US20140052349A1 - Shovel, monitoring device of the same and output device of shovel - Google Patents
Shovel, monitoring device of the same and output device of shovel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140052349A1 US20140052349A1 US14/113,003 US201214113003A US2014052349A1 US 20140052349 A1 US20140052349 A1 US 20140052349A1 US 201214113003 A US201214113003 A US 201214113003A US 2014052349 A1 US2014052349 A1 US 2014052349A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- shovel
- image data
- time
- abnormal
- determined
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02F—DREDGING; SOIL-SHIFTING
- E02F9/00—Component parts of dredgers or soil-shifting machines, not restricted to one of the kinds covered by groups E02F3/00 - E02F7/00
- E02F9/26—Indicating devices
- E02F9/267—Diagnosing or detecting failure of vehicles
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0264—Control of logging system, e.g. decision on which data to store; time-stamping measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
- G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
- G07C5/0816—Indicating performance data, e.g. occurrence of a malfunction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q9/00—Arrangements in telecontrol or telemetry systems for selectively calling a substation from a main station, in which substation desired apparatus is selected for applying a control signal thereto or for obtaining measured values therefrom
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04Q—SELECTING
- H04Q2209/00—Arrangements in telecontrol or telemetry systems
- H04Q2209/80—Arrangements in the sub-station, i.e. sensing device
- H04Q2209/82—Arrangements in the sub-station, i.e. sensing device where the sensing device takes the initiative of sending data
- H04Q2209/823—Arrangements in the sub-station, i.e. sensing device where the sensing device takes the initiative of sending data where the data is sent when the measured values exceed a threshold, e.g. sending an alarm
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a shovel capable of determining an operational abnormality, a monitoring device of the shovel, and an output device mounted on a shovel capable of determining an operational abnormality.
- a failure determination method for construction equipment based on a detection value detected by a sensor mounted on the construction equipment, has been known (see PTL 1). Failure information is sent to a center, and therefore a failure diagnosis procedure is extracted in the center, based on the sensor detecting an abnormal value. An operator of the construction equipment conducts a failure diagnosis in accordance with the failure diagnosis procedure.
- An object of the invention is to provide a shovel which enables an operator to easily specify the cause of failure by making the operator confirm the circumstances at the time of failure and a monitoring device of the shovel.
- a shovel including:
- a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device
- control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on a detection value detected by the sensors and causes the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted from the temporary storage device to the abnormality information storage device when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
- a shovel including:
- a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device
- control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on a detection value detected by the sensors and causes the image data stored in the temporary storage device, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted from the transmitter when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
- a monitoring device of a shovel including:
- a transceiver that receives a plurality of detection values detected by a sensor for detecting a plurality physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel and image data acquired by an imaging device installed on the shovel and transmits a command to the shovel;
- control device performs an operation abnormality determination based on the detection values which are detected by the sensor and input from the transceiver and causes a command instructing transmission of image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted to the shovel via the transceiver when the operation is determined to be abnormal, and
- FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B are a side view and a plan view, respectively, of a shovel according to an embodiment 1.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the shovel according to the embodiment 1.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a process of an image capture control device of the shovel according to the embodiment 1.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the shovel according to the embodiment 1.
- FIG. 5 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on an output device of the shovel according to the embodiment 1.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of a shovel according to an embodiment 2.
- FIG. 7 is a chart showing an example of a detection value detected by a sensor.
- FIG. 8 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on an output device of the shovel according to the embodiment 2.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 3.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the shovel according to the embodiment 3.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 4.
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the monitoring device according to the embodiment 4.
- FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B are a side view and a plan view, respectively, of a shovel according to an embodiment 1.
- a hydraulic shovel exemplifies a shovel, in the embodiment 1.
- the embodiment 1 can be adopted to other shovels, such as a hybrid shovel or an electric shovel.
- An upper revolving superstructure 12 is mounted to an undercarriage 10 via a revolving bearing 11 .
- the upper revolving superstructure 12 revolves clockwise or counter-clockwise with respect to the undercarriage 10 .
- a boom 13 is installed on the upper revolving superstructure 12 .
- An arm 15 is connected to a tip of the boom 13 .
- a bucket 17 is connected to a tip of the arm 15 .
- the boom 13 is driven by a hydraulic cylinder 14 .
- the arm is driven by a hydraulic cylinder 16 .
- the bucket 17 is driven by a hydraulic cylinder 18 .
- a cabin 19 is mounted to the upper revolving superstructure 12 , and a driver gets into the cabin 19 and operates a hydraulic shovel.
- An imaging device 20 is mounted to the upper revolving superstructure 12 .
- a frontward imaging device 20 F, a right imaging device 20 R, a left imaging device 20 L and a backward imaging device 20 B constitute the imaging device 20 .
- the frontward imaging device 20 F, the right imaging device 20 R, the left imaging device 20 L and the backward imaging device 20 B respectively image front, right, left and back sides of the upper revolving superstructure 12 .
- the frontward imaging device 20 F is mounted between the cabin 19 and the boom 13 , for example.
- An omnidirectional image can be obtained by combining images obtained by these imaging devices.
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an abnormality determination function of the shovel.
- An image capture control device 24 stores image data acquired by the imaging device 20 in a temporary storage device 25 at a predetermined cycle.
- the temporary storage device 25 has a ring buffer structure, for example. In other words, the oldest image data are overwritten (replaced) with new image data when no free storage area remains.
- Image capture mode Storage portion 26 Information that specifies a capturing method of the image data, such as resolution and a capturing cycle, is stored in an image capture mode storage portion 26 .
- a parameter for specifying the resolution is set to any one of a “high resolution”, a “normal resolution” and a “low resolution”, for example.
- a parameter for specifying the capturing cycle is set to any one of a “long cycle”, a “normal cycle” and a “short cycle”.
- An image capture mode is determined by the resolution and the capturing cycle. An operator operates an input device 33 to input the image capture mode to a control device 30 . Then, the image capture mode is set to the image capture mode storage portion 26 .
- An image capture cycle is about several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example.
- the image capture control device 24 stores image data acquired by the imaging device 20 , based on the image capture mode set to the image capture mode storage portion 26 , in the temporary storage device 25 .
- image resolution or lengthening the capturing cycle it is possible to store a long term image data in the temporary storage device 25 .
- by increasing the image resolution and shortening the capturing cycle it is possible to increase an information amount of image data in a predetermined time.
- a plurality of sensors 34 are installed on the shovel.
- the sensors 34 detect physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel.
- An engine speed, a radiator coolant temperature, a fuel temperature, an atmospheric pressure, an engine oil pressure, a boost temperature, an intake temperature, a hydraulic operating fluid temperature, a boost pressure, a battery voltage, a hydraulic pressure of each part, a machine operation time, a traveling operation time, a revolving operation time, an idle time and the like are exemplified as the physical quantities relating to the operation state.
- the control device 30 controls the temporary storage device 25 , the image capture mode storage portion 26 , an output device 31 , and an abnormality information storage device 32 .
- Instructions of an operator are input to the control device 30 via the input device 33 .
- the detection values detected by the sensors 34 are input to the control device 30 .
- a liquid crystal display device is adopted as the output device 31 , for example.
- a touch-panel type liquid crystal display device maybe adopted as a device functioning as the output device 31 and the input device 33 .
- FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of an operation of the image capture control device 24 .
- the image data is acquired from the imaging device 20 in step SA 1 .
- the resolution of the image data is converted so as to be the resolution specified in the image capture mode, and then the converted image data is stored in the temporary storage device 25 .
- the oldest image data are overwritten with new image data.
- step SA 2 a period of a capturing cycle specified in the image capture mode elapses. Then, whether or not the start key of the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SA 3 . When the start key of the shovel is in a stopped state, the process is finished. When the start key of the shovel is not in a stopped state, the process returns to step SA 1 .
- FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an operation of the control device 30 .
- the detection values detected by the sensors 34 are acquired in step SB 1 .
- Whether or not the acquired detection values are within an allowable range is determined in step SB 2 .
