US20060006881A1 - Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system - Google Patents
Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060006881A1 US20060006881A1 US10/839,835 US83983504A US2006006881A1 US 20060006881 A1 US20060006881 A1 US 20060006881A1 US 83983504 A US83983504 A US 83983504A US 2006006881 A1 US2006006881 A1 US 2006006881A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- energy
- antenna
- shielding
- enclosure
- transmitter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 64
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 abstract description 20
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 abstract description 11
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000005670 electromagnetic radiation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007769 metal material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R29/00—Arrangements for measuring or indicating electric quantities not covered by groups G01R19/00 - G01R27/00
- G01R29/08—Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics
- G01R29/0807—Measuring electromagnetic field characteristics characterised by the application
- G01R29/0814—Field measurements related to measuring influence on or from apparatus, components or humans, e.g. in ESD, EMI, EMC, EMP testing, measuring radiation leakage; detecting presence of micro- or radiowave emitters; dosimetry; testing shielding; measurements related to lightning
- G01R29/0835—Testing shielding, e.g. for efficiency
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to communication systems and subsystems therefor, and is particularly directed to a new and improved architecture and methodology for performing calibration and installation site verification testing of the effectiveness of an electromagnetic radiation shielding structure within which electronic equipment is installed.
- EMP electromagnetic pulse
- radar broadcast radio and TV
- Cellular Phone etc.
- EMP externally-sourced electromagnetic pulse
- An adjunct to this shielding structure is the need to verify its shielding effectiveness, once the equipment has been deployed at a host facility.
- a first is the fact that there is usually very little, if any, room inside the equipment cabinet proper to install testing hardware and its associated antenna, particularly once the cabinet has been integrated with other units at a host site, such as a commercial communication facility.
- signals emitted by the testing apparatus not interfere with the operation of other electronic circuitry that may be located within the same environment as the electronic circuitry under test.
- commercial telecommunication providers customarily refuse to allow the use of RF radiating test equipment in their facilities for fear that the testing might interrupt service.
- the architecture of the present invention includes an external subsystem, which is located outside an Electromagnetic shielded enclosure containing electronic equipment to be protected, and an internal subsystem, that is configured to be readily installed along with the electronic equipment within the shielded equipment housing proper.
- the external subsystem includes a host computer, which controls the operation of each of the transmit and receive subsystems, and a receiver, which is selectively coupled by the host processor to either an RF receive antenna or to a current sense probe.
- the receive antenna which may be implemented as a log periodic antenna, that may be pivotally mounted by way of a boom to the cabinet, so that its boresight may be selectively directed at the center of a cabinet door-mounted, ferrite-loaded log-spiral RF transmission antenna for either of first and second spatial locations of the antenna (respectively associated with the open or closed state of a cabinet door).
- Configuring the RF transmission antenna as a low profile, ferrite-loaded, (log)-spiral shape facilitates its being unobtrusively supported on the inside of a cabinet door, so as to facilitate space saving, and also enable it to be located directly adjacent to the electromagnetic shielding structure of the cabinet.
- the current sense probe is coupled to a power interface, through which primary power is supplied from an external power supply to the circuitry components housed within the shielding enclosure.
- All control signals transmitted between external and internal subsystems are routed into the shielded cabinet by way of fiber optic links, in order to eliminate RF leakage from the shielded enclosure, and thereby prevent RF emissions that might interfere with other systems in an equipment bay commonly shared with the protected equipment.
- a prescribed reference signal e.g., a 10 MHz clock internal to the receiver
- the signal generator is operative under processor control to generate all test signals that are employed to test the effectiveness of the electromagnetic shielding of the cabinet, including the RF attenuation of a power filter that is coupled with the power source for the cabinet. Having the source of test signals and its associated transmission antenna located within the shielded cabinet serves to minimize the impact of such signals on circuits within the environment outside the cabinet.
- the receive antenna is preferably mounted by way of a pivotable attachment at the distal end of a boom, which is supported by and extends outwardly from the top of the shielding enclosure. This allows the receive antenna to readily clear a cabinet door through which physical access to the interior of the cabinet is provided.
- the pivotable attachment of the antenna to the distal end of the boom allows the antenna to be oriented at a selected boresight projection angle relative to the plane of the log-spiral transmission antenna for either the open or closed state of the door.
- a 45° degree orientation of the receive antenna allows it to capture both horizontal and vertical polarization components of the RF emissions from RF transmission antenna for either of a first spatial location of antenna corresponding to the open state of the cabinet door (calibration mode), or a second spatial location of the transmission antenna corresponding to the closed state of the cabinet door (verification mode).
- the printed circuit board upon which the spiral pattern of the transmission antenna is preferably back-loaded with ferrite material. This results in a relatively low standing wave ratio across the entirety of its operational frequency band.
- the cabinet door When the system is operated in calibration mode, the cabinet door is open, and the receive antenna is oriented so that its boresight is pointed at the center of the log-spiral door-mounted transmit antenna.
- the RF signal switches are controlled so that the output of the signal generator will be supplied to the transmit antenna, and so that the output of the receive antenna will be coupled to the external receiver.
- the controller then tunes the receiver and the transmit signal generator to a first test frequency of a prescribed band of frequencies, and instructs the signal generator to transmit at that frequency at a prescribed power level.
- the energy level received by the receiver is then stored in memory as the open door calibration value.
- the control processor then subtracts from that stored value a predetermined shielding performance threshold (e.g., 80 dB), plus a signal-to-noise (e.g., 14 dB) buffer value to establish a maximum allowable noise floor that will permit reliable and repeatable measurements, and stores this maximum noise floor value.
- a predetermined shielding performance threshold e.g. 80 dB
- a signal-to-noise e.g., 14 dB
- This series of operations is then repeated for all of the remaining frequencies into which the band of interest has been divided.
- the band being tested e.g., 200 Mhz-1 GHz
- the signal generator and the receiver are then tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured.
- the resulting attenuation value is stored to provide a baseline against which to measure the attenuation performance of the power filter once the equipment has been installed in the field.
- an offset e.g., 6 dB lower than the measured value
- the control processor may issue a ‘filter failure’ indication.
- a precursor aspect of the shielding performance test is to look for the presence of ambient noise (RF interference) sources that might be coincident with one or more of the frequencies of interest. Whenever an ambient noise sources is found, the controller locates and identifies a nearby (slightly higher) frequency that is effectively free of ambient interference. At each frequency iteration for which it has been determined that a prescribed maximum noise floor is not exceeded, the transmitter generates that frequency and a shielding measurement is performed.
- RF interference ambient noise
- the receive antenna is pivoted from its position used in the calibration routine, described above, so that it points at the center of the transmit antenna.
- the control processor tunes the receiver to the first test frequency of the prescribed band of frequencies of interest, and measures power level received by the receiver. This power measurement is then compared with the maximum allowable noise floor value, previously stored during the calibration routine. If the output of the receiver is at or below the maximum allowable noise floor value for the frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is not a significant source of ambient interference at this frequency.
- the signal generator generates an output at the same power level used during the calibration routine at the frequency of interest, and the output of the receiver is measured at this frequency.
- the output of the receiver is then compared with the previously stored open door calibration value.
- the shielding effectiveness is calculated by subtracting the closed door received power level from the stored open door calibration value. If the shielding effectiveness is above the predetermined performance threshold (i.e., 80 dB), the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a PASS. On the other hand, if the calculated shielding effectiveness is below the predetermined performance threshold, the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a FAIL. This process is then iteratively repeated for each of the frequencies for which a calibration test was performed.
- the band interval between the current frequency, to which the transmitter and receiver are presently tuned, and the next higher frequency of the frequency band of interest is subdivided into sub-band containing a prescribed plurality (e.g., 100) of frequencies between these two frequencies.
- the controller tunes the receiver to the first frequency in the sub-band and measures ambient energy received by the receiver. This energy measurement is then compared with the maximum allowable noise floor. If the output of the receiver is not below the noise floor value for the sub-band of interest, it is inferred that there is a source of ambient interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement is not to be carried out at this frequency. Instead, the routine increments the receiver to the next frequency in the sub-band and measures the ambient energy received by the receiver, as described above.
- the signal generator is caused to generate an output at the sub-band frequency of interest, and the output of the receiver is measured at this frequency.
- the output of the receiver is then compared with the previously stored open door calibration value.
- the shielding effectiveness is calculated by subtracting the closed door received power level from the stored open door calibration value. If the shielding effectiveness is above the predetermined performance threshold (i.e., 80 dB), the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a PASS. Otherwise, the effectiveness of the cabinet shielding for this sub-band frequency is denoted as a FAIL.
- the routine increments the tuning of the receiver and signal generator to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and repeats the measurement process at that frequency.
- the control processor may proceed to measure the effectiveness of the power filter.
- the power filter test may be conducted prior to the shielding verification test.
- the steps of the power filter verification test are essentially the same as the calibration test conducted in the lab.
- the resulting attenuation value is compared with that previously stored during the calibration test. If the attenuation is at least as high as the calibration value, it is inferred that the filter is operating properly, and a PASS output is generated. On the other hand, if the attenuation is not as high as the calibration value, its difference is noted. As a further safeguard, if the attenuation is less than the previously stored alarm threshold offset, an alarm may be issued as a ‘filter failure’ indication.
- FIG. 1 is an overall block diagram of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system in accordance with the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a partial respective view of a shielding cabinet that houses and supports portions of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system of FIG. 1 ;
- FIGS. 3-6 are flow charts associated with the operation of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system of the present invention.
- the invention resides primarily in a modular arrangement of conventional communication electronic circuits and electronic signal processing circuits and components therefor.
- these modular arrangements may be readily implemented as field programmable gate array (FPGA)-, or application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)-based chip sets.
- FPGA field programmable gate array
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- FIG. 1 is an overall block diagram of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system in accordance with the present invention.
- the present invention includes an external subsystem 100 , which is located outside an electromagnetic shielded cabinet 200 containing electronic equipment 300 to be protected, and an internal subsystem 400 , which is configured so that it may be readily installed with the shielded electronic equipment within the enclosure 200 .
- the external subsystem 100 includes a host computer 101 , which controls the operation of each of the two subsystems, and a receiver 102 , having a relatively narrow IF bandwidth (e.g., on the order of 10 Hz or less to achieve a large measurement dynamic range, and to minimize the effects of ambient RF interference), which is selectively coupled through an input switch 103 to either an RF receive antenna 104 or to a current sense probe 105 , under the control of host processor 101 via a control link 115 .
- Receive antenna 104 which may comprise a log periodic antenna, as a non-limiting example, is configured to be pivotally mounted by way of a boom (shown in FIG.
- the current sense probe 105 is coupled to a power link 106 , through which power is supplied from an external power supply (not shown) to the circuitry components housed within cabinet 200 .
- all (control) communication signals transmitted from the external subsystem 100 to the internal subsystem 400 are conducted by way of fiber optic links; this serves to limit RF emissions by the shielded enclosure, and thereby prevents RF emissions that might interfere with other systems in an equipment bay commonly shared with the equipment 300 .
- an analog-to-fiber optic converter 107 is coupled to convert a 10 MHz analog signal sourced in the receiver 102 into optical format for transport over a fiber optic link 108 to a fiber optic-to-analog converter 402 of the internal subsystem 400 .
- This 10 MHz reference signal is used to synchronize and lock respective receive and transmit oscillators within the receiver 102 and a signal generator 403 , so that the two exactly track each other during scanning of the test frequency band, as will be described.
- the output of fiber optic-to-analog converter 402 is coupled to the signal generator 403 which, under the control of host processor 101 , is operative to generate all test signals that are employed to test the effectiveness of the electromagnetic shielding of the cabinet 200 , including the RF attenuation of the power filter 420 that is coupled with the power link 106 . Having the source of test signals and its associated transmission antenna located within the shielded cabinet serves to minimize the impact of such signals on circuits within the environment outside the cabinet.
- the external subsystem 100 further includes a general purpose instrumentation bus (GPIB)-to-fiber optic converter 109 , which converts control signals sourced from the host processor 101 into optical format for transport over optical fiber 110 to a fiber optic-to-GPIB converter 410 .
- a first output 411 of the fiber optic-to-GPIB converter 410 is coupled to signal generator 403 , while a second output 412 thereof is coupled to the control input 421 of an output switch 430 .
- Output switch 430 has a first output 432 , through which RF test signals are coupled to the RF transmission antenna 401 , and a second output 433 , through which low frequency test signals are coupled to a power lead current coupler 425 on the interior side of power filter 430 .
- receive antenna 104 is preferably mounted by way of a pivotable attachment 201 at the distal end 202 of a boom 203 , which is supported by and extends outwardly from the top 204 of the cabinet 200 .
- This boom attachment allows the receive antenna 104 to readily clear a cabinet door 205 through which physical access to the interior 206 of the cabinet is provided.
- the pivotable attachment 201 of the antenna 104 to the distal end of the boom 203 allows the antenna to be oriented at a selected boresight projection angle relative to the plane of the log-spiral transmission antenna 401 .
- the boresight axis of RF receive antenna 104 may have a projection angle of 45° relative to the plane of the door 205 . This enables the receive antenna 104 to receive both horizontal and vertical polarization components of the RF emissions from RF transmission antenna 401 , for either of a first spatial location of antenna 401 , corresponding to the open state of the cabinet door 205 shown in FIG. 2 , or a second spatial location of antenna 401 , corresponding to the closed state of the cabinet door 205 .
- the cabinet door 205 is opened such that the plane of the door is generally orthogonal to the side 208 of the cabinet which the door closes.
- receive antenna 104 is pivoted to a first antenna position that directs its boresight axis at an angle of 45° relative to the plane of the door and such that the boresight axis of antenna 104 intersects the geometric center of transmission antenna 401 .
- the receive antenna 104 is then pivoted to a second antenna position that again directs the boresight axis of antenna 104 at an angle of 45° relative to the plane of the door and such that the boresight axis of antenna 104 intersects the geometric center of the transmission antenna 401 .
- the support for the transmission antenna 401 (namely, the door 205 ) effectively constitutes a ground plane.
- the printed circuit board upon which the spiral pattern of which the antenna 401 is disposed is preferably back-loaded with ferrite material. This results in transmission antenna 401 having a relatively low standing wave ratio (e.g., on the order of ⁇ 2.5) across the entirety of its operational frequency band, and remaining unaffected by its relatively close proximity to the metallic surface of its supporting door.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 Operation of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 may be readily understood by reference to the flow charts of FIGS. 3-6 as follows. Before installing the equipment in the field, it is initially necessary to obtain a baseline relative to which the shielding effectiveness of the cabinet 200 is to be measured. For this purpose, a calibration routine, which is typically conducted in a relatively RF-free environment (e.g., in a factory laboratory) and the steps of which are shown in FIG. 3 , is initially conducted.
- a calibration routine which is typically conducted in a relatively RF-free environment (e.g., in a factory laboratory) and the steps of which are shown in FIG. 3 , is initially conducted.
- a first step 301 the door 205 of the cabinet is opened to its open position shown in FIG. 2 .
- the receive antenna 104 is then oriented at 45° angle relative to its associated door, so that the receive antenna 104 is pointed at the center of the log-spiral transmit antenna 401 , as shown in step 302 .
- the control processor 101 controls the switches 103 and 430 , so that the output of the signal generator 403 will be supplied to antenna 401 , and so that the output of the receive antenna 104 will be coupled to receiver 102 .
- step 304 the controller tunes the receiver 102 and the signal generator 403 to a first test frequency (e.g., 200 MHz) of a prescribed band of frequencies of interest and, in step 305 , instructs the signal generator to transmit at that frequency at a prescribed power level.
- the power level received by receiver 102 is then stored in memory as the open door calibration value in step 306 .
- the control processor subtracts from that stored value a predetermined shielding performance threshold (e.g., 80 dB),plus a signal-to-noise (e.g., 14 dB) buffer value to establish a maximum allowable noise floor that will permit reliable and repeatable measurements, and stores the resulting value in step 308 .
- a predetermined shielding performance threshold e.g. 80 dB
- a signal-to-noise e.g., 14 dB
- the routine determines whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest has been processed. If the answer is NO, as at the beginning of the calibration process, then in step 310 , the routine increments the tuning of the receiver 102 and signal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and branches back to step 305 .
- the band being tested e.g., 200 Mhz-1 GHz
- the band being tested may be subdivided into respective log-based frequency intervals, at each of which the calibration measurement process described above is carried out.
- control processor After the control processor has conducted the above routine for the last RF frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the RF calibration band (the answer to query step 309 is YES), it proceeds to calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter 420 . As an alternative the control processor may calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter, prior to conducting the calibration routine for the RF transmitter, without a loss in generality.
- the control processor changes the switch positions of switches 103 and 430 , so that the transmit/receive path proceeds from the signal generator 403 —the current coupler 425 —filter 420 —current probe 105 —receiver 102 .
- step 502 the signal generator and the receiver are tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and, in step 503 , the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured.
- the resulting attenuation value is stored in step 504 , to provide a baseline against which to measure the attenuation performance of the power filter once the equipment has been installed in the field.
- an offset e.g., 6 dB lower than the measured value
- the control processor may issue a ‘filter failure’ indication.
- a precursor aspect of the shielding performance test is to look for the presence of ambient noise (RF interference) sources that might be coincident with one or more of the frequencies of interest and, if such ambient noise sources are found, to locate and identify a nearby (slightly higher) frequency that is effectively free of ambient interference.
- RF interference ambient noise
- the receive antenna 104 is pivoted from its position used in the calibration routine, described above, so that it is oriented at 45° angle relative to the closed door, and so that the receive antenna now points at the center of the transmit antenna 401 .
- the control processor 101 controls switch 103 , so that the output of the receive antenna 104 will be coupled to receiver 102 .
- the controller tunes the receiver 102 to the first test frequency (e.g., 200 MHz) of the prescribed band of frequencies of interest and, in step 604 , measures power level received by the receiver 102 .
- the first test frequency e.g. 200 MHz
- this power measurement is compared with the maximum allowable noise floor value, stored at step 308 in the calibration routine of FIG. 3 . If the output of the receiver is below the noise floor value for the frequency of interest (the answer to query step 605 is YES), it is inferred that there is not a significant source of interference at this frequency.
- step 606 the signal generator 403 is caused to generate an output at the same power level used during the calibration routine at the frequency of interest, and the output of receive antenna 104 , as received by receiver 102 is measured at this frequency.
- step 607 the receive power level is measured and stored.
- step 608 the shielding effectiveness of the enclosure is evaluated by subtracting the received power level from the value previously stored in step 306 , FIG. 3 .
- step 609 the computed shielding level is compared to the predetermined required level (e.g., 80 dB). If the shielding level is equal to or greater than the required level, then a PASS is recorded for that frequency in 610 .
- the predetermined required level e.g. 80 dB
- the routine determines whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest (e.g., 200 MHz-1 GHz) has been processed. If the answer to query step 612 is YES, the measurement verification routine is complete. However, if the answer is NO, then in step 619 , the routine increments the tuning of the receiver 102 and signal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and branches back to step 604 , so as to conduct the verification test for the next frequency within the band of interest.
- the last frequency e.g., 1 GHz
- the band of interest e.g. 200 MHz-1 GHz
- step 605 Where the answer to query step 605 is NO, namely, the output of the receiver 102 is not below the noise floor value for the frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is a source of interference at that frequency.
- the routine branches to step 613 , wherein the band interval between the current frequency, to which the transmitter 403 and receiver 102 are presently tuned, and the next higher frequency of the frequency band of interest, is subdivided into sub-band containing a prescribed plurality (e.g., 100) of frequencies between these two frequencies.
- a prescribed plurality e.g. 100
- step 614 the controller tunes the receiver 102 to the first frequency in the sub-band and measures ambient power received by receiver 102 in step 615 .
- this energy measurement is compared with the maximum allowable value for the noise floor. If the output of the receiver is not below the noise floor value for the sub-band of interest (the answer to query step 616 is NO), it is inferred that there is a source of interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement is not to be carried out at this frequency.
- the routine determines whether the last frequency in the sub-band of interest has been processed. If the answer is YES, the routine branches back to step 612 to determine whether the last frequency in the band has been reached, as described above. If the answer is NO, then the routine in step 618 increments the receiver 102 to the next frequency in the sub-band and branches back to step 615 wherein the ambient power received by the receiver is measured, as described above.
- the routine transitions back to step 606 .
- the routine branches to step 612 , to determine whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest (e.g., 200 MHz-1 GHz) has been processed. If the answer is NO, then the routine increments the tuning of the receiver 102 and signal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and then branches back to step 604 , as described above.
- the control processor may proceed to calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter 420 .
- the power filter test may be conducted prior to the shielding verification test. The steps of the test are shown in the routine in FIG. 6 , and is essentially the same as the calibration test conducted in the lab and shown in FIG. 4 , described above.
- step 701 with the cabinet door closed, the control processor changes the switch positions of switches 103 and 430 , so that the transmit/receive path proceeds from the signal generator 403 —the current coupler 425 —filter 420 —current probe 105 —receiver 102 .
- step 702 the signal generator and the receiver are then tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured in step 703 .
- query step 704 the resulting attenuation value is compared with that previously stored during the calibration test, described above.
- step 705 If the attenuation is at least as high as the calibration value (the answer to query step 704 is YES), it is inferred that the filter is operating properly, and a PASS output is generated in step 705 . On the other hand, if the attenuation is not as high as the calibration value (the answer to query step 704 is NO), its difference is noted in step 706 . As a further safeguard, shown in query step 707 , if the attenuation is less than the alarm threshold offset (e.g., 6 dB) stored in step 505 in the routine of FIG. 3 , an alarm may be issued in step 708 as ‘filter failure’ indication.
- the alarm threshold offset e.g., 6 dB
- the use of an extremely narrow receive bandwidth serves to minimize effects of interference from surrounding equipment at the same facility and other RF environments, while also achieving an ultra low noise floor to minimize the required signal source power within the cabinet to a level that is significantly below the Network Equipment Building System (NEBS) rated RF susceptibility level.
- NEBS Network Equipment Building System
- the use of a slaved clock reference for synchronization between the signal generator and the receiver effectively eliminates the need for frequency precision and peak search measurement delays.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention was made with Government support under Prime Contract No. HQ0006-01-C-0001 awarded by the Department of Defense. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
- The present invention relates in general to communication systems and subsystems therefor, and is particularly directed to a new and improved architecture and methodology for performing calibration and installation site verification testing of the effectiveness of an electromagnetic radiation shielding structure within which electronic equipment is installed.
- In order to protect the circuit components of electronic equipment from potentially damaging electromagnetic radiation, such as an externally-sourced electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or other interference signals such as radar, broadcast radio and TV, Cellular Phone, etc., it is customary practice to house the equipment within some form of shielded structure such as a cabinet, or enclosure as non-limiting examples. An adjunct to this shielding structure is the need to verify its shielding effectiveness, once the equipment has been deployed at a host facility. Up to the present, it has been conventional practice to conduct only ‘acceptance’ testing of the shielding for densely populated enclosures within a laboratory environment at the factory, and then assume that once it has passed the acceptance test, the shielding structure's effectiveness will be sustained in the equipment's deployed environment.
- However, there is a government agency ‘verification’ requirement (MIL-STD-188-125) that mandates the ability to test the shielding effectiveness of the protective structure subsequent to deployment of the equipment at a host facility, such testing can be very difficult or impossible due to the lack of room inside a densely populated shielded structure. This strict verification requirement creates a two-fold problem that is typically encountered when attempting to conduct on-site testing of the electromagnetic radiation shielding-effectiveness of the protective enclosure.
- A first is the fact that there is usually very little, if any, room inside the equipment cabinet proper to install testing hardware and its associated antenna, particularly once the cabinet has been integrated with other units at a host site, such as a commercial communication facility. Secondly, it is necessary that signals emitted by the testing apparatus not interfere with the operation of other electronic circuitry that may be located within the same environment as the electronic circuitry under test. Indeed, commercial telecommunication providers customarily refuse to allow the use of RF radiating test equipment in their facilities for fear that the testing might interrupt service.
- In accordance with the present invention, these and other problems are successfully addressed by a new and improved testing architecture and methodology that is operative to perform calibration prior to installation in the field and thereafter perform installation site monitoring and verification testing of the effectiveness of an electromagnetic radiation shielding structure within which electronic equipment is installed.
- For this purpose, the architecture of the present invention includes an external subsystem, which is located outside an Electromagnetic shielded enclosure containing electronic equipment to be protected, and an internal subsystem, that is configured to be readily installed along with the electronic equipment within the shielded equipment housing proper. The external subsystem includes a host computer, which controls the operation of each of the transmit and receive subsystems, and a receiver, which is selectively coupled by the host processor to either an RF receive antenna or to a current sense probe. The receive antenna, which may be implemented as a log periodic antenna, that may be pivotally mounted by way of a boom to the cabinet, so that its boresight may be selectively directed at the center of a cabinet door-mounted, ferrite-loaded log-spiral RF transmission antenna for either of first and second spatial locations of the antenna (respectively associated with the open or closed state of a cabinet door). Configuring the RF transmission antenna as a low profile, ferrite-loaded, (log)-spiral shape facilitates its being unobtrusively supported on the inside of a cabinet door, so as to facilitate space saving, and also enable it to be located directly adjacent to the electromagnetic shielding structure of the cabinet. This serves to minimize physical interference with other user equipment, and provides an efficient radiator with constant load impedance over a wide frequency range that is substantially unaffected by conductive surfaces (the door shielding) in close proximity. The current sense probe is coupled to a power interface, through which primary power is supplied from an external power supply to the circuitry components housed within the shielding enclosure.
- All control signals transmitted between external and internal subsystems are routed into the shielded cabinet by way of fiber optic links, in order to eliminate RF leakage from the shielded enclosure, and thereby prevent RF emissions that might interfere with other systems in an equipment bay commonly shared with the protected equipment. A prescribed reference signal (e.g., a 10 MHz clock internal to the receiver) is used to synchronize and lock respective receive and transmit oscillators within the receiver and signal generator, so that the two exactly track each other during scanning of test frequencies. The signal generator is operative under processor control to generate all test signals that are employed to test the effectiveness of the electromagnetic shielding of the cabinet, including the RF attenuation of a power filter that is coupled with the power source for the cabinet. Having the source of test signals and its associated transmission antenna located within the shielded cabinet serves to minimize the impact of such signals on circuits within the environment outside the cabinet.
- The receive antenna is preferably mounted by way of a pivotable attachment at the distal end of a boom, which is supported by and extends outwardly from the top of the shielding enclosure. This allows the receive antenna to readily clear a cabinet door through which physical access to the interior of the cabinet is provided. In addition, the pivotable attachment of the antenna to the distal end of the boom allows the antenna to be oriented at a selected boresight projection angle relative to the plane of the log-spiral transmission antenna for either the open or closed state of the door. A 45° degree orientation of the receive antenna allows it to capture both horizontal and vertical polarization components of the RF emissions from RF transmission antenna for either of a first spatial location of antenna corresponding to the open state of the cabinet door (calibration mode), or a second spatial location of the transmission antenna corresponding to the closed state of the cabinet door (verification mode). To compensate for the effect of the ground plane imparted by the metallic material of the door, the printed circuit board upon which the spiral pattern of the transmission antenna is preferably back-loaded with ferrite material. This results in a relatively low standing wave ratio across the entirety of its operational frequency band.
- The electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system of the present invention has two operational modes—calibration and verification. The calibration mode is conducted with the cabinet door(s) open prior to installing the shielded cabinet in the field; the shielding verification mode is conducted with the cabinet door(s) closed after the cabinet has been deployed and is integrated with other equipment in an electronic equipment bay.
- When the system is operated in calibration mode, the cabinet door is open, and the receive antenna is oriented so that its boresight is pointed at the center of the log-spiral door-mounted transmit antenna. The RF signal switches are controlled so that the output of the signal generator will be supplied to the transmit antenna, and so that the output of the receive antenna will be coupled to the external receiver. The controller then tunes the receiver and the transmit signal generator to a first test frequency of a prescribed band of frequencies, and instructs the signal generator to transmit at that frequency at a prescribed power level. The energy level received by the receiver is then stored in memory as the open door calibration value. The control processor then subtracts from that stored value a predetermined shielding performance threshold (e.g., 80 dB), plus a signal-to-noise (e.g., 14 dB) buffer value to establish a maximum allowable noise floor that will permit reliable and repeatable measurements, and stores this maximum noise floor value. This series of operations is then repeated for all of the remaining frequencies into which the band of interest has been divided. As a non-limiting example, the band being tested (e.g., 200 Mhz-1 GHz) may be subdivided into respective log-based frequency intervals, at each of which the calibration measurement process described above is carried out.
- Once the control processor has conducted the above routine for the last RF frequency in the RF calibration band, it proceeds to calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter. Alternatively, the control processor may calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter, prior to conducting the calibration routine, without a loss in generality. With the cabinet door(s) closed, the control processor sets the positions of signal routing switches so that the transmit/receive path proceeds from the signal generator—current coupler—the power filter—current probe—receiver.
- The signal generator and the receiver are then tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured. The resulting attenuation value is stored to provide a baseline against which to measure the attenuation performance of the power filter once the equipment has been installed in the field. In addition, an offset (e.g., 6 dB lower than the measured value) may be stored as an alarm threshold for use in the field. Namely, once the equipment has been installed, if the attenuation characteristics of the filter at the performance measurement frequency (10 KHz) are less than the offset (6 dB), the control processor may issue a ‘filter failure’ indication.
- When the calibration routines have been completed, the cabinet is ready for deployment in the field. Once deployed, a cabinet shielding performance verification test is conducted. A precursor aspect of the shielding performance test is to look for the presence of ambient noise (RF interference) sources that might be coincident with one or more of the frequencies of interest. Whenever an ambient noise sources is found, the controller locates and identifies a nearby (slightly higher) frequency that is effectively free of ambient interference. At each frequency iteration for which it has been determined that a prescribed maximum noise floor is not exceeded, the transmitter generates that frequency and a shielding measurement is performed.
- To this end, with the cabinet door closed, the receive antenna is pivoted from its position used in the calibration routine, described above, so that it points at the center of the transmit antenna. Next, the control processor tunes the receiver to the first test frequency of the prescribed band of frequencies of interest, and measures power level received by the receiver. This power measurement is then compared with the maximum allowable noise floor value, previously stored during the calibration routine. If the output of the receiver is at or below the maximum allowable noise floor value for the frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is not a significant source of ambient interference at this frequency.
- The signal generator generates an output at the same power level used during the calibration routine at the frequency of interest, and the output of the receiver is measured at this frequency. The output of the receiver is then compared with the previously stored open door calibration value. The shielding effectiveness is calculated by subtracting the closed door received power level from the stored open door calibration value. If the shielding effectiveness is above the predetermined performance threshold (i.e., 80 dB), the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a PASS. On the other hand, if the calculated shielding effectiveness is below the predetermined performance threshold, the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a FAIL. This process is then iteratively repeated for each of the frequencies for which a calibration test was performed.
- If, during the verification test, the output of the receiver is not below the maximum allowable noise floor value for the frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is a source of ambient interference at that frequency. In response, the band interval between the current frequency, to which the transmitter and receiver are presently tuned, and the next higher frequency of the frequency band of interest, is subdivided into sub-band containing a prescribed plurality (e.g., 100) of frequencies between these two frequencies.
- Next, the controller tunes the receiver to the first frequency in the sub-band and measures ambient energy received by the receiver. This energy measurement is then compared with the maximum allowable noise floor. If the output of the receiver is not below the noise floor value for the sub-band of interest, it is inferred that there is a source of ambient interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement is not to be carried out at this frequency. Instead, the routine increments the receiver to the next frequency in the sub-band and measures the ambient energy received by the receiver, as described above.
- Where the output of the receiver is below the noise floor value for the sub-band frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is not a significant source of ambient interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement may be carried out at this frequency. In this case, the signal generator is caused to generate an output at the sub-band frequency of interest, and the output of the receiver is measured at this frequency. The output of the receiver is then compared with the previously stored open door calibration value. The shielding effectiveness is calculated by subtracting the closed door received power level from the stored open door calibration value. If the shielding effectiveness is above the predetermined performance threshold (i.e., 80 dB), the effectiveness of the shielding for that frequency is denoted as a PASS. Otherwise, the effectiveness of the cabinet shielding for this sub-band frequency is denoted as a FAIL. The routine then increments the tuning of the receiver and signal generator to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and repeats the measurement process at that frequency.
- Once the control processor has conducted the RF shielding verification test routine for the last RF frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the RF calibration band, it may proceed to measure the effectiveness of the power filter. Alternatively, as was the case with the calibration test, the power filter test may be conducted prior to the shielding verification test. The steps of the power filter verification test are essentially the same as the calibration test conducted in the lab. The resulting attenuation value is compared with that previously stored during the calibration test. If the attenuation is at least as high as the calibration value, it is inferred that the filter is operating properly, and a PASS output is generated. On the other hand, if the attenuation is not as high as the calibration value, its difference is noted. As a further safeguard, if the attenuation is less than the previously stored alarm threshold offset, an alarm may be issued as a ‘filter failure’ indication.
-
FIG. 1 is an overall block diagram of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system in accordance with the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a partial respective view of a shielding cabinet that houses and supports portions of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system ofFIG. 1 ; and -
FIGS. 3-6 are flow charts associated with the operation of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system of the present invention. - Before describing the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system in accordance with the present invention, it should be observed that the invention resides primarily in a modular arrangement of conventional communication electronic circuits and electronic signal processing circuits and components therefor. In a practical implementation that facilitates packaging in a hardware-efficient equipment configuration, these modular arrangements may be readily implemented as field programmable gate array (FPGA)-, or application specific integrated circuit (ASIC)-based chip sets. Consequently, the configuration of such an arrangement of circuits and components and the manner in which they are interfaced with one another have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings in readily understandable block diagram format, which show only those specific details that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to obscure the disclosure with details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the description herein. The block diagram illustrations are primarily intended to show the components of the invention in a convenient functional grouping, whereby the present invention may be more readily understood.
- Attention is initially directed to
FIG. 1 , which is an overall block diagram of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system in accordance with the present invention. As shown therein, the present invention includes anexternal subsystem 100, which is located outside an electromagnetic shieldedcabinet 200 containingelectronic equipment 300 to be protected, and aninternal subsystem 400, which is configured so that it may be readily installed with the shielded electronic equipment within theenclosure 200. - The
external subsystem 100 includes ahost computer 101, which controls the operation of each of the two subsystems, and areceiver 102, having a relatively narrow IF bandwidth (e.g., on the order of 10 Hz or less to achieve a large measurement dynamic range, and to minimize the effects of ambient RF interference), which is selectively coupled through aninput switch 103 to either an RF receiveantenna 104 or to acurrent sense probe 105, under the control ofhost processor 101 via acontrol link 115. Receiveantenna 104, which may comprise a log periodic antenna, as a non-limiting example, is configured to be pivotally mounted by way of a boom (shown inFIG. 2 to be described), so that its boresight may be selectively directed at the center of a cabinet door-mounted, log-spiralRF transmission antenna 401 for either of first and second spatial locations of the antenna 401 (respectively associated with the open or closed state of a cabinet door). Configuring theRF transmission antenna 401 as a low profile, ferrite-loaded, log-spiral shape facilitates its being unobtrusively supported on the inside of a cabinet door, so as to facilitate space saving and to enable it to be located directly adjacent to the electromagnetic shielding structure of the cabinet. This serves to minimize physical interference with other user equipment, and provides an efficient radiator with constant load impedance over a wide frequency range that is substantially unaffected by conductive surfaces (the door shielding) in close proximity. Thecurrent sense probe 105 is coupled to apower link 106, through which power is supplied from an external power supply (not shown) to the circuitry components housed withincabinet 200. - As described briefly above, all (control) communication signals transmitted from the
external subsystem 100 to theinternal subsystem 400 are conducted by way of fiber optic links; this serves to limit RF emissions by the shielded enclosure, and thereby prevents RF emissions that might interfere with other systems in an equipment bay commonly shared with theequipment 300. To this end an analog-to-fiber optic converter 107 is coupled to convert a 10 MHz analog signal sourced in thereceiver 102 into optical format for transport over afiber optic link 108 to a fiber optic-to-analog converter 402 of theinternal subsystem 400. This 10 MHz reference signal is used to synchronize and lock respective receive and transmit oscillators within thereceiver 102 and asignal generator 403, so that the two exactly track each other during scanning of the test frequency band, as will be described. The output of fiber optic-to-analog converter 402 is coupled to thesignal generator 403 which, under the control ofhost processor 101, is operative to generate all test signals that are employed to test the effectiveness of the electromagnetic shielding of thecabinet 200, including the RF attenuation of thepower filter 420 that is coupled with thepower link 106. Having the source of test signals and its associated transmission antenna located within the shielded cabinet serves to minimize the impact of such signals on circuits within the environment outside the cabinet. - The
external subsystem 100 further includes a general purpose instrumentation bus (GPIB)-to-fiber optic converter 109, which converts control signals sourced from thehost processor 101 into optical format for transport overoptical fiber 110 to a fiber optic-to-GPIB converter 410. A first output 411 of the fiber optic-to-GPIB converter 410 is coupled to signalgenerator 403, while asecond output 412 thereof is coupled to the control input 421 of anoutput switch 430.Output switch 430 has afirst output 432, through which RF test signals are coupled to theRF transmission antenna 401, and asecond output 433, through which low frequency test signals are coupled to a power leadcurrent coupler 425 on the interior side ofpower filter 430. - As pointed out above, and as shown in the diagrammatic perspective view of
FIG. 2 , receiveantenna 104 is preferably mounted by way of apivotable attachment 201 at thedistal end 202 of aboom 203, which is supported by and extends outwardly from the top 204 of thecabinet 200. This boom attachment allows the receiveantenna 104 to readily clear acabinet door 205 through which physical access to theinterior 206 of the cabinet is provided. In addition, thepivotable attachment 201 of theantenna 104 to the distal end of theboom 203 allows the antenna to be oriented at a selected boresight projection angle relative to the plane of the log-spiral transmission antenna 401. - As a non-limiting example, with the log-spiral
RF transmission antenna 401 mounted upon the relatively flat surface of theinterior side 207 of thedoor 205, the boresight axis of RF receiveantenna 104 may have a projection angle of 45° relative to the plane of thedoor 205. This enables the receiveantenna 104 to receive both horizontal and vertical polarization components of the RF emissions fromRF transmission antenna 401, for either of a first spatial location ofantenna 401, corresponding to the open state of thecabinet door 205 shown inFIG. 2 , or a second spatial location ofantenna 401, corresponding to the closed state of thecabinet door 205. - Namely, for the disposition shown in
FIG. 2 , thecabinet door 205 is opened such that the plane of the door is generally orthogonal to theside 208 of the cabinet which the door closes. In this position of the door, receiveantenna 104 is pivoted to a first antenna position that directs its boresight axis at an angle of 45° relative to the plane of the door and such that the boresight axis ofantenna 104 intersects the geometric center oftransmission antenna 401. In a complementary manner, when thecabinet door 205 is closed such that the plane of the door is generally parallel to theside 208 of the cabinet, the receiveantenna 104 is then pivoted to a second antenna position that again directs the boresight axis ofantenna 104 at an angle of 45° relative to the plane of the door and such that the boresight axis ofantenna 104 intersects the geometric center of thetransmission antenna 401. - To provide its intended shielding, it is common practice to make all the sides of the radiation-blocking enclosure of conductive material (e.g., metal), or to coat each side of the cabinet with a layer of conductive shielding material. In a typical installation, for a rectangular configured cabinet structure, all six sides of the cabinet, including one or more doors thereof, are metallic. As such, the support for the transmission antenna 401 (namely, the door 205) effectively constitutes a ground plane. To compensate for the effect of the ground plane imparted by the metallic material of the door, the printed circuit board upon which the spiral pattern of which the
antenna 401 is disposed is preferably back-loaded with ferrite material. This results intransmission antenna 401 having a relatively low standing wave ratio (e.g., on the order of <2.5) across the entirety of its operational frequency band, and remaining unaffected by its relatively close proximity to the metallic surface of its supporting door. - Operation of the electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2 may be readily understood by reference to the flow charts ofFIGS. 3-6 as follows. Before installing the equipment in the field, it is initially necessary to obtain a baseline relative to which the shielding effectiveness of thecabinet 200 is to be measured. For this purpose, a calibration routine, which is typically conducted in a relatively RF-free environment (e.g., in a factory laboratory) and the steps of which are shown inFIG. 3 , is initially conducted. - At a
first step 301, thedoor 205 of the cabinet is opened to its open position shown inFIG. 2 . (In the case of a cabinet with more than one door supporting a respective transmit antenna, then there will be more than one receive antenna.) With the cabinet door open, the receiveantenna 104 is then oriented at 45° angle relative to its associated door, so that the receiveantenna 104 is pointed at the center of the log-spiral transmitantenna 401, as shown instep 302. Next, instep 303, thecontrol processor 101 controls theswitches signal generator 403 will be supplied toantenna 401, and so that the output of the receiveantenna 104 will be coupled toreceiver 102. - Next, in
step 304, the controller tunes thereceiver 102 and thesignal generator 403 to a first test frequency (e.g., 200 MHz) of a prescribed band of frequencies of interest and, instep 305, instructs the signal generator to transmit at that frequency at a prescribed power level. The power level received byreceiver 102 is then stored in memory as the open door calibration value instep 306. Instep 307, the control processor subtracts from that stored value a predetermined shielding performance threshold (e.g., 80 dB),plus a signal-to-noise (e.g., 14 dB) buffer value to establish a maximum allowable noise floor that will permit reliable and repeatable measurements, and stores the resulting value instep 308. - Next, in
query step 309, the routine determines whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest has been processed. If the answer is NO, as at the beginning of the calibration process, then instep 310, the routine increments the tuning of thereceiver 102 andsignal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and branches back tostep 305. As pointed out above, during the calibration test, in accordance with a non-limiting example, the band being tested (e.g., 200 Mhz-1 GHz) may be subdivided into respective log-based frequency intervals, at each of which the calibration measurement process described above is carried out. - Once the control processor has conducted the above routine for the last RF frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the RF calibration band (the answer to query
step 309 is YES), it proceeds to calibrate the effectiveness of thepower filter 420. As an alternative the control processor may calibrate the effectiveness of the power filter, prior to conducting the calibration routine for the RF transmitter, without a loss in generality. With reference to the flow chart inFIG. 4 , atstep 501, with the cabinet door(s) closed, the control processor changes the switch positions ofswitches signal generator 403—thecurrent coupler 425—filter 420—current probe 105—receiver 102. Next, similar to the calibration routine for the transmit and receive antennas, described above, instep 502, the signal generator and the receiver are tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and, instep 503, the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured. The resulting attenuation value is stored instep 504, to provide a baseline against which to measure the attenuation performance of the power filter once the equipment has been installed in the field. In addition, as shown instep 505, an offset (e.g., 6 dB lower than the measured value) may be stored as an alarm threshold for use in the field. Namely, once the equipment has been installed, if the attenuation characteristics of the filter at the performance measurement frequency (10 KHz) are less than the offset (6 dB), the control processor may issue a ‘filter failure’ indication. - With the calibration routines of
FIGS. 3 and 4 completed, the equipment is ready for deployment in the field. Once deployed, a cabinet shielding performance verification test, shown in the flow chart ofFIG. 5 , is conducted. A precursor aspect of the shielding performance test is to look for the presence of ambient noise (RF interference) sources that might be coincident with one or more of the frequencies of interest and, if such ambient noise sources are found, to locate and identify a nearby (slightly higher) frequency that is effectively free of ambient interference. At each frequency iteration for which it has been determined that a prescribed noise floor is not exceeded,transmitter 403 is caused to generate that frequency and a shielding measurement is performed. - For this purpose, at a
first step 601, with the cabinet door closed, the receiveantenna 104 is pivoted from its position used in the calibration routine, described above, so that it is oriented at 45° angle relative to the closed door, and so that the receive antenna now points at the center of the transmitantenna 401. Next, instep 602, thecontrol processor 101 controls switch 103, so that the output of the receiveantenna 104 will be coupled toreceiver 102. Then, instep 603, the controller tunes thereceiver 102 to the first test frequency (e.g., 200 MHz) of the prescribed band of frequencies of interest and, instep 604, measures power level received by thereceiver 102. Inquery step 605, this power measurement is compared with the maximum allowable noise floor value, stored atstep 308 in the calibration routine ofFIG. 3 . If the output of the receiver is below the noise floor value for the frequency of interest (the answer to querystep 605 is YES), it is inferred that there is not a significant source of interference at this frequency. - The routine then transitions to step 606, wherein the
signal generator 403 is caused to generate an output at the same power level used during the calibration routine at the frequency of interest, and the output of receiveantenna 104, as received byreceiver 102 is measured at this frequency. Next, instep 607, the receive power level is measured and stored. Then, instep 608, the shielding effectiveness of the enclosure is evaluated by subtracting the received power level from the value previously stored instep 306,FIG. 3 . Next, inquery step 609, the computed shielding level is compared to the predetermined required level (e.g., 80 dB). If the shielding level is equal to or greater than the required level, then a PASS is recorded for that frequency in 610. - On the other hand, if the answer to query
step 609 is NO, the effectiveness of the cabinet shielding at that frequency is denoted as a FAIL and stored in 611. Next, inquery step 612, the routine determines whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest (e.g., 200 MHz-1 GHz) has been processed. If the answer to querystep 612 is YES, the measurement verification routine is complete. However, if the answer is NO, then instep 619, the routine increments the tuning of thereceiver 102 andsignal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and branches back to step 604, so as to conduct the verification test for the next frequency within the band of interest. - Where the answer to query
step 605 is NO, namely, the output of thereceiver 102 is not below the noise floor value for the frequency of interest, it is inferred that there is a source of interference at that frequency. In response, the routine branches to step 613, wherein the band interval between the current frequency, to which thetransmitter 403 andreceiver 102 are presently tuned, and the next higher frequency of the frequency band of interest, is subdivided into sub-band containing a prescribed plurality (e.g., 100) of frequencies between these two frequencies. - Next, in
step 614, the controller tunes thereceiver 102 to the first frequency in the sub-band and measures ambient power received byreceiver 102 instep 615. Inquery step 616, this energy measurement is compared with the maximum allowable value for the noise floor. If the output of the receiver is not below the noise floor value for the sub-band of interest (the answer to querystep 616 is NO), it is inferred that there is a source of interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement is not to be carried out at this frequency. Instead, inquery step 617, the routine determines whether the last frequency in the sub-band of interest has been processed. If the answer is YES, the routine branches back to step 612 to determine whether the last frequency in the band has been reached, as described above. If the answer is NO, then the routine instep 618 increments thereceiver 102 to the next frequency in the sub-band and branches back to step 615 wherein the ambient power received by the receiver is measured, as described above. - Where the output of the receiver is below the noise floor value for the sub-band frequency of interest (the answer to query
step 616 is YES), it is inferred that there is not a significant source of interference at this frequency, so that a shielding effectiveness measurement may be carried out at this frequency. In this case, the routine transitions back tostep 606. As in the case forquery step 609, for either case (PASS or FAIL), the routine branches to step 612, to determine whether the last frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the band of interest (e.g., 200 MHz-1 GHz) has been processed. If the answer is NO, then the routine increments the tuning of thereceiver 102 andsignal generator 403 to the next frequency subdivision of the band of interest, and then branches back to step 604, as described above. - Once the control processor has conducted the RF shielding verification test routine for the last RF frequency (e.g., 1 GHz) in the RF calibration band (the answer to query
step 612 is YES), it may proceed to calibrate the effectiveness of thepower filter 420. Alternatively, as was the case with the calibration test, the power filter test may be conducted prior to the shielding verification test. The steps of the test are shown in the routine inFIG. 6 , and is essentially the same as the calibration test conducted in the lab and shown inFIG. 4 , described above. Namely, instep 701, with the cabinet door closed, the control processor changes the switch positions ofswitches signal generator 403—thecurrent coupler 425—filter 420—current probe 105—receiver 102. Next, instep 702, the signal generator and the receiver are then tuned to the same frequency (e.g., 10 KHz) and the attenuation performance of the power filter is measured instep 703. Next, inquery step 704 the resulting attenuation value is compared with that previously stored during the calibration test, described above. If the attenuation is at least as high as the calibration value (the answer to querystep 704 is YES), it is inferred that the filter is operating properly, and a PASS output is generated instep 705. On the other hand, if the attenuation is not as high as the calibration value (the answer to querystep 704 is NO), its difference is noted instep 706. As a further safeguard, shown inquery step 707, if the attenuation is less than the alarm threshold offset (e.g., 6 dB) stored instep 505 in the routine ofFIG. 3 , an alarm may be issued instep 708 as ‘filter failure’ indication. - As will be appreciated from the foregoing description, the problems of conventional EMP shielding verification test routines (as a non-limiting example) are successfully addressed in accordance with the present invention, which complies with verification requirement (MIL-STD-188-125) that mandates the ability to test the shielding effectiveness of the protective structure subsequent to deployment of the equipment at a host facility, and mitigates installing test components (e.g., placement of a test antenna), once the cabinet has been populated with other equipment. Since the system is controlled by an external processor, which is linked to the internal subsystem by way of fiber optic connections, there is no danger of RF leakage. Having the ferrite-loaded transmit antenna mounted on the inside of a cabinet door provides a considerable saving of internal space of the shielding enclosure, and prevents radiating other equipment within a common equipment bay.
- In addition, the use of an extremely narrow receive bandwidth serves to minimize effects of interference from surrounding equipment at the same facility and other RF environments, while also achieving an ultra low noise floor to minimize the required signal source power within the cabinet to a level that is significantly below the Network Equipment Building System (NEBS) rated RF susceptibility level. Also, the use of a slaved clock reference for synchronization between the signal generator and the receiver effectively eliminates the need for frequency precision and peak search measurement delays.
- While we have shown and described an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, it is to be understood that the same is not limited thereto but is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as known to a person skilled in the art. We therefore do not wish to be limited to the details shown and described herein, but intend to cover all such changes and modifications as are obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Claims (23)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/839,835 US6987392B1 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2004-05-05 | Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/839,835 US6987392B1 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2004-05-05 | Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060006881A1 true US20060006881A1 (en) | 2006-01-12 |
US6987392B1 US6987392B1 (en) | 2006-01-17 |
Family
ID=35540643
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/839,835 Expired - Fee Related US6987392B1 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2004-05-05 | Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6987392B1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100208433A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2010-08-19 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Protective telecommunications enclosure systems and methods |
US20110210654A1 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2011-09-01 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Tippable shelf for telecommunications rack |
KR20120019983A (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2012-03-07 | 금오공과대학교 산학협력단 | Electromagnetic pulse protection measuring system and method thereof for structure |
US20130194772A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2013-08-01 | Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc | Protective Telecommunications Enclosure Systems and Methods |
EP1972951A3 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2017-01-04 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Shielding measurement |
US10039023B2 (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2018-07-31 | Xiaomi Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically switching an intelligent device between test mode and normal work mode |
WO2019095359A1 (en) * | 2017-11-20 | 2019-05-23 | 华为技术有限公司 | Signal transmission device and system |
US10725093B2 (en) * | 2018-05-25 | 2020-07-28 | Adivic Technology Co., Ltd. | RF testing apparatus, movable testing device thereof, and case module thereof |
CN114184834A (en) * | 2021-10-26 | 2022-03-15 | 中国工程物理研究院应用电子学研究所 | System and method for testing high-power microwave protection performance of electromagnetic protection device with high confidence |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
USRE47599E1 (en) | 2000-10-20 | 2019-09-10 | Promega Corporation | RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags |
US20020183882A1 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2002-12-05 | Michael Dearing | RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags |
CA2425189A1 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2002-05-02 | Promega Corporation | Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products |
US7102747B2 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-09-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | In situ excitation for Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy |
US20070176607A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-02 | Mccormick Raymond A | System and method for testing information handling system chassis shielding effectiveness |
US7675294B2 (en) * | 2006-03-08 | 2010-03-09 | Tritech Applied Sciences, Inc. | System and method for determining attenuation of electromagnetic waves impacting an electromagnetic shield |
US7710275B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2010-05-04 | Promega Corporation | RFID reader enclosure and man-o-war RFID reader system |
US7750861B2 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2010-07-06 | Harris Corporation | Hybrid antenna including spiral antenna and periodic array, and associated methods |
ES2859780T3 (en) * | 2009-09-01 | 2021-10-04 | G4S Monitoring Tech Limited | Proximity sensors |
RU2761774C1 (en) * | 2021-05-25 | 2021-12-13 | Федеральное казенное предприятие "Научно-производственный центр "Дельта", ФКП "НПЦ "Дельта" | Method for automatic control of efficiency of passive protection of electromagnetic protected structure |
Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US22972A (en) * | 1859-02-15 | Wheel for bailed ad-carriages | ||
US34616A (en) * | 1862-03-04 | Improvement in manufacture of dentists pins | ||
US51880A (en) * | 1866-01-02 | button | ||
US77854A (en) * | 1868-05-12 | waknek | ||
US4962358A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1990-10-09 | The Curran Company | Integrity monitoring method and system for shielded enclosures having a fiber optic cable for bidirectional communications between a receiver and transmitter thereof |
US5915241A (en) * | 1996-09-13 | 1999-06-22 | Giannini; Jo Melinna | Method and system encoding and processing alternative healthcare provider billing |
US5933809A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-08-03 | Medcom Solutions, Inc. | Computer software for processing medical billing record information |
US5956690A (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 1999-09-21 | The Detroit Medical Center | Bundled billing accounting computer systems |
US5991750A (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 1999-11-23 | Ge Capital | System and method for pre-authorization of individual account transactions |
US6067522A (en) * | 1996-03-01 | 2000-05-23 | Warady; Arthur D. | Health and welfare benefit enrollment and billing system and method |
US6117073A (en) * | 1998-03-02 | 2000-09-12 | Jones; Scott J. | Integrated emergency medical transportation database system |
US6125350A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 2000-09-26 | Software For Surgeons | Medical information log system |
US6182047B1 (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 2001-01-30 | Software For Surgeons | Medical information log system |
US6338039B1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2002-01-08 | Michael Lonski | Method for automated collection of psychotherapy patient information and generating reports and treatment plans |
US6370544B1 (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 2002-04-09 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | System and method for integrating enterprise management application with network management operations |
US6870090B2 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2005-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for protecting against leakage of sensitive information from compromising electromagnetic emissions from computing systems |
-
2004
- 2004-05-05 US US10/839,835 patent/US6987392B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US22972A (en) * | 1859-02-15 | Wheel for bailed ad-carriages | ||
US34616A (en) * | 1862-03-04 | Improvement in manufacture of dentists pins | ||
US51880A (en) * | 1866-01-02 | button | ||
US77854A (en) * | 1868-05-12 | waknek | ||
US4962358A (en) * | 1989-04-27 | 1990-10-09 | The Curran Company | Integrity monitoring method and system for shielded enclosures having a fiber optic cable for bidirectional communications between a receiver and transmitter thereof |
US6182047B1 (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 2001-01-30 | Software For Surgeons | Medical information log system |
US6125350A (en) * | 1995-06-02 | 2000-09-26 | Software For Surgeons | Medical information log system |
US5933809A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-08-03 | Medcom Solutions, Inc. | Computer software for processing medical billing record information |
US6067522A (en) * | 1996-03-01 | 2000-05-23 | Warady; Arthur D. | Health and welfare benefit enrollment and billing system and method |
US5915241A (en) * | 1996-09-13 | 1999-06-22 | Giannini; Jo Melinna | Method and system encoding and processing alternative healthcare provider billing |
US6370544B1 (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 2002-04-09 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | System and method for integrating enterprise management application with network management operations |
US5956690A (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 1999-09-21 | The Detroit Medical Center | Bundled billing accounting computer systems |
US5991750A (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 1999-11-23 | Ge Capital | System and method for pre-authorization of individual account transactions |
US6117073A (en) * | 1998-03-02 | 2000-09-12 | Jones; Scott J. | Integrated emergency medical transportation database system |
US6338039B1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2002-01-08 | Michael Lonski | Method for automated collection of psychotherapy patient information and generating reports and treatment plans |
US6870090B2 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2005-03-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for protecting against leakage of sensitive information from compromising electromagnetic emissions from computing systems |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1972951A3 (en) * | 2007-03-19 | 2017-01-04 | Diehl BGT Defence GmbH & Co.KG | Shielding measurement |
US9124956B2 (en) | 2007-07-19 | 2015-09-01 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Method of producing a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse protected enclosure |
US8289717B2 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2012-10-16 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Protective telecommunications enclosure systems and methods |
US20130194772A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2013-08-01 | Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc | Protective Telecommunications Enclosure Systems and Methods |
US9095045B2 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2015-07-28 | Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc | Protective telecommunications enclosure systems and methods |
US20100208433A1 (en) * | 2007-07-19 | 2010-08-19 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Protective telecommunications enclosure systems and methods |
US20110210654A1 (en) * | 2010-02-26 | 2011-09-01 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Tippable shelf for telecommunications rack |
KR20120019983A (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2012-03-07 | 금오공과대학교 산학협력단 | Electromagnetic pulse protection measuring system and method thereof for structure |
KR101720796B1 (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2017-03-30 | 금오공과대학교 산학협력단 | Electromagnetic pulse protection measuring method for structure |
US10039023B2 (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2018-07-31 | Xiaomi Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically switching an intelligent device between test mode and normal work mode |
WO2019095359A1 (en) * | 2017-11-20 | 2019-05-23 | 华为技术有限公司 | Signal transmission device and system |
US11024959B2 (en) | 2017-11-20 | 2021-06-01 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Signal transmission apparatus and system |
US10725093B2 (en) * | 2018-05-25 | 2020-07-28 | Adivic Technology Co., Ltd. | RF testing apparatus, movable testing device thereof, and case module thereof |
CN114184834A (en) * | 2021-10-26 | 2022-03-15 | 中国工程物理研究院应用电子学研究所 | System and method for testing high-power microwave protection performance of electromagnetic protection device with high confidence |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6987392B1 (en) | 2006-01-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6987392B1 (en) | Electromagnetic protection test and surveillance system | |
US6088582A (en) | Controlled environment radio test apparatus and method | |
Bergsma et al. | Shielding Effectiveness of Cabinets using IEEE 299 and IEEE 299.1 and Effect of Loading | |
US7440741B2 (en) | Over-the-air testing of compact flash radio | |
CN115932690A (en) | Device and method for real-time verification of radiation disturbance measurement system | |
Battermann et al. | Discussion of the height scan introduced in CISPR 32 for measuring emissions above 1 GHz | |
JP3664961B2 (en) | Electromagnetic shield room system | |
Santos et al. | Shielding effectiveness measurements of coaxial cable and connectors using compact open area test site | |
CN219105143U (en) | Apparatus and application architecture for real-time verification of radiated disturbance measurement systems | |
JPH0643197A (en) | Distribution estimating apparatus | |
Das et al. | Reviews on Electromagnetic Interference/Compatibilities | |
CN109596911A (en) | A kind of radio observatory location Electro Magnetic Compatibility control method | |
Celozzi et al. | Appendix D Standards and Measurement Methods for Shielding Applications | |
Dybdal | Communication satellite antenna testing | |
Fan et al. | Vulnerability Assessment of a Protection Relay in Electrical Substation to Radiated Intentional EMI | |
Trout | Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft Transmitter Electromagnetic Compatibility | |
ARSALANE et al. | Implementation of a simulated model for the evaluation of electromagnetic disturbances in anechoic chamber | |
Park et al. | Experimental Study of Site-VSWR Method For Radiated Emission Test Sites Above 18 GHz | |
Dina et al. | Considerations on radiated emission measurements for a Laptop in a semi-anechoic chamber | |
Patscheck et al. | EVLA Shielded Chamber Characterization, Radiated Emissions Test Protocol, RF Shielding Characteristics of Buildings at VLA Site, and Radiated Emissions Test of MCB Ethernet Switchgear | |
Yemini et al. | Compact RCS Test Range Feed Carousel and Baffle House Design | |
TAJIMA et al. | Verification method for quasi-test site used in measuring radiated electromagnetic disturbance from EUT unable for conventional test site | |
JP2005128036A (en) | Electromagnetic shield room system | |
Moongilan | Distributed RF immunity hardening design approach for telecommunication hardware and installation sites | |
Imrane et al. | Identification of New EMC Factors of UAV FHSS Datalink in the Pre-Compliance Test Phase. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HARRIS CORPORATION, FLORIDA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HERNANDEZ, ARECIO A.;HOYT, DAVID GEORGE;REEL/FRAME:015305/0878 Effective date: 20040429 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: LTOS); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NORTH SOUTH HOLDINGS INC., NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HARRIS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:030119/0804 Effective date: 20130107 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.) |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.) |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20180117 |