JP2016034468A - Golf club fitting device, method and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a fitting device for objectively and accurately determining an optimum club weight which is a golf club weight suitable for a golfer.SOLUTION: There is provided a fitting device for determining an optimum club weight which is a golf club weight suitable for a golfer. The fitting device includes an acquisition part, a calculation part, and a determination part. The acquisition part acquires a value of the measurement that measures a test club swing motion by the golfer with a measurement device. Based on the value of the measurement, the calculation part calculates an index indicating energy or torque exerted by the golfer at the time of the swing motion, or an index correlated with them. The determination part determines the optimum club weight according to the magnitude of the index.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a fitting apparatus, method, and program for determining a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer (hereinafter referred to as an optimum club weight).

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, various fitting methods have been proposed in which a golf club is made a test club and the movement thereof is measured by a measuring device, and a golf club suitable for the golfer is determined based on the measured value. Patent Document 1 points out that it is important to consider the weight of the golf club, the length of the golf club, and the like in order to select a golf club suitable for the golfer.

JP 2013-226375 A

  By the way, the optimum club weight is determined empirically by a skilled club fitter based on the weight of the golf club currently used by the golfer, the trial hit results of various golf clubs, the apparent swing tempo, etc. There are many. However, such a fitting method that depends on experience and intuition is not objective, and there is a problem that individual differences occur in the fitting results.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a fitting device, method, and program for objectively and accurately determining an optimum club weight, which is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer.

  A fitting device according to a first aspect of the present invention is a fitting device that determines an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer, and includes an acquisition unit, a calculation unit, and a determination unit. The acquisition unit acquires a measurement value obtained by measuring a swing motion of a test club by the golfer using a measuring device. The calculation unit calculates an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation or an index correlated therewith based on the measured value. The determining unit determines the optimum club weight according to the size of the index.

  The fitting apparatus which concerns on the 2nd viewpoint of this invention is a fitting apparatus which concerns on a 1st viewpoint, Comprising: The said calculation part calculates several types of said parameter | index. The determining unit determines the optimum club weight according to the sizes of the plurality of types of indices.

  A fitting apparatus according to a third aspect of the present invention is the fitting apparatus according to the first aspect or the second aspect, wherein the index includes the arm energy of the golfer during the swing operation and the golfer during the swing operation. Includes at least one of the torques around the shoulder.

  The fitting apparatus which concerns on the 4th viewpoint of this invention is a fitting apparatus which concerns on a 3rd viewpoint, Comprising: The said calculation part calculates the head speed at the time of the said swing operation | movement. The determining unit determines the optimum club weight according to the magnitude of the head speed in addition to the magnitude of at least one of the arm energy and the torque around the shoulder.

  A fitting device according to a fifth aspect of the present invention is the fitting device according to any one of the first to fourth aspects, wherein the determining unit increases the optimum club weight as the index is larger or smaller. To decide.

  A fitting device according to a sixth aspect of the present invention is the fitting device according to any one of the first to fifth aspects, and further includes a storage unit. The storage unit stores correspondence data defining a correspondence between the size of the index and the optimum club weight for each type of the test club. The determining unit determines the optimum club weight by referring to the correspondence data in the storage unit according to the type of the test club.

  A fitting device according to a seventh aspect of the present invention is the fitting device according to any one of the first to sixth aspects, wherein a swing inertia moment is selected from a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight. An optimum club specifying unit for specifying a golf club that is small and has a large grip end moment of inertia is further provided.

A fitting method according to an eighth aspect of the present invention is a fitting method for determining an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer, and includes the following steps (1) to (3).
(1) A step of measuring a swing motion of the test club by the golfer with a measuring device.
(2) A step of calculating an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation or an index correlated therewith based on a measured value by the measuring device.
(3) A step of determining the optimum club weight according to the size of the index.

The fitting method according to the ninth aspect of the present invention is the fitting method according to the eighth aspect, further comprising the following step (4).
(4) A step of identifying a golf club having a small swing inertia moment and a large grip end inertia moment from among a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight.

A fitting program according to a tenth aspect of the present invention is a fitting program for determining an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer, and causes a computer to execute the following steps (1) to (3): .
(1) A step of acquiring a measured value obtained by measuring a swing motion of the test club by the golfer with a measuring device.
(2) A step of calculating an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation or an index correlated therewith based on a measured value by the measuring device.
(3) A step of determining the optimum club weight according to the size of the index.

A fitting program according to an eleventh aspect of the present invention is the fitting program according to the tenth aspect, and further causes the computer to execute the following step (4).
(4) A step of identifying a golf club having a small swing inertia moment and a large grip end inertia moment from among a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight.

  The present inventors have discovered that there is a correlation between the optimum club weight and the energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing motion. Therefore, according to the present invention, the optimum club weight is determined in accordance with an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swinging motion of the test club by the golfer, or the size of the index correlated therewith. . Thereby, the optimum club weight can be objectively determined with high accuracy.

The figure which shows a golf swing system provided with the fitting apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. The functional block diagram of a fitting system. The figure explaining xyz local coordinate system on the basis of the grip of a golf club. (A) The figure which shows an address state. (B) The figure which shows a top state. (C) The figure which shows an impact state. (D) The figure which shows a finish state. The flowchart which shows the flow of 1st conversion processing. The flowchart which shows the flow of the process which derives | leads-out the time of an address. The figure explaining a swing plane. The flowchart which shows the flow of a shoulder behavior derivation | leading-out process. The figure which illustrates a double pendulum model notionally. The flowchart which shows the flow of an parameter | index calculation process. Another diagram conceptually explaining the double pendulum model. The figure explaining the arm energy which is one of the weight indicators. The flowchart which shows the flow of the optimal total weight determination process. The figure which plotted the value of the arm energy and average shoulder torque at the time of swing operation | movement by 10 professional model users and 10 average model users. The figure which shows a pro model area | region and an average model area | region. The figure which shows the relationship between the weight of a golf club, and head speed. The figure which shows the head speed and optimal club weight at the time of the swing operation | movement by the professional model user calculated | required by experiment. The figure which shows the head speed and the optimal club weight at the time of swing operation | movement by the average model user calculated | required by experiment. The figure which shows the division area for allocating the optimal club weight to a professional model user. The figure which shows the division area for allocating the optimal club weight to an average model user. Contour map of head speed by simulation. FIG. 6 is a contour map of head speed according to another simulation. Furthermore, the contour map of the head speed by another simulation. Contour map of cock angle by simulation. The figure explaining the optimal club specific process. The figure explaining the various angles which are the weight parameter | index which concerns on a modification.

  Hereinafter, a golf club fitting device, method, and program according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

<1. Schematic configuration of fitting system>
1 and 2 show an overall configuration of a fitting system 100 including a fitting device 2 according to the present embodiment. The fitting device 2 is a device that analyzes the swing motion of the golf club 4 based on measurement data obtained by measuring the swing motion of the golf club 4 by the golfer 7. In the present embodiment, the fitting device 2 is used for the purpose of supporting the fitting of the golf club 4. The measurement of the swing motion is performed by the sensor unit 1 (measuring device) attached to the grip 42 of the golf club 4, and the fitting device 2 constitutes the fitting system 100 together with the sensor unit 1.

  Hereinafter, after describing the configuration of the sensor unit 1 and the fitting device 2, the flow of the analysis process of the swing operation will be described.

<1-1. Configuration of sensor unit>
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3, the sensor unit 1 is attached to an end portion of the grip 42 of the golf club 4 opposite to the head 41 and measures the behavior of the grip 42. The golf club 4 is a general golf club and includes a shaft 40, a head 41 provided at one end of the shaft 40, and a grip 42 provided at the other end of the shaft 40. The sensor unit 1 is configured to be small and light so as not to hinder the swing operation. As shown in FIG. 2, an acceleration sensor 11, an angular velocity sensor 12, and a geomagnetic sensor 13 are mounted on the sensor unit 1 according to the present embodiment. The sensor unit 1 is also equipped with a communication device 10 for transmitting measurement data from these sensors 11 to 13 to the external fitting device 2. In the present embodiment, the communication device 10 is wireless so as not to hinder the swing operation, but may be connected to the fitting device 2 in a wired manner via a cable.

The acceleration sensor 11, the angular velocity sensor 12, and the geomagnetic sensor 13 respectively measure grip acceleration, grip angular velocity, and grip geomagnetism in the xyz station coordinate system with the grip 42 as a reference. More specifically, the acceleration sensor 11 measures grip accelerations a _x , a _y , and a _z in the x-axis, y-axis, and z-axis directions. The angular velocity sensor 12 measures grip angular velocities ω _x , ω _y , and ω _z around the x axis, the y axis, and the z axis. Geomagnetic sensor 13 measures the x-axis, y-axis and z-axis direction of the grip geomagnetism m _x, m _y, a m _z. These measurement data are acquired as time-series data of a predetermined sampling period Δt. The xyz local coordinate system is a three-axis orthogonal coordinate system defined as shown in FIG. That is, the z axis coincides with the direction in which the shaft 40 extends, and the direction from the head 41 toward the grip 42 is the z axis positive direction. The x-axis is oriented as much as possible in the toe-heel direction of the head 41, and the y-axis is oriented as much as possible in the normal direction of the face surface of the head 41.

  In the present embodiment, measurement data obtained by the acceleration sensor 11, the angular velocity sensor 12, and the geomagnetic sensor 13 are transmitted to the fitting device 2 in real time via the communication device 10. However, for example, the measurement data may be stored in a storage device in the sensor unit 1, and the measurement data may be taken out from the storage device after the swing operation is finished and transferred to the fitting device 2.

<1-2. Configuration of fitting device>
The configuration of the fitting device 2 will be described with reference to FIG. The fitting device 2 is manufactured by installing the fitting program 3 according to the present embodiment stored in a computer-readable recording medium 20 such as a CD-ROM or USB memory from the recording medium 20 to a general-purpose personal computer. Is done. The fitting program 3 is software for analyzing the swing motion based on the measurement data sent from the sensor unit 1 and outputting information that assists in selecting a golf club suitable for the golfer 7. The fitting program 3 causes the fitting apparatus 2 to execute an operation described later.

  The fitting device 2 includes a display unit 21, an input unit 22, a storage unit 23, a control unit 24, and a communication unit 25. These units 21 to 25 are connected via the bus line 26 and can communicate with each other. In the present embodiment, the display unit 21 is configured with a liquid crystal display or the like, and displays information to be described later to the user. In addition, a user here is a general term for the person who requires the result of fitting, such as golfer 7 himself or its instructor. The input unit 22 can be configured with a mouse, a keyboard, a touch panel, and the like, and accepts an operation from the user on the fitting device 2.

  The storage unit 23 is configured by a nonvolatile storage device such as a hard disk. The storage unit 23 stores the fitting program 3 and the measurement data sent from the sensor unit 1. The storage unit 23 stores correspondence data 28. The correspondence relationship data 28, which will be described in detail later, is defined for each golf club 4 of various models and is data indicating conditions for determining the optimum club weight. The communication unit 25 is a communication interface that enables communication between the fitting device 2 and an external device, and receives data from the sensor unit 1.

  The control unit 24 can be composed of a CPU, ROM, RAM, and the like. The control unit 24 reads and executes the fitting program 3 in the storage unit 23 to virtually acquire the acquisition unit 24A, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C, the index calculating unit 24D, the determining unit 24E, and the display It operates as the control unit 24F and the optimum club specifying unit 24G. Details of the operations of the units 24A to 24G will be described later.

<2. Analysis of swing motion>
Next, a swing operation analysis process for fitting the golf club 4 by the fitting system 100 will be described. The analysis processing according to the present embodiment includes the following seven steps.
(1) Grip acceleration a _x in the xyz local coordinate system, a _y, a _z, grip angular velocity ω _x, ω _y, ω _z and grip geomagnetism m _x, m _y, measuring step of measuring the measurement data m _z ( 2) First, the measurement data in the xyz local coordinate system obtained in the measurement process is converted into grip accelerations a _X , a _Y , a _Z and grip angular velocities ω _X , ω _Y , ω _Z in the XYZ global coordinate system. Conversion step (In the first conversion step, grip speeds v _X , v _Y , and v _Z in the XYZ global coordinate system are also derived.)
(3) The behavior of the grip 42 (grip angular velocities ω _X , ω _Y , ω _Z and grip velocities v _X , v _Y , v _Z ) in the XYZ global coordinate system is determined from the grip 42 in the swing plane P (described later). (4) Shoulder behavior deriving step for deriving a pseudo shoulder behavior of the golfer 7 in the swing plane P based on the behavior of the grip 42 in the swing plane P (4) 5) A weight index that is a specification for determining the optimum club weight based on the behavior of the grip 42 and the pseudo shoulder behavior (in this embodiment, the average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy exhibited by the golfer 7) E _AVE and index calculation step of calculating the three indicators) a head velocity V _h (6), based on the weight indicator, a shaft 40 suitable optimum total weight determining step (7) golfer 7 to determine the optimum club weight The optimum shaft determining step for calculating the weight (hereinafter referred to as the optimum shaft weight) and the bending rigidity (hereinafter referred to as the optimum bending stiffness), and (8) the optimum club weight specified in the optimum total weight determining step and the optimum shaft determining step Optimum club specifying step for specifying a golf club that can increase the head speed from among a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimal shaft weight and the optimal bending rigidity calculated in the following.

  The XYZ global coordinate system is a three-axis orthogonal coordinate system defined as shown in FIG. That is, the Z-axis is a direction from the vertically lower side to the upper side, the X-axis is a direction from the back to the stomach of the golfer 7, and the Y-axis is parallel to the ground plane and goes from the ball hitting point to the target point. Direction.

<2-1. Measurement process>
In the measurement process, the golf club 4 with the sensor unit 1 is swung by the golfer 7. The golf club 4 swung in the measurement process is one of the two test clubs. However, as will be described in detail later, when it is determined that the first selected test club is not suitable for the golfer 7, another golf club is also swung. These test clubs are different types of golf clubs. In the present embodiment, one test club is a professional golf club (hereinafter referred to as a professional model club), and the other is a golf club suitable for average users (hereinafter referred to as a golf club). Average model club). In the present embodiment, the professional model club is heavier than the average model club. Which test club is to be swung in the measurement process is determined based on the preference and experience of the golfer 7.

Subsequently, as described above golf club 4 grip acceleration a _x during the swing operation, a _y, a _z, grip angular velocity ω _x, ω _y, ω _z and grip geomagnetism m _x, m _y, m _z of the measurement data Is measured by the sensor unit 1. This measurement data is transmitted to the fitting device 2 via the communication device 10 of the sensor unit 1. On the other hand, on the fitting device 2 side, the acquisition unit 24 </ b> A receives this via the communication unit 25 and stores it in the storage unit 23. In this embodiment, at least time-series measurement data from the address to the impact is measured.

  Note that the golf club swing operation generally proceeds in the order of address, top, impact, and finish. The address means an initial state in which the head 41 of the golf club 4 is arranged near the ball, as shown in FIG. 4A, and the top means the golf club 4 from the address, as shown in FIG. 4B. Is taken back and the head 41 is swung up most. As shown in FIG. 4 (C), the impact means a state at the moment when the golf club 4 is swung down from the top and the head 41 collides with the ball, and the finish is as shown in FIG. 4 (D). It means a state in which the golf club 4 is swung forward after impact.

In the measurement process, it is preferable that the golf club 4 described above is tried a plurality of times, preferably five times or more. In this case, an average value of the measurement data can be calculated and used for subsequent calculations. Also, in order to remove abnormal values due to miss shots, measurement errors, etc., the standard deviation σ of the measurement data is calculated, and the measurement data of all trial hits are preferably within the average value ± 1.65σ, more preferably the average value ± 1. It is preferable to obtain measurement data that falls within 28σ. Then, in order to perform the check, the control unit 24 calculates the standard deviation σ of the measurement data. When the value of σ does not satisfy the above conditions, a message for requesting addition or re-measurement is displayed. You may make it display on the part 21. FIG. It should be noted that, instead of the average value of the measurement data itself, an average value of machining values calculated based on the measurement data (for example, average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE and head speed V _h described later) is calculated. May be. Similarly, when calculating the average value of the processed values, it is possible to check the reliability of the data based on the standard deviation σ.

<2-2. First conversion step>
Hereinafter, the first conversion step for converting the measurement data of the xyz local coordinate system into the value of the XYZ global coordinate system will be described with reference to FIG. Specifically, first, the acquisition unit 24A performs grip accelerations a _x , a _y , a _z , grip angular velocities ω _x , ω _y , ω _z and grips in the xyz local coordinate system stored in the storage unit 23. geomagnetic m _x, m _y, reads the measurement data of the time series of m _z (step S1).

Next, based on the time-series measurement data in the xyz local coordinate system read out in step S1, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B derives the times t _i , t _t , and t _a of impact, top, and address. (Step S2). In this embodiment, the impact time t _i is first derived, the top time t _t is derived based on the impact time t _i , and the address time t _a is derived based on the top time t _t .

Specifically, the time when the increment of the grip angular velocity ω _x per sampling period Δt first exceeds the threshold of 300 deg / s is set as the temporary impact time. Then, the time at which the increment of the grip angular velocity ω _x per sampling period Δt exceeds 200 deg / s from the time when a predetermined time is passed from the time of the temporary impact to the time of the temporary impact is detected. The time t _i is set.

Next, the time before the impact time t _i and when the grip angular velocity ω _y is switched from negative to positive is specified as the top time t _t . The address time t _a is calculated according to the flowchart of FIG.

In subsequent step S3, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B calculates a posture matrix N (t) at time t from the address to the impact. Assume that the posture matrix is expressed by the following formula. The posture matrix N (t) is a matrix for converting the XYZ global coordinate system at time t to the xyz local coordinate system.

The meanings of the nine components of the posture matrix N (t) are as follows.
Component a: Cosine of the angle formed by the X axis of the global coordinate system and the x axis of the local coordinate system Component b: Cosine of the angle formed by the Y axis of the global coordinate system and the x axis of the local coordinate system Component c: Overall Cosine of angle formed by Z axis of coordinate system and x axis of local coordinate system Component d: Cosine of angle formed by X axis of global coordinate system and y axis of local coordinate system Component e: Y of global coordinate system Cosine of angle between axis and y axis of local coordinate system Component f: cosine of angle between Z axis of global coordinate system and y axis of local coordinate system Component g: X axis of global coordinate system and local Cosine of angle between z axis of coordinate system Component h: Cosine of angle between Y axis of global coordinate system and z axis of local coordinate system Component i: Z axis of global coordinate system and z of local coordinate system Here, the vector (a, b, c) represents a unit vector in the x-axis direction, and the vector (d, e, f) represents a single vector in the y-axis direction. Represents a vector, the vector (g, h, i) represents a unit vector in the z-axis direction.

Further, the attitude matrix N (t) can be expressed by the following equation according to the concept of Euler angles in the ZYZ system. Here, φ, θ, and ψ are rotation angles around the Z axis, the Y axis, and the Z axis.

In calculating the posture matrix N (t) to the impact from the address, first, the address of the time t _a at the posture matrix N (t _a) is calculated. Specifically, φ and θ at the time of address are calculated according to the following equations. Note that the following expression uses that the golf club 4 is stationary at the time of addressing and only the gravity in the vertical direction is detected by the acceleration sensor 11. The grip accelerations a _x , a _y , and a _z in the following expressions are values at the time of addressing.

Subsequently, ψ at the time of addressing is calculated according to the following equation.
However, the values of m _xi and my _{y in} the above formula are calculated according to the following formula. Further, the following grip geomagnetic m _x in the formula, m _y, m _z is the value at the address.

From the above, to generate address phi, theta, [psi is grip acceleration a _x in the xyz local coordinate system, a _y, a _z and grip geomagnetism m _x, m _y, is calculated on the basis of the m _z. And these phi, theta, by substituting the value Expression 2 of [psi, Adoresu when the posture matrix N (t _a) is calculated.

Subsequently, the posture matrix N (t) from the address to the impact is calculated by updating the posture matrix N (t _a ) at the time of time at intervals of the sampling period Δt. More specifically, first, the attitude matrix N (t) is expressed by the following expression using four quaternion variables q ₁ , q ₂ , q ₃ , q ₄ (q ₄ is a scalar part).

Therefore, from Equations 1 and 7, the four quaternion variables q ₁ , q ₂ , q ₃ , and q ₄ can be calculated according to the following equations.

Now, the value of a~i that defines the address at the time of the attitude matrix N (t _a) is known. Therefore, according to the above formula, first, quaternion four variables q ₁ , q ₂ , q ₃ , and q ₄ at the time of address are calculated.

The quaternion q ′ after a lapse of a minute time from the time t is expressed by the following equation using the quaternion q at the time t.

The first-order differential equation representing the temporal change of the four quaternion variables q ₁ , q ₂ , q ₃ , and q ₄ is expressed by the following equation.

By using the equations (9) and (10), the quaternion at time t can be sequentially updated to the quaternion at the next time t + Δt. Here, the quaternion from the address to the impact is calculated. Then, by sequentially substituting the four quaternion variables q ₁ , q ₂ , q ₃ , and q ₄ from the address to the impact into the formula 7, the attitude matrix N (t) from the address to the impact is calculated. The

Next, in step S4, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B determines the grip acceleration a _x , a _y , a _{z in} the xyz local coordinate system from the address to the impact based on the posture matrix N (t) from the address to the impact. The time series data of the grip angular velocities ω _x , ω _y , and ω _z is converted into time series data in the XYZ global coordinate system. The converted grip accelerations a _X , a _Y , a _Z and grip angular velocities ω _X , ω _Y , ω _Z are calculated according to the following equations.

In subsequent step S5, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B integrates the time series data of the grip accelerations a _X , a _Y , and a _Z , thereby grip speeds v _X , v _{Y in} the XYZ global coordinate system from the address to the impact. , V _Z is derived. At this time, it is preferable to perform offset so that the grip speeds v _X , v _Y , and v _Z from the address to the impact are 0 m / s at the top. For example, offset at an arbitrary time t is grip velocity v _X at time t, v _Y, v from _Z, (grip velocity v _X at the top of the time _{t t, v Y, v Z} ) × t / (t t is performed by subtracting the -t _a).

<2-3. Second conversion step>
Hereinafter, the second conversion step for converting the behavior of the grip 42 in the XYZ global coordinate system calculated in the first conversion step into the behavior of the grip 42 in the swing plane P will be described. In the present embodiment, the swing plane P is defined as a plane that includes the origin of the XYZ global coordinate system and is parallel to the Y axis and the shaft 40 of the golf club 4 at the time of impact (see FIG. 7). In the second conversion step, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B projects the grip speeds v _X , v _Y , v _Z and the grip angular velocities ω _X , ω _Y , ω _Z in the XYZ global coordinate system into the swing plane P. v _pX , v _pY , v _pZ and grip angular velocities ω _pX , ω _pY , ω _pZ are calculated.

Specifically, based on the z-axis vector (g, h, i) included in the posture matrix N (t) representing the extending direction of the shaft 40, the golf player 7 is viewed from the front. E) Time series data of the inclination of the shaft 40 is calculated. Then, based on this time series data, the time when the shaft 40 is parallel to the Z axis when viewed from the positive direction of the X axis is specified, and this is set as the impact time t _i . Here, the impact time t _i does not always coincide with the impact time t _i already described. Subsequently, the inclination of the shaft 40 viewed from the negative Y-axis direction is calculated based on the z-axis vector (g, h, i) included in the posture matrix N (t _i ) at the time t _i of the impact. That is, an angle α ′ formed between the shaft 40 and the X axis viewed from the negative direction of the Y axis at the time of impact is calculated, and this is set as the swing plane angle.

When the swing plane angle α ′ is obtained, a projection transformation matrix A for projecting an arbitrary point in the XYZ global coordinate system onto the swing plane P can be calculated as follows. However, α = 90 ° −α ′.

Here, based on the above projective transformation matrix A, the grip speeds v _pX , v _pY , v _pZ and the grip angular velocities ω _pX , ω _pY , ω _pZ after the projective transformation from the address to the impact according to the following formula: Series data is calculated.

Note that the grip speed (v _pY , v _pZ ) obtained by the above calculation represents the grip speed (vector) in the swing plane P, and the grip angular speed ω _pX is an axis perpendicular to the swing plane P. It represents the angular velocity around. Here, the grip speed (scalar) in the swing plane P from the address to the impact is calculated according to the following equation.