- the allowable range is preset for each physical quantity relating to the operation state.
- step SB 3 Whether or not the operation state is abnormal is determined in step SB 3 .
- the operation state of the shovel is determined to be abnormal.
- the operation state is determined to be normal.
- step SB 5 whether or not the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SB 5 .
- step SB 4 is executed. Then, whether or not the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SB 5 .
- step SB 4 a process of step SB 4 will be described.
- the image data stored in the temporary storage device 25 the image data which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the present is read out and stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- the detection value of each sensor 34 at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal is stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- the stored image data and the detection value of the sensor 34 are associated with each other.
- the image data and the detection value of the sensor 34 may be associated with each other, based on indices given thereto, for example.
- the image data and the detection value of the sensor 34 may be associated with each other, based on the time at which the data is acquired.
- image data corresponding to a period after that time may be stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- the image data corresponding to a period from the first time to the second time may be transmitted from the temporary storage device 25 to the abnormality information storage device 32 after waiting for the image data transmission until the second time, for example.
- a period from the first time to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal is set to about 30 sec to 5 min, and a period from the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the second time is set to about 10 sec to 1 min.
- an alarm may be raised from the output device 31 to inform an operator that the operation state is abnormal.
- step SB 5 When, in step SB 5 , it is determined that the shovel is in a stopped state, the process is finished. When it is determined that the shovel is not in a stopped state, the process returns to step SB 1 after a predetermined time elapses in step SB 6 .
- the waiting time of step SB 6 is set to several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example.
- the image data corresponding to a period before the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal or a period before and after the time is stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- the image data is useful in specifying the cause of abnormality.
- a maintenance person it is possible for a maintenance person to search for the cause of the abnormality by operating the input device 33 (see FIG. 2 ).
- FIG. 5 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on the output device 31 at the time of searching for the cause of abnormality.
- An image display window 35 , a progress status bar 36 , operating icons 37 and a character information display window 38 are shown in a display screen.
- a display screen when it is determined that an abnormality has occurred at the time of 10:35:20 on Apr. 26, 2012 is exemplarily shown in FIG. 5 .
- the progress status bar 36 shows a period from a data collection start time of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 (see FIG. 2 ) to a finish time.
- a slider 36 A displayed in the progress status bar 36 is slid, an image at the time corresponding to the position of the slider 36 A is displayed on the image display window 35 .
- a mark 36 B for indicating abnormality occurrence time is displayed on the progress status bar 36 at the position corresponding to a time of abnormality occurrence.
- the progress status bar 36 and the slider 36 A function as a time indicator by which the time of the image to be displayed on the image display window 35 is indicated.
- the length of the progress status bar 36 corresponds to a time range within which the time can be specified by the slider 36 A.
- a numeric input window used for inputting a time as a numeric value maybe displayed as a time indicator, instead of the slider 36 A.
- a playback, a frame-by-frame playback, a pause or the like of moving image can be carried out by operating the operating icon 37 .
- the operating icon 37 includes an instruction button used for jumping to the time of abnormality occurrence.
- the instruction button When the instruction button is operated, the image at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal in step SB 2 shown in FIG. 4 is displayed on the image display window 35 . It is possible to quickly display the image at the time immediately before the time of abnormality occurrence, by providing the instruction button used for jumping to the time of abnormality occurrence.
- FIG. 5 shows an example of an image at the time when the hydraulic abnormality is detected. It is possible to know that a truck intrudes between the upper revolving superstructure 12 and the bucket 17 (see FIGS. 1A and 1B ), from the image shown in FIG. 5 . Here, the following estimation can be carried out. The truck is in contact with hydraulic piping, and thus the hydraulic piping is broken. Therefore, a hydraulic abnormality is detected. In this way, it is possible to specify the cause of the abnormality by inspecting the image data corresponding to a period before and after the time at which the abnormality occurs.
- a functional block diagram of a shovel according to an embodiment 2 is the same as the functional block diagram of the shovel according to the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an operation of the control device 30 (see FIG. 2 ) of the shovel according to the embodiment 2.
- the control device 30 of the shovel according to the embodiment 2 includes a unit space defining flag and an area for storing the inverse matrix of a correlation matrix.
- the detection value is acquired from the sensor 34 (see FIG. 2 ), in step SC 1 .
- Whether or not the unit space is defined is determined in step SC 2 . Specifically, it is determined whether the unit space defining flag is set to “defined” or “undefined”, in step SC 2 .
- the unit space is used as a reference for determination when the abnormality determination using Mahalanobis-Taguchi method is carried out in the following step.
- the detection value of the sensor 34 is accumulated as a sample, in step SC 3 .
- Whether or not the number of accumulated samples is enough is determined in step SC 4 .
- the unit space is defined in step SC 5 . Specifically, the correlation matrix of physical quantities of samples which constitute the unit space and the inverse matrix of the correlation matrix are calculated.
- FIG. 7 shows an example of the detection values detected by the sensor 34 .
- the number of physical quantities of a detection target is represented by K, and the number of accumulated samples is represented by N.
- the detection values of N samples constitute the unit space.
- the detection value of a physical quantity k is indicated as x (n, k).
- the mean value and the standard deviation are calculated with respect to the detection values of each physical quantity.
- the mean value and the standard deviation of the physical quantity k are indicated as m(k) and a(k), respectively.
- the detection values of each sample are standardized, whereby standardized detection values are calculated.
- the standardized detection value X(n,k) of the detection value x(n,k) of the physical quantity k in the sample to which the sample number n is assigned is shown as the following Equation.
- Correlation coefficients between the physical quantities are calculated based on the standardized detection values X (n,k).
- a correlation coefficient r(i,j) of a physical quantity i and a physical quantity j is calculated by the following Equation.
- a correlation matrix R of the physical quantities 1 to K is shown as the following Equation.
- An inverse matrix A of the correlation matrix R is calculated.
- the inverse matrix A is stored in the control device 30 so as to be available in the following step.
- step SC 6 the unit space defining flag is set to “defined”.
- the process waits for a predetermined time in step SC 11 .
- the waiting time is set to about several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example. After waiting for the predetermined time, the process returns to step SC 1 .
- the unit space defining flag can be reset by the operation of an operator. In other words, it is possible to set the unit space defining flag to “undefined”.
- a Mahalanobis distance (MD) of the detection values (verification data) detected by each sensor 34 is calculated in step SC 7 .
- MD Mahalanobis distance
- the value of a physical quantity k, out of K detection values (verification data) detected by the sensors 34 is indicated as y(k).
- the detection value y(k) is standardized, whereby a standardized detection value Y (k) is calculated.
- the standardized detection value Y(k) can be calculated by the following Equation.
- the square (D 2 ) of the Mahalanobis distance of the verification data can be calculated by the following Equation using the inverse matrix A of the correlation matrix R.
- the Mahalanobis distance MD (or the square D 2 of the Mahalanobis distance) is calculated, the Mahalanobis distance MD and a threshold are compared in step SC 8 .
- the process of step SC 9 is to start.
- the process of step SC 9 is the same as the process of step SB 4 (see FIG. 4 ) in the embodiment 1.
- step SC 9 When the process of step SC 9 is finished or when the Mahalanobis distance MD is determined, in step SC 8 , to be equal to or less than the threshold, whether or not the shovel is in the stopped state is determined in step SC 10 .
- the process When the shovel is in the stopped state, the process is finished.
- the process waits for a predetermined time in step SC 11 . Then, the process returns to step SC 1 .
- the Mahalanobis-Taguchi method is adopted as a method of determining whether or not an operation state is abnormal. Thus, it is unnecessary to set the allowable range to each detection value of the sensors 34 .
- the allowable range of the detection value is set based on cases where the abnormality occurred in the past or the like, for example.
- a new abnormality which has not occurred in the past may not be detected in some cases.
- deviation amounts of the plurality of detection values with respect to allowed values are integrated into the Mahalanobis distance (MD) in the embodiment 2, and thus it is possible to easily determine whether or not the operation is abnormal.
- FIG. 8 shows an example of an image displayed on the output device 31 (see FIG. 2 ) when the cause of abnormality is searched for in the shovel according to the embodiment 2.
- FIG. 8 shows an example of an image displayed on the output device 31 (see FIG. 2 ) when the cause of abnormality is searched for in the shovel according to the embodiment 2.
- the embodiment 2 differs between the embodiment 2 and the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 will be described.
- a window 39 for displaying an alarm level variation is shown in the embodiment 2.
- a variation graph of alarm levels with the elapsed time corresponding to a time range specified by the slider 36 A is displayed in the window 39 for displaying the alarm level variation.
- a display image time line 39 A is displayed in the window 39 for displaying alarm level variation at a position corresponding to the time (the time corresponding to the displayed image) specified by the slider 36 A. Furthermore, an abnormality occurrence time line 39 B is displayed in the window 39 for displaying the alarm level variation at a position corresponding to the mark 36 B for indicating abnormality occurrence time.
- the alarm level shows the level of possibility that an abnormality is occurring in the shovel.
- the Mahalanobis distance calculated in step SC 7 (see FIG. 6 ) is adopted as the alarm level. It is conceived that any cause of abnormality is generated immediately before the alarm level is increased rapidly.
- FIG. 9 shows a functional block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 3.
- a description focuses on differences between the shovel of the embodiment 3 and the shovel of the embodiment 1. A description of the same configuration will not be repeated.
- an abnormality determination process and the accumulation process of data when the abnormality occurs are completed only in the shovel.
- the abnormality determination process is carried out by the local control device 30 mounted on a shovel 50 .
- the image data and the like when the operation is determined to be abnormal are accumulated in a monitoring device 60 .
- a transceiver 40 which transmits various data, such as image data, to the monitoring device 60 via a communication line 45 is mounted on the shovel 50 .
- a transceiver 41 , a control device 61 , an output device 62 , an input device 63 and the abnormality information storage device 32 are provided in the monitoring device 60 .
- the transceiver 41 receives data sent from the shovel 50 via the communication line 45 .
- the control device 61 controls the output device 62 , the input device 63 and the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a process performed by the local control device 30 mounted on the shovel 50 .
- Steps SB 1 , SB 2 , SB 3 , SB 5 , and SB 6 are, respectively, the same as steps SB 1 , SB 2 , SB 3 , SB 5 , and SB 6 of the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 4 .
- the process of step SD 4 is executed instead of step SB 4 in the embodiment 1.
- step SD 4 will be described.
- step SB 3 When the operation state is determined, in step SB 3 , to be abnormal, the local control device 30 waits until the second time following the determination time such that image data is accumulated in the temporary storage device 25 .
- the image data corresponding to a period from the first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the second time, out of the image data stored in the temporary storage device 25 , and the detection values of the sensors 34 when the operation is determined to be abnormal are transmitted from the transceiver 40 to the monitoring device 60 . Instead, the image data corresponding to a period from the first time prior to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, out of the image data stored in the temporary storage device 25 , may be transmitted. Furthermore, an alarm is raised from the output device 31 , whereby the abnormality is notified to an operator.
- the control device 61 of the monitoring device 60 stores the received image data in the abnormality information storage device 32 .
- an alarm is raised from the output device 62 .
- the control device 61 When an observer of the monitoring device 60 commands a data display via the input device 63 , the control device 61 outputs the detection values of the sensor and the image data, which are accumulated in the abnormality information storage device 32 , to the output device 62 .
- the image data corresponding to a period before and after the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal becomes useful information when an observer specifies the cause of abnormality.
- the image displayed on the output device 62 is the same as the image output on the output device 31 according to the embodiment 1 shown in
- FIG. 5 or the image output on the output device 31 according to the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 8 .
- FIG. 11 is a functional block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 4.
- a description focuses on differences of the shovel and the monitoring device between the embodiment 4 and the embodiment 3. A description of the same configuration will not be repeated.
- the local control device 30 mounted on the shovel 50 carries out the abnormality determination process in the embodiment 3.
- the control device 61 mounted on the monitoring device 60 carries out the abnormality determination process in the embodiment 4.
- the shovel 50 transmits an abnormality determination request as well as the detection values of the sensor 34 to the monitoring device 60 at predetermined cycles.
- FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of a process performed by the control device 61 of the monitoring device 60 .
- Whether or not the abnormality determination request is received from the shovel 50 is determined in step SE 1 .
- step SE 1 is repeated until the abnormality determination request is received.
- the abnormality determination is performed in step SE 2 , based on the detection value of the sensor which is received from the shovel 50 .
- the abnormality determination process is the same as the abnormality determination process of steps SB 2 and SB 3 (see FIG. 4 ) according to the embodiment 1 or steps SC 7 and SC 8 (see FIG. 6 ) according to the embodiment 2.
- step SE 4 When the operation state is determined to be abnormal in step SE 3 , it is commanded, in step SE 4 , that shovel 50 transmits the image data.
- This command includes a start time (the first time) and a finish time (the second time) of the image data to be transmitted.
- the shovel 50 transmits the image data corresponding to a period from the first time to the second time, out of the image data accumulated in the temporary storage device 25 , to the monitoring device 60 as a response to the command.
- step SE 5 the image data received from the shovel 50 and the detection values of the sensor at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal are stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 in a state of being associated with each other.
- step SE 6 whether or not the operation of the monitoring device 60 is in a stopped state is determined in step SE 6 .
- step SE 6 Whether or not the operation of the monitoring device 60 is in a stopped state is determined in step SE 6 , even when the operation is determined, in step SE 3 , not to be abnormal.
- step SE 6 When the monitoring device 60 is determined, in step SE 6 , not to be in a stopped state, the process returns to step SE 1 . When the monitoring device 60 is determined to be in a stopped state, the process is finished.
- an observer of the monitoring device 60 can use the image corresponding to a period before and after the time of the detected abnormality which is displayed on the output device 62 , even in the case of the embodiment 4.
- the image displayed on the output device 62 is the same as the image output on the output device 31 , according to the embodiment 1 shown in FIG. 5 , or the image output on the output device 31 , according to the embodiment 2 shown in FIG. 8 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Component Parts Of Construction Machinery (AREA)
Abstract
A temporary storage device temporarily stores image data acquired by an imaging device. Each of a plurality of sensors detects a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of a shovel. A control device performs an operation abnormality determination based on detection values detected by the sensors. When an operation is determined to be abnormal, the control device transmits the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, from the temporary storage device to the abnormality information storage device. Therefore, it is easy to specify a cause of abnormality of the operation state of the shovel.
Description
- The present invention relates to a shovel capable of determining an operational abnormality, a monitoring device of the shovel, and an output device mounted on a shovel capable of determining an operational abnormality.
- A failure determination method for construction equipment, based on a detection value detected by a sensor mounted on the construction equipment, has been known (see PTL 1). Failure information is sent to a center, and therefore a failure diagnosis procedure is extracted in the center, based on the sensor detecting an abnormal value. An operator of the construction equipment conducts a failure diagnosis in accordance with the failure diagnosis procedure.
- [PTL 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2002-332664
- In some cases, it is difficult to specify the cause of failure only by performing a diagnosis based on the detection value of the sensor and following the failure diagnosis procedure even when the failure diagnosis procedure is provided. Particularly, an attachment, such as a boom, and a cabin are mounted on a revolving superstructure of a shovel. Thus, motion not only in a front-rear direction but also in a right-left direction is carried out in the shovel. Since a working range of the shovel is extensive as described above, a situation in which the shovel encounters failure is likely to occur. An object of the invention is to provide a shovel which enables an operator to easily specify the cause of failure by making the operator confirm the circumstances at the time of failure and a monitoring device of the shovel.
- According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a shovel including:
- an imaging device;
- a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device;
- a plurality of sensors that each detect a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel;
- an abnormality information storage device; and
- a control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on a detection value detected by the sensors and causes the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted from the temporary storage device to the abnormality information storage device when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
- According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a shovel including:
- an imaging device;
- a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device;
- a plurality of sensors that each detect a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel;
- a transmitter for transmitting the data, and
- a control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on a detection value detected by the sensors and causes the image data stored in the temporary storage device, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted from the transmitter when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
- According to still another aspect of the invention, there is provided a monitoring device of a shovel including:
- a transceiver that receives a plurality of detection values detected by a sensor for detecting a plurality physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel and image data acquired by an imaging device installed on the shovel and transmits a command to the shovel;
- an abnormality information storage device; and
- a control device,
- wherein the control device performs an operation abnormality determination based on the detection values which are detected by the sensor and input from the transceiver and causes a command instructing transmission of image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to be transmitted to the shovel via the transceiver when the operation is determined to be abnormal, and
- wherein the image data which is transmitted from the shovel to the transceiver is stored in the abnormality information storage device in response to the command.
- It is possible to investigate the cause of abnormality using image data at the time where an operation state is determined to be abnormal.
-
FIG. 1A andFIG. 1B are a side view and a plan view, respectively, of a shovel according to anembodiment 1. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the shovel according to theembodiment 1. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a process of an image capture control device of the shovel according to theembodiment 1. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the shovel according to theembodiment 1. -
FIG. 5 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on an output device of the shovel according to theembodiment 1. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of a shovel according to anembodiment 2. -
FIG. 7 is a chart showing an example of a detection value detected by a sensor. -
FIG. 8 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on an output device of the shovel according to theembodiment 2. -
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to anembodiment 3. -
FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the shovel according to theembodiment 3. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 4. -
FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a process of a control device of the monitoring device according to the embodiment 4. -
FIG. 1A andFIG. 1B are a side view and a plan view, respectively, of a shovel according to anembodiment 1. A hydraulic shovel exemplifies a shovel, in theembodiment 1. However, theembodiment 1 can be adopted to other shovels, such as a hybrid shovel or an electric shovel. - An upper revolving
superstructure 12 is mounted to anundercarriage 10 via a revolving bearing 11. The upper revolvingsuperstructure 12 revolves clockwise or counter-clockwise with respect to theundercarriage 10. Aboom 13 is installed on the upper revolvingsuperstructure 12. Anarm 15 is connected to a tip of theboom 13. Abucket 17 is connected to a tip of thearm 15. Theboom 13 is driven by ahydraulic cylinder 14. The arm is driven by ahydraulic cylinder 16. Thebucket 17 is driven by ahydraulic cylinder 18. Furthermore, acabin 19 is mounted to the upper revolvingsuperstructure 12, and a driver gets into thecabin 19 and operates a hydraulic shovel. - An
imaging device 20 is mounted to the upper revolvingsuperstructure 12. Afrontward imaging device 20F, aright imaging device 20R, aleft imaging device 20L and abackward imaging device 20B constitute theimaging device 20. Thefrontward imaging device 20F, theright imaging device 20R, theleft imaging device 20L and thebackward imaging device 20B respectively image front, right, left and back sides of the upper revolvingsuperstructure 12. Thefrontward imaging device 20F is mounted between thecabin 19 and theboom 13, for example. An omnidirectional image can be obtained by combining images obtained by these imaging devices. -
FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of an abnormality determination function of the shovel. An imagecapture control device 24 stores image data acquired by theimaging device 20 in atemporary storage device 25 at a predetermined cycle. Thetemporary storage device 25 has a ring buffer structure, for example. In other words, the oldest image data are overwritten (replaced) with new image data when no free storage area remains. - Information that specifies a capturing method of the image data, such as resolution and a capturing cycle, is stored in an image capture
mode storage portion 26. A parameter for specifying the resolution is set to any one of a “high resolution”, a “normal resolution” and a “low resolution”, for example. A parameter for specifying the capturing cycle is set to any one of a “long cycle”, a “normal cycle” and a “short cycle”. An image capture mode is determined by the resolution and the capturing cycle. An operator operates aninput device 33 to input the image capture mode to acontrol device 30. Then, the image capture mode is set to the image capturemode storage portion 26. An image capture cycle is about several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example. - The image
capture control device 24 stores image data acquired by theimaging device 20, based on the image capture mode set to the image capturemode storage portion 26, in thetemporary storage device 25. By decreasing image resolution or lengthening the capturing cycle, it is possible to store a long term image data in thetemporary storage device 25. On the contrary, by increasing the image resolution and shortening the capturing cycle, it is possible to increase an information amount of image data in a predetermined time. - A plurality of
sensors 34 are installed on the shovel. Thesensors 34 detect physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel. An engine speed, a radiator coolant temperature, a fuel temperature, an atmospheric pressure, an engine oil pressure, a boost temperature, an intake temperature, a hydraulic operating fluid temperature, a boost pressure, a battery voltage, a hydraulic pressure of each part, a machine operation time, a traveling operation time, a revolving operation time, an idle time and the like are exemplified as the physical quantities relating to the operation state. - The
control device 30 controls thetemporary storage device 25, the image capturemode storage portion 26, anoutput device 31, and an abnormalityinformation storage device 32. - Instructions of an operator are input to the
control device 30 via theinput device 33. The detection values detected by thesensors 34 are input to thecontrol device 30. A liquid crystal display device is adopted as theoutput device 31, for example. A touch-panel type liquid crystal display device maybe adopted as a device functioning as theoutput device 31 and theinput device 33. -
FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of an operation of the imagecapture control device 24. When an engine start key of the shovel is turned on, the image data is acquired from theimaging device 20 in step SA1. The resolution of the image data is converted so as to be the resolution specified in the image capture mode, and then the converted image data is stored in thetemporary storage device 25. When a free area for storing the image data does not remain, the oldest image data are overwritten with new image data. - In step SA2, a period of a capturing cycle specified in the image capture mode elapses. Then, whether or not the start key of the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SA3. When the start key of the shovel is in a stopped state, the process is finished. When the start key of the shovel is not in a stopped state, the process returns to step SA1.
-
FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of an operation of thecontrol device 30. When the engine start key of the shovel is turned on, the detection values detected by thesensors 34 are acquired in step SB1. Whether or not the acquired detection values are within an allowable range is determined in step SB2. The allowable range is preset for each physical quantity relating to the operation state. - Whether or not the operation state is abnormal is determined in step SB3. When at least one of the detection values is out of the allowable range, the operation state of the shovel is determined to be abnormal. When all the detection values are within the allowable range, the operation state is determined to be normal. When the operation state is determined to be normal, whether or not the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SB5. When the operation state is determined to be abnormal, step SB4 is executed. Then, whether or not the shovel is in a stopped state is determined in step SB5.
- Hereinafter, a process of step SB4 will be described. Among the image data stored in the
temporary storage device 25, the image data which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the present is read out and stored in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32. Furthermore, the detection value of eachsensor 34 at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal is stored in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32. The stored image data and the detection value of thesensor 34 are associated with each other. The image data and the detection value of thesensor 34 may be associated with each other, based on indices given thereto, for example. In addition, the image data and the detection value of thesensor 34 may be associated with each other, based on the time at which the data is acquired. - Furthermore, in addition to the image data corresponding to a period prior to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, image data corresponding to a period after that time may be stored in the abnormality
information storage device 32. At a second time following the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, the image data corresponding to a period from the first time to the second time may be transmitted from thetemporary storage device 25 to the abnormalityinformation storage device 32 after waiting for the image data transmission until the second time, for example. A period from the first time to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal is set to about 30 sec to 5 min, and a period from the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the second time is set to about 10 sec to 1 min. - Furthermore, an alarm may be raised from the
output device 31 to inform an operator that the operation state is abnormal. - When, in step SB5, it is determined that the shovel is in a stopped state, the process is finished. When it is determined that the shovel is not in a stopped state, the process returns to step SB1 after a predetermined time elapses in step SB6. The waiting time of step SB6 is set to several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example.
- In the
embodiment 1, the image data corresponding to a period before the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal or a period before and after the time is stored in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32. The image data is useful in specifying the cause of abnormality. When any abnormality occurs in the shovel, it is possible for a maintenance person to search for the cause of the abnormality by operating the input device 33 (seeFIG. 2 ). -
FIG. 5 is a view showing an example of an image displayed on theoutput device 31 at the time of searching for the cause of abnormality. Animage display window 35, aprogress status bar 36, operatingicons 37 and a characterinformation display window 38 are shown in a display screen. A display screen when it is determined that an abnormality has occurred at the time of 10:35:20 on Apr. 26, 2012 is exemplarily shown inFIG. 5 . - The
progress status bar 36 shows a period from a data collection start time of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device 32 (seeFIG. 2 ) to a finish time. When aslider 36A displayed in theprogress status bar 36 is slid, an image at the time corresponding to the position of theslider 36A is displayed on theimage display window 35. Amark 36B for indicating abnormality occurrence time is displayed on theprogress status bar 36 at the position corresponding to a time of abnormality occurrence. Theprogress status bar 36 and theslider 36A function as a time indicator by which the time of the image to be displayed on theimage display window 35 is indicated. The length of theprogress status bar 36 corresponds to a time range within which the time can be specified by theslider 36A. A numeric input window used for inputting a time as a numeric value maybe displayed as a time indicator, instead of theslider 36A. - A playback, a frame-by-frame playback, a pause or the like of moving image can be carried out by operating the operating
icon 37. In addition, the operatingicon 37 includes an instruction button used for jumping to the time of abnormality occurrence. When the instruction button is operated, the image at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal in step SB2 shown inFIG. 4 is displayed on theimage display window 35. It is possible to quickly display the image at the time immediately before the time of abnormality occurrence, by providing the instruction button used for jumping to the time of abnormality occurrence. -
FIG. 5 shows an example of an image at the time when the hydraulic abnormality is detected. It is possible to know that a truck intrudes between the upper revolvingsuperstructure 12 and the bucket 17 (seeFIGS. 1A and 1B ), from the image shown inFIG. 5 . Here, the following estimation can be carried out. The truck is in contact with hydraulic piping, and thus the hydraulic piping is broken. Therefore, a hydraulic abnormality is detected. In this way, it is possible to specify the cause of the abnormality by inspecting the image data corresponding to a period before and after the time at which the abnormality occurs. - A functional block diagram of a shovel according to an
embodiment 2 is the same as the functional block diagram of the shovel according to theembodiment 1 shown inFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing an operation of the control device 30 (seeFIG. 2 ) of the shovel according to theembodiment 2. Thecontrol device 30 of the shovel according to theembodiment 2 includes a unit space defining flag and an area for storing the inverse matrix of a correlation matrix. - The detection value is acquired from the sensor 34 (see
FIG. 2 ), in step SC1. Whether or not the unit space is defined is determined in step SC2. Specifically, it is determined whether the unit space defining flag is set to “defined” or “undefined”, in step SC2. The unit space is used as a reference for determination when the abnormality determination using Mahalanobis-Taguchi method is carried out in the following step. When the unit space is undefined, the detection value of thesensor 34 is accumulated as a sample, in step SC3. Whether or not the number of accumulated samples is enough is determined in step SC4. When the number of samples is enough, the unit space is defined in step SC5. Specifically, the correlation matrix of physical quantities of samples which constitute the unit space and the inverse matrix of the correlation matrix are calculated. - Hereinafter, a method of defining the unit space will be described.
-
FIG. 7 shows an example of the detection values detected by thesensor 34. The number of physical quantities of a detection target is represented by K, and the number of accumulated samples is represented by N. The detection values of N samples constitute the unit space. In a sample to which the sample number n is assigned, the detection value of a physical quantity k is indicated as x (n, k). The mean value and the standard deviation are calculated with respect to the detection values of each physical quantity. The mean value and the standard deviation of the physical quantity k are indicated as m(k) and a(k), respectively. - The detection values of each sample are standardized, whereby standardized detection values are calculated. The standardized detection value X(n,k) of the detection value x(n,k) of the physical quantity k in the sample to which the sample number n is assigned is shown as the following Equation.
-
- Correlation coefficients between the physical quantities are calculated based on the standardized detection values X (n,k).
- A correlation coefficient r(i,j) of a physical quantity i and a physical quantity j is calculated by the following Equation.
-
- A correlation matrix R of the
physical quantities 1 to K is shown as the following Equation. -
- An inverse matrix A of the correlation matrix R is calculated. The inverse matrix A is stored in the
control device 30 so as to be available in the following step. - In step SC6, the unit space defining flag is set to “defined”. In the case where the number of samples is determined to be not enough in step SC4, or after the unit space defining flag is set to “defined” in step SC6, the process waits for a predetermined time in step SC11. The waiting time is set to about several hundred ms to 1 sec, for example. After waiting for the predetermined time, the process returns to step SC1.
- Furthermore, the unit space defining flag can be reset by the operation of an operator. In other words, it is possible to set the unit space defining flag to “undefined”.
- When, in step SC2, the unit space is determined to be defined, a Mahalanobis distance (MD) of the detection values (verification data) detected by each
sensor 34 is calculated in step SC7. Hereinafter, a calculation method of the Mahalanobis distance will be described. - The value of a physical quantity k, out of K detection values (verification data) detected by the
sensors 34, is indicated as y(k). The detection value y(k) is standardized, whereby a standardized detection value Y (k) is calculated. The standardized detection value Y(k) can be calculated by the following Equation. -
- The square (D2) of the Mahalanobis distance of the verification data can be calculated by the following Equation using the inverse matrix A of the correlation matrix R.
-
- When the Mahalanobis distance MD (or the square D2 of the Mahalanobis distance) is calculated, the Mahalanobis distance MD and a threshold are compared in step SC8. The threshold is set in advance. The threshold is set to 2, for example. When the threshold is compared to the square D2 itself of the Mahalanobis distance defined in Equation described above, the threshold is set to 22=4. When the Mahalanobis distance MD is greater than the threshold, the process of step SC9 is to start. The process of step SC9 is the same as the process of step SB4 (see
FIG. 4 ) in theembodiment 1. - When the process of step SC9 is finished or when the Mahalanobis distance MD is determined, in step SC8, to be equal to or less than the threshold, whether or not the shovel is in the stopped state is determined in step SC10. When the shovel is in the stopped state, the process is finished. When the shovel is not in the stopped state, the process waits for a predetermined time in step SC11. Then, the process returns to step SC1.
- In the
embodiment 2, the Mahalanobis-Taguchi method is adopted as a method of determining whether or not an operation state is abnormal. Thus, it is unnecessary to set the allowable range to each detection value of thesensors 34. - In the
embodiment 1 described above, the allowable range of the detection value is set based on cases where the abnormality occurred in the past or the like, for example. Thus, there is a possibility that a new abnormality which has not occurred in the past may not be detected in some cases. However, by adopting the Mahalanobis-Taguchi method, it is unnecessary to set the allowable range of the detection value based on cases in the past. Therefore, it is possible to detect a new abnormality which has not occurred in the past. - Furthermore, deviation amounts of the plurality of detection values with respect to allowed values are integrated into the Mahalanobis distance (MD) in the
embodiment 2, and thus it is possible to easily determine whether or not the operation is abnormal. -
FIG. 8 shows an example of an image displayed on the output device 31 (seeFIG. 2 ) when the cause of abnormality is searched for in the shovel according to theembodiment 2. Hereinafter, differences between theembodiment 2 and theembodiment 1 shown inFIG. 5 will be described. Besides theimage display window 35, theprogress status bar 36, the operatingicon 37 and the characterinformation display window 38, awindow 39 for displaying an alarm level variation is shown in theembodiment 2. A variation graph of alarm levels with the elapsed time corresponding to a time range specified by theslider 36A is displayed in thewindow 39 for displaying the alarm level variation. A displayimage time line 39A is displayed in thewindow 39 for displaying alarm level variation at a position corresponding to the time (the time corresponding to the displayed image) specified by theslider 36A. Furthermore, an abnormalityoccurrence time line 39B is displayed in thewindow 39 for displaying the alarm level variation at a position corresponding to themark 36B for indicating abnormality occurrence time. The alarm level shows the level of possibility that an abnormality is occurring in the shovel. The Mahalanobis distance calculated in step SC7 (seeFIG. 6 ) is adopted as the alarm level. It is conceived that any cause of abnormality is generated immediately before the alarm level is increased rapidly. -
FIG. 9 shows a functional block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to anembodiment 3. Hereinafter, a description focuses on differences between the shovel of theembodiment 3 and the shovel of theembodiment 1. A description of the same configuration will not be repeated. - In the
embodiment 1, an abnormality determination process and the accumulation process of data when the abnormality occurs are completed only in the shovel. In theembodiment 2, the abnormality determination process is carried out by thelocal control device 30 mounted on ashovel 50. The image data and the like when the operation is determined to be abnormal are accumulated in amonitoring device 60. Atransceiver 40 which transmits various data, such as image data, to themonitoring device 60 via acommunication line 45 is mounted on theshovel 50. - A
transceiver 41, acontrol device 61, anoutput device 62, aninput device 63 and the abnormalityinformation storage device 32 are provided in themonitoring device 60. Thetransceiver 41 receives data sent from theshovel 50 via thecommunication line 45. Thecontrol device 61 controls theoutput device 62, theinput device 63 and the abnormalityinformation storage device 32. -
FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a process performed by thelocal control device 30 mounted on theshovel 50. Steps SB1, SB2, SB3, SB5, and SB6 are, respectively, the same as steps SB1, SB2, SB3, SB5, and SB6 of theembodiment 1 shown inFIG. 4 . The process of step SD4 is executed instead of step SB4 in theembodiment 1. Hereinafter, step SD4 will be described. - When the operation state is determined, in step SB3, to be abnormal, the
local control device 30 waits until the second time following the determination time such that image data is accumulated in thetemporary storage device 25. The image data corresponding to a period from the first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the second time, out of the image data stored in thetemporary storage device 25, and the detection values of thesensors 34 when the operation is determined to be abnormal are transmitted from thetransceiver 40 to themonitoring device 60. Instead, the image data corresponding to a period from the first time prior to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, out of the image data stored in thetemporary storage device 25, may be transmitted. Furthermore, an alarm is raised from theoutput device 31, whereby the abnormality is notified to an operator. - Subsequently, a process of the
control device 61 of themonitoring device 60 will be described. When the image data corresponding to a period before and after the time at which the operation state is determined to be abnormal and the detection values of the sensors are received from theshovel 50, thecontrol device 61 stores the received image data in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32. At the same time, an alarm is raised from theoutput device 62. - When an observer of the
monitoring device 60 commands a data display via theinput device 63, thecontrol device 61 outputs the detection values of the sensor and the image data, which are accumulated in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32, to theoutput device 62. The image data corresponding to a period before and after the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal becomes useful information when an observer specifies the cause of abnormality. The image displayed on theoutput device 62 is the same as the image output on theoutput device 31 according to theembodiment 1 shown in -
FIG. 5 or the image output on theoutput device 31 according to theembodiment 2 shown inFIG. 8 . -
FIG. 11 is a functional block diagram of a shovel and a monitoring device according to an embodiment 4. Hereinafter, a description focuses on differences of the shovel and the monitoring device between the embodiment 4 and theembodiment 3. A description of the same configuration will not be repeated. - The
local control device 30 mounted on theshovel 50 carries out the abnormality determination process in theembodiment 3. However, thecontrol device 61 mounted on themonitoring device 60 carries out the abnormality determination process in the embodiment 4. Theshovel 50 transmits an abnormality determination request as well as the detection values of thesensor 34 to themonitoring device 60 at predetermined cycles. -
FIG. 12 shows a flowchart of a process performed by thecontrol device 61 of themonitoring device 60. Whether or not the abnormality determination request is received from theshovel 50 is determined in step SE1. When the abnormality determination request is not received, step SE1 is repeated until the abnormality determination request is received. - When the abnormality determination request is received, the abnormality determination is performed in step SE2, based on the detection value of the sensor which is received from the
shovel 50. The abnormality determination process is the same as the abnormality determination process of steps SB2 and SB3 (seeFIG. 4 ) according to theembodiment 1 or steps SC7 and SC8 (seeFIG. 6 ) according to theembodiment 2. - When the operation state is determined to be abnormal in step SE3, it is commanded, in step SE4, that
shovel 50 transmits the image data. This command includes a start time (the first time) and a finish time (the second time) of the image data to be transmitted. When receiving the transmission command of the image data, theshovel 50 transmits the image data corresponding to a period from the first time to the second time, out of the image data accumulated in thetemporary storage device 25, to themonitoring device 60 as a response to the command. In addition, it is preferable to perform a data compression of the image data before transmission. - In step SE5, the image data received from the
shovel 50 and the detection values of the sensor at the time when the operation is determined to be abnormal are stored in the abnormalityinformation storage device 32 in a state of being associated with each other. When a process of step SE5 is finished, whether or not the operation of themonitoring device 60 is in a stopped state is determined in step SE6. Whether or not the operation of themonitoring device 60 is in a stopped state is determined in step SE6, even when the operation is determined, in step SE3, not to be abnormal. - When the
monitoring device 60 is determined, in step SE6, not to be in a stopped state, the process returns to step SE1. When themonitoring device 60 is determined to be in a stopped state, the process is finished. - To specify the cause of the abnormality, an observer of the
monitoring device 60 can use the image corresponding to a period before and after the time of the detected abnormality which is displayed on theoutput device 62, even in the case of the embodiment 4. The image displayed on theoutput device 62 is the same as the image output on theoutput device 31, according to theembodiment 1 shown inFIG. 5 , or the image output on theoutput device 31, according to theembodiment 2 shown inFIG. 8 . - Although the invention is described with reference to the embodiments described above, it is not limited thereto. For example, it is apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified, improved, combined, or the like in various ways.
-
- 10: undercarriage
- 11: revolving mechanism
- 12: upper revolving superstructure
- 13: boom
- 14: hydraulic cylinder
- 15: arm
- 16: hydraulic cylinder
- 17: bucket
- 18: hydraulic cylinder
- 19: cabin
- 20F: frontward imaging device
- 20R: right imaging device
- 20L: left imaging device
- 20B: backward imaging device
- 24: image control device
- 25: temporary storage device
- 26: operation mode storage portion
- 27: sensor
- 30: control device
- 31: output device
- 32: abnormality information storage device
- 33: input device
- 34: sensor
- 35: image display window
- 36: progress status bar
- 36A: slider
- 36B: mark for indicating abnormality occurrence time
- 37: operating icon
- 38: character information display window
- 39: window for displaying alarm level variation
- 39A: display image time line
- 39B: abnormality occurrence time line
- 40, 41: transceiver
- 45: communication line
- 50: shovel
- 60: monitoring device
- 61: control device
- 62: output device
- 63: input device
Claims (20)
1. A shovel comprising:
an imaging device;
a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device;
a plurality of sensors that each detect a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel;
an abnormality information storage device; and
a control device that determines whether or not an operation is abnormal based on detection values detected by the sensors, and transmits the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, from the temporary storage device to the abnormality information storage device when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
2. The shovel according to claim 1 ,
wherein the control device stores the detection values detected by the sensors as well as the image data at the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal in the abnormality information storage device.
3. The shovel according to claim 1 ,
wherein the control device
additionally transmits the image data, which corresponds to a period until a second time following the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, from the temporary storage device to the abnormality information storage device when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
4. The shovel according to claim 1 ,
wherein the control device
acquires the detection values detected by the plurality of sensors, during a normal operation, and decides an unit space, which is used in Mahalanobis-Taguchi method, based on the acquired detection values,
calculates Mahalanobis distance from the center of the unit space to detection values of an evaluation-target detected by the plurality of sensors, and
performs the operation abnormality determination based on the calculated Mahalanobis distance.
5. The shovel according to claim 1 ,
wherein the temporary storage device has a ring buffer structure where the oldest image data are overwritten with new image data when no free storage area remains,
wherein the control device has an image capture mode storage portion for storing an image capture mode which specifies the resolution of image data to be stored in the temporary storage device, and
wherein the image data which is acquired by the imaging device is stored in the temporary storage device at the resolution specified in the image capture mode stored in the image capture mode storage portion.
6. The shovel according to claim 1 , further comprising:
an output device for displaying an image,
wherein the control device
displays a time indicator for an operator to specify a time on the output device, and
displays the image data at the time specified by the time indicator, out of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device, on the output device as an image.
7. The shovel according to claim 6 ,
wherein the control device displays information about the time range within which a time can be specified to be displayed on the time indicator and displays a temporal variation of alarm levels on the output device, corresponding to the time range displayed on the time indicator.
8. A shovel comprising:
an imaging device;
a temporary storage device that temporarily stores image data acquired by the imaging device;
a plurality of sensors that each detect a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel;
a transmitter for transmitting the data, and
a control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on detection values detected by the sensors, and transmits the image data stored in the temporary storage device, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which an operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, from the transmitter when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
9. The shovel according to claim 8 ,
wherein the control device transmits the detection values detected by the sensors at the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal as well as the image data from the transmitter.
10. The shovel according to claim 8 ,
wherein the control device
additionally transmits the image data, which corresponds to a period until a second time following the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, from the transmitter when the operation is determined to be abnormal.
11. The shovel according to claim 8 ,
wherein the control device
acquires the detection values detected by the plurality of sensors, during a normal operation, and decides an unit space which is used in Mahalanobis-Taguchi method, based on the acquired detection values,
calculates a Mahalanobis distance from the center of the unit space to detection values of an evaluation-target acquired by the plurality of sensors, and
performs the operation abnormality determination of an operation based on the calculated Mahalanobis distance.
12. A monitoring device of a shovel, comprising:
a transceiver that receives a plurality of detection values detected by sensors for detecting a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel and image data acquired by an imaging device installed on the shovel and transmits a command to the shovel;
an abnormality information storage device; and
a control device,
wherein the control device determines whether or not an operation is abnormal based on the detection values which are detected by the sensors and input from the transceiver, and the control device transmits a command instructing transmission of image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the operation is determined to be abnormal, to the shovel via the transceiver when the operation is determined to be abnormal, and
wherein the control device stores the image data which is transmitted from the shovel to the transceiver in the abnormality information storage device in response to the command.
13. The monitoring device of a shovel according to claim 12 , further comprising:
an output device for displaying an image,
wherein the control device
displays a time indicator for an operator to specify a time on the output device, and
displays the image data at the time specified by the time indicator, out of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device, on the output device as an image.
14. The monitoring device of a shovel according to claim 13 ,
wherein the control device displays information about the time range within which a time can be specified on the time indicator and displays a temporal variation of alarm levels on the output device, corresponding to the time range displayed on the time indicator.
15. A monitoring device of a shovel comprising:
a receiver that receives image data from a shovel that has an imaging device, a temporary storage device temporarily storing image data acquired by the imaging device, a plurality of sensors that each detect a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel, and a local control device that performs an operation abnormality determination based on detection values detected by the sensors, reads out the image data from the temporary storage device when the operation is determined to be abnormal, and transmits the image data to the monitoring device of the shovel;
an abnormality information storage device for storing image data;
an output device for displaying an image; and
a control device,
wherein the control device stores the image data received by the receiver in the abnormality information storage device and displays the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device on the output device as an image.
16. The monitoring device of a shovel according to claim 15 ,
wherein the control device
displays a time indicator for an operator to specify a time on the output device, and
displays the image data at the time specified by the time indicator, out of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device, on the output device as an image.
17. An output device of a shovel that displays image data acquired by an imaging device mounted on a shovel,
wherein the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the shovel is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the shovel is determined to be abnormal, is displayed.
18. A method of monitoring a shovel, comprising:
storing image data acquired by an imaging device mounted on a shovel in a temporary storage device temporarily;
detecting a plurality of physical quantities relating to an operation state of the shovel by a plurality of sensors mounted on the shovel, respectively, and performing an operation abnormality determination based on detection values detected by the sensors;
reading out the image data from the temporary storage device and transmitting the image data to the monitoring device of the shovel when an operation is determined to be abnormal in performing an operation abnormality determination;
storing the image data received by the monitoring device in an abnormality information storage device of the monitoring device; and
displaying the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device as an image on an output device of the monitoring device.
19. The method of monitoring the shovel according to claim 18 , further comprising:
displaying a time indicator for an operator to specify a time on the output device; and
specifying a time on the time indicator by an operator,
wherein the image data at the time specified by an operator, out of the image data stored in the abnormality information storage device, is displayed as an image on the output device in displaying the image data as an image on the output device.
20. A method of monitoring a shovel, comprising:
acquiring image data acquired by an imaging device mounted on a shovel; and
displaying the image data, which corresponds to a period from a first time prior to a time at which the shovel is determined to be abnormal to at least the time at which the shovel is determined to be abnormal, out of the image data acquired in the step of acquiring the image data, on an output device.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2011-109437 | 2011-05-16 | ||
JP2011109437 | 2011-05-16 | ||
PCT/JP2012/062288 WO2012157603A1 (en) | 2011-05-16 | 2012-05-14 | Shovel, monitoring device therefor, and shovel output device |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140052349A1 true US20140052349A1 (en) | 2014-02-20 |
Family
ID=47176920
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/113,003 Abandoned US20140052349A1 (en) | 2011-05-16 | 2012-05-14 | Shovel, monitoring device of the same and output device of shovel |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20140052349A1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2711471B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5709986B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101614013B1 (en) |
CN (2) | CN103459728A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012157603A1 (en) |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130261885A1 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Harnischfeger Technologies, Inc. | Overhead view system for a shovel |
US20140195015A1 (en) * | 2013-01-08 | 2014-07-10 | Vega Grieshaber Kg | Method for monitoring and controlling field devices, control device, program elements and machine-readable medium |
US20150222495A1 (en) * | 2014-02-04 | 2015-08-06 | Falkonry Inc. | Operating behavior classification interface |
US10308157B2 (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2019-06-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Truck cycle segmentation monitoring system and method |
US10409926B2 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2019-09-10 | Falkonry Inc. | Learning expected operational behavior of machines from generic definitions and past behavior |
US10802941B2 (en) | 2015-02-12 | 2020-10-13 | Edwards Limited | Processing tool monitoring |
CN112166218A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2021-01-01 | 株式会社小松制作所 | Display system for working machine and control method thereof |
EP3783156A4 (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2022-01-26 | Komatsu Ltd. | Display system for wheel loader, and control method for display system |
US20220205222A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-06-30 | Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Shovel |
US20220251806A1 (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2022-08-11 | Sumitomo Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Excavator management system, mobile terminal for excavator, and recording medium |
CN117216728A (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2023-12-12 | 金成技术股份有限公司 | Excavator movable arm stability detection method |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6169473B2 (en) * | 2013-10-25 | 2017-07-26 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | Work machine management device and work machine abnormality determination method |
JP6320185B2 (en) * | 2014-06-16 | 2018-05-09 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | Excavator support device |
WO2016148251A1 (en) * | 2015-03-19 | 2016-09-22 | 住友建機株式会社 | Excavator |
JP6543533B2 (en) * | 2015-08-26 | 2019-07-10 | Kyb株式会社 | Data processor |
JP6608345B2 (en) * | 2016-09-28 | 2019-11-20 | 日立建機株式会社 | Work machine |
WO2018167904A1 (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2018-09-20 | 三菱電機ビルテクノサービス株式会社 | Monitoring system |
CN109577395B (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2020-12-01 | 中船重工中南装备有限责任公司 | Track chassis cutter suction type dredging robot with track correcting function |
JP6956347B2 (en) * | 2019-01-31 | 2021-11-02 | 株式会社安川電機 | Trace data acquisition system, trace data acquisition method, and program |
CN114008274B (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2024-03-19 | 住友建机株式会社 | Excavator and excavator diagnostic system |
JP7257430B2 (en) * | 2021-02-10 | 2023-04-13 | 住友重機械工業株式会社 | Excavators and systems for excavators |
WO2023190116A1 (en) | 2022-03-31 | 2023-10-05 | 住友建機株式会社 | Excavator, excavator management system, and excavator assisting device |
WO2023218653A1 (en) * | 2022-05-13 | 2023-11-16 | ファナック株式会社 | Video management device, and computer-readable storage medium |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060177119A1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2006-08-10 | Mcpheely Bernard M | Digital diagnosti video system for manufacturing and industrial process |
US7149530B1 (en) * | 1999-03-17 | 2006-12-12 | Komatsu Ltd. | Device for presenting information to mobile |
US20070118338A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-24 | Caterpillar Inc. | Process model based virtual sensor and method |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH07119183A (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1995-05-09 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | Monitoring device for hydraulic working machine |
JP3935626B2 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2007-06-27 | 日立建機株式会社 | Automatic operation construction machine start-up inspection device |
JP4356157B2 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2009-11-04 | 井関農機株式会社 | Abnormal information storage device for work vehicle |
JP4897152B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2012-03-14 | 日立建機株式会社 | Construction machine failure diagnosis method and construction machine failure diagnosis system |
CN1291602C (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2006-12-20 | 株式会社日立制作所 | Information monitoring providing apparatus and information monitoring providing method |
JP3902168B2 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2007-04-04 | 日立建機株式会社 | Diagnostic information display system for construction machinery |
JP2005113397A (en) * | 2003-10-03 | 2005-04-28 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | Display device of construction machine |
JP4310632B2 (en) * | 2003-11-07 | 2009-08-12 | 日立建機株式会社 | Construction machine display device |
JP2005163370A (en) * | 2003-12-02 | 2005-06-23 | Hitachi Constr Mach Co Ltd | Image display device for construction machine |
AU2008284657B2 (en) * | 2007-08-09 | 2011-05-12 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Operating machine instrument diagnostic apparatus and instrument diagnostic system |
WO2010021042A1 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2010-02-25 | 株式会社 アロー | Data communication system |
US20100123779A1 (en) * | 2008-11-18 | 2010-05-20 | Dennis Michael Snyder | Video recording system for a vehicle |
JP5313099B2 (en) * | 2009-09-25 | 2013-10-09 | 日立建機株式会社 | Machine abnormality monitoring device |
EP2530209B2 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2023-04-26 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Operation machine monitoring diagnosis device |
-
2012
- 2012-05-14 US US14/113,003 patent/US20140052349A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2012-05-14 WO PCT/JP2012/062288 patent/WO2012157603A1/en active Application Filing
- 2012-05-14 JP JP2013515147A patent/JP5709986B2/en active Active
- 2012-05-14 EP EP12784997.4A patent/EP2711471B1/en active Active
- 2012-05-14 CN CN201280017565XA patent/CN103459728A/en active Pending
- 2012-05-14 CN CN201910018260.4A patent/CN110056021A/en active Pending
- 2012-05-14 KR KR1020137025080A patent/KR101614013B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-05-14 EP EP19188023.6A patent/EP3599314A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7149530B1 (en) * | 1999-03-17 | 2006-12-12 | Komatsu Ltd. | Device for presenting information to mobile |
US20060177119A1 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2006-08-10 | Mcpheely Bernard M | Digital diagnosti video system for manufacturing and industrial process |
US20070118338A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-24 | Caterpillar Inc. | Process model based virtual sensor and method |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9598836B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2017-03-21 | Harnischfeger Technologies, Inc. | Overhead view system for a shovel |
US20130261885A1 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Harnischfeger Technologies, Inc. | Overhead view system for a shovel |
US20140195015A1 (en) * | 2013-01-08 | 2014-07-10 | Vega Grieshaber Kg | Method for monitoring and controlling field devices, control device, program elements and machine-readable medium |
US10409926B2 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2019-09-10 | Falkonry Inc. | Learning expected operational behavior of machines from generic definitions and past behavior |
US11308250B2 (en) | 2013-11-27 | 2022-04-19 | Falkonry Inc. | Learning expected operational behavior of machines from generic definitions and past behavior |
US10037128B2 (en) * | 2014-02-04 | 2018-07-31 | Falkonry, Inc. | Operating behavior classification interface |
US10656805B2 (en) | 2014-02-04 | 2020-05-19 | Falkonry, Inc. | Operating behavior classification interface |
US20150222495A1 (en) * | 2014-02-04 | 2015-08-06 | Falkonry Inc. | Operating behavior classification interface |
US10802941B2 (en) | 2015-02-12 | 2020-10-13 | Edwards Limited | Processing tool monitoring |
US10308157B2 (en) * | 2016-08-31 | 2019-06-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Truck cycle segmentation monitoring system and method |
CN112166218A (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2021-01-01 | 株式会社小松制作所 | Display system for working machine and control method thereof |
EP3779073A4 (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2022-01-26 | Komatsu Ltd. | Display system for work machine, and method for controlling display system |
EP3783156A4 (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2022-01-26 | Komatsu Ltd. | Display system for wheel loader, and control method for display system |
US20220205222A1 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2022-06-30 | Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Shovel |
US12110663B2 (en) * | 2019-09-18 | 2024-10-08 | Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Shovel |
US20220251806A1 (en) * | 2019-10-31 | 2022-08-11 | Sumitomo Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Excavator management system, mobile terminal for excavator, and recording medium |
CN117216728A (en) * | 2023-11-09 | 2023-12-12 | 金成技术股份有限公司 | Excavator movable arm stability detection method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2711471B1 (en) | 2019-09-04 |
CN103459728A (en) | 2013-12-18 |
EP2711471A1 (en) | 2014-03-26 |
JPWO2012157603A1 (en) | 2014-07-31 |
CN110056021A (en) | 2019-07-26 |
EP3599314A1 (en) | 2020-01-29 |
KR20130138821A (en) | 2013-12-19 |
JP5709986B2 (en) | 2015-04-30 |
KR101614013B1 (en) | 2016-04-29 |
EP2711471A4 (en) | 2016-02-17 |
WO2012157603A1 (en) | 2012-11-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20140052349A1 (en) | Shovel, monitoring device of the same and output device of shovel | |
US10046701B2 (en) | Vehicle periphery monitoring device and vehicle periphery monitoring system | |
WO2013047408A1 (en) | Shovel, shovel management device, and shovel management method | |
JP4040205B2 (en) | Vehicle abnormality diagnosis device | |
JP5233043B2 (en) | Operation guidance device for transmission / reception system of construction machine | |
JP6051311B2 (en) | Abnormality diagnosis method and apparatus | |
US20130304896A1 (en) | Trigger-based data collection system | |
EP2249314B1 (en) | System for monitoring the state and driving of a vehicle | |
US20140244099A1 (en) | Vehicle diagnostic method, and external diagnostic device | |
KR20070022996A (en) | Vehicle management system in telematics system and method thereof | |
JP2005043138A (en) | Vehicle information terminal apparatus | |
US20220205221A1 (en) | Shovel, shovel management device, shovel management system, shovel supporting device | |
KR101321415B1 (en) | System and method for receiving vehicle driving information using mobile terminal | |
KR101445370B1 (en) | Multi black box mounted mdr module | |
US10430057B2 (en) | Operator interface for wireless sensing and system and method thereof | |
KR20210058713A (en) | Vehicle predictive management system using vehicle data and mobile platform | |
US9104536B2 (en) | Method for sampling monitoring data of construction equipment | |
KR101311112B1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Deciding Accident of Vehicles | |
KR20200075943A (en) | Auto driving system of transportation | |
KR20140028891A (en) | Real time video monitoring system for vehicle | |
KR20180079636A (en) | System and method for monitoring operation information in construction equipment | |
JP2017031579A (en) | Extraction system, extraction server, extraction method, and extraction program | |
US12110663B2 (en) | Shovel | |
KR20150110862A (en) | System for providing car repair technique | |
JP2023027898A (en) | Special-purpose vehicle control device and special-purpose vehicle control device management system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SUMITOMO HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD., JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TSUKANE, KAORU;REEL/FRAME:031442/0405 Effective date: 20130905 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |