US20060085150A1 - Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements - Google Patents
Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060085150A1 US20060085150A1 US10/967,772 US96777204A US2006085150A1 US 20060085150 A1 US20060085150 A1 US 20060085150A1 US 96777204 A US96777204 A US 96777204A US 2006085150 A1 US2006085150 A1 US 2006085150A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- phase noise
- spectrum analyzer
- array
- measurement signal
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R23/00—Arrangements for measuring frequencies; Arrangements for analysing frequency spectra
- G01R23/16—Spectrum analysis; Fourier analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R35/00—Testing or calibrating of apparatus covered by the other groups of this subclass
- G01R35/005—Calibrating; Standards or reference devices, e.g. voltage or resistance standards, "golden" references
Definitions
- phase noise can reduce measurement accuracy of a spectrum analyzer when the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer cannot be isolated from signal measurements that are performed by the spectrum analyzer.
- Phase noise can also limit measurement sensitivity of the spectrum analyzer. If the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer is sufficiently high relative to the signals being measured, the signals can be masked by the phase noise and go undetected by the spectrum analyzer.
- decreasing the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer to improve the measurement accuracy and measurement sensitivity can be costly or difficult to achieve, due to inherent noise within local oscillators, frequency references and other components of the spectrum analyzers that contribute to phase noise. Accordingly, there is motivation to compensate for the effects of phase noise on the measurements acquired by spectrum analyzers.
- phase noise compensation technique is used in the Option 226 Phase Noise Measurement Personality for the AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. model E4440A PSA series Spectrum Analyzer.
- This technique includes characterizing the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer by stimulating the spectrum analyzer with a signal having phase noise that is substantially lower than that of the spectrum analyzer, and then measuring the stimulus signal. The resultant phase noise from the measured stimulus signal is subtracted on a linear power scale from subsequent signal measurements that are performed by the spectrum analyzer.
- This phase noise characterization pertains only to the one particular operating state of the spectrum analyzer at which the stimulus signal is measured. Therefore, in order to compensate for phase noise using this technique, the characterization is typically performed upon each change of the operating state of the spectrum analyzer, which increases measurement set-up time for the spectrum analyzer.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method for compensating for phase noise of a spectrum analyzer when measuring the phase noise of an applied signal based on an established model of the phase noise that accommodates a variety of operating states of the spectrum analyzer.
- Each operating state has a carrier frequency associated therewith.
- a frequency offset from the carrier frequency of a designated operating state identifies a frequency range for measuring the phase noise of the applied signal.
- the model, along with the frequency offset, is used to form an array that is applied to extract an output signal from a phase noise measurement signal that is acquired by the spectrum analyzer.
- FIG. 1 shows exemplary signals relevant to spectral measurements by a spectrum analyzer
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a phase noise compensation system according to embodiments of the present invention
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a measurement acquisition unit of a conventional spectrum analyzer
- FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram for establishing a phase noise model according to embodiments of the present invention
- FIGS. 5A-5B show exemplary signals relevant to the embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a phase noise compensation method according to embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 shows exemplary signals relevant to spectral measurements acquired by a typical spectrum analyzer.
- a continuous wave signal S CW is shown with a carrier frequency of f C .
- the carrier frequency f C has an amplitude A C corresponding to a peak power of the carrier frequency f C .
- the continuous wave signal S CW also includes mirror sideband phase noise signals, one of which is within the frequency range denoted S.
- the characteristics of the phase noise signal are of particular importance.
- the phase noise can be plotted as a function of frequency to determine if the phase noise drop off follows an expected pattern or scale.
- the carrier frequency f C is not shown on the spectrum analyzer screen, and thus not included within the frequency span of the spectrum analyzer.
- the frequency span of the spectrum analyzer would be set to the frequency span for the phase noise measurement signal S.
- FIG. 1 also shows a measured signal S CWm that results when the continuous wave signal S CW is measured by a spectrum analyzer.
- the spectrum analyzer has a phase noise ⁇ SA in the operating state at which the continuous wave signal S CW is measured.
- the measured signal S CW m includes the phase noise ⁇ SA contributed by the spectrum analyzer.
- the measured signal S CWm can be expressed as the signal S CWm plus the amplitude (power) of the carrier frequency A i multiplied with the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer.
- phase noise measurement S MEAS acquired by the spectrum analyzer can be expressed as the phase noise of the applied signal S IN p plus the amplitude of the carrier frequency A C of the applied signal S IN multiplied with the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer, as indicated in equation 1.
- S MEAS S IN p+A C * ⁇ SA (1)
- FIG. 2 shows a spectrum analyzer 10 including a phase noise compensation system 12 in accordance with the embodiments of the present invention.
- the spectrum analyzer 10 includes a controller 14 , typically a computer or other type of processor, that is coupled to a keyboard, touch screen, or other type of user interface 16 .
- the user interface 16 can also be a computer that is coupled to the spectrum analyzer 10 via an interface bus or other communications path 15 .
- the user interface 16 provides an input 17 to the controller 14 , which is used to adjust the operating state of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the operating state includes the center frequency CF, the frequency span SPAN, and resolution bandwidth RBW settings for a measurement acquisition unit 18 of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the measurement acquisition unit 18 includes the components, elements or subsystems used to characterize the spectral content of signals S IN that are applied to the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- FIG. 3 shows a simplified block diagram of the measurement acquisition unit 18 of a conventional spectrum analyzer 10 , such as an AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. model E4440 PSA series Spectrum Analyzer, that includes an offset synthesizer 21 .
- the offset synthesizer 21 provides a local oscillator signal S LO that establishes the center frequency CF and frequency span SPAN for the measurements performed by the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- a filter 26 establishes the resolution bandwith RBW for the measurements performed by the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the operation of a conventional spectrum analyzer is described, for example, in Spectrum Analysis Basics , Application Note 150, provided by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Palo Alto, Calif., USA.
- the operating states of the spectrum analyzer 10 are set according to parameters within a designated parameter set 13 associated with the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the parameters are adjusted, set or otherwise designated via the controller 14 in response to the inputs provided by the user interface 16 .
- the parameter set 13 includes a local oscillator (LO) configuration parameter set 41 , a sweep configuration parameter set 42 , a measurement parameter set 43 and a carrier knowledge parameter set 44 .
- the LO configuration parameter set 41 , sweep configuration parameter set 42 and measurement parameter set 44 are used by the controller 14 to set the measurement acquisition unit 18 .
- the carrier knowledge parameter set 44 includes carrier parameters known by the controller 14 , but not used in acquiring S MEAS .
- An exemplary LO configuration parameter set 41 designates the operating states of a spectrum analyzer 10 that includes an offset synthesizer SYNTH in the measurement acquisition unit 18 .
- Parameter Parameter designation Sampler IF frequency f SIF Sampler IF polarity P Sampler harmonic number N PLL divide ratio R
- the settings of the LO configuration parameter set 41 that designates the operating state of the spectrum analyzer 10 also influence the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the sampler IF frequency (intermediate frequency) f SIF , sampler IF polarity P, sampler harmonic number N and PLL (phase lock loop) divide ratio R within the offset synthesizer of the measurement acquisition unit 18 impact the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the parameter settings that designate the operating state of the spectrum analyzer 10 for the measurement also establish the phase noise ⁇ SA that is contributed to the measurement by the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the phase noise compensation system 12 shown in FIG. 2 includes a computational unit 20 and signal processor 30 . While the computational unit 20 and the signal processor 30 are shown separate from the controller 14 , the computational unit 20 and the signal processor 30 are typically implemented within the controller 14 .
- the computational unit 20 forms an array D 24 from a phase noise model (f OFFSET ) 22 .
- the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) 22 represents the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 at frequency offsets f OFFSET when the operating state of the spectrum analyzer 10 is set in accordance with the LO configuration parameter set 41 .
- the computational unit 20 selects a particular phase noise model (f OFFSET ) 22 that corresponds to the LO configuration parameter set 41 .
- the computational unit 20 selects specific samples from the selected phase noise model 22 based on the frequency span SPAN, a number of measurement points n in S MEAS and a frequency offset f CO from the carrier frequency, which indicates the frequency range between the carrier frequency and an edge frequency on the screen.
- the frequency offset f CO can be positive or negative, depending on the phase noise sideband signal being measured.
- the selected samples collectively form the array D 24 .
- the samples in the array D 24 correspond to the phase noise density in dBc/Hz (the ratio of decibels relative to the carrier power in each hertz of bandwidth). Thus, the samples represent the relative phase noise attributed to the spectrum analyzer 10 . However, to remove the effects of the phase noise from the measured signal S MEAS , the absolute phase noise of the spectrum analyzer is needed. Therefore, the array D is applied to a noise bandwidth scaling 25 that converts the phase noise array proportional to the noise bandwidth NBW of the spectrum analyzer, established based on the setting of the resolution bandwidth RBW of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the noise bandwidth NBW is typically a designated multiple of the resolution bandwidth RBW.
- the signal processor 30 applies the array D 24 , now in dBc, to a multiplier 32 that multiplies the array D 24 with the power of the carrier frequency A C to obtain the absolute phase noise of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the output of the multiplier 32 is input to a summation unit 34 that applies the phase noise measurements S MEAS of the signal SN acquired by the measurement acquisition system 18 to the output of multiplier 32 in order to extract an output signal S OUT .
- the output signal S OUT is a representation of the phase noise measurement of signal S IN that includes compensation to reduce the influence of the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 40 for establishing the phase noise model (f OFFSET ), which includes applying a series of calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL to the spectrum analyzer 10 (step 41 ).
- the calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL stimulate the spectrum analyzer 10 at a sufficient number of frequencies or other stimulus conditions to enable the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 to be represented at predetermined frequency offsets f OFFSET and at the various parameter settings that designate the operating states of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- step 42 of the flow diagram 40 the parameters in the parameter set 13 are adjusted to settings ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL that designate corresponding operating states of the spectrum analyzer for the measurement of each of the calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL .
- Step 44 includes measuring each of the calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL at the center frequency CF, frequency span SPAN and resolution bandwidth RBW determined by the operating state designated by the settings ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL of the parameters in the parameter set 13 .
- phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 at predetermined frequency offsets f OFFSET from the measured calibration signals is isolated in step 46 to form a phase noise calibration set ⁇ CAL ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL , which is a function of the parameters in the parameter set 13 adjusted to the settings ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL .
- the calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL applied to the spectrum analyzer have substantially lower phase noise than the spectrum analyzer 10 , so that the phase noise of each measured calibration signal is attributed to the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 can be isolated by subtracting, on a linear power scale, the phase noise of the calibration signals from the total phase noise that is measured by the spectrum analyzer, where the subtraction is performed at the frequency offsets f OFFSET .
- Step 48 includes establishing the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) as a set of functions F of the frequency offsets f OFFSET and the parameters in the parameter set 13 .
- the functions F include a series of contours, typically represented by coefficients, polynomial terms, of elements in an array or look-up table, which result from curve fitting or other mappings of phase noise at frequency offsets f OFFSET to the phase noise calibration set ⁇ CAL ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL established in step 46 .
- the set of functions F are linear, wherein each function Fx within the set of functions F has a slope m that is a function of the sampler IF polarity P, the sampler harmonic number N and the PLL divide ratio R.
- Each function Fx also has an offset b that is a function of the sampler IF polarity P, the sampler harmonic number N and PLL divide ratio R.
- the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) provides a mapping or correspondence between phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 at frequency offsets f OFFSET , and settings of the parameters in the parameter set 13 .
- the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 can be determined from the phase noise model (f OFFSET ).
- the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) is stored in a memory or other storage medium (not shown) that is accessible to the controller 14 .
- phase noise model (f OFFSET ) applied signals are subsequently measured by the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the measurement acquisition unit 18 receives the signal S IN and acquires a phase noise measurement S MEAS for the applied signal S IN .
- the phase noise measurement S MEAS typically stored in a display memory 26 , is acquired at an operating state that includes a designated setting of the center frequency CF, frequency span SPAN, number of measurement points n, resolution bandwidth RBW and frequency offset from the carrier frequency f CO .
- the computational unit 20 forms an array D 24 for the applied signal S IN from the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) 22 based on the frequency span SPAN, number of measurement points n and the frequency offset f CO .
- FIGS. 5A and 5B show exemplary signals relevant to the embodiments of the present invention.
- a phase noise measurement trace S MEAS for a continuous wave signal at a designated operating state of the spectrum analyzer has a predetermined number of measurement points, designated by integer index i.
- integer index i the carrier frequency of the full continuous wave signal is shown as part of an off-screen spectrum 500 .
- the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) 22 for the applied signal S IN is shown in FIG. 5B .
- the array D 24 includes selected points in the phase noise model 22 , designated by the index i.
- the signal processor 30 applies the array D to the measurement trace S MEAS to extract the output signal S OUT
- Applying the array D typically includes a multiplication of the power of the carrier frequency A C with the array D, and a subtraction of the resulting product A C *D from the measurement trace S MEAS .
- the measurement trace S MEAS and the array D are each expressed on a linear power scale for processing by the signal processor 30 .
- the output signal S OUT provided by the signal processor 30 as a result of applying the array D to the measurement trace S MEAS is expressed in equation 3.
- S OUT S MEAS ⁇ A C *D (3)
- the array D Since the array D provides an estimate of the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 at the designated operating state, the array D is approximately equal to the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the resulting output signal S OUT is a representation of the phase noise of the signal S IN that includes compensation to reduce the influence of the phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a phase noise compensation method 60 according to embodiments of the present invention.
- Step 62 includes establishing the phase noise model for the spectrum analyzer.
- This step in the phase noise compensation method 60 typically includes applying the series of calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL to the spectrum analyzer 10 , and adjusting the parameters in the parameter set 13 to the settings ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL to designate corresponding operating states of the spectrum analyzer for the measurement of each of the calibration signals S 1 CAL . . . SN CAL .
- phase noise ⁇ SA of the spectrum analyzer 10 is isolated at predetermined frequency offsets f OFFSET from the measured calibration signal to form the phase noise calibration set ⁇ CAL ⁇ f OFFSET , f SIF , P, N, R ⁇ CAL , when the parameter set 13 includes the parameters of table 1.
- the phase noise model (f OFFSET ) is established as the set of functions F, of the frequency offsets f OFFSET and the parameters in the parameter set 13 .
- the frequency offset from the carrier frequency to the beginning of the frequency range of the phase noise for which phase noise measurements are to be taken is determined.
- the frequency offset can be positive or negative depending on the phase noise sideband of interest with positive offsets representing upper sidebands and negative offsets representing lower sidebands. For example, to measure the phase noise of an applied signal between 1 and 3 kilohertz offset from the carrier frequency, the frequency offset is set to 1 kilohertz.
- a trace S MEAS including an array phase noise measurement points, is acquired by the measurement acquisition unit 18 of the spectrum analyzer in response to the signal S IN applied to the spectrum analyzer 10 .
- the array D is formed from the phase noise model, based on the operating state of the spectrum analyzer 10 designated by the parameter set 13 , including, for example, the frequency span SPAN, the number of measurement points n in S MEAS and the desired frequency offset from the carrier frequency f CO . While step 66 is shown proceeding step 68 , the array D can be formed before or after the acquisition of S MEAS .
- Step 69 includes applying the array D to the phase noise measurements S MEAS to extract the output signal S OUT This typically includes a multiplication of the power of the carrier frequency A C with the array D and then a subtraction of the resulting product from the phase noise measurements S MEAS , where the phase noise measurements S MEAS and the array D are each expressed on a linear power scale.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is related by subject matter to U.S. Utility Application for patent Ser. No. 10/807,205, entitled PHASE NOISE COMPENSATION FOR SPECTRAL MEASUREMENTS, which was filed on Mar. 23, 2004. U.S. Utility Application for patent Ser. No. 10/807,205 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- The performance of spectrum analyzers can be degraded by phase noise that is inherent within the spectrum analyzers. For example, phase noise can reduce measurement accuracy of a spectrum analyzer when the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer cannot be isolated from signal measurements that are performed by the spectrum analyzer. Phase noise can also limit measurement sensitivity of the spectrum analyzer. If the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer is sufficiently high relative to the signals being measured, the signals can be masked by the phase noise and go undetected by the spectrum analyzer. Unfortunately, decreasing the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer to improve the measurement accuracy and measurement sensitivity can be costly or difficult to achieve, due to inherent noise within local oscillators, frequency references and other components of the spectrum analyzers that contribute to phase noise. Accordingly, there is motivation to compensate for the effects of phase noise on the measurements acquired by spectrum analyzers.
- One phase noise compensation technique is used in the Option 226 Phase Noise Measurement Personality for the AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. model E4440A PSA series Spectrum Analyzer. This technique includes characterizing the phase noise of the spectrum analyzer by stimulating the spectrum analyzer with a signal having phase noise that is substantially lower than that of the spectrum analyzer, and then measuring the stimulus signal. The resultant phase noise from the measured stimulus signal is subtracted on a linear power scale from subsequent signal measurements that are performed by the spectrum analyzer. This phase noise characterization pertains only to the one particular operating state of the spectrum analyzer at which the stimulus signal is measured. Therefore, in order to compensate for phase noise using this technique, the characterization is typically performed upon each change of the operating state of the spectrum analyzer, which increases measurement set-up time for the spectrum analyzer.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method for compensating for phase noise of a spectrum analyzer when measuring the phase noise of an applied signal based on an established model of the phase noise that accommodates a variety of operating states of the spectrum analyzer. Each operating state has a carrier frequency associated therewith. A frequency offset from the carrier frequency of a designated operating state identifies a frequency range for measuring the phase noise of the applied signal. The model, along with the frequency offset, is used to form an array that is applied to extract an output signal from a phase noise measurement signal that is acquired by the spectrum analyzer.
- The disclosed invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, which show exemplary embodiments of the invention and which are incorporated in the specification hereof by reference, wherein:
-
FIG. 1 shows exemplary signals relevant to spectral measurements by a spectrum analyzer; -
FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a phase noise compensation system according to embodiments of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a measurement acquisition unit of a conventional spectrum analyzer; -
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram for establishing a phase noise model according to embodiments of the present invention; -
FIGS. 5A-5B show exemplary signals relevant to the embodiments of the present invention; and -
FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a phase noise compensation method according to embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 1 shows exemplary signals relevant to spectral measurements acquired by a typical spectrum analyzer. InFIG. 1 , a continuous wave signal SCW is shown with a carrier frequency of fC. The carrier frequency fC has an amplitude AC corresponding to a peak power of the carrier frequency fC. The continuous wave signal SCW also includes mirror sideband phase noise signals, one of which is within the frequency range denoted S. In applications such as phase noise measurement personality applications, the characteristics of the phase noise signal are of particular importance. For example, the phase noise can be plotted as a function of frequency to determine if the phase noise drop off follows an expected pattern or scale. Typically, in phase noise measurement personality applications, the carrier frequency fC is not shown on the spectrum analyzer screen, and thus not included within the frequency span of the spectrum analyzer. Using the example shown inFIG. 1 , the frequency span of the spectrum analyzer would be set to the frequency span for the phase noise measurement signal S. -
FIG. 1 also shows a measured signal SCWm that results when the continuous wave signal SCW is measured by a spectrum analyzer. The spectrum analyzer has a phase noise φSA in the operating state at which the continuous wave signal SCW is measured. The measured signal SCWm includes the phase noise φSA contributed by the spectrum analyzer. The measured signal SCWm can be expressed as SCWm=SCW+Ai*φSA, where * indicates multiplication. Thus, the measured signal SCWm can be expressed as the signal SCWm plus the amplitude (power) of the carrier frequency Ai multiplied with the phase noise φSA of the spectrum analyzer. - When isolating the phase noise of a signal SIN applied to a typical spectrum analyzer, a phase noise measurement SMEAS acquired by the spectrum analyzer can be expressed as the phase noise of the applied signal SINp plus the amplitude of the carrier frequency AC of the applied signal SIN multiplied with the phase noise φSA of the spectrum analyzer, as indicated in
equation 1.
S MEAS =S IN p+A C*φSA (1) -
FIG. 2 shows aspectrum analyzer 10 including a phasenoise compensation system 12 in accordance with the embodiments of the present invention. Thespectrum analyzer 10 includes acontroller 14, typically a computer or other type of processor, that is coupled to a keyboard, touch screen, or other type ofuser interface 16. Theuser interface 16 can also be a computer that is coupled to thespectrum analyzer 10 via an interface bus orother communications path 15. - The
user interface 16 provides aninput 17 to thecontroller 14, which is used to adjust the operating state of thespectrum analyzer 10. The operating state includes the center frequency CF, the frequency span SPAN, and resolution bandwidth RBW settings for ameasurement acquisition unit 18 of thespectrum analyzer 10. However, there may be additional operating states, or operating states that are different from these exemplary operating states, depending on themeasurement acquisition unit 18 of thespectrum analyzer 10. Themeasurement acquisition unit 18 includes the components, elements or subsystems used to characterize the spectral content of signals SIN that are applied to thespectrum analyzer 10. -
FIG. 3 shows a simplified block diagram of themeasurement acquisition unit 18 of aconventional spectrum analyzer 10, such as an AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. model E4440 PSA series Spectrum Analyzer, that includes anoffset synthesizer 21. Theoffset synthesizer 21 provides a local oscillator signal SLO that establishes the center frequency CF and frequency span SPAN for the measurements performed by thespectrum analyzer 10. Afilter 26 establishes the resolution bandwith RBW for the measurements performed by thespectrum analyzer 10. The operation of a conventional spectrum analyzer is described, for example, in Spectrum Analysis Basics, Application Note 150, provided by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Palo Alto, Calif., USA. - Referring again to
FIG. 2 , the operating states of thespectrum analyzer 10 are set according to parameters within a designatedparameter set 13 associated with thespectrum analyzer 10. The parameters are adjusted, set or otherwise designated via thecontroller 14 in response to the inputs provided by theuser interface 16. Within theparameter set 13 are various categories of parameter sets. For example, theparameter set 13 includes a local oscillator (LO)configuration parameter set 41, a sweep configuration parameter set 42, a measurement parameter set 43 and a carrier knowledge parameter set 44. The LO configuration parameter set 41, sweepconfiguration parameter set 42 andmeasurement parameter set 44 are used by thecontroller 14 to set themeasurement acquisition unit 18. The carrierknowledge parameter set 44 includes carrier parameters known by thecontroller 14, but not used in acquiring SMEAS. - An exemplary LO
configuration parameter set 41, tabulated in table 1, designates the operating states of aspectrum analyzer 10 that includes an offset synthesizer SYNTH in themeasurement acquisition unit 18.Parameter Parameter designation Sampler IF frequency fSIF Sampler IF polarity P Sampler harmonic number N PLL divide ratio R - The settings of the LO configuration parameter set 41 that designates the operating state of the
spectrum analyzer 10 also influence the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10. For the parameter set 41 of table 1, the sampler IF frequency (intermediate frequency) fSIF, sampler IF polarity P, sampler harmonic number N and PLL (phase lock loop) divide ratio R within the offset synthesizer of themeasurement acquisition unit 18 impact the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10. Thus, when a phase noise measurement is taken of an applied signal SIN by thespectrum analyzer 10, the parameter settings that designate the operating state of thespectrum analyzer 10 for the measurement also establish the phase noise φSA that is contributed to the measurement by thespectrum analyzer 10. - The phase
noise compensation system 12 shown inFIG. 2 includes acomputational unit 20 andsignal processor 30. While thecomputational unit 20 and thesignal processor 30 are shown separate from thecontroller 14, thecomputational unit 20 and thesignal processor 30 are typically implemented within thecontroller 14. Thecomputational unit 20 forms anarray D 24 from a phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22. The phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22 represents the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 at frequency offsets fOFFSET when the operating state of thespectrum analyzer 10 is set in accordance with the LO configuration parameter set 41. Thus, based on the settings in the LO configuration parameter set 41, thecomputational unit 20 selects a particular phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22 that corresponds to the LO configuration parameter set 41. - Once the appropriate
phase noise model 22 has been selected, thecomputational unit 20 selects specific samples from the selectedphase noise model 22 based on the frequency span SPAN, a number of measurement points n in SMEAS and a frequency offset fCO from the carrier frequency, which indicates the frequency range between the carrier frequency and an edge frequency on the screen. The frequency offset fCO can be positive or negative, depending on the phase noise sideband signal being measured. The selected samples collectively form thearray D 24. - The samples in the
array D 24 correspond to the phase noise density in dBc/Hz (the ratio of decibels relative to the carrier power in each hertz of bandwidth). Thus, the samples represent the relative phase noise attributed to thespectrum analyzer 10. However, to remove the effects of the phase noise from the measured signal SMEAS, the absolute phase noise of the spectrum analyzer is needed. Therefore, the array D is applied to a noise bandwidth scaling 25 that converts the phase noise array proportional to the noise bandwidth NBW of the spectrum analyzer, established based on the setting of the resolution bandwidth RBW of thespectrum analyzer 10. The noise bandwidth NBW is typically a designated multiple of the resolution bandwidth RBW. - The
signal processor 30 applies thearray D 24, now in dBc, to amultiplier 32 that multiplies thearray D 24 with the power of the carrier frequency AC to obtain the absolute phase noise of thespectrum analyzer 10. The output of themultiplier 32 is input to asummation unit 34 that applies the phase noise measurements SMEAS of the signal SN acquired by themeasurement acquisition system 18 to the output ofmultiplier 32 in order to extract an output signal SOUT. The output signal SOUT is a representation of the phase noise measurement of signal SIN that includes compensation to reduce the influence of the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10. -