Further, here, the inclination of the shaft 40 at the top in the swing plane P, which is necessary for the later calculation, is also calculated. Specifically, first, the z-axis vector (g, h, i) included in the top posture matrix N (t _t ) is projected into the swing plane P using the projective transformation matrix A according to the following equation. To do. Here, the projected vector is (g ′, h ′, i ′).

The vector (h ′, i ′) specified by the above expression is a vector representing the inclination of the shaft 40 at the top in the swing plane P. Therefore, the inclination β of the shaft 40 at the top in the swing plane P is calculated by substituting the above calculation results into the following equation.

<2-4. Shoulder behavior derivation process>
Hereinafter, while calculating FIG. 8, shoulder behavior derivation for deriving a pseudo shoulder behavior in the swing plane P based on the grip behavior (grip speed V _GE and grip angular velocity ω _pX ) in the swing plane P will be described below. The process will be described. In the present embodiment, the behavior of the golf club 4 is a double pendulum model in which the shoulder of the golfer 7 and the grip 42 (or the wrist of the golfer who holds the golf club 7) are nodes, and the arm of the golfer 7 and the golf club 4 are linked. Based on the analysis. However, the shoulder behavior is not directly measured, but is derived as a pseudo shoulder behavior based on the actually measured grip behavior. In the following, unless otherwise specified, the term “shoulder” simply means such a pseudo shoulder. The same applies to the pseudo “arm” defined as extending linearly between the pseudo shoulder and the grip 42 (wrist).

In specifying the shoulder behavior from the grip behavior, the double pendulum model according to the present embodiment is based on the following (1) to (5). FIG. 9 is a diagram conceptually illustrating the following preconditions.
(1) On the swing plane P, the grip 42 (wrist) moves circularly around the shoulder. (2) On the swing plane P, the distance (radius) R between the shoulder and the grip 42 is constant.
(3) The shoulder does not move (but rotates) during the swing motion.
(4) On the swing plane P, the angle between the top arm and the golf club 4 is 90 °.
(5) The arm at the time of impact faces the lower side of the Z axis when viewed from the positive direction of the X axis.

Under the above assumption, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C calculates the movement distance D of the grip 42 from the top to the impact in the swing plane P (step S21). The moving distance D is derived by integrating the grip speed V _GE from the top to the impact.

  Subsequently, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C calculates the arm rotation angle γ from the top to the impact in the swing plane P (step S22). The rotation angle γ is calculated based on the inclination β of the shaft 40 at the top calculated in the second conversion step. Next, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C calculates the radius R = D / γ (step S23).

Then, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C calculates an angular velocity (an angular velocity of the arm) ω ₁ around the shoulder from the top to the impact in the swing plane P as the shoulder behavior according to the following equation. That is, the arm angular velocity ω ₁ is a value reflecting the measured grip velocity V _GE .
ω ₁ = V _GE / R

<2-5. Index calculation process>
Hereinafter, an index calculation process for calculating a weight index for determining the optimum club weight based on the behavior of the grip 42 and the behavior of the shoulder will be described with reference to FIG. In the present embodiment, average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE, and head speed V _h described later are calculated as weight indexes.

Specifically, first, in step S31, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C integrates the angular velocity ω ₁ of the arm from the top to the impact, and calculates the rotational angle θ ₁ of the arm from the top to the impact. At this time, it is preferable to use trapezoidal integration. The rotation angle θ ₁ is defined as shown in FIG. 11, and the paper surface of FIG. 11 is equal to the swing plane P. In the following, the analysis proceeds based on a new XY coordinate system in the swing plane P shown in FIG. The X axis of the new XY coordinate system in the swing plane P is equal to the Y axis of the XYZ global coordinate system described above, and the Y axis of the new XY coordinate system is the Z axis of the XYZ global coordinate system within the swing plane P. Is the axis projected onto

Further, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C differentiates the angular velocity ω ₁ of the arm from the top to the impact, and calculates the angular acceleration ω ₁ ′ from the top to the impact. Next, the shoulder behavior deriving unit 24C calculates the position (X ₁ , Y ₁ ), the velocity (V _X1 , V _Y1 ) and the acceleration (A _X1 , A _Y1 ) of the center of gravity of the arm from the top to the impact. These values are calculated by substituting the calculation results described above into the following equations.

  Where r is the distance from the shoulder to the center of gravity of the arm. In the present embodiment, it is assumed that the center of gravity of the arm is at the center of the arm. Therefore, R = 2r.

Next, in step S <b> 32, the grip behavior deriving unit 24 </ b> B performs a calculation similar to that in step S <b> 31 also about the grip 42. That is, the grip angular velocity ω _pX from the top to the impact = the angular velocity ω ₂ of the golf club 4 around the grip 42 is integrated, and the rotation angle θ ₂ of the golf club 4 (shaft 40) around the grip 42 from the top to the impact is calculated. To do. Also at this time, it is preferable to use trapezoidal integration, and the rotation angle θ ₂ is defined as shown in FIG.

Subsequently, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B differentiates the angular velocity ω ₂ of the golf club 4 from the top to the impact, and calculates the angular acceleration ω ₂ ′ from the top to the impact. Next, the grip behavior deriving unit 24B calculates the position (X ₂ , Y ₂ ), speed (V _X2 , V _Y2 ), and acceleration (A _X2 , A _Y2 ) of the golf club 4 from the top to the impact. . These values are calculated by substituting the calculation results described above into the following equations.

  However, L is the distance from the grip 42 to the center of gravity of the golf club 4. The value of L is a specification of the golf club 4 and is set in advance.

Next, in step S33, the index calculation unit 24D substitutes the calculation result described above into the following formula to thereby obtain the restraining force R ₂ = (R _X2 , R _Y2 ) generated in the grip 42 from the top to the impact. calculate. The following formula is based on the balance of forces in the translational direction. Where m ₂ is the mass of the golf club and g is the acceleration of gravity. Further, m ₂ is the specification of the golf club 4 and is determined in advance.

In step S34, the index calculation unit 24D, by substituting the following equation calculation results described above, calculates the torque T ₁ and the torque T ₂ of the around the grip 42 of the shoulder around from the top to the impact.

However, I ₁ is the moment of inertia around the center of gravity of the arm, and I ₂ is the moment of inertia around the center of gravity of the golf club 4. In this embodiment, the moment of inertia I ₁ around the center of gravity of the arm is
Under the assumption that the center of gravity of the arm is at the center of the arm is calculated as ^{_{I 1 = m 1 r 2/}} 3. m ₁ is the mass of the arm. In the present embodiment, the mass m ₁ of the arm is appropriately determined in advance.
For example, before starting the analysis, the weight of the golfer 7 is input, and the weight of the arm is automatically calculated by multiplying the input weight by a predetermined coefficient. I ₂ is the specification of the golf club 4 and is predetermined.

Further, in the present embodiment, index calculation unit 24D calculates the value T _ti integrated over the interval of the torque T ₁ of the surrounding shoulder from the top to the impact. T _ti is the total amount of torque (hereinafter referred to as total shoulder torque) that is exerted around the shoulder of the golfer 7 from the top to the impact, and in this sense is an index that represents the torque around the shoulder during the swing operation. In addition, the index calculation unit 24D calculates an average shoulder torque (hereinafter referred to as an average shoulder torque) T _AVE = T _ti / t _i −t _c during a swing operation by dividing the torque T _ti by the time from the top to the impact. Is calculated. The average shoulder torque T _{AVE is} also an index representing the torque around the shoulder during the swing motion, and is one of the weight indices. In calculating the total shoulder torque T _ti , only the positive torque T ₁ may be integrated, or the average value of the torque T ₁ may be integrated.

In subsequent step S35, the index calculating unit 24D calculates the arm power (power) E ₁ ′ from the top to the impact based on the above-described calculation result. Specifically, E ₁ 'is the velocity vector of the shoulder and v _s, the velocity vector of the grip 42 as v _g, expressed according to the following equation. Here, R ₁ is a binding force generated on the shoulder. Further, v _s and v _g can be calculated by first-order differentiation of the shoulder position vector d _s and the grip 42 position vector d _g = d _s + (2X ₁ , 2Y ₁ ), respectively.

In this embodiment, since the shoulder does not move, v _s = (0, 0), and the arm power E ₁ ′ is calculated according to the following equation. The index calculation unit 24D calculates the arm power E ₁ ′ from the top to the impact by substituting the calculation result described above into the following equation.

In subsequent step S36, the index calculation unit 24D identifies the time t _c a work rate of the arm with subsequent top E ₁ 'turns from positive to negative, the workload of the arm from time t _t of the top to the time t _c E ₁ is calculated. The work E ₁ of the arm is calculated by integrating the work E ₁ ′ of the arm in the interval from time t t to _{t c} (see FIG. 12). The work amount E ₁ can be considered as an index representing the work amount (energy) exerted by the arm between the times t t to _{t c} , and in this sense, the work amount E ₁ is called arm energy during the swing operation. Can do.

In subsequent step S37, the index calculation unit 24D calculates a cock release timing t _r during the swing operation. The present inventors, through experimentation, head speed V _h at impact as a weight indicator, cook release timing t _r during the swing operation, and the arm energy E ₁ or the average work rate E _AVE = E ₁ / It was found that there is a correlation with t _c −t _t . The average power E _AVE is arm energy that is averaged or consumed per unit time during the swing motion. Therefore, here, in order to calculate the head speed V _h at impact, cock release timing t _r is calculated. In the present embodiment, the cock release timing t _r is the time t _t ~t section arms work rate at up to _c E ₁ 'is the time when the maximum is identified as a cook release timing t _r (see FIG. 12) .

In subsequent step S38, the index calculation unit 24D calculates the head speed V _h at the time of impact based on the cock release timing _tr and the arm energy E _AVE . Specifically, the head speed V _h at the time of impact is calculated according to the following formula. Note that k ₁ , k ₂ , and k ₃ are constants obtained by multiple regression analysis from the results of many experiments performed in advance, and are values that are stored in the storage unit 23 in advance. Thus, the index calculation process ends.
V _h = k ₁ · E _AVE + k ₂ · _tr + k ₃

<2-6. Optimal total weight determination process>
Hereinafter, the flow of the optimum total weight determining step for determining the optimum club weight will be described with reference to FIG.

  First, in step S40, the determination unit 24E determines the type of the test club that has been tried in the measurement process. If the professional model club has been trial-struck, the process proceeds to step S41, and if the average model club has been trial-struck, the process proceeds to step S51. Which test club has been tried is determined based on information input by the user via the input unit 22.

Note that the type of the test club is determined in step S40 because the area where the weight index is distributed differs depending on the type of the test club. More specifically, the inventors have 10 golfers who normally use professional model golf clubs (hereinafter referred to as professional model users) and golfers who normally use average model golf clubs (hereinafter referred to as averages). 14 model users) each of the professional model club and the average model club was tried and the weight index was calculated. The result shown in FIG. 14 was obtained. The weight index calculated in this experiment was the average shoulder torque T _AVE and arm energy E _AVE , and specific values were calculated according to the same steps as described above. And the present inventors discovered from the result shown in FIG. 14 that the space which shows a weight parameter | index is divided | segmented into a pro model area | region and an average model area | region, as shown in FIG. Note that the pro model region is a region in which the weight index during the swing motion by the professional model user is distributed, and the average model region is a region in which the weight index during the swing motion by the average model user is distributed. In the example of FIG. 14, the pro model region is a region where the average shoulder torque T _AVE ≧ 55 N · m and the arm energy E _AVE ≧ 150 N · m / s, and the average model region is the average shoulder torque T _AVE <55 N · m. M or arm energy E _AVE <150 N · m / s. However, these numerical values may differ depending on swing conditions such as the type of test club. In this experiment, as a professional model club, a driver of SRIXON (registered trademark) Z-525 (shaft is Miyazaki KENA Blue6 S-Flex, golf club weight is 315 g, balance is D2) manufactured by Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. XXIO (registered trademark) 7 manufactured by Dunlop Sports Co., Ltd. (shaft is MP-700 R-Flex, golf club weight is 285 g, balance is D1) was used as the average model club. .

Next, step S41 and subsequent steps S42 to S45 will be described. Steps S41 to S45 are steps for determining an optimum club weight range (hereinafter referred to as an optimum weight zone) according to the average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE, and head speed V _h . Here, as the values of T _AVE , E _AVE and V _h are larger, the optimum weight band is set to a larger value stepwise.

Specifically, in step S41, the determination unit 24E determines that the head speed V _h is 45 m / s or more, the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 85 N · m or more, and the arm energy E _AVE is 350 N · m / s. It is determined whether or not s or more (hereinafter referred to as professional condition 1). When professional condition 1 is satisfied, it is determined that 320 g or more is the optimum weight band. On the other hand, if the professional condition 1 is not satisfied in step S41, the process proceeds to step S42. In step S42, the determination unit 24E determines whether or not the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 75 N · m or more and the arm energy E _AVE is 250 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, professional condition 2). . When professional condition 2 is satisfied, it is determined that 310 g to 320 g are optimum weight zones. On the other hand, if the professional condition 2 is not satisfied in step S42, the process proceeds to step S43. In step S43, the determination unit 24E determines whether the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 70 N · m or more and the arm energy E _AVE is 175 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, professional condition 3). . And when professional condition 3 is satisfy | filled, it determines with 305g-315g being an optimal weight belt | band | zone. On the other hand, if the professional condition 3 is not satisfied in step S43, the process proceeds to step S44. In step S44, the determination unit 24E determines whether or not the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 55 N · m or more and the arm energy E _AVE is 120 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, professional condition 4). . And when professional condition 4 is satisfy | filled, it determines with 300g-310g being an optimal weight range. On the other hand, if the professional condition 4 is not satisfied in step S44, the process proceeds to step S45. In step S45, determination unit 24E determines whether the head velocity V _h greater than 38m / s (hereinafter, pro condition 5). When professional condition 5 is satisfied, it is determined that 290 g to 300 g is the optimum weight band. On the other hand, if the professional condition 5 is not satisfied in step S45, it is determined that the average model club is more appropriate than the professional model club. In response, the display control unit 24F displays a message on the display unit 21 indicating that the measurement process is to be performed again using the average model club, and the process proceeds to step S51.

On the other hand, step S51 and subsequent steps S52 and S53 are steps for determining an optimum weight band according to the average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE, and head speed V _h . Here, as the values of T _AVE , E _AVE and V _h are larger, the optimum weight band is set to a larger value stepwise.

Specifically, the determination unit 24E determines that the head speed V _h is 40 m / s in step S51.
Whether or not the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 65 N · m or more and the arm energy E _AVE is 200 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, average condition 1) is determined. When the average condition 1 is satisfied, it is determined that the professional model club is more appropriate than the average model club. In response to this, the display control unit 24F displays a message on the display unit 21 indicating that the measurement process is to be started again using the professional model club, and proceeds to step S41. On the other hand, when the average condition 1 is not satisfied in step S51, the process proceeds to step S52. In step S52, the determination unit 24E determines whether or not the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 55 N · m or more and the arm energy E _AVE is 150 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, average condition 2). . When average condition 2 is satisfied, it is determined that 290 g to 300 g is the optimum weight band. On the other hand, when the average condition 2 is not satisfied in step S52, the process proceeds to step S53. In step S53, the determination unit 24E determines that the head speed V _h is greater than 38 m / s, the average shoulder torque T _AVE is 48 N · m or more, and the arm energy E _AVE is 100 N · m / s or more (hereinafter, average). It is determined whether or not the condition 3) is satisfied. When the average condition 3 is satisfied, it is determined that 290 g to 300 g is the optimum weight band. On the other hand, when the average condition 3 is not satisfied in step S53, it is determined that 290 g or less is the optimum weight band.

The above steps S41 to S45 and steps S51 to S53 are based on the following knowledge. That is, in the above-described experiment described with reference to FIGS. 14 and 15, the head speed V _h and the optimum club weight that maximizes the flight distance were also calculated. The head speed V _h was calculated according to the same process as described above. On the other hand, regarding the optimum club weight, golf clubs having various weights were swung to the golfer, the weight of the golf club giving the maximum flight distance was specified, and this was set as the optimum club weight. More specifically, five types of golf clubs of 324 g, 316 g, 312 g, 308 g, and 300 g were swung to the professional model user, and golf clubs of 295 g, 290 g, and 285 g were swung to the average model user. 17 and 18 show the values of the head speed V _h and the optimum club weight obtained by this experiment.

The optimum club weight can also be calculated as the optimum club weight in the simulation according to the following algorithm. That is, the present inventors have found that there is a relationship as shown in FIG. 16 between the head speed V _h and the weight of the golf club 4. Specifically, as the golf club 4 to be swung becomes heavier, the golf club 4 cannot be shaken off by the golfer's force, and the head speed V _h becomes smaller. However, even if it is lighter than a certain level, the head speed V _h reaches its peak (see FIG. 16). This is because it cannot be shaken with a force more than a full swing. In other words, even if it is easy to swing lightly above a certain level, the head speed V _h does not increase when the golfer reaches the limit. Thus, the head speed V _h is a certain point (change point of FIG. 16) as a boundary, a proportional region head speed V _h is proportional to the weight of the golf club 4, head speed V _h is the weight of the golf club 4 Regardless, it is divided into constant areas that are generally constant. Further, in order to extend the flight distance, it is preferable that both the head speed V _h and the weight of the golf club 4 are large. Therefore, the weight of the golf club 4 corresponding to the above change point is the optimum club that maximizes the flight distance. It can be said that it is weight. Accordingly, by swinging a golf club 4 different weight golfers participating in the experiment, head speed V _h and the head speed relationship between the weight of the golf club 4 V _h - plotted in golf club weight plane. Then, a regression line in the proportional region and a regression line in the constant region are calculated, a change point that is an intersection thereof is obtained, and the golf club weight corresponding to the change point can be set as the optimum golf club weight.

As shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, it can be seen from the above experiment that the optimum club weight increases as the arm energy E _AVE and the average shoulder torque T _AVE both increase. As a result, the present inventors calculated the average shoulder torque T _{AVE -arm} energy E _{AVE -head} speed V _h space as shown in FIG. 19 for the professional model user and as shown in FIG. 20 for the average model user. It was discovered that the region showing the optimum weight band can be defined by dividing the region. However, for simplicity, in FIG. 19 and FIG. 20, the axis representing the head speed V _h is omitted, and the average shoulder torque T _{AVE -arm} energy E _AVE plane is shown. That is, in steps S41 to S45 and steps S51 to S53 described above, the points indicating the average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE, and head speed V _h are plotted in any region in the T _AVE -E _AVE -V _h space. Depending on whether or not, it is a step for determining the optimum weight band. Note that the threshold values of T _AVE , E _AVE, and V _h used for the determinations in steps S41 to S45 and steps S51 to S53, in other words, the values indicating the boundaries of the divided areas shown in FIGS. Are stored in the storage unit 23 as correspondence data 28. That is, the correspondence relationship data 28 is data indicating a correspondence relationship between the sizes of T _AVE , E _AVE, and V _h and the optimum weight band. In steps S41 to S45 and steps S51 to S53, the correspondence data 28 in the storage unit 23 is referred to, and the above determination is performed. In FIG. 2, the correspondence relationship data 28 is shown as data different from the fitting program 3, but may be incorporated in the program 3.

By the way, in the professional model area, when T _AVE ≧ 85 N · m and E _AVE ≧ 350 N · m / s, the optimum weight band is 320 g or more or 310 g depending on whether the head speed V _h is 45 m / s or not. It can be distributed to any of ~ 320g. As shown in the experimental results shown in FIG. 17, this is the optimum in the case of V _h ≦ 45 m / s in the vicinity of the boundary line of the region where T _AVE ≧ 85 N · m and E _AVE ≧ 350 N · m / s. This is because when the club weight is 316 g and V _h ≧ 45 m / s, the optimum club weight is 324 g or more.

<2-7. Optimal shaft determination process>
Hereinafter, the optimum shaft determination process for calculating the optimum shaft weight and the optimum bending rigidity suitable for the golfer 7 will be described.

First, the determination unit 24E determines an optimum shaft weight range (hereinafter, optimum shaft weight band) based on the optimum weight band. Specifically, as shown in Tables 1 and 2 below, the optimum shaft weight band is determined in advance for each optimum weight band for each model of the golf club 4, and the optimum shaft weight band is determined based on this. .

  Subsequently, the determination unit 24E determines the range of the optimum bending stiffness of the shaft 40 (hereinafter, the optimum bending stiffness band). Since the method for determining the optimum bending stiffness band is known (refer to Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2013-208366 if necessary), detailed description thereof is omitted here.

  When the optimal weight band, the optimal shaft weight band, and the optimal bending rigidity band are determined by the above steps, the determination unit 24E determines the weight of the entire golf club 4, the weight of the shaft 40, and the bending rigidity of various golf clubs whose known weights are known. Golf clubs (hereinafter referred to as candidate clubs) belonging to the optimum weight zone, optimum shaft weight zone and optimum bending stiffness zone are identified from the clubs (hereinafter referred to as target clubs). The display control unit 24F displays on the display unit 21 the optimum weight band, the optimum shaft weight band, and the optimum bending rigidity band together with information indicating the type of the identified candidate club. Thereby, the user can know the type of golf club suitable for the golfer 7, and can know the optimum weight band, the optimum shaft weight band, and the optimum bending rigidity band.

<2-8. Optimal club identification process>
Hereinafter, an optimal club specifying step for specifying a golf club (hereinafter referred to as an optimal club) that can increase the head speed from among the candidate clubs specified in the above step will be described. The optimum club is specified based on the values of the grip end inertia moment I _G and the swing inertia moment I _S when the golfer 7 performing the fitting uses each candidate club.

The grip end inertia moment I _G is the moment of inertia around the grip end and is calculated as I _G = I ₂ + m ₂ L ² . On the other hand, the swing inertia moment _IS is the inertia moment around the shoulder during the swing, and can be calculated according to the following equation.
I _S = I ₂ + m ₂ (2r + L) ² + I ₁ + m ₁ r ²

However, for each golfer 7, the weight of the arm is the same even if the golf club changes. Therefore, for the sake of simplicity, the swing inertia moment I _S in this embodiment is defined according to the following equation, omitting the moment of inertia of the arm rotation.
I _S = I ₂ + m ₂ (2r + L) ²

The algorithm of the optimum club specifying process described below is based on the relationship between the head speed V _h , the grip end inertia moment I _G, and the swing inertia moment I _S as shown in FIGS. FIG. 21 to FIG. 23 show the results of the simulation performed by the present inventors. Thirteen points (circles) in the I _G -I _S plane in FIG. 21 are points indicating (I _G , I _S ) when the subject swings 13 golf clubs having different specifications. However, this data is not the data obtained by actually making a test shot of 13 golf clubs, but the data obtained by making a trial hit of one golf club (hereinafter referred to as a reference club) and simulating from this data. It is.

The specifications of the reference club (golf club weight m ₂ [g], center of gravity L [mm], moment of inertia I ₂ [kg · cm ² ]) were (272, 936, 453). Further, the sensor unit 1 as used in the measurement process was attached to the reference club. Then, the subject was given a test by hitting the reference club, and inverse dynamics analysis was performed according to the same algorithm as described above, and the torque T ₁ around the shoulder, the torque T ₂ around the grip 42, and the arm length R were calculated. Subsequently, assuming that these parameters T ₁ , T ₂ , and R are constant, the values of the specifications of the 13 golf clubs (golf club weight m ₂ , center of gravity distance L, inertia moment I _2, etc.) are used. A forward kinematics analysis was performed. In the simulation of FIG. 21, golf club weight m ₂ = 272 g (constant) is used, and the specifications (L, I ₂ ) of the remaining 12 golf clubs excluding the reference club are (941, 192). ) (941, 138) (938.5, 324) (936, 507) (941, 83) (938.5, 270) (933.5, 633) (931, 809) (936, 399) (933. 5,578) (931, 755) (931, 700). Through the above forward kinematic analysis, the head speed V _h , the grip end inertia moment I _G, and the swing inertia moment I _S for each golf club were calculated. The 10 diagonal lines drawn in FIG. 21 are contour lines of the head speed V _h derived based on the values of the 13 head speeds V _h .

The result of the same simulation performed on 13 different golf clubs is shown in FIGS. Specifically, in the simulation of FIG. 22, golf clubs having a center of gravity L = 936 cm (constant) are used, and the specifications (m ₂ , I ₂ ) of the remaining 12 golf clubs excluding the reference club are (284). , 349) (284, 294) (278, 400) (272, 507) (284, 240) (278, 346) (266, 560) (260, 666) (272, 399) (266, 506) (260 612) (260, 557). In the simulation of FIG. 23, golf clubs having a moment of inertia I ₂ = 453 kg · cm ² (constant) are used, and the specifications (L, m ₂ ) of the remaining 12 golf clubs excluding the reference club are (932). ., 293) (930.9, 297) (934.3, 282) (937.8, 267.6) (929.2, 302) (932.5, 287) (933.5, 258) ( 943.5, 244) (934.2, 276.4) (937.8, 262) (941.5, 248) (939.7, 252).

The above contour maps of FIGS. 21 to 23 are drawn in increments of 0.1 m / s. The numerical values attached to these contour lines are relative head speed V _h values when the head speed V _h in the reference club is 0.0 m / s. From these contour maps, it can be seen that in the I _G -I _S plane, the head speed V _h increases as it goes to the lower right and decreases as it goes to the upper left. In other words, it can be seen that the head speed V _h increases as the value of the swing inertia moment I _S decreases and the grip end inertia moment I _G increases. This tendency does not depend on conditions such as whether the golf club weight m ₂ is constant, the center of gravity L is constant, or the moment of inertia I ₂ is constant.

By the way, in general, and the grip end moment of inertia I _G and swing moment of inertia I _S is increased, become golf club is less likely to swing for the position of the center of gravity is closer to the head side, the head speed V _h is believed to decrease. However, from the simulation results of FIGS. 21 to 23, the inventors of the present invention, even if the grip end inertia moment I _G is increased, if the increment of the swing inertia moment I _S relative to the increment is set to a certain value or less, I have noticed that it is possible to improve the head speed V _h. The inventors have further studied and found that this can be explained from the result of another simulation shown in FIG.

FIG. 24 is a contour diagram of the cock angle derived based on the values of 13 cock angles when the subject swings 13 golf clubs in the simulation of FIG. Here, the cock angle refers, it is the angle formed between the arm and the golf club in the cock release timing t _r (angle indicated by the constant chain line in FIG. 11).

The contour lines in FIG. 24 are drawn in 0.5 ° increments. The numerical values attached to these contour lines are relative angles when the cock angle at the reference club is 0.0 °. From these contour maps, it can be seen that in the I _G -I _S plane, the cock angle decreases toward the right and increases toward the left. In other words, as the grip end moment of inertia I _G increases, it can be seen that cock angle decreases. On the other hand, since the contour lines extending generally vertically, cock angle is not affected by the swing moment of inertia I _S. For the sake of simplicity, only the simulation results corresponding to FIG. 21 are shown, but the same tendency with respect to the cock angle was also confirmed in the simulations corresponding to FIG. 22 and FIG.

The small cock angle means that the wrist cock is accumulated and the golf club passes near the golfer's body during the swing. Therefore, when the cock angle is small, the effective swing inertia moment I _S is small, and an increase in the head speed V _h is expected.

As described above, even if the grip end inertia moment I _G increases, if the increment of the swing inertia moment I _S is set to a certain value or less, the advantage of having a smaller cock angle than the disadvantage of making it difficult to swing the golf club. It is clear that the head speed V _h is improved. That is, if the grip end inertia moment I _G can be increased and the swing inertia moment I _S can be reduced, the head speed V _h can be improved.

Based on the above knowledge, the optimum club specifying step is executed. First, the optimum club specifying unit 24G narrows down candidate clubs from a plurality of target clubs to be fitted. Specifically, information indicating the specifications of each target club (hereinafter, specification information) is stored in the storage unit 23 in advance. In the present embodiment, as specifications here, for each target club, the golf club weight m ₂ , the moment of inertia I ₂ around the center of gravity of the golf club 4, and the distance from the grip 42 to the center of gravity of the golf club 4 (center of gravity distance) A value such as L is stored. Therefore, the optimum club specifying unit 24G refers to the specification information in the storage unit 23, so that golf clubs belonging to the optimum weight zone, the optimum shaft weight zone, and the optimum bending stiffness zone are selected as candidate clubs from the target clubs. Are all specified. When there is only one candidate club, the following processing is omitted and the one candidate club is specified as the optimum club.

On the other hand, when there are a plurality of candidate clubs, an optimum club that is a golf club capable of particularly increasing the head speed is identified from these candidate clubs. Specifically, the optimum club specifying unit 24G derives the grip end inertia moment I _G and the swing inertia moment I _S when the golfer 7 performing the fitting swings each candidate club according to the above-described definition formula. . At this time, using the parameter R already calculated in the steps from the measurement step to the index calculation step and the specifications of the candidate club specifications (golf club weight m ₂ , center of gravity distance L, inertia moment I _2, etc.) A kinematic analysis is performed. In this case, it is not necessary for the golfer 7 to swing the candidate club again.

When the inertia moments I _G and I _S corresponding to each candidate club are found, the optimum club specifying unit 24G has a smaller swing inertia moment I _S from a plurality of candidate clubs, and the grip end inertia moment I _G. A large golf club is identified and is designated as the optimum club. Specifically, the optimum club specifying unit 24G plots the points of (I _G , I _S ) corresponding to each candidate club in the I _G -I _S plane, and the candidate club corresponding to the point at the lowermost right. Is determined to be the best club. For example, when there are three candidate clubs A, B, and C as shown in FIG. 25A, the candidate club C is determined as the optimum club. On the other hand, when there are three candidate clubs A, B, and C as shown in FIG. 25B, it is not possible to determine which of the candidate clubs B and C exists at the lower right. . In this case, both B and C are determined as the optimum clubs.

Incidentally, B of FIG. 25 (B), also a plurality of candidate club corresponding and C, if it is possible to draw contour lines as shown in FIGS. 21 to 23 in I _G -I _S plane, determines superiority or inferiority be able to. Therefore, in another embodiment, the optimum club specifying unit 24G has already calculated parameters T ₁ , T ₂ , R and various predetermined golf club specifications (golf club weight m ₂ , center of gravity distance L, inertia moment). The contour of the head velocity V _h in the I _G -I _S plane may be derived by forward dynamic analysis using the value of I ₂ etc. This contour line depends on the golfer 7. Then, from the slopes of the contour lines, the head speed V _h corresponding to a plurality of candidate clubs such as B and C is determined (see FIG. 25C), and the highest one is determined as the optimum club. Can do.

When the above processing is completed, the display control unit 24F causes the display unit 21 to display information for specifying the optimum club. Thereby, the golfer 7 can grasp | ascertain the optimal golf club for himself. Moreover, in order to improve the persuasiveness of the above output values, the display control unit 24F can also display the graphs shown in FIGS. 25A to 25C on the display unit 21 together.
<3. Modification>
As mentioned above, although one Embodiment of this invention was described, this invention is not limited to the said embodiment, A various change is possible unless it deviates from the meaning. For example, the following changes can be made. Moreover, the gist of the following modifications can be combined as appropriate.

<3-1>
In the above-described embodiment, the sensor unit 1 including the acceleration sensor, the angular velocity sensor, and the geomagnetic sensor is used as the measurement device that measures the swing motion of the golfer 7, but the measurement device may have other configurations. . For example, the geomagnetic sensor can be omitted. In this case, the measurement data can be converted from the xyz local coordinate system to the XYZ global coordinate system by a statistical method. In addition, since such a method is a well-known technique (refer to Unexamined-Japanese-Patent No. 2013-56074 if needed), detailed description is abbreviate | omitted here. Alternatively, a three-dimensional measurement camera can be used as a measurement device. Since a method of measuring the behavior of a golfer, a golf club, or a golf ball with a three-dimensional measurement camera is also known, detailed description thereof is omitted here. If a 3D measurement camera is used, the process of converting the measurement data from the xyz local coordinate system to the XYZ global coordinate system can be omitted, and the grip behavior in the XYZ global coordinate system can be measured directly. can do.

<3-2>
The head speed V _h can be calculated by other methods than the statistical method based on the multiple regression equation described above. For example, you may calculate geometrically according to the following formula | equation. However, L _club is the length of the golf club which is the spec of the golf club.
Position vector (d _hX , d _hY ) of the head at the tip of the shaft 40
d _hX = 2X ₁ + L _club cos θ ₂
d _hY = 2Y ₁ + L _club sin θ ₂
Speed vector (V _hX , V _hY ) of the head at the tip of the shaft 40
V _hX = 2V _X1 -L _club ω ₂ sin θ ₂
V _hY = 2V _Y1 + L _club ω ₂ cos θ ₂
V _h = sqrt (V _hX ² + V _hY ² )

<3-3>
The optimum total weight determination step can be executed by the user, not the fitting device 2. That is, the calculated weight index is displayed on the display unit 21 after the index calculation process is completed. And based on the correspondence data 28 as shown in FIG.19 and FIG.20, a user may judge an optimal weight belt himself. At this time, if the correspondence data 28 is displayed on the display unit 21 or a paper medium on which the correspondence data 28 is printed is prepared, the user's judgment becomes easy. Similarly, some or all of the processes in the optimum shaft determining step and / or the optimum club specifying step can be executed by the user instead of the fitting device 2.

<3-4>
The weight index shown in the above embodiment is an exemplification, and various other indices correlated with the optimum club weight can be used. For example, not only the arm energy E _AVE and the average shoulder torque T _AVE but also the arm energy E ₁ and the shoulder torque T _ti can be used as the weight index. In addition, an index representing the energy of an arbitrary part or the torque of an arbitrary part exhibited by the golfer 7 during the swing operation can be used as a weight index. The term “during swing operation” here is not limited to the time from the top to the impact or cock release timing described in the above embodiment, but as long as there is a correlation between the weight index and the optimum club weight, It can be said to mean any time or period within. In addition, the following indices that are considered to be correlated with the energy or torque exerted by the golfer 7 can also be used as the weight indices. The indexes other than the following (7) to (9) tend to increase the optimum club weight as the value increases, and the indexes (7) to (9) indicate the optimum club weight as the value decreases. Tend to be larger.
(1) Angle θ3 formed by the shaft 40 and the overall coordinate system Z-axis (below the grip) at the top time (see FIG. 26)
(2) Average value of angular velocity ω ₂ during swing motion (3) Maximum value of angular velocity ω ₂ from top to impact (4) Average value of grip speed V _GE from top to impact (5) From top Maximum value of the grip speed V _GE to impact (6) Distance D of grip 42 between top and impact D
(7) cock release timing t _r say the difference (in this case between the time of cock release timing t _r and the impact is, Hayamari the release speed of the cock angle θ4 the arm and the shaft 40 is made, the arm of the energy of the shaft 40 energy It can be defined as the timing when it starts to change.
(8) cock angle θ4 to cook release timing t arm and the shaft 40 at _r is made (see Figure 26)
(9) Down swing time, that is, time from top to impact (10) Integral value of torque T ₂ from time of top to time when torque T ₂ around grip 42 reverses positive and negative

<3-5>
In the above embodiment, the optimum club weight is determined according to the size of the three weight indicators, but the optimum club weight is determined according to the size of one, two, four or more weight indicators. May be. For example, the optimum club weight can be determined only depending on the magnitude of any one or two indices selected from the three of arm energy E _AVE , average shoulder torque T _AVE, and head speed V _h . From the experimental results shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, it can be seen that the arm energy E _AVE and the average shoulder torque T _AVE have a higher correlation with the optimum club weight than the head speed V _h . Therefore, when the head speed V _h is used as a weight index, it is preferably used in combination with at least one of the arm energy E _AVE and the average shoulder torque T _AVE . In addition to E _AVE , T _AVE , and V _h , the optimum club weight can be determined according to the size of an arbitrary number of indices selected from the weight indices exemplified in the modified example 3-4. .

  Examples of the present invention will be described below. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples.

The average shoulder torque T _AVE , arm energy E _AVE , and head speed V _h were calculated by letting a professional model user and five average model users each hit a professional model club and an average model club, respectively. The result shown in was obtained. The values of T _AVE and E _AVE were calculated from the above measurement process according to the same process as the index calculation process. Further, the value of V _h was measured by a BCS system. The BCS system used here is a measurement system disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Nos. 2012-170547 and 2012-170532 by the applicants. In addition, the optimum weight band was derived by the method according to the above embodiment, and the optimum club weight for maximizing the flight distance was derived by the same method as the experiment described in the above embodiment.

  From the above results, with regard to the professional model user, except for one of the five P3, the optimum weight band according to the present example and the optimum club weight by the experiment coincided. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two values for one person who did not agree. Regarding the average model user, except for one A4 out of five people, the optimum weight band in the method according to the present example and the optimum club weight in the experiment coincided. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two values for one person who did not agree. This confirmed the high accuracy of the fitting method according to the above embodiment.

The golf clubs P1, P2, P4, P5 and A1, A2, A5 have the optimum club weight among the plurality of golf clubs used in the experiment for deriving the optimum club weight (hereinafter, experimental club). Table 5 below shows the specifications (golf club length, head weight, shaft weight, grip weight, golf club total weight m ₂ ). Further, according to the above definition formula, the swing inertia moment I _S and the grip end inertia moment I _G ) when each golfer used the experimental club were also calculated. These golf players P1, P2, P4, P5 and A1, A2, A5 are golf clubs belonging to the optimum weight zone, and have a grip end inertia moment I _G larger than that of the experimental club, and the swing inertia moment I _S Another small golf club (hereinafter referred to as a verification club) was swung. The specifications of the verification club are shown in Table 5. Further, as described above, by using the BCS system, was measured head velocity V _h during verification club swing, it became the results as shown in Table 5 below. The golfers P3 and A4 were not subjected to verification because the optimum weight band in the method according to the present example and the optimum club weight in the experiment did not match. A3 was not subject to verification because an appropriate verification club could not be prepared.

From the above results, it was confirmed that the head speed V _h was higher in the verification club than in the experimental club. That is, according to the optimum club specifying step according to the above embodiment, it has been confirmed that it is possible to narrow down the golf clubs that can further increase the head speed V _h .

1 Sensor unit (measuring device)
2 Fitting device 3 Fitting program 4 Golf club 7 Golfer 24A Acquisition unit 24B Grip behavior deriving unit 24C Shoulder behavior deriving unit 24D Index calculation unit (calculation unit)
24E determination unit 41 head 42 grip

Claims (11)

A fitting device for determining an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer,
An acquisition unit for acquiring a measurement value obtained by measuring a swing motion of the test club by the golfer with a measurement device;
Based on the measured value, a calculation unit that calculates an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation, or an index correlated therewith,
A determination unit that determines the optimum club weight according to the size of the index,
Fitting device. The calculation unit calculates a plurality of types of the indicators,
The determining unit determines the optimum club weight according to the size of the plurality of types of indicators.
The fitting device according to claim 1. The indicator includes at least one of arm energy of the golfer during the swing operation and torque around the shoulder of the golfer during the swing operation.
The fitting apparatus according to claim 1 or 2. The calculation unit calculates a head speed during the swing operation,
The determining unit determines the optimum club weight according to the size of the head speed in addition to the size of at least one of the arm energy and the torque around the shoulder.
The fitting device according to claim 3. The determining unit determines the optimum club weight to be a larger value as the index is larger or smaller.
The fitting apparatus in any one of Claim 1 to 4. For each type of test club, a storage unit is further provided for storing correspondence data for defining a correspondence between the size of the index and the optimum club weight.
The determining unit determines the optimum club weight by referring to the correspondence data in the storage unit according to the type of the test club.
The fitting apparatus in any one of Claim 1 to 5. 7. The golf club according to claim 1, further comprising an optimum club specifying unit that specifies a golf club having a small swing inertia moment and a large grip end inertia moment from a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight. The fitting device described. A fitting method for determining an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer,
Measuring the swing movement of the test club by the golfer with a measuring device;
Calculating an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation based on a measurement value by the measuring device, or an index correlated therewith;
Determining the optimum club weight according to the size of the indicator,
Fitting method. The method according to claim 8, further comprising: identifying a golf club having a small swing inertia moment and a large grip end inertia moment from among a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight. A fitting program for determining an optimum club weight that is a weight of a golf club suitable for a golfer,
Obtaining a measurement value obtained by measuring the swing motion of the test club by the golfer with a measuring device;
Calculating an index representing energy or torque exerted by the golfer during the swing operation based on a measurement value by the measuring device, or an index correlated therewith;
Causing the computer to execute the step of determining the optimum club weight in accordance with the size of the indicator.
Fitting program. 11. The program according to claim 10, further causing the computer to execute a step of identifying a golf club having a small swing inertia moment and a large grip end inertia moment from among a plurality of golf clubs that match the optimum club weight.