JP2016048414A - Image forming system - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To drastically reduce the man-hour of an operation test for an application program that is operated in an image forming apparatus.SOLUTION: A test device 100 includes an HDD125 as storage means for storing a request list 130 having a plurality of inspection codes each of which corresponds to an application program of each of various functions. A request list reading section 113 as request list reading means reads the request list 130, an HTML code request section 114 as request output means sequentially outputs a request for each inspection code of the request list 130, an HTML code comparison section 115 as request comparison means compares the consistency between the HTML code from an image forming apparatus which has responded to the request from the HTML code request section 114 and the HTML code of the inspection code corresponding to the request, and outputs a comparison result.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to an image forming system suitable for an operation test of an application program installed in an image forming apparatus.

  For example, an image forming apparatus such as an MFP (Multifunction Peripheral) is provided with an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) as a large-capacity storage device. The HDD stores application programs (hereinafter referred to as programs) for providing various functions of the image forming apparatus. Incidentally, as various functions of the image forming apparatus, there are a multi-operation function for each job such as copy, print, scanner, FAX (Facsimile), a user box function, and the like.

  In such an image forming apparatus, for example, various setting operations are performed by a touch operation on the panel. When various setting operations are performed, the screen of the panel is switched to a screen corresponding to each operation.

  Whether or not the screen on the panel is correctly displayed is confirmed by an operation test, but the operation test is often performed visually. In addition, when changing the contents of the screen on the panel, the HTML (HyperText Markup Language) code included in the program is changed. In this case, it is necessary to confirm the influence on other screens by changing the HTML code. However, confirming the HTML codes for all the screens leads to an increase in the number of man-hours.

  As for such an operation test, in Patent Document 1, in the development environment of a Web service having a GUI (graphical user interface) screen, when the screen design, the wording, and the processing content are corrected, the test necessary for checking the correction content A web service test apparatus that reduces man-hours has been proposed. This is because the design and processing contents of each screen of the Web service are stored separately in a display component storage unit, a text storage unit, a link storage unit, a CGI storage unit, and a screen transition storage unit. Based on the above, the CGI is selected and executed according to the send button, the screen transition destination is determined, the HTML file is generated, and sent to the browser to realize the Web service, and the test item generation unit Is configured to generate a test pattern for a Web service based on information in the screen transition storage unit.

JP2008-040882

  In the above-described Patent Document 1, since it is possible to test a Web service by only correcting information on a storage unit related to a change in screen design, wording, and processing content of the Web service, a GUI (graphical user interface) is provided. In the development environment of a web service having a screen, when the screen design, wording, and processing content of the web service are corrected, the number of test steps required for checking the correction content can be reduced.

  However, the operation test in Patent Document 1 is performed for a fixed mechanism such as CGI (Common Gateway Interface). For this reason, when such an operation test is applied to the above-described image forming apparatus, a program that operates on the image forming apparatus is not a fixed mechanism such as CGI, and thus a test apparatus is recreated for each image forming apparatus to be operated. There was a problem that it was necessary.

  The present invention has been made in view of such a situation, and an object thereof is to provide an image forming system capable of solving the above problems.

The image forming system of the present invention is represented by an image forming apparatus in which application programs for various functions related to image formation are installed, and HTML codes corresponding to the application programs for the various functions with respect to the image forming apparatus. And a test device that outputs a request using the inspection code, and when the test device receives an HTML code corresponding to the inspection code from the image forming apparatus, the HTML code and the HTML code of the inspection code It is characterized by comparing consistency with.
Further, the test apparatus includes a storage unit that stores a request list in which a plurality of inspection codes corresponding to the application programs for the various functions are registered, a request list reading unit that reads the request list, and the request list A request output unit that sequentially outputs a request for each inspection code, and the consistency between the HTML code from the image forming apparatus according to the request from the request output unit and the HTML code of the inspection code corresponding to the request. And a request comparison means for comparing and outputting the comparison result.
The request comparison unit registers the HTML code from the image forming apparatus as a new inspection code in the request list when the HTML code from the image forming apparatus in response to the request is not registered as the inspection code. It is characterized by doing.
In the image forming system of the present invention, the test apparatus outputs a request using the inspection code indicated by the HTML code corresponding to the application program for each function to the image forming apparatus, and the inspection code is output from the image forming apparatus. When the HTML code corresponding to is output, the consistency between the HTML code and the HTML code of the inspection code is compared.

  According to the image forming system of the present invention, the test device compares the consistency between the HTML code corresponding to the inspection code from the image forming device and the HTML code of the inspection code. The number of man-hours for the operation test of the application program that runs on can be greatly reduced.

1 is a diagram showing an embodiment of an image forming system of the present invention. It is a figure which shows the structure of the test apparatus of FIG. It is a figure which shows the structure of the image forming apparatus of FIG. FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining an example of a request list used for an operation test of the image forming apparatus in FIG. 1. 3 is a flowchart for explaining an operation test process by the test apparatus of FIG. 1.

  Hereinafter, an image forming system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. First, as shown in FIG. 1, the image forming system includes a test apparatus 100 having a display unit 123 and an operation unit 124, and an image forming apparatus 200 having a panel unit 234. The test apparatus 100 is an information processing terminal such as a notebook computer. The image forming apparatus 200 is an MFP (Multifunction Peripheral) that is a complex peripheral device equipped with a plurality of functions such as copying, printing, scanning, and FAX (Facsimile).

  Further, the image forming apparatus 200 is a target of an operation test of an application program (hereinafter referred to as a program), and for the convenience of description, the target of the operation test is the same model or a similar model. To do. The programs include a copy function providing program that provides a copy function, a print function providing program that provides a print function, a scanner function providing program that provides a scanner function, and a FAX function providing program that provides a FAX function.

  Further, the content of the operation test is to check whether or not a predetermined screen is correctly switched and displayed according to the operation of the panel unit 234 of the image forming apparatus 200. That is, for example, when setting the copy processing, when the copy button is selected from the initial screen displayed on the panel unit 234, the initial screen is switched to the detailed copy setting screen.

  Conventionally, the panel unit 234 is operated for each image forming apparatus 200 to visually check whether or not a predetermined screen is switched and displayed. In the present embodiment, details will be described later. The test apparatus 100 checks whether a predetermined screen is correctly switched and displayed.

  In this case, requests (HTTP requests) along a request list 130 (to be described later) are sequentially transmitted from the test apparatus 100 side to the image forming apparatus 200 side. From the image forming apparatus 200 side, an HTML code included in each function providing program in response to a request (HTTP request) from the test apparatus 100 is transmitted to the test apparatus 100 side.

  Then, on the test apparatus 100 side, the consistency between the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 and inspection codes 1 to 4 indicated by the HTML code in the request list 130 described later is compared, and the comparison result is output.

  Next, the configuration of the test apparatus 100 will be described with reference to FIG. The test apparatus 100 includes a control unit 110, an I / F (interface) unit 122, a display unit 123, an operation unit 124, and an HDD (Hard Disk Drive) 125.

  The I / F unit 122 can transmit and receive data to and from the image forming apparatus 200. The I / F unit 122 can also transmit and receive data to and from the image forming apparatus 200 via a LAN (Local Area Network) or the like.

  The display unit 123 displays a screen necessary for an operation test of the image forming apparatus 200. Note that the screen necessary for the operation test is obtained by a predetermined test program. The operation unit 124 is operated, for example, when switching the content displayed on the display unit 123. The HDD 125 stores the request list 130 shown in FIG.

  Here, the request list 130 shown in FIG. 4 is an example, for example, an inspection code 1 corresponding to the copy function providing program, an inspection code 2 corresponding to the print function providing program, and an inspection code corresponding to the scanner function providing program. 3. An inspection code 4 corresponding to the FAX function providing program is registered.

  The inspection codes 1 to 4 are indicated by HTML codes, and an HTML code indicating screen switching according to each operation of copy, print, scanner, and FAX, and an HTML code of a screen displayed by the switching. And have. The HTML code transmitted from the image forming apparatus 200 in response to a request (HTTP request) from the test apparatus 100 is compared with the inspection codes 1 to 4 in the request list 130 according to the operation of the panel unit 234. It is checked whether a predetermined screen is correctly switched and displayed.

  When generating the request list 130, for example, a copy function providing program for providing the above-described copy function, a print function providing program for providing a print function, which is installed on the HDD 125 of the test apparatus 100 on the image forming apparatus 200 side, A scanner function providing program for providing a scanner function, a FAX function providing program for providing a FAX function, and the like are stored, and contents of a screen on the panel unit 234 of the image forming apparatus 200 are displayed on the display unit 123 by a viewer software such as a Web browser. Display the same contents. Then, for example, copy processing is set from the screen displayed on the display unit 123. In this case, when a copy button is selected from the initial screen displayed on the display unit 123, the initial screen is switched to a detailed copy setting screen.

  Such operations are performed for copy processing settings, print processing settings, scanner processing settings, and fax processing settings, and display of screen switching in accordance with copy, print, scanner, and fax operations. An HTML code and an HTML code of a screen displayed by switching are acquired. Thereby, the request list 130 in which the above inspection codes 1 to 4 are registered can be generated.

  By using the request list 130 as described above, an operation test of whether or not a predetermined screen is correctly switched according to an operation of the panel unit 234 and displayed on a plurality of image forming apparatuses 200 of the same model or similar models. It can be performed.

  The control unit 110 controls the entire operation of the test apparatus 100, and includes a RAM (Random Access Memory) 111, a ROM (Programmable Read-Only Memory) 112, a request list reading unit 113, an HTML code request unit 114, and an HTML code. A comparison unit 115, a communication control unit 116, a display control unit 117, an operation control unit 118, an HDD control unit 119, and a system control unit 120 are provided. These are connected to the data bus 121. The request list reading unit 113, the HTML code request unit 114, and the HTML code comparison unit 115 are execution units realized by a test program.

  The RAM 111 is a work memory for executing a program. The ROM 115 stores a boot loader (control program) for performing an operation check of each unit. The request list reading unit 113 reads the request list 130 stored in the HDD 125.

  The HTML code request unit 114 follows the request list 130 read from the HDD 125 by the request list reading unit 113 and requests the image forming apparatus 200 to support the copy function, print function, scanner function, and FAX function (HTTP request). (Inspection codes 1 to 4 are sequentially output).

  The HTML code comparison unit 115 compares the consistency between the HTML code of the request list 130 read by the request list reading unit 113 and the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200, and outputs a comparison result. If the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 is not registered in the request list 130, the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 is registered in the request list 130 as a new inspection code. Thereafter, the HTML code registered in the request list 130 is used as a new inspection code.

  The communication control unit 116 controls data transmission / reception with the image forming apparatus 200 via the I / F unit 122. The display control unit 117 controls display on the display unit 123. The operation control unit 118 controls operations performed by the operation unit 124. The HDD control unit 119 controls writing and reading of data with respect to the HDD 125. The system control unit 120 controls operations of the request list reading unit 113, the HTML code request unit 114, the HTML code comparison unit 115, and the like when the operation test is started.

  Next, the configuration of the image forming apparatus 200 will be described with reference to FIG. The image forming apparatus 200 includes a control unit 210, a scanner unit 230, a printer unit 231, a FAX unit 232, an I / F 233, a panel unit 234, and an HDD 235.

  The scanner unit 230 inputs image data of a document read by an image sensor (not shown) to the control unit 210. That is, the scanner unit 230 converts an image signal of a document from an image sensor (not shown) into digital image data, and sequentially inputs the digital image data to the control unit 210.

  The printer unit 231 prints an image on a sheet based on the image data output from the control unit 210. The FAX unit 232 transmits the image data output from the control unit 210 to the counterpart facsimile via the telephone line, and receives the image data from the counterpart facsimile and inputs it to the control unit 210. That is, the FAX unit 232 compresses and modulates the image data output from the control unit 210 and transmits the image data to the counterpart facsimile while controlling connection with a telephone line by an NCU (Network Control Unit) (not shown). Further, the FAX unit 232 demodulates and decompresses image data from the other party's facsimile while being connected to the telephone line by the NCU, and inputs it to the control unit 210.

  The I / F 233 enables data transmission / reception with the test apparatus 100. The I / F unit 233 can also transmit and receive data to and from the test apparatus 100 via a LAN (Local Area Network) or the like.

  The panel unit 234 performs display for selecting one of the printer function, the FAX function, and the scan function of the image forming apparatus 200 and various settings.

  The HDD 235 stores a program for providing various functions of the image forming apparatus 200. As described above, the program includes a copy function providing program that provides a copy function, a print function providing program that provides a print function, a scanner function providing program that provides a scanner function, a FAX function providing program that provides a FAX function, and the like. is there.

  The control unit 210 controls the overall operation of the image forming apparatus 200, and includes a scanner control unit 211, a printer control unit 212, a FAX (Facsimile) control unit 213, a RAM 214, a ROM 215, a communication control unit 216, and a panel display control unit. 217, a request processing unit 218, an HDD control unit 219, and a system control unit 220. These are connected to the data bus 221.

  The scanner control unit 211 controls the reading operation of the scanner unit 230. The printer control unit 212 controls the printing operation of the printer unit 231. The FAX control unit 213 controls image data transmission / reception operations by the FAX unit 232.

  The RAM 214 is a work memory for executing a program. The ROM 215 stores a boot loader (control program) for performing an operation check of each unit. The communication control unit 216 controls data transmission / reception with the test apparatus 100 via the I / F 233. The panel display control unit 217 controls the display operation of the panel unit 234.

  The request processing unit 218 responds to the HTML code request corresponding to each of the above-described inspection codes 1 to 4 from the test apparatus 100, and the HTML code included in each program of the copy function, the print function, the scanner function, and the FAX function. To get. The acquired HTML code is transmitted to the test apparatus 100 by the system control unit 220 via the communication control unit 216. The HDD control unit 219 controls writing and reading of data with respect to the HDD 235.

  Next, a test process in the image forming system will be described with reference to FIG. First, when the operation test is started, the request list reading unit 113 reads the request list 130 stored in the HDD 125 (step S101). Next, in accordance with the request list 130 read by the request list reading unit 113, the HTML code requesting unit 114 requests the image forming apparatus 200 to support the respective copy function, print function, scanner function, and FAX function (HTTP request). ) Are sequentially performed (step S102). In this case, it is assumed that a request using, for example, the inspection code 1 in the request list 130 is output.

  At this time, on the image forming apparatus 200 side, the request processing unit 218 acquires an HTML code included in the copy function program in response to an HTML code request corresponding to the inspection code 1 from the test apparatus 100. The acquired HTML code is transmitted to the test apparatus 100 by the system control unit 220 via the communication control unit 216.

  Upon receiving the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200, the test apparatus 100 determines whether the HTML code received by the HTML code comparison unit 115 is registered in the request list 130 (step S104). In this case, since the HTML code received by the HTML code comparison unit 115 corresponds to a request (HTTP request) using the check code 1, it is determined that the received HTML code is registered (step S104: Yes). The consistency between the received HTML code and the HTML code of the inspection code 1 is compared (step S105).

  On the other hand, when the received HTML code is not registered in the request list 130 (step S104: No), the HTML code received by the HTML code comparison unit 115 is registered in the request list 130 as a new inspection code (step S106). ). Thereafter, the HTML code registered in the request list 130 is used as a new inspection code. Here, the case where the received HTML code is not registered is as follows. That is, as described above, the inspection codes 1 to 4 of the request list 130 include the HTML code indicating the switching of the screen according to each operation of copying, printing, scanning, and FAX, and the screen displayed by the switching. It is registered as an HTML code.

  On the other hand, a copy function providing program that provides a copy function, a print function providing program that provides a print function, a scanner function providing program that provides a scanner function, and a FAX function that provides a FAX function are installed on the image forming apparatus 200 side. In the provided program or the like, an HTML code indicating switching of a plurality of screens and an HTML code of the screen are included. For this reason, even if an HTML code corresponding to, for example, the inspection code 1 is obtained from the image forming apparatus 200 side, the HTML code may not be registered in the request list 130.

  That is, the HTML code indicating the switching of the screen according to the copy operation in the inspection code 1 and the HTML code of the screen displayed by the switching are switched from the initial screen to the screen for detailed setting of the copy. It is assumed that the detailed copy setting screen is displayed. At this time, there may be a detailed setting screen on the lower layer of the copy attached to the detailed copy setting screen. Further, the detailed setting screen below the copy attached to the detailed copy setting screen may be, for example, a detailed setting screen in which copying and FAX are combined.

  In any case, when the HTML code received from the image forming apparatus 200 side is not registered in the request list 130, the HTML code received by the HTML code comparison unit 115 is registered in the request list 130 as a new inspection code.

  Next, it is determined whether or not the HTML code request unit 114 has transmitted all requests (step S107). Here, since only the inspection code 1 in the request list 130 is output, not all requests have been transmitted (step S107: No), the process returns to step S102, and the inspection code 2 is output.

  If it is determined that all requests have been transmitted (step S107: Yes), the HTML code comparison unit 115 and the HTML code of the request list 130 read by the request list reading unit 113 and the HTML from the image forming apparatus 200 are displayed. The consistency with the code is compared, and the comparison result is output (step S108).

  As described above, in the present embodiment, the test apparatus 100 outputs a request using the inspection codes 1 to 4 indicated by the HTML codes corresponding to the application programs for the various functions to the image forming apparatus 200. When the HTML codes corresponding to the inspection codes 1 to 4 are output from the image forming apparatus 200, the consistency between the HTML code and the HTML codes of the inspection codes 1 to 4 is compared.

  Specifically, the test apparatus 100 includes an HDD 125 that is a storage unit that stores a request list 130 in which a plurality of inspection codes corresponding to application programs for various functions are registered, and is a request list reading unit. The request list 130 is read by the request list reading unit 113, and the request is sequentially output for each of the inspection codes 1 to 4 of the request list 130 by the HTML code request unit 114, which is a request output unit. The unit 115 compares the consistency of the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 in response to the request from the HTML code request unit 114 and the HTML codes of the inspection codes 1 to 4 corresponding to the request, and outputs the comparison result.

  In this way, the test apparatus 100 compares the consistency between the HTML code corresponding to the inspection code from the image forming apparatus 200 and the HTML codes of the inspection codes 1 to 4. The number of man-hours for the operation test of the application program that runs on can be greatly reduced.

  In addition, since the test apparatus 100 can perform an operation test of an application program for each function of the image forming apparatus 200, there is no oversight of defects as compared to a conventional operation test performed visually, and the application program It is also possible to reliably prevent quality degradation.

  In the present embodiment, when the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 according to the request is not registered as the inspection codes 1 to 4 by the HTML code requesting unit 114, the HTML code from the image forming apparatus 200 is requested in the request list. 130 is registered as a new inspection code. As a result, a new inspection code is automatically registered in the request list 130, and the new inspection code registered in the request list 130 can be used in subsequent operation tests.

100 Test apparatus 110 Control unit 111 RAM
112 ROM
113 Request list reading unit 114 HTML code request unit 115 HTML code comparison unit 116 Communication control unit 117 Display control unit 118 Operation control unit 119 HDD control unit 120 System control unit 121 Data bus 122 I / F unit 123 Display unit 124 Operation unit 125 235 HDD
130 Request list 200 Image forming apparatus 210 Control unit 211 Scanner control unit 212 Printer control unit 213 FAX control unit 214 RAM
215 ROM
216 Communication control unit 217 Panel display control unit 218 Request processing unit 219 HDD control unit 220 System control unit 221 Data bus 230 Scanner unit 231 Printer unit 232 FAX unit 233 I / F unit 234 Panel unit

Claims (3)

An image forming apparatus in which application programs for various functions related to image formation are installed;
A test apparatus for outputting a request using an inspection code indicated by an HTML code corresponding to the application program for each of the various functions to the image forming apparatus,
When the test apparatus receives an HTML code corresponding to the inspection code from the image forming apparatus, the test apparatus compares the consistency between the HTML code and the HTML code of the inspection code. The test device comprises:
Storage means for storing a request list in which a plurality of inspection codes corresponding to the application programs for the various functions are registered;
Request list reading means for reading the request list;
Request output means for sequentially outputting a request for each inspection code in the request list;
Request comparison means for comparing the consistency of the HTML code from the image forming apparatus according to the request from the request output means and the HTML code of the inspection code corresponding to the request, and outputting a comparison result. The image forming system according to claim 1.   The request comparison unit registers the HTML code from the image forming apparatus as a new inspection code in the request list when the HTML code from the image forming apparatus according to the request is not registered as the inspection code. The image forming system according to claim 2.

Images