US20070223733A1 - Ambient Noise Sound Level Compensation - Google Patents
Ambient Noise Sound Level Compensation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070223733A1 US20070223733A1 US11/757,798 US75779807A US2007223733A1 US 20070223733 A1 US20070223733 A1 US 20070223733A1 US 75779807 A US75779807 A US 75779807A US 2007223733 A1 US2007223733 A1 US 2007223733A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- listening area
- noise
- level
- listening
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 claims 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000011312 Silene vulgaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000000022 Silene vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
- H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
- H04S7/301—Automatic calibration of stereophonic sound system, e.g. with test microphone
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03G—CONTROL OF AMPLIFICATION
- H03G3/00—Gain control in amplifiers or frequency changers
- H03G3/20—Automatic control
- H03G3/30—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices
- H03G3/32—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices the control being dependent upon ambient noise level or sound level
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R29/00—Monitoring arrangements; Testing arrangements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R29/00—Monitoring arrangements; Testing arrangements
- H04R29/007—Monitoring arrangements; Testing arrangements for public address systems
Definitions
- the invention generally relates to sound processing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to sound processing systems that adjust the sound output of the system based on the noise level in a listening area.
- Listening environments tend to have some amount of background or ambient noise. This noise is a challenge to sound-system designers, especially when the background or ambient noise is large or has a time-varying intensity.
- a sound system designer generally tries to play sound—such as music or voice—with enough volume that the sound being played can be heard over the background or ambient noise.
- the sound being played may come from a live or recorded audio source signal.
- This source signal may be a digital or analog electronic representation of the sound desired for a listening area.
- the source signal needs to be generated with enough strength that the resulting sound is audible over the background or ambient noise.
- sound-system designers may measure the background or ambient noise in a listening area and adjust the sound level of the source signal accordingly.
- a pre-performance calibration lets technicians select a strength for a source signal, so that the broadcast sound has an adequate volume for the acoustic properties and the noise in a particular listening area.
- this solution may be insufficient when the noise in a listening area varies over time.
- the noise level can vary over time due to a variety of independently changing factors, such as the presence of people in the listening area, the foot traffic of people in the listening area, the number of the conversations of the people, the volume of the conversations, and the operation of machinery such as air handling units and the like. If the listening area is an outdoor location, there are additional factors that contribute to the time-varying noise, such as rain, wind, and nearby vehicular traffic.
- variable noise sources such as the operation of an air handling unit, vehicle noise, and the like.
- the variable noise sources can cycle between louder and softer noise levels during operation, increasing and decreasing the noise in the listening area.
- the noise measured during a pre-performance calibration might therefore not be a good representation of the ambient or background noise that occurs during a performance.
- a one-time calibration is not a full solution to the challenge of time-varying ambient noise.
- a better approach is to use real-time measurements of the noise, with ongoing adjustments of the source signal's strength.
- the level of the source signal (which may be the source signal's amplitude or intensity or power) may then be increased in response to an increase in the noise and decreased in response to a decrease in the noise.
- This solution involves determining the level of ambient noise while the source signal is being played—for example, measuring the volume of crowd noise, weather, and machinery while a concert or other event is being performed—and adjusting the source signal's level as that ambient noise changes. This approach involves some additional challenges.
- a microphone may be used in the listening area to monitor the ambient sound, which is a combination of the desired sound and the ambient or background noise in the listening area.
- This combination of monitored sounds may be represented as a microphone signal, which may be understood as a combination of the source signal and the received noise.
- the microphone signal is a valuable tool for monitoring the listening area and providing feedback on the sounds being experienced in the listening area.
- Existing systems may fail to take account of the fact that by monitoring the listening area, a measurement microphone hears the extraneous noise as well as the desired sounds. Thus, these systems may essentially attenuate the sound being played in response to itself which is not a desired solution.
- Another technique for estimating the received noise is to subtract a scaled r.m.s. level of the source signal from the microphone signal.
- One of the main shortcomings of this approach is that it operates on the full audio band signal received at the microphone such that the r.m.s. value determined can be affected by the frequency response from loudspeakers to microphone. The potential error in the r.m.s. computation from this mechanism can exceed the level difference caused by extraneous noise sources in the room.
- Another technique for estimating the received extraneous noise subtracts the source signal from the received microphone signal in the time domain.
- the technique measures the frequency response (or transfer function) from loudspeaker(s) to microphone and applies a complex frequency correction equalizer created in the digital domain as a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR) and applies time delay to the source signal in an attempt to make both signal equivalent in the absence of extraneous noise.
- FIR Finite Impulse Response filter
- the time delay for a signal to go from the source, such as a speaker or system of speakers, to the measurement microphone is affected by factors such as the number and type of loudspeakers used in a sound system, placement of the loudspeakers, proximity of the loudspeakers to the measurement microphone, reverberant standing waves, and multiple signals arriving at the measurement microphone due to signal reflections, signal echoes, and multiple signals due to multiple loudspeakers.
- These delay factors result in a variety of delays known as time smear. Because of the variety of factors that contribute to these delays, a real-time time-domain approach may be of limited reliability for comparing a microphone signal to a source signal.
- Yet another existing approach uses a fast Fourier transform to determine the level of noise present in a microphone signal. This approach is relatively complex, and involves a processing-intensive complete Fourier decomposition of the entire microphone signal.
- An ambient noise compensation system determines an ambient noise level of a listening area.
- the ambient noise level may be calculated from the differences between a desired audio signal in the listening area, a measured background noise level in the listening area, and measured acoustic characteristics of the listening area. Based on the ambient noise level, the system adjusts a level of the desired audio signal so that it is audible over undesirable noise.
- FIG. 1 depicts an environment in which compensation may be used to address background noise and time-varying ambient noise.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart outlining an example of a method for compensating for noise in a listening area.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the initial calibration phase from the flowchart of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the operation phase from the flowchart of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram exemplifying a system to compensate for ambient noise levels.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an implementation of the system from FIG. 5 .
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a logarithmic level estimator usable in blocks 628 and 638 from FIG. 6 .
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an ambient noise compensator usable in block 614 from FIG. 6 .
- This disclosure presents methods and systems for controlling the level of a desired sound signal to compensate for noise in a listening area.
- the methods and systems measure the level of a monitoring signal, such as a microphone signal, that is a combination of a desired source sound and undesired noise, and then calculate a noise level by subtracting a source signal level from the microphone signal level.
- the analyses may be performed separately for separate frequency bands. The separate frequency bands may be analyzed in parallel or sequentially.
- FIG. 1 depicts an environment in which an audio system projects sound waves that need to be audible over undesired environmental noise.
- a listening area 101 is shown as a space into which sound may be projected through speakers 130 for the benefit of an audience.
- the sound being projected is generated by an audio source 114 , represented in the figure as an audio amplifier.
- Other possible sources 114 include a variety of audio equipment, including CD players, public address systems, digital audio equipment, specialized electronics for concert acoustics, and other sources.
- the audio source 114 receives a live voice signal 112 via a cable from a source microphone 110 .
- other source detectors are possible, such as piezoelectric transducers.
- the audio source 114 generates a source signal 118 and transmits the source signal 118 to a noise compensation unit 120 .
- the noise compensation unit 120 modifies the source signal II 8 , as discussed below, to generate an output signal 125 .
- the output signal 125 is then provided, for example via additional amplifiers (not shown), to the speakers 130 , and is projected as speaker sound waves 135 into the listening area 101 .
- the noise compensation unit 120 adjusts the output signal 125 as needed to ensure that the speaker sound waves 135 are audible over any undesirable noise present in the listening area 101 .
- the noise compensation unit 120 may maintain the played sound at a level greater than the noise level in the listening area 101 . Additionally, for the comfort of people in the listening area, the noise compensation unit 120 may be designed to ensure that the sound being played does not exceed some pre-determined maximum level.
- the noise compensation unit 120 receives information about the noise level in the listening area 101 . Such information may be obtained by a microphone 150 located at or near the listening area 101 , and may be provided to the noise compensation unit 120 through a microphone signal 155 .
- One or more microphones 150 may be used, and their placement may be selected to detect sounds that would be heard by an intended audience. These sounds include the speaker sound waves 135 that are generated by the speakers 130 , and which project the desired sounds from the source signal 118 . However, the sounds heard by the intended audience and by microphone 150 also include undesired noise of various types.
- the noise in the listening area 101 may be categorized as a combination of a background noise 165 , which tends to persists at a roughly constant level over time, plus an ambient noise 145 , which is an additional noise with a sound level that varies over time.
- the noise detected by microphone 150 generally includes both background noise 165 , typically generated by background noise sources 160 , and time-varying ambient noise 145 , typically generated by ambient noise sources 140 .
- the background noise sources 160 are represented in the figure by a power generation unit. These sources 160 operate continuously and may not be completely turned off. Other examples of background noise sources 160 include the normal air flow patterns in a building, air conditioners, heating and ventilation units, power generators, and other machinery that cannot be fully silenced.
- Noise from these sources may be especially noticeable in a closed listening area. It is expected that the background noise sources 160 can be operated at some minimum sound level during calibrations, but that this minimum sound level is likely nonzero. The background noise sources 160 thus generate some minimum background noise 165 that is directed into the listening area 101 at all times.
- the minimum-level background noise 165 may be understood as constant, in the sense that it has a substantially time-independent frequency distribution.
- the background noise 165 is the minimum distribution of noise that may be expected at any time in the listening area.
- the listening area is subject to the time-varying ambient noise 145 .
- the ambient noise 145 is depicted as crowd noise
- the ambient noise source 140 is depicted as audience members engaged in speaking, moving, and walking. This crowd noise has a time-varying sound level, getting louder and softer as the audience size swells and shrinks.
- Other sources 140 of the time-varying ambient noise 145 include weather, passing traffic, and operating machinery.
- the ambient noise sources 140 may also include the background noise sources 160 , which may be expected to occasionally generate additional noise exceeding the level of the minimum background noise 165 .
- the microphone 150 detects a superposition of sounds that includes: the speaker sound waves 135 , the minimum background noise 165 , and the time-varying ambient noise 145 .
- the microphone signal 155 generated by microphone 150 thus represents a combination of these three sounds 135 , 145 , and 165 . This combination is provided in microphone signal 155 to the noise compensation unit 120 .
- one of the initial tasks for the noise compensation unit 120 is to extract information about the time-varying ambient noise 145 from the microphone signal 155 .
- the acoustic characteristics of the listening area also affect the microphone signal 155 detected by microphone 150 and may cause it to differ from the output signal 125 that is provided to the speakers 130 .
- the listening area 101 may have a non-flat frequency response that alters the speaker sound waves 135 as they travel from speakers 130 to microphone 150 . For example, some frequency ranges may be more attenuated than others in the listening area. The variations in frequency response may arise from the material used in construction of the listening area, the architecture of the listening area, furniture, carpeting, and drapery in the listening area, and other physical properties of the listening area.
- the variations in frequency response may also be due to factors such as the number and type of loudspeakers used in a sound system, placement of the loudspeakers, proximity of the loudspeakers to the measurement microphone 150 , reverberant standing waves, and single signals arriving at the measurement microphone multiple times due to reflections, echoes, and multiple loudspeakers.
- one approach to quantifying the acoustic characteristics of the listening area is to measure an acoustic transfer function of the listening area.
- the listening area 101 may be an indoor or outdoor location.
- the source signal 118 may be any of a variety of sound signals, including single or multiple voices or instruments, as live or prerecorded signals or as combinations of these varieties of sound signals.
- the source signal 118 , the microphone signal 155 , and the output signal 125 may be communicated by signal cables, as shown, or may be transmitted wirelessly, such as through radio or infrared signals. Further, the signals 118 , 125 , and 155 may each be in analog or digital form.
- Other variations of the listening area 101 and the equipment configuration are also possible, as would be understood to one skilled in the design of audio systems.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart outlining a method for compensating for noise in a listening area, such as the listening area 101 from FIG. 1 .
- This example includes two phases: an initial calibration phase 210 and an operation phase 220 .
- the calibration phase 210 is preferably conducted under controlled conditions, preferably with no audience present, prior to the operation phase 220 .
- the calibration phase 210 gathers information about the listening area 101 and the background noise 165 in the listening area.
- the operation phase 220 occurs later, and may be the period of time when an audience is present to experience the desired sound signals in the listening area 101 .
- the information gathered during the calibration phase 210 is used later to enhance the performance during the operation phase 220 .
- the operation phase involves an ongoing or iterative compensation of the noise in the listening area 101 .
- An additional level of iteration may also be employed, as indicated by looping arrow 240 , by repeating the calibration between performances or even occasionally during performances.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the initial calibration phase 210 from the flowchart of FIG. 2 .
- This implementation depicts the calibration phase as having several components, numbered here as blocks 305 , 307 , 308 , 310 , 320 , 330 , 340 , and 350 .
- the a listening area is prepared by controlling the sources of noise so that undesired noise is reduced to a minimum, preferably as close to silent as possible.
- the only sound present is a background noise, In the context of the illustration in FIG. 1 , this background is the background noise 165 discussed above.
- the calibration phase may be performed late at night, when passing traffic noise is largely absent, with the hall and surroundings largely vacant of audience and personnel, with any non-essential machinery in the vicinity turned off, and with any essential machinery operating in a way that generates a minimum level of noise.
- the only unintended sounds present during the calibration phase 210 are preferably those sounds that cannot be silenced, and which may thus be expected to persist in the background even during the subsequent operation phase.
- the background noise in the listening area is then detected by microphone 150 and conveyed via the microphone signal 155 to the noise compensation unit 120 .
- the microphone signal is analyzed to determine the level of the background noise. This level is considered an offset that indicates the amount of background noise in the listening area. This analysis may be done for each of several frequency bands, and a set of offsets—one for each frequency band—may be measured. These offsets may be used later to analyze sounds detected in the listening area during the operation phase 220 .
- a pink-noise test signal is projected into the listening area.
- This pink noise test signal may span a range of about 20 Hz to 20 kHz.
- Other test signals may be used, such as a series or combination of discrete tones, or a spectrum of white noise.
- the test signal is provided to the noise compensation unit 120 as source signal 118 .
- Speakers 130 project the test signal into the listening area 101 .
- the test signal is then detected by microphone 150 and a detected version of the test signal is returned in the microphone signal 155 to the noise compensation unit 120 .
- the known, original test signal may be used as the source signal 118 , and the detected test signal may be received as the microphone signal 155 .
- the test signal Before being detected by the microphone, the test signal is naturally modified in the listening area by the acoustic properties of the listening area. These acoustic properties are generally frequency-dependent, as noted above. Thus, different frequency bands of the test signal may experience different modifications. For example, some frequency ranges may be more attenuated than others in the listening area. Additional differences between the original and perceived test signal may also arise from imperfections in construction or placement of the transmitting equipment, such as speakers 130 from FIG. 1 . Still further, the perceived test signal may be different from the original test signal because of any background noise present in the listening area.
- Block 320 shows detection of the perceived test signal as a microphone signal, such as the microphone signal 155 from FIG. 1 .
- the microphone signal includes all the differences from the original test signal.
- the microphone signal detected in block 320 includes background noise in the listening area. Additionally, the microphone signal detected in block 320 also includes the originally projected test signal, plus any modifications arising from the acoustic properties of the listening area.
- the microphone signal is compared with the original test signal and with the background-noise offsets (measured in blocks 307 and 308 ) to determine the differences between the original test signal and the microphone signal. This comparison may be done separately for each frequency band in a set of frequency bands that span the audible spectrum.
- Block 340 depicts the calculation of relative gain factors that help characterize the listening area.
- the gain factors and the background-noise offsets relate the detected test signal to the original test signal.
- the gain factors may be calculated for a set of frequency bands. The gains may be used later to analyze sounds detected in the listening area during the operation phase 220 .
- the overall calibration phase 210 may be implemented to measure calibration information—such as the gain factors and offsets—in such a way that the original test signal can be substantially recovered when the calibration information is applied to the perceived test signal.
- calibration information such as the gain factors and offsets—in such a way that the original test signal can be substantially recovered when the calibration information is applied to the perceived test signal.
- the offsets for the various frequency bands indicate the background noise in the listening area.
- the gain factors for the various frequency bands are determined so that they represent an acoustic transfer function of the listening area.
- Other information may be obtained instead of or in addition to the gain and offset information. For example, phase-shift information, echo and reverberation information, and nonlinear differences between the original and perceived test signal may also be recorded.
- the gain factors, offsets, and any other calibration results may be stored in block 350 for later use during the operation phase.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the operation phase 220 from the flowchart of FIG. 2 .
- This implementation depicts the operation phase 220 as having several components, numbered here as blocks 410 , 420 , 430 , 440 , 450 , and 460 .
- a desired sound signal such as a music or voice signal
- the desired sound signal is provided to the noise compensation unit 120 as the source signal 118 , and speakers 130 project the desired sound signal into the listening area 101 .
- the sound in the listening area is detected as the microphone signal in block 420 .
- the sound in the listening area is more than the desired sound projected into the listening area in block 410 .
- the sound in the listening area includes any modifications arising from the acoustic response of the listening area (which may have been measured previously in the calibration phase 240 ).
- the detected sound also includes the background noise in the listening area (which also may have been measured previously in the calibration phase 240 ). Further, the detected sound includes any ambient noise in addition to the background noise.
- the microphone signal differs from the original desired sound signal.
- the microphone signal detected during operation (in block 420 ) resembles the microphone signal detected during calibration (in block 320 ). Both signals may include the sound projected into the listening area, modifications arising from the acoustic response of the listening area, and background noise in the listening area, However, unlike the microphone signal detected during calibration, the microphone signal detected during operation may also include the ambient noise in the listening area.
- Block 430 depicts the processing of the microphone signal to account for the previously measured acoustic properties of the listening area and for the previously measured background noise.
- the power of the microphone signal may be calculated in each frequency band. These calculated powers are scaled according to previously stored gain factors and reduced by previously stored offsets.
- the resulting frequency distribution is compared to the frequency distribution of the original sound signal. Any difference between these distributions may be attributed to ambient noise, which was not present during the calibration phase. The differences are then summed over all frequency bands in block 450 to generate a measurement of the ambient noise. This measurement may then be used as a control signal to adjust the volume of the desired sound signal, as shown in block 460 . As indicated by the looping arrow 230 , the adjustment in block 460 may understood as a feedback control (or as an iterative adjustment), since this adjustment affects the desired sound signal being projected in block 410 . With appropriate adjustments, the volume of the desired sound signal may be adjusted to compensate for changes over time in the ambient noise.
- FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram exemplifying a system 500 to compensate for ambient noise levels.
- the system 500 has two inputs and one output, and may be configured into a portable device, such as the noise compensation unit 120 shown in the listening area 101 from FIG. 1 .
- the system 500 includes a source input 502 , a microphone input 512 , and a sound output 506 .
- Other components of the system 500 include a variable amplifier 504 , a source sound processor 508 , an area sound processor 518 with a memory 520 , a comparison circuit 510 , and an ambient noise compensator 514 .
- the variable amplifier 504 connects the source input 502 to the sound output 506 , and is further connected to the source sound processor 508 .
- the area sound processor 518 is connected to the microphone input 512 .
- the ambient noise compensator 514 receives signals from the comparison circuit 510 , which in turn is connected to the source sound and area sound processors 508 and 518 .
- the ambient noise compensator 514 adjusts the sound level at the sound output 506 through a connection to the variable amplifier 504 .
- the source input 502 provides an audio input signal 552 , such as the source signal 118 from FIG. 1 .
- the source input 502 may be adjustable to provide a minimum signal level for the audio input signal 552 .
- the audio input signal 552 is then provided to variable amplifier 504 .
- Variable amplifier 504 is configured to modify the audio input signal 552 in response to ambient noise in a listening area, as described below.
- the resulting audio output signal 554 is provided from the variable amplifier 504 to the sound output 506 .
- the sound output 506 may be an interface that provides an audio signal, such as the output signal 125 shown in FIG. 1 , to loudspeakers in a listening area.
- the audio output signal 554 is also provided to the source sound processor 508 , which calculates a source level signal 558 from the audio output signal 554 .
- the source level signal 558 contains information on the sound level of the audio output signal 554 .
- the source level signal 558 may be a collection of audio output signal levels that describe the power spectrum of the audio output signal 554 .
- the source level signal 558 may be a single-valued signal that scales linearly or logarithmically with the instantaneous power of the audio output signal 554 .
- Other representations may also be used in the source level signal 558 .
- the source level signal 558 effectively represents the sound level of the output signal 125 projected into the listening area.
- this signal 125 may be produced by the sound output 506 from the audio output signal 554 .
- the microphone input 512 provides an microphone input signal 562 , such as the microphone signal 155 shown in FIG. 1 .
- the microphone input signal 562 may be a combination of the desired source sound and the undesired background and ambient noise in a listening area.
- the microphone input 512 may be adjustable to provide a minimum signal level for the microphone input signal 562 . From the microphone input 512 , the microphone input signal 562 is provided to the area sound processor 518 .
- the area sound processor 518 calculates a microphone level signal 568 from the microphone input signal 562 and from calibration information stored in the memory 520 .
- This calibration information may describe acoustic characteristics of the listening area, such as an acoustic transfer function of the listening area.
- the calibration information may also describe persistent background noise in the listening area.
- the area sound processor 518 may account for the effects of the listening area's transfer function and background noise. For example, the area sound processor 518 may calculate a power spectrum of the microphone input signal 562 , then (1) scale the resulting power spectrum as needed to undo the pre-measured transfer function of the listening area, and (2) subtract a pre-measured power spectrum of the background noise. The source level signal 518 may then be a collection of ambient sound signal levels that describe the power spectrum of the microphone input signal 562 , but with the effects of the listening area's transfer function and background noise removed.
- the microphone input signal 562 represents (a) the output signal 125 projected into the listening area, as modified by (b) the transfer function of the listening area 101 , and combined with (c) any constant level background noise 165 and (d) any time-varying ambient noise 145 .
- the microphone level signal 568 effectively represents the sound level of only: (a) the audio signal 125 and (d) any time-varying ambient noise 145 .
- the effects of (b) the transfer function of the listening area 101 and (c) the background noise 165 are removed by the area sound processor 518 .
- the source level signal 558 represents the sound level of (a) the output signal 125 .
- any differences between the source level signal 558 and the microphone level signal 568 may be seen as an indicator of only (d) the ambient noise 145 .
- the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 are provided to the comparison circuit 510 , which calculates an ambient noise level signal 560 from the differences between these signals 558 and 568 .
- the ambient noise level signal 560 may be the difference in sound levels (dB) between the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 . This difference in sound levels may be used as a measurement of the ambient noise (in dB) present in the microphone signal 562 .
- the comparison circuit 510 operates on the foregoing observation that differences between these signals 558 and 568 represents ambient noise that is neither desired sound (represented in source level signal 558 ) nor background noise (represented by measurements stored in memory 520 ) nor an effect of the listening area's transfer function (also stored in memory 520 ).
- the ambient noise level signal 560 thus contains information on the level of ambient noise in the microphone input signal 562 .
- the ambient noise compensator 514 receives the ambient noise level signal 560 from the comparison circuit 510 and calculates a compensation signal 564 in response.
- the compensation signal 564 is sent back to the variable amplifier 504 to adjust the level of the audio output signal 554 in response to ambient noise.
- ambient noise compensator 514 increases the audio output signal 554 up to a maximum level, and as the noise in a listening area decreases, the ambient noise compensator 514 decreases audio output signal 554 down to a minimum level.
- the ambient noise compensator 514 may generate the compensation signal 564 in such a way as to ensure that the audio output signal 554 has a sound level that is higher than the ambient noise, but which is not higher than a predetermined limit.
- This calculation may use two user-defined control parameters.
- the first control parameter called the sensitivity
- the second control parameter called the max boost
- the variable amplifier 504 amplifies the audio output signal 554 to achieve the desired sensitivity, while limiting the amplification as prescribed by the max boost.
- this calibration information may be obtained during a pre-performance calibration, such in blocks 308 and 340 of the procedure from FIG. 3 .
- the system 500 may be configured to measure the calibration information during the calibration procedure. For example, a known test signal may be applied at the source input 502 .
- the calibration information may then be iteratively selected by area sound processor 520 and comparison circuit 510 so that the microphone level signal 568 is brought to match band-by-band with the source level signal 558 .
- FIG. 6 is a more detailed block diagram of a particular implementation 600 of the system from FIG. 5 .
- the implementation 600 includes a source input stage 602 , a microphone input stage 612 , and a crossover circuit 606 , which implement the source input 502 , the microphone input 512 , and the sound output 506 , respectively, from FIG. 5 .
- a stereo voltage controlled amplifier (VCA) 604 and a makeup gain amplifier 605 serve as interconnected components of the variable amplifier 504 .
- a filter bank 620 , a running-average block 622 , and a logarithm block 628 may be connected in series, and serve as components of the source sound processor 508 .
- the area sound processor 518 may be similarly implemented by another filter bank 630 , running-average block 632 , and logarithm block 638 , along with a background removal stage 634 , and a gain stage 636 . These subcomponents may also be connected in series, starting with the filter bank 630 , then the running-average block 632 , the background removal stage 634 , the gain stage 636 , and finally the logarithm block 638 .
- the memory 520 from FIG. 5 may be coupled to the gain stage 636 and to the background removal stage 634 .
- the comparison circuit 510 from FIG. 5 is present in the implementation 600 as a difference block 640 , a band scaling block 642 , and a summer 644 connected in series.
- the ambient noise compensator 514 from FIG. 5 is presented in the implementation 600 as an ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- Implementation 600 also includes a mono RMS detector 626 , coupled to the makeup gain amplifier 605 , to the microphone input stage 612 , and to the ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- implementation 600 may be realized as a combination of software and hardware, such as with an appropriate set of computer instructions running on a digital signal processor.
- Another realization of implementation 600 uses a variety of interacting digital circuits to form the various blocks. These realizations of implementation 600 are “digital,” in the sense that all of the components are programmed or hard-wired logic elements, and all of the signals are digital signals or digital information.
- implementation 600 may also be realized with discrete components that communicate with each other using voltage signals. This alternative realization is considered “analog,” in the sense that all of the signals are voltages that represent scalar values.
- implementation 600 may be created from a combination of analog and digital components, so that some of the various signals communicated among the blocks are digital signals, and some of the signals are analog signals.
- all-analog, all-digital, or combinations of signals will vary according to a designer's particular needs, taking into account specific factors such as availability and costs of components, manufacturing costs, power consumption, performance requirements, tolerances, interfaces with external circuitry, and other factors known to the particular designer.
- the implementation 600 is illustrated as being configured into the noise compensation unit 120 from FIG. 1 .
- the source input stage 602 is shown as receiving the source signal 118 .
- the microphone input stage 612 is shown as receiving the microphone signal 155 .
- the crossover circuit 606 is shown as producing the output signal 125 . It is noted that the implementation 600 may be used in a variety of other settings, depending on the needs of a particular situation, and that other signals may accordingly be provided to and generated by the source input stage 602 , the microphone input stage 612 , and the crossover circuit 606 .
- the source input stage 602 generates the audio input signal 552 from the source signal 118 .
- audio input signal 552 is a stereophonic audio signal from any of a variety of sources such as, for example, the playback of an audio recording, or an audio signal from a live performance, or a combination of live and pre-recorded signals.
- the source input stage 602 may receive a user-controlled input (not shown) to adjust the minimum signal level when the system 600 is used with different audio sources.
- the audio input signal 552 is sent through the stereo VCA 604 , and from there to the makeup gain amplifier 605 , both of which are further described below. These components 604 and 605 adjust the level of the audio input signal 552 to create the audio output signal 554 .
- the audio output signal 554 is provided to the crossover circuit 606 , which sends the output source signal to a plurality of loudspeakers in the area as the output signal 125 .
- the output signal 125 is depicted as a set of four signals L, R, M, and S, which represent separate signals for left, right, mono, and subwoofer speakers.
- the mono RMS detector 626 receives the audio output signal 554 from the makeup gain amplifier 605 , and calculates a monophonic sound level 676 of the audio output signal 554 .
- the monophonic sound level 676 is used to determine a base level for comparisons in subsequent signal processing, as noted below.
- the audio output signal 554 is then passed through the filter bank 620 , where the audio output signal 554 is split into a plurality of separate frequency bands by a plurality of bandpass filters.
- Each bandpass filter allows signals in a certain desired frequency range to pass through, and attenuates signals outside the desired frequency range.
- the number and frequency range of the band pass filters in the filter bank 620 may cover some or all of the frequencies in the audible acoustic range, which is generally considered to span from about 20 Hz to about 20 kHz.
- the filter bank 620 uses eight band pass filters to split audio output signal 554 into eight band signals, each of which have separate frequency ranges. These separate ranges are bands from about 100 Hz to about 145 Hz, from about 145 Hz to about 211 Hz, from about 211 Hz to about 307 Hz, from about 307 Hz to about 447 Hz, from about 447 Hz to about 650 Hz, from about 650 Hz to about 944 Hz, from about 944 Hz to about 1372 Hz, and from about 1372 Hz to about 2000 Hz. Fewer filters may be used to save costs such as fabrication and processing power. Alternatively, more filters may be used to enhance the discrimination ability of the system.
- the resulting band-limited signals may be sent to the running-average block 622 , which calculates a running average of the absolute value for each band signal.
- the band-limited signals are each smoothed by an appropriate time constant, analogous to an RC time constant in a rectified RC filter. Depending on the design of other aspects of the system, this time constant may reflect a short integration, in the range of 0.25 seconds to 2 seconds, or a long integration, in the range of approximately 30 seconds.
- the running-average block 622 may be designed to first identify the peak levels of the band-limited signals in each of a series of short (0.5 to 1 sec) windows, and then calculate the running average of these peak values, thereby increasing the system's sensitivity to periodic bursty sound, such as a series of drumbeats or cowbell hits.
- Other approaches are also envisioned for the running-average block 622 , so that the outputs of the block 622 indicate a long-term average of the power in each frequency band.
- the outputs of the running-average block 622 may pass through the logarithm block 628 , which converts the power approximations from running-average block 622 into logarithmic representations of source signal levels. These logarithmic representations are the source level signal 558 , and are provided to the difference block 640 . In the difference block 640 , each individual logarithmic signal from the source level signal 558 may be compared with a corresponding signal derived from the microphone input signal 562 .
- the microphone input signal 562 is also processed by blocks 630 , 632 , 634 , 636 , and 638 . These blocks generate the microphone level signal 568 from the microphone input signal 562 .
- the microphone input stage 612 receives the microphone signal 155 and generates the microphone input signal 562 in response.
- the microphone input stage 612 may receive a user-controlled input (not shown) to adjust the minimum signal level of the microphone input signal 562 as needed when different types of microphone signals are used.
- the source input stage 612 may also normalize the microphone input signal 562 according to the monophonic sound level 676 , so that components of microphone input signal 562 may be properly compared against components of the audio output signal 554 . Alternatively, this normalization may be performed at a later stage in the signal processing, such as, for example, in the difference block 640 , or in ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- the microphone input signal 562 may be sent to the filter bank 630 .
- a set of bandpass filters in the filter bank 630 split the microphone input signal 562 into a set of frequency-band signals.
- the number and frequency ranges of the bandpass filters in the filter bank 630 for the microphone signal match the number and frequency ranges of the bandpass filters in the filter bank 620 for the source signal, discussed above.
- the filter bank 630 in implementation 600 uses eight bandpass filters to generate eight band-limited signals.
- the bandpass filters in filter bank 630 have band ranges from about 100 Hz to about 145 Hz, from about 145 Hz to about 211 Hz, from about 211 Hz to about 307 Hz, from about 307 Hz to about 447 Hz, from about 447 Hz to about 650 Hz, from about 650 Hz to about 944 Hz, from about 944 Hz to about 1372 Hz, and from about 1372 Hz to about 2000 Hz.
- the resulting band-limited signals may be provided from the filter bank 630 to the running-average block 632 , which calculates a running average of the absolute value for each band-limited signal.
- the band-limited signals are each smoothed by an appropriate time constant, analogous to an RC time constant in a rectified RC filter.
- an appropriate time constant analogous to an RC time constant in a rectified RC filter.
- various implementations of the running-average block 632 are envisioned.
- the outputs of the running-average block 632 may approximate a tong-term average of the power in each frequency band.
- the outputs of the running-average block 622 may then be processed in the background removal stage 634 and the gain stage 636 .
- the outputs of the running-average block 632 may be adjusted with separate offsets for each frequency band.
- the offsets may be determined during the calibration procedure (such as in the block 308 of FIG. 3 ) and then stored in the memory 520 .
- the background removal stage 634 recalls the offsets from the memory 520 and reduces the microphone signal levels for each frequency band according to the offsets.
- the outputs of the background removal stage 634 are provided to the gain stage 636 .
- the outputs of the running-average block 632 may be further adjusted individually with separate gain factors for each frequency band.
- the gain factors may be determined during a calibration procedure (such as the block 340 of FIG. 3 ) and then stored in the memory 520 . During operation, the gain stage 636 recalls the gain factors from the memory 520 and scales the microphone signal levels for each frequency band according to the gain factors.
- the outputs of the gain stage 636 may be converted in the logarithm block 638 into logarithmic representations of microphone signal levels. These logarithmic representations are the microphone level signal 568 , and may be provided to the difference block 640 .
- the difference block 640 receives the eight frequency-band components of the logarithmic source level signal 558 , and also receives the eight frequency-band components of the logarithmic microphone level signal 568 . The difference block 640 then compares the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 band-by-band, calculating the difference between the logarithmic levels for each of the eight frequency bands. These differences are output from the difference block 640 as a set of difference signals 690 , including one difference signal for each of the frequency bands.
- the difference signals 690 are the measurement of interest during a calibration such as the calibration phase 210 of FIG. 2 .
- the offsets in background removal stage 634 and the gains in gain stage 636 are selected so that the difference signals 690 are driven substantially to zero.
- the selection of gains may be achieved by an iterative procedure or by a direct computation, or by a combination of iterations and computations. Nullifying these differences means that the gains and offsets are selected so that the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 match each other in each frequency band during the calibration procedure.
- the microphone level signals 558 are modified by driving the difference between each band's microphone level source level to zero.
- the background removal stage 634 has been calibrated to remove the effects of constant-level background noise that are present in the microphone input signal 562 .
- the gain stage 636 has been calibrated to remove the effects of the room having a non-flat frequency response.
- the offsets are loaded from memory 520 into the background removal stage 634 and the gains are loaded from memory 520 into the gain stage 636 .
- the background removal stage 634 and the gain stage 636 then modify the microphone input signal 562 by removing the effects of constant-level background noise and the effects of the room having a non-flat frequency response.
- any differences between the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 may be attributed to time-varying ambient noise. This is expected because the ambient noise is the only component of the microphone input signal 562 that cannot be anticipated by any combination of the offsets in background removal stage 634 , the gains in the gain stage 636 , and the source level signal 558 .
- the difference signals 690 generated by the difference stage 640 are indicators of ambient noise in each of the frequency bands.
- the summer 644 receives these difference signals 690 and arithmetically adds the difference signals 690 together to generate the ambient noise level signal 560 .
- the summer 644 also may combine the difference signals 690 according to other protocols to generate the ambient noise level signal 560 .
- the summer 644 may be configured to exponentiate the individual difference signals 690 , arithmetically add the exponentials together, and then calculate a logarithm of the sum to generate the ambient noise level signal 560 .
- the ambient noise level signal indicates the amount of ambient noise in a listening area.
- One measure for indicating this noise is as a signal to noise ratio that indicates (in dB) the amount of ambient noise present, relative to the amount of desired sound.
- Other useful measures of indicating the ambient noise may also be used for the ambient noise level signal 560 .
- band scaling block 642 Prior to being added together in the summer 644 , the difference signals 690 may be processed in band scaling block 642 .
- Band scaling block 642 may have a configuration similar to that of gain stage 636 . This block 642 applies individual scaling factors to each of the difference signals 690 . Unlike the calibrated gains used in gain stage 636 , the scaling factors in band scaling block 642 may be user-specified parameters and may be adjusted during operation or derived from additional calibration tests. Alternatively, the scaling factors may be factory-preset constants.
- the scaling factors in band scaling block 642 reflect the different weights that should be accorded to ambient noise in the various frequency bands.
- the band scaling block 642 allows for variations in the significance of the noise signal in the frequency bands. This feature allows the system to boost the source signal more in response to some types of noise than others. For example, a user may recognize that a substantial amount of ambient noise appears in bursts in the 944 Hz to 1372 Hz frequency band from the clatter of cutlery in a particular listening area. If the user wishes for the system to ignore these temporary bursts of ambient noise, she may decide to reduce the weight given to the component for this frequency band in difference signal 690 .
- band scaling block 642 By adjusting the corresponding scaling factor in band scaling block 642 to a low setting, the user can prevent the cutlery noise from contributing to the ambient noise level signal 560 . To exclude other sources of ambient—but unimportant—noise, other scaling factors in band scaling block 642 can be similarly adjusted.
- the ambient noise level signal 560 is sent from the summer 644 to the ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 uses the ambient noise level signal 560 to calculate the compensation signal 564 .
- the compensation signal 564 is the signal sent to the stereo VCA 604 to keep the audio output signal 554 at a desired level above the ambient noise.
- the desired margin may be indicated by a sensitivity 648 , which is a user parameter provided to the ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- the compensation signal 564 may also be tailored to prevent the audio output signal 554 from increasing beyond a certain level. This maximum level is set by the max boost 646 , which is another user parameter provided to the ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- the sensitivity 648 may be user adjustable.
- the sensitivity 648 may be set to keep the source signal six decibels above the ambient noise in a listening area.
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 then examines the ambient noise level signal 560 and gives the compensation signal 564 an appropriate value so that in the listening area the desired sound is effectively 6 dB greater in volume than the ambient noise, but not greater in volume than whatever value is specified by the max boost 646 .
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 may also receive the monophonic sound level 676 from ambient noise compensation block 614 . Using this signal 676 , the ambient noise compensation block 614 may monitor the net level of the audio output signal 554 . If the monophonic sound level 676 decreases below a threshold level or disappears, as sometimes happens between songs or during a pause in a speech, the ambient noise compensation block 614 may refrain from adjustments of the source signal level until the monophonic sound level 676 again increases above a desired threshold level.
- the compensation signal 564 is an attenuation signal that reduces the level of the signal generated by stereo VCA 604 .
- Stereo VCA 604 then provides only attenuation to the audio input signal 552 .
- the output of stereo VCA 604 is then provided to the makeup gain amplifier 605 , which provides a constant amount of amplification, as determined by a makeup gain signal 664 .
- This arrangement of the stereo VCA 604 and the makeup gain amplifier 605 ensures that the audio output signal 554 never exceeds a level determined by the makeup gain signal 664 , which is fixed by the user-controlled max boost setting 646 .
- the makeup gain signal 664 is generated by the ambient noise compensation block 614 .
- the value of the makeup gain signal 664 may be determined solely by the max boost setting 646 .
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 gives the makeup gain signal 664 an appropriate value so that the maximum output of the makeup gain amplifier 605 is at a level corresponding to the desired max boost 646 .
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 When the listening area has no ambient noise, the ambient noise compensation block 614 generates the compensation signal 564 with a value for full attenuation, and the stereo VCA 604 applies this large attenuation. Conversely, when the listening area has a very large amount of ambient noise, the compensation signal 564 has a value for little or no attenuation, and the stereo VCA 604 applies little or no attenuation.
- the makeup gain signal 664 is configured so that when an unattenuated output from the stereo VCA 604 is amplified by the makeup gain amplifier 605 , the resulting signal has the level specified by the max boost 646 . This final signal is the audio output signal 554 . This arrangement ensures that the audio output signal 554 does not exceed the prescribed max boost 646 .
- the stereo VCA 604 may be a voltage controlled amplifier that amplifies the source signal exponentially.
- the input to the stereo VCA 604 may be a logarithmic signal, such as a decibel specification or a power-of-two specification of the desired attenuation.
- One example of the makeup gain amplifier 605 may be set to any amplification value between zero and eighteen decibels. Other configurations of the stereo VCA 604 and the makeup gain amplifier 605 also may be used.
- the ambient noise compensation block 614 Based on the amount of ambient noise in the microphone input signal 562 , then, the ambient noise compensation block 614 effectively increases or decreases the audio output signal 554 to maintain the desired margin between the source signal and the ambient noise. Further, the ambient noise compensation block 614 prevents the source signal from being adjusted if the source signal decreases below a threshold or disappears altogether, and also prevents the source signal from being increased above a maximum acceptable signal level, as specified by the maximum boost setting 646 .
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a logarithmic level estimator 700 that may be used in the logarithm blocks 628 and 638 from FIG. 6 . As described above, these blocks 628 and 638 convert the power approximations from blocks 622 and 636 into logarithmic representations of source signal levels.
- an absolute value stage 702 rectifies the input 701 (which may be a source signal or a microphone signal).
- the result from the absolute value stage 702 is then sent to a logarithmic polynomial approximation stage 704 , where a polynomial equation is used to closely approximate the logarithmic value of the rectified input.
- the result from the logarithmic polynomial approximation stage 704 is sent through a low pass filter stage 706 to generate the output 707 .
- the result achieved is a good short term average approximation for the logarithmic value of the total absolute-value signal power present in the input source or microphone signal.
- the above process is performed similarly in both the source logarithm block 628 and the microphone logarithm block 638 discussed above.
- Variations on the logarithmic level estimator 700 may be made as appropriate for a particular system, in light of speed, accuracy, and processing efficiency needs. For example, instead of simply rectifying the input 701 , the absolute value stage 702 of the logarithmic level estimator 700 may square, accumulate, and then square-root the input 701 . The resulting output 707 would then be an RMS measure of short term average signal power. Further, in some variations of implementation 600 , a single logarithmic level estimator 700 may be used for both of the logarithm blocks 628 and 638 , by sharing the logarithmic level estimator 700 . This sharing may be achieved, for example, by time-division multiplexing.
- portions of the logarithmic level estimator 700 of the system implementation 600 may be combined with other operational units, such as filter banks 620 and 630 , or with running-average blocks 622 and 632 , rather than being in distinct logarithm blocks 628 and 638 .
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an ambient noise compensator 800 that may be used in block 614 from FIG. 6 .
- the input 802 to the ambient noise compensator 800 is the sum created by summer 644 from all the difference signals. This sum represents the instantaneous signal to (ambient) noise ratio in the room, such that a positive input 802 indicates additional ambient noise was measured in a microphone signal.
- the desired signal to noise ratio, or sensitivity 648 is subtracted from the input 802 . If the resulting difference 862 is non-zero, the amount of boost for the system output (such as the audio output signal 554 from FIG. 6 ) may need to change in order to achieve the desired signal to noise ratio. In this sense the difference 862 is an error signal that directs the corrective action to be taken.
- the error 862 is first integrated in time in an integration block 853 , to generate an ambient control voltage 866 .
- the error 862 may be multiplied by a small attack/release rate factor at a scaling block 806 , and the resulting scaled error 864 is added to the previous ambient control voltage, generated by a delay block 808 from the ambient control voltage 866 .
- the sum of the scaled error 864 with the previous ambient control voltage is the ambient control voltage 866 .
- the delay block 808 introduces a fixed temporal delay that depends on particular implementations and clock rates; thus the time constant of the integration block may be controlled by the attack/release rate factor at block 806 .
- This factor may be chosen so that the integration block 853 has a time constant on the order of 30 seconds. This relatively large time constant sets the response time of the system: thus, the system may respond gradually to changes in ambient noise levels over a time scale of 30 seconds. Other time constants may also be selected, such as time constants of approximately 5 sec, 10 sec, 20 sec, 45 sec, 1 min, 2 min, or 10 min.
- the ambient control voltage 866 is subtracted from a makeup gain defeat 810 .
- the makeup gain defeat 810 is a parameter that may be derived directly from the max boost 648 discussed previously with reference to FIG. 6 .
- the makeup gain defeat 810 is a control voltage used to pre-attenuate the gain that will be subsequently re-applied by the makeup gain amplifier 605 of FIG. 6 .
- the output 812 of the ambient noise compensator 800 is the result of subtracting the ambient control voltage 866 from the makeup gain defeat 810 .
- This output 812 may be used as the compensation signal 564 of FIG. 6 .
- the ambient control voltage 866 increases and removes the attenuating effect of the makeup gain defeat 810 .
- the overall gain from the stereo VCA 604 and the makeup gain amplifier 605 then increases, raising the level of the audio output signal 554 . If there is enough ambient noise in the listening area, this increase will continue until the ambient control voltage 866 has removed all of the makeup gain defeat 810 , and the overall system gain will be at the max boost setting 646 .
- the ambient control voltage 866 decreases and restores the attenuating effect of the makeup gain defeat 810 .
- the overall gain from the stereo VCA 604 and the makeup gain amplifier 605 then decreases, lowering the level of the audio output signal 554 . If there is a low enough ambient noise level in the listening area, this decrease will continue until the signal level reaches a predetermined minimum level appropriate for the listening area, which is set by source input stage 602 .
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Soundproofing, Sound Blocking, And Sound Damping (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/669,290, filed Sep. 24, 2003, which is incorporated by reference.
- The invention generally relates to sound processing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to sound processing systems that adjust the sound output of the system based on the noise level in a listening area.
- Listening environments tend to have some amount of background or ambient noise. This noise is a challenge to sound-system designers, especially when the background or ambient noise is large or has a time-varying intensity. A sound system designer generally tries to play sound—such as music or voice—with enough volume that the sound being played can be heard over the background or ambient noise. The sound being played may come from a live or recorded audio source signal. This source signal may be a digital or analog electronic representation of the sound desired for a listening area. The source signal needs to be generated with enough strength that the resulting sound is audible over the background or ambient noise. Hence, sound-system designers may measure the background or ambient noise in a listening area and adjust the sound level of the source signal accordingly.
- By determining the strength of the noise present, system designers can select an appropriate strength for the source signal, so that the sound being played has an adequate volume. This procedure may be done as part of a pre-performance calibration, such as a “sound check,” in which an audio system is empirically calibrated prior to use. A pre-performance calibration lets technicians select a strength for a source signal, so that the broadcast sound has an adequate volume for the acoustic properties and the noise in a particular listening area.
- However, this solution may be insufficient when the noise in a listening area varies over time. The noise level can vary over time due to a variety of independently changing factors, such as the presence of people in the listening area, the foot traffic of people in the listening area, the number of the conversations of the people, the volume of the conversations, and the operation of machinery such as air handling units and the like. If the listening area is an outdoor location, there are additional factors that contribute to the time-varying noise, such as rain, wind, and nearby vehicular traffic.
- Further, in some listening areas, some factors may be more pronounced than others, especially variable noise sources such as the operation of an air handling unit, vehicle noise, and the like. The variable noise sources can cycle between louder and softer noise levels during operation, increasing and decreasing the noise in the listening area. The noise measured during a pre-performance calibration might therefore not be a good representation of the ambient or background noise that occurs during a performance. Thus, although it may be helpful, a one-time calibration is not a full solution to the challenge of time-varying ambient noise.
- A better approach is to use real-time measurements of the noise, with ongoing adjustments of the source signal's strength. The level of the source signal (which may be the source signal's amplitude or intensity or power) may then be increased in response to an increase in the noise and decreased in response to a decrease in the noise. This solution involves determining the level of ambient noise while the source signal is being played—for example, measuring the volume of crowd noise, weather, and machinery while a concert or other event is being performed—and adjusting the source signal's level as that ambient noise changes. This approach involves some additional challenges.
- One challenge is to measure the sound level in the listening area and ascertain how much of that sound is noise and how much is from the source signal being projected into the listening area. A microphone may be used in the listening area to monitor the ambient sound, which is a combination of the desired sound and the ambient or background noise in the listening area. This combination of monitored sounds may be represented as a microphone signal, which may be understood as a combination of the source signal and the received noise. The microphone signal is a valuable tool for monitoring the listening area and providing feedback on the sounds being experienced in the listening area. Existing systems may fail to take account of the fact that by monitoring the listening area, a measurement microphone hears the extraneous noise as well as the desired sounds. Thus, these systems may essentially attenuate the sound being played in response to itself which is not a desired solution.
- Another technique for estimating the received noise is to subtract a scaled r.m.s. level of the source signal from the microphone signal. One of the main shortcomings of this approach is that it operates on the full audio band signal received at the microphone such that the r.m.s. value determined can be affected by the frequency response from loudspeakers to microphone. The potential error in the r.m.s. computation from this mechanism can exceed the level difference caused by extraneous noise sources in the room.
- Another technique for estimating the received extraneous noise subtracts the source signal from the received microphone signal in the time domain. The technique measures the frequency response (or transfer function) from loudspeaker(s) to microphone and applies a complex frequency correction equalizer created in the digital domain as a Finite Impulse Response filter (FIR) and applies time delay to the source signal in an attempt to make both signal equivalent in the absence of extraneous noise. Because it is based on a time-domain comparison between the source signal and the microphone signal, this approach is largely insensitive to the frequency distribution of the noise and source signals. Further, the time delay for a signal to go from the source, such as a speaker or system of speakers, to the measurement microphone, is affected by factors such as the number and type of loudspeakers used in a sound system, placement of the loudspeakers, proximity of the loudspeakers to the measurement microphone, reverberant standing waves, and multiple signals arriving at the measurement microphone due to signal reflections, signal echoes, and multiple signals due to multiple loudspeakers. These delay factors result in a variety of delays known as time smear. Because of the variety of factors that contribute to these delays, a real-time time-domain approach may be of limited reliability for comparing a microphone signal to a source signal.
- Yet another existing approach uses a fast Fourier transform to determine the level of noise present in a microphone signal. This approach is relatively complex, and involves a processing-intensive complete Fourier decomposition of the entire microphone signal.
- Other approaches are limited to special applications, such as automotive sound systems, where special knowledge of the noise may be obtained from sources other than a microphone signal. For example, in the passenger compartment of an automobile, the main sources of extraneous noise include wind, tire noise, and engine noise. The level of these noise sources can be anticipated by inputs such as vehicle speed and engine speed, and the volume of the automobile's stereo system may be automatically adjusted. These approaches are not readily adaptable to more general situations, where the main indication of background or ambient noise is a microphone signal or some other input in which noise is combined with a desired sound.
- An ambient noise compensation system determines an ambient noise level of a listening area. The ambient noise level may be calculated from the differences between a desired audio signal in the listening area, a measured background noise level in the listening area, and measured acoustic characteristics of the listening area. Based on the ambient noise level, the system adjusts a level of the desired audio signal so that it is audible over undesirable noise.
- Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
- The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
-
FIG. 1 depicts an environment in which compensation may be used to address background noise and time-varying ambient noise. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart outlining an example of a method for compensating for noise in a listening area. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of the initial calibration phase from the flowchart ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the operation phase from the flowchart ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram exemplifying a system to compensate for ambient noise levels. -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an implementation of the system fromFIG. 5 . -
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a logarithmic level estimator usable inblocks FIG. 6 . -
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of an ambient noise compensator usable inblock 614 fromFIG. 6 . - This disclosure presents methods and systems for controlling the level of a desired sound signal to compensate for noise in a listening area. The methods and systems measure the level of a monitoring signal, such as a microphone signal, that is a combination of a desired source sound and undesired noise, and then calculate a noise level by subtracting a source signal level from the microphone signal level. The analyses may be performed separately for separate frequency bands. The separate frequency bands may be analyzed in parallel or sequentially.
-
FIG. 1 depicts an environment in which an audio system projects sound waves that need to be audible over undesired environmental noise. A listeningarea 101 is shown as a space into which sound may be projected throughspeakers 130 for the benefit of an audience. The sound being projected is generated by anaudio source 114, represented in the figure as an audio amplifier. Otherpossible sources 114 include a variety of audio equipment, including CD players, public address systems, digital audio equipment, specialized electronics for concert acoustics, and other sources. In the depiction ofFIG. 1 , theaudio source 114 receives a live voice signal 112 via a cable from asource microphone 110. Of course, other source detectors are possible, such as piezoelectric transducers. Theaudio source 114 generates asource signal 118 and transmits the source signal 118 to anoise compensation unit 120. Thenoise compensation unit 120 modifies the source signal II 8, as discussed below, to generate anoutput signal 125. Theoutput signal 125 is then provided, for example via additional amplifiers (not shown), to thespeakers 130, and is projected asspeaker sound waves 135 into the listeningarea 101. - In order for the sound being played to be adequately audible, the volume generally is maintained above the noise level in the
listening area 101. However, the sound being played generally should not be much louder than necessary, and the sound should not exceed a maximum level. For the benefit of an audience hearing the sound being played in thelistening area 101, thenoise compensation unit 120 adjusts theoutput signal 125 as needed to ensure that thespeaker sound waves 135 are audible over any undesirable noise present in thelistening area 101. Thenoise compensation unit 120 may maintain the played sound at a level greater than the noise level in thelistening area 101. Additionally, for the comfort of people in the listening area, thenoise compensation unit 120 may be designed to ensure that the sound being played does not exceed some pre-determined maximum level. In order to make these adjustments, thenoise compensation unit 120 receives information about the noise level in thelistening area 101. Such information may be obtained by amicrophone 150 located at or near the listeningarea 101, and may be provided to thenoise compensation unit 120 through amicrophone signal 155. - One or
more microphones 150 may be used, and their placement may be selected to detect sounds that would be heard by an intended audience. These sounds include thespeaker sound waves 135 that are generated by thespeakers 130, and which project the desired sounds from thesource signal 118. However, the sounds heard by the intended audience and bymicrophone 150 also include undesired noise of various types. - It is helpful to recognize that the noise in the
listening area 101 may be categorized as a combination of abackground noise 165, which tends to persists at a roughly constant level over time, plus anambient noise 145, which is an additional noise with a sound level that varies over time. The noise detected bymicrophone 150 generally includes bothbackground noise 165, typically generated bybackground noise sources 160, and time-varyingambient noise 145, typically generated by ambient noise sources 140. Thebackground noise sources 160 are represented in the figure by a power generation unit. Thesesources 160 operate continuously and may not be completely turned off. Other examples ofbackground noise sources 160 include the normal air flow patterns in a building, air conditioners, heating and ventilation units, power generators, and other machinery that cannot be fully silenced. Noise from these sources may be especially noticeable in a closed listening area. It is expected that thebackground noise sources 160 can be operated at some minimum sound level during calibrations, but that this minimum sound level is likely nonzero. Thebackground noise sources 160 thus generate someminimum background noise 165 that is directed into the listeningarea 101 at all times. The minimum-level background noise 165 may be understood as constant, in the sense that it has a substantially time-independent frequency distribution. Thebackground noise 165 is the minimum distribution of noise that may be expected at any time in the listening area. - In addition to the
minimum background noise 165, the listening area is subject to the time-varyingambient noise 145. In the figure, theambient noise 145 is depicted as crowd noise, and theambient noise source 140 is depicted as audience members engaged in speaking, moving, and walking. This crowd noise has a time-varying sound level, getting louder and softer as the audience size swells and shrinks.Other sources 140 of the time-varyingambient noise 145 include weather, passing traffic, and operating machinery. Theambient noise sources 140 may also include thebackground noise sources 160, which may be expected to occasionally generate additional noise exceeding the level of theminimum background noise 165. - The
microphone 150 detects a superposition of sounds that includes: thespeaker sound waves 135, theminimum background noise 165, and the time-varyingambient noise 145. Themicrophone signal 155 generated bymicrophone 150 thus represents a combination of these threesounds microphone signal 155 to thenoise compensation unit 120. As discussed below, one of the initial tasks for thenoise compensation unit 120 is to extract information about the time-varyingambient noise 145 from themicrophone signal 155. - In addition to the background and ambient noise, the acoustic characteristics of the listening area also affect the
microphone signal 155 detected bymicrophone 150 and may cause it to differ from theoutput signal 125 that is provided to thespeakers 130. The listeningarea 101 may have a non-flat frequency response that alters thespeaker sound waves 135 as they travel fromspeakers 130 tomicrophone 150. For example, some frequency ranges may be more attenuated than others in the listening area. The variations in frequency response may arise from the material used in construction of the listening area, the architecture of the listening area, furniture, carpeting, and drapery in the listening area, and other physical properties of the listening area. The variations in frequency response may also be due to factors such as the number and type of loudspeakers used in a sound system, placement of the loudspeakers, proximity of the loudspeakers to themeasurement microphone 150, reverberant standing waves, and single signals arriving at the measurement microphone multiple times due to reflections, echoes, and multiple loudspeakers. As described below, one approach to quantifying the acoustic characteristics of the listening area is to measure an acoustic transfer function of the listening area. - A number of variations of depicted in
FIG. 1 are possible. For example, the listeningarea 101 may be an indoor or outdoor location. Thesource signal 118 may be any of a variety of sound signals, including single or multiple voices or instruments, as live or prerecorded signals or as combinations of these varieties of sound signals. Thesource signal 118, themicrophone signal 155, and theoutput signal 125 may be communicated by signal cables, as shown, or may be transmitted wirelessly, such as through radio or infrared signals. Further, thesignals listening area 101 and the equipment configuration are also possible, as would be understood to one skilled in the design of audio systems. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart outlining a method for compensating for noise in a listening area, such as the listeningarea 101 fromFIG. 1 . This example includes two phases: aninitial calibration phase 210 and anoperation phase 220. Thecalibration phase 210 is preferably conducted under controlled conditions, preferably with no audience present, prior to theoperation phase 220. Thecalibration phase 210 gathers information about thelistening area 101 and thebackground noise 165 in the listening area. Theoperation phase 220 occurs later, and may be the period of time when an audience is present to experience the desired sound signals in thelistening area 101. - The information gathered during the
calibration phase 210 is used later to enhance the performance during theoperation phase 220. As indicated by loopingarrow 230, the operation phase involves an ongoing or iterative compensation of the noise in thelistening area 101. An additional level of iteration may also be employed, as indicated by loopingarrow 240, by repeating the calibration between performances or even occasionally during performances. -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of theinitial calibration phase 210 from the flowchart ofFIG. 2 . This implementation depicts the calibration phase as having several components, numbered here asblocks block 305 of the calibration phase, the a listening area is prepared by controlling the sources of noise so that undesired noise is reduced to a minimum, preferably as close to silent as possible. Thus, the only sound present is a background noise, In the context of the illustration inFIG. 1 , this background is thebackground noise 165 discussed above. For example, in preparation for a music performance in a concert hall, the calibration phase may be performed late at night, when passing traffic noise is largely absent, with the hall and surroundings largely vacant of audience and personnel, with any non-essential machinery in the vicinity turned off, and with any essential machinery operating in a way that generates a minimum level of noise. The only unintended sounds present during thecalibration phase 210 are preferably those sounds that cannot be silenced, and which may thus be expected to persist in the background even during the subsequent operation phase. - In
block 307 ofFIG. 3 , the background noise in the listening area is then detected bymicrophone 150 and conveyed via themicrophone signal 155 to thenoise compensation unit 120. Inblock 308, the microphone signal is analyzed to determine the level of the background noise. This level is considered an offset that indicates the amount of background noise in the listening area. This analysis may be done for each of several frequency bands, and a set of offsets—one for each frequency band—may be measured. These offsets may be used later to analyze sounds detected in the listening area during theoperation phase 220. - In
block 310 ofFIG. 3 , a pink-noise test signal is projected into the listening area. This pink noise test signal may span a range of about 20 Hz to 20 kHz. Other test signals may be used, such as a series or combination of discrete tones, or a spectrum of white noise. In the setup depicted inFIG. 1 , the test signal is provided to thenoise compensation unit 120 assource signal 118.Speakers 130 project the test signal into the listeningarea 101. The test signal is then detected bymicrophone 150 and a detected version of the test signal is returned in themicrophone signal 155 to thenoise compensation unit 120. - Thus, during
block 310 the known, original test signal may be used as thesource signal 118, and the detected test signal may be received as themicrophone signal 155. Before being detected by the microphone, the test signal is naturally modified in the listening area by the acoustic properties of the listening area. These acoustic properties are generally frequency-dependent, as noted above. Thus, different frequency bands of the test signal may experience different modifications. For example, some frequency ranges may be more attenuated than others in the listening area. Additional differences between the original and perceived test signal may also arise from imperfections in construction or placement of the transmitting equipment, such asspeakers 130 fromFIG. 1 . Still further, the perceived test signal may be different from the original test signal because of any background noise present in the listening area. -
Block 320 shows detection of the perceived test signal as a microphone signal, such as themicrophone signal 155 fromFIG. 1 . The microphone signal includes all the differences from the original test signal. Like the microphone signal detected inblock 307, the microphone signal detected inblock 320 includes background noise in the listening area. Additionally, the microphone signal detected inblock 320 also includes the originally projected test signal, plus any modifications arising from the acoustic properties of the listening area. - In
block 330, the microphone signal is compared with the original test signal and with the background-noise offsets (measured inblocks 307 and 308) to determine the differences between the original test signal and the microphone signal. This comparison may be done separately for each frequency band in a set of frequency bands that span the audible spectrum. -
Block 340 depicts the calculation of relative gain factors that help characterize the listening area. The gain factors and the background-noise offsets (measured inblocks 307 and 308) relate the detected test signal to the original test signal. Like the background-noise offsets, the gain factors may be calculated for a set of frequency bands. The gains may be used later to analyze sounds detected in the listening area during theoperation phase 220. - The
overall calibration phase 210 may be implemented to measure calibration information—such as the gain factors and offsets—in such a way that the original test signal can be substantially recovered when the calibration information is applied to the perceived test signal. As discussed above, the offsets for the various frequency bands indicate the background noise in the listening area. Similarly, the gain factors for the various frequency bands are determined so that they represent an acoustic transfer function of the listening area. Other information may be obtained instead of or in addition to the gain and offset information. For example, phase-shift information, echo and reverberation information, and nonlinear differences between the original and perceived test signal may also be recorded. The gain factors, offsets, and any other calibration results may be stored inblock 350 for later use during the operation phase. -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of theoperation phase 220 from the flowchart ofFIG. 2 . This implementation depicts theoperation phase 220 as having several components, numbered here asblocks block 410 of this phase, a desired sound signal, such as a music or voice signal, is projected into the listening area. In the setup fromFIG. 1 , the desired sound signal is provided to thenoise compensation unit 120 as thesource signal 118, andspeakers 130 project the desired sound signal into the listeningarea 101. - The sound in the listening area is detected as the microphone signal in
block 420. In general, the sound in the listening area is more than the desired sound projected into the listening area inblock 410. The sound in the listening area includes any modifications arising from the acoustic response of the listening area (which may have been measured previously in the calibration phase 240). The detected sound also includes the background noise in the listening area (which also may have been measured previously in the calibration phase 240). Further, the detected sound includes any ambient noise in addition to the background noise. As a result, the microphone signal differs from the original desired sound signal. - Referring back to the calibration process shown in
FIG. 3 , it can be seen that the microphone signal detected during operation (in block 420) resembles the microphone signal detected during calibration (in block 320). Both signals may include the sound projected into the listening area, modifications arising from the acoustic response of the listening area, and background noise in the listening area, However, unlike the microphone signal detected during calibration, the microphone signal detected during operation may also include the ambient noise in the listening area. -
Block 430 depicts the processing of the microphone signal to account for the previously measured acoustic properties of the listening area and for the previously measured background noise. The power of the microphone signal may be calculated in each frequency band. These calculated powers are scaled according to previously stored gain factors and reduced by previously stored offsets. For example, the processed power M′(n) in the n'th frequency band may be calculated according to the relation M′(n):=s(n)M(n)+a(n), where M(n) represents the power of the detected microphone signal in the n'th frequency band, s(n) represents the scaling factor for the nth frequency band (which may account for the acoustic properties of the listening area, as measured during the calibration phase), and a(n) represents the offset for the nth frequency band (which may account for the background-noise in the listening area, as measured during the calibration phase). - In
block 440, the resulting frequency distribution is compared to the frequency distribution of the original sound signal. Any difference between these distributions may be attributed to ambient noise, which was not present during the calibration phase. The differences are then summed over all frequency bands inblock 450 to generate a measurement of the ambient noise. This measurement may then be used as a control signal to adjust the volume of the desired sound signal, as shown inblock 460. As indicated by the loopingarrow 230, the adjustment inblock 460 may understood as a feedback control (or as an iterative adjustment), since this adjustment affects the desired sound signal being projected inblock 410. With appropriate adjustments, the volume of the desired sound signal may be adjusted to compensate for changes over time in the ambient noise. -
FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram exemplifying asystem 500 to compensate for ambient noise levels. Thesystem 500 has two inputs and one output, and may be configured into a portable device, such as thenoise compensation unit 120 shown in thelistening area 101 fromFIG. 1 . Thesystem 500 includes asource input 502, amicrophone input 512, and asound output 506. Other components of thesystem 500 include avariable amplifier 504, a sourcesound processor 508, anarea sound processor 518 with amemory 520, acomparison circuit 510, and anambient noise compensator 514. Thevariable amplifier 504 connects thesource input 502 to thesound output 506, and is further connected to the sourcesound processor 508. Thearea sound processor 518 is connected to themicrophone input 512. Theambient noise compensator 514 receives signals from thecomparison circuit 510, which in turn is connected to the source sound andarea sound processors ambient noise compensator 514 adjusts the sound level at thesound output 506 through a connection to thevariable amplifier 504. - The
source input 502 provides anaudio input signal 552, such as the source signal 118 fromFIG. 1 . Thesource input 502 may be adjustable to provide a minimum signal level for theaudio input signal 552. Theaudio input signal 552 is then provided tovariable amplifier 504.Variable amplifier 504 is configured to modify theaudio input signal 552 in response to ambient noise in a listening area, as described below. The resultingaudio output signal 554 is provided from thevariable amplifier 504 to thesound output 506. Thesound output 506 may be an interface that provides an audio signal, such as theoutput signal 125 shown inFIG. 1 , to loudspeakers in a listening area. - The
audio output signal 554 is also provided to the sourcesound processor 508, which calculates asource level signal 558 from theaudio output signal 554. Thesource level signal 558 contains information on the sound level of theaudio output signal 554. For example, thesource level signal 558 may be a collection of audio output signal levels that describe the power spectrum of theaudio output signal 554. Alternatively, thesource level signal 558 may be a single-valued signal that scales linearly or logarithmically with the instantaneous power of theaudio output signal 554. Other representations may also be used in thesource level signal 558. - When used in the configuration shown in
FIG. 1 , thesource level signal 558 effectively represents the sound level of theoutput signal 125 projected into the listening area. As noted above, thissignal 125 may be produced by thesound output 506 from theaudio output signal 554. - The
microphone input 512 provides anmicrophone input signal 562, such as themicrophone signal 155 shown inFIG. 1 . Themicrophone input signal 562 may be a combination of the desired source sound and the undesired background and ambient noise in a listening area. Themicrophone input 512 may be adjustable to provide a minimum signal level for themicrophone input signal 562. From themicrophone input 512, themicrophone input signal 562 is provided to thearea sound processor 518. - The
area sound processor 518 calculates amicrophone level signal 568 from themicrophone input signal 562 and from calibration information stored in thememory 520. This calibration information may describe acoustic characteristics of the listening area, such as an acoustic transfer function of the listening area. The calibration information may also describe persistent background noise in the listening area. - This information about the listening area may then be used during operation, such as in
block 430 of the procedure fromFIG. 4 . In generating themicrophone level signal 568, thearea sound processor 518 may account for the effects of the listening area's transfer function and background noise. For example, thearea sound processor 518 may calculate a power spectrum of themicrophone input signal 562, then (1) scale the resulting power spectrum as needed to undo the pre-measured transfer function of the listening area, and (2) subtract a pre-measured power spectrum of the background noise. Thesource level signal 518 may then be a collection of ambient sound signal levels that describe the power spectrum of themicrophone input signal 562, but with the effects of the listening area's transfer function and background noise removed. - Note that when used in the configuration shown in
FIG. 1 , themicrophone input signal 562 represents (a) theoutput signal 125 projected into the listening area, as modified by (b) the transfer function of thelistening area 101, and combined with (c) any constantlevel background noise 165 and (d) any time-varyingambient noise 145. After being processed in thearea sound processor 518, themicrophone level signal 568 effectively represents the sound level of only: (a) theaudio signal 125 and (d) any time-varyingambient noise 145. The effects of (b) the transfer function of thelistening area 101 and (c) thebackground noise 165 are removed by thearea sound processor 518. - As noted earlier, the
source level signal 558 represents the sound level of (a) theoutput signal 125. Thus, any differences between thesource level signal 558 and themicrophone level signal 568 may be seen as an indicator of only (d) theambient noise 145. - The source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 are provided to the
comparison circuit 510, which calculates an ambientnoise level signal 560 from the differences between thesesignals noise level signal 560 may be the difference in sound levels (dB) between the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568. This difference in sound levels may be used as a measurement of the ambient noise (in dB) present in themicrophone signal 562. Thecomparison circuit 510 operates on the foregoing observation that differences between thesesignals noise level signal 560 thus contains information on the level of ambient noise in themicrophone input signal 562. - The
ambient noise compensator 514 receives the ambientnoise level signal 560 from thecomparison circuit 510 and calculates acompensation signal 564 in response. Thecompensation signal 564 is sent back to thevariable amplifier 504 to adjust the level of theaudio output signal 554 in response to ambient noise. As the ambient noise in the listening area increases,ambient noise compensator 514 increases theaudio output signal 554 up to a maximum level, and as the noise in a listening area decreases, theambient noise compensator 514 decreasesaudio output signal 554 down to a minimum level. - As mentioned above, the
ambient noise compensator 514 may generate thecompensation signal 564 in such a way as to ensure that theaudio output signal 554 has a sound level that is higher than the ambient noise, but which is not higher than a predetermined limit. This calculation may use two user-defined control parameters. The first control parameter, called the sensitivity, indicates the desired signal-to-noise ratio between theaudio output signal 554 and the ambient noise in themicrophone input signal 562. The second control parameter, called the max boost, limits the maximum amount of gain that thesystem 500 will add in response to ambient noise. Guided by thecompensation signal 564, thevariable amplifier 504 amplifies theaudio output signal 554 to achieve the desired sensitivity, while limiting the amplification as prescribed by the max boost. An implementation of thesystem 500 that uses these two control parameters is described below, with reference toFIGS. 6 and 8 . - Regarding the calibration information stored in
memory 520, this calibration information may be obtained during a pre-performance calibration, such inblocks FIG. 3 . Thesystem 500 may be configured to measure the calibration information during the calibration procedure. For example, a known test signal may be applied at thesource input 502. The calibration information may then be iteratively selected byarea sound processor 520 andcomparison circuit 510 so that themicrophone level signal 568 is brought to match band-by-band with thesource level signal 558. -
FIG. 6 is a more detailed block diagram of aparticular implementation 600 of the system fromFIG. 5 . Theimplementation 600 includes asource input stage 602, amicrophone input stage 612, and acrossover circuit 606, which implement thesource input 502, themicrophone input 512, and thesound output 506, respectively, fromFIG. 5 . A stereo voltage controlled amplifier (VCA) 604 and amakeup gain amplifier 605 serve as interconnected components of thevariable amplifier 504. Afilter bank 620, a running-average block 622, and alogarithm block 628 may be connected in series, and serve as components of the sourcesound processor 508. - The
area sound processor 518 may be similarly implemented by anotherfilter bank 630, running-average block 632, andlogarithm block 638, along with abackground removal stage 634, and again stage 636. These subcomponents may also be connected in series, starting with thefilter bank 630, then the running-average block 632, thebackground removal stage 634, thegain stage 636, and finally thelogarithm block 638. Thememory 520 fromFIG. 5 may be coupled to thegain stage 636 and to thebackground removal stage 634. - The
comparison circuit 510 fromFIG. 5 is present in theimplementation 600 as adifference block 640, aband scaling block 642, and asummer 644 connected in series. Theambient noise compensator 514 fromFIG. 5 is presented in theimplementation 600 as an ambientnoise compensation block 614.Implementation 600 also includes amono RMS detector 626, coupled to themakeup gain amplifier 605, to themicrophone input stage 612, and to the ambientnoise compensation block 614. - The various components of
implementation 600 may be realized as a combination of software and hardware, such as with an appropriate set of computer instructions running on a digital signal processor. Another realization ofimplementation 600 uses a variety of interacting digital circuits to form the various blocks. These realizations ofimplementation 600 are “digital,” in the sense that all of the components are programmed or hard-wired logic elements, and all of the signals are digital signals or digital information. Alternatively,implementation 600 may also be realized with discrete components that communicate with each other using voltage signals. This alternative realization is considered “analog,” in the sense that all of the signals are voltages that represent scalar values. More generally,implementation 600 may be created from a combination of analog and digital components, so that some of the various signals communicated among the blocks are digital signals, and some of the signals are analog signals. The selection of all-analog, all-digital, or combinations of signals will vary according to a designer's particular needs, taking into account specific factors such as availability and costs of components, manufacturing costs, power consumption, performance requirements, tolerances, interfaces with external circuitry, and other factors known to the particular designer. - In
FIG. 6 , theimplementation 600 is illustrated as being configured into thenoise compensation unit 120 fromFIG. 1 . Thesource input stage 602 is shown as receiving thesource signal 118. Themicrophone input stage 612 is shown as receiving themicrophone signal 155. Thecrossover circuit 606 is shown as producing theoutput signal 125. It is noted that theimplementation 600 may be used in a variety of other settings, depending on the needs of a particular situation, and that other signals may accordingly be provided to and generated by thesource input stage 602, themicrophone input stage 612, and thecrossover circuit 606. - Internally, the
source input stage 602 generates the audio input signal 552 from thesource signal 118. Generally,audio input signal 552 is a stereophonic audio signal from any of a variety of sources such as, for example, the playback of an audio recording, or an audio signal from a live performance, or a combination of live and pre-recorded signals. Thesource input stage 602 may receive a user-controlled input (not shown) to adjust the minimum signal level when thesystem 600 is used with different audio sources. Theaudio input signal 552 is sent through thestereo VCA 604, and from there to themakeup gain amplifier 605, both of which are further described below. Thesecomponents audio input signal 552 to create theaudio output signal 554. Theaudio output signal 554 is provided to thecrossover circuit 606, which sends the output source signal to a plurality of loudspeakers in the area as theoutput signal 125. InFIG. 6 , theoutput signal 125 is depicted as a set of four signals L, R, M, and S, which represent separate signals for left, right, mono, and subwoofer speakers. - The
mono RMS detector 626 receives theaudio output signal 554 from themakeup gain amplifier 605, and calculates amonophonic sound level 676 of theaudio output signal 554. Themonophonic sound level 676 is used to determine a base level for comparisons in subsequent signal processing, as noted below. - The
audio output signal 554 is then passed through thefilter bank 620, where theaudio output signal 554 is split into a plurality of separate frequency bands by a plurality of bandpass filters. Each bandpass filter allows signals in a certain desired frequency range to pass through, and attenuates signals outside the desired frequency range. The number and frequency range of the band pass filters in thefilter bank 620 may cover some or all of the frequencies in the audible acoustic range, which is generally considered to span from about 20 Hz to about 20 kHz. - In the
implementation 600 illustrated inFIG. 6 , thefilter bank 620 uses eight band pass filters to splitaudio output signal 554 into eight band signals, each of which have separate frequency ranges. These separate ranges are bands from about 100 Hz to about 145 Hz, from about 145 Hz to about 211 Hz, from about 211 Hz to about 307 Hz, from about 307 Hz to about 447 Hz, from about 447 Hz to about 650 Hz, from about 650 Hz to about 944 Hz, from about 944 Hz to about 1372 Hz, and from about 1372 Hz to about 2000 Hz. Fewer filters may be used to save costs such as fabrication and processing power. Alternatively, more filters may be used to enhance the discrimination ability of the system. - Once the
audio output signal 554 is sent through thefilter bank 620, the resulting band-limited signals may be sent to the running-average block 622, which calculates a running average of the absolute value for each band signal. In the running-average block 622, the band-limited signals are each smoothed by an appropriate time constant, analogous to an RC time constant in a rectified RC filter. Depending on the design of other aspects of the system, this time constant may reflect a short integration, in the range of 0.25 seconds to 2 seconds, or a long integration, in the range of approximately 30 seconds. Alternatively, instead of averaging the band-limited signals, the running-average block 622 may be designed to first identify the peak levels of the band-limited signals in each of a series of short (0.5 to 1 sec) windows, and then calculate the running average of these peak values, thereby increasing the system's sensitivity to periodic bursty sound, such as a series of drumbeats or cowbell hits. Other approaches are also envisioned for the running-average block 622, so that the outputs of theblock 622 indicate a long-term average of the power in each frequency band. - The outputs of the running-
average block 622 may pass through thelogarithm block 628, which converts the power approximations from running-average block 622 into logarithmic representations of source signal levels. These logarithmic representations are thesource level signal 558, and are provided to thedifference block 640. In thedifference block 640, each individual logarithmic signal from thesource level signal 558 may be compared with a corresponding signal derived from themicrophone input signal 562. - In parallel with the processing of the
audio output signal 554 throughblocks microphone input signal 562 is also processed byblocks microphone level signal 568 from themicrophone input signal 562. - The
microphone input stage 612 receives themicrophone signal 155 and generates themicrophone input signal 562 in response. Themicrophone input stage 612 may receive a user-controlled input (not shown) to adjust the minimum signal level of themicrophone input signal 562 as needed when different types of microphone signals are used. Additionally, during calibrations (such as thecalibration phase 210 fromFIG. 2 ) thesource input stage 612 may also normalize themicrophone input signal 562 according to themonophonic sound level 676, so that components ofmicrophone input signal 562 may be properly compared against components of theaudio output signal 554. Alternatively, this normalization may be performed at a later stage in the signal processing, such as, for example, in thedifference block 640, or in ambientnoise compensation block 614. - From the
microphone input stage 612, themicrophone input signal 562 may be sent to thefilter bank 630. A set of bandpass filters in thefilter bank 630 split themicrophone input signal 562 into a set of frequency-band signals. The number and frequency ranges of the bandpass filters in thefilter bank 630 for the microphone signal match the number and frequency ranges of the bandpass filters in thefilter bank 620 for the source signal, discussed above. As illustrated, thefilter bank 630 inimplementation 600 uses eight bandpass filters to generate eight band-limited signals. To match the frequency bands used in thefilter bank 620, the bandpass filters infilter bank 630 have band ranges from about 100 Hz to about 145 Hz, from about 145 Hz to about 211 Hz, from about 211 Hz to about 307 Hz, from about 307 Hz to about 447 Hz, from about 447 Hz to about 650 Hz, from about 650 Hz to about 944 Hz, from about 944 Hz to about 1372 Hz, and from about 1372 Hz to about 2000 Hz. - The resulting band-limited signals may be provided from the
filter bank 630 to the running-average block 632, which calculates a running average of the absolute value for each band-limited signal. In the running-average block 632, the band-limited signals are each smoothed by an appropriate time constant, analogous to an RC time constant in a rectified RC filter. As discussed earlier with reference to the running-average block 622 in the sourcesound processor 508, various implementations of the running-average block 632 are envisioned. The outputs of the running-average block 632 may approximate a tong-term average of the power in each frequency band. The outputs of the running-average block 622 may then be processed in thebackground removal stage 634 and thegain stage 636. - In the
background removal stage 634, the outputs of the running-average block 632 may be adjusted with separate offsets for each frequency band. The offsets may be determined during the calibration procedure (such as in theblock 308 ofFIG. 3 ) and then stored in thememory 520. During operation, thebackground removal stage 634 recalls the offsets from thememory 520 and reduces the microphone signal levels for each frequency band according to the offsets. - The outputs of the
background removal stage 634 are provided to thegain stage 636. In thegain stage 636, the outputs of the running-average block 632 may be further adjusted individually with separate gain factors for each frequency band. The gain factors may be determined during a calibration procedure (such as theblock 340 ofFIG. 3 ) and then stored in thememory 520. During operation, thegain stage 636 recalls the gain factors from thememory 520 and scales the microphone signal levels for each frequency band according to the gain factors. - After the offsetting and scaling of
blocks gain stage 636 may be converted in thelogarithm block 638 into logarithmic representations of microphone signal levels. These logarithmic representations are themicrophone level signal 568, and may be provided to thedifference block 640. - The
difference block 640 receives the eight frequency-band components of the logarithmicsource level signal 558, and also receives the eight frequency-band components of the logarithmicmicrophone level signal 568. Thedifference block 640 then compares the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 band-by-band, calculating the difference between the logarithmic levels for each of the eight frequency bands. These differences are output from thedifference block 640 as a set of difference signals 690, including one difference signal for each of the frequency bands. - The difference signals 690 are the measurement of interest during a calibration such as the
calibration phase 210 ofFIG. 2 . During such a calibration, the offsets inbackground removal stage 634 and the gains ingain stage 636 are selected so that the difference signals 690 are driven substantially to zero. The selection of gains may be achieved by an iterative procedure or by a direct computation, or by a combination of iterations and computations. Nullifying these differences means that the gains and offsets are selected so that the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 match each other in each frequency band during the calibration procedure. - In other words, during calibration—when extraneous ambient noise is absent, the microphone level signals 558 are modified by driving the difference between each band's microphone level source level to zero. When the difference of each band's microphone and source signal is zero, the
background removal stage 634 has been calibrated to remove the effects of constant-level background noise that are present in themicrophone input signal 562. Further, at this point thegain stage 636 has been calibrated to remove the effects of the room having a non-flat frequency response. When the calibration is complete, and the final gains and offsets are stored inmemory 520. - During operation, such as in the
operation phase 220 fromFIG. 2 , the offsets are loaded frommemory 520 into thebackground removal stage 634 and the gains are loaded frommemory 520 into thegain stage 636. Thebackground removal stage 634 and thegain stage 636 then modify themicrophone input signal 562 by removing the effects of constant-level background noise and the effects of the room having a non-flat frequency response. - With this conditioning, any differences between the source and microphone level signals 558 and 568 may be attributed to time-varying ambient noise. This is expected because the ambient noise is the only component of the
microphone input signal 562 that cannot be anticipated by any combination of the offsets inbackground removal stage 634, the gains in thegain stage 636, and thesource level signal 558. During operation, then, the difference signals 690 generated by thedifference stage 640 are indicators of ambient noise in each of the frequency bands. Thesummer 644 receives these difference signals 690 and arithmetically adds the difference signals 690 together to generate the ambientnoise level signal 560. - The
summer 644 also may combine the difference signals 690 according to other protocols to generate the ambientnoise level signal 560. For example, thesummer 644 may be configured to exponentiate the individual difference signals 690, arithmetically add the exponentials together, and then calculate a logarithm of the sum to generate the ambientnoise level signal 560. - The ambient noise level signal indicates the amount of ambient noise in a listening area. One measure for indicating this noise is as a signal to noise ratio that indicates (in dB) the amount of ambient noise present, relative to the amount of desired sound. Other useful measures of indicating the ambient noise may also be used for the ambient
noise level signal 560. - Prior to being added together in the
summer 644, the difference signals 690 may be processed inband scaling block 642.Band scaling block 642 may have a configuration similar to that ofgain stage 636. Thisblock 642 applies individual scaling factors to each of the difference signals 690. Unlike the calibrated gains used ingain stage 636, the scaling factors inband scaling block 642 may be user-specified parameters and may be adjusted during operation or derived from additional calibration tests. Alternatively, the scaling factors may be factory-preset constants. - The scaling factors in
band scaling block 642 reflect the different weights that should be accorded to ambient noise in the various frequency bands. Theband scaling block 642 allows for variations in the significance of the noise signal in the frequency bands. This feature allows the system to boost the source signal more in response to some types of noise than others. For example, a user may recognize that a substantial amount of ambient noise appears in bursts in the 944 Hz to 1372 Hz frequency band from the clatter of cutlery in a particular listening area. If the user wishes for the system to ignore these temporary bursts of ambient noise, she may decide to reduce the weight given to the component for this frequency band indifference signal 690. By adjusting the corresponding scaling factor inband scaling block 642 to a low setting, the user can prevent the cutlery noise from contributing to the ambientnoise level signal 560. To exclude other sources of ambient—but unimportant—noise, other scaling factors inband scaling block 642 can be similarly adjusted. - Once the components of the
difference signal 690 have been added together, the ambientnoise level signal 560 is sent from thesummer 644 to the ambientnoise compensation block 614. Using the ambientnoise level signal 560, the ambientnoise compensation block 614 calculates thecompensation signal 564. As discussed above, thecompensation signal 564 is the signal sent to thestereo VCA 604 to keep theaudio output signal 554 at a desired level above the ambient noise. The desired margin may be indicated by asensitivity 648, which is a user parameter provided to the ambientnoise compensation block 614. Thecompensation signal 564 may also be tailored to prevent theaudio output signal 554 from increasing beyond a certain level. This maximum level is set by themax boost 646, which is another user parameter provided to the ambientnoise compensation block 614. - For example, the
sensitivity 648 may be user adjustable. Thesensitivity 648 may be set to keep the source signal six decibels above the ambient noise in a listening area. The ambientnoise compensation block 614 then examines the ambientnoise level signal 560 and gives thecompensation signal 564 an appropriate value so that in the listening area the desired sound is effectively 6 dB greater in volume than the ambient noise, but not greater in volume than whatever value is specified by themax boost 646. - The ambient
noise compensation block 614 may also receive themonophonic sound level 676 from ambientnoise compensation block 614. Using thissignal 676, the ambientnoise compensation block 614 may monitor the net level of theaudio output signal 554. If themonophonic sound level 676 decreases below a threshold level or disappears, as sometimes happens between songs or during a pause in a speech, the ambientnoise compensation block 614 may refrain from adjustments of the source signal level until themonophonic sound level 676 again increases above a desired threshold level. - In the
implementation 600 depicted inFIG. 6 , thecompensation signal 564 is an attenuation signal that reduces the level of the signal generated bystereo VCA 604.Stereo VCA 604 then provides only attenuation to theaudio input signal 552. The output ofstereo VCA 604 is then provided to themakeup gain amplifier 605, which provides a constant amount of amplification, as determined by amakeup gain signal 664. This arrangement of thestereo VCA 604 and themakeup gain amplifier 605 ensures that theaudio output signal 554 never exceeds a level determined by themakeup gain signal 664, which is fixed by the user-controlled max boost setting 646. - Like the
compensation signal 564, themakeup gain signal 664 is generated by the ambientnoise compensation block 614. The value of themakeup gain signal 664 may be determined solely by the max boost setting 646. The ambientnoise compensation block 614 gives themakeup gain signal 664 an appropriate value so that the maximum output of themakeup gain amplifier 605 is at a level corresponding to the desiredmax boost 646. - When the listening area has no ambient noise, the ambient
noise compensation block 614 generates thecompensation signal 564 with a value for full attenuation, and thestereo VCA 604 applies this large attenuation. Conversely, when the listening area has a very large amount of ambient noise, thecompensation signal 564 has a value for little or no attenuation, and thestereo VCA 604 applies little or no attenuation. Themakeup gain signal 664 is configured so that when an unattenuated output from thestereo VCA 604 is amplified by themakeup gain amplifier 605, the resulting signal has the level specified by themax boost 646. This final signal is theaudio output signal 554. This arrangement ensures that theaudio output signal 554 does not exceed theprescribed max boost 646. - The
stereo VCA 604 may be a voltage controlled amplifier that amplifies the source signal exponentially. Thus, the input to thestereo VCA 604 may be a logarithmic signal, such as a decibel specification or a power-of-two specification of the desired attenuation. One example of themakeup gain amplifier 605 may be set to any amplification value between zero and eighteen decibels. Other configurations of thestereo VCA 604 and themakeup gain amplifier 605 also may be used. - Based on the amount of ambient noise in the
microphone input signal 562, then, the ambientnoise compensation block 614 effectively increases or decreases theaudio output signal 554 to maintain the desired margin between the source signal and the ambient noise. Further, the ambientnoise compensation block 614 prevents the source signal from being adjusted if the source signal decreases below a threshold or disappears altogether, and also prevents the source signal from being increased above a maximum acceptable signal level, as specified by the maximum boost setting 646. -
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of one embodiment of alogarithmic level estimator 700 that may be used in the logarithm blocks 628 and 638 fromFIG. 6 . As described above, theseblocks blocks - To complete the logarithmic conversion, first an
absolute value stage 702 rectifies the input 701 (which may be a source signal or a microphone signal). The result from theabsolute value stage 702 is then sent to a logarithmicpolynomial approximation stage 704, where a polynomial equation is used to closely approximate the logarithmic value of the rectified input. Finally, the result from the logarithmicpolynomial approximation stage 704 is sent through a lowpass filter stage 706 to generate theoutput 707. The result achieved is a good short term average approximation for the logarithmic value of the total absolute-value signal power present in the input source or microphone signal. The above process is performed similarly in both thesource logarithm block 628 and themicrophone logarithm block 638 discussed above. - Variations on the
logarithmic level estimator 700 may be made as appropriate for a particular system, in light of speed, accuracy, and processing efficiency needs. For example, instead of simply rectifying theinput 701, theabsolute value stage 702 of thelogarithmic level estimator 700 may square, accumulate, and then square-root theinput 701. The resultingoutput 707 would then be an RMS measure of short term average signal power. Further, in some variations ofimplementation 600, a singlelogarithmic level estimator 700 may be used for both of the logarithm blocks 628 and 638, by sharing thelogarithmic level estimator 700. This sharing may be achieved, for example, by time-division multiplexing. Also, portions of thelogarithmic level estimator 700 of thesystem implementation 600 may be combined with other operational units, such asfilter banks average blocks distinct logarithm blocks -
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of anambient noise compensator 800 that may be used inblock 614 fromFIG. 6 . Theinput 802 to theambient noise compensator 800 is the sum created bysummer 644 from all the difference signals. This sum represents the instantaneous signal to (ambient) noise ratio in the room, such that apositive input 802 indicates additional ambient noise was measured in a microphone signal. The desired signal to noise ratio, orsensitivity 648, is subtracted from theinput 802. If the resultingdifference 862 is non-zero, the amount of boost for the system output (such as theaudio output signal 554 fromFIG. 6 ) may need to change in order to achieve the desired signal to noise ratio. In this sense thedifference 862 is an error signal that directs the corrective action to be taken. - To effect this change, the
error 862 is first integrated in time in anintegration block 853, to generate anambient control voltage 866. Insideintegration block 853, theerror 862 may be multiplied by a small attack/release rate factor at ascaling block 806, and the resulting scalederror 864 is added to the previous ambient control voltage, generated by adelay block 808 from theambient control voltage 866. The sum of the scalederror 864 with the previous ambient control voltage is theambient control voltage 866. Thedelay block 808 introduces a fixed temporal delay that depends on particular implementations and clock rates; thus the time constant of the integration block may be controlled by the attack/release rate factor atblock 806. This factor may be chosen so that theintegration block 853 has a time constant on the order of 30 seconds. This relatively large time constant sets the response time of the system: thus, the system may respond gradually to changes in ambient noise levels over a time scale of 30 seconds. Other time constants may also be selected, such as time constants of approximately 5 sec, 10 sec, 20 sec, 45 sec, 1 min, 2 min, or 10 min. - Finally, the
ambient control voltage 866 is subtracted from amakeup gain defeat 810. Themakeup gain defeat 810 is a parameter that may be derived directly from themax boost 648 discussed previously with reference toFIG. 6 . Themakeup gain defeat 810 is a control voltage used to pre-attenuate the gain that will be subsequently re-applied by themakeup gain amplifier 605 ofFIG. 6 . - The
output 812 of theambient noise compensator 800 is the result of subtracting theambient control voltage 866 from themakeup gain defeat 810. Thisoutput 812 may be used as thecompensation signal 564 ofFIG. 6 . As the amount of ambient noise in the listening area goes up, theambient control voltage 866 increases and removes the attenuating effect of themakeup gain defeat 810. The overall gain from thestereo VCA 604 and themakeup gain amplifier 605 then increases, raising the level of theaudio output signal 554. If there is enough ambient noise in the listening area, this increase will continue until theambient control voltage 866 has removed all of themakeup gain defeat 810, and the overall system gain will be at the max boost setting 646. - Conversely, if the amount of ambient noise in the listening area goes down, the
ambient control voltage 866 decreases and restores the attenuating effect of themakeup gain defeat 810. The overall gain from thestereo VCA 604 and themakeup gain amplifier 605 then decreases, lowering the level of theaudio output signal 554. If there is a low enough ambient noise level in the listening area, this decrease will continue until the signal level reaches a predetermined minimum level appropriate for the listening area, which is set bysource input stage 602. - While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Claims (19)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/757,798 US20070223733A1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2007-06-04 | Ambient Noise Sound Level Compensation |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/669,290 US7333618B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2003-09-24 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
US11/757,798 US20070223733A1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2007-06-04 | Ambient Noise Sound Level Compensation |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/669,290 Division US7333618B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2003-09-24 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070223733A1 true US20070223733A1 (en) | 2007-09-27 |
Family
ID=34313696
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/669,290 Active 2026-01-19 US7333618B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2003-09-24 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
US11/757,798 Abandoned US20070223733A1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2007-06-04 | Ambient Noise Sound Level Compensation |
US11/944,016 Active 2026-03-16 US8005231B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2007-11-21 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/669,290 Active 2026-01-19 US7333618B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2003-09-24 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/944,016 Active 2026-03-16 US8005231B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2007-11-21 | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7333618B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090310793A1 (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2009-12-17 | Sony Corporation | Audio signal processing device and audio signal processing method |
US20130272531A1 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-17 | Envoy Medical Corporation | Feedback scan for hearing aid |
US20140211955A1 (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2014-07-31 | Qnx Software Systems Limited | Microphone hiss mitigation |
Families Citing this family (93)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6919599B2 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2005-07-19 | International Rectifier Corporation | Short channel trench MOSFET with reduced gate charge |
US7333618B2 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2008-02-19 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
WO2005074129A2 (en) * | 2004-01-28 | 2005-08-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Automatic audio signal dynamic range adjustment |
US7580531B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2009-08-25 | Cirrus Logic, Inc | Dynamic range reducing volume control |
US20080085007A1 (en) * | 2004-04-12 | 2008-04-10 | Bryce Engelbrecht | Systems and Methods for Monitoring Temporal Volume Control |
US7587310B2 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2009-09-08 | Lsi Corporation | Sound processor architecture using single port memory unit |
US20060095453A1 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2006-05-04 | Miller Mark S | Providing a user a non-degraded presentation experience while limiting access to the non-degraded presentation experience |
US7359686B2 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2008-04-15 | Microtune (Texas), L.P. | Radio-frequency amplifier system |
US8249861B2 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2012-08-21 | Qnx Software Systems Limited | High frequency compression integration |
US8086451B2 (en) | 2005-04-20 | 2011-12-27 | Qnx Software Systems Co. | System for improving speech intelligibility through high frequency compression |
US7813931B2 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2010-10-12 | QNX Software Systems, Co. | System for improving speech quality and intelligibility with bandwidth compression/expansion |
US9271074B2 (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2016-02-23 | Lsvt Global, Inc. | System and method for measuring sound |
KR100638337B1 (en) * | 2005-09-05 | 2006-10-24 | 주식회사 비손하이테크 | Apparatus and method for noise removal and mobile phone with noise removal function |
US20070188308A1 (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2007-08-16 | Lavoie Bruce S | Vehicular indicator audio controlling |
DE102006010008B3 (en) * | 2006-03-04 | 2007-03-01 | Dräger Medical AG & Co. KG | Respiration monitoring apparatus has tone generator controlled by flow rate sensor, microphone connected to processor producing signals representing background noise which adjust sound produced by tone generator |
US20110014981A1 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2011-01-20 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Tracking device with sound emitter for use in obtaining information for controlling game program execution |
JP4969645B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2012-07-04 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Automatic external defibrillator with voice prompts with enhanced clarity |
US8041025B2 (en) * | 2006-08-07 | 2011-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and arrangements for controlling modes of audio devices based on user selectable parameters |
US8208646B2 (en) * | 2006-11-22 | 2012-06-26 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Audio filtration for content processing systems and methods |
US8316408B2 (en) * | 2006-11-22 | 2012-11-20 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Audio processing for media content access systems and methods |
KR100829112B1 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2008-05-16 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Audio signal distortion compensation device and method for potable device |
WO2008081403A1 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2008-07-10 | Grundig Elektronik Anonim Sirketi | A method for reducing noise |
US7953233B2 (en) * | 2007-03-20 | 2011-05-31 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Synchronous detection and calibration system and method for differential acoustic sensors |
US8306235B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2012-11-06 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for using a sound sensor to adjust the audio output for a device |
DE102007057664A1 (en) * | 2007-11-28 | 2009-06-04 | K+H Vertriebs- Und Entwicklungsgesellschaft Mbh | Speaker Setup |
JP5191750B2 (en) * | 2008-01-25 | 2013-05-08 | 川崎重工業株式会社 | Sound equipment |
EP2106159A1 (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2009-09-30 | Deutsche Thomson OHG | Loudspeaker panel with a microphone and method for using both |
US8085941B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2011-12-27 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | System and method for dynamic sound delivery |
ES2329331B1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2010-08-30 | Nilo Crambo,S.A. | SYSTEM OF CAPTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUNDS. |
US9020158B2 (en) * | 2008-11-20 | 2015-04-28 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Quiet zone control system |
US8135140B2 (en) | 2008-11-20 | 2012-03-13 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with audio signal compensation |
US20100329471A1 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2010-12-30 | Manufacturing Resources International, Inc. | Ambient noise compensation system |
TW201026014A (en) * | 2008-12-29 | 2010-07-01 | Inventec Appliances Corp | Method for volume adaptation, mobile electronic device and computer program product using the method thereof |
US8718289B2 (en) * | 2009-01-12 | 2014-05-06 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with parallel adaptive filter configuration |
US20100239110A1 (en) * | 2009-03-17 | 2010-09-23 | Temic Automotive Of North America, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Optimizing an Audio Communication System |
US8189799B2 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2012-05-29 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control based on audio system output |
US8199924B2 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2012-06-12 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with an infinite impulse response filter |
US8077873B2 (en) * | 2009-05-14 | 2011-12-13 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with adaptive speaker selection |
JP5470452B2 (en) * | 2009-06-26 | 2014-04-16 | ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ | EEG monitoring device and method for presenting a message there |
CN101997498A (en) * | 2009-08-27 | 2011-03-30 | 北京宏景捷讯网络技术股份有限公司 | Volume adjusting method and device |
US8831934B2 (en) | 2009-10-27 | 2014-09-09 | Phonak Ag | Speech enhancement method and system |
TWI562137B (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2016-12-11 | Dts Inc | Adaptive environmental noise compensation for audio playback |
CN102907019B (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2015-07-01 | 英派尔科技开发有限公司 | Acoustic noise management through control of electrical device operations |
US8798278B2 (en) | 2010-09-28 | 2014-08-05 | Bose Corporation | Dynamic gain adjustment based on signal to ambient noise level |
JP5627440B2 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2014-11-19 | キヤノン株式会社 | Acoustic apparatus, control method therefor, and program |
JP5643686B2 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2014-12-17 | 株式会社東芝 | Voice discrimination device, voice discrimination method, and voice discrimination program |
JP5649488B2 (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2015-01-07 | 株式会社東芝 | Voice discrimination device, voice discrimination method, and voice discrimination program |
US8965756B2 (en) * | 2011-03-14 | 2015-02-24 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Automatic equalization of coloration in speech recordings |
EP2530835B1 (en) * | 2011-05-30 | 2015-07-22 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH | Automatic adjustment of a speed dependent equalizing control system |
US20120308047A1 (en) * | 2011-06-01 | 2012-12-06 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Self-tuning mems microphone |
US9032042B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2015-05-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Audio presentation of condensed spatial contextual information |
US20130063368A1 (en) * | 2011-09-14 | 2013-03-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Touch-screen surface temperature control |
US9589550B2 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2017-03-07 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | Methods and systems for measuring and reporting an energy level of a sound component within a sound mix |
JP2013102411A (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2013-05-23 | Sony Corp | Audio signal processing apparatus, audio signal processing method, and program |
US8958569B2 (en) | 2011-12-17 | 2015-02-17 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Selective spatial audio communication |
US9258641B2 (en) * | 2012-06-07 | 2016-02-09 | Qbiz, Llc | Method and system of audio capture based on logarithmic conversion |
US9685921B2 (en) * | 2012-07-12 | 2017-06-20 | Dts, Inc. | Loudness control with noise detection and loudness drop detection |
KR101253708B1 (en) * | 2012-08-29 | 2013-04-12 | (주)알고코리아 | Hearing aid for screening envirronmental noise and method for screening envirronmental noise of hearing aid |
US9498658B2 (en) * | 2013-02-01 | 2016-11-22 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Respirator mask speech enhancement apparatus and method |
US9517366B2 (en) | 2013-02-01 | 2016-12-13 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Respirator mask speech enhancement apparatus and method |
US9257952B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2016-02-09 | Kopin Corporation | Apparatuses and methods for multi-channel signal compression during desired voice activity detection |
US10306389B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2019-05-28 | Kopin Corporation | Head wearable acoustic system with noise canceling microphone geometry apparatuses and methods |
US9007201B2 (en) * | 2013-05-17 | 2015-04-14 | Tyco Fire & Security Gmbh | Method for self-testing notification appliances in alarm systems |
US9787273B2 (en) * | 2013-06-13 | 2017-10-10 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Smart volume control of device audio output based on received audio input |
US9554226B2 (en) * | 2013-06-28 | 2017-01-24 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | Headphone response measurement and equalization |
WO2015010865A1 (en) | 2013-07-22 | 2015-01-29 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems Gmbh | Automatic timbre control |
US10319389B2 (en) * | 2013-07-22 | 2019-06-11 | Harman Becker Automotive Systems Gmbh | Automatic timbre control |
US10414337B2 (en) | 2013-11-19 | 2019-09-17 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | Apparatus for providing environmental noise compensation for a synthesized vehicle sound |
US10373611B2 (en) | 2014-01-03 | 2019-08-06 | Gracenote, Inc. | Modification of electronic system operation based on acoustic ambience classification |
US9344821B2 (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2016-05-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically providing to a person feedback pertaining to utterances spoken or sung by the person |
US9923534B2 (en) * | 2014-07-31 | 2018-03-20 | E.F. Johnson Company | Automatic volume control for land mobile radio |
JP6574835B2 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2019-09-11 | ハーマン インターナショナル インダストリーズ インコーポレイテッド | Auto calibration noise canceling headphones |
US9565491B2 (en) * | 2015-06-01 | 2017-02-07 | Doppler Labs, Inc. | Real-time audio processing of ambient sound |
US9913056B2 (en) | 2015-08-06 | 2018-03-06 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | System and method to enhance speakers connected to devices with microphones |
US20170110105A1 (en) | 2015-10-16 | 2017-04-20 | Avnera Corporation | Active noise cancelation with controllable levels |
US11631421B2 (en) | 2015-10-18 | 2023-04-18 | Solos Technology Limited | Apparatuses and methods for enhanced speech recognition in variable environments |
JP6855381B2 (en) * | 2015-10-21 | 2021-04-07 | 日本電気株式会社 | Personal authentication device, personal authentication method and personal authentication program |
JP2017216614A (en) * | 2016-06-01 | 2017-12-07 | ヤマハ株式会社 | Signal processor and signal processing method |
US9837064B1 (en) * | 2016-07-08 | 2017-12-05 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Generating spectrally shaped sound signal based on sensitivity of human hearing and background noise level |
US9769582B1 (en) * | 2016-08-02 | 2017-09-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Audio source and audio sensor testing |
US10261749B1 (en) | 2016-11-30 | 2019-04-16 | Google Llc | Audio output for panoramic images |
EP3556013B1 (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2024-09-11 | Qsic Pty Ltd | Sound management method and system |
US9998082B1 (en) * | 2017-01-16 | 2018-06-12 | Gibson Brands, Inc. | Comparative balancing |
US10530318B2 (en) | 2017-11-30 | 2020-01-07 | Apple Inc. | Audio system having variable reset volume |
JP6899534B2 (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2021-07-07 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Volume control device, volume control method, and volume control system |
US10959034B2 (en) * | 2018-01-09 | 2021-03-23 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Reducing unwanted sound transmission |
US11232807B2 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2022-01-25 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Background noise estimation using gap confidence |
US10800409B2 (en) * | 2018-09-04 | 2020-10-13 | Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. | Systems and methods for operating a mobile machine using detected sounds |
US11817114B2 (en) | 2019-12-09 | 2023-11-14 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Content and environmentally aware environmental noise compensation |
CA3161269A1 (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2021-07-08 | Swaroop Mahadeva | Apparatus and method for automatic volume control with ambient noise compensation |
US11288036B2 (en) | 2020-06-03 | 2022-03-29 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Adaptive modulation of audio content based on background noise |
EP4150759A1 (en) * | 2020-06-23 | 2023-03-22 | Google LLC | Smart background noise estimator |
CN116754830B (en) * | 2023-06-13 | 2024-01-09 | 武汉阿迪克电子股份有限公司 | Metering method and device of electric energy meter and storage medium |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4479237A (en) * | 1981-02-18 | 1984-10-23 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automatic sound level control system for audio equipment |
US4628530A (en) * | 1983-02-23 | 1986-12-09 | U. S. Philips Corporation | Automatic equalizing system with DFT and FFT |
US4641344A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1987-02-03 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Audio equipment |
US4845758A (en) * | 1985-06-26 | 1989-07-04 | U.S. Philips Corp. | Equalizer with adjustable band filters and a digital filter suitable for use in the equalizer |
US4944018A (en) * | 1988-04-04 | 1990-07-24 | Bose Corporation | Speed controlled amplifying |
US5208866A (en) * | 1989-12-05 | 1993-05-04 | Pioneer Electronic Corporation | On-board vehicle automatic sound volume adjusting apparatus |
US5426703A (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1995-06-20 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Active noise eliminating system |
US5689572A (en) * | 1993-12-08 | 1997-11-18 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of actively controlling noise, and apparatus thereof |
US5872852A (en) * | 1995-09-21 | 1999-02-16 | Dougherty; A. Michael | Noise estimating system for use with audio reproduction equipment |
US5907622A (en) * | 1995-09-21 | 1999-05-25 | Dougherty; A. Michael | Automatic noise compensation system for audio reproduction equipment |
US6606391B2 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 2003-08-12 | Dspfactory Ltd. | Filterbank structure and method for filtering and separating an information signal into different bands, particularly for audio signals in hearing aids |
US6805633B2 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2004-10-19 | Bally Gaming, Inc. | Gaming machine with automatic sound level adjustment and method therefor |
US7054448B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2006-05-30 | Pioneer Corporation | Automatic sound field correcting device |
US7171010B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2007-01-30 | Boston Acoustics, Inc. | Dynamic bass boost apparatus and method |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5170434A (en) * | 1988-08-30 | 1992-12-08 | Beltone Electronics Corporation | Hearing aid with improved noise discrimination |
US7333618B2 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2008-02-19 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Ambient noise sound level compensation |
-
2003
- 2003-09-24 US US10/669,290 patent/US7333618B2/en active Active
-
2007
- 2007-06-04 US US11/757,798 patent/US20070223733A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-11-21 US US11/944,016 patent/US8005231B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4479237A (en) * | 1981-02-18 | 1984-10-23 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automatic sound level control system for audio equipment |
US4628530A (en) * | 1983-02-23 | 1986-12-09 | U. S. Philips Corporation | Automatic equalizing system with DFT and FFT |
US4641344A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1987-02-03 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Audio equipment |
US4845758A (en) * | 1985-06-26 | 1989-07-04 | U.S. Philips Corp. | Equalizer with adjustable band filters and a digital filter suitable for use in the equalizer |
US4944018A (en) * | 1988-04-04 | 1990-07-24 | Bose Corporation | Speed controlled amplifying |
US5208866A (en) * | 1989-12-05 | 1993-05-04 | Pioneer Electronic Corporation | On-board vehicle automatic sound volume adjusting apparatus |
US5426703A (en) * | 1991-06-28 | 1995-06-20 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Active noise eliminating system |
US5689572A (en) * | 1993-12-08 | 1997-11-18 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of actively controlling noise, and apparatus thereof |
US5872852A (en) * | 1995-09-21 | 1999-02-16 | Dougherty; A. Michael | Noise estimating system for use with audio reproduction equipment |
US5907622A (en) * | 1995-09-21 | 1999-05-25 | Dougherty; A. Michael | Automatic noise compensation system for audio reproduction equipment |
US6606391B2 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 2003-08-12 | Dspfactory Ltd. | Filterbank structure and method for filtering and separating an information signal into different bands, particularly for audio signals in hearing aids |
US7054448B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2006-05-30 | Pioneer Corporation | Automatic sound field correcting device |
US6805633B2 (en) * | 2002-08-07 | 2004-10-19 | Bally Gaming, Inc. | Gaming machine with automatic sound level adjustment and method therefor |
US7171010B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2007-01-30 | Boston Acoustics, Inc. | Dynamic bass boost apparatus and method |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090310793A1 (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2009-12-17 | Sony Corporation | Audio signal processing device and audio signal processing method |
US8761406B2 (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2014-06-24 | Sony Corporation | Audio signal processing device and audio signal processing method |
US20130272531A1 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-17 | Envoy Medical Corporation | Feedback scan for hearing aid |
US9451368B2 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2016-09-20 | Envoy Medical Corporation | Feedback scan for hearing aid |
US20140211955A1 (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2014-07-31 | Qnx Software Systems Limited | Microphone hiss mitigation |
US9210507B2 (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2015-12-08 | 2236008 Ontartio Inc. | Microphone hiss mitigation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7333618B2 (en) | 2008-02-19 |
US20080069365A1 (en) | 2008-03-20 |
US20050063552A1 (en) | 2005-03-24 |
US8005231B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8005231B2 (en) | Ambient noise sound level compensation | |
US9892721B2 (en) | Information-processing device, information processing method, and program | |
US9014386B2 (en) | Audio enhancement system | |
JP3306600B2 (en) | Automatic volume control | |
EP3163914B1 (en) | Sound level estimation | |
US7302062B2 (en) | Audio enhancement system | |
US8170221B2 (en) | Audio enhancement system and method | |
CN102726060B (en) | Controller for a headphone arrangement | |
US9735746B2 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
US20110251704A1 (en) | Adaptive environmental noise compensation for audio playback | |
CN112954115B (en) | Volume adjusting method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
KR20070050930A (en) | System for and method of audio signal processing for presentation in a high-noise environment | |
EP2693636A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
EP2693635A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
CA2471674A1 (en) | Auto-adjusting sound masking system and method | |
EP2693637A1 (en) | Automatic loudness control | |
EP3863308B1 (en) | Volume adjustment device and volume adjustment method | |
JP4522509B2 (en) | Audio equipment | |
JPH03237899A (en) | Howling suppression device | |
US20170353169A1 (en) | Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method | |
JPH0746069A (en) | Sound reproduction device | |
Designs et al. | Noise Sensing Using a Variation of the nLMS Adaptive Filter with Auto Calibration | |
Jeub et al. | On the application of psychoacoustically-motivated dereverberation for recordings taken in the German parliament |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, CAL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHUTTLEWORTH, TIMOTHY J.;KREIFELDT, RICHARD A.;REED, C. REX;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022134/0941;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040202 TO 20040219 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED;BECKER SERVICE-UND VERWALTUNG GMBH;CROWN AUDIO, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022659/0743 Effective date: 20090331 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED;BECKER SERVICE-UND VERWALTUNG GMBH;CROWN AUDIO, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022659/0743 Effective date: 20090331 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, CON Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025795/0143 Effective date: 20101201 Owner name: HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS GMBH, CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:025795/0143 Effective date: 20101201 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED;HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS GMBH;REEL/FRAME:025823/0354 Effective date: 20101201 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, CON Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:029294/0254 Effective date: 20121010 Owner name: HARMAN BECKER AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS GMBH, CONNECTICUT Free format text: RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:029294/0254 Effective date: 20121010 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |