JP4954927B2 - Carburized induction-hardened steel parts with excellent surface fatigue strength and low noise - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to carburized induction-hardened steel parts, and more specifically, gears applied to mechanical structure parts, particularly power transmission parts such as automobiles, sheaves of continuously variable transmissions (CVT), constant velocity joints (CVJ). Related to noise reduction of tripods, hubs and other parts.

  Power transmission parts such as mechanical structural parts such as gears of automatic transmissions, CVT sheaves of continuously variable transmissions (CVT), tripods of constant velocity joints (CVJ), and hubs are required to have surface fatigue strength. Conventionally, in general, the above-mentioned parts are made of case-hardened steel with C of about 0.2%, such as JIS SCr420, SCM420, etc., and carburized and quenched, and the surface of the parts has a martensite structure with C of about 0.8%. It is used with increased surface fatigue strength.

Further, Patent Document 1 proposes a method for producing a case-hardened product that obtains high fatigue strength by induction hardening after carburizing and quenching.
Further, Patent Document 2 discloses a constant velocity joint inner ring in which graphite grains are precipitated in order to combine fatigue characteristics and machinability.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 64-36779 JP 2005-273007 A

In recent years, in addition to high fatigue strength, it has also been required to reduce noise caused by vibrations during driving due to environmental problems, but the above-described prior art has not taken noise reduction measures.
Therefore, the present invention has an object to provide a steel part having a surface pressure fatigue strength equivalent to that of a steel part obtained by carburizing or carbonitriding the case-hardened steel and further subjected to induction hardening, and having low noise during use. And

In the steel parts subjected to carburizing or carbonitriding and further subjected to induction hardening, at least the following matters are necessary to reduce noise during use without reducing high surface pressure fatigue strength. This has been found and the present invention has been completed.
Noise must be reduced during use if graphite grains that have the effect of damping vibrations are present in the entire cross section (excluding the nitrided layer).
The graphite particles must have an average particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm and a maximum diameter of 20 μm or less.
Appropriate steel components are required to precipitate the graphite grains.
In order to precipitate the graphite grains, it is necessary to perform graphitization annealing after carburizing or carbonitriding, and then to perform induction hardening.

  The gist of the present invention based on the above findings is as follows.

(1) The chemical component is mass%,
C: 0.1-1.2%
Si: 0.5-3.0%
Mn: 0.1 to 1.5%
P: 0.05% or less,
S: 0.001 to 0.3%,
O: 0.0050% or less,
N: 0.003 to 0.03%,
In addition,
Al: 0.005 to 0.2%,
Ti: 0.005 to 0.2%,
One or two of them,
The balance is made of steel, which consists essentially of iron and inevitable impurities,
Graphite particles having a carburized layer or a carbonitrided layer and an induction-hardened layer on the surface, an average particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm, and a maximum particle size of 20 μm or less over the entire cross section excluding the nitrided layer Carburized induction-hardened steel parts with excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise characteristics.

(2) Furthermore, the chemical component is mass%,
V: 0.01 to 0.3%
Nb: 0.01 to 0.3%
The carburized induction-hardened steel part having excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise properties as described in the above item (1), characterized by containing one or two of the following.

(3) Furthermore, the chemical component is mass%,
Ni: 0.2-3.0%,
Cu: 0.2-3.0%,
Co: 0.2-3.0%
The carburized induction-hardened steel part having excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise properties as described in (1) or (2) above, comprising one or more of the above.

(4) Furthermore, the chemical component is mass%,
Cr: 0.05 to 0.4%,
Mo: 0.05-0.4%
W: 0.05-0.4%
B: 0.0006 to 0.0050%
The carburized induction-hardened steel part having excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise properties according to any one of the above (1) to (3), characterized by containing one or more of the above.

  (5) The surface pressure according to any one of (1) to (4), wherein the steel part is any one of a gear, a sheave of a continuously variable transmission, a tripod of a constant velocity joint, or a hub. Carburized induction-hardened steel parts with excellent fatigue strength and low noise.

  Gears that can be applied to power transmission parts such as automobiles, and that achieves both noise reduction by using graphite, continuously variable transmission (CVT) sheaves, constant velocity joint (CVJ) tripods, hubs, etc. This can greatly contribute to the improvement of automobile comfort.

  In order to achieve both the carburizing effect and the use of the graphite grain effect, in addition to using steel materials with suitable components, after carburizing or carbonitriding, a graphitization annealing treatment is performed, followed by an induction hardening treatment. It is necessary. The reason is based on the following (a) to (c).

  From the viewpoint of noise reduction, it is necessary to ensure that the graphite has an average particle size of 0.1 μm or more, but from the viewpoint of surface fatigue strength, it is necessary to limit the maximum particle size to 20 μm or less. It is necessary to make it the chemical component mentioned later.

  From the viewpoint of surface pressure fatigue strength, the C concentration of the component surface layer must be 0.4 to 1.5% by carburizing or carbonitriding. However, when carburizing or carbonitriding with a carbon potential of 0.4 to 1.5% is performed after the graphitizing annealing, there is a problem that the graphite dissolves in austenite. Must be done in advance.

  Using the steel material of the present invention, the average particle size of the carburized layer and the core of the surface layer is 0.1 by performing the graphitization annealing treatment in a temperature range of 650 to 720 ° C. for less than 24 hours following the carburizing treatment. Fine graphite particles as fine as 10 μm can be dispersed. However, since the graphitization annealing treatment is a treatment in the ferrite region, it is too soft as a power transmission component. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a quenching treatment after heating to an austenite temperature range (about 723 ° C. or higher). For this purpose, an induction hardening process that can be heated in a short time on the order of several seconds is required. In carburizing and quenching using a general furnace and quenching, heating requires an order of several minutes or more, and there is a problem that fine graphite particles are dissolved.

  First, the reason for defining the structure, which is important for the steel part of the present invention, will be described.

[The surface layer includes a carburized layer or a carbonitrided layer and an induction-hardened layer, and graphite particles having an average particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm and a maximum particle size of 20 μm or less exist over the entire cross section excluding the nitrided layer. thing]
Since both the carburized layer or the carbonitrided layer and the induction-hardened layer are present in the surface layer, the surface layer can have a high hardness of HV700 or more and can ensure the necessary surface pressure fatigue strength.

From the viewpoint of noise reduction, graphite particles having an average particle size of 0.1 μm or more are necessary. However, if graphite particles having a maximum particle size exceeding 20 μm are present, the stress is concentrated on the graphite particles during use and a fracture starting point cannot be secured, so that the required surface pressure fatigue strength cannot be ensured. It is necessary that the maximum is 20 μm or less, and the average particle size is 10 μm or less. Desirably, the average particle size is in the range of 1 to 7 μm.
Here, the average particle diameter is a value obtained by simply averaging the spherical equivalent diameters of individual graphite grains by the number (total value / number of individual spherical equivalent diameters), and the maximum grain diameter is a graphite grain. This is the longest diameter of each individual and the maximum diameter.

  The graphite size of steel parts is measured by observing the entire cross section from the surface of the steel part to the center (in the case of hollow) with a scanning electron microscope, and binarizing the intensity of the reflected electron beam using an image analyzer. The average particle diameter, the maximum particle diameter, the maximum particle diameter, and the number average average particle diameter in the measurement visual field can be measured.

  In the present invention, it is necessary to perform a graphitization annealing process after a carburizing process or a carbonitriding process, and then an induction hardening process. It is important to perform graphitization after carburizing or carbonitriding. The reason is the stability of the graphite size. If the graphite treatment is performed first, if the carbon potential is less than 1.5% in the subsequent carburizing treatment or carbonitriding treatment, the graphite dissolves in the austenite and burns down in a few minutes to several tens of minutes. In addition, when the carbon potential is more than 1.5%, the existing graphite grains are rapidly coarsened due to the high temperature compared to the graphitization annealing process (600 to 720 ° C.) described later. Exceeds 20 μm, and in any case, fine graphite grains cannot be present.

  Carburizing treatment or carbonitriding treatment has a carbon potential in the range of 0.4 to 1.5%, and by making the carbon potential 0.2% or more higher than the carbon concentration of the steel material, It is desirable to ensure sufficient surface pressure fatigue strength by applying sufficient surface layer compressive residual stress of 300 MPa or more. If the difference between the carbon potential and the carbon concentration of the steel material is less than 0.2%, the difference between the surface layer and the core portion of the transformation expansion amount associated with the martensite transformation becomes small. It is not preferable because sufficient surface layer compressive residual stress cannot be applied. The cooling rate after the carburizing treatment is preferably set to 1 ° C./second or more from the viewpoint of preventing the coarsening of graphite precipitated during cooling, and may be quenched.

  After the above-mentioned carburizing treatment or carbonitriding treatment is performed on the steel having the chemical component of the present invention, it is maintained at 600 to 720 ° C. (hereinafter referred to as graphitization annealing), so that the entire surface of the carburized layer and the core portion can be obtained. Graphite grains are precipitated. When the graphitization annealing time is short, the graphite grains are fine and the amount of precipitation is small. As the graphitization annealing time is long, the graphite grains gradually increase and the amount of precipitation tends to increase, and the range is from 1 to 24 hours. Increasing the graphitization annealing time tends to increase the size of the graphite grains, and a preferred mode is to make the average grain size of the graphite grains 3 μm by treatment at 700 ° C. for about 2 hours.

  The steel having the chemical component of the present invention is subjected to the above-mentioned carburizing treatment or carbonitriding treatment and graphitization annealing treatment, and then subjected to induction hardening to impart a surface compressive residual stress of −300 MPa or more while hardening the surface. By this, the surface fatigue strength is secured. The reason for heating by high frequency here is to heat for a short time on the order of several seconds. This is because in carburizing and quenching using a general furnace and quenching, heating requires an order of several minutes or more, and fine graphite is dissolved. In addition, as is well known, induction hardening is advantageous to fatigue strength through the use of finer grains and increased compressive residual stress than normal carburizing and quenching, and is therefore also advantageous for surface fatigue strength. To work. About the heating method at the time of induction hardening, it is not necessary to adopt a special method, and a general method is sufficient. For example, the standard frequency is around 400 kHz for small parts and around 5 kHz for large parts. The refrigerant used for quenching does not need to adopt a particularly special method, but it is preferable to use a water-based one having a large cooling capacity such as a polymer quencher because the compressive residual stress of the surface layer can be increased. After induction hardening, it is preferable to ensure the toughness of the parts by performing low temperature tempering at around 150 ° C. according to a general carburized and quenched product.

  In the present invention, both carburizing treatment and carbonitriding treatment are possible, but the difference is in the state of the outermost layer.

  When the carburizing treatment is employed, after the subsequent graphitization annealing treatment and induction hardening treatment, graphite having an average particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm is obtained from the surface to the core portion. When carbonitriding is employed, since a nitride layer of about 0.2 mm from the surface is formed, the precipitation of graphite in the subsequent graphitization annealing treatment is suppressed. There is little or no, and it has graphite having an average particle diameter of 0.1 to 10 μm from a depth of about 0.2 mm to the center (in the case of a hollow, the inner surface). In this case, although the noise reduction performance is reduced by the amount of some graphite, the noise reduction performance is markedly superior to the carburized product of the prior art, and the nitriding layer is resistant to temper softening caused by nitrogen. Due to the improvement effect, it is strengthened compared with the carburized product of the prior art, and the surface pressure fatigue strength is improved. This carbonitriding process does not need to adopt a particular method, and a general method is sufficient. For example, by adding about 10% by volume of ammonia to the metamorphic gas for carburization and holding at about 900 ° C. for about 30 minutes or more, a steel material has a nitride layer of about 0.1% by mass about 0.1 mm deep. This can be done.

  It should be noted that the presence of both a carburized layer or a carbonitrided layer and an induction-hardened layer on the surface layer in an actual steel part means that a micro sample is taken from the steel part and observed in an optical microscope after nital corrosion. It can be discriminated by the hardness distribution from the surface to the core and the C distribution and N distribution from the surface to the core measured by EPMA.

  In addition, after carburizing induction-hardened steel parts according to the present invention, after induction hardening treatment, additional effects such as sub-zero treatment, tempering treatment, WPC treatment, barrel polishing treatment, tooth grinding treatment, honing finish processing, etc. are effective. It does not prevent.

  Next, the reason for defining the chemical composition of the steel of the present invention will be described. In addition,% described here means mass%.

C: 0.1-1.2%
C is an important element for producing graphite, and is an indispensable element for ensuring the strength after induction hardening. Therefore, in the present invention, the lower limit of the C amount is set to 0.1%. However, if the content exceeds 1.2%, the machinability and forgeability at the time of component production are remarkably impaired, so the upper limit was made less than 1.2%. The most preferable addition amount is 0.2 to 0.8%.

Si: 0.5 to 3.0%
Si is one of the powerful elements that promote graphitization. Furthermore, it is one of the elements effective for improving the surface pressure fatigue strength through an increase in temper softening resistance. In order to precipitate sufficient graphite by a short-time annealing treatment, the content is preferably 0.5% or more. However, if it exceeds 3.0%, decarburization during forging becomes remarkable, so 3.0% was made the upper limit. The most preferable addition amount is 1.0 to 2.0%.

Mn: 0.1 to 1.5%
Mn combines with S and exists as MnS inclusions or as a solid solution Mn in the matrix. Solid solution Mn is effective in improving hardenability, and MnS forms single or composite inclusions and becomes a graphite production site. In order to obtain the effect, addition of 0.1% or more is necessary. However, if it exceeds 1.5%, graphitization is remarkably inhibited, so 1.5% was made the upper limit. The most preferable addition amount is 0.2 to 0.7%.

P: 0.05 or less P is a component contained as an impurity in steel, and it is necessary to reduce it as much as possible in order to segregate at the grain boundary and reduce toughness, and it is necessary to limit it to 0.05% or less.

S: 0.001 to 0.3%
S reacts with an alloy element such as Mn, Mg or Cu and exists as a sulfide. Since these sulfides function as nucleation sites for graphite, 0.001% or more is necessary. Therefore, in the present invention, the lower limit of the amount of S is set to 0.001%. However, if it exceeds 0.30%, forgeability is impaired, so 0.3% was made the upper limit. The most preferable addition amount is 0.001 to 0.020%.

O: 0.0050% or less,
O is present in the steel as oxide inclusions such as alumina and titania. However, if O is large, the oxide becomes large and the power transmission component is damaged starting from this, so 0.0050% It is necessary to restrict to the following. The smaller the content, the better, so 0.0020% or less is desirable. Furthermore, when the long life is intended, 0.0015% or less is desirable.

N: 0.003 to 0.03%
N forms various nitrides and works effectively for refining the austenite structure during induction hardening, so 0.003% or more is necessary. However, if it exceeds 0.03%, the forgeability is remarkably impaired, so 0.03% was made the upper limit. The most preferable addition amount is 0.005 to 0.02%.

Al: 0.005 to 0.2%, Ti: One or two of 0.005 to 0.2% Al and Ti precipitate and disperse in the steel as nitrides, during induction hardening. In order to effectively work for refining the austenite structure, one or two of Al and Ti are required to be 0.005% or more, respectively. However, if it exceeds 0.2%, the precipitates become coarse and the steel becomes brittle, so the upper limit was made 0.2% respectively. Most preferably, 0.005 to 0.05% of Al is added.

V: 0.01 to 0.3%, Nb: one or two of 0.01 to 0.3% V, Nb may not be added, but by adding Al, Ti is nitride As a result of precipitation and dispersion in steel, it is effective for refining the austenite structure during induction hardening. In order to exert these effects, it is necessary to add 0.01% or more of one or two of V and Nb. However, even if added over 0.3%, the effect is saturated and the economy is impaired, so the upper limit was made 0.3%. Most preferably, 0.1 to 0.2% of V is added.

One or more of Ni, Cu, Co Ni: 0.2-3.0%
When Ni is added, it has the effect of destabilizing cementite and promoting graphitization, and improving hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, the content is preferably 0.2% or more. However, even if added over 3.0%, the effect is saturated and economically disadvantageous, so 3.0% was made the upper limit.

Cu: 0.2-3.0%
When Cu is added, it has the effect of destabilizing cementite and promoting graphitization and improving hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, the content is preferably 0.2% or more. However, even if added over 3.0%, the effect is saturated and economically disadvantageous, so 3.0% was made the upper limit.

Co: 0.2-3.0%
When added, Co has the effect of destabilizing cementite and promoting graphitization and increasing the hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, the content is preferably 0.2% or more. However, even if added over 3.0%, the effect is saturated and economically disadvantageous, so 3.0% was made the upper limit.

One or more of Cr, Mo, W, and B Cr: 0.05 to 0.4%
If Cr is added, it has the effect of improving the hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, 0.05% or more is preferable. However, if added over 0.4%, graphitization is remarkably inhibited, so 0.4% was made the upper limit.

Mo: 0.05-0.4%
Mo may not be added. Addition has the effect of improving hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, 0.05% or more is preferable. However, if added over 0.4%, graphitization is remarkably inhibited, so 0.4% was made the upper limit.

W: 0.05-0.4%
If W is added, it has the effect of improving the hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, 0.05% or more is preferable. However, if added over 0.4%, graphitization is remarkably inhibited, so 0.4% was made the upper limit.

B: 0.0006 to 0.0050%
If B is added, it contributes to the improvement of hardenability. In order to obtain the effect, the content is preferably 0.0006% or more. However, if it exceeds 0.0050%, graphitization is inhibited, and the B compound is precipitated at the grain boundary to deteriorate the fracture toughness, so 0.0050% was made the upper limit.

  In the present invention, in addition to the above components, Ca, Mg, Zr, Te, and Ce can be added as long as the effects of the present invention are not impaired.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be specifically described by way of examples. These examples are for explaining the present invention, and do not limit the scope of the present invention.

After forging and annealing each steel material having the chemical composition shown in Table 1, a small roller test piece having a cylindrical portion with a diameter of 26 mm and a width of 28 mm by machining, a diameter of 130 mm, a width of 18 mm, and R = Large roller specimens with 150 mm crowning were produced. Thereafter, the small roller test piece and the large roller test piece were No. 1-No. 21 and no. For 25 to 28, carburizing treatment (950 ° C. × 2 hours of RX gas carburizing → oil quenching) was performed at the carbon potential shown in Table 2, followed by graphitizing annealing treatment at the temperature and time shown in Table 2, and thereafter Was subjected to induction hardening (frequency 100 kHz, heating temperature 980 ° C.). Water was used as the refrigerant during induction hardening. Thereafter, a tempering treatment at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes was performed for the test. No. 25-No. For No. 28, carbonitriding was performed at the carbon potential shown in Table 2 (950 ° C. × 2 hours of 10% ammonia-90% RX gas carburizing mixture → oil quenching), followed by graphitization at the temperature and time shown in Table 2 An annealing treatment was performed, followed by induction hardening (frequency 100 kHz, heating temperature 980 ° C.). Water was used as the refrigerant during induction hardening. Thereafter, a tempering treatment at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes was performed for the test. No. For No. 29, carburizing treatment (950 ° C. × 2 hours of RX gas carburizing → oil quenching) was performed at the carbon potential shown in Table 2, and then tempering treatment was performed at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes for the test. No. For No. 30, carburization treatment (950 ° C. × 2 hours of RX gas carburization → oil quenching) was performed at the carbon potential shown in Table 2, followed by induction hardening (frequency 100 kHz, heating temperature 980 ° C.). Water was used as the refrigerant during induction hardening. Thereafter, a tempering treatment at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes was performed for the test. No. 31 is subjected to carbonitriding with carbon potential shown in Table 2 (950 ° C. × 2 hours of 10% ammonia-90% RX gas carburizing mixing → oil quenching), and then tempering at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes. The test was conducted. No. No. 32 was subjected to carbonitriding treatment at a carbon potential shown in Table 2 (950 ° C. × 2 hours of 10% ammonia-90% RX gas carburizing mixture → oil quenching), followed by induction quenching (frequency 100 kHz, heating temperature 980). ° C). Water was used as the refrigerant during induction hardening. Thereafter, a tempering treatment at 150 ° C. for 90 minutes was performed for the test.
The graphite size of the component is such that the distance from the surface is 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1. 0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 13.0 mm of the backscattered electron image on the scanning electron microscope each having an area of 0.009 mm length × 0.012 mm width at a magnification of 10,000. After photographing 5 fields of view, the image was binarized to identify graphite and steel, and the average particle size and maximum particle size were measured by an image analyzer.

The carbonitriding treatment in this example was confirmed to be a nitrided layer at a depth of 0.05 mm from the surface from the N distribution measurement result of EPMA, so the graphite size of the nitrided layer was measured at a depth of 0.05 mm. The result was adopted. Moreover, the above-mentioned graphite size measurement location is a carburized layer using the result of measuring the depth of the carburized layer by the C distribution of EPMA and measuring the depth of the induction hardened layer by the optical micrograph after the nital corrosion photograph. Whether it is an induction-hardened layer or a non-high-frequency hardened layer was determined, and the graphite size measurement results are shown in Table 2.
The residual stress on the surface was measured by the X-ray method.

A vibration damping test was conducted to evaluate the noise. A logarithmic damping rate is obtained by attaching a strain gauge to the cylindrical part of the small roller manufactured above and hanging it with a thread, hitting the opposite side of the strain gauge with a hammer, and detecting the strain vibration with the strain gauge. Was measured.
As an evaluation of the surface pressure fatigue strength, a roller pitching fatigue test was performed using the large roller and the small roller produced as described above. In the roller pitching fatigue test, the large roller is pressed against the small roller with a surface pressure of 2500 MPa, the circumferential speed direction of both rollers at the contact portion is the same direction, and the slip rate is -40% (larger roller than the small roller). The rotational speed of the small roller until the occurrence of pitching in the small roller was defined as the life. The oil temperature of the gear oil supplied to the contact portion was 80 ° C. The occurrence of pitching was detected by a vibrometer provided in the testing machine. After the vibration was detected, the rotation of both rollers was stopped and the occurrence of pitching and the number of rotations were confirmed. When pitching does not occur even when the rotational speed reaches 10 million times, it can be evaluated that the surface has sufficient surface fatigue strength. Therefore, the test was stopped at 10 million times.

  As shown in Table 2, No. of the present invention example. 1-No. The logarithmic damping factor of 24 has excellent vibration damping characteristics exceeding 0.010 and excellent noise reduction characteristics. In addition, the roller pitting fatigue test has a lifetime of 10 million cycles and has excellent surface pressure. It became clear that it had fatigue strength.

  On the other hand, comparative example No. exceeding the upper limit of C prescribed | regulated in this invention. No. 25 had to stop evaluation because the material was not machinable and the parts could not be manufactured. Comparative Example No. below the lower limit of C defined in the present invention. No. 26 had a short life of 1.1 million times in the roller pitting fatigue test. This is because the strength after induction hardening could not be secured due to the low C.

  Comparative Example No. below the lower limit of Si defined in the present invention. No. 27 has a low logarithmic decay rate of 0.007 and is inferior in noise reduction characteristics. This is because there is no graphite in the part. Comparative Example No. 1 in which the graphitization annealing time was increased to 50 hours to coarsen the graphite and exceeded both the average particle size and the maximum particle size of the graphite size defined in the present invention. No. 28 had a short life of 5.6 million times in the roller pitting fatigue test. As a result of investigating the test piece after the test, this is because cracks propagated starting from the coarsened graphite, leading to breakage, resulting in a short life due to the coarsened graphite. Comparative Example No. 1 in which the graphitization annealing temperature was increased to 730 ° C. to coarsen the graphite and exceeded the maximum graphite size defined in the present invention. No. 29 had a short life of 4.8 million times in the roller pitting fatigue test. As a result of investigating the test piece after the test, this is because cracks propagated starting from the coarsened graphite, leading to breakage, resulting in a short life due to the coarsened graphite. Comparative Example No. exceeding the average size of graphite specified in the invention. No. 30 had a life of 8.5 million times in the roller pitting fatigue test. As a result of investigating the test piece after the test, this is because cracks propagated starting from the coarsened graphite, leading to breakage, resulting in a short life due to the coarsened graphite. In contrast, No. of a comparative example in which carburizing treatment was performed on general steel without performing graphitization treatment. No. 31 had a low logarithmic attenuation rate of 0.007 and was inferior in noise reduction characteristics. This is because there is no graphite in the part. No. of the comparative example which performed the carburizing process and the induction hardening process to general steel without performing graphitization process. No. 32 has a low logarithmic attenuation factor of 0.007 and is inferior in noise reduction characteristics. This is because there is no graphite in the part. No. of a comparative example in which carbonitriding was performed on general steel without performing graphitization. No. 33 had a logarithmic decay rate of 0.007 and was inferior in noise reduction characteristics. This is because there is no graphite in the part. No. of comparative example in which carbonitriding treatment and induction hardening treatment were performed on general steel without performing graphitization treatment. No. 34 had a logarithmic attenuation factor as low as 0.007 and inferior in noise reduction characteristics. This is because there is no graphite in the part.

Claims (5)

Chemical composition is mass%,
C: 0.1-1.2%
Si: 0.5-3.0%
Mn: 0.1 to 1.5%
P: 0.05% or less,
S: 0.001 to 0.3%,
O: 0.0050% or less,
N: 0.003 to 0.03%,
In addition,
Al: 0.005 to 0.2%,
Ti: 0.005 to 0.2%,
One or two of them,
The balance is made of steel, which consists essentially of iron and inevitable impurities,
Graphite particles having a carburized layer or a carbonitrided layer and an induction-hardened layer on the surface, an average particle size of 0.1 to 10 μm, and a maximum particle size of 20 μm or less over the entire cross section excluding the nitrided layer Carburized induction-hardened steel parts with excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise characteristics. Furthermore, the chemical composition is mass%,
V: 0.01 to 0.3%
Nb: 0.01 to 0.3%
The carburized induction-hardened steel part excellent in surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise property according to claim 1, characterized by containing one or two of the following. Furthermore, the chemical composition is mass%,
Ni: 0.2-3.0%,
Cu: 0.2-3.0%,
Co: 0.2-3.0%
The carburized induction hardening steel part excellent in surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise property according to claim 1 or 2, characterized by containing one or more of the following. Furthermore, the chemical composition is mass%,
Cr: 0.05 to 0.4%,
Mo: 0.05-0.4%
W: 0.05-0.4%
B: 0.0006 to 0.0050%
The carburized induction-hardened steel part having excellent surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise properties according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized by containing at least one of the above.   5. The surface pressure fatigue strength and low noise property according to claim 1, wherein the steel part is any one of a gear, a sheave of a continuously variable transmission, a tripod of a constant velocity joint, or a hub. Excellent carburized induction hardened steel parts.