[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

US20050068920A1 - Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems - Google Patents

Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050068920A1
US20050068920A1 US10/991,270 US99127004A US2005068920A1 US 20050068920 A1 US20050068920 A1 US 20050068920A1 US 99127004 A US99127004 A US 99127004A US 2005068920 A1 US2005068920 A1 US 2005068920A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
outage probability
probability
total
radio resource
lowest
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/991,270
Inventor
Guodong Zhang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
InterDigital Technology Corp
Original Assignee
InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by InterDigital Technology Corp filed Critical InterDigital Technology Corp
Priority to US10/991,270 priority Critical patent/US20050068920A1/en
Publication of US20050068920A1 publication Critical patent/US20050068920A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • H04W72/542Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using measured or perceived quality
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/02Access restriction performed under specific conditions
    • H04W48/06Access restriction performed under specific conditions based on traffic conditions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of communications, specifically wireless communications. More specifically, the present invention relates to call admission control in third generation wireless systems.
  • WCDMA-TDD wideband code division multiple access time division duplex
  • WCDMA-TDD wideband code division multiple access time division duplex
  • the goal of call admission control is to guarantee that the quality of service (QoS) is met for all users admitted into the system.
  • QoS quality of service
  • Call admission control directly affects the QoS of mobile users, and the stability and capacity of the system. Therefore, call admission control is v important for the design of WCDMA-TDD systems.
  • the present invention is a system and method for performing call admission control where admission decisions are based on a dynamic SIR requirement and the assumption that a user can use multiple timeslots.
  • the present invention is implemented without using online measurement, thereby avoiding software and hardware implementation costs attributed thereto.
  • FIG. 1 is a method for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a call admission control system in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • call admission control is performed in WCDMA-TDD systems (where users can use multiple timeslots) while taking into account the fact that each user's required signal to interference ration (SIR) is a random variable.
  • SIR signal to interference ration
  • Resource allocation is optimized so as to yield the lowest total outage probability (P out-total ) for a new user and to ensure P out-total is below a predetermined value.
  • the present invention is preferably implemented using the following assumptions.
  • Second, the chip rate of a WCDMA-TDD system is 3.84 Mcps making the equivalent chip rate in one timeslot 256 kcps (i.e. 3.84 Mcps/15 256 kcps).
  • BS base station
  • Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factor (OVSF) codes are used for channelization codes.
  • the spreading factor of a channelization code can take a value of 2, 4, 8, and 16 in the uplink.
  • a resource unit (RU) corresponds to a particular physical channel and is defined as a channelization code having spreading factor 16 in a particular time slot. RUs therefore correspond to physical channels in a particular timeslot.
  • the primary goal of call admission control is to properly allocate RUs (i.e. physical channels) so that QoS requirements are guaranteed, for both the new user and any users already in the cell.
  • RUs i.e. physical channels
  • the number of RUs required by a new user depends on the type of call the new user has placed. For example, a new user placing a voice call requires two RUs while a new user placing a 64k data call requires five RUs.
  • P out is the probability that, in a particular timeslot, a user's required SIR will be below a certain predetermined value.
  • P out the required SIR of each user is not fixed, but follows a certain distribution thereby making P out difficult to calculate. That is, even though the distribution of the SIR is known, the computation of P out is still very complex, and cannot be done in real time.
  • the Gaussian approximation in contrast, provides a sufficiently approximate result and has relatively low computation complexity. Therefore, the Gaussian approximation approach is used to allow the RNC (Radio Network Controller) to compute P out for each timeslot and make resource allocation decisions in real time.
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • the P out of every timeslot assigned to a new user may be combined to compute P out-total for the new user. Assuming a new user is allocated RUs in a particular number of timeslots, the P out-total of a new user is defined as the probability that an outage will occur in at least one of those timeslots.
  • step 12 the method 10 begins in step 12 by computing the current P out of each uplink timeslot.
  • P out is the probability that a new user's SIR is below a predetermined value in a particular timeslot and is computed for each uplink timeslot. Therefore, in step 12 , the probability of the new user's SIR being below the predetermined value is computed for each timeslot.
  • P out accounts for the fact that the user's SIR changes with time and is computed by the RNC using the Gaussian approximation to reduce computation complexity.
  • step 14 the timeslot having the lowest P out , say timeslot i, is selected in step 14 . Since timeslot i is the timeslot with the lowest P out , the P out in timeslot i is denoted P out (i).
  • step 16 one RU is assigned to timeslot i and P out (i) is updated accordingly.
  • step 18 the method determines whether additional RUs need to be assigned. As mentioned, for purposes of describing the invention, it can be assumed that the new user requires two RUs. Therefore, the determination in step 18 will be positive and the method will proceed to step 20 .
  • step 20 the method determines whether P out (i) is still the lowest P out (i.e. the method determines whether, despite being assigned a RU, timeslot i still has the lowest P out ) If P out (i) is still the lowest P out , the method goes back to step 16 and the second RU is assigned to timeslot i and continues as indicated. If, in contrast, P out (i) is no longer the lowest P out , the method proceeds to step 22 .
  • P′ contribution is computed. The P′ contribution is the contribution to P out-total assuming the next RU (i.e. the second RU according to the assumption noted above) is accepted to timeslot i despite the fact that P out (i) is no longer the lowest P out . The P′ contribution is the same value as the new P out of timeslot i. That is, P′ contribution is equal to P out (i).
  • step 24 P contribution is computed.
  • the P contribution is the contribution to P out-total assuming the next RU (i.e. the second RU according to the assumption noted above) is accepted to the timeslot having the lowest P out , say timeslot j.
  • P contribution and P contribution have been computed, the method proceeds to step 26 where it determines whether P contribution is greater than or equal to P contribution (i.e. P out (i)′). If P contribution is greater than or equal to P′ Contribution , the method proceeds to step 16 wherein the next RU will be assigned to timeslot i despite the fact that timeslot i no longer has the lowest P out .
  • i is set equal to j in step 28 and the method proceeds to step 16 .
  • the method sets i equal to j so that, in step 16 , the next RU is assigned to timeslot j because assigning the next RU to timeslot j will result in the lowest P out-total.
  • step 16 the method again proceeds to step 18 .
  • steps 20 through 28 would not have been necessary where the new user only needed one RU. But, because in the assumption of the example the user needed two RUs, one run through steps 20 through 28 was necessary in order to determine the optimal allocation of the second RU. Steps 20 through 28 are performed, as needed, for every RU required by the user. Once all of the RUs have been assigned, the method proceeds to step 30 . In step 30 , P out-total is computed to determine the outage probability of the new user based on the allocation of RU(s), as allocated in steps 12 through 28 .
  • step 32 the method determines whether P out-total is less than or equal to a predetermined value, say ⁇ .
  • the predetermined value ⁇ is an operator dependent parameter and may be any value, as desired, depending on the desired level of network stability. If P out-total is less than ⁇ , the new user is admitted (step 34 ). If not, the new user is rejected (step 36 ).
  • P out-total increases as the number of users increases and saturates around the predetermined value ⁇ thereby dramatically improving system stability (i.e. the number of dropped calls).
  • system stability i.e. the number of dropped calls.
  • the present invention also results in a dramatic increase in blocking probability (which also increases as the number of users) in comparison to static sequential and random call admission control methods.
  • the combination of increased stability and blocking probability significantly improves users QoS as, from a user's perspective, having a call blocked is much more preferable than having a call dropped.
  • the system 100 comprises a RNC 102 , a BS or Node-B 104 and user equipment (UE) 106 wherein the BS and UE each have a multi-user detection (MUD) receiver 103 , 108 , respectively.
  • RNC Radio Network Controller
  • UE user equipment
  • MOD multi-user detection
  • the RNC 102 When the UE 106 is used by a user to place a call, the RNC 102 will perform call admission control and allocate RUs required by that new call to appropriate timeslots so as to ensure the lowest possible P out-total and to ensure that P out-total remains below the predetermined threshold ⁇ .
  • the RNC 102 computes P out for every uplink timeslot and assigns a RU to the timeslot with the lowest P out . If there are additional RUs required by the new user that need to be allocated, the RNC 102 will assign subsequent RUs to the same timeslot the previous RU was assigned to, so long as that timeslot still has the lowest P out . If that timeslot no longer has the lowest P out , the RNC 102 will determine whether it still should assign subsequent RUs to that timeslot or to the timeslot now having the lowest P out . To make that determination the RNC 103 determines which timeslot results in the lowest contribution to P out-total . The RNC repeats this analysis for every RU required by the new call.
  • the RNC 103 determines whether the allocation results in P out-total being below the predetermined ⁇ . If P out-total is below ⁇ , the new user is admitted. If not, the new user is rejected.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
  • Radio Relay Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method and system for performing call admission control in wireless communication systems is disclosed. Resource units required by a new user are assigned based on an outage probability of each uplink timeslot. The outage probability of each timeslot is updated as the resource units are assigned so that each resource unit assignment results in the lowest possible contribution to total outage probability. Once all of the resource units are assigned, the total outage probability is computed based on the resource allocation. If the total outage probability is below a predetermined value, the new user is admitted. If the total outage probability is above the predetermined value, the new user is rejected.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/301,001 filed Nov. 21, 2002, which in turn claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/365,355, filed on Mar. 14, 2002, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
  • BACKGROUND
  • The present invention relates to the field of communications, specifically wireless communications. More specifically, the present invention relates to call admission control in third generation wireless systems.
  • Third generation wireless communications, such as wideband code division multiple access time division duplex (WCDMA-TDD) systems, will support not only voice service, but also a wide range of broadband services, such as video and Internet traffic. In such a system, the goal of call admission control is to guarantee that the quality of service (QoS) is met for all users admitted into the system. Call admission control directly affects the QoS of mobile users, and the stability and capacity of the system. Therefore, call admission control is v important for the design of WCDMA-TDD systems.
  • In recent years, there have been some advances regarding call admission control in WCDMA-FDD systems but few in WCDMA-TDD systems. One such system addresses the problem by making resource allocation based on a fixed required signal to interference ratio (SIR). In WCDMA-TDD systems, however, the required SIR of a user is not fixed and, in contrast, changes with time because of imperfect power control. In WCDMA-FDD systems, there are no timeslots whereas in WCDMA-TDD systems a user can use more than one timeslot.
  • A need therefore exists for providing call admission control for TDD systems.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention is a system and method for performing call admission control where admission decisions are based on a dynamic SIR requirement and the assumption that a user can use multiple timeslots. The present invention is implemented without using online measurement, thereby avoiding software and hardware implementation costs attributed thereto.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S)
  • FIG. 1 is a method for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a call admission control system in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
  • In accordance with the present invention, call admission control is performed in WCDMA-TDD systems (where users can use multiple timeslots) while taking into account the fact that each user's required signal to interference ration (SIR) is a random variable. Resource allocation is optimized so as to yield the lowest total outage probability (Pout-total) for a new user and to ensure Pout-total is below a predetermined value.
  • The present invention is preferably implemented using the following assumptions. First, as specified by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standards, each frame is divided into 15 timeslots. Second, the chip rate of a WCDMA-TDD system is 3.84 Mcps making the equivalent chip rate in one timeslot 256 kcps (i.e. 3.84 Mcps/15=256 kcps). Third, a multi-user detection (MUD) receiver is used at the base station (BS).
  • In each timeslot, Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factor (OVSF) codes are used for channelization codes. The spreading factor of a channelization code can take a value of 2, 4, 8, and 16 in the uplink. For purposes of describing the present invention, a resource unit (RU) corresponds to a particular physical channel and is defined as a channelization code having spreading factor 16 in a particular time slot. RUs therefore correspond to physical channels in a particular timeslot.
  • For a new user seeking admission to a cell, the primary goal of call admission control is to properly allocate RUs (i.e. physical channels) so that QoS requirements are guaranteed, for both the new user and any users already in the cell. The number of RUs required by a new user depends on the type of call the new user has placed. For example, a new user placing a voice call requires two RUs while a new user placing a 64k data call requires five RUs.
  • Decisions made by a call admission control system are based on whether RUs can be allocated successfully for the new user. Whether a RU can be allocated successfully for a new user depends on the individual outage probabilities (Pout) for all of the timeslots in which RUs have been assigned. Therefore, Pout is the probability that, in a particular timeslot, a user's required SIR will be below a certain predetermined value. In WCDMA-TDD systems, however, the required SIR of each user is not fixed, but follows a certain distribution thereby making Pout difficult to calculate. That is, even though the distribution of the SIR is known, the computation of Pout is still very complex, and cannot be done in real time.
  • The Gaussian approximation, in contrast, provides a sufficiently approximate result and has relatively low computation complexity. Therefore, the Gaussian approximation approach is used to allow the RNC (Radio Network Controller) to compute Pout for each timeslot and make resource allocation decisions in real time.
  • The Pout of every timeslot assigned to a new user may be combined to compute Pout-total for the new user. Assuming a new user is allocated RUs in a particular number of timeslots, the Pout-total of a new user is defined as the probability that an outage will occur in at least one of those timeslots. The Pout-total may be computed as desired. By way of example, Pout-total may be computed according to P out - total = 1 - i = Ω ( 1 - P out ( i ) ) ,
    where Ω is the set of timeslots in which RUs have been allocated to the user.
  • Referring now to FIG. 1, a method 10 is shown wherein call admission control is performed in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems. Assuming, purely for purposes of describing the invention, that a new user requires two RUs (i.e. the new user has placed a voice call), the method 10 begins in step 12 by computing the current Pout of each uplink timeslot. Again, Pout is the probability that a new user's SIR is below a predetermined value in a particular timeslot and is computed for each uplink timeslot. Therefore, in step 12, the probability of the new user's SIR being below the predetermined value is computed for each timeslot. As explained, Pout accounts for the fact that the user's SIR changes with time and is computed by the RNC using the Gaussian approximation to reduce computation complexity.
  • Once Pout has been computed for each timeslot, the timeslot having the lowest Pout, say timeslot i, is selected in step 14. Since timeslot i is the timeslot with the lowest Pout, the Pout in timeslot i is denoted Pout(i). In step 16, one RU is assigned to timeslot i and Pout(i) is updated accordingly. Once the first RU has been assigned, the method proceeds to step 18. In step 18, the method determines whether additional RUs need to be assigned. As mentioned, for purposes of describing the invention, it can be assumed that the new user requires two RUs. Therefore, the determination in step 18 will be positive and the method will proceed to step 20.
  • In step 20, the method determines whether Pout(i) is still the lowest Pout (i.e. the method determines whether, despite being assigned a RU, timeslot i still has the lowest Pout) If Pout(i) is still the lowest Pout, the method goes back to step 16 and the second RU is assigned to timeslot i and continues as indicated. If, in contrast, Pout(i) is no longer the lowest Pout, the method proceeds to step 22. In step 22, P′contribution is computed. The P′contribution is the contribution to Pout-total assuming the next RU (i.e. the second RU according to the assumption noted above) is accepted to timeslot i despite the fact that Pout(i) is no longer the lowest Pout. The P′contribution is the same value as the new Pout of timeslot i. That is, P′contribution is equal to Pout(i).
  • In step 24, Pcontribution is computed. The Pcontribution is the contribution to Pout-total assuming the next RU (i.e. the second RU according to the assumption noted above) is accepted to the timeslot having the lowest Pout, say timeslot j. The Pcontribution is given by Pcontribution=1−(1−Pout(i))·(1−Pout(j)) Once Pcontribution and Pcontribution have been computed, the method proceeds to step 26 where it determines whether Pcontribution is greater than or equal to Pcontribution (i.e. Pout(i)′). If Pcontribution is greater than or equal to P′Contribution, the method proceeds to step 16 wherein the next RU will be assigned to timeslot i despite the fact that timeslot i no longer has the lowest Pout. That is, even though timeslot i no longer has the lowest Pout, assigning the next RU to timeslot i will result in a lower Pout-total than assigning the next RU to timeslot j, which actually has the lowest Pout. If, in contrast, Pcontribution is less than P′contribution, i is set equal to j in step 28 and the method proceeds to step 16. The method sets i equal to j so that, in step 16, the next RU is assigned to timeslot j because assigning the next RU to timeslot j will result in the lowest Pout-total.
  • From step 16, the method again proceeds to step 18. Note, steps 20 through 28 would not have been necessary where the new user only needed one RU. But, because in the assumption of the example the user needed two RUs, one run through steps 20 through 28 was necessary in order to determine the optimal allocation of the second RU. Steps 20 through 28 are performed, as needed, for every RU required by the user. Once all of the RUs have been assigned, the method proceeds to step 30. In step 30, Pout-total is computed to determine the outage probability of the new user based on the allocation of RU(s), as allocated in steps 12 through 28.
  • In step 32, the method determines whether Pout-total is less than or equal to a predetermined value, say θ. The predetermined value θ is an operator dependent parameter and may be any value, as desired, depending on the desired level of network stability. If Pout-total is less than θ, the new user is admitted (step 34). If not, the new user is rejected (step 36).
  • Pursuant to the present invention, Pout-total increases as the number of users increases and saturates around the predetermined value θ thereby dramatically improving system stability (i.e. the number of dropped calls). Due to the stringent admission standards, the present invention also results in a dramatic increase in blocking probability (which also increases as the number of users) in comparison to static sequential and random call admission control methods. The combination of increased stability and blocking probability significantly improves users QoS as, from a user's perspective, having a call blocked is much more preferable than having a call dropped.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2, a system 100 is shown for implementing call admission control according to the present invention. The system 100 comprises a RNC 102, a BS or Node-B 104 and user equipment (UE) 106 wherein the BS and UE each have a multi-user detection (MUD) receiver 103, 108, respectively.
  • When the UE 106 is used by a user to place a call, the RNC 102 will perform call admission control and allocate RUs required by that new call to appropriate timeslots so as to ensure the lowest possible Pout-total and to ensure that Pout-total remains below the predetermined threshold θ.
  • To perform call admission control, the RNC 102 computes Pout for every uplink timeslot and assigns a RU to the timeslot with the lowest Pout. If there are additional RUs required by the new user that need to be allocated, the RNC 102 will assign subsequent RUs to the same timeslot the previous RU was assigned to, so long as that timeslot still has the lowest Pout. If that timeslot no longer has the lowest Pout, the RNC 102 will determine whether it still should assign subsequent RUs to that timeslot or to the timeslot now having the lowest Pout. To make that determination the RNC 103 determines which timeslot results in the lowest contribution to Pout-total. The RNC repeats this analysis for every RU required by the new call.
  • Once all of the RUs that are required by the new user have been allocated to particular timeslots, the RNC 103 determines whether the allocation results in Pout-total being below the predetermined θ. If Pout-total is below θ, the new user is admitted. If not, the new user is rejected.
  • Although the present invention has been described in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto, and that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is defined by the attached claims.

Claims (6)

1. A method for performing call admission control in a time-slotted wireless communication system, the method comprising:
(a) calculating an individual outage probability of each of a plurality of time slots, the individual outage probability being a probability that a signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) in a time slot falls below a predetermined SIR value; and
(b) allocating for a user one or more radio resource units to one or more time slots such that a total outage probability becomes the lowest, the total outage probability being a probability that an SIR in any allocated time slot falls below the predetermined SIR value.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
determining whether the total outage probability is below a predetermined threshold; and
admitting the user when the determination is positive and rejecting the user when the determination is negative.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein step (b) comprises:
selecting a time slot having the lowest individual outage probability;
allocating the time slot one of a plurality of radio resource units; and
allocating subsequent radio resource units in a time slot in which a contribution to the total outage probability of each subsequent radio resource unit is lowest.
4. An apparatus for performing call admission control in a time-slotted wireless communication system, the apparatus comprising:
an outage probability calculator for calculating an individual outage probability of each of a plurality of time slots, the individual outage probability being a probability that a signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) in a time slot falls below a predetermined SIR value; and
a radio resource unit allocator for allocating for a user one or more radio resource units to one or more time slots such that a total outage probability becomes the lowest, the total outage probability being a probability that an SIR in any allocated time slot falls below the predetermined SIR value.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 further comprising:
a controller for determining whether the total outage probability is below a predetermined threshold, whereby admitting the user when the determination is positive and rejecting the user when the determination is negative.
6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the radio resource unit allocator allocates one of a plurality of radio resource units to a time slot having the lowest individual outage probability, and subsequent radio resource units in a time slot where a contribution to the total outage probability of each subsequent radio resource unit is lowest.
US10/991,270 2002-03-14 2004-11-17 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems Abandoned US20050068920A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/991,270 US20050068920A1 (en) 2002-03-14 2004-11-17 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US36535502P 2002-03-14 2002-03-14
US10/301,001 US6842618B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2002-11-21 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems
US10/991,270 US20050068920A1 (en) 2002-03-14 2004-11-17 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/301,001 Continuation US6842618B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2002-11-21 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050068920A1 true US20050068920A1 (en) 2005-03-31

Family

ID=28044743

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/301,001 Expired - Fee Related US6842618B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2002-11-21 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems
US10/991,270 Abandoned US20050068920A1 (en) 2002-03-14 2004-11-17 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/301,001 Expired - Fee Related US6842618B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2002-11-21 Method and system for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (2) US6842618B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1486082B1 (en)
JP (2) JP4047285B2 (en)
KR (3) KR100715709B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE347777T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003228299A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2478704A1 (en)
DE (1) DE60310209T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2278161T3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA04008916A (en)
NO (1) NO20044340L (en)
TW (3) TW200420149A (en)
WO (1) WO2003079703A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070047474A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2007-03-01 Ipwireless, Inc. Apparatus and method for communicating signaling information
US20100062785A1 (en) * 2008-09-11 2010-03-11 Hwang Chan Soo Cognitive radio communication system based on cooperation signal provided by another system
US20100227619A1 (en) * 2007-11-01 2010-09-09 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for detecting stationary users and call admission control method thereof in wireless communication system
US8903411B1 (en) * 2010-07-02 2014-12-02 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Applying call events in association with user devices based on priority levels
US9066278B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2015-06-23 Nec Corporation Communication apparatus, method, and computer implementable product for admission control

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004034686A1 (en) * 2002-10-09 2004-04-22 Interdigital Technology Corporation Information storage for radio resource management
US7106708B2 (en) * 2003-02-19 2006-09-12 Interdigital Technology Corp. Method for implementing fast dynamic channel allocation (F-DCA) call admission control in radio resource management
US7369559B2 (en) * 2003-10-06 2008-05-06 Cisco Technology Inc. Adaptive call admission control for calls handled over a compressed clear channel
US7599339B2 (en) 2003-11-12 2009-10-06 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and system for transferring wireless transmit/receive unit-specific information
JP4588031B2 (en) * 2004-09-17 2010-11-24 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Mobile communication method, base station and radio network controller
US7468951B2 (en) * 2005-02-02 2008-12-23 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for evaluting number of additional admissible calls for use in call admission control
KR100685793B1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-02-22 한국전자통신연구원 Method for call admission control in packet based communication system
KR101523480B1 (en) 2006-08-21 2015-05-28 인터디지탈 테크날러지 코포레이션 Dynamic resource allocation, scheduling and signaling for variable data rate service in lte
JP4355333B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2009-10-28 京セラ株式会社 Mobile communication system, mobile station apparatus, base station apparatus, and channel allocation method
KR101007740B1 (en) * 2008-11-28 2011-01-13 주식회사 케이티 Method for call admission control and device thereof
US8089870B2 (en) * 2009-07-22 2012-01-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. QoE based admission control
US8411629B1 (en) 2009-08-11 2013-04-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic admission control of wireless video to a wireless network
JP5522255B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-06-18 富士通株式会社 Wireless communication system, management apparatus, wireless communication method, and wireless communication program
WO2012052071A1 (en) * 2010-10-18 2012-04-26 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Communication scheduling based on priority and resource utilization
US9930578B2 (en) 2015-05-04 2018-03-27 Apple Inc. Enhanced voice roaming for UE devices associated with a home network without SRVCC
US10091132B2 (en) * 2016-01-29 2018-10-02 Raytheon Company Systems and methods for resource contention resolution

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5838671A (en) * 1995-06-23 1998-11-17 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Method and apparatus for call admission control in CDMA mobile communication system
US5884174A (en) * 1996-06-07 1999-03-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Call admission control for wireless networks
US6262980B1 (en) * 1997-12-02 2001-07-17 At&T Corp Dynamic resource allocation method and apparatus for broadband services in a wireless communications system
US6314293B1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-11-06 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Probabilistic use of wireless reserve channels for admission control
US20020119783A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2002-08-29 Yair Bourlas Adaptive call admission control for use in a wireless communication system
US6459681B1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2002-10-01 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Method and system for connection admission control
US6516193B1 (en) * 1997-01-03 2003-02-04 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Localized special services in a mobile communications system
US20030114167A1 (en) * 2001-12-10 2003-06-19 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Communication control system, communication control method, base station and mobile station
US20030161268A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-08-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Cross-layer integrated collision free path routing
US7110771B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2006-09-19 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method for implementing fast-dynamic channel allocation call admission control for radio link reconfiguration in radio resource management

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3810618B2 (en) * 2000-06-23 2006-08-16 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Channel allocation method and communication apparatus

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5838671A (en) * 1995-06-23 1998-11-17 Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc. Method and apparatus for call admission control in CDMA mobile communication system
US5884174A (en) * 1996-06-07 1999-03-16 Lucent Technologies Inc. Call admission control for wireless networks
US6516193B1 (en) * 1997-01-03 2003-02-04 Nokia Telecommunications Oy Localized special services in a mobile communications system
US6262980B1 (en) * 1997-12-02 2001-07-17 At&T Corp Dynamic resource allocation method and apparatus for broadband services in a wireless communications system
US6459681B1 (en) * 1998-11-13 2002-10-01 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Method and system for connection admission control
US6314293B1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-11-06 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Probabilistic use of wireless reserve channels for admission control
US20020119783A1 (en) * 2000-12-27 2002-08-29 Yair Bourlas Adaptive call admission control for use in a wireless communication system
US20030114167A1 (en) * 2001-12-10 2003-06-19 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Communication control system, communication control method, base station and mobile station
US20030161268A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-08-28 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Cross-layer integrated collision free path routing
US7110771B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2006-09-19 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method for implementing fast-dynamic channel allocation call admission control for radio link reconfiguration in radio resource management

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070047474A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2007-03-01 Ipwireless, Inc. Apparatus and method for communicating signaling information
US7817613B2 (en) * 2005-08-24 2010-10-19 Wireless Technology Solutions Llc Apparatus and method for communicating signaling information
US20110032851A1 (en) * 2005-08-24 2011-02-10 Wireless Technology Solutions Llc Apparatus and Method for Communicating Signaling Information
US8804580B2 (en) 2005-08-24 2014-08-12 Nvidia Corporation Apparatus and method for communicating signaling information
US9066337B2 (en) 2005-08-24 2015-06-23 Nvidia Corporation Apparatus and method for communicating signaling information
US20100227619A1 (en) * 2007-11-01 2010-09-09 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for detecting stationary users and call admission control method thereof in wireless communication system
US8295847B2 (en) * 2007-11-01 2012-10-23 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method for detecting stationary users and call admission control in wireless communication system
US20100062785A1 (en) * 2008-09-11 2010-03-11 Hwang Chan Soo Cognitive radio communication system based on cooperation signal provided by another system
US8620382B2 (en) 2008-09-11 2013-12-31 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Cognitive radio communication system based on cooperation signal provided by another system
US8903411B1 (en) * 2010-07-02 2014-12-02 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Applying call events in association with user devices based on priority levels
US9066278B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2015-06-23 Nec Corporation Communication apparatus, method, and computer implementable product for admission control

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20040101308A (en) 2004-12-02
ES2278161T3 (en) 2007-08-01
EP1486082A4 (en) 2005-03-30
JP4047285B2 (en) 2008-02-13
DE60310209T2 (en) 2007-11-22
EP1486082A1 (en) 2004-12-15
KR20050090478A (en) 2005-09-13
WO2003079703A1 (en) 2003-09-25
TW200420149A (en) 2004-10-01
JP4560070B2 (en) 2010-10-13
US20040192321A1 (en) 2004-09-30
US6842618B2 (en) 2005-01-11
MXPA04008916A (en) 2004-11-26
ATE347777T1 (en) 2006-12-15
CA2478704A1 (en) 2003-09-25
EP1486082B1 (en) 2006-12-06
NO20044340L (en) 2004-10-13
AU2003228299A1 (en) 2003-09-29
TW200708129A (en) 2007-02-16
KR100715709B1 (en) 2007-05-08
JP2007306628A (en) 2007-11-22
KR20080029014A (en) 2008-04-02
JP2005520443A (en) 2005-07-07
TWI260179B (en) 2006-08-11
TW200304333A (en) 2003-09-16
DE60310209D1 (en) 2007-01-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4560070B2 (en) Method and system for implementing call admission control in the uplink of a third generation wireless communication system
US6693952B1 (en) Dynamic code allocation for downlink shared channels
US7257376B2 (en) Systems and methods for making channel assignments to reduce interference and increase capacity of wireless networks
US6091954A (en) Channel assignment in enhanced fixed-plan mobile communications systems
US8179835B2 (en) System and method for efficiently allocating wireless resources
EP1958464B1 (en) Resource partitioning in a cellular communication system
Fu et al. Analysis of throughput and fairness with downlink scheduling in WCDMA networks
US20080101288A1 (en) Method and device for allocating radio configuration types
US20050070295A1 (en) Code tree fragmentation in call admission control
US7133366B2 (en) Modeling of hybrid time-code division multiple access communication systems
US20050117533A1 (en) Wireless communication method and apparatus for implementing call admission control based on common measurements
EP1765034A1 (en) Method and apparatus for performing call admission control in the uplink for third generation wireless communication systems
KR100330419B1 (en) Admission Control Based on Cell Load in CDMA System

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION