JP2005259067A - Job management device and job allocation program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a job management device and a job management program for selecting a specific person in charge who takes charge of a job among a plurality of persons in charge for every area and creating person in charge allocation data in which areas to be allocated to each person in charge are recorded. <P>SOLUTION: A job management server 1 stores person in charge matrix temporary data 15 in which whether or not each person in charge can take charge of the job is recorded for every area, when he or she can take charge, priority of charge of the job in the area is recorded and job schedule matrix data 17 in which presence/absence of the job on a day when allocation of the person in charge is specified is recorded for every area, an allocation operation part 12 selects areas recorded in the job schedule matrix data 17 as the job exists one by one, selects persons in charge who can take charge of the areas and with the highest priority of charge of the job from the person in charge matrix temporary data 15 for every selected area, records the areas allocated to the selected persons in charge and creates person in charge allocation data 16. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a business management apparatus that performs business assignment by simple calculation, and a business assignment program.

In a calculation in which elements of another set B (components: B1, B2, B3,..., Bm) are assigned to an arbitrary set A (components: A1, A2, A3,..., An) one by one.
(1) Calculation is repeated an indefinite number of times (2) Randomness (equality) is obtained for correspondence of each element (3) There are a plurality of combinations that should not be associated (4) Number of association trends When the allocation calculation is performed on the condition that classification of stages is necessary, according to the conventional technique, although there are various calculation methods that satisfy the conditions (1) and (2), in addition, (3) and In order to realize the calculation method that satisfies the condition (4), a complicated algorithm including rule definition, brute force confirmation, etc. is required. In order to describe a program of a complex algorithm including the above conditions, It is known to require a significant amount of coding.

  As an example to which such a calculation method is applied, there is personnel assignment, and as this kind of technology, Patent Document 1 discloses a processing method for appropriately performing positions of personnel in consideration of variations in workers' abilities. However, in order to optimize the personnel assignment, the amount of data prepared in advance is large and the calculation amount is also very large.

  Here, as an example of personnel assignment, in a sales department of a company, a plurality of persons in charge (10 sales persons from A to J) are in charge of a plurality of tasks one by one every day, Let us assume a case in which 7 areas from a to g) are visited every day.

  It is assumed that each person in charge has an area in which the person in charge can (cannot) be assigned, and the level of strength and weakness (priority for assigning that area) of the area in charge is defined.

  In addition, there are four areas a, c, e, and f that sales representative A can handle. Of these, area f has little experience in charge (due to training), so we want to assign it with priority over other areas. Suppose there are conditions.

  Then, for a certain period (for example, one week) of this sales department, the preparatory work such as a holiday / vacation schedule applied by each sales person and preferentially assigning a specific area to someone is executed. Therefore, it is assumed that the daily work assignment is calculated so that the areas where the charge is not determined are assigned equally to the remaining charge in consideration of the priority.

  In the conventional technology, for example, which area each person can be in charge of, refer to the actual data such as which rules or parameters such as the priority in charge are registered and which area was in charge the day before. On the other hand, a general method has been realized by a series of complex logics in which the next day's charge is determined on a trial basis and this combination is evaluated to be appropriate.

However, with this conventional calculation method, the program becomes complicated when there are many rules to consider, such as when the number of persons in charge and the types of priority levels are large, the area to be visited varies depending on the day, etc. Not only does it take a long time to calculate, but it also necessitates maintenance such as the registration of new rules that were not anticipated at the time of program creation, and the review of the priority evaluation method itself, and even the maintenance of the system is often difficult.
JP 2002-149931 A

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a task management apparatus and task assignment program for assigning tasks by simple calculation.

  In order to achieve the above object, the business management device according to claim 1 selects a specific person in charge of work for each region from a plurality of persons in charge and assigns each person in charge. This is a business management device that creates assigned person assignment data in which a given area is recorded, and records whether each person can take charge of work for each area. Means for storing the person-in-charge matrix data in which the person-in-charge is recorded and the work schedule matrix data in which the presence or absence of work on the day on which the assignment of the person in charge is specified is recorded for each region; And select the person in charge who can be in charge of each area and who has the highest priority of the person in charge from the person in charge matrix data. , Characterized in that to record the area assigned to the selected person and a allocation calculating means for generating said representative allocation data.

  The business management device according to claim 2 is the business management device according to claim 1, wherein the allocation calculation means is a priority recorded for the selected person in charge. Is set so as to be lower and recorded in the person-in-charge matrix data.

  The business management device according to claim 3 is the business management device according to claim 2, wherein the storage means is a region that can be handled for each person in charge and each region that can be handled The assignable area data in which the level of proficiency of the work is recorded is stored, and the allocation calculation means resets the priority so as to become lower according to the proficiency and records it in the person-in-charge matrix data. And

  Further, the business management device according to claim 4 is the business management device according to claim 1 to claim 3, wherein the storage means is a schedule other than business in each region for each person in charge. The person-in-charge schedule data recorded is stored in the person-in-charge schedule data on the day when the person-in-charge assignment is designated. And the person-in-charge assignment data is created.

  In addition, in the business management program according to the invention described in claim 5, a specific person in charge of work for each region is selected from a plurality of persons in charge, and a region assigned to each person in charge is recorded. A business assignment program executed on a computer for creating person-in-charge assignment data, wherein the computer stores a value indicating whether each person in charge can perform work for each region. Stores person-in-charge matrix data in which values indicating the priority of business persons in the region are recorded, and work schedule matrix data in which values indicating the presence or absence of work on the day on which the assignment of persons in charge is specified are recorded for each region The business assignment program selects one area in which the value indicating the presence of business is recorded in the work schedule matrix data, and the selected business area The person in charge who has the highest value indicating the priority of the person in charge of work is selected from the person-in-charge matrix data, and the area assigned to the selected person in charge is recorded and recorded. It is made to function as an allocation calculating means for creating person-in-charge allocation data.

  Further, the business management program according to claim 6 is the business management program according to claim 5, wherein the allocation calculation means has a priority recorded for the selected person in charge. The value is subtracted by a predetermined number so as to be low and recorded in the person-in-charge matrix data.

  Further, the business management program according to claim 7 is the business management program according to claim 6, wherein the computer is configured to be in charge for each person in charge and in each area in which the person can be assigned. The responsible area data in which a value indicating the level of proficiency of work is recorded is stored, and the assignment calculation means subtracts a predetermined number of values so that the priority is lowered according to the value indicating the proficiency level, and the person in charge It is recorded in matrix data.

  The business management program according to claim 8 is the business management program according to claim 5 to claim 7, wherein the computer has a schedule other than business in each region for each person in charge. The person-in-charge schedule data recorded is stored, and the allocation calculation means selects a person in charge who has a schedule other than work in each area recorded in the person-in-charge schedule data on the day when the person-in-charge assignment is designated. The person-in-charge assignment data is created by excluding it.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to assign a person in charge without requiring a complicated calculation by preparing in advance data that records whether the priority and the person in charge are available. In addition, the priority evaluation method itself can be easily reviewed, and system maintenance can be facilitated.

  An embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. As an example of the personnel assignment, a case is assumed in which a plurality of persons in charge in a sales department of a certain company are in charge of a plurality of tasks one by one every day and go around the area in charge one by one every day.

  FIG. 1 shows the system configuration and functional configuration in this embodiment. This system includes a business management server 1, a database 2, and a plurality of clients 3, and the business management server 1 and each client 3 are connected to each other via a network 4.

  The business management server 1 has a communication function for transmitting / receiving various data to / from the client 3 via the network 4, and further includes an input data receiving unit 11, an allocation calculation unit 12, and an evaluation calculation unit 13. A storage device (not shown) for storing data files of temporary person matrix data 15, person-in-charge assignment data 16, work schedule matrix data 17, and evaluation data 18.

  The input data receiving unit 11 has a function of recording each data transmitted from the client 3 in the database 2. Specifically, the input data reception unit 11 records the area that can be handled for each person in charge in the area 21 that can be handled later, and records the work schedule of each person in the person-in-charge data 22 that will be described later. It has a function, a function of recording the presence / absence of business in each region on each day of the week in business schedule data 23 described later, and a function of recording the business performance of each person in charge in performance data 26 described later.

  The allocation calculation unit 12 creates work schedule matrix data 17 based on work schedule data 23 to be described later, and creates and updates person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 based on person matrix data 24 to be described later. The person in charge is selected according to the procedure and the person-in-charge assignment data 16 is created.

  The evaluation calculation unit 13 has a function of creating evaluation data 18 based on standard time data 25 and performance data 26 described later.

  The person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 is data that is temporarily created and updated based on the person-in-charge matrix data 24, which will be described later, and records the priority of the person in charge in each area where each person in charge can handle. (Details will be described later).

  The person-in-charge assignment data 16 is data in which the area assigned to each person in charge is recorded, and is provided to the client 3 when the client 3 is instructed to create the person-in-charge assignment data 16. (Details will be described later).

  The work schedule matrix data 17 is data that is temporarily created based on work schedule data 23 to be described later, and the date (period) specified when the client 3 is instructed to create the person-in-charge assignment data 16. The presence or absence of work is recorded for each region (details will be described later).

  The evaluation data 18 is data created on the basis of standard time data 25 and performance data 26, which will be described later, and results are recorded corresponding to the proficiency level of each person in charge (details will be described later).

  The database 2 is connected to the business management server 1, and each data file of responsible area data 21, person schedule data 22, job schedule data 23, person matrix data 24, standard time data 25, and performance data 26 is stored. Remember.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the chargeable area data 21 is data in which the area where work can be performed for each person in charge and the proficiency level of the work in the area where the service can be performed are recorded. In FIG. 2, the numerical value in parentheses is a value indicating the proficiency level in the area where the person in charge can be assigned. For example, the areas where the person in charge A can be assigned are area a, area b, and area f. As for the proficiency level in the region, the proficiency level is “3” in the region a, and the proficiency level is “1” in the region b and the region f. In this embodiment, the proficiency level is ranked in three stages from “1” to “3”, and the higher the value, the higher the proficiency level.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the person-in-charge schedule data 22 is data in which a daily schedule is recorded for each person in charge, and before the person-in-charge assignment data 16 is created, the “vacation” “ The schedule for each person in charge such as “business trip” is recorded.

  As shown in FIG. 4, the work schedule data 23 is data in which the presence / absence of work in each area is recorded for each day of the week. In FIG. Indicates that will be done. For example, on Monday, business is performed in six regions from region a to region f, but no business is performed in region g. In FIG. 4, the presence or absence of work from Monday to Saturday is recorded, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the presence or absence of work is recorded by providing a special period such as Sundays, public holidays, or summer holidays. You may do it.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the person-in-charge matrix data 24 is data in which the priority of the person in charge of the business in the area that can be handled by each person in charge is recorded for each region. This priority is indicated by a numerical value from “7” to “1”, and the higher the numerical value, the higher the priority. Further, a part having a priority of “−1” indicates that the person in charge cannot take charge of work, and coincides with an area not recorded in the chargeable area data 21.

  As shown in FIG. 6, the standard time data 25 is data in which standard work times at the respective proficiency levels “1” to “3” are recorded for each area. For example, in the area a, the proficiency level “1” is recorded. It is shown that the standard work time of 360 is 360 minutes, the standard work time of proficiency level “2” is 300 minutes, and the standard work time of proficiency level “3” is 250 minutes.

  The performance data 26 is data in which the results of daily work hours are recorded for each person in charge (details will be described later).

  The client 3 is a computer equipped with a display device such as a display. By operating communication software such as a Web browser, the client 3 transmits input data to the business management server 1 and receives various data.

  In the present embodiment, for the sake of convenience, the person in charge will be described as 10 persons from A to J and the area as 7 persons from a to g. Further, each data file of the responsible area data 21, the person-in-charge schedule data 22, the work schedule data 23, the person-in-charge matrix data 24, and the standard time data 25 is input by the administrator and recorded in the database 2 in advance. I will do it.

≪Assignment of business≫
Next, processing when creating the person-in-charge assignment data 16 will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG.

  First, the administrator inputs the date (period) and the person in charge for designating the creation of the person-in-charge assignment data 16, and the client 3 issues a request to create the person-in-charge assignment data 16 together with the date (period) in which the client 3 is entered. When transmitted to the business management server 1, the allocation calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 acquires the business schedule data 23 from the database 2, creates the business schedule matrix data 17 for the specified date (period), and stores it therein. To record.

  For example, if the designated date (period) is from May 3 (Monday) to May 8 (Saturday), the presence or absence of business in each region from Monday to Saturday is set as shown in FIG. Therefore, work schedule matrix data 17 as shown in FIG. 8 is created. In FIG. 8, a location where the value is “1” indicates that the business is performed, and a location where the value is “0” indicates that the business is not performed. It is shown that business is performed in six regions from to region f, and business is not performed in region g.

  Next, the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 acquires the person-in-charge matrix data 24 from the database 2, creates the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15, and records it in the storage device. At this stage, the value recorded in the person-in-charge matrix data 24 is used as the value of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 as it is. FIG. 9A shows the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 at this stage.

  Next, the allocation calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 acquires the person-in-charge schedule data 22 from the database 2, acquires the person in charge who cannot handle the business, and acquires the area where the business is not performed from the business schedule matrix data 17. To do. For example, on May 3rd, the person in charge G is “vacation” and the person in charge J is “in-house work” and cannot be in charge. In addition, the area g is “0” and no business is performed. The shaded portion in FIG. 9 of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 is a value that is not referred to.

  Next, the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 randomly selects one of six regions from the region a to the region f where the business is performed in the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 illustrated in FIG. The person in charge is selected (step S01), and the person in charge having the maximum value in the record of the selected area is selected as the person in charge of the selected area (step S02). For example, it is assumed that the allocation calculation unit 12 selects the region b in step S01. In the record of region b, the value is not “−1 (not in charge)” is the person in charge A, the person in charge B, and the person in charge I, and the person in charge whose value is “7” has the maximum value. Since it is person A, person in charge of area b is person A. When there are a plurality of the same values, they are selected at random or in the order of detection.

  Next, the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 updates the person-in-charge assignment data 16 and the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 (step S03). In the above example, the assignment calculation unit 12 records “b” indicating the region b in the person-in-charge A column on May 3 in the person-in-charge assignment data 16. In addition, a predetermined number of values in the area b and person A fields of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 are subtracted and updated. About the number to subtract, you may set by proficiency, for example. By subtracting “1” if the proficiency level in the area in charge is “3”, subtracting “2” if the proficiency level is “2”, and subtracting “4” if the proficiency level is “1”, There are fewer opportunities to deal with poor areas. In addition, the higher the proficiency level, the greater the opportunity to take charge of areas that are not good at increasing the value to be subtracted. When the value of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 becomes “0” or less as a result of the subtraction, it is updated to “7”.

  Next, the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 updates the business schedule matrix data 17 (step S04). Since the person in charge of the area b is set to the person in charge A in step S02, the allocation calculation unit 12 updates the value of the area b on May 3 to “0”.

  Next, the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 determines whether or not the person in charge is assigned to all the regions (step S05). If not assigned, the process proceeds to step S01 to perform the same process, and the person in charge is assigned. select. Similar processing is repeated.

  Assume that individual regions are randomly selected in the order described on the left side of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 in FIG. If the region a is selected next to the region b, the person in charge D (value is “7”) has the largest value in the record of the region a, and therefore the person in charge D is in charge of the region a. Next, assuming that the area e is selected, the person B and the person C (whose value is “7”) have the largest value in the record for the area e. Is selected (here, the person in charge C is selected). Next, if the area c is selected, the person in charge B (value is “1”) has the largest value in the record of the area c, and therefore the person in charge B is in charge of the area c. Next, assuming that the area d is selected, the person in charge E (value is “7”) has the largest value in the record of the area d, and therefore the person in charge E is in charge of the area d. Finally, when the region f is selected, the person in charge F (value is “7”) has the largest value in the record of the region f, and therefore the person in charge F is in charge of the region f.

  Also, the value of the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 is “-1” by subtracting “2” from “7” from “7” in the case of person A and “1” in the case of person B. Is changed from “7” to “3” for the person in charge C, from “7” to “5” for the person in charge D, and from “7” to “7” in the case of person in charge E. In the case of the person in charge F, the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 shown in FIG. 9 (2) is created by subtracting from "7" to "5" according to the respective proficiency levels.

  In this manner, the person in charge matrix temporary data 15 is sequentially updated as shown in FIGS. 9 (1) to (2), (3), (4). The person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 after all the persons in charge in each area from May 3 to May 8 are selected is recorded with the values shown in FIG. Is as shown in FIG.

  The data shown in FIG. 11 is person-in-charge assignment data 16, and the assignment calculation unit 12 of the business management server 1 assigns persons in charge to all areas on the specified date (period), and then assigns the person-in-charge data. 16 is output to the client 3 (step S06). Further, the assignment calculation unit 12 records the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 as the person-in-charge matrix data 24 in the database 2 and deletes the person-in-charge matrix temporary data 15 and the work schedule matrix data 17 from the storage device.

  The shaded portion in FIG. 11 indicates that the area in charge of the person in charge has not been assigned. In the present embodiment, since the regions are selected in a random order, there is a possibility that the person in charge cannot be selected. In this case, error information indicating that the person in charge could not be selected is assigned to the person-in-charge assignment data 16. It is recorded, and the selection process of the person in charge in the area is canceled and the process shifts to the selection process in the next area.

≪Registration of achievements≫
In this system, the work time can be recorded from the client 3 to the work management server 1 as a work result.

  First, the date (period) when the manager registers the result, the person in charge, and the individual work time are input, and the client 3 records the result data 26 together with the input date (period), the person in charge, and the individual work time. When the request for recording is transmitted to the business management server 1, the evaluation calculation unit 13 of the business management server 1 records the received work time in the performance data 26 of the database 2. FIG. 12 shows the result data 26. The location where the work time is recorded is the same as the location where the area in charge is recorded in the person assignment data 16 created earlier. In FIG. 12, the shaded portion indicates that the area in charge is not assigned and the work time is not recorded.

  In addition, the evaluation calculation unit 13 of the business management server 1 records the work time in the result data 26, and then acquires the chargeable area data 21 and the standard time data 25 to create the evaluation data 18. As shown in FIG. 13, the evaluation data 18 records the results corresponding to the proficiency level of each person in charge. For example, the area in charge of the person in charge A on May 3 is the area b, but the proficiency level of the person in charge A in the area b is “1”, and the result is 280 minutes. On the other hand, the standard work time of proficiency level “1” in region b is 265 minutes, and the actual work time exceeds the standard work time by about 6%. In FIG. 13, “b (2) + 6%” indicates that the actual result exceeds 6% of the standard working time of the proficiency level “2” in the region b. “3) -6%” indicates that the actual performance has been reduced by 6% with respect to the standard working time of the proficiency level “3” in the region g.

  After creating the evaluation data 18, the evaluation calculation unit 13 of the business management server 1 outputs the evaluation data 18 to the client 3. The client 3 that has received the evaluation data 18 displays the evaluation data 18 on the display, but the administrator can grasp the proficiency level of each person in charge by viewing the evaluation data 18. It is also possible to grasp the degree of occurrence of work load for each region and each day of the week. Furthermore, it is also possible to use it as reference material when updating the proficiency level value of the chargeable area data 21.

  In the present embodiment, the client 3 server system has been described as an example. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the above-described processing may be performed by one computer.

  The business management server 1 may be realized by causing a general-purpose computer to execute a business management program (an input data reception program, an allocation calculation program, and an evaluation calculation program) describing the above functions. This business management program may be read from a recording medium and executed by a general-purpose computer, or may be transmitted from the outside via the network 4 and executed by the general-purpose computer.

It is a figure which shows the structure of a system, and a function structure. It is a figure which shows charge area data. It is a figure which shows a person in charge schedule data. It is a figure which shows work schedule data. It is a figure which shows a person in charge matrix data. It is a figure which shows standard time data. It is a flowchart which shows the process at the time of assigning a person in charge. It is a figure which shows work schedule matrix data. It is a figure which shows a person in charge matrix temporary data. It is a figure which shows the person in charge matrix data after a person in charge setting. It is a figure which shows a person in charge allocation data. It is a figure which shows track record data. It is a figure which shows evaluation data.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Business management server, 2 ... Database, 3 ... Client, 4 ... Network, 11 ... Input data reception part, 12 ... Assignment operation part, 13 ... Evaluation operation part, 15 ... Person in charge matrix temporary data, 16 ... Person in charge assignment Data, 17 ... Business schedule matrix data, 18 ... Evaluation data, 21 ... Available area data, 22 ... Person schedule data, 23 ... Business schedule data, 24 ... Person matrix data, 25 ... Standard time data, 26 ... Actual data

Claims (8)

A business management device for selecting a specific person in charge of work for each region from a plurality of persons in charge and creating person assignment data in which the region assigned to each person is recorded,
Whether or not each person in charge can handle the work for each region is recorded, and if it can be done, person matrix data in which the priority of the person in charge in the region is recorded,
Work schedule matrix data in which the presence or absence of work on the day on which the assignment of the person in charge is specified is recorded for each region,
Storage means for storing
Select one area that is recorded as having work in the work schedule matrix data one by one, and in charge of the person in charge who can take charge of that area and has the highest priority in charge of the work. Assigning calculation means for selecting the person-in-charge matrix data, recording the area assigned to the selected person in charge and creating the person-in-charge assignment data;
A business management apparatus comprising:   2. The business management according to claim 1, wherein the assignment calculation unit resets the priority recorded for the selected person in charge to be low and records it in the person-in-charge matrix data. 3. apparatus. The storage means stores area that can be handled for each person in charge, and area data that can be handled in which the proficiency level of work in each area that can be handled is recorded,
The work management apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the assignment calculation unit resets the priority so as to become lower according to the proficiency level, and records it in the person-in-charge matrix data. The storage means stores person-in-charge schedule data in which schedules other than work in each region are recorded for each person in charge,
The assignment calculation means creates the person-in-charge assignment data by excluding the person in charge who has recorded a schedule other than the work in each region in the person-in-charge schedule data on the day when assignment of the person in charge is specified. The business management apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the business management apparatus is configured as described above. A business assignment program that is executed on a computer that selects a specific person in charge of work for each region from a plurality of persons and creates person assignment data in which the region assigned to each person is recorded Because
The computer
A value indicating whether or not each person in charge can handle the work for each region is recorded, and if it can be handled, person matrix data in which a value indicating the priority of the person in charge in the region is recorded,
Work schedule matrix data in which values indicating the presence or absence of work on the day on which the assignment of the person in charge is designated are recorded for each region;
Remember
The business assignment program causes the computer to
Select one area in which the value indicating the presence of work is recorded in the work schedule matrix data, and the person in charge of the area can be assigned to the selected area and the value indicating the priority of the work charge is the highest. Assigning calculation means for selecting a person from the person-in-charge matrix data, recording an area assigned to the selected person in charge and creating the person-in-charge assignment data;
A business management program characterized by functioning.   6. The allocation calculation means subtracts a predetermined number of values so as to lower the priority recorded for the selected person in charge, and records the result in the person-in-charge matrix data. Business management program. The computer stores chargeable area data in which a value indicating the proficiency level of the work in each area where the charge can be handled and the chargeable area for each responsible person is recorded,
7. The business management program according to claim 6, wherein the allocation calculation means subtracts a predetermined number of values so as to lower the priority according to the value indicating the proficiency level, and records the result in the person-in-charge matrix data. . The computer stores person schedule data in which schedules other than work in each region are recorded for each person in charge,
The assignment calculation means creates the person-in-charge assignment data by excluding the person in charge who has recorded a schedule other than the work in each region in the person-in-charge schedule data on the day when assignment of the person in charge is specified. The business management program according to claim 5, wherein: