[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US20080052310A1 - Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise - Google Patents

Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080052310A1
US20080052310A1 US11/927,209 US92720907A US2008052310A1 US 20080052310 A1 US20080052310 A1 US 20080052310A1 US 92720907 A US92720907 A US 92720907A US 2008052310 A1 US2008052310 A1 US 2008052310A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
enterprise
reference data
data
segment
core
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/927,209
Inventor
Vasudev Rangadass
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Blue Yonder Group Inc
Original Assignee
I2 Technologies US Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US11/927,209 priority Critical patent/US20080052310A1/en
Application filed by I2 Technologies US Inc filed Critical I2 Technologies US Inc
Assigned to I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. reassignment I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: RANGADASS, VASUDEV
Publication of US20080052310A1 publication Critical patent/US20080052310A1/en
Assigned to WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT reassignment WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Assigned to JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC reassignment JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC
Assigned to JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. reassignment JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Assigned to JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. reassignment JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL Assignors: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC
Assigned to CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH reassignment CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Assigned to CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH reassignment CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Assigned to JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. reassignment JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697 Assignors: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., RP CROWN HOLDING LLC, RP CROWN PARENT, LLC
Assigned to JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. reassignment JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809 Assignors: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Assigned to JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. reassignment JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.. Assignors: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Assigned to JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. reassignment JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Assignors: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Assigned to JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. reassignment JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT. Assignors: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Assigned to MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC., MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC., REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC, Blue Yonder Group, Inc., BLUE YONDER, INC., BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC., BY BOND FINANCE, INC., BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC., I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC, JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC., JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC., REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION reassignment MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/25Integrating or interfacing systems involving database management systems
    • G06F16/254Extract, transform and load [ETL] procedures, e.g. ETL data flows in data warehouses
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/10File systems; File servers
    • G06F16/17Details of further file system functions
    • G06F16/176Support for shared access to files; File sharing support
    • G06F16/1767Concurrency control, e.g. optimistic or pessimistic approaches
    • G06F16/1774Locking methods, e.g. locking methods for file systems allowing shared and concurrent access to files
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/10File systems; File servers
    • G06F16/17Details of further file system functions
    • G06F16/178Techniques for file synchronisation in file systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/21Design, administration or maintenance of databases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/27Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
    • G06F16/275Synchronous replication
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • G06F16/283Multi-dimensional databases or data warehouses, e.g. MOLAP or ROLAP
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/80Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of semi-structured data, e.g. markup language structured data such as SGML, XML or HTML
    • G06F16/84Mapping; Conversion
    • G06F16/86Mapping to a database
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/951Indexing; Web crawling techniques
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/912Applications of a database
    • Y10S707/944Business related
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/964Database arrangement
    • Y10S707/966Distributed
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99938Concurrency, e.g. lock management in shared database
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • Y10S707/99945Object-oriented database structure processing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99948Application of database or data structure, e.g. distributed, multimedia, or image

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to enterprise management solutions, and more particularly to an enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management (MDM) system used for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise.
  • MDM master data management
  • An enterprise may use a data management system to address management of enterprise data.
  • a considerable amount of data is required to adequately define an enterprise.
  • the data may be of two fundamental types.
  • a first type of data which may be referred to as core enterprise reference data, describes the structure and characteristics of the enterprise and its entities and is not transient or transactional in nature.
  • This type of data may be associated with enterprise data masters and may be stored in a core reference data repository, although such data is not restricted to the type of data associated with traditional enterprise data masters. Efficient handling this data is critical, as is orderly and process-driven management of the state of the data. Use of this data is, in general, not limited to particular portions of the enterprise; rather, this data is typically used pervasively throughout the enterprise and with its value chain partners.
  • the second type of data which may be referred to as operational data, is transient transactional data required by planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components.
  • This type of data is typically not stored in the core reference data repository; the data management system provides a staging and distribution framework for such data.
  • a problem facing many enterprises is to create a system that provides for effective and scalable management, distribution, and use of both its core enterprise reference data and its transactional data in a manner that services needs for this data within the enterprise as a whole and also specific needs of planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components associated with the enterprise.
  • an enterprise solution framework for an enterprise is provided.
  • a configuration segment is provided for specifying a configuration of the enterprise.
  • the configuration segment includes a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data associated with an enterprise.
  • This system includes: (1) a centralized master repository containing the core enterprise reference data; (2) an internal services framework coupled to the centralized master repository that provides internal services for managing the core enterprise reference data within the centralized master repository, one or more of the internal services having direct access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for management purposes; and (3) an infrastructure services layer coupled to the centralized master repository that provides for bulk data transfers of core enterprise reference data between the centralized master repository and one or more external operational systems according to one or more enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for operational purposes.
  • a planning segment is provided for planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to the configuration of the enterprise specified in the configuration segment, the planning including generating decisions specifying actions to be taken.
  • An execution segment is provided for execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the planning segment, the execution including taking actions based on the decisions generated in the planning segment.
  • a monitoring segment is provided for monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the execution segment, the monitoring including determining results of actions taken in the execution segment and providing feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly.
  • a plurality of external operational systems embody the planning, execution, and monitoring segments.
  • Certain embodiments may provide an enterprise framework incorporating classification into configuration, planning, execution, and monitoring segments. Certain embodiments may provide a secure system of record optimized in architecture and design for management of core enterprise reference data. Certain embodiments may allow for full or partial automation of important time- and labor-intensive business processes according to embedded enterprise-level business workflows. Certain embodiments may provide all, some, or none of these technical advantages. Certain embodiments may provide one or more other technical advantages, one or more of which may be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the figures, description, and claims included herein.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example enterprise application framework including an MDM system
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example high level logical business architecture for an MDM system
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example high level logical technical architecture an MDM system
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example high level logical data services architecture for an MDM system
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an example high level logical architecture of an MDM database
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example information sharing architecture for an MDM system
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example MDM studio and an associated MDM model library
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example MDM use model
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an example high level physical architecture for an MDM system
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an example new item introduction process provided within an MDM system.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example enterprise solution framework 2 including a Master Data Management (MDM) system 4 .
  • framework 2 includes a classification of an associated enterprise into four fundamental segments: (1) configuration of the enterprise and its entities; (2) planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, decisions about what to do; (3) execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, acting upon those decisions; and (4) monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, monitoring the results of those decisions and supplying feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly.
  • MDM system 4 represents the configuration segment
  • the planning, execution, and monitoring enterprise solution components 6 represent the planning, execution, and monitoring segments, respectively. That is enterprise solution components 6 comprise planning systems 6 a , execution systems 6 b , and monitoring systems 6 c.
  • MDM system 4 provides centralized storage and management of enterprise reference data, maintaining reference data and associated data management processes separate from enterprise solution components 6 and associated operational processes while making reference data available to enterprise solution components 6 for consumption as needed.
  • Centralized storage and management of reference data for existing and future enterprise solution components 6 may facilitate extension or other modification of enterprise solution components 6 without needing to modify reference data within MDM system 4 .
  • Centralized storage and management of reference data may also facilitate integration of enterprise solution components 6 , for example, when one enterprise solution component 6 is replaced with another or an enterprise solution component providing an entirely new business function is introduced.
  • Centralized storage and management of reference data may further facilitate integration of one enterprise into another, for example, in connection with a merger or acquisition.
  • Infrastructure services 8 provide bulk data transfer and enterprise messaging between MDM system 4 and enterprise solution components 6 in accordance with business workflows operating in association with infrastructure services 8 .
  • These workflows which may be embedded partially within MDM system 4 and partially within infrastructure services 8 , may incorporate customized business best practices of the enterprise.
  • these workflows may be wholly or partially automated using an appropriate enterprise-level workflow engine and appropriate MDM system resources available to that workflow engine.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example high level logical business architecture 10 for an MDM system 4 .
  • the logical business architecture represents a business-centric view of MDM system 4 and includes core business processes, services, and data elements that MDM system 4 may be required to provide depending on the nature of the enterprise associated with MDM system 4 .
  • MDM system 4 includes a process layer 12 that provides a context for implementing and wholly or partially automating business configuration processes 14 .
  • a service layer 16 underlying process layer 12 provides services 18 providing functions enabling process tasks that are appropriate for processes 14 .
  • a data layer 20 underlying service layer 16 provides base data models and physical representations for storing core enterprise reference data 22 for retrieval and use in connection with processes 14 and associated services 18 .
  • MDM system 4 An understanding of the fundamental concepts relating to the purposes and functions of MDM system 4 may aid in understanding the MDM architecture.
  • MDM system 4 At the core of MDM system 4 is the concept of data management, which encompasses both what data is stored and how that data is stored and made available for use. Since MDM system 4 is primarily concerned with structural data describing the enterprise or, more precisely, with data associated with entities within the business structure of the enterprise, the focus of the MDM architecture is on the storage, management, and retrieval of data associated with entities or with relationships between entities. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 provides such data storage, management, and retrieval using a core MDM reference data repository based on a multi-dimensional database construct.
  • An entity associated with a retail enterprise is an item. Items may have attributes such as size, weight, color, etc. If a particular entity, in this case a particular item, is considered a coordinate in a first dimension representing items, then the attributes of the particular item entity are associated with the coordinate for the particular item in the item dimension. At this point, the example involves only a one-dimensional line space, where discrete points on the line represent particular items.
  • Locations may have attributes such as size, physical address, etc.
  • a particular location may be considered a coordinate in a second dimension representing locations, where the attributes of the particular location entity are associated with the coordinate for the particular location in the location dimension.
  • the example involves two one-dimensional line spaces, where discrete points on the first line represent particular items and discrete points on the second line represent particular locations.
  • the example may be extended to include attributes that depend on the combination of a particular item and a particular location. Neither the item dimension nor the location dimension alone will suffice to store such multi-dimensional attributes.
  • the example can be further extended to include attributes that depend on the combination of any number of arbitrary entity dimensions, leading to the concept of attributes as generalized data stored at and retrieved from points in an n-dimensional entity space.
  • a particular three-dimensional entity space suitable for an example retail enterprise might include item, location, and time dimensions, where attributes stored at each (item, location, time) point within a volume defined by an orthogonal arrangement of these axes corresponds to a particular combination of entities in the item, location, and time dimensions.
  • all reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 may be equivalent to an attribute associated with a point in n-dimensional entity space.
  • an overriding characteristic of all data that is considered for inclusion within MDM system 4 is the multi-dimensional database construct described above.
  • a core architectural principle for MDM system 4 may be to accommodate a dimensional data structure as a core element in every component of MDM system 4 .
  • This may have several important implications for the MDM architecture and design. Such important implications may include, without limitation: (1) a consistent mechanism for locating points in an n-dimensional entity space; (2) a consistent mechanism for storing data at and retrieving data from points in an n-dimension entity space; and (3) ensuring that all distinct data storage components support the above.
  • MDM system 4 Another fundamental concept for MDM system 4 may involve optimization of the physical architecture and database structures for the desired functions of MDM system 4 .
  • the core MDM reference data repository as described above, is primarily for data management and is structured to provide a rich data management framework.
  • input and output data staging and distribution elements of MDM system 4 may require efficient data transfer and throughput. While many systems have attempted to provide a compromise architecture to handle all such needs, MDM system 4 is preferably structured so that each element is designed to optimally accomplish its corresponding functions.
  • MDM system 4 may provide value for enterprises in various industry settings, such as retailing, manufacturing, or other industry settings. Although retail examples may be provided for purposes of illustration, the present invention contemplates MDM system 4 being used in connection with, and being tailored to, any suitable enterprise.
  • the MDM architecture and design are preferably constructed to provide elements suitable to allow for successful deployment of MDM system 4 across multiple industry types and multiple enterprises within a particular industry type.
  • MDM system 4 includes a process layer 12 that provides the context for implementing and wholly or partially automating business configuration processes 14 .
  • processes 14 provide functions necessary to realize process workflows provided as part of the MDM solution, providing structure to enterprise activities and enabling those activities to be repeated, controlled, monitored, and improved overtime.
  • Each process 14 represents a sequence of tasks that together accomplish a business activity.
  • MDM system 4 may provide native support for generic processes 14 and support specific to particular processes 14 .
  • processes 14 allow rich business workflows to be embedded within MDM system 4 and supported using the resources within underlying service and data layers 16 and 20 , respectively.
  • MDM system 4 provides a highly configurable, flexible, and extensible environment for implementing and wholly or partially automating any suitable processes 14 .
  • Processes 14 may operate at two levels.
  • the first level the enterprise level, may include larger scale intra-enterprise and inter-enterprise processes 14 associated with management of data as it relates to the targeted goals of the MDM solution.
  • MDM system 4 is associated with a retail enterprise
  • an example of a first level process 14 may be a new item introduction process 14 involving storage of externally generated data concerning a new item into the core MDM reference data repository.
  • the second level may include smaller scale management processes 14 involving movement of data internal to MDM system 4 , such as retrieval of data from the core MDM reference data repository in accordance with queries from user interface, analytics, or other services internal to MDM system 4 .
  • generic processes 14 that may apply to any enterprise and any dimension of MDM system 4 may include, without limitation: (1) new entity introduction; (2) entity maintenance; (3) metadata realignment; (4) entity extraction; and (5) entity replication.
  • This process 14 represents the introduction of a new entity into MDM system 4 .
  • this may include introducing a new item, location, vendor, or customer.
  • the process 14 may be initiated by the enterprise associated with MDM system 4 or by any other enterprise, such as a vendor of a new item being introduced.
  • a vendor providing a new item may be considered an example of content exchange.
  • the retail enterprise associated with MDM system 4 must add enterprise specific data to MDM system 4 for the new item, validate the data, approve use of the new item, and publish the new item as available for use by planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 , possibly through replication.
  • An example new item introduction process 14 is described more fully below with reference to FIG. 10 .
  • This process 14 involves updating one or more characteristics of an existing entity, such as an item, location, vendor, or customer for an example retail enterprise.
  • the process 14 may be initiated by the enterprise associated with MDM system 4 or by any other enterprise, such as a vendor of an item for which one or more characteristics are to be updated.
  • a vendor of an item for which one or more characteristics are to be updated.
  • an “improved” item may effectively retain its original part number and Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) but have one or more of its primary attributes altered by the vendor, such as its size, weight, or color.
  • the retail enterprise might alter one or more secondary attributes of an existing item.
  • This process 14 involves movement within a dimension of one or more members of one level relationship to another level relationship in a dimensional hierarchy. For example, a retail enterprise might move an item from one class to another class, which would in turn require identification of the one or more members to alter and the target relationships.
  • the process 14 may need to keep appropriate audit and journal trails may require one or more approval sub-processes.
  • This process 14 involves providing selection criteria for one or more entities, performing an appropriate query, and moving appropriate data or otherwise making the data available to the requesting role or subsystem.
  • This process 14 involves systematic replication of data in MDM system 4 in whole or in part to other subsystems for internal use. Such replication may allow the data to be used in a more efficient fashion than through direct operational access to the core MDM reference data repository.
  • service layer 16 provides services 18 that provide functions enabling the construction of process tasks appropriate for processes 14 .
  • Each service 18 provides a useful unit of work or enables a process task in the context of MDM system 4 .
  • Services 18 are not processes 14 ; rather, a service 18 is more analogous to a task within a process 14 or an action in response to a request associated with a process 14 , such as computing the value of a function associated with the service 18 or issuing a query to view, update, or delete information in the core MDM reference data repository.
  • services 18 within service layer 16 of MDM system 4 for an example retail enterprise may include, without limitation: (1) entity maintenance services 18 a ; (2) metadata maintenance services 18 b ; (3) parameter maintenance services 18 c ; (4) attribute/trait services 18 d ; (5) event (calendar) services 18 e ; (6) supply chain network services 18 f ; (7) sourcing services 18 g ; (8) activity based costing (ABC) services 18 h ; (9) contract services 18 i ; and (10) bill of materials (BOM) services 18 j.
  • Entity maintenance services 18 a provide basic functions for navigating, accessing, filtering, and sorting entities within MDM system 4 .
  • items, locations, vendors, and customers may be types of entities that are managed within MDM system 4 and maintained using entity maintenance services 18 a.
  • Metadata maintenance services 18 b provide basic functions for the construction, management, and realignment of appropriate metadata.
  • metadata may include metadata describing the enterprise as a whole, the structure of MDM system 4 , the structures of the data staging areas of MDM system 4 , and the relationships between the data staging areas and the core MDM reference data repository.
  • Such functions may include the ability to create dimensions and to define hierarchies on the dimension spaces, where each hierarchy includes a number of levels each having a number of members.
  • Such functions may also include maintenance with respect to dimensions, levels, and members, such as creation, modification, or deletion of such metadata elements.
  • Parameter maintenance services 18 c provide basic functions for the maintenance, management, and distribution of enterprise solution component parameters (i.e. business rule parameters).
  • One or more parameters may be, but are not required to be, specific to one or more particular enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Each parameter may be tied to one or more entities and, as such, may be viewed as a secondary attribute of the entities (as opposed to a primary attribute such as size, weight, and color of an example item).
  • Parameter maintenance services 18 c provide functions particularly appropriate for these types of attributes.
  • MDM system 4 may not only provide storage for such attributes and enable retrieval of such attributes for use, but may also provide a standardized management paradigm for all parameters in the overall enterprise solution. In one embodiment, this has the beneficial effect of providing a uniform methodology for parameter management and relieves point solution components from providing such functionality.
  • Attribute/Trait services 18 d provide functions appropriate for this type of data residing within or managed using MDM system 4 . Since the number, and even the types, of such attributes/traits are typically not known a priori, the requirements for the physical structure of a system to handle this type of data are somewhat different than for more static master data. Attribute/Trait services 18 d provide basic functions for creating, maintaining, and using this type of data and may also include more sophisticated services such as attribute/trait clustering services.
  • Event or more generally calendar, services 18 e deal with management of time-related activities. These services 18 e provide basic functions for establishing reference calendars and for creating and managing time-related activities (i.e. events with respect to established calendars).
  • Supply chain network services 18 f provide basic functions for supporting the definition and use of the physical supply chain network associated with an enterprise.
  • the supply chain network is crucial to many planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6 supported using MDM system 4 .
  • Sourcing services 18 g provide basic functions for accessing and using elements of the MDM model that are relevant to sourcing solution components, such as a supplier relationship management solution component.
  • MDM system 4 provides models to capture cost data, such as cost elements that when aggregated represent the total landed cost of goods. Included in these models are costs associated with activities such as handling an item as it passes through points in the associated supply chain network.
  • ABC services 18 h provide basic functions for handling ABC data stored within and managed using MDM system 4 .
  • data such as normalized demand profiles (or associations to such profiles) are examples of secondary attributes that MDM system 4 may need to be accommodate.
  • MDM system 4 does not inherently create or manage contracts for an example retail enterprise.
  • MDM system 4 preferably provides a repository for contract data as it relates to entities stored within MDM system 4 and provides a centralized distribution mechanism for contract data to appropriate enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Contract services 18 i provide basic functions for inputting, associating, and distributing contract-related data related to core enterprise data residing within MDM system 4 .
  • BOM services 18 j provide basic functions for creating, managing, and visualizing BOMs for the enterprise.
  • a single actual BOM may be too atomic for planning purposes, such that suitable aggregation of one or more actual BOMs into a representation appropriate for planning may be required to support a planning system associated with MDM system 4 .
  • MDM system 4 may store such representations as reference data and make them available to planning or other external operational systems as needed.
  • MDM system 4 may also automatically generate such representations, based on a MDM BOM model, to reduce or eliminate the need for manual evaluation and aggregation of individual actual BOMs to order to create such representations.
  • BOM services 18 j preferably support the elements of any appropriate MDM BOM model.
  • MDM system 4 is fundamentally concerned with the ability to create, manipulate, and extract data associated with the enterprise solution.
  • data layer 20 provides the base data models and physical representations for storing various types of enterprise reference data 22 for retrieval and use in connection with processes 14 and associated services 18 .
  • reference data 22 within data layer 20 of MDM system 4 for an example retail enterprise may include, without limitation: (1) master data 22 a ; (2) metadata 22 b ; (3) enterprise models 22 c ; (4) parameter data 22 d ; (5) attribute/trait data 22 e ; (6) event (calendar) data 22 f ; (7) supply chain network data 22 g ; and (8) ABC data 22 h.
  • Master data 22 a represents core configuration data associated with entities, such as items, locations, vendors, and customers for an example retail enterprise.
  • entities such as items, locations, vendors, and customers for an example retail enterprise.
  • MDM system 4 may extend the traditional concept of master data with respect to such entities to accommodate complex business workflows envisioned for an enterprise solution.
  • legacy masters for example item masters, may capture attributes of items such as SKUs that indicate where the items fit into the hierarchical structure of the enterprise data, there is no guarantee that a legacy system could manipulate or even view such data in a dimensional sense.
  • an item or other master for MDM system 4 is able to create, manipulate, navigate, view, and extract data in a dimensional way.
  • an entity within a master data type represents an atomic member of that type, such as a particular item, a particular location, a particular vendor, or a particular customer. Attributes of entities such as items, locations, and the like may have important roles with respect to planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6 .
  • a first type of entity attribute is a physical or primary attribute generally associated with inherent characteristics of the entity, such as size, weight, and color for an example item entity. Primary attributes may be very important, for example, in planning product assortments or solving logistics problems associated with shipping an order for an item. Primary attributes are reasonably static and require no other context for meaning than the associated entity itself.
  • a second type of entity attribute exists as a consequence of the use of the entity within the enterprise, which may result in a defined relationship of the entity to another entity or to an external metric.
  • An example of such as attribute of an item might be the category or sub-category within the enterprise to which the item is assigned.
  • This type of attribute often referred to as a qualitative or secondary attribute, may be very important for more advanced analytic techniques such as item grouping/clustering, customer focused marketing, and promotions.
  • master data 22 a allows MDM system 4 to manage both primary and secondary attributes of entities.
  • master data 22 a may be reasonably static and may not change rapidly over time. For example, a color (primary attribute) of a particular shirt may not change within a season the shirt is sold. Although the sub-category within the enterprise to which the shirt is assigned (secondary attribute) may change, as a result of a realignment for example, such changes will likely be infrequent.
  • attributes/trait data 22 e may be heavily used for targeted assortment and hence must capture dynamic behaviors of customers.
  • attributes/traits may themselves change, with new attributes/traits being added as appropriate and existing attributes/traits which are no longer valid being dropped as appropriate.
  • metadata 22 b is data describing other data.
  • metadata 22 b describes the structure of the data stored in and managed using MDM system 4 .
  • metadata 22 b provides a description of the structure of the dimensional view of master data 22 a . This description focuses on what dimensions exist, what levels describe the dimension coordinates, and what members exist and are associated with the levels.
  • navigation constructs referred to as hierarchies may be defined.
  • metadata 22 b might include the various levels of the taxonomy of items and one or more hierarchies for navigating through the various levels of the taxonomy.
  • MDM system 4 captures metadata 22 b in a form that can be effectively replicated to downstream enterprise solution components 6 that require consistency in the dimensional view of master data 22 a .
  • MDM system 4 may manage the creation, manipulation, and deletion of metadata 22 b and provide for realignment of master data 22 a (e.g. moving an item from a first category to a second category) such that any realignment is properly reflected in metadata 22 b.
  • Enterprise models 22 c represent organizational views of the roles within an enterprise. In one embodiment, enterprise models 22 c may extend beyond the enterprise boundary to cover all organizational elements of the value chain associated with the enterprise. Enterprise models 22 c may be important with respect to authentication and authorization aspects of data access. Additionally, enterprise models 22 c may provide for approval chain relationships important to business process management.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example high level logical technical architecture 30 for MDM system 4 .
  • logical technical architecture 30 represents a technology-centric view of MDM system 4 and specifies logical elements of MDM system 4 that together may operate to provide the desired MDM solution.
  • logical technical architecture 30 includes an MDM services framework 32 containing core MDM services 34 .
  • MDM database 36 includes the core MDM reference data repository.
  • Certain services 34 may be applied to any classes of reference data 22 to be modeled within the core MDM reference data repository.
  • Other services 34 may be tailored to particular classes of reference data 22 modeled within the core MDM reference data repository.
  • Other services 34 may generically support various security, data access, data staging, and other data management needs.
  • Example services 34 are described more fully below.
  • Appropriate services 34 may access database 36 using one or more appropriate data access links 38 .
  • External operational systems 40 may access database 36 using one or more data access layers 42 .
  • an external operational system 40 may access database 36 in connection with a business workflow using a “front side” data access layer 42 a , an associated “front” bus 44 a between external operational system 40 and front side data access layer 42 a , and an associated data interface 46 a between front side data access layer 42 a and database 36 .
  • Front side data access layer 42 a is typically used to pass control data from external operational systems 40 to MDM system 4 for controlling MDM operations and may be associated with application integration.
  • One or more services 34 may access front-side data access layer 42 a using one or more suitable data access links 48 .
  • An external operational system 40 may access database 36 using a “back side” data access layer 42 b , an associated “back” bus 44 b between external operational system 40 and back side data access layer 42 b , and an associated data interface 46 b between back side data access layer 42 b and database 36 .
  • Back side data access layer 42 b is typically used for movement of reference data 22 to and from external operational systems 40 and may be associated with data integration.
  • front side data access layer 42 a may also be used to move reference data 22 to and from external operational systems 40 where appropriate, for example, where an external operational system 40 requires particular reference data 22 in a particular message-based or other format.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example high level logical data services architecture 50 for MDM system 4 .
  • data services architecture 50 includes primary layers: (1) a “front side” data services layer 52 a ; (2) a physical data layer 54 ; and (3) a “back side” data services layer 52 b .
  • Front side data services layer 52 a is associated with front side data access layer 42 a , described above with reference to FIG. 3 , and provides direct data access to internal MDM services 34 that directly access the core MDM reference data repository within database 36 .
  • front side data services layer 52 a may provide direct access to database 36 for internal analytics or user interface service queries.
  • Physical data layer 54 includes database 36 in which the core MDM reference data model resides.
  • Back side data services layer 52 b is associated with back side data access layer 42 b , described above with reference to FIG. 3 , and provides indirect data access to external operational services 56 associated with external operational systems 40 that indirectly access the core MDM reference data repository within database 36 .
  • back side data services layer 52 b may provide operational services with indirect access to database 36 through staging areas of database 36 , staging areas associated with external operational systems 40 , and persistent data stores associated with external operational systems 40 .
  • each of the three primary layers of data services architecture 50 may be mapped to appropriate technology components.
  • Front side data services layer 52 a may be mapped to an appropriate object-based services layer, such as Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) or JAVA 2 PLATFORM ENTERPRISE EDITION (J2EE), residing on an appropriate application server within an application server layer (described below with reference to FIG. 9 ).
  • object-based services layer such as Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) or JAVA 2 PLATFORM ENTERPRISE EDITION (J2EE)
  • front side data services layer 52 a may be more tightly coupled to physical data layer 54 due to the necessity of an object-to-relational translation layer as part of front side data services layer 52 a.
  • Database 36 within physical data layer 54 may be implemented as a relational database.
  • Database 36 may be modeled and managed in a number of ways, one of which may be selected for a particular deployment.
  • object relational database management technology may be used, although this approach is typically subject to performance risks.
  • the core MDM reference data model may be mapped to existing services 34 using a suitable object relational mapping layer.
  • a fixed data model relational database with a light access layer may be used. The light access layer would provide persistent objects tailored to the fixed and optimized physical schema of the relational database rather than driving the physical schema through an object relational mapping layer.
  • new services 34 may be mapped to an existing core MDM reference data model.
  • a single core MDM reference data repository within a single database 36 is primarily described herein for convenience, the present invention contemplates any number of core MDM reference data repositories within any number of databases 36 according to particular needs.
  • all core MDM reference data repositories within all databases 36 are subject to centralized data management associated with a single MDM system 4 and preferably appear to both internal MDM services 34 and external operational services 56 as a single core MDM reference data repository.
  • Back side data services layer 52 b is preferably optimized for potentially large data synchronization and replication operations, preferably incorporating net change techniques, efficient store procedure techniques, and an object-based control layer. Furthermore, since back side data services layer 52 b maps to planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 for which data movements and associated mappings (i.e. transformations) must remain reasonably fixed over time, the core MDM reference data model should also be reasonably fixed over time.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an example high level logical architecture 70 of database 36 .
  • database 36 incorporates a consistent dimensional modeling framework imposed on a model supporting a persistence management service, which is described more fully below. This preferably allows services framework 32 to manage reference data 22 within database 36 in a manner that is consistent with established dimensional views of reference data 22 . Where MDM system 4 does not physically contain all reference data 22 , reference data 22 that is not physically contained in MDM system 4 preferably appears as if it is physically contained in MDM system 4 .
  • Database 36 includes a managed data area 72 containing reference data 22 , at least some of which may be managed remotely from MDM system 4 . Managed data area 72 provides the core MDM reference data repository for reference data 22 .
  • Database 36 may also include a cached data area 74 containing cached data 76 representing reference data 22 that has been extracted from managed data area 72 , processed according to the needs of one or more elements of MDM system 4 using a data management framework 78 , and is re-inserted in managed data area 72 as reference data 22 once processing is complete.
  • data management framework 78 may provide the process controller within business process toolkit 34 a , UI services 34 d , or any other suitable element of MDM system 4 with operational access to cached data 76 .
  • Reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 has an assigned state consistent with its use.
  • cached data area 74 provides a mechanism to hold a copy of reference data 22 for manipulation while the state' of reference data 22 in managed data area 72 is maintained as locked for read only access until the manipulation process has completed.
  • the manipulation process sees only the state of cached data 76 within cached data area 74 , while other processes, services, and systems associated with MDM system 4 see the true state of reference data 22 within managed data area 72 rather than an intermediate state reflecting the still incomplete manipulation process.
  • Database 36 may also include an operational access area 80 providing one or more external operational systems 40 with access to reference data 22 within managed data area 72 .
  • external operational systems 40 may include external enterprises such as manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of items associated with enterprise.
  • External operational systems 40 may also include planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6 within the enterprise but external to MDM system 4 .
  • Operational access area 80 may containing a master copy 82 of an Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) repository used to provide authentication and authorization services as described more fully below.
  • LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
  • Operational access area 80 may also contain inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68 , respectively, for data that is inbound from and outbound to, respectively, external operational systems 40 .
  • LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
  • data may enter MDM system 4 from any appropriate source and may leave MDM system 4 for any appropriate target.
  • reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository can be readily made available to external operational systems 40 , storing reference data 22 within the core MDM reference data repository may provide little value to the enterprise.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example information sharing architecture 90 for MDM system 4 .
  • database 36 may be optimized for management of reference data 22 rather than for speed of data input or data output. Accordingly, a staging strategy may be employed to minimize data transfer times to and from external operational systems 40 .
  • inbound data may be received from one or more data sources 92 for storage in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 .
  • Data sources 92 may include persistent data stores associated with external enterprises 40 a , such as manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and customers where MDM system 4 is associated with an example retail enterprise.
  • Data sources 92 may also include operational staging data stores associated with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 .
  • the inbound data is first moved into inbound staging tables 94 of inbound staging area 84 , then into core MDM tables 96 within the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as reference data 22 .
  • Data cleansing, validation, transformation, or other processing may occur, where appropriate, during the movement of data from inbound staging area 84 to the core MDM reference data repository managed data area 72 .
  • outbound data may be provided to one or more data targets 98 , such as persistent data stores associated with external enterprises 40 a or operational staging data stores associated with planning, execution, monitoring, or other external enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Outbound data being distributed using MDM system 4 without being stored in the core MDM reference data repository may be sent from inbound staging tables 94 of inbound staging area 84 to outbound staging tables 100 a of uncoupled outbound staging area 86 a , then out to data targets 98 .
  • outbound reference data 22 in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 may be moved out of core MDM tables 96 of managed data area 72 to outbound staging tables 100 b of coupled outbound staging area 86 b , then out to data targets 98 .
  • Reference data 22 stored within core MDM tables 96 may be substantially continuously synchronized with the outbound data in outbound staging tables 100 , such that at any point in time an accurate snapshot of reference data 22 is available within outbound staging area 86 . Synchronization of reference data with operational data may be important, for example, to help ensure that planning based upon operational data is not performed for an entity that no longer exists within the enterprise as reflected in reference data 22 . Data transformation or other processing may occur, where appropriate, during the movement of reference data 22 from the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 to outbound staging area 86 .
  • services framework 32 may provide services 34 organized into the following groups, without limitation: (1) business process toolkit 34 a , (2) security services 34 b , (3) general services 34 c , (4) user interface services 34 d , (5) data access services 34 e , and (6) data staging services 34 f.
  • Business process toolkit 34 a may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 that provides for management of MDM models, processes, and associated business rules. Automated processes associated with this subsystem may be used to implement model changes associated with physical deployment of MDM system 4 .
  • business process toolkit 34 a may include, without limitation: (1) a MDM studio, (2) a MDM model library, (3) a business rules management service, (4) a process controller, and (5) a MDM structure update service.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example MDM studio 110 and an associated MDM model library 112 containing one or more MDM models 114 appropriate for MDM system 4 .
  • MDM studio 110 may provide services to model the structure of MDM system 4 and its components, for example, for purposes of constructing MDM system 4 or for purposes of extending or otherwise updating MDM system 4 .
  • MDM studio 110 may provide support for one or more graphical modeling user interfaces. Modeling of MDM system 4 may include, for example, modeling structural aspects of the core MDM reference data repository within managed data area 72 of database 36 , modeling the structure of staging areas 66 and 68 of database 36 , and modeling appropriate process workflows.
  • MDM studio 110 may provide support both for initial construction of MDM models 114 and later extension or other updating of MDM models 114 .
  • MDM models 114 include, without limitation: (1) MDM process model 114 a , (2) MDM document model 114 b , (3) MDM forms model 114 c , (4) MDM reference data model 114 d , and (5) MDM staging data model 114 e.
  • Process models 114 a describe the processes 14 to be used for managing reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository within database 36 .
  • the corresponding process model 114 a describes the flow of tasks to be performed on reference data 22 in connection with process 14 , particular services 18 associated with these tasks, and one or more particular process engines responsible for execution of process 14 .
  • descriptions may utilize Web Services Description Language (WSDL) protocols.
  • Each process 14 may represent one or more user interface task flows, enterprise solution component task flows, inter-enterprise process flows, or any other appropriate processes or task flows.
  • Process model 114 a may specify allocation of each process 14 to a process controller, user interface controller, or enterprise-level workflow controller. Process model 114 a may also provide for graphical or other simulation of processes 14 .
  • Document model 114 b provides the metadata for MDM documents that are utilized in connection with processes 14 .
  • MDM documents represent external cached representations of specific metadata elements within the underlying reference data model 114 d.
  • Forms model 114 c provides metadata describing forms associated with objects within reference data model 114 d . Forms may be important for efficient extraction of metadata elements from reference data model 114 d and may be analogous to database views.
  • Reference data model 114 d represents the metadata describing reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository. This is the lowest level metadata representation contained within model library 112 .
  • reference data model 114 d may be an enterprise meta-model in Extensible Markup Language (XML) Software Description (XSD) format, which may separate instance data from metadata in a manner desirable for management and which back side data access layer 42 b may read directly from model library 112 . It may be important to synchronize changes to reference data model 114 d with any higher level constructs, such as forms model 114 c or document model 114 b . Synchronization of models 114 may be automatic or, if appropriate, studio 110 may flag the need for changes and direct an administrative user to assist in synchronizing models 114 .
  • XML Extensible Markup Language
  • XSD Software Description
  • a generic reference data model for reference data 22 to be stored within the core MDM reference data repository may be constructed to represent a synthesis of all applicable data elements, such as all data elements associated with enterprises in the retail industry for example, and may be viewed as a superset of reference data models 114 d to be used in actual deployments of MDM system 4 .
  • the generic reference data model, and all reference data models 114 d ultimately derived from the generic reference data model, should be constructed for consistency and efficient management of reference data 22 .
  • the generic reference data model may be captured as a document in an annotated RATIONAL ROSE object model.
  • Staging data model 114 e represents metadata describing the structure of inbound and outbound staging tables 94 and 78 , respectively, and also the mapping between reference data model 114 d and the staging table representation of the data within inbound and outbound staging tables 94 and 78 , respectively.
  • Reference data model 114 d may be a normalized data model derived from a generic reference data model as described above. However, inbound data may reflect arbitrary schema that are inconsistent with reference data model 114 d . For inbound data, appropriate mappings (i.e.
  • references data model 114 d to source data models such as an inbound staging data model 114 e representing an arbitrary input data format for an external operational system 40
  • source data models such as an inbound staging data model 114 e representing an arbitrary input data format for an external operational system 40
  • outbound data may need to be de-normalized for consumption as operational data.
  • appropriate mappings (i.e. transformations) of reference data model 114 d to target data models such as an outbound staging data model 114 e representing a flat output data format for an external operational system 40 , may be performed as reference data is being moved out of the core MDM reference data repository
  • the business rules management service may provide for creation and maintenance of business rule elements associated with services 18 , such as import validation rules, staging transformation rules, and general consistency rules associated with MDM system 4 .
  • the business rules management service may provide for run-time-script-based rules or for association of design-time rules objects with MDM process workflows.
  • the process controller may represent a run-time process workflow controller for MDM system 4 .
  • process model 114 a may specify allocation of one or more processes 14 to the process controller, a user interface controller, or an enterprise-level workflow controller.
  • the process controller operates in cooperation with any such user interface controller and any such enterprise-level workflow controller.
  • MDM system 4 provides a mechanism to model its structure and a mechanism to automate a process to realize an extension of that model in a physical deployment.
  • the structure update service may provide for automated implementation of a model 114 that is created or changed during the modeling process.
  • the structure update service may be particularly important with respect to the structure of inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68 , respectively. It may be necessary to initially specify staging data model 114 e , the reference model to staging area structure. In addition, it may be necessary to generate appropriate Structured Query Language (SQL) or changes to SQL to maintain the state of staging areas 66 and 68 relative to staging data model 114 e .
  • SQL Structured Query Language
  • the structure update service may also provide for updating staging data model 114 e and other models 114 , along with associated SQL, in response to updates provided with enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Such structure updates may be driven according to update description script documents providing information necessary for the structure update to automatically execute.
  • Security services 34 b may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 designed to fulfill two primary responsibilities. The first responsibility is to control access to MDM system 4 itself. The second responsibility is to manage the structure of the security model as applied to enterprise solution components 6 . For this responsibility, services are provided to manage the security context that all enterprise solution components 6 will utilize, for example, through an LDAP repository whose master copy 82 resides within operational access area 80 of database 36 .
  • Security services 34 b may include, without limitation: (1) authentication services, and (2) authorization services.
  • Authentication services provide initial log-in security with respect to enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Authentication is preferably based on an organizational model for the enterprise to provide a single log-in security context for all enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Authorization services provide layered, granular access to specific services 18 or reference data 22 for an authenticated user.
  • Authorization may be provided at two levels.
  • the first level (Level 1) deals with access to enterprise solution components 6 represented by specific applications or high level groups of services 18 .
  • Level 2) deals with access to specific functions within an enterprise solution component 6 .
  • Field level authorization may be handled by particular enterprise solution components 6 themselves as appropriate. In the case of MDM system 4 itself, any required authorization above Level 2 (i.e. Level 3 and higher) may need to be provided within MDM system 4 .
  • General services 34 c may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 and may include, without limitation: (1) a change management service; (2) a lifecycle management service; (2) a group management service; and (4) an analytics and reporting service.
  • the change management services provides an audit trail for changes made to MDM system 4 .
  • information may be kept regarding who made a change, at what time the change was made, and perhaps the value that was changed.
  • the audit trail for changes should preferably be implemented in such a fashion that the mechanism can be turned off for information not requiring change management or for changes prior to configuration control, such as changes associated with initial setup of data elements.
  • Logical grouping of reference data 22 may be important for many data management aspects, such as retrieving reference data 22 and making changes to reference data 22 . Therefore, in terms of granularity, in one embodiment change management is group-based with overrides at the group member level.
  • reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 has an assigned state consistent with its use.
  • the lifecycle management service allows for defining a lifecycle that describes the possible states for data elements, as well as a mechanism for managing the movement of data from one lifecycle state to another.
  • Logical grouping of reference data 22 may be important for many data management aspects, such as retrieving reference data 22 and making changes to reference data 22 . Although single entities may be manipulated, many updates will typically occur with respect to groups of entities. In one embodiment, the group aspect of data manipulation is built in from the foundation of MDM system 4 .
  • the health and status of a large data repository is critical.
  • the analytics and reporting service provides knowledge concerning what reference data 22 is stored within the core MDM reference data repository and the state of various system elements of MDM system 4 . Although the types of analysis and associated reports will be specific to MDM system 4 , general analysis and reporting tools may be used where appropriate.
  • Analytics may extend to a broad range of activities supported directly by this service or indirectly through management by this service.
  • Analytics may include clustering services for attributes/traits, decision support activities relating to entity data stored within the core MDM reference data repository, management of parameter computation such as coordinating parameter computation using an external engine, updating parameters such as lead times for items at particular locations, and any other suitable analytics.
  • Reports may include change log activity, history traces for specific entities or groups of entities, reports on production parameter sets including time-phased sets, calendar examination and reconciliation, reports on new entities (such as new items) entered into the core MDM reference data repository and dying entities (such as items) removed from the core MDM reference data repository, and any other suitable reports.
  • Data access services 34 e may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 to provide a key interface between user interface layers, data management business rules, and the underlying core MDM reference data repository within database 36 .
  • Data access services 34 e may be included within data management framework 78 described above with reference to FIG. 5 . Since in one embodiment the predominant view of reference data 22 is object-based, data access services 34 e may support a persistent mapping to underlying data structures within database 36 .
  • data access services 34 e may incorporate the concept of a data cache, such as cached data area 74 of database 36 described above, that provides a mechanism to hold a copy of reference data 22 in cached data area 74 for manipulation while maintaining the state of reference data 22 in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as locked for read only access until the manipulation process has completed.
  • a copy of reference data 22 is being held as cached data 76 within cached data area 74 during the manipulation process, the manipulation process sees only the state of cached data 76 within cached data area 74 , while other processes, services, and systems associated with MDM system 4 see the true state of reference data 22 within managed data area 72 rather than an intermediate state reflecting the still incomplete manipulation process.
  • Data access services 34 e may include, without limitation: (1) a persistence management service; and (2) a data access layer service.
  • the persistence management service provides the logical mapping between the user view of reference data 22 and the underlying persistent object model associated with reference data 22 .
  • the service provides for managing the creation, update, and deletion of model instances, including appropriate memory-level caching of persistent objects.
  • the data access layer service provides the link between the logical object model associated with reference data 22 and the physical instances of relational core MDM tables 96 in which the persistent objects are held as reference data 22 .
  • the separation of the persistence layer from a particular physical mapping layer allows for multiple physical targets, which is especially useful when a distributed physical data model is required (e.g., in certain cases of parameter maintenance).
  • Data staging services 34 e may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 , primarily to provide synchronization of inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68 , respectively, with managed data area 72 of database 36 .
  • Data staging services 34 e may include, without limitation: (1) a data import service; (2) a validation service; and (3) a syndication service.
  • the data import service provides functions for moving data from external sources into database 36 .
  • the data import service might be used to move existing master data into database 36 for storage and later redistribution to one or more planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 .
  • Importing data includes moving the inbound data into inbound staging area 84 , validating and transforming the inbound data where appropriate, and moving the inbound data from inbound staging area 84 into the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as reference data 22 .
  • Validation rules may include basic value type rules, referential integrity rules, enterprise-specific business rules, or any other suitable rule.
  • validation is selectable such that higher levels of validation may be used when an inbound data set is “dirty,” requiring more stringent validation, and lower levels of validation may be used when an inbound data set is clean,” requiring less stringent validation.
  • the syndication service which essentially exports data from database 36 to planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 , may have two primary elements.
  • the first element provides functions for synchronization of core MDM tables 96 within managed data area 72 with outbound staging tables 100 within outbound staging area 86 , such that a valid snapshot of reference data 22 exists at all times within outbound staging tables 100 , consistent with update transaction boundaries.
  • the second element provides functions for schedule-based or demand-based movement of data from outbound staging tables 100 to a target enterprise solution component 6 .
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example MDM use model 130 for MDM system 4 .
  • use model 130 describes how MDM system 4 will be used in terms of where data is stored and how the data is accessed.
  • the external operational systems 40 that interact with MDM system 4 view MDM system 4 as a reference data repository, not as an operational data source.
  • reference data 22 within core MDM reference data repository 132 may be synchronized and replicated to local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40 through appropriate external access services 136 operating in association with one or both data access layers 42 .
  • Internal access services 138 associated with managing reference data 22 within MDM system 4 may have direct access to reference data 22 within core MDM reference data repository 132 .
  • MDM system 4 may act as a secure system of record that is optimized in architecture and design for management of reference data 22 rather than operational use of reference data 22 . Consuming services other than those related to managing reference data 22 are not permitted to directly access reference data 22 .
  • key metrics to be considered in designing a physical architecture in accordance with use model 130 may include, without limitation: (1) throughput performance; (2) query performance; (3) configuration flexibility; and (4) scale. Each of these metrics is discussed below in relation to appropriate physical characteristics of an implementation of MDM system 4 .
  • the primary use model for MDM system 4 features a centralized master repository, core MDM reference data repository 132 of managed data area 72 of database 36 , for the core enterprise data, reference data 22 .
  • a goal is to shield core MDM reference data repository 132 from operational loading while allowing for optimal design of external operational systems 40 that use reference data 22 in an operational mode.
  • use model 130 calls for synchronizing and replicating reference data 22 into local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40 that use reference data 22 . This implies a physical architecture and design that facilitate outbound throughput performance for moving reference data 22 from core MDM reference data repository 132 to target persistent stores 134 .
  • the physical architecture and design should preferably also support inbound throughput performance.
  • a primary design criterion following from the above is that physical data layer 54 should provide for as efficient access to reference data 22 as possible. It may be desirable to consider any indirection layer that resides between core MDM tables 96 containing reference data 22 , which may have a relational table structure, and the exterior representation of reference data 22 , which may be an object representation.
  • the context for query performance is that of constructing views of reference data 22 for the MDM user interface or an analytics service internal to MDM system 4 , such as the analytics and reporting service described above with reference to FIG. 3 .
  • Such user interface and analytics service queries are likely to be more filter-driven, looking for particular subsets of reference data 22 within a much larger row context, than any SQL or other queries associated with the bulk export of reference data 22 discussed above with respect to throughput.
  • the structure of physical data layer 54 and the associated data access layer service should be designed to handle potentially large numbers of complex queries in a timely manner. Return of large and small query result row sets should be efficient independent of the target service (e.g., the user interface).
  • Design criteria for query performance may include low mean query response times at the database level, sufficient performance under inbound loading involving a large number of inbound queries, and minimal latency in the associated data access layer service.
  • Configuration flexibility may be examined from both the user view and the solution view.
  • reference data 22 contained in core MDM reference data repository 132 needs to be mapped to a particular data view that the enterprise requires.
  • configuration flexibility may be less critical if not counter to those metrics. In general, it would be unwise to change reference data model 114 d for each enterprise deployment, since that would imply reconfiguration of all interfaces from core MDM reference data repository 132 to local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40 .
  • a design criterion for configuration flexibility is that reference data model 114 d should be stable from deployment to deployment and should represent a superset of anticipated reference data 22 for any enterprise.
  • Attainment of this state may be evolutionary over several deployments, but should be smoothly accomplished in a relatively short period of time without significant model redesign. If a user view mapping configuration is required, it should preferably be at the outermost layers of the design (i.e. close to the user interface rather than interior to data structures of core MDM reference data repository 132 ).
  • Core MDM reference data repository 132 may hold vast amounts of reference data 22 , particularly where MDM system 4 is associated with an example retail enterprise having very large numbers of items, locations, or other entities. If attribute/trait data 22 e is utilized, where several hundred trait attributes per entity may be common, the potential for vast amounts of reference data 22 is even higher. These characteristics may effectively lead to large table row counts, complex relational joins, and the need for a dimension framework for reference data 22 .
  • a design criterion for scalability which is also related to both throughput and query performance, is the ability to efficiently handle large row sets both when querying into the sets and when moving the sets. These type of efficiencies generally come from well-designed and well-tuned relational tables specifically engineered for performance-related metrics.
  • a corollary is that the design should preferably be capable of utilizing parallel database technology if possibly required to sufficiently scale in the enterprise environment. If the design cannot utilize parallel database technology, then the option is lost when attempting to boost performance through deployment configuration.
  • a first driver is the dual types of users of MDM system 4 ; the administrative role user and the process participant role user.
  • the first classification of user role is concerned primarily with the administration of enterprise configuration information contained within MDM system 4 , as well as the associated MDM models 114 , which are realized physically in database 36 .
  • the second classification of user role is more concerned with viewing and entering information associated with processes 14 , such as new item introduction for example.
  • a modeling studio style interface may be more important to the administrative role user, while well-designed view and entry screen sequences may be more important to the process participant role user.
  • User interface architecture and design requirements may be broken down along these or other suitable lines.
  • a second driver is the flexibility that is inherent in the MDM architecture.
  • both reference data model 114 d and staging data model 114 e may be altered at the time of deployment. This provides flexibility for MDM system 4 to accommodate idiosyncrasies of the enterprise.
  • the user interface architecture preferably accommodates these flexible models. For example, if a field is added or deleted within reference data model 114 d or staging data model 114 e , a corresponding entry screen may accordingly adapt dynamically to the model change without the need for reprogramming.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an example high level physical architecture 150 for MDM system 4 , which may be loosely mapped to logical business architecture 10 described above with reference to FIG. 2 and logical technical architecture 30 described above with reference to FIG. 3 .
  • MDM system 4 includes a web server 152 , a MDM application server layer 154 , an infrastructure services application server layer 156 , and a MDM database layer 158 .
  • a user associated with MDM system 4 may send a Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP) or other request to web server 152 to perform an appropriate operation.
  • Web server 152 may communicate the request to one or more appropriate application servers within application server layer 154 to invoke one or more suitable applications 160 .
  • Application server layer 154 may include one or more application servers supporting engines 160 a that provide process and service functions of MDM system 4 , supporting the MDM user interface 140 b , and supporting other suitable applications 160 .
  • Infrastructure services application server layer 156 may include one or more application servers supporting front side data access layer 42 a , back side data access layer 42 b , and a suitable enterprise-level workflow engine 162 that provides process and service functions associated with data access layers 42 .
  • front side data access layer 42 a may be implemented using a WEBMETHODS ENTERPRISE SERVER product
  • back side data access layer 42 b may be implemented in part using an INFORMATICA POWERCENTER product with an integrated Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) tool
  • enterprise-level workflow engine 162 may be implemented using a WEBMETHODS BUSINESS INTEGRATOR product.
  • implementation of processes 14 may be shared between enterprise-level workflow engine 162 of application server layer 156 and applications 160 of application server layer 154 .
  • Services 12 and associated services 34 may be provided primarily using application server layer 154 .
  • Database layer 158 contains the actual physical data models 114 , such as reference data model 114 d and staging data model 114 e described above with reference to FIG. 7 , with associated data services provided either at database layer 8 or application server layer 154 .
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an example new item introduction process 14 provided within MDM system 4 .
  • introduction of a new item entity for retail and associated vendor enterprises is described as an example, the present invention contemplates analogous or other introduction of any suitable new entity for any suitable enterprise, whether or not specifically described herein.
  • New item introduction is a very common and integral practice for dynamic value chain partners such as retailers and finished goods vendors.
  • the frequency of new items being introduced to a retailer assortment may vary from one to one thousand each week, depending upon the retail segment and other factors.
  • New item introduction may be the most important phase in the life cycle of an item. This process has traditionally been highly paper intensive and has impeded the ability of retailers and vendors to introduce items on a dynamic (i.e. day-to-day) basis, since there are thousands of variables, attributes, and other factors that may need to be considered in introducing a new item at the retailer shelf, from pricing to shelf-level execution.
  • MDM system 4 incorporates an embedded business workflow for new item introduction that enables an example retail enterprise to introduce a new item more quickly, more easily, with more flexibility, and with more streamlined integration with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 than with previous techniques.
  • a new item may be introduced in a number of different ways.
  • a vendor may introduce the new item to a retailer, a retailer may introduce the new item through item design (i.e. for private label), or a retailer and vendor may jointly decide to introduce the new item.
  • item design i.e. for private label
  • a retailer and vendor may jointly decide to introduce the new item.
  • this description will include details of new item introduction from a generic perspective. That is, the described workflows are generic in that they outline the processes that the retailer may go through, irrespective of whether the retailer introduces the new item, the vendor introduces the new item, or the retailer and vendor jointly introduce the new item.
  • These workflows may also be applicable across all retailer formats (e.g., mass merchant, department store, etc.) and all merchandise segments (hardlines, grocery, softlines, etc.).
  • new item introduction process 14 there are two major aspects of new item introduction process 14 : (1) a first sub-process 170 involving introduction, review, acceptance, and rejection of the new item, which may be analogized to the conception of a child; and (2) a second sub-process 172 involving creation of the new item within the retailer for initiating merchandising, replenishment, and supply chain planning and execution functions on the new item to make the new item available at the shelf for sale to the customer, which may be analogized to the birth of the child.
  • a first sub-process 170 involving introduction, review, acceptance, and rejection of the new item, which may be analogized to the conception of a child
  • second sub-process 172 involving creation of the new item within the retailer for initiating merchandising, replenishment, and supply chain planning and execution functions on the new item to make the new item available at the shelf for sale to the customer, which may be analogized to the birth of the child.
  • First sub-process 170 may include, without limitation: a vendor introduction component 174 (where the vendor is introducing the new item), a retailer review component 176 ; a retailer rejection/modification component 178 ; a retailer approval component 180 ; and a vendor/retailer agreement finalization component 182 .
  • Second sub-process 172 may include a vendor/retailer keying component 184 , in which the vendor or retailer creates one or more appropriate masters for the new item within database 36 .
  • Such masters may include, for example, an item master 186 , an item-location master 188 , and a vendor-item master 190 .
  • legacy systems 192 and associated production databases 194 of the retailer or vendor may receive and recognize the new item for merchandising, replenishment, and supply chain planning and execution functions.
  • automation of the new item introduction process may provide one or more of the following benefits, without limitation: (1) providing the retailer with the ability to merchandise and incorporate a new item into its assortments more quickly, thereby making the new item available to customers more quickly than its competitors; (2) as a result of a shorter time-to-market for new items, the retailer may considerably improve its chances of increasing sales and market share; (3) reduced labor costs and paper-flow within and across various retail functions; (4) reducing or eliminating the possibility of keying errors, thereby reducing the potential for human error; (5) providing tighter and more streamlined integration of the new item introduction process with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 , leading to better placement and replenishment of merchandise; and (6) efficiencies in planning and execution achieved through streamlined integration with new item introduction may be effectively leveraged to provide the lowest shelf-landed cost to the end-customer.
  • examples may include, without limitation: (1) data from a vendor's quote associated with a new item may be automatically filled in for the retailer, no longer needing to be manually keyed in to finalize a contract with respect to the new item; (2) Universal Product Code (UPC) number may be automatically created for a new item once the new item has been created, no longer needing to be manually keyed in; (3) a retailer legacy system may be automatically checked to verify that a UPC number for a new item is associated with a retailer product number, no longer needing to be manually verified; and (4) in association with a merchandise planning system or other enterprise solution component 6 , a product number for a new product may be automatically filled in for creation of a product assortment incorporating a new item, no longer needing to be manually keyed in.
  • UPC Universal Product Code
  • New item introduction process 14 illustrated in FIG. 10 may be described in more detail, from introduction of the new item by the vendor through maintenance of the item by the retailer in its systems.
  • new item introduction, entry, creation, and maintenance associated with new item introduction process 14 within an example retailer may be broken down into the following primary sub-processes, without limitation: (1) an initiation sub-process; (2) a preliminary planning sub-process; (3) an item entry, approval, initial forecast estimation, and replenishment initiation sub-process; (4) an item setup, creation, activation, and initial replenishment sub-process; (5) an item merchandising and shelf execution setup sub-process; (6) an item forecast entry and replenishment sub-process; (7) an order management and collaboration sub-process; (8) inbound (vendor-to-retailer) and outbound (retailer-to-location) supply chain planning and execution sub-processes; (9) an item maintenance sub-process; and (10) an exceptions handling and management sub-process.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

In one embodiment, an enterprise solution framework is provided. A configuration segment is provided for specifying a configuration of an enterprise. The configuration segment includes a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data, including: (1) a centralized master repository containing the reference data; (2) an internal services framework providing internal services for managing the reference data, the internal services having direct access to the reference data for management purposes; and (3) an infrastructure services layer providing bulk: data transfers of reference data between the repository and external operational systems according to enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the reference data for operational purposes. A planning segment is provided for planning according to the configuration specified in the configuration segment. An execution segment is provided for execution according to output of the planning segment. A monitoring segment is provided for monitoring according to output of the execution segment. External operational systems embody the planning, execution, and monitoring segments.

Description

    CLAIM OF PRIORITY
  • This is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/847,009 filed on 17 May 2004 entitled “ENTERPRISE SOLUTION FRAMEWORK INCORPORATING A MASTER DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CENTRALLY MANAGING CORE REFERENCE DATA ASSOCIATED WITH AN ENTERPRISE”, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/755,437 entitled “MASTER DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR CENTRALLY MANAGING CACHED DATA REPRESENTING CORE ENTERPRISE REFERENCE DATA MAINTAINED AS LOCKED IN TRUE STATE READ ONLY ACCESS UNTIL COMPLETION OF MANIPULATION PROCESS”, filed 12 Jan. 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,037, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/469,501 filed 9 May 2003 entitled “SYSTEM FOR CENTRALLY MANAGING CORE REFERENCE DATA ASSOCIATED WITH AN ENTERPRISE” and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/439,864 filed 13 Jan. 2003 entitled “BUSINESS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”.
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/847,037, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/755,437, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/469,501, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/439,864 are commonly assigned to the assignee of the present application. The disclosure of related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/847,037, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/755,437, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/469,501, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/439,864 are hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure as if fully set forth herein.
  • BACKGROUND
  • 1. Technical Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates generally to enterprise management solutions, and more particularly to an enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management (MDM) system used for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise.
  • 2. Background of the Invention
  • An enterprise may use a data management system to address management of enterprise data. A considerable amount of data is required to adequately define an enterprise. The data may be of two fundamental types. A first type of data, which may be referred to as core enterprise reference data, describes the structure and characteristics of the enterprise and its entities and is not transient or transactional in nature. This type of data may be associated with enterprise data masters and may be stored in a core reference data repository, although such data is not restricted to the type of data associated with traditional enterprise data masters. Efficient handling this data is critical, as is orderly and process-driven management of the state of the data. Use of this data is, in general, not limited to particular portions of the enterprise; rather, this data is typically used pervasively throughout the enterprise and with its value chain partners. The second type of data, which may be referred to as operational data, is transient transactional data required by planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components. This type of data is typically not stored in the core reference data repository; the data management system provides a staging and distribution framework for such data. A problem facing many enterprises is to create a system that provides for effective and scalable management, distribution, and use of both its core enterprise reference data and its transactional data in a manner that services needs for this data within the enterprise as a whole and also specific needs of planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components associated with the enterprise.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one embodiment, an enterprise solution framework for an enterprise is provided. A configuration segment is provided for specifying a configuration of the enterprise. The configuration segment includes a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data associated with an enterprise. This system includes: (1) a centralized master repository containing the core enterprise reference data; (2) an internal services framework coupled to the centralized master repository that provides internal services for managing the core enterprise reference data within the centralized master repository, one or more of the internal services having direct access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for management purposes; and (3) an infrastructure services layer coupled to the centralized master repository that provides for bulk data transfers of core enterprise reference data between the centralized master repository and one or more external operational systems according to one or more enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for operational purposes. A planning segment is provided for planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to the configuration of the enterprise specified in the configuration segment, the planning including generating decisions specifying actions to be taken. An execution segment is provided for execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the planning segment, the execution including taking actions based on the decisions generated in the planning segment. A monitoring segment is provided for monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the execution segment, the monitoring including determining results of actions taken in the execution segment and providing feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly. A plurality of external operational systems embody the planning, execution, and monitoring segments.
  • Particular embodiments of the present invention may provide one or more technical advantages. For example, certain embodiments may provide an enterprise framework incorporating classification into configuration, planning, execution, and monitoring segments. Certain embodiments may provide a secure system of record optimized in architecture and design for management of core enterprise reference data. Certain embodiments may allow for full or partial automation of important time- and labor-intensive business processes according to embedded enterprise-level business workflows. Certain embodiments may provide all, some, or none of these technical advantages. Certain embodiments may provide one or more other technical advantages, one or more of which may be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the figures, description, and claims included herein.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • To provide a more complete understanding of the present invention and the features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example enterprise application framework including an MDM system;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example high level logical business architecture for an MDM system;
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example high level logical technical architecture an MDM system;
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example high level logical data services architecture for an MDM system;
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an example high level logical architecture of an MDM database;
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example information sharing architecture for an MDM system;
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example MDM studio and an associated MDM model library;
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example MDM use model;
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an example high level physical architecture for an MDM system; and
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an example new item introduction process provided within an MDM system.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • I. Enterprise Solution Framework
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example enterprise solution framework 2 including a Master Data Management (MDM) system 4. In one embodiment, framework 2 includes a classification of an associated enterprise into four fundamental segments: (1) configuration of the enterprise and its entities; (2) planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, decisions about what to do; (3) execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, acting upon those decisions; and (4) monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities; that is, monitoring the results of those decisions and supplying feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly. In this embodiment, MDM system 4 represents the configuration segment, while the planning, execution, and monitoring enterprise solution components 6 represent the planning, execution, and monitoring segments, respectively. That is enterprise solution components 6 comprise planning systems 6 a, execution systems 6 b, and monitoring systems 6 c.
  • MDM system 4 provides centralized storage and management of enterprise reference data, maintaining reference data and associated data management processes separate from enterprise solution components 6 and associated operational processes while making reference data available to enterprise solution components 6 for consumption as needed. Centralized storage and management of reference data for existing and future enterprise solution components 6 may facilitate extension or other modification of enterprise solution components 6 without needing to modify reference data within MDM system 4. Centralized storage and management of reference data may also facilitate integration of enterprise solution components 6, for example, when one enterprise solution component 6 is replaced with another or an enterprise solution component providing an entirely new business function is introduced. Centralized storage and management of reference data may further facilitate integration of one enterprise into another, for example, in connection with a merger or acquisition.
  • Infrastructure services 8 provide bulk data transfer and enterprise messaging between MDM system 4 and enterprise solution components 6 in accordance with business workflows operating in association with infrastructure services 8. These workflows, which may be embedded partially within MDM system 4 and partially within infrastructure services 8, may incorporate customized business best practices of the enterprise. In addition, these workflows may be wholly or partially automated using an appropriate enterprise-level workflow engine and appropriate MDM system resources available to that workflow engine.
  • II. MDM Logical Business Architecture
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example high level logical business architecture 10 for an MDM system 4. In general, the logical business architecture represents a business-centric view of MDM system 4 and includes core business processes, services, and data elements that MDM system 4 may be required to provide depending on the nature of the enterprise associated with MDM system 4. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 includes a process layer 12 that provides a context for implementing and wholly or partially automating business configuration processes 14. A service layer 16 underlying process layer 12 provides services 18 providing functions enabling process tasks that are appropriate for processes 14. A data layer 20 underlying service layer 16 provides base data models and physical representations for storing core enterprise reference data 22 for retrieval and use in connection with processes 14 and associated services 18.
  • An understanding of the fundamental concepts relating to the purposes and functions of MDM system 4 may aid in understanding the MDM architecture. At the core of MDM system 4 is the concept of data management, which encompasses both what data is stored and how that data is stored and made available for use. Since MDM system 4 is primarily concerned with structural data describing the enterprise or, more precisely, with data associated with entities within the business structure of the enterprise, the focus of the MDM architecture is on the storage, management, and retrieval of data associated with entities or with relationships between entities. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 provides such data storage, management, and retrieval using a core MDM reference data repository based on a multi-dimensional database construct.
  • Consider the following example. One example of an entity associated with a retail enterprise is an item. Items may have attributes such as size, weight, color, etc. If a particular entity, in this case a particular item, is considered a coordinate in a first dimension representing items, then the attributes of the particular item entity are associated with the coordinate for the particular item in the item dimension. At this point, the example involves only a one-dimensional line space, where discrete points on the line represent particular items.
  • Another example of an entity associated with an enterprise is a store or other location. Locations may have attributes such as size, physical address, etc. Like the particular item discussed above, a particular location may be considered a coordinate in a second dimension representing locations, where the attributes of the particular location entity are associated with the coordinate for the particular location in the location dimension. At this point, the example involves two one-dimensional line spaces, where discrete points on the first line represent particular items and discrete points on the second line represent particular locations. The example may be extended to include attributes that depend on the combination of a particular item and a particular location. Neither the item dimension nor the location dimension alone will suffice to store such multi-dimensional attributes. However, if the item and location dimensions are viewed as axes, and each intersection of item and location coordinates within an area defined by an orthogonal arrangement of these axes is viewed as a (item, location) point in two-dimensional entity space at which such attributes are stored, the concept becomes clear.
  • The example can be further extended to include attributes that depend on the combination of any number of arbitrary entity dimensions, leading to the concept of attributes as generalized data stored at and retrieved from points in an n-dimensional entity space. For example, a particular three-dimensional entity space suitable for an example retail enterprise might include item, location, and time dimensions, where attributes stored at each (item, location, time) point within a volume defined by an orthogonal arrangement of these axes corresponds to a particular combination of entities in the item, location, and time dimensions. In one embodiment, all reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 may be equivalent to an attribute associated with a point in n-dimensional entity space.
  • In one embodiment, an overriding characteristic of all data that is considered for inclusion within MDM system 4 is the multi-dimensional database construct described above. Hence, a core architectural principle for MDM system 4 may be to accommodate a dimensional data structure as a core element in every component of MDM system 4. This may have several important implications for the MDM architecture and design. Such important implications may include, without limitation: (1) a consistent mechanism for locating points in an n-dimensional entity space; (2) a consistent mechanism for storing data at and retrieving data from points in an n-dimension entity space; and (3) ensuring that all distinct data storage components support the above.
  • Another fundamental concept for MDM system 4 may involve optimization of the physical architecture and database structures for the desired functions of MDM system 4. The core MDM reference data repository, as described above, is primarily for data management and is structured to provide a rich data management framework. On the other hand, input and output data staging and distribution elements of MDM system 4 may require efficient data transfer and throughput. While many systems have attempted to provide a compromise architecture to handle all such needs, MDM system 4 is preferably structured so that each element is designed to optimally accomplish its corresponding functions.
  • MDM system 4 may provide value for enterprises in various industry settings, such as retailing, manufacturing, or other industry settings. Although retail examples may be provided for purposes of illustration, the present invention contemplates MDM system 4 being used in connection with, and being tailored to, any suitable enterprise. The MDM architecture and design are preferably constructed to provide elements suitable to allow for successful deployment of MDM system 4 across multiple industry types and multiple enterprises within a particular industry type.
  • A. Process Layer
  • As described above, MDM system 4 includes a process layer 12 that provides the context for implementing and wholly or partially automating business configuration processes 14. In general, processes 14 provide functions necessary to realize process workflows provided as part of the MDM solution, providing structure to enterprise activities and enabling those activities to be repeated, controlled, monitored, and improved overtime. Each process 14 represents a sequence of tasks that together accomplish a business activity. MDM system 4 may provide native support for generic processes 14 and support specific to particular processes 14. In one embodiment, processes 14 allow rich business workflows to be embedded within MDM system 4 and supported using the resources within underlying service and data layers 16 and 20, respectively. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 provides a highly configurable, flexible, and extensible environment for implementing and wholly or partially automating any suitable processes 14.
  • Processes 14 may operate at two levels. The first level, the enterprise level, may include larger scale intra-enterprise and inter-enterprise processes 14 associated with management of data as it relates to the targeted goals of the MDM solution. For example, where MDM system 4 is associated with a retail enterprise, an example of a first level process 14 may be a new item introduction process 14 involving storage of externally generated data concerning a new item into the core MDM reference data repository. The second level may include smaller scale management processes 14 involving movement of data internal to MDM system 4, such as retrieval of data from the core MDM reference data repository in accordance with queries from user interface, analytics, or other services internal to MDM system 4.
  • For example, generic processes 14 that may apply to any enterprise and any dimension of MDM system 4 may include, without limitation: (1) new entity introduction; (2) entity maintenance; (3) metadata realignment; (4) entity extraction; and (5) entity replication.
  • 1. New Entity Introduction
  • This process 14 represents the introduction of a new entity into MDM system 4. For an example retail enterprise, this may include introducing a new item, location, vendor, or customer. The process 14 may be initiated by the enterprise associated with MDM system 4 or by any other enterprise, such as a vendor of a new item being introduced. A vendor providing a new item may be considered an example of content exchange. In any case, the retail enterprise associated with MDM system 4 must add enterprise specific data to MDM system 4 for the new item, validate the data, approve use of the new item, and publish the new item as available for use by planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6, possibly through replication. An example new item introduction process 14 is described more fully below with reference to FIG. 10.
  • 2. Entity Maintenance
  • This process 14 involves updating one or more characteristics of an existing entity, such as an item, location, vendor, or customer for an example retail enterprise. The process 14 may be initiated by the enterprise associated with MDM system 4 or by any other enterprise, such as a vendor of an item for which one or more characteristics are to be updated. For example, an “improved” item may effectively retain its original part number and Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) but have one or more of its primary attributes altered by the vendor, such as its size, weight, or color. Similarly, the retail enterprise might alter one or more secondary attributes of an existing item.
  • 3. Metadata Realignment
  • This process 14 involves movement within a dimension of one or more members of one level relationship to another level relationship in a dimensional hierarchy. For example, a retail enterprise might move an item from one class to another class, which would in turn require identification of the one or more members to alter and the target relationships. The process 14 may need to keep appropriate audit and journal trails may require one or more approval sub-processes.
  • 4. Entity Extraction
  • This process 14 involves providing selection criteria for one or more entities, performing an appropriate query, and moving appropriate data or otherwise making the data available to the requesting role or subsystem.
  • 5. Entity Replication
  • This process 14 involves systematic replication of data in MDM system 4 in whole or in part to other subsystems for internal use. Such replication may allow the data to be used in a more efficient fashion than through direct operational access to the core MDM reference data repository.
  • B. Service Layer
  • As described above, service layer 16 provides services 18 that provide functions enabling the construction of process tasks appropriate for processes 14. Each service 18 provides a useful unit of work or enables a process task in the context of MDM system 4. Services 18 are not processes 14; rather, a service 18 is more analogous to a task within a process 14 or an action in response to a request associated with a process 14, such as computing the value of a function associated with the service 18 or issuing a query to view, update, or delete information in the core MDM reference data repository. In one embodiment, services 18 within service layer 16 of MDM system 4 for an example retail enterprise may include, without limitation: (1) entity maintenance services 18 a; (2) metadata maintenance services 18 b; (3) parameter maintenance services 18 c; (4) attribute/trait services 18 d; (5) event (calendar) services 18 e; (6) supply chain network services 18 f; (7) sourcing services 18 g; (8) activity based costing (ABC) services 18 h; (9) contract services 18 i; and (10) bill of materials (BOM) services 18 j.
  • 1. Entity Maintenance
  • Entity maintenance services 18 a provide basic functions for navigating, accessing, filtering, and sorting entities within MDM system 4. For an example retail enterprise, items, locations, vendors, and customers may be types of entities that are managed within MDM system 4 and maintained using entity maintenance services 18 a.
  • 2. Metadata Maintenance
  • Metadata maintenance services 18 b provide basic functions for the construction, management, and realignment of appropriate metadata. For example, such metadata may include metadata describing the enterprise as a whole, the structure of MDM system 4, the structures of the data staging areas of MDM system 4, and the relationships between the data staging areas and the core MDM reference data repository. Such functions may include the ability to create dimensions and to define hierarchies on the dimension spaces, where each hierarchy includes a number of levels each having a number of members. Such functions may also include maintenance with respect to dimensions, levels, and members, such as creation, modification, or deletion of such metadata elements.
  • 3. Parameter Maintenance
  • Parameter maintenance services 18 c provide basic functions for the maintenance, management, and distribution of enterprise solution component parameters (i.e. business rule parameters). One or more parameters may be, but are not required to be, specific to one or more particular enterprise solution components 6. Each parameter may be tied to one or more entities and, as such, may be viewed as a secondary attribute of the entities (as opposed to a primary attribute such as size, weight, and color of an example item). Parameter maintenance services 18 c provide functions particularly appropriate for these types of attributes. MDM system 4 may not only provide storage for such attributes and enable retrieval of such attributes for use, but may also provide a standardized management paradigm for all parameters in the overall enterprise solution. In one embodiment, this has the beneficial effect of providing a uniform methodology for parameter management and relieves point solution components from providing such functionality.
  • 4. Attribute/Trait Services
  • Some attributes of entities are quantitative, well-defined, and stable overtime. Examples of such attributes might include the size, weight, and color of an item or the address of a vendor. Other types of attributes are more qualitative, not as well-defined, and may change over time. These attributes, which may be referred to as traits, are often useful for customer-centric marketing and serve as the basis for attribute/trait cluster generation. Attribute/Trait services 18 d provide functions appropriate for this type of data residing within or managed using MDM system 4. Since the number, and even the types, of such attributes/traits are typically not known a priori, the requirements for the physical structure of a system to handle this type of data are somewhat different than for more static master data. Attribute/Trait services 18 d provide basic functions for creating, maintaining, and using this type of data and may also include more sophisticated services such as attribute/trait clustering services.
  • 5. Event (Calendar) Services
  • Event, or more generally calendar, services 18 e deal with management of time-related activities. These services 18 e provide basic functions for establishing reference calendars and for creating and managing time-related activities (i.e. events with respect to established calendars).
  • 6. Supply Chain Network Services
  • Supply chain network services 18 f provide basic functions for supporting the definition and use of the physical supply chain network associated with an enterprise. The supply chain network is crucial to many planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6 supported using MDM system 4.
  • 7. Sourcing Services
  • Sourcing services 18 g provide basic functions for accessing and using elements of the MDM model that are relevant to sourcing solution components, such as a supplier relationship management solution component.
  • 8. Activity Based Costing (ABC) Services
  • A number of useful measures may be associated with entities, such as items where MDM system 4 is associated with a retail enterprise, that traditionally have not been associated with an item catalog or similar construct. These measures may enable useful advanced analysis. One example is cost and price data associated with items. Such data may be used for advanced pricing optimization and ABC analyses. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 provides models to capture cost data, such as cost elements that when aggregated represent the total landed cost of goods. Included in these models are costs associated with activities such as handling an item as it passes through points in the associated supply chain network. ABC services 18 h provide basic functions for handling ABC data stored within and managed using MDM system 4. Moreover, data such as normalized demand profiles (or associations to such profiles) are examples of secondary attributes that MDM system 4 may need to be accommodate.
  • 9. Contract Services
  • In one embodiment, MDM system 4 does not inherently create or manage contracts for an example retail enterprise. However, MDM system 4 preferably provides a repository for contract data as it relates to entities stored within MDM system 4 and provides a centralized distribution mechanism for contract data to appropriate enterprise solution components 6. Contract services 18 i provide basic functions for inputting, associating, and distributing contract-related data related to core enterprise data residing within MDM system 4.
  • 10. Bill of Materials (BOM) Services
  • For an example retail enterprise, BOM services 18 j provide basic functions for creating, managing, and visualizing BOMs for the enterprise. For example, a single actual BOM may be too atomic for planning purposes, such that suitable aggregation of one or more actual BOMs into a representation appropriate for planning may be required to support a planning system associated with MDM system 4. MDM system 4 may store such representations as reference data and make them available to planning or other external operational systems as needed. MDM system 4 may also automatically generate such representations, based on a MDM BOM model, to reduce or eliminate the need for manual evaluation and aggregation of individual actual BOMs to order to create such representations. BOM services 18 j preferably support the elements of any appropriate MDM BOM model.
  • C. Data Layer
  • MDM system 4 is fundamentally concerned with the ability to create, manipulate, and extract data associated with the enterprise solution. As described above, data layer 20 provides the base data models and physical representations for storing various types of enterprise reference data 22 for retrieval and use in connection with processes 14 and associated services 18. In one embodiment, reference data 22 within data layer 20 of MDM system 4 for an example retail enterprise may include, without limitation: (1) master data 22 a; (2) metadata 22 b; (3) enterprise models 22 c; (4) parameter data 22 d; (5) attribute/trait data 22 e; (6) event (calendar) data 22 f; (7) supply chain network data 22 g; and (8) ABC data 22 h.
  • 1. Master Data
  • Master data 22 a represents core configuration data associated with entities, such as items, locations, vendors, and customers for an example retail enterprise. Many aspects of value chain management generally, and most planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 in particular, require reference data 22 regarding what items are sold, what locations sell the items, what vendors supply the items, what customers purchase the items, and other fundamental data elements on which all other enterprise data is built or to which all other enterprise data relates in some manner. MDM system 4 may extend the traditional concept of master data with respect to such entities to accommodate complex business workflows envisioned for an enterprise solution. Although legacy masters, for example item masters, may capture attributes of items such as SKUs that indicate where the items fit into the hierarchical structure of the enterprise data, there is no guarantee that a legacy system could manipulate or even view such data in a dimensional sense. In one embodiment, an item or other master for MDM system 4 is able to create, manipulate, navigate, view, and extract data in a dimensional way.
  • In one embodiment, an entity within a master data type represents an atomic member of that type, such as a particular item, a particular location, a particular vendor, or a particular customer. Attributes of entities such as items, locations, and the like may have important roles with respect to planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6. A first type of entity attribute is a physical or primary attribute generally associated with inherent characteristics of the entity, such as size, weight, and color for an example item entity. Primary attributes may be very important, for example, in planning product assortments or solving logistics problems associated with shipping an order for an item. Primary attributes are reasonably static and require no other context for meaning than the associated entity itself. A second type of entity attribute exists as a consequence of the use of the entity within the enterprise, which may result in a defined relationship of the entity to another entity or to an external metric. An example of such as attribute of an item might be the category or sub-category within the enterprise to which the item is assigned. This type of attribute, often referred to as a qualitative or secondary attribute, may be very important for more advanced analytic techniques such as item grouping/clustering, customer focused marketing, and promotions. In one embodiment, master data 22 a allows MDM system 4 to manage both primary and secondary attributes of entities.
  • It may be important to distinguish between data considered to be master data 22 a and data considered to be attribute/trait reference data 22 e described below. As discussed above, master data 22 a may be reasonably static and may not change rapidly over time. For example, a color (primary attribute) of a particular shirt may not change within a season the shirt is sold. Although the sub-category within the enterprise to which the shirt is assigned (secondary attribute) may change, as a result of a realignment for example, such changes will likely be infrequent. In contrast, for example, attributes/trait data 22 e may be heavily used for targeted assortment and hence must capture dynamic behaviors of customers. In addition, attributes/traits may themselves change, with new attributes/traits being added as appropriate and existing attributes/traits which are no longer valid being dropped as appropriate.
  • 2. Metadata
  • Another form of reference data 22 that is inherent to the entity masters described above and is very important to many enterprise solution components 6 is enterprise metadata 22 b. In general, metadata 22 b is data describing other data. In the context of MDM system 4, metadata 22 b describes the structure of the data stored in and managed using MDM system 4. In general, metadata 22 b provides a description of the structure of the dimensional view of master data 22 a. This description focuses on what dimensions exist, what levels describe the dimension coordinates, and what members exist and are associated with the levels. In addition, navigation constructs referred to as hierarchies may be defined. For example, for an example retail enterprise, metadata 22 b might include the various levels of the taxonomy of items and one or more hierarchies for navigating through the various levels of the taxonomy. In one embodiment, MDM system 4 captures metadata 22 b in a form that can be effectively replicated to downstream enterprise solution components 6 that require consistency in the dimensional view of master data 22 a. As described above in connection with metadata maintenance services 18 b, MDM system 4 may manage the creation, manipulation, and deletion of metadata 22 b and provide for realignment of master data 22 a (e.g. moving an item from a first category to a second category) such that any realignment is properly reflected in metadata 22 b.
  • 3. Enterprise Models
  • Enterprise models 22 c represent organizational views of the roles within an enterprise. In one embodiment, enterprise models 22 c may extend beyond the enterprise boundary to cover all organizational elements of the value chain associated with the enterprise. Enterprise models 22 c may be important with respect to authentication and authorization aspects of data access. Additionally, enterprise models 22 c may provide for approval chain relationships important to business process management.
  • 4. Parameter Data
  • 5. Attribute/Trait Data
  • 6. Event (Calendar) Data
  • 7. Supply Chain Network Data
  • 8. Activity Based Costing (ABC) Data
  • III. MDM Logical Technical Architecture
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example high level logical technical architecture 30 for MDM system 4. In general, logical technical architecture 30 represents a technology-centric view of MDM system 4 and specifies logical elements of MDM system 4 that together may operate to provide the desired MDM solution. In one embodiment, logical technical architecture 30 includes an MDM services framework 32 containing core MDM services 34. MDM database 36 includes the core MDM reference data repository. Certain services 34 may be applied to any classes of reference data 22 to be modeled within the core MDM reference data repository. Other services 34 may be tailored to particular classes of reference data 22 modeled within the core MDM reference data repository. Other services 34 may generically support various security, data access, data staging, and other data management needs. Example services 34 are described more fully below. Appropriate services 34 may access database 36 using one or more appropriate data access links 38.
  • External operational systems 40 may access database 36 using one or more data access layers 42. In one embodiment, an external operational system 40 may access database 36 in connection with a business workflow using a “front side” data access layer 42 a, an associated “front” bus 44 a between external operational system 40 and front side data access layer 42 a, and an associated data interface 46 a between front side data access layer 42 a and database 36. Front side data access layer 42 a is typically used to pass control data from external operational systems 40 to MDM system 4 for controlling MDM operations and may be associated with application integration. One or more services 34 may access front-side data access layer 42 a using one or more suitable data access links 48. An external operational system 40 may access database 36 using a “back side” data access layer 42 b, an associated “back” bus 44 b between external operational system 40 and back side data access layer 42 b, and an associated data interface 46 b between back side data access layer 42 b and database 36. Back side data access layer 42 b is typically used for movement of reference data 22 to and from external operational systems 40 and may be associated with data integration. However, front side data access layer 42 a may also be used to move reference data 22 to and from external operational systems 40 where appropriate, for example, where an external operational system 40 requires particular reference data 22 in a particular message-based or other format.
  • A. Logical Data Services Architecture
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example high level logical data services architecture 50 for MDM system 4. In one embodiment, data services architecture 50 includes primary layers: (1) a “front side” data services layer 52 a; (2) a physical data layer 54; and (3) a “back side” data services layer 52 b. Front side data services layer 52 a is associated with front side data access layer 42 a, described above with reference to FIG. 3, and provides direct data access to internal MDM services 34 that directly access the core MDM reference data repository within database 36. For example, front side data services layer 52 a may provide direct access to database 36 for internal analytics or user interface service queries. Physical data layer 54 includes database 36 in which the core MDM reference data model resides. Back side data services layer 52 b is associated with back side data access layer 42 b, described above with reference to FIG. 3, and provides indirect data access to external operational services 56 associated with external operational systems 40 that indirectly access the core MDM reference data repository within database 36. For example, back side data services layer 52 b may provide operational services with indirect access to database 36 through staging areas of database 36, staging areas associated with external operational systems 40, and persistent data stores associated with external operational systems 40. In a physical deployment, each of the three primary layers of data services architecture 50 may be mapped to appropriate technology components.
  • Front side data services layer 52 a may be mapped to an appropriate object-based services layer, such as Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) or JAVA 2 PLATFORM ENTERPRISE EDITION (J2EE), residing on an appropriate application server within an application server layer (described below with reference to FIG. 9). In certain embodiments, front side data services layer 52 a may be more tightly coupled to physical data layer 54 due to the necessity of an object-to-relational translation layer as part of front side data services layer 52 a.
  • Database 36 within physical data layer 54 may be implemented as a relational database. Database 36 may be modeled and managed in a number of ways, one of which may be selected for a particular deployment. In one embodiment, object relational database management technology may be used, although this approach is typically subject to performance risks. With this approach, the core MDM reference data model may be mapped to existing services 34 using a suitable object relational mapping layer. In an alternative embodiment, for improved performance or other reasons, a fixed data model relational database with a light access layer may be used. The light access layer would provide persistent objects tailored to the fixed and optimized physical schema of the relational database rather than driving the physical schema through an object relational mapping layer. With this approach, new services 34 may be mapped to an existing core MDM reference data model.
  • Although a single core MDM reference data repository within a single database 36 is primarily described herein for convenience, the present invention contemplates any number of core MDM reference data repositories within any number of databases 36 according to particular needs. However, all core MDM reference data repositories within all databases 36 are subject to centralized data management associated with a single MDM system 4 and preferably appear to both internal MDM services 34 and external operational services 56 as a single core MDM reference data repository.
  • Back side data services layer 52 b is preferably optimized for potentially large data synchronization and replication operations, preferably incorporating net change techniques, efficient store procedure techniques, and an object-based control layer. Furthermore, since back side data services layer 52 b maps to planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 for which data movements and associated mappings (i.e. transformations) must remain reasonably fixed over time, the core MDM reference data model should also be reasonably fixed over time.
  • B. Logical Data Repository Architecture
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an example high level logical architecture 70 of database 36. In one embodiment, database 36 incorporates a consistent dimensional modeling framework imposed on a model supporting a persistence management service, which is described more fully below. This preferably allows services framework 32 to manage reference data 22 within database 36 in a manner that is consistent with established dimensional views of reference data 22. Where MDM system 4 does not physically contain all reference data 22, reference data 22 that is not physically contained in MDM system 4 preferably appears as if it is physically contained in MDM system 4. Database 36 includes a managed data area 72 containing reference data 22, at least some of which may be managed remotely from MDM system 4. Managed data area 72 provides the core MDM reference data repository for reference data 22. Database 36 may also include a cached data area 74 containing cached data 76 representing reference data 22 that has been extracted from managed data area 72, processed according to the needs of one or more elements of MDM system 4 using a data management framework 78, and is re-inserted in managed data area 72 as reference data 22 once processing is complete. For example, data management framework 78 may provide the process controller within business process toolkit 34 a, UI services 34 d, or any other suitable element of MDM system 4 with operational access to cached data 76.
  • Reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 has an assigned state consistent with its use. In one embodiment, in association with data management framework 78, cached data area 74 provides a mechanism to hold a copy of reference data 22 for manipulation while the state' of reference data 22 in managed data area 72 is maintained as locked for read only access until the manipulation process has completed. Once a copy of reference data 22 is being held as cached data 76 within cached data area 74 during the manipulation process, the manipulation process sees only the state of cached data 76 within cached data area 74, while other processes, services, and systems associated with MDM system 4 see the true state of reference data 22 within managed data area 72 rather than an intermediate state reflecting the still incomplete manipulation process.
  • Database 36 may also include an operational access area 80 providing one or more external operational systems 40 with access to reference data 22 within managed data area 72. Where MDM system 4 is associated with an example retail enterprise, external operational systems 40 may include external enterprises such as manufacturers, distributors, and vendors of items associated with enterprise. External operational systems 40 may also include planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise solution components 6 within the enterprise but external to MDM system 4. Operational access area 80 may containing a master copy 82 of an Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) repository used to provide authentication and authorization services as described more fully below. Operational access area 80 may also contain inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68, respectively, for data that is inbound from and outbound to, respectively, external operational systems 40.
  • C. Information Sharing Architecture
  • In one embodiment, data may enter MDM system 4 from any appropriate source and may leave MDM system 4 for any appropriate target. Unless reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository can be readily made available to external operational systems 40, storing reference data 22 within the core MDM reference data repository may provide little value to the enterprise. Conversely, there may be other data residing within portions of the enterprise that needs to be distributed to other portions of the enterprise through MDM system 4. FIG. 6 illustrates an example information sharing architecture 90 for MDM system 4. In one embodiment, database 36 may be optimized for management of reference data 22 rather than for speed of data input or data output. Accordingly, a staging strategy may be employed to minimize data transfer times to and from external operational systems 40.
  • As described above, inbound data may be received from one or more data sources 92 for storage in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72. Data sources 92 may include persistent data stores associated with external enterprises 40 a, such as manufacturers, distributors, vendors, and customers where MDM system 4 is associated with an example retail enterprise. Data sources 92 may also include operational staging data stores associated with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6. The inbound data is first moved into inbound staging tables 94 of inbound staging area 84, then into core MDM tables 96 within the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as reference data 22. Data cleansing, validation, transformation, or other processing may occur, where appropriate, during the movement of data from inbound staging area 84 to the core MDM reference data repository managed data area 72. For example, it may be very important that reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository and made available to external operations systems 40 is considered clean, such data cleansing in connection with loading of inbound data.
  • As described above, outbound data may be provided to one or more data targets 98, such as persistent data stores associated with external enterprises 40 a or operational staging data stores associated with planning, execution, monitoring, or other external enterprise solution components 6. Outbound data being distributed using MDM system 4 without being stored in the core MDM reference data repository may be sent from inbound staging tables 94 of inbound staging area 84 to outbound staging tables 100 a of uncoupled outbound staging area 86 a, then out to data targets 98. Similarly, outbound reference data 22 in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 may be moved out of core MDM tables 96 of managed data area 72 to outbound staging tables 100 b of coupled outbound staging area 86 b, then out to data targets 98. Reference data 22 stored within core MDM tables 96 may be substantially continuously synchronized with the outbound data in outbound staging tables 100, such that at any point in time an accurate snapshot of reference data 22 is available within outbound staging area 86. Synchronization of reference data with operational data may be important, for example, to help ensure that planning based upon operational data is not performed for an entity that no longer exists within the enterprise as reflected in reference data 22. Data transformation or other processing may occur, where appropriate, during the movement of reference data 22 from the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 to outbound staging area 86.
  • D. MDM Services Framework
  • Referring again to FIG. 3, in one embodiment, services framework 32 may provide services 34 organized into the following groups, without limitation: (1) business process toolkit 34 a, (2) security services 34 b, (3) general services 34 c, (4) user interface services 34 d, (5) data access services 34 e, and (6) data staging services 34 f.
  • 1. Business Process Toolkit
  • Business process toolkit 34 a may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 that provides for management of MDM models, processes, and associated business rules. Automated processes associated with this subsystem may be used to implement model changes associated with physical deployment of MDM system 4. In one embodiment, business process toolkit 34 a may include, without limitation: (1) a MDM studio, (2) a MDM model library, (3) a business rules management service, (4) a process controller, and (5) a MDM structure update service.
  • a. MDM Studio & MDM Model Library
  • FIG. 7 illustrates an example MDM studio 110 and an associated MDM model library 112 containing one or more MDM models 114 appropriate for MDM system 4. MDM studio 110 may provide services to model the structure of MDM system 4 and its components, for example, for purposes of constructing MDM system 4 or for purposes of extending or otherwise updating MDM system 4. MDM studio 110 may provide support for one or more graphical modeling user interfaces. Modeling of MDM system 4 may include, for example, modeling structural aspects of the core MDM reference data repository within managed data area 72 of database 36, modeling the structure of staging areas 66 and 68 of database 36, and modeling appropriate process workflows. MDM studio 110 may provide support both for initial construction of MDM models 114 and later extension or other updating of MDM models 114. In one embodiment, MDM models 114 include, without limitation: (1) MDM process model 114 a, (2) MDM document model 114 b, (3) MDM forms model 114 c, (4) MDM reference data model 114 d, and (5) MDM staging data model 114 e.
  • (1) MDM Process Model
  • Process models 114 a describe the processes 14 to be used for managing reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository within database 36. In one embodiment, for a particular process 14, the corresponding process model 114 a describes the flow of tasks to be performed on reference data 22 in connection with process 14, particular services 18 associated with these tasks, and one or more particular process engines responsible for execution of process 14. For service oriented tasks, descriptions may utilize Web Services Description Language (WSDL) protocols. Each process 14 may represent one or more user interface task flows, enterprise solution component task flows, inter-enterprise process flows, or any other appropriate processes or task flows. Process model 114 a may specify allocation of each process 14 to a process controller, user interface controller, or enterprise-level workflow controller. Process model 114 a may also provide for graphical or other simulation of processes 14.
  • (2) MDM Document Model
  • Document model 114 b provides the metadata for MDM documents that are utilized in connection with processes 14. In one embodiment, MDM documents represent external cached representations of specific metadata elements within the underlying reference data model 114 d.
  • (3) MDM Forms Model
  • Forms model 114 c provides metadata describing forms associated with objects within reference data model 114 d. Forms may be important for efficient extraction of metadata elements from reference data model 114 d and may be analogous to database views.
  • (4) MDM Reference Data Model
  • Reference data model 114 d represents the metadata describing reference data 22 stored within the core MDM reference data repository. This is the lowest level metadata representation contained within model library 112. In one embodiment, reference data model 114 d may be an enterprise meta-model in Extensible Markup Language (XML) Software Description (XSD) format, which may separate instance data from metadata in a manner desirable for management and which back side data access layer 42 b may read directly from model library 112. It may be important to synchronize changes to reference data model 114 d with any higher level constructs, such as forms model 114 c or document model 114 b. Synchronization of models 114 may be automatic or, if appropriate, studio 110 may flag the need for changes and direct an administrative user to assist in synchronizing models 114.
  • A generic reference data model for reference data 22 to be stored within the core MDM reference data repository may be constructed to represent a synthesis of all applicable data elements, such as all data elements associated with enterprises in the retail industry for example, and may be viewed as a superset of reference data models 114 d to be used in actual deployments of MDM system 4. The generic reference data model, and all reference data models 114 d ultimately derived from the generic reference data model, should be constructed for consistency and efficient management of reference data 22. In one embodiment, the generic reference data model may be captured as a document in an annotated RATIONAL ROSE object model.
  • (5) MDM Staging Data Model
  • Staging data model 114 e represents metadata describing the structure of inbound and outbound staging tables 94 and 78, respectively, and also the mapping between reference data model 114 d and the staging table representation of the data within inbound and outbound staging tables 94 and 78, respectively. Reference data model 114 d may be a normalized data model derived from a generic reference data model as described above. However, inbound data may reflect arbitrary schema that are inconsistent with reference data model 114 d. For inbound data, appropriate mappings (i.e. transformations) of reference data model 114 d to source data models, such as an inbound staging data model 114 e representing an arbitrary input data format for an external operational system 40, may be performed as inbound data is being stored in the core MDM reference data repository. Similarly, outbound data may need to be de-normalized for consumption as operational data. For outbound data, appropriate mappings (i.e. transformations) of reference data model 114 d to target data models, such as an outbound staging data model 114 e representing a flat output data format for an external operational system 40, may be performed as reference data is being moved out of the core MDM reference data repository
  • b. Business Rules Management Service
  • Referring again to FIG. 3, the business rules management service may provide for creation and maintenance of business rule elements associated with services 18, such as import validation rules, staging transformation rules, and general consistency rules associated with MDM system 4. The business rules management service may provide for run-time-script-based rules or for association of design-time rules objects with MDM process workflows.
  • c. Process Controller
  • The process controller may represent a run-time process workflow controller for MDM system 4. As described above, process model 114 a may specify allocation of one or more processes 14 to the process controller, a user interface controller, or an enterprise-level workflow controller. In one embodiment, the process controller operates in cooperation with any such user interface controller and any such enterprise-level workflow controller.
  • d. MDM Structure Update Service
  • In one embodiment, MDM system 4 provides a mechanism to model its structure and a mechanism to automate a process to realize an extension of that model in a physical deployment. The structure update service may provide for automated implementation of a model 114 that is created or changed during the modeling process. The structure update service may be particularly important with respect to the structure of inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68, respectively. It may be necessary to initially specify staging data model 114 e, the reference model to staging area structure. In addition, it may be necessary to generate appropriate Structured Query Language (SQL) or changes to SQL to maintain the state of staging areas 66 and 68 relative to staging data model 114 e. Without automation of these tasks using the structure update service, maintaining coordination of various elements of MDM system 4 would be a very intensive manual task. The structure update service may also provide for updating staging data model 114 e and other models 114, along with associated SQL, in response to updates provided with enterprise solution components 6. Such structure updates may be driven according to update description script documents providing information necessary for the structure update to automatically execute.
  • 2. Security Services
  • Naturally, only users with appropriate access should be permitted to view or manipulate reference data 22 within MDM system 4. Security services 34 b may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 designed to fulfill two primary responsibilities. The first responsibility is to control access to MDM system 4 itself. The second responsibility is to manage the structure of the security model as applied to enterprise solution components 6. For this responsibility, services are provided to manage the security context that all enterprise solution components 6 will utilize, for example, through an LDAP repository whose master copy 82 resides within operational access area 80 of database 36. Security services 34 b may include, without limitation: (1) authentication services, and (2) authorization services.
  • a. Authentication
  • Authentication services provide initial log-in security with respect to enterprise solution components 6. Authentication is preferably based on an organizational model for the enterprise to provide a single log-in security context for all enterprise solution components 6.
  • b. Authorization
  • Authorization services provide layered, granular access to specific services 18 or reference data 22 for an authenticated user. Authorization may be provided at two levels. The first level (Level 1) deals with access to enterprise solution components 6 represented by specific applications or high level groups of services 18. The second level (Level 2) deals with access to specific functions within an enterprise solution component 6. Field level authorization may be handled by particular enterprise solution components 6 themselves as appropriate. In the case of MDM system 4 itself, any required authorization above Level 2 (i.e. Level 3 and higher) may need to be provided within MDM system 4.
  • 3. General Services
  • General services 34 c may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 and may include, without limitation: (1) a change management service; (2) a lifecycle management service; (2) a group management service; and (4) an analytics and reporting service.
  • a. Change Management
  • The change management services provides an audit trail for changes made to MDM system 4. For example, information may be kept regarding who made a change, at what time the change was made, and perhaps the value that was changed. The audit trail for changes should preferably be implemented in such a fashion that the mechanism can be turned off for information not requiring change management or for changes prior to configuration control, such as changes associated with initial setup of data elements. Logical grouping of reference data 22 may be important for many data management aspects, such as retrieving reference data 22 and making changes to reference data 22. Therefore, in terms of granularity, in one embodiment change management is group-based with overrides at the group member level.
  • b. Lifecycle Management
  • As described above, reference data 22 stored within MDM system 4 has an assigned state consistent with its use. The lifecycle management service allows for defining a lifecycle that describes the possible states for data elements, as well as a mechanism for managing the movement of data from one lifecycle state to another.
  • c. Group Management
  • Given the vast scope and scale of data that may potentially reside within MDM system 4, it is preferable that the overall strategy for data management be based on logical groups of data rather than individual data elements. Logical grouping of reference data 22 may be important for many data management aspects, such as retrieving reference data 22 and making changes to reference data 22. Although single entities may be manipulated, many updates will typically occur with respect to groups of entities. In one embodiment, the group aspect of data manipulation is built in from the foundation of MDM system 4.
  • d. Analytics and Reporting
  • The health and status of a large data repository, such as the core MDM reference data repository within database 36, is critical. The analytics and reporting service provides knowledge concerning what reference data 22 is stored within the core MDM reference data repository and the state of various system elements of MDM system 4. Although the types of analysis and associated reports will be specific to MDM system 4, general analysis and reporting tools may be used where appropriate. Analytics may extend to a broad range of activities supported directly by this service or indirectly through management by this service. Analytics may include clustering services for attributes/traits, decision support activities relating to entity data stored within the core MDM reference data repository, management of parameter computation such as coordinating parameter computation using an external engine, updating parameters such as lead times for items at particular locations, and any other suitable analytics. Reports may include change log activity, history traces for specific entities or groups of entities, reports on production parameter sets including time-phased sets, calendar examination and reconciliation, reports on new entities (such as new items) entered into the core MDM reference data repository and dying entities (such as items) removed from the core MDM reference data repository, and any other suitable reports.
  • 4. User Interface Services
  • 5. Data Access Services
  • Data access services 34 e may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32 to provide a key interface between user interface layers, data management business rules, and the underlying core MDM reference data repository within database 36. Data access services 34 e may be included within data management framework 78 described above with reference to FIG. 5. Since in one embodiment the predominant view of reference data 22 is object-based, data access services 34 e may support a persistent mapping to underlying data structures within database 36. Accordingly, in one embodiment, data access services 34 e may incorporate the concept of a data cache, such as cached data area 74 of database 36 described above, that provides a mechanism to hold a copy of reference data 22 in cached data area 74 for manipulation while maintaining the state of reference data 22 in the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as locked for read only access until the manipulation process has completed. Once a copy of reference data 22 is being held as cached data 76 within cached data area 74 during the manipulation process, the manipulation process sees only the state of cached data 76 within cached data area 74, while other processes, services, and systems associated with MDM system 4 see the true state of reference data 22 within managed data area 72 rather than an intermediate state reflecting the still incomplete manipulation process. Data access services 34 e may include, without limitation: (1) a persistence management service; and (2) a data access layer service.
  • a. Persistence Management
  • The persistence management service provides the logical mapping between the user view of reference data 22 and the underlying persistent object model associated with reference data 22. The service provides for managing the creation, update, and deletion of model instances, including appropriate memory-level caching of persistent objects.
  • b. Data Access Layer
  • The data access layer service provides the link between the logical object model associated with reference data 22 and the physical instances of relational core MDM tables 96 in which the persistent objects are held as reference data 22. The separation of the persistence layer from a particular physical mapping layer allows for multiple physical targets, which is especially useful when a distributed physical data model is required (e.g., in certain cases of parameter maintenance).
  • 6. Data Staging Services
  • Data staging services 34 e may be provided using a corresponding subsystem within services framework 32, primarily to provide synchronization of inbound and outbound staging areas 66 and 68, respectively, with managed data area 72 of database 36. Data staging services 34 e may include, without limitation: (1) a data import service; (2) a validation service; and (3) a syndication service.
  • a. Data Import
  • The data import service provides functions for moving data from external sources into database 36. For example, the data import service might be used to move existing master data into database 36 for storage and later redistribution to one or more planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6. Importing data includes moving the inbound data into inbound staging area 84, validating and transforming the inbound data where appropriate, and moving the inbound data from inbound staging area 84 into the core MDM reference data repository of managed data area 72 as reference data 22.
  • b. Validation
  • The validation service allows predefined, as well as user-defined, validation rules to be applied to inbound data prior to insertion into database 36. Validation rules may include basic value type rules, referential integrity rules, enterprise-specific business rules, or any other suitable rule. In one embodiment, validation is selectable such that higher levels of validation may be used when an inbound data set is “dirty,” requiring more stringent validation, and lower levels of validation may be used when an inbound data set is clean,” requiring less stringent validation.
  • c. Syndication
  • The syndication service, which essentially exports data from database 36 to planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6, may have two primary elements. The first element provides functions for synchronization of core MDM tables 96 within managed data area 72 with outbound staging tables 100 within outbound staging area 86, such that a valid snapshot of reference data 22 exists at all times within outbound staging tables 100, consistent with update transaction boundaries. The second element provides functions for schedule-based or demand-based movement of data from outbound staging tables 100 to a target enterprise solution component 6.
  • IV. MDM Use Model
  • FIG. 8 illustrates an example MDM use model 130 for MDM system 4. In general, use model 130 describes how MDM system 4 will be used in terms of where data is stored and how the data is accessed. In one embodiment, the external operational systems 40 that interact with MDM system 4 view MDM system 4 as a reference data repository, not as an operational data source. Accordingly, reference data 22 within core MDM reference data repository 132 may be synchronized and replicated to local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40 through appropriate external access services 136 operating in association with one or both data access layers 42. Internal access services 138 associated with managing reference data 22 within MDM system 4 may have direct access to reference data 22 within core MDM reference data repository 132. In contrast, operational services 140 of external operational systems 40, which are not associated with managing reference data 22 within MDM system 4, may only access data within the associated persistent stores 134, never directly accessing reference data 22 within core MDM reference data repository 132. Thus, in essence, MDM system 4 may act as a secure system of record that is optimized in architecture and design for management of reference data 22 rather than operational use of reference data 22. Consuming services other than those related to managing reference data 22 are not permitted to directly access reference data 22.
  • In one embodiment, key metrics to be considered in designing a physical architecture in accordance with use model 130 may include, without limitation: (1) throughput performance; (2) query performance; (3) configuration flexibility; and (4) scale. Each of these metrics is discussed below in relation to appropriate physical characteristics of an implementation of MDM system 4.
  • A. Throughput Performance
  • The primary use model for MDM system 4 features a centralized master repository, core MDM reference data repository 132 of managed data area 72 of database 36, for the core enterprise data, reference data 22. In one embodiment, a goal is to shield core MDM reference data repository 132 from operational loading while allowing for optimal design of external operational systems 40 that use reference data 22 in an operational mode. Accordingly, as described more fully above, use model 130 calls for synchronizing and replicating reference data 22 into local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40 that use reference data 22. This implies a physical architecture and design that facilitate outbound throughput performance for moving reference data 22 from core MDM reference data repository 132 to target persistent stores 134. If reference data 22 is being moved in quantity from external operation systems 40 into MDM system 4, then the physical architecture and design should preferably also support inbound throughput performance. A primary design criterion following from the above is that physical data layer 54 should provide for as efficient access to reference data 22 as possible. It may be desirable to consider any indirection layer that resides between core MDM tables 96 containing reference data 22, which may have a relational table structure, and the exterior representation of reference data 22, which may be an object representation.
  • B. Query Performance
  • The context for query performance is that of constructing views of reference data 22 for the MDM user interface or an analytics service internal to MDM system 4, such as the analytics and reporting service described above with reference to FIG. 3. Such user interface and analytics service queries are likely to be more filter-driven, looking for particular subsets of reference data 22 within a much larger row context, than any SQL or other queries associated with the bulk export of reference data 22 discussed above with respect to throughput. The structure of physical data layer 54 and the associated data access layer service should be designed to handle potentially large numbers of complex queries in a timely manner. Return of large and small query result row sets should be efficient independent of the target service (e.g., the user interface). Design criteria for query performance may include low mean query response times at the database level, sufficient performance under inbound loading involving a large number of inbound queries, and minimal latency in the associated data access layer service.
  • C. Configuration Flexibility
  • Configuration flexibility may be examined from both the user view and the solution view. With respect to the user view, reference data 22 contained in core MDM reference data repository 132 needs to be mapped to a particular data view that the enterprise requires. With respect to the solution view, where the core metrics are typically performance in replication and query performance, configuration flexibility may be less critical if not counter to those metrics. In general, it would be unwise to change reference data model 114 d for each enterprise deployment, since that would imply reconfiguration of all interfaces from core MDM reference data repository 132 to local persistent stores 134 of external operational systems 40. A design criterion for configuration flexibility is that reference data model 114 d should be stable from deployment to deployment and should represent a superset of anticipated reference data 22 for any enterprise. Attainment of this state may be evolutionary over several deployments, but should be smoothly accomplished in a relatively short period of time without significant model redesign. If a user view mapping configuration is required, it should preferably be at the outermost layers of the design (i.e. close to the user interface rather than interior to data structures of core MDM reference data repository 132).
  • D. Scalability
  • Core MDM reference data repository 132 may hold vast amounts of reference data 22, particularly where MDM system 4 is associated with an example retail enterprise having very large numbers of items, locations, or other entities. If attribute/trait data 22 e is utilized, where several hundred trait attributes per entity may be common, the potential for vast amounts of reference data 22 is even higher. These characteristics may effectively lead to large table row counts, complex relational joins, and the need for a dimension framework for reference data 22. A design criterion for scalability, which is also related to both throughput and query performance, is the ability to efficiently handle large row sets both when querying into the sets and when moving the sets. These type of efficiencies generally come from well-designed and well-tuned relational tables specifically engineered for performance-related metrics. A corollary is that the design should preferably be capable of utilizing parallel database technology if possibly required to sufficiently scale in the enterprise environment. If the design cannot utilize parallel database technology, then the option is lost when attempting to boost performance through deployment configuration.
  • V. User Interface Architecture
  • There are several drivers for the architecture and design of a user interface for MDM system 4. A first driver is the dual types of users of MDM system 4; the administrative role user and the process participant role user. The first classification of user role is concerned primarily with the administration of enterprise configuration information contained within MDM system 4, as well as the associated MDM models 114, which are realized physically in database 36. The second classification of user role is more concerned with viewing and entering information associated with processes 14, such as new item introduction for example. A modeling studio style interface may be more important to the administrative role user, while well-designed view and entry screen sequences may be more important to the process participant role user. User interface architecture and design requirements may be broken down along these or other suitable lines. A second driver is the flexibility that is inherent in the MDM architecture. In one embodiment, both reference data model 114 d and staging data model 114 e may be altered at the time of deployment. This provides flexibility for MDM system 4 to accommodate idiosyncrasies of the enterprise. Correspondingly, the user interface architecture preferably accommodates these flexible models. For example, if a field is added or deleted within reference data model 114 d or staging data model 114 e, a corresponding entry screen may accordingly adapt dynamically to the model change without the need for reprogramming.
  • VI. MDM Physical Architecture
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an example high level physical architecture 150 for MDM system 4, which may be loosely mapped to logical business architecture 10 described above with reference to FIG. 2 and logical technical architecture 30 described above with reference to FIG. 3.
  • In one embodiment, MDM system 4 includes a web server 152, a MDM application server layer 154, an infrastructure services application server layer 156, and a MDM database layer 158. Using a web browser or otherwise, a user associated with MDM system 4 may send a Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP) or other request to web server 152 to perform an appropriate operation. Web server 152 may communicate the request to one or more appropriate application servers within application server layer 154 to invoke one or more suitable applications 160. Application server layer 154 may include one or more application servers supporting engines 160 a that provide process and service functions of MDM system 4, supporting the MDM user interface 140 b, and supporting other suitable applications 160. Infrastructure services application server layer 156 may include one or more application servers supporting front side data access layer 42 a, back side data access layer 42 b, and a suitable enterprise-level workflow engine 162 that provides process and service functions associated with data access layers 42. For example, in one particular embodiment, front side data access layer 42 a may be implemented using a WEBMETHODS ENTERPRISE SERVER product, back side data access layer 42 b may be implemented in part using an INFORMATICA POWERCENTER product with an integrated Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) tool, and enterprise-level workflow engine 162 may be implemented using a WEBMETHODS BUSINESS INTEGRATOR product.
  • In one embodiment, implementation of processes 14 may be shared between enterprise-level workflow engine 162 of application server layer 156 and applications 160 of application server layer 154. Services 12 and associated services 34 may be provided primarily using application server layer 154. Database layer 158 contains the actual physical data models 114, such as reference data model 114 d and staging data model 114 e described above with reference to FIG. 7, with associated data services provided either at database layer 8 or application server layer 154.
  • VII. Example New Item Introduction Process
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an example new item introduction process 14 provided within MDM system 4. Although introduction of a new item entity for retail and associated vendor enterprises is described as an example, the present invention contemplates analogous or other introduction of any suitable new entity for any suitable enterprise, whether or not specifically described herein.
  • New item introduction is a very common and integral practice for dynamic value chain partners such as retailers and finished goods vendors. The frequency of new items being introduced to a retailer assortment may vary from one to one thousand each week, depending upon the retail segment and other factors. New item introduction may be the most important phase in the life cycle of an item. This process has traditionally been highly paper intensive and has impeded the ability of retailers and vendors to introduce items on a dynamic (i.e. day-to-day) basis, since there are thousands of variables, attributes, and other factors that may need to be considered in introducing a new item at the retailer shelf, from pricing to shelf-level execution. There is a business need for retailers to automate significant portions of the new item introduction process, and to streamline integration with planning, execution, monitoring, and other enterprise component solutions, to introduce new items with a shorter time-to-market, generate customer interest, and gain market share. In one embodiment, with new item introduction process 14, MDM system 4 incorporates an embedded business workflow for new item introduction that enables an example retail enterprise to introduce a new item more quickly, more easily, with more flexibility, and with more streamlined integration with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6 than with previous techniques.
  • A new item may be introduced in a number of different ways. For example, a vendor may introduce the new item to a retailer, a retailer may introduce the new item through item design (i.e. for private label), or a retailer and vendor may jointly decide to introduce the new item. Although there may be slight variations in these three methods of new item introduction, since this example will focus on the workflows internal to the retailer, this description will include details of new item introduction from a generic perspective. That is, the described workflows are generic in that they outline the processes that the retailer may go through, irrespective of whether the retailer introduces the new item, the vendor introduces the new item, or the retailer and vendor jointly introduce the new item. These workflows may also be applicable across all retailer formats (e.g., mass merchant, department store, etc.) and all merchandise segments (hardlines, grocery, softlines, etc.).
  • As illustrated in FIG. 10, in one embodiment there are two major aspects of new item introduction process 14: (1) a first sub-process 170 involving introduction, review, acceptance, and rejection of the new item, which may be analogized to the conception of a child; and (2) a second sub-process 172 involving creation of the new item within the retailer for initiating merchandising, replenishment, and supply chain planning and execution functions on the new item to make the new item available at the shelf for sale to the customer, which may be analogized to the birth of the child. First sub-process 170 may include, without limitation: a vendor introduction component 174 (where the vendor is introducing the new item), a retailer review component 176; a retailer rejection/modification component 178; a retailer approval component 180; and a vendor/retailer agreement finalization component 182. Second sub-process 172 may include a vendor/retailer keying component 184, in which the vendor or retailer creates one or more appropriate masters for the new item within database 36. Such masters may include, for example, an item master 186, an item-location master 188, and a vendor-item master 190. After creation and storage of masters for the new item according to execution of vendor/retailer keying component 184, legacy systems 192 and associated production databases 194 of the retailer or vendor may receive and recognize the new item for merchandising, replenishment, and supply chain planning and execution functions.
  • There may be many potential benefits of providing wholly or partially automated processes 14 for new item introduction, entry, creation, and maintenance. For example, automation of the new item introduction process may provide one or more of the following benefits, without limitation: (1) providing the retailer with the ability to merchandise and incorporate a new item into its assortments more quickly, thereby making the new item available to customers more quickly than its competitors; (2) as a result of a shorter time-to-market for new items, the retailer may considerably improve its chances of increasing sales and market share; (3) reduced labor costs and paper-flow within and across various retail functions; (4) reducing or eliminating the possibility of keying errors, thereby reducing the potential for human error; (5) providing tighter and more streamlined integration of the new item introduction process with planning, execution, monitoring, or other enterprise solution components 6, leading to better placement and replenishment of merchandise; and (6) efficiencies in planning and execution achieved through streamlined integration with new item introduction may be effectively leveraged to provide the lowest shelf-landed cost to the end-customer. With respect to tighter and more streamlined integration, examples may include, without limitation: (1) data from a vendor's quote associated with a new item may be automatically filled in for the retailer, no longer needing to be manually keyed in to finalize a contract with respect to the new item; (2) Universal Product Code (UPC) number may be automatically created for a new item once the new item has been created, no longer needing to be manually keyed in; (3) a retailer legacy system may be automatically checked to verify that a UPC number for a new item is associated with a retailer product number, no longer needing to be manually verified; and (4) in association with a merchandise planning system or other enterprise solution component 6, a product number for a new product may be automatically filled in for creation of a product assortment incorporating a new item, no longer needing to be manually keyed in.
  • New item introduction process 14 illustrated in FIG. 10 may be described in more detail, from introduction of the new item by the vendor through maintenance of the item by the retailer in its systems. In one embodiment, new item introduction, entry, creation, and maintenance associated with new item introduction process 14 within an example retailer may be broken down into the following primary sub-processes, without limitation: (1) an initiation sub-process; (2) a preliminary planning sub-process; (3) an item entry, approval, initial forecast estimation, and replenishment initiation sub-process; (4) an item setup, creation, activation, and initial replenishment sub-process; (5) an item merchandising and shelf execution setup sub-process; (6) an item forecast entry and replenishment sub-process; (7) an order management and collaboration sub-process; (8) inbound (vendor-to-retailer) and outbound (retailer-to-location) supply chain planning and execution sub-processes; (9) an item maintenance sub-process; and (10) an exceptions handling and management sub-process.
  • Although the present invention has been described with several embodiments, a plethora of changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications may be suggested to one skilled in the art, and it is intended that the invention encompass all such changes, substitutions, variations, alterations, and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. A computer-implemented enterprise solution framework for an enterprise, comprising:
a configuration segment specifying a configuration of the enterprise, the configuration segment comprising a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data associated with an enterprise, comprising:
a centralized master repository containing the core enterprise reference data, wherein the core enterprise reference data comprises master data representing core configuration data associated with entities of the enterprise;
an internal services framework coupled to the centralized master repository and providing internal services for managing the core enterprise reference data within the centralized master repository, one or more of the internal services having direct access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for management purposes; and
an infrastructure services layer coupled to the centralized master repository and providing for bulk data transfers of core enterprise reference data between the centralized master repository and one or more external operational systems according to one or more enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for operational purposes;
a planning segment for planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to the configuration of the enterprise specified in the configuration segment, the planning comprising generating decisions specifying actions to be taken;
an execution segment for execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the planning segment, the execution comprising taking actions based on the decisions generated in the planning segment; and
a monitoring segment for monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the execution segment, the monitoring comprising determining results of actions taken in the execution segment and providing feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly;
a database associated with the centralized master repository for storing the core enterprise reference data.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the one or more external operational systems comprise a system selected from the group consisting of:
a planning system;
an execution system; and
a monitoring system.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the enterprise is a retail enterprise and the one or more external operational systems comprise:
a merchandising planning system;
a replenishment planning system;
an order management system; and
a logistics and distribution system.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein each of the one or more external operational systems comprise:
one or more external enterprise solution components associated with the enterprise.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the system comprises a secure system of record for management of the core enterprise reference data rather than operational use of the core enterprise reference data by the external operational systems.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the database associated with the centralized master repository is a multi-dimensional database construct in which all the core enterprise reference data stored within the centralized master repository is represented as an attribute associated with a point in n-dimensional entity space.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein an external access service replicates the core enterprise reference data in the centralized master repository to be replicated to persistent stores of the external operational systems for operational use by the external operational systems, the external operational systems not being permitted direct access the core enterprise reference data in the centralized master repository.
8. A method for providing an enterprise solution framework for an enterprise, comprising:
providing a configuration segment specifying a configuration of the enterprise, the configuration segment comprising a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data associated with an enterprise, comprising:
a centralized master repository containing the core enterprise reference data, wherein the core enterprise reference data comprises master data representing core configuration data associated with entities of the enterprise;
an internal services framework coupled to the centralized master repository and providing internal services for managing the core enterprise reference data within the centralized master repository, one or more of the internal services having direct access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for management purposes; and
an infrastructure services layer coupled to the centralized master repository and providing for bulk data transfers of core enterprise reference data between the centralized master repository and one or more external operational systems according to one or more enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for operational purposes;
providing a planning segment for planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to the configuration of the enterprise specified in the configuration segment, the planning comprising generating decisions specifying actions to be taken;
providing an execution segment for execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the planning segment, the execution comprising taking actions based on the decisions generated in the planning segment; and
providing a monitoring segment for monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the execution segment, the monitoring comprising determining results of actions taken in the execution segment and providing feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly;
storing the core enterprise reference data in a database associated with the centralized master repository.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein each of the one or more external operational systems comprise a system selected from the group consisting of:
a planning system;
an execution system; and
a monitoring system.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the enterprise is a retail enterprise and the one or more external operational systems comprise:
a merchandising planning system;
a replenishment planning system;
an order management system; and
a logistics and distribution system.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein each of the one or more external operational systems comprise:
one or more external enterprise solution components associated with the enterprise.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data comprises a secure system of record for management of the core enterprise reference data rather than operational use of the core enterprise reference data by the external operational systems.
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the database associated with the centralized master repository is a multi-dimensional database construct in which all the core enterprise reference data stored within the centralized master repository is represented as an attribute associated with a point in n-dimensional entity space.
14. The method of claim 8, wherein an external access service replicates the core enterprise reference data in the centralized master repository to be replicated to persistent stores of the external operational systems for operational use by the external operational systems, the external operational systems not being permitted direct access the core enterprise reference data in the centralized master repository.
15. Software providing an enterprise solution framework for an enterprise, the software being embodied in one or more computer-readable media and when executed using one or more computer systems operable to:
provide a configuration segment specifying a configuration of the enterprise, the configuration segment comprising a system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data associated with an enterprise, the configuration segment operable to:
interact with a centralized master repository containing the core enterprise reference data, wherein the core enterprise reference data comprises master data representing core configuration data associated with entities of the enterprise;
provide an internal services framework coupled to the centralized master repository and providing internal services for managing the core enterprise reference data within the centralized master repository, one or more of the internal services having direct access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for management purposes; and
provide an infrastructure services layer coupled to the centralized master repository and providing for bulk data transfers of core enterprise reference data between the centralized master repository and one or more external operational systems according to one or more enterprise-level business workflows, the external operational systems being permitted indirect access to the core enterprise reference data stored in the centralized master repository for operational purposes;
provide a planning segment for planning with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to the configuration of the enterprise specified in the configuration segment, the planning comprising generating decisions specifying actions to be taken;
provide an execution segment for execution with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the planning segment, the execution comprising taking actions based on the decisions generated in the planning segment; and
provide a monitoring segment for monitoring with respect to the enterprise and its entities according to output of the execution segment, the monitoring comprising determining results of actions taken in the execution segment and providing feedback to the configuration and planning segments accordingly;
store the core enterprise reference data in a database associated with the centralized master repository.
16. The software of claim 15, wherein each of one or more external operational systems comprise a system selected from the group consisting of:
a planning system;
an execution system; and
a monitoring system.
17. The software of claim 16, wherein the enterprise is a retail enterprise and the one or more external operational systems comprise:
a merchandising planning system;
a replenishment planning system;
an order management system; and
a logistics and distribution system.
18. The software of claim 16, wherein each of the one or more external operational systems comprise:
one or more external enterprise solution components associated with the enterprise.
19. The software of claim 15, wherein the system for centrally managing core enterprise reference data comprises a secure system of record for management of the core enterprise reference data rather than operational use of the core enterprise reference data by the external operational systems.
20. The software of claim 15, wherein the database associated with the centralized master repository is a multi-dimensional database construct in which all the core enterprise reference data stored within the centralized master repository is represented as an attribute associated with a point in n-dimensional entity space.
US11/927,209 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise Abandoned US20080052310A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/927,209 US20080052310A1 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US43986403P 2003-01-13 2003-01-13
US46950103P 2003-05-09 2003-05-09
US10/755,437 US7213037B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-01-12 Master data management system for centrally managing cached data representing core enterprise reference data maintained as locked in true state read only access until completion of manipulation process
US10/847,009 US7765185B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/927,209 US20080052310A1 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/847,009 Continuation US7765185B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080052310A1 true US20080052310A1 (en) 2008-02-28

Family

ID=32600285

Family Applications (11)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/755,437 Active 2025-05-29 US7213037B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-01-12 Master data management system for centrally managing cached data representing core enterprise reference data maintained as locked in true state read only access until completion of manipulation process
US10/847,422 Abandoned US20040215662A1 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US10/847,009 Expired - Fee Related US7765185B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US10/847,037 Expired - Fee Related US7725429B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/697,966 Expired - Fee Related US8725678B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-04-09 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/927,312 Expired - Fee Related US8204922B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/927,209 Abandoned US20080052310A1 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Enterprise Solution Framework Incorporating a Master Data Management System for Centrally Managing Core Reference Data Associated with an Enterprise
US11/927,269 Expired - Fee Related US8392363B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US14/275,713 Expired - Fee Related US9037535B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2014-05-12 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US14/715,423 Expired - Fee Related US9529886B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2015-05-18 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US15/388,046 Expired - Fee Related US10042904B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2016-12-22 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise

Family Applications Before (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/755,437 Active 2025-05-29 US7213037B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-01-12 Master data management system for centrally managing cached data representing core enterprise reference data maintained as locked in true state read only access until completion of manipulation process
US10/847,422 Abandoned US20040215662A1 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US10/847,009 Expired - Fee Related US7765185B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US10/847,037 Expired - Fee Related US7725429B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2004-05-17 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/697,966 Expired - Fee Related US8725678B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-04-09 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US11/927,312 Expired - Fee Related US8204922B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/927,269 Expired - Fee Related US8392363B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2007-10-29 Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US14/275,713 Expired - Fee Related US9037535B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2014-05-12 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US14/715,423 Expired - Fee Related US9529886B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2015-05-18 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US15/388,046 Expired - Fee Related US10042904B2 (en) 2003-01-13 2016-12-22 System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (11) US7213037B2 (en)
DE (1) DE102004001835A1 (en)
TW (1) TW200419413A (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100131622A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Unified storage for configuring multiple networking technologies
US20100131652A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Brewis Deon C Unified interface for configuring multiple networking technologies
US20100131618A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Common configuration application programming interface
US20100131619A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Creating cross-technology configuration settings
US8380787B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2013-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Federation of master data management systems
US20130198129A1 (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-08-01 Emptoris, Inc. Method for building and maintaining trusted supplier records
US8601029B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2013-12-03 International Business Machines Corporation Data stewardship in federated multi-level master data management systems
US8635249B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-01-21 International Business Machines Corporation Federation of multi-level master data management systems
US10255241B2 (en) 2013-10-17 2019-04-09 Sap Se System for customizing specific database models using specific database views

Families Citing this family (141)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TW200419413A (en) 2003-01-13 2004-10-01 I2 Technologies Inc Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US8504406B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2013-08-06 Restaurant Services, Inc. Method of product ordering and inventory repositioning for a promotion
DE102004022481A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2005-01-13 i2 Technologies, Inc., Dallas Management system for master memory holding core reference data using data thesaurus and master data schematic for central management of core reference data in central master memory
US20050043982A1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2005-02-24 Nguyen Vinh Dinh Contextual workflow modeling
US8060553B2 (en) * 2003-08-27 2011-11-15 International Business Machines Corporation Service oriented architecture for a transformation function in a data integration platform
US20050262189A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-11-24 Ascential Software Corporation Server-side application programming interface for a real time data integration service
US20050240354A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-27 Ascential Software Corporation Service oriented architecture for an extract function in a data integration platform
US8041760B2 (en) 2003-08-27 2011-10-18 International Business Machines Corporation Service oriented architecture for a loading function in a data integration platform
US20050232046A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-20 Ascential Software Corporation Location-based real time data integration services
US20050228808A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-13 Ascential Software Corporation Real time data integration services for health care information data integration
US20050223109A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-06 Ascential Software Corporation Data integration through a services oriented architecture
US20060010195A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2006-01-12 Ascential Software Corporation Service oriented architecture for a message broker in a data integration platform
US7814142B2 (en) * 2003-08-27 2010-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation User interface service for a services oriented architecture in a data integration platform
US20050235274A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-20 Ascential Software Corporation Real time data integration for inventory management
WO2005022417A2 (en) 2003-08-27 2005-03-10 Ascential Software Corporation Methods and systems for real time integration services
US7814470B2 (en) * 2003-08-27 2010-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation Multiple service bindings for a real time data integration service
US20050234969A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-10-20 Ascential Software Corporation Services oriented architecture for handling metadata in a data integration platform
US8090595B2 (en) * 2004-02-02 2012-01-03 John W Hartman System and method for analyzing and improving business performance
EP1723521A2 (en) * 2004-02-25 2006-11-22 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation An executable application configuration system
US8392231B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2013-03-05 Sap Aktiengesellschaft System and method for performing assortment definition
US8639548B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2014-01-28 Sap Aktiengesellschaft System and method for assortment planning
US7752067B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2010-07-06 Sap Aktiengesellschaft System and method for assortment planning
US8370184B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2013-02-05 Sap Aktiengesellschaft System and method for assortment planning
US8285584B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2012-10-09 Sap Ag System and method for performing assortment planning
US8108270B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2012-01-31 Sap Ag Method and system for product layout display using assortment groups
US7761406B2 (en) * 2004-03-16 2010-07-20 International Business Machines Corporation Regenerating data integration functions for transfer from a data integration platform
US20050251533A1 (en) * 2004-03-16 2005-11-10 Ascential Software Corporation Migrating data integration processes through use of externalized metadata representations
DE602005026643D1 (en) 2004-04-30 2011-04-14 Research In Motion Ltd SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FILING DATA TRANSFERS IN A MOBILE DEVICE
JP5112613B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2013-01-09 エスアーペー アーゲー Activity management system and method, activity management apparatus, client terminal, and computer program
US9043781B2 (en) * 2004-12-03 2015-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Algorithm for automated enterprise deployments
US7464118B2 (en) * 2004-12-03 2008-12-09 International Business Machines Corporation Algorithm for maximizing application availability during automated enterprise deployments
US20060143225A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-06-29 Rainer Brendle System and method for enterprise data objects
US7496624B2 (en) * 2004-12-29 2009-02-24 Sap Ag Client registration for purposes of maintaining detailed client information at a web services registry
US7827134B2 (en) * 2005-01-05 2010-11-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for transferring data and metadata between relational databases
US7424481B2 (en) * 2005-02-01 2008-09-09 Sap Ag Data management and processing system for large enterprise model and method therefor
US7496887B2 (en) 2005-03-01 2009-02-24 International Business Machines Corporation Integration of data management operations into a workflow system
US20060224633A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Common Import and Discovery Framework
US7487191B2 (en) * 2005-06-10 2009-02-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for model-based replication of data
US7614082B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2009-11-03 Research In Motion Limited System and method for privilege management and revocation
US7499906B2 (en) * 2005-09-05 2009-03-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for optimization in workflow management systems
US8078484B2 (en) * 2005-10-28 2011-12-13 The Kroger Co. Loss preporting system and method with viewable performance based reports
US20070240102A1 (en) * 2006-03-02 2007-10-11 International Business Machines Corporation Software development tool for sharing test and deployment assets
US7873675B2 (en) * 2006-03-17 2011-01-18 Microsoft Corporation Set-based data importation into an enterprise resource planning system
US8751946B2 (en) * 2006-04-05 2014-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced display of properties for a program object
US8812556B2 (en) * 2006-04-06 2014-08-19 International Business Machines Corporation Storing modification data for recreating modifications
US20080120323A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Lehman Brothers Inc. System and method for generating customized reports
US8250583B2 (en) * 2006-12-04 2012-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation Workflow processing system and method with federated database system support
US8140479B2 (en) * 2006-12-21 2012-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Logical classification of objects on a computer system
US8190661B2 (en) * 2007-01-24 2012-05-29 Microsoft Corporation Using virtual repository items for customized display
US20080201330A1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2008-08-21 Microsoft Corporation Software repositories
US8145673B2 (en) 2007-02-16 2012-03-27 Microsoft Corporation Easily queriable software repositories
US20080208806A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Techniques for a web services data access layer
US10387440B2 (en) 2007-03-29 2019-08-20 Jda Software Group, Inc. Generic data staging and loading using enhanced metadata and associated method
US7831625B2 (en) 2007-05-16 2010-11-09 Microsoft Corporation Data model for a common language
US8171003B2 (en) * 2007-06-06 2012-05-01 Kunio Kamimura Method and apparatus for changing reference of database
US20110137862A1 (en) * 2008-06-12 2011-06-09 Athena Telecom Lab, Inc. Method and apparatus for parallel edit to editable objects
JP4573277B2 (en) * 2007-06-06 2010-11-04 株式会社アテナテレコムラボ Database conflict resolution method
US20090025012A1 (en) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Bernhard Kelnberger Master data completion for incoming xml-messages
US7660782B2 (en) * 2007-10-05 2010-02-09 Wipro Limited Architecture for master data management in an enterprise
US20110004622A1 (en) * 2007-10-17 2011-01-06 Blazent, Inc. Method and apparatus for gathering and organizing information pertaining to an entity
US10452768B2 (en) * 2007-11-03 2019-10-22 International Business Machines Corporation Managing source annotation metadata
US7836030B2 (en) * 2007-11-13 2010-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Data library optimization
US8276152B2 (en) * 2007-12-05 2012-09-25 Microsoft Corporation Validation of the change orders to an I T environment
EP2250589A4 (en) * 2008-03-03 2011-05-25 Kuity Corp Systems and methods for mapping enterprise data
US20090271234A1 (en) * 2008-04-23 2009-10-29 John Hack Extraction and modeling of implemented business processes
US8095963B2 (en) 2008-04-30 2012-01-10 Microsoft Corporation Securing resource stores with claims-based security
US8205216B2 (en) 2008-05-01 2012-06-19 International Business Machines Corporation Data sharing between applications where only one application knows the business purpose of the data
US8032516B2 (en) * 2008-07-31 2011-10-04 The Boeing Company Methods and systems that provide unified bills of material
BRPI0920810A2 (en) * 2008-10-07 2015-12-22 Zap Holdings Ltd synchronization of relational databases with olap cubes
US8429193B2 (en) * 2009-01-09 2013-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation Security control of analysis results
US8095571B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2012-01-10 Microsoft Corporation Partitioning modeling platform data
US8458148B2 (en) * 2009-09-22 2013-06-04 Oracle International Corporation Data governance manager for master data management hubs
US8447755B1 (en) 2009-09-29 2013-05-21 Aquire Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods of analyzing changes and data between hierarchies
US9311378B2 (en) * 2009-10-09 2016-04-12 International Business Machines Corporation Data synchronization between a data management system and an external system
US9305270B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2016-04-05 Sap Se Synchronization of recipe structures and bill of materials including the adjustment to manufacturing requirements
US8417726B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2013-04-09 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Guided structure synchronization
US20110276362A1 (en) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-10 Oracle International Corporation Auditing client - service provider relationships with reference to internal controls assessments
US20110276363A1 (en) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-10 Oracle International Corporation Service level agreement construction
US20110276912A1 (en) * 2010-05-05 2011-11-10 Oracle International Corporation Automating internal controls assessments for outsourced operations
US10078674B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2018-09-18 Mcl Systems Limited Integrated workflow and database transactions
US8954927B2 (en) * 2010-12-30 2015-02-10 Sap Ag Management of objects within a meta-data repository
US9584949B2 (en) 2011-01-27 2017-02-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Cloud based master data management architecture
US9128768B2 (en) 2011-01-27 2015-09-08 Microsoft Technology Licensing, LCC Cloud based master data management
US8667024B2 (en) 2011-03-18 2014-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Shared data management in software-as-a-service platform
US8595798B2 (en) 2011-06-17 2013-11-26 International Business Machines Corporation Enforcing data sharing policy through shared data management
US8635673B2 (en) 2011-06-17 2014-01-21 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic application adaptation in software-as-a-service platform
US9652790B2 (en) 2011-06-17 2017-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Open data marketplace for municipal services
US8825861B2 (en) 2011-06-26 2014-09-02 International Business Machines Corporation System management operational workflow templates
US8849916B2 (en) 2011-06-26 2014-09-30 International Business Machines Corporation Infrastructure management operational workflows
US9443258B2 (en) 2011-08-26 2016-09-13 Apple Inc. Mass ingestion of content related metadata to an online content portal
US9161226B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2015-10-13 Blackberry Limited Associating services to perimeters
US9497220B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2016-11-15 Blackberry Limited Dynamically generating perimeters
US9613219B2 (en) 2011-11-10 2017-04-04 Blackberry Limited Managing cross perimeter access
US8799227B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2014-08-05 Blackberry Limited Presenting metadata from multiple perimeters
US20130226966A1 (en) * 2012-02-27 2013-08-29 Technion Research & Development Foundation Limited Processing a hierarchical structure to respond to a query
US20130231967A1 (en) * 2012-03-02 2013-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Structured communication for automated data governance
US9122740B2 (en) * 2012-03-13 2015-09-01 Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc. Bulk traversal of large data structures
US9280788B2 (en) * 2012-06-13 2016-03-08 Oracle International Corporation Information retrieval and navigation using a semantic layer
US9369466B2 (en) 2012-06-21 2016-06-14 Blackberry Limited Managing use of network resources
US10795879B2 (en) 2012-06-22 2020-10-06 Iqvia Inc. Methods and systems for predictive clinical planning and design
US20130346093A1 (en) * 2012-06-22 2013-12-26 Quintiles Transnational Corporation Systems and Methods for Analytics on Viable Patient Populations
US9058367B2 (en) * 2012-08-20 2015-06-16 Sears Brands, L.L.C. Methods and systems for staging and propagating data
US9075955B2 (en) 2012-10-24 2015-07-07 Blackberry Limited Managing permission settings applied to applications
US8656016B1 (en) 2012-10-24 2014-02-18 Blackberry Limited Managing application execution and data access on a device
US20140122413A1 (en) * 2012-10-29 2014-05-01 Paris Technologies, Inc. Bulk read and write between multi-dimensional data structures
US8706537B1 (en) * 2012-11-16 2014-04-22 Medidata Solutions, Inc. Remote clinical study site monitoring and data quality scoring
US20140214801A1 (en) * 2013-01-29 2014-07-31 Vito Anthony Ciliberti, III System and Method for Enterprise Asset Management and Failure Reporting
US9734230B2 (en) 2013-09-12 2017-08-15 Sap Se Cross system analytics for in memory data warehouse
US9773048B2 (en) 2013-09-12 2017-09-26 Sap Se Historical data for in memory data warehouse
US9734221B2 (en) 2013-09-12 2017-08-15 Sap Se In memory database warehouse
US9298727B2 (en) * 2013-11-01 2016-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Plural architecture master data management
US9384246B2 (en) 2013-11-01 2016-07-05 International Business Machines Corporation Plural architecture master data management with supplemental attributes
WO2015148739A1 (en) * 2014-03-26 2015-10-01 Systems Imagination, Inc. System and methods for data integration in n-dimensional space
US10103937B1 (en) 2014-06-03 2018-10-16 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company System and method for central administration of multiple application environments
WO2016021015A1 (en) * 2014-08-07 2016-02-11 株式会社Ale Logistics solution and intranet system
US10261945B1 (en) * 2015-02-04 2019-04-16 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for storing and accessing monitoring data
EP3076359A1 (en) * 2015-04-01 2016-10-05 Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Implementing retail customer analytics data model in a distributed computing environment
US10423901B2 (en) 2015-04-28 2019-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of event contexts using bookend events
US9953295B2 (en) 2015-04-28 2018-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation Management of event contexts using bookend contexts
US9454559B1 (en) 2015-12-17 2016-09-27 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic master data management
US10248668B2 (en) * 2016-07-18 2019-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation Mapping database structure to software
US11023483B2 (en) * 2016-08-04 2021-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation Model-driven profiling job generator for data sources
US10885157B2 (en) 2017-04-03 2021-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Determining a database signature
RU2728506C2 (en) * 2018-06-29 2020-07-29 Акционерное общество "Лаборатория Касперского" Method of blocking network connections
US10459766B1 (en) 2018-08-20 2019-10-29 Bank Of America Corporation System for optimizing resource prioritization based on services efficiency
US20200351373A1 (en) * 2019-05-03 2020-11-05 Munish Kumar Gupta Systems and methods for managing profile updates
EP3736706B1 (en) * 2019-05-06 2022-07-27 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Locking of spatial regions of fully-connected large-scale multi-dimensional spatial data for collaborative updating
US11204913B2 (en) 2019-05-13 2021-12-21 Sap Se Generic data state transfer interface to the state of data and information for a reporting system
US11263334B2 (en) 2019-06-18 2022-03-01 Adp, Llc Method and system for natively accessing enterprise data according to an identified view context
US11556895B2 (en) * 2019-08-28 2023-01-17 One Network Enterprises, Inc. System and computer program for providing high delivery performance in a value chain
CN110422535B (en) * 2019-09-05 2023-09-15 浙江大学深圳研究院 Intelligent book recycling bin with interaction function and application method thereof
CN111784108B (en) * 2020-05-29 2024-01-02 远光软件股份有限公司 Modeling method and device of main data management platform
US11734356B2 (en) * 2020-09-11 2023-08-22 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for implementing an open policy agent bridge
GB2604934B (en) * 2021-01-29 2024-05-15 Audet Magna Ltd Automating complex processes
CN112949041B (en) * 2021-02-01 2022-08-05 广东工业大学 Automatic stereoscopic warehouse construction method based on digital twinning
CN113094360B (en) * 2021-03-19 2023-11-10 北京优奥创思科技发展有限公司 Cross-industry data processing method
US11494841B2 (en) 2021-04-01 2022-11-08 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and method for multimodal reference data contribution and management using straight through processing
US11847143B2 (en) 2021-04-02 2023-12-19 Capital One Services, Llc Systems and methods for automated data governance
CN113204444B (en) * 2021-07-06 2022-04-26 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 Present vehicle management system based on global situation and method thereof
US20230185786A1 (en) * 2021-12-13 2023-06-15 International Business Machines Corporation Detect data standardization gaps
CN117435555B (en) * 2023-12-20 2024-03-12 杭州硕磐智能科技有限公司 Main data management method, platform, server and storage medium

Citations (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6073109A (en) * 1993-02-08 2000-06-06 Action Technologies, Inc. Computerized method and system for managing business processes using linked workflows
US6230309B1 (en) * 1997-04-25 2001-05-08 Sterling Software, Inc Method and system for assembling and utilizing components in component object systems
US6295536B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-09-25 American Management Systems, Inc. Computer architecture for multi-organization data access
US20010044738A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-11-22 Alex Elkin Method and system for top-down business process definition and execution
US6324581B1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2001-11-27 Emc Corporation File server system using file system storage, data movers, and an exchange of meta data among data movers for file locking and direct access to shared file systems
US20020016810A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Database system and information processing system with process code information
US20020065701A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Kim Kyu Dong System and method for automating a process of business decision and workflow
US20020123957A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-09-05 Burt Notarius Method and apparatus for marketing and communicating in the wine/spirits industry
US20020133504A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2002-09-19 Harry Vlahos Integrating heterogeneous data and tools
US20020138316A1 (en) * 2001-03-23 2002-09-26 Katz Steven Bruce Value chain intelligence system and methods
US6463513B1 (en) * 1999-09-07 2002-10-08 International Business Machines Corporation Cache storage optimization in a data storage library of a redundant copy synchronization token tracking system
US6475389B2 (en) * 2000-07-24 2002-11-05 Health Research, Inc. Method for detection of prostate specific membrane antigen in serum
US20020174191A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2002-11-21 Robertson James A. Method and system for using mobile code in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US20020186254A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2002-12-12 Apps4Biz.Com Holding Ag Information handling method and apparatus and intuitive graphical user interface for navigating business application software
US20030023898A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-30 Jacobs Dean Bernard Layered architecture for data replication
US20030033217A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for mapping shelf space
US20030046639A1 (en) * 2001-05-09 2003-03-06 Core Ipr Limited Method and systems for facilitating creation, presentation, exchange, and management of documents to facilitate business transactions
US20030055668A1 (en) * 2001-08-08 2003-03-20 Amitabh Saran Workflow engine for automating business processes in scalable multiprocessor computer platforms
US20030088461A1 (en) * 1995-06-16 2003-05-08 E-Centives, Inc. Virtual couponing method and apparatus for use with consumer kiosk
US20030097345A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-05-22 Mitch Upton System and method for invoking business functionality for a workflow
US6574617B1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2003-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selective replication of databases within a workflow, enterprise, and mail-enabled web application server and platform
US6604110B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2003-08-05 Ascential Software, Inc. Automated software code generation from a metadata-based repository
US6606740B1 (en) * 1998-10-05 2003-08-12 American Management Systems, Inc. Development framework for case and workflow systems
US6621505B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2003-09-16 Journee Software Corp. Dynamic process-based enterprise computing system and method
US6633862B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2003-10-14 Intel Corporation System and method for database cache synchronization across multiple interpreted code engines
US20030200130A1 (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-10-23 Kall Jonathan J. Suite of configurable supply chain infrastructure modules for deploying collaborative e-manufacturing solutions
US6662199B1 (en) * 2000-01-04 2003-12-09 Printcafe Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for customized hosted applications
US20040122699A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-24 Descisys Ltd. Method and system for integrating workflow management with business intelligence
US6768995B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-07-27 Adaytum, Inc. Real-time aggregation of data within an enterprise planning environment
US20040215662A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-10-28 Vasudev Rangadass Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US6816902B1 (en) * 1998-12-01 2004-11-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for improving workflow performance in workflow application systems
US6826566B2 (en) * 2002-01-14 2004-11-30 Speedtrack, Inc. Identifier vocabulary data access method and system
US6826568B2 (en) * 2001-12-20 2004-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Methods and system for model matching
US20040243640A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2004-12-02 Bostleman Mark W. System and method for providing selective data access and workflow in a network environment
US20040249832A1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-12-09 Goldthorpe Ward Hillary Method for systemic enterprise knowledge management
US6834268B2 (en) * 1996-10-02 2004-12-21 Nintendo Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US20050004831A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2005-01-06 Adeel Najmi System providing for inventory optimization in association with a centrally managed master repository for core reference data associated with an enterprise
US20050021541A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2005-01-27 Vasudev Rangadass Data management system providing a data thesaurus for mapping between multiple data schemas or between multiple domains within a data schema
US20050038705A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2005-02-17 Tokuhiro Yamada Pos system, pos server, shop terminal, sales managing method, and recording medium
US6873997B1 (en) * 1999-08-04 2005-03-29 Agile Software Corporation Data management system and method for automatically propagating information to disparate information systems from a central location
US6920474B2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2005-07-19 Data Quality Solutions, Inc. Method and system for enterprise business process management
US6954757B2 (en) * 2001-02-02 2005-10-11 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Framework, architecture, method and system for reducing latency of business operations of an enterprise
US6968535B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-11-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Service mapping method of enterprise application modeling and development for multi-tier service environments
US6993530B2 (en) * 1998-11-19 2006-01-31 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for obtaining an identifier for a logical unit of data in a database
US7020697B1 (en) * 1999-10-01 2006-03-28 Accenture Llp Architectures for netcentric computing systems
US7027997B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2006-04-11 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Flexible web-based interface for workflow management systems
US7043478B2 (en) * 2001-04-24 2006-05-09 Autodesk Canada Co. Asynchronous database updates
US7047535B2 (en) * 2001-07-30 2006-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for performing workflow related operations using an application programming interface
US7054823B1 (en) * 1999-09-10 2006-05-30 Schering Corporation Clinical trial management system
US7058642B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2006-06-06 Intel Corporation Method and data structure for a low memory overhead database
US7069536B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2006-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for executing a workflow
US7076556B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2006-07-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for storage and retrieval of connection data in a communications system
US7100147B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2006-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for generating a workflow
US7120896B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2006-10-10 Vitria Technology, Inc. Integrated business process modeling environment and models created thereby
US7168077B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2007-01-23 Handysoft Corporation System and method of executing and controlling workflow processes
US7350209B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2008-03-25 Bmc Software System and method for application performance management
US7379899B1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2008-05-27 Nintendo Of America Inc. Method and apparatus for verifying product sale transactions and processing product returns
US7386797B1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2008-06-10 Oracle Corporation Framework to model and execute business processes within a collaborative environment
US7472077B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2008-12-30 Amazon.Com, Inc. User interfaces and methods for facilitating user-to-user sales

Family Cites Families (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE69402716T2 (en) * 1993-06-11 1997-12-11 Northern Telecom Ltd., Montreal, Quebec METHOD FOR SUPPLYING CALL MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTROLLED BY THE USER
EP0647909B1 (en) * 1993-10-08 2003-04-16 International Business Machines Corporation Information catalog system with object-dependent functionality
US5712668A (en) * 1994-03-25 1998-01-27 Hewlett-Packard Company Rotary Multi-ridge capping system for inkjet printheads
US5661781A (en) * 1995-05-01 1997-08-26 At&T Message notification system for card users
US5778370A (en) * 1995-08-25 1998-07-07 Emerson; Mark L. Data village system
US5781911A (en) * 1996-09-10 1998-07-14 D2K, Incorporated Integrated system and method of data warehousing and delivery
US5995596A (en) * 1997-03-12 1999-11-30 Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. System and method for coordination of multimedia messages across multiple systems
US6266681B1 (en) * 1997-04-08 2001-07-24 Network Commerce Inc. Method and system for inserting code to conditionally incorporate a user interface component in an HTML document
US6195662B1 (en) * 1997-06-27 2001-02-27 Juxtacomm Technologies Inc. System for transforming and exchanging data between distributed heterogeneous computer systems
US5995945A (en) * 1997-08-25 1999-11-30 I2 Technologies, Inc. System and process for inter-domain planning analysis and optimization using model agents as partial replicas of remote domains
US6442528B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2002-08-27 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Exemplar workflow used in the design and deployment of a workflow for multi-enterprise collaboration
US6256676B1 (en) * 1998-11-18 2001-07-03 Saga Software, Inc. Agent-adapter architecture for use in enterprise application integration systems
US6260309B1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2001-07-17 Ethan W. Cliffton Split-sphere observatory dome with a rotating oculus window
AU1795800A (en) * 1998-12-31 2000-07-24 Ct Motion Ltd. A method and system for managing mobile workers
US7177825B1 (en) * 1999-05-11 2007-02-13 Borders Louis H Integrated system for ordering, fulfillment, and delivery of consumer products using a data network
WO2001002973A1 (en) 1999-07-02 2001-01-11 Covad Communications Group, Inc. Process fulfillment systems and methods using distributed workflow management architecture
US6408292B1 (en) * 1999-08-04 2002-06-18 Hyperroll, Israel, Ltd. Method of and system for managing multi-dimensional databases using modular-arithmetic based address data mapping processes on integer-encoded business dimensions
US7162427B1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2007-01-09 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Structure and method of modeling integrated business and information technology frameworks and architecture in support of a business
US6442748B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2002-08-27 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for a persistent state and persistent object separator in an information services patterns environment
US6587547B1 (en) * 1999-09-13 2003-07-01 Microstrategy, Incorporated System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with real-time drilling via telephone
US20020029207A1 (en) * 2000-02-28 2002-03-07 Hyperroll, Inc. Data aggregation server for managing a multi-dimensional database and database management system having data aggregation server integrated therein
US7117215B1 (en) * 2001-06-07 2006-10-03 Informatica Corporation Method and apparatus for transporting data for data warehousing applications that incorporates analytic data interface
EP1172736A1 (en) * 2000-07-11 2002-01-16 Columbus IT Partner Consulting A/S Database conversion or integration
US6895471B1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2005-05-17 Informatica Corporation Method and apparatus for synchronizing cache with target tables in a data warehousing system
US20020095322A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2002-07-18 Manugistics, Inc. System and method of monitoring supply chain parameters
EP1207471A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-05-22 Mitac International Corporation Method of collaboration commerce
US7143099B2 (en) * 2001-02-08 2006-11-28 Amdocs Software Systems Limited Historical data warehousing system
AU2002347919A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-06-10 Bea Systems, Inc. System and method for implementing a service adapter
US7107285B2 (en) * 2002-03-16 2006-09-12 Questerra Corporation Method, system, and program for an improved enterprise spatial system
US20040015408A1 (en) * 2002-07-18 2004-01-22 Rauen Philip Joseph Corporate content management and delivery system
US7509326B2 (en) * 2002-09-03 2009-03-24 Sap Ag Central master data management
US7752070B2 (en) * 2002-11-12 2010-07-06 Sas Institute Inc. Enterprise information evolution analysis system
US7108445B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-09-19 Joseph Henriques, Jr. Adaptor for a mailbox post
US7177877B2 (en) * 2003-05-29 2007-02-13 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Method and system for externalizing conditional logic for collecting multi-purpose objects
US7379540B1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2008-05-27 Shortel, Inc. Server with backup capability for distributed IP telephony systems
CA2442796A1 (en) 2003-09-26 2005-03-26 Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee Binding a workflow engine to a data model
US7725302B2 (en) 2003-12-02 2010-05-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and system and program storage device for generating an SWPM-MDT workflow in response to a user objective and executing the workflow to produce a reservoir response model
JP2006243832A (en) * 2005-02-28 2006-09-14 Ricoh Co Ltd Workflow retrieval system

Patent Citations (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6073109A (en) * 1993-02-08 2000-06-06 Action Technologies, Inc. Computerized method and system for managing business processes using linked workflows
US20030088461A1 (en) * 1995-06-16 2003-05-08 E-Centives, Inc. Virtual couponing method and apparatus for use with consumer kiosk
US6834268B2 (en) * 1996-10-02 2004-12-21 Nintendo Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US6230309B1 (en) * 1997-04-25 2001-05-08 Sterling Software, Inc Method and system for assembling and utilizing components in component object systems
US6990636B2 (en) * 1997-09-30 2006-01-24 Initiate Systems, Inc. Enterprise workflow screen based navigational process tool system and method
US6621505B1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2003-09-16 Journee Software Corp. Dynamic process-based enterprise computing system and method
US6606740B1 (en) * 1998-10-05 2003-08-12 American Management Systems, Inc. Development framework for case and workflow systems
US20030200527A1 (en) * 1998-10-05 2003-10-23 American Management Systems, Inc. Development framework for case and workflow systems
US7379899B1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2008-05-27 Nintendo Of America Inc. Method and apparatus for verifying product sale transactions and processing product returns
US6993530B2 (en) * 1998-11-19 2006-01-31 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for obtaining an identifier for a logical unit of data in a database
US6816902B1 (en) * 1998-12-01 2004-11-09 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for improving workflow performance in workflow application systems
US6295536B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2001-09-25 American Management Systems, Inc. Computer architecture for multi-organization data access
US6324581B1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2001-11-27 Emc Corporation File server system using file system storage, data movers, and an exchange of meta data among data movers for file locking and direct access to shared file systems
US6873997B1 (en) * 1999-08-04 2005-03-29 Agile Software Corporation Data management system and method for automatically propagating information to disparate information systems from a central location
US6463513B1 (en) * 1999-09-07 2002-10-08 International Business Machines Corporation Cache storage optimization in a data storage library of a redundant copy synchronization token tracking system
US7054823B1 (en) * 1999-09-10 2006-05-30 Schering Corporation Clinical trial management system
US7020697B1 (en) * 1999-10-01 2006-03-28 Accenture Llp Architectures for netcentric computing systems
US6662199B1 (en) * 2000-01-04 2003-12-09 Printcafe Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for customized hosted applications
US20010044738A1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-11-22 Alex Elkin Method and system for top-down business process definition and execution
US20020174191A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2002-11-21 Robertson James A. Method and system for using mobile code in a global ecosystem of interrelated services
US20020016810A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Database system and information processing system with process code information
US6574617B1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2003-06-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selective replication of databases within a workflow, enterprise, and mail-enabled web application server and platform
US6475389B2 (en) * 2000-07-24 2002-11-05 Health Research, Inc. Method for detection of prostate specific membrane antigen in serum
US7076556B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2006-07-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for storage and retrieval of connection data in a communications system
US6604110B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2003-08-05 Ascential Software, Inc. Automated software code generation from a metadata-based repository
US20020133504A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2002-09-19 Harry Vlahos Integrating heterogeneous data and tools
US7027997B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2006-04-11 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Flexible web-based interface for workflow management systems
US20040243640A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2004-12-02 Bostleman Mark W. System and method for providing selective data access and workflow in a network environment
US20020065701A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Kim Kyu Dong System and method for automating a process of business decision and workflow
US6633862B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2003-10-14 Intel Corporation System and method for database cache synchronization across multiple interpreted code engines
US20020123957A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-09-05 Burt Notarius Method and apparatus for marketing and communicating in the wine/spirits industry
US6954757B2 (en) * 2001-02-02 2005-10-11 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Framework, architecture, method and system for reducing latency of business operations of an enterprise
US20020138316A1 (en) * 2001-03-23 2002-09-26 Katz Steven Bruce Value chain intelligence system and methods
US7043478B2 (en) * 2001-04-24 2006-05-09 Autodesk Canada Co. Asynchronous database updates
US20030046639A1 (en) * 2001-05-09 2003-03-06 Core Ipr Limited Method and systems for facilitating creation, presentation, exchange, and management of documents to facilitate business transactions
US20030033217A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for mapping shelf space
US20020186254A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2002-12-12 Apps4Biz.Com Holding Ag Information handling method and apparatus and intuitive graphical user interface for navigating business application software
US7100147B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2006-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for generating a workflow
US7069536B2 (en) * 2001-06-28 2006-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for executing a workflow
US7350209B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2008-03-25 Bmc Software System and method for application performance management
US20030023898A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-30 Jacobs Dean Bernard Layered architecture for data replication
US7047535B2 (en) * 2001-07-30 2006-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for performing workflow related operations using an application programming interface
US20030055668A1 (en) * 2001-08-08 2003-03-20 Amitabh Saran Workflow engine for automating business processes in scalable multiprocessor computer platforms
US20030097345A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-05-22 Mitch Upton System and method for invoking business functionality for a workflow
US7120896B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2006-10-10 Vitria Technology, Inc. Integrated business process modeling environment and models created thereby
US7472077B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2008-12-30 Amazon.Com, Inc. User interfaces and methods for facilitating user-to-user sales
US20050038705A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2005-02-17 Tokuhiro Yamada Pos system, pos server, shop terminal, sales managing method, and recording medium
US6826568B2 (en) * 2001-12-20 2004-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Methods and system for model matching
US20040249832A1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-12-09 Goldthorpe Ward Hillary Method for systemic enterprise knowledge management
US6826566B2 (en) * 2002-01-14 2004-11-30 Speedtrack, Inc. Identifier vocabulary data access method and system
US20030200130A1 (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-10-23 Kall Jonathan J. Suite of configurable supply chain infrastructure modules for deploying collaborative e-manufacturing solutions
US7058642B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2006-06-06 Intel Corporation Method and data structure for a low memory overhead database
US6968535B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-11-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Service mapping method of enterprise application modeling and development for multi-tier service environments
US6920474B2 (en) * 2002-03-25 2005-07-19 Data Quality Solutions, Inc. Method and system for enterprise business process management
US7386797B1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2008-06-10 Oracle Corporation Framework to model and execute business processes within a collaborative environment
US6768995B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2004-07-27 Adaytum, Inc. Real-time aggregation of data within an enterprise planning environment
US20040122699A1 (en) * 2002-12-13 2004-06-24 Descisys Ltd. Method and system for integrating workflow management with business intelligence
US20040225677A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-11-11 Vasudev Rangadass Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US20040215655A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-10-28 Vasudev Rangadass Enterprise solution framework incorporating a master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US7213037B2 (en) * 2003-01-13 2007-05-01 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Master data management system for centrally managing cached data representing core enterprise reference data maintained as locked in true state read only access until completion of manipulation process
US20040215662A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-10-28 Vasudev Rangadass Master data management system for centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US7168077B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2007-01-23 Handysoft Corporation System and method of executing and controlling workflow processes
US20050021541A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2005-01-27 Vasudev Rangadass Data management system providing a data thesaurus for mapping between multiple data schemas or between multiple domains within a data schema
US7310646B2 (en) * 2003-05-09 2007-12-18 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Data management system providing a data thesaurus for mapping between multiple data schemas or between multiple domains within a data schema
US20050004831A1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2005-01-06 Adeel Najmi System providing for inventory optimization in association with a centrally managed master repository for core reference data associated with an enterprise

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8751612B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2014-06-10 Microsoft Corporation Creating cross-technology configuration settings
US8676942B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2014-03-18 Microsoft Corporation Common configuration application programming interface
US20100131618A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Common configuration application programming interface
US20100131619A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Creating cross-technology configuration settings
US8615570B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2013-12-24 Microsoft Corporation Unified storage for configuring multiple networking technologies
US20100131622A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Unified storage for configuring multiple networking technologies
US20100131652A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 Brewis Deon C Unified interface for configuring multiple networking technologies
US8683046B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2014-03-25 Microsoft Corporation Unified interface for configuring multiple networking technologies
US8380787B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2013-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Federation of master data management systems
US8635249B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-01-21 International Business Machines Corporation Federation of multi-level master data management systems
US8601029B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2013-12-03 International Business Machines Corporation Data stewardship in federated multi-level master data management systems
US20130282651A1 (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-10-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method for building and maintaining trusted supplier records
US20130198129A1 (en) * 2012-01-30 2013-08-01 Emptoris, Inc. Method for building and maintaining trusted supplier records
US9058348B2 (en) * 2012-01-30 2015-06-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method for building and maintaining trusted supplier records
US9069811B2 (en) * 2012-01-30 2015-06-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method for building and maintaining trusted supplier records
US10255241B2 (en) 2013-10-17 2019-04-09 Sap Se System for customizing specific database models using specific database views

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7213037B2 (en) 2007-05-01
US9037535B2 (en) 2015-05-19
US20070192361A1 (en) 2007-08-16
US20080052316A1 (en) 2008-02-28
US20040215655A1 (en) 2004-10-28
US8392363B2 (en) 2013-03-05
US20040215662A1 (en) 2004-10-28
US20170140015A1 (en) 2017-05-18
US10042904B2 (en) 2018-08-07
US20080052311A1 (en) 2008-02-28
TW200419413A (en) 2004-10-01
US20040177075A1 (en) 2004-09-09
US20040225677A1 (en) 2004-11-11
US7725429B2 (en) 2010-05-25
DE102004001835A1 (en) 2004-07-22
US8204922B2 (en) 2012-06-19
US7765185B2 (en) 2010-07-27
US20150254321A1 (en) 2015-09-10
US8725678B2 (en) 2014-05-13
US20140250057A1 (en) 2014-09-04
US9529886B2 (en) 2016-12-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10042904B2 (en) System of centrally managing core reference data associated with an enterprise
US8239426B2 (en) Data management system providing a data thesaurus for mapping between multiple data schemas or between multiple domains within a data schema
US7788119B2 (en) System providing for inventory optimization in association with a centrally managed master repository for core reference data associated with an enterprise
US7574379B2 (en) Method and system of using artifacts to identify elements of a component business model
US7657777B2 (en) Common semantic model of management of a supply chain
US7836103B2 (en) Exchanging project-related data between software applications
US8645431B2 (en) Multi-level supply chain management system and methods
US20050288956A1 (en) Systems and methods for integrating business process documentation with work environments
US20140149186A1 (en) Method and system of using artifacts to identify elements of a component business model
CN112288150A (en) Boats and ships industry pipe fitting processing management and control integrated system
CN115210701A (en) System and method for automatically generating BI models using data introspection and curation
Verbruggen et al. iDOCEM: defining a common terminology for object-centric event logging and data-centric process modelling
Jigeesh et al. Creating a Virtual Data Warehouse for Manufacturing Industry.
Prakash et al. Requirements Engineering for Data Warehousing
Reddy et al. Data Warehouse Architecture for Army Installations
Buxmann et al. Data Management: Concepts and SAP Solutions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RANGADASS, VASUDEV;REEL/FRAME:020101/0549

Effective date: 20040301

AS Assignment

Owner name: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026072/0353

Effective date: 20110318

Owner name: WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, AS AGENT, CALIFO

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026072/0353

Effective date: 20110318

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC;REEL/FRAME:026468/0119

Effective date: 20100205

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026740/0676

Effective date: 20110524

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC, ARIZONA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC;REEL/FRAME:026740/0676

Effective date: 20110524

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:029529/0812

Effective date: 20121221

AS Assignment

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, NEW YORK

Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029556/0809

Effective date: 20121221

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, NEW YORK

Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:029556/0697

Effective date: 20121221

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:RP CROWN PARENT, LLC;RP CROWN HOLDING LLC;JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:040326/0449

Effective date: 20161012

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0697;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:040337/0053

Effective date: 20161012

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL/FRAME NO. 29556/0809;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:040337/0356

Effective date: 20161012

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, IL

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:RP CROWN PARENT, LLC;RP CROWN HOLDING LLC;JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:040326/0449

Effective date: 20161012

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026468 FRAME 0199. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME FROM I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC. TO JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;ASSIGNOR:I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:055136/0623

Effective date: 20100205

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE CONVEYING AND RECEIVING PARTIES TO INCLUDE A PERIOD AFTER THE TERM INC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 026740 FRAME: 0676. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:055257/0747

Effective date: 20110524

AS Assignment

Owner name: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REEL 026468 FRAME NUMBER FROM 0199 TO 0119 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 055136 FRAME 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.;REEL/FRAME:056813/0110

Effective date: 20100205

AS Assignment

Owner name: BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: BY BOND FINANCE, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION, ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC, ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC, ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: BLUE YONDER, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916

Owner name: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC., ARIZONA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:057724/0593

Effective date: 20210916