KR20120092421A - System for improving studying capability using relational questions and operating method thereof - Google Patents

Abstract

PURPOSE: A learning capability improvement system and an operation method thereof are provided to an optimized learning capability improvement system to each trainee. CONSTITUTION: A question management system(1000) stores a plurality of questions for evaluating a trainee in a question database and searches it. A relation key management system(2000) stores a relation key value showing relation between the questions in a relation key database and searches it. A question setting system(3000) is connected to the question management system and the relation key management system through a network. The question setting system sets a first question consisting of questions among the saved questions. The question setting system receives an answer for the first question from the trainee and grades the answer and analyzes a grading result. The question setting system sets a second question consisting of relational questions by using relation key information according to an analyzing result of the grading result.

Description

System for improving studying capability using relational questions and Operating method about

The present invention relates to a system for improving learning ability and an operation method thereof, and more particularly, to a system for improving learning ability using a relational question item based on an evaluation result of a trainee and an operation method thereof.

In general, schools and other educational institutions submit a test for each grade level of the trainees and evaluate the scores of each trainees. However, this general evaluation method has a limitation in that it can only check the current level of learning of the trainee because it only calculates a score for each subject of the trainee or provides only answer information for each question. .

In order to assess the level of learning for the trainees, a questionnaire with multiple questions should be provided to the trainee, and the answer sheet containing the answers to the questions should be analyzed. In general, this process is performed by printing a test question on paper to solve the problem (Paper Based Test) and by printing a test question on a screen such as a monitor and inputting a correct answer to a computer (Computer Based Test). Can be.

A system for analyzing a student's answer sheet and providing a result of scoring or basic information (for example, information on problem solving of an item, overall average score, and overall ranking of the trainee) is known. However, in order to provide more detailed information and individual evaluation results of the trainees, the educator or the questionnaire must directly check the evaluation results of the trainees and analyze them and generate various types of information. In addition, such a one-way information is provided only for the identification of the trainee, the learning effect obtained by the trainee by this information is the limit that occurs.

In addition, in the system for providing the above-described service for learning evaluation and improvement to the trainees, there is a problem that the waste of manpower is very high and the labor cost is high when the conventional method of manually scoring a person is used. . In addition, in most cases, the learning evaluation is performed by solving a large number of questions in a given time. However, in the case of a scoring method using an optical mark reader (OMR) card, the card for the optical mark reader is used every time a test is performed. The problem of having to print, the problem with the optical mark reader card, and the inconvenience of having to replace the card for the optical mark reader if the wrong mark is displayed, and the process of rewriting the answer on the test sheet back to the card for the optical mark reader. There is a problem that a lot of mistakes occur in.

In other words, there is a need to reduce the costly and effort-consuming problems in the procedure for evaluating the learning of the learner as described above, and the need for an automated procedure to be optimized for each learner to improve the learning ability. Done.

The present invention is to solve the above problems, to reduce the cost or effort required to perform the learning evaluation for the trainees, and to optimize each of the trainees to improve the ability to learn questions An object of the present invention is to provide a system for improving learning ability and an operation method thereof.

In order to achieve the above object, the operating method of the learning ability improvement system according to an embodiment of the present invention, searching for problems stored in the problem database, and processing the first question consisting of one or more questions and Receiving an answer to the question from a trainee, scoring the received answer and analyzing a scoring result, and determining whether to answer a relational question according to a result of analyzing the scoring result; Retrieving relation key information stored in a relation key database according to the determination result; retrieving relational items stored in the problem database using the retrieved relation key information; and one or more relational items using the search result Providing a second question consisting of questions And a gong.

Preferably, the answer to the question is received by the trainee directly through the terminal, or received as a scanned image of the scanned answer written through a writing implement, and when the answer is received as the scanned image, the scan The method may further include detecting numeric information of an answer detected in the image.

Also, preferably, the step of determining whether to answer the relational item includes determining whether an item in which an incorrect answer occurs among the first item exists, wherein the item in which the incorrect answer has occurred and the relationship key information are mutually determined. The related relational question is characterized as a second question.

On the other hand, the learning ability improvement system according to an embodiment of the present invention, a problem management system for managing the storage and retrieval of a plurality of problems in the problem database for the learning evaluation for the trainee, and the relationship between the plurality of problems Accessing the problem management system and the relationship key management system through a relationship key management system and network that manages storing and retrieving a relationship key value in a relationship key database, wherein one or more of the questions stored in the problem database Answering the questions from the trainee, scoring and analyzing the scoring result, and determining whether to ask the relational item according to the result of analyzing the scoring result, and determining The relationship key definition retrieved from the relationship key database according to the result. And a question questioning system for questioning and processing a second question consisting of one or more relational questions among the problems stored in the question database by using a beam.

According to the system for improving the learning ability using the relational item question of the present invention as described above and an operation method thereof, the result of the education evaluation of the trainee is analyzed and the relational item is automatically generated using the relationship key for each item to the learner. Therefore, there is an effect that can provide a learning ability improvement system optimized for each trainee.

In addition, according to the system for improving the learning ability using the relational question item of the present invention and a method of operating the same, the procedures for improving the learning ability and the optimized learning ability for each trainee are automatically performed, thus cost, effort, and time required for this. There is an effect that can be reduced.

In addition, according to the system for improving the learning ability using the relational questions and the operation method of the present invention, the learning evaluation can be performed by recording the answer using the monitor, recording the answer using the OMR card, recording the answer using natural language numbers, and the like. Therefore, there is an effect that can improve the convenience of the educator or trainee.

1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system for improving learning ability according to an embodiment of the present invention.
2 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the problem management system of FIG. 1.
3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the relationship key management system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the item / item information providing unit of FIG. 1.
5A and 5B are diagrams showing one embodiment of a test paper used in a learning ability improving system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
6 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of the reading system of FIG. 1.
7A and 7B are block diagrams illustrating an example of an implementation of an information processing unit and an answer processing unit of FIG. 6.
8A, B, C, and D are tables showing an example of confirming a numerical answer in the reading system of FIG.
9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method of operating a learning ability improving system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
10 is a flowchart illustrating another example of a method of operating a learning ability improving system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

In order to fully understand the present invention, operational advantages of the present invention, and objects achieved by the practice of the present invention, reference should be made to the accompanying drawings and the accompanying drawings which illustrate preferred embodiments of the present invention.

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings. Like reference symbols in the drawings denote like elements.

1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a system for improving learning ability according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the learning ability improvement system 100 according to an embodiment of the present invention may include a problem management system 1000, a relationship key management system 2000, and a problem question system 3000. have. In addition, a problem database 1100 in which various problems are database-stored and stored for learning evaluation of a trainee, and a relationship key database 2100 in which information for generating a relational question according to a learning evaluation result of each trainee are stored. It may be further included in the capability enhancement system 100. Although FIG. 1 illustrates that the problem database 1100 and the relationship key database 2100 are separate components, the problem database 1100 is provided in the problem management system 1000 and the relationship key database 2100 It may be described that the relation key management system 2000 is provided.

On the other hand, as shown in Figure 1, the question question system 3000 is a control unit 3010, item / item information providing unit 3020, grade processing unit 3030, result analysis unit 3040 and database unit 3050 ) May be provided. The problem question system 3000 may include a reading system 3100, or the problem question system 3000 may operate in conjunction with the reading system 3100. In addition, the scanner 4100, the educator terminal 4200, and the educator terminal 4300 may be connected to the problem management system 1000, the relationship key management system 2000, and the problem question system 3000 through a network. Although each component is illustrated one by one for convenience of description, a plurality of scanners 4100, an educator terminal 4200, and an educator terminal 4300 may be connected through a network.

Referring to the specific operation of the learning ability improvement system 100 that can be configured as described above are as follows.

In the process of creating a database pool with the entire study text, problem and commentary pool, the problem management system 1000 is accessed through a network, and various problems and information related to the database pool object are stored in the problem database 1100. The scanning document scanning the test paper on which various problems are printed may be provided to the problem management system 1000, and problems input by an educator through the educator terminal 4200 may be provided to the problem management system 1000. The information may include a description pool of various problems, subject or subject page information of each problem, and difficulty information of each problem. The problem management system 1000 manages detecting a problem from a scanning document or storing problems input through the educator terminal 4200 in the problem database 1100.

In addition, in order to improve the learning ability through the relational item evaluation by referring to the education evaluation result of the trainee, the relation key management system 2000 may generate a relationship key value according to the relationship between various problems stored in the problem database 1100. 2100 to manage. In storing the relationship key value, the relationship key value may be set with reference to information of a plurality of elements. For example, referring to information such as grade classification, subject, subject page or difficulty of each question, the relation key values between the related problems may be set and stored in the relation key database 2100. When a problem has information such as a predetermined subject, subject page, difficulty, etc., one or more other problems related to the one problem are searched using the information and the relation key value stored in the relation key database 2100. can do.

Subsequently, in order to evaluate the learner's learning, the trainee uses the trainee terminal 4300 to access the question-making system 3000 through a network. The question-making system 3000 constructs an item for learning evaluation by referring to the item selected by the trainee or the information of the trainee, and provides the question to the trainee terminal 4300. To this end, the problem questioning system 3000 connects to the problem management system 1000 or the relationship key management system 2000 via a network, receives various problem information therefrom, and also receives relationship key information. The trainee can solve the questions displayed through the trainee terminal 4300 and input the answers directly into the terminal, or solve the questions on a test paper generated by printing the questions and write the answers using a writing tool.

The controller 3010 controls the overall operation of the question-making system 3000, and also includes various components of the question-making system 3000, such as an item / item information providing unit 3020, a grade processing unit 3030, and a result analyzing unit. The operation of the 3040 and the database unit 3050 may be controlled. The item / item information providing unit 3020 configures items or relational items to provide the trainee terminal 4300 to improve the learner's learning evaluation and learning ability. For example, the question information stored in the problem database 1100 is read with reference to a subject, item, difficulty, etc., to which learning evaluation is performed by the trainee, and the items to be provided to the trainee terminal 4300 are constructed using the question information. In addition, when constructing a relational item for a question in which an incorrect answer occurs or a subject (or item) that does not have an evaluation score, the information stored in the problem database 1100 or the relationship key database 2100 may be used. By using this method, the relational question information related to the item (or item) having the incorrect answer or the evaluation score is not received, and the relational items to be provided to the trainee terminal 4300 are used.

When the answer prepared by the trainee is provided to the question-making system 3000, the question-making system 3000 provides the answer to the reading system 3100, and the reading system 3100 determines whether the answer is correct or incorrect. Is determined. For example, when the trainee inputs the answer directly through the trainee terminal 4300, the corresponding answer information is provided to the reading system 3100 to determine whether the answer is correct or incorrect. Or, if the trainee has written an answer using a writing instrument on the test paper, the scanned image scanned by the test paper is provided to the reading system 3100, and the reading system 3100 is provided with the writing instrument on a predetermined position of the test paper. It detects whether the information is written, and also detects the answer written by the trainee using the detected description of the writing implement, and determines whether the answer is correct or incorrect.

When the scoring result of the answer performed by the reading system 3100 is provided to the question-making system 3000, the question-making system 3000 performs various procedures thereafter using the scoring result. For example, the grade processing unit 3030 performs a processing operation such as calculating a grade of the trainee using the scoring result. In addition, the result analysis unit 3040 analyzes the learning evaluation result of the trainee using the scoring result of the reading system 3100 and / or the grade calculation result of the grade processing unit 3030. For example, when constructing an item, refer to various information related to the item (grade information, subject and subject page information, difficulty information, etc.) and use the scoring result and / or grade calculation result, so that the subject or the subject is vulnerable. Analyze the field.

The item / item information providing unit 3020 configures relational items to be provided to the trainee using the analysis result. For example, if an incorrect answer is written in a predetermined question or if it is determined that prior learning is required for the question, information indicating the question is provided to the relationship key management system 2000. Relationship keys related to the item are retrieved from the relationship key database 2100, and the relationship key information is provided to the problem management system 1000. Accordingly, one or more problems related to the question in which the incorrect answer is written are searched in the problem database 1100, and the searched problems are provided to the problem question system 3000. The item / item information providing unit 3020 configures such relational items and provides them to the trainee terminal 4300, so that the relational item evaluation is performed for each trainee, and the learning ability improvement effect is optimized for each trainee. To lose.

In reconstructing relational items, as described above, the relation key setting of each problem may be set in various forms. For example, when evaluating the learning of a predetermined subject, the same or low-level relational questions may be automatically repeated for each item in which an incorrect answer is generated. In addition, when a plurality of questions are asked in a predetermined field of the subject, the result of learning about the items in the same field is evaluated, and when the evaluation is insufficient, the same field as the field and an incorrect answer are generated. You can search for one or more relational items related to the items and have them automatically repeat. In addition, similarly, the learning result of the subject may be evaluated, and if the evaluation is insufficient, the relational questions about the same subject at the lower grade level may be automatically repeated regardless of the grade of the trainee.

On the other hand, the database unit 3050 in the problem questions system 3000 of the components shown in Figure 1 may be stored in a database of various information related to the learning of the trainee. For example, information about the trainees to be learned, and the result information of the learning evaluation may be stored in the database unit 3050, and in operating the learning evaluation and learning ability improvement system for the trainee, the database unit ( Various information stored in 3050 may be used. In addition, the item / item information providing unit 3020 not only configures and provides the above-described items for evaluating the learning and relational items for improving the learning ability, but also includes information on problem solving of a predetermined item for the trainee. You can provide more item information.

In addition, in FIG. 1, the problem questions system 3000 and the reading system 3100 are illustrated to have different configurations, but embodiments of the present disclosure are not necessarily limited thereto. Various functions performed in the reading system 3100, for example, a function of determining whether an answer is correct or incorrect by using an answer written by the trainee, and detecting a writing implement answer written by the trainee directly on the test paper, The function of determining whether or not an incorrect answer may be implemented together in the question-making system 3000.

2 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the problem management system of FIG. 1. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the problem management system 1000 may include an image reception processor 1010, a text processing unit 1020, and a problem DB management unit 1030. The problem management system 1000 receives a scan document describing problems or receives problems directly input by an educator through a network. In addition, the problem management system 1000 may be connected to the problem database 1100 to manage storing problems in the problem database 1100, or to manage the problems stored in the problem database 1100 through the network to the problem question system 3000. Manage what you provide.

The image receiving processor 1010 inputs a scanned document transmitted through a network. In addition, the text processing unit 1020 extracts problems from the input scanned document. The image data is text-processed by the text processing unit 1020, and the problem DB management unit 1030 stores the text-processed problems or problems directly input by the educator in the problem database 1100.

3 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the relationship key management system of FIG. 1. As shown in FIG. 3, the relationship key management system 2000 may include a problem DB search unit 2010, a relationship key search unit 2020, and a relationship key registration unit 2030. The relation key management system 2000 manages to store relation key information in the relation key database 2100 by connecting to the relation key database 2100 or to solve relation key information stored in the relation key database 2100 via a network. It manages what is provided to the question system 3000 and the problem management system 1000. FIG.

The educator reviews the problems stored in the problem database 1100 and registers the relationship key values in the relationship key database 2100 through the relationship key management system 2000. The problem DB search unit 2010 searches and displays the problem or problem information stored in the problem database 1100 to the educator. The educator identifies the problems and enters information for registering the relationship key in response to each problem. The relationship key registration unit 2030 receives registration information input by the educator, and registers the relationship key in the relationship key database 2100 using the registration information. For example, each question may have a key value indicating a subject, a field or page within the subject, a difficulty level, and the like, and a relationship key value indicating a degree of relevance between a plurality of questions is set and stored in the relationship key database 2100. do. Accordingly, when an incorrect answer occurs in a predetermined item, a relation key value related to the item, for example, a relation key value representing a relational item corresponding to a previous difficulty level in the same subject and field is stored.

The relation key search unit 2020 searches for the relation key value corresponding to the relation key database 2100 in the relation key database 2100 by using predetermined item information input through the network and provides the same. For example, according to the learning evaluation analysis result for the trainee, when repetitive learning is required for some items, information related to the item is provided to the relationship key search unit 2020. The relation key search unit 2020 searches for the relation key related thereto using the information related to the corresponding item in the relation key database 2100 and provides it. The retrieved relationship key may be provided to the problem management system 1000. When the relationship key is provided to the problem management system 1000, relational items are searched from the problem database 1100 according to the information of the relationship key, and the retrieved problems are provided to the problem question system 3000. The question-making system 3000 constructs a relational question using the searched problems and provides the same to the trainee so that the repetitive learning is performed.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of the item / item information providing unit of FIG. 1. As illustrated in FIG. 4, the item / item information providing unit 3020 includes a search managing unit 3021, an item question processing unit 3022, an item information providing unit 3023, a relational item question processing unit 3024, and an analysis result receiving unit. 3025.

The retrieval management unit 3021 manages the retrieval of problems or relationship key information by connecting to the problem management system 1000 and the relationship key management system 2000 of FIG. For example, when information on a grade of a trainee, information on a subject of learning evaluation, and the like are received, the search managing unit 3021 may access the problem management system 1000 and search for problems for learning evaluation using the above information. As a result, it receives a number of problems.

The item question processing unit 3022 reconstructs the searched questions and performs a processing operation for causing a question for learning evaluation to be asked. For example, a predetermined number of questions should be presented to the trainee for the evaluation of learning, and a question is composed of the set number of questions found in the problem database 1100 and presented to the trainee. In addition, the item information providing unit 3023, when completing the answer of the trainee according to the learning evaluation is completed, and provides the information to the trainee, such as information on the answer of each item in scoring the corresponding answer. Also, the relational item question processing unit 3024 processes an operation of generating a relational item based on a result of analyzing a trainee's learning evaluation. The analysis result receiving unit 3025 may grade the answer of the above-mentioned trainee and receive the analysis result and provide it to the relational item question processing unit 3024. Based on the received analysis result, the relational item question processing unit 3024 allows the relational items optimized for the learner and the trainee to be searched, and provides the learner with the relational item by reconstructing the searched problems.

On the other hand, according to an embodiment of the present invention, while providing an optimized learning ability improvement service for the trainees through the relational questions as described above, provides a reading system for the educator or trainees for the procedural convenience of learning evaluation. Referring to the specific operation of the reading system provided in the learning ability improving system 100 of the present invention.

As described above, the operation of performing the learning evaluation according to an embodiment of the present invention, the trainee can solve the questions displayed on the terminal and input the answers directly, or print the questions provided to the trainee and the general test method In the same way, you can write your answers on the test paper using writing instruments. In the method of writing the answer on the test paper, in the case of multiple-choice questions, you can mark the answer by marking one of the numbers of the multiple views, or write the numerical answer directly in the brackets printed next to each question. It can be described. In the embodiment of the present invention, by supporting the various forms of answer writing method as described above, it provides procedural convenience in writing and scoring answers of educators or trainees.

FIG. 5A illustrates an example of a test sheet on which the answer reading is to be performed in the reading system 3100 of FIG. 1, and FIG. 5B illustrates an example of a test sheet on which the answer sheet is completed by the trainee on the designed test sheet. First, the operation related to the design of the test paper will be described.

The reading system 3100 may perform a function for designing a test sheet. As shown in Fig. 5A, the items set the positions of a plurality of pieces of information used for scoring the answers on the scanned image of the printed test paper. For example, a position where the examinee information is printed on the scanned image is set, and the position may be an area having a predetermined horizontal / vertical size. The set location (or area) may be stored in the reading system 3100, and the information of the trainee who filled in the test paper is checked by detecting and analyzing the stored location (or area) when performing scoring on the test paper. Can be.

The test paper can be divided into the area in which the items requiring the written answer and the area in which the non-answer information is printed. The position designated by the number 1 of FIG. 5A is an area indicating the start and end of the test paper, and the design of the test paper is set by placing a cursor at a starting point pre-printed on the test paper and drawing a rectangle, and by placing a cursor at the end point and drawing a rectangle. Can be. Information relating to the x, y coordinate values of the set rectangle and the size of the width / length is stored in the reading system 3100. The reason for setting the start / end position as described above is to detect the information by correcting such an error value since the positions of the answer and non-answer information on the scanned image are also inclined when the test paper is tilted and scanned.

In addition, the position (or area) designated by the number 2 in FIG. 5A is set to determine the characteristics of the writing implement for the student to write an answer on the actual test paper. The writing instrument display position is set by placing the cursor at the writing instrument display position on the test paper and drawing a rectangle. Information relating to the x and y coordinate values of the quadrangle and the size of the horizontal and vertical is stored in the reading system 3100. The trainee marks the test using a writing instrument for writing an answer on the test sheet. The characteristics of the writing implement may be detected as various elements when scoring the test strip, and for example, information related to the color or thickness of the writing implement may be detected and used for scoring the test strip.

Meanwhile, the position designated by the number 3 of FIG. 5A is an area for inputting the information of the trainee, and may also be set by drawing a rectangle by placing a cursor at a position of an input field of examinee information on a test paper. The examinee's information may include name and examinee's number. Information relating to the x and y coordinate values of the square of the set position and the size of the horizontal and vertical is stored in the reading system 3100. The position designated by the number 3 may be blinded (for example, by treating the position designated by the number 3 in black) so that the grader cannot check the information of the subject during the subsequent subjective scoring, and there is a possibility of a negative test that may occur if Decreases.

Similarly, the person designing the test paper sets the position of various non-answer information and answer information by placing a cursor in the corresponding column and drawing a rectangle. For example, the position designated by the number 4 in FIG. 5A is an area including information related to the background and mark color values, and is set by placing a cursor at a position where the background and mark are already printed and drawing a rectangle. In the case of the background and the mark column, color information of the mark having the background color of the test paper and the color of the basic writing implement (for example, black) is included. In addition to the numerical writing method or item selection method based on the comparison of writing tool characteristics, the answer can be written and checked by simply marking the selected item as a basic writing tool, and in this case, the color of the background and mark displayed in the background and mark columns. You can use the information to verify your answers.

In addition, the position designated by the number 5 in FIG. 5A is an area including information for page division when the test paper has several sheets, and is set by placing a cursor in a corresponding column and drawing a rectangle. In addition, the position designated by the number 6 of FIG. 5A is an area for writing the answers of the multiple-choice questions numerically, and is set by placing a cursor in the corresponding column and drawing a rectangle. In addition, the position designated by the number 7 of FIG. 5A is an area for writing the answer of the multiple-choice item by item selection, and is set by placing a cursor in the corresponding column and drawing a rectangle.

The area defined by the numbers 4 to 7 as described above may also be set by the person designing the test paper by drawing a rectangle, and information related to the x and y coordinate values and the size of the width and length of each area may be read. Stored in 3100. In addition, the locations of the various answer information and the non-answer information as described above may be variously set by the person designing the test paper. In addition, the size of the region corresponding to each position may also be set differently by the square set by the person designing the test paper.

On the other hand, the test paper that the answer is completed by the trainee as shown in Figure 5b. 5B illustrates an example in which an answer of a multiple-choice question is written in a numerical manner.

After completing the answer sheet, the test sheet is scanned and provided to the reading system 3100. First, the reading system 3100 confirms the test sheet start / end position with reference to information stored by the positioning operation in the test sheet design. That is, the position of the scanned image is searched using the start / end position information previously stored in the reading system 3100, and the start and end positions of the scanned image are identified by detecting the start point and the end point in the position (or region). do. If the start point and / or the end point are not detected at the corresponding position, the start point and the end point may be detected by enlarging the area to be detected.

According to the detection operation as described above, the positions of the start point and the end point may be checked. When the test sheet is printed incorrectly or the scanning operation is performed incorrectly, the start point and / or the end point may not be detected. If it is impossible to check the starting point and the end point, the corresponding scan image may be designated as an error image, and the error image may be separately stored. In addition, even when the horizontal / vertical error range exceeds a predetermined threshold, the corresponding scan image can be designated as an error image.

When the position of the start point and the end point is confirmed, the reading system 3100 checks whether an error has occurred in the position of the identified start point and the end point, and then corrects by the error value in confirming the positions of other non-answer information and answer information. Do this. If no error occurs, the locations of the non-answer information and the answer information are checked without a separate correction procedure.

In addition, the reading system 3100 checks the writing implement characteristics, the information of the trainee, the page information, and the selection / number writing mode as non-answer information. The writing implements characteristic detects the writing implements present at the corresponding position using the writing instrument display position information previously stored in the reading system 3100. For example, the trainee performs writing tool display on the writing instrument display field and may be displayed by drawing a short solid line so that the characteristic of the writing instrument is displayed well as shown in FIG. 5B.

When the writing implements display is detected, the reading system 3100 confirms the characteristics of the writing implements from the detected writing implements display. The writing instrument may be identified by identifying one or more physical properties, and one or more properties may be detected. For example, a characteristic such as color and thickness of the writing instrument displayed at the corresponding position is detected and the detected result is stored in the reading system 3100. The characteristics of the writing implement as described above are then used to ensure that the scoring of the answer is performed only when the writing implement of the answer written by the actual trainee is the same or more than a certain ratio similar to the checked writing implement.

Meanwhile, the checking of the trainee information and the page information may also be performed using previously stored location information on the scanned image. Using the location information, the information of the trainees described in the corresponding column is confirmed, and the scoring results of the test paper are registered as the grades of the trainees. In addition, in performing scoring, the correct answer and the wrong answer are determined by checking the corresponding page information and comparing the detected answer with the best answer of the corresponding page. On the other hand, the view selection and the number entry mode may be preset by the user, and it is determined whether to perform the answer detection in the view selection mode or the number entry mode according to the mode setting.

The reading system 3100 performs scoring on the test paper when the error value correction, the confirmation of various information, and the answer writing mode are performed according to the above procedure. In addition, the scoring result may be provided to the question-making system 3000 of FIG. 1. Along with the scoring result, a scanned image or an error image of the completed test paper may also be transmitted to the problem-producing system 3000. If the scanned image is an error image, if the grader manually scores the test paper and inputs a score, the manually inputted scoring result may be transmitted to the question-making system 3000.

6 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a reading system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 6, the reading system 3100 includes a control unit 3110, a scan image receiving unit 3120, a mode setting unit 3130, a design managing unit 3140, a reading managing unit 3150, and a database unit 3160. ) May be included. In addition, the read management unit 3150 may include an information processing unit 151 and an answer processing unit 152.

The controller 3110 controls the overall operation of the reading system 3100. Various functional blocks illustrated in FIG. 6 may operate under the control of the controller 3110. The scan image receiver 3120 receives a scan image scanned by the test paper. The received scan image is stored in the database unit 3160, and the scan image is provided to the read management unit 3150 to perform scoring. The mode setting unit 3130 sets whether to perform answer writing and grading on the test paper by the numerical writing method or the item selection method.

The design manager 3140 manages the overall operation related to the test sheet design. For example, when the test paper design mode is selected by the person designing the test paper, the design manager 3140 receives various information related to the design and uses the test paper to design the test paper. When the location of various pieces of non-answer information and answer information is set by the person designing the test paper, the design management unit 3140 stores the set location information in the database unit 3160.

On the other hand, the read management unit 3150 performs various read operations related to scoring of the test paper. When the scanned image of the test sheet on which the answer is written is received by the scan image receiving unit 3120, the read managing unit 3150 performs a scoring operation by performing various processing operations using the received scan image.

The information processing unit 3151 performs a processing operation of various kinds of information related to the answer and non-answer information. For example, the location on the scan image is detected using various location information stored in the database unit 3160, and the various information is confirmed from the detected location. Accordingly, the start position and the end position of the scanned image are checked, the characteristics of the writing implement, the student information / page information, and the optional answer or the numerical answer are checked according to the answer writing method. In addition, the information processing unit 3151 confirms the start position and the end position of the test paper, and according to the result of the check, the scanned image is separately stored in the database unit 3160 as an error image, or the error value in confirming various kinds of information. By correcting and detecting the position, the various information can be accurately confirmed.

The answer processing unit 3152 performs an answer processing operation such as scoring by using the answer detected in the scanned image. For example, the selected answer or the numeric answer detected as the answer in the scanned image is received, and the answer is checked using the received selection position or the numeric information. In addition, when performing answer writing and scoring in the numerical writing mode, the numerical judgment information may be further received in checking the answer. That is, in order to check whether the number entered by the trainee corresponds to any of the numbers 0 to 9, additional information is received as a reference for determining the number, and the received numerical answer is one of the numbers 0 to 9; Check which one is true. If the position of the selected answer or the number of the answer is identified by the trainee, the score is used to generate the scoring result.

7A and 7B are block diagrams illustrating an exemplary embodiment of the read management unit of FIG. 6. FIG. 7A illustrates an embodiment of the information processing unit 3151, and FIG. 7B illustrates an embodiment of the answer processing unit 3152.

As shown in FIG. 7A, the information processor 3151 includes a location information receiver 3210, a location detector 3220, an error value corrector 3230, an image storage manager 3240, and an information checker 3250. can do. Also, the information checking unit 3250 includes a start / end position checking unit 3151, a writing tool checking unit 3252, a student information checking unit 3253, a page information checking unit 3254, and an optional answer / numeric answer detecting unit ( 3255).

The location information receiver 3210 receives location information of various items set in the process of designing the test paper. The position detector 3220 detects a position on the scan image by using the position information. The information checking unit 3250 checks or detects various pieces of information on the detected position of the scan image. As described above, the start / end position of the test paper, the writing instrument characteristic, the student information / page information, the position / answer number of the selected answer, etc. may be confirmed or detected. The error value corrector 3230 performs an error value correcting operation in response to the result of confirming the start / end position. In addition, the image storage management unit 3240 manages the operation of storing the scanned image in the database, for example, when a start position or an end position is not detected according to a result of checking a start / end position, or a detected start / end position If exceeds a predetermined threshold value, the scanned image may be separately stored in another folder in the database unit as an error image.

The start / end position checking unit 3251 of the information checking unit 3250 checks whether a starting point or an ending point exists on the position detected by the position detecting unit 3220. In addition, the start / end position checking unit 3251 generates information related to a result of checking whether a start point or an end point exists, and an error value of the start point or the end point. The writing implement checking unit 3252 detects an indication written in the corresponding position using the position information of the writing implement display column and confirms the characteristic of the writing implement using the detected display. If the subject is to use the writing implement to be used in the corresponding column, the characteristic of the writing instrument (eg, the color and / or thickness of the writing instrument) is confirmed. In addition, basic information necessary for scoring the test sheet is confirmed. For example, the trainee information confirming unit 3253 confirms the trainee information described in the trainee information field by using the position information from the position detector 3220, and checks the page information checker ( 3254 identifies information indicating the number of test strips printed on one side of the test strip. The identified information may be used later in the scoring process.

Meanwhile, the selection answer / numeric answer detection unit 3255 detects the position of a selected view among a plurality of views according to the answer writing mode, or detects the numerical answer written in the corresponding answer field when the number writing method is used. For example, when the answer is written in accordance with the item selection method, the selection answer / numeric answer detection unit 3255 detects the position of the figure or symbol displayed as the answer and generates the detection result. Or, in the case of filling in the answer in accordance with the number entry method, the optional answer / numeric answer detection unit 3255 determines whether or not the number is written in the answer box, along with the information (eg, information indicating the form of the number) in the answer box. Will occur).

On the other hand, as shown in Figure 7b, the answer processing unit 3152 is a selective answer / numeric answer receiving unit 3310, numeric determination information receiving unit 3320, answer check unit 3330, scoring performing unit 3340 and the trainee information The display blocking unit 3350 may be included. The selection answer / numeric answer receiver 3310 receives the selection answer / numeric answer information detected by the information processing unit 3151. In addition, when the answer is written according to the number writing method, the number judgment information receiving unit 3320 receives various kinds of information for checking whether the number written by the trainee as the answer is any of 0 to 9. For example, in the reading system 3100 of FIG. 6, numeric judgment information for identifying a number is stored in a database, and when the scoring is performed by the numeric writing mode, the stored numeric judgment information is sent to the numeric judgment information receiver 3320. Is provided.

The answer check unit 3330 receives the selected answer / numeric answer information to check the answer. For example, in the item selection mode, the answer check unit 3330 checks which of the plurality of view items the answer is using the location information such as a figure or a symbol displayed as the answer. Alternatively, in the number entry mode, the numerical answer information written by the trainee and the previously stored numerical judgment information are received, and the number of the answer written by the trainee is checked. A detailed method of checking the number will be described later. The scoring unit 3340 compares the detected answer with the best answer and performs scoring on the test paper.

8A, B, C, and D are tables showing an example of confirming a numerical answer in a reading system. 8A illustrates an example of confirming numbers 0 to 2, FIG. 8B illustrates an example of confirming numbers 3 to 6, and FIG. 8C illustrates an example of confirming numbers 7 to 9. FIG. 9 is a table showing another example of a method for confirming a numerical answer.

Numerical judgment information as shown in Figs. 8A, B, and C may be pre-stored in the reading system 3100 of Fig. 6, and the numerical answer and the numerical judgment information detected as answers in the reading system 3100 may be stored in each other. By comparison, it is possible to check what number the numerical answer is. When confirming the number according to an embodiment of the present invention, the number of answers can be confirmed by analyzing the structural pattern of the number. Analyzing the structural pattern of numbers may be performed by detecting the inflection point of the detected answer number, the horizontal / vertical line form, the presence of a continuous point, and the like, and also using the virtual baseline, the numerical answer associated with the baseline. This can be done by analyzing the form of.

As shown in Fig. 8A, in confirming the number 0, the shape of the detected numerical answer is one point or two or more consecutive points at the starting vertex, and one point or two at the bottom is the same as the starting vertex. Detect if there are more than one consecutive points. It also detects whether there are two lines falling down from the start vertex (which may include vertical lines, oblique lines, curved lines, etc.). When the above condition is satisfied, the corresponding numerical answer is checked as "0".

On the other hand, when the shape of the numerical answer is detected as one line falling downward without an inflection point or an oblique line down the left or right direction, the corresponding numerical answer is checked as "1". In addition, in confirming the number "2", the parabola moves from the upper left to the right and detects whether an inflection point exists from the upper right end to the lower left direction and whether an oblique line occurs in the lower direction. Also, it is detected whether a horizontal line has occurred from the bottom left end to the right side.

On the other hand, some or all of the numbers from 0 to 9 may be further confirmed using a baseline to further examine whether the detection operation is correctly performed, in addition to the above detection operation. For example, in order to examine whether a diagonal line has occurred downward from the inflection point, it is detected whether the coordinate value decreases downward based on the left reference line. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "2" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

On the other hand, Figure 8b is an example of confirming the numbers of 3 to 6 is shown, it detects whether an inflection point occurs in the lower left direction from the upper right end moving in a parabola from the upper left to the right. In addition, oblique lines are generated in the downward direction, and the same is repeated at the intermediate position to detect whether parabola is generated from left to right, and also whether diagonal lines are generated after the inflection point is generated. On the other hand, in the detection using the reference line, it is detected whether the coordinate value decreases after decreasing and then decreases again on the basis of the left reference line. With reference to the detection result as described above, if the corresponding condition is satisfied, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "3".

On the other hand, in confirming the number "4", it is detected whether there is a horizontal line at an intermediate position, and whether there are two lines falling downward from the upper direction of the horizontal line toward the horizontal line. It also detects if there is one row falling below it from the horizon and if one row below the horizon aligns with the second row above the horizon. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "4" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

On the other hand, in confirming the number "5", it is detected whether there is a horizontal line at the top position and a line falling in the downward direction. Also, an inflection point occurs after moving from left to right, and it is detected whether an oblique line occurs downward after the inflection point is generated. In addition, when detecting using the reference line, it is detected whether the coordinate value maintains a constant value in the downward direction based on the left reference line and decreases after increasing. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "5" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

On the other hand, in confirming the number "6", it detects whether there exist two lines falling downward at an end without an inflection point and falling downward, and also whether there is a single point or two or more consecutive points at the bottom. do. With reference to the detection result as described above, if the corresponding condition is satisfied, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "6".

Meanwhile, an example of confirming the numbers 7 to 9 is shown in FIG. 8C, and in checking the number "7", it is detected whether a horizontal line exists from the upper left to the right. Also, it is detected whether a long diagonal line occurs in the downward direction from the upper right end, and whether a short diagonal line occurs in the downward direction from the upper left end. Further, upon detection using the reference line, it is detected whether the coordinate value maintains a constant value in the downward direction based on the left reference line. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "7" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

On the other hand, in identifying the number " 8 ", it is detected whether there is one point or two or more consecutive points at the starting vertex and whether there are two lines falling downward from the starting vertex. In addition, it is detected whether there is one point or two or more consecutive points in the middle and again there are two lines falling downward from the middle point. In addition, it detects whether there is a single point or two or more consecutive points at the bottom as the starting vertex. In addition, when detecting using the reference line, it is detected whether the coordinate value increases and decreases downward based on the left reference line. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "8" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

On the other hand, in confirming the number "9", it is detected whether there is one point or two or more consecutive points at the start vertex, and whether there are two lines falling downward from the start vertex. It also detects whether a long diagonal line occurs from the middle to the downward direction. With reference to the detection result as described above, it is confirmed that the numerical answer is "9" when the corresponding condition is satisfied.

As described above in FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C, one or more conditions need to be satisfied in confirming each number. For example, in confirming any number, when all of a plurality of conditions are satisfied, the number can be accurately confirmed. On the other hand, at least one condition may not be satisfied in checking the number. For example, the form of writing the numbers may be different for each trainee, and some conditions may not be detected correctly depending on the characteristics of the writing implement. Accordingly, in confirming each number, it is not necessary to confirm that the number must meet all the conditions. For example, by weighting a plurality of conditions for identifying each number, the accuracy is calculated according to whether each condition is satisfied, and if the calculated accuracy exceeds a predetermined threshold, the numerical answer is given. It can be confirmed as a number satisfying a condition exceeding the threshold.

On the other hand, as the fonts of the trainees may be different, the answer may not be confirmed by the structural pattern analysis of the above-described numbers. In this case, the reconfirmation procedure for the answer may be performed. In the reconfirmation procedure, the corresponding numerical answer may be confirmed by analyzing other conditions. Numerical determination information for the reconfirmation procedure may also be stored in a database in the reading system of the present application.

As shown in the table of FIG. 8D, each number can be confirmed by comparing the number, location, and distance between the points indicated on the plurality of lines, and also as shown in FIG. 8D. You can check the number by analyzing the distribution of the points of the subsequent lines.

First, the number of points of the first line is detected, and different values are applied to the corresponding line according to the detection result. For example, if one point is detected in the first line, a is applied, if two points are detected, c is applied, and if three or more points are detected, e is applied.

Then, the number of points of each line, the position of the point and the distance between the points from the second line to the end line are analyzed. First, the number of points of the current line is compared with the number of points of the upper line. If the number of points on the current line and the number of points on the upper line are different from each other, if the number of points on the current line is one, a is applied to the current line, and if the number of points on the current line is two, c is applied. If the number of points on the current line is three or more, e is applied to the current line.

In addition, when the number of points of the current line and the number of points of the upper line are the same, if the points of the current line are one, the position value of the point of the current line and the position value of the point of the upper line are compared with each other. As a result of the comparison, if the point on the upper line is greater than or equal to the position value of the point on the current line, a is applied to the current line. If the point on the upper line is smaller than the position value of the point on the current line, b is applied to the current line. .

In addition, if the number of points on the current line and the number of points on the upper line are the same and two points on the current line, the distance value of the two points on the current line and the two points on the upper line are calculated and compared with each other. . As a result of comparison, if the distance value of the upper line is greater than or equal to the distance value of the current line, c is applied to the current line. If the distance value of the upper line is smaller than the distance value of the current line, d is applied to the current line. .

According to the above analysis result, values applied to each line are detected corresponding to one number. For example, one numerical answer consists of points distributed over ten lines, and a pattern of applied values for each of the ten lines is detected. The number of the detected application value may be checked with reference to information previously stored in a database. For example, each of the numbers 0 to 9 may have a plurality of patterns of application values, and according to the result of analyzing the numerical answer, it is checked whether the pattern of the application values detected belongs to any of the numbers of 0 to 9. You can check the corresponding numerical answers.

In addition to the analysis method shown in FIG. 8D, various other factors may be used to identify the numbers. For example, if three or more points are detected in succession at least two lines, this actually represents one horizontal line. That is, when the answer is displayed with a writing instrument with a thick thickness, three or more points may be detected in succession over a plurality of lines when a horizontal line is written. In this case, the operation of giving an application value to the current line can be omitted. In addition, when a large number is entered, the same applied value can be detected equally over a plurality of lines. In this case, an operation of applying an application value to some of the lines may be omitted. For example, when the application value is repeated four or more times, the operation of applying an application value to the corresponding line may be omitted.

9 is a flowchart illustrating an example of a method of operating a learning ability improving system according to an embodiment of the present invention. As an example, FIG. 9 illustrates an operation method of storing and storing various problems, problem information, and relationship keys representing a relationship between each problem.

First, information including various problems for learning evaluation and problem solving corresponding to each problem is supplied to the system (S11). The information may be provided in the form of a scanned image, or may be provided in the form of an educator inputting each problem or its information through a corresponding terminal.

Then, it is determined whether the above information is input as a computerized character (S12). As a result of the determination, when the problems are provided in a form other than the computerized character (for example, in the form of a scanned image), the problem is extracted by performing a texting operation therefrom (S13). For example, when the input information is a scan image, a texting operation is performed from the scanning image.

When a problem for learning evaluation is provided in various forms as described above, the problem is stored in a problem database (S14). The operation of storing the database by storing the problems may be performed by the problem management system 1000 of FIG. 1. In addition, if the problems are stored, problems databased by the educator are identified, and a relationship key is registered based on the correlation of the identified problems. The registered relationship key information is stored in the relationship key database (S15).

10 is a flowchart illustrating another example of a method of operating a learning ability improving system according to an embodiment of the present invention.

A trainee can access his / her question (3000) in FIG. 1 to input his information (trainee information), and enter a subject or field of a subject for which learning is to be evaluated. The database is searched to construct an item for learning evaluation, and the question is processed (S21). The above-configured questions are provided to the trainee, and the trainee selects whether the answer of the question is directly input through the terminal or the answer sheet is written on the test paper using a writing tool through the test paper output (S12). .

When the answer is directly input through the terminal, the learning ability improvement system receives the answer input by the trainee (S23). On the other hand, when the answer is written through the test sheet, the trainee scans the completed test sheet and provides the scanned image to the learning improvement system through the network. The learning ability improvement system receives the scanned image (S24), and detects the answer described by the trainee through the above-described answer detection method for the received scanned image (S25).

As the answer is detected, the answer scoring operation according to the above-described reading system is performed, and the answer result of analyzing the answer evaluation result of the learner's learning evaluation is analyzed according to the scoring operation (S26). In addition, as the answers are scored, item information such as information on solving the corresponding item may be provided (S27). The item information may be provided at the same time as the grading, or may be provided when the learner makes a choice.

Based on analyzing the result of the answer, it is determined whether to provide a learning ability improvement service through a relational question for the trainee. For example, a relational question of each item in which an incorrect answer occurs may be questioned according to whether a correct answer or a wrong answer is given to each item generated in a predetermined subject. Alternatively, when an evaluation result of a predetermined field is analyzed among the subjects, and the evaluation result does not reach a predetermined score, a relational question related to the predetermined field may be asked. Alternatively, if the overall evaluation result of the subject does not reach a predetermined score, a relational question related to the subject may be asked. In other words, the result of analyzing the learning evaluation is analyzed to determine whether the evaluation result is less than a predetermined reference value (S28), and if not, the evaluation is completed without the question of relational questions (S29).

On the other hand, if the evaluation result is insufficient, the relationship key information stored in the relationship key database 2100 is searched and analyzed through the relationship key management system 2000 of FIG. The relational question is processed (S31). As a relational question is asked, it is determined whether the answer item is input through the terminal or the answer sheet is written by the writing paper. In addition, other relational item question processing operations, such as answer reception, answer result analysis, and evaluation result, may be repeatedly performed.

While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the true scope of the present invention should be determined by the technical idea of the appended claims.

Claims (5)

Searching for problems stored in the problem database, and processing a first question consisting of one or more questions;
Receiving an answer to the question from the trainee;
Scoring the received answer and analyzing a scoring result;
Determining whether to ask a relational question according to a result of analyzing the scoring result;
Retrieving relationship key information stored in a relationship key database according to the determination result;
Retrieving relational items stored in the problem database using the retrieved relationship key information; And
And processing a second question consisting of one or more relational questions by using the search result. The method of claim 1,
The answer to the question is received directly by the trainee through the terminal, or received as a scanned image scanning the answer written through a writing implement,
And when the answer is received as the scan image, detecting numerical information of the answer detected in the scan image. The method of claim 1,
Determining whether or not to ask the relational question, comprising the step of determining whether there is an item that has an incorrect answer among the first item,
And a relational question related to each other through the question in which the wrong answer has occurred and the relation key information as the second question. A computer-readable storage medium having recorded thereon a program code for performing the method of operating the system of claim 1. A problem management system that manages storing and retrieving a plurality of problems in a problem database for learning assessment for a trainee;
A relationship key management system for managing storing and retrieving relationship key values in the relationship key database indicative of associations between the plurality of problems;
Access the problem management system and the relationship key management system through a network, answer a first question consisting of one or more of the questions stored in the problem database, and receive and grade answers to the questions from the trainee. And analyzing a scoring result, and determining whether to ask a relational item according to the result of analyzing the scoring result, and using the relation key information retrieved from the relation key database according to the determination result. And a question questioning system for questioning a second question consisting of one or more relational questions.

Images