JP2010113539A - Information processing method, information processing apparatus, and program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an information processing method, an information processing apparatus and a program for achieving efficient collaborative operations by efficiently specifying an object which should be targeted by a user who is trying to execute the cancellation of operations in a virtual space simultaneously accessible by a plurality of users. <P>SOLUTION: When an Undo button is selected, only operations related with objects OBJ1, OBJ2, and OBJ4 included in a View range VA1 are extracted as Undo candidate operations, and an operation related with an object OBJ3 positioned outside the View range VA1 is not extracted as the Undo candidate operation. Then, when the operation related with the object OBJ2 (in this case, a moving operation) is defined as the latest operation, the operation is canceled. That is, the Undo processing is executed to the object OBJ2, and the object OBJ2 is returned to the position before movement. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an information processing method, an information processing apparatus, and a program thereof that provide a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users.

  An application called a workspace is provided in order to improve the efficiency of collaborative work by a plurality of users. This workspace is a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users. Typically, data is shared among a plurality of information processing apparatuses configured to be able to communicate with each other such as a network connection. Realized. Generally, in such a workspace, data is shared in units of objects such as text, lines, and images.

  By the way, in many applications executed by the information processing apparatus, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 07-065186 (Patent Document 1), a function for returning an operation once performed to the original state (operation cancellation), so-called The “Undo function” is implemented. According to this Undo function, the work can be made more efficient when the work is advanced through trial and error.

The Undo function is also implemented in the workspace as described above. For example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-288428 (Patent Document 2), the contents of each operation performed by each designer in a design work performed by a plurality of designers in a team format are sequentially stored as history information in a common history information storage means. A CAD system is disclosed that provides an undo function for recording and canceling the previous operation based on the order of recording history information in the history information storage means. In this CAD system, when the designer executes the undo function, the operation immediately before the designer performed can be canceled.
Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 07-065186 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-288428

  However, since a plurality of users collaborate in real time in the workspace, operations such as changes to a plurality of objects can be executed in parallel by the respective users even on the same workspace. Under such circumstances, it is not easy to specify and cancel an operation for an object.

  That is, as disclosed in the above-mentioned Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 07-065186 (Patent Document 1), if operations for all objects existing on the workspace are candidates for operation cancellation, the operation to be subject to operation cancellation It is necessary to repeat an undo operation (for example, pressing an undo button) until the user arrives at the terminal, which causes a problem that the user's operation becomes complicated. Further, there is a possibility that an operation that should not be the target may be canceled in the process of reaching the operation that should be the target of the operation cancellation. In such a case, it affects other users who are collaborating on the workspace.

  As described above, in a workspace where a plurality of objects exist, an operation cancellation (Undo) cannot be performed efficiently, which may cause a problem that work efficiency is lowered.

  Accordingly, the present invention has been made to solve such a problem, and an object of the present invention is to provide an object to be targeted by a user who intends to cancel an operation in a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users. It is to provide an information processing method, an information processing apparatus, and a program capable of efficient collaborative work by specifying efficiently.

  According to an aspect of the present invention, there is provided an information processing method for providing a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users using at least one information processing apparatus including a display unit. In the information processing method, the information processing device draws an object in the virtual space on the display unit, and the information processing device stores history information of an operation performed on the object by the user in the virtual space inside or outside the information processing device Storing in the arranged storage unit. The history information includes information on the position in the virtual space where the user performed an operation on the object. In the information processing method, the information processing apparatus specifies a first viewing range that is a range in the virtual space that the user visually recognizes in response to an operation cancellation instruction from the user; Extracting the history information in which the position of the object that is the target of the operation is included in the first viewing range as a candidate for canceling the operation.

  Preferably, an attribute is added to the object to specify an owner of the object, and the information processing method further includes a step of the information processing apparatus receiving a setting of an owner of the object to be an operation cancellation target. . In the step of extracting as an operation cancellation candidate, history information that is not included in the owner in which the owner attribute added to the object to be operated is set in advance is excluded from the operation cancellation candidates.

  More preferably, during execution of the operation cancellation, the object excluded from the operation cancellation candidates is kept hidden.

  Preferably, in the information processing method, the information processing device accepts the setting of a group of users who perform joint work in the virtual space, and the information processing device responds to an instruction to cancel the operation from the user. A step of identifying a second viewing range that is a range in a virtual space visually recognized by other users included in the group to which the information belongs, and the information processing apparatus includes an overlapping range between the first viewing range and the second viewing range Further comprising the step of identifying In the step of extracting as an operation cancellation candidate, history information in which the position of the object to be operated is included in the overlapping range is extracted as an operation cancellation candidate.

  Preferably, the information processing method includes a step in which the information processing apparatus accepts a setting of a user having authority to cancel the operation, and a third area in which the information processing apparatus is in a virtual space visually recognized by the user having authority. And a step of specifying a viewing range. In the step of extracting as an operation cancellation candidate, history information in which the position of the object to be operated is included in both the first and second viewing ranges is extracted as an operation cancellation candidate.

  Preferably, the information processing method further includes a step in which the information processing apparatus receives a setting of an operation cancelable range that is a range in which the operation cancellation is permitted in the virtual space. In the step of extracting as an operation cancellation candidate, history information in which the position of the object to be operated is included in both the overlapping range and the operation cancelable range is extracted as an operation cancellation candidate.

  Preferably, the virtual space is provided by a plurality of information processing devices, and the information processing method is such that each of the plurality of information processing devices corresponds to a visual field range in a virtual space designated by a user who uses the information processing device. The method further includes a step of visualizing the display unit to be displayed. The range in the virtual space visually recognized by the user is regarded as the same range as the visual field range designated by the user.

  Alternatively, preferably, the information processing method further includes a step of specifying a viewpoint of the user who instructs to cancel the operation, and a range in the virtual space visually recognized by the user is determined based on the viewpoint of the user.

  Alternatively, preferably, the display unit includes a screen on which the workspace is displayed, and the information processing method further includes a step of specifying a relative position between the user who instructs to cancel the operation and the screen. The range on the virtual space visually recognized by the user is determined based on the relative position with respect to the user's screen.

  According to another aspect of the present invention, an information processing apparatus that provides a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users is provided. The information processing apparatus includes a display unit, a storage unit, a unit that draws an object in the virtual space on the display unit, and a unit that stores, in the storage unit, history information of operations performed on the object by the user in the virtual space. The history information includes information on the position in the virtual space where the user performed an operation on the object. In response to an operation cancellation instruction from the user, the information processing apparatus specifies a first viewing range that is a range in the virtual space that the user visually recognizes, and the position of the object that is the target of the operation Includes means for extracting history information included in the first viewing range as a candidate for operation cancellation.

  According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a program for providing a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users, using at least one information processing apparatus including a display unit. The program stores, in an information processing device, a step of drawing an object in a virtual space on a display unit, and history information of an operation performed on the object by a user in the virtual space in a storage unit disposed inside or outside the information processing device. And executing the storing step. The history information includes information on the position in the virtual space where the user performed an operation on the object. The program is a step of identifying a first viewing range, which is a range in a virtual space visually recognized by the user, in response to an operation cancellation instruction from the user to the information processing apparatus, and a target of the operation. Extracting history information in which the position of the object is included in the first viewing range as a candidate for canceling the operation.

  According to the present invention, in a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users, the operation cancellation candidates are limited to those related to objects existing within the range visually recognized by the user who intends to perform the operation cancellation. The object to be targeted can be efficiently identified. By this. Efficient collaboration is realized.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. Note that the same or corresponding parts in the drawings are denoted by the same reference numerals and description thereof will not be repeated.

[Embodiment 1]
(Whole workspace configuration)
FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a system for providing a work space according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 1, the system according to the present embodiment is generically referred to as a plurality of information processing apparatuses PC1 to PC3 (hereinafter referred to as “information processing apparatus PC”) that are devices connected to each other via a network NW so that data communication is possible. Included). Furthermore, in the system according to the present embodiment, server apparatus SRV, which is another form of information processing apparatus, is connected to the same network NW so as to be able to perform data communication in order to perform user authentication described later. In addition, when these functions are provided by any one of the information processing apparatuses PC, the server apparatus SRV can be omitted.

  These information processing apparatuses PC1 to PC3 provide a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users by sharing work space data described later. That is, when a workspace is updated by a user operation on any of the information processing apparatuses PC, the contents of the updated workspace are transmitted to other information processing apparatuses PC. By performing such synchronization processing as needed, the contents of substantially the same workspace are shared among all the information processing apparatuses PC. Instead of the configuration in which the plurality of information processing apparatuses PC individually hold the work space data, only one specific information processing apparatus PC (master) holds the work space data, and other information processing apparatuses PC ( A configuration in which the slave) performs data access to the master information processing apparatus PC may be employed.

  Further, the server device SRV may hold the work space data in an integrated manner. In such a case, the server SRV provides a plurality of monitors 205 that are a plurality of display units, and as a whole, a work space can be provided by a single information processing apparatus.

  Each information processing apparatus PC does not necessarily have to be connected to the same layer network as long as it can logically communicate data with each other.

(Hardware configuration)
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a schematic hardware configuration of a personal computer which is a representative example of information processing apparatus PC according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 2, information processing apparatus PC according to the first embodiment is a CPU 201 that executes various programs including an operating system, and a storage unit that temporarily stores data necessary for execution of programs by CPU 201. And a hard disk unit (HDD) 211 that stores a program executed by the CPU 201 in a nonvolatile manner. Such a program is read from a CD-ROM 215a or a flexible disk 217a by a CD-ROM (Compact Disk-Read Only Memory) drive 215 or a flexible disk (FD: Flexible Disk) drive 217, respectively.

  The CPU 201 receives an operation request from the user via the input device 209 such as a keyboard and a mouse, and outputs a screen output generated by executing the program to the monitor 205 as a display unit. In addition, the CPU 201 performs data communication with another information processing apparatus PC or server apparatus SRV via a communication interface 207 formed of a LAN card or the like. These parts are connected to each other via the internal bus 203.

  Also, the hardware configuration of server SRV is the same as in FIG. 2, and therefore detailed description will not be repeated.

(Work space)
In this specification, “work space” means a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users, and the work space is provided by work space data and an arbitrary number of object data included in the work space data. . In the present specification, a rendering (visualization) of workspace data, object data, and the like may be referred to as a “workspace”.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram schematically showing an example of a workspace according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  FIG. 3A shows an overall image of the visualized work space WS. As an example, it is assumed that the workspace WS includes three objects OBJ. Note that the object OBJ is a unit of an object that is a target of each operation by the user. Specifically, the object OBJ is arbitrarily handled electronically such as a text object indicating characters, a line object indicating drawing, or an image object indicating an image. Possible information can be used.

  The size of the work space WS can be freely set, and is generally set to be larger than the display size of the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC. Therefore, only a partial area of the work space WS is rendered (visualized) on the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC as shown in FIGS. 2 (a) and 2 (b). Hereinafter, an area displayed on the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC is referred to as a view range (view range) VA.

  Referring to FIG. 2B, a view display window 300 is displayed on the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC, in which an object within the view range designated by the user is drawn in the work space WS. On the view display window 300, a view position designation dialog 302 for designating which position of the view range VA is arranged in the work space WS, a tool box 304 for performing various operations in the work space WS, and the like. Is displayed.

  That is, the user who uses each information processing apparatus PC uses the input device 209 such as a keyboard and a mouse to select and operate the view position designation dialog 302, thereby appropriately specifying the position of the view range VA. In addition, the user selects various operation buttons included in the tool box 304 using the input device 209 including a keyboard and a mouse, and selects and drags objects to be displayed. Operations such as new creation / change / deletion are possible.

  FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing a data structure for providing a work space according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 4, the data structure includes workspace data 262a describing the size of the workspace, the workspace name, the file name of the object data, and the like. Object data 262b describing each object is provided in association with the work space data 262a. This object data 262b is newly created when the user adds a new object on the workspace. Further, history information is provided in association with each object data 262b. This history information sequentially stores the contents of operations performed on objects by the user. Therefore, the history information is newly created or its contents are updated if any operation is performed on the object.

The detailed contents of each data will be described later.
(Undo function overview)
Next, referring to FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, the Undo function provided in the workspace according to the present embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 5 shows an example of a usage state of the workspace according to the first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an execution example of the Undo process in the use state illustrated in FIG. 5.

  Referring to FIG. 5, it is assumed that four objects OBJ1 to OBJ4 have already been created in workspace WS. Further, it is assumed that the user of the information processing device PC1 has set the range excluding the object OBJ3 as the view range VA1. Here, the user of the information processing device PC1 operates the input device 209 to instruct execution of undo processing included in the tool box 304 displayed on the monitor 205 of the information processing device PC (hereinafter referred to as “Undo button”). ")" Is selected, an undo process is executed for an object existing on the workspace WS. That is, the Undo button included in the tool box 304 accepts an operation cancellation instruction from the user.

  In particular, in the workspace according to the present embodiment, an operation related to an object included in a range visually recognized by a user (in this example, a user of information processing apparatus PC1) who intends to execute the Undo process is a candidate for the Undo process. It is extracted as an operation (hereinafter also referred to as “Undo candidate operation”). That is, not all objects existing on the workspace WS but only operations related to objects included in the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the undo process (in this example, the user of the information processing apparatus PC1). Candidate operation. Then, the undo process is sequentially performed on the operations extracted as the undo candidate operations according to a predetermined order (typically, a time series in which the operations are performed).

  In the present embodiment described below, the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the undo process is regarded as the same range as the view range specified by the user. That is, an operation related to an object included in the View range designated by the user who intends to execute the Undo process is extracted as an Undo candidate operation.

  More specifically, when the Undo button is selected in the state shown in FIG. 5, that is, when the Undo process is instructed, as shown in FIG. 6, the objects OBJ1, OBJ2, which are included in the View range VA1, are shown. Only operations related to OBJ4 are extracted as undo candidate operations, and operations related to the object OBJ3 located outside the view range VA1 are not undo candidate operations.

  Furthermore, if the operation related to the object OBJ2 (in this example, the move operation) among the operations related to the objects OBJ1, OBJ2, and OBJ4 is the latest, the operation is canceled, that is, the undo for the object OBJ2 is performed. The process is executed, and the object OBJ2 returns to the position before the movement.

  As described above, in the workspace according to the present embodiment, undo candidate operations are extracted by narrowing down operations related to objects included in the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the undo process. Even if there are many objects in the space, the target of Undo processing can be efficiently identified. Further, it is possible to prevent a mistake that the Undo process is mistakenly performed on an object that has been changed by another user.

(Control structure of information processing device)
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a control structure of information processing apparatus PC according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 7, each of information processing apparatuses PC has, as its control structure, a data operation unit 252, a view management unit 254, a drawing unit 256, an undo processing interface 258, an object extraction unit 260, A data storage unit 262, a synchronization processing unit 264, a transmission / reception unit 266, and a user authentication unit 270 are included. The data storage unit 262 is provided as an arbitrary area of the hard disk unit 211 (FIG. 2), the transmission / reception unit 266 is provided by the cooperation of the communication interface 207 (FIG. 2) and related driver software, and the other units are representative. Specifically, the program is provided by the CPU 201 (FIG. 2) developing the program in the memory unit 213 (FIG. 2) and executing each command. Note that all or part of these functions may be realized by hardware.

  The data storage unit 262 includes work space data 262a, object data 262b, and history information 262c that are associated with each other. Further, the data storage unit 262 includes View information 262d.

  The data operation unit 252 newly creates / changes / deletes the object data 262b and the history information 262c for the target object in accordance with the operation of the input device 209 by the user. At this time, the data operation unit 252 may describe in the history information 262c which user has performed the operation for each operation based on user information from the user authentication unit 270 described later. Further, the data operation unit 252 updates the contents of the target object data 262b in accordance with an instruction for instructing an undo process from an undo process interface 258 described later. As a result, the operation on the target object is canceled.

  The view management unit 254 refers to the work space data 262a, the object data 262b, and the history information 262c stored in the data storage unit 262, and draws information such as objects included in the view range designated by the user. Output to. Also, the view management unit 254 outputs position information of the current view range to the view information 262d. This View information 262d is updated as needed with the change of the View range.

  The drawing unit 256 refers to the view information 262d stored in the data storage unit 262, specifies an object included in the current view range, and performs a drawing process based on the object. That is, the drawing unit 256 generates a view display window 300 (see FIG. 3B) that visualizes objects in the view range of the workspace.

  The undo processing interface 258 generally controls undo processing according to the present embodiment. Specifically, the undo processing interface 258 sorts undo candidate operations extracted (recognized) by an object extraction unit 260 (to be described later) in the order in which each operation was performed. Subsequently, the undo processing interface 258 sequentially gives a command for canceling the rearranged undo candidate operation to the data operation unit 252 in accordance with the user operation.

  When an undo process is instructed by a user operation, the object extraction unit 260 refers to the view information 262d stored in the data storage unit 262, acquires the position information of the view range, and the object data 262b in the data storage unit 262 Then, referring to the history information 262c, Undo candidate operations included in the View range are extracted. At this time, the history information 262c of the object existing in or existing in the View range is the Undo candidate operation.

  The synchronization processing unit 264 synchronizes the work space data 262a providing the work space, the object data 262b, and the history information 262c with other information processing apparatuses PC. That is, when any of the work space data 262a, the object data 262b, and the history information 262c is added or updated in the own device, the synchronization processing unit 264 converts all or the difference of the added or updated data into the work space data. Are transmitted to the other information processing apparatuses PC sharing the information. In addition, when the synchronization processing unit 264 receives all or the difference of the added or updated data from another information processing device PC, the synchronization processing unit 264 updates the data stored in the data storage unit 262 of the own device accordingly.

  The transmission / reception unit 266 controls data communication between the other information processing apparatus PC and the server apparatus SRV. Specifically, the transmission / reception unit 266 transmits a necessary message in response to a request from the synchronization processing unit 264, or provides the synchronization processing unit 264 with data received from another information processing apparatus PC or server apparatus SRV. To do.

  User authentication unit 270 performs user authentication using the workspace application according to the present embodiment. Specifically, when the application of the workspace is executed, the user authentication unit 270 prompts the user to input an ID and password. When the user inputs an ID and password, the server device SRV (FIG. 1) is inquired to authenticate the user. If the user authentication is successful, the user is allowed to use the application in the workspace, and the user name currently being used (logged in) is retained. In the present embodiment, based on the user ID authenticated by the user authentication unit 270, the name of the user who performed each operation is described in the history information 262c. Note that it is not always necessary to describe the user name in the history information 262c.

(data structure)
The structure of each data stored in the data storage unit 262 of the information processing apparatus PC will be described with reference to FIGS. Each data is typically described in a markup language such as XML (Extensible Markup Language). This is to enhance the expandability of the system by freely setting tags (attributes given to characters surrounded by <> and </>).

(1-1) Workspace Data FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of the contents of workspace data 262a according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 8, workspace data 262a includes an identification number (ID) 401 for identifying the workspace, a workspace name 402 that is the name of the workspace, and objects included in the workspace. Object data number 403 for specifying.

  The object data number 403 is sequentially added according to the object added on the workspace by the user operation. Note that once an object is added to the workspace, even if the object is subsequently deleted, the description of the object data number 403 remains unless special processing is performed. This is because, as will be described later, in order to provide the Undo function, it is necessary to keep history information of each object.

(1-2) Object Data FIG. 9 shows an example of the contents of object data 262b according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 9, object data 262b is generated in association with object data number 403 described in work space data 262a shown in FIG. That is, each object data 262b includes an identification number (ID) 405 associated with the object data number 403 (FIG. 8) of the work space data 262a. Further, each object data 262b includes an object name 406 that is the name of the object, owner information 407 for specifying an owner (owner) for the object, and history for specifying history information about the object. Information number 408.

  The owner information 407 is information for specifying the user who newly created or changed the corresponding object. The user described in the owner information 407 is typically treated as a user who has authority to change the target object. That is, the owner information 407 is an attribute for specifying the owner for each object.

  The history information number 408 is a number associated with an identification number of history information described later. Although the identification number of the history information can be arbitrarily set, in this embodiment, it is assumed that the identification number increases in time series, that is, a newer one has a larger identification number.

(1-3) History Information FIG. 10 shows an example of the contents of history information 262c according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 10, history information 262c is generated in association with history information number 408 described in object data 262b shown in FIG. That is, it includes an identification number (ID) 409 associated with the history information number 408 (FIG. 11) of the object data 262b. Furthermore, each history information 262c includes a history name 410 that is the name of the history information, action type information 411 that indicates the operated contents of the history, and operation time information 412 that indicates the time when the history is operated. Object location information 413 indicating position information (each coordinate) where the history operation has been performed, operation operator information 414 indicating a user who has performed the history operation, and object details indicating detailed information of the corresponding object Information 415.

  The action type information 411 describes the contents of the operation performed on the corresponding object, for example, values such as “(new) creation”, “move”, “size change”, “delete”, and the like. The operation time information 412 describes the time when the user performed an operation on each object. The history information 262c is newly created every time the user performs one operation (for example, one movement operation) on each object.

  In the movement place information 413, the value of the position information (start position or end position) on the workspace where the user has operated each object is described.

  In the motion operator information 414, a value for specifying a user who performed an operation on each object is described. As a value for specifying this user, an authenticated user name held by the user authentication unit 270 (FIG. 7) is used.

  In the object detailed information 415, information defining each object is described. For example, if the corresponding object is a line object (object type is “line”), vector data (start point, end point, anchor point, curvature) indicating the outline is described. If the corresponding object is an image object (object type is “... Jpg”), a file name for specifying the image data is described.

  In the above-described example, each object data and corresponding history information have been described as being handled as different files (data) linked to each other. However, the same file (history information is included in each object data) Data).

(1-4) View Information List FIG. 11 shows an example of the contents of View information 262d according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 11, View information 262d includes an identification number (ID) 421 for specifying the View information, a user name 422 for specifying a user who uses information processing apparatus PC, and information processing And View position information 423 indicating the coordinates of each vertex of the View range in the apparatus PC.

(Undo process)
FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of Undo processing according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Note that the processing procedure shown in FIG. 12 is typically provided by the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executing a program. Here, in the information processing apparatus PC, it is assumed that objects in the view range designated by each user in the work space are sequentially drawn on the monitor 205. In the information processing apparatus PC, when an operation is performed on any object performed by each user in the work space, the contents are sequentially stored in the history information 262c of the data storage unit 262.

  Referring to FIG. 12, first, CPU 201 of information processing device PC determines whether or not the user has selected the Undo button in tool box 304 (see FIGS. 5 and 6) (step S100). If the Undo button is not selected (NO in step S100), the process of step S100 is repeated. On the other hand, when the Undo button is selected (YES in step S100), the process proceeds to step S102.

  In other words, the user who wants to cancel some operation operates the information processing apparatus PC being used to include the position where the object on which the target operation has been performed or the position where the object existed. After setting the View range, the Undo button of the tool box 304 displayed in the View display window 300 (see FIGS. 5 and 6) is selected with a mouse or the like.

  In step S102, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to the view information 262d stored in the data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211), and acquires information on the current view range (the coordinates of each vertex). Subsequently, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to all the history information 262c (hard disk unit 211) stored in the data storage unit 262, and the operation place information 413 (FIG. 10) included in each history information 262c. Based on the value, Undo candidate operations included in the View range are extracted (step S104). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC extracts the history information 262c in which the value of the operation location information 413 that is the position information is included in the View range acquired in step S102 as an undo candidate operation.

  Further, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC rearranges the extracted Undo candidate operations in the order of the newest execution times based on the values of the respective operation time information 412 (FIG. 12) (step S106). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC sorts the extracted undo candidate operations in descending order using the value of the operation time information 412 as a key.

  Hereinafter, the processing in steps S104 and S106 will be described with reference to FIGS.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of history information according to the first embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of Undo candidate operations extracted from the history information illustrated in FIG. 13 and their rearrangement.

  As an example, four objects of “object A” (ID = 1), “object B” (ID = 2), “object C” (ID = 3), and “object D” (ID = 4) are displayed on the workspace. Assume that an object is placed. FIG. 13 briefly shows the contents described in the history information 262c of these objects in a tabular form. In FIG. 13, the left frame for each piece of history information indicates the values of “operation type information 411”, “operation time information 412”, and “operation operator information 414” in order from the top. To do. Further, it is assumed that the “X coordinate value” and the “Y coordinate value” of the “motion location information 413” are shown in order from the top in the right frame for each history information.

  Note that the table shown in FIG. 13 is for convenience of explanation, and it is not always necessary to generate data having the same data structure as in FIG.

  For such history information about each object, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC extracts information within the current view range. For example, when the coordinates of each vertex of the current View range are (421, 385), (610, 385), (421, 518), (610, 518), the operation location information among the history information. Those having an X coordinate value 413 in the range of 421 to 610 and a Y coordinate value in the range of 385 to 518 are extracted as undo candidate operations.

  In the example shown in FIG. 13, since the history information (1) of the object C exists outside the View range in this example, the remaining history information excluding it is extracted as an undo candidate operation.

  Further, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC rearranges the extracted undo candidate operations in the new order based on the values of the respective operation time information 412. FIG. 14 shows an example of Undo candidate operation after extraction and rearrangement as described above. The contents of these undo candidate operations are the targets of undo processing. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S108 (FIG. 12).

  Referring to FIG. 12 again, in step S108, CPU 201 of information processing apparatus PC sets the latest undo candidate operation rearranged in step S106 as the target undo candidate operation. In subsequent step S110, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executes an undo process for the target undo candidate operation. More specifically, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC corresponds to the history information number 408 described in the object data 262b (FIG. 9) stored in the data storage unit 262 (the value of the history information number is Delete the largest). As a result of this operation, history information having one less history information number is associated as an attribute with the target object, and the latest operation is canceled. Then, the process proceeds to step S112.

  In step S112, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC determines whether there is a next new undo candidate operation rearranged in step S106. Next, when there is no new one (NO in step S112), the undo process ends.

  On the other hand, if there is a next new Undo candidate operation (YES in Step S112), the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC sets the next new Undo candidate operation as the target Undo candidate operation (Step S114). . Further, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC determines whether or not the user has selected the Undo button of the tool box 304 again (step S116). If the Undo button is selected again (YES in step S116), the process proceeds to step S110.

  On the other hand, if the Undo button has not been selected again (NO in step S116), the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC determines whether or not the user has instructed another operation other than the Undo button (step S118). If the user has not performed any operation (NO in step S118), the process returns to step S116.

  On the other hand, when the user instructs an operation other than the Undo button (YES in step S118), the Undo process ends, and a process corresponding to the designated operation is executed.

(Operation / Effect in Embodiment 1)
According to the present embodiment, even in the case where a plurality of objects exist in a workspace that is a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users, the user who intends to cancel the operation visually recognizes the user. Only operations related to objects included in the range are extracted as candidates. In this way, since the candidate Undo operation is narrowed down to the range visually recognized by each user, the object to be subjected to the Undo process can be efficiently identified.

  Therefore, each user can efficiently specify an object to be subjected to the undo process by a simple operation and execute the process, thereby improving the efficiency of the entire collaborative work. At the same time, it is possible to avoid a situation in which an undo process is executed without knowing the user for an operation related to an object existing outside the range visually recognized by each user.

[Embodiment 2]
In the first embodiment described above, the configuration in which all operations related to objects existing in the View range set by the user of the information processing apparatus PC are set as undo candidate operations is illustrated. On the other hand, depending on the situation, there is a case where only an operation related to an object for which a specific user is an owner is desired to be an undo candidate operation. For example, there may be a case where undo processing is permitted only between team members who perform the same collaborative work. In such a case, the configuration according to the second embodiment described below is more appropriate.

  Since the system for providing a work space according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention and the configuration of information processing apparatus PC are the same as in Embodiment 1 described above, detailed description will not be repeated.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an example of a dialog for performing view filtering setting according to the second embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an execution example of Undo processing in the use state of the workspace according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

  On the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC according to the present embodiment, a dialog for performing the view filtering setting shown in FIG. 15 is displayed in response to a user operation or when drawing of the workspace is started. That is, this dialog accepts the setting of the owner of the object that is to be an undo candidate operation. More specifically, only operations related to an object whose owner is a user set (check box selected) on this dialog can be extracted as an undo candidate operation. In the example illustrated in FIG. 15, “user A”, “user B”, and “user C” are selected as the “owner of the object to be displayed”.

  In the dialog shown in FIG. 15, the owners of the objects already existing in the workspace are extracted and the selection candidates (user A, user B,...) Are displayed. Alternatively, the selection candidate (user A, user B,...) May be displayed by making an inquiry to the server SRV (FIG. 1) and acquiring a list of users who can be authenticated.

  Referring to FIG. 16, it is assumed that four objects OBJ1 to OBJ4 have already been created in workspace WS according to the present embodiment, as in FIG. Further, it is assumed that the user of the information processing device PC1 has set the range excluding the object OBJ3 as the view range VA1. Furthermore, the owner of the objects OBJ1 and OBJ2 is “user A”, the owner of the object OBJ3 is “user C”, and the owner of the object OBJ4 is “user D”.

  Here, when the user of the information processing device PC1 operates the input device 209 to select the Undo button included in the tool box 304 displayed on the monitor 205 of the information processing device PC, the same as in the first embodiment described above. In addition, the Undo process is executed on the object existing on the workspace WS. In particular, in the workspace according to the present embodiment, only operations related to objects that match the view filtering setting as shown in FIG. 15 are extracted as undo candidate operations. That is, of the respective pieces of history information, the attribute of the owner added to the target object is not included in the Undo candidate operation if it is not included in the view filtering setting shown in FIG.

  In the example shown in FIG. 16, only the operations related to the objects OBJ1 and OBJ2 whose owner is “User A” among the objects existing within the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the Undo process (in the View range VA1). It is extracted as an Undo candidate operation. Here, the object OBJ4 corresponding to the history information excluded from the undo candidate operation is kept hidden (or made transparent) on the work space WS at least during execution of a series of undo processes. Thereafter, similarly to the above-described first embodiment, the undo process is sequentially executed on the history information extracted as the undo candidate operations according to a predetermined order (typically, time series in which the operations are performed). Is done.

  As described above, the object OBJ4 that has not been extracted as the undo candidate operation is not displayed, so that the user who intends to execute the undo process can be prevented from being confused.

  The control structure of information processing device PC according to the second embodiment of the present invention is the same as the control structure shown in FIG. 7 described above except for the contents of the View information held in data storage unit 262, and therefore will be described in detail. Does not repeat.

  FIG. 17 shows an example of the content of view information 262d # 1 according to the second embodiment of the present invention. With reference to FIG. 17, View information 262d # 1 further includes filtering information 424 in addition to the data included in View information 262d shown in FIG. This filtering information 424 describes the setting in the dialog shown in FIG. 15, that is, the owner setting of the object to be subjected to the Undo candidate operation. Specifically, a user set (check box selected) on the dialog shown in FIG. 15 is described as an element of the <display> tag. As will be described later, Undo candidate operations are extracted based on the contents of the filtering information 424.

(Undo process)
FIG. 18 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of Undo processing according to the second embodiment of the present invention. The processing procedure shown in FIG. 18 is obtained by adding step S103 and executing step S104A in place of step S104 in the flowchart showing the processing procedure of the undo processing according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. .

  18 is typically provided when the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executes a program. Here, in the information processing apparatus PC, it is assumed that objects in the view range designated by each user in the work space are sequentially drawn on the monitor 205. In the information processing apparatus PC, when an operation is performed on any object performed by each user in the work space, the contents are sequentially stored in the history information 262c of the data storage unit 262.

  Referring to FIG. 18, the CPU 201 of the information processing device PC refers to the view information 262 d stored in the data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211), and acquires information on the current view range (coordinates of each vertex). (Step S102) and filtering information is acquired (Step S103). In subsequent step S104A, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to all the history information 262c (hard disk unit 211) stored in the data storage unit 262, and the operation location information 413 (FIG. 5) included in each history information 262c. Based on the value of 10) and the owner information 407 included in the associated object data 262b, an Undo candidate operation is extracted (step S104A). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC includes the value of the operation location information 413 as the position information included in the View range acquired in step S102 and matches the filtering information acquired by the owner of the corresponding object in step S103. The history information 262c is extracted as an undo candidate operation.

  Through these processes, operations related to objects that exist within the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the Undo process and that match the predetermined filtering information are extracted as candidates for the Undo process.

  Since other processes are the same as those in the flowchart shown in FIG. 12, detailed description will not be repeated.

  An example of the extracted Undo candidate operation in the filtering setting shown in FIG. 15 is as shown in FIG. FIG. 19 is a diagram showing an example of candidate Undo operations extracted from the history information shown in FIG. 13 and their rearrangement in Embodiment 2 of the present invention. As can be seen from comparison with the undo candidate operations extracted from the history information according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 14 and the rearranged examples, the operations related to the object OBJ4 whose owner is “user D” in FIG. Is excluded from the Undo candidate operation.

(Operation / Effect in Embodiment 2)
According to the present embodiment, in addition to the operations and effects in the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further narrow down the targets to be extracted as Undo candidate operations. That is, according to the present embodiment, only the operations performed by the members of the team that perform the same preset collaborative work can be extracted as undo candidate operations, so that objects to be subjected to undo processing can be more efficiently obtained. Can be identified.

  Therefore, each user can efficiently specify an object to be subjected to the Undo process by a simple operation and execute the process, and can further improve the efficiency of the entire collaborative work.

[Embodiment 3]
In the first embodiment described above, the configuration in which all operations related to objects existing within the range visually recognized by the user of the information processing apparatus PC are set as undo candidate operations is illustrated. On the other hand, depending on the situation, it may be preferable to limit the Undo candidate operation to an operation related to an object existing within a range visually recognized by all members performing the same collaborative work. In such a case, the configuration according to the third embodiment described below is more appropriate.

  The system for providing a work space according to the third embodiment of the present invention and the configuration of the information processing apparatus PC are the same as those in the first embodiment except for the internal control structure described later. Detailed description will not be repeated.

  FIG. 20 shows an example of a dialog for performing joint user setting according to the third embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 21 is a diagram showing an execution example of Undo processing in the use state of the workspace according to the third embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating a display example on the monitor of the information processing apparatus PC when the setting for the dialog for performing the joint user setting illustrated in FIG. 20 is validated.

  On the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC according to the present embodiment, a dialog for performing the joint user setting shown in FIG. 20 is displayed in response to a user operation or when drawing of the workspace is started. This dialog accepts the settings of a group of users who collaborate on the workspace. More specifically, operations related to objects included in a range visually recognized by (a plurality of) users (check boxes selected) set on this dialog are extracted as undo candidate operations.

  In this way, the dialog shown in FIG. 20 accepts further narrowing conditions for extracting Undo candidate operations. In the example shown in FIG. 20, “user A” and “user B” are selected as “collaboration users”. That is, “user A” and “user B” are set as a group of users who collaborate on the workspace.

  In the dialog shown in FIG. 20, the selection candidate (user A, user B,...) Is displayed by making an inquiry to the server SRV (FIG. 1) and acquiring a list of users who can be authenticated. Is done.

  Referring to FIG. 21, it is assumed that four objects OBJ1 to OBJ4 have already been created in workspace WS according to the present embodiment, as in FIG. In addition, it is assumed that the user A is using the information processing apparatus PC1 and the user B is using the information processing apparatus PC2. Furthermore, the user A operates the information processing apparatus PC1 to set the range including the objects OBJ1, OBJ2, and OBJ4 as the view range VA1, and the user B operates the information processing apparatus PC2 to include OBJ2. It is assumed that the range is set as the View range VA2.

  Here, when the user of the information processing device PC1 operates the input device 209 to select the Undo button included in the tool box 304 displayed on the monitor 205 of the information processing device PC, the same as in the first embodiment described above. In addition, the Undo process is executed on the object existing on the workspace WS.

  In particular, in the workspace according to the present embodiment, only operations related to objects included in the range visually recognized by the respective users included in the group set in FIG. 20 are extracted as undo candidate operations. Typically, in the example illustrated in FIG. 21, an overlap view range between a range visually recognized by the user A (typically, the view range VA1) and a range visually recognized by the user B (typically, the view range VA2). Only operations related to the object OBJ2 existing in the VAC are extracted as undo candidate operations. Thereafter, similarly to the above-described first embodiment, undo processing is sequentially executed in accordance with a predetermined order (typically time series in which operations are performed) with respect to operations extracted as candidates for these undo processing. Is done.

  When the setting for the dialog for performing the joint user setting shown in FIG. 20 is enabled, the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC displays the users included in the group being set as shown in FIG. A dialog 306 may be displayed.

  Moreover, in the above-mentioned explanation, although illustrated about the structure which specifies the overlapping range between the ranges which two users are visually recognizing, the overlapping range between the ranges which three or more users are visually recognizing is shown. It may be specified.

  Or in the above-mentioned explanation, although illustrated about composition which extracts operation concerning an object contained in an overlapping range between each user's visually recognized range as Undo candidate operation, any user who performs joint work An operation related to an object that is visually recognized by can be set as an undo target. In such a case, an Undo candidate operation may be extracted from a range obtained by adding up the ranges visually recognized by the respective users.

  In this way, since only operations related to objects within the range visually recognized by all users who are collaborating (users belonging to the set group) are extracted as Undo candidate operations, It is possible to avoid a situation in which the Undo process is executed in a place where some of the users who are performing do not know.

(Control structure of information processing device)
FIG. 23 is a block diagram showing a control structure of information processing device PC according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

  The control structure of the information processing apparatus PC shown in FIG. 23 is substantially the same as the control structure of the information processing apparatus PC shown in FIG. 7 with the addition of the View information exchange unit 268.

  The view information exchanging unit 268 exchanges the position information of the current view range and the position information of the overlapping view range with the server SRV as described later. More specifically, the view information exchanging unit 268 transmits the view information 262d stored in the data storage unit 262 to the server device SRV and acquires position information of the overlapping view range from the server device SRV. Each time the view range setting is changed, the view information exchange unit 268 transmits the changed value to the server SRV as needed.

  In the present embodiment, the overlap view range is calculated by the server SRV based on the position information of the view range transmitted from each information processing apparatus PC to the server SRV. Instead of such a configuration, the View information exchanging unit 268 acquires the position information of the View range for each user from another information processing apparatus PC, etc., and specifies the overlapping View range in each information processing apparatus PC. Also good.

  Also, the View information exchange unit 268 transmits the joint user setting set in the dialog shown in FIG. 20 to the server SRV via the transmission / reception unit 266.

  Other portions are the same as the corresponding portions of the control structure of information processing apparatus PC shown in FIG. 7, and thus detailed description will not be repeated.

(Control structure of server device)
FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing a control structure of server SRV according to the third embodiment of the present invention.

  The control structure of the server SRV shown in FIG. 24 includes a transmission / reception unit 290, a data storage unit 292, a joint user management unit 294, a duplicate view information generation unit 296, and a view information update unit 298 as the control structure. Including. The data storage unit 292 is provided as an arbitrary area of the hard disk unit 211 (FIG. 2), the transmission / reception unit 290 is provided in cooperation with the communication interface 207 (FIG. 2) and related driver software, and the other units are representative. Specifically, the program is provided by the CPU 201 (FIG. 2) developing the program in the memory unit 213 (FIG. 2) and executing each command. Note that all or part of these functions may be realized by hardware.

  The data storage unit 292 includes a plurality of view information 262d acquired from each information processing apparatus PC and joint user information 262f.

  The joint user management unit 294 updates the contents of the joint user information 262f stored in the data storage unit 292 in accordance with the joint user setting transmitted from any one of the information processing apparatuses PC. In the joint user information 262f, as described later, each user name set as a joint user is described. That is, the joint user information 262f holds the setting of a group of users who perform joint work on the workspace.

  The view information update unit 298 updates the contents of the view information 262d associated with each information processing device PC stored in the data storage unit 292 according to the position information of the view range transmitted from each information processing device PC. . The contents of the view information 262d are substantially the same as the contents of the view information 262d stored in the data storage unit 262 of the corresponding information processing apparatus PC.

  The duplication view information generation unit 296 identifies position information of the duplication view range based on the view information 262d and the joint user information 262f of each information processing apparatus PC stored in the data storage unit 292. Then, the overlap view information generation unit 296 transmits the calculated position information of the overlap view range to all or the information processing apparatus PC that has requested transmission.

  The transmission / reception unit 266 controls data communication with the information processing apparatus PC. Specifically, the transmission / reception unit 266 transmits a necessary message in response to a request from the duplicate view information generation unit 296, or receives data received from any one of the information processing apparatuses PC as the joint user management unit 294 or the view information. To update unit 298.

  Server device SRV also includes a known control structure for performing user authentication (not shown).

(data structure)
FIG. 25 shows an example of the contents of joint user information 262f according to the third embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 25, joint user information 262f includes joint user information 431 for specifying settings as users who perform joint work, that is, the contents of joint user settings. The content of the joint user information 431 is updated by the joint user management unit 294 every time the user changes the setting on the dialog shown in FIG.

(Position information of overlap view range)
FIG. 26 is a diagram for describing processing for specifying position information of the overlap view range according to the third embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 26 illustrates a case where user A and user B are set as users who perform collaborative work as shown in FIG. 21 in order to simplify the description. Further, the position information of the overlap view range is generated by the overlap view information generation unit 296 (FIG. 24).

  Referring to FIG. 26, duplicate view information generation unit 296 acquires the contents of view information 262d for information processing device PC1 (user A) and information processing device PC2 (user B) stored in data storage unit 292. . In the example shown in FIG. 26, the coordinates of each vertex of the View range set by the user A are (125, 230), (925, 230), (125, 830), (925, 830), and the user B The coordinates of the vertices of the View range set by are (520, 26), (1335, 26), (520, 528), (1335, 528).

  The overlap view information generation unit 296 calculates a common part (AND) of each view range and calculates the coordinates of each vertex of the overlap view range. In the example shown in FIG. 26, the coordinates of each vertex of the overlap view range are calculated as (520, 230), (925, 230), (520, 528), (925, 528). The calculated coordinates (position information) are output as overlap view information 262g. Further, the duplicate view information 262g is transmitted from the server apparatus SRV to each information processing apparatus PC.

(sequence)
With reference to the sequence diagram shown in FIG. 27, processing executed between each information processing device PC and server device SRV in order to calculate the duplicate view information as described above will be described.

  Referring to FIG. 27, when user A who is using information processing apparatus PC1 performs an operation of changing the position of the View range (sequence SQ12), information processing apparatus PC1 uses the position information of the changed View range as the server apparatus. Transmit to SRV (sequence SQ14). In response to the transmitted view information, server SRV updates the content of view information 262d associated with information processing device PC1 held in its own data storage unit 292 (sequence SQ16). .

  Similarly, when user B who is using information processing device PC2 performs an operation of changing the position of the View range (sequence SQ22), information processing device PC2 transmits the changed position information of the View range to server SRV. (Sequence SQ24). In response to the transmitted view information, server SRV updates the contents of view information 262d associated with information processing device PC2 held in data storage unit 292 of its own device (sequence SQ26). .

By such processing, the contents of the view information 262d are updated as needed.
For example, when user A who is using information processing apparatus PC1 performs a joint user setting operation (sequence SQ32) in the dialog for setting the joint user (FIG. 20), information processing apparatus PC1 is set. The joint user information is transmitted to server SRV (sequence SQ34). In response to the transmitted joint user information, server SRV updates the contents of joint user information 262f held in data storage unit 292 of its own device (sequence SQ36). Although not shown, the same processing is executed when the user B who is using the information processing apparatus PC2 performs a joint user setting operation.

  Furthermore, when user A who is using information processing device PC1 selects the Undo button in tool box 304 and performs an undo operation (sequence SQ42), information processing device PC1 sends a duplicate view information request to server SRV. Transmit (sequence SQ44). In response to the transmitted duplicate view information request, the server SRV refers to the contents of the joint user information 262f stored in the data storage unit 292 and identifies the joint user information to which the user A belongs. Then, the server SRV acquires position information of the View range for all users included in the identified joint user information with reference to the View information 262d. Furthermore, server SRV calculates the common part of the acquired view range, and generates position information of the overlap view range (sequence SQ36). Thereafter, server SRV transmits the generated position information of the overlap view range to requesting information processing apparatus PC1 (sequence SQ48).

  Information processing device PC1 executes the undo process based on the position information of the overlapping view range (sequence SQ50).

  Although not shown, the same processing is executed when the user B who is using the information processing apparatus PC2 performs an Undo operation.

(Undo process)
FIG. 28 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of Undo processing according to the third embodiment of the present invention. The processing procedure shown in FIG. 28 is such that steps S102A and S102B are executed instead of step S102 in the flowchart showing the processing procedure of the Undo process according to the first embodiment shown in FIG.

  The processing procedure shown in FIG. 28 is typically provided by the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executing a program. Here, in the information processing apparatus PC, it is assumed that objects in the view range designated by each user in the work space are sequentially drawn on the monitor 205. In the information processing apparatus PC, when an operation is performed on any object performed by each user in the work space, the contents are sequentially stored in the history information 262c of the data storage unit 262.

  Referring to FIG. 28, when the Undo button is selected (YES in step S100), CPU 201 of information processing apparatus PC transmits a duplicate view information request to server apparatus SRV (step S102A). ). Thereafter, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC determines whether or not duplicate view information has been received from the server apparatus SRV (step S102B). If duplicate view information is not received from server SRV (NO in step S102B), it waits until it is received.

  When the duplicate view information is received from server SRV (YES in step S102B), CPU 201 of information processing device PC refers to all history information 262c (hard disk unit 211) stored in data storage unit 262, and Based on the value of the operation place information 413 (FIG. 10) included in each history information 262c, the Undo candidate operation included in the received overlap view range is extracted (step S104). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC extracts the history information 262c in which the value of the operation location information 413, which is the position information, is included in the overlapping view range acquired in step S102B, as an undo candidate operation.

  Since other processes are the same as those in the flowchart shown in FIG. 12, detailed description will not be repeated.

  In the above description, a configuration in which a user who performs one type of collaborative work is set is illustrated, but a user who participates in a plurality of collaborative works may be determined. That is, a plurality of user group settings for collaborative work on the workspace may be accepted. In this case, identification information for specifying each group may be set in the dialog for performing the joint user setting shown in FIG. 20, and the joint user information is set together with the identification information. It may be stored.

(Operation / Effect in Embodiment 3)
According to the present embodiment, in addition to the operations and effects in the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further narrow down the targets to be extracted as Undo candidate operations. That is, according to the present embodiment, an operation related to an object included in a range visually recognized by each member performing joint work can be extracted as an undo candidate operation. It is possible to specify the object to be more efficiently.

  Therefore, each user can efficiently specify an object to be subjected to the Undo process by a simple operation and execute the process, and can further improve the efficiency of the entire collaborative work. At the same time, it is possible to avoid a situation in which an undo process is executed when some of the users who are collaborating do not know.

[First Modification of Embodiment 3]
In the above-described third embodiment, an example of a configuration in which an operation related to an object existing within a range visually recognized by users who perform joint work is used as an undo candidate operation is described. In some cases, it may be preferable to execute the undo process on the condition that the authorized user (or “chairman”) is viewing. That is, when it is preferable that only operations related to objects that exist within the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the undo process and are within the range visually recognized by the authorized user are extracted as candidates for the undo process There is also. In such a case, the configuration according to the first modification of the third embodiment described below is more appropriate.

  Since the system for providing a work space according to the first modification of the third embodiment of the present invention and the configuration of the information processing apparatus PC are the same as those of the first embodiment described above, a detailed description will be given. Do not repeat. Since the control structures of information processing device PC and server device SRV are the same as those in FIGS. 23 and 24, respectively, detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

  FIG. 29 shows an example of the contents of work space data 262a # 1 according to the first modification of the third embodiment of the present invention. In this modification, a user who has the authority to monitor the execution of the undo process is described in the work space data 262a # 1.

  The workspace data 262a # 1 illustrated in FIG. 29 further includes undo processing authority user information 433 indicating a user who has authority to monitor execution of undo processing in the workspace data 262a illustrated in FIG. The undo authority user information 433 is added at the timing when a new workspace is created in accordance with a predetermined dialog screen, default setting, or the like.

  When any user performs an undo operation, the value of the undo authority user information 433 included in the work space data 262a # 1 defining the target work space WS is referred to, and the same as in FIGS. 26 and 27 described above. According to the procedure, the position information of the View range visually recognized by the authorized user is acquired. Then, an operation related to an object that exists or exists within the overlapping range of the view range of the user who intends to execute the undo process and the view range of the authorized user is extracted as an undo candidate operation. Since such an operation procedure is the same as that of the above-described third embodiment, detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

(Undo process)
FIG. 30 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of Undo processing according to the first modification of the third embodiment of the present invention. The processing procedure shown in FIG. 30 is such that steps S103A to S103C are further executed in the flowchart showing the processing procedure of the undo processing according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 12, and step S104B is executed instead of step S104. It is a thing.

  30 is typically provided by the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executing a program. Here, in the information processing apparatus PC, it is assumed that objects in the view range designated by each user in the work space are sequentially drawn on the monitor 205. In the information processing apparatus PC, when an operation is performed on any object performed by each user in the work space, the contents are sequentially stored in the history information 262c of the data storage unit 262.

  Referring to FIG. 30, when the Undo button is selected (YES in step S100), CPU 201 of information processing apparatus PC stores View information 262d stored in data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211). Referring to the current view range information (the coordinates of each vertex) is acquired (step S102). Subsequently, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to the work space data 262a # 1 stored in the data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211) and acquires the value stored in the undo processing authority user information ( Step S103A). Furthermore, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC designates the user acquired in step S103A and transmits a view information request to the server SRV (step S103B). Thereafter, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC determines whether or not the user's View information designated by the server apparatus SRV has been received (step S103C). If the view information of the designated user is not received from server SRV (NO in step S103C), the process waits until it is received.

  When the user's View information specified by server SRV is received (YES in step S103C), the process proceeds to step S104B.

  In step S104B, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to all the history information 262c (hard disk unit 211) stored in the data storage unit 262, and operates location information 413 (FIG. 10) included in each history information 262c. ) To extract Undo candidate operations (step S104B). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing device PC includes a history in which the value of the operation location information 413 as the position information is included in the view range acquired in step S102 and included in the view range of the authorized user received in step S103C. Information 262c is extracted as an undo candidate operation.

  Since other processes are the same as those in the flowchart shown in FIG. 12, detailed description will not be repeated.

(Operation / Effect in First Modification of Embodiment 3)
According to the present modification, in addition to the operations and effects in the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further narrow down the targets to be extracted as undo candidate operations. That is, according to the present embodiment, the range extracted as an undo candidate operation can be limited to a range that is viewed by a user having authority for collaborative work. Can be identified more efficiently.

  Therefore, each user can efficiently specify an object to be subjected to the Undo process by a simple operation and execute the process, and can further improve the efficiency of the entire collaborative work. At the same time, it is possible to avoid a situation in which an undo process is executed without a user having the authority to collaborate.

[Second Modification of Embodiment 3]
In the above-described third embodiment and the first modified example, the system constituted by a plurality of information processing devices PC and server devices SRV is exemplified. However, the information processing devices PC are connected by so-called peer-to-peer connection. A similar system may be configured.

  FIG. 31 is a block diagram showing a control structure of information processing devices PC1 and PC2 for realizing a work space according to the second modification of the third embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 31, for example, in addition to the functions included in control structure (FIG. 23) of information processing apparatus PC according to the third embodiment, server apparatus SRV (FIG. 24), and the functions included in the control structure (FIG. 23) of the information processing apparatus PC according to the third embodiment, excluding the data storage unit 262 and the like, are mounted on the information processing apparatus PC2. Thus, a work space can be provided without requiring the server SRV. Since the configuration and operation of each unit have been described above, detailed description will not be repeated.

  Further, the server apparatus SRV may commonly provide a function corresponding to the data storage unit 262 to each information processing apparatus PC.

(Operation / Effect in Second Modification of Embodiment 3)
According to this modification, in addition to the operations and effects in the first and third embodiments described above, the work space can be realized using a more simplified configuration.

[Embodiment 4]
In the first embodiment described above, the configuration in which all operations related to objects existing in the View range set by the user of the information processing apparatus PC are set as undo candidate operations is illustrated. On the other hand, depending on the situation, there may be a case where only an operation related to an object existing in a specific range of the workspace is desired as an undo candidate operation. For example, when only a specific object existing on the workspace is a change target, it may be assumed that it is necessary to protect the other objects from being subjected to undo processing. In such a case, the configuration according to the fourth embodiment described below is more appropriate.

  Since the system for providing a work space according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention and the configuration of information processing apparatus PC are the same as in the first embodiment, detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

  FIG. 32 shows an example of a screen for setting an undo processable range according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention. In the workspace according to the present embodiment, a range in which Undo processing is permitted (hereinafter also referred to as “Undo processable range”) can be set. This undo processable range is preferably set in common for all users participating in the workspace. This is because the undo processable range is mainly intended to protect objects existing on the workspace.

  On the monitor 205 of the information processing apparatus PC according to the present embodiment, a dialog for setting an undo processable range shown in FIG. 32 is displayed in response to a user operation or when drawing of the workspace is started. In this dialog, the entire workspace is drawn and a setting frame 322 for setting an undo processable range is displayed in an overlay manner. The user operates the input device 209 such as a keyboard and a mouse to adjust the setting frame 322 to an arbitrary range, thereby setting the undo processable range. The undo processable range is stored in the work space data as will be described later.

  In a state where such an undo processable range is set, if any user performs an undo operation, it exists within the overlapping range of the view range of the user who intends to execute the undo process and the undo processable range. Alternatively, an operation related to the existing object is extracted as an Undo candidate operation. Then, similarly to the above-described first embodiment, undo processing is sequentially executed in accordance with a predetermined order (typically, time series in which operations are performed) for operations extracted as candidates for these undo processing. Is done.

  As described above, objects outside the undo processable range are not extracted as candidates for the undo process even if they exist within the range visually recognized by the user who intends to execute the undo process. As a result, unintended undo processing for an object that should not be changed can be avoided.

  The control structure of information processing device PC according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention is also the same as the control structure shown in FIG. 7 described above except for the contents of the work space data held in data storage unit 262, and thus detailed. The explanation will not be repeated.

  FIG. 33 shows an example of the contents of work space data 262a # 2 according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention. In the present embodiment, the undo processable range information is described in the work space data 262a # 2.

  The work space data 262a # 2 shown in FIG. 33 further includes undo processable range information 432 describing the undo processable range in the work space data 262a shown in FIG. The undo processable range information 432 is added at the timing when a workspace is newly created in accordance with the setting on the dialog screen as shown in FIG. 32 and the default setting.

  When any user performs an Undo operation, the value of the undo processable range information 432 included in the work space data 262a # 2 that defines the target work space WS is referred to. Then, an operation related to an object that exists in or overlaps the view range of the user who is to execute the undo process and the undo processable range is extracted as an undo candidate operation.

(Undo process)
FIG. 34 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of Undo processing according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention. The processing procedure shown in FIG. 34 is such that step S103D is further executed and step S104C is executed instead of step S104 in the flowchart showing the processing procedure of the undo processing according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. Is.

  Also, the processing procedure shown in FIG. 34 is typically provided by the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC executing a program. Here, in the information processing apparatus PC, it is assumed that objects in the view range designated by each user in the work space are sequentially drawn on the monitor 205. In the information processing apparatus PC, when an operation is performed on any object performed by each user in the work space, the contents are sequentially stored in the history information 262c of the data storage unit 262.

  Referring to FIG. 34, when the Undo button is selected (YES in step S100), CPU 201 of information processing apparatus PC stores View information 262d stored in data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211). Referring to the current view range information (the coordinates of each vertex) is acquired (step S102). Subsequently, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to the work space data 262a # 1 stored in the data storage unit 262 (hard disk unit 211) and acquires the value stored in the undo processable range information ( Step S103D). Then, the process proceeds to step S104C.

  In step S104C, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC refers to all the history information 262c (hard disk unit 211) stored in the data storage unit 262, and operates location information 413 (FIG. 10) included in each history information 262c. ) To extract Undo candidate operations (step S104C). That is, the CPU 201 of the information processing apparatus PC stores the history information 262c in which the value of the operation location information 413 that is the position information is included in the view range acquired in step S102 and included in the undo processable range acquired in step S103D. Extracted as an Undo candidate operation.

  Since other processes are the same as those in the flowchart shown in FIG. 12, detailed description will not be repeated.

(Operation / Effect in Embodiment 4)
According to the present embodiment, in addition to the operations and effects in the first embodiment described above, it is possible to further narrow down the targets to be extracted as Undo candidate operations. In other words, according to the present embodiment, only operations related to objects included in a range in which preset Undo processing is permitted can be extracted as Undo candidate operations, so that an object to be subjected to Undo processing can be more efficiently processed. Can be specified.

  Therefore, each user can efficiently specify an object to be subjected to the Undo process by a simple operation and execute the process, and can further improve the efficiency of the entire collaborative work. At the same time, since the undo process is executed only for operations related to objects existing in the range agreed upon in advance between the members who collaborate in advance, the undo process is erroneously performed for objects not related to the workspace. Can be avoided.

[Embodiment 5]
Embodiments 1 to 4 described above exemplify forms in which each user collaborates on a workspace using different information processing apparatuses PC. In contrast, Embodiment 5 of the present invention exemplifies a configuration in which a common screen (screen) is shared by a plurality of users. That is, in Embodiments 1 to 4, it is possible to regard the range visually recognized by each user as the View range on each information processing apparatus PC, but when a plurality of users visually recognize a common screen, It is necessary to identify in which part each user is viewing visually. Hereinafter, a configuration suitable for such a form will be exemplified.

  FIG. 35 is an external view showing a form of providing a work space according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.

  Referring to FIG. 35, the workspace according to the present embodiment is typically displayed or projected on a relatively large screen (screen) SCN. Each user typically collaborates on such a screen-displayed workspace using a portable terminal or a wireless input device.

  In such a form, the visually recognized range can be specified based on the viewpoint of each user. More specifically, each user is asked to wear glasses or sunglasses equipped with an infrared irradiation device, and the position of an infrared pointer or the like projected from the infrared irradiation device onto the screen SCN is determined based on each user's viewpoint. It can be detected as a position. Alternatively, as disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-115043, the movement of the eyeball of each user may be detected, and the viewpoint position of each user may be detected based on the detection result.

  FIG. 36 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing for detecting a range visually recognized by the user based on the user's viewpoint.

  As shown in FIG. 36 (a), when the workspace is displayed on the wall-mounted screen SCN, the user visually recognizes a predetermined range centered on the viewpoint of each user detected by the above processing. It can be determined as a range. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 36 (b), a circular area AREA1 within a range of a distance X centered on the detected user's viewpoint is determined as a range visually recognized by the user. Then, an operation related to an object included in the circle area AREA1 is extracted as an Undo candidate operation. Note that undo candidate operation extraction processing is similar to the processing described above, and thus detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

  FIG. 37 is a diagram illustrating an example of processing for detecting a range visually recognized by the user based on the relative position between the screen and the user.

  As shown in FIG. 37 (a), when a workspace is displayed on a wall-mounted screen SCN, it is determined as a range visually recognized by each user based on the relative position between the screen and each user. Can do. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 37 (b), a range in which the user visually recognizes a circular area AREA2 having a distance Y centered on a center point determined based on the height of the user's eye line or the like. Determine as. This distance Y changes dynamically depending on the distance between the screen SCN and the user. Then, an operation related to the object included in the circle area AREA2 is extracted as an Undo candidate operation. Note that undo candidate operation extraction processing is similar to the processing described above, and thus detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

  The relative position of the user with respect to the screen SCN can be detected by a pressure sensor or the like installed on the floor surface. Alternatively, each user may wear glasses or sunglasses equipped with a laser device, and the laser device may be used to measure the distance to the screen SCN.

  FIG. 38 is a diagram illustrating an example of a process for determining a range visually recognized by the user in the workspace displayed on the screen arranged on the floor surface.

  As shown in FIG. 38 (a), when a work space is displayed on the screen SCN arranged on the floor surface, the range that each user can visually recognize can be determined based on the user's standing position and its orientation. it can. More specifically, as shown in FIG. 38 (b), a predetermined range centered on a point separated from the user's standing position by a predetermined distance along its direction (that is, the direction in which the user's eyes are facing). The circular area AREA3 is determined as a range visually recognized by the user. This is because it is considered that the user's line of sight is directed from diagonally upward to the screen SCN arranged on the floor. Then, an operation related to the object included in the circle area AREA3 is extracted as an Undo candidate operation. Note that undo candidate operation extraction processing is similar to the processing described above, and thus detailed description thereof will not be repeated.

  Note that the user's standing position and direction can be detected using a sensor attached to each user's shoe or the like.

(Operation / Effect in Embodiment 5)
According to the present embodiment, in addition to the operations and effects in the first embodiment described above, the range that is actually viewed by the user can be specified as the range that is being viewed, and thus a more user-friendly work Can provide space.

[Combination of Embodiments 1 to 5]
Of course, it is also possible to arbitrarily combine the configurations according to the first to fifth embodiments described above.

[Other embodiments]
In the above-described first to fifth embodiments, the present invention has been illustrated with respect to a configuration in the case where the present invention is applied to a workspace in which various objects can be arbitrarily arranged. Applicable. That is, in a spreadsheet application in which cells are arranged in a matrix, processing similar to the above can be performed by regarding each cell as corresponding to one object described above. Further, in the document creation application, processing similar to the above can be performed by regarding each structural unit such as a word, sentence, paragraph, and section as corresponding to one object described above.

  In addition, the program according to the present invention is a program module that executes a process by calling a required module at a predetermined timing in a predetermined arrangement among program modules provided as a part of an operating system (OS) of a computer. Also good. In that case, the program itself does not include the module, and the process is executed in cooperation with the OS. A program that does not include such a module can also be included in the program according to the present invention.

  Furthermore, the program according to the present invention may be provided by being incorporated in a part of another program. Even in this case, the program itself does not include the module included in the other program, and the process is executed in cooperation with the other program. Such a program incorporated in another program can also be included in the program according to the present invention.

  The provided program product is installed in a program storage unit such as a hard disk and executed. Note that the program product includes the program itself and a storage medium in which the program is stored.

  Furthermore, part or all of the functions realized by the program according to the present invention may be configured by dedicated hardware.

  The embodiment disclosed this time should be considered as illustrative in all points and not restrictive. The scope of the present invention is defined by the terms of the claims, rather than the description above, and is intended to include any modifications within the scope and meaning equivalent to the terms of the claims.

It is a schematic block diagram of the system for providing the work space according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the schematic hardware constitutions of the personal computer which is a typical example of the information processing apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is the figure which showed typically an example of the workspace according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the data structure for providing the work space according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the use condition of the workspace according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows the example of execution of the Undo process in the use condition shown in FIG. It is a block diagram which shows the control structure of the information processing apparatus according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the work space data according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the object data according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the log | history information according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of View information according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the Undo process according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the historical information according to Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example after Undo candidate operation extracted from the log | history information shown in FIG. 13, and those rearrangement. It is a figure which shows an example of the dialog for performing View filtering setting according to Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a figure which shows the example of execution of the Undo process in the use condition of the workspace according to Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of View information according to Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the Undo process according to Embodiment 2 of this invention. In Embodiment 2 of this invention, it is a figure which shows an example after Undo candidate operation extracted from the log | history information shown in FIG. 13, and those rearrangement. It is a figure which shows an example of the dialog for performing the joint user setting according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a figure which shows the example of execution of the Undo process in the use condition of the workspace according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating a display example on the monitor of the information processing apparatus when the setting for the dialog for performing the joint user setting illustrated in FIG. 20 is validated. It is a block diagram which shows the control structure of the information processing apparatus according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the control structure of the server apparatus according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the joint user information according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a figure for demonstrating the process which specifies the positional information on the overlap View range according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a sequence diagram which shows the process performed between the information processing apparatus and server apparatus for calculating duplication View information according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the Undo process according to Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the work space data according to the 1st modification of Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the Undo process according to the 1st modification of Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the control structure of the information processing apparatus for implement | achieving the work space according to the 2nd modification of Embodiment 3 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen which sets the Undo processable range according to Embodiment 4 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the content of the work space data according to Embodiment 4 of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the process sequence of the Undo process according to Embodiment 4 of this invention. It is an external view which shows the provision form of the workspace according to Embodiment 5 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which detects the range which a user visually recognizes based on a user's viewpoint. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which detects the range which a user visually recognizes based on the relative position of a screen and a user. It is a figure which shows an example of the process which determines the range which a user visually recognizes in the workspace displayed on the screen arrange | positioned on the floor surface.

Explanation of symbols

  201 CPU, 203 internal bus, 205 monitor, 207 communication interface, 209 input device, 211 hard disk unit (HDD), 213 memory unit, 215 CD-ROM drive, 215a CD-ROM, 217 FDD drive, 217a flexible disk, 252 data Operation unit, 254 View management unit, 256 drawing unit, 258 Undo processing interface, 260 object extraction unit, 262,296 data storage unit, 264 synchronization processing unit, 266,290 transmission / reception unit, 268 View information exchange unit, 270 user authentication Unit, 294 joint user management unit, 296 duplicate view information generation unit, 298 view information update unit, NW network, PC, PC1-PC3 information processing device, SCN screen, S V server device.

Claims (11)

An information processing method for providing a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users using at least one information processing apparatus including a display unit,
The information processing apparatus rendering an object of the virtual space on the display unit;
The information processing apparatus includes a step of storing history information of an operation performed on an object performed by a user in the virtual space in a storage unit disposed inside or outside the information processing apparatus, and the history information is stored by the user Including information on the position in the virtual space where the operation was performed on the object,
The information processing apparatus, in response to an operation cancellation instruction from a user, identifying a first viewing range that is a range on the virtual space that the user visually recognizes;
An information processing method comprising: a step of extracting history information in which the position of an object to be operated is included in the first viewing range as a candidate for canceling the operation. The object has an attribute that identifies the owner of the object,
The information processing method further includes a step in which the information processing apparatus receives a setting of an owner of an object to be an operation cancellation target,
In the step of extracting as an operation cancellation candidate, history information that is not included in the preset owner with the attribute of the owner added to the object to be operated is excluded from the operation cancellation candidate. The information processing method according to claim 1.   The information processing method according to claim 2, wherein an object excluded from the operation cancellation candidates is kept hidden during execution of the operation cancellation. In the information processing method, the information processing apparatus receives a setting of a group of users who perform joint work in the virtual space;
The information processing apparatus, in response to an instruction to cancel the operation from the user, identifying a second viewing range that is a range in the virtual space visually recognized by other users included in the group to which the user belongs. When,
The information processing apparatus further includes a step of specifying an overlapping range between the first viewing range and the second viewing range,
The history information in which the position of the object that is the target of the operation is included in the overlapping range is extracted as the candidate for canceling the operation in the step of extracting as the candidate for canceling the operation. Information processing method according to item. The information processing method includes:
The information processing apparatus accepting a setting of a user who has authority to cancel the operation;
The information processing apparatus further includes a step of specifying a third viewing range that is a range in the virtual space that is viewed by the authorized user.
In the step of extracting as the operation cancellation candidate, history information in which the position of the object that is the target of the operation is included in both the first and second viewing ranges is extracted as the operation cancellation candidate. The information processing method according to any one of claims 1 to 4. The information processing method further includes a step of accepting a setting of an operation cancelable range in which the information processing apparatus is a range in which operation cancellation is permitted on the virtual space,
In the step of extracting as the operation cancellation candidate, the history information in which the position of the object that is the target of the operation is included in both the overlapping range and the operation cancellation possible range is extracted as the operation cancellation candidate. The information processing method of any one of Claims 1-5. The virtual space is provided by a plurality of the information processing devices,
The information processing method further includes a step in which each of the plurality of information processing devices visualizes a visual field range in the virtual space designated by a user who uses the information processing device on the corresponding display unit,
The information processing method according to claim 1, wherein a range in the virtual space visually recognized by the user is regarded as the same range as the visual field range designated by the user. The information processing method further includes a step of specifying a user's viewpoint instructing the operation cancellation,
The information processing method according to claim 1, wherein a range in the virtual space that is visually recognized by the user is determined based on a viewpoint of the user. The display unit includes a screen on which the workspace is displayed,
The information processing method further includes a step of specifying a relative position between a user who instructs to cancel the operation and the screen,
The information processing method according to claim 1, wherein the range on the virtual space that the user visually recognizes is determined based on a relative position of the user with the screen. An information processing apparatus that provides a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users,
A display unit;
A storage unit;
Means for drawing the object of the virtual space on the display unit;
Means for storing, in the storage unit, history information of an operation performed on the object by the user in the virtual space, and the history information includes information on a position in the virtual space where the user performed the operation on the object. Including
Means for identifying a first viewing range that is a range in the virtual space that the user visually recognizes in response to an operation cancellation instruction from the user;
An information processing apparatus comprising: means for extracting history information in which a position of an object that is an operation target is included in the first viewing range as a candidate for the operation cancellation. A program for providing a virtual space that can be accessed simultaneously by a plurality of users using at least one information processing apparatus including a display unit,
The program is stored in the information processing apparatus.
Drawing an object of the virtual space on the display unit;
Storing history information of operations performed on the object performed by the user in the virtual space in a storage unit disposed inside or outside the information processing apparatus, wherein the history information indicates that the user operates the object. Storing the information including information on a position in the virtual space that has been performed;
In response to an operation cancellation instruction from the user, identifying a first viewing range that is a range in the virtual space that the user visually recognizes;
And a step of extracting history information in which the position of the object that is the target of the operation is included in the first viewing range as a candidate for the operation cancellation.

Images