KR100926184B1 - Method for Estimating the Human Body Effects for Magnetic Fields with Harmonics - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a human influence of magnetic fields including harmonics, comprising: measuring an effective value (Brms) of a magnetic field from a magnetic field source; And calculating a harmonic component included in the magnetic field and evaluating a current density induced in the human body from the magnetic field source in consideration of the calculated harmonic component, wherein evaluating the current density includes: Calculating a fundamental wave coverage ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for the magnetic field of; Calculating a sum of harmonics to an effective value ratio (B _T / Brms); Calculating a sum of the harmonics (B _T); And calculating a contribution constant (K).

According to the present invention, the effect of harmonic components on the human body can be evaluated with a slight error only by the effective value of the magnetic field measured in the field without having expensive equipment for measuring the waveform and analyzing the frequency.

Magnetic field, human body influence, fundamental wave, harmonic, rms value

Description

Method for Estimating the Human Body Effects for Magnetic Fields with Harmonics}

The present invention relates to a method for evaluating human impact of a magnetic field including harmonics, and more particularly, using an estimation formula considering a human influence contribution constant for each harmonic generation characteristic. The present invention relates to a human body influence evaluation method of a magnetic field containing harmonics capable of accurately evaluating a human body's exposure criteria or a current density induced in the human body to a magnetic field containing a harmonic component generated from an electric device.

With the development of power electronic technology, power conversion devices using semiconductor devices have been introduced from industrial devices to home appliances, and the magnetic fields generated in most electric devices contain many harmonics. .

Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a 'Precautionary Policy' based on Prudent Avoidance, and the issue of the human body impact assessment by the electromagnetic field has been highlighted as an issue in Korea.

Although the epidemiological studies of the effects of the electromagnetic field on human body are inconsistent, it may be controversial, but it has reached a level where the extremely low frequency electromagnetic field is a risk factor for human health. In addition, the demand for a pleasant living environment is rapidly increasing due to the increase of national income and the improvement of environmental awareness.Environmental technology for the convenience and comfort of energy service has emerged as an important social task. It is urgent to secure technological competitiveness through

Public exposure criteria for the magnetic field are classified by frequency as shown in FIG. 1. In FIG. 1, when the domestic commercial power supply frequency is 60 Hz, the reference value is 833 mG, and the harmfulness of the electric equipment is evaluated by examining whether the measured value at the measurement point defined for the magnetic field source corresponds to 833 mG.

However, even when the effective values of the magnetic fields are similar, the effective values of the magnetic fields are different according to the degree of inclusion of harmonic components, as shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, and their effects on the human body may also be very different. FIG. 2A illustrates a case where there are few harmonic components and FIG. 2B illustrates a case where many harmonic components are present. The current density induced in the human body by the magnetic field is not only the effective value of the harmonics included in the magnetic field, but also the distribution of harmonic components by frequency. It depends on the ratio.

The current density evaluation induced in the human body in the prior art mostly ignores the influence of the above-mentioned harmonic components and evaluates only the individual magnetic field exposure reference value and the current density induced in the human body. That is, most of the magnetic measuring instruments have a problem that a significant error occurs in the actual electrical equipment that generates harmonic magnetic fields because it is impossible to reflect the harmonic content ratio by measuring only the effective value in the measurement frequency band in the evaluation.

In addition, the method of measuring the waveform of the magnetic field in order to consider the harmonic components and performing the frequency analysis of the waveform has a problem that requires expensive equipment and consumes a lot of time or effort.

The problem to be solved by the present invention is to solve the above problems, it is possible to accurately determine the effect of harmonic components on the human body only by the effective value of the magnetic field measured in the field without having expensive equipment for measuring the frequency by measuring the waveform It is to provide a method for evaluating the human impact of a magnetic field containing harmonics that can be evaluated.

Another problem to be solved by the present invention is to solve the above problems, it is useful for electromagnetic field investigation and research to deal with human body problems caused by the magnetic field including harmonics of the electromagnetic problems, domestic electric magnetic field does not consider harmonic components It is to provide a method for assessing the human impact of magnetic fields containing harmonics that can be used to revise human exposure standards.

The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a human influence of magnetic fields including harmonics, comprising: measuring an effective value (Brms) of a magnetic field from a magnetic field source; And calculating a harmonic component included in the magnetic field and evaluating a human influence of the magnetic field source in consideration of the calculated harmonic component.

Preferably, the human body impact evaluation is characterized by performing a current density evaluation induced in the human body from the magnetic field source.

Also preferably, the current density evaluation is characterized by the following equation.

Where i is the order of each frequency, f ₁ is the fundamental frequency, f _n is the frequency of the nth harmonic, B ₁ is the magnetic field of the fundamental frequency, and B _T is the sum of each harmonic. And F _i is the ratio of the i-th harmonic to B _T , and K is the contribution constant.)

Also preferably, the evaluating the human influence may include calculating a fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for the magnetic field of the magnetic field source; Calculating a sum of harmonics to an effective value ratio (B _T / Brms); Calculating a sum of the harmonics (B _T); And calculating a contribution constant (K).

Also preferably, the calculating of the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) may include constructing a harmonic component characteristic database including a measurement result of the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for each magnetic field source. It characterized by including:

Also preferably, the step of calculating the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) may include harmonics from a harmonic component characteristic database including a fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) measurement result for each magnetic field source. And establishing an estimation formula for the sum of the effective value ratios (B _T / Brms).

Also preferably, the estimation equation for the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) is characterized by the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

Also preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 55% ≦ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100%.

Harmonic sum to effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) = -1.0791 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.9927

Also preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 30% ≦ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <55%.

Sum of Harmonics to RMS Values (B _T / Brms) = -1.6741 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.6593

Also, preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 10% ≦ base wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <30%.

The sum for the effective value ratio of the harmonics _{(B T / Brms) = 412,418} × (B 1 / B T) 5 - 43,784 × (B 1 / B T) 4 + 181,570 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 36,643 × ( B ₁ / B _T ) ² + 3,583 × (B ₁ / B _T )-131.97

Also preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 0.1% ≦ base wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <10%.

The sum for the effective value ratio of the harmonics _{(B T / Brms) = -364,553} × (B 1 / B T) 4 + 83,255 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 6,270 × (B 1 / B T) 2 + 166.8 × (B ₁ / B _T ) + 1.8271

Also preferably, the calculating of the contribution constant (K) may include: a contribution constant from a harmonic component characteristic database including a result of measuring the contribution constant (K) according to the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for each magnetic field source Formulating an estimation equation for (K).

Also preferably, the estimation formula for the contribution constant (K) is characterized in that it is established for each fundamental wave containing ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

Also, preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 71% ≦ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100%.

Contribution Constant (K) = -4.2257ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 1.0767

Also, preferably, the estimation equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 31% ≦ base wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <70%.

Contribution constant (K) = 1,537.7 × (B 1 / B T) 4 - 3,047.3 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 2,198.4 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 691.6 × (B 1 / B T) + 85.541

Also preferably, the estimated equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is the following equation when 0% <fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) ≤ 30%.

Contribution constant (K) = 2154.2 × (B 1 / B T) 4 - 3011.8 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 1077.2 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 143.31 × (B 1 / B T) + 15.384

And preferably, after calculating the contribution constant (K), calculating a human influence index obtained by multiplying the ratio of harmonics to effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) by the contribution constant (K). It is characterized by.

According to the present invention, the effect of harmonic components on the human body can be evaluated with a slight error only by the effective value of the magnetic field measured in the field without having expensive equipment for measuring the waveform and analyzing the frequency.

According to the present invention, it is useful for electromagnetic field investigation and research dealing with the problem of human influence by the magnetic field including harmonics among the electromagnetic problems, and also has an effect that can be utilized in the revision of the human body exposure standard in the domestic electric field without considering harmonic components.

Before describing the details for carrying out the present invention, it should be noted that configurations that are not directly related to the technical gist of the present invention are omitted within the scope of not distracting the technical gist of the present invention.

In addition, the terms or words used in the present specification and claims are consistent with the technical spirit of the present invention on the basis of the principle that the inventor can appropriately define the concept of the term in order to explain the invention in the best way. It should be interpreted as meaning and concept.

Hereinafter, a method for evaluating a human effect of a magnetic field including harmonics according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. 3 to 12.

3 is an overall flowchart of a method for evaluating a human effect of a magnetic field including harmonics according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

Also, Figure 4 is the sum for the effective value ratio of the harmonics (B _T / Brms) is a graph, Figure 5 is the fundamental wave contains the ratio (B ₁ / B _T) representing in accordance with the fundamental wave contains the ratio (B ₁ / B _T) Is a graph showing the ratio of the harmonics to the effective value (B _T / Brms) in the case of 55% to 100%, and FIG. 6 shows the harmonics when the ratio of the fundamental wave (B ₁ / B _T ) is 30% to 55%. It is a graph showing the sum to effective value ratio (B _T / Brms), and FIG. 7 is the sum of harmonic to effective value ratio (B _T / Brms when the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 10% to 30%. ) Is a graph showing the sum of harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 0.1% to 10%.

9 is a graph showing the contribution constant K according to the fundamental wave inclusion ratio B ₁ / B _T , and FIG. 10 is a case where the fundamental wave inclusion ratio B ₁ / B _T is 71% to 100%. 11 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K), FIG. 11 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K) when the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 31% to 70%, and FIG. 12 is a fundamental wave inclusion ratio ( When B ₁ / B _T ) is 0% to 30%, it is a graph showing the contribution constant (K).

In the method for evaluating the human impact of a magnetic field including harmonics according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, as shown in FIG. 3, first, the effective value (Brms) of the magnetic field is measured from a magnetic field source that is the subject of the human impact assessment. (S10).

The step S10 may be performed by measuring an effective value within a measurement frequency band using a conventional magnetic meter as described above.

Next, in order to consider the harmonic components included in the magnetic field, the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) is obtained (S20).

Hereinafter, a process of calculating the sum-to-effective ratio (B _T / Brms) of harmonics in the step S20 will be described in detail.

The current density J induced inside the human body by the magnetic field can be expressed by Equation 1 below in the case of a single frequency.

In Equation 1, f denotes a frequency [Hz], and B denotes a magnetic field RMS value [uT]. Therefore, in the case of a single frequency, the frequency is a constant, so the current density J is only proportional to the rms value of the magnetic field. However, when various frequencies are included, such as harmonics, the current density J is expressed as Equation 2 below.

In Equation 2, i is the order of each frequency, f ₁ is the fundamental frequency, f _n is the frequency of the n-th harmonic. In addition, B ₁ is the magnetic field value of the fundamental frequency, B _T is the sum of each harmonic magnetic field. And F _i is the ratio of the i-th harmonic to B _T , and K is referred to as a contribution constant in a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

In Equation 2, in order to evaluate the influence of the harmonic-containing magnetic field on the current density induced inside the human body, the sum B _T and the contribution constant K of each harmonic magnetic field should be obtained. In order to evaluate the harmonic content of the current induced in the human body using only the effective value measured with a conventional magnetic field meter, the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) of the database showing the harmonic content of each electric device is calculated. The equation for the sum-to-effective ratio (B _T / Brms) of each harmonic as shown in FIG. 4 is established.

The database showing the harmonic component characteristics of each electric device can be obtained by performing experiments for each electric device, and examples thereof are shown in Table 1 below.

Test subject Fundamental Wave Inclusion Ratio (%) Minimum value Value Median Average One air conditioner 48 86 67 68 2 television 23 61 33 35 3 fan 52 87 72 71 4 Refrigerator 24 94 82 79 5 Hair dryer 6 79 17 24 6 Microwave 57 72 68 66 7 Electric blanket 17 93 59 59 8 Coffee Pot 68 93 89 85 9 Vacuum cleaner 46 89 61 62 10 Electric iron 90 94 94 93 11 washer 44 95 68 66 12 electric rice cooker 55 92 72 72 13 Toast 84 92 89 89 14 stand 23 78 61 58 15 Shaver 0.1 6 One 2 16 mixer 45 63 55 54 17 water purifier 75 76 76 139 18 Power line 94 95 95 95

Preferably, in order to minimize the error of the estimation equation for the sum-to-effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) of each harmonic, an estimation equation is established for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

When 55% ≤ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 3 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 5.

B _T / Brms = -1.0791 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.9927

In Equation 3, the error is 0.8%.

In addition, when 30% ≤ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <55%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 4 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 6.

B _T / Brms = -1.6741 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.6593

In Equation 4, the error is 1.9%.

In addition, when 10% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <30%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 5 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 7.

_{B T / Brms = 412,418 × (} B 1 / B T) 5 - 43,784 × (B 1 / B T) 4 + 181,570 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 36,643 × (B 1 / B T) 2 + 3,583 × (B ₁ / B _T )-131.97

In Equation 5, the error is 13.3%.

In addition, when 0.1% ≦ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <10%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 6 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 8.

_{B T / Brms = -364,553 × (} B 1 / B T) 4 + 83,255 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 6,270 × (B 1 / B T) 2 + 166.8 × (B 1 / B T) + 1.8271

In Equation 6, the error is 9.0%.

Next, in order to consider the harmonic components included in the magnetic field, a contribution constant K is obtained (S30). Hereinafter, the process of calculating the contribution constant (K) of the step S30 will be described in detail.

Wherein the S30 step contribution constant (K) calculations also the sum for the effective value ratio of the step S20 harmonics (B _T / Brms) calculating process similarly to the fundamental wave contains the ratio as shown in Fig. 9 (B ₁ / B It can be performed by establishing an estimation equation using the result of the contribution constant (K) according to _T ).

Preferably, in order to minimize the error of the estimation equation with respect to the contribution constant (K), the estimation equation is established for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

When 71% ≤ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 7 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 10.

K = -4.2257ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 1.0767

In Equation 7, the error is 13%.

In addition, when 31% ≤ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <70%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 8 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 11.

_{K = 1,537.7 × (B 1 /} B T) 4 - 3,047.3 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 2,198.4 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 691.6 × (B 1 / B T) + 85.541

In Equation 8, the error is 17%.

In addition, when 0% <fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) ≤ 30%, the estimated equation is as shown in Equation 9 below, and a schematic diagram thereof is shown in FIG. 12.

_{K = 2154.2 × (B 1 /} B T) 4 - 3011.8 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 1077.2 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 143.31 × (B 1 / B T) + 15.384

In Equation 9, the error is 17%.

Finally, the human impact assessment of the magnetic field source considering the harmonic components included in the magnetic field is performed (S40) .The sum of the harmonics to the effective value (B _T / Brms)

The step S40 may be performed by comparing the human influence index for each magnetic field source. The human influence index is a value obtained by multiplying the contribution ratio (K) by the ratio of the harmonics calculated as described above to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms). Can be set.

Hereinafter, an example of an evaluation result regarding a method for evaluating a human influence of a magnetic field including harmonics according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described.

Table 2 summarizes the results of the human body impact evaluation of the microwave oven, razor, and power transmission line evaluated by the above-described method using only the magnetic field rms measured using a conventional magnetic meter.

Microwave Shaver Power line Remarks Measured value (Brms, mG) 86.6 88.6 88.6 Fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ,%) 68 One 95 TABLE 1 B _T / Brms 1.4 2.9 1.0 [Equation 3] to [Equation 6] Harmonic Sum (B _T , mG) 121.2 251.1 88.6 (B _T / Brms) × (Brms) Contribution Constant (K) 2.4 14.1 1.3 [Equation 7] to [Equation 9] Human influence index 3.36 40.9 1.3 (B _T / Brms) × K

In the above [Table 2], the conventional evaluation method is similar to the 86.6mG, 88.6mG, 88.6mG effective value of measuring the magnetic field generated in the microwave oven, shaver, power transmission line, respectively, all the reference value 883mG at the commercial frequency 60Hz Satisfied, it was determined that the current density induced inside the human body by the magnetic field generated from each source is similar.

However, in order to consider the influence of harmonics in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, when the coverage ratio of fundamental waves included in the microwave oven, razor, and transmission line is calculated, there are significant differences, respectively, as 68%, 1%, and 95%. . Using the fundamental wave inclusion ratio, the sum of effective harmonic ratios (B _T / Brms) for each source according to Equations 3 to 6 is 1.4, 2.9, and 1.0. The sum of harmonics, B _T, is 121.1 mG, 251.1 mG, and 88.6 mG, respectively. The contributions are also 2.4, 14.1, and 1.3, respectively.

These results indicate that microwave ovens increase the current density induced in the human body about twice as much as sources with little harmonic content, such as power transmission lines, and sources with very high harmonic content, such as razors, are about 30 times higher than power transmission lines. This means that the current density can be generated.

In conclusion, the conventional evaluation method using only the effective magnetic field value did not lead to a significant evaluation result, and when evaluating the human influence by the magnetic field, the evaluation of the harmonic component should be considered in the same manner as in the preferred embodiment of the present invention. It can be seen that results can be obtained.

As described above and described with reference to a preferred embodiment for illustrating the technical idea of the present invention, the present invention is not limited to the configuration and operation as shown and described as described above, it is a deviation from the scope of the technical idea It will be understood by those skilled in the art that many modifications and variations can be made to the invention without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, all such suitable changes and modifications and equivalents should be considered to be within the scope of the present invention.

1 is an exemplary view of frequency-specific exposure criteria for the magnetic field of the general public.

2A is an illustration of magnetic field waveform characteristics when there are few harmonic components.

2B is an illustration of magnetic field waveform characteristics when there are many harmonic components.

3 is an overall flowchart of a method for evaluating a human effect of a magnetic field including harmonics according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

4 is a graph showing the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) according to the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

5 is a graph showing the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 55% to 100%.

6 is a graph showing the ratio of the sum of harmonics to the effective value (B _T / Brms) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 30% to 55%.

7 is a graph showing the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 10% to 30%.

8 is a graph showing the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) when the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 0.1% to 10%.

9 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K) according to the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ).

10 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 71% to 100%.

11 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K) when the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 31% to 70%.

12 is a graph showing the contribution constant (K) when the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) is 0% to 30%.

Claims (17)

In the human body impact evaluation method of magnetic fields containing harmonics (Harmonics), Measuring an effective value (Brms) of the magnetic field from the magnetic field source; And Calculating a harmonic component included in the magnetic field, and evaluating a current density induced in the human body from the magnetic field source in consideration of the calculated harmonic component. delete The method of claim 1, The current density evaluation is a human body impact evaluation method of a magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that by the following equation.

Where i is the order of each frequency, f ₁ is the fundamental frequency, f _n is the frequency of the nth harmonic, B ₁ is the magnetic field of the fundamental frequency, and B _T is the sum of each harmonic. And F _i is the ratio of the i-th harmonic to B _T , and K is the contribution constant.) The method of claim 3, wherein Evaluating the current density, Calculating a fundamental wave coverage ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for the magnetic field of the magnetic field source; Calculating a sum of harmonics to an effective value ratio (B _T / Brms); Calculating a sum of the harmonics (B _T); And Computing the contribution constant (K); human body impact evaluation method of a magnetic field containing a harmonic comprising a. The method of claim 4, wherein Calculating the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ), A method for evaluating the human body influence of a magnetic field including harmonics, comprising: constructing a harmonic component characteristic database including a measurement result of fundamental wave content (B ₁ / B _T ) by magnetic field source. The method of claim 4, wherein The step of calculating the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms), Establishing an estimation formula for the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) from the harmonic component characteristic database including the measurement results of the fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for each magnetic field source; A method for evaluating human influence of a magnetic field containing harmonics. The method of claim 6, The estimation method for the sum of the harmonics to the effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) is the body effect evaluation method of the magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that it is established for each fundamental wave containing ratio (B ₁ / B _T ). The method of claim 7, wherein The estimation formula for each of the fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 55% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100% of the following equation. Harmonic sum to effective value ratio (B _T / Brms) = -1.0791 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.9927 The method of claim 7, wherein The estimation equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 30% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <55%, the following equations for the human body impact evaluation method of the magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that the following equation. Sum of Harmonics to RMS Values (B _T / Brms) = -1.6741 × ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 0.6593 The method of claim 7, wherein The estimation method according to the fundamental wave content ratio is 10% ≤ fundamental wave content ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <30% The human body impact evaluation method of a magnetic field containing a harmonic, characterized in that the following equation. The sum for the effective value ratio of the harmonics _{(B T / Brms) = 412,418} × (B 1 / B T) 5 - 43,784 × (B 1 / B T) 4 + 181,570 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 36,643 × ( B ₁ / B _T ) ² + 3,583 × (B ₁ / B _T )-131.97 The method of claim 7, wherein The estimation equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 0.1% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <10% The human body impact evaluation method of the magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that the following equation. The sum for the effective value ratio of the harmonics _{(B T / Brms) = -364,553} × (B 1 / B T) 4 + 83,255 × (B 1 / B T) 3 - 6,270 × (B 1 / B T) 2 + 166.8 × (B ₁ / B _T ) + 1.8271 The method of claim 4, wherein Computing the contribution constant (K), Establishing an estimation formula for the contribution constant (K) from a harmonic component characteristic database including the result of measuring the contribution constant (K) according to the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) for each magnetic field source; The human body influence evaluation method of the magnetic field containing harmonics. The method of claim 12, The estimation formula for the contribution constant (K) is a human body influence evaluation method of a magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that established by the fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ). The method of claim 13, The estimation equation for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 71% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <100% The human body impact evaluation method of the magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that the following equation. Contribution Constant (K) = -4.2257ln (B ₁ / B _T ) + 1.0767 The method of claim 13, The estimation method for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 31% ≤ fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) <70% The method of the human body impact evaluation of the magnetic field containing harmonics, characterized in that the following equation. Contribution constant (K) = 1,537.7 × (B 1 / B T) 4 - 3,047.3 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 2,198.4 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 691.6 × (B 1 / B T) + 85.541 The method of claim 13, The estimation formula for each fundamental wave inclusion ratio is 0% <fundamental wave inclusion ratio (B ₁ / B _T ) ≤ 30%, the following equations for the human body impact evaluation method of a magnetic field containing a harmonic, characterized in that: Contribution constant (K) = 2154.2 × (B 1 / B T) 4 - 3011.8 × (B 1 / B T) 3 + 1077.2 × (B 1 / B T) 2 - 143.31 × (B 1 / B T) + 15.384 The method of claim 4, wherein After calculating the attribution constant (K), Computing a human influence index multiplied by the sum of the harmonics ratio (B _T / Brms) and the contribution constant (K); further comprising a harmonics.

Images