US20080220011A1

US20080220011A1 - Use of Flagellin in Tumor Immunotherapy

Info

Publication number: US20080220011A1
Application number: US11/793,156
Authority: US
Inventors: Steven B. Mizel
Original assignee: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Current assignee: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Priority date: 2004-12-16
Filing date: 2005-12-16
Publication date: 2008-09-11
Also published as: AU2005325715A1; EP1827489B1; AU2005325715B2; EP1824510A4; WO2006066214A2; EP1827489A4; US20080124361A1; EP1824510A2; AU2005316265A1; EP1824510B1; US7794731B2; WO2006066214A3; EP1827489A2; WO2006081007A2; JP2008523819A; CA2589556A1; US8198424B2; CA2589553A1; WO2006081007A3; CA2589553C

Abstract

The invention provides a fusion protein comprising a flagellin adjuvant and a tumor antigen. Also provided are compositions comprising a flagellin adjuvant and a tumor antigen. The invention further provides pharmaceutical formulations and methods for inducing an immune response against a tumor antigen and methods of treating a tumor in a subject.

Description

RELATED APPLICATION INFORMATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/636,635, filed 16 Dec. 2004, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/709,609, filed 19 Aug. 2005; the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

STATEMENT OF FEDERAL SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under grant numbers R01-A1051319 and T32-AI007401 from the National Institutes of Health. The United States government has certain rights to this invention.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention concerns the use of a flagellin adjuvant, tumor antigens and fusion proteins thereof to produce an immune response against tumors (e.g., in prophylactic or therapeutic methods).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Currently accepted treatments for breast cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Immunotherapy represents a relatively new approach for which there has been a surge of interest (Ribas et al. (2003) J. Clin. Oncol. 21:2415-2432; Scanlan et al. (2001) Breast Cancer Res. 3:95-98; Jäger et al. (2002) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:178-182; Ko et al. (2003) Clin. Cancer Res. 9:3222-3234). The major advantages of an immunological approach are that it is not invasive and it selectively targets breast cancer cells, leaving normal cells unharmed. In recent years, investigators have defined a number of proteins that are mutated or inappropriately expressed by breast cancer cells that may serve as useful targets for immunotherapy. For example, phase I/II clinical trials have been initiated using mucin (MUC-1), HER-2/neu, CEA, and hTERT vaccines (see Ko et al. (2003) Clin. Cancer Res. 9:3222-3234 for review). Although a number of these studies have revealed instances of enhanced immune reactivity, for example, T cell proliferation or cytotoxic T cell activity, positive clinical results have been limited to a relatively small subset of patients.
The lack of strong clinical responses to tumor vaccines is likely due to a combination of several factors. Since some of the target tumor antigens are over-expressed, but not mutated, it is possible that self-tolerance precludes a strong response. However, this may not be the case with mutated forms of these antigens. Alternatively, the protocols that have been used to immunize patients may promote the generation of low, but not high avidity T cells (see Ko et al. (2003) Clin. Cancer Res. 9:3222-3234 for discussion); the high avidity cells being most effective in tumor cell clearance. Finally, the over-production of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) by tumor cells may limit the effectiveness of a potentially efficacious vaccination strategy.
Work in other systems has established the value of adjuvants in the enhancement of weak immune responses. Thus it is possible that a potent adjuvant may allow the immune system to not only overcome the immunosuppressive effect of tumor-derived TGF-β, but also promote the generation of high avidity anti-tumor T cells, NK cells, or antibodies. It should be noted that a number of vaccine protocols have used a variety of adjuvants ranging from individual cytokines (e.g., IL-2, IL-12, gamma interferon, or GM-CSF) to microbial cell components (e.g., Detox B or BCG). Although individual cytokines possess some adjuvant activity, their effectiveness may be limited by the scope of their individual biologic activities. There is clearly a need to develop and test new adjuvants that promote more effective anti-tumor responses.
It would be desirable to provide improved reagents, pharmaceutical formulations and methods for producing immune responses against cancer.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect of the invention is a fusion protein comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of: (a) a flagellin adjuvant comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of (i) a flagellin N-terminal constant region; (ii) a flagellin C-terminal constant region; and (b) a tumor antigen between the N-terminal constant region and the C-terminal constant region (e.g., inserted into or in place of part or all of the flagellin hypervariable region, which is optionally partially or entirely deleted).
A further aspect of the invention is a nucleic acid encoding a fusion protein as described above. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid is operably associated with a promoter.
A further aspect of the invention is a vector comprising a nucleic acid as described above.
A further aspect of the invention is a host cell comprising a nucleic acid or vector as described above. In some embodiments, the host cell expresses the encoded fusion protein.
A further aspect of the invention is a method of making a fusion protein as described above, the method comprising culturing a host cell comprising a nucleic acid encoding the fusion protein described above in a suitable culture medium under conditions sufficient for the fusion protein to be production. Optionally, the fusion protein is collected from the host cell or from the culture medium.
A further aspect of the invention is a composition comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of (a) a flagellin adjuvant, and (b) a tumor antigen (with the tumor antigen and the flagellin adjuvant being separate or coupled to one another, i.e., in the form of a fusion protein, for example, a fusion protein as described herein).
A further aspect of the present invention is a pharmaceutical formulation comprising a fusion protein or a composition as described above in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
A further aspect of the invention is a method of inducing an immune response (e.g., producing antibodies and/or inducing a cell-mediated immune response) to a tumor antigen in a subject, comprising administering a fusion protein, a composition, or a pharmaceutical formulation as described above to the subject in an amount effective to induce an immune response to the tumor antigen in the subject.
A still further aspect of the invention is a method of treating a tumor in a subject, the method comprising administering a fusion protein, a composition, or a pharmaceutical formulation as described above to the subject in a treatment effective amount. The invention can be practiced in therapeutic and prophylactic methods.
In particular embodiments of the methods of the invention, the subject is a mammalian subject, a primate subject, or a human subject.
A further aspect of the invention is the use of a fusion protein or composition as described herein for the preparation of a medicament for carrying out a method of treatment as described herein.
These and other aspects of the invention are set forth in the description of the invention that follows.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts TNFα expression in the lungs of BALB/c mice given flagellin or mutant flagellin 229 by i.t. instillation.

FIG. 2 depicts the effect of flagellin on tumor growth. The open circles represent the mice given the Fra-1 antigen and the inactive form of flagellin. The closed circles represent the mice given Fra-1 antigen and the active form of flagellin.

FIG. 3 shows that immunization with flagellin and the F1 antigen of Yersinia pestis results in substantial anti-F1 antibody production. (Panel a) Female BALB/c mice were immunized intratracheally (i.t.) or intranasally (i.n.) with 10 μg F1+1 μg flagellin (FliC). Control animals were immunized i.t. with 10 μg F1 alone or with 1 μg of the 229 mutant flagellin. Mice were boosted in an identical manner at 4 weeks and plasma was collected 2 weeks later for analysis by ELISA. Numbers within the bars indicate ratio of IgG1/IgG2a isotypes. * indicates statistical significance over controls and ** indicates i.n. titers are statistically greater than i.t. (p<0.007). (Panel b) Anti-F1 antibody titers from mice immunized i.n. with 10 μg F1+1 μg flagellin. Each line represents one mouse and arrows indicate booster immunizations. (Panel c) Female BALB/c mice were immunized i.t. with 10 μg F1 and increasing amounts of FliC or 5 μg of 229 and boosted at 4 weeks. Plasma anti-F1 IgG titers were determined 2 weeks post-boost. (Panel d) A group of female BALB/c mice was immunized i.n. with 5 μg of flagellin alone and boosted in an identical manner at 4 weeks. Anti-FliC antibody titers were determined 2 weeks later (mean anti-FliC titer=8.5×10⁵) and flagellin-immune mice were then immunized and boosted with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC i.n. Two weeks post-boost, anti-F1 titers were determined and compared to titers of flagellin-naive animals immunized with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC or 229. Bars represent mean antibody titers ±s.e.m. Seven female BALB/c mice were used per immunization group.

FIG. 4 shows that flagellin stimulates antigen-specific responses and requires T cells. (Panel a) Groups of 7 female BALB/c mice were immunized i.n. with 10 μg F1 antigen+1 μg flagellin (FliC) and boosted at 4 weeks with PBS, 1 μg FliC alone, 10 μg F1 alone or 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC. Plasma was collected 3 weeks after boosting for analysis by ELISA. * indicates statistical significance over animals boosted with PBS or FliC alone and ** indicates that boosting with F1+FliC results in antibody titers statistically greater than F1 antigen alone (p<0.01). Bars represent mean antibody titers ±s.e.m. (Panel b) A group of 7 athymic nude mice (BALB/cAnNCr-nu/nu) was immunized and boosted i.n. with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC. Plasma was collected 2 weeks post-boost for analysis of anti-F1 IgG titers by ELISA. * indicates statistical significance compared to normal BALB/c mice immunized in an identical manner (p<0.001).

FIG. 5 depicts the requirements for the adjuvant effects of flagellin. TNFR^−/− (panel a) or IL6^−/− (panel b) and wild-type B6; 129 control mice were immunized i.t. with 10 μg F1 antigen+1 μg flagellin (FliC) or mutant flagellin (229). * indicates TNFR^−/− titers are statistically less than B6; 129 control (p<0.001). C3H/HeJ (Tlr4 P712H mutant) and wild-type C3H/HeN mice were immunized with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC or 229 (panel c). IFNα/βR^−/− (panel d) and IFNγ^−/− (panel e) mice and corresponding wild-type controls were immunized i.n. with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC or 229. Seven female mice were used in each immunization group. Mice were boosted in the same manner at 4 weeks and plasma was collected 2 weeks later for analysis of anti-F1 IgG titers by ELISA. Bars represent mean antibody titers ±s.e.m.

FIG. 6 shows that flagellin promotes a protective response for intranasal infection with Yersinia pestis CO92. Groups of 15 female BALB/c mice (panel a) were immunized i.n. with 10 μg F1 antigen+1 μg flagellin (FliC) or PBS alone and boosted in an identical manner at 4 weeks. Plasma was collected 2 weeks post-boost for analysis of antibody titers by ELISA (mean anti-F1 titer=9.4×10⁵). One week later mice were challenged i.n. with a dose of Y. pestis CO92 equivalent to 100×LD₅₀. Mice were monitored for 30d post-challenge. Groups of 10 antibody-deficient IgH^−/− mice (panel b) were immunized i.n. with 10 g F1+1 μg FliC or PBS alone and boosted in an identical manner at 4 weeks. Mice were challenged two weeks later i.n. with a dose of Y. pestis equivalent to 155×LD₅₀. Groups of 10 wild-type C57BL/6 mice (panel c) and female IFNγ^−/− mice (panel d) were immunized and boosted i.n. with 10 μg F1+1 μg FliC. Plasma was collected 2 weeks post-boost for analysis of antibody titers by ELISA (anti-F1 titer≧1×10⁶). One week later mice were challenged i.n. with a dose of Y. pestis equivalent to 150×LD₅₀and monitored for 16d post-challenge

FIG. 7 shows that flagellin is an effective adjuvant in nonhuman primates. Female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were immunized intranasally (n=6) or intramuscularly (n=6) with 150 μg F1/V fusion protein+50 μg flagellin. Control animals (n=3) were immunized i.n. and i.m. with PBS alone. No significant change in body temperature occurred over 12 h and TNF-α was not detected in plasma collected at 4 h, 12 h and 24 h post-immunization. Animals were boosted in an identical manner at 4 weeks and plasma was collected 2 weeks later for analysis by ELISA. Bars indicate mean anti-F1/V antibody titers ±s.e.m. and * indicates statistical significance over intranasal immunization (p<0.006).

FIG. 8 shows that a fusion protein containing flagellin and the Yersinia pestis F1 and V proteins retains flagellin biological activity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is based, in part, on the discovery that flagellins, and fragments thereof, can function as adjuvants to enhance the anti-tumor immune response mounted in a subject.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
As used in the description of the invention and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
By “consisting essentially of” as used herein, it is meant that the indicated peptide, protein, fusion protein, nucleic, compound, composition, and the like does not include any other material elements (i.e., elements that materially impact the structure and/or function of the peptide, protein, fusion protein, nucleic acid, compound or composition).
In representative embodiments of the invention, the peptides, proteins, fusion proteins, nucleic acids and/or cells of the invention are “isolated.” By “isolated” it is meant that the peptide, protein, fusion protein, nucleic acid and/or cell is at least partially purified away from other components.

1. Tumor Antigens.

The term “tumor antigen” as used herein indicates a molecule (e.g., a protein or peptide) that is expressed by a tumor cell and either (a) differs qualitatively from its counterpart expressed in normal cells, or (b) is expressed at a higher level in tumor cells than in normal cells. Thus, a tumor antigen can differ from (e.g., by one or more amino acid residues where the molecule is a protein), or it can be identical to, its counterpart expressed in normal cells. Some tumor antigens are not expressed by normal cells, or are expressed at a level at least about two-fold higher (e.g., about two-fold, three-fold, five-fold, ten-fold, 20-fold, 40-fold, 100-fold, 500-fold, 1,000-fold, 5,000-fold, or 15,000-fold higher) in a tumor cell than in the tumor cell's normal counterpart.
Any suitable tumor antigen can be used in the practice of the present invention. Tumor antigens include without limitation naturally occurring tumor antigens and modified forms thereof that induce an immune response in a subject, and further include antigens associated with tumor cells and antigens that are specific to tumor cells and modified forms of the foregoing that induce an immune response in a subject. The term tumor antigen further encompasses antigens that correspond to proteins that are correlated with the induction of tumors such as oncogenic virus antigens (e.g., human papilloma virus antigens). Exemplary tumor antigens include, without limitation, HER2/neu and BRCA1 antigens for breast cancer, MART-1/MelanA (melanoma antigen), Fra-1 (breast cancer), NY-BR62, NY-BR85, hTERT, gp100, tyrosinase, TRP-1, TRP-2, NY-ESO-1, CDK-4, β-catenin, MUM-1, Caspase-8, KIAA0205, SART-1, PRAME, and p15 antigens, members of the MAGE family (melanoma antigens), the BAGE family (melanoma antigens), the DAGE/PRAME family (such as DAGE-1), the GAGE family (melanoma antigens), the RAGE family (such as RAGE-1), the SMAGE family, NAG, TAG-72, CA125, mutated proto-oncogenes such as p21ras, mutated tumor suppressor genes such as p53, tumor associated viral antigens (e.g., HPV E6 and E7), the SSX family, HOM-MEL-55, NY-COL-2, HOM-HD-397, HOM-RCC-1.14, HOM-HD-21, HOM-NSCLC-11, HOM-MEL-2.4, HOM-TES-11, RCC-3.1.3, NY-ESO-1, and the SCP family. Members of the MAGE family include, but are not limited to, MAGE-1, MAGE-2, MAGE-3, MAGE-4, MAGE-6, MAGE-11 and MAGE-12. Members of the GAGE family include, but are not limited to, GAGE-1, GAGE-6. See, e.g., the review by Van den Eynde and van der Bruggen, (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 684-693; and Sahin et al., (1997) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 709-716.
The tumor antigen can also be, but is not limited to human epithelial cell mucin (Muc-1; a 20 amino acid core repeat for the Muc-1 glycoprotein, present on breast cancer cells and pancreatic cancer cells), MUC-2, MUC-3, MUC-18, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), the raf oncogene product, CA-125, GD2, GD3, GM2, TF, sTn, gp75, EBV-LMP 1 & 2, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), GnT-V intron V sequence (N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V intron V sequence), Prostate Ca psm, MUM-1-B (melanoma ubiquitious mutated gene product), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), CO17-1A, GA733, gp72, β-HCG, gp43, HSP-70, p17 mel, HSP-70, gp43, HMW, HOJ-1, melanoma gangliosides, TAG-72, mutated proto-oncogenes such as p21ras, mutated tumor suppressor genes such as p53, estrogen receptor, milk fat globulin, telomerases, nuclear matrix proteins, prostatic acid phosphatase, protein MZ2-E, polymorphic epithelial mucin (PEM), folate-binding-protein LK26, truncated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Thomsen-Friedenreich (T) antigen, GM-2 and GD-2 gangliosides, polymorphic epithelial mucin, folate-binding protein LK26, human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), pancreatic oncofetal antigen, cancer antigens 15-3, 19-9, 549, 195, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), ovarian cancer antigen (OCA), pancreas cancer associated antigen (PaA), EBNA (Epstein-Barr Virus nuclear antigen) 1-6, gp75, chimeric protein p210_BCR-ABL, lung resistance protein (LRP) Bcl-2, and Ki-67. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,537,552; see also U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,815,531; 6,773,707; 6,682,928; and 6,623,739.
The tumor antigen can also be an antibody produced by a B cell tumor (e.g., B cell lymphoma; B cell leukemia; myeloma; hairy cell leukemia), a fragment of such an antibody, which contains an epitope of the idiotype of the antibody, a malignant B cell antigen receptor, a malignant B cell immunoglobulin idiotype, a variable region of an immunoglobulin, a hypervariable region or complementarity determining region (CDR) of a variable region of an immunoglobulin, a malignant T cell receptor (TCR), a variable region of a TCR and/or a hypervariable region of a TCR. In one embodiment, the tumor antigen of this invention can be a single chain antibody (scFv), comprising linked V_H, and V_Ldomains, which retains the conformation and specific binding activity of the native idiotype of the antibody.
Certain tumor antigens referred to as “cancer/testis” antigens are relatively prevalent on a wide array of different tumors. Thus, use of the present invention to administer one or more cancer/testis antigens can elicit a response against an array of tumors. For example, a cocktail comprising a flagellin adjuvant and a series of (e.g., two or more, for example 6-12) cancer/testis antigens (e.g., in the form of a fusion protein of the invention) can be used to treat a wide array of tumors, possibly avoiding the need to identify particular tumor antigens expressed by a subject's tumor on an individualized basis. Non-limiting examples of cancer/testis antigens include but are not limited to MAGE-A, MAGE-B, BAGE, GAGE-A, SSX-2, NY-ESO-1, SCP-1, CT7/MAGE-C1 HOM-TES-85, CT/BRDT, CT10, CTp11/SPAN-X-C1, SAGE, OY-TES-1, cTAGE-I, CT15/Fertilin beta, CT16, CT17, MMA-I and CAGE, which can be used individually or in any combination with each other and/or with other tumor antigens.
Also encompassed by the present invention are modified forms of the tumor antigens described above which induce an immune response in a subject. Modified forms of naturally occurring tumor antigens can advantageously have reduced pathogenicity and/or enhanced immunogenicity as compared with the naturally occurring antigen.
Fragments of naturally-occurring tumor antigens that induce an immune response in the subject can be used according to the present invention. The fragment can comprise one or multiple epitopes, and can further comprise 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the full-length protein. In embodiments of the invention, the fragment comprises all or substantially all (e.g., all but about 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 or 50 amino acids) of the extracellular domain of the protein, optionally without the transmembrane and/or cytoplasmic portions. In other embodiments, the fragment comprises at least about 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the extracellular portion of the protein, optionally without the transmembrane or cytoplasmic portions.
Further, the recitation of a “NY-ESO-1 antigen,” or any other specified tumor antigen, includes without limitation any naturally occurring Her2/neu antigen (or other specified tumor antigen), and modified forms thereof that induce an immune response in a subject.
For example, any suitable NY-ESO-1 antigen can be used with the present invention, including the full-length protein and fragments thereof. For example, the antigen can comprise one or multiple epitopes, and can further comprise 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the NY-ESO-1 protein. In particular embodiments, the NY-ESO-1 antigen is as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0203051 A1. In further embodiments, the NY-ESO-1 antigen comprises all or substantially all (e.g., all but about 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 or 50 amino acids) of the extracellular domain of the protein, optionally without the transmembrane and/or cytoplasmic portions. In other embodiments, the NY-ESO-1 antigen comprises at least about 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the extracellular portion of the NY-ESO-1 protein, optionally without the transmembrane or cytoplasmic portions. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the NY-ESO-1 antigen can be presented in the form of a fusion peptide (alone or as part of a fusion protein of the invention). For example, a fusion peptide comprising the NY-ESO-1 antigen and a cytokine (e.g., interferon-γ, IL-2 [including IL-2 immunotoxins, such as IL-2-diphtheria toxin], IL-12, or GM-CSF) can be delivered. Also encompassed by the present invention are modified forms of any of the foregoing that induce an immune response in a subject.
Any suitable Her2/neu antigen can be used with the present invention, including the full-length protein and fragments thereof. For example, the antigen can comprise one or multiple epitopes, and can further comprise 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the Her2/neu protein. In particular embodiments, the Her2/neu antigen is as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040241686. In other embodiments, the Her2/neu antigen comprises an epitope as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040121946. In further embodiments, the Her2/neu antigen comprises all or substantially all (e.g., all but about 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 or 50 amino acids) of the extracellular domain of the protein, optionally without the transmembrane and/or cytoplasmic portions, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,169. In other embodiments, the Her2/neu antigen comprises at least about 6, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500 or more consecutive amino acids of the extracellular portion of the Her2/neu protein, optionally without the transmembrane or cytoplasmic portions. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the Her2/neu antigen can be presented in the form of a fusion peptide (alone or as part of a fusion protein of the invention). For example, a fusion peptide comprising the Her2/neu antigen and a cytokine (e.g., IL-12, IL-2 [including IL-2 immunotoxins, such as IL-2-diphtheria toxin] or GM-CSF) can be delivered (see, e.g., Dela Cruz et al., (2003) Vaccine 21: 1317). Also encompassed by the present invention are modified forms of any of the foregoing that induce an immune response in a subject.
The tumor antigens that can be used in accordance with the present invention are in no way limited to the tumor antigens listed herein. Other tumor antigens can be identified, isolated and cloned by methods known in the art such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,514,506.
It has recently been shown that regulatory T cells play a major role in limiting the effectiveness of anti-tumor vaccines. Strategies that block (generally temporarily) regulatory T cell activity (e.g., via an IL-2 immunotoxin, such as an IL-2-diphtheria toxin, or γ-interferon) can be used to enhance the effectiveness of the fusion proteins, compositions and methods of the invention. The IL-2 immunotoxin or γ-interferon can be can be formulated and administered with the fusion proteins and immunogenic compositions of the invention. Alternatively, they can be formulated separately and are optionally administered concurrently with the fusion proteins and immunogenic compositions of the invention. As used herein, the term “concurrently” means sufficiently close in time to produce a combined effect (that is, concurrently can be simultaneously, or it can be two or more events occurring within a short time period [e.g., minutes or hours] before or after each other). In particular embodiments, a flagellin/tumor antigen fusion protein comprises the IL-2 immunotoxin or γ-interferon. In other embodiments wherein the flagellin adjuvant and the tumor antigen are not provided as a fusion protein, the IL-2 immunotoxin or γ-interferon is fused to the flagellin or the tumor antigen.
The term “tumor” is understood in the art, for example, as an abnormal mass of undifferentiated cells within a multicellular organism. Tumors can be malignant or benign. Generally, the inventive methods disclosed herein are used to treat malignant tumors. The tumor to be treated or immunized against (i.e., prophylactic treatment) can be, but is not limited to, tumors present in myeloma, hematological cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas (such as B cell lymphoma, T cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma), hematopoietic neoplasmas, thymoma, head and neck cancer, sarcoma, lung cancer, liver cancer, genitourinary cancers (such as ovarian cancer, vaginal cancer, cervical cancer, uterine cancer, bladder cancer, testicular cancer, prostate cancer or penile cancer), adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, renal cancer, liver cancer, primary or metastatic melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, neurological tumors including brain tumors such as astrocystomas and glioblastomas, angiosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma, head and neck cancer, thyroid carcinoma, soft tissue sarcoma, bone cancer such as bone sarcoma, vascular cancer, gastrointestinal cancer (such as gastric, stomach or colon cancer), and any other tumor now known or later identified (see, e.g., Rosenberg (1996) Ann. Rev. Med. 47:481-491.

2. Flagellins.

The inventor has determined that flagellin can function as an adjuvant to enhance the active immune response mounted by a host to a tumor antigen. As used herein, the term “adjuvant” has its ordinary meaning as understood by those skilled in the art. For example, an adjuvant can be defined as a substance that increases the ability of an antigen to stimulate an immune response against the antigen in the subject. In particular embodiments, the adjuvant increases the immune response against the antigen by at least about 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100, 150, 500, 1000-fold or more. In other embodiments, the adjuvant reduces the amount of antigen required to achieve a particular level of immune response (cellular and/or humoral and/or mucosal), e.g., a reduction of at least about 15%, 25%, 35%, 50%, 65%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or more. An adjuvant can further be a substance that prolongs the time over which an immune response, optionally protective immune response, is sustained (e.g., by at least about a 2-fold, 3-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold longer time period or more). In some instances there may be no significant immune response elicited in the host in the absence of an adjuvant.
Flagellin proteins are known and described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,585,980, 6,130,082; 5,888,810; 5,618,533; 4,886,748 and U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2003/0044429 A1; and Donnelly et al., (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 43: 40456. Most gram-negative bacteria express flagella, which are surface structures that provide motility. The flagella are formed from a basal body, a filament, and a hook that connects the two. The filament is formed of a long polymer of a single protein, flagellin, with a small cap protein at the end. Polymerization of flagellin is mediated by conserved regions at the N- and C-termini, whereas the intervening regions of the flagellin protein are very diverse among species.
In illustrative embodiments of the invention, a fusion protein is provided comprising a flagellin adjuvant and one or more tumor antigens. In general, fusion proteins of the invention comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of: (a) a flagellin adjuvant comprising (i) a flagellin N-terminal constant region; and (ii) a flagellin C-terminal constant region; and (b) a tumor antigen, wherein the tumor antigen is between the N-terminal constant region and the C-terminal constant region. In some embodiments, the flagellin hypervariable region between the constant regions is deleted (in whole or in part); in other embodiments the hypervariable region is present. When the hypervariable region is present (in whole or in part) the antigen can be inserted (i) within the hypervariable region, (ii) between the flagellin N-terminal constant region and the hypervariable region, or (iii) between the flagellin C-terminal constant region and the hypervariable region.
Further, the N-terminal constant and C-terminal constant regions can be linked by a hinge region. The hypervariable region or a tumor antigen can function as a hinge region. Additionally, or alternatively, a segment of about 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 50 or more amino acids can function as a hinge region.
Conserved regions of flagellin are well known in the art and have been described, for example, in Mimori-Kiyosue et al., (1997) J. Mol. Virol. 270:222-237; lino et al., (1977) Ann. Rev. Genet. 11:161-182; and Schoenhals et al, (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175:5395-5402. As is understood by those skilled in the art, the size of the constant region will vary somewhat depending on the source of the flagellin protein. In general, the N-terminal constant domain includes the approximately 170 or 180 N-terminal amino acids of the protein, whereas the C-terminal constant domain typically spans the approximately 85 to 100 C-terminal amino acids. The central hypervariable region varies considerably by size and sequence among bacteria, and accounts for most of the difference in molecular mass. The N- and C-terminal constant regions of flagellin proteins from a variety of bacteria are known, and others can be readily identified by those skilled in the art using known alignment techniques, which are facilitated by the elucidation of the crystal structure of the flagellin monomer (Samatey et al., (2001) Nature 41:331).
The terms “flagellin N-terminal constant region” and “flagellin C-terminal constant region” as used herein includes active fragments (e.g., fragments of at least about 50, 100 or 120 amino acids in length) and modifications of any of the foregoing that enhance the immune response to the tumor antigen (e.g., by activating the TLR5 pathway). For example, the native flagellin regions can be modified to increase safety and/or immune response. In some embodiments, the flagellin N-terminal and/or C-terminal constant region comprises the full-length region or, alternatively, can comprise only a fragment of one or both regions.
In particular embodiments, the N-terminal and/or C-terminal constant region comprises a TLR5 recognition site(s) and is able to activate the TLR5 pathway.
In representative embodiments, the N-terminal constant region comprises the N-terminal RINSA domain (amino acids 31-52 of the S. dublin flagellin) as described by Eaves-Pyles et al. (2001) J. Immunology 167: 7009-7016, or a homolog or modified form thereof that enhances the immunogenicity of the tumor antigen. In other embodiments, the N-terminal constant region comprises the D1 and D2 domains, and the C-terminal constant region comprises the D1 and D2 domains (Eaves-Pyles et al. (2001) J. Immunology 167: 7009-7016) or a modified form thereof that enhances the immunogenicity of the tumor antigen.
In other embodiments, the flagellin N-terminal and/or C-terminal constant region comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of the peptide GAVQNRFNSAIT (SEQ ID NO:4) as described by U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2003/0044429 A1 to Alderem et al., or a homolog or modification thereof that enhances the immunogenicity of the tumor antigen.
In still other embodiments, the N-terminal constant domain comprises the “motif N” (e.g., amino acids 98-108 of the S. muenchen flagellin) and/or the C-terminal constant domain comprises the “motif C” (e.g., amino acids 441-449 of the S. muenchen flagellin) identified by Kanneganti et al., (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279:5667-5676, or a homolog or modified form thereof that enhances an immune response to the tumor antigen.
In other illustrative embodiments, the N-terminal constant domain comprises amino acids 88 to 97 of the P. aeruginosa flagellin (see, e.g., Verma et al., (2005) Infect. Immun. 73:8237-8246) or a homolog or modified form thereof that enhances an immune response to the tumor antigen.
Regions of the flagellin protein involved in TLR5 signaling have been identified by Smith et al. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4:1247-1253 (e.g., amino acids 78-129, 135-173 and 394-444 of S. typhimurium flagellin or homologs or modified forms thereof).
The flagellin N-terminal constant, C-terminal constant and hypervariable regions can be derived from flagellins from any suitable source, with some or all of these regions being derived from the same organism or from different organisms. A number of flagellin genes have been cloned and sequenced (see, e.g., Kuwajima et al., (1986) J. Bact. 168:1479; Wei et al., (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 186:791-803; and Gill et al., (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:7395-7401). Non-limiting sources of flagellins include but are not limited to S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium, S. dublin, H. pylori, V. cholera, S. marcesens, S. flexneri, S. enterica, T. pallidum, L. pneumophila, B. burgdorferei, C. difficile, A. tumefaciens, R. meliloti, B. clarridgeiae, R. lupine, P. mirabilis, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli.
Non-limiting examples of fusion proteins of the invention are provided in the working Examples herein.
Optionally, the fusion protein can comprise any other peptide or protein. For example, the fusion protein can further comprise one or more antigens from other organisms. In representative embodiments, the fusion protein further comprises an immunomodulatory compound. For example, it is known in the art that immune responses can be enhanced by an immunomodulatory cytokine or chemokine (e.g., α-interferon, β-interferon, γ-interferon, co-interferon, τ-interferon, interleukin-1α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-2, interleukin-3, interleukin-4, interleukin 5, interleukin-6, interleukin-7, interleukin-8, interleukin-9, interleukin-10, interleukin-11, interleukin 12, interleukin-13, interleukin-14, interleukin-18, B cell Growth factor, CD40 Ligand, tumor necrosis factor-α, tumor necrosis factor-β, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, lymphotoxin, CCL25 [MECK], and CCL28 [TECH]). In particular embodiments, the fusion protein comprises γ-interferon and/or an IL-2-immunotoxin (e.g., an IL-2-diphtheria toxin).
The invention also provides a composition comprising a flagellin adjuvant and a tumor antigen. According to this embodiment, the flagellin adjuvant can be a full-length flagellin or can be a flagellin peptide comprising the N-terminal constant and/or C-terminal constant regions as described in more detail above. Further, also as described above, the flagellin adjuvant can be coupled (i.e., fused) to a tumor antigen to form a fusion protein. The composition can comprise one or more tumor antigens fused to the flagellin adjuvant and, optionally, one or more tumor antigens present in the composition are not fused to the flagellin adjuvant. In other embodiments, the flagellin adjuvant is not coupled to a tumor antigen.
Unless indicated otherwise, the fusion protein is administered per se as a protein (or a nucleic acid encoding the protein) and not as part of live, killed, or recombinant bacterium- or virus-vectored vaccine.

4. Recombinant Nucleic Acids and Production of Fusion Proteins.

Except as otherwise indicated, standard methods known to those skilled in the art may be used for cloning genes, amplifying and detecting nucleic acids, generating fusion constructs, expressing peptides in host cells or organisms, and the like. Such techniques are known to those skilled in the art. See, e.g., Sambrook et al., “Molecular Cloning” A Laboratory Manual 2nd Ed. (Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y., 1989); F. M. Ausubel et al. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Green Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).
As used herein, “nucleic acid” encompasses both RNA and DNA, including cDNA, genomic DNA, synthetic (e.g., chemically synthesized) DNA and chimeras of RNA and DNA. The nucleic acid may be double-stranded or single-stranded. The nucleic acid may be synthesized using oligonucleotide analogs or derivatives (e.g., inosine or phosphorothioate nucleotides). Such oligonucleotides can be used, for example, to prepare nucleic acids that have altered base-pairing abilities or increased resistance to nucleases.
The fusion protein of the invention can be produced in, and optionally purified from, cultured cells or organisms expressing a heterologous nucleic acid encoding the fusion protein for a variety of purposes (e.g., to produce immunogenic compositions, as a diagnostic or research reagent, and the like).
In some embodiments, the fusion protein can be collected and, optionally, purified from the host cell. For example, the fusion protein can be collected from the conditioned medium. According to this embodiment, it may be advantageous to express the fusion protein operably associated with a secretory signal sequence. Alternatively, the fusion protein can be isolated from the host cell (e.g., the host cell can be lysed and the fusion protein isolated therefrom).
In other embodiments, the host cells are collected and the fusion protein is not isolated therefrom.
Generally, the heterologous nucleic acid is incorporated into an expression vector (viral or non-viral). Suitable expression vectors include but are not limited to plasmids, bacteriophage, bacterial artificial chromosomes (bacs), yeast artificial chromosomes (yacs), cosmids, virus vectors, and the like. Expression vectors compatible with various host cells are well known in the art and contain suitable elements for transcription and translation of nucleic acids. Typically, an expression vector contains an “expression cassette,” which includes, in the 5′ to 3′ direction, a promoter, a coding sequence encoding the fusion protein operatively associated with the promoter, and, optionally, a termination sequence including a stop signal for RNA polymerase and a polyadenylation signal for polyadenylase.
Expression vectors can be designed for expression of polypeptides in prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells. For example, polypeptides can be expressed in bacterial cells such as E. coli, insect cells (e.g., in the baculovirus expression system), yeast cells, mammalian cells, or plant cells. Examples of vectors for expression in yeast S. cerevisiae include pYepSecl (Baldari et al., (1987) EMBO J. 6:229-234), pMFa (Kurjan and Herskowitz, (1982) Cell 30:933-943), pJRY88 (Schultz et al., (1987) Gene 54:113-123), and pYES2 (Invitrogen Corporation, San Diego, Calif.). Baculovirus vectors available for expression of nucleic acids to produce proteins in cultured insect cells (e.g., Sf9 cells) include the pAc series (Smith et al., (1983) Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:2156-2165) and the pVL series (Lucklow, V. A., and Summers, M. d. (1989) Virology 170:31-39).
Additionally, the expression vector will generally include expression control sequences (e.g., transcription/translation control signals and polyadenylation signals), which are operably associated with the nucleic acid sequence encoding the fusion protein of the invention. It will be appreciated that a variety of promoter/enhancer elements can be used depending on the level and tissue-specific expression desired. The promoter can be constitutive or inducible (e.g., the metallothionein promoter or a hormone inducible promoter), depending on the pattern of expression desired. The promoter can be native or foreign and can be a natural or a synthetic sequence. By foreign, it is intended that the promoter is not found in the wild-type host into which the promoter is introduced. The promoter is chosen so that it will function in the target cell(s) of interest. Moreover, specific initiation signals are generally provided for efficient translation of inserted protein coding sequences. These translational control sequences, which can include the ATG initiation codon and adjacent sequences, can be of a variety of origins, both natural and synthetic. In embodiments of the invention wherein the expression vector comprises two open reading frames to be transcribed, the open reading frames can be operatively associated with separate promoters or with a single upstream promoter and one or more downstream internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequences (e.g., the picornavirus EMC IRES sequence).
Examples of mammalian expression vectors include pCDM8 (Seed, (1987) Nature 329:840) and pMT2PC (Kaufman et al. (1987), EMBO J. 6:187-195). When used in mammalian cells, the expression vector's control functions are often provided by viral regulatory elements. For example, commonly used promoters are derived from polyoma, adenovirus 2, cytomegalovirus and Simian Virus 40.
The invention further provides a host cell comprising (transiently or stably) a nucleic acid encoding a fusion protein of the invention. Suitable host cells are well-known in the art and include prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. See e.g., Goeddel, Gene Expression Technology: Methods in Enzymology 185, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. (1990). It is well-known that proteins can be expressed in bacterial cells such as E. coli, insect cells (e.g., the baculovirus expression system), yeast cells, plant cells or mammalian cells (e.g. human, rat, mouse, hamster, bovine, porcine, ovine, caprine, equine, feline, canine, lagomorph, simian and the like). The host cell can be a cultured cell such as a cell of a primary or immortalized cell line. The host cell can be a cell in a microorganism, animal or plant being used essentially as a bioreactor. In particular embodiments of the present invention, the host cell is an insect cell that allows for replication of expression vectors. For example, the host cell can be from Spodoptera frugiperda, such as the Sf9 or Sf21 cell lines, drosophila cell lines, or mosquito cell lines, e.g., Aedes albopictus derived cell lines. Use of insect cells for expression of heterologous proteins is well documented, as are methods of introducing nucleic acids, such as vectors, e.g., insect-cell compatible vectors (such as baculovirus vectors), into such cells and methods of maintaining such cells in culture. See, for example, Methods in Molecular Biology, ed. Richard, Humana Press, NJ (1995); O'Reilly et al., Baculovirus Expression Vectors, A Laboratory Manual, Oxford Univ. Press (1994); Samulski et al., J. Vir. 63:3822-8 (1989); Kajigaya et al., Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 4646-50 (1991); Ruffing et al., J. Vir. 66:6922-30 (1992); Kimbauer et al., Vir. 219:37-44 (1996); Zhao et al., Vir. 272:382-93 (2000); and U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,059 to Samulski et al. In particular embodiments of the present invention, the insect cell is an Sf9 cell.
Vectors can be introduced into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells via conventional transformation or transfection techniques. As used herein, the terms “transformation” and “transfection” refer to a variety of art-recognized techniques for introducing foreign nucleic acids (e.g., DNA) into a host cell, including calcium phosphate or calcium chloride co-precipitation, DEAE-dextran-mediated transfection, lipofection, electroporation, microinjection, DNA-loaded liposomes, lipofectamine-DNA complexes, cell sonication, gene bombardment using high velocity microprojectiles, and viral-mediated transfection. Suitable methods for transforming or transfecting host cells can be found in Sambrook et al. (Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory press (1989)), and other laboratory manuals.
In further embodiments of the present invention, the host cell can be stably transformed with the heterologous nucleic acid sequence encoding the fusion protein. “Stable transformation” as used herein generally refers to the integration of the heterologous nucleic acid sequences into the genome of the host cell in contrast to “transient transformation” wherein the heterologous nucleic acid sequence introduced into the host cell does not integrate into the genome of the host cell. The term “stable transformant” can further refer to stable maintenance of an episome (e.g. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)) in the cell.
When producing stably transformed cells, often only a small fraction of cells (in particular, mammalian cells) integrate a foreign nucleic acid into their genome. In order to identify and select these integrants, a nucleic acid that encodes a selectable marker (e.g., resistance to antibiotics) can be introduced into the host cells along with the nucleic acid of interest. Preferred selectable markers include those that confer resistance to drugs, such as G418, hygromycin and methotrexate. Nucleic acids encoding a selectable marker can be introduced into a host cell on the same vector as that comprising the nucleic acid of interest or can be introduced on a separate vector. Cells stably transfected with the introduced nucleic acid can be identified by drug selection (e.g., cells that have incorporated the selectable marker gene will survive, while the other cells die).
The fusion protein can also be produced in a transgenic plant in which the isolated nucleic acid encoding the fusion protein is inserted into the nuclear or plastidic genome. Plant transformation is known as the art. See, in general, Methods in Enzymology Vol. 153 (“Recombinant DNA Part D”) 1987, Wu and Grossman Eds., Academic Press and European Patent Application EP 693554.
Foreign nucleic acids can be introduced into plant cells or protoplasts by several methods. For example, nucleic acid can be mechanically transferred by microinjection directly into plant cells by use of micropipettes. Foreign nucleic acid can also be transferred into a plant cell by using polyethylene glycol which forms a precipitation complex with the genetic material that is taken up by the cell (Paszkowski et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3:2712-22). Foreign nucleic acid can be introduced into a plant cell by electroporation (Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5824). In this technique, plant protoplasts are electroporated in the presence of plasmids or nucleic acids containing the relevant genetic construct. Electrical impulses of high field strength reversibly permeabilize biomembranes allowing the introduction of the plasmids. Electroporated plant protoplasts reform the cell wall, divide, and form a plant callus. Selection of the transformed plant cells comprising the foreign nucleic acid can be accomplished using phenotypic markers.
Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) can be used as a vector for introducing foreign nucleic acids into plant cells (Hohn et al. (1982) “Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors,” Academic Press, New York, pp. 549-560; Howell, U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,956). CaMV viral DNA genome is inserted into a parent bacterial plasmid creating a recombinant DNA molecule which can be propagated in bacteria. The recombinant plasmid can be further modified by introduction of the desired DNA sequence. The modified viral portion of the recombinant plasmid is then excised from the parent bacterial plasmid, and used to inoculate the plant cells or plants.
High velocity ballistic penetration by small particles can be used to introduce foreign nucleic acid into plant cells. Nucleic acid is disposed within the matrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (Klein et al. (1987) Nature 327:70-73). Although typically only a single introduction of a new nucleic acid segment is required, this method also provides for multiple introductions.
A nucleic acid can be introduced into a plant cell by infection of a plant cell, an explant, a meristem or a seed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformed with the nucleic acid. Under appropriate conditions, the transformed plant cells are grown to form shoots, roots, and develop further into plants. The nucleic acids can be introduced into plant cells, for example, by means of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The Ti plasmid is transmitted to plant cells upon infection by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and is stably integrated into the plant genome (Horsch et al. (1987) Science 227:1229-1231; Fraley et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:4803).
The fusion protein can be expressed from the nucleic acid operably associated with other peptides or proteins, for example, operably associated with purification signals (such as poly His) or as a chimera with other proteins (e.g., a cytokine such as γ-interferon and/or an IL-2-immunotoxin such as an IL-2-diphtheria toxin).

5. Methods of Administering the Fusion Proteins, Flagellin Adjuvants, and Compositions of the Invention.

The present invention can be practiced for therapeutic and prophylactic purposes, in accordance with known techniques (see, e.g., PCT Application WO 2004/101737 to Pizzo et al.). The present invention can be practiced prophylactically to prevent or reduce tumor formation. In other embodiments, however, the methods of the invention are practiced to treat a subject that has already developed a tumor. Immunogenic compositions for use in the inventive methods are described below. Boosting dosages can further be administered over a time course of weeks, months or years. For existing tumors, initial high doses followed by boosting doses may be advantageous.
The invention can be practiced to treat subjects with existing tumors or to prevent or delay tumors from occurring. Further, the inventive methods can be used to treat both a primary tumor and to prevent metastasis. In addition, the inventive methods can be advantageously employed to reduce or prevent growth of metastatic nodules (e.g., following surgical removal of a primary tumor). The methods of the invention can also be prophylactic, e.g., to treat a subject believed at risk for tumors.
By the term “treat,” “treating” or “treatment of” (or grammatically equivalent terms) it is meant that the severity of the subject's condition is reduced or at least partially improved or ameliorated and/or that some alleviation, mitigation or decrease in at least one clinical symptom is achieved and/or there is a delay in the progression of the condition and/or prevention or delay of the onset of a disease or disorder. The term “treat,” “treats,” “treating,” or “treatment of” and the like also include prophylactic treatment of the subject (e.g., to prevent the onset of infection or cancer). As used herein, the term “prevent,” “prevents,” or “prevention” (and grammatical equivalents thereof) are not meant to imply complete abolition of disease and encompasses any type of prophylactic treatment that reduces the incidence of the condition, delays the onset and/or progression of the condition, and/or reduces the symptoms associated with the condition. Thus, the term “treat,” “treating” or “treatment of” (or grammatically equivalent terms) refer to both prophylactic and therapeutic regimens.
As used herein, a method of “treating a tumor” in a subject includes both therapeutic methods of treating existing tumors (including reducing the incidence and/or the severity of metastasis) and prophylactic methods of preventing or reducing tumor formation.
The terms “vaccination” or “immunization” are well-understood in the art, and are used interchangeably herein unless otherwise indicated. For example, the terms vaccination or immunization can be understood to be a process that increases an organism's immune response to antigen and therefore to resist or overcome infection. In the case of the present invention, vaccination or immunization against the tumor antigen increases the organism's immune response and resistance to tumors.
As used herein, a “treatment effective amount” is an amount that is sufficient to treat (as defined herein) the subject.
An “active immune response” or “active immunity” is characterized by “participation of host tissues and cells after an encounter with the immunogen. It involves differentiation and proliferation of immunocompetent cells in lymphoreticular tissues, which lead to synthesis of antibody or the development of cell-mediated reactivity, or both.” Herbert B. Herscowitz, Immunophysiology: Cell Function and Cellular Interactions in Antibody Formation, in IMMUNOLOGY: BASIC PROCESSES 117 (Joseph A. Bellanti ed., 1985). Alternatively stated, an active immune response is mounted by the host after exposure to immunogens by infection or by vaccination. Active immunity can be contrasted with passive immunity, which is acquired through the “transfer of preformed substances (antibody, transfer factor, thymic graft, interleukin-2) from an actively immunized host to a non-immune host.” Id.
A “protective” immune response or “protective” immunity as used herein indicates that the immune response confers some benefit to the subject in that it prevents or reduces the incidence and/or severity of disease. Alternatively, a protective immune response or protective immunity may be useful in the therapeutic treatment of existing disease.
The present invention can be practiced for both medical and veterinary purposes. Subjects to be treated by the methods of the invention include both avian and mammalian subjects, mammalian subjects including but not limited to humans, non-human primates (e.g., monkeys, apes, baboons, and chimpanzees), dogs, cats, rabbits, goats, horses, pigs, cattle, sheep, and the like (including both male and female subjects and subjects of all ages including infant, juvenile, adolescent and adult subjects). Subjects may be treated for any purpose, such as for eliciting a protective immune response; for eliciting the production of antibodies in that subject (typically an animal subject) which antibodies can be collected and used for other purposes such as diagnostic purposes or administering to other subjects to produce passive immunity therein, etc.
In particular embodiments, the subject is an animal tumor model. In other embodiments, the subject has a tumor and/or is a subject believed at risk for tumors.
Optionally, the subject can be a subject “in need of” the fusion proteins, compositions, pharmaceutical formulations and methods of the invention (e.g., to protect against cancer).
In some embodiments the subjects are aged subjects, e.g., human subjects 50 or 60 years old or more, where other adjuvants such as alum are generally less effective.
Accordingly, in particular embodiments, the invention provides a method of inducing an immune response against a tumor antigen in a subject (such as a mammalian subject, e.g., human or primate), the method comprising administering a fusion protein of the invention or a pharmaceutical composition thereof to the subject in an immunogenically effective amount. In representative embodiments, the method is practiced as a method of treating a tumor in a subject (such as a mammalian subject, e.g., human or primate), the method comprising administering a fusion protein of the invention or a pharmaceutical composition thereof to the subject in a treatment effective amount.
The invention further provides a method of inducing an immune response to a tumor antigen in a subject (such as a mammalian subject, e.g., human or primate), the method comprising administering a flagellin adjuvant and a tumor antigen, or a pharmaceutical composition(s) thereof, to the subject in an immunogenically effective amount. In representative embodiments, the method is practiced as a method of treating a tumor in a subject (such as a mammalian subject, e.g., human or primate), the method comprising administering a flagellin adjuvant and a tumor antigen, or a pharmaceutical composition(s) thereof, to the subject in a treatment effective amount. The flagellin adjuvant and tumor antigen can be administered in the same or separate compositions. If administered as separate compositions, they can optionally be administered concurrently.
Administration can be by any route known in the art. As non-limiting examples, the route of administration can be by inhalation (e.g., oral and/or nasal inhalation), oral, buccal (e.g., sublingual), rectal, vaginal, topical (including administration to the airways), intraocular, transdermal, by parenteral (e.g., intramuscular [including administration to skeletal, cardiac and/or diaphragm muscle], intravenous, subcutaneous, intradermal, intrapleural, intracerebral and intra-arterial, and intrathecal) routes, as well as direct tissue or organ injection, or by administration to the central nervous system (e.g., stereotactic administration to the brain).
In particular embodiments, administration is to a mucosal surface, e.g., by intranasal, inhalation, intra-tracheal, oral, rectal or vaginal administration, and the like. In general, mucosal administration refers to delivery to a mucosal surface such as a surface of the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, reproductive tract, etc.
Methods of administration to the respiratory tract include but are not limited to transmucosal, intranasal, inhalation or intratracheal administration or administration to the lungs. Other methods of mucosal administration include oral, buccal (e.g., sub-lingual), intra-tracheal, rectal, vaginal and intra-ocular administration.
In some embodiments of the invention, administration is in or near the site of a tumor. In other embodiments, administration is directly into the lymphatic system (e.g., in or near a lymph node).
The protein(s) of the invention can be delivered per se or by delivering a nucleic acid intermediate that encodes the protein(s) and is expressed in the subject to produce the protein(s), such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,466 to Felgner et al.
Immunomodulatory compounds, such as immunomodulatory chemokines and cytokines (preferably, CTL inductive cytokines) can be co-administered to a subject. Cytokines may be administered by any method known in the art. Exogenous cytokines may be administered to the subject, or alternatively, a nucleotide sequence encoding a cytokine may be delivered to the subject using a suitable vector, and the cytokine produced in vivo. In particular embodiments, the cytokine is provided as fusion protein with the flagellin adjuvant and/or tumor antigen. For example, a fusion protein comprising a flagellin adjuvant, a tumor antigen, and an immunomodulatory cytokine (e.g., interferon-γ or an IL-2-immunotoxin) can be administered. Alternatively, a fusion protein comprising the cytokine and the tumor antigen or the flagellin adjuvant can be administered.
In addition to their use for prophylactic or therapeutic purposes, the fusion proteins and compositions of the present invention can be administered to subjects for the purpose of producing antibodies to a tumor antigen, which antibodies are in turn useful for diagnostic or therapeutic/prophylactic purposes in human and animal subjects.

6. Pharmaceutical Compositions.

The invention further provides pharmaceutical compositions (e.g., immunogenic compositions) comprising a fusion protein of the invention in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In particular embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for mucosal delivery. By “pharmaceutically acceptable” it is meant a material that is not toxic or otherwise undesirable.
In representative embodiments, the fusion protein is present in the pharmaceutical composition in an “immunogenically effective” amount. An “immunogenically effective amount” is an amount that is sufficient to evoke an active immune response (i.e., cellular and/or humoral) in the subject to which the pharmaceutical composition is administered. Optionally, the dosage is sufficient to produce a protective immune response (prophylactic or therapeutic after onset of infection). The degree of protection conferred need not be complete or permanent, as long as the benefits of administering the pharmaceutical composition outweigh any disadvantages thereof. Immunogenically effective amounts depend on the protein, the manner of administration, the stage and severity of the disease being treated, the weight and general state of health of the subject, and the judgment of the prescribing physician.
Dosages of pharmaceutically active compounds can be determined by methods known in the art, see, e.g., Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (Maack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa.). In particular embodiments, the dosage of the fusion proteins of the present invention ranges from about 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 25, 250, 100, 150 or 250 μg to about 300, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000 or 10,000 μg of fusion protein for a typical (e.g. 70 kg) subject. In particular embodiments, dosages are in the range of about 50 to 2000 μg, about 100 to 1500 μg, or about 250 to 1000 μg for a typical subject. The initial dose can be followed by boosting dosages over weeks, months or years of from about 1 μg to 250, 500 or 1000 μg depending on the subject's response to the initial dosage.
The invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising: (a) a flagellin adjuvant; and (b) a tumor antigen. In particular embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for mucosal administration. Optionally, the tumor antigen is coupled to the flagellin adjuvant, i.e., is in the form of a fusion protein with the flagellin antigen. According to this embodiment, the composition can further comprise one or more additional tumor antigens that are not coupled to the flagellin adjuvant (i.e., is not part of a fusion protein with the flagellin adjuvant).
Optionally, the tumor antigen is present in an immunogenically effective amount, as defined herein. Further, in some embodiments, the flagellin adjuvant is present in an “adjuvant effective amount.” An “adjuvant effective amount” is an amount of the flagellin adjuvant that is sufficient to enhance or stimulate the active immune response (cellular and/or humoral) mounted by the host against the tumor antigen, optionally an active mucosal immune response. In particular embodiments, the active immune response (e.g., a mucosal immune response) by the host is enhanced by at least about 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 75, 100, 150, 500, 1000-fold or more. In other embodiments, an “adjuvant effective amount” is an amount of the flagellin adjuvant that reduces the amount of antigen required to achieve a specified level of immunity (cellular and/or humoral), optionally mucosal immunity, for example, a reduction of at least about 15%, 25%, 35%, 50%, 65%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 98% or more in the amount of antigen. As a further option, an “adjuvant effective amount” can refer to an amount of the flagellin adjuvant that accelerates the induction of the immune response in the host and/or reduces the need for booster immunizations to achieve protection. As yet another alternative, an “adjuvant effective amount” can be an amount that prolongs the time period over which an immune response, optionally protective immune response, is sustained (e.g., by at least about a 2-fold, 3-fold, 5-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold longer time period or more).
Dosages of the flagellin adjuvant and tumor antigen (if not in the form of a fusion protein) can be determined by those skilled in the art. In particular embodiments, dosages of the flagellin adjuvant are in the range from about 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 25, 50, 100 or 150 μg to about 200, 250, 300, 500, 1000, or 2500 μg for a typical (e.g., 70 kg) subject. In particular embodiments, dosages are from about 10 to 1000 μg, or from about 50 to 500 μg, or from about 150 to 300 μg for a typical subject. Suitable dosages of the tumor antigen can range from about 0.1, 0.5, 1, 10, 25, 50, 100 or 150 μg to about 200, 300, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 5000 or 10,000 μg for a typical (e.g. 70 kg) subject. In particular embodiments, the dosage of the tumor antigen is from about 50 to 2000 μg, from about 150 to about 1500 μg, or from about 300 to about 1000 μg for a typical subject. The initial dose can be followed by boosting dosages over weeks, months or years of from about 1 μg to about 1000 μg depending on the subject's response to the initial dosage.
The pharmaceutical compositions of the invention can optionally comprise other medicinal agents, pharmaceutical agents, stabilizing agents, buffers, carriers, diluents, salts, tonicity adjusting agents, wetting agents, and the like, for example, sodium acetate, sodium lactate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, calcium chloride, sorbitan monolaurate, triethanolamine oleate, etc.
For injection, the carrier will typically be a liquid. For other methods of administration, the carrier may be either solid or liquid. For inhalation administration, the carrier will be respirable, and is typically in a solid or liquid particulate form.
While adjuvants beyond flagellin are generally not required, the composition can optionally comprise an additional adjuvant, such as complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant, aluminum phosphate, aluminum hydroxide, alum, cytokines, TLR ligands, and the like.
The concentration of the proteins in the pharmaceutical compositions can vary widely, e.g., from less than about 0.01% or 0.1% up to at least about 2% to as much as 20% to 50% or more by weight, and will be selected primarily by fluid volumes, viscosities, etc., in accordance with the particular mode of administration selected.
The proteins can be formulated for administration in a pharmaceutical carrier in accordance with known techniques. See, e.g., Remington, The Science And Practice of Pharmacy (9^thEd. 1995). In the manufacture of a pharmaceutical composition according to the invention, the protein(s) (including physiologically acceptable salts thereof) is typically admixed with, inter alia, an acceptable carrier. The carrier can be a solid or a liquid, or both, and is optionally formulated with the compound as a unit-dose formulation, for example, a tablet. A variety of pharmaceutically acceptable aqueous carriers can be used, e.g., water, buffered water, 0.9% saline, 0.3% glycine, hyaluronic acid, pyrogen-free water, pyrogen-free phosphate-buffered saline solution, bacteriostatic water, or Cremophor EL[R] (BASF, Parsippany, N.J.), and the like. These compositions can be sterilized by conventional techniques. One or more proteins can be incorporated in the formulations of the invention, which can be prepared by any of the well-known techniques of pharmacy.
The pharmaceutical compositions can be packaged for use as is, or lyophilized, the lyophilized preparation generally being combined with a sterile aqueous solution prior to administration. The compositions can further be packaged in unit/dose or multi-dose containers, for example, in sealed ampoules and vials.
The pharmaceutical compositions can be formulated for administration by any method known in the art according to conventional techniques of pharmacy. For example, the compositions can be formulated to be administered intranasally, by inhalation (e.g., oral inhalation), orally, buccally (e.g., sublingually), rectally, vaginally, topically, intrathecally, intraocularly, transdermally, by parenteral administration (e.g., intramuscular [including administration to skeletal, cardiac and/or diaphragm muscle], intravenous, subcutaneous, intradermal, intrapleural, intracerebral and intra-arterial, intrathecal), topically (e.g., to both skin and mucosal surfaces, including airway surfaces), as well as direct tissue or organ injection, and by administration to the central nervous system (e.g., stereotactic administration to the brain).
In some embodiments of the invention, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for administration in or near the site of a tumor. In other embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated for administration directly into the lymphatic system (e.g., in or near a lymph node).
In particular embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is administered to a mucosal surface, e.g., by intranasal, inhalation, intratracheal, oral, rectal or vaginal administration, and the like.
For intranasal or inhalation administration, the pharmaceutical composition can be formulated as an aerosol (this term including both liquid and dry powder aerosols). For example, the pharmaceutical composition can be provided in a finely divided form along with a surfactant and propellant. Typical percentages of the composition are 0.01-20% by weight, preferably 1-10%. The surfactant is generally nontoxic and soluble in the propellant. Representative of such agents are the esters or partial esters of fatty acids containing from 6 to 22 carbon atoms, such as caproic, octanoic, lauric, palmitic, stearic, linoleic, linolenic, olesteric and oleic acids with an aliphatic polyhydric alcohol or its cyclic anhydride. Mixed esters, such as mixed or natural glycerides may be employed. The surfactant may constitute 0.1-20% by weight of the composition, preferably 0.25-5%. The balance of the composition is ordinarily propellant. A carrier can also be included, if desired, as with lecithin for intranasal delivery. Aerosols of liquid particles can be produced by any suitable means, such as with a pressure-driven aerosol nebulizer or an ultrasonic nebulizer, as is known to those of skill in the art. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,501,729. Aerosols of solid particles can likewise be produced with any solid particulate medicament aerosol generator, by techniques known in the pharmaceutical art. Intranasal administration can also be by droplet administration to a nasal surface.
Injectable formulations can be prepared in conventional forms, either as liquid solutions or suspensions, solid forms suitable for solution or suspension in liquid prior to injection, or as emulsions. Alternatively, one can administer the pharmaceutical composition in a local rather than systemic manner, for example, in a depot or sustained-release formulation.
Extemporaneous injection solutions and suspensions can be prepared from sterile powders, granules and tablets of the kind previously described. For example, an injectable, stable, sterile composition of this invention in a unit dosage form in a sealed container can be provided. The composition can be provided in the form of a lyophilizate, which can be reconstituted with a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carrier to form a liquid composition suitable for injection into a subject. The unit dosage form can be from about 1 μg to about 10 grams of the composition of this invention. When the composition is substantially water-insoluble, a sufficient amount of emulsifying agent, which is pharmaceutically acceptable, can be included in sufficient quantity to emulsify the composition in an aqueous carrier. One such useful emulsifying agent is phosphatidyl choline.
Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for oral administration can be presented in discrete units, such as capsules, cachets, lozenges, or tables, as a powder or granules; as a solution or a suspension in an aqueous or non-aqueous liquid; or as an oil-in-water or water-in-oil emulsion. Oral delivery can be performed by complexing a compound(s) of the present invention to a carrier capable of withstanding degradation by digestive enzymes in the gut of an animal. Examples of such carriers include plastic capsules or tablets, as known in the art. Such formulations are prepared by any suitable method of pharmacy, which includes the step of bringing into association the compound(s) and a suitable carrier (which may contain one or more accessory ingredients as noted above). In general, the pharmaceutical compositions are prepared by uniformly and intimately admixing the compound(s) with a liquid or finely divided solid carrier, or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the resulting mixture. For example, a tablet can be prepared by compressing or molding a powder or granules containing the compound(s), optionally with one or more accessory ingredients. Compressed tablets are prepared by compressing, in a suitable machine, the composition in a free-flowing form, such as a powder or granules optionally mixed with a binder, lubricant, inert diluent, and/or surface active/dispersing agent(s). Molded tablets are made by molding, in a suitable machine, the powdered compound moistened with an inert liquid binder.
Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for buccal (sub-lingual) administration include lozenges comprising the compound(s) in a flavored base, usually sucrose and acacia or tragacanth; and pastilles comprising the compound(s) in an inert base such as gelatin and glycerin or sucrose and acacia.
Pharmaceutical compositions of this invention suitable for parenteral administration can comprise sterile aqueous and non-aqueous injection solutions of the compounds of this invention, which preparations are preferably isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient. These preparations can contain anti-oxidants, buffers, bacteriostats and solutes, which render the composition isotonic with the blood of the intended recipient. Aqueous and non-aqueous sterile suspensions, solutions and emulsions can include suspending agents and thickening agents. Examples of non-aqueous solvents are propylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, vegetable oils such as olive oil, and injectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. Aqueous carriers include water, alcoholic/aqueous solutions, emulsions or suspensions, including saline and buffered media. Parenteral vehicles include sodium chloride solution, Ringer's dextrose, dextrose and sodium chloride, lactated Ringer's, or fixed oils. Intravenous vehicles include fluid and nutrient replenishers, electrolyte replenishers (such as those based on Ringer's dextrose), and the like. Preservatives and other additives may also be present such as, for example, antimicrobials, anti-oxidants, chelating agents, and inert gases and the like.
Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for rectal administration are preferably presented as unit dose suppositories. These can be prepared by admixing the compound(s) with one or more conventional solid carriers, such as for example, cocoa butter and then shaping the resulting mixture.
Pharmaceutical compositions of this invention suitable for topical application to the skin preferably take the form of an ointment, cream, lotion, paste, gel, spray, aerosol, or oil. Carriers that can be used include, but are not limited to, petroleum jelly, lanoline, polyethylene glycols, alcohols, transdermal enhancers, and combinations of two or more thereof. In some embodiments, for example, topical delivery can be performed by mixing a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention with a lipophilic reagent (e.g., DMSO) that is capable of passing into the skin.
Pharmaceutical compositions suitable for transdermal administration can be in the form of discrete patches adapted to remain in intimate contact with the epidermis of the subject for a prolonged period of time. Compositions suitable for transdermal administration can also be delivered by iontophoresis (see, for example, Pharmaceutical Research 3:318 (1986)) and typically take the form of an optionally buffered aqueous solution of the compound(s). Suitable formulations can comprise citrate or bis\tris buffer (pH 6) or ethanol/water and can contain from 0.1 to 0.2M active ingredient.
Further, the compound(s) can be formulated as a liposomal formulations. The technology for forming liposomal suspensions is well known in the art. When the compound(s) or salt thereof is an aqueous-soluble salt, using conventional liposome technology, the same can be incorporated into lipid vesicles. In such an instance, due to the water solubility of the compound(s) or salt, the compound(s) or salt will be substantially entrained within the hydrophilic center or core of the liposomes. The lipid layer employed can be of any conventional composition and can either contain cholesterol or can be cholesterol-free. When the compound(s) or salt of interest is water-insoluble, again employing conventional liposome formation technology, the salt can be substantially entrained within the hydrophobic lipid bilayer which forms the structure of the liposome. In either instance, the liposomes which are produced can be reduced in size, as through the use of standard sonication and homogenization techniques.
The liposomal formulations can be lyophilized to produce a lyophilizate which can be reconstituted with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, such as water, to regenerate a liposomal suspension.
Having described the present invention, the same will be explained in greater detail in the following examples, which are included herein for illustration purposes only, and which are not intended to be limiting to the invention. Abbreviations used herein are as follows: GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor; IL, interleukin; i.n., intranasal; i.t., intra-tracheal; NK, natural killer cell; NO, nitric oxide; s.c., subcutaneous; TLR, toll like receptor; TGF-β; transforming growth factor beta.

Example 1

Cancer Antigens and Vaccines Thereof

Effect of flagellin on innate immunity in the mouse lung. Non-surgical intratracheal (i.t.) instillation of 1 μg of flagellin is sufficient to induce maximal production of TNFα after approximately 4 hr (FIG. 1). By 12-24 hr, cytokine levels in broncheoalveolar lavage fluid return to baseline levels. Note that a mutant flagellin that does not bind to TLR5 and thus lacks signaling activity, did not induce cytokine production. In addition to TNFα, several other cytokines including IL-6, G-CSF, and the chemokines, MIP-2 and KC were induced to relatively high levels. The increase in cytokine expression is followed by the transient infiltration of neutrophils (maximal at 12-24 hr). It is important to emphasize that the innate immune response initiated by flagellin does not result in severe tissue damaging inflammation. The induced inflammatory response is relatively moderate and acute in nature. These findings, in conjunction with those of other investigators, establish the in vivo potency of flagellin as an activator of innate immunity.
Adjuvant effect of flagellin in the mouse lung. In addition to analyzing the innate response induced by flagellin, the effects of flagellin on the antibody response were examined. BALB/c mice were immunized with 10 μg F1 antigen with 1 μg flagellin or an inactive flagellin mutant protein by nonsurgical intra-tracheal (i.t.) or intra-nasal (i.n.) instillation. Four weeks later, the mice were boosted with the same regimens and then serum levels of anti-F1 IgG were determined two weeks later. Flagellin, but not the inactive mutant, exhibited extraordinarily potent adjuvant activity as measured by serum anti-F1 IgG levels. In animals immunized i.t., the antibody titers ranged from 20,000 to greater than 100,000, and from 90,000 to greater than 300,000 in the case of animals immunized i.n. The results for i.n. immunization are presented in Table 1. Analysis of the cytokine requirements for this response using knockout mice indicate that neither IL-6, IL-12, nor TNF-α are required for the adjuvant effect of flagellin (FIG. 5). Furthermore, the maximal adjuvant effect of flagellin is achieved with a dose of flagellin (1 μg) that is 5-10× less than required for the maximal induction of the innate immune response in the respiratory tract of mice. Thus maximal adjuvant activity is achieved with a dose of flagellin that produces limited inflammation.

TABLE 1

I.n. immunization with Y. pestis F1 antigen and wild-type flagellin
results in a strong anti-F1 IgG response. Mice were given two
immunizations with 10 μg F1 antigen and 1 μg
wild-type or mutant flagellin. Serum anti-F1 IgG titers were measured
by ELISA.

	Flagellin	Total IgG Titer

	Inactive mutant (7 mice)	<100
	wild-type mouse 1	>300,000
	mouse 2	>300,000
	mouse 3	>300,000
	mouse 4	90,000
	mouse 5	>300,000
	mouse 6	300,000

Example 2

Flagellin as an Adjuvant to Produce an Antigen-Specific Breast Cancer Response

Treatment of breast tumor in vivo. BALB/c mice were immunized with the Fra-1 antigen, an antigen that is over-expressed by many breast tumors, and either flagellin or an inactive form of flagellin. The mice were boosted once prior to subcutaneous injection of D2F2 cells, a breast cancer tumor. The mice were monitored for the growth of tumors and the tumor volumes were determined. Data are shown in FIG. 2. The open circles represent the mice given the Fra-1 antigen and the inactive form of flagellin. The closed circles represent the mice given Fra-1 antigen and the active form of flagellin. As can readily be seen, flagellin+Fra-1 antigen had a significant effect on the growth of the tumor.
Evaluation of whether flagellin can promote a protective immune response against D2F2 breast cancer cells in a mouse model. The ability of flagellin to promote a protective state of immunity against D2F2 breast cancer cells is evaluated using as an antigen, Fra-1, a protein that is over-expressed by these cancer cells These experiments involve immunization and then challenge with D2F2 cells as well as challenge followed by immunization. In addition, the nature of the induced effectors-antibodies vs. cytolytic T cells and/or NK cells is determined.
A. Preparation of purified recombinant Fra-1 antigen. The pET22 expression vector encoding the cDNA encoding murine Fra-1 (kindly provided by Dr. Rong Xiang, The Scripps Research Institute) is used to express the Fra-1 protein in Rosetta-gami-pLysS bacteria. The protein is purified using the Talon affinity resin (via recognition of the His-tag on the Fra-1) and contaminating endotoxin is removed by passage of the purified protein over a Detoxi-gel column (McDermott et al. (2000) Infect. Immun. 68:5525-5529). Using this procedure, mg amounts of several proteins have been obtained previously (e.g., flagellin, F1 antigen, and IRAK-4 [a eukaryotic protein]).
B. Evaluation of whether flagellin promotes protective immunity against D2F2 breast cancer cells in BALB/c mice immunized with Fra-1 antigen and flagellin. Groups of 7 mice are immunized with 10 μg Fra-1 protein with or without 1 μg flagellin or mutant flagellin 229 intra-peritoneally (i.p.) or intramuscularly (i.m.). Two weeks later, the mice are boosted and then challenged with 1×10⁶D2F2 cells (given subcutaneously (s.c.)). Tumor mass and the survival of the mice is followed over a period of approximately 3 months. In the absence of immunity, approximately 50% of the mice succumb within 4 weeks after challenge. The s.c. tumors are measured for width and length so that tumor volume can be calculated. If a significant effect of flagellin is observed, the dose of flagellin that produces the maximal response is determined. Once the optimal dose of flagellin is established, it is determined if flagellin can promote the clearance of an existing tumor. Groups of 7 mice are challenged with D2F2 cells by s.c. injection and then immunized with Fra-1 with or without flagellin at the time of challenge or 1, 3, 7, and 21 days later. In each case, the mice are boosted after 2 weeks. Tumor mass and survival of the mice are determined.
C. Identification of the potential effectors in the flagellin-promoted response against Fra-1-expressing D2F2 cells. To identify the induced effectors in the flagellin-promoted response, the level of circulating anti-Fra-1 antibodies as well as the relative numbers of CD8+ cytolytic T cells (CTL) and NK cells are determined. BALB/c mice are immunized with Fra-1 and flagellin or mutant flagellin according to the protocol presented above.
1. Anti-Fra-1 antibodies. Two weeks after challenge with D2F2 cells, the mice are euthanized and serum samples are taken for analysis of circulating anti-Fra-1 antibodies by ELISA. Using appropriate anti-isotypic antibodies, the levels of circulating total IgG and IgM as well as IgG1 and IgG2a sub-isotypes are assessed.
2. Anti-Fra-1 specific CD8+ CTL. Anti-Fra-1 specific CD8+ CTL are determined by isolating splenocytes and assessing their cytolytic activity in a standard ⁵¹Cr-release assay. The lysis mediated by CD8+ CTL should be blocked by an anti-MHC class I antibody. Therefore, cell samples are analyzed in the presence and absence of this antibody. By varying the ratio of effectors-to-targets, a relative estimate of the increase in CD8+ CTL in mice immunized with Fra-1 and flagellin or mutant flagellin is obtained. The numbers of activated CD8+ CTL can also be determined using an ELISPOT assay for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production. Using anti-CD8 MACS MicroBeads (Miltenyl Biotech), CD8+ splenocytes from immunized mice are isolated and the cells incubated for 24 h with irradiated D2F2 cells. The cells are analyzed by ELISPOT assay for IFN-γ production. If sufficient numbers of cells are present, intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) is used as a second method.
3. NK cells. The relative numbers of activated NK cells are assessed in a ⁵¹Cr-release assay using YAC-1 cells as targets. Splenocytes are obtained from immunized and D2F2 challenged mice and assessed for cytolytic activity against YAC-1 cells. Since the expression of DX5 is associated with NK cells, the expression of this marker by flow cytometry is measured using a commercially available PE-labeled antibody. A stimulatory effect of flagellin on the expansion of NK cells should be associated with an increase in DX5 expression.
The efficacy of a recombinant flagellin protein containing Fra-1 epitopes in the protective response against D2F2 breast cancer cells. It is further determined if flagellin can serve as a vaccine vector and adjuvant. If this is the case, recombinant flagellin proteins encoding a number of epitopes from different tumor antigens are generated.
The available evidence indicates that human breast cancers exhibit substantial heterogeneity in the tumor-specific antigens that they express. For example, MAGE-3 is expressed in approximately 14% of breast cancers, whereas Her2/neu is expressed in 40%, NY-BR-62 in 60%, and NY-BR-85 in approximately 90% (Scanlan and Jäger (2001) Breast Cancer Res. 3:95-98). It is determined if a recombinant flagellin protein containing full-length Fra-1 antigen can function in the same manner as the two proteins.
If this is the case, then the epitopes within Fra-1 that are involved in inducing a protective response are mapped. It would be a straightforward effort to do the same thing with other major breast cancer antigen targets. A flagellin protein expressing epitopes from a range of target antigens can be generated. Alternatively, a cocktail of flagellin proteins can be used—each flagellin expressing a subset of target epitopes. Furthermore, by introducing foreign epitopes are introduced into the hypervariable region of the protein—a region that is not involved in the interaction of flagellin with TLR5 (Donnelly and Steiner (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277:40456-40461; Smith et al. (2003) Nat. Immunol. 4:1247-1253; Murthy et al. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279:5667-5675), it is unlikely that the biologic activities of flagellin are affected in any significant manner.
Generation of a flagellin/Fra-1 chimera. The full sequence for Fra-1 is inserted into the hypervariable region of flagellin and the resultant construct is cloned into the pET22a expression vector and the protein is expressed in Rosetta-gami-pLysS bacteria. Endotoxin is removed using a Detoxi-gel column. The biologic activity of the chimeric protein is assessed using TNFα production by RAW264.7 cells. The chimera is titrated and its potency compared with wild-type flagellin.
Mapping of Fra-1 epitopes required for protection against D2F2 cells. The ability of the chimera to protect BALB/c mice against a challenge with D2F2 cells is evaluated. If the chimera induces protective immunity, overlapping truncations of the Fra-1 sequence are generated and tested for efficacy in the context of the flagellin. To reduce the number of constructs, three overlapping fragments covering the entire sequence of Fra-1 are prepared. If one of these truncations is active, additional truncations are generated to define the minimal sequence(s) that is required for protection. If none of the three truncations is functional by itself, these are tested in pairs to determine if the required sequences are in different parts of the protein. Using this approach, the minimal required sequences can be defined.

Example 3

Flagellin is an Effective Mucosal Adjuvant for Immunization Against Lethal Respiratory Challenge with Yersinia pestis

Methods:

Plasmids and cell culture. The coding sequence for the F1 antigen of Yersinia pestis, caf1, (plasmid containing the entire caf operon kindly provided by Dr. J. B. Bliska, State University of New York, Stony Brook) was subcloned into the NdeI and XhoI sites of the pET29a expression vector from Novagen (EMD Biosciences, Inc., Madison, Wis.). The recombinant F1/V fusion construct (Heat et al. (1998) Vaccine 16:1131-1137) (provided by Drs. G. Andrews and P. Worsham, USAMRIID) was sequenced and subcloned into pET16b. Sequencing revealed the absence of 21 amino acids corresponding to the signal sequence of F1.
Reagents and antibodies. Purified, recombinant His-tagged flagellin from Salmonella enteritidis was prepared as described previously (Honko and Mizel (2004) Infect. Immun. 72:6676-6679; McDermott et al. (2000) Infect. Immun. 68:5525-5529). The 229 mutant flagellin, as well as the F1 and F1/V antigens were purified in an identical manner. Endotoxin levels were ≦1 pg/μg as detected by the QCL-1000® Chromogenic LAL Test Kit from the Cambrex Corporation (East Rutherford, N.J.). TNF-α was detected using the BD OptEIA ELISA kit (mono/mono) per the manufacturers instructions (BD Biosciences). An anti-F1 mouse monoclonal IgG1, clone YPF19 obtained from Research Diagnostics, Inc. (Flanders, N.J.), was used as a control in the anti-F1 ELISA. Goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP was purchased from SouthernBiotech (Birmingham, Ala.). Goat anti-monkey IgG-HRP was purchased from Research Diagnostics, Inc. (Flanders, N.J.).
Mice. Female BALB/cAnNCr mice were purchased from the Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, Md.). Female IL-6−/− mice (B6; 129S2-116/J), TNFR1 mice (tm1Kopf−/− B6; 129S-Tnfrsf1a Tnfrsf1b/J), IFNγ (tm1Imx tm1Imx −/− B6.129S7-Ifngtm1Ts/J) and control mice (C57BL/6J, B6; 129SF2/J and 129/SvJ) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me.). IFNα/βR−/− mice were provided by Dr. C. Schindler, Columbia University, New York (Müller et al. (1994) Science 264:1918-1921). Mice were maintained in a specific-pathogen free facility and all research complied with federal and institutional guidelines set forth by the Wake Forest University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Nonsurgical intratracheal and intranasal immunization of mice. For intratracheal immunization, mice were anesthetized with Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol, Sigma; tert-amyl alcohol, Fisher) by intraperitoneal injection and suspended from a length of wire by their front incisors. Using a sterile gel-loading tip inserted gently into the trachea, 10 μg F1 antigen and the indicated amount of flagellin or the flagellin mutant 229 was administered in a total of 50 μL pyrogen-free PBS. For intranasal immunization, small volumes (9-12 μL total) containing antigen and adjuvant in PBS were administered to the nostrils of anesthetized mice. Mice were boosted at 4 weeks and plasma collected 2-3 weeks post-boost for analysis of antibody titers.
Immunization of monkeys. Fifteen healthy adult female cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were maintained in accordance with federal and institutional guidelines set forth by the Wake Forest University Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were anesthetized with 7-10 mg/kg ketamine intramuscularly for immunizations and blood collection. For intranasal immunization, 150 μg F1/V fusion protein and 50 μg flagellin were delivered dropwise (100 μL/nostril) to animals in a recumbent position. Intramuscular immunizations were administered into the quadriceps in a volume of 1 mL. Control animals received PBS intranasally and intramuscularly.
Analysis of plasma antibody titers by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). Heparinized tubes (StatSpin; Fisher Scientific) or BD Vacutainer PST tubes were used for plasma collection. Plasma was then aliquoted and frozen at −70° C. until analysis. ELISA plates were coated with 100 μL of antigen at 10 μg/mL in sterile PBS overnight at 4° C. and blocked with 10% FCS in PBS. Duplicate or triplicate plasma dilutions were added and the plate was incubated overnight at 4° C., followed by secondary anti-Ig antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Peroxidase activity was detected with 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) Liquid Substrate System (Sigma-Aldrich) and stopped with 2M H₂SO₄. End-point dilution titers were defined as the inverse of the highest dilution that resulted in an absorbance value (OD₄₅₀)>0.1 over that of naive plasma.
Respiratory challenge with Yersinia pestis CO92. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases (Fort Collins, Colo.) provided a stock culture of Yersinia pestis CO92 biovar orientalis, a strain isolated from a fatal case of human primary pneumonic plague (Doll et al. (1994) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51:109-114). Heart infusion broth was inoculated with a single colony from a subculture plate and grown at 28° C. to an approximate density of 1×10⁹colony forming units (cfu)/mL. Mice were challenged intranasally with 10 μL of culture diluted in PBS to ˜1.8×10⁷cfu/mL, a dose equivalent to 150× lethal dose 50% (LD50) of 1.2×10⁴cfu (data not shown). Actual cfu/mL values were determined by plating serial dilutions onto tryptose blood agar plates. Survival was monitored for 14-30 days post challenge. All experiments were conducted according to CDC approved standard operating procedures for the BSL3 and ABSL3 facility at the Infectious Disease Unit at Virginia Tech (CDC approval #C20031120-0016).
Statistical analysis. Data are represented as individual values with means and standard error. The F test for equality of variance and Student's one-sided t-test were used to assign statistical significance at p<0.05 or p<0.01. SigmaStat3.1 (Systat Software, Inc., Richmond, Calif.) was used to determine LD₅₀values by nonlinear regression.

Results:

Immunization with flagellin promotes a potent adaptive response to the F1 antigen of Yersinia pestis. To determine the ability of flagellin to promote a humoral immune response against the F1 antigen of Y. pestis, BALB/c mice were immunized with 10 μg F1 antigen and 1 μg recombinant flagellin (FliC) intratracheally (i.t.) or intranasally (i.n.). Control animals were immunized with F1 antigen in PBS, or F1 and a mutant form of flagellin, designated 229. Four weeks later, mice were boosted in an identical manner and plasma was collected for analysis of circulating antibody titers at various times post-boost. No F1-specific IgG was detected in the groups of control mice. However, a vaccine containing F1 and flagellin stimulated a dramatic increase in total IgG titers (FIG. 3, panel a), with high levels of F1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a. The mean ratio of IgG1 to IgG2a (indicated within the bars) ranged from 30-170 when flagellin and F1 were administered i.t. and was approximately 3 when given i.n. Although i.n. and i.t. immunization resulted in mixed Th responses, the bias towards an apparent Th2 response was more evident following intratracheal immunization. It is important to note that flagellin did not promote significant F1-specific IgE production. Mice immunized with F1 and flagellin exhibited sustained titers of anti-F1 IgG after two immunizations (FIG. 3, panel b). A tertiary immunization at 16 weeks improved the antibody response in the two mice that had lower initial titers.
In a previous study, it was demonstrated that the innate response to flagellin in the lung was maximal with doses of flagellin in the range of 5-15 μg (Honko and Mizel (2004) Infect. Immun. 72:6676-6679). To determine if there was a linear relationship between the magnitude of the cytokine response and the antibody response promoted by flagellin, BALB/c mice were immunized with F1 antigen and 1 μg, 5 μg and 15 μg of flagellin (FIG. 3, panel c). Anti-F1 IgG titers were not significantly different at these doses, indicating that the adjuvant effect is maximal at 1 μg flagellin. However, we noticed a trend towards a greater IgG1/IgG2a ratio with increasing doses of flagellin. Thus it appears that a maximal adaptive response may not require a maximal innate response.
Pre-existing immunity to flagellin is an obvious concern when considering its use as an adjuvant. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of immunization with flagellin and F1 in the presence of high titers of anti-flagellin antibodies. Female BALB/c mice were immunized and boosted with 5 μg flagellin i.n. and anti-flagellin antibody titers were determined. Flagellin-specific IgG titers were below the level of detection prior to immunization, and increased significantly with a mean anti-FliC IgG titer of 8.5×10⁵. These mice were then immunized and boosted with 10 μg F1 and 1 μg FliC i.n. Two weeks post-boost, anti-F1 IgG titers were similar between naive and FliC-immune mice (FIG. 3, panel d), indicating that circulating anti-flagellin antibodies did not positively or negatively alter the response to flagellin. Our results, support the conclusion that flagellin is an effective adjuvant in the presence of prior immunity to flagellin.
The adjuvant effect of flagellin stimulates antigen-specific responses and is dependent on T lymphocytes. The development of immunological memory is an essential feature of an effective vaccine, preparing the immune system to respond rapidly following subsequent exposure to the antigen during infection. To evaluate the requirement for flagellin stimulation in the secondary immunization, four groups of BALB/c mice were immunized with F1 antigen and flagellin and subsequently boosted with PBS, flagellin alone, F1 antigen alone, or flagellin and F1 (FIG. 4, panel a). F1-specific IgG titers in mice boosted with PBS or flagellin alone remained between 500-1100, values that are typical for post-primary responses. However, mice that received F1 antigen alone in the secondary immunization had dramatically increased anti-F1 IgG titers. Although flagellin was not required in the boost, there was a significant increase in anti-F1 antibody titers when flagellin was present. These findings are analogous to those reported in Pasare and Medzhitov (2004) Immunity 21:733-741 using LPS as an adjuvant. The authors suggested that once CD4⁺ memory is established using LPS as an adjuvant, TLR stimulation is no longer required for activation of these lymphocytes. Although the memory response in our system remains to be fully characterized, the lack of an F1-specific IgG response in athymic nude mice (BALB/cAnNCr-nu/nu) immunized with flagellin and F1 (FIG. 4, panel b) demonstrates a requirement for T cells in the humoral response to this vaccine.
TNF-α, IL-6 and interferons are not required for the adjuvant effects of flagellin. Previously, it was determined that flagellin induces high levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in the lung (Example 1; Honko and Mizel (2004) Infect. Immun. 72, 6676-6679). Therefore, the role of these cytokines in the adjuvant activity of flagellin was evaluated. TNF-α is a pleiotropic cytokine that promotes dendritic cell maturation (Banchereau et al. (2000) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18, 767-811). As shown in FIG. 5, panel a, the anti-F1 antibody response remains extremely high in these mice, indicating that TNF-α is not required for the adjuvant effect of flagellin. However, flagellin-stimulated TNF-α production appears to enhance the antibody response against F1 antigen, as the titers in TNFR^−/− mice were reduced approximately two-fold relative to wild-type B6; 129 mice. The role of IL-6, a cytokine that promotes B cell proliferation and differentiation (Kaminura et al. (2003) Rev. Physiol Biochem. Pharmacol. 149:1-38), in the adjuvant activity of flagellin was evaluated using IL-6^−/− mice. There was no defect in anti-F1 IgG production in these mice following immunization with F1 and FliC (FIG. 5, panel b), indicating that this cytokine is also not essential for the adjuvant effect of flagellin.
In vitro, flagellin stimulates nitric oxide and interferon-β (IFN-β) production via signaling through functional TLR5/4 heteromeric complexes (Mizel et al. (2003) J. Immunol 170:6217-6223). C3H/HeJ mice, which possess a nonfunctional mutant TLR4 (Poltorak et al. (1998) Science 282:2085-2088), provide a model to separate the effects of TLR5/4 heteromeric and TLR5/5 homomeric signaling in vivo. In the lung, flagellin-stimulated production of TNF-α, IL-6, G-CSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor), keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC), macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2) and MIP-1α was not disrupted in C3H/HeJ mice (Example 1; Honko and Mizel (2004) Infect. Immun. 72:6676-6679); however, interferon production was not evaluated. Type I IFNs are proposed to link innate and adaptive immune responses by stimulating the upregulation of MHC and costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells (Le Bon and Tough (2002) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:432-436). To determine the role of TLR5/4 signaling on the adjuvant effect of flagellin, anti-F1 antibody titers in C3H/HeJ mice were compared to their wild-type counterpart, C3H/HeN mice (FIG. 5, panel c), following immunization with F1 antigen and flagellin. As there was no defect in antibody production, signaling via TLR5/4 complexes is not required for the adjuvant effects of flagellin. The role of interferons in the adjuvant activity of flagellin was evaluated directly by determining antibody responses in mice lacking either type I interferon signaling (IFNα/βR^−/−) or the ability to produce interferon-γ (IFNγ^−/−) (FIG. 5, panels d and e). As both strains of mice responded in a manner similar to wild-type mice immunized with F1 antigen and flagellin, interferons are also not required for the adjuvant effect of flagellin.
Flagellin promotes a protective response for intranasal challenge with Yersinia pestis CO92. The fundamental test of a vaccine is the ability to provide protection against challenge with a pathogen. As a model for respiratory infection, immunized and control mice were challenged intranasally with virulent Y. pestis CO92. To ensure that vaccination induced adequate protection, a challenge dose of 150 times the lethal dose 50% (LD₅₀) for i.n. infection with Y. pestis was selected on the basis of recommendations from a recent Plague Vaccine Workshop sponsored by the NIAID and the FDA (Oct. 13-14, 2004). BALB/c mice immunized and boosted i.n. with flagellin and F1 had a 93% survival rate, versus only 7% in the control group (FIG. 6, panel a), following challenge with a dose equivalent to 100×LD₅₀. B cell-deficient IgH^−/− mice were used to evaluate the B cell/antibody dependence of the protective response (FIG. 6, panel b). All control and immunized mice succumbed to Y. pestis infection at a dose of approximately 150×LD₅₀, indicating that protection at this challenge dose is B cell-mediated and thus presumably antibody-mediated. Previously, Elvin et al. examined the role of type 1 effector functions in protection from Y. pestis infection using Stat4^−/− animals that have defective IL-12 and IFN-γ-mediated cellular immune responses (Elvin and Williamson (2004) Microb. Patho. 37:177-184). Whereas immunized Stat4′-mice produced similar levels of anti-F1 and anti-V IgG as their wild-type counterpart, these animals were less protected from high dose challenge. To address the role of IFN-γ-mediated protection following intranasal challenge in our system, groups of IFN-γ^−/− and wild-type C57BL/6 mice were immunized and boosted with F1 antigen and flagellin prior to challenge with 150×LD₅₀ Y. pestis. Wild-type C57BL/6 mice were completely protected by i.n. immunization with flagellin and F1, versus only 10% of controls (FIG. 6, panel c). Immunized IFN-γ^−/− mice had 80% survival following challenge (FIG. 6, panel d), indicating that IFN-γ-mediated responses are not required for protection. As these animals had high titers of anti-F1 IgG, these results confirm the importance of F1-specific antibodies in protection from Y. pestis infection and support the utility of circulating IgG titers as a correlate of protective efficacy. The observation that two IFNγ^−/− mice succumbed to infection suggests that IFN-γ may augment antibody-mediated protection from Y. pestis, possibly through the promotion of the respiratory burst in phagocytes.
Flagellin is an effective adjuvant in nonhuman primates. In view of the ability of flagellin to promote protective adaptive immune responses in murine models, we next evaluated the effectiveness of flagellin as an adjuvant in nonhuman primates. A recombinant fusion protein consisting of the F1 and V antigens of Y. pestis was used for immunization of female cynomolgus macaques. Groups of 6 monkeys were immunized with 150 μg F1/V fusion and 50 μg flagellin i.n. or intramuscularly (i.m.). Additional control animals (n=3) received PBS by both routes. Prior to immunization, the monkeys exhibited anti-flagellin antibody titers of approximately 9.8×10⁴. Monkeys immunized with flagellin exhibited no change in body temperature or plasma TNF-α levels during the first 24 h following immunization, and no observable inflammation occurred at the site of injection. Animals were boosted in an identical manner at four weeks and plasma anti-F1/V IgG titers were determined two weeks later (FIG. 7). Immunized monkeys exhibited a striking increase in F1/V-specific antibody titers. No antigen-specific IgE was detected. These results clearly establish that flagellin is an effective adjuvant for the development of an antibody response in nonhuman primates, even in the presence of circulating anti-flagellin antibodies.

Example 4

Yersinia pestis Antigens and Vaccines

A fusion protein to induce an immune response against Yersinia pestis is produced in a like manner as described in Example 2, with a Y. pestis V antigen, a Y. pestis F1 antigen, or a fusion peptide thereof. Such fusion proteins can be used to induce an immune response, optionally a protective immune response, as described herein. Optionally, the response is a mucosal immune response. Specific non-limiting examples of suitable fusion proteins are:

Example A: FliC/F1/V amino acid sequence
(SEQ ID NO: 1)

1	MAQVINTNSL SLLTQNNLNK SQSSLSSAIE RLSSGLRINS
	AKDDAAGQAI

51	ANRFTSNIKG LTQASRNAND GISIAQTTEG ALNEINNNLQ
	RVRELSVQAT

101	NGTNSDSDLK SIQDEIQQRL EEIDRVSNQT QFNGVKVLSQ
	DNQMKIQVGA

151	NDGETITIDL QKIDVKSLGL DGFNVNGPKE ATVGDLKSSF
	KNVTGRSMAD

201	LTASTTATAT LVEPARITLT YKEGAPITIM DNGNIDTELL
	VGTLTLGGYK

251	TGTTSTSVNF TDAAGDPMYL TFTSQDGNNH QFTTKVIGKD
	SRDFDISPKV

301	NGENLVGDDV VLATGSQDFF VRSIGSKGGK LAAGKYTDAV
	TVTVSNQGSI

351	EGRNRAYEQN PQHFIEDLEK VRVEQLTGHG SSVLEELVQL
	VKDKNIDISI

401	KYDPRKDSEV FANRVITDDI ELLKKILAYF LPEDAILKGG
	HYDNQLQNGI

451	KRVKEFLESS PNTQWELRAF MAVMHFSLTA DRIDDDILKV
	IVDSMNHHGD

501	ARSKLREELA ELTAELKIYS VIQAEINKHL SSSGTINIHD
	KSINLMDKNL

551	YGYTDEEIFK ASAEYKILEK MPQTTIQVDG SEKKIVSIKD
	FLGSENKRTG

601	ALGNLKNSYS YNKDNNELSH FATTCSDKSR PLNDLVSQKT
	TQLSDITSRF

651	NSAIEALNRF IQKYDSVMQR LLDDTSGK RS ATGDK ITLAG
	KTMFIDKTAS

701	GVSTLINEDA AAAKKSTANP LASIDSALSK VDAVRSSLGA
	IQNRFDSAIT

751	NLGNTVTNLN SARSRIEDAD YATEVSNMSK AQILQQAGTS
	VLAQANQVPQ

801	NVLSLLRLEH HHHHH*

Example B: FliC/F1 amino acid sequence
(SEQ ID NO: 2)

1	MAQVINTNSL SLLTQNNLNK SQSSLSSAIE RLSSGLRINS
	AKDDAAGQAI

51	ANRFTSNIKG LTQASRNAND GISIAQTTEG ALNEINNNLQ
	RVRELSVQAT

101	NGTNSDSDLK SIQDEIQQRL EEIDRVSNQT QFNGVKVLSQ
	DNQMKIQVGA

151	NDGETITIDL QKIDVKSLGL DGFNVNGPKE ATVGDLKSSF
	KNVTGRSMAD

201	LTASTTATAT LVEPARITLT YKEGAPITIM DNGNIDTELL
	VGTLTLGGYK

251	TGTTSTSVNF TDAAGDPMYL TFTSQDGNNH QFTTKVIGKD
	SRDFDISPKV

301	NGENLVGDDV VLATGSQDFF VRSIGSKGGK LAAGKYTDAV
	TVTVSNQ RSA

351	TGDK ITLAGK TMFIDKTASG VSTLINEDAA AAKKSTANPL
	ASIDSALSKV

401	DAVRSSLGAI QNRFDSAITN LGNTVTNLNS ARSRIEDADY
	ATEVSNMSKA

451	QILQQAGTSV LAQANQVPQN VLSLLRLEHH HHHH*

EXAMPLE C: FliC/V amino acid sequence
(SEQ ID NO: 3)

1	MAQVINTNSL SLLTQNNLNK SQSSLSSAIE RLSSGLRINS
	AKDDAAGQAI

51	ANRFTSNIKG LTQASRNAND GISIAQTTEG ALNEINNNLQ
	RVRELSVQAT

101	NGTNSDSDLK SIQDEIQQRL EEIDRVSNQT QFNGVKVLSQ
	DNQMKIQVGA

151	NDGETITIDL QKIDVKSLGL DGFNVNGPKE ATVGDLKSSF
	KNVTGRSMIR

201	AYEQNPQHFI EDLEKVRVEQ LTGHGSSVLE ELVQLVKDKN
	IDISIKYDPR

251	KDSEVFANRV ITDDIELLKK ILAYFLPEDA ILKGGHYDNQ
	LQNGIKRVKE

301	FLESSPNTQW ELRAFMAVMH FSLTADRIDD DILKVIVDSM
	NHHGDARSKL

351	REELAELTAE LKIYSVIQAE INKHLSSSGT INIHDKSINL
	MDKNLYGYTD

401	EEIFKASAEY KILEKMPQTT IQVDGSEKKI VSIKDFLGSE
	NKRTGALGNL

451	KNSYSYNKDN NELSHFATTC SDKSRPLNDL VSQKTTQLSD
	ITSRFNSAIE

501	ALNRFIQKYD SVMQRLLDDT SGK RSATGDK ITLAGKTMFI
	DKTASGVSTL

551	INEDAAAAKK STANPLASID SALSKVDAVR SSLGAIQNRF
	DSAITNLGNT

601	VTNLNSARSR IEDADYATEV SNMSKAQILQ QAGTSVLAQA
	NQVPQNVLSL

651	LRLEHHHHHH *

Note:
FliC obtained from S. enteritidis. In each of these fusion proteins, the N terminal constant region of FliC ends at amino acid residue 198, and the C terminal constant region (the first seven amino acids of which is denoted in bold and underlined) begins at amino acid residue 679 of Example A (SEQ ID NO: 1), amino acid residue 348 of Example B (SEQ ID NO: 2), and amino acid residue 524 of Example C (SEQ ID NO: 3).

Example 5

Biological Activity of a Fusion Peptide Containing Flagellin and the F1 and V Antigens of Yersinia pestis

To prepare an expression plasmid encoding flagellin and Yersinia pestis F1 and V antigens as a single protein, the majority of the nucleotide sequence encoding the hypervariable region of the S. enteritidis flagellin was removed and replaced with the F1 and V sequences in tandem separated by an eighteen nucleotide bridge encoding 6 amino acids (see Example A, SEQ ID NO:1, above). The recombinant protein was produced in BL21 cells and purified by affinity chromatography on a metal affinity resin. Endotoxin and contaminating nucleic acid were removed using an Acrodisc chromatography filter. To determine if the resultant protein retained flagellin bioactivity, TLR5-negative and TLR5-positive RAW264.7 cells were incubated with the trifusion protein and the extent of tumor necrosis factor-a production was determined. The TLR5-negative RAW cells were used to control for any contaminating factors that might have an effect in this assay. As shown in FIG. 8, a fusion protein containing flagellin and the Yersinia pestis F1 and V proteins retains flagellin biological activity in TLR5-positive cells. The protein did not signal in TLR5-negative RAW264.7 cells.
Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5)-negative RAW264.7 cells or TLR5-positive RAW264.7 cells (a cell line created by stably transfecting RAW264.7 cells with a construct encoding a TLR5-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein) were incubated with increasing concentrations of a fusion protein encoding flagellin and the F1 and V proteins of Y. pestis for 4 hours and then the culture medium was assayed by ELISA for the content of TNF-α
To determine if flagellin+F1+V or a single protein containing all three protects against a lethal challenge with Y. pestis CO92, C3H/HeJ mice were immunized and boosted with phosphate buffered saline only (PBS) or a vaccine containing three proteins-i mg flagellin+5 mg each F1 and V or a vaccine containing a single protein containing flagellin, F1, and V (flagellin/F1V; 10 mg). The mice were boosted after 4 weeks with the same regimens and then challenged with approximately 150 LD₅₀of Y. pestis CO92. The mice were bled prior to the challenge and anti-F1 IgG titers were determined by ELISA. As shown in Table 2, flagellin+F1 and V antigens of Yersinia pestis or a fusion protein containing flagellin and the F1 and V antigens of Yersinia pestis provides complete protection against a lethal respiratory challenge with Yersinia pestis.

TABLE 2

Results of protection studies of mice immunized with flagellin + F1
and V antigens of Y. pestis or a fusion protein containing flagellin
and the F1 and V antigens of Y. pestis against a lethal
respiratory challenge with Y. pestis.

Survival

Immunization	Anti-F1 IgG titer	Anti-V IgG titer	Number	Percent

PBS	6.6 × 10²	1.2 × 10³	0/10	0
Flagellin +	4.5 × 10⁶	4.2 × 10⁶	10/10	100
F1 + V
Flagellin/F1/V	5 × 10⁶	6.3 × 10⁶	4/4	100

The foregoing is illustrative of the present invention, and is not to be taken as limiting thereof. The invention is defined by the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included therein.

Claims

1. A fusion protein comprising:

(a) a flagellin adjuvant comprising:

(i) a flagellin N-terminal constant region; and

(ii) a flagellin C-terminal constant region; and

(b) a tumor antigen between the N-terminal constant region and the C-terminal constant region.

2. The fusion protein of claim 1, wherein the flagellin adjuvant comprises a deleted flagellin hypervariable region or the flagellin hypervariable region is absent from the flagellin adjuvant.

3. The fusion protein of claim 1, wherein the tumor antigen is inserted (i) within the hypervariable region, (ii) between the flagellin N-terminal constant region and the hypervariable region, or (iii) between the flagellin C-terminal constant region and the hypervariable region.

4. The fusion protein of claim 1, wherein the tumor antigen is a breast tumor antigen.

5. The fusion protein of claim 1, wherein the tumor antigen is a cancer/testis antigen.

6. A nucleic acid encoding the fusion protein of claim 1.

7. A vector comprising the nucleic acid of claim 6.

8. A host cell comprising the nucleic acid of claim 6.

9. A method of making the fusion protein, the method comprising culturing the host cell of claim 8 in a culture medium under conditions sufficient for the fusion protein to be produced.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the fusion protein is collected from the host cell or from the culture medium.

11. An immunogenic composition comprising the fusion protein of claim 1 in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

12. A method of producing an immune response against a tumor antigen in a mammalian subject, the method comprising administering the immunogenic composition of claim 11 to the mammalian subject in an amount effective to produce an immune response in the mammalian subject against the tumor antigen.

13. A method of treating a tumor in a mammalian subject, the method comprising administering the immunogenic composition of claim 11 to the mammalian subject in a treatment effective amount.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the tumor is a breast tumor.

15. An immunogenic composition comprising in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier:

(a) a flagellin adjuvant; and

(b) a tumor antigen.

16. The immunogenic composition of claim 15, wherein the tumor antigen is a breast tumor antigen.

17. The immunogenic composition of claim 15, wherein the tumor antigen is a cancer/testis antigen.

18. The immunogenic composition of claim 17, wherein the immunogenic composition comprises two or more cancer/testis antigens.

19. The immunogenic composition of claim 15, wherein the tumor antigen is coupled to the flagellin adjuvant.

20. A method of producing an immune response against a tumor antigen in a mammalian subject, the method comprising administering the immunogenic composition of claim 15 to the mammalian subject in an amount effective to produce an immune response against the tumor antigen in the mammalian subject.

21. A method of treating a tumor in a mammalian subject, the method comprising administering the immunogenic composition of claim 15 to the mammalian subject in a treatment effective amount.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the tumor is a breast tumor.