US20060090408A1 - Vehicle barrier system - Google Patents
Vehicle barrier system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060090408A1 US20060090408A1 US11/054,257 US5425705A US2006090408A1 US 20060090408 A1 US20060090408 A1 US 20060090408A1 US 5425705 A US5425705 A US 5425705A US 2006090408 A1 US2006090408 A1 US 2006090408A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- barrier system
- vehicle barrier
- reaction mass
- modular vehicle
- post
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F13/00—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions
- E01F13/12—Arrangements for obstructing or restricting traffic, e.g. gates, barricades ; Preventing passage of vehicles of selected category or dimensions for forcibly arresting or disabling vehicles, e.g. spiked mats
Definitions
- This invention relates to a vehicle barrier system.
- bollards which include steel pipes filled with concrete and embedded into the ground to a depth of 48 inches. These bollards are spaced approximately 40-48 inches on center above the periphery of the facility to be protected. The installation of bollards requires the excavation and disposal of earth by backhoe, or by drilling, approximately 36′′ diameter holes by 60′′ deep.
- common landscape items such as park benches, bus waiting shelters, vehicular gates, pedestrian gates, street lighting, fountains, civic art and sculpture, trash receptacles, tables, chairs, and other exterior elements which may disguise and increase the vehicle arresting function of the barrier system.
- the invention results from the realization that a truly simple and inexpensive yet versatile and effective modular vehicle barrier arresting system can be achieved with a reaction mass for installation in the earth and at least one actuator post extending upward from and immovably anchored to the reaction mass.
- the reaction mass has a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with the post.
- This invention features a modular vehicle barrier system including a reaction mass for installation in the earth and at least one post immovably anchored in the reaction mass and extending upwardly therefrom.
- the reaction mass has a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with the post.
- the reaction mass may extend rearwardly from the post under at least the forward portion of the vehicle for bearing a portion of the weight of the vehicle.
- the post may or may not be closer to the forward end than the rearward end of the reaction mass.
- Each post may be made of metal.
- Each post may be made of metal and filled with concrete.
- the reaction mass may include a metal framework.
- the metal framework may include metal members welded together.
- the post may be made of metal and welded to the framework.
- the metal framework may be filled with concrete.
- the metal framework may be filled with concrete in situ.
- the reaction mass may include a thrust block at its forward end.
- the thrust block may include a metal core.
- the thrust block may include a concrete mass extending to confronting virgin earth.
- the thrust block may include a concrete mass poured in situ.
- the top of the reaction mass may be below the surface.
- the top of the reaction mass may be flush with the surface.
- the system may be accompanied with hardscape environs and the posts may form a part of the hardscape environs.
- the system may be accompanied with hardscape objects and the posts may be integral with the hardscape objects.
- FIG. 1 is schematic side elevational sectional view of a vehicle barrier system according to this invention
- FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 with portions broken away showing the addition of a thrust block frame
- FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 with a concrete addition to the thrust block frame of FIG. 2 ;
- FIG. 4 is a schematic front elevational view of the vehicle barrier system of FIG. 1 showing a module with three posts immovably mounted to the reaction mass frame;
- FIG. 5 is a schematic top plan view of the barrier system of FIG. 4 ;
- FIG. 6 is a view similar to FIG. 5 with the addition of the thrust block frame to the reaction mass frame of FIG. 5 ;
- FIG. 6A is a three dimensional view of the system of FIG. 6 ;
- FIG. 7 is a view similar to FIG. 6 with concrete installed in the reaction mass frame and the thrust block frame with an additional in situ pour against virgin earth;
- FIG. 8 is a schematic front elevational view of a vehicle barrier system according to this invention associated with hardscape objects in the surrounding environment;
- FIG. 9 is a view similar to FIG. 8 showing a series of such vehicle barrier systems interconnected to form a continuous hardscape object such as a fence;
- FIG. 10 is a front elevational view of a 9′ high anti-climb fence with which the posts of the vehicle barrier system of this invention are integral;
- FIGS. 11 and 12 are views similar to FIGS. 8, 9 , and 10 showing various hardscape object environments with which the vehicle barrier system of this invention may be associated and/or integrated.
- reaction mass 12 for installation in the earth and at least one post 14 immovably anchored in reaction mass 12 and extending upwardly therefrom.
- Reaction mass 12 includes a forward member 16 for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle 18 with post 14 .
- reaction mass 12 extends rearwardly 20 sufficiently from post 14 to be under at least the forward portion of the vehicle where it may bear a portion of the weight of the vehicle.
- Post 14 may be closer to the forward end 22 than the rearward end 20 .
- Reaction mass 12 has depth d of approximately 15 inches and in FIG. 1 its top 17 is shown flush with the surface 24 .
- reaction mass 12 may be formed from steel shapes as explained hereinafter and may include an additional thrust block 28 , FIG. 2 , including frame 29 made of steel shapes which may additionally include concrete 31 .
- Post 14 is typically made of steel and may be solid steel or may be a steel cylinder 30 filled with a strong dense material such as concrete 32 for example. Also as shown in FIG. 2 , reaction mass 12 had its top 17 not flush but below the surface 24 of the earth.
- Thrust block 28 may be further formed by a mass of concrete 32 poured in and around frame 29 not visible in FIG. 3 .
- vehicle barrier system 10 may include a plurality of such posts 14 attached to reaction mass 12 .
- Frame 40 of reaction mass 12 FIG. 5
- End channels 46 and 48 may be made of similar channel material and there may be cross-beams 50 , 52 , and 54 .
- Lateral stabilizer 56 may be made of a “T” shape with a height of 6 inches, a width of 10 inches, and a weight of 26.5 pounds per linear foot. I-beams having a height of 14 inches, a width of 10 inches and a weight of 61 pounds per linear foot. The entire frame has a length l equal to 1371 ⁇ 2 inches and a width w equal to 48.625 inches and an overall weight including frame 40 and bearing post 14 of 4,700 pounds. Also included may be 1 ⁇ 2 inch steel plate bottom and channel “grabbers”.
- All of the beams, 42 - 56 may be fastened in any suitable fashion, e.g., bolts, welding.
- beams 42 - 56 are shown welded to each other such as at welds 60 , but this could as well be done by high strength bolts.
- This is illustrated with respect to thrust block frame 29 in FIG. 6 , where longitudinal L angle 70 , 42 are attached to the cross channels 74 , 76 , 78 , 80 and 82 by means of bolts 84 and connector plates 86 .
- Angle 70 has a height of 8 inches and a width of 4 inches and a weight of 19.6 pounds per linear foot.
- Channels 74 - 82 have a height of 6 inches a width of 2 inches and a weight of 10.5 pounds per linear foot. Either or both reaction mass frame 40 and thrust block frame 29 may use welds, bolts or any other suitable fastening technique as indicated earlier. Likewise, posts 14 are immovably anchored to frame 40 in reaction mass 12 by a suitable strong attachment means. For example, welds 62 or by bolts 64 . I-beams 74 - 82 typically have a length of 22 inches so that the thrust block frame 29 adds approximately 2 feet to the width w of reaction mass frame 40 . A better understanding of reaction mass 12 with frame 40 , posts 14 and thrust block frame 29 is afforded by the three dimensional view of FIG. 6A .
- Reaction mass 12 frame 40 may be filled with a strong dense material such as concrete 90 , FIG. 7 , having a density of approximately 144 pounds per cubic foot so that the overall modular reaction mass including frame 40 and concrete 90 with posts 14 weighs approximately 12,235 pounds.
- Concrete 90 may be supplied initially and shipped as a part of the module or may be filled in situ.
- Thrust block 28 may also have the concrete portion poured at the factory where the module is made or in situ as shown by shute 100 delivering concrete 102 on site. If thrust block 28 is made previously and shipped to the site as a part of reaction mass 12 it is typically not practical to make the trench in which system 10 modules are installed with clean sharp edges that will just fit the edge of the thrust block 28 so that the thrust block will be up against virgin naturally compressed soil.
- posts 14 may be covered by architecturally designed fence posts 110 which are further integrated into railing panels 112 .
- Systems 10 of three posts 14 each, FIG. 9 laid in an extensive trench 21 inches deep and 6 feet wide may use connecting rail panels 112 to be made to appear as one continuous decorative fence wholly appropriate to the landscape and completely disguising the barrier system.
- the vehicle barrier system according to this invention is associated with or form a part of the hardscape environs or is integral with the hardscape objects.
- FIG. 10 shows a 9′ high anti-climb fence 114 , such as used around an embassy or other public building, of substantial height and length and mounted to and supported by posts 14 which are immovably anchored in the reaction masses of their respective or common barrier systems 10 .
- posts 14 which are immovably anchored in the reaction masses of their respective or common barrier systems 10 .
- the embodiments herein have been shown as having one or three posts these are not limitations of the invention as any number is workable depending upon the constraints of shipment, handling, ease of installation and size of vehicles to be blocked. Typically, when there is more than one post there are spaced at approximately 46 inches apart.
- Posts 14 in addition to being disposed in designer posts 110 a , FIG.
- FIG. 11 may be made as a part of supports 120 for park bench 122 or may be disposed in the bases 124 of various light posts 126 or even as a part of structures and buildings such as bus waiting shelter 130 , FIG. 12 , where post 14 can be wholly integrated in the hardscape objects and the presence of the barrier system including each of the barrier system modules is wholly disguised.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
Abstract
A modular vehicle barrier system includes a reaction mass for installation in the earth; at least one post immovably anchored in the reaction mass and extending upwardly therefrom; the reaction mass having a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with the post.
Description
- This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/621,374 filed Oct. 22, 2004, entitled “Assault Vehicle Barrier System” incorporated by reference herein.
- This invention relates to a vehicle barrier system.
- With the rise in terrorism there has been a rise in the need for security and protection devices to defend buildings and facilities from attack by assault vehicles such as cars and trucks loaded with explosives. The presently available devices suffer from one or more disadvantages including being generally complex and expensive, and requiring substantial ground preparation, earth moving, utility relocation and construction effort. One of the most popular approaches presently is the use of simple bollards which include steel pipes filled with concrete and embedded into the ground to a depth of 48 inches. These bollards are spaced approximately 40-48 inches on center above the periphery of the facility to be protected. The installation of bollards requires the excavation and disposal of earth by backhoe, or by drilling, approximately 36″ diameter holes by 60″ deep. The process requires costly underground utility relocation (most utilities are located 36″ to 48″ below grade). This is a time consuming and costly process in an urban setting. Further, in and around many government buildings there exist underground tunnels for heat, water, sewerage utilities and personal egress which are located within 36″ of the top surface. Thus not allowing the installation of bollards in that area. Jersey barriers are also temporarily used to bar entry of unwanted vehicles. Conventional barriers such as those that are selectively extendable and retractable e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,424; 4,705,426 are not sufficient to meet present government specifications such as SD-STD-02.01, Revision A, March 2003. Whether these simpler approaches are used or more complex approaches are used the flexibility of design is severely limited: architectural and aesthetic qualities are generally sacrificed for security.
- It is therefore an object of this invention to provide an improved vehicle barrier system.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved vehicle barrier system which requires much less ground preparation.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved vehicle barrier system which is a shallow ground mounted system.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved vehicle barrier system which admits of easy and aesthetic variations in design and appearance.
- It is a further object of this invention to provide such an improved vehicle barrier system which permits easy integration of common landscape items such as park benches, bus waiting shelters, vehicular gates, pedestrian gates, street lighting, fountains, civic art and sculpture, trash receptacles, tables, chairs, and other exterior elements which may disguise and increase the vehicle arresting function of the barrier system.
- The invention results from the realization that a truly simple and inexpensive yet versatile and effective modular vehicle barrier arresting system can be achieved with a reaction mass for installation in the earth and at least one actuator post extending upward from and immovably anchored to the reaction mass. The reaction mass has a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with the post.
- The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
- This invention features a modular vehicle barrier system including a reaction mass for installation in the earth and at least one post immovably anchored in the reaction mass and extending upwardly therefrom. The reaction mass has a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with the post.
- In a preferred embodiment the reaction mass may extend rearwardly from the post under at least the forward portion of the vehicle for bearing a portion of the weight of the vehicle. The post may or may not be closer to the forward end than the rearward end of the reaction mass. There may be a plurality of spaced posts anchored in the reaction mass. Each post may be made of metal. Each post may be made of metal and filled with concrete. The reaction mass may include a metal framework. The metal framework may include metal members welded together. The post may be made of metal and welded to the framework. The metal framework may be filled with concrete. The metal framework may be filled with concrete in situ. The reaction mass may include a thrust block at its forward end. The thrust block may include a metal core. The thrust block may include a concrete mass extending to confronting virgin earth. The thrust block may include a concrete mass poured in situ. The top of the reaction mass may be below the surface. The top of the reaction mass may be flush with the surface. The system may be accompanied with hardscape environs and the posts may form a part of the hardscape environs. The system may be accompanied with hardscape objects and the posts may be integral with the hardscape objects.
- Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is schematic side elevational sectional view of a vehicle barrier system according to this invention; -
FIG. 2 is a view similar toFIG. 1 with portions broken away showing the addition of a thrust block frame; -
FIG. 3 is a view similar toFIG. 2 with a concrete addition to the thrust block frame ofFIG. 2 ; -
FIG. 4 is a schematic front elevational view of the vehicle barrier system ofFIG. 1 showing a module with three posts immovably mounted to the reaction mass frame; -
FIG. 5 is a schematic top plan view of the barrier system ofFIG. 4 ; -
FIG. 6 is a view similar toFIG. 5 with the addition of the thrust block frame to the reaction mass frame ofFIG. 5 ; -
FIG. 6A is a three dimensional view of the system ofFIG. 6 ; -
FIG. 7 is a view similar toFIG. 6 with concrete installed in the reaction mass frame and the thrust block frame with an additional in situ pour against virgin earth; -
FIG. 8 is a schematic front elevational view of a vehicle barrier system according to this invention associated with hardscape objects in the surrounding environment; -
FIG. 9 is a view similar toFIG. 8 showing a series of such vehicle barrier systems interconnected to form a continuous hardscape object such as a fence; -
FIG. 10 is a front elevational view of a 9′ high anti-climb fence with which the posts of the vehicle barrier system of this invention are integral; and -
FIGS. 11 and 12 are views similar toFIGS. 8, 9 , and 10 showing various hardscape object environments with which the vehicle barrier system of this invention may be associated and/or integrated. - Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
- There is shown in
FIG. 1 a vehicle barrier system 10 according to this invention including areaction mass 12 for installation in the earth and at least onepost 14 immovably anchored inreaction mass 12 and extending upwardly therefrom.Reaction mass 12 includes aforward member 16 for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of thevehicle 18 withpost 14. Typicallyreaction mass 12 extends rearwardly 20 sufficiently frompost 14 to be under at least the forward portion of the vehicle where it may bear a portion of the weight of the vehicle.Post 14 may be closer to theforward end 22 than therearward end 20.Reaction mass 12 has depth d of approximately 15 inches and inFIG. 1 its top 17 is shown flush with thesurface 24. The portion of theearth 26 immediately in front offorward member 16 is preferably virgin earth which is already naturally compacted to provide good resistance against any movement ofreaction mass 12. The size and weight ofreaction mass 12 and post 14 combined with the resistance of theearth 26 makes it possible forvehicle barrier system 10 to operate effectively to arrest the movement of vehicles even though it requires installation to only a depth of 21 inches.Reaction mass 12 may be formed from steel shapes as explained hereinafter and may include anadditional thrust block 28,FIG. 2 , includingframe 29 made of steel shapes which may additionally include concrete 31.Post 14 is typically made of steel and may be solid steel or may be asteel cylinder 30 filled with a strong dense material such asconcrete 32 for example. Also as shown inFIG. 2 ,reaction mass 12 had its top 17 not flush but below thesurface 24 of the earth. -
Thrust block 28,FIG. 3 , may be further formed by a mass ofconcrete 32 poured in and aroundframe 29 not visible inFIG. 3 . Although thus farvehicle barrier system 10 is shown in side view depicting but onepost 14, this is not a necessary limitation of the invention, for as shown inFIG. 4 ,vehicle barrier system 10 may include a plurality ofsuch posts 14 attached toreaction mass 12.Frame 40 ofreaction mass 12,FIG. 5 , may be formed of steel shapes including but not limited toforward channel 42 and rearward channel 44, which are 15 inches high and 3.375 inches wide and have a weight of 33.9 pounds per linear foot.End channels Lateral stabilizer 56 may be made of a “T” shape with a height of 6 inches, a width of 10 inches, and a weight of 26.5 pounds per linear foot. I-beams having a height of 14 inches, a width of 10 inches and a weight of 61 pounds per linear foot. The entire frame has a length l equal to 137½ inches and a width w equal to 48.625 inches and an overallweight including frame 40 and bearing post 14 of 4,700 pounds. Also included may be ½ inch steel plate bottom and channel “grabbers”. - All of the beams, 42-56 may be fastened in any suitable fashion, e.g., bolts, welding. In
FIG. 6 , beams 42-56 are shown welded to each other such as atwelds 60, but this could as well be done by high strength bolts. This is illustrated with respect to thrustblock frame 29 inFIG. 6 , wherelongitudinal L angle cross channels bolts 84 andconnector plates 86.Angle 70, has a height of 8 inches and a width of 4 inches and a weight of 19.6 pounds per linear foot. Channels 74-82 have a height of 6 inches a width of 2 inches and a weight of 10.5 pounds per linear foot. Either or bothreaction mass frame 40 andthrust block frame 29 may use welds, bolts or any other suitable fastening technique as indicated earlier. Likewise, posts 14 are immovably anchored to frame 40 inreaction mass 12 by a suitable strong attachment means. For example, welds 62 or bybolts 64. I-beams 74-82 typically have a length of 22 inches so that thethrust block frame 29 adds approximately 2 feet to the width w ofreaction mass frame 40. A better understanding ofreaction mass 12 withframe 40, posts 14 andthrust block frame 29 is afforded by the three dimensional view ofFIG. 6A . -
Reaction mass 12frame 40,FIG. 7 , may be filled with a strong dense material such asconcrete 90,FIG. 7 , having a density of approximately 144 pounds per cubic foot so that the overall modular reactionmass including frame 40 and concrete 90 withposts 14 weighs approximately 12,235 pounds.Concrete 90 may be supplied initially and shipped as a part of the module or may be filled in situ.Thrust block 28 may also have the concrete portion poured at the factory where the module is made or in situ as shown byshute 100 delivering concrete 102 on site. Ifthrust block 28 is made previously and shipped to the site as a part ofreaction mass 12 it is typically not practical to make the trench in whichsystem 10 modules are installed with clean sharp edges that will just fit the edge of thethrust block 28 so that the thrust block will be up against virgin naturally compressed soil. For this reason more concrete 102 will be added in situ so that the space between theedge 104 ofthrust block 28 and theirregular edge 106 of the earth of the trench will be filled with a minimally compressible material such as the concrete 108 which then engages thevirgin earth 26. Of course if the concrete portion ofthrust block 28 is not made previously and shipped withreaction mass 40, then the entire assembly of thrust block plus thefill portion 102 can be poured at one in the same time. - One of the important advantages of this invention in addition to the fact that it requires less ground preparation and can be shallow ground mounted is the fact that it admits of easy and aesthetic variations in design and appearance. And in fact it is easily integrated in common landscape items referred to as hardscape, such as park benches, bus waiting shelters, vehicle gates, pedestrian gates, street lighting, fountains, civic arts and sculpture, trash receptacles, tables, chairs, and other exterior elements which can both disguise and beautify the installation and can increase the vehicle arresting function of the barrier system.
- For example, posts 14,
FIG. 8 , may be covered by architecturally designedfence posts 110 which are further integrated intorailing panels 112.Systems 10 of threeposts 14 each,FIG. 9 , laid in an extensive trench 21 inches deep and 6 feet wide may use connectingrail panels 112 to be made to appear as one continuous decorative fence wholly appropriate to the landscape and completely disguising the barrier system. Various other integrations are possible in which the vehicle barrier system according to this invention is associated with or form a part of the hardscape environs or is integral with the hardscape objects.FIG. 10 shows a 9′ highanti-climb fence 114, such as used around an embassy or other public building, of substantial height and length and mounted to and supported byposts 14 which are immovably anchored in the reaction masses of their respective orcommon barrier systems 10. Although the embodiments herein have been shown as having one or three posts these are not limitations of the invention as any number is workable depending upon the constraints of shipment, handling, ease of installation and size of vehicles to be blocked. Typically, when there is more than one post there are spaced at approximately 46 inches apart.Posts 14 in addition to being disposed indesigner posts 110 a,FIG. 11 may be made as a part ofsupports 120 forpark bench 122 or may be disposed in thebases 124 of variouslight posts 126 or even as a part of structures and buildings such asbus waiting shelter 130,FIG. 12 , wherepost 14 can be wholly integrated in the hardscape objects and the presence of the barrier system including each of the barrier system modules is wholly disguised. - Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
- In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
- Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
Claims (19)
1. A modular vehicle barrier system comprising:
a reaction mass for installation in the earth;
at least one post immovably anchored in said reaction mass and extending upwardly therefrom;
said reaction mass having a forward member for confronting and compressing the surrounding earth and absorbing energy from the impact of the vehicle with said post.
2. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which said reaction mass extends rearwardly from said post under at least the forward portion of the vehicle for bearing a portion of the weight of the vehicle.
3. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which said post is closer to the forward end than the rearward end of said reaction mass.
4. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which there are a plurality of spaced posts anchored in said reaction mass.
5. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which each said post is made of metal.
6. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which each said post is made of metal and filled with concrete.
7. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which said reaction mass includes a metal framework.
8. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 7 in which said metal framework includes metal members welded or bolted together.
9. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 8 in which said post is made of metal and is welded to said framework.
10. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 7 in which said metal framework is filled with concrete.
11. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 10 in which said metal framework is filled with concrete in situ.
12. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which said reaction mass includes a thrust block at its forward end.
13. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 12 in which said thrust block includes a metal core.
14. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 12 in which said thrust block includes a concrete mass extending to confronting virgin earth.
15. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 14 in which said thrust block includes a concrete mass poured in situ.
16. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which the top of said reaction mass is below the surface.
17. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which the top of said reaction mass is flush with the surface.
18. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which the system is accompanied with hardscape environs and said posts form a part of the hardscape environs.
19. The modular vehicle barrier system of claim 1 in which the system is accompanied with hardscape objects and said posts are integral with the hardscape objects.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/054,257 US20060090408A1 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2005-02-09 | Vehicle barrier system |
US11/491,625 US7775738B2 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2006-07-24 | Vehicle barrier system |
US12/804,421 US20100322707A1 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2010-07-21 | Vehicle barrier system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US62137404P | 2004-10-22 | 2004-10-22 | |
US11/054,257 US20060090408A1 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2005-02-09 | Vehicle barrier system |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/491,625 Continuation-In-Part US7775738B2 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2006-07-24 | Vehicle barrier system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060090408A1 true US20060090408A1 (en) | 2006-05-04 |
Family
ID=36260203
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/054,257 Abandoned US20060090408A1 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2005-02-09 | Vehicle barrier system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060090408A1 (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080038056A1 (en) * | 2006-08-13 | 2008-02-14 | Niraj Patel | Shallow Bollard |
US20080112756A1 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2008-05-15 | Tarek Ahmed Omar | Fixed bollard system |
US20090028638A1 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2009-01-29 | John Edwin Crawford | Bollard System and Method of Installation |
US20090035061A1 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2009-02-05 | John Edwin Crawford | Removable Bollard System and Method of Installation |
US20100166498A1 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2010-07-01 | Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc | Anti-ram system and method of installation |
US20100237441A1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2010-09-23 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Gated Diode with Non-Planar Source Region |
US20110164921A1 (en) * | 2005-10-18 | 2011-07-07 | Secureusa, Inc. | Shallow Mounted Fixed Vehicle Barrier Device |
US8277143B2 (en) | 2009-05-12 | 2012-10-02 | RSA Protective Technology, LLC | Surface mount vehicle anti-ram security systems |
GB2489695A (en) * | 2011-04-04 | 2012-10-10 | Marshalls Mono Ltd | Security device to halt and/or deflect vehicles |
EP3441527A1 (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2019-02-13 | Christoph Hassenbach | Shut-off device for preventing the passage of land vehicles |
US20190218731A1 (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2019-07-18 | Eps Italia Srl | Anti-vehicle devices for a modular anti-vehicle barrier and method for making said modular anti-vehicle barrier |
US10988903B1 (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2021-04-27 | Neusch Innovations, Lp | Shallow mount bollard |
CN112942186A (en) * | 2021-02-01 | 2021-06-11 | 亿宇联物联网科技(中山)有限公司 | Anti-collision control method of parking management system |
US11428508B2 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2022-08-30 | Neusch Innovations, Lp | Anti-ram crash gate |
Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1449518A (en) * | 1922-02-09 | 1923-03-27 | John A Lawson | Road guard |
US1650093A (en) * | 1925-10-21 | 1927-11-22 | Rank John | Anchoring base for traffic signals |
US2725958A (en) * | 1953-03-16 | 1955-12-06 | Flexicore Co Of Colorado | Bumper block |
US2774323A (en) * | 1955-05-18 | 1956-12-18 | Everett S Kirk | Audio road signal |
US2783730A (en) * | 1954-09-16 | 1957-03-05 | Robins Seymour | Device for alerting a motorist to vehicle speed |
US2959826A (en) * | 1956-09-04 | 1960-11-15 | Petroleum Dispense Master Ltd | Storage island motor fueler |
US3537687A (en) * | 1967-09-25 | 1970-11-03 | Philip Adelman | Garden fence and wall |
US3880697A (en) * | 1973-09-07 | 1975-04-29 | Hagger Company | Method of and apparatus for making bonded belt loops |
US5466088A (en) * | 1994-01-24 | 1995-11-14 | Nasatka; Ralph G. | Vehicle barrier having a pivotal vehicle barricade and a cooperating pivotal signal barrier |
US5700106A (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1997-12-23 | Young; James E. | Island form |
US5954085A (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1999-09-21 | Petro-First, Inc. | Prefabricated modular fuel dispensing system |
US6099200A (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 2000-08-08 | Pepe; John J. | Anti-terror bollard |
US6338594B1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2002-01-15 | Richard S. Adler | Movable barrier wall |
US6375384B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2002-04-23 | Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. | Island forms |
US6413009B1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-07-02 | Barrier Systems, Inc. | Vehicular traffic barrier system |
US6435760B1 (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2002-08-20 | Universal Valve Co., Inc. | Quick re-install bumper guard system and method |
US20020122693A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-09-05 | Northwest Pipe Company | Breakaway post slipbase |
US20030081997A1 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-01 | Rick Kramer | Vehicle crash wall |
US6669402B1 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2003-12-30 | Safety Barriers, Inc. | Protection barrier system |
US20040028469A1 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2004-02-12 | Blackwater Target Systems | Vehicle barrier |
US6709190B1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-23 | James O. Partin | Double-cross barricade |
US20050150165A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2005-07-14 | Ingo Herwich | Vehicle barrier |
US6939080B2 (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2005-09-06 | Albert L. Wokas | Tank for service stations |
US20050220536A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2005-10-06 | Blair Joey W | Bollard and cable vehicle barrier |
-
2005
- 2005-02-09 US US11/054,257 patent/US20060090408A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1449518A (en) * | 1922-02-09 | 1923-03-27 | John A Lawson | Road guard |
US1650093A (en) * | 1925-10-21 | 1927-11-22 | Rank John | Anchoring base for traffic signals |
US2725958A (en) * | 1953-03-16 | 1955-12-06 | Flexicore Co Of Colorado | Bumper block |
US2783730A (en) * | 1954-09-16 | 1957-03-05 | Robins Seymour | Device for alerting a motorist to vehicle speed |
US2774323A (en) * | 1955-05-18 | 1956-12-18 | Everett S Kirk | Audio road signal |
US2959826A (en) * | 1956-09-04 | 1960-11-15 | Petroleum Dispense Master Ltd | Storage island motor fueler |
US3537687A (en) * | 1967-09-25 | 1970-11-03 | Philip Adelman | Garden fence and wall |
US3880697A (en) * | 1973-09-07 | 1975-04-29 | Hagger Company | Method of and apparatus for making bonded belt loops |
US5466088A (en) * | 1994-01-24 | 1995-11-14 | Nasatka; Ralph G. | Vehicle barrier having a pivotal vehicle barricade and a cooperating pivotal signal barrier |
US5954085A (en) * | 1994-07-12 | 1999-09-21 | Petro-First, Inc. | Prefabricated modular fuel dispensing system |
US5700106A (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1997-12-23 | Young; James E. | Island form |
US6939080B2 (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2005-09-06 | Albert L. Wokas | Tank for service stations |
US6375384B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2002-04-23 | Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. | Island forms |
US6099200A (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 2000-08-08 | Pepe; John J. | Anti-terror bollard |
US6338594B1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2002-01-15 | Richard S. Adler | Movable barrier wall |
US6435760B1 (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2002-08-20 | Universal Valve Co., Inc. | Quick re-install bumper guard system and method |
US6413009B1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-07-02 | Barrier Systems, Inc. | Vehicular traffic barrier system |
US20020122693A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-09-05 | Northwest Pipe Company | Breakaway post slipbase |
US20030081997A1 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-01 | Rick Kramer | Vehicle crash wall |
US20040028469A1 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2004-02-12 | Blackwater Target Systems | Vehicle barrier |
US20050201829A1 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2005-09-15 | Blackwater Target Systems | Vehicle barrier |
US6709190B1 (en) * | 2002-09-16 | 2004-03-23 | James O. Partin | Double-cross barricade |
US6669402B1 (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2003-12-30 | Safety Barriers, Inc. | Protection barrier system |
US20050150165A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2005-07-14 | Ingo Herwich | Vehicle barrier |
US20050220536A1 (en) * | 2004-03-30 | 2005-10-06 | Blair Joey W | Bollard and cable vehicle barrier |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100166498A1 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2010-07-01 | Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc | Anti-ram system and method of installation |
US8215865B2 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2012-07-10 | Rsa Protective Technologies, Llc | Anti-ram system and method of installation |
US8197156B2 (en) * | 2005-10-18 | 2012-06-12 | Mitch Morgan | Shallow mounted fixed vehicle barrier device |
US20110164921A1 (en) * | 2005-10-18 | 2011-07-07 | Secureusa, Inc. | Shallow Mounted Fixed Vehicle Barrier Device |
US20090028638A1 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2009-01-29 | John Edwin Crawford | Bollard System and Method of Installation |
US20090035061A1 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2009-02-05 | John Edwin Crawford | Removable Bollard System and Method of Installation |
US7607856B2 (en) | 2006-08-13 | 2009-10-27 | Niraj Patel | Shallow bollard |
US20080038056A1 (en) * | 2006-08-13 | 2008-02-14 | Niraj Patel | Shallow Bollard |
US7850391B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2010-12-14 | Tarek Ahmed Omar | Fixed bollard system |
US20080112756A1 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2008-05-15 | Tarek Ahmed Omar | Fixed bollard system |
US20100237441A1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2010-09-23 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Gated Diode with Non-Planar Source Region |
US8143680B2 (en) | 2007-04-02 | 2012-03-27 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Gated diode with non-planar source region |
US8523479B2 (en) | 2009-05-12 | 2013-09-03 | RSA Protective Technology, LLC | Surface mount vehicle anti-ram security systems |
US8277143B2 (en) | 2009-05-12 | 2012-10-02 | RSA Protective Technology, LLC | Surface mount vehicle anti-ram security systems |
GB2489695A (en) * | 2011-04-04 | 2012-10-10 | Marshalls Mono Ltd | Security device to halt and/or deflect vehicles |
GB2489695B (en) * | 2011-04-04 | 2014-12-31 | Marshalls Mono Ltd | Security device |
US11428508B2 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2022-08-30 | Neusch Innovations, Lp | Anti-ram crash gate |
EP3441527A1 (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2019-02-13 | Christoph Hassenbach | Shut-off device for preventing the passage of land vehicles |
US20190218731A1 (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2019-07-18 | Eps Italia Srl | Anti-vehicle devices for a modular anti-vehicle barrier and method for making said modular anti-vehicle barrier |
US10753055B2 (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2020-08-25 | Eps Italia Srl | Anti-vehicle devices for a modular anti-vehicle barrier and method for making said modular anti-vehicle barrier |
US10988903B1 (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2021-04-27 | Neusch Innovations, Lp | Shallow mount bollard |
US11773547B2 (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2023-10-03 | Neusch Innovations, Lp | Shallow mount bollard |
CN112942186A (en) * | 2021-02-01 | 2021-06-11 | 亿宇联物联网科技(中山)有限公司 | Anti-collision control method of parking management system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7775738B2 (en) | Vehicle barrier system | |
US5400563A (en) | Combination column and panel barrier system and method of construction | |
US20060090408A1 (en) | Vehicle barrier system | |
US7699558B2 (en) | Anti-ram system and method of installation | |
US8197156B2 (en) | Shallow mounted fixed vehicle barrier device | |
US8820722B2 (en) | Barrier fencing system | |
US9234323B2 (en) | Post footing | |
US20160076208A1 (en) | Surface Mount Post and Post Retaining System | |
EP1916338A1 (en) | Self-supporting soundproofing and retaining prefabricated concrete panel | |
EP2014833A2 (en) | Sound-resistant and sound-absorbent noise barrier | |
US6000182A (en) | Noise abatement wall | |
CN214695725U (en) | Steel construction combination formula retaining wall | |
NL1016913C2 (en) | Partition element with sound barrier. | |
US11781276B1 (en) | Shallow-mount braced-post barrier | |
Inzhutov et al. | A comparative analysis of foundation design solutions on permafrost soils | |
JP5688039B2 (en) | Partition structure | |
WO2004055273A1 (en) | Multi-level undercut excavation method using superimposed posts | |
WO2004092543A2 (en) | Blast and anti-ramming walls | |
KR102654666B1 (en) | Precast concrete soundproof wall for inserting electrical wire tubes, and construction method for the same | |
US20030223811A1 (en) | Modular exterior casing for crash barriers made of glass fiber reinforced concrete | |
KR101186563B1 (en) | Construction method and foundation structure used pile foundation of precast concrete for soundproofing fence | |
KR100593297B1 (en) | Structure of panel using entrance transport pipe | |
CN112878360B (en) | Steel structure combined retaining wall and construction method thereof | |
CN221740897U (en) | Double-deck hidden arch bridge structure of high roadbed that fills | |
KR20020028967A (en) | The method for construction using pressure-input propulsion of ecosystem travel load |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |