[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP3161562B1 - A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller - Google Patents

A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3161562B1
EP3161562B1 EP15734470.6A EP15734470A EP3161562B1 EP 3161562 B1 EP3161562 B1 EP 3161562B1 EP 15734470 A EP15734470 A EP 15734470A EP 3161562 B1 EP3161562 B1 EP 3161562B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
supervisory controller
local
control
controllers
process variables
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15734470.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3161562A2 (en
Inventor
Shrikant Bhat
Michael Lundh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ABB Schweiz AG
Original Assignee
ABB Schweiz AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ABB Schweiz AG filed Critical ABB Schweiz AG
Publication of EP3161562A2 publication Critical patent/EP3161562A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3161562B1 publication Critical patent/EP3161562B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/4184—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by fault tolerance, reliability of production system
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B9/00—Safety arrangements
    • G05B9/02—Safety arrangements electric
    • G05B9/03—Safety arrangements electric with multiple-channel loop, i.e. redundant control systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
    • G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
    • G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
    • G05B19/0423—Input/output
    • G05B19/0425—Safety, monitoring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
    • G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
    • G05B19/0428—Safety, monitoring
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20—Pc systems
    • G05B2219/24—Pc safety
    • G05B2219/24182—Redundancy
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to control systems and industrial automation. More particularly, the present invention relates to redundant secondary controllers of control systems.
  • advanced process control applications are control applications supervise and regulate the local control applications.
  • Advanced process control applications due to their high processing requirements, are present on remote servers and communicate with the local control applications within the plant site in terms of assigning the set-points to the local control applications.
  • the local control applications targets to attain the received set points. For example, a model predictive control assigns set-point to the plant level PID control and PID controller targets to attain that.
  • a backup or redundant network access point having similar functionality as the advanced control application is provided. Upon detection of loss of connectivity, the redundant network access point is selected to act as the advanced control application.
  • a secondary communication channel is present between the cloud platform and the local control application. The advanced control application is accessed through the secondary communication channel upon failure of the primary communication channel.
  • US 2005/0004684 A1 relates to a system and a method for adjusting a control model, wherein control information is received from a sensor.
  • a cloud-hosted control system for protecting against local control failure is described.
  • a process control system that integrates the collection and analysis of process control data is presented in US 2007/0142936 A1 .
  • Figure 1 illustrates a system 100 controlling a process using a plurality of field devices (not shown in figure 1 ) in a process plant 150.
  • the plurality of field devices includes one or more sensors located in various areas of the process plant for measuring process variables associated with the process. These process variables are herein referred to as measured process variables. Additionally, the plurality of field devices includes one or more actuators which regulate various physical parameters in relation to the process.
  • the plurality of field devices including the sensors and the field devices are operatively connected to a plurality of corresponding regulatory controllers 160 (illustrated in figure to as controller 163 and controller 166), thereby forming one or more control loops.
  • the regulatory controllers 160 on the basis of set points in relation to certain process variables (herein after referred to as control variables) and the measurements from the sensors, regulate the actuators accordingly.
  • the regulatory controllers 160 receive set points in relation to the one or more control variables from a remote supervisory controller 120 during normal mode of operation.
  • the remote supervisory controller 120 is located outside the process plant 150.
  • the remote supervisory controller 120 is connected to the plurality of regulatory controllers 160 via a communication link 155.
  • the remote supervisory controller 120 receives information associated with one or more measured process variables, and generates one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, using a remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables.
  • the remote supervisory controller 120 is hosted as a service on a remote computing platform 110.
  • the system 100 includes a local supervisory controller 130 connected to the plurality of regulatory controllers 160 over a process bus 170 of a control network within the process plant 150.
  • the local supervisory controller 130 includes a local process model (not shown in figure 1 ).
  • the local process model of the local supervisory controller 130 is configured by a configuration server 125.
  • the local supervisory controller 130 uses the configured local process model, provides intermediate set points to the plurality of regulatory controller 160 till the communication link 155 is recovered and connection with the remote supervisory controller 120 is reestablished.
  • the local supervisory controller 130 works a temporary back up for the remote supervisory controller 120 till the communication link 155 recovers from the intermediate failure.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a method 200 for controlling a process using a plurality of field devices in the process plant 150, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • the configuration server monitors transmission of the information associated with one or more measured process variables, and the one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables;
  • Figure 2 illustrates a method 200 of assisting a first operator using the operator assistance tool during one or more engineering activities including configuration of a plurality of devices (115, 117 and 119), in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • control data refers to information associated with one or more measured process variables, and one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, generated using the remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables.
  • the configuration server 125 determines one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables, based on the control data and a predetermined correlation function.
  • the configuration server 125 utilizes a plurality of statistical methods commonly known in the art to determine one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables. For example, if the configuration server 125 identifies from the control data that violation of a measured process variable results in new set points in relation to control process variable, the configuration server 125 determines that a functional correlation exists between the measured process variable and the control process variable.
  • the configuration server 125 identifies the one or more control variables for which new set points are generated when certain measured process variables violate process constraints. Accordingly, the configuration server 125 determines functional correlations between the control variables and measured variables.
  • the configuration server 125 determines the significance of each control variable on a measured variable.
  • the configuration server 125 configures the local process model based on the determined one or more functional correlations. In an embodiment, the configuration server 125 configures the local process model in accordance with the significance of each control process variable on a measured process variable.
  • the local supervisory controller provides one or more intermediate set points in relation to the one or more control process variables using the configured local process model, to the plurality of controllers 160 for regulating the one or more field devices.
  • the communication link 155 recovers from the intermediate failure within a predetermined time period.
  • the predetermined time period is set by an operator of the process plant 150.
  • the local supervisory controller 130 raises an alarm.
  • the configuration server 125 keeps tuning and updating the functional correlations and accordingly configures the local supervisory controller.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to control systems and industrial automation. More particularly, the present invention relates to redundant secondary controllers of control systems.
    • BACKGROUND
  • In automation context, advanced process control applications are control applications supervise and regulate the local control applications. Advanced process control applications, due to their high processing requirements, are present on remote servers and communicate with the local control applications within the plant site in terms of assigning the set-points to the local control applications. The local control applications targets to attain the received set points. For example, a model predictive control assigns set-point to the plant level PID control and PID controller targets to attain that.
  • Usually advanced process control applications involve use of model, control, optimization, analytical computations, etc., with different levels of complexity and often require an expert support. While shifting advanced applications to a cloud platform or a remote computing platform, the computational complexity and expertise stays with the cloud platform, and only the optimal set points are communicated to the plant level local control applications. In case of failure of connectivity to the cloud platform, or any other issues that prevent communication between the advanced process control application and the local control application, the local control application keeps operating at the previously assigned set-points from the advanced control application.
  • Conventionally, one approach to handle loss of connectivity between the cloud platform and the local control application, a backup or redundant network access point having similar functionality as the advanced control application is provided. Upon detection of loss of connectivity, the redundant network access point is selected to act as the advanced control application. In another approach, a secondary communication channel is present between the cloud platform and the local control application. The advanced control application is accessed through the secondary communication channel upon failure of the primary communication channel.
  • US 2005/0004684 A1 relates to a system and a method for adjusting a control model, wherein control information is received from a sensor. In US 2013/0285799 A1 , a cloud-hosted control system for protecting against local control failure is described. A process control system that integrates the collection and analysis of process control data is presented in US 2007/0142936 A1 .
  • However, these approaches involve considerable costs. Therefore, there is a need for an improved method and system which is capable of handling loss of connectivity between the advanced control processes on the cloud platform and the local control infrastructure present in the plant
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • Figure 1 illustrates a system for controlling a process using a plurality of field devices in a process plant, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention; and
    • Figure 2 illustrates a method for controlling a process using a plurality of field devices in a process plant, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments, which may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, electrical and other changes may be made without departing from the scope of the embodiments. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a system 100 controlling a process using a plurality of field devices (not shown in figure 1) in a process plant 150. The plurality of field devices includes one or more sensors located in various areas of the process plant for measuring process variables associated with the process. These process variables are herein referred to as measured process variables. Additionally, the plurality of field devices includes one or more actuators which regulate various physical parameters in relation to the process.
  • The plurality of field devices including the sensors and the field devices are operatively connected to a plurality of corresponding regulatory controllers 160 (illustrated in figure to as controller 163 and controller 166), thereby forming one or more control loops. The regulatory controllers 160, on the basis of set points in relation to certain process variables (herein after referred to as control variables) and the measurements from the sensors, regulate the actuators accordingly. The regulatory controllers 160 receive set points in relation to the one or more control variables from a remote supervisory controller 120 during normal mode of operation.
  • The remote supervisory controller 120 is located outside the process plant 150. The remote supervisory controller 120 is connected to the plurality of regulatory controllers 160 via a communication link 155. The remote supervisory controller 120 receives information associated with one or more measured process variables, and generates one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, using a remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables. In an embodiment, the remote supervisory controller 120 is hosted as a service on a remote computing platform 110.
  • Additionally, the system 100 includes a local supervisory controller 130 connected to the plurality of regulatory controllers 160 over a process bus 170 of a control network within the process plant 150. The local supervisory controller 130 includes a local process model (not shown in figure 1). The local process model of the local supervisory controller 130 is configured by a configuration server 125. Upon an intermediate or temporary failure of communication link 155, the local supervisory controller 130 using the configured local process model, provides intermediate set points to the plurality of regulatory controller 160 till the communication link 155 is recovered and connection with the remote supervisory controller 120 is reestablished. The local supervisory controller 130 works a temporary back up for the remote supervisory controller 120 till the communication link 155 recovers from the intermediate failure. These aspects are further explained in the description of figure 2.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a method 200 for controlling a process using a plurality of field devices in the process plant 150, in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • At step 210, the configuration server monitors transmission of the information associated with one or more measured process variables, and the one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables;
  • Figure 2 illustrates a method 200 of assisting a first operator using the operator assistance tool during one or more engineering activities including configuration of a plurality of devices (115, 117 and 119), in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
  • At step 210, the configuration server 125 monitors transmission of control data between the remote supervisory controller 120 and the plurality of controllers 160 over the communication link 155. The control data herein refers to information associated with one or more measured process variables, and one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, generated using the remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables.
  • At step 220, the configuration server 125 determines one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables, based on the control data and a predetermined correlation function. The configuration server 125 utilizes a plurality of statistical methods commonly known in the art to determine one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables. For example, if the configuration server 125 identifies from the control data that violation of a measured process variable results in new set points in relation to control process variable, the configuration server 125 determines that a functional correlation exists between the measured process variable and the control process variable. Particularly, using the remote supervisory controller and the control data, the configuration server 125 identifies the one or more control variables for which new set points are generated when certain measured process variables violate process constraints. Accordingly, the configuration server 125 determines functional correlations between the control variables and measured variables.
  • Similarly in an embodiment, when the number of measured variables is more than the number of control variables or vice versa, the configuration server 125 determines the significance of each control variable on a measured variable.
  • At step 230, the configuration server 125 configures the local process model based on the determined one or more functional correlations. In an embodiment, the configuration server 125 configures the local process model in accordance with the significance of each control process variable on a measured process variable. Upon the intermediate or temporary failure of the communication link 155, at step 240, the local supervisory controller provides one or more intermediate set points in relation to the one or more control process variables using the configured local process model, to the plurality of controllers 160 for regulating the one or more field devices.
  • The communication link 155 recovers from the intermediate failure within a predetermined time period. In an embodiment, the predetermined time period is set by an operator of the process plant 150. In an embodiment, if the communication link 155 does not recover within the predetermined period of time, the local supervisory controller 130 raises an alarm. In an embodiment, the configuration server 125 keeps tuning and updating the functional correlations and accordingly configures the local supervisory controller.
  • .This written description uses examples to describe the subject matter herein, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the subject matter. The patentable scope of the subject matter is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.

Claims (8)

  1. A method for controlling a process with a plurality of field devices in a process plant (150) using a plurality of regulatory controllers (160), wherein the plurality of regulatory controllers (160) are connected to a remote supervisory controller (120) over a communication link (155) and to a local supervisory controller (130) over a process bus (170) for receiving set points, the method comprising
    a. monitoring transmission of control data between the remote supervisory controller (120) and the plurality of controllers (160) over the communication link (155), wherein the control data includes information associated with one or more measured process variables, and one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, generated by the remote supervisory controller (120) using a remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables;
    b. determining one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables, based on the control data and a predetermined correlation function for configuring a local process model of the local supervisory controller;
    c. configuring the local process model based on the determined one or more functional correlations; and
    d. providing one or more intermediate set points in relation to the one or more control process variables using the configured local process model, to the plurality of controllers (160) for regulating the one or more field devices, upon an intermediate failure of the communication link (155);
    wherein the communication link (155) recovers from the intermediate failure within a predetermined time period.
  2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the plurality of regulatory controller (160) includes one or more proportional integrative derivative (PID) controllers.
  3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the predetermined correlation function is set in the remote supervisory controller (120).
  4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the local process model is a linear process model.
  5. A system for controlling a process using a plurality of field devices in a process plant (150), the system comprising
    a. a plurality of regulatory controllers (160) for regulating the plurality of field devices of the process plant (150), wherein the plurality of the regulatory controllers (160) are connected to a local supervisory controller (130) over a process bus of a control network in the process plant;
    b. a remote supervisory controller (120) connected to the plurality of regulatory controllers (160) via a communication link (155) for receiving information associated with one or more measured process variables, and for generating and transmitting one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables, using a remote process model based on the information associated with the one or more measured process variables; and
    c. wherein the local supervisory controller (130) is configured to
    i. provide one or more intermediate set points in relation to the one or more control process variables using a local process model, to the plurality of controllers (160) for regulating the one or more field devices, upon an intermediate failure of the communication link (155); and
    d. a configuration server (125) connected to the remote supervisory controller, configured to
    i. monitor transmission of control data between the remote supervisory controller (120) and the plurality of controllers (160) via the communication link (155), wherein the control data includes the information associated with one or more measured process variables, and the one or more set points in relation to one or more control process variables;
    ii. determine one or more functional correlations between the one or more measured process variables and the one or more control process variables based on the control data and a predetermined correlation function; and
    iii. configure the local process model based on the determined one or more functional correlations; and
    wherein the communication link (155) recovers from the intermediate failure within a predetermined time period.
  6. The system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the plurality of regulatory controller (160) includes one or more proportional integrative derivative (PID) controllers.
  7. The system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the predetermined correlation function is set in the remote supervisory controller (120).
  8. The system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the local process model is a linear process model.
EP15734470.6A 2014-06-26 2015-06-25 A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller Active EP3161562B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IN3099CH2014 2014-06-26
PCT/IB2015/054769 WO2015198256A2 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-06-25 A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3161562A2 EP3161562A2 (en) 2017-05-03
EP3161562B1 true EP3161562B1 (en) 2020-05-20

Family

ID=53514376

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15734470.6A Active EP3161562B1 (en) 2014-06-26 2015-06-25 A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US10503155B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3161562B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107003644B (en)
WO (1) WO2015198256A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9494924B2 (en) * 2012-05-18 2016-11-15 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Social infrastructure control system, control method, control apparatus, and server
DE102016107491A1 (en) 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 Beckhoff Automation Gmbh Connection unit, monitoring system and method for operating an automation system
US10416661B2 (en) * 2017-11-30 2019-09-17 Abb Schweiz Ag Apparatuses, systems and methods of secure cloud-based monitoring of industrial plants
US11050651B2 (en) * 2018-01-04 2021-06-29 General Electric Company Systems and methods for health monitoring and upgrade of a distributed controller
US11502904B2 (en) * 2018-01-04 2022-11-15 General Electric Company Systems and methods for automatic feedback control in a distributed control system
WO2019157602A1 (en) * 2018-02-19 2019-08-22 Venne Jean Simon Systems and methods of optimizing hvac control in a building or network of buildings
US11579596B2 (en) * 2018-07-26 2023-02-14 Nec Corporation Plant monitoring apparatus, plant monitoring method, and computer readable recording medium
US10809701B2 (en) * 2018-12-13 2020-10-20 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Network adapted control system
US11481282B2 (en) * 2019-03-29 2022-10-25 Honeywell International Inc. Redundant controllers or input-output gateways without dedicated hardware
US11762742B2 (en) 2020-03-31 2023-09-19 Honeywell International Inc. Process control system with different hardware architecture controller backup
US11989084B2 (en) 2020-09-23 2024-05-21 Honeywell International Inc. Self-healing process control system
US11874938B2 (en) 2020-11-03 2024-01-16 Honeywell International Inc. Admittance mechanism
US11796976B2 (en) * 2020-12-15 2023-10-24 Reid Alan Baldwin HVAC control using home automation hub
EP4057087B1 (en) * 2021-03-08 2024-03-06 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method for providing a predicted binary process signal
EP4063974A1 (en) * 2021-03-23 2022-09-28 ABB Schweiz AG Controlling an industrial process using virtualized instances of control software

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7289861B2 (en) * 2003-01-28 2007-10-30 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Process control system with an embedded safety system
US20050004684A1 (en) * 2003-07-01 2005-01-06 General Electric Company System and method for adjusting a control model
US20060047776A1 (en) * 2004-08-31 2006-03-02 Chieng Stephen S Automated failover in a cluster of geographically dispersed server nodes using data replication over a long distance communication link
US7738975B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2010-06-15 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Analytical server integrated in a process control network
US9015520B2 (en) * 2006-06-29 2015-04-21 Dssdr, Llc Data transfer and recovery
EP2293159A1 (en) 2009-09-02 2011-03-09 ABB Research Ltd. Redundant control for a process control system
US9575476B2 (en) * 2012-04-26 2017-02-21 Honeywell International Inc. System and method to protect against local control failure using cloud-hosted control system back-up processing
US10096003B2 (en) * 2013-05-31 2018-10-09 Javid Vahid Apparatus, methods and systems for knowledge based maintenance
US9904915B2 (en) * 2013-08-08 2018-02-27 Ncr Corporation Virtualized ATM
US20170082998A1 (en) * 2014-04-22 2017-03-23 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Monitoring of failure tolerance for an automation installation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US10503155B2 (en) 2019-12-10
WO2015198256A3 (en) 2016-03-10
US20170199515A1 (en) 2017-07-13
WO2015198256A2 (en) 2015-12-30
EP3161562A2 (en) 2017-05-03
CN107003644A (en) 2017-08-01
CN107003644B (en) 2020-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3161562B1 (en) A method for controlling a process plant using a redundant local supervisory controller
CN110832416B (en) Integrity monitoring in an automation system
US11175976B2 (en) System and method of generating data for monitoring of a cyber-physical system for early determination of anomalies
EP3175591B1 (en) System and method for controller redundancy and controller network redundancy with ethernet/ip i/o
JP6647824B2 (en) Error diagnosis system and error diagnosis method
US11494252B2 (en) System and method for detecting anomalies in cyber-physical system with determined characteristics
US10573421B2 (en) Plant operation system and plant operation method
JP6961740B2 (en) Use of AI to ensure data integrity of industrial controllers
US10591970B2 (en) Industrial asset management systems and methods thereof
US20180372788A1 (en) Universal terminals transmitter supporting flexible connection of rtd sensor
US10649879B2 (en) Integration of diagnostic instrumentation with machine protection system
US11561525B2 (en) Flexible condition monitoring of industrial machines
US20210333787A1 (en) Device management system, model learning method, and model learning program
JP2017062207A (en) Abnormality sign monitoring system
EP3885853B1 (en) I/o mesh architecture for a safety instrumented system
EP3674828B1 (en) System and method of generating data for monitoring of a cyber-physical system for early determination of anomalies
EP3931646B1 (en) System, device and method for managing and optimizing connection between field devices and automation devices
US11768750B2 (en) Method for improving the measuring performance of an automation field device to be configured
JP6914680B2 (en) Monitoring and control system and time adjustment method
EP3304221B1 (en) System and method for handling equipment service for model predictive controllers and estimators
KR101790152B1 (en) System and method for restoring plant data in distributed controller system
GB2507602A (en) Methods and apparatus to apply multiple trip limits to a device in a process control system
KR102649422B1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing driving information
CN106534094B (en) Vulnerability scanning method, device and system and industrial control system
JP2019075026A (en) Monitoring device, model creation server, and monitoring system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161229

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200110

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015053034

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1273004

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200821

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200921

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200920

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200820

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200820

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1273004

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015053034

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200625

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200630

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200625

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200720

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200520

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240621

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240619

Year of fee payment: 10