JP6946793B2 - Golf club - Google Patents

Description

The present invention relates to a golf club.

Golf clubs are known for the purpose of improving the directional stability of a hit ball. Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2001-149510 discloses a golf club having a real loft of 11 ° or less, a club frequency of 240 cpm or less, and a predetermined relationship between these real lofts and the club frequency. Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-201911 states that the total weight of a golf club is 285 g or less, the length of the club is 111 cm or more, and the mass ratio of the head to the total weight of the golf club is 73% or more and 81% or less. Disclose the alleged golf club.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2001-149510 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-201911

The present inventor has diligently studied further improvement of golf clubs. As a result, new findings were obtained regarding the effect of golf clubs on swing stability.

An object of the present invention is to provide a golf club capable of improving swing stability.

On one side, the golf club comprises a head, a shaft and a grip. The club frequency may be 210 cpm or less. The club length may be 45.7 inches or more and 46.5 inches or less.

On the other side, the grip weight Wg may be 30 g or less.

When the weight of the head is Wh and the weight of the club is Wc, Wh / Wc may be 0.72 or more.

On another aspect, the swing weight of the golf club may be D5 or more.

The distance from the rear end of the grip to the center of gravity of the grip is Lg1, and the length of the grip is Lg2. On the other side, Lg1 / Lg2 may be 0.37 or more.

On the other side, the shoulder center grip GLL calculated by the following formula (1) ^{may be 140 kg · cm 2} or less.
Shoulder center grip GLL = Wg x L x L ... (1)
However, in this formula (1), Wg is the weight (kg) of the grip, and L is a value calculated by the following formula (2). In this formula (2), Lg1 is the distance (cm) from the rear end of the grip to the center of gravity of the grip.
^{L = [60 2 + (Lg1} ) 2] 1/2 ··· (2)

The force acting on the human body during the swing is suppressed, and the swing can be stabilized.

FIG. 1 shows a golf club according to an embodiment. FIG. 2 is a view of a golfer swinging from above. In FIG. 2, the force acting on the body during the downswing is indicated by an arrow. FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram showing the force acting on the body in each phase of the swing. FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram showing the state of the arm and the club in the initial stage of the downswing. FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing a method of measuring the club frequency.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on preferred embodiments with reference to the drawings as appropriate.

In the present application, the "axial direction" means the axial direction of the shaft in a straight state without bending.

FIG. 1 shows a golf club 2 according to an embodiment. The golf club 2 includes a head 4, a shaft 6, and a grip 8. The head 4 is attached to the tip portion of the shaft 6. A grip 8 is attached to the butt portion of the shaft 6.

The golf club 2 is excellent in flight distance performance. Golf club 2 is a driver (No. 1 wood). Usually, the driver's club length is 43 inches or more. Preferably, the golf club 2 is a wood type golf club.

The club 2 has a club weight Wc.

What is indicated by the double-headed arrow Lc in FIG. 1 is the club length. The method for measuring the club length Lc will be described later.

In this embodiment, the head 4 has a hollow structure. The head 4 is a wood type. The head 4 may be a hybrid type (utility type). The head 4 may be of an iron type. The head 4 may be a putter type. Examples of the material of the head 4 include metal and fiber reinforced plastic. Examples of this metal include titanium alloys, pure titanium, stainless steel and soft iron. Examples of fiber reinforced plastics include carbon fiber reinforced plastics.

The head 4 has a head weight Wh.

The shaft 6 is made of a laminate of fiber reinforced resin layers. The shaft 6 is a tubular body. The shaft 6 has a hollow structure. As shown in FIG. 1, the shaft 6 has a tip end Tp and a butt end Bt. The tip end Tp is located inside the head 4. The butt end Bt is located inside the grip 8.

The shaft 6 has a shaft weight Ws.

What is indicated by the double-headed arrow Lf2 in FIG. 1 is the shaft length. The shaft length Lf2 is the axial distance between the tip end Tp and the butt end Bt. In FIG. 1, the double-headed arrow Lf1 indicates the axial distance from the butt end Bt to the shaft center of gravity Gs. The shaft center of gravity Gs is the center of gravity of the shaft 6 alone. The center of gravity Gs is located on the shaft axis.

The shaft 6 is a so-called carbon shaft. Preferably, the shaft 6 is made by curing the prepreg sheet. In this prepreg sheet, the fibers are substantially unidirectionally oriented. A prepreg in which the fibers are substantially oriented in one direction in this way is also referred to as a UD prepreg. "UD" is an abbreviation for Unidirection. A prepreg other than the UD prepreg may be used. For example, the fibers contained in the prepreg sheet may be woven.

The prepreg sheet has fibers and a resin. This resin is also referred to as a matrix resin. Typically, this fiber is a carbon fiber. Typically, this matrix resin is a thermosetting resin.

The shaft 6 is manufactured by a so-called sheet winding method. In the prepreg, the matrix resin is in a semi-cured state. The shaft 6 is formed by winding and curing a prepreg sheet.

As the matrix resin of the prepreg sheet, in addition to the epoxy resin, a thermosetting resin other than the epoxy resin, a thermoplastic resin, or the like can be used. From the viewpoint of shaft strength, the matrix resin is preferably an epoxy resin.

The manufacturing method of the shaft 6 is not limited. From the viewpoint of design freedom, a shaft manufactured by the sheet winding method is preferable. The material of the shaft 6 is not limited. The shaft 6 may be, for example, a steel shaft.

The grip 8 is a portion gripped by the golfer during the swing. The grip 8 has a grip weight Wg.

Examples of the material of the grip 8 include a rubber composition and a resin composition. Examples of the rubber in this rubber composition include natural rubber (NR), ethylene propylene diene rubber (EPDM), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), isoprene rubber (IR), butadiene rubber (BR), and chloroprene rubber (CR). Acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) and the like can be mentioned. In particular, natural rubber, or a blend (mixed) of ethylene propylene diene rubber or styrene butadiene rubber having a good affinity for natural rubber is preferable. Examples of the resin contained in the resin composition include thermoplastic resins. This thermoplastic resin can be used for injection molding. As the thermoplastic resin, a thermoplastic elastomer is preferable, and a thermoplastic elastomer containing a soft segment and a hard segment is more preferable. Urethane-based thermoplastic elastomers are more preferable from the viewpoint of achieving both grip and wear resistance.

The rubber composition of the grip 8 may be foam rubber. A foaming agent may be blended in the foam rubber. An example of this foaming agent is a pyrolytic foaming agent. Examples of this pyrolytic foaming agent include azo compounds such as azodicarbonamide, nitroso compounds such as dinitrosopentamethylenetetramine, and triazole compounds. Foam rubber contributes to weight reduction of the grip 8.

A plurality of types of rubber having different foaming rates may be used. The plurality of types of rubber having different foaming rates may include non-foaming rubber (zero foaming rate). By adjusting the arrangement of these plurality of types of rubber, the position of the grip center of gravity Gg (described later) can be adjusted.

The manufacturing method of the grip 8 is not limited. The grip 8 can be manufactured by a known manufacturing method. Press molding and injection molding are exemplified as this manufacturing method.

When a plurality of types of rubber having different foaming rates are used, press molding is preferable. In this case, for example, a rubber sheet 1 made of a material molded at a first foaming rate and a rubber sheet 2 made of a material molded at a second foaming rate are prepared. Press molding is performed by placing each of these sheets at an arbitrary position in the mold and heating and pressurizing them. In this method, rubbers having different foaming rates can be freely arranged.

[1. Relationship between the force F acting on the human body during the swing and the stability of the swing]
The present inventor examined the possibility of improving a golf club from a new viewpoint. As a result, not only the golf club itself, but also the relationship between the swing and the golf club was reached. Then, the present inventor has found that the force F acting on the human body during the swing can make the swing unstable, and that this force F can be controlled by the specifications of the golf club. Moreover, in the analysis of this force F, it was found that it is necessary to consider not only the movement of the club but also the movement of the arm.

[1-1. Force acting on the human body during the swing F]
FIG. 2 shows a state in which a golfer during a swing is viewed from above. FIG. 2 shows the state in the vicinity of the top of swing and the initial state of the downswing. The top of swing is also simply called the top.

The swing is regarded as a rotational movement with the center of the human body h10 as the swing axis. The center of the human body h10 is substantially the torso h12. In the swing, the golf club 2 rotates, and at the same time, the arms (left arm h14 and right arm h16) also rotate. The centrifugal force F1 of the arm and the centrifugal force F2 of the club act on the center of the human body h10 (body h12). The force F can be considered to be substantially the sum of the centrifugal force F1 of the arm and the centrifugal force F2 of the club.

In a normal golf swing, the centrifugal force F1 of the arm in the downswing is larger than the centrifugal force F2 of the club (see FIG. 2). This is because the weight of the arm is much larger than the weight of the club 2. While the club weight is about 0.2 to 0.5 kg, the total weight of both arms is about 6 kg even for a person weighing 50 kg. In many aspects of the downswing, the club 2 is farther from the swing axis than the arm, and the club 2 rotates faster than the arm, but due to this large weight difference, the centrifugal force F1 of the arm is the club's. Centrifugal force is larger than F2. The present inventor has found by studying the swing that the centrifugal force of the club is about 200 to 300 N, while the centrifugal force of the arm is about 400 N.

[1-2. Relationship between the force F and the balance of the human body]
FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the positions of both feet during the swing. In the human body during the swing, the front-back direction D1 and the hitting direction D2 are defined. The front-back direction D1 is a direction connecting the front and the back of the human body. The hitting direction D2 is a direction connecting the position of the ball and the target. Direction D1 and D2 are parallel to the ground.

During the swing, the human body h10 attempts to maintain balance between the left foot LF and the right foot RF. However, this balance can be lost due to the force F acting on the human body during the swing. When the balance is lost, the distance between the ball and the swing axis changes. As a result, the hitting point fluctuates. Due to this variation in the hitting point, the hitting result varies. The hitting result is the flight distance of the hit ball, the direction of the hit ball, the launch angle, the amount of spin, the trajectory, and the like. Furthermore, if the balance is lost, the swing axis will be shaken and a smooth swing will be hindered. Balance is important.

The left foot LF and the right foot RF are arranged along the hitting direction D2. In other words, the human body h10 is in contact with the ground at two different positions in the direction D2. Therefore, the balance is relatively hard to be lost with respect to the force along the hitting direction D2. On the other hand, the balance is easily lost with respect to the force along the front-rear direction D1. In particular, the human body h10 tends to stagger when pulled forward.

FIG. 3 shows the force F acting on the central CB of the human body at each time point from the downswing to the impact. FIG. 3 shows the case of a conventional golf club. As the force F, the force Fa at the time of turning back, the force Fb in the first half of the downswing, the force Fc in the middle of the town swing, the force Fd immediately before the impact, and the force Fe at the impact are shown. In the initial stage of the downswing, the rotation speed of the arm and the club 2 is slow, and the force F is small (see Fa and Fb). From the latter half of the downswing to the impact, the rotational speed of the arm and the club 2 increases, and the force F is large (see Fc, Fd, and Fe).

In the phase near the impact, the club 2 and the arm are located in front of the human body h10, and the wrist cock is unraveled so that the club 2 is far from the human body h10. Therefore, a large force F acts forward. That is, in the phase near the impact, the anteroposterior component of the force F is large (see Fc, Fd, and Fe). As described above, the force that pulls the human body h10 forward tends to upset the balance of the human body h10. If the force of pulling forward can be suppressed, the balance (posture) of the human body h10 can be easily maintained. If the balance of the human body h10 can be stabilized, the swing of the swing axis is suppressed and the variation of the hitting point is reduced.

[2. Club that can reduce force F]
Based on the above analysis, the present inventor examined a club that can reduce the force F.

The distance between the fuselage h12 and the center of gravity of the club 2 changes during the swing. One reason for this change is the deflection of the shaft 6 (see the alternate long and short dash line in FIG. 2). The distance between the club 2 and the swing shaft (body h12) changes depending on the degree of bending of the shaft 6. As this distance becomes closer, the moment of inertia of the club 2 around the swing axis becomes smaller.

The timing of the transition from the top to the downswing is also called the turning back from the top. In this turning back from the top, the shaft 6 can be bent by the inertial force of the head 4 acting when the traveling direction of the swing is reversed. The deflection of the shaft 6 is such that the head 4 is delayed with respect to the traveling direction of the downswing (see the club 2 indicated by the alternate long and short dash line in FIG. 2). In the present application, the deflection at the initial stage of this downswing is also referred to as initial deflection.

The initial deflection is the deflection in the direction in which the center of gravity of the club 2 approaches the human body h10. When the initial deflection is large, the center of gravity of the club 2 approaches the center of rotation, and the moment of inertia of the club 2 around the swing axis becomes small. On the contrary, when the deflection is small, the center of gravity of the club 2 is farther from the swing axis than when the deflection is large. As a result, the moment of inertia of the club 2 around the swing axis becomes large.

When the initial deflection is large, the trajectory of the head 4 approaches the fuselage h12. In other words, the trajectory of the head 4 approaches the swing axis. As a result, in the first half of the downswing, the moment of inertia of the club 2 around the swing axis becomes small, and the rotation speed of the arm increases (arm speed increasing effect A). This rotational energy is transmitted to the club 2 and the head 4 is accelerated.

In the club 2 in which the head 4 is accelerated, the centrifugal force of the club 2 with respect to the swing axis increases, and the rotation of the club 2 around the center of gravity of the club 2 is promoted. Due to this rotational movement, the grip 8 located on the opposite side of the head 4 tries to move in the direction opposite to the traveling direction of the downswing, but since the grip 8 is restrained by the arm, the grip 8 has an arm. A force is generated in the direction of decelerating. As a result, the head 2 runs while the movement of the hand of the human body h10 becomes slow. That is, in the latter half of the downswing, the head 2 is accelerated and the rotation speed of the arm becomes small (arm speed suppression effect).

By increasing the initial deflection in this way, the head speed in the vicinity of the impact is increased, and the rotation speed of the arm in the vicinity of the impact is decreased. In this case, the force F, which is substantially the sum of the centrifugal force F1 of the arm and the centrifugal force F2 of the club, becomes small. This is because, as described above, the weight of the arm is heavier than the weight of the club 2. Therefore, the amount of decrease in the centrifugal force F1 due to the decrease in the rotation speed of the arm exceeds the amount of increase in the centrifugal force F2 due to the increase in the head 2. As a result, the force F, particularly the force pulling the human body h10 forward, is reduced and the swing is stabilized.

As described above, the force F can be suppressed by increasing the initial deflection. In particular, the force F can be reduced in the vicinity of the impact, which is a phase in which the anteroposterior component of the force F increases. Therefore, the balance of the human body h10 is maintained, the swing is stable, and the variation of the hitting point is suppressed. This effect is also called the swing stabilizing effect.

In addition, the head speed increases even though the rotation speed of the arm near the impact is suppressed. As a result, in addition to suppressing the variation in the hitting points, the head speed also increases. In this club, the flight distance is increased and the flight distance is stably obtained. In other words, the average flight distance increases.

[2-1. Club frequency]
The club frequency is measured in the completed club. The club frequency is a dynamic characteristic, not a static characteristic. The swing is dynamic. The club frequency can accurately reflect the behavior of the club during the swing.

In the measurement of the club frequency, the grip side of the club is fixed, a load is applied to the head side of the club, and the club vibrates. This situation is close to the club's situation when turning back from the top. Moreover, the club frequency is a dynamic index. This club frequency can accurately reflect the dynamic behavior during the swing.

By reducing the club frequency, the shaft tends to bend when turning back from the top. That is, as the club frequency is reduced, the initial deflection is increased. As a result, the rotational speed of the arm is increased at the beginning of the downswing, and this rotational energy is transmitted to the club, and by the reaction, the rotational speed of the arm is decreased and the head speed is improved. Therefore, the energy transfer coefficient from the arm to the club is improved, the force F is reduced, and the swing is stabilized. The small club frequency enhances the swing stabilizing effect described above and contributes to an increase in the average flight distance.

[2-2. Club length Lc]
When the club length Lc is large, there is an advantage that the turning radius of the swing is large and the head speed is increased, but there is a drawback that the variation of the hitting points is increased.

As described above, by reducing the club frequency, the shaft tends to bend when turning back from the top, and a swing stabilizing effect can be obtained. By applying this effect to a long club, it is possible to take advantage of the above-mentioned advantage while suppressing the variation in hitting points, which is the above-mentioned drawback. As a result, the head speed is improved and the average flight distance is increased.

[2-3. Wh / Wc]
The ratio (Wh / Wc) is the ratio of the head weight Wh to the club weight Wc. When the head weight Wh is large, the kinetic energy of the head is increased and the coefficient of restitution is improved. Further, when the head weight Wh is large, the inertia of the head increases, and the stationary state of the head at the top is likely to be maintained. As a result, the shaft tends to bend when turning back from the top. By increasing Wh / Wc, the initial deflection can be increased.

On the other hand, when the head weight Wh is large, the centrifugal force F2 of the club increases, so that the force F acting on the body during the swing can also increase. As a result, the balance of the human body h10 is lost, and the swing tends to become unstable. However, this inconvenience can be eliminated by the swing stabilizing effect described above. As a result, the kinetic energy of the head is increased while maintaining the stability of the swing. Further, the increase in the initial deflection due to the inertia of the head further enhances the swing stabilizing effect. Therefore, the swing is stable, the variation in hitting points is reduced, and the initial velocity of the ball is increased. As a result, the average flight distance can be further increased.

[2-4. Swing weight (14 inch balance)]
Swing weights are also commonly referred to as swing balances. By increasing the head weight Wh, the swing weight can be increased. The swing weight in the present application is a 14-inch balance.

When the swing weight is large, the head weight Wh tends to be large. In this case, the kinetic energy of the head is increased and the initial velocity of the ball is improved. Further, when the swing weight is large, the inertia of the head increases, and it is easy to maintain the stationary state of the head at the top. As a result, the shaft tends to bend when turning back from the top. Increasing the swing weight can increase the initial deflection.

On the other hand, when the swing weight is large, the centrifugal force F2 of the club tends to increase. In this case, the force F acting on the body during the swing can also increase. As a result, the balance of the human body h10 is lost, and the swing tends to become unstable. However, this inconvenience can be eliminated by the swing stabilizing effect described above. As a result, the kinetic energy of the head is increased while maintaining the stability of the swing. Further, the increase in the initial deflection due to the inertia of the head further enhances the swing stabilizing effect. Therefore, the swing is stable, the variation in hitting points is reduced, and the initial velocity of the ball is increased. As a result, the average flight distance can be further increased.

[2-5. Grip weight Wg]
As described above, in the analysis of the force F, the centrifugal force acting on the club and the arm is taken into consideration. At impact, the club and each part of the arm are almost straight when the wrist cock made at the top is unraveled. At this impact, the center of gravity of the shaft and the center of gravity of the head are far from the swing axis (center of the fuselage). On the other hand, in the top of a general golfer, the center of gravity of the shaft and the center of gravity of the head are closer to the swing axis than at the time of impact due to the wrist cock, but the distance between the center of gravity of the grip and the swing axis is almost the same. Therefore, due to the position of the center of gravity of the grip on the top, the grip weight Wg greatly affects the rotation speed of the arm when turning back from the top. By reducing the grip weight Wg, the rotation speed of the arm when turning back from the top increases (arm speed increase effect B).

On the other hand, when the grip weight Wg is light, the hand becomes excessively easy to move. Therefore, the behavior at hand may become unstable. However, due to the above-mentioned arm speed suppressing effect, the centrifugal force F1 of the arm is reduced, and the behavior at hand is stabilized. As a result, the swing stabilizing effect is achieved while eliminating the instability of the behavior at hand. Further, in addition to the above-mentioned arm speed increasing effect A, the above-mentioned arm speed increasing effect B is produced. Due to these effects, the average flight distance can be effectively increased.

[2-6. Shoulder center grip GLL]
In the present application, the shoulder center grip GLL is defined. FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram for explaining this shoulder center grip GLL.

FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram showing the state of the left arm h14 and the club 2 in the phase of turning back from the top. In a typical swing, in this aspect, the angle θ formed by the left arm h14 and the shaft axis z of the club 2 is approximately 90 °. This angle θ is generated by the wrist cock. In this turning phase, the left arm h14 and the club 2 forming an angle of 90 ° with each other rotate about the swing axis Zs (centers of both shoulders).

The shoulder center grip GLL is defined as an index of the dynamic influence of the grip 8 on the rotation at this turning. In the calculation of the shoulder center grip GLL, the distance between the swing axis Zs and the grip end is set to 60 cm. This distance is based on the average arm length.

The grip 8 has a center of gravity Gg. The grip center of gravity Gg is the center of gravity of the grip alone. In the club 2, the center of gravity Gg of the grip is located on the shaft axis z. In FIG. 4, the double-headed arrow Lg1 indicates the distance from the rear end of the grip 8 to the grip center of gravity Gg. In FIG. 4, the double-headed arrow Lg2 indicates the total length of the grip 8. Lg1 and Lg2 are measured along the shaft axis z.

As mentioned above, the angle θ can be 90 °. When the unit of the distance Lg1 is centimeters, the distance L (centimeters) between the rotation center Zs and the grip center of gravity Gg is as follows according to the three-square theorem.
^{L = [60 2 + (Lg1} ) 2] 1/2

Based on this distance L (centimeter), the shoulder center grip GLL (kg · cm ² ) is calculated by the following formula.
Shoulder center grip GLL = Wg x L x L
However, Wg is the grip weight (kilogram).

By reducing the shoulder center grip GLL, the rotation speed at the initial stage of the downswing can be increased. Therefore, the rotation speed of the arm increases in the first half of the downswing (arm speed increase effect C). This arm speed increasing effect C can act synergistically with the above-mentioned arm speed increasing effects A and B.

[2-7. Lg1 / Lg2; Grip center of gravity ratio]
The distance between the rear end of the grip 8 and the center of gravity of the grip Gg is Lg1. The total length of the grip 8 is Lg2. By increasing Lg1 / Lg2, the rotation of the grip 8 around the grip end is suppressed, and the wrist cock is easily maintained at the initial stage of the downswing. This can increase the rotational speed of the arm in the early stages of the downswing.

As described above, the typical angle θ at the top is about 90 degrees. Therefore, even if Lg1 increases, L does not increase so much. Therefore, even if Lg1 increases, the shoulder center grip GLL does not increase so much. As a result, the above-mentioned effect due to the large Lg1 / Lg2 and the above-mentioned arm speed increasing effect C due to the small shoulder center grip GLL can be compatible with each other.

[3. Preferred value]
Preferred values for each specification are as follows.

[3-1. Club frequency]
From the viewpoint of increasing the initial deflection and enhancing the swing stabilizing effect, the club frequency is preferably 230 cpm or less, more preferably 220 cpm or less, and even more preferably 210 cpm or less. If the club frequency is too low, the bending back may be insufficient. From this viewpoint, the club frequency is preferably 150 cpm or more, more preferably 160 cpm or more, and further preferably 170 cpm or more.

[3-2. Club length Lc]
From the viewpoint of increasing the swing stabilizing effect and increasing the head speed, the club length Lc is preferably 45.5 inches or more, more preferably 45.7 inches or more, and further preferably 46.0 inches or more. Considering the ease of swinging, the club length Lc is preferably 48 inches or less, more preferably 47.5 inches or less, and even more preferably 47 inches or less.

[3-3. Wh / Wc]
From the viewpoint of increasing the swing stabilizing effect and increasing the coefficient of restitution, the ratio (Wh / Wc) is preferably 0.70 or more, more preferably 0.71 or more, still more preferably 0.72 or more. Considering the ease of swinging, an excessive head weight Wh is not preferable. From this viewpoint, the ratio (Wh / Wc) is preferably 0.82 or less, more preferably 0.81 or less, still more preferably 0.80 or less.

[3-4. Swing weight (14 inch balance)]
From the viewpoint of increasing the swing stabilizing effect and increasing the coefficient of restitution, the swing weight is preferably D2 or more, more preferably D3 or more, more preferably D4 or more, and even more preferably D5 or more. Considering the ease of swinging, the swing weight is preferably E5 or less, more preferably E3 or less, and even more preferably E1 or less.

[3-5. Grip weight Wg]
From the viewpoint of the swing stabilizing effect and the arm speed increasing effect B, the grip weight Wg is preferably 36 g or less, more preferably 34 g or less, more preferably 30 g or less, and more preferably 28 g or less. Considering the strength of the grip, the grip weight Wg is preferably 15 g or more, more preferably 17 g or more, and further preferably 19 g or more.

[3-6. Shoulder center grip GLL]
By reducing the shoulder center grip GLL, the rotation speed at the initial stage of the downswing can be increased, and the arm speed increasing effect C is produced. From this viewpoint, the shoulder center grip GLL is ^{preferably 140 kg · cm 2} or less, more preferably 130 kg · cm ² or less, more preferably 120 kg · cm ² or less, and more preferably 110 kg · cm ² or less. Due to design restrictions, the shoulder center grip GLL is ^{preferably 60 kg · cm 2} or more, more preferably 70 kg · cm ² or more, and even more preferably 80 kg · cm ² or more.

[3-7. Lg1 / Lg2; Grip center of gravity ratio]
By increasing Lg1 / Lg2, the rotation of the grip 8 around the grip end is suppressed, and the wrist cock is easily maintained at the initial stage of the downswing. By this maintenance, the trajectory of the head 4 at the initial stage of the downswing becomes close to the swing axis, and the above-mentioned arm speed increasing effect A is further enhanced. From this viewpoint, Lg1 / Lg2 is preferably 0.37 or more, more preferably 0.38 or more, more preferably 0.39 or more, and more preferably 0.40 or more. From design restrictions, Lg1 / Lg2 is preferably 0.52 or less, more preferably 0.50 or less, and even more preferably 0.48 or less.

The method for adjusting Lg1 is not limited, and examples thereof include the following.
(A) Adjust the wall thickness distribution of the grip.
(B) Use a plurality of types of rubber having different specific densities and adjust their arrangement.
(C) Use a plurality of types of rubber having different foaming rates, and adjust their arrangement.

[4. Measuring method]
The measurement method of each specification is as follows.

[4-1. Club length Lc]
The club length Lc in the present application is measured in accordance with the provisions of R & A (Royal and Ancient Golf Club of Saint Andrews; British Golf Association). This provision is described in "1c Length" in "1 Club" of "Appendix II Club Design" in the latest Rules of Golf issued by R & A. As shown in FIG. 1, in the measurement of the club length Lc, the sole abuts on a plane of 60 ° with respect to the club mounting plane Pc. The distance from the line of intersection between the 60 ° plane and the club mounting plane Pc to the rear end of the club is the club length Lc. In the actual measurement, the club mounting plane Pc is horizontal.

[4-2. Club frequency]
FIG. 5 shows how the club 2 is fixed to the club frequency measuring instrument. The trade name "GOLF CLUB TIMING HARMONIZER" manufactured by Fujikura Rubber Industries, Ltd. is used for measuring the club frequency. As shown in FIG. 5, the clamp CP1 fixes the grip end from a point 7 inches from the grip end. That is, the length F1 of the fixed portion is 7 inches (about 178 mm). An arbitrary load is applied downward to the head 4 to vibrate the shaft 6. The frequency per minute is the club frequency (cpm).

[4-3. Swing weight (14 inch balance)]
The swing weight is measured using the trade name "BANCER-14" manufactured by DAININ. This swing weight is 14 inches balanced.

Swing weights are represented by symbols that are a combination of one letter of the alphabet and numbers. The alphabet is one of A to F. The number is an integer from 0 to 9. The numbers after the decimal point are rounded off. In this swing weight, a position 14 inches away from the grip end is used as a fulcrum. The swing weight is determined based on the value obtained by multiplying the axial distance (inch) from this fulcrum to the center of gravity of the club by the club weight (ounce). This numerical value is classified into 6 stages from A to F. Further, each of A to F is subdivided by a numerical value of 0 to 9. From A to F, it means that the swing weight is large, and as the numerical value is large, it means that the swing weight is large.

[5. Other specifications]
Other preferred specifications are as follows.

[5-1. Head weight Wh]
From the viewpoint of the initial deflection and the coefficient of restitution, the head weight Wh is preferably 188 g or more, more preferably 190 g or more, and more preferably 192 g or more. From the viewpoint of ease of swinging, the head weight Wh is preferably 210 g or less, more preferably 207 g or less, and more preferably 205 g or less.

[5-2. Shaft weight Ws]
From the viewpoint of making it easier to swing while increasing the ratio (Wh / Wc), it is preferable that the shaft weight Ws is light. From the viewpoint of increasing initial deflection and ease of swinging, the shaft weight Ws is preferably less than 50 g, more preferably 48 g or less, more preferably 46 g or less, more preferably 44 g or less, and even more preferably 43 g or less. From the viewpoint of the strength and durability of the shaft, the shaft weight Ws is preferably 33 g or more, more preferably 35 g or more, and more preferably 37 g or more.

[5-3. Lf1 / Lf2: Shaft center of gravity ratio]
As described above, the distance Lf1 is the distance between the butt end Bt of the shaft 6 and the shaft center of gravity Gs, and the distance Lf2 is the total length of the shaft 6. Lf1 and Lf2 are axial distances.

It is preferable that Lf1 / Lf2 is small in order to make it easier to swing even if Wh / Wc is increased. From the viewpoint of achieving both an increase in initial deflection and ease of swinging, Lf1 / Lf2 is preferably 0.46 or less, more preferably 0.45 or less, and even more preferably 0.44 or less. From design restrictions, Lf1 / Lf2 is preferably 0.33 or more, more preferably 0.34 or more, and more preferably 0.35 or more.

[5-4. Count]
The longer the club, the more important the flight distance performance tends to be. Also, the longer the club, the greater the variation in RBIs is for the driver. From this point of view, a wood type club is preferable, and a driver is particularly preferable. Particularly preferably, the driver's real loft is usually 7 ° or more and 15 ° or less. The volume of the head is preferably 350 cc or more, more preferably 380 cc or more, more preferably 400 cc or more, and even more preferably 420 cc or more. From the viewpoint of head strength, the volume of the head is preferably 470 cc or less.

[5-5. Club weight Wc]
From the viewpoint of ease of swinging, the club weight Wc is preferably 290 g or less, more preferably 280 g or less, more preferably 275 g or less, and even more preferably 272 g or less. Considering the strength of the club, the club weight Wc is preferably 230 g or more, more preferably 240 g or more, and more preferably 245 g or more.

Hereinafter, the effects of the present invention will be clarified by Examples, but the present invention should not be construed in a limited manner based on the description of these Examples.

[Sample 1]
A driver head made of titanium alloy was obtained by welding the forged face member and the cast body member. A shaft was obtained by a sheet winding method using a plurality of prepreg sheets. A grip was obtained by heating and pressurizing the rubber composition in the mold. In the molding of the grip, three types of rubber having different foaming rates were used. A first rubber having a relatively low foaming rate was used for the outer layer over the entire length of the grip. A second rubber with a relatively high foaming rate was used for the inner layer over the entire length of the grip. Further, a non-foaming third rubber was used only at the tip of the grip. By assembling these heads, shafts and grips, a golf club sample 1 was obtained. The specifications and evaluation results of Sample 1 are shown in Table 3 below.

[Samples 2-26]
Golf club samples 2 to 26 were obtained in the same manner as in sample 1 except for the specifications shown in Tables 3 to 8 below.

The head weight Wh was adjusted by arranging an adhesive inside the head. This adhesive was used by being fixed to the inner surface of the head. This adhesive is thermoplastic and sticks to a predetermined position on the inner surface of the head at room temperature and flows at high temperature. This adhesive was heated to a high temperature and poured into the inside of the head, and then cooled to room temperature and fixed. This adhesive was arranged so as not to change the position of the center of gravity of the head.

Shaft specifications such as club frequency were adjusted by the laminated design of the prepreg sheet and the prepreg material. Tables 1 and 2 below show examples of prepreg sheets that can be used. By appropriately selecting these various types of seats, the shaft specifications can be easily adjusted. Further, the club frequency and Lf1 / Lf2 can be adjusted by appropriately using the rear end partial layer and the front end partial layer.

Grip specifications such as grip weight Wg were adjusted by the volume ratio and arrangement of a plurality of types of rubber having different foaming rates. Since the above-mentioned third rubber (non-foaming rubber) has a relatively large specific gravity and is locally arranged, it is useful for adjusting the distance Lg1.

The specifications and evaluation results of each sample are shown in Tables 3 to 8 below. The measurement method of each specification is as described above.

[Evaluation method]
The evaluation method is as follows.

[Head speed]
Ten testers with a handicap of 0 to 20 conducted the actual hit test. Each tester hit five balls at each club, and the head speed and RBI were measured for each of these hits. The average value of the 50 data is shown in the table below.

[Standard deviation of RBI]
In the above actual hitting test, the hitting point was measured together with the head speed. The hitting point was measured using a shot marker (impact marker). This shot marker was attached to the face surface of the head, and the position of the striking mark on the face surface was measured. The distance (deviation distance) of the hitting point from the face center was measured. The deviation distance (mm) in the left-right direction and the deviation distance (mm) in the vertical direction were measured. The left-right direction means the toe-heel direction. The vertical direction means the top-sole direction. The standard deviations of the left and right hit points and the top and bottom hit points are shown in the table below.

Since the hitting point can be measured with high accuracy, it is useful as an index for accurately detecting the variation of the swing. That is, the hitting point is effective for accurately detecting the stability of the swing.

In Table 3, the club frequency is changed. As shown in Table 3, it was obtained that the smaller the club frequency, the smaller the variation in the hitting points. That is, it was confirmed that the variation in the hitting points tends to be suppressed by reducing the club frequency. This result indicates that a small club frequency contributes to swing stability. In addition, the head speed is also increased by reducing the club frequency.

In Table 4, the club lengths have changed. Generally, the longer the club, the faster the head speed, but the greater the variation in hitting points. However, it was confirmed that by reducing the club frequency, the variation in hitting points does not increase even if the club is lengthened within a predetermined club length range.

In Table 5, the grip weight Wg is changed. It was confirmed that the smaller the grip weight Wg, the more the variation in the hitting points was suppressed and the head speed tended to be higher.

Further, in Table 5, the shoulder center grip GLL is changed. It was confirmed that the smaller the shoulder center grip GLL, the more the variation in the hitting points was suppressed and the head speed tended to be higher.

In Table 6, Lg1 / Lg2 is changed. It was confirmed that the larger Lg1 / Lg2, the more the variation of the hitting points was suppressed and the head speed tended to be higher.

In Table 7, the swing weights are changed. It was confirmed that when the club frequency is small, the larger the swing weight, the more the variation in the hitting points tends to be suppressed. Moreover, the head speed did not decrease in spite of the increase in the swing weight.

In Table 8, the ratio (Wh / Wc) is changed. It was confirmed that the larger the ratio (Wh / Wc), the more the variation in the hitting points tends to be suppressed.

As these evaluation results show, the superiority of the present invention is clear.

The golf club described above can be applied to any golf club such as a wood type, a utility (hybrid) type, and an iron type.

2 ... Golf club 4 ... Head 6 ... Shaft 8 ... Grip Gs ... Center of gravity of shaft Gg ... Center of gravity of grip z ... Shaft axis Tp ... Shaft tip end Bt・ ・ ・ But end of shaft

Claims (6)

Equipped with head, shaft and grip,
The club frequency is 150 cpm or more and 210 cpm or less.
A golf club with a club length of 45.7 inches or more and 46.5 inches or less. Equipped with head, shaft and grip,
The club frequency is 210 cpm or less,
The club length is 45.7 inches or more and 46.5 inches or less.
A golf club having a shoulder center grip GLL of 140 kg · cm ^{2 or less calculated by the following formula (1).}
Shoulder center grip GLL = Wg x L x L ... (1)
However, in this formula (1), Wg is the weight (kg) of the grip, and L is a value calculated by the following formula (2). In this formula (2), Lg1 is the distance (cm) from the rear end of the grip to the center of gravity of the grip.
^{L = [60 2 + (Lg1} ) 2] 1/2 ··· (2) The golf club according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the grip weight Wg is 30 g or less. The golf club according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein when the weight of the head is Wh and the weight of the club is Wc, Wh / Wc is 0.72 or more. Any one of claims 1 to 4 in which Lg1 / Lg2 is 0.37 or more when the distance from the rear end of the grip to the center of gravity of the grip is Lg1 and the length of the grip is Lg2. Golf clubs listed in. The golf club according to claim 1, wherein the shoulder center grip GLL calculated by the following formula (1) is 140 kg · cm ^{2 or less.}
Shoulder center grip GLL = Wg x L x L ... (1)
However, in this formula (1), Wg is the weight (kg) of the grip, and L is a value calculated by the following formula (2). In this formula (2), Lg1 is the distance (cm) from the rear end of the grip to the center of gravity of the grip.
^{L = [60 2 + (Lg1} ) 2] 1/2 ··· (2)

Images