US20060260956A1 - Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein - Google Patents
Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060260956A1 US20060260956A1 US11/135,237 US13523705A US2006260956A1 US 20060260956 A1 US20060260956 A1 US 20060260956A1 US 13523705 A US13523705 A US 13523705A US 2006260956 A1 US2006260956 A1 US 2006260956A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- oxygen
- polymeric article
- package
- plasma
- generated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65B—MACHINES, APPARATUS OR DEVICES FOR, OR METHODS OF, PACKAGING ARTICLES OR MATERIALS; UNPACKING
- B65B25/00—Packaging other articles presenting special problems
- B65B25/008—Packaging other articles presenting special problems packaging of contact lenses
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D2585/00—Containers, packaging elements or packages specially adapted for particular articles or materials
- B65D2585/54—Containers, packaging elements or packages specially adapted for particular articles or materials for articles of special shape not otherwise provided for
- B65D2585/545—Contact lenses
Definitions
- the present invention relates to polymeric articles having reduced interaction with packaging materials, methods for producing such articles, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between such articles and their packaging materials.
- the present invention relates to ophthalmic devices that are modified to have reduced interaction with packaging materials, methods for producing such ophthalmic devices, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between such ophthalmic devices and their packaging materials.
- Packaging containers are often made of polymeric materials. These containers also are often used to contain products made of polymers, which tend to stick to the containers.
- ophthalmic devices such as contact lenses and intraocular lenses (“IOLs”)
- IOLs intraocular lenses
- the individual package typically comprises a cavity, which is typically made of a polymeric material and sealed with a lid typically made of a laminated foil.
- packaging solutions have been formulated to reduce or prevent device sticking.
- certain surfactants such as polyvinyl alcohol or poly(alkyleneoxy) surfactants, have been used in the formulation of packaging solutions.
- adding new compounds, including surfactants, in device packaging solution would require regulatory approval.
- Other challenges encountered in adding a surfactant to a packaging solution including the possibility of lowering shelf-life and/or adverse reactions during heat sterilization, have further limited the use of surfactants in a packaging solution for the purpose of preventing device sticking.
- the present invention provides polymeric articles that have reduced potential for interaction with the packages in which they are contained, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between the polymeric articles and the packages.
- the present invention provides packages and methods for containing or storing ophthalmic devices, which packages and methods provide at least reduced potential for the sticking of such devices to the packages.
- the present invention provides a method for preventing or reducing interaction between an ophthalmic device and a package containing the device.
- the method for preventing or reducing interaction between the ophthalmic device and the package comprises oxidizing the ophthalmic device.
- the method comprises treating the ophthalmic device with an oxygen-containing plasma before disposing the treated device in the package.
- the method further comprises disposing a solution in the package and disposing the device in the solution.
- the ophthalmic device is a contact lens or an intraocular lens.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a package of the present invention for packaging or storing a polymeric article.
- the present invention provides polymeric articles that have reduced potential for interaction with the packages in which they are contained, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between the polymeric articles and the packages.
- the present invention provides packages and methods for containing or storing ophthalmic devices, which packages and methods provide at least reduced potential for the sticking of such devices to the packages.
- the packages and the ophthalmic devices comprise polymeric materials.
- a method for preventing or reducing interaction between an ophthalmic device and a package comprises oxidizing the ophthalmic device. In still another aspect, the method comprises causing an increase in the oxygen content of the ophthalmic device. In still another aspect, the method comprises treating the ophthalmic device with oxygen-containing plasma.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of a package 10 for containing or storing a polymeric article 40 , such as a contact lens. It should be understood that the drawings in this disclosure are not drawn to scale.
- package 10 has the design of a blister pack.
- Package 10 comprises a base portion 12 and a cover member 14 .
- Base portion 12 forms a cavity 16 , which has an opening 18 .
- a flange 22 extends outwardly from opening 18 .
- Cover member 14 releasably seals opening 18 with, for example, an adhesive 26 , which is applied to a surface of flange 22 .
- Cavity 16 is sized to receive polymeric article 40 .
- cavity 16 contains a sufficient quantity of a solution 30 for storing and keeping polymeric article 40 in a hydrated state.
- the quantity of solution 30 is enough to keep polymeric article 40 submerged.
- solution 30 can be a saline solution.
- Base portion 12 can be made of a thermoplastic or thermoset polymeric materials.
- thermoplastic materials are polyolefins (such as low- and high-density polyethylene and polypropylene), polysulfones, polyethylene terephthalate, polycarbonates, nitrile rubbers, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (“ABS”) polymers, and polyimides.
- thermoset polymeric materials are epoxy and phenolic-based polymers.
- Base portion 12 also can be made of a composite of any of these polymeric materials and compatible reinforcing agents or materials, such as silica or glass fibers.
- base portion 12 is made of polypropylene for its good thermoforming properties and its ability to withstand thermal sterilization. Alternatively, other polymeric materials can be chosen if non-thermal sterilization is used. Base portion 12 can be formed by conventional extrusion or molding processes and has thickness sufficient for withstanding handling of the package.
- Cover member 14 is typically made of a metal foil, such as aluminum foil. Alternatively, it can be a laminated multilayered stack of metallic and polymeric materials. Such a multilayered stack can be made by coextrusion of sheets of metallic and polymeric materials, with or without an adhesive between the layers.
- polymeric article 40 is a contact lens and solution 30 is a contact lens storing solution, such as a saline solution, which keeps contact lens 40 in a hydrated state.
- solution 30 is a contact lens storing solution, such as a saline solution, which keeps contact lens 40 in a hydrated state.
- contact lenses in wide use fall into two categories: (1) the hard or rigid gas permeable corneal type lenses formed from materials prepared by polymerization of acrylic esters, such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone acrylates, and fluorosilicone methacrylates; and (2) gel, hydrogel, or soft-type lenses that are formulated from polymers having a proportion of hydrophilic repeat units derived from monomers, such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (“HEMA”), N,N-dimethylacrylamide, or N-vinylpyrrolidone, such that the water content of the lens during use is at least 20% by weight.
- HEMA 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
- the term “soft contact lens” generally refers to those contact lenses that readily flex under small amounts of force and return to their original shape when that force is released.
- silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses can benefit from a method of the present invention.
- Contact lens 40 is treated with an oxygen-containing plasma before being disposed in solution 30 in cavity 16 .
- a treated contact lens of the present invention does not stick to or has reduced potential for sticking to the internal surface of cavity 16 or to the surface of cover member 14 that is adjacent to the contact lens 40 .
- the optical properties, such as light transmission or optical power, of well-treated lenses are not detectably affected by the treatment with oxygen-containing plasma.
- polymeric article 40 is treated with oxidizing plasma.
- the oxidizing plasma is oxygen-containing plasma, which can be generated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere by a conventional method such as low-pressure electrical discharge, radio-frequency (“RF”) capacitive discharge, RF inductively coupled plasma discharge, microwave-generated plasma discharge, or combinations thereof.
- a suitable method for the present invention is RF inductively coupled plasma discharge in a low-pressure oxygen-containing atmosphere (such as pressure in the range from about 0.1 Pa to about 1000 Pa), at RF in the range from about 1 MHz to about 100 MHz (such as the commonly used frequency of 13.56 MHz), and at power in the range from about 10 to about 1000 W.
- the duration of the treatment can be in a range from about 1 second to about 2 hours.
- the treatment duration is sufficient to prevent the sticking of the polymeric article 40 to the internal surface of cavity 16 .
- the treatment duration can be in the range from about 10 seconds to about 1 hour.
- the oxygen-containing species of the plasma are derived from an oxygen-containing gas introduced into the plasma chamber, such as oxygen, air, NO x (N 2 O, NO, N 2 O 3 , N 2 O 4 , NO 2 ,N 2 O 5 , N 3 O 4 , NO 3 ), SO x , (SO 2 , SO 3 ), or a mixture of any of these gases and an inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, helium, argon, neon, krypton, xenon, and combinations thereof.
- an oxygen-containing gas introduced into the plasma chamber such as oxygen, air, NO x (N 2 O, NO, N 2 O 3 , N 2 O 4 , NO 2 ,N 2 O 5 , N 3 O 4 , NO 3 ), SO x , (SO 2 , SO 3 ), or a mixture of any of these gases and an inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, helium, argon, neon, krypton, xenon, and combinations thereof
- Monomer formulation RD-1632 comprising polymerizable dialkyl siloxanes and a polymerizable fluoroalkyl siloxane (Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, N.Y. ) was cast into contact lenses in polypropylene molds and cured under ultraviolet (“UV”) light. The lenses were released from the molds using liquid nitrogen.
- UV ultraviolet
- These lenses were treated with oxygen plasma at a range of treatment times (from 30 seconds to 30 minutes) in a Metroline/IPC 7104 plasma chamber at pressure of about 40 Pa (or 0.3 mm Hg), power of 400 W, and RF of 13.56 MHz. Some lenses were also treated for 30 seconds at the same pressure and RF, but at power of 100 W.
- the loading for each plasma treatment was 50 lenses on a tray designed to handle lenses, centered on a shelf in the middle of the chamber. After plasma treatment, these lenses were extracted in a bath of isopropanol (“IPA”) for 4 hours, re-hydrated in water, and packaged into polypropylene blister packs in three different fill volumes of aqueous borate buffered saline solution (3.6, 4.2 and 4.7 ml).
- IPA isopropanol
- the packaged lenses were sterilized in steam in an autoclave, for example at a temperature up to, and including, 100° C.
- the sterilization temperature can be higher if super heated steam is used. However, the sterilization temperature should not be high enough to negatively affect the polymeric article and the package.
- sterilization can be effect by radiation, such as gamma or e-beam radiation.
- XPS X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy
- AFM atomic force microscopy
- the unstuck lenses and their surfaces were characterized using XPS and AFM.
- the oxygen concentrations found by XPS were higher (and carbon concentrations lower) for all the treated samples compared with the controls (Table 2).
- Atomic concentration data obtained from XPS analysis suggests that with increasing plasma treatment time, the carbon concentrations decreased and oxygen concentrations increased up to the twenty-minute treatment time (Table 2).
- the lenses with the thirty-minute treatment time showed slight increases in carbon and decreases in oxygen from the twenty-minute treatment. This data suggests that the surface was being oxidized with increasing plasma time. It is believed that oxygen is incorporated into the lens surfaces and exists as various oxygen-containing moieties, such as one or more of the groups of hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, ether, and epoxide.
- Roughness data obtained from AFM analyses are shown in Table 3.
- the untreated, control samples showed low roughness values.
- AFM images indicated that treatment times from 0.5 minute up to 20 minutes resulted in varying degrees of formation of islands having sizes from a micrometer in diameter to about 20 micrometers in diameter.
- the lenses treated for thirty minutes showed large islands with space between and wrinkled areas around the islands. These observations were also supported by the large RMS (root means square) roughness values and standard deviations.
- the surface morphology appeared to trend in these plasma treatment times from a mildly cracked under-treated surface, to a well-treated homogeneous surface similar in morphology to the untreated control to a grossly cracked over-treated surface.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Treatments Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
- Eyeglasses (AREA)
- Medical Preparation Storing Or Oral Administration Devices (AREA)
- Packages (AREA)
Abstract
A method for preventing or reducing interaction between a container and a polymeric article contained therein comprises oxidizing a surface of the polymeric article. The method is advantageously used to package ophthalmic devices in polymeric containers.
Description
- The present invention relates to polymeric articles having reduced interaction with packaging materials, methods for producing such articles, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between such articles and their packaging materials. In particular, the present invention relates to ophthalmic devices that are modified to have reduced interaction with packaging materials, methods for producing such ophthalmic devices, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between such ophthalmic devices and their packaging materials.
- Packaging containers are often made of polymeric materials. These containers also are often used to contain products made of polymers, which tend to stick to the containers. For example, ophthalmic devices, such as contact lenses and intraocular lenses (“IOLs”), are commonly contained in packages filled with packaging solution for shipment to points of use. The individual package typically comprises a cavity, which is typically made of a polymeric material and sealed with a lid typically made of a laminated foil. Because the ophthalmic device tends to stick to the package, packaging solutions have been formulated to reduce or prevent device sticking. For this reason, certain surfactants, such as polyvinyl alcohol or poly(alkyleneoxy) surfactants, have been used in the formulation of packaging solutions. However, adding new compounds, including surfactants, in device packaging solution would require regulatory approval. Other challenges encountered in adding a surfactant to a packaging solution, including the possibility of lowering shelf-life and/or adverse reactions during heat sterilization, have further limited the use of surfactants in a packaging solution for the purpose of preventing device sticking.
- Therefore, there is a continued need to provide products that do not tend to interact with packaging materials and methods for making such products. In particular, it is very desirable to provide ophthalmic devices that at least have a property of reduced interaction with packaging materials and methods for making such ophthalmic devices.
- In general, the present invention provides polymeric articles that have reduced potential for interaction with the packages in which they are contained, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between the polymeric articles and the packages.
- In one aspect, the present invention provides packages and methods for containing or storing ophthalmic devices, which packages and methods provide at least reduced potential for the sticking of such devices to the packages.
- In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for preventing or reducing interaction between an ophthalmic device and a package containing the device.
- In still another aspect, the method for preventing or reducing interaction between the ophthalmic device and the package comprises oxidizing the ophthalmic device.
- In yet another aspect, the method comprises treating the ophthalmic device with an oxygen-containing plasma before disposing the treated device in the package.
- In still another aspect, the method further comprises disposing a solution in the package and disposing the device in the solution.
- In yet another aspect, the ophthalmic device is a contact lens or an intraocular lens.
- Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and claims.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a package of the present invention for packaging or storing a polymeric article. - In general, the present invention provides polymeric articles that have reduced potential for interaction with the packages in which they are contained, and methods for preventing or reducing interaction between the polymeric articles and the packages.
- In one aspect, the present invention provides packages and methods for containing or storing ophthalmic devices, which packages and methods provide at least reduced potential for the sticking of such devices to the packages. In another aspect, the packages and the ophthalmic devices comprise polymeric materials.
- In another aspect, a method for preventing or reducing interaction between an ophthalmic device and a package comprises oxidizing the ophthalmic device. In still another aspect, the method comprises causing an increase in the oxygen content of the ophthalmic device. In still another aspect, the method comprises treating the ophthalmic device with oxygen-containing plasma.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of apackage 10 for containing or storing apolymeric article 40, such as a contact lens. It should be understood that the drawings in this disclosure are not drawn to scale. In one embodiment,package 10 has the design of a blister pack.Package 10 comprises abase portion 12 and acover member 14.Base portion 12 forms acavity 16, which has anopening 18. Aflange 22 extends outwardly from opening 18.Cover member 14 releasably seals opening 18 with, for example, an adhesive 26, which is applied to a surface offlange 22.Cavity 16 is sized to receivepolymeric article 40. In one embodiment,cavity 16 contains a sufficient quantity of asolution 30 for storing and keepingpolymeric article 40 in a hydrated state. In one aspect, the quantity ofsolution 30 is enough to keeppolymeric article 40 submerged. In another aspect,solution 30 can be a saline solution. -
Base portion 12 can be made of a thermoplastic or thermoset polymeric materials. Non-limiting examples of thermoplastic materials are polyolefins (such as low- and high-density polyethylene and polypropylene), polysulfones, polyethylene terephthalate, polycarbonates, nitrile rubbers, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (“ABS”) polymers, and polyimides. Non-limiting examples of thermoset polymeric materials are epoxy and phenolic-based polymers.Base portion 12 also can be made of a composite of any of these polymeric materials and compatible reinforcing agents or materials, such as silica or glass fibers. Preferably,base portion 12 is made of polypropylene for its good thermoforming properties and its ability to withstand thermal sterilization. Alternatively, other polymeric materials can be chosen if non-thermal sterilization is used.Base portion 12 can be formed by conventional extrusion or molding processes and has thickness sufficient for withstanding handling of the package. -
Cover member 14 is typically made of a metal foil, such as aluminum foil. Alternatively, it can be a laminated multilayered stack of metallic and polymeric materials. Such a multilayered stack can be made by coextrusion of sheets of metallic and polymeric materials, with or without an adhesive between the layers. - In one embodiment,
polymeric article 40 is a contact lens andsolution 30 is a contact lens storing solution, such as a saline solution, which keepscontact lens 40 in a hydrated state. - Generally, contact lenses in wide use fall into two categories: (1) the hard or rigid gas permeable corneal type lenses formed from materials prepared by polymerization of acrylic esters, such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone acrylates, and fluorosilicone methacrylates; and (2) gel, hydrogel, or soft-type lenses that are formulated from polymers having a proportion of hydrophilic repeat units derived from monomers, such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (“HEMA”), N,N-dimethylacrylamide, or N-vinylpyrrolidone, such that the water content of the lens during use is at least 20% by weight. The term “soft contact lens” generally refers to those contact lenses that readily flex under small amounts of force and return to their original shape when that force is released. In one embodiment, silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses can benefit from a method of the present invention.
- Contact
lens 40 is treated with an oxygen-containing plasma before being disposed insolution 30 incavity 16. A treated contact lens of the present invention does not stick to or has reduced potential for sticking to the internal surface ofcavity 16 or to the surface ofcover member 14 that is adjacent to thecontact lens 40. The optical properties, such as light transmission or optical power, of well-treated lenses are not detectably affected by the treatment with oxygen-containing plasma. - In general,
polymeric article 40 is treated with oxidizing plasma. In one embodiment, the oxidizing plasma is oxygen-containing plasma, which can be generated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere by a conventional method such as low-pressure electrical discharge, radio-frequency (“RF”) capacitive discharge, RF inductively coupled plasma discharge, microwave-generated plasma discharge, or combinations thereof. A suitable method for the present invention is RF inductively coupled plasma discharge in a low-pressure oxygen-containing atmosphere (such as pressure in the range from about 0.1 Pa to about 1000 Pa), at RF in the range from about 1 MHz to about 100 MHz (such as the commonly used frequency of 13.56 MHz), and at power in the range from about 10 to about 1000 W. The duration of the treatment can be in a range from about 1 second to about 2 hours. Preferably, the treatment duration is sufficient to prevent the sticking of thepolymeric article 40 to the internal surface ofcavity 16. For example, the treatment duration can be in the range from about 10 seconds to about 1 hour. - The oxygen-containing species of the plasma are derived from an oxygen-containing gas introduced into the plasma chamber, such as oxygen, air, NOx (N2O, NO, N2O3, N2O4, NO2,N2O5, N3O4, NO3), SOx, (SO2, SO3), or a mixture of any of these gases and an inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, helium, argon, neon, krypton, xenon, and combinations thereof.
- Monomer formulation RD-1632 comprising polymerizable dialkyl siloxanes and a polymerizable fluoroalkyl siloxane (Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Rochester, N.Y. ) was cast into contact lenses in polypropylene molds and cured under ultraviolet (“UV”) light. The lenses were released from the molds using liquid nitrogen.
- These lenses were treated with oxygen plasma at a range of treatment times (from 30 seconds to 30 minutes) in a Metroline/IPC 7104 plasma chamber at pressure of about 40 Pa (or 0.3 mm Hg), power of 400 W, and RF of 13.56 MHz. Some lenses were also treated for 30 seconds at the same pressure and RF, but at power of 100 W. The loading for each plasma treatment was 50 lenses on a tray designed to handle lenses, centered on a shelf in the middle of the chamber. After plasma treatment, these lenses were extracted in a bath of isopropanol (“IPA”) for 4 hours, re-hydrated in water, and packaged into polypropylene blister packs in three different fill volumes of aqueous borate buffered saline solution (3.6, 4.2 and 4.7 ml). The packaged lenses were sterilized in steam in an autoclave, for example at a temperature up to, and including, 100° C. The sterilization temperature can be higher if super heated steam is used. However, the sterilization temperature should not be high enough to negatively affect the polymeric article and the package. Alternatively, sterilization can be effect by radiation, such as gamma or e-beam radiation.
- Samples of these packages were then randomly opened and inspected for sticking to the blister and/or lidstock. Further chemical and physical characterization on the lenses was conducted using X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (“XPS”) and atomic force microscopy (“AFM”). Three lenses from each lot were tested for surface analysis. Following desalination, lenses were cut into quarters and mounted for XPS and AFM analyses with one-quarter posterior side up and one-quarter anterior side up for each technique. Survey and high resolution spectra were obtained for one spot on each lens quarter for XPS.
- At all fill levels, the untreated lenses tenaciously stuck to the package (Table 1). There was minimal or no sticking at the fill volumes of 3.6 and 4.2 ml, from 0.5 minute of plasma treatment to 30 minutes of treatment, indicating that a minimal plasma treatment was necessary to prevent this negative phenomena with these fluorosilicone hydrogel lenses. At the highest fill volume (4.7 ml), sticking to the packages decreased with increasing plasma surface treatment time. It is believed that the lens was pushed against the lidstock rather than actually stuck.
- Cloud-clarity qualitative ratings of the treated lenses, compared to the untreated control, were maintained up to 15 minutes. At treatment time of 20 minutes, this rating dropped, and at 30 minutes decreased greatly.
- The unstuck lenses and their surfaces were characterized using XPS and AFM. The oxygen concentrations found by XPS were higher (and carbon concentrations lower) for all the treated samples compared with the controls (Table 2).
- Atomic concentration data obtained from XPS analysis suggests that with increasing plasma treatment time, the carbon concentrations decreased and oxygen concentrations increased up to the twenty-minute treatment time (Table 2). The lenses with the thirty-minute treatment time showed slight increases in carbon and decreases in oxygen from the twenty-minute treatment. This data suggests that the surface was being oxidized with increasing plasma time. It is believed that oxygen is incorporated into the lens surfaces and exists as various oxygen-containing moieties, such as one or more of the groups of hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, ether, and epoxide.
- Roughness data obtained from AFM analyses are shown in Table 3. The untreated, control samples showed low roughness values. AFM images indicated that treatment times from 0.5 minute up to 20 minutes resulted in varying degrees of formation of islands having sizes from a micrometer in diameter to about 20 micrometers in diameter. The lenses treated for thirty minutes showed large islands with space between and wrinkled areas around the islands. These observations were also supported by the large RMS (root means square) roughness values and standard deviations. In general, the surface morphology appeared to trend in these plasma treatment times from a mildly cracked under-treated surface, to a well-treated homogeneous surface similar in morphology to the untreated control to a grossly cracked over-treated surface. Such an over-treated surface rendered the lens cloudy because of the large micrometer-sized cracks. Surface roughness data also suggests such a trend, wherein the RMS roughness initially increases with treatment, then decreases and levels off at 5-15 minutes, then increases again at the treatment times of 20 and 30 minutes.
TABLE 1 Results of Blister Pack Inspection Fill Number of Treatment Number of Volume Lenses Time Power Lenses Cloudy/ (ml) Evaluated (min.) (W) Stuck Clarity 3.6 10 0.5 400 0 4/4 3.6 10 5 400 0 4/4 3.6 10 10 400 0 4/4 3.6 10 15 400 0 4/4 3.6 10 20 400 0 3/2 3.6 10 30 400 0 1/1 3.6 10 0.5 100 0 4/4 3.6 10 no treatment 9 4/4 4.2 10 0.5 400 0 4/4 4.2 10 5 400 0 4/4 4.2 10 10 400 0 4/4 4.2 10 15 400 0 4/4 4.2 10 20 400 0 3/2 4.2 10 30 400 0 1/1 4.2 10 0.5 100 1 4/4 4.2 10 no treatment 9 4/4 4.7 9 0.5 400 7 4/4 4.7 10 5 400 10 4/4 4.7 10 10 400 8 4/4 4.7 10 15 400 7 4/4 4.7 10 20 400 6 3/2 4.7 10 30 400 0 1/1 4.7 10 0.5 100 0 4/4 4.7 10 no treatment 10 4/4 -
TABLE 2 Surface Atomic Concentration (in Atomic %) Via XPS Analysis Sample Carbon Nitrogen Oxygen Fluorine Silicon Control 53.8(1) 5.9(1) 23.0(1) 4.2(1) 13.1(1) 0.3(2) 0.4(2) 0.3(2) 0.3(2) 0.1(2) 0.5 min., 100 W 52.0 5.8 25.3 4.1 12.7 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 min., 400 W 52.1 5.7 25.6 4.0 12.7 0.9 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.4 5 min., 400 W 52.0 6.2 25.7 3.5 12.7 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 10 min., 400 W 51.7 5.7 26.3 3.9 12.3 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 15 min., 400 W 51.6 6.1 25.9 3.7 12.7 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 20 min., 400 W 50.6 5.6 27.1 3.7 13.0 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 30 min., 400 W 51.4 5.8 26.2 3.7 13.0 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3
Notes:
(1)Average
(2)Standard deviation
-
TABLE 3 AFM RMS Roughness Values Treatment Average (nm) Standard Deviation (nm) Control, no treatment 3 1 0.5 min., 100 W 4 2 0.5 min., 400 W 7 2 5 min., 400 W 4 1 10 min., 400 W 4 1 15 min., 400 W 4 1 20 min., 400 W 8 2 30 min., 400 W 12 16 - While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described in the foregoing, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many equivalents, modifications, substitutions, and variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Claims (18)
1. A method for preventing or reducing interaction between a container and a polymeric article contained therein, said method comprising:
oxidizing a surface of said polymeric article.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising disposing a quantity of solution in said container.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said oxidizing comprises exposing said polymeric article to oxygen-containing plasma.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein said oxygen-containing plasma is generated by a technique selected from the group consisting of low-pressure electrical discharge, radio-frequency (“RF”) capacitive discharge, RF inductively coupled plasma discharge, microwave-generated plasma discharge, and combinations thereof; and said plasma being generated in an oxygen-containing atmosphere.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein said oxygen-containing atmosphere comprises a material selected from the group consisting of oxygen, air, NOx, SOx, and mixtures thereof with an inert gas selected from the group consisting of nitrogen, helium, argon, neon, krypton, xenon, and combinations thereof.
6. The method of claim 3 , wherein said oxygen-containing plasma is generated by RF inductively coupled plasma discharge in an oxygen-containing atmosphere.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein said plasma discharge is generated at a radio frequency in a range from about 1 MHz to about 100 MHz.
8. The method of claim 3 , wherein said oxidizing is carried out at a pressure in a range from about 0.1 Pa to about 1000 Pa.
9. The method of claim 3 , wherein said oxidizing is carried out for a time from about 1 second to about 2 hours.
10. The method of claim 3 , wherein said oxidizing is carried out for a time from about 10 seconds to about 1 hour.
11. A method for preventing or reducing interaction between a package and a polymeric article contained therein, said method comprising:
exposing said polymeric article to oxygen-containing plasma to produce a treated polymeric article; and
disposing said treated polymeric article in a quantity of an aqueous solution contained in said package;
wherein said oxygen-containing plasma is generated by RF inductively coupled plasma discharge at a radio frequency in a range from about 1 MHz to about 100 MHz, said exposing is carried out in an oxygen-containing atmosphere having a pressure in a range from about 0.1 to about 1000 Pa, for a time in a range from about 1 second to about 2 hours.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein said polymeric article is a contact lens or an intraocular lens.
13. A package comprising a polymeric article having an oxidized surface contained in a container, wherein said polymeric article is free from interaction with an internal surface of said container.
14. The package of claim 13 , wherein said container further includes a quantity of an aqueous solution.
15. The package of claim 14 , wherein said surface of said polymeric article is oxidized by a treatment in oxygen-containing plasma.
16. The package of claim 15 , wherein said oxidized polymeric articles has a surface oxygen concentration greater than a surface oxygen concentration of a polymeric article before oxidation.
17. The package of claim 15 , wherein said oxidized polymeric article has a surface oxygen concentration of greater than about 25 atomic percent, as determined by XPS analysis.
18. The package of claim 17 , wherein said plasma is generated by RF inductively coupled plasma discharge in an oxygen-containing atmosphere at a radio frequency in a range from about 1 MHz to about 100 MHz.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/135,237 US20060260956A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2005-05-23 | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein |
PCT/US2006/019271 WO2006127395A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2006-05-18 | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein |
TW095118029A TW200706568A (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2006-05-19 | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/135,237 US20060260956A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2005-05-23 | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060260956A1 true US20060260956A1 (en) | 2006-11-23 |
Family
ID=37025023
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/135,237 Abandoned US20060260956A1 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2005-05-23 | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060260956A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW200706568A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006127395A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070034533A1 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2007-02-15 | Coopervision Inc. | Contact lens package |
US20100256651A1 (en) * | 2009-04-07 | 2010-10-07 | Dharmendra Jani | Intraocular Lens Injector with Hydrophilic Coating |
US20150114851A1 (en) * | 2012-04-23 | 2015-04-30 | Coopervision International Holding Company, Lp | Contact lens blister packages |
US20160278915A1 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2016-09-29 | Aaren Scientific Inc. | Hydrophilic iol packaging system |
US20190046353A1 (en) * | 2016-02-09 | 2019-02-14 | Greensmith Technologies Ltd | Contact lens packaging |
US11947193B2 (en) | 2017-02-08 | 2024-04-02 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Contact lens packaging |
Citations (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4122942A (en) * | 1974-01-31 | 1978-10-31 | Wolfson Leonard G | Hydrophilic contact lens case |
US4822451A (en) * | 1988-04-27 | 1989-04-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Process for the surface modification of semicrystalline polymers |
US5080924A (en) * | 1989-04-24 | 1992-01-14 | Drexel University | Method of making biocompatible, surface modified materials |
US5290548A (en) * | 1987-04-10 | 1994-03-01 | University Of Florida | Surface modified ocular implants, surgical instruments, devices, prostheses, contact lenses and the like |
US5396085A (en) * | 1993-12-28 | 1995-03-07 | North Carolina State University | Silicon carbide switching device with rectifying-gate |
US5439984A (en) * | 1992-12-23 | 1995-08-08 | Kodama; Jun | Plasma treatment of polymer powders |
US5527566A (en) * | 1991-05-17 | 1996-06-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conditioning of a polymeric substrate |
US5576068A (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1996-11-19 | Societe De Transformation Des Elastomers A Usages Medicaux Et Industriels | Method of treating a packaging element, especially for medical or pharmaceutical use; packaging element thus treated |
US5618316A (en) * | 1993-12-14 | 1997-04-08 | Hoffman; Allan S. | Polyethylene oxide coated intraocular lens |
US5722536A (en) * | 1996-02-08 | 1998-03-03 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Disposable contact lens package with snap-together feature |
US5747831A (en) * | 1994-07-01 | 1998-05-05 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | SIC field-effect transistor array with ring type trenches and method of producing them |
US5753938A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1998-05-19 | North Carolina State University | Static-induction transistors having heterojunction gates and methods of forming same |
US5849368A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1998-12-15 | Schneider (Usa) Inc | Process for hydrophilicization of hydrophobic polymers |
US5945701A (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 1999-08-31 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Static induction transistor |
US6193369B1 (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2001-02-27 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses |
US6213604B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2001-04-10 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses with a flexible carbon coating |
US20020046958A1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2002-04-25 | Lipscomb Lance Kyle | Textured contact lens package |
US6380569B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2002-04-30 | Rockwell Science Center, Llc | High power unipolar FET switch |
US6550915B1 (en) * | 1998-12-21 | 2003-04-22 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Surface treatment of fluorinated contact lens materials |
US6617653B1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2003-09-09 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Misfet |
US6638563B2 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2003-10-28 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for applying renewable polymeric lens coating |
US6767783B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2004-07-27 | Mississippi State University-Research And Technology Corporation (Rtc) | Self-aligned transistor and diode topologies in silicon carbide through the use of selective epitaxy or selective implantation |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9113875D0 (en) * | 1991-06-27 | 1991-08-14 | Biointeractions Ltd | Polymer coatings |
USRE37558E1 (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 2002-02-26 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Packaging arrangement for contact lenses |
-
2005
- 2005-05-23 US US11/135,237 patent/US20060260956A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-05-18 WO PCT/US2006/019271 patent/WO2006127395A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-05-19 TW TW095118029A patent/TW200706568A/en unknown
Patent Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4122942A (en) * | 1974-01-31 | 1978-10-31 | Wolfson Leonard G | Hydrophilic contact lens case |
US5290548A (en) * | 1987-04-10 | 1994-03-01 | University Of Florida | Surface modified ocular implants, surgical instruments, devices, prostheses, contact lenses and the like |
US4822451A (en) * | 1988-04-27 | 1989-04-18 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Process for the surface modification of semicrystalline polymers |
US5080924A (en) * | 1989-04-24 | 1992-01-14 | Drexel University | Method of making biocompatible, surface modified materials |
US5527566A (en) * | 1991-05-17 | 1996-06-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conditioning of a polymeric substrate |
US5439984A (en) * | 1992-12-23 | 1995-08-08 | Kodama; Jun | Plasma treatment of polymer powders |
US5618316A (en) * | 1993-12-14 | 1997-04-08 | Hoffman; Allan S. | Polyethylene oxide coated intraocular lens |
US5396085A (en) * | 1993-12-28 | 1995-03-07 | North Carolina State University | Silicon carbide switching device with rectifying-gate |
US5747831A (en) * | 1994-07-01 | 1998-05-05 | Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft | SIC field-effect transistor array with ring type trenches and method of producing them |
US5849368A (en) * | 1995-02-01 | 1998-12-15 | Schneider (Usa) Inc | Process for hydrophilicization of hydrophobic polymers |
US5576068A (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1996-11-19 | Societe De Transformation Des Elastomers A Usages Medicaux Et Industriels | Method of treating a packaging element, especially for medical or pharmaceutical use; packaging element thus treated |
US5722536A (en) * | 1996-02-08 | 1998-03-03 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Disposable contact lens package with snap-together feature |
US5753938A (en) * | 1996-08-08 | 1998-05-19 | North Carolina State University | Static-induction transistors having heterojunction gates and methods of forming same |
US5945701A (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 1999-08-31 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Static induction transistor |
US6193369B1 (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2001-02-27 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses |
US6550915B1 (en) * | 1998-12-21 | 2003-04-22 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Surface treatment of fluorinated contact lens materials |
US6794456B2 (en) * | 1998-12-21 | 2004-09-21 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Surface treatment of fluorinated contact lens materials |
US6213604B1 (en) * | 1999-05-20 | 2001-04-10 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses with a flexible carbon coating |
US6380569B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2002-04-30 | Rockwell Science Center, Llc | High power unipolar FET switch |
US6617653B1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2003-09-09 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Misfet |
US20020046958A1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2002-04-25 | Lipscomb Lance Kyle | Textured contact lens package |
US6638563B2 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2003-10-28 | Bausch & Lomb Incorporated | Method for applying renewable polymeric lens coating |
US6767783B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2004-07-27 | Mississippi State University-Research And Technology Corporation (Rtc) | Self-aligned transistor and diode topologies in silicon carbide through the use of selective epitaxy or selective implantation |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070034533A1 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2007-02-15 | Coopervision Inc. | Contact lens package |
WO2007086936A1 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2007-08-02 | Coopervision, Inc. | Contact lens package |
US7426993B2 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2008-09-23 | Coopervision International Holding Company, Lp | Contact lens package |
US20100256651A1 (en) * | 2009-04-07 | 2010-10-07 | Dharmendra Jani | Intraocular Lens Injector with Hydrophilic Coating |
US20150114851A1 (en) * | 2012-04-23 | 2015-04-30 | Coopervision International Holding Company, Lp | Contact lens blister packages |
US10390593B2 (en) * | 2012-04-23 | 2019-08-27 | Coopervision International Holding Company, Lp | Contact lens blister packages |
US20160278915A1 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2016-09-29 | Aaren Scientific Inc. | Hydrophilic iol packaging system |
US10299914B2 (en) * | 2013-10-24 | 2019-05-28 | Carl Zeiss Meditec Production, LLC | Hydrophilic IOL packaging system |
US20190046353A1 (en) * | 2016-02-09 | 2019-02-14 | Greensmith Technologies Ltd | Contact lens packaging |
US11071644B2 (en) * | 2016-02-09 | 2021-07-27 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Contact lens packaging |
US11947193B2 (en) | 2017-02-08 | 2024-04-02 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Contact lens packaging |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006127395A1 (en) | 2006-11-30 |
TW200706568A (en) | 2007-02-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2006127395A1 (en) | Methods for preventing or reducing interaction between packaging materials and polymeric articles contained therein | |
CA2373556C (en) | Surface-treatment of silicone medical devices comprising an intermediate carbon coating and graft polymerization | |
CA2373552C (en) | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses with a flexible carbon coating | |
JP6023589B2 (en) | Silicone hydrogel contact lens and method for producing silicone hydrogel contact lens | |
EP2237699B1 (en) | Packaging solutions | |
EP0785854B1 (en) | Method for treating plastic mold pieces | |
WO1999057179A1 (en) | Surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses | |
EP2681617B1 (en) | Silicone hydrogel contact lenses | |
US8419792B2 (en) | Brush copolymers | |
TW201341417A (en) | Silicone hydrogels formed from zero diluent reactive mixtures | |
HUE027342T2 (en) | Method for applying a coating onto a silicone hydrogel lens | |
US20020182315A1 (en) | Surface treatment of non-plasma treated silicone hydrogel contact lenses | |
JP2012514114A (en) | Brush copolymer | |
EP2492720A1 (en) | Wettable Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses | |
US6491281B1 (en) | Mold assembly for producing ophthalmic lens article | |
TWI435801B (en) | Use of surfactants in extraction procedures for silicone hydrogel ophthalmic lenses | |
US6998073B2 (en) | Pulse extraction of ocular medical devices | |
AU3660399A (en) | Plasma surface treatment of silicone hydrogel contact lenses | |
KR101324049B1 (en) | Methods of inspecting ophthalmic lenses | |
JP2007070405A (en) | Method for producing contact lens material and method for producing soft contact lens | |
US12097295B2 (en) | Packaging solutions | |
US20060131769A1 (en) | Pre-polymer extraction using a super-cooled fluid | |
EP2492719A1 (en) | Dimensionally stable silicone hydrogel contact lenses | |
US20080153938A1 (en) | Surface Treatment of Fluorinated Biomedical Devices |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STACHOWSKI, MARK J.;FRIENDS, GARY D.;RASTOGI, SANJAY M.;REEL/FRAME:016599/0937 Effective date: 20050518 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |