KR20240028670A - Method for mornitoring the reliability of responses to personality test and apparatus for performing the same - Google Patents

Abstract

A method for monitoring response reliability to a personality test and a device for performing the same are disclosed. A method for monitoring the reliability of personality test responses of a server according to various embodiments includes the operation of providing a first interface including reliability items for checking the reliability of an applicant's first responses to personality test items to an applicant terminal; Receiving the applicant's second responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminal; calculating reliability of the first responses based on the second responses; and providing a second interface including information on the reliability of the applicant's responses to the applicant terminal based on the calculated reliability of the first responses.

Description

Method for monitoring response reliability to personality tests and apparatus for performing the same

The disclosure below relates to a method for monitoring response reliability to a personality test and an apparatus for performing the same.

The purpose of the personality test is to determine whether the applicant (or test taker) has the capabilities appropriate for the position being hired or whether the applicant has tendencies that may harm the organizational culture (e.g., counterproductive behavior types). In order for a personality test to be conducted properly, it is necessary to monitor the reliability of the applicant's responses and inform the applicant of the reliability of the monitored applicant's responses.

As related prior art, there is Korean Patent Publication No. KR 2299995 B1 (title of the invention: Method and device for providing standard personality test service).

The background technology described above is possessed or acquired by the inventor in the process of deriving the disclosure of the present application, and cannot necessarily be said to be known technology disclosed to the general public before this application.

In order to evaluate the reliability of an applicant's response in a personality test, methods such as presenting the same question repeatedly and checking whether the applicant gave the same response to the same question are used. Response reliability verification technology can be used to determine the reliability of personality test results, but it cannot be a fundamental means of ensuring that an appropriate personality test is conducted.

Various embodiments monitor response reliability in real time during the personality test process and provide applicants with an interface that indicates response reliability, allowing applicants to perform the personality test honestly and sincerely.

However, technical challenges are not limited to the above-mentioned technical challenges, and other technical challenges may exist.

A method for monitoring the reliability of personality test responses of a server according to various embodiments includes the operation of providing a first interface including reliability items for checking the reliability of an applicant's first responses to personality test items to an applicant terminal; Receiving the applicant's second responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminal; calculating reliability of the first responses based on the second responses; and providing a second interface including information on the reliability of the applicant's responses to the applicant terminal based on the calculated reliability of the first responses.

The calculating operation may include calculating reliability of the first responses based on a standard deviation of the second responses and the first responses.

The calculating operation may include calculating the reliability of the first responses based on the number of responses with the highest response scale among the first responses, the second responses, and the standard deviation. .

The providing operation includes providing the applicant terminal with a third interface indicating that the response reliability is high or a fourth interface indicating that the response reliability is low based on a comparison result of the reliability of the calculated first responses and the threshold value. Can include actions.

The operation of providing the fourth interface includes providing the applicant terminal with a fifth interface that is displayed to cover at least part of the personality test questions based on the comparison result and includes information indicating that the response reliability is low. It can be included.

The reliability questions may include non-compliance confirmation questions that instruct the applicant to respond with a specific option.

A server that performs a personality test according to various embodiments includes a memory including instructions; and a processor electrically connected to the memory and configured to execute the instructions, wherein when the instructions are executed by the processor, the processor performs functions to determine the reliability of the applicant's first responses to the personality test questions. Providing a first interface including reliability questions to an applicant terminal, receiving the applicant's second responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminal, and determining the reliability of the first responses based on the second responses. A second interface including information on the reliability of the applicant's responses may be calculated and provided to the applicant terminal based on the reliability of the calculated first responses.

The processor may calculate the reliability of the first responses based on a standard deviation of the second responses and the first responses.

The processor may calculate the reliability of the first responses based on the number of responses with the highest response scale among the first responses, the second responses, and the standard deviation.

The processor may provide the applicant terminal with a third interface indicating that the response reliability is high or a fourth interface indicating that the response reliability is low based on a comparison result between the calculated reliability of the first responses and the threshold value. .

The processor may provide the applicant terminal with a fifth interface that is displayed to cover at least part of the personality test questions based on the comparison result and includes information indicating that the response reliability is low.

The reliability questions may include non-compliance confirmation questions that instruct the applicant to respond with a specific option.

1 is a diagram for explaining a toughness test system according to various embodiments.
Figures 2 to 5 are diagrams for explaining the interface provided on the recruiter's terminal.
Figures 6 to 8 are diagrams for explaining the interface provided to the server administrator.
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments.
10 and 11 are diagrams for explaining an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments.
12 to 14 are diagrams for explaining an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments.
Figure 15 is a flowchart illustrating a method for monitoring server response reliability according to various embodiments.
Figure 16 is a schematic block diagram of a server according to various embodiments.

Specific structural or functional descriptions of the embodiments are disclosed for illustrative purposes only and may be changed and implemented in various forms. Accordingly, the actual implementation form is not limited to the specific disclosed embodiments, and the scope of the present specification includes changes, equivalents, or substitutes included in the technical idea described in the embodiments.

Terms such as first or second may be used to describe various components, but these terms should be interpreted only for the purpose of distinguishing one component from another component. For example, a first component may be named a second component, and similarly, the second component may also be named a first component.

When a component is referred to as being “connected” to another component, it should be understood that it may be directly connected or connected to the other component, but that other components may exist in between.

Singular expressions include plural expressions unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, “A or B”, “at least one of A and B”, “at least one of A or B”, “A, B or C”, “at least one of A, B and C”, and “A Each of phrases such as “at least one of , B, or C” may include any one of the items listed together in the corresponding phrase, or any possible combination thereof. In this specification, terms such as “comprise” or “have” are intended to designate the presence of the described features, numbers, steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof, and are intended to indicate the presence of one or more other features or numbers, It should be understood that this does not exclude in advance the possibility of the presence or addition of steps, operations, components, parts, or combinations thereof.

Unless otherwise defined, all terms used herein, including technical or scientific terms, have the same meaning as commonly understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art. Terms as defined in commonly used dictionaries should be interpreted as having meanings consistent with the meanings they have in the context of the related technology, and unless clearly defined in this specification, should not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense. No.

Hereinafter, embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings. In the description with reference to the accompanying drawings, identical components are assigned the same reference numerals regardless of the reference numerals, and overlapping descriptions thereof will be omitted.

1 is a diagram for explaining a toughness test system according to various embodiments.

Referring to FIG. 1, according to various embodiments, the personality test system 100 includes a server 110 (e.g., a server of a personality test service provider), a recruiter terminal 130, and one or more applicant terminals 150-1. May include ~150-n) (n is a natural number).

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide an interface for generating personality test items to the recruiter terminal 130. For example, the server 110 may provide an interface through which a recruiter can select a job category and personality test questions (e.g., competency test questions, counterproductive behavior test questions). The interfaces provided to the recruiter terminal 130 will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 2 to 5.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide interfaces for customizing a personality test service and managing a database for the administrator of the server 110. Interfaces for the administrator of the server 110 will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 6 to 8.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide an interface for a personality test to one or more applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n sequentially or simultaneously. For example, the server 110 may provide an interface for guiding a personality test and an interface including personality test items. The interfaces provided to applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n will be described in detail with reference to FIGS. 9 to 13.

Figures 2 to 5 are diagrams for explaining the interface provided on the recruiter's terminal.

Referring to FIGS. 2 to 5 , according to various embodiments, the hiring manager determines whether to conduct the competency test 201, whether to conduct the counterproductive behavior test 203, and the job category to be recruited through the interfaces 200 to 400. You can decide whether to select (205) or not. The competency test (201) refers to a test to check the applicant's suitability for the organizational culture and job, and the counterproductive behavior test (203) refers to a test to determine whether the applicant has a type of behavior that is detrimental to the organization's purpose and/or organizational members. It may mean an inspection to

According to various embodiments, when the recruiter selects the competency test 201, the server (e.g., server 110 in FIG. 1) provides specific information to the recruiter terminal (e.g., recruiter terminal 130 in FIG. 1). An interface 200 containing a list of capabilities 211 to 239 may be provided. The recruiter can select competencies to be tested through the interface 200. For example, the recruiter may select only one competency among the competencies (211-239) or all of the competencies (211-239). According to various embodiments, recruiters may change the names of competencies 211-239. For example, a recruiter can change the name of a competency (e.g., Pursuit of Expertise (211)) by moving the mouse cursor (295) to the area (275) where the competency is displayed and double-clicking. According to various embodiments, recruiters may identify sub-competencies of competencies 211-239. For example, when a recruiter positions the mouse cursor 295 in an area (e.g., area 285) where definitions 241-269 of competencies 211-239 are displayed, the server 110 recruits. An interface 290 that displays information on sub-competencies (e.g., establishment of continuous growth goals, securing competitive advantage) of a competency (e.g., pursuit of expertise (211)) may be provided to the person in charge terminal (130).

According to various embodiments, when the recruiter selects the anti-social behavior test 203, the server 110 provides an interface 300 on which specific anti-social behavior types 311 to 323 are displayed on the recruiter terminal 130. can be provided. As described above, the recruiter can select counterproductive behavior types 311 to 323 to be tested through the interface 300. Additionally, the recruiter can change the names of counterproductive behavior types (311 to 323) and check information on sub-behavior types of counterproductive behavior types (311 to 323).

According to various embodiments, when a recruiter selects a job group 205, the server 110 provides an interface 400 including a list of specific job groups 411 to 425 to the recruiter terminal 130. can do. If the recruiter does not select the job group 205 to be recruited, the interface 400 may not be provided. According to various embodiments, the recruiter may change the names of job groups 411 to 425. For example, when a recruiter moves the mouse cursor 295 to an area (e.g. area 435) where an occupation (e.g. service (411)) is displayed and double-clicks, the job group (e.g. service (411)) is displayed. ) can be renamed. According to various embodiments, when the recruiter selects one or more job groups among the job groups 411 to 425, the server 110 provides a score indicating the applicant's suitability for the selected job group after completing the personality test to the recruiter terminal 130. can be provided to. Additionally, the server 110 may provide the recruiter terminal 130 with one or more job groups suitable for the applicant along with the applicant's suitability score for the selected recruitment job group. If the recruiter does not select a job group 205, the server 110 may provide one or more job groups suitable for the applicant to the recruiter terminal 130 after the personality test is completed.

According to various embodiments, when a recruiter selects one or more occupational groups among the occupational groups 411 to 425, the server 110 provides capabilities suitable for the selected occupational group (e.g., one or more capabilities among the capabilities 211 to 239). Alternatively, counterproductive behavior types that are not suitable for the selected job group (e.g., one or more behavior types among the counterproductive behavior types 311 to 323) may be provided to the recruiter terminal 130. According to various embodiments, the server 110 uses previously performed personality test data (e.g., a data pair of the competency and/or counterproductive behavior type selected by the recruiter in the previously performed personality tests and the recruited job group). The above-described operations can be performed. For example, the server 110 may identify competencies (e.g., competencies 211 to 239 in FIG. 2) and/or counterproductive behavior types (e.g., FIG. Based on the frequency with which the 3 counterproductive behavior types (311 to 323) are selected, a list of competencies suitable for the selected occupational group and/or a list of counterproductive behavior types unsuitable for the selected occupational group can be provided to the recruiter terminal 130. there is. Specifically, the server 110 may provide the recruiter terminal 130 with a list of competencies and/or counterproductive behavior types that were frequently selected as test targets in past personality tests for the selected job group. For example, the server 110 calculates the standard deviation of personality test scores for competencies (211-239) and/or counterproductive behavior types (311-323) recorded in past personality tests for the selected occupation. Based on this, a list of competencies suitable for the selected job group and/or a list of counterproductive behavior types unsuitable for the selected job group may be provided to the recruiter terminal 130. Specifically, the server 110 may provide the recruiter terminal 130 with a list of capabilities and/or counterproductive behavior types that recorded a large standard deviation in past personality tests for the selected job group.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 selects one or more competencies among the competencies 211 to 219 and/or one or more counterproductive behavior types from the counterproductive behavior types 311 to 323 when the recruiter selects the recruiter. A list of occupations corresponding to (e.g., selected competencies and/or selected counterproductive behavior types) may be provided to the recruiter terminal 130. For example, the server 110 may perform the above-described operations using previously performed personality test data. For example, the server 110 may provide the recruiter terminal 130 with a list of occupations in which the selected competencies and/or counterproductive behavior types were frequently used in past personality tests. According to various embodiments, the server 110 recommends (or provides) the type of personality test or job group required to the recruiter based on the recruiter's selection (e.g., selection of job category, competency, and/or type of counterproductive behavior) to the recruiter. Convenience can be improved.

According to various embodiments, after the recruiter's selection is completed, the server 110 displays the interface 500 that displays the selected items (e.g., competency list, counterproductive behavior type list, recruitment job list) to the recruiter terminal 130. ) can be provided. The recruiter can final confirm the selection and create a personality test through the interface 500. The server 110 may create standards for evaluation when creating a personality test. Norms may refer to data (e.g., average score, standard deviation of a comparison group) that serves as a standard for evaluating an applicant's personality test results. For example, the server 110 may generate a standard based on previously performed personality test result data. According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide the administrator of the recruiter terminal 130 and the server 110 with an interface (not shown) that can set the response time for personality test items before and after creating the personality test. You can. For example, recruiters and administrators of server 110 may increase response times for specific candidates (e.g., people with disabilities) through an interface (not shown).

Figures 6 to 8 are diagrams to explain the interface provided for the server manager.

Referring to FIGS. 6 to 8 , according to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide an interface 600 for customizing a personality test to an administrator of the server 110. For example, the administrator of the server 110 can add a new competency 601 (e.g., initiative) to the list of competencies (e.g., competencies 275 to 239 in FIG. 2) through the interface 600. there is. The administrator of the server 110 may select a scale associated with the new competency 601 from among the competency evaluation scales 611 to 639. The administrator of the server 110 may enter the definition of the new competency 601. When the administrator of the server 110 completes inputting the new competency 601 and clicks the OK button, the server 110 may create a standard for the new competency 601.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide an interface 700 for creating standards to the administrator of the server 110. For example, the server 110 may determine the sample number of the comparison group (e.g., applicants stored in a personality test service provider's database) and the comparison group's competencies 211-230 and counterproductive behavior types (e.g. : An interface 700 that can modify the average score and standard deviation for the counterproductive behavior types (311 to 323) of FIG. 3 can be provided to the administrator of the server 110. For example, the server 110 may itself update the sample number, average score, and standard deviation of the comparison group based on the results of a previously performed life test. According to various embodiments, the server 110 can increase the accuracy of personality test results by continuously updating data for generating standards.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide the administrator of the server 110 with an interface 810 through which data stored in the database can be downloaded. For example, administrators can select a specific date to download data. For example, administrators can download the entire data.

According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide the administrator of the server 110 with an interface 860 that can generate a personality test sample (eg, a personality test for testing). When there is a request from a recruiter, the manager can create a personality test sample through the interface 860 and provide it to the recruiter's terminal (e.g., the recruiter's terminal 130 in FIG. 1). For example, the server 110 may generate a personality test sample using personality test questions pre-selected by an administrator.

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments. FIG. 9 is for explaining an interface provided to an applicant terminal (e.g., applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n in FIG. 1) by a server (e.g., server 110 in FIG. 1) at the beginning of the personality test. It may be a drawing.

Referring to FIG. 9 , according to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide interfaces 910 to 970 to applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n before the start of the personality test. The interface 910 may be an interface for logging in of applicants. The interface 930 may be an interface for personality test precautions. The interface 950 may be an interface for a personality test response method. The interface 930 and the interface 950 may be configured to display the information by dividing it into multiple pages when there is a large amount of information (e.g., precautions, response methods) provided to the applicant. For example, the server 110 provides interfaces 930, 950 that move to the next page in response to the applicant's button (e.g., next button) click or the applicant's voice (e.g., applicant's “next” utterance). ) can be provided. The interface 970 may be an interface that counts down the time remaining until the start of the personality test.

10 and 11 are diagrams for explaining an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments.

Figure 10 is an interface 1000 including Likert scale questions provided to an applicant terminal (e.g., applicant terminals 150-1 to 150 to n) of Fig. 1 by a server (e.g., server 110 of Fig. 1). ) This is a drawing to explain. Likert scale items may refer to personality test items that use a Likert scale (e.g., competency test items, counterproductive behavior test items).

Referring to FIG. 10, according to various embodiments, the interface 1000 may include one or more Likert scale items. For example, the interface 1000 may include personality test items using a 6-point scale. The interface 1000 may display the personality test progress and response time.

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an interface 1160 that provides nonresponse personality test questions again in the personality test process.

Referring to FIG. 11 , according to various embodiments, during a personality test, an applicant may not respond to a specific question or may not be able to respond to a specific question due to elapse of response time. The server 110 may provide the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n with an interface 1160 that provides non-response questions (e.g., questions 1111 and 1113) back to the applicant. For example, if the personality test includes a total of 172 questions, the server 110 may provide an interface 1160 that provides the applicant with non-answered questions following the last question (e.g., the 172nd question). If there is a non-response question among the competency test questions, the server 110 provides a non-response question following the last question of the competency test. If there is a non-response question among the counterproductive behavior test questions, the server 110 provides a non-response question following the last question of the counterproductive behavior test. can be provided. According to various embodiments, the server 110 checks non-response questions while the personality test is in progress and provides the applicant with non-response questions following the last question, so that the applicant can answer all personality test questions without being disturbed.

12 to 14 are diagrams for explaining an example of an interface provided to an applicant terminal according to various embodiments.

FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an interface 1210 for informing the applicant that the applicant's response reliability is being monitored during the personality test process.

Referring to FIG. 12 , according to various embodiments, interface 1210 may include information 1215 indicating that the applicant's response reliability is being monitored. The server (e.g., the server 110 in FIG. 1) connects the interface 1210 to the applicant terminal (e.g., the applicant terminal 150 in FIG. 1) until the progress rate of the personality test reaches a threshold (e.g., the first threshold). It can be provided at -1~150-n)).

Figure 13 is a diagram for explaining interfaces 1310 and 1330 for informing the applicant of the applicant's response reliability during the personality test process.

Referring to FIG. 13, according to various embodiments, the interface 1310 may include information 1315 indicating that the applicant's response reliability is high. The interface 1330 may include information 1335 indicating that the applicant's response reliability is low. The server 110 provides the interface 1310 or interface 1330 to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n based on the result of comparing the applicant's response reliability with a threshold (e.g., a second threshold). can do. The method of calculating the response reliability of the server 110 will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 15. The server 110 may provide the interface 1310 or the interface 1330 to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n after the progress rate of the personality test reaches a threshold (e.g., first grain threshold). .

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an interface 1410 for warning an applicant that response reliability is low during a personality test.

Referring to FIG. 14 , according to various embodiments, the interface 1410 may include information 1335 indicating that the applicant's response reliability is low and other information 1415 indicating that the applicant's response reliability is low. The information 1415 may be configured to cover at least part of the personality test questions 1420. The server 110 may provide the interface 1410 to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n based on the result of comparing the applicant's response reliability with a threshold (eg, a second threshold). For example, the server 110 may provide the interface 1410 to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n when the applicant's response reliability is greater than or equal to a threshold (e.g., a second threshold). .

Figure 15 is a flowchart illustrating a method for monitoring server response reliability according to various embodiments.

Referring to FIG. 15, according to various embodiments, operations 1510 to 1550 may be performed sequentially, but are not limited thereto. For example, the order of operations 1510 to 1550 may be changed, or two or more operations may be performed sequentially.

In operation 1510, the server (e.g., server 110 in FIG. 1) provides an interface that includes reliability items for checking the reliability of the applicant's responses to personality test items (e.g., competency test items, counterproductive behavior test items). (e.g., interface 1000 in FIG. 10) can be provided to applicant terminals (e.g., applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n in FIG. 1). For example, the reliability items may include at least one of a fictional response check item, a non-compliance check item, a response consistency check item, and a self-reliability check item. Fictitious response confirmation items can refer to items that ask questions about behaviors that are considered socially correct but are difficult to practice (e.g., I have never hidden my mistakes). A non-compliance confirmation question may refer to a question that instructs the applicant to respond with a specific option (e.g., answer with 4 points). The response consistency check question may refer to a question that checks whether the applicant responds the same by providing the same question in duplicate. Self-reliability confirmation questions may refer to questions that confirm to the applicant whether he or she is answering sincerely (e.g., “I am answering sincerely”).

In operation 1530, the server 110 may receive the applicant's responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n.

In operation 1550, the server 110 may calculate the reliability of the applicant's responses to the personality test questions. According to various embodiments, the server 110 may calculate response reliability based on the applicant's responses to reliability questions. For example, the server 110 may calculate response confidence in the form of a score (eg, confidence score). Confidence score and response confidence may be inversely proportional. The server 110 may calculate a reliability score in proportion to the number of questions to which the applicant responded with a score higher than a certain scale (e.g., 5 or higher in a personality test using a 6-point scale) in the case of fictional response questions. The server 110 may calculate a reliability score in proportion to the number of questions to which the applicant responded differently from the instructions to the questions confirming non-compliance with instructions. The server 110 determines whether the applicant has a response that is different from the answer to the same question as the previously presented response consistency question (e.g., a personality test using a 6-point scale that differs by more than 3 points from the answer to the same question). The reliability score can be calculated in proportion to the number of questions answered. The server 110 may calculate a confidence score in proportion to the number of questions to which the applicant answers the self-confidence confirmation questions below a certain scale (e.g., 3 points or below in a personality test using a 6-point scale). According to various embodiments, the server 110 may calculate a reliability score based on the standard deviation of responses to personality test questions. For example, the server 110 calculates the standard deviation of the applicant's responses to the n personality test questions for each n (n is a natural number) personality test questions, and the standard deviation is set to a threshold (e.g., the third If it is below the threshold, the reliability score can be calculated. According to various embodiments, the server 110 may calculate a confidence score based on the number of personality test questions to which the applicant responded with the highest scale (e.g., 6 points in a personality test using a 6-point scale). You can. For example, the server 110 may calculate a reliability score in proportion to the number of personality test questions to which the applicant responded with the highest rating. According to various embodiments, the server 110 may provide a confidence score calculated based on responses to confidence items, a confidence score calculated based on the standard deviation of responses to personality test items, and responses based on the highest scale. Response reliability can be calculated by adding up the reliability scores calculated in proportion to the number of personality test items.

In operation 1570, the server 110 may provide interfaces containing information about response reliability to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n. For example, the server 110 provides an interface (e.g., interface 1210 in FIG. 12) containing information indicating that the applicant's response reliability is being monitored during the personality test process to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n. ) can be provided. For example, the server 110 may provide an interface ( For example, the interface 1310 in FIG. 13) or an interface indicating low response reliability (for example, the interface 1330 in FIG. 13) may be provided to the applicant terminals 150-1 to 150-n. For example, the server 110 provides an interface (e.g., interface 1410 in FIG. 14) that warns the applicant that the response reliability is low when the calculated response reliability is greater than or equal to a threshold (e.g., a second threshold). can be provided to the applicant terminal (150-1 to 150-n).

Figure 16 is a schematic block diagram of a server according to various embodiments.

Referring to FIG. 16, according to various embodiments, the server 1600 (eg, the server 110 of FIG. 1) may include a memory 1620 and a processor 1640.

According to various embodiments, the memory 1620 may store instructions (or programs) executable by the processor 1640. For example, the instructions may include instructions for executing the operation of the processor 1640 and/or the operation of each component of the processor 1640.

The processor 1640 may process data stored in the memory 1620. The processor 1640 may execute computer-readable code (e.g., software) stored in the memory 1620 and instructions triggered by the processor 1640.

The processor 1640 may be a data processing device implemented in hardware that has a circuit with a physical structure for executing desired operations. For example, the intended operations may include code or instructions included in the program.

For example, data processing devices implemented in hardware include microprocessors, central processing units, processor cores, multi-core processors, and multiprocessors. , ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit), and FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array).

Operations performed by the processor 1640 may be substantially the same as the operations of the server 110 described with reference to FIGS. 1 to 15 . Accordingly, detailed description will be omitted.

The embodiments described above may be implemented with hardware components, software components, and/or a combination of hardware components and software components. For example, the devices, methods, and components described in the embodiments may include, for example, a processor, a controller, an arithmetic logic unit (ALU), a digital signal processor, a microcomputer, and a field programmable gate (FPGA). It may be implemented using a general-purpose computer or a special-purpose computer, such as an array, programmable logic unit (PLU), microprocessor, or any other device capable of executing and responding to instructions. The processing device may execute an operating system (OS) and software applications running on the operating system. Additionally, a processing device may access, store, manipulate, process, and generate data in response to the execution of software. For ease of understanding, a single processing device may be described as being used; however, those skilled in the art will understand that a processing device includes multiple processing elements and/or multiple types of processing elements. It can be seen that it may include. For example, a processing device may include multiple processors or one processor and one controller. Additionally, other processing configurations, such as parallel processors, are possible.

Software may include a computer program, code, instructions, or a combination of one or more of these, which may configure a processing unit to operate as desired, or may be processed independently or collectively. You can command the device. Software and/or data may be used on any type of machine, component, physical device, virtual equipment, computer storage medium or device to be interpreted by or to provide instructions or data to a processing device. , or may be permanently or temporarily embodied in a transmitted signal wave. Software may be distributed over networked computer systems and stored or executed in a distributed manner. Software and data may be stored on a computer-readable recording medium.

The method according to the embodiment may be implemented in the form of program instructions that can be executed through various computer means and recorded on a computer-readable medium. A computer-readable medium may store program instructions, data files, data structures, etc., singly or in combination, and the program instructions recorded on the medium may be specially designed and constructed for the embodiment or may be known and available to those skilled in the art of computer software. there is. Examples of computer-readable recording media include magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tapes, optical media such as CD-ROMs and DVDs, and magnetic media such as floptical disks. -Includes optical media (magneto-optical media) and hardware devices specifically configured to store and execute program instructions, such as ROM, RAM, flash memory, etc. Examples of program instructions include machine language code, such as that produced by a compiler, as well as high-level language code that can be executed by a computer using an interpreter, etc.

The hardware devices described above may be configured to operate as one or multiple software modules to perform the operations of the embodiments, and vice versa.

As described above, although the embodiments have been described with limited drawings, those skilled in the art can apply various technical modifications and variations based on this. For example, the described techniques are performed in a different order than the described method, and/or components of the described system, structure, device, circuit, etc. are combined or combined in a different form than the described method, or other components are used. Alternatively, appropriate results may be achieved even if substituted or substituted by an equivalent.

Therefore, other implementations, other embodiments, and equivalents of the claims also fall within the scope of the claims described below.

Claims (12)

In a method for monitoring the reliability of a server's personality test response,
An operation of providing a first interface including reliability questions for checking the reliability of the applicant's first responses to the personality test questions to the applicant terminal;
Receiving the applicant's second responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminal;
calculating reliability of the first responses based on the second responses; and
An operation of providing a second interface including information about the applicant's response reliability to the applicant terminal based on the calculated reliability of the first responses.
Including, monitoring method.
According to paragraph 1,
The calculation operation is,
Calculating reliability of the first responses based on a standard deviation of the second responses and the first responses.
Including, monitoring method.
According to paragraph 1,
The calculation operation is,
Calculating reliability of the first responses based on the number of responses with the highest response scale among the first responses, the second responses, and the standard deviation of the first responses.
Including, monitoring method.
According to paragraph 1,
The operation provided above is,
An operation of providing the applicant terminal with a third interface indicating that the response reliability is high or a fourth interface indicating that the response reliability is low based on a comparison result between the calculated reliability of the first responses and the threshold value.
Including, monitoring method.
According to paragraph 4,
The operation of providing the fourth interface is:
An operation of providing a fifth interface to the applicant terminal, which is displayed to cover at least part of the personality test questions based on the comparison result and includes information indicating that the response reliability is low.
Including, monitoring method.
According to paragraph 1,
The reliability questions above are:
A question to confirm non-compliance with instructions instructing the above applicant to respond with a specific option
Including, monitoring method.
In the server that performs the personality test,
memory containing instructions; and
It is electrically connected to the memory and includes a processor for executing the instructions,
When the instructions are executed by the processor, the processor:
Providing a first interface including reliability questions for checking the reliability of the applicant's first responses to the personality test questions to the applicant terminal,
Receiving the applicant's second responses to the reliability questions from the applicant terminal,
Calculate reliability of the first responses based on the second responses,
A server providing a second interface including information on reliability of responses of the applicant to the applicant terminal based on the calculated reliability of the first responses.
In clause 7,
The processor,
A server that calculates a confidence level of the first responses based on a standard deviation of the second responses and the first responses.
In clause 7,
The processor,
A server that calculates the reliability of the first responses based on the number of responses with the highest response scale among the first responses, the second responses, and a standard deviation of the first responses.
In clause 7,
The processor,
A server that provides the applicant terminal with a third interface indicating that the reliability of the response is high or a fourth interface indicating that the reliability of the response is low based on a comparison result of the calculated reliability of the first responses and a threshold value.
According to clause 10,
The processor,
A server that provides the applicant terminal with a fifth interface that is displayed to cover at least part of the personality test questions based on the comparison result and includes information indicating that the response reliability is low.
In clause 7,
The reliability questions above are:
A server including a non-compliance confirmation question instructing the applicant to respond with a specific option.

Images