FR2990774A1 - Ophthalmic lens for pair of glasses for e.g. improving contrast of vision of wearer, has interferential filter whose curve of reflectivity includes angle of incidences, where parameters of incidences are defined by using specific expression - Google Patents

Abstract

The lens has a front main face and a rear main face, where one of the main faces comprises an interferential filter. The filter exhibits an average blue reflection factor for a set of wavelengths ranging from 420 nanometers to 450 nanometers. Curve of reflectivity of the filter has maximum of reflectivity with a wavelength less than 435 nanometers, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) greater than/equal to 80 nanometers, and two angle of incidences ranging between 0 and 15 degree, and 30 to 45 degree respectively. Parameters of the angle of incidences are defined by using specific expression.

Description

The invention relates to the field of ophthalmic optics. It relates more particularly to an ophthalmic lens, one of whose main faces comprises an optical filter intended to reduce the effects of the phototoxicity of blue light on the retina of a spectacle wearer.

Throughout this patent application, reference will be made to ranges of values, in particular wavelengths and angles of incidence. The expression "between the x and y values" means "in the range of x to y", the x and y terminals being included in this range. The light visible by the human eye extends over a light spectrum ranging from a wavelength of 380 nanometers (nm) to about 780 nm. The part of this spectrum, located between about 380 nm and 500 nm, corresponds to a substantially blue, high energy light. Numerous studies (see, for example, Kitchel E., "The effects of blue light on ocular health", Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness Vol.94, No. 6, 2000 or Glazer-Hockstein et al., Retina, Vol.26 , No. 1, pp. 1-4, 2006) suggest that blue light has phototoxic effects on the eye, and especially on the retina.

Indeed, ocular photobiology studies (Algvere PV et al., "Age-Related Maculopathy and the Impact of the Blue Light Hazard", Acta Ophthalmo, Scand., Vol 84, pp. 4-15, 2006) and Clinical studies (Tomany SC et al., "Sunlight and the 10-Year Incidence of Age-Related Maculopathy." The Bernier Dam Eye Study, "Arch Ophthalmol., Vol 122, pp. 750-757, 2004) have shown that Too long or too intense blue light exposure can induce severe ophthalmic conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Nevertheless, a part of this blue light, between about 465 nm and 495 nm is beneficial insofar as it intervenes in the mechanisms of regulation of biological rhythms, called "circadian cycles". Thus, it is recommended to limit the exposure to potentially harmful blue light, especially for the wavelength band which presents an increased dangerousness (see in particular table B1 of the standard ISO 8980-3: 2003 (E) concerning the danger function of blue light B (X)). For this purpose, it may be advisable to wear in front of each eye an ophthalmic lens that prevents or limits the transmission of phototoxic blue light to the retina.

It has already been proposed, for example in the patent application WO2008024414, to at least partially cut the troublesome part of the blue light spectrum from 400 nm to 460 nm by means of lenses comprising a film partially inhibiting light in the range. of desired wavelengths, by absorption or by reflection. Moreover, those skilled in the art are in search of filters making it possible to minimize the amount of harmful blue light received by the retina, while also making it possible to efficiently transmit visible light for wavelengths greater than 465 nm in order to on the one hand, to preserve a good vision for the wearer and, on the other hand, not to alter the circadian cycles. The difficulty is that the ranges of wavelengths from 420 nm to 450 nm which must be filtered are very close to the wavelength ranges which must not, or very little, be filtered.

It is an object of the invention to provide an ophthalmic lens comprising a reflection filter taking into account all of the light irradiation from the surrounding medium and reducing the blue light received by the eye in the range of lengths of light. wave ranging from 420 nm to 450 nm while allowing excellent transmission in the wavelength range of 465 nm to 495 nm.

Another object of the invention is to provide an ophthalmic lens comprising a reflection filter having the above properties, which is easy and inexpensive to implement industrially. In general, it is possible to design filters, called "narrow", very selective, having a limited bandwidth and a reflectivity peak centered on this bandwidth. To limit the transmission of phototoxic blue light to the retina, a suitable narrow filter should thus have for example a mid-height width of 30 nm between 420 nm and 450 nm, and a maximum of reflectivity for the central wavelength. of 435 nm. In practice, narrow, very selective filters generally consist of a stack comprising a large number of dielectric layers and whose total thickness is high.

Such filters are long and expensive to produce industrially, especially when they are deposited under vacuum. The multiplication of the number of layers and the multiplication of the interfaces also makes it difficult to reach good mechanical properties. Taking into account the constraints above leads to limiting the number of layers, which has the effect of limiting the performance in terms of spectral selectivity (the width at half height of such a narrow filter can then reach up to 70 nm) and angular, the filter becoming weakly angularly selective. This means that if, for wavelengths between 420 nm and 450 nm, the reflectivity of the main face of an ophthalmic lens provided with such a narrow filter is high for angles of incidence on this main face included between 0 ° and 15 °, then the reflectivity for angles of incidence between 30 ° and 45 ° on this same main face will also be relatively high. The angle of incidence is conventionally defined as the angle between the normal to the surface at the point of incidence and the direction of the light beam contacting this surface. This entails a number of consequences for a spectacle wearer equipped with ophthalmic lenses on the main face before which a narrow optical filter has been deposited as described above. It will be understood here that the main front face of the ophthalmic lens is the main face of the ophthalmic lens which is located furthest from the eyes of the spectacle wearer. By contrast, we designate the main face of the ophthalmic lens that is located closest to the eyes of the wearer the rear main face. Positioned in relation to the eyes of the wearer, the ophthalmic lenses receive, on the one hand, "direct" light incident on the main faces before ophthalmic lenses, and, on the other hand, "indirect" light coming from the back of the wearer and reflected by the ophthalmic lenses. The light coming from the back of the wearer and reflected by the ophthalmic lens in the direction of the wearer's eye is mainly the incident light on the back main face of the ophthalmic lens with angles of incidence between 30 ° and 45 ° .

This visible light coming from the rear of the carrier at an angle of incidence of between 30 ° and 45 ° crosses the rear main face, on which a first reflection occurs, then the substrate to reach the front main face comprising said filter. Moreover, it is known that the optical properties of a filter deposited on the main front face of an ophthalmic lens, for example the reflectivity, are equivalent whether the light is incident on the side of the main face before or coming from the side from the back main face. If the narrow filter effectively reflects the blue light whose wavelength is between 420 nm and 450 nm for an angle of incidence on the front main face between 30 ° and 45 °, then it also effectively reflects this blue light arriving from the rear, for an angle of incidence between 30 ° and 45 ° on the main rear face.

Thus, even if the direct light incident on the main faces before ophthalmic lenses is efficiently rejected due to the reflection on the narrow filters deposited on the front main faces, the indirect light from the back of the wearer is reflected equally efficiently towards the eyes of the wearer. Finally, despite the use of a narrow filter, the amount of phototoxic blue light reaching the retina of the wearer may be relatively large and present a danger to the wearer. Moreover, the filter, whether applied on the front or rear face, behaves in the same way with respect to light in the wavelength range of 420 nm to 450 nm, since the ophthalmic lens, in either case, transmits light in the wavelength range of 420 nm to 450 nm. The same detrimental effect vis-à-vis the phototoxic blue light is therefore manifested for the wearer if the filter, instead of being applied to the main front face of the ophthalmic lens, is applied to the rear main face. Furthermore, as already mentioned above, narrow reflection filters with a limited number of layers and a thickness compatible with large-scale industrial production have only reduced spectral selectivity, and are capable of reflecting a significant portion of the light. in the range governing circadian cycles.

In order to meet the objectives of the invention and to overcome the aforementioned disadvantages of the state of the art, the present invention provides an ophthalmic lens provided with a reflection filter to reduce the amount of phototoxic blue light arriving on the surface. retina of a carrier of this ophthalmic lens, while at the same time preserving the circadian cycles. To this end, the invention relates to an ophthalmic lens having a front main face and a rear main face, at least one of the main faces comprising a filter which gives the main face comprising said filter the following properties: an average factor of reflection in blue (R ,,, B) over a range of wavelengths ranging from 420 nanometers to 450 nanometers which is greater than or equal to 5%, for an angle of incidence of between 0 ° and 15 °, a spectral reflectivity curve for an angle of incidence between 0 ° and 15 °, this reflectivity curve having: a maximum of reflectivity at a wavelength of less than 435 nanometers, and a width at half height (FWHM) greater than 80 nanometers, and - for an angle of incidence 0 between 0 ° and 15 ° and for an angle of incidence 0 'between 30 ° and 45 °, a parameter A (0,0') defined by the relation A (0,0 ') = 1 - [Re, (435 nm) / Re (435 nm)], as that this parameter A (0,0 ') is greater than or equal to 0.6, where Re (435 nm) represents the value of the reflectivity of the main face comprising said filter, at the wavelength of 435 nanometers for l 0 and angle of incidence, and Re, (435 nm) represents the value of the reflectivity of the main face having said filter at the wavelength of 435 nanometers for the angle of incidence 0 '. Thus, the ophthalmic lens according to the invention makes it possible to minimize the transmission of phototoxic blue light to the retina of a carrier of this ophthalmic lens, thanks firstly to its average reflectivity over a range of wavelengths. ranging from 420 nm to 450 nanometers and thanks, on the other hand, to its angular selectivity. Indeed, the ophthalmic lens provided with said filter has, at a given wavelength, a substantially different reflectivity for two angles of incidence on the main face having said substantially different filter.

Moreover, this filter is off-center with respect to the wavelength band of the phototoxic blue light between 420 nanometers and 450 nanometers. Indeed, the ophthalmic lens has a maximum of reflectivity at a wavelength of less than 435 nanometers. This then makes it possible to adjust the angular selectivity of the lens. The spectral characteristics (reflectivity, Rn 'R', ..) of each main face of an ophthalmic lens according to the invention are determined in a conventional manner for an incident light beam arriving on the main face from the air, without passing through the substrate.

Finally, an ophthalmic lens according to the invention having a parameter A (0,0 ') as defined above makes it possible: to maximize the reflection of the phototoxic blue light coming from the side of the main front side, the intensity of this reflection being related to the magnitude Re (435 nm), and - to minimize the reflection of the phototoxic blue light coming from the side of the main rear face, the intensity of this reflection being linked to the size Re, (435 nm) . Thus, the ophthalmic lens according to the invention, provided with its filter, reduces the overall transmission of phototoxic blue light to the retina of a carrier of such an ophthalmic lens. The proposed filter having a half-height width greater than a narrow filter, it is less thick than such a narrow filter and comprises fewer layers, and therefore is easier to manufacture and less expensive than a narrow filter. narrow filter. Furthermore, other advantageous and non-limiting features of the ophthalmic lens according to the invention are the following: the filter is formed on the main front face of the ophthalmic lens; the parameter A (0,0 ') is determined for an angle of incidence 0 on the main face comprising said filter such that 0 = 15 ° and for an angle of incidence 0' on the main face comprising said filter such that 0 '= 450; the parameter A (0,0 ') is greater than or equal to 0.65, better still greater than or equal to 0.7, more preferably greater than or equal to 0.75, and optimally greater than or equal to 0.8; the maximum reflectivity is at a wavelength less than or equal to 410 nm, better still less than or equal to 400 nm, and even better, less than or equal to 390 nm; the maximum reflectivity is at a wavelength greater than or equal to 350 nanometers, preferably in the wavelength range from 360 nm to 400 nm, better in the wavelength range of 370 nm at 390 nm; the width at half height is greater than or equal to 90 nanometers, preferably greater than or equal to 100 nanometers; the width at half height is less than or equal to 150 nanometers, preferably less than or equal to 120 nanometers, better still less than or equal to 110 nm. Thus, the width at half height is generally between 80 nm and 150 nm, preferably between 90 nm and 120 nm, better between 90 nm and 110 nm and better still between 100 nm and 110 nm. Finally, other advantageous and non-limiting features of the ophthalmic lens according to the invention are the following: the value of the reflectivity at the maximum reflectivity of the main face comprising the filter, for an angle of incidence of 15 °, is preferably at least 1.5 times higher, better at least 2 times higher and optimally at least 2.5 times higher than the value of the reflectivity of this same main face, for the same angle of incidence, and the wavelength of 435 nm; the ratio [R15 (435 nm) - R15 (480 nm)] / R15 (435 nm) where R15 (435 nm) and R15 (480 nm) respectively represent the reflectivity of the main face of the lens ophthalmic lens comprising said filter at a wavelength of 435 nm and a wavelength of 480 nm, for an angle of incidence on this main face of 15 °, is greater than or equal to 0.8, better superior or equal to 0.85 and more preferably greater than or equal to 0.9. This ratio characterizes the excellent selectivity of the filter equipping the ophthalmic lens according to the invention which makes it possible to protect the phototoxic band without disturbing the chronobiological band; the average light reflection factor (Ru) on the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter is less than or equal to 2.5%, preferably less than or equal to 1.5%; the average light reflection factor (Ru) on each of the main faces of the ophthalmic lens is less than or equal to 2.5%, preferably less than or equal to 1.5%; the average light reflection factor (Ru) on the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter is less than or equal to 0.7%; the filter is formed on the main front face of the ophthalmic lens and the average (unweighted) reflection factor in the ultraviolet (UV) range from 300 nm to 380 nm, for an angle of incidence on this main front face 15 °, is greater than or equal to 15%, better than or equal to 20% and more preferably greater than or equal to 25%; the filter is an interference filter; the filter comprises a number of layers less than or equal to 11, preferably from 2 to 10 layers, and even more preferably from 4 to 9 layers and better still from 4 to 7 layers; the filter has a total thickness less than or equal to 700 nanometers, preferably less than or equal to 600 nanometers, and more preferably less than or equal to 550 nm, and optimally from 200 nm to 400 nm; the main rear face of the ophthalmic lens comprises an anti-UV coating, that is to say a little UV reflective coating, preferably an antireflection coating effective in the UV and in the visible. In addition, the ophthalmic lens according to the invention advantageously enters into the embodiment of a pair of glasses. Thus, the invention also proposes a pair of spectacles comprising at least one ophthalmic lens according to the invention. Furthermore, the use of an ophthalmic lens according to the invention is particularly advantageous for therapeutic use or to prevent diseases related to the phototoxicity of blue light. The invention proposes the use of an ophthalmic lens according to the invention for increasing the vision contrast of a wearer.

The invention finally proposes the use of an ophthalmic lens according to the invention to protect at least a portion of the eye of a wearer from the phototoxicity of the blue light, in particular to protect it from a degenerative process such as as age-related macular degeneration (LA DM). The invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which ophthalmic lenses have a filter according to the invention on their main front face: FIGS. 1 to 3 show the spectral reflectivity curves for an angle of incidence on the main front side of 15 °, certain ophthalmic lenses prepared in Examples 1 to 3 of the present application and ophthalmic lenses coated with a filter not satisfying the characteristics of the filters of the invention, in particular the width at half height (see Comparative Examples C1, C2, and C3). FIG. 4 shows, for each of the preceding examples, the weighted transmission factor (in%) and the weighted back reflectivity (in%), the weighting being made by means of the risk function of the blue light. FIG. 5 represents the spectral reflectance curves between 380 nm and 500 nm of the ophthalmic lens of example 3 of the present application for angles of incidence on the main front face of 0 ° and 45 °. As is well known, the ophthalmic lens according to the invention comprises a transparent substrate of mineral or organic glass. This substrate may comprise one or more functional coatings for conferring on the ophthalmic lens particular optical and / or mechanical properties, such as, for example, an anti-shock coating, an anti-abrasion coating, an anti-reflection coating, a coating. anti-UV, anti-static coating, polarizing coating, and antifouling and / or anti-fogging coating. All these coatings are well known in the art of ophthalmic lenses. The substrate of the ophthalmic lens according to the invention is preferably made of organic glass, for example a thermoplastic or thermosetting plastic material. Among the thermoplastic materials that are suitable for substrates, mention may be made of (meth) acrylic (co) polymers, in particular poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), thio (meth) acrylic (co) polymers, polyvinyl butyral (PVB) ), polycarbonates (PC), polyurethanes (PU), poly (thiourethanes), polyol allyl carbonates (co) polymers, ethylene / vinyl acetate thermoplastic copolymers, polyesters such as poly (terephthalate), ethylene) (PET) or poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT), polyepisulfides, polyepoxides, polycarbonate / polyester copolymers, copolymers of cycloolefins such as ethylene / norbornene or ethylene / cyclopentadiene copolymers and combinations thereof. By (co) polymer is meant a copolymer or a homopolymer. By (meth) acrylate is meant an acrylate or a methacrylate. For the purposes of the present invention, polycarbonate (PC) is intended to mean homopolycarbonates as well as copolycarbonates and copolycarbonates that are sequenced. The substrates which are particularly recommended are the substrates obtained by (co) polymerization of the diethylene glycol bis-carbonate, sold, for example, under the trade name CR-39® by the company PPG Industries (ORMA® ESSILOR lenses), or by polymerization of the thio (meth) acrylic monomers, such as those described in the French patent application FR 2734827. The substrates may be obtained by polymerization of mixtures of the above monomers, or may further comprise mixtures of these polymers and (co) polymers. Other preferred substrates are polycarbonates.

The ophthalmic lens has a front main face and a rear main face. By main rear side is meant the main face which, when using the ophthalmic lens, is closest to the eye of the user. This is usually a concave face. Conversely, front main face, we mean the main face which, when using the ophthalmic lens, is furthest from the eye of the user. This is usually a convex face.

According to the invention, at least one of the main faces of the ophthalmic lens comprises a filter. As indicated above, the substrate of the ophthalmic lens may comprise different coatings either on the main front face of the ophthalmic lens or on the main rear face of the ophthalmic lens.

A coating that is "on" the substrate or that has been "deposited" on the substrate is defined as a coating that: (i) is positioned over a major face of the substrate, (ii) is not necessarily in contact with the substrate, that is to say one or more intermediate coatings may be disposed between the substrate and the coating in question, and (iii) does not necessarily completely cover the main face of the substrate. When "a layer A is located under a layer B", it will be understood that the layer B is further away from the substrate than the layer A. In one embodiment, the filter is formed directly on the front main face of the ophthalmic lens.

In another preferred embodiment, it is deposited directly on an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating which has itself been deposited on the front main face of the ophthalmic lens. Before the deposition of the filter, it is common to subject the surface of said substrate to a physical or chemical activation treatment, intended to increase the adhesion of the filter on the main face or faces.

This pre-treatment is generally conducted under vacuum. It can be a bombardment with energetic species, for example an ion beam ("Ion Pre-Cleaning" or "IPC") or an electron beam, a corona discharge treatment, effluvage , a UV treatment, or a vacuum plasma treatment, generally an oxygen or argon plasma. It can also be an acidic or basic surface treatment and / or by solvents (water or organic solvent). In the present application, the spectral reflectivity of the ophthalmic lens, for a given angle of incidence of the face comprising said filter, represents the variation of the reflectivity (ie of the reflection factor) at this angle of incidence as a function of the wave length. The spectral reflectivity curve corresponds to a graphical representation of the spectral reflectivity in which the spectral reflectivity (ordinates) is plotted as a function of the wavelength (abscissa). The spectral reflectivity curves can be measured by means of a spectrophotometer, for example a Perkin Elmer Lambda 850 spectrophotometer equipped with URA (Universal Reflectance Accessory). The average reflection factor, denoted Rrn, is as defined in ISO 13666: 1998, and measured in accordance with ISO 8980-4 (at an angle of incidence of less than 17 °, typically 15 °). that is, it is the (unweighted) average of the spectral reflectivity over the entire light spectrum ranging from 400 nm to 700 nm.

Likewise, the luminous reflection factor, denoted R ', also referred to herein as average light reflection factor, is as defined in ISO 13666: 1998, and measured in accordance with ISO 8980-4 (at an angle of incidence less than 17 °, typically 15 °), that is to say that it is the weighted average of the spectral reflectivity over the entire visible light spectrum between 380 nm and 780 nm .

By analogy, we define a mean reflection factor in blue between 420 nm and 450 nm, denoted R ,,, B, which corresponds to the average (unweighted) of the spectral reflectivity over the wavelength range from 420 nm at 450 nm. According to the invention, this average reflection factor in the blue Rrn, B can be measured for an angle of incidence on the main face having the filter between 0 ° (normal incidence) and 15 °, preferably at 15 °. In the present application, note also: - Re (435 nm) the value of the reflectivity of the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter according to the invention, this value being determined (by measurement or by calculation) to a length wavelength of 435 nanometers and for an angle of incidence 0 on the main face having the filter between 0 ° and 15 °, and - Re, (435 nm) the value of the reflectivity of the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter according to the invention, this value being determined (by measurement or by calculation) at a wavelength of 435 nanometers and for an angle of incidence 0 'on the main face comprising the filter between 30 ° and 45 ° °.

Then define a parameter A (0,0 ') by the following relation: A (0,0') = 1 - [Re, (435 nm) / Re (435 nm)]. We will see in the following description how this parameter A (0,0 ') makes it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of an ophthalmic lens to limit the amount of phototoxic blue light arriving on the retina of a wearer, taking into account respective contributions of the blue light from the side of the front side or the side of the rear face of the lens.

According to the invention, the filter gives the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter the property of presenting, for an angle of incidence on this main face between 0 ° and 15 °, a mean factor of reflection in the blue Rrn, B which is greater than or equal to 5%. The filter is thus specially designed to maximize the average reflection factor in blue Rrn, B. This maximizes the rejection of phototoxic blue light, in the wavelength range 420 nm to 450 nm, arriving directly on the front main face of the lens. It is considered here that most of the direct light coming from the front of the wearer of the ophthalmic lens and reaching the retina thereof has a low incidence on the front main face, generally between 0 ° and 15 °. . According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the average reflection factor in blue R ,,, B, for an angle of incidence on the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter between 0 ° and 15 °, preferably 15 °, is greater than or equal to 10%, more preferably greater than or equal to 20%, and more preferably greater than or equal to 30%, and optimally greater than or equal to 50%. According to the invention, the filter also gives the main face comprising the filter the property of presenting a spectral reflectivity curve for an angle of incidence on this main face between 0 ° and 15 °, preferably 15 °, which a: - a maximum reflectivity at a wavelength of less than 435 nanometers, and - a half-height width (FWHM) greater than or equal to 80 nanometers. Indeed, as can be seen in FIGS. 1 to 3, the spectral reflectivity curves of the main face before the ophthalmic lenses in accordance with the invention generally have, in the wavelength range from 380 nm to 500 nm. nm, a form of "bell" that can be characterized by its height (maximum reflectivity) and its width at half height (FWHM or "Full Width at Half Maximum" in English). According to the invention, the maximum reflectivity is obtained for a wavelength of less than 435 nm. It is therefore offset with respect to the central wavelength (435 nm) of the wavelength band between 420 nm and 450 nm of the phototoxic blue light. Preferably, the maximum reflectivity is at a wavelength less than or equal to 410 nm, better still less than or equal to 400 nm and even more preferably less than or equal to 390 nm. In a preferred embodiment, this offset is limited so that the maximum reflectivity is also at a wavelength greater than or equal to 350 nm. Preferably, the maximum reflectivity is at a wavelength greater than 360 nm, better still greater than or equal to 370 nm.

According to the invention, the width at mid-height of the spectral reflectivity curve considered, for an angle of incidence on the main face having the filter between 0 ° and 15 ° is greater than or equal to 80 nm. A filter dimensioned such that the spectral reflectivity curve for an angle of incidence on the main face having the filter between 0 ° and 15 ° has a width at half height (FWHM) greater than or equal to 80 nanometers , will be designated subsequently wide filter. In a preferred embodiment, the width at half height is greater than or equal to 90 nanometers, preferably greater than or equal to 100 nanometers. Also preferably, the half-height width is less than 150 nanometers, more preferably less than 120 nanometers, more preferably less than 110 nm. Still according to the invention, the filter finally gives the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter the property of having a parameter A (0,0 '), as defined above, greater than or equal to 0.6. As defined above, the parameter A (0.0 ') depends both on the reflectivity at 435 nm for an angle of incidence 0 on the main face between 0 ° and 15 °, denoted Re (435 nm) and both reflectivity at 435 nm for an angle of incidence 0 'on the main face between 30 ° and 45 °, denoted Re, (435 nm). In the case of an ophthalmic lens according to the invention, placed in front of the eye of a wearer, as explained in the introduction, it is understood that the amount of phototoxic blue light included in the wavelength range of 420 nm at 450 nm arriving directly on the main front face of the ophthalmic lens and reaching the eye of the wearer varies in the opposite direction to the magnitude Re (435 nm). Similarly, the amount of phototoxic blue light in the wavelength range of 420 nm to 450 nm arriving indirectly from the back of the wearer and reflected by the ophthalmic lens varies in the same direction as the magnitude Re. , (435 nm). Thus, by choosing a parameter A (0,0 ') such that A (0,0') 0,6, an ophthalmic lens with an effective and optimized filter against phototoxic blue light is obtained. Indeed, the parameter A (0,0 ') is all the higher as: (i) the value of the reflectivity Re, (435 nm) is small, that is to say that the quantity of blue light phototoxicity from the back of the wearer and reflected by the ophthalmic lens towards the retina of the wearer is low, and that (ii) the value of the reflectivity Re (435 nm) is high, i.e. the amount of phototoxic blue light arriving directly on the front main face of the ophthalmic lens and reflected by it is high.

In a preferred embodiment, the parameter A (0,0 ') of the ophthalmic lens provided with a wide filter according to the invention is greater than or equal to 0.7, better or equal to 0.75, and better still greater than or equal to 0.8. Preferably, the parameter A (0,0 ') is determined for an angle of incidence 0 substantially equal to 15 ° and an angle of incidence 0' substantially equal to 45 °. Preferably, the average transmission factor in the blue between 465 nm and 495 nm of the ophthalmic lens according to the invention (for an angle of incidence on the main front face between 0 ° and 15 °), which corresponds to the mean (unweighted) of the spectral transmittivity over the range of wavelengths from 465 nm to 495 nm, is greater than or equal to 80%, better than or equal to 85%, and more preferably greater than or equal to 90% . This makes it possible in particular to ensure that most of the blue light between 465 nm and 495 nm, which would be responsible for the synchronization of the biological clock, is transmitted to the eye of a wearer equipped with this ophthalmic lens. In a preferred manner, the transmission factor of the ophthalmic lens at 480 nm for an angle of incidence on the main front face between 0 ° and 15 ° is greater than or equal to 70%, better still greater than or equal to 90%, and even better than or equal to 95%. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the filter that includes the lens is an interference filter. By this it will be understood that the filter comprises at least one layer formed on one of the main faces of the ophthalmic lens provided with the interference filter, this layer having a refractive index different from at least 0.1 units of the index of refraction of the substrate. The optical properties of such a filter, such as reflectivity, result from interference from multiple reflections at the air interfaces! layer and substrate! layer. A filter layer is defined as having a deposited thickness greater than or equal to 1 nm. Thus, any layer having a thickness less than 1 nm will not be counted in the number of layers of the filter. Any sub-layer disposed between the filter and the substrate is also not counted in the number of layers of the interference filter. Unless otherwise indicated, all layer thicknesses disclosed herein are physical thicknesses, not optical thicknesses. When the interference filter of the invention comprises at least two layers, it then comprises a stack of at least one layer of high refractive index, or "high index layer" designated HI layer, and at least one layer of stockings refractive index, or "low index layer" denoted layer B. In a preferred embodiment, the interference filter comprises less than 11 layers, preferably a number of layers ranging from 2 to 10 layers, better still from 4 to 9 layers, optimally from 4 to 7 layers. It is not necessary for the HI and BI layers to be alternated in the stack of the interference filter, although they may be alternated according to one embodiment of the invention. Two or more HI layers can be laid one on top of the other, just as two or more BI layers can be laid on top of each other. In the present application, a layer of the interference filter is said layer of high refractive index "when its refractive index is greater than 1.60, preferably greater than or equal to 1.65, more preferably greater than or equal to 1, 70, better than or equal to 1.80 and even better than or equal to 1.90. Similarly, a layer of the interference filter is called a low refractive index layer when its refractive index is less than 1.50, preferably less than or equal to 1.48, better still less than or equal to 1.47. Unless otherwise indicated, the refractive indexes referred to herein are expressed at a temperature of 25 ° C and a reference wavelength of 550 nm. The HI layer is a conventional high refractive index layer, well known in the art. It generally comprises one or more mineral oxides such as, without limitation: zirconia (ZrO 2), titanium oxide (TiO 2), alumina (Al 2 O 3), tantalum pentoxide (Ta 2 O 5), neodymium oxide ( Nd205), praseodymium oxide (Pr203), praseodymium titanate (PrTiO3), lanthanum oxide (La203), niobium pentoxide (Nb205), or yttrium oxide (Y203). Optionally, the HI layers may also contain silica or other materials of low refractive index, provided that their refractive index is greater than 1.60 as indicated above. Preferred materials are TiO 2, PrTiO 3, ZrO 2, Al 2 O 3, Y 2 O 3 and mixtures thereof.

The BI layer is also a well known conventional low refractive index layer and may comprise, without limitation: silica (5iO 2), or a mixture of silica and alumina, in particular silica doped with alumina , the latter contributing to increase the thermal resistance of the interference filter. The BI layer is preferably a layer comprising at least 80% by weight of silica, better still at least 90% by weight of silica, relative to the total mass of the BI layer, and more preferably consists of a silica layer. Optionally, the low index layers may also contain materials of high refractive index, provided that the refractive index of the resulting layer is less than 1.50. When a layer BI comprising a mixture of 5iO 2 and Al 2 O 3 is used, it preferably comprises from 1 to 10%, better still from 1 to 8% and even more preferably from 1 to 5% by weight of Al 2 O 3 relative to the mass. total silica and alumina in this layer. For example, 5iO 2 layers doped with 4% or less of Al 2 O 3 by mass, or a 5iO 2 layer doped with 8% Al 2 O 3 can be employed. Commercially available 5102 / A1203 mixtures can be used, such as LIMA 'marketed by UMICORE MATERIALS AG (refractive index between 1.48 and 1.50), or the substance L5' sold by MERCK KGaA ( refraction equal to 1.48 for a wavelength of 500 nm).

The outer layer of the interference filter is generally a low index layer, typically based on silica, preferably comprising at least 80% by weight of silica, better still at least 90% by weight of silica (for example a layer of silica doped with silica. alumina), relative to the total mass of this outer layer, and even better consists of an outer layer of silica.

In a preferred embodiment, the filter has a total thickness of less than or equal to 700 nanometers, more preferably less than or equal to 600 nm. The total thickness of the filter is generally greater than 200 nm, preferably greater than 250 nm. In particular embodiments of the invention where the filter is an interference filter comprising 8 or 9 layers, the total thickness of the stack is preferably between 450 nm and 600 nm. In particular embodiments of the invention where the filter is an interference filter comprising 6 or 7 layers, the total thickness of the stack is preferably less than 500 nm, better still is between 300 nm and 500 nm. In particular embodiments of the invention where the filter is an interference filter comprising 4 or 5 layers, the total thickness of the stack is preferably less than 300 nm, better it is between 200 nm and 300 nm. Generally, the HI layers have a physical thickness ranging from 10 nm to 100 nm, better still less than or equal to 80 nm, and better still less than or equal to 70 nm, and the BI layers have a physical thickness ranging from 10 nm to 150 nm , better than or equal to 135 nm, and more preferably less than or equal to 120 nm. The ophthalmic lens of the invention can also be made antistatic, i.e. not retain and / or develop appreciable electrostatic charge, by incorporating at least one electrically conductive layer into the filter. Preferably, it is an additional layer of a conductive oxide such as indium oxide, tin oxide, ITO (Indium Tin Oxide). This layer has a thickness generally less than 20 nm, preferably between 5 nm and 15 nm. It is preferably adjacent to a high index layer such as a zirconium oxide layer. Preferably, this conductive layer is disposed under the last low index layer of the filter (that is to say the layer closest to the air), generally based on silica. According to one embodiment of the invention, the filter is deposited on an underlayer. It is considered here that this sub-layer of the filter is not part of the filter. By underlayer of the filter, or adhesion layer is meant a coating of relatively large thickness, used for the purpose of improving the mechanical properties such as the abrasion resistance and / or the scratch of the filter and or promote its adhesion to the underlying substrate or coating.

Given its relatively large thickness, the underlayer generally does not participate in the optical filtering activity of the filter, in particular in the case where it has a refractive index close to that of the underlying coating (which is generally the anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating) or that of the substrate of the ophthalmic lens, when the underlayer is directly deposited on the substrate of the ophthalmic lens. The underlayer must be of sufficient thickness to promote the abrasion resistance of the filter, but preferably not so great as not to cause light absorption which, depending on the nature of the underlayer, could significantly reduce the filtering factor. Ty visual transmission as defined in ISO 13666: 1998, and measured in accordance with ISO 8980-3. The thickness of this sub-layer is generally less than 300 nm, better still less than 200 nm, and is generally greater than 90 nm, better still greater than 100 nm. The underlayer preferably comprises a layer based on SiO 2, preferably comprising at least 80% by weight of silica, better still at least 90% by weight of silica, with respect to the total mass of the underlayer, and even more preferably better consists of a silica underlayer. The thickness of this silica-based underlayer is generally less than 300 nm, more preferably less than 200 nm, and is generally greater than 90 nm, more preferably greater than 100 nm. According to another embodiment, this 5iO 2 -based sublayer is a silica-doped sublayer with alumina, in proportions as defined above, preferably consisting of a silica layer doped with silica. alumina. According to a particular embodiment, the underlayer consists of a 5iO 2 layer. It is preferable to use a monolayer sub-layer. However, the underlayer can be laminated (multilayer), in particular when the underlayer and the underlying coating (or the substrate, if the underlayer is deposited directly on the substrate) exhibit a difference in not negligible refraction. This is particularly the case when the underlying coating, which is generally an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating, or the substrate, has a high refractive index, term by which is meant a higher refractive index or 1.55, preferably greater than or equal to 1.57. In this case, the sub-layer may comprise, in addition to a layer of thickness between 90 nm and 300 nm, said main layer, preferably at most three other layers, better at most two other layers, interposed between the optionally coated substrate and this layer of thickness between 90 nm and 300 nm, which is generally a silica-based layer. These additional layers are preferably thin layers, the function of which is to limit the multiple reflections at the underlying sub-layer / coating interface or at the sub-layer / substrate interface, as appropriate.

A multilayer sublayer preferably comprises, in addition to the main layer, a layer of high refractive index and thickness of less than or equal to 80 nm, better still less than or equal to 50 nm and better still less than or equal to 30 nm. This high refractive index layer is directly in contact with the high refractive index substrate or the underlying high refractive index coating, as appropriate. Of course, this embodiment may be used even if the substrate (or the underlying coating) has a refractive index of less than 1.55. Alternatively, the underlayer comprises, in addition to the main layer and the above-mentioned high refractive index layer, a layer of refractive index material less than or equal to 1.55, preferably less than or equal to 1.52. more preferably less than or equal to 1.50 based on SiO 2 (that is to say preferably comprising at least 80% by mass of silica) with a thickness of less than or equal to 80 nm, better still less than or equal to 50 nm and more preferably less than or equal to 30 nm, on which is deposited said high refractive index layer. Typically, in this case, the underlayer comprises, deposited in this order on the optionally coated substrate, a layer of 25 nm of SiO 2, a layer of 10 nm of ZrO 2 or Ta 2 O 5 and the main layer of the underlayer.

The filter and the optional sub-layer are preferably deposited by vacuum deposition according to one of the following techniques: i) by evaporation, possibly assisted by ion beam; ii) ion beam sputtering; iii) sputtering; iv) plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. These different techniques are described in the books "Thin Film Processes" and "Thin Film Processes II" (Vossen & Kern Publishers, Academic Press, 1978 and 1991 respectively). A particularly recommended technique is the vacuum evaporation technique. Preferably, when the filter is an interference filter, the deposition of each of the layers of the stack of the filter and the possible sub-layer is carried out by vacuum evaporation. In a particular embodiment of the invention, the ophthalmic lens has a mean light reflection factor R 'on the main face of the ophthalmic lens having the filter which is less than or equal to 2.5%. Preferably, this average light reflection factor R 'is less than or equal to 2%, better still less than or equal to 1.5%. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the average light reflection factor R 'is less than or equal to 0.7%, better still less than or equal to 0.6%. In a preferred embodiment, the ophthalmic lens has a mean light reflection factor R 'on each of the main faces of the ophthalmic lens which is less than or equal to 2.5%. More preferably, this average light reflection factor R 'is less than or equal to 0.7%. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the main face coated by the filter according to the invention is the main front face of the ophthalmic lens of the invention and the rear main face is coated with a conventional antireflection coating or preferably an antireflection coating effective in the UV, that is to say, little UV reflective, such as those described for example in PCT / EP2011 / 072386.

The average factor of reflection in the UV Ruv on the main rear face of the ophthalmic lens, for wavelengths between 280 nm and 380 nm, weighted by the function W (X) defined in ISO 13666: 1998 , is less than or equal to 7%, better than or equal to 6%, and more preferably less than or equal to 5%, for an angle of incidence of 30 ° and for an angle of incidence of 45 °. The average factor of reflection in the UV Ruv is defined by the relation: 380 f W (2) .R (2) .d2 Ruv 280 380 f W (2) .d2 280 where R (X) denotes the spectral reflectivity on the main rear face of the ophthalmic lens at the wavelength considered, and W (X) denotes a weighting function equal to the product of the solar spectral irradiance Es (X) by the relative spectral function of efficiency S ( X). The spectral function W (X), which makes it possible to calculate the UV radiation transmission factors, is defined in the ISO 13666: 1998 standard. The UV-efficient antireflection coating preferably comprises a stack of at least one layer of high refractive index and at least one layer of low refractive index.

In another embodiment of the invention, the two main front and rear faces each comprise a phototoxic blue light filter. The two filters thus formed, one on the front main face and the other on the rear main face, can then be identical or different. The filter according to the invention can be deposited directly on a bare substrate. In certain applications, it is preferable that the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter is coated with one or more functional coatings prior to the formation of the filter on this main face. These functional coatings, conventionally used in optics, can be, without limitation: an anti-shock primer layer, an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating, a polarizer coating, a colored coating.

Generally, the main front and / or rear face of the substrate on which a filter will be formed is coated with a layer of anti-shock primer, an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating. The filter is preferably deposited on an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating. The anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating may be any layer conventionally used as an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch coating in the field of ophthalmic lenses. Such coatings are described, inter alia, in EP 0614957. The ophthalmic lens according to the invention may also comprise coatings formed on the filter and capable of modifying its surface properties, such as hydrophobic and / or oleophobic coatings ( "Top coal-" anti-fouling) and / or anti-fog coatings. Such coatings are described, inter alia, in US 7678464. These coatings are preferably deposited on the outer layer of the filter. Their thickness is generally less than or equal to 10 nm, preferably from 1 nm to 10 nm, better still from 1 nm to 5 nm. Typically, an ophthalmic lens according to the invention comprises a substrate successively coated on its main face before a layer of anti-shock primer, an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch layer, a filter according to the invention, and a hydrophobic and / or oleophobic coating. The ophthalmic lens according to the invention is preferably an ophthalmic lens for spectacles, or an ophthalmic lens blank. The invention thus also relates to a pair of spectacles comprising at least one such ophthalmic lens.

The ophthalmic lens may be a polarized lens, or a solar lens, tinted, with or without correction. The rear principal face of the substrate of the optical article may be successively coated with a layer of anti-shock primer, with an anti-abrasion and / or anti-scratch layer, with an anti-reflection coating which may whether or not it is an anti-UV coating, and a hydrophobic and / or oleophobic coating. It is particularly advantageous for protecting from the phototoxicity of blue light the eye of a wearer suffering from deterioration of an eye, in particular due to a degenerative process such as age-related macular degeneration. An ophthalmic lens as described above also has the advantage of conferring a better visual contrast to the wearer. The following examples illustrate the invention in a more detailed but nonlimiting manner. EXAMPLES 1. General Procedures and Procedures The filters according to the invention are deposited on ORMA® glasses coated with an anti-abrasion coating as described in Example 3 of Patent EP614957. The evaporation device and the deposition conditions of the TiO 2 and ZrO 2 layers (evaporation rate, pressure) are as described in the patent application WO 2008107325. 2. Calculation of the Curves The spectral reflectivity curves of the filters according to US Pat. The invention has been modeled from the Essential Mac Leod software (version 9.4) of Thin Film Center.

The characteristics of the filters and their properties are given in point 3 below.

The ophthalmic lenses equipped with the filters of Examples 1 and 2 were indeed made and the spectral reflectivity curves measured. It was verified that the curves obtained corresponded to those modeled. 3. Stacks of filters and properties. Spectral reflectivity curves. Results The structural characteristics and the optical performance of the ophthalmic lenses obtained according to Examples 1 to 3 are detailed below. The spectral reflectivity curves at an angle of incidence on the main front face of 15 ° and for wavelengths ranging from 280 nm to 780 nm of Examples 1 to 3 below are shown in Figures 1 to 3. Also shown in these figures are the spectral reflectivity curves of Comparative Examples C1, C2, and C3 (see below). The values of the average reflection factors are those of the front main face. The factors Rrn, B and R 'are indicated for an angle of incidence of 15 °.

Ex. 1: 4 layers wide filter on the main front face Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 34 nm SiO 2 35 nm ZrO 2 73 nm 5iO 2 110 nm Air Thickness 2 total 52 nm Rm, B @ 15 ° (420 - 450nm) 11.8 % Max. Reflectivity 359 nm Width at half 98 nm height 1 (0 = 15 °, 0 '= 45 °) @ 435 nm 0.72 Rm @ 15 ° (465-495 nm) 2.3% @ spectral @ 0.85 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° (380 - 780 nm) 0.5% Ex. 2: 6-layer wide filter on the main front side Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 44 nm SiO 2 45 nm ZrO 2 68 nm SiO 2 32 nm ZrO 2 66 nm 5iO 2 124 nm Air Thickness 3 total 79 nm Rm, B @ 15 ° (420 - 450 nm) 30.6% Max. Reflectivity 379 nm Width at mid-100 nm height 1 (E) = 15 °, 0 '= 45 °) @ 435 nm 0.75 Rm @ 15 ° (465 -495 nm) @ spectral @ 0.92 15 ° 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° (380 - 780 nm) 1.9% Ex. 3: broad 8-layer filter on the main front face Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 47 nm SiO 2 50 nm ZrO 2 54 nm SiO 2 70 nm ZrO 2 45 nm Si02 62 nm ZrO2 53 nm 5iO2 134 nm Air Total thickness 15 nm Rm, B @ 15 ° 51.5% (420-450nm) Max. Reflectivity 384 nm Width at mid-105 nm height 1 (0 = 15 °, 0 '= 45 °) @ 435 nm 0.80 Rm @ 15 ° (465 -495 nm) @ spectral @ 0.95 15 ° 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° 2.0% (380 - 780 nm) In the preceding table, the spectral parameter λ 15 ° is defined by the relation: λ spectral @ 15 ° = [R15 (435 nm) - R15. (480 nm)] / R15 (435 nm) where R15 (435 nm) and R15 (480 nm) respectively represent the reflectivity of the main front face at 435 nm and at 480 nm, for an angle of incidence of 15 ° on the main front side.

It is found that the ophthalmic lenses according to the invention have very good phototoxic blue light reflection properties (Rn ,, B> 10%), without this adversely affecting the anti-reflection performance in the visible range (R, < 2.5% for an angle of incidence of 15 °). The ophthalmic lenses obtained according to Examples 1 to 3 also have excellent transparency properties and good colorimetric neutrality, good resistance to abrasion and scratching, and good resistance to treatment by dipping in hot water. followed by a mechanical surface stress. The adhesion of the coatings to the substrate is also very satisfactory. Comparative Examples C1, C2, and C3 The "anti-blue light" performance of three ophthalmic lenses equipped with a filter that does not satisfy the characteristics of the filters of the invention, in particular the half-height width, are recorded in the tables. below (see next page). It can be seen that ophthalmic lenses equipped with filters according to the invention have a better light reflection factor Ft than comparative lenses, in particular filters having a limited number of layers (number of layers less than or equal to 7, preferably less than or equal to equal to 6 layers). It is found that all the ophthalmic lenses of comparative examples C1, C2, and C3 which are provided with filters which do not satisfy the characteristics of the filters of the invention, in particular the half-height width, have a mean reflection factor in the blue. Rrn, B greater than or equal to 5%. On the other hand, as can be seen in FIGS. 1 to 3, no comparative example of these ophthalmic lenses has: a maximum of reflectivity at a wavelength of less than 435 nm, and a greater half-height width or equal to 80 nm. Comparative Example Cl: 4-layer "narrow" filter on the main front face Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 45 nm SiO 2 15 nm ZrO 2 235 nm SiO 2 98 nm Air Thickness 393 nm total Rm, B @ 15 ° 8.5% ( 420 - 450nm) Max. Reflectivity 435 nm Width at mid-62 nm height 1 (E) = 0 °, 0 '= 45 °) 0.40 @ 435 nm Rm @ 15 ° (465 - 495 nm) @ spectral @ 0.40 15 ° 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° (380 - 780 nm) 1.4% Comparative Example C2: 6-layer "narrow" filter on the main front face Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 34 nm SiO 2 43 nm ZrO 2 315 nm SiO 2 nm ZrO2 196 nm 5iO2 115 nm Air Thickness 7 total 28 nm Rm, B @ 15 ° 35.0% (420 - 450 nm) Max. Reflectivity 437 nm Width at mid-47 nm height 1 (E) = 0 °, 0 '= 45 °) 0.55 @ 435 nm Rm @ 15 ° (465 -495 nm) @ spectral @ 0.90 15 ° 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° (380 - 780 nm) 2.6% Comparative example C3: 8-layer "narrow" filter on the main front face Substrate + hard coat ZrO 2 163 nm 5iO 2 220 nm ZrO 2 182 nm SiO 2 51 nm ZrO 2 47 nm SiO 2 26 nm ZrO 2 121 nm 5iO 2 107 nm Air Total thickness 9 nm Rm, B @ 15 ° 55.0% (420-450 nm) Max. Reflectivity 436 nm Width at mid-54 nm height 1 (E) = 0 °, 0 '= 45 °) 0.57 @ 435 nm Rm @ 15 ° (465 -495 nm) 13.8% @ spectral @ 0.93 15 ° 435 nm / 480 nm Rv @ 15 ° (380 - 780 nm) 2.1% Furthermore, it will be understood in the light of FIG. 4 the effectiveness of Examples 1 to 3 of ophthalmic lenses according to the invention compared to to Comparative Examples C1, C2, and C3 described above. The rear reflection BR (X) and the transmission T (X) of the entire optical system (with the blue filter corresponding to Examples 1, 2 and 3 and Comparative Examples C1, C2 and C3, on the front face of a ORMA® glass biplane lens, with Crizal Forte® UV antireflection on the back (R = 0.59%, Ruv = 3.1% at 45 ° incidence), were determined using Essential Mac Leod software for each of the filters studied The calculation takes into account all the multiple reflections occurring within the ophthalmic lens.To assess the risk associated with blue light, these transmission and reflection curves are weighted to using the WB (X) spectral function derived from the international standard ISO 8980-3.

This function results from the product of the blue light hazard function B (X) and the spectral distribution of solar radiation function. (X) integrated over the wavelength range from 380 nm to 500 nm.

Spectral functions for calculating transmission values or reflection of light in the band 380-500 nm Solar irradiation Risk function Weighting function WB (A) = Es (A) .B (A) Spectral length of blue light d At (nm) Es (A) (mW / m2.nm) B (A) 0.006 2 336 365 397 380 385 390 395 432 400 470 405 562 410 672 415 705 420 733 425 760 430 787 0.012 0.025 10 0, 05 22 0.10 47 0.20 112 0.40 269 0.80 564 0.90 660 0.95 722 0.98 771 1.00 849 1.00 911 0.97 930 0.94 946 0.90 933 864 0.70 776 0.62 706 0.55 639 0.45 532 0.40 479 0.22 266 0.16 194 0.10 122 435 440 445 450 455 849 911 959 1006 1037 460 1080 465 1109 470 1138 475 1161 480 1183 485 1197 490 1210 495 1213 500 1215 Table 1: Numerical data used to calculate the weighting function WB (A). In FIG. 4 are represented: on the abscissa: the value of the rear reflection weighted by the risk weighting function of the blue light, for an angle of incidence on the main rear face of 45 °. 500 f WB (2) .BR (2) .d / I BRB 380,500 f WB (2) .c2,380 where BR (X) is the back reflectance spectral factor of glass ("back reflectance" in English), and - on the ordinate: the value of the transmission weighted by the risk weighting function of the blue light. This transmission value represents the share (in%) of direct light transmitted in the blue-violet band (from 380 nm to 500 nm) by this ophthalmic lens for an angle of incidence on the main front face of 00. 500 f WB (2) .T (2) .d2 TB - "0 500 IWB (2) .d2 380 where T (X) is the spectral transmittance of glass The WBOO is the weighting function that is equal to to the product of the spectral solar irradiation Es (X) and the risk function of the blue light 8 (4 (see Table 1) It can be seen in Figure 4 that Examples 1 to 3 of ophthalmic lenses according to the invention not only have a lower transmission, but also a lower back reflection, than the comparative examples C1, C2, and C3, with equal number of layers Thus, the ophthalmic lenses according to the invention make it possible to prevent a degenerative process of the of a carrier due to the phototoxicity of blue light, such as age-related macular degeneration.

FIG. 5 represents the spectral reflectivity curves between 380 nm and 500 nm of the ophthalmic lens of example 3 for angles of incidence on the front main face of 00 and 450. It can be seen from this figure that the 45 ° spectral reflectivity curve is shifted towards the short wavelengths (i.e. towards deep blue and UV) with respect to the spectral reflectivity curve at 0 °. This is an illustration of the high angular selectivity of the wide filter of Example 3.

This shift then causes the value of the spectral reflectivity at 435 nm for an angle of incidence of 45 °, denoted here R 45 (435 nm), is low, here equal to 11%, and much lower than the value of the spectral reflectivity. at 435 nm for an angle of incidence of 0 °, noted here 1'4 (435 nm), equal to 59.5%. It is thus understood that the value of the parameter A (0,0 ') is here high, equal to 0,82. This is true for all ophthalmic lenses, which are provided with at least one wide filter according to the invention.

On the contrary, and as can be seen in the tables of the comparative examples, an ophthalmic lens provided with a filter that does not satisfy the characteristics of the filters of the invention, in particular the width at half height, does not have any parameter A ( 0.0 ') high enough to be effective against phototoxic blue light.

Claims (7)

REVENDICATIONS1. Ophthalmic lens having a front main face and a rear main face, at least one of the main faces having a filter which gives the main face comprising said filter the following properties: a mean reflection factor in the blue (R ',, e) over a range of wavelengths ranging from 420 nanometers to 450 nanometers which is greater than or equal to 5%, for an angle of incidence between 0 ° and 15 °, a spectral reflectivity curve for an angle of incidence between 0 ° and 15 °, this reflectivity curve having: a reflectivity maximum at a wavelength less than 435 nanometers, and a half-height width (FWHM) greater than or equal to 80 nanometers, and for a angle of incidence θ between 00 and 15 ° and for an angle of incidence 8 'between 30 ° and 450, a parameter at (0.8') defined by the relation, at (0.8 ') = 1 - [Re, (435 nm) / Re (435 nm)], such that this parameter A (8,8 ') is higher ur or equal to 0.6, where - R0 (435 nm) represents the value of the reflectivity of the main face comprising said filter at the wavelength of 435 nanometers for the angle of incidence 8, and - Re, (435 nm) represents the value of the reflectivity of the main face comprising said filter at the wavelength of 435 nanometers for the angle of incidence 0 '. An ophthalmic lens according to claim 1, wherein the parameter A (8.01 is defined for an angle of incidence 8 = 15 ° and an angle of incidence 8 '= 45 °. An ophthalmic lens according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the average blue reflection factor (R, ', B) is greater than or equal to 10%, more preferably greater than or equal to 20%, and more preferably greater than or equal to 30%. 4. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the maximum reflectivity is at a wavelength less than or equal to 410 nm, better still less than or equal to 400 nm, and more preferably less than or equal to 390 nm. 5. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the width at half height is greater than or equal to 90 nanometers, preferably greater than or equal to 100 nanometers. 6. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the width at half height is less than or equal to 150 nanometers, preferably less than or equal to 120 nanometers, better still less than or equal to 110 nm. 7. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the average light reflection factor (K) on the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter is less than or equal to 2.5%, preferably less than or equal to at 1.5% .8. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the average light reflection factor (Ru) on each of the main faces of the ophthalmic lens is less than or equal to 2.5%, preferably less than or equal to 1.5 %. 9. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the average light reflection factor (Ru) on the main face of the ophthalmic lens comprising the filter is less than or equal to 0.7%. 10. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the filter is an interference filter. 11. Ophthalmic lens according to claim 10, wherein the filter comprises a number of layers less than or equal to 11, preferably from 2 to 10 layers, and even more preferably from 4 to 9 layers. 12. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the filter has a total thickness less than or equal to 700 nanometers, preferably less than or equal to 600 nanometers. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the ratio [R154435 nm) - R15 (480 nm) / R15 (435 nm) is greater than or equal to 0.8, where R15 (435 nm) and R15 (480 nm) respectively represent the reflectivity of the main face comprising said filter at 435 nm and at 480 nm, for an angle of incidence of 15 ° on this main face. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in that the value of the maximum reflectivity reflectivity of the main face comprising said filter, for an angle of incidence of 15 °, is preferably at least 1.5 times higher, better at least 2 times greater than the reflectivity value of this same main face, at the wavelength of 435 nm and at an angle of incidence of 15 °. 15. Ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the filter is formed on the front main face of the ophthalmic lens. An ophthalmic lens according to claim 15, wherein the rear major face of the ophthalmic lens comprises an anti-reflective coating effective in the UV. 17. Pair of spectacles comprising at least one ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 16. 18. Use of an ophthalmic lens according to one of claims 1 to 16 for improving the vision contrast of a wearer.