FIG. 4 shows a flow diagram 40 for establishing the phase noise model (fOFFSET), which includes applying a series of calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL to the spectrum analyzer 10 (step 41). The calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL stimulate thespectrum analyzer 10 at a sufficient number of frequencies or other stimulus conditions to enable the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 to be represented at predetermined frequency offsets fOFFSET and at the various parameter settings that designate the operating states of thespectrum analyzer 10. - In
step 42 of the flow diagram 40, the parameters in the parameter set 13 are adjusted to settings {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL that designate corresponding operating states of the spectrum analyzer for the measurement of each of the calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL.Step 44 includes measuring each of the calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL at the center frequency CF, frequency span SPAN and resolution bandwidth RBW determined by the operating state designated by the settings {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL of the parameters in the parameter set 13. The phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 at predetermined frequency offsets fOFFSET from the measured calibration signals is isolated instep 46 to form a phase noise calibration set φCAL{fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL, which is a function of the parameters in the parameter set 13 adjusted to the settings {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL. The calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL applied to the spectrum analyzer have substantially lower phase noise than thespectrum analyzer 10, so that the phase noise of each measured calibration signal is attributed to thespectrum analyzer 10. Alternatively, the phase noise of the calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL has low uncertainty, so that the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 can be isolated by subtracting, on a linear power scale, the phase noise of the calibration signals from the total phase noise that is measured by the spectrum analyzer, where the subtraction is performed at the frequency offsets fOFFSET. -
Step 48 includes establishing the phase noise model (fOFFSET) as a set of functions F of the frequency offsets fOFFSET and the parameters in the parameter set 13. When the parameter set includes the exemplary parameters of table 1, the phase noise model is expressed as (fOFFSET)=F{fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N. R}. The functions F include a series of contours, typically represented by coefficients, polynomial terms, of elements in an array or look-up table, which result from curve fitting or other mappings of phase noise at frequency offsets fOFFSET to the phase noise calibration set φCAL {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL established instep 46. - In one example, the set of functions F are linear, wherein each function Fx within the set of functions F has a slope m that is a function of the sampler IF polarity P, the sampler harmonic number N and the PLL divide ratio R. Each function Fx also has an offset b that is a function of the sampler IF polarity P, the sampler harmonic number N and PLL divide ratio R. The linear relationship for the modeled phase noise of the
spectrum analyzer 10 and sampler 1F frequency fSIF for each setting or adjustment of the sampler IF polarity P, the sampler harmonic number N and the PLL divide ratio R, at the offset frequency fOFFSET, is expressed as (fOFFSET)=m(fOFFSET, P, N, R} fSIF+b{fOFFSET, P, N, R} - The phase noise model (fOFFSET) provides a mapping or correspondence between phase noise φSA of the
spectrum analyzer 10 at frequency offsets fOFFSET, and settings of the parameters in the parameter set 13. Thus, for a given operating state of thespectrum analyzer 10 that is designated by the parameters, the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 can be determined from the phase noise model (fOFFSET). Typically, the phase noise model (fOFFSET) is stored in a memory or other storage medium (not shown) that is accessible to thecontroller 14. - Referring again to
FIGS. 2 and 3 , once the phase noise model (fOFFSET) is established, applied signals are subsequently measured by thespectrum analyzer 10. For example, themeasurement acquisition unit 18 receives the signal SIN and acquires a phase noise measurement SMEAS for the applied signal SIN. The phase noise measurement SMEAS, typically stored in adisplay memory 26, is acquired at an operating state that includes a designated setting of the center frequency CF, frequency span SPAN, number of measurement points n, resolution bandwidth RBW and frequency offset from the carrier frequency fCO. Thecomputational unit 20 forms anarray D 24 for the applied signal SIN from the phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22 based on the frequency span SPAN, number of measurement points n and the frequency offset fCO. -
FIGS. 5A and 5B show exemplary signals relevant to the embodiments of the present invention. As shown inFIG. 5A , a phase noise measurement trace SMEAS for a continuous wave signal at a designated operating state of the spectrum analyzer has a predetermined number of measurement points, designated by integer index i. For ease of understanding, the carrier frequency of the full continuous wave signal is shown as part of an off-screen spectrum 500. - The phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22 for the applied signal SIN is shown in
FIG. 5B . Thearray D 24 includes selected points in thephase noise model 22, designated by the index i. The first selected point inarray D 24 corresponds to the frequency at which i=0 inFIG. 5A , and is shown inFIG. 5B as the phase noise value at the frequency offset fOFFSET(0). Each point in thearray D 24 has a corresponding value Di, established from the phase noise model (fOFFSET) 22 evaluated at offset frequencies fOFFSET=fOFFSET(0)+i(SPAN/n). The array D applied to thesignal processor 30 inFIG. 2 comprises a set of values Di that are power ratios expressed on a linear scale. For an array D having n points, Di can be expressed as:
Di=NBW*100.1(fOFFSET(i)) (2)
In equation 2, the term NBW represents the noise bandwidth of the spectrum analyzer 10 (shown inFIG. 3 ). - Referring again to
FIG. 2 , thesignal processor 30 applies the array D to the measurement trace SMEAS to extract the output signal SOUT Applying the array D typically includes a multiplication of the power of the carrier frequency AC with the array D, and a subtraction of the resulting product AC*D from the measurement trace SMEAS. The measurement trace SMEAS and the array D are each expressed on a linear power scale for processing by thesignal processor 30. The output signal SOUT provided by thesignal processor 30 as a result of applying the array D to the measurement trace SMEAS is expressed in equation 3.
S OUT =S MEAS −A C *D (3) - Since the array D provides an estimate of the phase noise φSA of the
spectrum analyzer 10 at the designated operating state, the array D is approximately equal to the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10. Thus, the resulting output signal SOUT is a representation of the phase noise of the signal SIN that includes compensation to reduce the influence of the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10. -
FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a phasenoise compensation method 60 according to embodiments of the present invention.Step 62 includes establishing the phase noise model for the spectrum analyzer. This step in the phasenoise compensation method 60 typically includes applying the series of calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL to thespectrum analyzer 10, and adjusting the parameters in the parameter set 13 to the settings {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL to designate corresponding operating states of the spectrum analyzer for the measurement of each of the calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL. Each of the calibration signals S1 CAL . . . SNCAL is then measured at the center frequency CF, frequency span SPAN and resolution bandwidth RBW determined by the designated operating state. Then, the phase noise φSA of thespectrum analyzer 10 is isolated at predetermined frequency offsets fOFFSET from the measured calibration signal to form the phase noise calibration set φCAL {fOFFSET, fSIF, P, N, R}CAL, when the parameter set 13 includes the parameters of table 1. Then, the phase noise model (fOFFSET) is established as the set of functions F, of the frequency offsets fOFFSET and the parameters in the parameter set 13. - In
step 64, the frequency offset from the carrier frequency to the beginning of the frequency range of the phase noise for which phase noise measurements are to be taken is determined. The frequency offset can be positive or negative depending on the phase noise sideband of interest with positive offsets representing upper sidebands and negative offsets representing lower sidebands. For example, to measure the phase noise of an applied signal between 1 and 3 kilohertz offset from the carrier frequency, the frequency offset is set to 1 kilohertz. - In
step 66, a trace SMEAS, including an array phase noise measurement points, is acquired by themeasurement acquisition unit 18 of the spectrum analyzer in response to the signal SIN applied to thespectrum analyzer 10. - In
step 68, the array D is formed from the phase noise model, based on the operating state of thespectrum analyzer 10 designated by the parameter set 13, including, for example, the frequency span SPAN, the number of measurement points n in SMEAS and the desired frequency offset from the carrier frequency fCO. Whilestep 66 is shown proceedingstep 68, the array D can be formed before or after the acquisition of SMEAS. -
Step 69 includes applying the array D to the phase noise measurements SMEAS to extract the output signal SOUT This typically includes a multiplication of the power of the carrier frequency AC with the array D and then a subtraction of the resulting product from the phase noise measurements SMEAS, where the phase noise measurements SMEAS and the array D are each expressed on a linear power scale. - As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the innovative concepts described in the present application can be modified and varied over a wide rage of applications. Accordingly, the scope of patents subject matter should not be limited to any of the specific exemplary teachings discussed, but is instead defined by the following claims.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,772 US7035743B1 (en) | 2004-10-18 | 2004-10-18 | Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,772 US7035743B1 (en) | 2004-10-18 | 2004-10-18 | Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060085150A1 true US20060085150A1 (en) | 2006-04-20 |
US7035743B1 US7035743B1 (en) | 2006-04-25 |
Family
ID=36181833
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/967,772 Expired - Lifetime US7035743B1 (en) | 2004-10-18 | 2004-10-18 | Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7035743B1 (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110317743A1 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Spread spectrum wireless communication code for data center environments |
US8417911B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Associating input/output device requests with memory associated with a logical partition |
US8615622B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Non-standard I/O adapters in a standardized I/O architecture |
US8615586B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discovery of logical images at storage area network endpoints |
US8645606B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Upbound input/output expansion request and response processing in a PCIe architecture |
US8645767B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable I/O adapter function level error detection, isolation, and reporting |
US8656228B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Memory error isolation and recovery in a multiprocessor computer system |
US8671287B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-03-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Redundant power supply configuration for a data center |
US8677180B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Switch failover control in a multiprocessor computer system |
US8745292B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-06-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for routing I/O expansion requests and responses in a PCIE architecture |
US8918573B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Input/output (I/O) expansion response processing in a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) environment |
US20150015503A1 (en) * | 2013-07-10 | 2015-01-15 | Anritsu Corporation | Signal processing device and signal processing method |
CN114265017A (en) * | 2021-12-26 | 2022-04-01 | 中国电子科技集团公司第十四研究所 | Phase noise measurement method based on digital signal processing |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP5154741B2 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2013-02-27 | テクトロニクス・インターナショナル・セールス・ゲーエムベーハー | Noise characteristics display method |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6172564B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2001-01-09 | Eugene Rzyski | Intermodulation product cancellation circuit |
US6393372B1 (en) * | 1999-05-17 | 2002-05-21 | Eugene Rzyski | Automated frequency stepping noise measurement system |
US6621277B2 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2003-09-16 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Phase noise measurement module and method for a spectrum analyzer |
US20050216214A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Gorin Joseph M | Phase noise compensation for spectral measurements |
-
2004
- 2004-10-18 US US10/967,772 patent/US7035743B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6393372B1 (en) * | 1999-05-17 | 2002-05-21 | Eugene Rzyski | Automated frequency stepping noise measurement system |
US6172564B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2001-01-09 | Eugene Rzyski | Intermodulation product cancellation circuit |
US6621277B2 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2003-09-16 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Phase noise measurement module and method for a spectrum analyzer |
US20050216214A1 (en) * | 2004-03-23 | 2005-09-29 | Gorin Joseph M | Phase noise compensation for spectral measurements |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8677180B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Switch failover control in a multiprocessor computer system |
US8769180B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-07-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Upbound input/output expansion request and response processing in a PCIe architecture |
US8416834B2 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Spread spectrum wireless communication code for data center environments |
US8457174B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Spread spectrum wireless communication code for data center environments |
US8615622B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Non-standard I/O adapters in a standardized I/O architecture |
US8615586B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-12-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Discovery of logical images at storage area network endpoints |
US8645606B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Upbound input/output expansion request and response processing in a PCIe architecture |
US20110317743A1 (en) * | 2010-06-23 | 2011-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Spread spectrum wireless communication code for data center environments |
US8656228B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Memory error isolation and recovery in a multiprocessor computer system |
US9298659B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2016-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Input/output (I/O) expansion response processing in a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIE) environment |
US8645767B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable I/O adapter function level error detection, isolation, and reporting |
US8700959B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-04-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scalable I/O adapter function level error detection, isolation, and reporting |
US8745292B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-06-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for routing I/O expansion requests and responses in a PCIE architecture |
US8417911B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Associating input/output device requests with memory associated with a logical partition |
US8918573B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Input/output (I/O) expansion response processing in a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) environment |
US8671287B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2014-03-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Redundant power supply configuration for a data center |
US9201830B2 (en) | 2010-06-23 | 2015-12-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Input/output (I/O) expansion response processing in a peripheral component interconnect express (PCIe) environment |
US20150015503A1 (en) * | 2013-07-10 | 2015-01-15 | Anritsu Corporation | Signal processing device and signal processing method |
US9234923B2 (en) * | 2013-07-10 | 2016-01-12 | Anritsu Corporation | Signal processing device and signal processing method |
CN114265017A (en) * | 2021-12-26 | 2022-04-01 | 中国电子科技集团公司第十四研究所 | Phase noise measurement method based on digital signal processing |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7035743B1 (en) | 2006-04-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7035743B1 (en) | Phase noise compensation for phase noise measurements | |
US7035324B2 (en) | Phase-noise measurement with compensation for phase noise contributed by spectrum analyzer | |
US10006952B1 (en) | System and method for reducing the effects of spurs on measurements using averaging with specific null selection | |
JP2869012B2 (en) | Phase noise measurement system and method | |
US6191571B1 (en) | Measuring method by spectrum analyzer | |
US8026728B2 (en) | Spectrum analyzers with dynamic range indicator and methods of use | |
JP2000147031A (en) | Rf spectrum analyzer and method for analyzing spectrum of rf signal | |
JP5783667B2 (en) | Electronic component tester, spectrum analyzer, electronic component test method, and magnetic head component / magnetic medium component tester | |
US5172064A (en) | Calibration system for determining the accuracy of phase modulation and amplitude modulation noise measurement apparatus | |
US6980915B2 (en) | Phase noise compensation for spectral measurements | |
EP0437034A2 (en) | I.F. calibration method | |
US6904381B2 (en) | Testing of a frequency converter device | |
JP4629177B2 (en) | Measuring device for phase noise to be measured | |
Mirra et al. | A multi-step phase calibration procedure for closely spaced multi-tone signals | |
JPS58150872A (en) | Method and device for testing frequency response of device to input signal | |
US6909508B2 (en) | Measuring optical waveforms | |
US6968278B1 (en) | Reducing the occurrence of spurs when analyzing signals | |
JP2005308512A (en) | Spectrum processing method and measuring apparatus using the same | |
JP2005308509A (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring phase noise | |
Farahat et al. | Efficient computational model of phase noise and its applicability to assess the performance of digital modulation techniques | |
Leng | Measurement corrections for phase noise characterization with different baseband analyzer | |
Vael et al. | A controllable phase coherent pulsed RF signal generator for microwave network analyzer measurements | |
KR100378764B1 (en) | Device and method for sampling large signal parameter | |
Note | Agilent PN 4395/96-1 How to Measure Noise Accurately Using the Agilent Combination Analyzers | |
Roberts | SIGNAL SOURCING REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECTRUM ANALYZER CALIBRATION AN INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., COLORADO Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GORIN, JOSEPH M;REEL/FRAME:015477/0647 Effective date: 20041013 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:033746/0714 Effective date: 20140801 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553) Year of fee payment: 12 |