GB2467199A - Attractant bait for the control of parasites in cultured fish, a method of preparation and use thereof - Google Patents
Attractant bait for the control of parasites in cultured fish, a method of preparation and use thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2467199A GB2467199A GB0918958A GB0918958A GB2467199A GB 2467199 A GB2467199 A GB 2467199A GB 0918958 A GB0918958 A GB 0918958A GB 0918958 A GB0918958 A GB 0918958A GB 2467199 A GB2467199 A GB 2467199A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- attractant
- mucus
- fish
- bait
- fractions
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000005667 attractant Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 230000031902 chemoattractant activity Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 66
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 61
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 12
- 244000045947 parasite Species 0.000 title abstract description 59
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 3
- 210000003097 mucus Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 89
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 235000010419 agar Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 244000078703 ectoparasite Species 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- -1 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000000679 carrageenan Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229920001525 carrageenan Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 235000010418 carrageenan Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229940113118 carrageenan Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L zinc;1-(5-cyanopyridin-2-yl)-3-[(1s,2s)-2-(6-fluoro-2-hydroxy-3-propanoylphenyl)cyclopropyl]urea;diacetate Chemical compound [Zn+2].CC([O-])=O.CC([O-])=O.CCC(=O)C1=CC=C(F)C([C@H]2[C@H](C2)NC(=O)NC=2N=CC(=CC=2)C#N)=C1O UHVMMEOXYDMDKI-JKYCWFKZSA-L 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acrylamide Chemical compound NC(=O)C=C HRPVXLWXLXDGHG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 229920001661 Chitosan Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 235000019688 fish Nutrition 0.000 claims description 51
- 241001280377 Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Species 0.000 claims description 15
- 241000277275 Oncorhynchus mykiss Species 0.000 claims description 14
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 claims description 14
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 241001611004 Caligus rogercresseyi Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 241000277263 Salmo Species 0.000 claims description 11
- 241000277334 Oncorhynchus Species 0.000 claims description 9
- 241000972773 Aulopiformes Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 241000556575 Eleginops maclovinus Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 235000019515 salmon Nutrition 0.000 claims description 8
- 241000277289 Salmo salar Species 0.000 claims description 5
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000277338 Oncorhynchus kisutch Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 244000144974 aquaculture Species 0.000 abstract description 12
- 238000009360 aquaculture Methods 0.000 abstract description 11
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 239000002202 Polyethylene glycol Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 229920001223 polyethylene glycol Polymers 0.000 abstract 1
- 241001611011 Caligus Species 0.000 description 23
- 241000277331 Salmonidae Species 0.000 description 18
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 14
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 12
- 241000239250 Copepoda Species 0.000 description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 7
- SEQKRHFRPICQDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methylglycine Chemical compound OCC(CO)(CO)[NH2+]CC([O-])=O SEQKRHFRPICQDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 5
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 4
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000005199 ultracentrifugation Methods 0.000 description 4
- IHPYMWDTONKSCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2'-piperazine-1,4-diylbisethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OS(=O)(=O)CCN1CCN(CCS(O)(=O)=O)CC1 IHPYMWDTONKSCO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- DVLFYONBTKHTER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OS(=O)(=O)CCCN1CCOCC1 DVLFYONBTKHTER-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 3
- 239000007995 HEPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007993 MOPS buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 3
- JOCBASBOOFNAJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC(CO)(CO)NCCS(O)(=O)=O JOCBASBOOFNAJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000007990 PIPES buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000877 Sex Attractant Substances 0.000 description 3
- UZMAPBJVXOGOFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Syringetin Natural products COC1=C(O)C(OC)=CC(C2=C(C(=O)C3=C(O)C=C(O)C=C3O2)O)=C1 UZMAPBJVXOGOFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000007994 TES buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007997 Tricine buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- KCFYHBSOLOXZIF-UHFFFAOYSA-N dihydrochrysin Natural products COC1=C(O)C(OC)=CC(C2OC3=CC(O)=CC(O)=C3C(=O)C2)=C1 KCFYHBSOLOXZIF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 206010061217 Infestation Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241001247234 Lepeophtheirus salmonis Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000133262 Nauplius Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010035148 Plague Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241000935744 Udonella sp. Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- CXEGAUYXQAKHKJ-NSBHKLITSA-N emamectin B1a Chemical compound C1=C[C@H](C)[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)O[C@]11O[C@H](C\C=C(C)\[C@@H](O[C@@H]2O[C@@H](C)[C@H](O[C@@H]3O[C@@H](C)[C@H](NC)[C@@H](OC)C3)[C@@H](OC)C2)[C@@H](C)\C=C\C=C/2[C@]3([C@H](C(=O)O4)C=C(C)[C@@H](O)[C@H]3OC\2)O)C[C@H]4C1 CXEGAUYXQAKHKJ-NSBHKLITSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229930014626 natural product Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 239000003016 pheromone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000005871 repellent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002940 repellent Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000239290 Araneae Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000005894 Emamectin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241001454772 Encarsia formosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000258937 Hemiptera Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000001295 Levene's test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001524040 Monogenea Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000030852 Parasitic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000179203 Phytoseiulus persimilis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000242594 Platyhelminthes Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 241000869417 Trematodes Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000123960 Trematomus bernacchii Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000010162 Tukey test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002141 anti-parasite Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003096 antiparasitic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003139 biocide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002975 chemoattractant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000973 chemotherapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000287 crude extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021050 feed intake Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005194 fractionation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003205 fragrance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000099 in vitro assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006193 liquid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006213 oxygenation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000024241 parasitism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002319 phototactic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940068196 placebo Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000902 placebo Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 244000062645 predators Species 0.000 description 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001507086 salmonid fish Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000009738 saturating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007790 scraping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001568 sexual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007858 starting material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000856 sucrose gradient centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/002—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing a foodstuff as carrier or diluent, i.e. baits
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N25/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests
- A01N25/02—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators, characterised by their forms, or by their non-active ingredients or by their methods of application, e.g. seed treatment or sequential application; Substances for reducing the noxious effect of the active ingredients to organisms other than pests containing liquids as carriers, diluents or solvents
- A01N25/04—Dispersions, emulsions, suspoemulsions, suspension concentrates or gels
-
- A01N63/02—
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
- A01N63/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi, animals or substances produced by, or obtained from, microorganisms, viruses, microbial fungi or animals, e.g. enzymes or fermentates
- A01N63/10—Animals; Substances produced thereby or obtained therefrom
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
- Farming Of Fish And Shellfish (AREA)
- Heterocyclic Carbon Compounds Containing A Hetero Ring Having Oxygen Or Sulfur (AREA)
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention is related to the control of ectoparasites belonging to the genusCaligusin cultured fish. More specifically, the invention is directed to the isolation of attractant fractions from fish mucus for the control of parasites in aquaculture industry fish. The present invention is further directed to the manufacture of an attractant bait based on the mucus and/or attractant fractions isolated from fish mucus. The attractant bait comprises the fish mucus and/or attractant fractions isolated from fish mucus, a gel selected from agar, gelatin, carrageenan, acrylamide, polyethylene glycol and chitosan, and a supporting matrix, which may be polypropylene. A method of preparation of the bait and the use thereof is also claimed.
Description
ATTRACTANT BAIT FOR THE CONTROL OF PARASITES IN CULTURED FISH, A
METHOD OF PREPARATION AND USE THEREOF
The present invention is related to the control of ectoparasites belonging to the genus Caligus in cultured fish. More specifically, the invention is directed to the isolation of attractant fractions from fish mucus for the control of parasites in aquaculture industry fish. The present invention is further directed to the manufacture of an attractant bait based on the mucus and/or attractant fractions isolated from fish mucus.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Fish ectoparasitosis produced by the genus Caligus represent a yet unsolved problem for the salmon culture industry in a national and international scale.
Currently, the national industry can only use a very small selection of antiparasitic products, all of them chemotherapeutic products, represented by emamectin benzoate and other pyretroid or dichlobenzuron products for ectoparasites, all authorized for use in caligidosis treatment. Due to commercial and sanitary restrictions generated by the growing concern about consumer's food safety, the commercialization of emamectin sulfate and chemicals in general will be strongly reduced in the short term, leaving the salmonid producing industry in a very vulnerable position.
The search for alternative solutions is absolutely necessary and urgent for the national aquaculture industry, because yearly losses around US$350.000 are caused by infestation by parasites of the genus Caligus.
One alternative to chemical products is biological control, which in general terms is defined as an activity that manages a series of natural enemies, also referred as to predators, with the objective to reduce or even completely fight against parasites that affect a given culture. Biological control is an effective risk-free alternative compared to the numerous and growing issues derived from the use of biocide chemicals. The examples of the use of biological controls are plentiful in agriculture, e.g. the control of yellow spiders with Phytoseiulus persimilis and white flies with Encarsia formosa and Vorticillium Iecanhi.
The use of sexual pheromones has been also applied as a form of biological plague management. A portion of living beings communicate with each other by means of sounds, but the majority communicates by means of odorants, releasing substances called pheromones; blind obedience of an organism to pheromones opens a vast range of possibilities to manage its behavior at will.
Currently, there are two modalities for using sexual pheromones that have been synthesized and commercialized. First, they can be used as attractant agents for traps and baits. The second usage form is "male confusion" produced by flooding or saturating large areas with sexual pheromones.
In other types of biological control, the behavior is determined by the presence or occurrence of stimuli that are predominantly chemical in nature, though physical and mechanical stimuli can also be present. Hence, a chemical substance present in a plant can make the insect to be attracted to the plant itself; in this case, the substance is an attractant. In other cases, the effect can be the opposite; hence, the substance is a repellent.
Some substances stimulate feeding, while some others inhibit feed intake. Part of this behavior is due to stimuli that are produced as communication mechanisms between individuals of the same species. Sent and received messages can induce sexual attraction, alarm, aggregation, orientation and others. The applications of ethological control include the use of attractants in traps and baits, repellents, feeding deterrents and diverse substances with similar effects. As an example, colorful sticky traps attract insects. The selection of specific colors depends on the specific wavelength related to insect vision.
In the case of Caligus parasitosis, studies have been carried out using a biological control methodological approach with Udonella sp., a platyhelminth that is frequently found on ovigerous Caligus rogercress�yi females and was thought to have some type of effect on fecundity and survival of planktonic stages of the parasite. However, as a result of this research, Udonella sp. was found to be an epibiont with a biological relation more neutral than adverse over Caligus.
The behavior of the free life stages of Caligus in southern Chilean cultures have been little investigated, but it is known that small copepods have a positive phototactic orientation and parasites have in general positive tactisms to several organic substances contained in fish mucus.
The use of biological baits has been suggested to control monogenea, trematode, insect and rodent plagues. The principle used is fundamentally based in exploiting the behavior of parasites when confronted to chemicals contained in fish mucus that can stimulate certain parasite receptors, which induce them to adhere to the host's skin (Buchmann et al, 1998; Buchmann et al, 1999).
Therefore, the attractant substance contained in the host skin mucus attracts the parasite and compels it to approach the skin and parasite the host.
Consequently, getting technological solutions directed to new products against fish ectoparasites from natural products based on the chemoattractant properties thereof is a pending challenge. The development of this type of product is proposed in the present patent application to tackle the growing necessity and demand for natural products in worldwide aquaculture production.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to the control of fish ectoparasites, particularly in the salmonid culture industry, in which one of the high-impact productivity-decreasing ectoparasites belongs to the genus Caligus, and to obtaining attractant fractions for parasite control in aquaculture industry fish. More specifically, the present invention is directed to the isolation of attractant fractions for the control of parasites in aquaculture industry fish. The present invention is also directed to the manufacture and use of an attractant bait based on fish mucus or attractant fractions of fish mucus, wherein said use of an attractant bait is directed to the control of parasites in the aquaculture industry.
In the present invention, fractions are isolated from the mucus of susceptible salmonids that are able to attract infesting stages of parasites from the genus Caligus.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a frequency distribution plot of the parasite attraction toward different mucus fractions from rainbow trout, shown as the attraction percentage of each particular fraction (number of parasites attracted by the fraction / total number of parasites).
Figure 2 shows a frequency distribution plot of the parasite attraction toward different mucus fractions from Atlantic salmon, shown as the attraction percentage of each particular fraction (number of parasites attracted by the fraction / total number of parasites).
Figure 3 shows a frequency distribution plot of the parasite attraction toward different mucus fractions from Pacific salmon, shown as the attraction percentage of each particular fraction (number of parasites attracted by the fraction / total number of parasites).
Figure 4 shows a plot of the average small C. rogercresseyi copepods attached to each fish at the end of an experiment in the presence (Tank 7) or absence (Tank 1) of attractant baits manufactured according to one embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to obtaining mucus extracts or total mucus from different fish species that show attractant properties for the control of fish ectoparasites in the aquaculture industry and particularly in the salmonid culture industry.
In the present invention, fractions are isolated from salmonid mucus that are able to attract infesting stages of parasites from the genus Caligus.
To understand the meaning of parasites infesting stages", we will refer to one of the most common salmonid parasites, the salmon louse.
Caligus rogercresseyi, ordinarily known as salmon louse, is characterized by having a direct life cycle including: 1) Free larvae life stages (nauplius I, nauplius II and small copepods).
2) Parasitary larvae stages attached to a salmon, referred to as chalimus I to IV.
3) Adult motile parasite stages able to move on the host surface.
Harmful stages for salmonids are chalimus (2) and adult parasites (3), which stress fish by feeding from their blood and skin.
Nevertheless, it has been established that small copepod stages (1) of the genus Caligus have a positive chemotactism toward specific molecular compounds contained in salmonid mucus, which allows them to find a host, settle on the host and begin their transformation into a chalimus (2).
In the present invention, fractions are isolated from the mucus of susceptible salmonids that are able to attract these infesting stages of parasites from the genus Caligus, i.e. small copepods.
In this sense, the present invention is able to shorten the life cycle of parasites, interfering in the stage when small copepods attach to the skin of salmonids and transform into the non-motile larvae known as chalimus.
With this strategy, chalimus larvae are prevented to reach the adult stage and reproduce. This can be translated in ostensible decreases of parasite charges, which allow controlling this parasitism.
In this way, the present invention provides an effective product with no negative effects to the environment and human health, contrarily to the chemical alternatives in use nowadays.
In the present invention, fractions are isolated from salmonid mucus that are able to attract infesting stages of parasites from the genus Caligus.
Although a specific parasite has been described herein, someone skilled in the art will readily observe that the process of the invention can be applied using mucus from different fish species to obtain products with equivalent properties for the control of water parasites that are specific to the fish from which the mucus is extracted In one implementation of the invention, the mucus is obtained directly from different fish species, such as Patagonian blennie or Antarctic rock cod (Eleginops maclovinus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Pacific salmon or coho or silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and king salmon or Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and the like, for the control of parasites.
In another implementation of the invention, a process is described to obtain attractant fractions isolated from mucus from the abovementioned fish species. The fractions obtained in this way are able to shorten the life cycle of parasites, particularly parasites from the genus Caligus, interfering in the stage when small copepods attach to the skin of salmonids and transform into the chalimus.
In another implementation, the mucus obtained from the abovementioned fish species or the attractant fractions obtained from the mucus are deposited on a substrate or matrix. In this way, infesting parasite stages are prevented to develop on fish but they develop on the substrate or matrix onto which mucus or attractant fractions isolated from mucus were deposited, in order to control parasites.
In another implementation of the invention, a substrate or matrix is described onto which mucus obtained from the abovementioned fish species or attractant fractions obtained from said mucus are deposited. Said substrate or matrix is useful to inhibit the attachment of parasites to fish in the aquaculture industry. In particular, said substrate or matrix prevents the attachment of parasites from the genus Caligus in the infesting stages thereof.
Another implementation of the invention uses said mucus, said attractant fractions and/or substrates or matrixes containing them for the control of ectoparasites, particularly from the genus Caligus in aquaculture.
The present invention describes the manner by which mucus is obtained, fractions with high attractant activity are selected and active components present in these fractions are characterized. Furthermore, the incorporation of mucus or attractant fractions into a substrate or matrix suitable for use as an attractant bait for fish ectoparasites in the aquaculture industry, in particular parasites from the genus Caligus, is described.
The mucus is obtained from any aquaculture species that can be affected by parasite infestation, such as Patagonian blennie (Eleginops maclovinus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Pacific salmon or coho or silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and king salmon or Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In particular, the parasite belongs to the genus Cailgus. Preferably, the mucus is obtained from cultured salmonid species selected from trout and salmon, such as e.g. Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Pacific salmon or coho or silver salmon (Qncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and king salmon or Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).
The mucus can be obtained from alive or dead fish, at any developmental stage. Preferably, fish from primary harvest plants, sacrifice centers or process centers are used.
In a preferred implementation, the mucus is obtained from sacrificed fish that are treated with distilled water and dried, after which mucus is extracted by scraping the fish skin, avoiding damaging or tearing the skin. Mucus is coIected at cold temperatures, preferably less than 6°C, and more preferably between 1-4°C.
This is done in this way in order to avoid degradation of the attractant molecules present in the mucus, which are labile are higher temperatures.
If attractant fractions should be obtained, the mucus is placed in centrifuge tubes. The tubes are centrifuged between 800 and 2,000 g, preferably around 1,500 g, for around 13 to 18 minutes, preferably for 15 to 16 minutes, and more preferably for 15 minutes, at a temperature ranging from 3 to 5°C, more preferably at 4°C. The supernatant is collected and stored in other tubes to be subsequently frozen. This crude extract will be the starting material for the separation of attractant fractions and compounds from salmonid mucus.
For the separation and extraction of attractant compounds from salmonid mucus, the fraction obtained before is centrifuged in a sucrose gradient.
Using sucrose gradient centrifugation, 18 mucus fractions were obtained, which can be observed in Figures 1 to 3.
Sucrose gradients are formed at concentrations ranging from 10 to 80% sucrose, preferably using at least a gradient having 4 different concentrations, more preferably 6 different concentrations, and most preferably 8 different concentrations.
If a gradient with 8 different concentrations is used, these concentrations differ in 10% sucrose concentration from one to the next, and a given volume of each concentration is placed in a centrifuge tube starting from the most concentrated solution at the bottom of the tube to the most diluted concentration at the top layer.
Said volumes can be equal or different from each other, however equal volumes of each concentration are preferred to form the sucrose gradient. In the ultracentrifugation process, no more than 60% of the total capacity of the tubes should be used. Preferably, 50-mi ultracentrifuge tubes are used wherein 20 to 30 ml sucrose gradients are formed, preferably around 25 ml, and if an 8 concentrations gradient is used, 3 ml of each concentration are used. A sample of the mucus extract is thawed and a volume ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 ml, preferably from 1 to 2 ml, more preferably around I ml, is placed at the top of each tube where the sucrose gradient has been formed.
In one implementation of the invention, more than one ultracentrifugation cycle is used, preferably more than 2 cycles and more preferably 3 or more cycles, are used, wherein each cycle has the abovementioned characteristics. Preferably, a first centrifugation cycle is carried out at 15,000 rpm at a temperature controlled at 4°C for 60 minutes. Subsequently, the same centrifuge tube is centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 90 minutes and finally a third cycle is carried out at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 90 minutes.
Once the ultracentrifugation in a sucrose gradient has been performed, the separated fractions are carefully extracted at the border of the tube, preferably between I to 3 ml of each fraction, and more preferably around 1.5 ml. These fractions are placed in individual tubes and kept refrigerated between I and 4°C. For each identified fraction, protein concentration was measured using the Lowry method.
Subsequently, each of these fractions can be integrated into a semi-solid gel solution, such as agar, gelatin, carrageenan, acrylamide, polyethylenglycol, chitosan and the like prepared in an appropriate buffer with a pH between 6 and 8, such as TRIS, Tricine, HEPES, TES, MOPS or PIPES, among others, or distilled water, with a concentration from 0.5 to 10% of gelifying agent.
To evaluate the attractant ability of each fraction obtained from the sucrose gradient over infesting stage individuals from the genus Caligus, gel-integrated fractions were used. In these assays, gel concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10%, preferably from I to 5%, more preferably from 1 to 2% and most preferably from 1.2 to 1.7% were used. These mixtures were carried out in the presence of a buffer with a pH between 6 and 8, preferably around 7, or simply distilled water.
Buffers that can be used include TRIS, Tricine, HEPES, TES, MOPS or PIPES.
In vitro assays demonstrate that in fractions 5 to 15 (p < 0.25) the parasite behavior was surprisingly favorable, showing a high preference toward said fractions, which indicates a high attraction of the parasite toward the components of said fractions. In particular, it is possible to appreciate that the parasites, in this case small Caligus copepods, approach plates that have a higher attractant quality and do not die during the assay time, which is carried out for more than 30 minutes, preferably for 60 or more minutes.
Another implementation of this invention is an attractant bait manufactured using fish mucus and/or attractant fractions obtained from fish mucus, a gel and a suitable substrate or matrix.
The fish mucus can be obtained from Patagonian blennie (Eleginops maclovinus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Pacific salmon or coho or silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and king salmon or Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and the like. Attractant fractions are obtained as described above.
The gel can be selected from agar, gelatin, carrageenan, polyacrylamide or any other suitable gelifying agent that could solidify at a temperature lower than 40'C to prevent the degradations of the active components that are present in the mucus.
The substrate or matrix is a suitable structure able to support the gel mixed with the mucus and/or attractant fractions obtained from the mucus. Said substrate or matrix could have a sponge-like structure and be manufactured from synthetic or natural materials.
For manufacturing the attractant bait, a gel solution is prepared in distilled water or a suitable buffer such as TRIS, Tricine, HEPES, TES, MOPS or PIPES and the like, at a concentration ranging from 0.5% to 10% by weight, bringing it to a temperature lower than 40°C. At said temperature, the mucus and/or attractant fraction thereof is added in a proportion ranging from 100 p1 to 10 ml of mucus or attractant fraction obtained from the mucus for each liter of gel solution. The mixture is stirred to homogeneity. When still in liquid form, the liquid is added to the suitable substrate or matrix (sponge-like structure) within a mould. Depending on the gel, the temperature is decreased until solidification of the mixture inside the substrate or matrix.
APPLICATION EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1: Isolation of mucus from sacrificed fish Sacrificed fish, washed with distilled water and dried with paper, from the species rainbow trout, Atlantic salmon and Pacific salmon were used, and their skins were scraped with a spatula to extract around 9 ml of mucus per processed fish, which was conserved at 4°C.
EXAMPLE 2: Isolation of attractant fractions from mucus The mucus previously obtained as in Example 1 was centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 18 minutes at 4°C to isolate a mucus extract. The supernatant was removed and frozen. The mucus samples from each species were processed separately during all the previous and successive steps.
An aliquot of the supernatant (1.5 ml) was loaded into ultra-centrifuge tubes wherein a sucrose gradient was preformed with 8 different sucrose concentrations ranging from 10 to 80% of sucrose. The samples were centrifuged following a 3-cycle process. The ultracentrifugation process of the samples placed in the abovementioned tubes was carried out in a refrigerated Kibota model KR 20000T ultracentrifuge, using a first cycle at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 60 minutes. A second cycle was carried out at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 90 minutes, and a third and last cycle was performed at 15,000 rpm at 4°C for 90 minutes.
Each fraction was individually removed and placed in individual containers. An aliquot of said fractions was assayed to evaluate their attractant capacity over species of the genus Cailgus.
EXAMPLE 3: Assessment of the effectiveness of the mucus and/or attractant fractions over Caligus parasites I ml of each fraction obtained in Example 2 was mixed with 1.5% agar in Tris buffer at pH 7 and was placed in Petri dishes, which were evaluated according to the attraction they exerted on parasites from the genus Caligus.
The series of plates was transported to evaluate the performance of the different fractions separated from the mucus of salmonid fish.
This was carried out for each mucus type (trout, Pacific salmon, Atlantic salmon) and repeated 6 times.
Furthermore, performance assays were carried out to control the technique, i.e. the inclusion of a placebo fractionation (distilled water) instead of mucus and incorporating it in plates.
Separated mucus fractions in Petri dishes were placed in darkened fish tanks containing sterile seawater, together with positive (agar medium with whole mucus) and negative (agar medium without mucus) controls.
small live Caligus copepods were placed in each fish tank, taking said moment as the beginning of the experiment.
To measure the attraction level of the different mucus fractions (determining the presence of small copepods on each plate), sample plates were observed under a magnifying glass at different times: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 30 and 60 minutes, and then 24 hours after the beginning of the experiment. This last control time allowed observing the change in the physiological development of the parasite (shedding).
The study contemplated the observation of at least 400 plates with different mucus fractions for each studied hydrobiological species, including positive, negative and technical controls. In this way, a statistical evidence can be obtained.
The results of observations made 24 hours after the beginning of the experiments evidenced that fractions obtained from Atlantic salmon develop morphological and physiological changes in parasites.
The results obtained from the performance assays were statistically evaluated in the following manner: Frequency distribution: a frequency distribution of the occurrences was constructed with the results obtained.
Chi-squared for ratios: significant differences were detected in the attraction level between the different separated mucus fractions.
Tukey test for ratios: it was specifically determined which fraction was significantly different, according to its attraction level.
For all the mucus fractions obtained, observation times are not significantly different between them, i.e. the attraction of the parasite to the fractions is not dependent on the time during which the attractant is present (see Tables 1, 2 and 3 wherein attraction toward the bait is observed (1) or not (0) with the indicated mucus fraction along time).
Table 1. Performance assays of the different mucus fractions from rainbow trout.
m1inutos Minutos [1 2 4 fi B 10 3fl 60 Total o 4 6 8 10 30 60 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0_ 00 0 12 0 00 000 0 O 1 0 0 0 1 tE3 0 --o ---a -o -o -cjio 0 0 0 0_ 0 _O_ 0 _°: -- 0 accjn 0 -0 0 -1 1jfón5* 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 acc 0 --0 --_0_ 0_ ---0 acc 17 0 --_i 1_ --0 _0 I -- __.._, _4_ 0 --_i: ---_1_ -- 0 _1_ ----_1_ t91 0 l _0 --l_ l - 0 _1_ ----40 0 _0 0_ --a:-: - *ce. 0 0 0 0 _0 1_ --0 1 0 0 0 0 -0 0 -- 0 0 0_ _o_ o:i i: o Z 0 L _1_ 0 0 _4 6CC 13 0 1 1 1 1 1 6 ac 00 0011O3 k14 0 -, 0 1 --0_ 1 1 --0 _5 -15 0 0 _0_ _1_ 1 _i _1 5 -0 -0 0 0 1 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci!f6 0 0 0 0 1 1 n47 0 00 -0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I 4 ccthn18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 80 0 0 0 0 0 [ Minutos --I F 2 6 8 10 30 60 T0161 0 2 4 6 8 10 30 60 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 0 0 0 ___ -o--r &w2o1oo 01002 r --1 0 0 0 1Ioft 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 ----a o o 0 0 --1 1_ -1 - ___________ _0_ 0 0 0 -1&5 0 _1 --1_ _0_ _4 -6 C Q __0_ _1___ ____________ _1 1 1 1 0 CCIO*b 0 0 o_ _i _i ________ 0 1:i: :i: : 1 7 0 i 0_ _0 1 r-acc --_1_. _1_ ----a o 0 --_0_ -1_ _____ 0 0 0 -0 00 0 ____if El ra 0 1 00 a 5 0 --_0_ _0_ _0_ ----_0 6 0 -- -- -- --2 0 __ _1 -_0_ _0 7 0 0 0 0 1 -r ccl 7 0 _0_ 0 0 -0 8 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 I Mbnitos ---trmurns [0 2 4 6 L 8 10 30 60 Total I 0 2 4 6 8 10 30 60 TotalI 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 1 0 1 2__ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 o i a I 0 0 0 0 2 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 o 2 4 6 $ I 10 30 60 TotaIl 0 2 4 6 I 8 10 30 60 Tota' o 1 0 1 110 0 0 31 0 0 0 010 1 0 0 1 o 0 0 1 OJi 1 1 4J 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 0 olD 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 OLO 0 0 0 0 1 0 olo 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Ofo 0 1 1 0 0 1 olo 0 0 0 1 m.lrnItnS Minulos ___________ 0 2 4 6 10 30 60 Total 0 6 0 10 311 60 Total _____________ 1 0 0 0 1 EcEOd 0 0 a o a ____________ 0 0 ci 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3.001 ErT6iR 0 looi lj: 0 0 ElEfciöJi'4 0 _O_0_Qç ___________ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ____________ O 0 FàEfláii 0 0 0 0 0 0 IFión 0 1 1 Fiacci6n, 0 0 1 1 0 0 ___________ 0 1 Fràiâá4i. 0 0 0 0 1 1 - c 1 FFacc jun 0 0 0 0 1 I -JO 0 U 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 lFä12 0 0 4 Frion'Ti2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 - ___________ 1 0 1 4 Jb3 a 0 i 1 1 1 _____ 0 0 1 Fi!àiióii40 1 1 1 1 0 0 Frc16ifl5 0 0 0 0 FracclOnlS 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fciáñ,16 0 1 0 2 Fraciiôiij6 0 1 0 0 0 1 ?á&T170 0 0 0 0 Fracm on:17o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FrIñii:1B 0 ü a 0 0 Fracciñn'18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 On the other hand, differences are observed between different mucus fractions.
As evidenced in Figures 1 to 3, in this assay the behavior of the parasites when confronted to different mucus fractions from rainbow trout shows a definite attraction in certain fractions, particularly fractions 6, 8 and 12 (p <0.025). A different situation occurs with mucus from Atlantic and Pacific salmon, since the attractant mucus components are contained in fractions 12 and 13 (p < 0.001), and 7 and 13 (p < 0.001), respectively.
EXAMPLE 4: Manufacture of an attractant bait for the control of Caligus parasites in cultured fish To manufacture the attractant bait, mucus obtained indistinctly and directly from fish according to Example 1 and/or attractant fractions obtained as in
Example 2 were used.
Agar was dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 1.5% by weight at a temperature of 90°C. The solution was stirred at room temperature until its temperature reached 40°C. In this moment, an amount of 150 p1 of mucus or attractant fractions per liter of liquid agar solution was added. Once an homogeneous liquid was obtained, 1.8 I were deposited inside a round-shaped mould with an approximate diameter of 32 cm that contained a white polypropylene sponge with an approximate diameter of 32 cm and an approximate thickness from 1.5 to 2 cm.
Special care was put to verify that the sponge was completely soaked in the liquid solution. The bait prepared in this way was left to cool to room temperature until the agar solidified. The final product thus obtained is the attractant bait of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 5: Use of an attractant bait for the control of Caligus rogercresseyi parasites in tanks with cultured fish In this study, 1-rn3 tanks were used with 30 fish (Atlantic salmon) each
according to the following specifications:
-Negative Control: Fish without C. rogercresseyi and without including baits, but under the same experimental management conditions.
-Positive Control: Fish challenged with C. rogercresseyi without including baits.
-Group 1: Fish challenged with C. rogercresseyi including 4 baits.
Individual fish had an initial live weight of 160 g +1-15 g and were healthy and free from concomitant diseases. The fishes used in this experiment were from a sanitarily certified commercial stock. Before the assays, fish were acclimated into the tank conditions for at least 7 days.
The day when the experiment began, 4 baits from Example 4 were placed in the test tank at least one hour before inoculating small C. rogercresseyi copepods. 1,500 +1-200 small copepods were used in the positive control tank and in the Group I tank wherein 4 attractant baits according to Example 4 have been placed.
The study of the effectiveness of the baits was performed continually for 7 days in darkened closed tanks with constant oxygenation. In order to avoid dragging out the small copepods, special care was taken regarding water flows in the tanks.
At the end of said period, all animals were sacrificed to count the parasites present on each animal and on each bait. Figure 4 shows the small copepod average attached to each animal in Tank I (fish with C. rogercresseyi without attracting baits) compared to Tank 7 (fish with C. rogercresseyi with the attracting baits according to Example 4). According to a Levene test for variance homogeneity and a one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance), significant differences were detected with a confidence level p < 0.05 between both tanks.
The above experiment demonstrates the efficacy of using attractant baits for controlling parasites, in particular C. rogercresseyi, on cultured fish, particularly salmonids.
Claims (9)
- CLAIMS1. An attractant bait for ectoparasites in cultured fish, wherein said attractant bait comprises: a. an attractant comprising fish mucus and/or an attractant fraction obtained from fish mucus; b. a gel selected from the group consisting of agar, gelatin, carrageenan, acrylamide, polyethylenglycol, chitosan and the like; C. a supporting matrix.
- 2. An attractant bait according to claim 1, wherein the gel is agar.
- 3. An attractant bait according to claim 1, wherein the matrix is a sponge-like structure comprising synthetic or natural materials.
- 4. An attractant bait according to claim 3, wherein the matrix is made from polypropylene.
- 5. An attractant bait according to claim 1, wherein the fish species is selected from the group consisting of Patagonian blennie (Eleginops maclovinus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Pacific salmon or coho or silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and king salmon or Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and the like.
- 6. A method to manufacture a bait according to claims I to 5, wherein said method comprises the steps of: a. isolating mucus from fish and keeping the mucus at a temperature ranging from I to 6°C; b. optionally purifying an attractant fraction; c. Preparing a liquid gel selected from the group consisting of agar, gelatin, carrageenan, acrylamide, polyethylenglycol, chitosan and the like; d. incorporating the mucus from step (a) and/or the attractant fraction from step (b) into the gel of step (C); e. incorporating the gel with the mucus and/or attractant fraction from step (d) into a suitable matrix; f. solidifying the gel of step (e).
- 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the purification of the attractant fraction (step b) is performed according to the following steps: a. centrifuging at 800 to 2,000 g the fish mucus for 13 to 18 minutes at a temperature ranging from 3 to 5°C; b. placing the supernatant of step (a) into a sucrose gradient that has 4 to 8 different concentrations with a correlative difference of 10% between each of them; c. centrifuging the loaded sucrose gradient between I and 3 times at a speed ranging from 12,000 to 20,000 rpm for 60 to 120 minutes at a temperature ranging from 3 to 5°C; d. isolating the different fractions.
- 8. Use of the bait according to claims 1 to 7, wherein said bait is used to attract ectoparasite larvae by placing the bait in the sea in fish culture zones.
- 9. A use according to claim 8, wherein the ectoparasites are Caligus rogercresseyi.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CL2009000160A CL2009000160A1 (en) | 2009-01-26 | 2009-01-26 | Ectoparasite attractant bait in farmed fish comprising an attractant that is mucus of fish and / or an attractive fraction obtained therefrom, a gel and a support matrix; method to produce said bait and its use to attract caligus ectoparasites. |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB0918958D0 GB0918958D0 (en) | 2009-12-16 |
GB2467199A true GB2467199A (en) | 2010-07-28 |
GB2467199B GB2467199B (en) | 2014-11-12 |
Family
ID=51726870
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB0918958.0A Expired - Fee Related GB2467199B (en) | 2009-01-26 | 2009-10-29 | Attractant bait for the control of parasites in cultured fish, method of preparation and use thereof. |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2685795C (en) |
CL (1) | CL2009000160A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2467199B (en) |
NO (1) | NO339385B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011135384A1 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2011-11-03 | Biotatools As | Sea lice control |
WO2013093543A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Babolna Bio Ltd | A consumable aqueous gel for use in pest control, a pest control device comprising an aqueous gel, and the use of an aqueous gel in a pest control device and in a method of controlling pests |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3698644A1 (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2020-08-26 | Kl-Teho Oy | A fishing bait, a mouldable composition for manufacturing the fishing bait, a method for manufacturing the fishing bait and a use of the mouldable composition |
NO345419B1 (en) * | 2019-04-26 | 2021-01-25 | Blue Lice As | Apparatus for collecting pelagic crustacean larvae |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007284426A (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2007-11-01 | Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd | Protein for allowing cilia of neobenedenia girellae larva to fall off to make its harpago expose |
-
2009
- 2009-01-26 CL CL2009000160A patent/CL2009000160A1/en unknown
- 2009-10-29 GB GB0918958.0A patent/GB2467199B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2009-11-12 CA CA2685795A patent/CA2685795C/en active Active
- 2009-12-01 NO NO20093450A patent/NO339385B1/en unknown
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2007284426A (en) * | 2006-03-24 | 2007-11-01 | Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd | Protein for allowing cilia of neobenedenia girellae larva to fall off to make its harpago expose |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Buchmann, K.;Nielsen, M.E., "Chemoattraction of Ichthyophthirius multifiis (Cliphora) theronts to host molecules", International Journal of Parisitology, 29 (1999), pages 1415-1423 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011135384A1 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2011-11-03 | Biotatools As | Sea lice control |
WO2013093543A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Babolna Bio Ltd | A consumable aqueous gel for use in pest control, a pest control device comprising an aqueous gel, and the use of an aqueous gel in a pest control device and in a method of controlling pests |
US9370177B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2016-06-21 | Babolna Bio Ltd. | Consumable aqueous gel for use in pest control, a pest control device comprising an aqueous gel, and the use of an aqueous gel in a pest control device and in a method of controlling pests |
AU2011384165B2 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2017-04-20 | Babolna Bio Ltd | A consumable aqueous gel for use in pest control, a pest control device comprising an aqueous gel, and the use of an aqueous gel in a pest control device and in a method of controlling pests |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2685795A1 (en) | 2010-07-26 |
GB2467199B (en) | 2014-11-12 |
NO339385B1 (en) | 2016-12-05 |
NO20093450L (en) | 2010-07-27 |
GB0918958D0 (en) | 2009-12-16 |
CA2685795C (en) | 2021-03-23 |
CL2009000160A1 (en) | 2010-05-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Rivers et al. | Physiological trade-offs of forming maggot masses by necrophagous flies on vertebrate carrion | |
Butt et al. | Bioassays of entomogenous fungi. | |
Brooks | The microorganisms of healthy insects | |
López-Riquelme et al. | The funeral ways of social insects. Social strategies for corpse disposal | |
Suárez-Morales | Class maxillopoda | |
CA2685795C (en) | Attractant bait for the control of parasites in cultured fish, a method of preparation and use thereof | |
Brazil et al. | Bionomy: biology of neotropical phlebotomine sand flies | |
CN101347129B (en) | Bacillus thuringiensis suspending agent for killing mosquito | |
Rowe et al. | Production of bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) for pollination and research | |
US5899168A (en) | Synthetic diet for rearing the hymenopterous ectoparasitoid, catolaccus grandis | |
Brundage | Fitness effects of colonization time of Chrysomya rufifacies and Cochliomyia macellaria, and their response to intra-and inter-specific eggs and egg-associated microbes | |
Maciel et al. | Eggs hatching and oncomiracidia lifespan of Dawestrema cycloancistrium, a monogenean parasitic on Arapaima gigas | |
Marcondes et al. | Flies | |
Barakat et al. | Changes in the haemolymph of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria after injection with Bacillus thuringiensis | |
Smyth | Cestoda | |
Dowling | 14 The evolution of parasitism and host associations in mites | |
Foster | Colonization and maintenance of mosquitoes in the laboratory | |
JP6676619B2 (en) | Palmitoleic acid for use in inhibiting sea lice adhesion to fish | |
Dhooria | Ane's encyclopedic dictionary of general & applied entomology | |
Prasad et al. | Biotoxicity of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin, against early larval instars of anopheline mosquitoes | |
RU2751602C1 (en) | System of measures to combat endo- and exogenous stages of coccidia of broiler chickens with the floor technology of their maintenance | |
CN109526884B (en) | Method for culturing Steinernema carpocapsae nematodes | |
Fitri et al. | The Potential of Local Chitinolitic Bacteria Isolates as Larvacide of Aedes aegypti L. | |
Marcondes | and Patricia Jacqueline Thyssen | |
Pandey | In vitro mass culture technique of Hexamermis vishwakarma Dhiman |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20171029 |
|
S28 | Restoration of ceased patents (sect. 28/pat. act 1977) |
Free format text: APPLICATION FILED |
|
S28 | Restoration of ceased patents (sect. 28/pat. act 1977) |
Free format text: RESTORATION ALLOWED Effective date: 20180806 |
|
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20231029 |