JP6865908B1 - Numerical control device and machine learning device - Google Patents

Abstract

The numerical control device (1A) controls the machine tool (2A), the motor load current value (41) of the motor that drives the cutting tool used by the machine tool (2A), and the work by the cutting tool. The cutting coordinate value (40), which is the cutting position to, the tool type (42), which is the type of cutting tool, the work type (43), which is the type of work, and the work temperature (44), which is the temperature of the work. A state observation unit (11A) for observing a state variable including, a data acquisition unit (12) for acquiring a wear amount measurement result (45) which is a result of measuring the wear amount of a cutting tool, and a state variable and a wear amount. A learning unit (13) for learning the amount of wear of the cutting tool according to a data set created based on the combination of the measurement results (45) is provided.

Description

The present disclosure relates to a numerical control device and a machine learning device for estimating the amount of wear of a cutting tool used by a machine tool.

A machine tool that processes a workpiece using a cutting tool is controlled by a numerical control device. When this machine tool processes for a long period of time, the cutting edge of the cutting tool wears, so that the finished workpiece has a large dimensional error. In order to suppress this dimensional error, the machine tool operator periodically measures the amount of wear of the cutting tool.

Various efforts have been attempted in order to save the trouble of measuring the amount of wear by the operator. The numerical control device described in Patent Document 1 estimates the actual amount of wear of the cutting tool from the data showing the correlation between the rate of change of the motor load current when the cutting tool collides with the workpiece and the amount of wear of the cutting tool. doing.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 10-20911

However, in the technique of Patent Document 1, the amount of wear of the cutting tool is estimated without considering the mounting abnormality of the work, the shape abnormality of the work, and the like. That is, in the technique of Patent Document 1, the motor load is caused by an increase in the motor load current due to wear of the cutting tool and a change in the cutting area of the work due to an abnormality in the mounting of the work or an abnormality in the shape of the work. It cannot be distinguished from the increase in current, and the amount of wear cannot be estimated accurately.

The present disclosure has been made in view of the above, and an object of the present disclosure is to obtain a numerical control device capable of accurately estimating the amount of wear of a cutting tool.

In order to solve the above-mentioned problems and achieve the object, the numerical control device of the present disclosure includes a control unit that controls a machine tool based on a machining program and a load current value of a motor that drives a cutting tool used by the machine tool. A state observation unit that observes state variables including the cutting position of the cutting tool on the work, the tool type that is the type of cutting tool, the work type that is the type of work, and the work temperature that is the temperature of the work. And. Further, the numerical control device of the present disclosure is a data set created based on a combination of a data acquisition unit that acquires a wear amount measurement result, which is a result of measuring the wear amount of a cutting tool, and a state variable and a wear amount measurement result. According to the above, a learning unit for generating a learning model for estimating the amount of wear of the cutting tool from the state variable is provided.

The numerical control device according to the present disclosure has an effect that the amount of wear of the cutting tool can be accurately estimated.

The figure which shows the structure of the control system provided with the numerical control device which concerns on Embodiment 1. A flowchart showing a processing procedure of machine learning by the machine learning device according to the first embodiment. A flowchart showing a procedure for estimating the estimated wear amount by the machine learning device according to the first embodiment. The figure which shows the structure of the neural network used by the machine learning apparatus which concerns on Embodiment 1. The figure which shows the hardware configuration example which realizes the machine learning apparatus which concerns on Embodiment 1. The figure which shows the structure of the control system provided with the numerical control device which concerns on Embodiment 2. The figure for demonstrating the cutting start coordinates to the workpiece without mounting error detected by the numerical control device which concerns on Embodiment 2. The figure for demonstrating the cutting start coordinates to the workpiece which has a mounting error detected by the numerical control device which concerns on Embodiment 2.

Hereinafter, the numerical control device and the machine learning device according to the embodiment of the present disclosure will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

Embodiment 1.
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a control system including the numerical control device according to the first embodiment. The control system 100A includes a numerical control (NC) device 1A and a machine tool 2A.

The numerical control device 1A is a computer that controls the machine tool 2A. The machine tool 2A is a device that processes a workpiece, which is a workpiece, using a cutting tool. The machine tool 2A includes a drive unit 31, an HMI (Human Machine Interface) screen 32, a temperature sensor 33, and a wear amount measuring device 34.

The drive unit 31 drives the motor. The motors driven by the drive unit 31 are a servo motor and a spindle motor. When the servomotor drives the cutting tool, the drive unit 31 sends the load current value of the servomotor as the motor load current value 41 to the numerical control device 1A. When the spindle motor drives a cutting tool, the drive unit 31 sends the load current value of the spindle motor to the numerical control device 1A as the motor load current value 41.

The HMI screen 32 is a screen that displays information input by the operator. The HMI screen 32 is connected to an input device (not shown) that receives information input by the operator, and displays information sent from the input device. Examples of input devices are mice, keyboards, and the like.

The information input by the operator to the input device is the tool type 42 and the work type 43. The tool type 42 and the work type 43 displayed on the HMI screen 32 are sent to the numerical control device 1A. The tool type 42 is information indicating the type of cutting tool, and the work type 43 is information indicating the type of work. The work type 43 includes information on the material of the work, information on the shape of the work, information on the size of the work, and the like. The tool type 42 and the work type 43 may be set by any method. In the following description, a case where the tool type 42 and the work type 43 input to the input device are sent to the HMI screen 32, and the tool type 42 and the work type 43 are sent from the HMI screen 32 to the numerical control device 1A will be described. ..

The temperature sensor 33 is an example of a temperature detecting device capable of measuring the temperature of the work. The temperature sensor 33 sends the measured temperature as the work temperature 44 to the numerical control device 1A.

The wear amount measuring device 34 is a device that measures the wear amount of the cutting tool. When the wear amount measuring device 34 is a caliper or the like that manually measures the wear amount of the cutting tool, the wear amount measurement result 45, which is the measurement result of the wear amount, is input to the numerical control device 1A by the operator. When the wear amount measuring device 34 is a device that automatically measures the wear amount of the cutting tool, the wear amount measuring device 34 sends the wear amount measurement result 45 to the numerical control device 1A.

When the wear amount measuring device 34 is a manual measuring device, the wear amount measuring device 34 is arranged outside the machine tool 2A, and when the wear amount measuring device 34 is an automatic measuring device, the wear amount measuring device 34 , Arranged inside the machine tool 2A. In the following description, a case where the wear amount measuring device 34 is an automatic measuring device and the wear amount measurement result 45 is sent from the wear amount measuring device 34 to the numerical control device 1A will be described.

The numerical control device 1A includes a machine learning device 10, a control unit 21, and an estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22. The control unit 21 controls the machine tool 2A by using the machining program 20. Further, when the machining program 20 is executed, the control unit 21 calculates a cutting coordinate value 40 indicating a cutting position (tool coordinates) on the work by the cutting tool based on the machining program 20. The control unit 21 sends the cutting coordinate value 40 to the machine learning device 10.

The machine learning device 10 is a computer that learns the amount of wear of the cutting tool based on the information acquired when the workpiece is machined by the cutting tool. The machine learning device 10 has a function of learning the amount of wear of the cutting tool and a function of estimating the amount of wear of the cutting tool using the learning result. The machine learning device 10 outputs the estimated wear amount 75, which is the estimation result, to the estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22.

The machine learning device 10 includes a state observation unit 11A, a data acquisition unit 12, and a learning unit 13. The state observing unit 11A acquires the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the work temperature 44 from the machine tool 2A.

Specifically, the state observing unit 11A acquires the motor load current value 41 from the drive unit 31, and acquires the tool type 42 and the work type 43 from the HMI screen 32. Further, the state observation unit 11A acquires the work temperature 44 from the temperature sensor 33. Further, the state observation unit 11A acquires the cutting coordinate value 40 from the control unit 21. The state observing unit 11A sends the acquired cutting coordinate value 40, motor load current value 41, tool type 42, work type 43, and work temperature 44 to the learning unit 13.

The data acquisition unit 12 acquires the wear amount measurement result 45 from the wear amount measuring device 34. The data acquisition unit 12 sends the acquired wear amount measurement result 45 to the learning unit 13.

The learning unit 13 measures the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, the work temperature 44, and the wear amount output from the data acquisition unit 12 output from the state observation unit 11A. The estimated wear amount 75 is learned based on the data set created based on the combination of the results 45. Here, the data set is data in which state variables and determination data are associated with each other. In the first embodiment, the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the work temperature 44 are state variables, and the wear amount measurement result 45 is the determination data.

At the learning stage, the learning unit 13 learns the estimated wear amount 75 by updating a learning model such as a neural network. The learning unit 13 adjusts the learning model so that the wear amount measurement result 45 is output from the learning model when the state variable is input to the learning model. The learning unit 13 stores this learning model.

When the learning unit 13 receives a state variable from the state observing unit 11A in the utilization stage (estimation stage), the learning unit 13 inputs this state variable into the learning model. In this case, the learning model outputs the estimated wear amount 75 corresponding to the state variable. The learning unit 13 sends the estimated wear amount 75 to the estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22.

The estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22 calculates the correction amount 76 based on the estimated wear amount 75. The correction amount 76 is a position correction amount of the cutting tool for correcting the machining position of the work by the cutting tool. The correction amount 76 is used to eliminate a machining error of the work due to wear of the cutting tool.

The estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22, which is a reflecting unit, sends the correction amount 76 to the control unit 21 to reflect the correction amount 76 to the position of the cutting tool. The control unit 21 controls the machine tool 2A while correcting the position of the cutting tool using the correction amount 76.

Next, the machine learning processing procedure by the machine learning device 10 and the estimation processing procedure of the estimated wear amount 75 by the machine learning device 10 will be described. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of machine learning by the machine learning device according to the first embodiment.

The tool type 42 and the work type 43 used for machining the work are set in advance using the HMI screen 32. The state observation unit 11A acquires the tool type 42 and the work type 43 from the HMI screen 32 (step S10).

When the control unit 21 starts executing the machining program 20, the control unit 21 calculates the cutting coordinate value 40 based on the machining program 20. The state observation unit 11A acquires the cutting coordinate value 40 from the control unit 21 (step S20). Further, the state observing unit 11A acquires the motor load current value 41 from the drive unit 31 (step S30) and the work temperature 44 from the temperature sensor 33 (step S40). The state observation unit 11A transmits the acquired data to the learning unit 13 (step S50). The data transmitted by the state observing unit 11A to the learning unit 13 is a cutting coordinate value 40, a motor load current value 41, a tool type 42, a work type 43, and a work temperature 44.

At the time of machine learning, the data acquisition unit 12 acquires the wear amount measurement result 45 from the wear amount measuring device 34 (step S60). The data acquisition unit 12 transmits the acquired data to the learning unit 13 (step S70). That is, the data acquisition unit 12 transmits the wear amount measurement result 45 to the learning unit 13. The processes of steps S10 to S70 may be executed in any order.

The learning unit 13 learns the estimated wear amount 75 based on the data acquired by the state observation unit 11A and the data acquisition unit 12 (step S80). That is, the learning unit 13 generates a learning model based on a data set in which state variables and determination data are associated with each other. The learning unit 13 stores the learning model.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a procedure for estimating the estimated wear amount by the machine learning device according to the first embodiment. Of the processes shown in FIG. 3, the same processes as those shown in FIG. 2 will be omitted.

Of the processes performed by the machine learning device 10 when estimating the estimated wear amount 75, steps S10 to S50 are the same as during machine learning. In step S50, after the state observing unit 11A transmits the acquired data to the learning unit 13, the learning unit 13 estimates the estimated wear amount 75 based on the learning model and the data acquired by the state observing unit 11A. (Step S90). That is, the learning unit 13 estimates the estimated wear amount 75 based on the state variables and the learning model. In this way, the learning unit 13 calculates the estimated wear amount 75 from the state variables acquired from the state observation unit 11A based on the learning result (learning model) generated by using the data set in which the state variables and the determination data are associated with each other. presume.

The learning unit 13 may also update the learning model when estimating the estimated wear amount 75. In other words, the learning unit 13 may learn the estimated wear amount 75 while estimating the estimated wear amount 75.

The learning unit 13 sends the estimated wear amount 75 to the estimated wear amount reflection unit 22. The estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22 calculates a correction amount 76 for correcting the position of the cutting tool based on the acquired estimated wear amount 75. The estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22 sends the calculated correction amount 76 to the control unit 21. The control unit 21 controls the machine tool 2A by using the correction amount 76 and the machining program 20.

Here, the relationship between each data acquired by the state observation unit 11A and the wear amount measurement result 45 acquired by the data acquisition unit 12 will be described. As the cutting tool wears and the sharpness decreases, the resistance between the work and the cutting tool increases, so that the motor load current value 41 increases. Further, the motor load current value 41 also changes when the cutting region by the cutting tool changes due to the mounting error of the work, the variation in the shape of the work, the expansion of the work, or the like.

The machine learning device 10 uses the cutting coordinate value 40 to determine whether the change in the motor load current value 41 is due to the wear of the cutting tool or the change in the cutting region.

The machine learning device 10 determines that the motor load current value 41 has changed due to wear of the cutting tool when the motor load current value 41 changes at the timing when the cutting coordinate value 40 becomes a preset normal coordinate. To do. In this case, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model so that the estimated wear amount 75 approaches the wear amount measurement result 45. That is, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model so that the closer the cutting coordinate value 40 is to the normal coordinates, the closer the estimated wear amount 75 is to the wear amount measurement result 45.

On the other hand, in the machine learning device 10, when the motor load current value 41 changes at a timing when the cutting coordinate value 40 is not the normal coordinate set in advance, the cutting area changes due to a work mounting error or the like. It is determined that the motor load current value 41 has changed. In this case, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model so that the estimated wear amount 75 does not approach the wear amount measurement result 45. That is, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model so that the farther the cutting coordinate value 40 is from the normal coordinates, the farther the estimated wear amount 75 is from the wear amount measurement result 45.

Further, when the material or shape of the cutting tool and the work is changed, the amount of wear of the cutting tool changes even in the same machining. Therefore, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model based on the tool type 42 and the work type 43.

Further, since the work itself is deformed when the work temperature 44 changes, the cutting region changes when the work temperature 44 changes. For example, when the work temperature 44 becomes high, the work expands and the cutting area becomes large. In this case, as the work temperature 44 rises, the motor load current value 41 also rises. That is, when the work temperature 44 changes, the motor load current value 41 also changes. Therefore, the machine learning device 10 adjusts the learning model based on the work temperature 44.

As described above, the machine learning device 10 is used to learn the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the estimated wear amount 75 corresponding to the work temperature 44. The machine learning device 10 may be, for example, a device connected to the numerical control device 1A via a network and separate from the numerical control device 1A. Further, the machine learning device 10 may be built in the numerical control device 1A. Further, the machine learning device 10 may exist on the cloud server.

The learning unit 13 learns the estimated wear amount 75 by so-called supervised learning according to, for example, a neural network model. Here, supervised learning is a model in which a large number of data sets of a certain input and a result (label) are given to a learning device to learn the features in those data sets and estimate the result from the input. Say.

A neural network is composed of an input layer composed of a plurality of neurons, an intermediate layer (hidden layer) composed of a plurality of neurons, and an output layer composed of a plurality of neurons. The intermediate layer may be one layer or two or more layers.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a configuration of a neural network used by the machine learning device according to the first embodiment. For example, in the case of a three-layer neural network as shown in FIG. 4, when a plurality of inputs are input to the input layers X1 to X3, the values are multiplied by the weights w11 to w16 and input to the intermediate layers Y1 and Y2. , The result is further multiplied by the weights w21 to w26 and output from the output layers Z1 to Z3. This output result depends on the values of the weights w11 to w16 and the weights w21 to w26.

The neural network of the first embodiment is according to a data set created based on a combination of a cutting coordinate value 40, a motor load current value 41, a tool type 42, a work type 43, a work temperature 44, and a wear amount measurement result 45. The estimated wear amount 75 is learned by so-called supervised learning.

That is, the neural network inputs the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the work temperature 44, and the result output from the output layers Z1 to Z3 is the wear amount measurement result 45. The estimated wear amount 75 is learned by adjusting the weights w11 to w16 and w21 to w26 so as to approach. The learning unit 13 stores a neural network in which the weights w11 to w16 and w21 to w26 are adjusted.

The neural network can also learn the estimated wear amount 75 by so-called unsupervised learning. Unsupervised learning is to learn how the input data is distributed by giving a large amount of input data to the machine learning device, and input data without giving the corresponding teacher data (output data). It is a method of learning a device that performs compression, classification, shaping, etc. In unsupervised learning, the features in those datasets can be clustered among similar people. Unsupervised learning can use this result to predict the output by setting some criteria and allocating the output to optimize it. In addition, as an intermediate problem setting between unsupervised learning and supervised learning, there is also what is called semi-supervised learning, in which only a part of the input and output data sets exist, and the other data is input only. This is the case.

Further, the learning unit 13 may learn the estimated wear amount 75 according to the data sets created for the plurality of numerical control devices 1A. The learning unit 13 may acquire a data set from a plurality of machine tools 2A used at the same site, or data collected from a plurality of machine tools 2A operating independently at different sites. The set may be used to learn the estimated wear amount 75. Further, it is possible to add a numerical control device for collecting a data set to the target on the way, or conversely to remove it from the target. Further, a machine learning device that has learned the estimated wear amount 75 for a certain numerical control device is attached to another numerical control device, and the estimated wear amount 75 is relearned and updated for the other numerical control device. It may be.

Further, as the learning algorithm used in the learning unit 13, deep learning (deep learning), which learns the extraction of the feature amount itself, can also be used, and the learning unit 13 uses another known method, for example, genetics. Machine learning may be performed according to objective programming, functional logic programming, support vector machines, and the like.

Here, the hardware configuration of the machine learning device 10 will be described. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a hardware configuration that realizes the machine learning device according to the first embodiment. The machine learning device 10 can be realized by an input device 103, a processor 101, a memory 102, a display device 105, and an output device 104.

An example of the processor 101 is a CPU (Central Processing Unit, a central processing unit, a processing unit, an arithmetic unit, a microprocessor, a microcomputer, a DSP (Digital Signal Processor)) or a system LSI (Large Scale Integration). Examples of the memory 102 are RAM (Random Access Memory) and ROM (Read Only Memory).

The machine learning device 10 is realized by the processor 101 reading and executing a computer-executable learning program for executing the operation of the machine learning device 10 stored in the memory 102. It can be said that the learning program, which is a program for executing the operation of the machine learning device 10, causes the computer to execute the procedure or method of the machine learning device 10.

The learning program executed by the machine learning device 10 has a modular configuration including a state observation unit 11A, a data acquisition unit 12, and a learning unit 13, and these are loaded on the main storage device, and these are the main ones. Generated on the storage device.

The input device 103 receives the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the work temperature 44, which are state variables, from the machine tool 2A and inputs them to the processor 101. Further, the input device 103 receives the wear amount measurement result 45, which is the determination data, from the machine tool 2A and inputs it to the processor 101. Further, the input device 103 receives the cutting coordinate value 40, which is a state variable, from the control unit 21 and inputs it to the processor 101.

The memory 102 is used as a temporary memory when the processor 101 executes various processes. The memory 102 stores the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, the work temperature 44, the wear amount measurement result 45, the estimated wear amount 75, and the like. The output device 104 outputs the estimated wear amount 75 and the like to the estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22.

The display device 105 displays the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, the work temperature 44, the wear amount measurement result 45, the estimated wear amount 75, and the like. An example of the display device 105 is a liquid crystal monitor.

The learning program may be a file in an installable or executable format, stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and provided as a computer program product. Further, the learning program may be provided to the machine learning device 10 via a network such as the Internet. It should be noted that some of the functions of the machine learning device 10 may be realized by dedicated hardware such as a dedicated circuit, and some may be realized by software or firmware. Further, the numerical control device 1A can also be realized by the same hardware configuration as the machine learning device 10.

The machine tool 2A performs machining with the work fixed in the machine tool 2A, but in addition to the mounting error when mounting the work, the size of the work itself, the variation in the shape of the work, the deformation of the work due to the temperature change of the work, etc. It may occur. Due to these factors, the cutting area of the work changes even in the same machining, so that the amount of wear of the cutting tool also changes. Further, as the cutting tool wears, the resistance between the work and the cutting tool increases, so that the motor load current value 41 required for machining increases. Further, if the work mounting error or the work shape variation is large, there is a concern that the work accuracy of the finished product may be affected.

In the first embodiment, the numerical control device 1A is based on the motor load current value 41, the work temperature 44, and the cutting coordinate value 40 in order to consider the influence of the work mounting error, the work shape variation, and the like. Since the estimated wear amount 75 is estimated, the estimated wear amount 75 of the cutting tool can be estimated with high accuracy. Therefore, the numerical control device 1A can calculate the highly accurate correction amount 76 based on the estimated wear amount 75 estimated with high accuracy.

Since the calculated correction amount 76 is automatically reflected in the control unit 21, the numerical control device 1A can be continuously operated for a long period of time without the manual operation of the operator, which leads to an improvement in productivity.

As described above, in the first embodiment, the numerical control device 1A includes a state observation unit 11A, a data acquisition unit 12, and a learning unit 13. Then, the state observing unit 11 includes a motor load current value 41, a cutting coordinate value 40 which is a cutting position on the work by the cutting tool, a tool type 42, a work type 43, and a work temperature 44. Is observing. In addition, the data acquisition unit 12 has acquired the wear amount measurement result 45, which is the result of measuring the wear amount of the cutting tool. Further, the learning unit 13 generates a learning model for estimating the wear amount of the cutting tool from the state variable according to the data set created based on the combination of the state variable and the wear amount measurement result 45. In this way, the numerical control device 1A estimates the amount of wear in consideration of the work mounting abnormality, the work shape abnormality, and the like by using the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, and the work temperature 44. Therefore, the amount of wear of the cutting tool can be estimated accurately.

Embodiment 2.
Next, the second embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 6 to 8. In the second embodiment, the numerical control device detects an abnormality in the work such as an abnormality in the mounting position of the work and an abnormality in the shape of the work.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a configuration of a control system including the numerical control device according to the second embodiment. Of the components of FIG. 6, components that achieve the same functions as the numerical control device 1A of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1 are designated by the same reference numerals, and redundant description will be omitted.

The control system 100B includes a numerical control device 1B and a machine tool 2B. The numerical control device 1B is a computer that controls the machine tool 2B. The numerical control device 1B has a function of detecting an abnormality in the mounting position of the work and a function of calculating the amount of mounting error of the work. The machine tool 2B is a device for machining a workpiece with a cutting tool, similarly to the machine tool 2A. The machine tool 2A includes a drive unit 31 and an HMI screen 32.

The information input by the operator to the input device connected to the HMI screen 32 is the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the error threshold 46. The error threshold value 46 is a threshold value for determining whether or not the amount of mounting error of the work is within the permissible range. That is, the error threshold value 46 is a threshold value for determining whether or not to issue a warning with respect to the amount of mounting error of the work. The amount of error in mounting the work is calculated based on the cutting start coordinates, which is the start position of cutting on the work by the cutting tool. The difference between the normal cutting start coordinates and the actual cutting start coordinates is the amount of work mounting error.

The numerical control device 1B includes a control unit 21, a state observation unit 11B, an abnormality determination device 50, and an error amount calculation device 60. The abnormality determination device 50, the error amount calculation device 60, and the numerical control device 1B can be realized by the same hardware configuration as the machine learning device 10. The state observation unit 11B of the numerical control device 1B acquires the motor load current value 41, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the error threshold value 46 from the machine tool 2B.

Specifically, the state observing unit 11B acquires the motor load current value 41 from the drive unit 31, and acquires the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the error threshold 46 from the HMI screen 32. Further, the state observation unit 11B acquires the cutting coordinate value 40 from the control unit 21. The state observation unit 11B sends the acquired cutting coordinate value 40, motor load current value 41, tool type 42, work type 43, and error threshold value 46 to the abnormality determination device 50.

The abnormality determination device 50 is a device that determines whether or not the amount of mounting error of the work, the shape of the work, or the like exceeds a preset error threshold value 46. The error amount calculation device 60 is a device that calculates the mounting error amount of the work.

The abnormality determination device 50 includes a mounting abnormality determination unit 52 and a warning display unit 51. Further, the error amount calculation device 60 has an error amount calculation unit 62 and a calculation result display unit 61.

The mounting abnormality determination unit 52 receives the motor load current value 41, the cutting coordinate value 40, the tool type 42, the work type 43, and the error threshold value 46 output from the state observation unit 11B. The mounting abnormality determination unit 52 detects the cutting start coordinate, which is the cutting start position, based on the motor load current value 41 and the cutting coordinate value 40.

Here, the cutting start coordinates will be described. FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining the cutting start coordinates of the workpiece having no mounting error detected by the numerical control device according to the second embodiment. FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining the cutting start coordinates of the workpiece having a mounting error detected by the numerical control device according to the second embodiment.

7 and 8 describe a case where the Z-axis direction is the vertical direction and the XY plane parallel to the upper surface of the processing table 85 on which the work 80 is mounted is a horizontal plane. That is, the two axes in the plane parallel to the upper surface of the processing table 85 and orthogonal to each other are defined as the X axis and the Y axis. Further, the axis orthogonal to the X-axis and the Y-axis is defined as the Z-axis.

FIG. 7 shows a case where the work 80 is attached straight to the processing table 85 without being tilted. FIG. 8 shows a case where the work 80 is attached to the processing table 85 in an inclined state.

For example, the cutting tool 71 processes the work 80 from the Z-axis direction. In this case, the cutting tool 71 moves from the upper side of the work 80 and comes into contact with the work 80.

If there is no mounting error of the work 80 on the machining table 85, the cutting tool 71 starts machining the work 80 after coming into contact with the work 80 at the desired cutting start coordinates (X1, Z1). In this case, since the cutting tool 71 comes into contact with the work 80 at the cutting start coordinates (X1, Z1), the motor load current value 41 suddenly rises at the cutting start coordinates (X1, Z1). Then, the cutting tool 71 performs machining on the work 80 in the Z-axis direction to machine the machining region 81 of the work 80 extending in the Z-axis direction.

On the other hand, when there is an error in mounting the work 80 on the machining table 85, the cutting tool 71 comes into contact with the work 80 at cutting start coordinates (X2, Z2) different from the desired cutting start coordinates (X1, Z1), and then the cutting tool 71 comes into contact with the work 80. Machining of the work 80 is started. In this case, since the cutting tool 71 comes into contact with the work 80 at the cutting start coordinates (X2, Z2), the motor load current value 41 suddenly rises at the cutting start coordinates (X2, Z2). Then, the cutting tool 71 processes the machining area 82 at the lower part of the work 80 by executing the machining on the work 80 in the Z-axis direction. The processing area 82 is a region different from the processing area 81.

In this way, when there is a mounting error of the work 80, the cutting start coordinates change as compared with the case where there is no mounting error. Similarly, when the shape of the work 80 varies, the cutting start coordinates change as compared with the case where the shape of the work 80 does not vary. Further, even when the work 80 is expanded or contracted, the cutting start coordinates are changed as compared with the case where the work 80 is not expanded or contracted.

When the coordinate difference, which is the difference between the changed cutting start coordinates (X2, Z2) and the normal cutting start coordinates (X1, Z1), exceeds the preset error threshold value 46. In addition, it is determined that the work 80 is abnormal. The abnormality of the work 80 is an abnormality of mounting the work 80 on the processing table 85, an abnormality of the shape of the work 80, or the like.

The normal cutting start coordinates are different for each combination of the tool type 42 and the work type 43. Therefore, the mounting abnormality determination unit 52 determines whether or not there is an abnormality in the work 80 by using the normal cutting start coordinates corresponding to the combination of the tool type 42 and the work type 43.

When the mounting abnormality determination unit 52 detects an abnormality, the mounting abnormality determination unit 52 sends abnormality information indicating the abnormality determination to the warning display unit 51. Further, the mounting abnormality determination unit 52 sends the start position error, the tool type 42, and the work type 43, which are the coordinate differences between the changed cutting start coordinates and the normal cutting start coordinates, to the error amount calculation unit 62.

When the warning display unit 51 receives the abnormality information from the mounting abnormality determination unit 52, the warning display unit 51 displays a warning indicating that the work 80 is abnormal, and informs the operator that there is a concern about the machining accuracy of the finished work 80. Warn and call attention. The warning display unit 51 is not limited to displaying the warning, and may output the warning by any method. For example, the warning display unit 51 may output a warning sound.

Upon receiving the start position error from the mounting abnormality determination unit 52, the error amount calculation unit 62 assumes that the shape of the work 80 is normal, and based on the start position error, the tool type 42, and the work type 43, Calculate the amount of work mounting error. The error amount calculation unit 62 sends the work mounting error amount, which is the calculation result, to the calculation result display unit 61. When the calculation result display unit 61 receives the work mounting error amount from the error amount calculation unit 62, the calculation result display unit 61 displays the received work mounting error amount and warns the operator that there is a concern about the machining accuracy of the finished work 80. And call attention. In this way, since the numerical control device 1B warns the operator when there is an abnormality such as a work mounting error, it is possible to prevent the defective work 80 of the finished product from flowing out.

The numerical control devices 1A and 1B may be combined. That is, the numerical control device 1A may include the abnormality determination device 50, or the numerical control device 1A may include the abnormality determination device 50 and the error amount calculation device 60. Further, the numerical control device 1B may include the machine learning device 10, or the numerical control device 1B may include the machine learning device 10 and the estimated wear amount reflecting unit 22.

As described above, in the second embodiment, the numerical control device 1B uses the cutting coordinate value 40, the motor load current value 41, and the error threshold value 46 to move the work such as an abnormality in the mounting position of the work and an abnormality in the shape of the work. Anomalies have been detected. As a result, the numerical control device 1B can output a warning or the like when an abnormality occurs in the work.

The configuration shown in the above embodiments is an example, and can be combined with another known technique, can be combined with each other, and does not deviate from the gist. It is also possible to omit or change a part of the configuration.

1A, 1B Numerical control device, 2A, 2B Machine tool, 10 Machine learning device, 11A, 11B State observation unit, 12 Data acquisition unit, 13 Learning unit, 20 Machining program, 21 Control unit, 22 Estimated wear amount reflection unit, 31 Drive unit, 32 HMI screen, 33 temperature sensor, 34 wear amount measuring device, 40 cutting coordinate value, 41 motor load current value, 42 tool type, 43 work type, 44 work temperature, 45 wear amount measurement result, 46 error threshold, 50 Abnormality judgment device, 51 Warning display unit, 52 Mounting abnormality judgment unit, 60 Error amount calculation device, 61 Calculation result display unit, 62 Error amount calculation unit, 71 Cutting tool, 75 Estimated wear amount, 76 Correction amount, 80 work, 81 , 82 Machining area, 85 Machining table, 100A, 100B control system, 101 processor, 102 memory, 103 input device, 104 output device, 105 display device, X1 to X3 input layer, Y1, Y2 intermediate layer, Z1 to Z3 output layer ..

Claims (6)

A control unit that controls the machine tool based on the machining program,
The load current value of the motor that drives the cutting tool used by the machine tool, the cutting position of the cutting tool on the work, the tool type that is the type of the cutting tool, the work type that is the type of the work, and the above. A state observation unit that observes state variables including the work temperature, which is the temperature of the work, and
A data acquisition unit that acquires the wear amount measurement result, which is the result of measuring the wear amount of the cutting tool, and
A learning unit that generates a learning model for estimating the wear amount of the cutting tool from the state variable according to a data set created based on the combination of the state variable and the wear amount measurement result.
A numerical control device characterized by comprising. The learning unit estimates the amount of wear of the cutting tool from the state variables using the learning model.
The numerical control device according to claim 1. Based on the wear amount estimated by the learning unit, a position correction amount for correcting the position of the cutting tool is calculated, and the position correction amount is sent to the control unit to obtain the position correction amount for the cutting tool. Further equipped with a reflection part to reflect on the position of
The numerical control device according to claim 2. Based on the cutting position and the load current value, the cutting start coordinates, which are the coordinates at which the cutting tool starts machining on the work, are calculated, and the cutting tool moves onto the work in a normal state. An abnormality determination device that outputs a warning when the coordinate difference, which is the difference between the machining start coordinate and the cutting start coordinate, exceeds the threshold value is further provided.
The numerical control device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the numerical control device is characterized. An error amount calculation device that estimates the mounting error amount of the work on the assumption that the shape of the work is normal based on the coordinate difference and outputs the mounting error amount is further provided.
The numerical control device according to claim 4. The load current value of the motor that drives the cutting tool used by the machine tool, the cutting position on the work by the cutting tool, the tool type that is the type of the cutting tool, the work type that is the type of the work, and the work. The state observation unit that observes the state variables including the work temperature, which is the temperature of
A data acquisition unit that acquires the wear amount measurement result, which is the result of measuring the wear amount of the cutting tool, and
A learning unit that generates a learning model for estimating the wear amount of the cutting tool from the state variable according to a data set created based on the combination of the state variable and the wear amount measurement result.
A machine learning device characterized by being equipped with.

Images