[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US20050138126A1 - Peer-to-peer e-mail - Google Patents

Peer-to-peer e-mail Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050138126A1
US20050138126A1 US10/744,435 US74443503A US2005138126A1 US 20050138126 A1 US20050138126 A1 US 20050138126A1 US 74443503 A US74443503 A US 74443503A US 2005138126 A1 US2005138126 A1 US 2005138126A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
computer
mail
network
available
computer network
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/744,435
Inventor
Timucin Ozugur
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alcatel Lucent SAS
Original Assignee
Alcatel SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alcatel SA filed Critical Alcatel SA
Priority to US10/744,435 priority Critical patent/US20050138126A1/en
Assigned to ALCATEL reassignment ALCATEL ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: OZUGUR, TIMUCIN
Priority to EP04029617A priority patent/EP1562339A1/en
Publication of US20050138126A1 publication Critical patent/US20050138126A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
    • H04L51/21Monitoring or handling of messages
    • H04L51/214Monitoring or handling of messages using selective forwarding
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L51/00User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
    • H04L51/21Monitoring or handling of messages
    • H04L51/224Monitoring or handling of messages providing notification on incoming messages, e.g. pushed notifications of received messages

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to data communication in computer networks and, more particularly, to e-mail communication in computer networks.
  • e-mail systems are typically structured as client/server-based systems.
  • enterprises e.g., businesses or other organizations
  • the licensing costs involved in obtaining the support of an e-mail exchange server can be rather expensive.
  • the licensing costs for e-mail exchange server support can be quite high when considered on a per employee basis.
  • Exemplary embodiments of the present invention utilize data storage capacity already available within an enterprise's computer network to store temporarily an e-mail whose intended recipient computer is unavailable.
  • This temporary e-mail storage, as well as ultimate delivery of the e-mail to its intended destination, can be coordinated by control signaling that is internal to the enterprise's computer network. This provides the network with e-mail service which, at little added cost, eliminates the need for an external e-mail exchange server and its associated costs.
  • FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary procedures for delivery of an e-mail to its intended recipient in exemplary embodiments of a peer-to-peer e-mail system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary procedures for temporary storage of an e-mail whose intended recipient is unavailable in exemplary embodiments of a peer-to-peer e-mail system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by the e-mail proxy of FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus according to the invention capable of performing the operations of FIG. 3 .
  • FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by any of the computers illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • FIG. 6 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus according to the invention capable of performing the operations of FIG. 5 .
  • Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide a SIP-based peer-to-peer e-mail system.
  • An e-mail is sent by a computer or other data processing apparatus associated with the originator of the e-mail.
  • the e-mail is received at an e-mail proxy, and this e-mail proxy begins the e-mail delivery process by sending a SIP INVITE message to make sure that the computer (as used herein, “computer” can include any type of data processing apparatus, e.g., a handheld, laptop, or desktop computer, a router, etc.) associated with the e-mail's intended recipient is powered-up and able to receive e-mail.
  • the intended destination computer If the intended destination computer is powered-down or otherwise out-of-service, or if the intended destination computer is out of memory, then another computer within the enterprise temporarily stores the e-mail on behalf of the intended recipient. This temporary storage computer then uses SIP NOTIFY messages to periodically notify the intended destination computer that the temporary storage computer is holding an e-mail for the intended destination computer.
  • FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a computer network 11 with peer-to-peer e-mail capabilities according to the present invention.
  • the computer network 11 can be, in some exemplary embodiments, an ethernet LAN including a plurality of computers for supporting anywhere from about 2 to about 100 employees of a given enterprise.
  • the network 11 includes a router which provides communication connectivity between network 11 and another, external computer network 14 such as the Internet.
  • the aforementioned e-mail proxy is implemented on the router.
  • the user of a computer 13 has originated an e-mail for delivery to computer 2 .
  • the e-mail is received by the e-mail proxy.
  • the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to computer 2 , and at 17 the e-mail proxy receives a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 2 , before the e-mail proxy times out. In this situation, the e-mail proxy sends the e-mail to computer 2 at 19 .
  • FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a computer network similar to FIG. 1 , but FIG. 2 illustrates the situation where the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to computer 2 at 16 , but times out before receiving a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 2 .
  • the e-mail proxy at 21 sends a further SIP INVITE message to computer 3 at 24 .
  • the e-mail proxy Before the e-mail proxy times out, it receives at 23 a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 3 .
  • the e-mail proxy sends the e-mail to computer 3 for temporary storage until computer 2 (the intended destination) can receive the e-mail.
  • computer 3 at 25 periodically sends SIP NOTIFY messages to computer 2 in order to notify computer 2 that computer 3 is temporarily storing an e-mail for computer 2 .
  • FIG. 3 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by the e-mail proxy of FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • the e-mail proxy at 31 defines a destination address variable (dest) to be the intended destination address of the received e-mail.
  • the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to the intended destination computer.
  • the destination address variable is changed from the intended destination address to another destination address associated with another computer within the enterprise's internal data network. This destination address produced at 35 identifies a candidate for temporarily storing the e-mail.
  • FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus (e.g., the router of FIGS. 1 and 2 ) that can implement the e-mail proxy in the data communication network of FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • the data processing apparatus of FIG. 4 can perform the exemplary operations illustrated in FIG. 3 . More specifically, after a received e-mail is buffered at 40 , a destination selector 41 sets a destination address variable (dest) to be the intended destination (int.dest.) address of the buffered e-mail, generally corresponding to operation 31 of FIG. 3 .
  • a destination address variable (dest) sets a destination address variable (dest) to be the intended destination (int.dest.) address of the buffered e-mail, generally corresponding to operation 31 of FIG. 3 .
  • a conventional SIP stack 49 and the destination selector 41 are cooperable for supporting the signaling illustrated at 42 in order to implement the operations illustrated at 32 - 35 of FIG. 3 .
  • a “send e-mail” signal is applied to the destination selector 41 .
  • destination selector 41 produces a signal 43 A which controls a further selector 43 to implement the decision operation at 36 of FIG. 3 . That is, if the signal 43 A indicates that the destination which has responded with a 200 OK message is the intended e-mail destination, then the e-mail from buffer 40 is sent on path 48 through selector 43 (see also 37 in FIG. 3 ). Otherwise, signal 43 A controls selector 43 such that the e-mail from buffer 40 is, by operation of a conventional forwarding module 45 , sent as a forwarded e-mail to the destination address designated at 44 (see also 38 in FIG. 3 ).
  • FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by any of the computers illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 . It is initially determined at 50 whether the computer has been requested via SIP messaging about its availability to receive an e-mail. Such a request can arise in three ways.
  • the computer can receive a SIP INVITE message requesting the computer's availability to receive its own e-mail from the e-mail proxy, in a second situation the computer can receive a SIP INVITE message to request the computer's availability to receive and temporarily store an e-mail that is intended for another recipient, and in a third situation the computer can receive a SIP NOTIFY message requesting the computer's availability to receive its own e-mail from a temporary storage computer where that e-mail has been temporarily stored.
  • the computer determines at 51 whether it has enough available memory to receive and store the e-mail. If the computer is out of memory, then operations return to 50 . Otherwise, the computer sends a SIP 200 OK message at 52 to indicate that the computer is available, the request has been accepted, and the e-mail can be delivered.
  • the e-mail is received at 53 , it is determined at 54 whether or not the computer is the intended destination of the received e-mail. If so, then the e-mail is passed to normal incoming e-mail processing at 55 , after which operations return to 50 . Otherwise, if the computer is not the intended destination of the received e-mail, then at 56 the received e-mail is stored, and a destination address variable (dest) is set to the address of the computer that is the intended destination of the received e-mail.
  • a destination address variable (dest) is set to the address of the computer that is the intended destination of the received e-mail.
  • a SIP NOTIFY message is sent to the destination address indicating to the recipient that the computer has an e-mail for delivery to the recipient. If, after a predetermined period of time at 58 , a SIP 200 OK message has not been received at 59 to indicate availability for delivery of the e-mail, and if the computer is not preparing to power down at 501 , then the operations at 57 - 59 are repeated until either a 200 OK message is received or it is determined at 501 that the computer is about to power down. If a 200 OK message is received at 59 before any indication that the computer will power down at 501 , then the e-mail is sent to the destination address at 500 , after which operations return to 50 .
  • the destination address variable is updated to another destination address of another computer within the enterprise's computer network.
  • the destination address produced at 502 thus identifies a candidate for temporarily storing the e-mail.
  • a SIP INVITE message is sent to the destination address to request the availability of the computer at the destination address to store the original e-mail temporarily for the intended recipient. If a corresponding 200 OK message accepting the e-mail is received at 504 before a time out occurs at 505 , then the original e-mail is forwarded to the destination address at 506 for temporary storage, after which operations return to 50 .
  • the destination address variable is updated at 502 to the address of another temporary storage candidate computer in the enterprise's computer network, and a corresponding SIP INVITE message is sent at 503 to the new candidate at the updated destination address.
  • the operations at 502 - 504 can be repeated until a 200 OK response corresponding to the INVITE message of 503 is received at 504 before a time out occurs at 505 .
  • FIG. 6 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus which can perform the exemplary operations illustrated in FIG. 5 .
  • a conventional SIP stack 69 interfaces communication signals from a communication port 600 to a storage memory apparatus 64 , a destination selector 67 , an e-mail routing selector 66 , and a memory manager 60 .
  • the SIP stack signaling illustrated generally at 61 and 62 is cooperable with the memory manager 60 for performing operations generally in correspondence with the above-described operations illustrated at 50 - 52 of FIG. 5 .
  • the e-mail is received and applied to a detector 63 which can perform the above-described operation illustrated at 54 in FIG. 5 .
  • a storage apparatus 64 stores the e-mail and provides the intended destination address of that e-mail, in general correspondence to the above-described operations illustrated at 56 in FIG. 5 .
  • the signaling illustrated at 65 in FIG. 6 generally corresponds to the above-described operations illustrated at 57 - 59 and 501 (N) in FIG. 5 .
  • the storage apparatus 64 is cooperable with the outgoing e-mail routing selector 66 and control signal 66 A from SIP stack 69 for sending the original e-mail out on path 600 to its intended destination address, in general correspondence to the above-described operation at 59 (Y) and 500 in FIG. 5 .
  • the destination selector 67 is operable for selecting temporary destination addresses which identify other computers in the enterprise's data network that are candidates to provide temporary storage of the received e-mail.
  • the destination selector 67 is cooperable with the SIP stack 69 for effectuating the signaling illustrated generally at 68 , thereby effectuating the above-described operations illustrated generally at 502 - 505 of FIG. 5 .
  • the control signal 66 B is responsive to the signaling at 68 for causing the original e-mail to be routed from storage 64 through selector 66 to the outgoing e-mail output via a forwarding module 68 .
  • the forwarding module 68 uses conventional techniques to send the original e-mail as a forwarded e-mail to the current temporary destination address provided at 68 A by the destination selector 67 (see also 506 in FIG. 5 ).
  • the e-mail proxy can be implemented on a dedicated computer of the enterprise's internal computer network rather than on the router of FIGS. 1 and 2 .
  • the dedicated computer which implements the e-mail proxy can also be used as a dedicated computer for temporary storage of e-mails whose intended destination computers are powered down, out of service or out of memory. In these latter embodiments, operations can proceed from 34 (Y) of FIG. 3 to 56 of FIG. 5 , as shown by broken line in FIGS. 3 and 5 .
  • the e-mail proxy can be implemented on a first dedicated computer within the enterprise's data network, and a further computer can be dedicated for temporarily storing e-mails enroute to their intended destination computers.
  • the dedicated e-mail proxy computer can perform the exemplary operations described above with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4
  • the dedicated temporary storage computer can perform the exemplary operations described above with respect to FIGS. 5 and 6 .
  • FIGS. 1-6 can be readily achieved by, for example, suitably modifying software, hardware, or both in conventional computers and routers.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

E-mail service for an enterprise is provided by utilizing data storage capacity already available within the enterprise to store e-mail temporarily if the intended e-mail recipient is unable to receive the e-mail. This temporary e-mail storage, and ultimate delivery of the e-mail to its intended destination, can both be coordinated by control signaling that is internal to the enterprise. This provides the enterprise with e-mail service without using an external e-mail exchange server.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates generally to data communication in computer networks and, more particularly, to e-mail communication in computer networks.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Conventional e-mail systems are typically structured as client/server-based systems. This means that enterprises (e.g., businesses or other organizations) that wish to utilize e-mail must obtain the support of an appropriate e-mail exchange server. The licensing costs involved in obtaining the support of an e-mail exchange server can be rather expensive. For a relatively small enterprise (for example, a business with 2-100 employees), the licensing costs for e-mail exchange server support can be quite high when considered on a per employee basis.
  • It is therefore desirable to provide for e-mail service at a lower cost than the licensing costs associated with e-mail exchange servers.
  • Exemplary embodiments of the present invention utilize data storage capacity already available within an enterprise's computer network to store temporarily an e-mail whose intended recipient computer is unavailable. This temporary e-mail storage, as well as ultimate delivery of the e-mail to its intended destination, can be coordinated by control signaling that is internal to the enterprise's computer network. This provides the network with e-mail service which, at little added cost, eliminates the need for an external e-mail exchange server and its associated costs.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary procedures for delivery of an e-mail to its intended recipient in exemplary embodiments of a peer-to-peer e-mail system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary procedures for temporary storage of an e-mail whose intended recipient is unavailable in exemplary embodiments of a peer-to-peer e-mail system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by the e-mail proxy of FIGS. 1 and 2.
  • FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus according to the invention capable of performing the operations of FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by any of the computers illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
  • FIG. 6 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus according to the invention capable of performing the operations of FIG. 5.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Exemplary embodiments of the invention provide a SIP-based peer-to-peer e-mail system. An e-mail is sent by a computer or other data processing apparatus associated with the originator of the e-mail. The e-mail is received at an e-mail proxy, and this e-mail proxy begins the e-mail delivery process by sending a SIP INVITE message to make sure that the computer (as used herein, “computer” can include any type of data processing apparatus, e.g., a handheld, laptop, or desktop computer, a router, etc.) associated with the e-mail's intended recipient is powered-up and able to receive e-mail. If the intended destination computer is powered-down or otherwise out-of-service, or if the intended destination computer is out of memory, then another computer within the enterprise temporarily stores the e-mail on behalf of the intended recipient. This temporary storage computer then uses SIP NOTIFY messages to periodically notify the intended destination computer that the temporary storage computer is holding an e-mail for the intended destination computer.
  • Some embodiments of the invention perform the following exemplary operations in order to effectuate peer-to-peer e-mail operations:
      • 1. The e-mail originator sends the e-mail to its intended recipient;
      • 2. The e-mail proxy within the enterprise receives the e-mail, and initiates a SIP INVITE message to the intended recipient;
      • 3. If the intended recipient's computer is powered up and has enough memory available, the intended recipient sends a SIP 200 OK message back to the e-mail proxy; and
      • 4. The e-mail proxy sends the e-mail to the intended recipient.
  • After operation 2 above, some exemplary embodiments may execute the following exemplary alternative operations as conditions warrant:
      • 3A. If the intended recipient's computer is powered-down or does not have enough memory available, then the intended recipient's computer does not send a SIP 200 OK message, and the e-mail proxy times out.
      • 4A. After the e-mail proxy times out, it sends a SIP INVITE message to another computer in the enterprise, (using, for example, the IP address of that computer). If that computer is powered-up and has enough available memory, it sends a SIP 200 OK message back to the e-mail proxy.
      • 5. The e-mail proxy then sends the e-mail to the computer from which the 200 OK message was received, for temporary storage in that computer. The user of the temporary storage computer may be prevented from reading the area of memory where the e-mail is stored.
      • 6. The temporary storage computer periodically sends a SIP NOTIFY message to the intended recipient computer in order to notify the intended recipient computer that the temporary storage computer is storing an e-mail for the intended recipient computer.
      • 7. If the temporary storage computer receives a 200 OK message from the intended recipient computer, then the temporary storage computer sends the e-mail to the intended recipient computer.
      • 8. If the temporary storage computer is about to power-down, and has not yet received a 200 OK message from the intended recipient computer in response to any of the periodic NOTIFY messages, then the temporary storage computer sends a SIP INVITE message to a further computer in the enterprise in order to determine whether that further computer can provide temporary storage for the intended recipient's e-mail.
      • 9. If a 200 OK message is received from the further computer, then the computer which is about to power-down sends the intended recipient's e-mail to the further computer for temporary storage.
  • FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a computer network 11 with peer-to-peer e-mail capabilities according to the present invention. The computer network 11 can be, in some exemplary embodiments, an ethernet LAN including a plurality of computers for supporting anywhere from about 2 to about 100 employees of a given enterprise. The network 11 includes a router which provides communication connectivity between network 11 and another, external computer network 14 such as the Internet. In the network 11, the aforementioned e-mail proxy is implemented on the router. In FIG. 1, the user of a computer 13 has originated an e-mail for delivery to computer 2. At 15, the e-mail is received by the e-mail proxy. At 16, the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to computer 2, and at 17 the e-mail proxy receives a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 2, before the e-mail proxy times out. In this situation, the e-mail proxy sends the e-mail to computer 2 at 19.
  • FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a computer network similar to FIG. 1, but FIG. 2 illustrates the situation where the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to computer 2 at 16, but times out before receiving a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 2. In this situation, the e-mail proxy at 21 sends a further SIP INVITE message to computer 3 at 24. Before the e-mail proxy times out, it receives at 23 a corresponding 200 OK message from computer 3. In response to this 200 OK message, the e-mail proxy sends the e-mail to computer 3 for temporary storage until computer 2 (the intended destination) can receive the e-mail. Once computer 3 has received and stored the e-mail, computer 3 at 25 periodically sends SIP NOTIFY messages to computer 2 in order to notify computer 2 that computer 3 is temporarily storing an e-mail for computer 2.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by the e-mail proxy of FIGS. 1 and 2. After receiving an e-mail at 30, the e-mail proxy at 31 defines a destination address variable (dest) to be the intended destination address of the received e-mail. Thereafter at 32, the e-mail proxy sends a SIP INVITE message to the intended destination computer. At 33 and 34, if a SIP 200 OK message is not received before a time out, then the destination address variable is changed from the intended destination address to another destination address associated with another computer within the enterprise's internal data network. This destination address produced at 35 identifies a candidate for temporarily storing the e-mail. Thereafter, the operations at 32-35 continue until a 200 OK message is received at 33. At 36, if the 200 OK message was received from the intended destination computer, then the e-mail is sent to the intended destination computer at 37. Otherwise, if at 36 the 200 OK message was received from a computer other than intended destination computer, then the e-mail is forwarded to that other computer at 38 for temporary storage. After the e-mail has been disposed of at 37 or 38, operations return to 30.
  • FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus (e.g., the router of FIGS. 1 and 2) that can implement the e-mail proxy in the data communication network of FIGS. 1 and 2. In some embodiments, the data processing apparatus of FIG. 4 can perform the exemplary operations illustrated in FIG. 3. More specifically, after a received e-mail is buffered at 40, a destination selector 41 sets a destination address variable (dest) to be the intended destination (int.dest.) address of the buffered e-mail, generally corresponding to operation 31 of FIG. 3. A conventional SIP stack 49 and the destination selector 41 are cooperable for supporting the signaling illustrated at 42 in order to implement the operations illustrated at 32-35 of FIG. 3. When the 200 OK message is received by the SIP stack 49, a “send e-mail” signal is applied to the destination selector 41. In response to the “send e-mail” signal, destination selector 41 produces a signal 43A which controls a further selector 43 to implement the decision operation at 36 of FIG. 3. That is, if the signal 43A indicates that the destination which has responded with a 200 OK message is the intended e-mail destination, then the e-mail from buffer 40 is sent on path 48 through selector 43 (see also 37 in FIG. 3). Otherwise, signal 43A controls selector 43 such that the e-mail from buffer 40 is, by operation of a conventional forwarding module 45, sent as a forwarded e-mail to the destination address designated at 44 (see also 38 in FIG. 3).
  • FIG. 5 illustrates exemplary operations which can be performed by any of the computers illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2. It is initially determined at 50 whether the computer has been requested via SIP messaging about its availability to receive an e-mail. Such a request can arise in three ways. In one situation, the computer can receive a SIP INVITE message requesting the computer's availability to receive its own e-mail from the e-mail proxy, in a second situation the computer can receive a SIP INVITE message to request the computer's availability to receive and temporarily store an e-mail that is intended for another recipient, and in a third situation the computer can receive a SIP NOTIFY message requesting the computer's availability to receive its own e-mail from a temporary storage computer where that e-mail has been temporarily stored.
  • After the request has been received at 50, the computer determines at 51 whether it has enough available memory to receive and store the e-mail. If the computer is out of memory, then operations return to 50. Otherwise, the computer sends a SIP 200 OK message at 52 to indicate that the computer is available, the request has been accepted, and the e-mail can be delivered. After the e-mail is received at 53, it is determined at 54 whether or not the computer is the intended destination of the received e-mail. If so, then the e-mail is passed to normal incoming e-mail processing at 55, after which operations return to 50. Otherwise, if the computer is not the intended destination of the received e-mail, then at 56 the received e-mail is stored, and a destination address variable (dest) is set to the address of the computer that is the intended destination of the received e-mail.
  • At 57, a SIP NOTIFY message is sent to the destination address indicating to the recipient that the computer has an e-mail for delivery to the recipient. If, after a predetermined period of time at 58, a SIP 200 OK message has not been received at 59 to indicate availability for delivery of the e-mail, and if the computer is not preparing to power down at 501, then the operations at 57-59 are repeated until either a 200 OK message is received or it is determined at 501 that the computer is about to power down. If a 200 OK message is received at 59 before any indication that the computer will power down at 501, then the e-mail is sent to the destination address at 500, after which operations return to 50.
  • If an impending power down is indicated at 501, then at 502 the destination address variable is updated to another destination address of another computer within the enterprise's computer network. The destination address produced at 502 thus identifies a candidate for temporarily storing the e-mail. Thereafter at 503, a SIP INVITE message is sent to the destination address to request the availability of the computer at the destination address to store the original e-mail temporarily for the intended recipient. If a corresponding 200 OK message accepting the e-mail is received at 504 before a time out occurs at 505, then the original e-mail is forwarded to the destination address at 506 for temporary storage, after which operations return to 50. If a 200 OK message is not received at 504 before a time out occurs at 505, then the destination address variable is updated at 502 to the address of another temporary storage candidate computer in the enterprise's computer network, and a corresponding SIP INVITE message is sent at 503 to the new candidate at the updated destination address. The operations at 502-504 can be repeated until a 200 OK response corresponding to the INVITE message of 503 is received at 504 before a time out occurs at 505.
  • FIG. 6 diagrammatically illustrates exemplary embodiments of a data processing apparatus which can perform the exemplary operations illustrated in FIG. 5. A conventional SIP stack 69 interfaces communication signals from a communication port 600 to a storage memory apparatus 64, a destination selector 67, an e-mail routing selector 66, and a memory manager 60. The SIP stack signaling illustrated generally at 61 and 62 is cooperable with the memory manager 60 for performing operations generally in correspondence with the above-described operations illustrated at 50-52 of FIG. 5. After the memory manager 60 has accepted a proposed e-mail, the e-mail is received and applied to a detector 63 which can perform the above-described operation illustrated at 54 in FIG. 5. A storage apparatus 64 stores the e-mail and provides the intended destination address of that e-mail, in general correspondence to the above-described operations illustrated at 56 in FIG. 5. The signaling illustrated at 65 in FIG. 6 generally corresponds to the above-described operations illustrated at 57-59 and 501 (N) in FIG. 5.
  • The storage apparatus 64 is cooperable with the outgoing e-mail routing selector 66 and control signal 66A from SIP stack 69 for sending the original e-mail out on path 600 to its intended destination address, in general correspondence to the above-described operation at 59 (Y) and 500 in FIG. 5.
  • The destination selector 67 is operable for selecting temporary destination addresses which identify other computers in the enterprise's data network that are candidates to provide temporary storage of the received e-mail. In response to an indication that the data processing apparatus will soon power down, the destination selector 67 is cooperable with the SIP stack 69 for effectuating the signaling illustrated generally at 68, thereby effectuating the above-described operations illustrated generally at 502-505 of FIG. 5. The control signal 66B is responsive to the signaling at 68 for causing the original e-mail to be routed from storage 64 through selector 66 to the outgoing e-mail output via a forwarding module 68. The forwarding module 68 uses conventional techniques to send the original e-mail as a forwarded e-mail to the current temporary destination address provided at 68A by the destination selector 67 (see also 506 in FIG. 5).
  • In some embodiments, the e-mail proxy can be implemented on a dedicated computer of the enterprise's internal computer network rather than on the router of FIGS. 1 and 2. In some embodiments, the dedicated computer which implements the e-mail proxy can also be used as a dedicated computer for temporary storage of e-mails whose intended destination computers are powered down, out of service or out of memory. In these latter embodiments, operations can proceed from 34 (Y) of FIG. 3 to 56 of FIG. 5, as shown by broken line in FIGS. 3 and 5.
  • In other embodiments, the e-mail proxy can be implemented on a first dedicated computer within the enterprise's data network, and a further computer can be dedicated for temporarily storing e-mails enroute to their intended destination computers. In some examples of such embodiments, the dedicated e-mail proxy computer can perform the exemplary operations described above with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4, and the dedicated temporary storage computer can perform the exemplary operations described above with respect to FIGS. 5 and 6.
  • It will be evident to workers in the art that the embodiments described above with respect to FIGS. 1-6 can be readily achieved by, for example, suitably modifying software, hardware, or both in conventional computers and routers.
  • Although exemplary embodiments of the invention are described above in detail, this does not limit the scope of the invention, which can be practiced in a variety of embodiments.

Claims (28)

1. A method of providing e-mail service to computers within a first computer network that includes a plurality of computers and has data communication connectivity to at least one further computer network, comprising:
determining that an e-mail should be delivered to a first computer in the first computer network; and
independently of the at least one further computer network, determining whether the first computer is available to receive the e-mail.
2. The method of claim 1, including, if the first computer is not available to receive the e-mail, temporarily storing the e-mail.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said temporarily storing step includes temporarily storing the e-mail within the first computer network independently of the at least one further computer network.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said temporarily storing step includes determining that a second computer in the first computer network is available to receive the e-mail, delivering the e-mail to the second computer and storing the e-mail in the second computer.
5. The method of claim 4, including, after said step of storing the e-mail in the second computer, periodically notifying the first computer that the e-mail is available for delivery to the first computer.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said periodically notifying step includes the second computer periodically notifying the first computer that the e-mail is available for delivery to the first computer.
7. The method of claim 5, including determining that the second computer is to be powered down, and thereafter determining, independently of the at least one further computer network, whether a third computer in the first computer network is available to receive the e-mail from the second computer.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein one of said steps of determining the availability of the first computer, determining the availability of the second computer, determining the availability of the third computer and periodically notifying the first computer includes using SIP messaging.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first computer is the intended recipient of the e-mail.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the first computer is a candidate for temporarily storing the e-mail enroute to the intended recipient of the e-mail.
11. A computer apparatus for operation in a first computer network that includes a plurality of computers and has data communication connectivity to at least one further computer network, comprising:
a destination selector for selecting within the first computer network a first computer to which an e-mail should be delivered;
a communication interface coupled to said destination selector for signaling to the first computer, independently of the at least one further computer network, that the e-mail is available for delivery to the first computer, said communication interface further for providing, independently of the at least one further computer network, an indication of whether the first computer is available to receive the e-mail; and
said destination selector responsive to said indication for providing the e-mail for transmission to one of the first computer and a further computer in the first computer network.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first computer is the intended destination of the e-mail, and said indication is that the first computer is unavailable to receive the e-mail, said destination selector responsive to said indication for providing the e-mail for transmission to the further computer, and wherein the further computer is for temporarily storing the e-mail while the e-mail is enroute to the first computer.
13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the first computer and the further computer are candidates for temporarily storing the e-mail while the e-mail is enroute to its intended destination, and said indication is that the first computer is unavailable to receive the e-mail, said destination selector responsive to said indication for providing the e-mail for transmission to the further computer for temporary storage therein.
14. The apparatus of claim 11, provided as one of a handheld computer, a laptop computer, a desktop computer and a router.
15. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said communication interface includes a SIP stack and said signaling includes SIP messaging.
16. A computer apparatus for operation in a first computer network that includes a plurality of computers and has data communication connectivity to at least one further computer network, comprising:
a storage device for receiving and storing an e-mail whose intended recipient is a first computer within the first computer network;
a communication interface for signaling to the first computer, independently of the at least one further computer network, that the e-mail is available for delivery to the first computer, said communication interface further for providing, independently of the at least one further computer network, an indication of whether the first computer is available to receive the e-mail; and
said storage device coupled to said communication interface and responsive to an indication that the first computer is available for providing the e-mail for transmission to the first computer.
17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said storage device is for receiving and storing the e-mail independently of the at least one further computer network.
18. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said communication interface is for periodically signaling to the first computer, independently of the at least one further computer network, that the e-mail is available for delivery to the first computer.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said communication interface is further for signaling to a second computer in the first computer network, independently of the at least one further computer network, that the e-mail is available for delivery to the second computer, said communication interface further for providing an indication of whether the second computer is available to receive the e-mail.
20. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said communication interface includes a SIP stack, and said signaling includes SIP messaging.
21. The apparatus of claim 16, provided as one of a handheld computer, a laptop computer, a desktop computer and a router.
22. A computer network, comprising:
a plurality of computers coupled for e-mail communication with one another;
a communication connectivity apparatus coupled to said computers for providing data communication connectivity to at least one further computer network; and
a first said computer and a second said computer coupled for communication signaling and cooperable independently of the at least one further computer network for signaling therebetween according to a predetermined signaling arrangement to permit said first computer to determine whether said second computer is available to receive an e-mail that said first computer has for transmission to said second computer.
23. The computer network of claim 22, wherein said computer network includes a data storage apparatus coupled to said first computer, said first computer responsive to an indication from said signaling that said second computer is not available to receive the e-mail for transmitting the e-mail to said data storage apparatus for temporary storage therein.
24. The computer network of claim 23, wherein said data storage apparatus includes a plurality of data storage devices in respective ones of said computers.
25. The computer network of claim 22, provided as an ethernet LAN.
26. The computer network of claim 22, wherein said signaling includes SIP messaging.
27. The computer network of claim 22, wherein said plurality of computers includes at least about 2 computers and at most about 100 computers.
28. A computer network, comprising:
a plurality of computers coupled for e-mail communication with one another;
a first said computer and a second said computer coupled for communication signaling and cooperable for signaling therebetween to permit said first computer to determine whether said second computer is available to receive an e-mail that said first computer has for transmission to said second computer;
a third said computer including a data storage device; and
said first computer responsive to an indication from said signaling that said second computer is not available to receive the e-mail for transmitting the e-mail to said third computer for temporary storage in said data storage device.
US10/744,435 2003-12-23 2003-12-23 Peer-to-peer e-mail Abandoned US20050138126A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/744,435 US20050138126A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2003-12-23 Peer-to-peer e-mail
EP04029617A EP1562339A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2004-12-15 Peer-to-peer-e-mail

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/744,435 US20050138126A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2003-12-23 Peer-to-peer e-mail

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050138126A1 true US20050138126A1 (en) 2005-06-23

Family

ID=34678855

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/744,435 Abandoned US20050138126A1 (en) 2003-12-23 2003-12-23 Peer-to-peer e-mail

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20050138126A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1562339A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090144380A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2009-06-04 Kallman William R Peer-to-peer email
US9299056B2 (en) 2010-09-12 2016-03-29 Scayl, Inc. Peer-to-peer email with video and advertising aspects

Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6208717B1 (en) * 1997-03-03 2001-03-27 Unisys Corporation Method for migrating or altering a messaging system
US6246871B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2001-06-12 Nokia Networks Oy Method and apparatus for providing access of messages to multiple recipients in cellular networks
US20020073137A1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2002-06-13 Meadway Michael D. Peer-to-peer automated anonymous asynchronous file sharing
US20020087634A1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2002-07-04 Ogle David Mark Technique for enabling wireless messaging systems to use alternative message delivery mechanisms
US20020143855A1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2002-10-03 Traversat Bernard A. Relay peers for extending peer availability in a peer-to-peer networking environment
US20030023691A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-01-30 Knauerhase Robert C. Routing messages using presence information
US6529995B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2003-03-04 Storage Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining and restoring mapping table entries and data in a raid system
US20030140149A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-24 Richard Marejka Communication protocol for use in controlling communications in a monitoring service system
US20030163761A1 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-08-28 Michael Chen System and method for message driven bean service migration
US20030225981A1 (en) * 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Direct addressed shared compressed memory system
US20040064511A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-04-01 Abdel-Aziz Mohamed M. Peer-to-peer email messaging
US20040107240A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-03 Globespan Virata Incorporated Method and system for intertask messaging between multiple processors
US20040162871A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2004-08-19 Pabla Kuldipsingh A. Infrastructure for accessing a peer-to-peer network environment
US20040205203A1 (en) * 2003-03-24 2004-10-14 Marcus Peinado Enforcing isolation among plural operating systems
US20050091316A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-28 Oscar Ponce System and method for creating and selectively sharing data elements in a peer-to-peer network
US20050091212A1 (en) * 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for accessing a file
US6993571B2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2006-01-31 International Business Machines Corporation Power conservation in a server cluster
US7149511B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2006-12-12 Rosetta-Wireless Corporation Wireless intelligent personal server
US7218919B2 (en) * 2000-08-21 2007-05-15 Suinno Oy Voicemail short message service method and means and a subscriber terminal
US7284268B2 (en) * 2002-05-16 2007-10-16 Meshnetworks, Inc. System and method for a routing device to securely share network data with a host utilizing a hardware firewall
US7315512B2 (en) * 2001-11-30 2008-01-01 Zte Corporation Method for redundancy backup of signaling link in IP network
US7349987B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2008-03-25 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method with parsing and dispersion techniques
US7398300B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2008-07-08 Broadcom Corporation One shot RDMA having a 2-bit state

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002007396A1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-01-24 Nokia Corporation Method and system providing a messaging service

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6208717B1 (en) * 1997-03-03 2001-03-27 Unisys Corporation Method for migrating or altering a messaging system
US6529995B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2003-03-04 Storage Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for maintaining and restoring mapping table entries and data in a raid system
US20020087634A1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2002-07-04 Ogle David Mark Technique for enabling wireless messaging systems to use alternative message delivery mechanisms
US6246871B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2001-06-12 Nokia Networks Oy Method and apparatus for providing access of messages to multiple recipients in cellular networks
US20020073137A1 (en) * 1999-10-14 2002-06-13 Meadway Michael D. Peer-to-peer automated anonymous asynchronous file sharing
US7218919B2 (en) * 2000-08-21 2007-05-15 Suinno Oy Voicemail short message service method and means and a subscriber terminal
US7149511B1 (en) * 2000-08-31 2006-12-12 Rosetta-Wireless Corporation Wireless intelligent personal server
US7349987B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2008-03-25 Digital Doors, Inc. Data security system and method with parsing and dispersion techniques
US20020143855A1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2002-10-03 Traversat Bernard A. Relay peers for extending peer availability in a peer-to-peer networking environment
US20030023691A1 (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-01-30 Knauerhase Robert C. Routing messages using presence information
US6993571B2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2006-01-31 International Business Machines Corporation Power conservation in a server cluster
US7315512B2 (en) * 2001-11-30 2008-01-01 Zte Corporation Method for redundancy backup of signaling link in IP network
US20030140149A1 (en) * 2002-01-14 2003-07-24 Richard Marejka Communication protocol for use in controlling communications in a monitoring service system
US20030163761A1 (en) * 2002-02-21 2003-08-28 Michael Chen System and method for message driven bean service migration
US7284268B2 (en) * 2002-05-16 2007-10-16 Meshnetworks, Inc. System and method for a routing device to securely share network data with a host utilizing a hardware firewall
US20030225981A1 (en) * 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 International Business Machines Corporation Direct addressed shared compressed memory system
US7398300B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2008-07-08 Broadcom Corporation One shot RDMA having a 2-bit state
US20040064511A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-04-01 Abdel-Aziz Mohamed M. Peer-to-peer email messaging
US20040107240A1 (en) * 2002-12-02 2004-06-03 Globespan Virata Incorporated Method and system for intertask messaging between multiple processors
US20040162871A1 (en) * 2003-02-13 2004-08-19 Pabla Kuldipsingh A. Infrastructure for accessing a peer-to-peer network environment
US20040205203A1 (en) * 2003-03-24 2004-10-14 Marcus Peinado Enforcing isolation among plural operating systems
US20050091316A1 (en) * 2003-10-03 2005-04-28 Oscar Ponce System and method for creating and selectively sharing data elements in a peer-to-peer network
US20050091212A1 (en) * 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for accessing a file

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090144380A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2009-06-04 Kallman William R Peer-to-peer email
US9166937B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2015-10-20 Scayl, Inc. Peer-to-peer email
US9578096B2 (en) 2007-11-21 2017-02-21 Scayl, Inc. Peer-to-peer email
US9299056B2 (en) 2010-09-12 2016-03-29 Scayl, Inc. Peer-to-peer email with video and advertising aspects
US9373133B2 (en) 2010-09-12 2016-06-21 Scayl, Inc. Peer-to-peer email with video and advertising aspects

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1562339A1 (en) 2005-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7103656B2 (en) System and method for administrating a wireless communication network
US7836136B1 (en) Method and apparatus for processing electronic messages
US8942115B2 (en) System and method for dynamic routing for push notifications
US7464141B2 (en) Method and system for associating related messages of different types
EP1635521B1 (en) Reducing storage requirement for route information
US8526455B2 (en) System and method for two way push notifications
US20060265347A1 (en) System and method for providing interactive communications
US10367892B2 (en) System and method for aggregating communication connections
US8972504B2 (en) Forwarding un-responded to instant messages to electronic mail
US9253127B2 (en) Optimized routing for proxy use
US7543030B2 (en) Peer-to-peer communication for instant messaging between different instant message application types
US20090138557A1 (en) Delegation of e-mail return receipts
CA2810852C (en) System and method for providing a plurality of prioritised email domain names
US10063648B2 (en) Relaying mobile communications
US20050138126A1 (en) Peer-to-peer e-mail
JP2003223404A (en) Electronic mail system
JPH11163921A (en) Device and method for mailing list distribution control
JP2007219721A (en) Electronic mail terminal, presence server, electronic mail system, electronic mail distribution method and program
JP2002330175A (en) Mail server, electronic mail service system and electronic mail transmission/reception control method, as well as its program and recording medium
US9338115B2 (en) Content based message delivery
KR100479157B1 (en) Dual web mail service system using pc mail server and host mail server
KR100890591B1 (en) Method and apparatus for pushing e-mail to wireless communication devices
WO2001067305A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for delegating administrative capabilities to domains served by mail providers
US20080244012A1 (en) Instant messaging with reduced message overhead
JP2003178379A (en) Monitoring control system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCATEL, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OZUGUR, TIMUCIN;REEL/FRAME:014850/0381

Effective date: 20031223

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION