JP4214289B2 - Wall construction method - Google Patents

Description

  The present invention relates to a method for housing construction.

  The present invention was developed primarily for use in the construction of walls in residential homes and will be described primarily with respect to this application. However, the present invention is not limited to this particular field of use and is readily applicable to floors, ceilings and other generally flat surfaces not only in residential residential facilities but also in commercial and industrial environments. It will be understood.

  The discussion of prior art in this specification should in no way be regarded as an admission that such prior art is widely known and forms part of the common general knowledge in the field.

  One building construction technique currently prevalent in residential dwellings usually requires first assembling a structural frame from timber or metal and attaching an external veneer or skin to the frame. One preferred type of veneer is formed from a single layer of brick and mortar. This has the advantage of providing the appearance of a “double brick” structure at a much lower cost. Nevertheless, “decorative bricks” and similar types of masonry structures are relatively time consuming and expensive to implement. An additional disadvantage of the basic veneered brick structure is that there is little room to change the appearance of the brick picker to suit various architectural styles and personal preferences.

  A variety of masonry undercoat systems, such as “stucco” undercoats, have been developed to achieve greater aesthetic diversity. These have the advantage of providing a solid “no joint” appearance. They provide greater flexibility in terms of surface skin, color, and finish, while maintaining the desired impression of solidity and firmness that exhibit masonry characteristics. However, these systems typically require special expertise to be applied effectively, adding to the construction time and cost, and causing other problems such as sagging, delamination, and environmental degradation. Cheap.

  In an attempt to address some of these problems, other cladding systems have been developed including a variety of forms such as aluminum cladding, vinyl cladding, fiber cement sheet pile construction, corrugated steel sheet pile construction, siding. These systems are usually less expensive, especially primed masonry, and are more or less functional at the reference level. However, depending on the specific material involved, in most cases these systems are less durable, less flexible in terms of surface finish, are less well insulated, and have lower strength properties Or lacks the desired appearance of solidity and firmness associated with the primed masonry structure.

  In an attempt to address these shortcomings, Applicants have previously developed a system that applies fiber reinforced cement (FRC) sheets to the building framework and primes the exterior to hide the joints between the sheets. However, this system was exposed to its own disadvantages. In particular, internal reinforcement was required to provide essential Class A bracing. This usually took the form of a backside primer which was applied by spraying onto the inner surface of the stud, ie the cladding sheet between the supplemental inner braces. In both cases, this added a significant amount of construction time and cost, but was considered essential to give the composite walls the necessary stiffness and structural integrity. This system also required that adjacent sheets be joined on top of the frame studs, again increasing construction time and causing considerable material consumption in the form of bleeds.

  Other problems that have arisen with some known primer systems used in connection with FRC sheet pile construction are not only the problem of primer cracking, especially in the vicinity of the joint, but also the sheet underneath in certain lighting conditions It was also the visibility of the joint through the primer that allowed it to be “read”.

  It is an object of the present invention to overcome or substantially improve one or more of these disadvantages of the prior art, or at least provide a useful alternative.

[Summary of the Invention]
Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of forming a synthetic wall, the method comprising:
Assembling a skeleton including a plurality of generally nationally spaced studs;
Arranging a plurality of external cladding sheets on the frame in a generally horizontal orientation such that a majority of the cladding lamina extends over two or more of the studs; and
Placing the cladding lamina so that the abutting ends of at least one set of adjacent laminae are joined off-stud;
The abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding lamellas are joined together by an off-stud joint by off-stud joint formation and moved between the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding lamellas and in particular coplanar Providing a resistance to the upper shift;
Securing the lamina to the framework in a substantially continuous abutting relationship to form a generally planar substrate for the wall;
Applying a surface primer that includes mesh streaks substantially uniformly on the base layer;
Including
It forms a structural wall with a primed masonry appearance without the need for supplemental internal rendering, bracing or reinforcement.
One surprising advantage of the present invention is that sheet “off-stud bonding” is possible without compromising the dimensional stability or structural integrity of the walls. This is made possible by the “off-stud joint formation” used to join together the ends of the abutting sheets. Formation not only helps to stabilize the vertical and horizontal edges of the sheet when not supported during rendering, but also helps prevent subsequent cracking of the primer mixture.
Preferably, the off-stud junction formation has a generally H-shaped cross-sectional profile that defines opposing longitudinal groove portions. More preferably, the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding sheets are joined together by engaging the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding sheets at opposing groove portions.
Instead, the off-stud joint formation takes the form of a connecting edge profile that extends complementarily at the abutting end of the at least one set of cladding slats.

  Preferably, the framework is substantially formed from timber. However, it should be understood that a skeleton formed from metal or other suitable material may be used instead. The studs are preferably spaced about the center of about 450 millimeters.

  Preferably, the outer cladding lamina is formed from fiber reinforced cement (FRC). The thickness of the FRC sheet is preferably between 4 and about 20 millimeters, more preferably between 6 and about 10 millimeters, and ideally between 7 and 8 millimeters.

  Preferably, the outer cladding sheet is substantially rectangular in shape and has a set of substantially parallel longitudinal sides and a set of substantially parallel edges. Most preferably, the sheet is about 2.4 meters long, about 0.45 meters wide, and about 7.5 millimeters thick with a density of about 10 kg / m. However, it will be appreciated that the dimensions may vary depending on the material properties of the cladding sheets, the geometry of the framing elements, and the particular application in which they are utilized.

  In a preferred embodiment, the elongated cladding lamella is oriented horizontally and applied to the skeleton in a staggered or “brick-like” pattern, with the longitudinal edges of the lamella extending substantially perpendicular to the entire interframe column.

  Preferably, the outer surface of each FRC cladding sheet is textured to facilitate mechanical and chemical bonding to the surface primer. Preferably, each building sheet also includes at least one angular edge so that adjacent building sheets can abut each other with minimal visibility at the junction. More preferably, each edge of each building sheet is substantially square and facilitates coplanar joint finishing and finishing with a consistent joint finishing and finishing system.

Ideally, the architectural laminates are arranged so that the mating ends of several adjacent laminates are joined together at the top of the underlying stud.

  Another surprising advantage of the present invention is that the backside primer may be applied if desired, but a backside primer layer on the opposite side of the architectural sheet is not required.

  Preferably, however, the back surface priming is applied to all exposed surfaces of the fiber cement sheet by brush, roller or spray if the back surface primer is not applied to the interior surface of the architectural sheet between the studs.

  Preferably, the mesh streaks are substantially formed from fiberglass and are applied to the top of the first stripping coat of the primer. Ideally, every joint in the fiberglass mesh is formed with a minimum overlap of about 50 millimeters.

  Preferably, the primer is a high-build primer formed from an acrylic-modified cementitious material that is designed to be screeded to a flat height finish when applied externally to a vertical surface. The primer is preferably applied to a depth sufficient to eliminate the possibility of the sheet being “ready” under any normal lighting conditions.

  Preferably, the method also includes the additional step of applying a selected texture finish to the primer to achieve the desired aesthetic impression. Also most preferably high quality acrylic textured film paint is applied to the texture finish or to the primer if no other texture finish is used.

  Preferably, the insulation is attached to the inside of the building sheet between the studs so that the wall cavity is preferably closed by a lining material such as a plaster board. Any suitable attachment material may be used including rock wool, glass wool, or polyester batting.

  Preferably, also a suitable drainage layer, ideally in the form of a steam permeable clapboard, is applied between the interior surfaces of the building sheet to achieve optimum waterproof properties.

  In a preferred embodiment, a finishing strip, ideally formed from aluminized stainless steel or PVC, is attached to provide a straight ruler to the finishing layer and protect the lamina edges at the top and bottom of the wall. .

  Referring initially to FIGS. 1 and 2, the present invention provides a method for forming a composite wall 1. The first stage of the process involves assembling a structural frame 2 that includes a series of normally upstanding studs 3 spaced about 450 millimeter centers. The frame is preferably formed from timber, but may alternatively be formed from metal or other suitable skeletal material.

  The next stage of the process entails placing a plurality of architectural or cladding lamellas 4 on the skeleton, usually in a horizontal orientation, so that at least the majority of the cladding lamellas extend across the plurality of studs. Ideally, the sheets are staggered in a brick-stacked configuration that may be regular or irregular as illustrated in FIG. FIG. 4 is similar but shows a typical attachment of a sheet around an opening such as a window or door. In such cases, staggering is preserved as much as possible.

In a preferred form of the invention, the building sheet is formed from fiber reinforced cement (FRC). The thickness of the FRC sheet is preferably between 4 and about 20 millimeters, more preferably between 6 and about 10 millimeters, and ideally about 7.5 millimeters. Most conveniently, the lamella is rectangular in shape and has a set of parallel longitudinal sides 5 and a set of parallel ends 6 that are substantially shorter in length than the sides. In one preferred system, the longitudinal side 5 is 2.4 millimeters long and the ends are 0.45 meters wide corresponding to the spacing of the studs. The density of the FRC sheet is preferably between 8 kg / m ² and 12 kg / m ² , ideally about 10 kg / m ² . The lamella is secured to the underlying stud using nails from a nail gun or alternatively by twisting, tacking, riveting, gluing, or other suitable fastening means.

  One surprising advantage of the construction technique according to the present invention is that the ends of the abutting sheets need not be joined at the top of the studs (a technique known as “on-stud joining”). Advantageously, off-stud bonding is possible without compromising the structural integrity of the finished wall. In that case, however, a special purpose off-stud coupler 8 is preferably used to join together the ends and / or sides of the abutting sheets. These connectors take the form of elongated PVC strips having a cross-sectional profile with an “H” shape as best depicted in FIGS. 5a and 5b. These help to stabilize the vertical and horizontal edges of the sheet, especially when not supported by the underlying studs during subsequent process steps. An alternative form of stud stabilization is illustrated in FIGS. 6a and 6b. In this case, a separate off-stud coupler is not used. Rather, the lamellae are complementary such as the formation of interlocking tongues and grooves adapted to counter relative movement and coplanar misalignment between the abutting lamellae along the joint. It is formed by an edge contour 9.

  The next major step of the construction process involves applying an initial stripping layer 10 of cementitious primer on the outer surface of the building sheet 4 so that it can substantially cover the sheet and intermediate bond lines. To do. This initial layer is ideally a few millimeters thick as best seen in FIG. 2a. Advantageously, the exterior surface of the building sheet is pre-roughened to increase the bond strength between the primer and the underlying FRC base layer.

  A layer of mesh streaks 11 is then applied to the surface of the initial undercoat layer 10 of the undercoat while the undercoat is still wet. Ideally fiberglass reinforced mesh is used. However, again, other suitable materials may be substituted. Most conveniently, the mesh is first cut into squares with a side length of about 1 m to facilitate handling in easily manageable parts. However, if the mesh is disassembled and applied, ideally at least a 50 millimeter overlap is provided between adjacent portions.

  With the mesh streaks 11 in place in this manner, an undercoat outer covering layer 12 is applied with sufficient thickness to completely embed and hide the mesh. The combined thickness of the primer layers 10 and 12 that capture the embedded mesh streaks 11 is preferably between 5 and 15 millimeters, ideally between about 7 mm and 8 mm. The final thickness may be varied to accommodate variations in the base layer and to suit the specific primer formation and the application in which it is used. Ideally, however, the primer is applied to a thickness sufficient to eliminate the possibility of the sheet being “read” in any normal lighting conditions, thereby providing the desired “no joint” of the primed masonry. Ensure appearance.

  The material used for the primer is ideally formed from an acrylic-modified cementitious high-build material that, when applied externally, is screed to a flat height finish. It will be appreciated that different textures may be used in different layers for a particular purpose, but the two subbing layers are usually the same texture.

  As shown in FIGS. 7a and 7b, a leveling joint 13 is incorporated. These are formed using a longitudinally extending PVC adjustment joint extrusion 14 which is ideally on a frame member such as top plate 15. Their joints prevent undercoating cracking due to differential expansion and contraction of the underlying architectural sheet.

  It is also preferred that the vertical adjustment joint 16 be provided with a maximum horizontal spacing of 4.8 meters between the centers as illustrated in FIG. 7c. Where possible, the vertical adjustment joint is formed by initially securing the waterproof membrane 17 to the skeleton and then applying a suitable tape over the “V” of the membrane. The sheet is then attached, leaving a minimal gap between the ends of about 6 millimeters, which is ideally not filled with a primer. FIG. 8 illustrates a technique for incorporating the leveling joint 13 just below the ground floor finishing strip 18 adjacent to the edge of the concrete slab 19.

  The next step, which is optional but desirable, involves applying a layer of textured finish 20 to the primer to create a variety of external aesthetic impressions. One preferred texture coating is finished to simulate the appearance of a conventional stucco plaster.

  In a preferred form of the invention, a finishing strip 18, ideally formed from aluminized stainless steel or PVC, is attached (as best seen in FIG. 8) to provide a straight ruler in the finishing layer; Mounted to protect the lamina edges at the top and bottom of the wall and the primer on the top and bottom of the wall.

  Finally, a layer of high quality acrylic textured film paint 25 is also applied either to the texture finish or to the primer if a separate texture finish is not used (see FIG. 2a). This allows for greater diversity in color choices while ensuring water and weather protection and combating environmental degradation.

  If desired, the backcoat 30 layer may also be applied to the inner surface of the architectural sheet between the studs. This is illustrated, for example, in the downstairs wall structure of FIGS. When used in this manner as an option, the backside primer gives the impression of additional strength, insulation and sound insulation, and increased firmness. However, one of the major advantages of the present invention arises from the surprising recognition that no backcoat layer or any other type of supplemental support or bracing is required.

  In the upper part of the wall of FIG. 2 where the backside primer is omitted, the omitted system is shown as a comparison. In that case, the wall cavities between the studs are simply filled with a layer of insulating material 32 such as rock rules, glass wool or polyester batting. The cavity is then closed from the inside using a conventional lining material such as plasterboard sheet 35. In situations where the backcoat is not applied and the inner surface of the building sheet is otherwise not exposed, it is also desirable to seal the inner surface of the sheet using a suitable primer or sealer by brush, rotation or spray.

  Exiting the system off in a consistent and aesthetically pleasing manner around window and door openings can be easily accomplished using a variety of techniques. As an example, FIGS. 9a, 9b and 9c show three different ways of forming a window frame and window sill 38 using complementary aluminum extrusions 40 that are aesthetically integrated with the final texture finish and paint coat. Is shown.

  The corners can be finished in a variety of ways. As an example, FIG. 10 shows one such method, where a protective metal angle portion 45 is attached at each outer corner 46 and the inner corner 47 is finished with a drainer 48 to ensure proper weatherproofing. .

  The wall construction method according to the present invention offers many advantages over the prior art. It provides the aesthetics and durability of a primed masonry structure while providing significantly accelerated construction time and sufficiently low material costs. Furthermore, the system is easy to apply and is less susceptible to surface cracking and delamination than most conventional known primer systems.

  Perhaps most importantly, the present invention requires supplemental internal bracing or the application of a backside primer to the inner surface of a sheet that is only understood by the applicant as a result of extensive research, development, and testing. If not at least a 3 meter high wall, the combination of method steps as defined by itself, as outlined in the AS 1684 Residential Timber-Frames Construction It stems from an unexpected understanding that it is sufficient to achieve the equivalent of “bracing” (ultimate limiting state (MLS) bracing capacity of at least 3.3 kN / m). Heretofore, such supplemental bracing or backside primer has been considered essential in this type of construction method in order to achieve the required degree of strength, stiffness and durability. In its implementation, previously known methods necessarily required additional construction steps, material costs, and specialized expertise, but the need is obviated by the present invention. Thus, while the present invention is surprising over the prior art, it represents a significant improvement both practically and commercially.

  Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific examples, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be embodied in many other forms.

The preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
It is the perspective view which cut off a part of chart which shows the synthetic wall formed according to the method of this invention. FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of the wall system of FIG. 1 applied to a two-story structure where a backside undercoat is applied downstairs and is omitted upstairs. FIG. 3 is an enlarged detail of the upper wall portion of FIG. 2. FIG. 9 is a plan view showing the application of a cladding or architectural slab to a vertical framed stud in a horizontally oriented staggered or “brick laid” pattern so that the slab extends across the plurality of studs. FIG. 4 is a plan view similar to FIG. 3 illustrating the mounting of architectural lamella around the window opening and the use of a PVC off-stud coupler. FIG. 4 is an enlarged perspective view showing the off-stud coupler in more detail. FIG. 4 is an enlarged perspective view showing the off-stud coupler in more detail. FIG. 6 is an enlarged perspective view showing the formation of complementary connecting edges in the architectural sheet as an alternative to the off-stud coupler of FIG. FIG. 6 is an enlarged perspective view showing the formation of complementary connecting edges in the architectural sheet as an alternative to the off-stud coupler of FIG. Fig. 5 is a vertical section showing the attachment of a leveling joint to deal with the expansion and contraction of the building sheet. Fig. 5 is a vertical section showing the attachment of a leveling joint to deal with the expansion and contraction of the building sheet. 4 is a horizontal cross section showing attachment of a vertical adjustment joint. FIG. 6 is a vertical cross section showing the finishing details of the wall adjacent the edge of the underlying concrete slab including a leveling joint extending along the slab edge. Fig. 5 is a vertical section showing a series of alternative ways of finishing the wall and integrating the wall into a window frame or window sill. Fig. 5 is a vertical section showing a series of alternative ways of finishing the wall and integrating the wall into a window frame or window sill. Fig. 5 is a vertical section showing a series of alternative ways of finishing the wall and integrating the wall into a window frame or window sill. It is a horizontal section which shows the external corner details of a wall.

Claims (36)

A method of forming a synthetic wall, the method comprising:
Assembling a skeleton comprising a plurality of generally upright and spaced studs;
Placing a plurality of external cladding laminaes on the framework in a generally horizontal orientation such that a majority of the cladding lamina extends across two or more of the studs; and
Placing the cladding lamina so that the abutting ends of at least one set of adjacent laminae are joined off-stud;
The off-stud joint formation joins the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding lamellas together at the off-stud joint, and moves between the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding lamellas, and in particular on the same plane. Providing resistance to misalignment;
Fixing the lamina to the frame in a substantially continuous abutting relationship and forming a generally planar substrate for the wall;
Applying a surface undercoat containing mesh streaks substantially uniformly on the base layer;
Including
It forms a structural wall with a primed masonry appearance without the need for supplemental internal rendering, bracing or reinforcement. The method of claim 1 wherein the off-stud junction formation has a generally H-shaped cross-sectional profile defining opposing longitudinal groove portions. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one set of cladding sheets are joined together by engaging the abutting ends of the at least one set of cladding sheets in opposing groove portions. The method of claim 1, wherein the off-stud joint formation takes the form of a complementary longitudinal edge profile extending at the abutting end of the at least one set of cladding sheets. 4. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, characterized in that the skeleton is substantially formed from timber . 5. A method according to claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein the skeleton is substantially formed from metal . 6. The method of claim 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, wherein the studs are spaced apart in the center between 300 mm and about 600 mm . The method of claim 6 wherein the studs are spaced about 450 millimeter centers . Claim 1,2,3,4,5,6 or 7 The method according outer cladding sheet is formed from a fiber-reinforced cement (FRC), characterized in Rukoto. 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the thickness of the FRC sheet is between 4 millimeters and about 20 millimeters. Claim 8 or 9 the method described thickness of the FRC sheet is characterized in der Rukoto between 6mm and about 10 millimeters. 11. A method according to claim 8, 9 or 10 , characterized in that the thickness of the FRC sheet is between 7 millimeters and about 8 millimeters . The shape of outer cladding sheet is in substantially rectangular, claim 1, characterized in Rukoto which have a and a set of substantially parallel longitudinal sides and a pair of substantially parallel end portions The method according to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or 11 . Sheet length of about 2.4 m, The method of claim 12, wherein a width of about 0.45 m, and a thickness of about 7.5 mm der Rukoto. Claim 12 or 13 method wherein Rukoto the thin plate having a density of between 8 and about 10 kg / m. Elongated cladding sheet is applied to the skeleton in a staggered or "brick-shaped" pattern is oriented horizontally, longitudinal edge of the sheet is characterized generally by vertically to Shin Zhang throughout skeleton stud 15. A method according to claim 12, 13 or 14 . West rough outer surface of the cladding sheet, according to claim, characterized in that it comprises an additional step to facilitate mechanical and chemical bonding to the surface undercoat 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 , 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 . Including the additional step of providing at least one angular edge on each building sheet such that adjacent building sheets can abut each other with minimal visibility at the junction . The method according to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 or 16 . The architectural sheet is arranged such that the mating ends of at least one pair of adjacent sheets are joined by off-studs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 or 17 . The process of applying the surface primer is continuous
A sub-process of applying an initial stripping layer of a cementitious undercoat on the outer surface of the building sheet so as to substantially cover the sheet and intermediate bond line;
A sub-process of applying a layer of mesh streaks to the surface of the stripping layer while the undercoat is still wet;
Applying a subbing outer covering layer with sufficient thickness to completely embed and hide the mesh; and
Claim 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 or 18 method wherein embedded Mukoto a. Embedded thickness coupled includes a mesh muscle of the undercoat layer is a between 5mm and 15 mm, The method of claim 19 ideally characterized by 8mm der Rukoto from 7 mm. Combined thickness of the undercoat layer, incorporating embedded mesh muscle, 7 mm and claims 22,19 or 20 method wherein der Rukoto between about 8 millimeters. The mesh streaks are substantially formed from fiberglass , characterized in that the mesh streaks are formed from fiberglass. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, The method according to 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or 21. Claim mesh, every junction point is to apply to said Rukoto so as to form a minimum overlap of about 50 mm 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, The method according to 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22 . The undercoat is a high-build undercoat, characterized in that it is a high-build undercoat, wherein the base coat is a high build base coat. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 , 20, 21, 22 or 23 . Undercoat is claim 1, 2, 3, 4, characterized in Rukoto formed from an acrylic-modified cementitious material which is adapted to be screed to a flat height finish when mounted in a vertical plane with the outside, The method according to 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 24. The underlaying is applied to a depth sufficient to eliminate the possibility of the sheet being "read" by the naked eye under normal lighting conditions . The method according to 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25. The process of claim 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 including applying a selected texture finish to the primer to achieve a specific desired aesthetic impression. , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 or 26. An additional step of applying an acrylic textured film paint as the outermost protective layer is included , characterized in that it includes an additional step of applying an acrylic textured film paint . The method according to 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 or 27. 12. An additional step of applying a backside primer layer in the middle of the frame studs on the opposite side of the building sheet, comprising : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 , 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 or 28 . An additional step of applying a backside primer layer to the exposed surface on the opposite side of the fiber cement lamina, comprising: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 or 29. 14. An additional step of attaching thermal insulation to the inside of the architectural sheet between the studs, characterized in that it comprises an additional step of attaching insulation. , 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 or 30. Claim comprising the additional step that applies a layer of a suitable draining material on the inner surface of the building sheet 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 or 31. The method of claim 32 , wherein the draining is in the form of a steam permeable clapboard material . Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, further comprising the step of closing the wall cavity with a lining material . The method according to 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 or 33. Providing a straight ruler in the finishing layer and attaching a finishing strip to protect the upper and lower sheet edges of the wall . 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 35. The method according to 31, 32, 33 or 34.

Images