JP2001307284A - System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive device - Google Patents
System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive deviceInfo
- Publication number
- JP2001307284A JP2001307284A JP2000125087A JP2000125087A JP2001307284A JP 2001307284 A JP2001307284 A JP 2001307284A JP 2000125087 A JP2000125087 A JP 2000125087A JP 2000125087 A JP2000125087 A JP 2000125087A JP 2001307284 A JP2001307284 A JP 2001307284A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- magnetic
- lane
- marker
- road
- failure detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 title abstract 2
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005389 magnetism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001771 impaired effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009191 jumping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、自動車の車線逸脱
防止装置の障害検知システムに関するものである。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a failure detection system for a lane departure prevention device of an automobile.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来、自動車を車線中央に沿って走行す
るように制御する車線逸脱防止システムは、車線中央位
置から自動車進行方向に対して左右方向への変異を計測
するために自動車の底面に磁気センサを搭載し、道路側
に磁気信号を発する磁気マーカを配置するようにしてい
る。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a lane departure prevention system for controlling a vehicle to travel along the center of the lane is provided on the bottom of the vehicle in order to measure deviation from the center of the lane to the left or right direction with respect to the traveling direction of the vehicle. A magnetic sensor is mounted, and a magnetic marker that emits a magnetic signal is arranged on the road side.
【0003】一般的に、自動車の底面に搭載される磁気
センサは車幅方向に数個を一列に並べて設置される。そ
れぞれの磁気センサは、道路側に設置された磁気マーカ
が発生する磁気を検出し、各磁気センサで検出した磁気
強度の違いを、予め制御装置に設定されている、磁気強
度と自動車の磁気マーカからのずれ量の相関関係情報に
照らし合わせることで、磁気マーカと自動車の左右方向
の位置関係を導き出す方式が用いられている。Generally, several magnetic sensors mounted on the bottom of an automobile are arranged in a row in the vehicle width direction. Each magnetic sensor detects the magnetism generated by a magnetic marker installed on the road side, and the difference between the magnetic intensities detected by each magnetic sensor is set in the control device in advance. A method of deriving the positional relationship between the magnetic marker and the vehicle in the left-right direction by comparing the information with the correlation information of the deviation amount from the vehicle is used.
【0004】この磁気マーカと自動車の位置検出精度を
高めるためには、同一車両に搭載された複数の磁気セン
サと、磁気センサからの出力信号を磁気強度に変換する
電子回路の特性が均一であることが求められると共に、
実際に車両に搭載し、動作させた上で、車両固有の磁気
への影響を含めて、特性を均一とする調整を厳密に実施
する必要がある。In order to improve the position detection accuracy of the magnetic marker and the vehicle, the characteristics of a plurality of magnetic sensors mounted on the same vehicle and an electronic circuit for converting an output signal from the magnetic sensor into magnetic strength are uniform. Is required,
It is necessary to rigorously perform the adjustment to make the characteristics uniform, including the effect on the magnetism inherent in the vehicle, after actually mounting and operating the vehicle.
【0005】[0005]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、温度変
化、信号、石や水の跳ね上げ、物体への接触等、厳しい
環境の中で車両に搭載される複数の装置の特性を均一に
維持し続けることは非常に困難である。しかし、車線逸
脱防止という安全性に関わる機能を提供するためには、
一定の特性の維持は必須であり、特性の均一性が損なわ
れた場合には、これを速やかに検知し、障害として通報
する必要がある。However, the characteristics of a plurality of devices mounted on a vehicle in a severe environment such as a temperature change, a signal, jumping of stones or water, contact with an object, etc., are maintained uniformly. It is very difficult. However, to provide safety-related functions such as lane departure prevention,
It is essential to maintain certain characteristics, and when the uniformity of characteristics is impaired, it is necessary to detect this promptly and report it as a failure.
【0006】しかも、必要なのは、道路に設置された磁
気マーカと自動車に搭載された検出器との間の特性の維
持であるため、仮に道路に設置された磁気マーカを用い
ずに、磁気マーカを擬似する試験装置を車載して、専用
の論理を用いて自動車側だけで擬似的に特性を検査した
のでは正確性に欠ける。Further, since it is necessary to maintain the characteristics between the magnetic marker installed on the road and the detector mounted on the automobile, the magnetic marker is not used without using the magnetic marker installed on the road. If a simulated test device is mounted on a vehicle and the characteristics are simulated only on the vehicle side using a dedicated logic, the accuracy is lacking.
【0007】しかし、特性の検査だけのために頻繁に検
査場や修理工場等に通うことは、自動車のユーザに対し
時間的、経済的負担を招く。[0007] However, frequent visits to an inspection site, a repair shop, or the like only for the inspection of characteristics causes a time and economic burden on the user of the automobile.
【0008】そこで、道路に設置された磁気マーカと車
載された磁気センサ及び制御装置を用い、一般的な自動
車ユーザの通常の走行パターンの中で、簡易な方法で特
性の検査ができる仕組みが必要となる。[0008] Therefore, there is a need for a mechanism capable of inspecting characteristics by a simple method using a magnetic marker installed on a road and a magnetic sensor and a control device mounted on a vehicle in a normal running pattern of a general automobile user. Becomes
【0009】本発明は、上記状況に鑑みて、道路に設置
された磁気マーカと車載された磁気センサ及び制御装置
を用い、簡易な方法で特性の確実な検査ができる車線逸
脱防止装置の障害検知システムを提供することを目的と
する。The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances and provides a method for detecting a failure of a lane departure prevention device capable of reliably inspecting characteristics by a simple method using a magnetic marker installed on a road, a magnetic sensor and a control device mounted on a vehicle. The purpose is to provide a system.
【0010】[0010]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、上記目的を達
成するために、 〔1〕車線逸脱防止装置の障害検知システムにおいて、
車線逸脱防止装置の障害検出試験の開始と終了を車載の
制御装置に通知するために、道路に車線幅いっぱいに、
しかも一直線かつ一定間隔に並べて敷設する複数の磁気
マーカを有する区間と、前記障害検出試験の開始と終了
を通知する複数の磁気マーカ敷設区間の間の区間に配置
され、道路に車線中央を示す磁気マーカと、車線中央以
外を示す磁気マーカを交互に敷設する磁気マーカを有す
る区間とを配置し、車線逸脱防止機能実行中に、複数の
磁気センサから同時に一定レベル以上の磁気強度信号を
受信した際に、それを障害検出試験開始要求と判断し、
道路に車線中央を示す磁気マーカと、車線中央以外を示
す磁気マーカを交互に検出し、毎回最新の、磁気マーカ
からの磁気強度信号と車線中央以外の磁気マーカからの
磁気強度信号を比較し、自動車の左右方向のずれに影響
されない障害判定を行い、複数の磁気センサから同時に
一定レベル以上の磁気強度信号を受信した際に、それを
障害検出試験終了要求と判断することを特徴とする。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides: (1) a failure detection system for a lane departure prevention device,
To notify the on-board controller of the start and end of the lane departure prevention device failure detection test, fill the road with the full lane width,
In addition, a magnetic field indicating a lane center on a road is arranged in a section between a section having a plurality of magnetic markers laid in a straight line and at regular intervals and a section having a plurality of magnetic markers laid to notify start and end of the failure detection test. When a marker and a section having a magnetic marker in which magnetic markers indicating other than the center of the lane are alternately laid are arranged, and when a lane departure prevention function is being executed, a magnetic intensity signal of a certain level or more is simultaneously received from a plurality of magnetic sensors. At the same time, it is determined that the failure detection test start request,
Magnetic markers indicating the center of the lane on the road and magnetic markers indicating other than the center of the lane are detected alternately, and the latest magnetic intensity signal from the magnetic marker and the magnetic intensity signal from the magnetic marker other than the center of the lane are compared each time. It is characterized in that a failure determination is made that is not affected by the shift of the vehicle in the left-right direction, and when a magnetic strength signal of a certain level or more is received simultaneously from a plurality of magnetic sensors, it is determined to be a failure detection test end request.
【0011】[0011]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の実施の形態につい
て図を参照しながら詳細に説明する。Embodiments of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings.
【0012】図1は本発明の実施例を示す道路へ敷設す
る磁気マーカの配置形態と、自動車へ搭載される磁気セ
ンサ及び制御装置の搭載形態を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a view showing an arrangement of magnetic markers laid on a road and an embodiment of a magnetic sensor and a control device mounted on an automobile according to an embodiment of the present invention.
【0013】道路10の検査開始区間Fへは、自動車1
1の進行方向と垂直に、磁気マーカ(●印)1を車線幅
いっぱいとなる様に一直線上に等間隔で並べて敷設す
る。この場合、各々の磁気マーカ1間の距離Xは、一般
的な自動車11の全幅を4当分程度にしたものとする。
この列を誤検出防止のために、2列以上敷設する。な
お、1列目F−1と2列目F−2は自動車11の進行方
向と垂直の方向へ、マーカ間距離の2分の1ずらして、
一直線に敷設することで無検出となることを回避する。[0013] To the inspection start section F of the road 10, the automobile 1
The magnetic markers (marked with ●) are laid at regular intervals on a straight line so as to fill the lane width, perpendicular to the traveling direction of the vehicle. In this case, it is assumed that the distance X between the magnetic markers 1 is equivalent to about four equivalents of the entire width of the general automobile 11.
Two or more rows are laid to prevent erroneous detection. The first column F-1 and the second column F-2 are shifted in the direction perpendicular to the traveling direction of the automobile 11 by half the distance between the markers,
By laying in a straight line, it is possible to avoid non-detection.
【0014】道路10の検査実施区間Gには、磁気マー
カ1を自動車の進行方向と並行に車線の中央と、自動車
の横幅方向へ左右に各々距離X、2X、3XとXずつ間
隔を増加させ、自動車の進行方向に等間隔Yで敷設す
る。In the inspection section G of the road 10, the distance between the magnetic marker 1 and the center of the lane is increased in parallel with the traveling direction of the vehicle and the distance X, 2X, 3X and X are increased in the lateral direction of the vehicle. Laid at equal intervals Y in the traveling direction of the automobile.
【0015】道路10の検査終了区間Hへは、検査開始
区間Fと同一の形態で、磁気マーカ1を敷設する。The magnetic marker 1 is laid on the road H at the inspection end section H in the same manner as the inspection start section F.
【0016】自動車11には、5個程度の磁気センサ1
2(A,B,C,D,E)を車幅方向に等間隔に搭載す
ると共に、図2に示すような検出論理を持つ制御装置1
3を搭載し、これらを電気的に接続する。The car 11 has about five magnetic sensors 1
2 (A, B, C, D, E) are mounted at equal intervals in the vehicle width direction, and the control device 1 has a detection logic as shown in FIG.
3 are mounted, and these are electrically connected.
【0017】以下、この車線逸脱防止装置の障害検知シ
ステムの動作について説明する。Hereinafter, the operation of the fault detection system for the lane departure prevention device will be described.
【0018】図2は本発明の車線逸脱防止装置の障害検
知システムの車載の制御装置に組み込む検査論理のフロ
ーチャート、図3は図1に示した道路上を自動車が通過
する場合に制御装置において実施される処理を具体的に
示す図である。FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the inspection logic incorporated in the on-vehicle control device of the fault detection system of the lane departure prevention device according to the present invention. FIG. 3 is implemented by the control device when the vehicle passes on the road shown in FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram specifically showing processing to be performed.
【0019】自動車11は車線逸脱防止を目的として磁
気マーカ1が設置されている道路10においては、車線
中央からの逸脱量を監視している(ステップS1)。こ
れが、図1に示す検査開始区間Fにさしかかると、制御
装置13は複数の磁気センサ12から同時に一定レベル
以上の磁気強度信号を受信する(ステップS2)。この
現象が、規定回数連続した場合(ステップS3)、これ
を障害検出試験開始要求と判断し、車線逸脱防止機能を
一時中断し、磁気センサ12及び制御装置13自体の障
害検出試験を開始する(ステップS4)。図3におい
て、障害検出試験開始後、制御装置13は最初の磁気マ
ーカ1を検出したかどうかをチェックする(ステップS
5)。検出した場合、磁気センサCを仮に基準センサと
決定(ステップS6)した後、障害検出終了区間Hを通
過するまで、順次全磁気センサ12で磁気マーカ1を検
出し、磁気強度を求めていく(ステップS7)。なお、
ステップS2,S3においてNOの場合には、ステップ
S1へ戻る。The vehicle 11 monitors the amount of deviation from the center of the lane on the road 10 on which the magnetic marker 1 is installed for the purpose of preventing lane departure (step S1). When this reaches the inspection start section F shown in FIG. 1, the control device 13 receives a magnetic intensity signal of a certain level or more from the plurality of magnetic sensors 12 at the same time (step S2). If this phenomenon has continued for a specified number of times (step S3), this is determined as a failure detection test start request, the lane departure prevention function is temporarily suspended, and the failure detection test of the magnetic sensor 12 and the control device 13 itself is started ( Step S4). In FIG. 3, after starting the failure detection test, the control device 13 checks whether or not the first magnetic marker 1 has been detected (Step S).
5). If it is detected, after temporarily determining the magnetic sensor C as the reference sensor (step S6), the magnetic markers 1 are sequentially detected by the all magnetic sensors 12 and the magnetic strength is obtained until the magnetic sensor C passes the fault detection end section H (step S6). Step S7). In addition,
If NO in steps S2 and S3, the process returns to step S1.
【0020】さらに、複数の磁気マーカ1を自動車11
の進行方向と垂直に一列に並べた場合、これらの磁気マ
ーカ1間の距離によっては、相互に干渉を起こす可能性
がある。つまり、複数の磁気マーカ1から同時に車載の
磁気センサ12で検出した磁気強度は、単一の磁気マー
カ1を検出した場合と異なることが考えられる。従っ
て、複数の磁気マーカ1から同時に磁気強度を得たとし
ても、これを障害試験に用いるべきではない。Further, a plurality of magnetic markers 1 are
When the magnetic markers 1 are arranged in a line in a direction perpendicular to the traveling direction, there is a possibility that mutual interference will occur depending on the distance between these magnetic markers 1. That is, the magnetic intensity detected by the on-vehicle magnetic sensor 12 from the plurality of magnetic markers 1 at the same time may be different from the case where the single magnetic marker 1 is detected. Therefore, even if the magnetic intensities are obtained simultaneously from the plurality of magnetic markers 1, they should not be used for the failure test.
【0021】図3に示す検査区間Gの区間1では、基準
センサCで検査マーカ1−1の磁気強度C−1−1を求
め、センサDで検査マーカ1−2の磁気強度D−1−2
を求める(ステップS8,S9,S10)。この磁気強
度C−1−1と磁気強度D−1−2の比率(ステップS
11)が、あらかじめ制御装置に設定された許容範囲以
内に収まっていれば検査は正常終了と判断し(ステップ
S12)、それ以外の場合はセンサD障害と判断する
(ステップS14)。In section 1 of the inspection section G shown in FIG. 3, the magnetic intensity C-1-1 of the inspection marker 1-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C, and the magnetic intensity D-1-1 of the inspection marker 1-2 is obtained by the sensor D. 2
(Steps S8, S9, S10). The ratio of this magnetic intensity C-1-1 to the magnetic intensity D-1-2 (step S
If 11) falls within the allowable range preset in the control device, it is determined that the inspection has been completed normally (step S12), otherwise, it is determined that the sensor D has failed (step S14).
【0022】図3に示す区間2では、基準センサCで検
査マーカ2−1の磁気強度C−2−1を求め、センサE
で検査マーカ2−2の磁気強度E−2−2を求める。こ
の磁気強度C−2−1と磁気強度E−2−2の比率が、
あらかじめ制御装置に設定された許容範囲以内に収まっ
ていれば検査は正常終了と判断し、それ以外の場合はセ
ンサE障害と判断する。In a section 2 shown in FIG. 3, the magnetic intensity C-2-1 of the inspection marker 2-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C, and the sensor E
Is used to determine the magnetic intensity E-2-2 of the inspection marker 2-2. The ratio between the magnetic intensity C-2-1 and the magnetic intensity E-2-2 is
If it falls within the allowable range set in the control device in advance, it is determined that the inspection is completed normally. Otherwise, it is determined that the sensor E has failed.
