US20030113673A1 - Photoresist stripper compositions - Google Patents
Photoresist stripper compositions Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030113673A1 US20030113673A1 US10/116,030 US11603002A US2003113673A1 US 20030113673 A1 US20030113673 A1 US 20030113673A1 US 11603002 A US11603002 A US 11603002A US 2003113673 A1 US2003113673 A1 US 2003113673A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mixture
- stripper composition
- gbl
- acetate
- nba
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/16—Coating processes; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/168—Finishing the coated layer, e.g. drying, baking, soaking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/26—Processing photosensitive materials; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/42—Stripping or agents therefor
- G03F7/422—Stripping or agents therefor using liquids only
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to photoresist stripper compositions used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, and more particularly, the present invention relates to photoresist stripper compositions which are especially suitable for use in the edge bead removal (EBR) and rework processes of photolithography.
- EBR edge bead removal
- Rework and edge bead removal (EBR) processes are common processes encountered during photolithography of semiconductor wafers or substrates.
- the rework process is carried out when a photoresist that has been coated onto a wafer contains defects.
- the defective photoresist is completely removed from the wafer using a stripper composition, thereby allowing the wafer to be reused.
- EBR results from certain characteristics of the photoresist coating process. That is, the photoresist is coated onto a wafer by dispensing the photoresist material onto a surface of the wafer while the wafer is rotating. As a result, the photoresist material tends to accumulate at the edge of the wafer, forming a so-called edge bead. Also, during the spraying process, photoresist material inevitably becomes coated onto the backside of the wafer. Accordingly, in the EBR process, a stripper composition is used to remove any unwanted photoresist from the edge and backside of the wafer.
- a stripper composition for stripping the photoresist exhibit good solubility with respect to the various types of photoresists now being utilized.
- solubility of conventional photoresist stripper compositions is often insufficient, particularly when used to remove DUV photoresists.
- a primary drawback to present photoresist stripper compositions is that they are expensive.
- one commonly used stripper composition includes ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) and gamma-butyro lactone (GBL) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,305).
- EL ethyl lactate
- EEP ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate
- GBL gamma-butyro lactone
- the main component is EEP (75 wt %), which is quite expensive.
- DUV photoresists in particular dissolve too slowly using this composition.
- a photoresist stripper composition consist essentially of a mixture of an acetic acid ester, ⁇ -butyrolactone (GBL), and a non-acetate ester.
- the acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate, with NBA being preferable.
- the non-acetate ester may be one or more of ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) and methyl-3-methoxy (MMP).
- the mixture may include 8-95 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 3-80 wt % of the non-acetate type ester. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the non-acetate type ester.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL.
- the mixture may include 20-90 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 20-70 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.5-5 wt % of the GBL, and 10-65 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP.
- a photoresist stripper composition consist essentially of a mixture of an acetic acid ester, ⁇ -butyrolactone (GBL), and an alcohol derivative.
- the acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate, with NBA being preferable.
- the alcohol derivative may be one or more of propylene glycol monomethyl ester (PGME) and propylene glycol monomethyl ester acetate (PGMEA).
- the mixture may include 42-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-45 wt % of the alcohol derivative. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the alcohol derivative.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the PGME. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-30 wt % of the PGME.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA.
- non-major components such as surfactants may be added to the afore-described stripper compositions of the present invention.
- surfactants it is preferable that the surfactant constitute less than 1 wt % of the mixture.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart for describing an edge bead removal (EBR) process used in photolithography
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart for describing rework process used in photolithography
- FIG. 3 is a table showing residue characteristics of various stripper compositions as applied to certain commercially available photoresists.
- FIG. 4 is a table showing EBR characteristics of various stripper compositions as applied to certain commercially available photoresists.
- the photoresist stripper compositions of the present invention are especially suitable for use with respect to various types of photoresists during edge bead removal (EBR) and rework processes of photolithography.
- EBR edge bead removal
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart for describing a typical EBR process.
- a stripper composition of the invention is prepared, and in step S 12 , the photoresist is coated onto a substrate.
- the stripper composition is dispensed to an edge and back side of the wafer while the wafer is rotated at a relatively slow speed (e.g., 800-2000 rpm) for 5 to 10 seconds.
- the edge may be dispensed with stripper composition using one nozzle, and the back side may be dispensed using another nozzle. It is also possible to move a spray nozzle along the edge of a stationary wafer, as opposed to rotating the wafer.
- a spin-dry process is carried out in which wafer is rotated at a relatively high speed (e.g., 2000-2500 rpm). The wafer may then be subjected to an exposure process and a developing process to form a photoresist pattern thereon.
- a relatively high speed e.g. 2000-2500 rpm.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart for describing the rework process.
- step S 10 the stripper composition is prepared and, in step S 12 , is dispensed to the substrate which is rotated at a relatively low speed (e.g., 800-2000 rpm) for 10-20 seconds.
- step S 14 the rotation of the substrate is temporarily paused for 10-30 seconds.
- step S 16 the stripper composition is dispensed onto the substrate which is rotated this time at a relatively high speed (e.g., 2000-2500 rpm) for 10-20 seconds.
- step S 18 the wafer is spin-dried at step S 18 , and then rinsed using pure water at step S 20 .
- FIG. 2 depicts a typical rework process, it should be noted that in some cases, an extra spin-dry is inserted between steps S 14 and S 16 , and in other cases steps, S 14 , S 16 and S 20 are omitted.
- a photoresist stripper composition according to a first embodiment of the present invention is a mixture in which an acetic acid ester, ⁇ -butyrolactone (GBL), and a non-acetate ester are the major components thereof.
- GBL ⁇ -butyrolactone
- GBL is a relatively stable solvent and has a high burning point.
- GBL is used as a food additive and is environmentally safe.
- the physical characteristics of GBL are as follows: a specific gravity of 1.1254 at 25° C.; a viscosity of 1.7 cps at 25° C.; a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of 204° C.; a flash point at atmospheric pressure of 98.3° C.; and a burning point at atmospheric pressure of 457° C.
- the acetic acid ester of the first embodiment may be, for example, n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, or isopropyl acetate. These compounds can be used individually or in combination.
- NBA n-butyl acetate
- NBA has particularly favorable characteristics since it exhibits good dissolubility with respect to photoresistive resins.
- the physical characteristics of NBA are as follows: a specific gravity of 0.882 at 20° C.; a viscosity of 0.693 cps at 25° C.; a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of 126.5° C.; a flash point at atmospheric pressure of 38° C.; and a burning point at atmospheric pressure of 421° C.
- the non-acetate ester of the stripper composition of the first embodiment may be ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) or methyl-3-methoxy (MMP). These compounds can be used individually or in combination.
- the mixture may include 8-95 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 3-80 wt % of the non-acetate type ester. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the non-acetate type ester.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL.
- the mixture may include 20-90 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 20-70 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.5-5 wt % of the GBL, and 10-65 wt % of the EEP.
- the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP.
- a photoresist stripper composition of the second embodiment of the present invention is a mixture in which an acetic acid ester, ⁇ -butyrolactone (GBL), and an alcohol derivative are the major components thereof.
- the acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate. These compounds can be used individually or in combination. However, as noted previously, NBA has particularly favorable characteristics.
- the alcohol derivative may be a poly alkyl alcohol derivative, and may be propylene glycol monomethyl ester (PGME) or propylene glycol monomethyl ester acetate (PGMEA), and these compounds may also be used individually or in combination.
- PGME propylene glycol monomethyl ester
- PGMEA propylene glycol monomethyl ester acetate
- the mixture may include 42-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-45 wt % of the alcohol derivative. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the poly alkyl alcohol derivative.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the PGME. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-30 wt % of the PGME.
- the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA.
- non-major components may be added to the afore-described stripper compositions of the first and second embodiments which do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the invention.
- a small amount of surfactant may be added to the mixture to improve wettability of the stripper toward the photoresist, and to thereby improve dispersion of the stripper composition.
- Suitable surfactants include alkyl benzene sulfonate and an alkaline metal salt thereof, alkylated diphenyl disulfonate and an alkaline metal salt thereof, alkyl aryl sulfonate, alkaline metal salt of fluoroalkyl carboxylate, and ammonium perfluoro alkyl sulfonate. It is preferable that any surfactant constitute less than 1 wt % of the mixture.
- NBA, GBL and EL were placed into a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL, and 10% by weight of EL.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.79 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EL.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.88 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of EEP.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were place in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EEP.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 35% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 60% by weight of EEP.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.78 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGMEA were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of PGMEA.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGMEA were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EL.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGME were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of PGME.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGME were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of PGME.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.78 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and MMP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 90% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 5% by weight of MMP.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 87% by weight of NBA, 1% by weight of GBL and 12% by weight of EEP.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- EEP, EL and GBL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of EEP, 20% by weight of EL and 5% by weight of GBL.
- the viscosity of thus the prepared stripper composition was 1.30 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- a stripper composition was prepared in accordance with a method disclosed in Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2001-0036461.
- NBA, GBL and acetone were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of acetone.
- the viscosity of thus the prepared stripper composition was 0.66 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- GBL and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 20% by weight of GBL and 80% by weight of EL.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 2.40 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the ratio of NBA to EL in the stripper composition was adjusted to 85:5 by weight.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA and GBL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition.
- the ratio of NBA to GBL in the stripper composition was adjusted to 85:5 by weight.
- the viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- Experiment 1 (PR1). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist AZ1520HS (Clariant company, U.S.A.) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 42,000 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 5,000 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 2 (PR2).
- 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist MCPR-4100H (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed.
- the thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 11,900 ⁇ .
- the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed.
- the observed dissolving rate was 3,000 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 3 (PR3). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist SAT-701 (TOK company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 9,700 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 9,700 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 5 (PR5). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist MCPR-i7010N (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 35,000 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 20,000 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 7 (PR7). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist THMR-ip3100 (TOK company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 14,400 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 14,400 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 8 (PR8). 1.5 cc of g-line photoresist GS111M (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 12,200 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 12,000 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 9 (PR9).
- 1.5 cc of far ultraviolet-line photoresist SEPR402 (Shinetsu company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 10,300 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 7,000 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 10 (PR10).
- 1.5 cc of deep ultraviolet ray photoresist SEPR-430 (Shinetsu company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed.
- the thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 5,700 ⁇ .
- the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed.
- the observed dissolving rate was 5,700 ⁇ /sec.
- Experiment 11 (PR11). 1.5 cc of deep ultraviolet ray photoresist SSK-500MA (Sumitomo company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 16,000 ⁇ . Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 7,000 ⁇ /sec.
- the stripper composition of Example 8 exhibits a good dissolving rate with respect to most photoresists.
- the stripper compositions prepared according to the other examples of the present invention exhibit similar results.
- the stripper compositions of the present invention can be advantageously used to dissolve a variety of different photoresists coated on a substrate.
- the stripper compositions of the present invention are suitable for use in the stripping the photoresists through dipping processes.
- EBR characteristics were observed with respect to the stripper compositions of Example 11 and Comparative Examples 1-5.
- the stripper compositions of Example 11 and Comparative Examples 1-5 were dispensed onto the edge portion and backside of substrates having photoresists coated thereon.
- the photoresists used were those of aforementioned Experiments 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11.
- N 2 (nitrogen) pressure type coater the compositions were dispensed with a N 2 pressure of 0.7 Kg/cm for 4 seconds.
- the symbol “ ⁇ ” denotes “good”, which represents that no residue was present on the substrate and the edge profile was in a good state.
- Example 11 exhibits favorable stripping characteristics in the EBR process, as shown in FIG. 4.
- Comparative Example 1 is quite expensive and exhibits a poor edge profile state when used to strip I-line photoresists.
- the acetone component of Comparative Example 2 gives rise to the poor edge profile state thereof, and the high viscosity (2.40 cp) of Comparative Example 3 results in very poor EBR characteristics.
- Comparative Example 5 which includes only NBA and GBL, also exhibits poor EBR characteristics.
- the stripper compositions of the first and second embodiments include, as a major component, an acetic acid ester compound such as NBA.
- NBA in particular is advantageous in view of its low costs and favorable characteristics.
- the use of NBA alone is not acceptable, particularly since its relatively high wettability results in poor EBR process characteristics, i.e., poor edge profile states.
- GBL is added to the acetic acid ester compound to improve EBR process characteristics. This is because GBL exhibits good solubility and penetration characteristics.
- GBL is a relatively expensive compound, and excessive use thereof unacceptably increases costs.
- an effective photoresist stripper composition is realized with only a limited amount of GBL.
- a non-acetate ester such as EL, EEP and/or MMP is added as a major component to reduce residue.
- a poly alkyl alcohol derivative such as PGME and/or PGMEA is added as a major component to reduce residue.
- the photoresist stripper compositions of the present invention exhibit favorable stripping characteristics as demonstrate herein, but can be manufactured at relatively low cost since only a limited amount GBL is used in combination with the acetic ester compound and the non-acetate ester or poly alkyl alcohol derivative.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Photosensitive Polymer And Photoresist Processing (AREA)
- Exposure Of Semiconductors, Excluding Electron Or Ion Beam Exposure (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention generally relates to photoresist stripper compositions used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices, and more particularly, the present invention relates to photoresist stripper compositions which are especially suitable for use in the edge bead removal (EBR) and rework processes of photolithography.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Rework and edge bead removal (EBR) processes are common processes encountered during photolithography of semiconductor wafers or substrates.
- The rework process is carried out when a photoresist that has been coated onto a wafer contains defects. In this case, the defective photoresist is completely removed from the wafer using a stripper composition, thereby allowing the wafer to be reused.
- On the other hand, EBR results from certain characteristics of the photoresist coating process. That is, the photoresist is coated onto a wafer by dispensing the photoresist material onto a surface of the wafer while the wafer is rotating. As a result, the photoresist material tends to accumulate at the edge of the wafer, forming a so-called edge bead. Also, during the spraying process, photoresist material inevitably becomes coated onto the backside of the wafer. Accordingly, in the EBR process, a stripper composition is used to remove any unwanted photoresist from the edge and backside of the wafer.
- During both the rework and EBR process, it is important that the photoresist not dissolve too slowly or incompletely in the stripper composition, otherwise residual contaminants (photoresist) may remain on the substrate after the stripping process. Any such contaminants can reduce device yield and adversely impact product reliability.
- In the meantime, to accommodate for increased degrees of integration of semiconductor devices, new photoresist are being developed. For example, a photoresist having novolak resin as a main component has been developed for application with light of I-line or G-line wavelengths. Also, amplified type photoresists which respond to an excimer laser or deep ultraviolet (DUV) also have been employed.
- It is therefore desirable that a stripper composition for stripping the photoresist exhibit good solubility with respect to the various types of photoresists now being utilized. However, the solubility of conventional photoresist stripper compositions is often insufficient, particularly when used to remove DUV photoresists.
- Further, a primary drawback to present photoresist stripper compositions is that they are expensive. For example, one commonly used stripper composition includes ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) and gamma-butyro lactone (GBL) (U.S. Pat. No. 5,866,305). Unfortunately, however, the main component is EEP (75 wt %), which is quite expensive. Also, DUV photoresists in particular dissolve too slowly using this composition.
- Accordingly, there is a demand for photoresist stripper compositions which exhibit favorable stripping characteristics in both the rework and EBR processes, and with respect to different types of photoresists, yet which can be manufactured at relatively low cost.
- According to one aspect of the present invention, a photoresist stripper composition consist essentially of a mixture of an acetic acid ester, γ-butyrolactone (GBL), and a non-acetate ester. The acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate, with NBA being preferable. The non-acetate ester may be one or more of ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) and methyl-3-methoxy (MMP).
- The mixture may include 8-95 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 3-80 wt % of the non-acetate type ester. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the non-acetate type ester.
- In the case where the acidic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is EL, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL.
- In the case where the acidic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is EEP, the mixture may include 20-90 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the EEP. Preferably, the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 20-70 wt % of the EEP. More preferably, the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.5-5 wt % of the GBL, and 10-65 wt % of the EEP.
- In the case where the acidic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is MMP, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP.
- According to another aspect of the present invention, a photoresist stripper composition consist essentially of a mixture of an acetic acid ester, γ-butyrolactone (GBL), and an alcohol derivative. The acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate, with NBA being preferable. The alcohol derivative may be one or more of propylene glycol monomethyl ester (PGME) and propylene glycol monomethyl ester acetate (PGMEA).
- The mixture may include 42-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-45 wt % of the alcohol derivative. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the alcohol derivative.
- In the case where the acetic acid ester is NBA and the poly alkyl alcohol derivative is PGME, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the PGME. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-30 wt % of the PGME.
- In the case where the acetic acid ester is NBA and the poly alkyl alcohol derivative is PGMEA, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA.
- Further, other non-major components such as surfactants may be added to the afore-described stripper compositions of the present invention. In the case of surfactants, it is preferable that the surfactant constitute less than 1 wt % of the mixture.
- The above and other aspects and features of the present invention will be readily understood from the description that follows, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart for describing an edge bead removal (EBR) process used in photolithography;
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart for describing rework process used in photolithography;
- FIG. 3 is a table showing residue characteristics of various stripper compositions as applied to certain commercially available photoresists; and
- FIG. 4 is a table showing EBR characteristics of various stripper compositions as applied to certain commercially available photoresists.
- The photoresist stripper compositions of the present invention are especially suitable for use with respect to various types of photoresists during edge bead removal (EBR) and rework processes of photolithography.
- FIG. 1 is a flow chart for describing a typical EBR process. In a step S10, a stripper composition of the invention is prepared, and in step S12, the photoresist is coated onto a substrate. Then, in step S14, the stripper composition is dispensed to an edge and back side of the wafer while the wafer is rotated at a relatively slow speed (e.g., 800-2000 rpm) for 5 to 10 seconds. The edge may be dispensed with stripper composition using one nozzle, and the back side may be dispensed using another nozzle. It is also possible to move a spray nozzle along the edge of a stationary wafer, as opposed to rotating the wafer. Lastly, at a step S16 (which may be omitted), a spin-dry process is carried out in which wafer is rotated at a relatively high speed (e.g., 2000-2500 rpm). The wafer may then be subjected to an exposure process and a developing process to form a photoresist pattern thereon.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart for describing the rework process. Here, in step S10, the stripper composition is prepared and, in step S12, is dispensed to the substrate which is rotated at a relatively low speed (e.g., 800-2000 rpm) for 10-20 seconds. Then, at step S14, the rotation of the substrate is temporarily paused for 10-30 seconds. Then, at step S16, the stripper composition is dispensed onto the substrate which is rotated this time at a relatively high speed (e.g., 2000-2500 rpm) for 10-20 seconds. Next, the wafer is spin-dried at step S18, and then rinsed using pure water at step S20. While FIG. 2 depicts a typical rework process, it should be noted that in some cases, an extra spin-dry is inserted between steps S14 and S16, and in other cases steps, S14, S16 and S20 are omitted.
- A photoresist stripper composition according to a first embodiment of the present invention is a mixture in which an acetic acid ester, γ-butyrolactone (GBL), and a non-acetate ester are the major components thereof.
- GBL is a relatively stable solvent and has a high burning point. In addition, GBL is used as a food additive and is environmentally safe. The physical characteristics of GBL are as follows: a specific gravity of 1.1254 at 25° C.; a viscosity of 1.7 cps at 25° C.; a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of 204° C.; a flash point at atmospheric pressure of 98.3° C.; and a burning point at atmospheric pressure of 457° C.
- The acetic acid ester of the first embodiment may be, for example, n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, or isopropyl acetate. These compounds can be used individually or in combination. However, NBA has particularly favorable characteristics since it exhibits good dissolubility with respect to photoresistive resins. The physical characteristics of NBA are as follows: a specific gravity of 0.882 at 20° C.; a viscosity of 0.693 cps at 25° C.; a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of 126.5° C.; a flash point at atmospheric pressure of 38° C.; and a burning point at atmospheric pressure of 421° C.
- The non-acetate ester of the stripper composition of the first embodiment may be ethyl lactate (EL), ethyl-3-ethoxy propionate (EEP) or methyl-3-methoxy (MMP). These compounds can be used individually or in combination.
- The mixture may include 8-95 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 3-80 wt % of the non-acetate type ester. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the non-acetate type ester.
- In the case where the acetic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is EL, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the EL.
- In the case where the acidic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is EEP, the mixture may include 20-90 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-70 wt % of the EEP. Preferably, the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 20-70 wt % of the EEP. More preferably, the mixture may include 30-89 wt % of the NBA, 0.5-5 wt % of the GBL, and 10-65 wt % of the EEP.
- In the case where the acidic acid ester is NBA and the non-acetate type ester is MMP, the mixture may include 50-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-90 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the MMP.
- A photoresist stripper composition of the second embodiment of the present invention is a mixture in which an acetic acid ester, γ-butyrolactone (GBL), and an alcohol derivative are the major components thereof.
- The previous description of GBL as it relates to the first embodiment of the invention applies to the second embodiment as well. Also, as with the first embodiment, the acetic acid ester may be one or more of n-butyl acetate (NBA), amyl acetate, ethyl aceto-acetate, and isopropyl acetate. These compounds can be used individually or in combination. However, as noted previously, NBA has particularly favorable characteristics.
- The alcohol derivative may be a poly alkyl alcohol derivative, and may be propylene glycol monomethyl ester (PGME) or propylene glycol monomethyl ester acetate (PGMEA), and these compounds may also be used individually or in combination.
- The mixture may include 42-90 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-45 wt % of the alcohol derivative. More preferably, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the acetic acid ester, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the poly alkyl alcohol derivative.
- In the case where the acetic acid ester is NBA and the poly alkyl alcohol derivative is PGME, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 5-40 wt % of the PGME. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-30 wt % of the PGME.
- In the case where the acetic acid ester is NBA and the poly alkyl alcohol derivative is PGMEA, the mixture may include 50-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-13 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA. More preferably, the mixture may include 55-85 wt % of the NBA, 1-7 wt % of the GBL, and 10-40 wt % of the PGMEA.
- Further, other non-major components may be added to the afore-described stripper compositions of the first and second embodiments which do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the invention. For example, while not substantially impacting the dissolvability per se of the stripper composition, a small amount of surfactant may be added to the mixture to improve wettability of the stripper toward the photoresist, and to thereby improve dispersion of the stripper composition. Suitable surfactants include alkyl benzene sulfonate and an alkaline metal salt thereof, alkylated diphenyl disulfonate and an alkaline metal salt thereof, alkyl aryl sulfonate, alkaline metal salt of fluoroalkyl carboxylate, and ammonium perfluoro alkyl sulfonate. It is preferable that any surfactant constitute less than 1 wt % of the mixture.
- A number (11) of non-limiting examples of the present invention are described below, followed by a number (5) of comparative examples.
- NBA, GBL and EL were placed into a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL, and 10% by weight of EL. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.79 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EL. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.88 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of EEP. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were place in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EEP. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 35% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 60% by weight of EEP. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.78 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGMEA were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of PGMEA. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGMEA were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of EL. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGME were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of PGME. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and PGME were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 20% by weight of PGME. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.78 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and MMP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 90% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 5% by weight of MMP. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA, GBL and EEP were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 87% by weight of NBA, 1% by weight of GBL and 12% by weight of EEP. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- EEP, EL and GBL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 75% by weight of EEP, 20% by weight of EL and 5% by weight of GBL. The viscosity of thus the prepared stripper composition was 1.30 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- A stripper composition was prepared in accordance with a method disclosed in Korean Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2001-0036461. NBA, GBL and acetone were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 85% by weight of NBA, 5% by weight of GBL and 10% by weight of acetone. The viscosity of thus the prepared stripper composition was 0.66 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- GBL and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The amount of each component of the stripper composition was adjusted to 20% by weight of GBL and 80% by weight of EL. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 2.40 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA and EL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The ratio of NBA to EL in the stripper composition was adjusted to 85:5 by weight. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- NBA and GBL were placed in a vessel and mixed to prepare a stripper composition. The ratio of NBA to GBL in the stripper composition was adjusted to 85:5 by weight. The viscosity of the thus prepared stripper composition was 0.74 cp (measured in a thermostat at 25° C.).
- Using the stripper composition prepared according to Example 8, experiments were carried out to measure the dissolving rate of the composition as applied to different commercially available photoresists.
- Experiment 1 (PR1). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist AZ1520HS (Clariant company, U.S.A.) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 42,000 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 5,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 2 (PR2). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist MCPR-4100H (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 11,900 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 3,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 3 (PR3). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist SAT-701 (TOK company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 9,700 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 9,700 Å/sec.
- Experiment 4 (PR4). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist SAT-668 (TOK company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 19,700 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 19,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 5 (PR5). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist MCPR-i7010N (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 35,000 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 20,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 6 (PR6). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist PFI-58A (Dongwoo company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 12,300 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 12,200 Å/sec.
- Experiment 7 (PR7). 1.5 cc of I-line photoresist THMR-ip3100 (TOK company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 110° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 14,400 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 14,400 Å/sec.
- Experiment 8 (PR8). 1.5 cc of g-line photoresist GS111M (Shipley Korea company, Korea) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 90° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 12,200 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 12,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 9 (PR9). 1.5 cc of far ultraviolet-line photoresist SEPR402 (Shinetsu company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 10,300 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 7,000 Å/sec.
- Experiment 10 (PR10). 1.5 cc of deep ultraviolet ray photoresist SEPR-430 (Shinetsu company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 5,700 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 5,700 Å/sec.
- Experiment 11 (PR11). 1.5 cc of deep ultraviolet ray photoresist SSK-500MA (Sumitomo company, Japan) was spin coated onto a substrate and then a soft baking (heating to 100° C.) was performed. The thickness of thus formed photoresist layer was 16,000 Å. Then, the substrate was dipped into the stripper composition at 25° C. to strip off the photoresist layer and the dissolving rate was observed. The observed dissolving rate was 7,000 Å/sec.
- As can been seen above, the stripper composition of Example 8 exhibits a good dissolving rate with respect to most photoresists. In addition, the stripper compositions prepared according to the other examples of the present invention exhibit similar results. As such, the stripper compositions of the present invention can be advantageously used to dissolve a variety of different photoresists coated on a substrate.
- The stripper compositions prepared according to each of Examples 1-11 and Comparative Examples 1-5 were used to strip the commercially available photoresists discussed above in connection with each of Experiments 1-11, and the presence of photoresist residue was observed in each case. In particular, the same photoresists were coated onto substrates in the same manner as described in Experiments 1-11. The coated substrates were dipped into stripper compositions prepared according to Examples 1-11 and Comparative Examples 1-5 for 120 seconds, and then, the substrates were air-dried. The dried substrates were observed by means of a microscope to determine the presence of photoresist residue. Test results are shown in the table of FIG. 3.
- In FIG. 3, “
PR 1” denotes the photoresist prepared according the previously describedExperiment 1, “PR 2” denotes the photoresist prepared according the previously describedExperiment 2, and so on. Likewise, “Ex 1” denotes the stripper composition of Example 1, “Ex 2” denotes the stripper composition of Example 2, and so on. “Com.Ex 1” through “Com.Ex 5” denote the Comparative Examples 1-5. - Further, in FIG. 3, the symbol “∘” denotes “good”, which represents that no residue was present on the substrate.
- The symbol “□” of FIG. 3 denotes “average”, indicating that there was some residue present on the substrate.
- Lastly, the symbol “X” of FIG. 3 denotes “poor”, meaning that there was a considerable amount of residue present on the substrate.
- As can be seen from FIG. 3, when the photoresist is stripped by dipping using the stripper compositions prepared from Examples 1-11, favorable stripping characteristics can be realized. Accordingly, the stripper compositions of the present invention are suitable for use in the stripping the photoresists through dipping processes.
- EBR characteristics were observed with respect to the stripper compositions of Example 11 and Comparative Examples 1-5. In particular, the stripper compositions of Example 11 and Comparative Examples 1-5 were dispensed onto the edge portion and backside of substrates having photoresists coated thereon. The photoresists used were those of
aforementioned Experiments - In FIG. 4, “
PR 3” denotes the photoresist prepared according the previously describedExperiment 3, “PR 4” denotes the photoresist prepared according the previously describedExperiment 4, and so on. Likewise, “Ex 11” denotes the stripper composition of Example 11, and “Com.Ex 1” through “Corn.Ex 5” denote the stripper compositions of Comparative Examples 1-5. - Further, in FIG. 4, the symbol “∘” denotes “good”, which represents that no residue was present on the substrate and the edge profile was in a good state.
- The symbol “□” of FIG. 4 denotes “average”, indicating that there was no residue present on the substrate, but that the edge profile was in a poor state.
- Lastly, the symbol “X” of FIG. 4 denotes “poor”, meaning that there was residue present on the substrate and the edge profile was in a poor state.
- The stripper composition of Example 11 exhibits favorable stripping characteristics in the EBR process, as shown in FIG. 4. Comparative Example 1 is quite expensive and exhibits a poor edge profile state when used to strip I-line photoresists. The acetone component of Comparative Example 2 gives rise to the poor edge profile state thereof, and the high viscosity (2.40 cp) of Comparative Example 3 results in very poor EBR characteristics. Finally, Comparative Example 5, which includes only NBA and GBL, also exhibits poor EBR characteristics.
- The stripper compositions of the first and second embodiments include, as a major component, an acetic acid ester compound such as NBA. NBA in particular is advantageous in view of its low costs and favorable characteristics. However, the use of NBA alone is not acceptable, particularly since its relatively high wettability results in poor EBR process characteristics, i.e., poor edge profile states.
- As such, GBL is added to the acetic acid ester compound to improve EBR process characteristics. This is because GBL exhibits good solubility and penetration characteristics. However, GBL is a relatively expensive compound, and excessive use thereof unacceptably increases costs. According to the present invention, an effective photoresist stripper composition is realized with only a limited amount of GBL.
- Also, if the acetic acid ester compound and GBL are used alone, an unacceptable amount of photoresist residue is observed. According to the first embodiment, a non-acetate ester such as EL, EEP and/or MMP is added as a major component to reduce residue. According to the second embodiment, a poly alkyl alcohol derivative such as PGME and/or PGMEA is added as a major component to reduce residue.
- The photoresist stripper compositions of the present invention exhibit favorable stripping characteristics as demonstrate herein, but can be manufactured at relatively low cost since only a limited amount GBL is used in combination with the acetic ester compound and the non-acetate ester or poly alkyl alcohol derivative.
- Although the invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments, the preferred embodiments are for descriptive purposes only. As it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that modifications of the described embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the scope of the appended claims is not to be interpreted as being restricted to these embodiments.
- It is noted that a claim of priority has been made to Korean patent application Nos. 2001-79490 and 2002-13631, filed Dec. 14, 2001 and Mar. 13, 2002, respectively, the contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Claims (30)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/378,615 US6682876B2 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2003-03-05 | Thinner composition and method of stripping a photoresist using the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR20010079490 | 2001-12-14 | ||
KR2001-79490 | 2001-12-14 | ||
KR2002-13631 | 2002-03-13 | ||
KR10-2002-0013631A KR100536044B1 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2002-03-13 | Thinner composition and method for stripping a photoresist using the same |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/378,615 Continuation-In-Part US6682876B2 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2003-03-05 | Thinner composition and method of stripping a photoresist using the same |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030113673A1 true US20030113673A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 |
US6589719B1 US6589719B1 (en) | 2003-07-08 |
Family
ID=26639519
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/116,030 Expired - Fee Related US6589719B1 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2002-04-05 | Photoresist stripper compositions |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6589719B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3590395B2 (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050250660A1 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2005-11-10 | Masayuki Takashima | Photoresist stripper |
US20060100116A1 (en) * | 2004-11-05 | 2006-05-11 | Echem Solution Corp. | Photo resist stripper composition |
WO2006104340A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Dongjin Semichem Co., Ltd. | Thinner composition for removing photoresist |
US20060229367A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2006-10-12 | Xy, Inc. | Flow path conditioner system |
US20060241004A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
US20090029893A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2009-01-29 | Jun Koshiyama | Cleaning Liquid For Lithography and Cleaning Method Using Same |
US20090076169A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-19 | Xy, Inc. | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
WO2010071761A1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-06-24 | Invista Technologies S.A.R.L. | Cyclohexane oxidation process byproduct stream derivatives and methods for using the same |
US20100249166A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2010-09-30 | Xy, Inc. | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
CN103050394A (en) * | 2011-10-13 | 2013-04-17 | 上海华虹Nec电子有限公司 | Etching method of extra-thick photoresist |
KR101379649B1 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2014-03-31 | 주식회사 코원이노텍 | Complex thinner composition for removing photoresist |
US20150133356A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Dynaloy, Llc | Photoresist and post etch residue cleaning solution |
KR101522903B1 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2015-05-28 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Thinner composition and method of forming a photosensitive film using the same |
US20150355545A1 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2015-12-10 | Dongwoo Fine-Chem Co., Ltd. | Thinner composition for improving coating and removing performance of resist |
US9482957B1 (en) * | 2015-06-15 | 2016-11-01 | I-Shan Ke | Solvent for reducing resist consumption and method using solvent for reducing resist consumption |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6878500B2 (en) * | 2002-04-06 | 2005-04-12 | Marlborough, | Stripping method |
KR101097908B1 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2011-12-23 | 주식회사 이엔에프테크놀로지 | Thinner composition and method of manufacturing the same |
JP4236198B2 (en) | 2004-12-28 | 2009-03-11 | 東京応化工業株式会社 | Lithographic cleaning liquid and semiconductor substrate forming method using the same |
US8227182B2 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2012-07-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Methods of forming a photosensitive film |
KR102310637B1 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2021-10-08 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Thinner compositions and methods of manufacturing semiconductor devices using the same |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1993018101A1 (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1993-09-16 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Composition containing lactone and ester for removing coatings |
JP3902798B2 (en) | 1994-10-05 | 2007-04-11 | ローム・アンド・ハース・エレクトロニック・マテリアルズ,エル.エル.シー. | Rinse solution and rinse method |
KR100234532B1 (en) * | 1996-09-21 | 1999-12-15 | 윤종용 | Thinner composition used in cleaning photoresist and semiconductor manufacturing method using the same |
KR100265766B1 (en) * | 1997-09-04 | 2000-09-15 | 윤종용 | Method of reworking wafer for semiconductor device and of manufacturing semiconductor device |
US6169646B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2001-01-02 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Magnetoresistive shield incorporating seedlayer for anisotropy enhancement |
JP3401201B2 (en) * | 1998-12-02 | 2003-04-28 | 東京応化工業株式会社 | Method for producing base material for electronic component and resist remover used therefor |
KR100308422B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2001-09-26 | 주식회사 동진쎄미켐 | Thinner composition for removing spin-on-glass coating and photosensitive resin |
KR100434485B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2004-06-05 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Photoresist stripper composition and method for stripping photoresist using the same |
-
2002
- 2002-04-05 US US10/116,030 patent/US6589719B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-06-11 JP JP2002169783A patent/JP3590395B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050250660A1 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2005-11-10 | Masayuki Takashima | Photoresist stripper |
US7199091B2 (en) * | 2004-04-19 | 2007-04-03 | Dongwoo Fine-Chem Co., Ltd. | Photoresist stripper |
US20060100116A1 (en) * | 2004-11-05 | 2006-05-11 | Echem Solution Corp. | Photo resist stripper composition |
US7456141B2 (en) * | 2004-11-05 | 2008-11-25 | Echem Solutions Corp. | Photo resist stripper composition |
WO2006104340A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Dongjin Semichem Co., Ltd. | Thinner composition for removing photoresist |
US20090054529A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2009-02-26 | Xy, Inc. | Flow Path Conditioner System |
US20060229367A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2006-10-12 | Xy, Inc. | Flow path conditioner system |
US8877818B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2014-11-04 | Xy, Llc | Antimicrobially active compositions |
US9750244B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2017-09-05 | Xy, Llc | Antimicrobially active compositions |
US20080090917A1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2008-04-17 | Chata Biosystems, Inc. | Antimicrobially active compositions |
US8846767B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2014-09-30 | Cdh Bioscience, Inc. | Flow path conditioner system |
US20060241004A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
US8263306B2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2012-09-11 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
WO2006115989A3 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2007-01-04 | Texas Instruments Inc | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
US20100104975A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-04-29 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of Blended Solvents in Defectivity Prevention |
US20100101487A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2010-04-29 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of Blended Solvents in Defectivity Prevention |
WO2006115989A2 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2006-11-02 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
US8129089B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2012-03-06 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Use of blended solvents in defectivity prevention |
US7884062B2 (en) | 2006-02-23 | 2011-02-08 | Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd. | Cleaning liquid for lithography and cleaning method using same |
US20090029893A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2009-01-29 | Jun Koshiyama | Cleaning Liquid For Lithography and Cleaning Method Using Same |
US8119688B2 (en) | 2007-09-19 | 2012-02-21 | Xy, Llc | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
US20100249166A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2010-09-30 | Xy, Inc. | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
WO2009038672A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-26 | Xy, Inc. | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
US20090076169A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-19 | Xy, Inc. | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
US9474814B2 (en) | 2007-09-19 | 2016-10-25 | Xy, Llc | Differential evaporation potentiated disinfectant system |
KR101522903B1 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2015-05-28 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Thinner composition and method of forming a photosensitive film using the same |
WO2010071761A1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-06-24 | Invista Technologies S.A.R.L. | Cyclohexane oxidation process byproduct stream derivatives and methods for using the same |
US20120101009A1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2012-04-26 | Invista North America S.A.R.L. | Cyclohexane oxidation process byproduct stream derivatives and methods for using the same |
CN103050394A (en) * | 2011-10-13 | 2013-04-17 | 上海华虹Nec电子有限公司 | Etching method of extra-thick photoresist |
US20150133356A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2015-05-14 | Dynaloy, Llc | Photoresist and post etch residue cleaning solution |
KR101379649B1 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2014-03-31 | 주식회사 코원이노텍 | Complex thinner composition for removing photoresist |
US20150355545A1 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2015-12-10 | Dongwoo Fine-Chem Co., Ltd. | Thinner composition for improving coating and removing performance of resist |
US9568830B2 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2017-02-14 | Dongwoo Fine-Chem Co., Ltd. | Thinner composition for improving coating and removing performance of resist |
US9482957B1 (en) * | 2015-06-15 | 2016-11-01 | I-Shan Ke | Solvent for reducing resist consumption and method using solvent for reducing resist consumption |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3590395B2 (en) | 2004-11-17 |
JP2003195529A (en) | 2003-07-09 |
US6589719B1 (en) | 2003-07-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6589719B1 (en) | Photoresist stripper compositions | |
US7863231B2 (en) | Thinner composition and method of removing photoresist using the same | |
US20030099908A1 (en) | Photoresist stripping solution and a method of stripping photoresists using the same | |
CN1612927A (en) | Aqueous stripping and cleaning composition | |
US6878500B2 (en) | Stripping method | |
JP2003316030A (en) | Cleaning composition | |
JP6588150B2 (en) | Cleaning solution and cleaning method for semiconductor substrate or apparatus | |
JP2014503604A (en) | Polymeric or monomeric compositions comprising at least one monoamide and / or at least one diamide for removing substances from a substrate and methods of using the same | |
US6682876B2 (en) | Thinner composition and method of stripping a photoresist using the same | |
US5637436A (en) | Method for removing photoresist composition from substrate surfaces | |
KR100536044B1 (en) | Thinner composition and method for stripping a photoresist using the same | |
KR20170057536A (en) | Thinner composition for cleaning photoresist coater | |
KR20010034237A (en) | Method for forming resist pattern | |
CN104969129B (en) | Diluent composition and use thereof | |
KR101370704B1 (en) | thinner composition for removing photosensitive resin and anti-reflective coating | |
KR20070052943A (en) | Thinner composition for removing photoresist | |
KR100483846B1 (en) | Thinner composition and method for stripping a photoresist using the same | |
US20070026346A1 (en) | Cleaning solution for lithography | |
KR101858257B1 (en) | Thinner composition for removing photosensitive resin or anti-reflective coating and method of manufacturing semiconductor device or thin film transistor-liquid crystal device using the same | |
TW202134420A (en) | Thinner composition for removing a photosensitive resin and anti-reflective coating, and method for removing photosensitive resin and anti-reflective coating | |
CN112947012A (en) | Photosensitive resin, thinner composition for removing antireflection film, and photosensitive resin and antireflection film removing method using same | |
KR20040101624A (en) | Thinner composition for removing photoresist | |
JPH09311470A (en) | Resist removing solution and production of substrate for producing electronic parts with the same | |
KR20170047062A (en) | Thinner composition |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., KOREA, REPUBLIC OF Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AHN, SEUNG-HUN;CHON, SANG-MUN;CHUNG, HOE-SIK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:012763/0336;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020322 TO 20020327 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20150708 |