Ref. 14 shows the neck sustaining serious trauma at instant of exterior impact as head itself is forced against inside wall of protective helmet. The cushioning is condensed by the depression causing the impact to have an equally damaging effect due to hitting a hard material. Ref. 16 Safety Zone of Body Impact Bracing Apparatus (above impact is injurious since it is outside of this Safety Zone, 16). Ref. 18 Sustained Injury against compressed, hardened, padding as would be the case with conventional protective helmets.
FIG. 2-10 is the space taken by the padding and cushioning of typical football helmets. This space around the head is central to the application of the novel technology, Impact Flexi-Brace product herein presented. The total cushioning area 10 is the integral “safety zone” for the wearer's head which is traditionally relied upon by manufacturers of such helmets. A helmet not featuring the novel bracing technology, as seen here in FIG. 1 would sustain injury 18 since 16 is the maximum movement environment for the head at time of any exterior impact from any direction. 12 further shows, (expanded/magnified view) concentric 360 deg. boundary segments around the head, such as 16 itself, for split-second “bracing” points at which the electronic mechanism would cause the helmet, (and the entire protective device—head, neck, & torso) to lock in-place for about a half second. Ref. 12 showing indexes 1-6 are possible “freeze points” for a given impact. Helmet would “e-brace” from movement. Ref. 16 would entail boundary 12 illustration 1-6. This locking event corresponds with a secondary, movement damping, element Lateral Flex Damper Device 26 (interior of Position Sensing Device 28) further illustrated in FIGS. 19B, C, and D. This device 26 facilitates means for attenuating lateral movement of the harnessing and position sensing device due to external impacts against said helmet.
It is to be noted that the neck reference 14 should be compared between those of FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 for effect upon impact, 20 head, 22 helmet 16 an imaginary boundary (safety zone) within which is the containment area referred to in 22. The mechanism for independent movement of head with helmet for the effect of 16 is the clamping device, or harnessing device 24 which buttresses the protective helmet, and other facilities, to the head. Columnar Support/Positioning Component (correlative index FIG. 2 Ref. 26 with Harnessing and position sensing device 26). Exterior of Position Sensing Device 28 beneath which is located the Lateral Flex Mechanism 26 and FIG. 19A Ref. 139 and to which is annexed the sensor switching detection device; see 63 FIG. 7 and FIG. 19A-148. The bracing signal initiates upon off-center movement at apex of 26/underside of 139 FIG. 19A with respect to 28 which is adjacent to it. The reinforcement stabilizing device 30 is graphically representative of FIGS. 5A and 5B which consist of the main structural factor of the invention. FIGS. 2 and 3 are simply the less detailed modeling of a more realistic depiction in FIGS. 4A39 and 4B39′, which correspond with FIGS. 20A-39 and 20B-39′.

Page

2

A Collar/shoulder bracing component is functionally contiguous with the vest/torso bracing framework component for coordinated bracing interval of protective helmet (thus substantially impeding movement of neck and head. In FIG. 3-14 it should be noted that the neck, as indicated, is only slightly bent; this is due to the small degree of movement of the head toward the right consequent to an exterior impact event. Accordingly, this is a scenario showing how the novel product arrests any contact of the wearer's head with the interior surface of a protective helmet upon sustaining an impact. Compare the appearance of the neck here with that of FIG. 1 wherein the head is not protected by the bracing device. The proposed standard protective device for the head is evident in FIG. 2 and its positive performance effect in FIG. 3. The shoulder guard harness 36 features the necessary bracing onset switches (not shown) for the operation of the bracing mechanism.
FIG. 3 Ref. 32 shows maximum movement of head before electronic “e-brace.” It is impacted only against the pliable cushioning/padding of the helmet. It does not go outside the comfort zone; also, there is only a minimal bending of the neck, not in danger of any injury. The impacting element may be from any angle around the helmet; the result will be similar—not proceeding to the extent as shown in previous illustration where the head may reach maximum suppression of the cushioning/padding and thus increased likelihood of severe trauma to the head, in addition to the neck and torso, by association. Shown above, impact angle 32 is the maximum limit, (at any impact point/angle, 360 deg.) to which the player's head can move within area 12 the confines of the soft cushioning sector—area 12 then too, outside of 12 remains still the added layer of condensed cushioning support of segment 10.
The star reference 32 shows light touching against soft cushioning; but there is no injurious impact! Compare the point-of-impact illustration of Page 1 FIG. 10 and this illustration; the profound difference is the stopping power indicated by the electronic bracing event and as demonstrated by the basketball & bowling ball illustrations. 34 Shows off-center sensor switch displacement due to force of impact thus initiating a signal for bracing of entire apparatus, head, (helmet) neck, and torso. Ref. 16 is the imaginary containment boundary within the helmet; it's the maximum degree from central displacement of the head, the 360 Safety Zone barriers at onset of electronic brace.
FIG. 4A is a frontal view of the Collar/shoulder Bracing Component showing the protective mechanism for the neck and head, exclusive of the Vest/Torso Bracing Framework Component. It includes, in part, the Harnessing and Position Sensing Device, not seen here but shown in FIG. 2, 24, 26, 28 together with FIGS. 19A-139, 19B, 19C, and 19D. A signal transmission wire 17 a leads from switching device FIG. 7 along top and back inner surface of protective helmet for signal transmission means leading to Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device FIG. 39, the WCRModule-1 FIG. 9A and to WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B; both of these, FIGS. 9A and 9B, operate as centralized retraction devices for effectively retracting the wire/cords of the front and back frame segment arrays of clench-switch devices, each one of which being means for a bracing interval for momentary cessation of independent structural movement of the tubular bracing members of both anterior and posterior frame segments, together with the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device, of the body impact bracing apparatus. The shoulder guard harness 36 (left and right) will function both as providing a physical impact damper and as a signal transmission initiating device for the operation of the bracing mechanism for the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device and both WCRModule-1 FIG. 9A and WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B, Pg. 5. Clamps 37 & 37′ are featured for tightening the harness FIG. 2-24 of the Harnessing and position sensing device 26. A stability containment band 38 and strapping 40 provide strength and integrity to the Collar/shoulder bracing component. The main component of the apparatus is the Collar/Shoulder Bracing Component, FIG. 4A (front view) and FIG. 4B (rear view) which may be modified for use, exclusive of the vest/torso bracing framework component. Both front and rear views show the essential protective mechanism, the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device, front 39, and rear 39′. For a clearer illustration of how these facilities, see FIG. 5A, FIG. 5B, and FIG. 6A1-4 on Page 3. The spanning device is, further, supported by a Collar Stabilizing Support Foundation 41 front view, and rear view 41′. This foundation provides specific structural support for the friction and anchoring/controlling rods of the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device. The Collar/Shoulder Bracing Component comprises also a clamping device: front 37 FIG. 4A, rear perspective 37′ FIG. 4B. Stability containment band, front perspective 38, and rear 38′, with associated strapping, 40 front, and 40′ rear, are the least means for securitization of the Collar/Shoulder Bracing Component to the upper torso of a user of the component. The co-referenced minimal stabilizing facilities of the Collar/Shoulder Bracing Component, per se, are the stability containment band 38 and securitization straps 40.

