[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US20100090410A1 - Expandable metal-to-metal seal - Google Patents

Expandable metal-to-metal seal Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100090410A1
US20100090410A1 US12/249,338 US24933808A US2010090410A1 US 20100090410 A1 US20100090410 A1 US 20100090410A1 US 24933808 A US24933808 A US 24933808A US 2010090410 A1 US2010090410 A1 US 2010090410A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
seal
machining
metal
annealing
polishing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/249,338
Inventor
James C. Doane
William M. Bailey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Baker Hughes Inc filed Critical Baker Hughes Inc
Priority to US12/249,338 priority Critical patent/US20100090410A1/en
Assigned to BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED reassignment BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAILEY, WILLIAM M., DOANE, JAMES C.
Publication of US20100090410A1 publication Critical patent/US20100090410A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B33/00Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
    • E21B33/10Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
    • E21B33/12Packers; Plugs
    • E21B33/1208Packers; Plugs characterised by the construction of the sealing or packing means
    • E21B33/1212Packers; Plugs characterised by the construction of the sealing or packing means including a metal-to-metal seal element
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16JPISTONS; CYLINDERS; SEALINGS
    • F16J15/00Sealings
    • F16J15/02Sealings between relatively-stationary surfaces
    • F16J15/06Sealings between relatively-stationary surfaces with solid packing compressed between sealing surfaces
    • F16J15/08Sealings between relatively-stationary surfaces with solid packing compressed between sealing surfaces with exclusively metal packing
    • F16J15/0881Sealings between relatively-stationary surfaces with solid packing compressed between sealing surfaces with exclusively metal packing the sealing effect being obtained by plastic deformation of the packing
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B2200/00Special features related to earth drilling for obtaining oil, gas or water
    • E21B2200/01Sealings characterised by their shape

Definitions

  • seals are endlessly used to effect working conditions supportive of desired production fluid recovery.
  • engineering and development dollars have been spent attempting to improve both pressure holding capacity and longevity.
  • One type of seal receiving significant interest is a metal-to-metal seal due to the fact that of many types metal seals exhibit high temperature tolerance, high-pressure capability, robust chemical resistance, and high durability.
  • seals that utilize metal as a sealing structure
  • those receiving the most attention contemporaneously with the filing of this document are heavier wall metal seals that are deformed in order to bring them into contact with another structure in a manner where a seal is created against that other structure. While such seals do indeed provide all of the above noted benefits with respect to metal-to-metal seals, recovery sometimes can be difficult.
  • Such seals experience a high degree work hardening when they are set and because of this work hardening experience loss of resilience. This is of course an issue with respect to stretching a seal out to retrieve it from the wellbore.
  • a seal includes a seal body having a bridge; at least one leg extending from the bridge; and at least one concentrated deformation area of the at least one leg, at least that area being at least one of polished and annealed after machining.
  • a method for improving durability of a plastically deformed metal-to-metal seal includes identifying one or more portions of the seal that experience a threshold deformation in use; and treating one or more of the identified portions with at least one of a polishing process and an annealing process after machining.
  • a method for making a metal-to-metal seal includes annealing a blank material; machining the blank material into a machined piece; and at least one of polishing and annealing the machined piece.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of a seal disclosed herein in a run in condition
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the embodiment of FIG. 1 illustrated in a set position
  • FIGS. 3A-3F represent sequential views of the seal of FIG. 1 withdrawing from the set position during retrieval;
  • the seal created as disclosed herein performs better in one respect due to its teardrop cross sectional shape.
  • the shape itself helps to absorb backlash in the setting force and therefore renders the seal more reliable. This is described in more detail in connection with one embodiment of a seal that forms the stated shape.
  • the drawings hereof illustrate a seal that bows radially outwardly, the components can easily be reversed such that the seal will bow radially inwardly such that the seal will be formed against a tubular radially inwardly disposed of the seal device rather than radially outwardly of the seal device as specifically illustrated.
  • the seal 10 comprises a seal body 12 having a first end ring 14 and a second end ring 16 .
  • Seal body 12 comprises a seal bridge 18 and first and second seal legs 20 and 22 .
  • the legs terminate at roots 36 and 38 .
  • Seal 10 further includes configurations capable of causing the seal body to collapse axially into a set position such as, for example, two gauge rings 24 and 26 , each disposed in operable communication with one end of the seal body 12 . While gauge rings are specifically disclosed, the terms as used herein are intended to convey any configuration capable of loading the seal body 12 to set the seal 10 and to be instrumental in retrieving the seal 10 .
  • each gauge ring includes an angled surface identified by the numerals 28 and 30 , respectively.
  • the surfaces 28 and 30 are roughly parallel to the legs 20 and 22 although not in contact therewith prior to the setting sequence for the seal 10 . These surfaces 28 and 30 come in contact with the legs 20 and 22 during the setting sequence to support the same as will be better appreciated after exposure to the operation section of this document.
  • radiuses 32 and 34 are in a range of about 0.13 to about 0.16 inch. While a wider range is also operable, it has been found that the range of about 0.13 to about 0.16 is effective in minimizing stress in the seal body 12 during setting. This is also the purpose for which the angled surfaces 28 and 30 are provided.
  • the angle of the surfaces 28 and 30 is selected to coincide with the angle of legs 20 and 22 as noted above in order to support these structures thereby preventing significant bending thereof during setting of the seal 10 .
  • Angles for surfaces 28 and 30 range in particular embodiments from about 45 degrees to about 90 degrees. As illustrated, the angles are both about 60 degrees.
  • the range indicated has been found to work well though it is to be appreciated that angles outside the exemplary range are also contemplated but may not reduce stress in legs 20 and 22 to the extent of the reduction found in the identified range.
  • the protective action of the surfaces 28 and 30 extends to both the legs 20 and 22 and leg roots 36 and 38 , respectively.
  • seal body 12 is a machined part in one embodiment such that there are no, or extremely little, residual stresses in the body 12 in the position shown in FIG. 1 . Little residual stress in the seal body 12 prior to deformation in use is a benefit as this helps to minimize the magnitude of stresses experienced by the body 12 during setting. As the purpose of this configuration is the reduction in initial stress of the body 12 , it is noted that an alternate arrangement is that body 12 could be a preformed and stress relieved component for some applications or even a molded component for some applications. Again, the important thing is that the position illustrated at the roots 36 and 38 is a position of the seal body 12 that should exist prior to setting of the seal, with very little residual stress.
  • Seal 10 is set through the application of an axial load resulting in the space between the gauge rings diminishing.
  • This can be effected in a number of ways including: 1) by causing at least one of the gauge rings to move toward the other of the gauge rings while the “other” gauge ring is stationary; 2) to cause one ring to move toward the “other” ring while the other ring moves away from the one ring more slowly than the one ring is moving toward the other ring; or 3) to cause one ring to move toward the other ring while the other ring is moving towards the one ring.
  • the drawings and description herein are directed to an embodiment where gauge ring 24 is moved while gauge ring 26 remains stationary through, for example, operable contact with an anchoring mechanism (not shown).
  • gauge rings 24 and 26 Due to the shape of body 12 , one will appreciate that axial shortening thereof will necessarily cause the body 12 to bulge outwardly. What may not be immediately appreciated from the drawings, however, is the action of gauge rings 24 and 26 on the process. As gauge rings 24 and 26 are moved so that they are closer to one another, surfaces 28 and 30 come into contact with legs 20 and 22 , respectively. As contact is made in this location, the legs 20 and 22 are substantially supported such that they and the roots 36 and 38 from which the legs extend experience very little bending stress while the seal 10 is being set. Since the distance between gauge rings 24 and 26 is still being reduced, however, the seal body 12 must necessarily still react. Due to the supported condition of legs 20 and 22 , a great majority of the bending stress in the body 12 is concentrated in the bridge 18 .
  • the stress in bridge 18 causes it to bow outwardly until it makes contact with an inside surface 40 of a tubular in which the seal 10 is being set. Once contact is made at surface 40 , a load useful for creating the desired seal begins to build. As gauge rings 24 and 26 continue to be urged into closer proximity with one another it will become apparent that radiuses 32 and 34 are also important to reducing stress in the seal body 12 . In the position of FIG. 2 , it will be easily appreciated that were the radiuses to be significantly sharper, much higher stress would be experienced by the seal body 12 at the contact point with such radiuses. It has been determined by the inventors hereof that a radius range of from about 0.13 inches to about 0.16 inches produces a desirably low stress in the seal body 12 .
  • the bridge 18 is deformed such that over an axial length thereof, more than 180 degrees of repositionment is represented. In other words, the bridge 18 is deformed from relatively flat to beyond U-shaped. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 2 , it will be appreciated that the bridge is nearly a closed teardrop shape 44 . In the condition illustrated in FIG. 2 substantial sealing force is applied to surface 40 such the pressure may be held in either direction relative to seal 10 . Important to notice as well is that because of the teardrop shape of bridge 18 , backlash in the setting system is better absorbed than in prior art sealing systems. This is because with a reduction in the sealing force at gauge rings 24 and 26 move slightly away from each other. When this occurs elastic resilience in the bridge 18 will tend to straighten the two sides 46 and 48 of the teardrop shape 44 . This will tend to increase loading at interface 50 with surface 40 rather than to reduce loading at interface 50 which would have been common in the prior art.
  • FIGS. 3 a through 3 f retrieval of seal 10 is illustrated in sequence. It is important to note in this sequence of drawings the relative positions of the legs 20 and 22 versus the teardrop shape 44 as they are illustrated in FIGS. 3 b and 3 c .
  • the teardrop shape 44 is maintained substantially intact while the legs 20 and 22 and the roots 36 and 38 are subjected to tensile bending stress and experience a greater degree of movement. This is beneficial since as noted above the legs and roots are protected from bending stress during initial setting of this seal. Therefore they have significantly greater elasticity than the bridge 18 , which has been work hardened, at this stage in use of the seal 10 .
  • FIG. 1 With reference to FIG.
  • a second annealing process and a polishing process applied to areas of the seal particularly stressed will substantially improve retrieval results without rupture of the seal.
  • Areas of the seal that are subject to stresses that induce significant work hardening and predispose the seal to rupture are identified through various means such as Finite Element Analysis (FEA) studies, skilled observations, and experience, for example.
  • FFA Finite Element Analysis
  • One or more of these identified areas may be treated with at least one of the polishing and annealing processes noted. In some instances, one or more of the identified areas will be treated with both processes.
  • the entire seal will be treated with one or both of the noted processes in order to avoid the need for identifying specific areas of the seal that would benefit from treatment.
  • Annealing is to be performed on a machined piece created by machining of a blank.
  • the annealing process includes in one embodiment using a vacuum annealing process employing a contact thermocouple at about 1800 degrees Fahrenheit for about one hour and a fast (gas) cool. Polishing comprises removing fine machining grooves with a sand paper or crocus cloth, for example. The polishing process is then finished utilizing a 320 grit of finer sandpaper or equivalent.
  • a blank is machined to within about 0.2 inch of minimum outside dimension and maximum inside dimension.
  • the rough machined part is then heat treated using a contact thermocouple for about one hour at about 1800 degrees Fahrenheit and then oil quenched or fan cooled.
  • the part is then finish machined. After finish machining either the whole part or one or more identified areas is one or more of annealed and polished as noted above.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Gasket Seals (AREA)

Abstract

A seal includes a seal body having a bridge; at least one leg extending from the bridge; and at least one concentrated deformation area of the at least one leg, at least that area being at least one of polished and annealed after machining and method.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • In the hydrocarbon recovery arts, seals are endlessly used to effect working conditions supportive of desired production fluid recovery. In recent years engineering and development dollars have been spent attempting to improve both pressure holding capacity and longevity. One type of seal receiving significant interest is a metal-to-metal seal due to the fact that of many types metal seals exhibit high temperature tolerance, high-pressure capability, robust chemical resistance, and high durability.
  • Although there are many types of seals that utilize metal as a sealing structure, those receiving the most attention contemporaneously with the filing of this document are heavier wall metal seals that are deformed in order to bring them into contact with another structure in a manner where a seal is created against that other structure. While such seals do indeed provide all of the above noted benefits with respect to metal-to-metal seals, recovery sometimes can be difficult. Such seals experience a high degree work hardening when they are set and because of this work hardening experience loss of resilience. This is of course an issue with respect to stretching a seal out to retrieve it from the wellbore.
  • SUMMARY
  • A seal includes a seal body having a bridge; at least one leg extending from the bridge; and at least one concentrated deformation area of the at least one leg, at least that area being at least one of polished and annealed after machining.
  • A method for improving durability of a plastically deformed metal-to-metal seal includes identifying one or more portions of the seal that experience a threshold deformation in use; and treating one or more of the identified portions with at least one of a polishing process and an annealing process after machining.
  • A method for making a metal-to-metal seal includes annealing a blank material; machining the blank material into a machined piece; and at least one of polishing and annealing the machined piece.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of a seal disclosed herein in a run in condition;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of the embodiment of FIG. 1 illustrated in a set position;
  • FIGS. 3A-3F represent sequential views of the seal of FIG. 1 withdrawing from the set position during retrieval;
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Initially it is to be understood that the seal created as disclosed herein performs better in one respect due to its teardrop cross sectional shape. The shape itself helps to absorb backlash in the setting force and therefore renders the seal more reliable. This is described in more detail in connection with one embodiment of a seal that forms the stated shape. It is also to be understood that although the drawings hereof illustrate a seal that bows radially outwardly, the components can easily be reversed such that the seal will bow radially inwardly such that the seal will be formed against a tubular radially inwardly disposed of the seal device rather than radially outwardly of the seal device as specifically illustrated.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a seal 10 in accordance with this disclosure is illustrated. The seal 10 comprises a seal body 12 having a first end ring 14 and a second end ring 16. Seal body 12 comprises a seal bridge 18 and first and second seal legs 20 and 22. The legs terminate at roots 36 and 38. Seal 10 further includes configurations capable of causing the seal body to collapse axially into a set position such as, for example, two gauge rings 24 and 26, each disposed in operable communication with one end of the seal body 12. While gauge rings are specifically disclosed, the terms as used herein are intended to convey any configuration capable of loading the seal body 12 to set the seal 10 and to be instrumental in retrieving the seal 10. This “operable communication” as noted is, in one embodiment, a fixed connection to each end ring 14 and 16, respectively, while in other embodiments it can float. The fixed connection as illustrated is adjacent roots 36 and 38. The gauge rings 24 and 26 are also in supportive communication with the legs 20 and 22, respectively. As can be readily seen in FIG. 1, each gauge ring includes an angled surface identified by the numerals 28 and 30, respectively. The surfaces 28 and 30 are roughly parallel to the legs 20 and 22 although not in contact therewith prior to the setting sequence for the seal 10. These surfaces 28 and 30 come in contact with the legs 20 and 22 during the setting sequence to support the same as will be better appreciated after exposure to the operation section of this document.
  • Also visible in FIG. 1 are two radiuses 32 and 34 provided one on each of gauge rings 24 and 26, respectively. The radiuses, in one embodiment, are in a range of about 0.13 to about 0.16 inch. While a wider range is also operable, it has been found that the range of about 0.13 to about 0.16 is effective in minimizing stress in the seal body 12 during setting. This is also the purpose for which the angled surfaces 28 and 30 are provided. The angle of the surfaces 28 and 30 is selected to coincide with the angle of legs 20 and 22 as noted above in order to support these structures thereby preventing significant bending thereof during setting of the seal 10. Angles for surfaces 28 and 30 range in particular embodiments from about 45 degrees to about 90 degrees. As illustrated, the angles are both about 60 degrees. The range indicated has been found to work well though it is to be appreciated that angles outside the exemplary range are also contemplated but may not reduce stress in legs 20 and 22 to the extent of the reduction found in the identified range.
  • The prevention of bending reduces work hardening effects that would otherwise be experienced in these locations. Such reduction in work hardening effectively equates to more residual elasticity in the material of the seal in locations of the seal (legs and roots) that will be subject to bending stresses upon retrieval of the seal. During setting of the seal the bending stress is localized in the bridge 18 and in retrieval, bending stress is localized in the legs and roots. Generally, materials that are somewhat ductile can be bent at least once without breaking, work hardening, of course, building within the material during this and any subsequent bending stress. Since in the disclosed seal, the configuration ensures that bending is experienced substantially only once in each localized area of the seal 12, the likelihood of each localized area enduring sufficient stress to rupture is dramatically reduced. The protective action of the surfaces 28 and 30 extends to both the legs 20 and 22 and leg roots 36 and 38, respectively. By avoiding stress in these structures during setting of the seal 10, the ability to retrieve the seal 10, without suffering a rupture of the seal, is facilitated. It is further noted that in the seal 10, nowhere is there a sharp bend of the material of the seal body 12. Rather, all bends are gradual thereby spreading the stress over a broader area of the seal material. This avoids point stresses that generally create weaknesses in the seal both while being initially deformed and certainly while being retrieved. As such, embodiments of the invention alleviate the problem found in the prior art as noted above.
  • One last point that should be made prior to a discussion of actuation of an exemplary seal 10 is that seal body 12 is a machined part in one embodiment such that there are no, or extremely little, residual stresses in the body 12 in the position shown in FIG. 1. Little residual stress in the seal body 12 prior to deformation in use is a benefit as this helps to minimize the magnitude of stresses experienced by the body 12 during setting. As the purpose of this configuration is the reduction in initial stress of the body 12, it is noted that an alternate arrangement is that body 12 could be a preformed and stress relieved component for some applications or even a molded component for some applications. Again, the important thing is that the position illustrated at the roots 36 and 38 is a position of the seal body 12 that should exist prior to setting of the seal, with very little residual stress. Further, stress is not introduced into roots 36 and 38 during the setting of the seal 10 due to the configuration of the gauge rings thereby retaining elasticity of the material of the body 12 in the legs and the roots. This is to the operator's advantage during retrieval of the seal 10, as noted above.
  • Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2 simultaneously, setting of seal 10 is illustrated. Seal 10 is set through the application of an axial load resulting in the space between the gauge rings diminishing. This can be effected in a number of ways including: 1) by causing at least one of the gauge rings to move toward the other of the gauge rings while the “other” gauge ring is stationary; 2) to cause one ring to move toward the “other” ring while the other ring moves away from the one ring more slowly than the one ring is moving toward the other ring; or 3) to cause one ring to move toward the other ring while the other ring is moving towards the one ring. For illustrative purposes, the drawings and description herein are directed to an embodiment where gauge ring 24 is moved while gauge ring 26 remains stationary through, for example, operable contact with an anchoring mechanism (not shown).
  • Due to the shape of body 12, one will appreciate that axial shortening thereof will necessarily cause the body 12 to bulge outwardly. What may not be immediately appreciated from the drawings, however, is the action of gauge rings 24 and 26 on the process. As gauge rings 24 and 26 are moved so that they are closer to one another, surfaces 28 and 30 come into contact with legs 20 and 22, respectively. As contact is made in this location, the legs 20 and 22 are substantially supported such that they and the roots 36 and 38 from which the legs extend experience very little bending stress while the seal 10 is being set. Since the distance between gauge rings 24 and 26 is still being reduced, however, the seal body 12 must necessarily still react. Due to the supported condition of legs 20 and 22, a great majority of the bending stress in the body 12 is concentrated in the bridge 18. The stress in bridge 18 causes it to bow outwardly until it makes contact with an inside surface 40 of a tubular in which the seal 10 is being set. Once contact is made at surface 40, a load useful for creating the desired seal begins to build. As gauge rings 24 and 26 continue to be urged into closer proximity with one another it will become apparent that radiuses 32 and 34 are also important to reducing stress in the seal body 12. In the position of FIG. 2, it will be easily appreciated that were the radiuses to be significantly sharper, much higher stress would be experienced by the seal body 12 at the contact point with such radiuses. It has been determined by the inventors hereof that a radius range of from about 0.13 inches to about 0.16 inches produces a desirably low stress in the seal body 12.
  • It is to be appreciated from FIG. 2 that the bridge 18 is deformed such that over an axial length thereof, more than 180 degrees of repositionment is represented. In other words, the bridge 18 is deformed from relatively flat to beyond U-shaped. In the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 2, it will be appreciated that the bridge is nearly a closed teardrop shape 44. In the condition illustrated in FIG. 2 substantial sealing force is applied to surface 40 such the pressure may be held in either direction relative to seal 10. Important to notice as well is that because of the teardrop shape of bridge 18, backlash in the setting system is better absorbed than in prior art sealing systems. This is because with a reduction in the sealing force at gauge rings 24 and 26 move slightly away from each other. When this occurs elastic resilience in the bridge 18 will tend to straighten the two sides 46 and 48 of the teardrop shape 44. This will tend to increase loading at interface 50 with surface 40 rather than to reduce loading at interface 50 which would have been common in the prior art.
  • Referring now to FIGS. 3 a through 3 f retrieval of seal 10 is illustrated in sequence. It is important to note in this sequence of drawings the relative positions of the legs 20 and 22 versus the teardrop shape 44 as they are illustrated in FIGS. 3 b and 3 c. Upon review of these figures it will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the teardrop shape 44 is maintained substantially intact while the legs 20 and 22 and the roots 36 and 38 are subjected to tensile bending stress and experience a greater degree of movement. This is beneficial since as noted above the legs and roots are protected from bending stress during initial setting of this seal. Therefore they have significantly greater elasticity than the bridge 18, which has been work hardened, at this stage in use of the seal 10. With reference to FIG. 3 d, it can be ascertained that he bridge 18 has begun to reopen but it is also important to note that the interface 50 has come out of contact with surface 40 by a significant margin at this point in the retrieval process. While more bending stress is being added to bridge 18 at this point in the process a rupture is less likely to create a problem. Moving on to FIGS. 3 e and 3 f the seal has already been substantially withdrawn and again rupture at this point is less damaging. It will also be appreciated by the reader at legs 20 and 22 and roots 36 and 38 are now significantly deformed but because this deformation is the first bending stress experienced by those components, they are highly likely to survive that stress.
  • In order to further enhance survivability of the seal when it undergoes retrieval stress, it has been discovered by the inventors hereof that one or both of a second annealing process and a polishing process applied to areas of the seal particularly stressed will substantially improve retrieval results without rupture of the seal. Areas of the seal that are subject to stresses that induce significant work hardening and predispose the seal to rupture are identified through various means such as Finite Element Analysis (FEA) studies, skilled observations, and experience, for example. One or more of these identified areas may be treated with at least one of the polishing and annealing processes noted. In some instances, one or more of the identified areas will be treated with both processes. Further, in some embodiments, the entire seal will be treated with one or both of the noted processes in order to avoid the need for identifying specific areas of the seal that would benefit from treatment. Annealing is to be performed on a machined piece created by machining of a blank. The annealing process includes in one embodiment using a vacuum annealing process employing a contact thermocouple at about 1800 degrees Fahrenheit for about one hour and a fast (gas) cool. Polishing comprises removing fine machining grooves with a sand paper or crocus cloth, for example. The polishing process is then finished utilizing a 320 grit of finer sandpaper or equivalent. In one particular embodiment of a seal a blank is machined to within about 0.2 inch of minimum outside dimension and maximum inside dimension. The rough machined part is then heat treated using a contact thermocouple for about one hour at about 1800 degrees Fahrenheit and then oil quenched or fan cooled. The part is then finish machined. After finish machining either the whole part or one or more identified areas is one or more of annealed and polished as noted above.
  • The foregoing description might be reasonably understood to relate to only a symmetrically positioned seal. It is to be appreciated however that depending upon the type of movement utilized during the setting process it is sometimes advantageous to prepare the seal 10 as a non-symmetrical device. More specifically, and utilizing one-gauge-ring movement as an example, if gauge ring 24 is moved toward gauge ring 26 while gauge ring 26 is held in a stationary position it is reasonably likely that the teardrop shape 44 will contact the inside surface 40 (at interface 50) before the seal 10 is fully set. While it is subtle in the drawings utilized to exemplify the invention, careful consideration of the illustrated position of interface 50 relative to a centerline of the seal 10 will show that it is offset in the direction of gauge ring 24. This is because of the contact with surface 40 prior to fully setting of the seal 10. Once contact is made at interface 50, the positioning of side 48 is relatively fixed and the positioning of side 46 will continue to change. Side 46 will deflect under the impetus of gauge ring 24 to have a greater curvature than that of side 48. Because it is desirable to promote symmetry as much as practicable in teardrop 44 it may be desirable in certain applications to vary a thickness of the seal body 12 over its length. More specifically is possible to utilize thickness of seal body 12 to encourage early deformation in some portions of the seal body 12 and delayed deformation in other portions of the seal body 12. Generally speaking in order to enhance symmetry in the teardrop 44 a lesser thickness at the more relatively fixed end of seal body 12 will allow side 48 to more readily deform into a desirable position. Likewise, while the angles of the angled surfaces 28 and 30 and the radiuses 32 and 34 need not be symmetrical and in some applications may be better operable by being disparate. It is further to be understood that although the disclosure hereinabove describes an embodiment where each component is mirrored on both axial ends of the seal 10, albeit not necessarily with the identical dimensions or shapes, the teardrop shape can still be created with asset of the identified components on but one axial side of the seal 10 with the other side being simply attached to a carrier component.
  • While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.

Claims (12)

1. A seal comprising:
a seal body having:
a bridge;
at least one leg extending from the bridge; and
at least one concentrated deformation area of the at least one leg, at least that area being at least one of polished and annealed after machining.
2. A seal as claimed in claim 1 wherein the at least one concentrated deformation area comprises a cold workable material.
3. A seal as claimed in claim 2 wherein the cold workable material.
4. A seal as claimed in claim 1 wherein the polish is with a grit of 320 or finer.
5. A seal as claimed in claim 1 wherein the seal is annealed before machining.
6. A method for improving durability of a plastically deformed metal-to-metal seal comprising:
identifying one or more portions of the seal that experience a threshold deformation in use; and
treating one or more of the identified portions with at least one of a polishing process and an annealing process after machining.
7. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the treating is both of the polishing process and the annealing process after machining.
8. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the polishing process comprises removing fine machining grooves.
9. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the polishing process includes polishing with a 320 or finer grit material.
10. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein the annealing process after machining is at a temperature of about 1800 degrees for about one hour.
11. A method for making a metal-to-metal seal comprising:
annealing a blank material;
machining the blank material into a machined piece; and
at least one of polishing and annealing the machined piece.
12. The method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the polishing and annealing the machined piece are both performed.
US12/249,338 2008-10-10 2008-10-10 Expandable metal-to-metal seal Abandoned US20100090410A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/249,338 US20100090410A1 (en) 2008-10-10 2008-10-10 Expandable metal-to-metal seal

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/249,338 US20100090410A1 (en) 2008-10-10 2008-10-10 Expandable metal-to-metal seal

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100090410A1 true US20100090410A1 (en) 2010-04-15

Family

ID=42098163

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/249,338 Abandoned US20100090410A1 (en) 2008-10-10 2008-10-10 Expandable metal-to-metal seal

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20100090410A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100212899A1 (en) * 2009-02-24 2010-08-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Downhole gap sealing element and method
US20130312954A1 (en) * 2011-02-02 2013-11-28 Daniele Di Crescenzo System for lining a wellbore
CN107304731A (en) * 2016-04-18 2017-10-31 福特环球技术公司 Improvement or relative improvement to metal to metal sealing
US10801285B2 (en) 2016-12-22 2020-10-13 Shell Oil Company Retrievable self-energizing top anchor tool
WO2024173157A1 (en) * 2023-02-14 2024-08-22 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Seal, method, and system

Citations (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2076543A (en) * 1935-12-12 1937-04-13 Flexion Inc Process of making piston rings
US2119252A (en) * 1936-04-04 1938-05-31 Guiberson Corp Well swab
US2173351A (en) * 1937-04-27 1939-09-19 Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Cementing packer for oil wells
US2791278A (en) * 1954-08-16 1957-05-07 Baker Oil Tools Inc Packing structures for well devices
US2913053A (en) * 1957-04-15 1959-11-17 Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Formation cleaner
US2921632A (en) * 1956-03-05 1960-01-19 Baker Oil Tools Inc Expansible and retractable packing structure
US3038541A (en) * 1960-01-13 1962-06-12 Frank D Sprague Jr Well packer
US3211488A (en) * 1963-01-17 1965-10-12 Ethylene Plastique Sa Cam-type tongs
US3784214A (en) * 1971-10-18 1974-01-08 J Tamplen Seal that is responsive to either mechanical or pressure force
US4326588A (en) * 1980-02-19 1982-04-27 Baker International Corporation Well tool having knitted wire mesh seal means and method of use thereof
US4482086A (en) * 1983-08-04 1984-11-13 Uop Inc. Expandable packer assembly for sealing a well screen to a casing
US4573537A (en) * 1981-05-07 1986-03-04 L'garde, Inc. Casing packer
US4588029A (en) * 1984-09-27 1986-05-13 Camco, Incorporated Expandable metal seal for a well tool
USRE32831E (en) * 1983-10-24 1989-01-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus for sealing a well casing
US4809989A (en) * 1987-06-05 1989-03-07 Otis Engineering Corporation Coil spring supported sealing element and device
US5240263A (en) * 1988-06-01 1993-08-31 Specialist Sealing Limited Metallic sealing rings and their manufacture
US5709269A (en) * 1994-12-14 1998-01-20 Head; Philip Dissolvable grip or seal arrangement
US5775429A (en) * 1997-02-03 1998-07-07 Pes, Inc. Downhole packer
US5988276A (en) * 1997-11-25 1999-11-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compact retrievable well packer
US6142227A (en) * 1995-09-08 2000-11-07 Bronnteknologiutvikling As Expandable retrievable bridge plug
US6182755B1 (en) * 1998-07-01 2001-02-06 Sandia Corporation Bellow seal and anchor
US6203020B1 (en) * 1998-11-24 2001-03-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Downhole packer with element extrusion-limiting device
US20030196795A1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2003-10-23 Andrew Kutac Inflatable packer with prestressed bladder
US6637750B2 (en) * 2000-12-20 2003-10-28 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Alternative metallic seals
US6779601B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2004-08-24 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Inflatable packing element
US6896049B2 (en) * 2000-07-07 2005-05-24 Zeroth Technology Ltd. Deformable member
US20060186602A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2006-08-24 Caledyne Limited Improved seal
US20070045966A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-01 Caterpillar Inc. Coatings for metal-metal seal surfaces

Patent Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2076543A (en) * 1935-12-12 1937-04-13 Flexion Inc Process of making piston rings
US2119252A (en) * 1936-04-04 1938-05-31 Guiberson Corp Well swab
US2173351A (en) * 1937-04-27 1939-09-19 Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Cementing packer for oil wells
US2791278A (en) * 1954-08-16 1957-05-07 Baker Oil Tools Inc Packing structures for well devices
US2921632A (en) * 1956-03-05 1960-01-19 Baker Oil Tools Inc Expansible and retractable packing structure
US2913053A (en) * 1957-04-15 1959-11-17 Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Formation cleaner
US3038541A (en) * 1960-01-13 1962-06-12 Frank D Sprague Jr Well packer
US3211488A (en) * 1963-01-17 1965-10-12 Ethylene Plastique Sa Cam-type tongs
US3784214A (en) * 1971-10-18 1974-01-08 J Tamplen Seal that is responsive to either mechanical or pressure force
US4326588A (en) * 1980-02-19 1982-04-27 Baker International Corporation Well tool having knitted wire mesh seal means and method of use thereof
US4573537A (en) * 1981-05-07 1986-03-04 L'garde, Inc. Casing packer
US4482086A (en) * 1983-08-04 1984-11-13 Uop Inc. Expandable packer assembly for sealing a well screen to a casing
USRE32831E (en) * 1983-10-24 1989-01-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus for sealing a well casing
US4588029A (en) * 1984-09-27 1986-05-13 Camco, Incorporated Expandable metal seal for a well tool
US4809989A (en) * 1987-06-05 1989-03-07 Otis Engineering Corporation Coil spring supported sealing element and device
US5240263A (en) * 1988-06-01 1993-08-31 Specialist Sealing Limited Metallic sealing rings and their manufacture
US5709269A (en) * 1994-12-14 1998-01-20 Head; Philip Dissolvable grip or seal arrangement
US6142227A (en) * 1995-09-08 2000-11-07 Bronnteknologiutvikling As Expandable retrievable bridge plug
US5775429A (en) * 1997-02-03 1998-07-07 Pes, Inc. Downhole packer
US5988276A (en) * 1997-11-25 1999-11-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compact retrievable well packer
US6182755B1 (en) * 1998-07-01 2001-02-06 Sandia Corporation Bellow seal and anchor
US6203020B1 (en) * 1998-11-24 2001-03-20 Baker Hughes Incorporated Downhole packer with element extrusion-limiting device
US6896049B2 (en) * 2000-07-07 2005-05-24 Zeroth Technology Ltd. Deformable member
US7134506B2 (en) * 2000-07-07 2006-11-14 Baker Hughes Incorporated Deformable member
US6637750B2 (en) * 2000-12-20 2003-10-28 Fmc Technologies, Inc. Alternative metallic seals
US6779601B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2004-08-24 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Inflatable packing element
US20030196795A1 (en) * 2002-04-17 2003-10-23 Andrew Kutac Inflatable packer with prestressed bladder
US20060186602A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2006-08-24 Caledyne Limited Improved seal
US20070045966A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-01 Caterpillar Inc. Coatings for metal-metal seal surfaces

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100212899A1 (en) * 2009-02-24 2010-08-26 Baker Hughes Incorporated Downhole gap sealing element and method
US8051913B2 (en) * 2009-02-24 2011-11-08 Baker Hughes Incorporated Downhole gap sealing element and method
US20130312954A1 (en) * 2011-02-02 2013-11-28 Daniele Di Crescenzo System for lining a wellbore
US9422794B2 (en) * 2011-02-02 2016-08-23 Shell Oil Company System for lining a wellbore
CN107304731A (en) * 2016-04-18 2017-10-31 福特环球技术公司 Improvement or relative improvement to metal to metal sealing
US10393267B2 (en) * 2016-04-18 2019-08-27 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Metal-to-metal sealing
US10801285B2 (en) 2016-12-22 2020-10-13 Shell Oil Company Retrievable self-energizing top anchor tool
WO2024173157A1 (en) * 2023-02-14 2024-08-22 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Llc Seal, method, and system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090072485A1 (en) Expandable metal-to-metal seal
US20100090410A1 (en) Expandable metal-to-metal seal
US20130147121A1 (en) Backup System for Packer Sealing Element
EP3445940B1 (en) Expandable backup ring
CN112166270B (en) Valve and valve seat with seal
US8201636B2 (en) Expandable packer
US6712401B2 (en) Tubular threaded joint capable of being subjected to diametral expansion
RU2655628C2 (en) Downhole expansion tube
US9140094B2 (en) Open hole expandable packer with extended reach feature
US20070200299A1 (en) Spring/seal element
US8151873B1 (en) Expandable packer with mandrel undercuts and sealing boost feature
KR101225202B1 (en) Hydroforming method and hydroformed component
DK2715048T3 (en) EXTRUSION PREVENTION SUPPORT DEVICE
WO2003002842A1 (en) Centering device
US20120217004A1 (en) Expandable Packer with Expansion Induced Axially Movable Support Feature
CA2639848C (en) Variable diameter pipe expander
JPWO2004090318A1 (en) Combination oil ring
JP6943843B2 (en) Clamp mechanism for hydraulic workpiece support
CN102444725A (en) Valve bore sealing method and apparatus
EP3695093A1 (en) Large-gap-seal ("lgs") assembly
NO333993B1 (en) Pipe seal and pipe coupling and methods for making the same
CN110678623B (en) Method for determining manufacturing parameters of sealing structure of oil well pipe joint and sealing method
JP3857310B2 (en) Pressure vessel processing
CN1954164A (en) Sealing device with stiffener
WO2004026017A2 (en) Residual stresses in expandable tubular casing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED,TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DOANE, JAMES C.;BAILEY, WILLIAM M.;REEL/FRAME:021789/0224

Effective date: 20081013

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION