US20020130276A1 - Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications - Google Patents
Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020130276A1 US20020130276A1 US09/808,210 US80821001A US2002130276A1 US 20020130276 A1 US20020130276 A1 US 20020130276A1 US 80821001 A US80821001 A US 80821001A US 2002130276 A1 US2002130276 A1 US 2002130276A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- chuck
- gas
- wafer
- substrate
- base
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/67—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
- H01L21/68—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for positioning, orientation or alignment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70691—Handling of masks or workpieces
- G03F7/707—Chucks, e.g. chucking or un-chucking operations or structural details
- G03F7/70708—Chucks, e.g. chucking or un-chucking operations or structural details being electrostatic; Electrostatically deformable vacuum chucks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G03—PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
- G03F—PHOTOMECHANICAL PRODUCTION OF TEXTURED OR PATTERNED SURFACES, e.g. FOR PRINTING, FOR PROCESSING OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; MATERIALS THEREFOR; ORIGINALS THEREFOR; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED THEREFOR
- G03F7/00—Photomechanical, e.g. photolithographic, production of textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. printing surfaces; Materials therefor, e.g. comprising photoresists; Apparatus specially adapted therefor
- G03F7/70—Microphotolithographic exposure; Apparatus therefor
- G03F7/70691—Handling of masks or workpieces
- G03F7/707—Chucks, e.g. chucking or un-chucking operations or structural details
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/67—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere
- H01L21/683—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for supporting or gripping
- H01L21/6831—Apparatus specially adapted for handling semiconductor or electric solid state devices during manufacture or treatment thereof; Apparatus specially adapted for handling wafers during manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or electric solid state devices or components ; Apparatus not specifically provided for elsewhere for supporting or gripping using electrostatic chucks
- H01L21/6833—Details of electrostatic chucks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L23/00—Details of semiconductor or other solid state devices
- H01L23/34—Arrangements for cooling, heating, ventilating or temperature compensation ; Temperature sensing arrangements
- H01L23/46—Arrangements for cooling, heating, ventilating or temperature compensation ; Temperature sensing arrangements involving the transfer of heat by flowing fluids
- H01L23/467—Arrangements for cooling, heating, ventilating or temperature compensation ; Temperature sensing arrangements involving the transfer of heat by flowing fluids by flowing gases, e.g. air
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L2924/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements or methods for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies as covered by H01L24/00
- H01L2924/0001—Technical content checked by a classifier
- H01L2924/0002—Not covered by any one of groups H01L24/00, H01L24/00 and H01L2224/00
Definitions
- This invention relates in general to a chuck used to hold a substrate during semiconductor processing, and more particularly to a system and method for controlling and maintaining uniform temperature of the substrate by adjusting pressure of the cooling gas maintained between the chuck and the substrate.
- One type of support system employs a perimeter-clamping ring which extends along the periphery of the wafer to retain the wafer in place. The portion of the wafer beneath the ring is clamped tightly against a support member. In such a system, the clamping ring reduces the total available area for circuit formation since the peripheral edge of the wafer is generally covered by the ring. Further, distortion to the wafer surface may result from particles trapped between the wafer and the support member.
- Another type of support system employs a vacuum to hold the wafer against a chuck.
- the wafer is held against the chuck by the use of a vacuum pump, which reduces the interior pressure in the space between the chuck and the wafer to a point that is lower than the exterior gas pressure of the chamber environment, in which the support system operates.
- Many semiconductor production processes such as plasma etching, are performed in a high vacuum chamber environment (10 ⁇ 3 Torr or less).
- the vacuum support system typically cannot operate well in such high vacuum chamber environment because the vacuum support system requires that the chamber environment has a higher pressure than the interior of the support system in order to hold the wafer down against the chuck.
- a typical electrostatic chuck includes a base having a surface on which the wafer is supported and an electrostatic member that is electrostatically biased with respect to the wafer by an electrical potential. The wafer is held in place against the chuck's support surface by electrostatic forces.
- the contact surface between the chuck and the wafer is smooth, the contact area is sufficient, and the thermal conductivity of the chuck is high, a substantial amount of heat can be transported from the wafer to the chuck and out through a heat exchanger. If the contact surface of the wafer or chuck is rough or the contact area is limited, the heat transfer via the chuck can be substantially reduced. Achieving intimate contact between chuck and wafer is difficult. Furthermore, this condition is normally avoided because of the risk of particles being trapped between the chuck and wafer, possibly leading to wafer distortion. In this situation an inert gas such as Helium (He) can be used as a thermal conductor to fill the space between the wafer and the chuck in order to conduct heat out of the wafer via the underside of the wafer. A fluid could also be flowed between the wafer and the chuck substrate, to convectively cool the wafer. However, maintaining sufficient clamping force, and avoiding serious leaks to the surrounding vacuum, would be difficult.
- He Helium
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,565,601 describes an electrostatic chuck and a method of controlling the temperature of a wafer being processed in a vacuum at a predetermined temperature.
- the electrostatic chuck clamps and supports the wafer both at its periphery and at interior points.
- a gas coolant is supplied to the gap between the chuck top and wafer bottom.
- the clamping region at the periphery provides a seal to prevent the flow of gas into the vacuum chamber.
- the peripheral contact region does not make good contact with the back of the wafer, for example, due to particles trapped in between or a non-flat surface of the wafer, leakage into the chamber will occur.
- Electrogrip Inc. manufactures a Helium-cooled electrostatic chuck with a leak rate of 0.5-1.0 sccm, for 200 mm wafers and a gas pressure of 10 Torr. This is equivalent to a throughput of about 0.013 Torr-l/sec at atmospheric pressure, 760 Torr.
- a chamber pressure of 1 mTorr typical of etching systems, with this leak rate a difficult to achieve such pumping speeds.
- chamber pressures of 10 ⁇ 6 to 10 ⁇ 7 Torr or better are required. Maintaining these vacuum levels with such a chuck leak rate would require pump speeds of 10 3 to 10 4 times larger, which is no longer feasible.
- the present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art by adding an annular array of gas inlets toward the periphery of an electrostatic chuck, to provide a uniform distribution of cooling gas to the held substrate, and a gas bearing seal at the wafer periphery.
- the present invention provides a uniform distribution of gas to a wafer held by an electrostatic pin chuck that has an annular array of gas inlets located within an annular array of gas outlets at the periphery of the chuck. Gas entering from the array of gas inlets helps to equalize the cooling gas pressure in the chuck cavity.
- the uniform distribution of gas results in a uniform transfer of heat from the wafer.
- Two annular rims surrounding the annular array of gas outlets towards the outer perimeter of the chuck help to prevent leakages of gas into the vacuum by functioning as gas bearing seals.
- the gas is supplied from a reservoir of sufficient size that essentially constant gas pressure between wafer and substrate is maintained, despite the loss of gas at the gas outlets.
- FIG. 1 is a top view of a wafer pin chuck in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a wafer pin chuck taken along line 2 - 2 in FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a graph comparing the Helium pressure beneath a wafer of a chuck with a single central gas inlet and one with an annular array of gas inlets;
- FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the Helium leakage from a wafer chuck configured with different rim thicknesses, wafer-chuck gaps, and vacuum pump pressures;
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a typical electronic beam lithography system incorporating the pin chuck system in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a general fabrication process for semiconductor devices.
- FIG. 7 is a detailed block diagram of fabricating semiconductor devices.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 are different views of a gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for supporting a 300 mm diameter wafer.
- the geometry of the pin chuck should match the geometry of the substrate to be supported.
- the pin chuck described in this embodiment is for use with a round silicon wafer 16 , therefore the base 30 is generally cylindrical.
- the height or thickness of the base 30 is sufficient enough to allow it to remain rigid under electrostatic operation in a vacuum or non-vacuum environment.
- Channels may be provided in the base 30 to provide a passageway for a cooling fluid or gas for removing heat from the chuck (not shown).
- In the base cavity 34 below the wafer 16 there is an array of regularly spaced support pins 10 .
- the number and diameter of the support pins 10 are selected so that the wafer 16 is unlikely to trap dust particles between the support pin 10 and the supported wafer 10 and possibly induce distortion in the wafer 10 .
- the total fraction of the wafer contacted by the pins should be less than about 5-10%.
- Electrostatic chucks utilize the attractive force between two plates of a capacitor to hold the wafer in place. If the wafer is separated from the chuck by an insulator of dielectric constant ⁇ and thickness d, and a voltage V is applied between them, an attractive force F is generated between them as follows:
- A is the common area of the wafer and chuck electrode.
- the distance d separating wafer and chuck must be minimized.
- high dielectric constants are an advantage. If a gap exists between wafer and chuck which is filled either with a low pressure gas or a vacuum, the dielectric constant is essentially that of free space ⁇ 0 .
- the wafer is supported on insulating pins. If the pins represent a fraction f of the wafer area, then the effective dielectric constant of the chuck becomes F ⁇ +(1 ⁇ f) ⁇ 0 , where ⁇ is the dielectric constant of the pin material. If f is small, the dielectric constant is essentially ⁇ 0 .
- the gas introduced into the spaces between the wafer and chuck must provide sufficient thermal heat transfer to control the wafer temperature.
- the gas pressure must be low enough that the attractive force holding the wafer to the chuck is not significantly diminished.
- the thermal conductivity of a gas is essentially independent of gas pressure as long as the mean free path of the gas molecules is small compared to the system dimensions. This fact permits using a gas at relatively low pressure in the chuck with little effect on heat transfer. This subject is discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/266,705.
- the gap between wafer and chuck surface should be kept to a minimum. In the preferred embodiment, and in the modeling calculations, this gap was maintained at 10 micron. For this gap, the heat transfer of He gas at 10 Torr pressure is not significantly different from its value at one atmosphere 760 Torr.
- annular outer rim 24 On the outer edge of the base 30 is an annular outer rim 24 , within which an annular channel 20 containing an annular array of vacuum pumpout ports 6 is located.
- the vacuum pumpout ports 6 are connected by a manifold and hoses (not shown) to a vacuum pump 31 .
- An annular inner rim 4 is positioned next to the annular channel 20 .
- the width of the annular inner rim 4 and annular outer rim 24 is several millimeters and the height of each rim is several microns less than the height of the support pins 10 , resulting in a gap 18 between the wafer 16 and the two rims 4 , 24 . This gap 18 is critical because it prevents contact of the wafer 16 to each rim 4 , 24 .
- the gap is larger than the size expected for typical particles in a semiconductor processing system.
- this structure reduces the possibility of particle-induced distortions in the wafer. Also since there is no clamping of the rims 4 , 24 to the wafer 16 at the periphery, there is no distortion caused by any sealing or clamping pressure applied on those structures.
- the inner rim 4 and outer rim 24 can still function as a gas bearing seal when cooling gas is flowing through the base cavity 34 , substantially reducing the gas leakage to the ambient environment.
- Cooling gas is introduced from a pressure controlled gas source 32 through an array of inlets 22 arranged in an annular groove 14 located at approximately 15 mm or less from the inner rim 4 .
- the inlets 22 are connected by a manifold and hoses (not shown) to a vacuum pump 31 .
- a central gas inlet 8 may also be used in addition, to allow the gas pressure to equilibrate beneath the wafer more rapidly. It can also speed up the removal of the gas at the end of wafer processing when the wafer is about to be removed from the chuck. Given the small gap between wafer and chuck, additional ports may be needed for this purpose.
- valves 33 a , 33 b , and 33 c are initially closed.
- the wafer is clamped to the chuck, and valves 33 a and 33 c are opened.
- a cooling gas such as Helium is introduced from the central gas inlet 8 and the gas inlets 22 holes via the circular pressure distribution groove 14 into the base cavity 34 defined by the under surface of the wafer 16 and the pin chuck surface.
- the pressure is distributed evenly throughout the surface of the wafer 16 except towards the inner rim 4 , where a pressure gradient occurs.
- the pressure gradient occurs because the pressure at the vacuum pumpout ports 6 is lower than the pressure at points closer to the wafer center.
- the inner rim 4 and outer rim 24 function as a gas bearing seal as the gas flows through the base cavity 34 .
- valve 33 a is closed and 33 b is opened.
- the coolant gas is pumped out, valves 33 b and 33 c are closed, and the wafer is removed from the chuck.
- FIG. 3 shows results obtained from numerically modeling gas flow between the chuck and wafer by representing the system by a finite number of conductance subsystems each with characteristics defined by its geometry and local gas pressures.
- the gas flows are determined from a series of conductance equations based on Kirchhoff's equations from circuit theory.
- the graph compares the numerical modeling results of the Helium pressure beneath the wafer for two differently configured chucks, one with a single central gas inlet and one configured with an annular array of gas inlets (i.e., inlets 14 ) located just inside of the rim 4 .
- the Helium pressure (Torr) is referenced on the ordinate and the radius (m) of the wafer chuck is referenced on the abscissa.
- the input parameters for the modeling are as follows, 46 Torr for inlet pressure for the chuck with a single gas inlet, 11.2 Torr for the chuck with an annular array of inlets located at a radius of 0.120 m, and 0.01 Torr for the pressure at the vacuum pump 31 connected through a hose and manifold to the pumpout ports 6 .
- the vacuum chamber surrounding the chuck is attached to a vacuum pump with a pumping speed of 1000 l/sec.
- a gap of 2 micron between the wafer bottom and the inner annular seal 4 was assumed.
- the Helium pressure distribution 50 under a wafer held with the chuck containing a single central gas inlet is not uniform.
- the pressure is higher towards the central gas inlet and lower towards the outer periphery, with approximate pressures of 46 Torr and 10 Torr, respectively.
- This uneven pressure distribution results in an uneven transfer of heat across the wafer (a direct relationship exists between the two parameters). As a result, the wafer will be cooled unevenly.
- the Helium pressure distribution 52 is substantially uniform from the center of the wafer to the inner rim 4 , at a distance of approximately 0.135 m, as measured from the center of the wafer towards its edge. Beyond approximately 0.135 m, the Helium pressure gradually decreases to the pressure at the vacuum pumpout ports 6 .
- the additional annular array of gas inlets allows the chuck to provide a uniform pressure of He gas across most of the wafer surface, which in turn results in a uniform heat transfer. While the heat transfer begins to decrease for radii greater than that of the annular gas inlets 14 , the area of the wafer so affected amounts to only a few percent of the total. It can be further reduced by placing the annular array of inlets 14 and the inner rim 4 as close to the edge of the wafer as possible.
- FIG. 4 show the results obtained from numerically modeling the chuck at various geometries and operating pressure conditions by representing the system by a finite number of conductance subsystems each with characteristics defined by its geometry and local gas pressures. The gas flows are determined from a series of equations based on Kirchhoff's equations. The graph shows the results of the leakage of cooling gas into the vacuum chamber for situations involving varying air bearing gaps, inner/outer annular rim radial thicknesses, and pump pressures for the annular pumpout ports of a wafer chuck. The wafer chuck was assumed placed in a vacuum chamber pumped by a 1000 l/sec. pump.
- the Helium pressure was set to 10 Torr and the inner and outer annular thicknesses were set to either 1 mm or 5 mm.
- the gap (microns) between the wafer bottom and the chuck is represented on the abscissa, and the resulting chamber pressure (Torr) is represented on the ordinate.
- Plot 46 shows that with a rim thickness of 5 mm and a Helium pump out pressure of 0.01 Torr at the vacuum pump, the vacuum chamber pressure increased from less than 1.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 8 Torr to over 1.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 Torr, as the gap between the wafer and rim increased from 1 ⁇ m to 5 ⁇ m, indicating a higher cooling gas leakage into the vacuum chamber.
- Data point 48 shows the same rim thickness at a wafer gap of 5 ⁇ m, and no vacuum pump, the chamber pressure increases to over 1.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 5 Torr, which indicates a higher leak rate into the chamber than when the pumpout ports are used.
- the chamber pressure is about 1.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 7 Torr with a 1 ⁇ m gap and the chamber pressure increases as the gap increases (plot 42 ).
- the chamber pressure increases to about 4.0 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 Torr (data point 40 ).
- the chamber pressure is about 1.6 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 Torr (plot 44 ).
- the lower pumpout pressure has little effect on chamber pressure (compare plot 42 ).
- the requirements for the vacuum pump 31 attached to the pumpout ports 6 are not too demanding.
- the gas throughput to the pump under the conditions represented by FIG. 3 is 0.0056 Torr-l/sec.
- the present invention provides a method of providing a uniform pressure of cooling gas to a wafer held by an electrostatic chuck, through the use of a pressure distribution groove containing an array of gas inlets.
- the uniform pressure of cooling gas results in uniform cooling of the wafer, which is important during the wafer processing stage.
- distortion of the features formed on the wafer can be reduced.
- the inner and outer rim in conjunction with the vacuum pumpout ports help to reduce the leakage of cooling gas, which allows the chuck to efficiently operate in chamber conditions that require vacuum pressures of 10 ⁇ 6 or lower.
- an example of a lithographic device is an electron beam lithography apparatus that comprises an electron gun 50 , illumination system 54 , a reticle stage 58 , a wafer stage 70 , and a projection system 60 .
- the illumination-optical system 54 is situated and configured to illuminate, with a charged-particle illumination beam 52 , a region of a reticle 56 defining a pattern to be transferred to a substrate 66 .
- the reticle stage 58 is situated and configured to hold and move the reticle 56 in the path of the illumination beam 52 .
- the illumination beam passing through the reticle carries an image of the illuminated region.
- the wafer stage 70 supports a gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck in accordance with the present invention (such as the pin chuck 68 in the illustrated embodiment), which is situated and configured to hold and move the substrate 66 for exposure with the reticle pattern by the imaging beam 52 .
- the pin chuck 68 is connected to a gas source 32 and vacuum pump 31 by appropriate plumbing and valves schematically represented in FIG. 2.
- a projection system 60 is situated between the reticle stage 58 and the wafer stage 70 , and configured to project an image of the reticle on an exposure surface of the sensitive substrate 66 .
- the projection system 60 comprises an electromagnetic deflector 62 (may include a plurality of defector plates for controlling beam deflection in two axes) situated and configured to deflect the beam so as to increase an area exposed by the pattern beam on the exposure surface.
- the projection system 60 also includes an electrostatic deflector 64 situated and configured to deflect the patterned beam sufficiently to correct a position error of the wafer stage 70 or the reticle stage 58 , or both stages, and thereby adjusting a pattern transfer position on the exposed surface.
- the apparatus also includes a controller 72 controlling the operations of the illumination system 54 , the projection system 60 , the reticle stage 58 , the wafer stage 70 , the electromagnetic deflector 62 , the electrostatic deflector 64 , the vacuum pump 31 and gas source 32 and associated valves.
- the controller 72 is configured to move the wafer stage 70 continuously during an exposure shot of the patterned beam on the surface of the substrate 66 , and to energize the electrostatic deflector 64 during the exposure shot to correct the pattern-transfer position during the shot.
- the disclosed invention is focused on a gas cooled chuck for a vacuum processing system, such as the electron beam lithography apparatus described above, the chuck can also be used in a non-vacuum processing system.
- semiconductor devices can be fabricated using the above described system, by the process shown generally in FIG. 6.
- step 701 the device's function and performance characteristics are designed.
- step 702 a mask (reticle) having a pattern is designed according to the previous designing step, and in a parallel step 703 a wafer is made from a silicon material.
- the mask pattern designed in step 702 is exposed onto the wafer from step 703 in step 704 by a photolithography system described hereinabove in accordance with the present invention.
- step 705 the semiconductor device is assembled (including the dicing process, bonding process and packaging process), then finally the device is inspected in step 706 .
- FIG. 7 illustrates a detailed flowchart example of the above-mentioned step 704 in the case of fabricating semiconductor devices.
- step 711 oxidation step
- step 712 CVD step
- step 713 electrode formation step
- step 714 ion implantation step
- ions are implanted in the wafer.
- the above-mentioned steps 711 - 714 form the preprocessing steps for wafers during wafer processing, and selection is made at each step according to processing requirements.
- step 715 photoresist formation step
- step 716 exposure step
- step 717 developing step
- step 718 etching step
- steps other than residual photoresist exposed material surface
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Container, Conveyance, Adherence, Positioning, Of Wafer (AREA)
- Exposure And Positioning Against Photoresist Photosensitive Materials (AREA)
- Electron Beam Exposure (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates in general to a chuck used to hold a substrate during semiconductor processing, and more particularly to a system and method for controlling and maintaining uniform temperature of the substrate by adjusting pressure of the cooling gas maintained between the chuck and the substrate.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- In processes involving the fabrication of semiconductor integrated circuits, electronic components, and devices, various support systems have been employed to support the substrate, such as a silicon wafer, during the processing of the wafer. In certain processes such as lithography, image quality considerations require that the wafer be held level by a chuck in such a way that its exposed surface is flat, with little distortion, which can cause image misalignment.
- One type of support system employs a perimeter-clamping ring which extends along the periphery of the wafer to retain the wafer in place. The portion of the wafer beneath the ring is clamped tightly against a support member. In such a system, the clamping ring reduces the total available area for circuit formation since the peripheral edge of the wafer is generally covered by the ring. Further, distortion to the wafer surface may result from particles trapped between the wafer and the support member.
- Another type of support system employs a vacuum to hold the wafer against a chuck. In the vacuum support system, the wafer is held against the chuck by the use of a vacuum pump, which reduces the interior pressure in the space between the chuck and the wafer to a point that is lower than the exterior gas pressure of the chamber environment, in which the support system operates. Many semiconductor production processes, such as plasma etching, are performed in a high vacuum chamber environment (10−3 Torr or less). The vacuum support system typically cannot operate well in such high vacuum chamber environment because the vacuum support system requires that the chamber environment has a higher pressure than the interior of the support system in order to hold the wafer down against the chuck.
- Another type of support system uses electrostatic forces to clamp a wafer to a support surface. Typically, in such a system, substantially all or all of the surface area of the wafer may become available for processing and the chuck can effectively be used in a high vacuum exterior environment. A typical electrostatic chuck includes a base having a surface on which the wafer is supported and an electrostatic member that is electrostatically biased with respect to the wafer by an electrical potential. The wafer is held in place against the chuck's support surface by electrostatic forces.
- During wafer processing, heat is often generated, and it is often necessary to limit the maximum temperature rise of the wafer. It is also important to maintain temperature uniformity over the wafer surface. If there are excessive temperature variations across the wafer surface (often due to poor and/or non-uniform heat transfer), the wafer can become distorted. In a vacuum environment, the transfer of heat out of the wafer is less efficient, because the heat transfer is accomplished mainly by radiation. The support system often provides a way of cooling the wafer in an attempt to maintain substantially constant wafer temperature. If the contact surface between the chuck and the wafer is smooth, the contact area is sufficient, and the thermal conductivity of the chuck is high, a substantial amount of heat can be transported from the wafer to the chuck and out through a heat exchanger. If the contact surface of the wafer or chuck is rough or the contact area is limited, the heat transfer via the chuck can be substantially reduced. Achieving intimate contact between chuck and wafer is difficult. Furthermore, this condition is normally avoided because of the risk of particles being trapped between the chuck and wafer, possibly leading to wafer distortion. In this situation an inert gas such as Helium (He) can be used as a thermal conductor to fill the space between the wafer and the chuck in order to conduct heat out of the wafer via the underside of the wafer. A fluid could also be flowed between the wafer and the chuck substrate, to convectively cool the wafer. However, maintaining sufficient clamping force, and avoiding serious leaks to the surrounding vacuum, would be difficult.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,565,601 describes an electrostatic chuck and a method of controlling the temperature of a wafer being processed in a vacuum at a predetermined temperature. The electrostatic chuck clamps and supports the wafer both at its periphery and at interior points. A gas coolant is supplied to the gap between the chuck top and wafer bottom. The clamping region at the periphery provides a seal to prevent the flow of gas into the vacuum chamber. However, if the peripheral contact region does not make good contact with the back of the wafer, for example, due to particles trapped in between or a non-flat surface of the wafer, leakage into the chamber will occur. Also, according to the patent, it requires clamping of the chuck and the wafer at the periphery to provide a seal to prevent the flow of gas coolant into the ambient vacuum. In order for the seal to be effective, a significant amount of clamping pressure must be applied, which can potentially distort the wafer.
- Electrogrip Inc., manufactures a Helium-cooled electrostatic chuck with a leak rate of 0.5-1.0 sccm, for 200 mm wafers and a gas pressure of 10 Torr. This is equivalent to a throughput of about 0.013 Torr-l/sec at atmospheric pressure, 760 Torr. In order to maintain a chamber pressure of 1 mTorr, typical of etching systems, with this leak rate a difficult to achieve such pumping speeds. However, for other applications, such as electron beam lithography, chamber pressures of 10−6 to 10−7 Torr or better are required. Maintaining these vacuum levels with such a chuck leak rate would require pump speeds of 103 to 104 times larger, which is no longer feasible.
- A need exists for an electrostatic chuck that provides uniform transfer of heat over the entire working area of the wafer, minimizes leakage of cooling gas into the operating environment, and secures the wafer without distortion.
- The present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art by adding an annular array of gas inlets toward the periphery of an electrostatic chuck, to provide a uniform distribution of cooling gas to the held substrate, and a gas bearing seal at the wafer periphery. In one particular embodiment, the present invention provides a uniform distribution of gas to a wafer held by an electrostatic pin chuck that has an annular array of gas inlets located within an annular array of gas outlets at the periphery of the chuck. Gas entering from the array of gas inlets helps to equalize the cooling gas pressure in the chuck cavity. The uniform distribution of gas results in a uniform transfer of heat from the wafer. Two annular rims surrounding the annular array of gas outlets towards the outer perimeter of the chuck help to prevent leakages of gas into the vacuum by functioning as gas bearing seals.
- The gas is supplied from a reservoir of sufficient size that essentially constant gas pressure between wafer and substrate is maintained, despite the loss of gas at the gas outlets.
- FIG. 1 is a top view of a wafer pin chuck in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a wafer pin chuck taken along line2-2 in FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 is a graph comparing the Helium pressure beneath a wafer of a chuck with a single central gas inlet and one with an annular array of gas inlets;
- FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the Helium leakage from a wafer chuck configured with different rim thicknesses, wafer-chuck gaps, and vacuum pump pressures; and
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a typical electronic beam lithography system incorporating the pin chuck system in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a general fabrication process for semiconductor devices; and
- FIG. 7 is a detailed block diagram of fabricating semiconductor devices.
- This invention is described in a preferred embodiment in the following description with reference to the following figures. While this invention is described in terms of the best mode of achieving this invention's objectives, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variation may be accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating from the spirit or scope of the invention.
- Referring now to the drawings, FIGS. 1 and 2 are different views of a gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for supporting a 300 mm diameter wafer. The geometry of the pin chuck should match the geometry of the substrate to be supported. The pin chuck described in this embodiment is for use with a
round silicon wafer 16, therefore thebase 30 is generally cylindrical. The height or thickness of thebase 30 is sufficient enough to allow it to remain rigid under electrostatic operation in a vacuum or non-vacuum environment. Channels may be provided in the base 30 to provide a passageway for a cooling fluid or gas for removing heat from the chuck (not shown). In the base cavity 34 below thewafer 16, there is an array of regularly spaced support pins 10. The number and diameter of the support pins 10 are selected so that thewafer 16 is unlikely to trap dust particles between thesupport pin 10 and the supportedwafer 10 and possibly induce distortion in thewafer 10. The total fraction of the wafer contacted by the pins should be less than about 5-10%. - Electrostatic chucks utilize the attractive force between two plates of a capacitor to hold the wafer in place. If the wafer is separated from the chuck by an insulator of dielectric constant ε and thickness d, and a voltage V is applied between them, an attractive force F is generated between them as follows:
- F=(εV 2/2d 2)A,
- where A is the common area of the wafer and chuck electrode. Clearly, in order to obtain a large attractive force for a given voltage, the distance d separating wafer and chuck must be minimized. Also high dielectric constants are an advantage. If a gap exists between wafer and chuck which is filled either with a low pressure gas or a vacuum, the dielectric constant is essentially that of free space ε0.
- For a pin chuck, the wafer is supported on insulating pins. If the pins represent a fraction f of the wafer area, then the effective dielectric constant of the chuck becomes Fε+(1−f)ε0, where ε is the dielectric constant of the pin material. If f is small, the dielectric constant is essentially ε0.
- The gas introduced into the spaces between the wafer and chuck must provide sufficient thermal heat transfer to control the wafer temperature. At the same time, the gas pressure must be low enough that the attractive force holding the wafer to the chuck is not significantly diminished. As is known, the thermal conductivity of a gas is essentially independent of gas pressure as long as the mean free path of the gas molecules is small compared to the system dimensions. This fact permits using a gas at relatively low pressure in the chuck with little effect on heat transfer. This subject is discussed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/266,705.
- For all the considerations mentioned above, the gap between wafer and chuck surface should be kept to a minimum. In the preferred embodiment, and in the modeling calculations, this gap was maintained at 10 micron. For this gap, the heat transfer of He gas at 10 Torr pressure is not significantly different from its value at one atmosphere 760 Torr.
- On the outer edge of the
base 30 is an annularouter rim 24, within which anannular channel 20 containing an annular array ofvacuum pumpout ports 6 is located. Thevacuum pumpout ports 6 are connected by a manifold and hoses (not shown) to avacuum pump 31. An annular inner rim 4 is positioned next to theannular channel 20. The width of the annular inner rim 4 and annularouter rim 24 is several millimeters and the height of each rim is several microns less than the height of the support pins 10, resulting in agap 18 between thewafer 16 and the tworims 4, 24. Thisgap 18 is critical because it prevents contact of thewafer 16 to eachrim 4, 24. The gap is larger than the size expected for typical particles in a semiconductor processing system. Thus, this structure reduces the possibility of particle-induced distortions in the wafer. Also since there is no clamping of therims 4, 24 to thewafer 16 at the periphery, there is no distortion caused by any sealing or clamping pressure applied on those structures. On the other hand, the inner rim 4 andouter rim 24 can still function as a gas bearing seal when cooling gas is flowing through the base cavity 34, substantially reducing the gas leakage to the ambient environment. - Cooling gas is introduced from a pressure controlled
gas source 32 through an array ofinlets 22 arranged in anannular groove 14 located at approximately 15 mm or less from the inner rim 4. Theinlets 22 are connected by a manifold and hoses (not shown) to avacuum pump 31. Acentral gas inlet 8 may also be used in addition, to allow the gas pressure to equilibrate beneath the wafer more rapidly. It can also speed up the removal of the gas at the end of wafer processing when the wafer is about to be removed from the chuck. Given the small gap between wafer and chuck, additional ports may be needed for this purpose. - In
operation valves valves 33 a and 33 c are opened. A cooling gas such as Helium is introduced from thecentral gas inlet 8 and thegas inlets 22 holes via the circularpressure distribution groove 14 into the base cavity 34 defined by the under surface of thewafer 16 and the pin chuck surface. The pressure is distributed evenly throughout the surface of thewafer 16 except towards the inner rim 4, where a pressure gradient occurs. The pressure gradient occurs because the pressure at thevacuum pumpout ports 6 is lower than the pressure at points closer to the wafer center. The inner rim 4 andouter rim 24 function as a gas bearing seal as the gas flows through the base cavity 34. At the end of processing, valve 33 a is closed and 33 b is opened. The coolant gas is pumped out,valves - FIG. 3 shows results obtained from numerically modeling gas flow between the chuck and wafer by representing the system by a finite number of conductance subsystems each with characteristics defined by its geometry and local gas pressures. The gas flows are determined from a series of conductance equations based on Kirchhoff's equations from circuit theory. The graph compares the numerical modeling results of the Helium pressure beneath the wafer for two differently configured chucks, one with a single central gas inlet and one configured with an annular array of gas inlets (i.e., inlets14) located just inside of the rim 4. The Helium pressure (Torr) is referenced on the ordinate and the radius (m) of the wafer chuck is referenced on the abscissa. The input parameters for the modeling are as follows, 46 Torr for inlet pressure for the chuck with a single gas inlet, 11.2 Torr for the chuck with an annular array of inlets located at a radius of 0.120 m, and 0.01 Torr for the pressure at the
vacuum pump 31 connected through a hose and manifold to thepumpout ports 6. The vacuum chamber surrounding the chuck is attached to a vacuum pump with a pumping speed of 1000 l/sec. In FIG. 3, a gap of 2 micron between the wafer bottom and the inner annular seal 4 was assumed. TheHelium pressure distribution 50 under a wafer held with the chuck containing a single central gas inlet is not uniform. The pressure is higher towards the central gas inlet and lower towards the outer periphery, with approximate pressures of 46 Torr and 10 Torr, respectively. This uneven pressure distribution results in an uneven transfer of heat across the wafer (a direct relationship exists between the two parameters). As a result, the wafer will be cooled unevenly. - With a wafer chuck having an annular array of
gas inlets 14, theHelium pressure distribution 52 is substantially uniform from the center of the wafer to the inner rim 4, at a distance of approximately 0.135 m, as measured from the center of the wafer towards its edge. Beyond approximately 0.135 m, the Helium pressure gradually decreases to the pressure at thevacuum pumpout ports 6. As demonstrated, the additional annular array of gas inlets allows the chuck to provide a uniform pressure of He gas across most of the wafer surface, which in turn results in a uniform heat transfer. While the heat transfer begins to decrease for radii greater than that of theannular gas inlets 14, the area of the wafer so affected amounts to only a few percent of the total. It can be further reduced by placing the annular array ofinlets 14 and the inner rim 4 as close to the edge of the wafer as possible. - FIG. 4 show the results obtained from numerically modeling the chuck at various geometries and operating pressure conditions by representing the system by a finite number of conductance subsystems each with characteristics defined by its geometry and local gas pressures. The gas flows are determined from a series of equations based on Kirchhoff's equations. The graph shows the results of the leakage of cooling gas into the vacuum chamber for situations involving varying air bearing gaps, inner/outer annular rim radial thicknesses, and pump pressures for the annular pumpout ports of a wafer chuck. The wafer chuck was assumed placed in a vacuum chamber pumped by a 1000 l/sec. pump. The Helium pressure was set to 10 Torr and the inner and outer annular thicknesses were set to either 1 mm or 5 mm. The gap (microns) between the wafer bottom and the chuck is represented on the abscissa, and the resulting chamber pressure (Torr) is represented on the ordinate.
Plot 46 shows that with a rim thickness of 5 mm and a Helium pump out pressure of 0.01 Torr at the vacuum pump, the vacuum chamber pressure increased from less than 1.0×10−8 Torr to over 1.0×10−6 Torr, as the gap between the wafer and rim increased from 1 μm to 5 μm, indicating a higher cooling gas leakage into the vacuum chamber.Data point 48 shows the same rim thickness at a wafer gap of 5 μm, and no vacuum pump, the chamber pressure increases to over 1.0×10−5 Torr, which indicates a higher leak rate into the chamber than when the pumpout ports are used. When the annular rim thickness is reduced to 1 mm and the pumpout pressure set to 0.01 Torr, the chamber pressure is about 1.0×10−7 Torr with a 1 μm gap and the chamber pressure increases as the gap increases (plot 42). With the rim still at 1 mm, no pumpout port, and the wafer gap at 1 μm, the chamber pressure increases to about 4.0×10−6 Torr (data point 40). At a rim thickness of 1 mm, pumpout pressure at 0.001 Torr, and gap at 2.1 μm, the chamber pressure is about 1.6×10−6 Torr (plot 44). The lower pumpout pressure has little effect on chamber pressure (compare plot 42). - The data from this numerical modeling indicate that with other parameters constant, as the gap between the wafer and inner/outer rim increases, the Helium gas leakage also increases. This is a result of a larger gap providing a larger cross sectional area for the gas to escape through. Secondly, as the annular thickness of the rims increase, the leakage decreases because of the increasing amount of rim surface area functioning as a gas bearing seal. Lastly, a reduction in pumpout pressure decreases Helium leakage, because a correspondingly lower pressure in the
annular channel 20 reduces the flow of gas from theannular channel 20 across theseal 24 to the chamber. These different factors can be used as a reference when designing an optimum chuck configuration for a particular application. - The requirements for the
vacuum pump 31 attached to thepumpout ports 6 are not too demanding. The gas throughput to the pump under the conditions represented by FIG. 3 is 0.0056 Torr-l/sec. In order to maintain the pressure at the entrance to the pump at 0.01 Torr, a pump speed of approximately 0.0056/0.01=0.56 l/sec is required. This speed is easily achieved with commercial pumps. - The gas escaping to the
pumpout ports 6 and the vacuum chamber must be replaced from a source, or the gas pressure in the chuck, and the thermal conductivity, will decrease with time. Assuming the gas pressure in the chuck Pchuck to be much greater than the vacuum pump pressure, the gas flow from the chuck can be approximated by CPchuck, where C is the conductance of the inner annular seal 4. If V is the volume of the He gas between the wafer bottom and the top of the chuck, then in the absence of a gas source the gas pressure will decrease with time t like exp[−Ct/V]. This relation is described in e.g. A User's Guide to Vacuum Technology by John F. O'Hanlon. Under the conditions represented in FIG. 3 the conductance is approximately 0.00057 l/sec, and the volume is approximately 0.00057 l. Consequently the time constant V/C, the time it takes the pressure to decrease to e−1 of its initial value, is only about 1 sec. This is much too short a time for processing operations, so a gas source is needed to maintain the pressure constant. - In summary, the present invention provides a method of providing a uniform pressure of cooling gas to a wafer held by an electrostatic chuck, through the use of a pressure distribution groove containing an array of gas inlets. The uniform pressure of cooling gas results in uniform cooling of the wafer, which is important during the wafer processing stage. By providing a uniform wafer temperature, distortion of the features formed on the wafer can be reduced. The inner and outer rim in conjunction with the vacuum pumpout ports help to reduce the leakage of cooling gas, which allows the chuck to efficiently operate in chamber conditions that require vacuum pressures of 10−6 or lower.
- There are many different types of lithographic devices in which the present invention may be deployed. Referring to FIG. 5, an example of a lithographic device is an electron beam lithography apparatus that comprises an
electron gun 50, illumination system 54, a reticle stage 58, awafer stage 70, and aprojection system 60. The illumination-optical system 54 is situated and configured to illuminate, with a charged-particle illumination beam 52, a region of areticle 56 defining a pattern to be transferred to asubstrate 66. The reticle stage 58 is situated and configured to hold and move thereticle 56 in the path of theillumination beam 52. (The illumination beam passing through the reticle carries an image of the illuminated region.) Thewafer stage 70 supports a gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck in accordance with the present invention (such as thepin chuck 68 in the illustrated embodiment), which is situated and configured to hold and move thesubstrate 66 for exposure with the reticle pattern by theimaging beam 52. Thepin chuck 68 is connected to agas source 32 andvacuum pump 31 by appropriate plumbing and valves schematically represented in FIG. 2. Aprojection system 60 is situated between the reticle stage 58 and thewafer stage 70, and configured to project an image of the reticle on an exposure surface of thesensitive substrate 66. Theprojection system 60 comprises an electromagnetic deflector 62 (may include a plurality of defector plates for controlling beam deflection in two axes) situated and configured to deflect the beam so as to increase an area exposed by the pattern beam on the exposure surface. Theprojection system 60 also includes anelectrostatic deflector 64 situated and configured to deflect the patterned beam sufficiently to correct a position error of thewafer stage 70 or the reticle stage 58, or both stages, and thereby adjusting a pattern transfer position on the exposed surface. The apparatus also includes acontroller 72 controlling the operations of the illumination system 54, theprojection system 60, the reticle stage 58, thewafer stage 70, theelectromagnetic deflector 62, theelectrostatic deflector 64, thevacuum pump 31 andgas source 32 and associated valves. - The
controller 72 is configured to move thewafer stage 70 continuously during an exposure shot of the patterned beam on the surface of thesubstrate 66, and to energize theelectrostatic deflector 64 during the exposure shot to correct the pattern-transfer position during the shot. Although the disclosed invention is focused on a gas cooled chuck for a vacuum processing system, such as the electron beam lithography apparatus described above, the chuck can also be used in a non-vacuum processing system. - Further, semiconductor devices can be fabricated using the above described system, by the process shown generally in FIG. 6. In
step 701 the device's function and performance characteristics are designed. Next, instep 702, a mask (reticle) having a pattern is designed according to the previous designing step, and in a parallel step 703 a wafer is made from a silicon material. The mask pattern designed instep 702 is exposed onto the wafer fromstep 703 instep 704 by a photolithography system described hereinabove in accordance with the present invention. In step 705 the semiconductor device is assembled (including the dicing process, bonding process and packaging process), then finally the device is inspected in step 706. - FIG. 7 illustrates a detailed flowchart example of the above-mentioned
step 704 in the case of fabricating semiconductor devices. In FIG. 7, in step 711 (oxidation step), the wafer surface is oxidized. In step 712 (CVD step), an insulation film is formed on the wafer surface. In step 713 (electrode formation step), electrodes are formed on the wafer by vapor deposition. In step 714 (ion implantation step), ions are implanted in the wafer. The above-mentioned steps 711-714 form the preprocessing steps for wafers during wafer processing, and selection is made at each step according to processing requirements. - At each stage of wafer processing, when the above-mentioned preprocessing steps have been completed, the following post-processing steps are implemented. During post-processing, first, in step715 (photoresist formation step), photoresist is applied to a wafer. Next, in step 716 (exposure step), the above-mentioned exposure device is used to transfer the circuit pattern of a mask (reticle) to a wafer. Then, in step 717 (developing step), the exposed wafer is developed, and in step 718 (etching step), parts other than residual photoresist (exposed material surface) are removed by etching. In step 719 (photoresist removal step), unnecessary photoresist remaining after etching is removed.
- Multiple circuit patterns are formed by repetition of these preprocessing and post-processing steps.
- It is to be understood that the photolithography system may be different than the one shown herein and other types of exposure apparatus may be implemented with the pin chuck of the present invention without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
- While the present invention has been described with respect to the preferred embodiments in accordance therewith, it will be apparent to those in the skilled art that various modifications and improvements may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the disclosed invention is to be considered merely as illustrative and limited in scope only as specified in the appended claims.
Claims (13)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,210 US6628503B2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2001-03-13 | Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications |
JP2002058101A JP4218248B2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-05 | Gas-cooled electrostatic pin chuck for use in vacuum |
KR1020020013205A KR20020073273A (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-12 | A gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications |
DE60217206T DE60217206D1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-13 | Gas-cooled electrostatic holding plate with pin-shaped spacers for vacuum applications |
EP02005780A EP1241706B1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2002-03-13 | A gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,210 US6628503B2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2001-03-13 | Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020130276A1 true US20020130276A1 (en) | 2002-09-19 |
US6628503B2 US6628503B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 |
Family
ID=25198184
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/808,210 Expired - Lifetime US6628503B2 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2001-03-13 | Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6628503B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1241706B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4218248B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20020073273A (en) |
DE (1) | DE60217206D1 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050207089A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Substrate holder and exposure apparatus using same |
US20060090855A1 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2006-05-04 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate mounting table, substrate processing apparatus and substrate temperature control method |
US20070085990A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Exposure apparatus |
US20070090301A1 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2007-04-26 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Gas shower, lithographic apparatus and use of a gas shower |
US20070152690A1 (en) * | 2006-01-03 | 2007-07-05 | Min-Sang Sung | Wafer stage and related method |
US20080035854A1 (en) * | 2004-07-12 | 2008-02-14 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Electron Microscope Phase Enhancement |
US20090294101A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fast substrate support temperature control |
US7900373B2 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2011-03-08 | Ers Electronic Gmbh | Method for conditioning semiconductor wafers and/or hybrids |
US20110085299A1 (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2011-04-14 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate cooling apparatus, substrate cooling method, and storage medium |
CN102914951A (en) * | 2011-08-04 | 2013-02-06 | 上海微电子装备有限公司 | Pre-aligning device for photoetching device |
US8861170B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-10-14 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US20140320841A1 (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2014-10-30 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Holding apparatus, processing apparatus, and method of manufacturing article |
US8879233B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-11-04 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with polymer protrusions |
US9025305B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2015-05-05 | Entegris, Inc. | High surface resistivity electrostatic chuck |
US20160379862A1 (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2016-12-29 | Eryn Smith | System and Method for Adhering a Semiconductive Wafer to a Mobile Electrostatic Carrier through a Vacuum |
US9543187B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2017-01-10 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US20180166305A1 (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2018-06-14 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for wafer backside cooling |
CN110323150A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-10-11 | 上海微电子装备(集团)股份有限公司 | Temperature control equipment |
CN110462810A (en) * | 2017-02-14 | 2019-11-15 | 应用材料公司 | Substrate position calibration method for the substrate support in base plate processing system |
TWI692837B (en) * | 2018-09-12 | 2020-05-01 | 大陸商中微半導體設備(上海)股份有限公司 | Lifting thimble element, electrostatic chuck and its processing device |
US11688590B2 (en) | 2018-03-26 | 2023-06-27 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Electrostatic-chuck heater |
Families Citing this family (69)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5914613A (en) | 1996-08-08 | 1999-06-22 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Membrane probing system with local contact scrub |
US6256882B1 (en) | 1998-07-14 | 2001-07-10 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Membrane probing system |
US6965226B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2005-11-15 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Chuck for holding a device under test |
US6914423B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2005-07-05 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Probe station |
DE20114544U1 (en) | 2000-12-04 | 2002-02-21 | Cascade Microtech, Inc., Beaverton, Oreg. | wafer probe |
TWI272689B (en) * | 2001-02-16 | 2007-02-01 | Tokyo Electron Ltd | Method and apparatus for transferring heat from a substrate to a chuck |
US6970634B2 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2005-11-29 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Fiber optic wafer probe |
WO2003052435A1 (en) | 2001-08-21 | 2003-06-26 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Membrane probing system |
JP2003174077A (en) * | 2001-12-04 | 2003-06-20 | Lintec Corp | Suction holder |
JP2004228456A (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2004-08-12 | Canon Inc | Exposure device |
EP1447715A3 (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2009-09-02 | ASML Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and method to detect correct clamping of an object |
JP2004363559A (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2004-12-24 | Canon Inc | Optical member holder |
US7057404B2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2006-06-06 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Shielded probe for testing a device under test |
US7492172B2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2009-02-17 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Chuck for holding a device under test |
JP4470199B2 (en) * | 2003-09-25 | 2010-06-02 | Smc株式会社 | Semiconductor substrate temperature control device |
US7250626B2 (en) | 2003-10-22 | 2007-07-31 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Probe testing structure |
US7198276B2 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2007-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive electrostatic pin chuck |
US7019820B2 (en) * | 2003-12-16 | 2006-03-28 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
EP2267535A1 (en) | 2003-11-05 | 2010-12-29 | ASML Netherlands BV | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
DE602004008009T2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2008-04-30 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus |
US7663860B2 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2010-02-16 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Electrostatic chuck |
US6897945B1 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2005-05-24 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7088431B2 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2006-08-08 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7187188B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2007-03-06 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Chuck with integrated wafer support |
US7427868B2 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2008-09-23 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Active wafer probe |
US7133120B2 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2006-11-07 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus, article support member, and method |
US8749762B2 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2014-06-10 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7548303B2 (en) * | 2004-09-04 | 2009-06-16 | Nikon Corporation | Cooling assembly for a stage |
US7420381B2 (en) | 2004-09-13 | 2008-09-02 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Double sided probing structures |
JP2006105789A (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-20 | Canon Inc | Temperature-measuring device and exposure device |
CN100382275C (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2008-04-16 | 东京毅力科创株式会社 | Substrate mounting table, substrate processing apparatus and substrate temperature control method |
KR101411123B1 (en) * | 2004-12-15 | 2014-06-25 | 가부시키가이샤 니콘 | Substrate holding apparatus, exposure apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7535247B2 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2009-05-19 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Interface for testing semiconductors |
US7656172B2 (en) | 2005-01-31 | 2010-02-02 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | System for testing semiconductors |
US20060271302A1 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2006-11-30 | Ehrlich James L | Method of Assessing Productivity of Lactating Animals Using Fitted Parameters to a Mechanistic Lactation Model |
US7372549B2 (en) * | 2005-06-24 | 2008-05-13 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7802917B2 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2010-09-28 | Lam Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for chuck thermal calibration |
CN100419989C (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2008-09-17 | 北京北方微电子基地设备工艺研究中心有限责任公司 | Static chuck |
KR100842739B1 (en) | 2006-05-02 | 2008-07-01 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Electrostatic chuck of high density plasma deposition apparatus |
US7978308B2 (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2011-07-12 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7593096B2 (en) | 2006-05-15 | 2009-09-22 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US7723999B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-05-25 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Calibration structures for differential signal probing |
US7403028B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2008-07-22 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Test structure and probe for differential signals |
US7764072B2 (en) | 2006-06-12 | 2010-07-27 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Differential signal probing system |
DE102006042026B4 (en) | 2006-09-07 | 2016-08-04 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Device for holding a substrate and method for treating a substrate |
JP4899879B2 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2012-03-21 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Substrate processing apparatus, substrate processing method, and storage medium |
US20080316461A1 (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2008-12-25 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
KR20120059630A (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2012-06-08 | 에이에스엠엘 네델란즈 비.브이. | Method of loading a substrate on a substrate table, device manufacturing method, computer program, data carrier and apparatus |
US8446566B2 (en) | 2007-09-04 | 2013-05-21 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method of loading a substrate on a substrate table and lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method |
US9013682B2 (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2015-04-21 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Clamping device and object loading method |
US7876114B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2011-01-25 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Differential waveguide probe |
US20090086187A1 (en) * | 2007-08-09 | 2009-04-02 | Asml Netherlands | Lithographic Apparatus and Device Manufacturing Method |
US9036326B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2015-05-19 | Axcelis Technologies, Inc. | Gas bearing electrostatic chuck |
US7888957B2 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2011-02-15 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Probing apparatus with impedance optimized interface |
WO2010059247A2 (en) | 2008-11-21 | 2010-05-27 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Replaceable coupon for a probing apparatus |
US8319503B2 (en) | 2008-11-24 | 2012-11-27 | Cascade Microtech, Inc. | Test apparatus for measuring a characteristic of a device under test |
JP2010129929A (en) * | 2008-11-28 | 2010-06-10 | Canon Inc | Substrate holding apparatus, substrate holding method, exposure apparatus, and device manufacturing method |
US8851133B2 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2014-10-07 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Method and apparatus of holding a device |
CN102736429B (en) * | 2011-04-07 | 2015-06-17 | 上海微电子装备有限公司 | Silicon chip temperature stabilizing device |
JP5550602B2 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2014-07-16 | パナソニック株式会社 | Electrostatic chuck and dry etching apparatus having the same |
CN102445856B (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2014-12-10 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | Silicon wafer object table temperature control system of lithography machine and control method thereof |
CN102445857B (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2013-10-02 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | Temperature control silicon wafer stage of photo-etching machine |
TWI448706B (en) * | 2012-12-24 | 2014-08-11 | Chroma Ate Inc | Test platform with dry environment |
CN103901359B (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2016-06-29 | 致茂电子(苏州)有限公司 | There is the test platform of dry environment |
WO2016135565A1 (en) | 2015-02-23 | 2016-09-01 | M Cubed Technologies, Inc. | Film electrode for electrostatic chuck |
JP6510461B2 (en) * | 2016-05-25 | 2019-05-08 | 日本特殊陶業株式会社 | Substrate holding device |
CN113156781B (en) * | 2021-04-23 | 2023-04-14 | 北京北方华创微电子装备有限公司 | Chuck device and semiconductor processing equipment |
KR20240047376A (en) * | 2021-08-12 | 2024-04-12 | 에이에스엠엘 네델란즈 비.브이. | Electrostatic holders, object tables and lithographic devices |
EP4134748A1 (en) * | 2021-08-12 | 2023-02-15 | ASML Netherlands B.V. | Electrostatic holder, object table and lithographic apparatus |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4213698A (en) | 1978-12-01 | 1980-07-22 | Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated | Apparatus and method for holding and planarizing thin workpieces |
US4551192A (en) | 1983-06-30 | 1985-11-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electrostatic or vacuum pinchuck formed with microcircuit lithography |
JPS6060060A (en) | 1983-09-12 | 1985-04-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Switchgear for door of railway rolling stock |
US4603466A (en) | 1984-02-17 | 1986-08-05 | Gca Corporation | Wafer chuck |
US4544446A (en) | 1984-07-24 | 1985-10-01 | J. T. Baker Chemical Co. | VLSI chemical reactor |
US4676649A (en) * | 1985-11-27 | 1987-06-30 | Compact Spindle Bearing Corp. | Multi-axis gas bearing stage assembly |
DE3915039A1 (en) | 1989-05-08 | 1990-11-15 | Balzers Hochvakuum | LIFTING TABLE |
US5197089A (en) * | 1990-05-21 | 1993-03-23 | Hampshire Instruments, Inc. | Pin chuck for lithography system |
US5230741A (en) | 1990-07-16 | 1993-07-27 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Gas-based backside protection during substrate processing |
JPH07110455B2 (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1995-11-29 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Wafer fixing device |
JPH0758191A (en) | 1993-08-13 | 1995-03-03 | Toshiba Corp | Wafer stage device |
JPH07153825A (en) * | 1993-11-29 | 1995-06-16 | Toto Ltd | Electrostatic chuck and treatment method of body to be attracted which uses said chuck |
US6278600B1 (en) * | 1994-01-31 | 2001-08-21 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with improved temperature control and puncture resistance |
US5885469B1 (en) | 1996-11-05 | 2000-08-08 | Applied Materials Inc | Topographical structure of an electrostatic chuck and method of fabricating same |
US5548470A (en) | 1994-07-19 | 1996-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Characterization, modeling, and design of an electrostatic chuck with improved wafer temperature uniformity |
US5708556A (en) | 1995-07-10 | 1998-01-13 | Watkins Johnson Company | Electrostatic chuck assembly |
US5810933A (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 1998-09-22 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wafer cooling device |
JP2002009139A (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2002-01-11 | Nikon Corp | Electrostatic chuck |
-
2001
- 2001-03-13 US US09/808,210 patent/US6628503B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-05 JP JP2002058101A patent/JP4218248B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-12 KR KR1020020013205A patent/KR20020073273A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-03-13 DE DE60217206T patent/DE60217206D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-13 EP EP02005780A patent/EP1241706B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7900373B2 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2011-03-08 | Ers Electronic Gmbh | Method for conditioning semiconductor wafers and/or hybrids |
US20050207089A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Substrate holder and exposure apparatus using same |
US20080035854A1 (en) * | 2004-07-12 | 2008-02-14 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Electron Microscope Phase Enhancement |
US7737412B2 (en) * | 2004-07-12 | 2010-06-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Electron microscope phase enhancement |
US20060090855A1 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2006-05-04 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate mounting table, substrate processing apparatus and substrate temperature control method |
US7742147B2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2010-06-22 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Exposure apparatus |
US20070085990A1 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-19 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Exposure apparatus |
US20070090301A1 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2007-04-26 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Gas shower, lithographic apparatus and use of a gas shower |
US7432513B2 (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2008-10-07 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Gas shower, lithographic apparatus and use of a gas shower |
US20070152690A1 (en) * | 2006-01-03 | 2007-07-05 | Min-Sang Sung | Wafer stage and related method |
US7889323B2 (en) * | 2006-01-03 | 2011-02-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Wafer stage and related method |
US10395963B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2019-08-27 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US9543187B2 (en) | 2008-05-19 | 2017-01-10 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US20090294101A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fast substrate support temperature control |
US8596336B2 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2013-12-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Substrate support temperature control |
US9721821B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2017-08-01 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US8879233B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-11-04 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with polymer protrusions |
US8861170B2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2014-10-14 | Entegris, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck with photo-patternable soft protrusion contact surface |
US8776393B2 (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2014-07-15 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate cooling apparatus, substrate cooling method, and storage medium |
US20110085299A1 (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2011-04-14 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Substrate cooling apparatus, substrate cooling method, and storage medium |
CN102044411A (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2011-05-04 | 东京毅力科创株式会社 | Substrate cooling apparatus, substrate cooling method, and storage medium |
US9025305B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2015-05-05 | Entegris, Inc. | High surface resistivity electrostatic chuck |
CN102914951A (en) * | 2011-08-04 | 2013-02-06 | 上海微电子装备有限公司 | Pre-aligning device for photoetching device |
US20140320841A1 (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2014-10-30 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Holding apparatus, processing apparatus, and method of manufacturing article |
US10236202B2 (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2019-03-19 | Diablo Capital, Inc. | System and method for adhering a semiconductive wafer to a mobile electrostatic carrier through a vacuum |
US20160379862A1 (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2016-12-29 | Eryn Smith | System and Method for Adhering a Semiconductive Wafer to a Mobile Electrostatic Carrier through a Vacuum |
US20180166305A1 (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2018-06-14 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for wafer backside cooling |
US10867816B2 (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2020-12-15 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for wafer backside cooling |
CN110462810A (en) * | 2017-02-14 | 2019-11-15 | 应用材料公司 | Substrate position calibration method for the substrate support in base plate processing system |
US11688590B2 (en) | 2018-03-26 | 2023-06-27 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Electrostatic-chuck heater |
CN110323150A (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2019-10-11 | 上海微电子装备(集团)股份有限公司 | Temperature control equipment |
CN110323150B (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2021-12-31 | 上海微电子装备(集团)股份有限公司 | Temperature control device |
TWI692837B (en) * | 2018-09-12 | 2020-05-01 | 大陸商中微半導體設備(上海)股份有限公司 | Lifting thimble element, electrostatic chuck and its processing device |
US11626314B2 (en) | 2018-09-12 | 2023-04-11 | Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. China | Lift pin assembly, an electrostatic chuck and a processing apparatus where the electrostatic chuck is located |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE60217206D1 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
KR20020073273A (en) | 2002-09-23 |
EP1241706B1 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
EP1241706A2 (en) | 2002-09-18 |
JP2002305238A (en) | 2002-10-18 |
EP1241706A3 (en) | 2004-02-18 |
US6628503B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 |
JP4218248B2 (en) | 2009-02-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6628503B2 (en) | Gas cooled electrostatic pin chuck for vacuum applications | |
US6496350B2 (en) | Electrostatic wafer chucks and charged-particle-beam exposure apparatus comprising same | |
KR100246811B1 (en) | Electrostatic chuck assembly | |
US6767844B2 (en) | Plasma chamber equipped with temperature-controlled focus ring and method of operating | |
US20070000614A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing substrate backside deposition during processing | |
JPH08227934A (en) | Plasma guard for chamber provided with electrostatic chuck | |
US6570752B2 (en) | Wafer chucks and the like including substrate-adhesion detection and adhesion correction | |
KR100537934B1 (en) | Backside gas quick dump apparatus for a semiconductor wafer processing system | |
KR20210126131A (en) | Electrostatic Chuck for High Bias Radio Frequency (RF) Power Application in Plasma Processing Chambers | |
US7151658B2 (en) | High-performance electrostatic clamp comprising a resistive layer, micro-grooves, and dielectric layer | |
US7764483B2 (en) | Semiconductor etching apparatus | |
US20040026386A1 (en) | Method for improving ash rate uniformity in photoresist ashing process equipment | |
KR101071603B1 (en) | Chamber and associated methods for wafer processing | |
US20040079289A1 (en) | Electrostatic chuck wafer port and top plate with edge shielding and gas scavenging | |
CN110729228A (en) | Ceramic hybrid insulator plate | |
JPH02119131A (en) | Temperature controlling method for sample and its equipment | |
JP2726410B2 (en) | Electrostatic attraction electrode | |
JP2626618B2 (en) | Sample holding method for vacuum processing equipment | |
JP2953688B2 (en) | Sample temperature control method | |
JPH02110925A (en) | Vacuum processing and device therefor | |
JP2636781B2 (en) | Vacuum processing method | |
JP2636782B2 (en) | Control method of heat transfer gas for sample temperature control | |
KR20230164168A (en) | Process cell for baking process after field guided exposure | |
JPH02110927A (en) | Specimen holding device | |
JPH02110926A (en) | Temperature control of specimen and device thereof |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NIKON CORPORATION, JAPAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SOGARD, MICHAEL;REEL/FRAME:011612/0274 Effective date: 20010312 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
CC | Certificate of correction | ||
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |