JP3201063U - Golf club shaft - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a shaft capable of swinging in a safe manner without causing an excessive feeling of feeling while a golfer feels enough to generate a large flying distance while suppressing an increase in shaft weight. SOLUTION: By increasing the torsional rigidity around the front end of the shaft while maintaining the bending rigidity, a moderate feeling of feeling and a feeling of swing are ensured while maintaining acceleration of the head due to bending and an increase in flight distance. Specifically, the ratio GI (x) / EI (x) of the torsional rigidity GI (x) and the bending rigidity EI (x) at each point on the shaft is 0.5 to 1.0, or the average torsional rigidity GIa The value of GIa / EIa, which is the ratio of average bending rigidity EIa, is set to 0.6 or more and 0.9 or less. [Selection] Figure 3

Description

  The present invention relates to a golf club shaft (hereinafter referred to as “shaft”) that has improved strength, directionality of the hit ball, flight distance, and swing feeling, and in particular, a shaft made of fiber reinforced resin (hereinafter referred to as “FRP shaft”). Is suitable).

  In golf clubs, it is known that the rigidity of the shaft greatly affects the directionality of the hit ball, the flight distance, and the swing feeling. It is said that the bending of the shaft accelerates the golf club head (hereinafter referred to as “head”) and contributes to an increase in flight distance, while the bending of the shaft is too large to deteriorate the hitting directionality. In addition to such physical effects and influences, it is also known that the feeling of bending when swinging has a great influence on golfers. A moderate feeling of swing makes it easy to take the timing of the swing and increases the flight distance and stabilizes the swing, but an inappropriate feeling of feeling worsens the feeling of swing. Specifically, if there is too little bending, it can easily lead to strength during the swing, which can cause the swing to break, and conversely if the feeling is too strong, the golfer feels uneasy and unreliable, swings with a prudent swing It is often impossible to do this.

  In recent years, FRP shafts that are easy to reduce weight are often used for counts intended for large flight distances such as wood clubs, but the FRP shaft has a bias layer with the fiber direction inclined from the shaft axis direction in the torsional direction. In order to determine the rigidity (hereinafter referred to as “torsional rigidity”) and the rigidity in the bending direction (hereinafter referred to as “bending rigidity”) by the straight layer having the fiber direction parallel to the shaft axial direction (for example, Patent Document 1). See Fig.), And there is an advantage that torsional rigidity and bending rigidity can be designed relatively freely.

  Using this, shafts having various rigidity characteristics have been proposed and manufactured (for example, see Patent Document 2 and Patent Document 3), in which a shear elastic modulus and a cross-sectional secondary pole are used as indices representing torsional rigidity. Focus on the product of moment, GI (hereinafter referred to as “torsional rigidity GI”), and EI (hereinafter referred to as “bending rigidity EI”), which is the product of Young's modulus and cross-sectional secondary moment as an indicator of bending rigidity. There have also been proposals to appropriately set these values for each part or part of the shaft (see, for example, Patent Document 4 and Patent Document 5).

JP 2009-060983 JP Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2007-135963 JP 2007-117109 A Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2007-061403 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-099229

  However, it is common to increase the amount of fiber used to increase rigidity, so if you try to design torsional rigidity GI and bending rigidity EI freely, one of the advantages of lightweight FRP shaft may be lost. There are many FRP shafts with a high degree of design freedom, but there are many lightweight shafts with low torsional rigidity GI and bending rigidity EI. When used, there are problems such as unstable directionality.

  Since the twist of the shaft has a greater influence on the posture of the head than the bending, if the twist is too large, the directional stability is impaired. The present inventors have found that since the center of gravity of the golf club does not lie on the shaft axis, the centrifugal force acting on the head and the torque generated by the acceleration / deceleration of the head cause torsion at the same time as bending. It has been found that the bending of the shaft is suppressed only by raising it, which affects the feeling of golfer's feeling and swing. In addition, if the shaft twists when the head rotates when the sweet spot is removed and hit, the golfer feels uneasy and may have a negative impact on play. Can also be improved.

  In view of such circumstances, the present invention is intended to provide a shaft that can swing with peace of mind without causing the feeling of bending that is felt by a golfer, while generating a sufficient amount to obtain a large flight distance. It is.

  The first idea of this application is that the torsional stiffness at a distance x from the tip end on the head mounting side to the bat end on the shaft axis on the shaft axis is GI (x), the bending stiffness at the same point GI (x) / EI (x), which is the ratio of these, is 0.5 to 1.0 at all points from the tip end to the bat end. Club shaft.

  The second idea of the present application is that when the torsional rigidity at the point x in the butt end direction on the shaft axis from the tip end is GI (x) and the bending rigidity at the same point is EI (x), from the tip end. GI (x) / EI (x), which is the ratio of torsional rigidity GI (x) and bending rigidity EI (x) in all sections starting from the point 200mm in the direction of the bat end on the shaft axis and ending at the butt end ) Is 0.5 or more and 1.0 or less.

  The third idea of this application is that the value of Gya / EIa, which is the ratio of the average torsional rigidity Gia from the tip end to the butt end and the average bending stiffness EIA from the tip end to the butt end, is 0.6 to 0.9. A golf club shaft is characterized.

The fourth device of the present application divides the entire shaft length into two equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section on the tip end side is GIt2, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt2, and the average torsional rigidity of the section on the butt end side is GIb2. The golf club shaft according to the first to third aspects of the present invention satisfies the following formula when the average bending rigidity of the section is EIb2.
GIt2 / EIt2> GIb2 / EIc2

The fifth device of the present application divides the entire shaft length into three equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the tip end is GIt3, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt3, and the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the butt end is GIb3. The average bending stiffness of the section is EIb3, the average torsional rigidity of the middle section is GIc3, and the average bending rigidity of the section is EIc3, the following two expressions are satisfied: It is a golf club shaft concerning the 3rd device.
GIt3 / EIt3 ≧ GIc3 / EIc3 ≧ GIb3 / EIc3
GIt3 / EIt3> GIb3 / EIc3

  A sixth invention of the present application is the golf club shaft according to the first to fifth inventions of the present application, wherein the torsional rigidity GI has a maximum point.

  The seventh aspect of the present application is the golf club shaft according to the sixth aspect of the present invention, characterized in that the maximum point is in a section closest to the tip end when the entire shaft length is divided into three equal parts.

  According to the shaft of the present invention, since the torsional rigidity is relatively higher than the bending rigidity, the bending occurs sufficiently and the head is accelerated to increase the flight distance, but the elastic deformation in the torsional direction is Since it is suppressed, the direction stability of the flying ball is improved, and the feeling that the golfer feels is somewhat small, and it feels firm and can realize a stable swing. Since the upper limit of the ratio between the torsional rigidity and the bending rigidity is also set, there is no possibility that the bending rigidity is excessively lowered and the strength in the bending direction is not insufficient.

  In addition, the fourth to seventh devices of the present application are more efficient by making the portion that relatively increases the torsional rigidity compared to the bending rigidity on the tip side that has the greatest influence on the bending feeling and the swinging feeling. Produces a sense of properness and swing, and contributes to a lighter shaft.

3 is a graph of torsional rigidity GI shown in Table 1. 3 is a graph of bending rigidity EI shown in Table 2. 4 is a graph of torsional rigidity GI / bending rigidity EI shown in Table 3.

Tables 1 to 3 show the numerical values of torsional rigidity GI, bending rigidity EI, and ratio GI / EI of Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4, and FIGS. 1 to 3 show these as graphs. . The first embodiment is an embodiment of the second to seventh devices of the present application, the second embodiment is the first to seventh device of the present application, and the third embodiment is the first or second embodiment of the present application. It will be described later.

Table 4 shows the results of making golf clubs using these shafts and hitting them. The test hitters are 28 male golfers aged 30-60, head speed 39-46 m / sec, handicap 7-25, career 3-30 years. Of course, club specifications such as length and balance are unified.

  Comparative Examples 1 and 2 are general examples of lightweight FRP shafts. As can be seen from FIGS. 1 and 2, since the torsional rigidity GI and bending rigidity EI are both low over the entire length of the shaft, although the flight distance appears as shown in Table 4, the shaft is too flexible and the directional stability is slightly low. The swinging feeling is not good because it is too strong. On the other hand, torsional rigidity GI and flexural rigidity EI were increased in Comparative Example 3 to eliminate this, but as shown in Table 4, there is no sense of bending and it is difficult to take timing, and it seems to be heavy. Become. This is because in order to increase the rigidity, it is necessary to increase the number of reinforcing fibers, which increases the mass.

  Therefore, in Examples 1 to 3, the bending rigidity EI is made equal to those in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, and only the torsional rigidity GI is increased. The inventors of the present application have found that not only the bending rigidity EI but also the torsional rigidity affects the sense of bending from the past prototype results, and in the conventional shaft shown in Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the tip end of the shaft is on the shaft axis. GI (x) / EI (x) in the section from the 200mm point to the butt end in the bat direction is less than 0.5, and the ratio of the average GI (x) to the average EI (x) of the total shaft length is 0.6a. In Examples 1 to 3, the GI (x) / EI (x) of the entire section from the tip end to the butt direction on the shaft axis from the point of 200 mm to the butt end is 0.5 or more, and the average GI of the entire shaft length GIa / EIa, which is the ratio of (x) to average EI (x), is 0.6 or more.

  The results of the trial hit evaluation are shown in Table 4, and Examples 1 to 3 were higher in evaluation than Comparative Examples 1 and 2. Since the bending rigidity EI is the same as that of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, it is a physical bending, that is, because the elastic deformation in the bending direction is sufficient, the flying distance is equal or more than that, but for a high torsional rigidity GI. The golfer's feeling of bending was not as in Comparative Examples 1 to 3, but the impression of swinging became high and the evaluation of the feeling of swing was high. In particular, in Examples 2 to 3, the GI (x) / EI (x) is 0.5 or more in the entire shaft length including the section from the tip end to 200 mm, so that the shaft is less twisted than Example 1, The directional stability was even better.

  In addition, as can be seen from Table 4, Examples 1 and 2 were superior in flight distance and swing feeling compared to Example 3. In Examples 1 and 2, the torsional rigidity is lower than that in Example 3 except for the section near the tip of the shaft (see FIG. 1). It was found that the torsional rigidity in the section near the tip is large, and the section from the middle to the butt end is relatively small. That is, by increasing the torsional rigidity in the section closer to the tip, it is possible to improve the feeling of efficiency and the feeling of swing.

In particular,
Divide the total length of the shaft into two equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section on the tip end side is GIt2, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt2, the average torsional rigidity of the section on the butt end side is GIb2, and the average bending rigidity of the section is EIb2. And when
GIt2 / EIt2> GIb2 / EIc2
Is to satisfy
Or
Divide the total length of the shaft into three equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the tip end is GIt3, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt3, the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the butt end is GIb3, and the average bending rigidity of the section EIb3, when the average torsional rigidity of the middle section is GIc3, and the average bending rigidity of the section is EIc3,
GIt3 / EIt3 ≧ GIc3 / EIc3 ≧ GIb3 / EIc3
When
GIt3 / EIt3> GIb3 / EIc3
Is to satisfy.

For this purpose, it is advantageous that the torsional rigidity GI has a local maximum point, and it is further preferable that the local maximum point is in the section closest to the tip end when the entire shaft length is divided into three equal parts.

  On the other hand, as can be seen from Table 4, Comparative Example 4, which had a relatively good evaluation, was broken during the test hit and had insufficient strength. When Table 3 is seen, it turns out that the comparative example 4 has a larger torsional rigidity than the bending rigidity in Examples 1 to 3 and above. Specifically, there are sites where GI (x) / EI (x) exceeds 1.0, and the average GIA / EIa exceeds 0.9. In order to increase the torsional rigidity GI, it is necessary to increase the bias layer arranged inside the shaft. However, in Comparative Example 4, since there were too many bias layers, the outer straight layer had to be insufficient, and the strength was insufficient. Is the result. Based on the above, it was considered necessary to set GI (x) / EI (x) to 1.0 or less or GIA / EIa to 0.9 or less in order to ensure strength.

  In particular, GI (x) / EI (x) is as high as 1.02 at the 150 mm point near the chip in Comparative Example 4, and the bias layer near the chip end is thick. Since the vicinity of the tip end is the part where the lack of strength is most likely to occur, the straight layer (referred to as “reinforcing layer”) increased only by this part is also required, so that the bias layer becomes too thick. If there is a risk of insufficient strength. Therefore, in order to give higher priority to strength, it is considered preferable not to increase GI (x) / EI (x) for 200 mm from the tip end.

  The present invention does not limit the material of the shaft, but a material that can be designed independently of torsional rigidity and bending rigidity is advantageous. At present, it is suitable for application to FRP shafts and is 30 g or more that is lightweight. Particularly suitable for shafts of less than 60 g. This is because the invention of the present application realizes an appropriate feeling and swing feeling while preventing an increase in the amount of prepreg and fiber used as much as possible.

  The golf club shaft of the present invention can be used for a golf club having a shaft excellent in a feeling of bending and a swing feeling along with a flight distance.

Claims (7)

  When the torsional rigidity at the point x at the distance x in the butt end direction from the tip end to the butt end is GI (x) and the bending rigidity at the same point is EI (x), GI (x) / A golf club shaft, wherein EI (x) is 0.5 or more and 1.0 or less at all points from a tip end to a butt end.   When the torsional rigidity at the point x at the distance x from the tip end to the butt end direction is GI (x) and the bending rigidity at the same point is EI (x), the tip end from the tip end to the butt end direction GI (x) / EI (x), which is the ratio of torsional rigidity GI (x) and bending rigidity EI (x), is 0.5 to 1.0 in all sections starting from the 200mm point and ending at the butt end A golf club shaft characterized by being.   A golf club shaft, wherein a value of Gia / EIa, which is a ratio of an average torsional rigidity Gia from the tip end to the butt end and an average bending rigidity EIA from the tip end to the butt end, is 0.6 to 0.9. Divide the total length of the shaft into two equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section on the tip end side is GIt2, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt2, the average torsional rigidity of the section on the butt end side is GIb2, and the average bending rigidity of the section is EIb2. 4. The golf club shaft according to claim 1, wherein the following formula is satisfied:
GIt2 / EIt2> GIb2 / EIc2 Divide the total length of the shaft into three equal parts, the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the tip end is GIt3, the average bending rigidity of the section is EIt3, the average torsional rigidity of the section closest to the butt end is GIb3, and the average bending rigidity of the section The golf club shaft according to claim 1, wherein EIb3 is satisfied, the average torsional rigidity of the middle section is GIc3, and the average bending rigidity of the section is EIc3, the following two expressions are satisfied: .
GIt3 / EIt3 ≧ GIc3 / EIc3 ≧ GIb3 / EIc3
GIt3 / EIt3> GIb3 / EIc3 The golf club shaft according to claim 1, wherein the torsional rigidity GI has a maximum point. 7. The golf club shaft according to claim 6, wherein the maximum point is in a section closest to the tip end when the overall length of the shaft is divided into three equal parts.

Images