JP5876860B2 - Network design apparatus and method - Google Patents
Network design apparatus and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP5876860B2 JP5876860B2 JP2013229361A JP2013229361A JP5876860B2 JP 5876860 B2 JP5876860 B2 JP 5876860B2 JP 2013229361 A JP2013229361 A JP 2013229361A JP 2013229361 A JP2013229361 A JP 2013229361A JP 5876860 B2 JP5876860 B2 JP 5876860B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- node
- line
- line bundle
- route
- candidates
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Description
本発明は、ネットワーク設計装置及び方法に係り、特に、面的被災に対して頑健な物理媒体ネットワークを設計するためのネットワーク設計装置及び方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a network design apparatus and method, and more particularly, to a network design apparatus and method for designing a physical medium network that is robust against an area disaster.
これまでは、ネットワークの信頼性は、主に、独立に生じる故障を前提として、あるノード間の接続確率が一定値以上となるよう、方策を講じることによって確保されてきた。しかしながら、面的被災によるネットワーク機能の喪失は、独立な故障という前提と大きく乖離するため、このような信頼性対策では不十分となる。信頼性工学においては、相関がある故障という概念によって、既存理論を高度化する試みもあるが、面的被災のような地理的概念によって、故障が生じ得るということまでは考慮できない。 Up to now, network reliability has been ensured by taking measures so that the probability of connection between certain nodes becomes a certain value or more, mainly on the premise of failure occurring independently. However, the loss of network functions due to a face-to-face disaster is far from the premise of an independent failure, so such reliability measures are insufficient. In reliability engineering, there are attempts to upgrade existing theories based on the concept of correlated failures, but it cannot be considered that failures can occur due to geographical concepts such as area damage.
一方、積分幾何によって、直線上に被災エリアが生じた場合に、2ノード間の接続確率を求めるアルゴリズムが示されている(例えば、非特許文献1参照)。 On the other hand, an algorithm for obtaining a connection probability between two nodes when a damaged area occurs on a straight line by integral geometry is shown (for example, see Non-Patent Document 1).
しかしながら、上記の非特許文献1の技術では、
(1)直線上の被災だけで、地震や津波に整合する面的被害になっていない;
(2)設計法にならない;
といった課題がある。
However, in the technique of Non-Patent
(1) It is not just damage on a straight line, it is not a surface damage consistent with earthquakes and tsunamis;
(2) Not a design method;
There is a problem.
本発明は、上記の点に鑑みなされたもので、面的被災によるネットワーク機能の喪失時において、面的な被災に対応したモデルに基づいて、物理媒体の経路設計が可能なネットワーク設計装置及び方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention has been made in view of the above points, and a network design apparatus and method capable of designing a path of a physical medium based on a model corresponding to an area disaster when the network function is lost due to the area disaster. The purpose is to provide.
一態様によれば、面的被災時に対応可能なネットワーク設計装置であって、
ネットワーク上のノードO,ノードkの間が接続可能である確率(以下、「接続確率」と記す)の評価方法及び回線束部分経路候補と個別回線部分経路候補を含む物理媒体経路候補が入力されると、面的被災時に、前記ネットワーク上の前記ノードOと前記ノードkの接続確率の最悪値、または、該接続確率の和を求め、経路候補と共に記憶手段に格納する接続確率最大化手段と、
前記記憶手段の前記経路候補から、前記接続確率の最悪値が最大となる、または、前記接続確率の和が最大となる経路を選択する経路選択手段と、を有するネットワーク設計装置が提供される。
According to one aspect, a network design device capable of responding to an area disaster,
Evaluation method of probability of connection between node O and node k on the network (hereinafter referred to as “connection probability”) and physical medium route candidate including line bundle partial route candidate and individual line partial route candidate are input. A connection probability maximizing means for obtaining the worst value of the connection probabilities of the node O and the node k on the network or the sum of the connection probabilities and storing them in the storage means together with the route candidates in the event of a disaster ,
There is provided a network design device comprising route selection means for selecting, from the route candidates in the storage means, a route having a maximum worst connection probability or a sum having the maximum connection probability.
一態様によれば、物理媒体経路を決めるネットワーク設計において、面的な被災に対応したモデルに基づいて、候補の経路の中から、ルートノードOとその他の各ノードk間の接続確率が最悪となるO−k間の接続確率が最良化するネットワーク設計が可能となる。 According to one aspect, in the network design for determining the physical medium path, the connection probability between the root node O and each of the other nodes k is the worst among the candidate paths based on the model corresponding to the area disaster. It is possible to design a network that optimizes the connection probability between O and k.
以下、図面と共に本発明の実施の形態を説明する。 Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
図1は、本発明の一実施の形態におけるネットワーク設計装置の構成を示す。 FIG. 1 shows the configuration of a network design apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
同図に示すネットワーク設計装置100は、入力部110、接続確率最大化処理部120、経路・接続確率記憶部130、経路選択部140、出力部150を有する。
The
上記の各構成を説明する前に、背景となる理論を示す。なお、ある平面図形Xに対して|X|をXの外周長、 Before explaining each of the above configurations, the theory behind this is presented. For a certain plane figure X, | X |
凸領域のA0内に光ファイバケーブルなどの物理媒体ネットワークがあり、ネットワーク内の2つのノードi,j間に経路p(i,j)があるとし、ここに災害が生じたとする。被災エリアに含まれるネットワーク部分は、全て壊れるとする。被災エリアモデルを図2に示す。被災エリア境界は、幅wの帯状領域Bに含まれるとする。被災エリアをこの帯状領域Bと半平面RBの和集合である半平面で近似する。被災エリアはA0を含む平面上で、角度を含めてランダムに生じるとする。 It is assumed that there is a physical medium network such as an optical fiber cable in A 0 in the convex area, and there is a path p (i, j) between two nodes i and j in the network, and a disaster occurs here. It is assumed that all network parts included in the disaster area are broken. A disaster area model is shown in FIG. It is assumed that the disaster area boundary is included in a belt-like region B having a width w. The affected area is approximated by a half-plane which is the union of the band-like region B and the half-plane R B. Affected areas and on a plane including A 0, occurs at random, including angle.
このとき、積分幾何の解析により、式(1)を得る。 At this time, Formula (1) is obtained by analysis of integral geometry.
式(1)から、この確率の最大化は、O−k間経路のconvex hullの外周長 From equation (1), this probability is maximized by the outer perimeter of the convex hull of the O-k path.
なお、 In addition,
図1の入力部110には、パラメータとして、回線束経路候補、策定された個別回線経路候補を含む物理媒体経路候補、及び、確率の評価方法として、上記のノードi,j間の接続確率を求める式(1)が入力される。 In the input unit 110 of FIG. 1, as a parameter, a line bundle path candidate, a physical medium path candidate including a formulated individual line path candidate, and a connection probability between the nodes i and j as a probability evaluation method are set. The required expression (1) is input.
物理媒体は、図3に示すように、回線束部分aと個別回線部分bからなるとする。簡単のため、2段階構成としたが、多段階の構成でも本発明を同様に適用できる。図4に示すように、既存手法によりコスト等の条件を考慮して得られた回線束の経路候補(以下、「回線束部分経路候補」と記す)が1〜nまであり、同回線束部分経路候補iに対し、既存手法によりコスト等の条件を考慮して得られた個別回線k(ノードk向けの回線)に関する個別回線部分経路候補集合をS(i,k)とする。 As shown in FIG. 3, the physical medium is composed of a line bundle part a and an individual line part b. Although the two-stage configuration is used for simplicity, the present invention can be similarly applied to a multi-stage configuration. As shown in FIG. 4, there are 1 to n channel bundle route candidates (hereinafter referred to as “line bundle partial route candidates”) obtained in consideration of conditions such as cost by the existing method. Let S (i, k) be the individual line partial path candidate set for the individual line k (line for the node k) obtained for the route candidate i in consideration of conditions such as cost by the existing method.
接続確率最大化処理部120は、各個別回線部分経路候補kについて、まず、ある回線束部分経路候補iを固定して、個別回線部分経路候補集合S(i,k)の各経路について、O−k間経路のconvex hullの外周長
For each individual line partial path candidate k, the connection probability
個別回線部分経路候補についての経路の選択は、他の個別回線に影響を与えないので、回線束部分経路候補iが採用される場合は、r(i,k)を採用すべきである。 Since the route selection for the individual line partial path candidate does not affect other individual lines, r (i, k) should be adopted when the line bundle partial path candidate i is adopted.
経路選択部140は、回線束部分経路候補1〜nについて、max_k f(i,k)が最小となる経路を経路・接続確率記憶部130から選択する。ここで、max_k f(i,k)は、回線束部分経路候補iを採用時に、最悪となるノードkに対する
The
出力部150は、経路選択部140で選択された経路を出力する。
The
図5は、本発明の一実施の形態におけるネットワーク設計装置の動作のフローチャートである。 FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the operation of the network design apparatus according to the embodiment of the present invention.
入力部110は、策定された回線束経路候補と個別回線経路候補が入力されると、それらを接続確率最大化処理部120に渡す(ステップ101)。 When the formulated line bundle route candidate and individual line route candidate are input, the input unit 110 passes them to the connection probability maximization processing unit 120 (step 101).
接続確率最大化処理部120は、処理する回線束部分経路候補の処理対象カウンタiと、処理する個別回線部分経路候補の処理対象カウンタkを1に初期化する(ステップ102,103)。
The connection probability
接続確率最大化処理部120は、上記の
The connection probability
全ての個別回線部分経路候補kについてステップ104の処理を行った場合は(ステップ105,Yes)、ステップ107に移行し、未処理の個別回線部分経路候補kがある場合には(ステップ105,No)、kの値をk=k+1とし(ステップ106)、ステップ104に戻る。 If the process of step 104 is performed for all individual line partial path candidates k (step 105, Yes), the process proceeds to step 107, and if there is an unprocessed individual line partial path candidate k (step 105, No) ), The value of k is set to k = k + 1 (step 106), and the process returns to step 104.
全ての回線束部分経路候補iについての処理が終わった場合には(ステップ107,Yes)、ステップ109に移行し、未処理の回線束部分経路候補iがある場合には(ステップ107,No)、iの値をi=i+1とし(ステップ108)、ステップ103に戻る。 When the processing for all line bundle partial route candidates i is completed (step 107, Yes), the process proceeds to step 109, and when there is an unprocessed line bundle partial route candidate i (step 107, No). , I is set to i = i + 1 (step 108), and the process returns to step 103.
経路選択部140は、経路・接続確率記憶部130から、最悪値の最大値max_k f(i,k)となる経路iを選択し、経路i_optと名付けて、当該経路i_optと、経路・接続確率記憶部130に保持している経路r(i,k)の中でi=i_optとなる個別回線部分経路候補r(i_opt,k)(k=1,2,…)を経路・接続確率記憶部130に格納する(ステップ109)。
The
出力部150は、経路・接続確率記憶部130からi_optとr(i_opt,k)を読み出して出力する(ステップ110)。
The
また、ルートノードOとその他の各ノードk間の経路のconvex hullの外周長が最小となる経路を選択することも可能である。O,k間の経路のconvex hullの外周長を最小化する際には、全個別回線部分経路候補及び全回線束部分経路候補について、経路のconvex hullの外周長を経路・接続確率記憶部130に保持しておき、接続確率最大化処理部120は、経路のconvex hullの外周長の最大値の最小化する。
It is also possible to select a route that minimizes the outer perimeter of the convex hull of the route between the root node O and each other node k. When minimizing the outer perimeter of the convex hull of the route between O and k, the outer perimeter of the convex hull of the route is stored in the route / connection
なお、上記の図1に示すネットワーク設計装置の各構成要素の動作をプログラムとして構築し、ネットワーク設計装置として利用されるコンピュータにインストールして実行させる、または、ネットワークを介して流通させることが可能である。 The operation of each component of the network design apparatus shown in FIG. 1 can be constructed as a program, installed in a computer used as the network design apparatus and executed, or distributed via a network. is there.
100 ネットワーク設計装置
110 入力部
120 接続確率最大化処理部
130 経路・接続確率記憶部
140 経路選択部
150 出力部
100 Network Design Device 110
Claims (4)
前記回線束部分経路候補ごと、かつ、前記ノードkごとに、当該回線束部分経路候補及び当該ノードkに係る複数の個別回線部分経路候補に関する接続確率を評価し、前記接続確率の最小値を特定する接続確率最大化部と、
複数の前記回線束部分経路候補の中から、前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値のうちの最大値、又は前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値の和、が最小である回線束部分経路候補を選択する経路選択部と、
を有することを特徴とするネットワーク設計装置。 A plurality of line bundle portions that are route candidates for the line bundle portion in a network including a line bundle portion connected to the node O and a plurality of individual line portions bundled in the line bundle portion and connected to a plurality of nodes k. An input unit that receives input of a plurality of individual line partial route candidates that are route candidates related to the individual line portion for each of the route candidates and the line bundle partial route candidates and for each node k;
For each line bundle partial path candidate and for each node k, the connection probability regarding the line bundle partial path candidate and a plurality of individual line partial path candidates for the node k is evaluated, and the minimum value of the connection probability is specified. A connection probability maximization unit to
Of the plurality of line bundle partial path candidates, the line bundle having the smallest maximum value among the minimum values evaluated for each node k or the sum of the minimum values evaluated for each node k. A route selector for selecting partial route candidates;
A network design apparatus comprising:
前記回線束部分経路候補ごと、かつ、前記ノードkごとに、当該回線束部分経路候補及び当該ノードkに係る複数の個別回線部分経路候補に関する凸集合の外周長を評価し、前記外周長の最小値を特定する接続確率最大化部と、
複数の前記回線束部分経路候補の中から、前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値のうちの最大値、又は前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値の和、が最小である回線束部分経路候補を選択する経路選択部と、
を有することを特徴とするネットワーク設計装置。 A plurality of line bundle portions that are route candidates for the line bundle portion in a network including a line bundle portion connected to the node O and a plurality of individual line portions bundled in the line bundle portion and connected to a plurality of nodes k. An input unit that receives input of a plurality of individual line partial route candidates that are route candidates related to the individual line portion for each of the route candidates and the line bundle partial route candidates and for each node k;
For each line bundle partial path candidate and for each node k, the circumference length of the convex set relating to the line bundle partial path candidate and a plurality of individual line partial path candidates related to the node k is evaluated, and the minimum of the outer circumference length is evaluated. A connection probability maximization unit that identifies a value;
Of the plurality of line bundle partial path candidates, the line bundle having the smallest maximum value among the minimum values evaluated for each node k or the sum of the minimum values evaluated for each node k. A route selector for selecting partial route candidates;
A network design apparatus comprising:
前記回線束部分経路候補ごと、かつ、前記ノードkごとに、当該回線束部分経路候補及び当該ノードkに係る複数の個別回線部分経路候補に関する接続確率を評価し、前記接続確率の最小値を特定する接続確率最大化手順と、)
複数の前記回線束部分経路候補の中から、前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値のうちの最大値、又は前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値の和、が最小である回線束部分経路候補を選択する経路選択手順と、
をコンピュータが実行することを特徴とするネットワーク設計方法。 A plurality of line bundle portions that are route candidates for the line bundle portion in a network including a line bundle portion connected to the node O and a plurality of individual line portions bundled in the line bundle portion and connected to a plurality of nodes k. An input procedure for receiving input of a plurality of individual line partial route candidates that are route candidates related to the individual line part for each route candidate and each line bundle partial route candidate and for each node k;
For each line bundle partial path candidate and for each node k, the connection probability regarding the line bundle partial path candidate and a plurality of individual line partial path candidates for the node k is evaluated, and the minimum value of the connection probability is specified. Connection probability maximization procedure, and)
Of the plurality of line bundle partial path candidates, the line bundle having the smallest maximum value among the minimum values evaluated for each node k or the sum of the minimum values evaluated for each node k. A route selection procedure for selecting partial route candidates;
A network design method characterized in that a computer executes .
前記回線束部分経路候補ごと、かつ、前記ノードkごとに、当該回線束部分経路候補及び当該ノードkに係る複数の個別回線部分経路候補に関する凸集合の外周長を評価し、前記外周長の最小値を特定する接続確率最大化手順と、
複数の前記回線束部分経路候補の中から、前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値のうちの最大値、又は前記ノードkごとに評価された前記最小値の和、が最小である回線束部分経路候補を選択する経路選択手順と、
をコンピュータが実行することを特徴とするネットワーク設計方法。 A plurality of line bundle portions that are route candidates for the line bundle portion in a network including a line bundle portion connected to the node O and a plurality of individual line portions bundled in the line bundle portion and connected to a plurality of nodes k. An input procedure for receiving input of a plurality of individual line partial route candidates that are route candidates related to the individual line part for each route candidate and each line bundle partial route candidate and for each node k;
For each line bundle partial path candidate and for each node k, the circumference length of the convex set relating to the line bundle partial path candidate and a plurality of individual line partial path candidates related to the node k is evaluated, and the minimum of the outer circumference length is evaluated. A connection probability maximization procedure to identify the value;
Of the plurality of line bundle partial path candidates, the line bundle having the smallest maximum value among the minimum values evaluated for each node k or the sum of the minimum values evaluated for each node k. A route selection procedure for selecting partial route candidates;
A network design method characterized in that a computer executes .
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2013229361A JP5876860B2 (en) | 2013-11-05 | 2013-11-05 | Network design apparatus and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2013229361A JP5876860B2 (en) | 2013-11-05 | 2013-11-05 | Network design apparatus and method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2015090994A JP2015090994A (en) | 2015-05-11 |
JP5876860B2 true JP5876860B2 (en) | 2016-03-02 |
Family
ID=53194354
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2013229361A Active JP5876860B2 (en) | 2013-11-05 | 2013-11-05 | Network design apparatus and method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP5876860B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9363398B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2016-06-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. | Interlocking assembly for a scanning unit |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6466796B2 (en) * | 2015-07-21 | 2019-02-06 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Reliability evaluation apparatus, reliability evaluation method, and program |
CN112422343B (en) * | 2020-11-18 | 2023-04-18 | 北京直真科技股份有限公司 | Method for evaluating hidden danger of same route based on transmission network |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3123690B2 (en) * | 1993-04-28 | 2001-01-15 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Dynamic routing control method |
JP5023517B2 (en) * | 2006-03-08 | 2012-09-12 | 日本電気株式会社 | Ad hoc network system, route repair method in the system, mobile terminal device, and program |
JP2008167119A (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-17 | Fujitsu Ltd | Network equipment, and control device and method for network equipment |
JP4877989B2 (en) * | 2007-03-05 | 2012-02-15 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Network design method, network design support apparatus, and network design support program |
CN102231647B (en) * | 2011-06-21 | 2014-04-23 | 中国电力科学研究院 | Fiber communication network service route configuration method used in electric power |
-
2013
- 2013-11-05 JP JP2013229361A patent/JP5876860B2/en active Active
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9363398B2 (en) | 2013-01-21 | 2016-06-07 | Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.P. | Interlocking assembly for a scanning unit |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2015090994A (en) | 2015-05-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6288244B2 (en) | Information processing apparatus, influence process extraction method, and program | |
US8144626B2 (en) | Determining disjoint paths with an optimized number of regenerators | |
Zhang et al. | Enhancing network robustness via shielding | |
Saito | Spatial design of physical network robust against earthquakes | |
WO2020177854A1 (en) | Automated root-cause analysis for distributed systems using tracing-data | |
US9337649B2 (en) | Fault processing system | |
JP5876860B2 (en) | Network design apparatus and method | |
JP6268029B2 (en) | Test case generation apparatus and test case generation method | |
US9992069B2 (en) | Network management based on assessment of topological robustness and criticality of assets | |
US7912691B2 (en) | Methods of placing reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers (ROADMS) in a network | |
US7941778B2 (en) | System and method of determining minimum cost path | |
JP6298752B2 (en) | Impact assessment device, impact assessment method, and impact assessment program | |
JP2016174281A (en) | Network evaluation device, network evaluation method and network evaluation program | |
JP5871892B2 (en) | Device design device for ring network of lower node, function deployment position determination device on ring network, backup deployment position determination device, and backup necessity determination device | |
US10700777B2 (en) | Method and system for assigning performance indicators to objects of a network | |
JP4422114B2 (en) | Failure effect degree determination method, apparatus and program | |
US20140169159A1 (en) | System and Method for Finding Partially Disjoint Paths for Spare Capacity Allocation in Shared Backup Path Protection for Dual Fiber Cuts | |
JP5871893B2 (en) | Update portion determination apparatus and method | |
JP7134103B2 (en) | Information processing device, placement determination method, and placement determination program | |
JP6025766B2 (en) | Network design apparatus, method and program | |
Kong et al. | Correlated-failure-aware VON mapping | |
JP2014168119A (en) | Transmission path division policy determining device and method | |
WO2012056611A1 (en) | Availability model generating device | |
JP2017069620A (en) | Reliability evaluation device, reliability evaluation method and program | |
Gardner et al. | Determining geographic vulnerabilities using a novel impact based resilience metric |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20151029 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20151124 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20151221 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20160119 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20160122 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 5876860 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |