JP2007299402A - System and method for presenting aseismatic performance - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a system and a method for presenting aseismatic performance capable of easily presenting an evaluation result of house aseismatic performance to a customer. <P>SOLUTION: An input means 14 inputs building information and geographic information about the house, and, from building structure data D1 and ground data D2 previously stored in a storage means 15, an evaluation means 16 extracts data respectively corresponding to the building information and the geographic information inputted by the input means 14. Based on the respective data, an evaluation means 16 analyzes a deformation condition of the house in an earthquake and diagnoses the ground in a building location by using seismic wave data D3 stored in the storage means 15. A result of the building aseismatic performance and a ground diagnosis result are presented to the customer through a diagnosis report 30. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a seismic performance presentation system and a seismic performance presentation method for presenting seismic performance of a building such as a house to a customer using, for example, a computer.

  2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, for example, as an evaluation system for evaluating the earthquake resistance performance of a house, it has been provided with input means for inputting house structure data, geographical data and ground data to a computer, and based on each data input by the input means, the current state of the house An evaluation system for evaluating seismic performance is known (for example, see Patent Document 1).

Thereby, for example, compared with the case where an expert engineer goes to a house and performs earthquake-resistant diagnosis and evaluates the earthquake-resistant performance of the house, the earthquake-resistant performance of the house can be evaluated quickly.
JP 2003-147970 (page 3-6, FIG. 1)

  However, the conventional evaluation system is not provided with a presentation means for presenting the result of evaluating the earthquake-resistant performance of the house on the spot to, for example, a customer who is considering housing construction.

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a seismic performance presentation system and a seismic performance presentation method capable of easily presenting to a customer the results of evaluating the seismic performance of a building.

  In order to solve the above problems, the invention according to claim 1 is characterized in that the input means for inputting the building information, the storage means for storing the building structural data and the seismic wave data, respectively, and the storage means. The data corresponding to the building information input by the input means is extracted from the structural data, and the seismic performance of the building is analyzed based on the data by analyzing the deformation state of the building during an earthquake using the seismic wave data. Evaluation means for evaluating the output, output means for outputting the evaluation result of the evaluation means, and presentation means for presenting the result of the earthquake resistance performance of the building output by the output means.

  The invention according to claim 2 is the invention according to claim 1, wherein ground data is stored in advance in the storage means, and the input means inputs geographical information of the building site of the building, When the geographic information is input by the input unit, the evaluation unit extracts data corresponding to the geographic information from the ground data, performs a ground diagnosis of the building site, and the output unit includes the evaluation unit. The ground diagnosis result is output, and the presenting means presents the ground diagnosis result.

  According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the invention according to the first or second aspect, the presenting means is configured to reinforce the ground on which the building is built and the structure of the building based on the deformation state of the building. A measure for improvement is presented, and the seismic performance of the building after the measure is presented.

  The invention according to claim 4 is a method for presenting seismic performance of a building, wherein building information is input, data corresponding to the input building information is extracted from structural data, and the extracted data Analyzing the deformation status of the building at the time of earthquake using seismic wave data based on the above, evaluating the seismic performance of the building, outputting the evaluation result, presenting the output results of the seismic performance of the building It is characterized by including.

  The invention according to claim 5 is the invention according to claim 4, wherein, in addition to the building information, the geographical information of the building site of the building is input, and data corresponding to the geographical information is extracted from ground data, A ground diagnosis is performed based on the data, a ground diagnosis result is output, and the output ground diagnosis result is presented.

  The invention according to claim 6 presents measures for reinforcing the ground on which the building is built and for improving the structure of the building based on the deformation state of the building in the invention according to claim 4 or 5. In addition, the seismic performance of the building after the implementation of measures is presented.

  According to the first aspect of the present invention, since the present invention includes the presenting means that presents the result of the earthquake resistance performance of the building that is evaluated by the evaluation means and output by the output means, for example, the building is constructed in consideration of the earthquake resistance performance. When making a plan or examining the seismic performance of an existing building, the seismic performance of the building evaluated by the evaluation means can be easily presented to the customer on the spot by the presentation means.

  According to the invention described in claim 2, the ground of the building site is diagnosed by the evaluation unit based on the geographical information of the building site of the building input by the input unit, and the ground diagnosis result is presented by the presentation unit. Therefore, in addition to the seismic performance of the building, the ground diagnosis result of the building site of the building can be easily presented to the customer on the spot. Thereby, for example, when there is a plan to construct a building, an architectural plan can be made not only from the viewpoint of the earthquake resistance performance of the building but also from the viewpoint of the ground condition of the planned construction site.

  According to invention of Claim 3, a presentation means presents the countermeasure for the reinforcement work of the ground in which a building is built, and improvement of the structure of a building based on the deformation | transformation condition of a building, and also after implementation of a countermeasure Presenting the seismic performance of other buildings, it is possible to make a building plan more easily by using the presentation means, for example, when planning to build a building in consideration of seismic performance. When examining the seismic performance of buildings, future seismic countermeasures can be more easily examined.

  According to the invention described in claim 4, the building information is input, the data corresponding to the input building information is extracted from the structure data, and the deformation state of the building at the time of the earthquake is used based on the extracted data using the seismic wave data. If you plan to build a building in consideration of the seismic performance, for example, by outputting the evaluation results and presenting the output results of the seismic performance of the building Alternatively, when examining the seismic performance of an existing building, the seismic performance of the building evaluated by the evaluation means can be easily presented to the customer on the spot by the presentation means.

  According to the invention described in claim 5, in addition to the building information, the geographical information of the building site of the building is input, the data corresponding to the geographical information is extracted from the ground data, and the ground diagnosis is performed based on the data. By outputting the diagnosis result and presenting the output ground diagnosis result, it is evaluated by the evaluation means, for example, when planning to build a building considering the seismic performance or examining the seismic performance of existing buildings In addition to the seismic performance of the building, the ground diagnosis result of the building site of the building diagnosed by the evaluation means can be easily presented to the customer on the spot by the presenting means.

  According to invention of Claim 6, based on the said deformation | transformation condition of a building, the countermeasure of the reinforcement work of the ground in which a building is built and the improvement of the structure of a building is shown, and also the earthquake resistance performance of the building after implementation of a countermeasure Can be presented.

  The present invention will be described with reference to the illustrated embodiments.

  FIG. 1 shows an example in which the seismic performance presentation system 10 according to the present embodiment is used to present the seismic performance of a unit building 12 (see FIG. 8) composed of a plurality of building units 11 having a frame structure. Indicates.

  A seismic performance presentation system 10 according to the present invention includes a microcomputer 13 for performing presentation of seismic performance. The microcomputer 13 includes input means 14 and storage means 15 for storing each data input by the input means.

  In the example shown in the figure, the input means 14 is composed of a well-known keyboard, and is used to input building information on a house and geographic information on a building site. In the illustrated example, the storage unit 15 is configured by a readable / writable storage medium such as a well-known hard disk drive. As will be described later, the storage unit 15 stores a simulation program P for simulating the deformation of the house during an earthquake based on each stored data. The storage means 15 stores a plurality of house structure data D1, ground data D2 of various places, and seismic wave data D3 of earthquakes that have occurred in the past in advance by the operation of the input means 14, respectively.

  Further, the microcomputer 13 includes an evaluation unit 16 for evaluating the earthquake resistance performance of the house and diagnosing the ground of the building, and an output unit 17 for outputting a result evaluated and diagnosed by the evaluation unit.

  In the example shown in the figure, the evaluation means 16 is composed of an arithmetic device such as a CPU, and includes an execution circuit C for executing the simulation program P. The evaluation means 16 analyzes the deformation state of the house at the time of the earthquake by executing the simulation program P, thereby evaluating the earthquake resistance performance of the house and diagnosing the ground based on the ground data D2. In the illustrated example, the output unit 17 is configured by an output device such as a monitor, and has a display screen (not shown).

  The example which shows a customer the evaluation result of the seismic performance of a house and the ground diagnosis result using the seismic performance presentation system 10 which concerns on this invention is demonstrated along the flowchart shown in FIG.

  First, after inputting the password (step S1), as shown in FIG. 3A, "Create new customer data" is selected on the window 18 displayed on the display screen of the output means 17. Subsequently, as shown in FIG. 3B, the house name is input to the input field 19a provided in the window 19 by the operation of the input means 14 (step S2).

  Next, the geographical information of a house is input (step S3). As shown in FIG. 4, the window 20 for inputting geographical information is provided with an input field 20a for entering the prefecture name, city name, town name and address of the building construction site. Each input column 20a is provided with a conventionally well-known pull-down menu 20b in the illustrated example. By selecting each data of prefecture name, city name, town name, and street address from each pull-down menu 20b, it is possible to input information on the building site without directly entering each input field 20a. The window 20 is provided with a map display button 20c. When the map display button 20c is pressed, although not shown, a map of Japan is displayed on the display screen, and information on the building site can be input by selecting the building site on the map.

  Further, the window 20 is provided with a “display ease of shaking map” button 20 d for displaying the ease of shaking of the inputted building site during an earthquake. When the “display ease of shaking map” button 20d is pressed, a window 21 showing the ease of shaking map 21a is displayed on the display screen as shown in FIG. 5 (step S4). In the swayability map 21a, a map around the building including the building is displayed. The ease of shaking map 21a is color-coded according to the ease of shaking of the surface ground at the time of the earthquake, that is, the ground amplification factor. As described in, for example, the specification of Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-261335 filed earlier by the present inventor, the ground amplification factor is the surface layer composed of multi-layered ground among the ground data D2 stored in the storage means 15. Based on the ground data such as layer thickness and shear wave velocity of each layer included in the ground, the ground data can be replaced with an equivalent single layer ground, and the convergence calculation can be performed while taking into account the nonlinearity of the ground. (This is the calculation method described in Ministry of Construction Notification No. 1457 No. 7.) The color classification of the ease of shaking map 21 a is performed based on the ground data D <b> 2 stored in the storage unit 15. With the ease of shaking map 21a, it is possible to easily check how easily the building is shaken when an earthquake occurs. The ease of shaking map 21a is stored in the storage means 15 for creating a diagnostic report described later (step S5). By printing this swayability map 21a with a printer (not shown) (step S6), it can be presented to the customer.

  After the input of the geographical information of the building is completed, the building information such as the design condition of the structure of the house to be evaluated is input. First, as shown in FIG. 6, the type of house to be built is selected from a plurality of house products 22a displayed in the window 22 and having different numbers of floors (step S7). The earthquake resistance of the constructed house changes according to the number of house levels selected in the window 22.

  Next, the specification of the building is selected (step S8). By pressing a “next” button 22b provided in the window 22, the process proceeds to a window 23 for selecting the type of the outer wall as shown in FIG. In the window 23 shown in FIG. 7, different types of outer walls such as weight and strength are selected. The aluminum, synthrite, tile, and dura stone shown in FIG. 7 are different from each other in weight, rigidity against in-plane shear deformation, and the like.

  Subsequently, a “next” button 23a provided in the window 23 is pressed, and the process proceeds to a window 24 for selecting the type of the roof of the house, as shown in FIG. In the illustrated example, a triangular roof or a flat roof can be selected. Houses with flat roofs receive less load from the roof than with triangular roofs, so when flat roofs are selected, they are more advantageous for earthquake resistance than when triangular roofs are selected. It is.

  Thereafter, although not shown in the drawing, the type of structural grade indicating the degree of earthquake resistance, wind resistance, snow resistance, etc. of the house is selected. Finally, a confirmation screen (not shown) for confirming the input design conditions is displayed. By pressing a “complete” button provided on the confirmation screen, the input design conditions are stored in the storage means 15. Input of conditions is completed.

  After the input of the design conditions for the housing structure is completed, the concrete shape of the housing is set. At this time, first, as shown in FIG. 9, “first floor” is selected in the “layer” column 25 a provided in the window 25, and the first floor of the house is configured by the creation unit 25 b provided in the window 25. The size and arrangement of the plurality of building units 11 are determined (step S9). Next, “second floor” is selected in the “layer” column 25a, and the size and arrangement of each building unit 11 are determined in the same manner as the first floor. Further, the type of each building unit 11 is designated on the window 25 (step S10). Subsequently, as shown in FIG. 10, an opening 25c such as a window is set in each building unit 11 on each floor by the creation unit 25b. Further, as shown in FIG. 11, the shape of the roof 25d is created by the creation unit 25b. Set (step S11). After the arrangement of each building unit 11, the arrangement of the opening 25c, and the setting of the shape of the roof 25d are completed, the “execute seismic diagnosis” button 25e provided on the window 25 is pressed (step S12). Thereby, the set arrangement of each building unit 11, the arrangement of the opening 25c, and the shape of the roof 25d are stored in the storage means 15, and the process proceeds to the next step. In addition to the examples shown in FIGS. 6 to 11, although not shown, for example, a menu for adding an outer staircase, an elevator, a balcony, a solar panel and the like to the house is arranged, the arrangement of each building unit 11, the arrangement of the opening 25 c and the roof 25 d Can be provided in the window 25 for setting the shape.

  When the “execute seismic diagnosis” button 25e is pressed, a window 26 for analyzing the seismic performance of the house is displayed on the display screen, as shown in FIG. In this window 26, each of a direct type earthquake (maximum acceleration of seismic wave: 820 gal) such as the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake and a plate type earthquake (maximum acceleration of seismic wave: 1330 gal) such as the Tokai earthquake assumed in the future will be shown. Of the seismic waveforms, there is provided a display unit 26a for displaying an earthquake having an earthquake waveform similar to that of an earthquake having a high probability of occurring in a building. The type of seismic waveform displayed on the display unit 26a is selected from the seismic wave data D3 based on the geographic information input by the input means 14. In the illustrated example, the display unit 26a displays a direct earthquake (maximum acceleration of seismic wave: 820 gal) at the time of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake.

  Further, the window 26 is provided with an input field 26b in which the seismic waveform is displayed in order to input the type of seismic waveform used for the analysis of seismic performance. In the example shown in the figure, the input field 26b displays that the waveform of a direct earthquake such as the Hanshin-Awaji Great Earthquake is used. In the input field 26b, a pull-down menu 26c is provided, and an earthquake waveform of the plate-type earthquake can be selected separately from the direct earthquake (step S13). After selecting the seismic waveform to be used for the analysis of seismic performance, a “decision” button 26 d provided on the window 26 is pressed. Thereby, the analysis of the seismic performance of the house is executed. In the example shown in FIG. 12, an example in which the earthquake waveform of the past Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and the waveform of the assumed Tokai earthquake can be selected in the input field 26b is shown. In addition to these, the area included in the earthquake wave data D3 Each seismic waveform can be selected.

  The analysis of the earthquake resistance performance of the house is performed by the evaluation means 16 based on the building information of the house stored in the storage means 15. When the “decision” button 26 d provided on the window 26 is pressed, the evaluation unit 16 extracts data corresponding to the building information and geographic information of the house from the structure data D1 stored in advance in the storage unit 15. Further, when a “decision” button 26d provided in the window 26 is pressed, as shown in FIG. 13, the deformation status and earthquake resistance performance of the house 28 to be built when an earthquake of the input type of waveform actually occurs are displayed. A window 27 for comparison with the deformation state of the low house 29 is displayed on the display screen of the output means 17. The comparison of the seismic performance of the houses 28 and 29 is performed by evaluating the simulation program P stored in the storage unit 15 based on the data extracted by the evaluation unit 16 and the seismic wave data D3 selected in the input field 26b of the window 26. This is performed by executing by the execution circuit C provided in the means 16. The evaluation result evaluated by the execution of the simulation program P is displayed in the window 27. In this window 27, the deformation status of both houses 28 and 29 due to the occurrence of the earthquake is displayed by animation (step 14). The window 27 is provided with a seismic wave display field 27b in which the seismic waveform selected in the input field 26b of the window 26 is displayed. In the seismic wave display column 27b, the waveforms of the north-south direction component and the east-west direction component of the seismic wave are respectively displayed. As the bright spot moves from right to left on the line indicating each seismic wave component in FIG. 13, the movement of the wave of each seismic wave component is indicated, and the deformation of the houses 28 and 29 corresponding to the movement of the bright spot. The state changes. Further, although not shown, the evaluation means 16 can compare the deformation state of the unit building 12 and the wooden house designed by the old building standard method when an earthquake occurs. Such a simulation of the deformation state of the house at the time of the occurrence of the earthquake can be performed using an earthquake response analysis model described in, for example, Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-161486 previously filed by the present inventor.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 1, the microcomputer 13 according to the present invention includes the above-described presenting means for presenting the result of the earthquake resistance performance and the ground diagnosis result of the house evaluated by the evaluation means 16 to the customer.

  As shown in FIGS. 14 (a) to 14 (e), the presenting means includes a diagnostic report 30 for reporting the results of analysis, evaluation and diagnosis by the evaluation means 16 to the customer. The diagnosis report 30 is created by the evaluation means 16 by pressing a “next” button 27a (see FIG. 13) provided in the window 27 for displaying the deformation status, and is displayed on the display screen by the output means 17. Is displayed. The diagnosis report 30 is composed of a total of 5 pages in the illustrated example.

  On the first page 31, as shown in FIG. 14A, the geographical information of the building site stored in the storage unit 15 and the assumed seismic intensity map 31 a around the building site are displayed. In the assumed seismic intensity map 31a, the estimated seismic intensity of earthquakes expected to occur at a high probability within the next 30 years in the building area and its surroundings are displayed in different colors for each seismic intensity. The assumed seismic intensity is calculated by multiplying the ground amplification factor displayed on the ease of shaking map 21a stored in the storage means 15 and the magnitude of shaking of the engineering base formed under the surface ground of the building area. Is done.

  The first page 31 is provided with a display field 31b for displaying the assumed seismic intensity of the building at the time of the earthquake. In the illustrated example, the assumed seismic intensity displayed in the display column 31b is stored in the storage means 15 from the ground data for each region that is included in the ground data D2 and is made public by the earthquake research promotion headquarters of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The data corresponding to the geographical information of the house is extracted by the evaluation means 16 and is determined by the evaluation means. Thereby, the danger level of the earthquake of a building area can be confirmed clearly.

  Further, the first page 31 is provided with a first evaluation column 31c for displaying an evaluation related to the assumed seismic intensity and a second evaluation column 31d for evaluating the topographic effect. In the first evaluation column 31c, the assumed seismic intensity, the degree of shaking of the house when an earthquake of the assumed seismic intensity occurs in the building site, and points for ensuring the earthquake resistance of the house with respect to the assumed seismic intensity are displayed. ing. In the second evaluation column 31d, it is displayed whether or not the building site corresponds to hilltop amplification. The point corresponding to the hilltop amplification is indicated by “□ (open square)” on the assumed seismic intensity map 31a, and it is also confirmed on the assumed seismic intensity map 31a whether the building area corresponds to the hilltop amplification. be able to. Hill amplification refers to a phenomenon in which shaking is amplified according to the unevenness of the ground when an earthquake occurs, and is particularly likely to occur at convex portions such as hills and ridges. As described in, for example, the specification of Japanese Patent Application No. 2005-168680 filed earlier by the present inventor, the hilltop amplification is based on the difference in elevation between the residential building and its surroundings. It is possible to make a terrain determination such as whether or not it is located at the tip on the ridge, the edge on the cliff, etc. Further, in the second evaluation column 31d, when the house is located on the hill, the aspect ratio that is the ratio between the elevation of the building and the distance of the building in the horizontal direction from the edge of the hill, The point when it corresponds to Agaoka amplification is displayed respectively.

  In the second page 32, as shown in FIG. 14 (b), a first comment field 32a in which explanations of the assumed seismic intensity displayed in the display field 31b and the first evaluation field 31c of the first page 31 are displayed. And a second comment field 32b in which a commentary on the hill amplification displayed in the second evaluation field 31d is displayed. In the first explanation column 31a, the degree of shaking for each assumed seismic intensity and the points to be noted at the time of the earthquake for each assumed seismic intensity are explained. In the second explanation column 32b, the aspect ratio and the points to be noted at the time of an earthquake are explained.

  The third page 33 is a page showing the landform classification of the building site as shown in FIG. On the third page 33, a terrain map 33a indicating the terrain classification of the building site and its surroundings is displayed. Each terrain division is color-coded for each division. As is well known in the art, the terrain classification is a classification classified based on the conditions of mountains and rivers. In the example shown in the figure, the geographical information of the building land of the house input by the input means 14 and the ground data It is determined by the evaluation means by collating the decision table of the Architectural Institute and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology public terrain classification stored in the storage means 15 as D2 by the evaluation means 16.

  The third page 33 is provided with a display field 33b for displaying the terrain classification of the building area. Further, the third page 33 is provided with an evaluation column 33c regarding the landform classification of the building site. In the evaluation column 33c, the terrain classification of the building area, the ground condition expected for the terrain classification, its quality, and points for reinforcing measures for the ground of the terrain classification are displayed.

  On the fourth page 34, as shown in FIG. 14 (d), there is provided a commentary column 34a for displaying a commentary on the terrain classification displayed in the display column 33b of the third page 33. In the commentary column 34a, the topographic features for each terrain classification, the expected ground situation for each terrain classification, and the judgment result of the quality of the ground are displayed. The quality of the ground can be determined by, for example, the above-mentioned determination table of the Architectural Institute.

  On the fifth page 35, as shown in FIG. 14 (e), a display field 35a for displaying a diagnosis result of the seismic performance of the house planned for construction based on the deformation state of the house evaluated by the evaluation means 16, and an earthquake resistance An evaluation column 35b for displaying the analysis result and determination of the performance, and a determination criterion column 35c in which the determination criterion of the evaluation is described are provided. The display column 33a displays the damage level of the house when an earthquake having the earthquake waveform input to the input column 26b provided in the window 26 shown in FIG. In the determination criterion column 35c, a countermeasure column 35d is provided in which a commentary on a measure for improving the structure of the house for each damage level displayed in the display column 33a is displayed. Based on the contents displayed in the evaluation column 35b, the judgment criterion column 35c, and the countermeasure column 35d, it is higher than the seismic performance of the house designed as described above by inputting the building data and the building information of the house again. A house having seismic performance can be constructed, and the seismic performance of the house after implementation of countermeasures can be presented by the presenting means.

  When the diagnostic report 30 is presented to the customer, the printed report is presented to the customer in writing by, for example, printing with a printer (not shown) (step S15). Further, the diagnostic report 30 can be presented to the customer in the state displayed on the display screen of the output means 17.

  When evaluating the seismic performance of a house when each data of the house that has been built has already been entered, by selecting "Open existing data" in the window 18 shown in FIG. The seismic performance of existing houses can be evaluated.

  According to the present embodiment, as described above, it is provided with the presenting means composed of the diagnostic report 30 for presenting the result of the earthquake resistance performance of the house which is evaluated by the evaluating means 16 and outputted by the output means 17. For example, when planning to build a house in consideration of the earthquake resistance performance, or when investigating the earthquake resistance performance of an existing house, it is easy to present the earthquake resistance performance of the house evaluated by the evaluation means 16 to the customer on the spot by the presentation means. Can be presented.

  Further, as described above, the ground of the building site is diagnosed by the evaluation unit 16 based on the geographical information of the building area of the house input by the input unit 14, and the ground diagnosis result is presented by the presentation unit. In addition to the seismic performance of the house, the ground diagnosis result of the residential building can be easily presented to the customer on the spot. Thereby, for example, when there is a plan to construct a house, it is possible to make a construction plan not only from the viewpoint of the earthquake resistance performance of the house but also from the viewpoint of the ground condition of the planned construction site.

  Further, as described above, the diagnostic report 30 presents measures for reinforcing the ground where the house is built and for improving the structure of the house based on the deformation status of the house. Since the seismic performance of the later house is presented, when making a plan to build a house in consideration of the seismic performance, for example, by presenting by the presentation means, it is possible to make a building plan more easily, When examining the seismic performance of existing houses, future seismic countermeasures can be more easily examined.

  In this embodiment, the window for selecting the type of seismic waveform used for the analysis of the seismic performance of the house is that the type of seismic waveform selected from the seismic wave data D3 based on the geographic information input by the input means 14 is the initial state. In the above example, the display unit 26a is displayed and the window 26 is provided with an input field 26b for selecting and inputting the type of seismic waveform actually used for the analysis of seismic performance. Thus, the window 36 shown in FIG. 15 can be applied to the present invention.

  In the example shown in FIG. 15, a Japan map 36 a is displayed in the window 36. The name of major earthquakes that occurred in the past, such as the Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, the Tokai Earthquake, the Chuetsu Earthquake, the Miyagi-oki Earthquake, the Great Kanto Earthquake, the Tokachi-oki Earthquake, the Tottori Earthquake, etc. It is attached to. In addition, the window 36 is provided with an input field 36b for inputting the type of earthquake used for the analysis of seismic performance. In the input field 36b, in the initial state, of the earthquakes attached to the Japan map 36a, the earthquake whose epicenter is closest to the address included in the geographic information input by the input means 14 is displayed. In the illustrated example, the selected earthquake name can be displayed in the input field 36b by moving the cursor to a desired earthquake name on the window 36 using, for example, a mouse (not shown) and clicking. In addition, the input field 36b is provided with a pull-down menu 36c that allows a desired earthquake to be selected from the above-described earthquakes, thereby replacing an earthquake used for analysis on the window 36. An earthquake different from the earthquake name displayed in the input field 36b in the initial state can be selected.

  After selecting the seismic waveform to be used for the analysis of the seismic performance, the “decision” button 36d provided on the window 36 is pressed to perform the analysis of the seismic performance of the house as described above.

  Further, in this embodiment, the present invention is applied to the seismic performance presentation system 10 in which the evaluation means 16 evaluates the evaluation result of the earthquake resistance performance of the house and the ground diagnosis result of the building, and presents them to the customer by the presentation means described above. However, instead of this, the present invention can be applied to a seismic performance presentation system in which only the evaluation result of the earthquake resistance performance of the house is evaluated by the evaluation means 16 and presented to the customer by the presentation means. .

  Furthermore, in this embodiment, each building unit 11 has an example of a frame structure, but instead of this, for example, a building unit or a non-unit type having a panel structure in which walls, floors, and ceilings are composed of panels. Can be used in the present invention.

1 is a block diagram schematically showing a seismic performance presentation system according to the present invention. It is a flowchart which shows the example which presents to the customer the evaluation of the earthquake resistance performance of the house planned to be built using the earthquake resistance performance presentation system according to the present invention. (A) is a top view which shows schematically the window for new data creation, (b) is a top view which shows schematically the window for inputting a house name. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for inputting a building area. It is a top view which shows roughly the window which shows the ease of shaking of a building area. It is a top view which shows schematically the window for selecting the kind of goods of a house. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for selecting the kind of outer wall of a house. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for selecting the kind of roof of a house. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for setting arrangement | positioning of each building unit. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for setting arrangement | positioning of the opening part to each building unit. It is a top view which shows schematically the window for setting the shape of a roof. It is a top view which shows roughly the window for selecting the seismic waveform used for analysis of seismic performance. It is a top view which shows roughly the window displayed by the animation by simulating the deformation | transformation condition of a house. It is a top view which shows roughly the 1st page of a diagnostic report. It is a top view which shows the 2nd page of a diagnostic report roughly. It is a top view which shows roughly the 3rd page of a diagnostic report. It is a top view which shows roughly the 4th page of a diagnostic report. It is a top view which shows roughly the 5th page of a diagnostic report. FIG. 13 is a plan view schematically showing an example different from the example shown in FIG. 12.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Seismic performance presentation system 14 Input means 15 Storage means 16 Evaluation means 30 Presentation means (diagnosis report)
D1 Structure data D2 Ground data D3 Seismic wave data

Claims (6)

  Corresponding to the building information input by the input means from the structure data stored in the storage means, the input means for inputting the building information, the storage means in which the building structural data and the seismic wave data are respectively stored in advance Data is extracted, and an evaluation means for evaluating the seismic performance of the building by analyzing the deformation state of the building at the time of an earthquake using the seismic wave data based on the data, and an output for outputting an evaluation result of the evaluation means And a presentation means for presenting the result of the earthquake resistance performance of the building output by the output means.   In the storage means, ground data is stored in advance, the input means inputs geographical information of the building site of the building, and the evaluation means inputs the geographical information by the input means, Data corresponding to the geographic information is extracted from the ground data, the ground diagnosis of the building site is performed, the output means outputs the ground diagnosis result of the evaluation means, and the presentation means displays the ground diagnosis result. The seismic performance presentation system according to claim 1, wherein the system is presented.   The presenting means presents measures for reinforcing the ground of the building area of the building and improving the structure of the building based on the deformation state of the building, and further presents the seismic performance of the building after the measures are implemented. The seismic performance presentation system according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that: A method of presenting seismic performance of a building,
Entering building information,
Extracting data corresponding to the input building information from the structure data;
Evaluating the seismic performance of the building by analyzing the deformation status of the building during the earthquake based on the extracted data using seismic wave data;
Outputting the evaluation results,
Presenting the output results of the seismic performance of the building;
A method for presenting seismic performance, comprising:   In addition to the building information, the geographical information of the building area of the building is input, the data corresponding to the geographical information is extracted from the ground data, the ground diagnosis is performed based on the data, and the ground diagnosis result is output and output. The seismic performance presentation method according to claim 4, wherein the ground diagnosis result is presented.   Based on the deformation status of the building, presents measures for reinforcing the ground of the building area of the building and improving the structure of the building, and further presents the seismic performance of the building after the measures are implemented. The method for presenting seismic performance according to claim 4 or 5.