Page

3

FIG. 5A is the frontal perspective of the neck stabilizing and spanning device exhibiting the three clenching devices for the neck. Upon bracing event, each unit will effectively lock any movement of the neck, not allowing even the smallest movement of the head in either direction; this is due to the actions of the friction and anchoring/controlling rods and electromagnet clenching devices. In closed-circuit clenching, they become immediately “fixed,” allowing neither up, down, diagonal, right, nor left movements. Wires 17 a lead from the switching device FIG. 7 the Harnessing and position sensing device, Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device, then to the WCRModule-1 FIG. 9A and to WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B which facilitate centralizing channel for signal transmission to the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device, with its electromagnetic clenching elements such as at 50 which are designed to immobilize movement of the protective helmet and thus the neck and head of the wearer: See FIGS. 6, 17, and 18 on page 7. Upon impact(s) to external surface of protective helmet, the Switching Device FIG. 7 immediately initiates onset-of-impact bracing signals which cause the entire apparatus to clench itself against all angles of helmet impact; a means for accomplishing this is the multi-directional element 63 of the switching device FIG. 7. Its configuration, together with the flexible member 62, responds to facilitates impacts against the helmet from all angles: lateral, diagonal, and top-down impacts. FIG. 5A-49 is the lower edge attachment member of a protective helmet; a collar anchoring member 51 serves as a means for designed attachment and structural support of the friction and anchoring/controlling rods but, further, serves as an element which, upon impact against shoulder guard harness 36 Pg. 2 causes a bracing event since such impact, not being that of the wearer, misaligns configuration between protective helmet and shoulder guard harness. A wire conduction insulating facility 52 contains lead wires to the clenching modules. A rod control slide FIG. 5B-53 carries the friction and anchoring/controlling rods 58 (Pg. 7, Ref. 58 FIG. 17) along the rod control slide 57 for required ease of movement of the wearer. FIG. 5A-55 is the movement range between a protective helmet and lower vest component. The wire 19 leads to the WCRModule-1 of the anterior frame segment, FIG. 9A; 17 b leads to WCRModule-2 of the posterior frame segment FIG. 9B. FIG. 5B is the rear interior aspect for the neck stabilizing and spanning device exhibiting the three clenching devices for the neck. FIG. 5B is simply the reversal of FIG. 5A, both of which are upright planar perspectives of the device for illustration, here, but semi-circular (wrap-around) in their normal collar-like setting in the apparatus.
Conduction wires 17 a, 17 b, 19 across the neck stabilizing and spanning device with the Harnessing and Position Sensing Device, and both WCRModule-1 and WCRModule-2: See Page 5. FIG. 6A-1 is shown here is a representative configuration for one of the electromagnetic clenching devices of the neck stabilizing and spanning device indicating that the wearer has raised the side of the head vertically upward in the direction shown and, further, that the position may be locked in this position. FIG. 6A-2: Shown here is a representative configuration for one of the Electromagnetic Clenching Devices indicating that the wearer has lowered the head vertically downward in the direction shown and, further, that the position may be locked in this position. FIG. 6A-2 58: This is a friction and anchoring/controlling rod that is essential for directional movement but bracing stability and support of the protective helmet upon activation of a bracing event arising from an onset-of-impact bracing signal.
FIG. 6A-3: Shown here is a representative configuration for one of the electromagnetic clenching devices indicating that the wearer has moved the head diagonally downward in the direction shown and, further, that the position may be locked in this position. Shown here in FIG. 6A-4 is a representative configuration for one of the electromagnetic clenching devices indicating that the wearer has moved the head diagonally upward in the direction shown and, further, the position may be locked in this position. P. 8 Ref. 26: This is the Harnessing and position sensing device that is designed to send a signal which would brace movements of both the three elements of the electromagnetic clenching devices and the vest/torso bracing framework component of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus. At least a button type battery 60 is shown here for the sending an onset-of-impact bracing signal to the circuit controlling bracing event of the neck/head (helmet) component and to the bracing control distributor module. A flexible member 62 is designed to facilitate immediate position-return aspect consequent to either a vertical depression or a lateral shift due to an exterior impact event. Wires 17 a indicate completion of circuit. Conduction wires 17 a form the essential circuiting means, or the necessary “open loop”/“closed loop” electronic rule. The connecting wires 17 b and 19 lead from 42 wherein they are routed downward to WCRModule-1 (for “19”) and WCRModule-2 (for “17 b”). The structure and function of middle electromagnetic clenching element 42 differs from the other clenching elements 50; it splits the circuit conduction wires “17 a” into “19” and “17 b.” Wire 17 a is for circuit conduction; both 17 b and 19 are the conduction/distribution wires to and from WCRModule-1 and WCRModule-2.

Page

4

FIG. 8 shows the different phases and perspective views of the protective Tubular Bracing Members through which is channeled the bracing/retraction wire 66 necessary for the bracing action throughout the vest/torso bracing framework component of the apparatus and; such elements are, further, being of an arc design so as to conform to the dimensions of the body of the wearer. One of the Clench-Switch Devices 65 for facilitating the bracing effect upon the torso vest/torso bracing framework component; it is activated both by direct exterior impact and by electronic onset-of-impact bracing signals as transmitted from the harnessing and position sensing device of the protective helmet. Retraction wire leads 66 connect adjacent tubular bracing members. These are designed to effectuate a clenching and bracing mode, impeding all movements of vest/torso bracing framework component and neck/head component. A flexible tube and return spring 68 features a hollow interior for passage of retraction wire 66 which would be pulled to bring upper and lower joints together for a clenching/bracing action. This clenching process is accomplished by way of illustrating the coupling segment 70 between, and among, the protective tubing frame elements whose ends are brought together into a locking event consequent to a retraction wire 66 running through them being retracted by the WCRModule-1 FIG. 9A which, itself, is actuated by an initial tug on the same structural elements that are, in turn, caused to be clenched/braced by the module. The tubular bracing members FIG. 8 of the apparatus are utilized as seen in various configurations here and as seen in how they interconnect 70, 76, 78, 80, and 84; reference 82 illustrates a variable position allowance due to type of connection at 84. Perspectives 69 and 72 are to be understood as being co-referenced with Ref. 85 Page 5 and are contiguous relative to Ref. 70. Ref. 65 shows the operational side view indicating the process whereby such tubular bracing members clinch before they can move inward towards the torso. A structural assembly element 74 is necessary for the connecting ends of the tubular bracing members.

Page

5

FIG. 9A is a top view of a Wire/Cord Retraction Module, WCRModule-1. An electronic signal causes at least a motor, or actuator, within it to retract wires/cords 87 whose retraction process will interact with a second Wire/Cord Retraction Module, WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B which corresponds with 104 of FIG. 14 on Page 6. Electrical wires FIGS. 9A-19 and 9B-17 b are evident for purposes of circuitry contact. FIG. 10 shows here the posterior frame aspect of the apparatus into which the WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B is structured; it could, as well, be a depiction of anterior frame using. It may be seen as a major component to the system in FIG. 20B. FIG. 9B is the more visual aspect of this module showing one of several retraction cords 83 which would be retracted as depicted in FIG. 14 Ref. 104 Pg. 6. FIG. 11 is a singular depiction of Pressure Point Devices set in both the frontal and posterior frame segments of the apparatus; they are very light in weight, of at least, a plastic material, but durable against impact damage, serving to cause a retraction of the cord to further cause reciprocal retraction between both modules FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B which, in turn, sends bracing signals to collar/shoulder bracing component (neck stabilizing and spanning device). A spool 88 is shown here for partial winding of retraction cord upon depression from top. The elements 90 and 92 facilitate the downward depression and twisting motion. Ref. 85 illustrates the tubular bracing members at which ends are the clench-switch devices 65, Page 4. The elements indicate: a top view (a) and the side, operational, view (b); bi-directional arrows on lower example (c) indicate the tubular bracing members may move slightly in one direction or the other (in or out) to conform with body movements until such time as an onset-of-impact bracing when they do not allow movement in toward the torso.

Page

6

FIG. 12 may generally represent the eight triangular sectors of both the anterior and posterior framework segments FIGS. 13A and 13B, respectively, of the apparatus, with both retracting mechanisms at 95. The eight triangular segments shown here indicate the retraction cable/wires FIG. 8 Ref. 66 but without the tubular bracing members FIG. 8 Pg. 4. The posterior segment of is shown at 104 of FIG. 14; the anterior segment is shown at 98 and further illustrated in FIG. 13A and FIG. 13B as indicated by the central parameter brackets, but more distinctly in here in FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B respectively. The frame bracket 102 is one of the segments illustrating the correspondence between posterior component and anterior component as presented in heavy lines in FIG. 13A (anterior) and FIG. 13B (posterior). The perspective relationship may also be understood from the position of the wearer's protective helmet 100 of FIG. 14 facing forward, toward 98. Signal transmission wires 17 b conduct such transmissions between module FIG. 9B of the vest/torso bracing framework component (posterior segment) and the collar/shoulder bracing component; also, Signal transmission wires 19 conduct such transmissions between bracing module FIG. 9A of the vest/torso bracing framework component (anterior segment) and the collar/shoulder bracing component.
The WCRModule-1 is at center of FIG. 13A; the WCRModule-2 is at center of FIG. 13B. Their opposing retraction process is indicated at each point of contact around each frame relevant to the wire/cord shown at FIG. 13A-96 with FIGS. 13B-97, and 9A-87 with 9B-83. The placement of the WCRModule-1 and the WCRModule-2, FIG. 9A and FIG. 9B, respectively, are indicated on the structurally generalized depiction of the novel vest/torso bracing framework component at 108 and 110 respectively but more precisely in FIG. 20A and FIG. 20B. FIG. 9B-83 would be contiguous with FIG. 9A-87 as non-electrical retraction cords, or wires, which are retracted and released between these two modules as they are operatively fixed in their places relevant to FIG. 15 Ref. 108, FIG. 15 Ref. 110 and better shown in FIG. 20A and FIG. 20B, respectively. Pressure Point Devices 94, co-referenced with FIG. 11 Pg. 5, in this linear aspect, define somewhat, their general positions beneath the Shoulder Guard Harness 99 of FIG. 14, co-referenced with FIG. 4A-36, Pg. 2. Ref. 89 simply indicates how one segment of the retraction wire interplay between both anterior and posterior segments; here, it is over-the-shoulder and under the right side shoulder guard harness 99.

Page 7

FIGS. 17, 18, 6B-1, 2, 3, and 4 comprise the Electromagnetic Clenching Device which is the most important device of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus since they constitute the singular unit which impedes all movement of the neck and head. Three of these units, as a set, constitute the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device which is shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, anterior and posterior, respectively. In FIG. 17 a metallic disc 114 and an electromagnet 118 would face each other as shown in 120 and 122. A friction anchoring/controlling rod 58 is slidably attached to each element allowing such rods to, opposingly but freely, pass between them: See illustrations of FIG. 6A. Once a bracing signal reaches the electromagnet, they will pull together impeding movement of the friction and anchoring/controlling rods 58 which comprise three sets of two such rods; see FIG. 5A, 5B, and FIG. 6A-2 reference 58.
The multiple parts of FIG. 18 comprise the elements which are designed to carry the components of FIG. 17 consequent to the natural head movements of one wearing the collar/shoulder bracing component and/or the standard novel apparatus. 126 and 126′ is the carriage frame which allows freedom of rotatable movement of the elements 120, 122, and 58. 128 and 130 (flexible hollow enclosing mini-spring) are one of the quadrants of 126′, itself being a frontal aspect view of 126. A spring-rod containment element 132 is a vertical aspect view of 128; it is necessary to push back. 136 is a frontal view of the suspension control arm 124 which is rotatably fastened to the lower edge of protective helmet. FIG. 6B-1 illustrates the containment unit comprising structured elements of FIGS. 17 and 18. It is a representative side perspective view of the Electromagnetic Clenching Device shown in FIG. 6A-1, 2, 3, & 4. A partially exploded view is shown here in FIG. 6B-2, a de-coupled view of the electromagnet and wiring plan in FIG. 6B-3, and simply the wiring encasement cap FIG. 6B-4 showing its wiring extension and wiring access aperture 138.

Page 8

Now turning to FIG. 19A-D, a protective helmet such as with American football, hockey, and motor vehicle/water craft sports, the helmet 140 comprises within itself a Switching device FIG. 7 which is contiguous with a Lateral Movement/Flex Damper Device 139 which is, further, functionally connected at the apex of the Columnar Support Component Ref. 26 of FIG. 2 as it is buttressed by the adjustable Harnessing Device 24. This mechanism 139 functions to dampen by degree, or increment, any movement of one's head toward any side of interior wall surface of the protective helmet. This facility and process would actually serves to take the place of any conventional cushioning/padding material lining the inner surface of protective helmet thus allowing more room for an electronically initiated damping of lateral movement FIGS. 19B, C, & D; see FIG. 2-12 corresponding incrementally with this facility. FIG. 19D-152 shows movement of apex/circumference 148 due to an impact event in a most forceful case, yet this does not indicate that the wearer's head within harness 24 has touched side of helmet FIG. 19A-140.
The mechanism is designed to gradually increase resistance to lateral movement, (displacement from center) of apex/circumference of Columnar Support/Positioning Component FIG. 19B-148 by increasing degree from the slightest to the more resistant. For example, columnar apex of FIG. 19C-150 shows less movement-from-center resistance than that of FIG. 19D-152 since 19D-152 is closer to the edge of Position Sensing Device 28 than is 19D-150. The sensitive Switching device FIG. 19B-146 with 63 FIG. 7 reacts to both lateral-impact movement/off-center placements, of 63 FIG. 7 by the Lateral Movement/Flex Damper Device 139, and it responds to “top down,” or angular downward impacts for an instantaneous, dual electronic safety bracing procedure. The Harnessing and position sensing device entails the involvements of an switching device FIG. 7 for onset of signal transmission, the Position Sensing Device 28, and circuit wiring 17 a (wire leading to both the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device and the WCRModule-1, wiring as well leading from the WCRModule-2 17 b) at instance of an exterior impact against protective helmet or against the Vest/Torso Bracing Component. Circuit conduction wire 17 a leads to electromagnetic clenching element 42 wherein it is split into 17 b and 19. Device FIG. 25 comprises the Harnessing Device 24, Columnar Support Component 26, and Position Sensing Device 28.

Page 9

FIG. 20A and FIG. 20B (P. 10) illustrate the two coordinating major components of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus. FIG. 20A here represents the frontal protective structures of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus minus the layers of various types of fabrics of the torso bracing jacket FIG. 22 and FIG. 23. The essential component is the neck stabilizing and spanning device FIG. 20A-39 which inhibits head concussion impacts. The vest/torso bracing framework component herein illustrates an overall three-part body safety feature for: head, neck, and torso/spinal cord. Also, that this framework component operates in conjunction with, and corresponds with, the collar/shoulder bracing component; see FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B. The frontal, anterior, perspective of the shows the position of the Wire/Cord Counter Retractor Module FIG. 9A indicating its design to retract/restore wire/cord at its eight points such as at 87; see FIGS. 13A, 13B, and FIG. 14. A leg insertion sleeve 158 a is secured by at least a Velcro-like adhesion flap 160. The sleeve is partially for thigh impact protection but is also for “cranking” the ventilation (HVAC) facility mechanism during coordinated walking and running. FIG. 20A-156 is flexible transmission tubing connected to the HVAC system which conducts cool or warm air to torso and upper sections of the apparatus, and further providing structural support & anchoring means at the waist for apparatus bracing events.
The illustrations FIG. 21A and FIG. 21B show the helmet component of the Body impact bracing apparatus as cutaway segments as viewed from the top. One shows the interior top of the Harnessing and position sensing device FIG. 21A-162 in the open position ready to be donned by a user. The head of a wearer 164, the space to be covered by the Harnessing and position sensing device 166, open position of Lever Clasp 168 indicating an as yet unsecured fitting to the head of wearer, a lever clasp Expansion Module 170 indicating open position of harnessing and position sensing device ready for helmet to be positioned and then closed for secure fit; ventilation apertures 172 through which are effused external air from HVAC mechanism. Such ventilation would reach the head, neck, torso, and (with continued design) sleeved arms and gloved hands. The ventilation system will be modulated manually for on/off and low, medium, and high; it is powered by the walking and running activity of the wearer of the apparatus; this activity may be further facilitated by at least pneumatic and/or hydraulic means. See FIG. 20B-194, FIGS. 22-198, 200, 201, 202, & 204. The cushioning/padding 174 around the interior of helmet may be optionally replaced by the Lateral Movement/Flex Damper Device FIG. 19A-139, excepting a modicum of such material. Lever Clasp Mechanism 168′ in closed/secured position shows that Harnessing Device 182 is in closed position a further indication of helmet being secured on head of wearer. The Bracing Initiation Switching device is beneath Apex of helmet 178.

Page

10

FIG. 20B, and FIG. 20A (P. 9) illustrate the two coordinating major components of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus. FIG. 20B here represents the posterior protective structures of the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus minus the layers of various overlay fabrics of the torso bracing jacket FIG. 23 and FIG. 24, P. 11. The neck stabilizing and spanning device FIG. 20A-44 is shown here as the opposite perspective to that of FIG. 20A-39. The electronic circuitry includes involvement of electrical wiring 17 b for current to the electronic clenching devices of the neck, the Neck Stabilizing and Spanning Device 39′. An option is available for a hi-tech mini-HVAC device 194 to be a component of the apparatus. When “on,” it would be mechanically operated by the actions of walking and running as facilitated by the leg sleeves 158 a & 158 b and engaged by a cranking device 190 and modulated by a battery-operated control module FIG. 22 which is, additionally, the power source for operations of the WCRModule-2 FIG. 9B. The HVAC system operates from the motion of the legs while walking and running. Air is effused throughout the apparatus. It has a control knob for climate-specific modulation control, and off/on. There's a Ventilation Tube FIG. 23-202, Pg. 11 leading to the helmet. The ventilation would reach the head, neck, and torso areas of the body as indicated in FIG. 23-196, 198, 200, 201, 202, and FIG. 20A-156. The ventilation system will be modulated manually for on/off and low, medium, and high. It is powered by the walking and running activity of the wearer of the apparatus. This system will be adaptable for both cooling and warming.

Page 11

FIG. 23 and FIG. 24 represent the necessary covering and further padding/cushioning for the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus. The structural/mechanical processes will be custom-designed into the apparel fabric with no measure of any limitation to natural movement and no indication as to additional weight to be carried. Seen here in FIG. 23, is the posterior cutaway section of the interior rear face of the torso bracing jacket. Within this article are layers of synthetic fabrics designed for the predetermined rigors of often brutal sports activities. A signaling wire 17 b depicts the approximate structural position with respect to WRCModule-2 FIG. 9B, from which it originates, and the collar/shoulder bracing component, to which it is leading. The protective framework and FIGS. 13A & 13B, Pg. 6, comprise the default component throughout the apparatus, including the collar/shoulder bracing component FIGS. 4A & 4B, P. 2. An impact padding sheath 210 shown here in minimized coverage adds protection to the apparatus; secondly, an HVAC device FIG. 20B-194, Pg. 10 provides air conditioning ingress through device 204, and egress to sleeves and gloves 201 (not shown) and egress to neck and head 202; the HVAC distributive conduit frame 196, and the air current transmission nodes 198 & 200 facilitate an even current flow throughout the apparatus. The mini-HVAC device is optionally structured into the torso bracing jacket for all weather conditions.
The specific fabrics for the torso bracing jacket layers are approximated in FIG. 24A-E and are representative for both anterior and posterior components: An outer surface of torso bracing jacket A/208 is the first point of contact of an impact; a second layer B is necessary for free movement of structural elements of the apparatus. The reinforcement tubular bracing members 85 framework, the vest/torso bracing framework component C/206, co-referenced with FIG. 10, Pg. 5 protects the wearer from exterior impacts; it moves with the natural contour movements of the wearer's torso; layer D/210 provides cushioning against impacts. Layer E encloses the heating and cooling frame 196. The fabric layers will be ergonomically appropriate for the most efficient ease of comfort and movement priorities.

Operation

In the sports of hockey and American football, no matter what configuration or amount of layering of cushioning/padding materials is utilized against head impact trauma, “more is not better.” Stuffing more padding, of any consistency, into the helmet would prove to be no less injurious than at present since the head would still sustain the shock from a more-than-moderate impact. This would be due to the closeness of the head to the “compressed” (thus hardened) interior-surface padding of the protective helmet at the instant of an exterior impact. Technically, the limited distance between the inner wall of the helmet and the head, being what it is, is a guarantee that head impact trauma will occur—no matter the cushioning, as well as the relative distance. Nothing causes the compression of the cushioning material other than: 1. the kinetic mass force of an impacting object against the helmet surface exterior and, 2. the inertial mass weight of one's head being impacted against the helmet surface interior. Such sequence allows an effect that is too slight for cushioning protection; it would be nearly the same as if the head were to be directly struck, almost without any cushioning at all since both the padding and cushioning would then “not” be pliable but hardened to near solid. So, since padding and cushioning presently entail the “primary” component, per se, against head impact injuries in hockey, American football, etc., such protective equipment injuries, now widely reported in the media, will continue. Faulty overall design of such protective gear, however varied, will continue the negative trend.
The novel design herein offers a solution: Conventional protective helmets may be modified to allow more space for measured “leeway of movement” of the interior wall area as measured from the wearer's head since it is the helmet wall that “moves toward/against” the wearer's head. It is this impact movement, (of inner surface of helmet) that would be “arrested” in “split-second-time” by an electronic bracing “intervention” of this novel technology, locking it momentarily, with other segments receiving the force of such impact then distributing it to the mass “inertial weight” of the body of the wearer, “not, injuriously, to the body itself” This impacting force is divided and “distributed” by the mass of the “inertial weight” of the body at rest, or in motion thus canceling it. The remaining force, if any, is the default potential force that would overcome inertia and cause movement of the body at rest. Accordingly, this further lessens the jolt, protecting the torso, (spine) neck, and head—the three segments along which flows the protective cerebrospinal fluid, (CSF) thereby stressing the significance of the Central Nervous System, which must be taken into consideration in concussion diagnoses.
The helmet component will integrally correspond with the vest/torso bracing framework component by a collar/shoulder bracing component, coupled with the neck stabilizing and spanning device, which is the essential, indispensable, technological device of this new invention for head and torso protective gear. Helmet movements will correspond to the movements of the wearer's head precisely; helmet movements not consistent with the wearer's head will cause a bracing event for both neck/helmet as well as vest/torso bracing framework component. An onset-of-impact bracing signal event involves at least a wire/cord retraction module, WCRModule-1 and an array of at least clench-switch devices which are functional facilities of the tubular bracing members of the vest/torso bracing framework component for purposes of initiating the bracing interval of the vest/torso bracing framework component. The wire/cord bracing relay and cord retraction modules, WCRModule-1 and WCRModule-2 are predisposed as two centralized controlling means, one anterior, one posterior, for at least two signaling transmission source processes:

- a. collar/shoulder bracing component: an onset-of-impact bracing signal transmission originating from the position sensing device coupled with at least one switching device within the protective helmet, transmitting first to the neck stabilizing and spanning device of the collar/shoulder bracing component then to the bracing control/wire retraction module (anterior) followed by the vest/torso bracing framework component for simultaneous and unified bracing interval of its friction and anchoring/controlling rods (1. neck/protective helmet and 2. torso);
- b. vest/torso bracing framework component: an onset-of-impact bracing signal transmission originating from one or more of the clench-switch devices arrayed about the vest/torso bracing framework component then leading to the wire/cord counter retractor module (posterior) which further facilitates the bracing interval coordinating with the collar/shoulder bracing component for the bracing interval of the protective helmet as well as of the vest/torso bracing framework component itself.

The apparatus, overall, may be thought of as “an impact counter-shock/deflection-distribution apparatus” or a type of protective “exo-skeletal firewall” that, upon onset of an external impact, to either helmet or torso would immediately receive the kinetic mass weight of the impact and distribute it as divided by the “inertial mass” of the recipient object, (mass of body/complex). Such recipient body, (inertial mass) receiving the “remaining” force of impact sustains it by distributing it throughout the apparatus—neither the body nor the head respectively would sustain an injurious force of impact.
Relatively speaking, only a small impact may be felt, if any at all. Furthermore, the “indirect” impact effects would be, also, minimized due to the immediate locking mechanism initiated upon impact at any point on the torso bracing jacket segment covering the torso. Accordingly, an impact event to a discrete point area of, for example, the lower back would cause a split-second electromagnetic, electronic, (or hydraulic) response mechanism to “lock” the entire unit, including all areas of the side, front, waist, shoulders, neck, and head, for about 0.5 sec. but depending upon the length of time the impact is held, (switch remaining closed) before recovery, which entails release, (“opening” of one or more of switches) as the physical impact, per se, is deflected.
The protective helmet is secured to the head of the wearer using two lever clasps outside the helmet at left and right sides. Such lever clasps operate to close an internal head-band type support structure, (Harnessing and Position Sensing Device) fitted around, and on, the head of the wearer. That is, ample space will be provided for the head inside the helmet so as to allow impact movement of the inner wall of helmet prior to impact “e-brace” before it touches the wearer's head. Such ample space would also feature a new configuration of cushioning material as well as a unique method for heating and ventilation. Also, the lever clasps, as they close, will position the helmet for support as well as for coordinated, movement, corresponding with movements of the head of the wearer. The bracing, locking, apparatus of the helmet will be activated if any exterior impact were to be sustained by the helmet, (head) from any angle. An impact would be detected by the movement-sensitive coordination between the helmet Harnessing and position sensing device element and the helmet itself. The triggering event is initiated by this “tandem-dependent” relationship. The free movement of the wearer's head would not trigger a locking event since such movement does not disrupt the tandem relationship.
The harnessing and position sensing device further facilitates means for conveying signals originating from at least one switching device within the protective helmet leading to at least one of the collar/shoulder bracing components and to the bracing retraction modules, WCRModule-1 and/or WCRModule-2, of the vest/torso bracing framework component; the harnessing and position sensing device further comprises:

- a. the position sensing device for the signal transmission means for correspondence of an onset of movement of said exterior impacts against said protective helmet,
- b. at least one switching device for detecting the exterior impacts to the protective helmet and to the vest/torso bracing framework component from any angle,
- c. at least one buttressing device for physical support of said protective helmet thus carrying and bearing the weight of the protective helmet as sustained by wearer of the protective helmet, the buttressing member further providing means for a foundational setting for position sensing device and at least one switching device for the harnessing and position sensing device, for registering the exterior impacts to the protective helmet, and for at least two signaling transmission processes for the bracing interval to the collar/shoulder bracing component and, further, to either WCRModule-1 or WCRModule-2,
- d. a clamping device for securitization of the helmet onto the harnessing and position sensing device and onto the head of the wearer of the apparatus and further providing a contiguous adjustable head band component for means of secure buttressing and stability of the protective helmet,
- e. the Lateral Movement/Flex Damper Device comprising means for gradual cushioned resistance against lateral impact position displacement of apex/circumference of columnar support/positioning component within said position sensing device from its centered, concentric, position by increments from the slightest to the more resistant as measured by intensity of the exterior impacts.

Once there is any movement from external impact(s) not corresponding with that of the head itself, this device will send a signal causing: 1. a bracing action (from bending) of neck, 2. a “leeway-of-movement” bracing of head, (against inside helmet wall) 3. a bracing action, (physical fortification) of vest/torso bracing framework component immobilizing all twisting, bending, stretching, and thus inhibiting injurious impact impinging of torso, (neck/spinal cord). Such effect processes would entail as also initiated, alternatively, by singular or multiple discrete-point impact(s) against the vest/torso bracing framework component of the thus inhibiting injurious impact impinging against the wearer's torso—as well as the head. Bracing lasts about 0.5 second, (or until release of onset switch) engaging both segments (collar/shoulder and vest) simultaneously.
The impetus for this signal is, at least, an electrical, or mechanical, switch mechanism within the helmet, the electrical switch may involve a battery in correspondence with the main circuit which reacts by initiating an alternative but corresponding bracing act for the entire system, head to waist, for as long as the switch, or switches, of impacting event(s) are sustained as impinging objects. The mechanical alternative mechanism would operate by purely mechanical, non-electrical, means, without use of a battery. The switching and position sensing device responds to impacts to the helmet from all directions.
A protective helmet being worn with the apparatus involves exterior clasping levers which operate for the secure harnessing of the helmet after positioning it to the head: While placing the helmet onto the head, the levers are extended outward. The levers are then closed inward against the surface of the helmet after it is securely placed onto the head. This process tightens an internal harnessing device around the head of the wearer for a secure fit; and it causes the wearer's head to be centered within the hollow of the helmet with adequate space all around within thus allowing ample room for movement, (leeway-of-movement) of the wearer's head allowing onset of an expected impact and, as well for adequate ventilation.
The half inch, or more, of allowed space, presumed by design, inhibits an injurious impact since, a. onset speed of an electrical bracing signal will halt movement of helmet within a fraction of an inch, in time, as it braces itself in concert with the vest/torso bracing framework component; b. The modicum of cushioning material, more pliable than conventional padding needs, will be sufficient if there is any contact; and c., more pliable cushioning material proves more necessary at times when a player or wearer falls to the ground hitting his head, (within the helmet) against the cushioned lining of the helmet. In this latter event, the neck is not abruptly forced to bend downwards from the shock, (itself often a traumatic event); it is supported, or “braced,” at the neck segment thus keeping the neck straight and, so, preventing the helmet from striking the ground or, just as injurious, preventing adverse bending of the neck. Also, spinal cord injuries extend from the base of the spine to the neck and brain, so occasions for whiplash, adding to trauma to the head, neck, and torso/spinal cord are diminished.
A bracing process may also be carried out utilizing either the attractive and/or repulsive forces of at least electromagnets and actuators interacting with, at least, a predetermined locking mechanism specified for interconnecting or adjacent parts of the apparatus. The locking action of the entire apparatus begins with an exterior depression or forceful impact to it. A circuit switching scheme is designed to trigger a locking action initiating from an impact area from any one singular of the multiple switch locations of the apparatus. An electronic process would, at least, retract cords leading to specified segments of the apparatus; or an electronic current would cause a device such as an actuator to clench movement of specified nodes in the vest/torso bracing framework component. Such retracting action, or clenching would cause all moving parts of the, including the helmet segment, to lock in place, (“Bracing” the wearer against injury) for about 0.5 sec., (half sec.) no matter what the position the wearer is in at that moment. It would lock in place for longer if there is a hold at one of the segment switches and/or if there are multiple, overlapping, or compounding of “hits” causing a hold for maintaining retraction and/or clenching.
The revolutionary idea, but straightforward, logical technology, entails a protective resistance mechanism against external impact injury; it is scientific, involving both Newton's First and Second Laws of Motion involving inertia and an external impacting force, kinetic energy. With respect to this new apparatus, the effect/law is initiated at the precise moment of an external impact against the protective helmet or against the vest/torso bracing framework component of the apparatus as it corresponds with the split-second timing of the electronic and mechanical processes comprising this new technology. Further explained, the application of inertia to this invention can be more easily understood by means of a theoretical analogy that can be drawn: An impact against an inertial mass of a basketball at rest is made as compared to an equal impact against an inertial mass of a bowling ball at rest. There are, of course, differences in straight-line distances traveled by these two items, both being impacted by the same mass from the same velocity of exterior force, and from the same angle. Following this scenario, the hypothetical basketball would travel 150 feet while the bowling ball would travel maybe 3 feet.
The analogous connection is made here with respect to an athletic player on the field without the new technology being related to the basketball and a player on the field equipped with, (wearing) the new technology being related to the basketball also but with the automatic, rapid deployable, bowling ball protection upon exterior impact—as described above. The bowling ball scenario would, theoretically, provide protection for a fragile object at its inner core which, itself, further provides a protective cushioned surrounding for this central fragile object. Such inner core would both sufficiently protect the object within its own center and, itself, be protected by the process of the divided, “distributed,” force of the impact at moment of impact, receiving merely one of the elements of the “divided” impacting force. The inertial mass of its outer shell, (bowling ball) would instantly materialize as a counterpoise exo-skeleton “upon demand” of an exterior impact. The analogical basketball has none of these protections. However, one must think of the basketball, theoretically, as “morphing” for the protections of a bowling ball at instant of impact, herein representing the protection of the head—with that of the torso being similar. The overall locking mechanism of the invention herein follows a similar process as depicted protecting the head, neck, and torso/spinal cord of field athletic sports players, particularly in hockey, American football, and by modification, rugby, etc.
The locking/bracing event of this new technology entails a parallel mechanism detailed above: Thus the “counter force” against exterior impact constitutes the inertial mass (weight) and/or the kinetic mass (weight while in motion) of the apparatus wearer as engaged against an impinging mass weight of an exterior impact whose force would be distributed thus circumventing any injury to the head or torso; nor would the neck be adversely affected by either torque movements or bends, the neck, (collar/shoulder bracing component) being the essential area for which the protective helmet bracing mechanism is engaged and upon which the invention is based.
The unique impact flexi-brace hereby protects head, neck, and torso/spinal cord of athletic sports tackle players in such field sports as hockey, American football, rugby, and (as modified) bicycle riding, bull riding, auto vehicle racing, lacrosse, etc. It does not address any involvement with protections for the legs body. This technology may be modified for competitions such as motorcycle, motor vehicle water course and motor vehicle road course car racing, in addition to other hazardous competitions. The Body Impact Bracing Apparatus protects head, neck, and torso/spinal cord against all impact angles, singularly, consecutively, or simultaneously by the bracing interval lasting about one half second, unless bracing impingement is sustained due to consecutive or “unreleased,” (as in a pile up tackle) whereby bracing event would be lengthened.

Further Details as to the Working of the Technology

An external impact to the segmented, from any angle, will “brace/lock” all segments of the device, immediately engaging the (mass) weight of the wearer's entire body, (by default of inertia) against such impact. By instantly locking upon impact, the aggregates to itself the total “inertial weight,” forming a unitary counter balance against the mass of the exterior impact—thus “softening the blow” from injurious hits.
The vital parts of the body, (head, neck, and torso/spinal cord) of the wearer would be protected against the small measure of the “divided” force of impact remaining, if any, since the total impact force has been decreased and distributed at onset of impact thus causing such minimized force to be harmless—relative to its initial magnitude. The inner surface of protective helmet would not impinge the scull of the wearer; the wearer's neck would not twist or bend from impact to helmet or to the vest/torso bracing framework component, so discrete points of torso would not impinge the torso due to the bracing/fortification event against exterior impacts.
The overall protection of the apparatus is for the CNS, the central nervous system, since, as noted by many medical researchers, concussions arise from impacts to more than just one part of the body. Impacts against the head, brain, are usually thought to be cause of the injuries leading to concussion. It is now known, and documented, that CTE, chronic traumatic encephalopathy and TBI, traumatic brain injury, may be traced to impact injuries to other parts of the central nervous system and, further, that the central vulnerability, as medically claimed, is the neck, the cervix spine. It is always suspect, according to one doctor, whenever there is a concussion. This new apparatus seeks to provide protection for the entirety of the central nervous system, with respect to injurious impacts, but specifying the neck as the tandem controlling inhibitor against such impacts against the CNS by introducing a device which protects torso/spinal cord, the head, and the neck. Though the neck does not directly sustain impacts; still, it remains the vulnerable, and widely overlooked, segment of the CNS upon examination for concussions due to impacts since each and every impact to the head, or punch to the face/head in boxing is registered/sustained by the neck, the cervix spine; likewise, injurious whiplash impacts to the torso, from any angle. The focus being the neck, in regards to the foregoing, this invention introduces the neck stabilizing and spanning device; it is the essential brace-controlling bridge between the collar/shoulder bracing component for the head/neck and the vest/torso bracing framework component for the torso/spinal cord; neither can be dispensed with for full central nervous system protections.

Alternative Embodiments

The vest/torso bracing framework component herein described may be applicable, as modified, for athletic sports activities such as rugby and bull riding arena competitions. Further, a design, as component-modified for young children, juniors, teens, and adult bicycle riders are applicable, in addition to other activities mentioned in the specification such as auto vehicle and motorcycle racing, skiing and others; therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiment as illustrated herein alone but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents therein and within the specification.

CONCLUSION, RAMIFICATIONS, AND SCOPE

It may be seen that the body impact bracing apparatus technology provides a highly reliable, and personally vital, protective equipment that can extend performance and endurance on the various athletic fields of sports but, more significantly, that it can preserve mental health and, even, life—for those engaged in the many field activities involving both head and torso impacts which are inevitable. While the description above contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention but, rather, as an exemplification of one preferred embodiment thereof. Other variations are possible. For example, modified application can be realized, with respect to the brutality of arena boxing; that is, this new product allows for a possible revolutionizing of that sport by making it a non-brutal, bloodless, event simply by employing the collar/shoulder bracing component herein alone. Moreover, with respect to the stated collar/shoulder bracing component, a protective unit, also exclusive of the torso, vest/torso bracing framework component, and capable of independent effective operation as defined above, but only for bracing the neck and, thus, for protection against head impacts only, has its efficacy in guarding against head trauma, in addition to, by default, injury to the neck since all head impacts will affect the neck, it being the sole element of stability for the protective helmet—without the new technology being herein introduced.
This novel invention acknowledges and asserts that current conventional body protective gear for a variety of sports activities such as hockey, American football, lacrosse, rugby, etc. are inappropriate with respect to their designs to offset injurious impacts to the bodies of the players these sports activities. Their heavily-padded helmets and torso padding maintain various standards of protection against injury from impact during above-mentioned competitive events. However, such standards provide far fewer protections than those achieved by the new art herein presented. Those standards do not provide a protective body-bracing that sustains singular discrete-point impacts, as well as multiple event, consecutive, and simultaneous impacts, absorbing the force of such impacts, and distributing them throughout the while still circumventing injuries for the wearer of such protective as provided herein. This novel protective gear addresses primarily such athletic sports such as hockey, American football, lacrosse, and rugby with relevant design modifications. Other subject-comparison protective gear types are relevant to hazardous occupational jobs such as industrial testing, etc. as well as to motorized vehicular water course and road course racing competitions as well as other competitive, but hazardous, sports arena events.
The medical, neurological, and life-saving objective benefits of the invention is tied to the highest level of effective protection against injuries. However, with the constant reports, now in the broadcast media in regards to athletic injuries, particularly in American football and hockey, it is now becoming apparent that the usual equipment has proven itself insufficient as a means of protection. The central nervous system extends from the brain and down through the spinal cord which is physically protected by the bony vertebral column. The functions of the brain and spinal cord operate as a conduit for motor and sensory information, as well as a center for coordinating certain reflexes. A delicate balance of cerebral blood flow to the brain must be maintained. Too much results in hyperemia; too little causes ischemia. Upsetting this balance by physical impacts against both the head and torso can cause Traumatic Brain Injury since such impacts disrupt the delicate balance of cushioning protections of the cerebrospinal fluid which encompasses the vital areas of the central nervous system, (brain and spinal cord). The three-segment (head, neck, and torso) focus upon the cervix (Atlas/Axis vertebrae) provides a unique CNS protective synergy apparatus.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A body impact bracing apparatus, comprising:

(a) a vest/torso bracing framework component, including a torso jacket, a multiplicity of at least tubular bracing members together with their clench-switch devices, bracing modules WCRModule-1 and WCRModule-2 for correspondence of onset-of-impact bracing signals between said framework component, on one part, and a collar/shoulder bracing component, on the other,

(b) the collar/shoulder bracing component for a protective helmet, including:

1. a neck stabilizing and spanning device for said onset-of-impact bracing signals between the helmet and the vest/torso bracing framework component, said device consisting of at least friction and anchoring/controlling rods for means of immobilizing tandem movement between said protective helmet of the collar/shoulder bracing component and the vest/torso bracing framework component,

2. a harnessing and position sensing device for detection of movements between the helmet and the vest/torso bracing framework component,

3. a clamping device for securitization of said helmet onto the harnessing and position sensing device,

4. multiple said clench-switch devices for said onset-of-impact bracing signals correspondence between said collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component,

5. a buttressing device for supporting the weight of said helmet on the head of a wearer of the apparatus,

6. a lateral movement/flex damper device for damping any counter-movement of the head of the wearer against any side of interior wall surface of the protective helmet;

7. at least one switching device for detecting multi-angular impressions, such device being contiguous with said damper device and said protective helmet;

(c) at least one signal transmission means for correspondence of said onset-of-impact bracing signals for cessation of movement arising from one or more exterior impacts against said protective helmet, against the collar/shoulder bracing component, and against said vest/torso bracing framework component;

(d) protective means for the head, neck and torso/spinal cord segments of the wearer of the apparatus, said segments being biologically predisposed as integrated and unified segments harboring the entirety of the central nervous system of the human body; accordingly, said collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component of the apparatus are predisposed for inter-dependent bracing signals, and so constituting a mutually unified means of the apparatus for encompassing, thereby protecting, said integrated segments from injurious impacts, thus neither said collar/shoulder bracing component nor said vest/torso bracing framework component being exclusive to itself with respect to its own, independent, sending said onset-of-impact bracing signals or to its receipt of said signals; both said components interactively, and necessarily, correspond, providing means for mutual bracing protection as a dual-component unit, alternating said onset-of-impact bracing signals when required.

2. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said harnessing and position sensing device is concentrically disposed within said lateral movement/flex damper device which is functionally contiguous to the interior central crown area of the protective helmet.

3. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said vest/torso bracing framework component comprises a frame of at least a grating-like said array of a plurality of at least semi-rigid interconnection of at least tubular bracing members having means for facilitating intervals of bracing.

4. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said collar/shoulder bracing component is structurally attachable to, and contiguous with, said vest/torso bracing framework component for means of a coordinated bracing interval, said neck stabilizing and spanning device of the collar/shoulder bracing component, is functionally contiguous to, and disposed between, the base of said protective helmet along its lower edge and securely anchored and disposed within and about a shoulder guard harness of a wearer of the apparatus at the lower edge of the spanning device, said collar/shoulder bracing component being further securely anchored and buttressed around and about the waist of the wearer.

5. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said vest/torso bracing framework component comprises:

a. electrical devices for contact between said exterior impacts and said clench-switch devices for inhibiting movement of at least tubular bracing members at multiple locations in said vest/torso bracing framework component, said electrical devices being channeled through bracing and cord retraction modules, said devices for said contact include at least: an actuator, signal transmission means, at least one electrical switch, a battery, electrical hard-wired conduction mechanisms capable of executing processes for effectuating said electrical devices for said contact and said bracing interval of the protective helmet, said collar/shoulder bracing component, and said vest/torso bracing framework component against said exterior impacts,

b. mechanical devices for said contact is operative within said bracing and cord retraction modules of the WCRModule-1 and the WCRModule-2, anterior and posterior frame segments respectively, said mechanical devices for said contact include at least one mechanical switch, line-cord mechanisms capable of executing processes for effectuating said mechanisms for the contact and the bracing interval of the protective helmet and the vest/torso bracing framework component against said exterior impacts, without utilization of an electrical power sourcing implement,

c. said bracing interval for momentary cessation of independent movement and a mechanically fortifying means for instantaneous rendering as rigid said array such that it will effectuate a solid, inflexible, but momentary wall-like structure for said frame thereby rendering the torso/spinal cord of the wearer of the apparatus less vulnerable to injuries that may arise from said exterior impacts against the vest/torso bracing framework component;

6. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said collar/shoulder bracing component includes:

a. the neck stabilizing and spanning device for bracing between the helmet and said shoulder guard harness, latter said spanning device includes mechanical, non-electronic clenching elements, said friction and anchoring/controlling rods for means of processes of said bracing,

b. the harnessing and position sensing device for the helmet,

c. a clamping device for securitization of said helmet onto the harnessing and position sensing device,

d. said buttressing device for supporting the weight of said helmet on the head of the wearer of the apparatus,

e. a mechanical means for impetus of bracing of the collar/shoulder bracing component consequent to said exterior impacts against both the shoulder guard harness and the protective helmet,

f. said lateral movement/flex damper device for damping any counter movement of the head of the wearer against any side of interior wall surface of the protective helmet;

7. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component are both involved with electrical and mechanical, coordinated, and corresponding means for processes of said bracing due to said exterior impacts against said protective helmet of the collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component, such that the collar/shoulder bracing component would receive said immediate, and reciprocal onset-of-impact bracing signals originating from both the protective helmet or the vest/torso bracing framework component, further such that said vest/torso bracing framework component would receive said immediate and reciprocal onset-of-impact bracing signals originating from both the protective helmet and the vest/torso bracing framework component itself; both the collar/shoulder bracing component, together with the protective helmet, and the vest/torso bracing framework component are mutually inter-reactive, mutually protective, operating mainly as a two-component, integrated, tandem system, the apparatus, working in unison as a singular cooperative unit, against injurious impacts;

8. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 5 wherein said mechanical devices for said contact is operative within said collar/shoulder bracing component such that the collar/shoulder bracing component may operate exclusive of electrical processes; accordingly, the collar/shoulder bracing component would immobilize any measure of movement of the protective helmet thereby circumventing injury to both the head and neck of said wearer of the body impact bracing apparatus, said collar/shoulder bracing component thus providing an anchoring and stabilizing means for said protective helmet against said external impacts;

9. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 1 wherein said collar/shoulder bracing component and said signal transmission means involve both electrical and mechanical processes for means of said bracing of the collar/shoulder bracing component itself with its harnessing and position sensing device thus achieving the objective said bracing for protection of the head and neck segments, exclusive of torso segment, upon said onset-of-impact bracing signals from the protective helmet and from the shoulder guard harness of said collar/shoulder bracing component, latter said bracing entails that, at least:

a. an onset-of-impact bracing signal will correspond with said neck stabilizing and spanning device of the apparatus causing said collar/shoulder bracing component to brace,

b. a structural assembly of said friction and anchoring/controlling rods of the neck stabilizing and spanning device is predetermined for process of said bracing upon said onset-of-impact bracing signals arising from said impact against said protective helmet or against said vest/torso bracing framework component thus further protecting the neck and head against said external impact,

c. the harnessing and position sensing device of said collar/shoulder bracing component will initiate upon being moved off its center configuration by a jolt from said exterior impact to the protective helmet, or to the shoulder guard harness;

10. The body impact bracing apparatus of claim 3 wherein said array is disposed between at least two layers of said torso bracing jacket, within the vest/torso bracing framework component, and, further contained and partitioned in its processes, there being at least a protective sheath closest to the wearer's body so that the operations of said vest/torso bracing framework component are inhibited from direct and adverse physical contact with the body of the wearer, said vest/torso bracing framework component materially consisting of layers of at least durable and semi-rigid fabrics that are predetermined for sustained forceful and robust field usage against wear, tear, stress, and breakage presumed in sports activities such as hockey, American football, and even rodeo bull riding competitions such, said fabrics being designed to allow contoured ease-of-movement for both wearer and for the vest/torso bracing framework component itself;

whereby, in sports activities such as hockey, American football, rugby, rodeo bull riding, etc., said wearer of the apparatus would be capable of deflecting potentially injurious field impacts of force without the usual results of traumatic and incapacitating injuries to the head and torso, but more importantly, to the neck, which has been generally overlooked in concussive, TBI/CTE injury determinations; the neck, the upper cervix spine, and Atlas vertebra, are the most vulnerable segment between the head and the torso with respect to impact injuries, according to medical specialists; so, any impact to the helmet/head in hockey and American football, and any punch to the face/head in boxing will be adversely registered both in the brain and by the neck, cumulatively; the most muscular of necks cannot protect against unforeseen, split-second offensive impacts; accordingly, the mid-segment “bracing bridge,” the neck stabilizing and spanning device between the head and torso is introduced; it instantaneously stabilizes impacting movements of the head and torso from either falls or from lateral offensive impacts, such tandem bracing device, being so integrally-positioned is the focal point and central protective means for the body impact bracing apparatus without which, and continuing to use flawed conventional protective gear, debilitating and fatal health issues will continue.

11. A method of using a body impact bracing apparatus, comprising the steps:

a. securely donning a collar/shoulder bracing component for a protective helmet for means of bracing protection against possible external impact injuries to the head, neck, or torso of a wearer of the body impact bracing apparatus, said collar/shoulder bracing component includes:

1. a neck stabilizing and spanning device for bracing between the helmet and a vest/torso bracing framework component,

2. a harnessing and position sensing device for the helmet,

3. a clamping device for securitization of said helmet onto the head of a wearer of the harnessing and position sensing device,

4. a buttressing device for supporting the weight of said helmet on the head of the wearer of the apparatus,

5. a lateral movement/flex damper device for damping any counter movement of the head of the wearer against any side of interior wall surface of the protective helmet,

6. a shoulder guard harness with its respective means for onset-of-impact bracing signals to both the protective helmet and to the vest/torso bracing framework component, said shoulder guard harness being further stabilized by tubing which, itself, is structurally supported by a strapping facility being secured by a strapping means at the waist of the wearer;

b. securely donning and strapping into place the vest/torso bracing framework component for means of protection against said possible external impacts to the head, neck, and torso of the wearer of the apparatus, said apparatus providing protective means such that said collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component are predisposed for inter-dependent bracing thus constituting a mutually dependent means of the apparatus for enclosing, thus protecting, the central nervous system of the human body, head, neck, and torso/spinal cord, from injurious impacts, said system extending from the head to below the torso waist; accordingly, neither of said collar/shoulder bracing component nor of the vest/torso bracing framework component, being exclusive with respect to the onset-of-impact bracing signals arising from either component, so necessarily providing inter-reactive means for mutual bracing protection as a two-component apparatus means for operating in unison for total protection of head, neck and torso/spinal cord members;

c. then said wearer, being so protected, exposing the apparatus, being thus worn, to known, but unpredictable and potentially injurious occasions of aggressive forces from said external impacts, said apparatus employing at least one signal transmission means for inter-reactive correspondences of onset-of-impact bracing signals for cessation of movement arising from said external impacts against said protective helmet of the collar/shoulder bracing component and against said vest/torso bracing framework component of the apparatus;

12. The method of using the body impact bracing apparatus of claim 11 wherein said neck stabilizing and spanning device being a linking, inter-component, process whereby said collar/shoulder bracing component and said vest/torso bracing framework component are predisposed for bracing with respect to each other for an interval, said bracing being due to said onset-of-impact bracing signals arising from said external impacts against the head, neck, or torso; said spanning device of the collar/shoulder bracing component, therefore, is central to the apparatus, providing a contiguous, tandem-bracing relationship between:

a. upper and lower components of the apparatus, which are the collar/shoulder bracing component and the vest/torso bracing framework component, respectively, and

b. a first component means and a second component means for their corresponding protective bracing of: 1. Head, 2. Neck, and 3. Torso, thus being a three-segment exposure to injury requiring a three-segment protective apparatus in two components, neither component working in isolation, without the other, for complete protection of the CNS as a whole: head, neck, and torso/spinal cord, each being suspect upon medical assessments due to concussion impact determinations;

whereby, the 3-segment dual component protective focus of the bracing apparatus solves a major problem by providing protective means against impact injuries, not just to the head within a faulty protective helmet but, more importantly with this new technology, to the neck: the cervix section of the vertebral column, which continues extending downward through the torso to below the waist; accordingly, the design of such dual component apparatus presumes the integrity, the entirety, of the Central Nervous System, any part of which being damaged, at least by concussive impacts, can cause subtle but cumulative withdrawals of vital elements for neurological health thus rendering those wearing flawed conventional protective equipment vulnerable to likely debilitating neurological diseases, TBI/CTE, (Traumatic Brain Injury & Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy) which too often, in hockey and American football alone, result in serious behavioral problems, memory loss, other long-term health issues, referred to as post concussion syndrome, PCS; its symptoms, from even mild head injury, include: headache, dizziness, fatigue, poor memory, poor concentration, irritability, depression, sleep disturbance, frustration, restlessness, sensitivity to noise, blurred vision, double vision, photophobia, nausea, tinnitus, and others; recovery can take weeks or months, some of these can become chronic; medical research has found that cumulative concussions may lead even to death as related to, or subsequent to, the above as causative factors; medical research has also found that impact concussions, being too often misdiagnosed as a problem in the head, must be attributed to the head, neck, (cervix) and spinal cord, which are, per se, the confines of the central nervous system, for which the Body Impact Bracing Apparatus seeks to provide integral adequate protection.