【0023】図3に示す区間3では、基準センサCで検
査マーカ3−1の磁気強度C−3−1は求まるが、検査
マーカ3−2から十分な磁気強度がどの磁気センサから
も得られないため、判断は実施しない。In section 3 shown in FIG. 3, although the magnetic intensity C-3-1 of the inspection marker 3-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C, a sufficient magnetic intensity is obtained from any of the magnetic sensors from the inspection marker 3-2. No judgment is made because there is no such information.
【0024】図3に示す区間4では、基準センサCで検
査マーカ4−1の磁気強度C−4−1を求め、センサB
で検査マーカ4−2の磁気強度B−4−2を求める。こ
の磁気強度C−4−1と磁気強度B−4−2の比率が、
あらかじめ制御装置に設定された許容範囲以内に収まっ
ていれば検査は正常終了と判断し、それ以外の場合はセ
ンサB障害と判断する。In a section 4 shown in FIG. 3, the magnetic intensity C-4-1 of the inspection marker 4-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C,
To determine the magnetic intensity B-4-2 of the inspection marker 4-2. The ratio between the magnetic strength C-4-1 and the magnetic strength B-4-2 is
If it falls within the allowable range set in the control device in advance, it is determined that the inspection has been completed normally. Otherwise, it is determined that the sensor B has failed.
【0025】図3に示す区間5では、基準センサCで検
査マーカ5−1の磁気強度C−5−1を求め、センサA
で検査マーカ5−2の磁気強度A−5−2を求める。こ
の磁気強度C−5−1と磁気強度A−5−2の比率が、
あらかじめ制御装置に設定された許容範囲以内に収まっ
ていれば検査は正常終了と判断し、それ以外の場合はセ
ンサA障害と判断する。In a section 5 shown in FIG. 3, the magnetic intensity C-5-1 of the inspection marker 5-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C, and the sensor A
Obtains the magnetic intensity A-5-2 of the inspection marker 5-2. The ratio between the magnetic strength C-5-1 and the magnetic strength A-5-2 is
If it is within the allowable range set in the control device in advance, it is determined that the inspection is completed normally, and otherwise, it is determined that the sensor A has failed.
【0026】図3に示す区間6では、基準センサCで検
査マーカ6−1の磁気強度C−6−1は求まるが、検査
マーカ6−2から十分な磁気強度がどの磁気センサから
も得られないため、判断は実施しない。In a section 6 shown in FIG. 3, although the magnetic intensity C-6-1 of the inspection marker 6-1 is obtained by the reference sensor C, a sufficient magnetic intensity is obtained from any of the magnetic sensors from the inspection marker 6-2. No judgment is made because there is no such information.
【0027】その後、自動車11の制御装置13は複数
の磁気センサ12から同時に一定の磁気強度信号を受信
する。この現象が、障害検出試験状態において、規定回
数連続した場合、これを障害検出試験終了要求と判断
し、障害検出試験を終了すると共に、それまでの判断結
果を基に障害センサ番号あるいは、検査正常終了をドラ
イバに通報した後、車線逸脱防止機能を再開し通常の動
作に復帰する。Thereafter, the control device 13 of the automobile 11 receives a constant magnetic intensity signal from the plurality of magnetic sensors 12 at the same time. If this phenomenon continues for a specified number of times in the failure detection test state, this is determined as a failure detection test termination request, the failure detection test is terminated, and the failure sensor number or normal After notifying the driver of the end, the lane departure prevention function is restarted and the operation returns to the normal operation.
【0028】なお、最終的に制御装置13が、基準セン
サと仮定したセンサC以外の、ABDE全てが障害と判
断した場合は、基準と仮定したセンサCが障害であると
通報する。When the control device 13 finally determines that all the ABDEs are faulty except for the sensor C assumed to be the reference sensor, the controller 13 reports that the sensor C assumed to be the reference is faulty.
【0029】最後に、検査終了区間Hに入り、複数のセ
ンサから同時に信号を受信し(ステップS15)、規定
回数連続で信号受信し(ステップS16)、障害センサ
が無いかをチェックし(ステップS17)、ステップS
17において障害センサが無い場合には、全センサ正常
を通知し、ステップS1へ戻る。ステップS17におい
て障害センサがある場合には、障害を通知(障害センサ
番号を通知)する(ステップS19)。Finally, the operation enters the inspection end section H, receives signals from a plurality of sensors simultaneously (step S15), receives signals continuously for a specified number of times (step S16), and checks whether there is any fault sensor (step S17). ), Step S
If there is no faulty sensor in 17, all sensors are notified of normality, and the process returns to step S1. If there is a failure sensor in step S17, the failure is notified (notification of the failure sensor number) (step S19).
【0030】このように、あらかじめ自動車11側に障
害検出試験用の論理を組み込んでおくことにより、道路
10に車線逸脱防止用マーカ1を試験用の形態で敷設す
れば、該当区間を自動車11が通過するだけで車線逸脱
防止装置の試験を実施することができ、障害を検出する
ことができる。As described above, by incorporating the logic for the failure detection test on the vehicle 11 side in advance, if the lane departure prevention marker 1 is laid on the road 10 in the test mode, the vehicle 11 will The test of the lane departure prevention device can be performed only by passing the vehicle, and a failure can be detected.
【0031】検査実施区間Gにおいて、自動車11及び
基準とする磁気センサが、車線の中央に敷設された磁気
マーカ1の直上を誤差無く通過するとは限らない。仮
に、検査実施区間Gの最初にのみ車線中央に磁気マーカ
1を敷設する形態とした場合、通過中の自動車11の横
ずれに伴って、基準とするセンサで最初に得た磁気強度
は実体とは異なるものとなり、障害判定の精度を低下さ
せる。これに対し本発明では、車線中央と、車線中央以
外に磁気マーカを交互に敷設することにより、横ずれに
よる変化分を含んだ磁気強度を毎回得た上で比較ができ
るため、障害判定の精度低下を防止することが可能であ
る。 (利用形態)上記実施例では、磁気マーカと磁気センサ
を用いての車線逸脱防止装置について説明したが、磁気
に限らず、電波、光、超音波、音波等の強度を検出する
システムに対してもマーカの敷設形態と制御装置の試験
論理を適用することができる。In the inspection section G, the vehicle 11 and the reference magnetic sensor do not always pass directly above the magnetic marker 1 laid in the center of the lane without error. If the magnetic marker 1 is laid at the center of the lane only at the beginning of the inspection section G, the magnetic intensity first obtained by the reference sensor with the lateral displacement of the passing vehicle 11 is not the actual substance. This is different, and lowers the accuracy of the fault determination. On the other hand, in the present invention, by alternately laying the magnetic markers at the center of the lane and other than at the center of the lane, the magnetic intensity including the change due to the lateral displacement can be obtained and compared each time, so that the accuracy of the fault determination is reduced. Can be prevented. (Usage Form) In the above embodiment, the lane departure prevention device using the magnetic marker and the magnetic sensor has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to magnetism, but may be applied to a system for detecting the intensity of radio waves, light, ultrasonic waves, sound waves, and the like. Also, the marker laying form and the test logic of the control device can be applied.
【0032】また、この実施例では、障害検出試験区間
を道路に適用したが、道路に限らず、ガソリンスタン
ド、カーディーラー、カー用品店等の路面に同一の配置
形態でマーカを敷設することで、同一の効果が得られる
と共に、自動車ユーザの利便性を更に高めることができ
る。Further, in this embodiment, the fault detection test section is applied to a road. However, the present invention is not limited to the road, and the markers may be laid in the same arrangement form on a road surface such as a gas station, a car dealer, and a car supply store. The same effect can be obtained, and the convenience for the automobile user can be further improved.
【0033】更に、この実施例では、障害検出試験と障
害通報を説明したが、試験によって得られた各磁気セン
サと電子回路の特性の違いを基に、特性を均一化させる
論理及び処理と電子回路を追加組み込みすることで、校
正機能を実現することができる。Further, in this embodiment, the failure detection test and the failure notification have been described. However, based on the difference between the characteristics of each magnetic sensor and the electronic circuit obtained by the test, logic and processing for equalizing the characteristics and the electronic circuit are performed. A calibration function can be realized by additionally incorporating a circuit.
【0034】なお、本発明は上記実施例に限定されるも
のではなく、本発明の趣旨に基づいて種々の変形が可能
であり、これらを本発明の範囲から排除するものではな
い。It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, but various modifications are possible based on the spirit of the present invention, and these are not excluded from the scope of the present invention.
【0035】[0035]
【発明の効果】以上、詳細に説明したように、本発明に
よれば、道路に設置された磁気マーカと車載された磁気
センサ及び制御装置を用い、簡易な方法で特性の確実な
検査を行うことができる。As described in detail above, according to the present invention, a reliable inspection of characteristics is performed by a simple method using a magnetic marker installed on a road, a magnetic sensor and a control device mounted on a vehicle. be able to.
【0036】したがって、車線逸脱防止装置の一定の特
性の維持を道路の走行時に実行することができ、その特
性の均一性が損なわれた場合には、これを速やかに検知
し、障害として通報することができる。Therefore, it is possible to maintain certain characteristics of the lane departure prevention device during traveling on the road, and when the uniformity of the characteristics is impaired, this is quickly detected and reported as a failure. be able to.
【0037】しかも、特性の検査だけのために頻繁に検
査場や修理工場等に通うことから解放されるため、自動
車のユーザに対する時間的、経済的負担をかけることが
なくなり、その実用的効果は著大である。In addition, since the user is freed from frequently going to an inspection place or a repair shop only for inspecting the characteristics, no time and economic burden is imposed on the user of the vehicle, and the practical effect is not obtained. It is huge.
【図1】本発明の実施例を示す道路へ敷設する磁気マー
カの配置形態と、自動車へ搭載される磁気センサ及び制
御装置の搭載形態を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an arrangement of a magnetic marker laid on a road and an installation of a magnetic sensor and a control device mounted on an automobile according to an embodiment of the present invention.
【図2】本発明の車線逸脱防止装置の障害検知システム
の車載の制御装置に組み込む検査論理のフローチャート
である。FIG. 2 is a flowchart of an inspection logic incorporated in a vehicle-mounted control device of the fault detection system of the lane departure prevention device of the present invention.
【図3】図1に示した道路上を自動車が通過する場合に
制御装置において実施される処理を具体的に示す図であ
る。FIG. 3 is a diagram specifically showing a process performed by a control device when a vehicle passes on the road shown in FIG. 1;
1 磁気マーカ 10 道路 11 自動車 12(A,B,C,D,E) 磁気センサ 13 制御装置 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Magnetic marker 10 Road 11 Automobile 12 (A, B, C, D, E) Magnetic sensor 13 Control device
Claims (1)
開始と終了を車載の制御装置に通知するために、道路に
車線幅いっぱいに、しかも一直線かつ一定間隔に並べて
敷設する複数の磁気マーカを有する区間と、(b)前記
障害検出試験の開始と終了を通知する複数の磁気マーカ
敷設区間の間の区間に配置され、道路に車線中央を示す
磁気マーカと、車線中央以外を示す磁気マーカを交互に
敷設する磁気マーカを有する区間とを配置し、(c)車
線逸脱防止機能実行中に、複数の磁気センサから同時に
一定レベル以上の磁気強度信号を受信した際に、それを
障害検出試験開始要求と判断し、(d)道路に車線中央
を示す磁気マーカと、車線中央以外を示す磁気マーカを
交互に検出し、毎回最新の、磁気マーカからの磁気強度
信号と車線中央以外の磁気マーカからの磁気強度信号を
比較し、自動車の左右方向のずれに影響されない障害判
定を行い、(e)複数の磁気センサから同時に一定レベ
ル以上の磁気強度信号を受信した際に、それを障害検出
試験終了要求と判断することを特徴とする車線逸脱防止
装置の障害検知システム。(A) In order to notify the start and end of a failure detection test of a lane departure prevention device to an on-vehicle control device, a plurality of magnets are laid on the road so as to fill the lane width and to be arranged in a straight line at regular intervals. A section having a marker, and (b) a magnetic marker disposed at a section between a plurality of magnetic marker laying sections for notifying the start and end of the failure detection test and indicating a lane center on a road, and a magnetic field indicating a section other than the lane center. (C) When a magnetic intensity signal of a certain level or more is simultaneously received from a plurality of magnetic sensors during execution of the lane departure prevention function, a fault is detected. (D) A magnetic marker indicating the center of the lane on the road and a magnetic marker indicating a position other than the center of the lane are alternately detected. The magnetic intensity signals from the magnetic markers are compared to determine a failure that is not affected by the lateral displacement of the vehicle. (E) When a magnetic intensity signal of a certain level or more is received from a plurality of magnetic sensors at the same time, A failure detection system for a lane departure prevention device, which determines a failure detection test termination request.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2000125087A JP2001307284A (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2000-04-26 | System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2000125087A JP2001307284A (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2000-04-26 | System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive device |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2001307284A true JP2001307284A (en) | 2001-11-02 |
Family
ID=18635102
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2000125087A Withdrawn JP2001307284A (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2000-04-26 | System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive device |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2001307284A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100803422B1 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2008-02-14 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Testing system for lane departure warning aparatus of vehicle and method thereof |
JP2012032898A (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2012-02-16 | Hitachi Ltd | Magnetic marker detecting device |
CN113454556A (en) * | 2019-02-23 | 2021-09-28 | 爱知制钢株式会社 | Diagnostic system and diagnostic method for magnetic marker |
-
2000
- 2000-04-26 JP JP2000125087A patent/JP2001307284A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100803422B1 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2008-02-14 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Testing system for lane departure warning aparatus of vehicle and method thereof |
JP2012032898A (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2012-02-16 | Hitachi Ltd | Magnetic marker detecting device |
CN113454556A (en) * | 2019-02-23 | 2021-09-28 | 爱知制钢株式会社 | Diagnostic system and diagnostic method for magnetic marker |
JPWO2020171232A1 (en) * | 2019-02-23 | 2021-12-16 | 愛知製鋼株式会社 | Magnetic marker diagnostic system and diagnostic method |
EP3929689A4 (en) * | 2019-02-23 | 2022-11-16 | Aichi Steel Corporation | Magnetic marker diagnostic system and diagnostic method |
JP7355102B2 (en) | 2019-02-23 | 2023-10-03 | 愛知製鋼株式会社 | Diagnostic system and method for magnetic markers |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
RU2419568C2 (en) | System and method of detecting rail fracture or vehicle | |
RU2503027C2 (en) | System for assisting vehicle driver and method of controlling operation thereof | |
JPH08304548A (en) | Equipment and method for measuring distance between vehicles for automobile | |
GB2547081A (en) | Diagnosing and supplementing vehicle sensor data | |
JPH07198828A (en) | Method and device for operating ultrasonic sensor | |
CN108674442B (en) | Train wheelbase detection method and system | |
CN105008150B (en) | Method for associating multiple tire locations on the vehicle with system for monitoring pressure in tyre | |
JP6465201B2 (en) | Method for determining failure of radio equipment and mobile radio system | |
US20040046546A1 (en) | Mobile detection system | |
MX2013009829A (en) | Process and system for detecting a particular state of a specific parking space. | |
CN107741257B (en) | Intelligent sampling metering device for identifying magnetic field interference and identification method | |
CN104864980A (en) | Motor stator temperature detection device and method, and temperature monitoring device and method | |
JP2001307284A (en) | System for detecting failure of traffic lane overrun preventive device | |
CN110455549A (en) | Diagnostic device, diagnostic system and diagnostic method | |
US7391009B2 (en) | Angle-measuring system having irregular reference mark that is dedicated without time delay | |
JP2005030811A (en) | Method for detecting deterioration of object to be detected, and apparatus for detecting deterioration in object to be detected | |
CN114563476B (en) | Seamless steel rail detection method and device based on guided wave attenuation and storage medium | |
CN113650647B (en) | Track break determination system and method for determining track break using the same | |
CN113624806B (en) | Monitoring method capable of positioning turnout fatigue crack and system device thereof | |
JPH02298885A (en) | Ultrasonic object detecting method | |
JP2009009298A (en) | Operation information acquisition device, operation information acquisition method and operation information acquisition program | |
US20060170567A1 (en) | Verification of loop sensing devices | |
JP3088389B2 (en) | Vehicle detector | |
JP2004224220A (en) | Communication wave type fixed position stopping control method | |
JP3776143B2 (en) | Ultrasonic vehicle passage detection system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A300 | Application deemed to be withdrawn because no request for examination was validly filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 20070703 |